Archive

2026

Browsing

A majority of the U.S. Supreme Court’s justices were absent from President Donald Trump’s 2026 State of the Union address Tuesday night — a conspicuous move coming just days after the high court struck down his signature global tariff policy.

Only Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. and Associate Justices Elena Kagan, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett attended the speech. Justices Samuel Alito., Clarence Thomas, Neil Gorsuch, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson were not present.

The absences followed a 6–3 Supreme Court decision ruling that Trump’s sweeping tariff plan exceeded presidential authority under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act — a major setback for the administration’s economic agenda.

In the wake of the ruling, Trump sharply criticized the justices who sided against him, saying he was ‘ashamed of certain members of the court’ and accusing them of lacking ‘the courage to do what’s right for the country.’ His criticism included members of the conservative bloc, among them two justices he appointed during his first term.

Supreme Court justices are not legally required to attend the State of the Union. Invitations are extended as a matter of tradition, and participation is left to individual discretion. Those who do attend typically enter the House chamber together in their black judicial robes and sit prominently in the front row — a visual symbol of the judiciary’s coequal status alongside the executive and legislative branches.

Still, attendance has long been uneven, reflecting discomfort within the judiciary about appearing at what has increasingly become a partisan spectacle.

Alito has not attended a State of the Union since 2010, when he famously shook his head and appeared to mouth ‘not true’ as then-President Barack Obama criticized the Court’s decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. Months later, Alito said publicly that sitting through the address made him feel like ‘the proverbial potted plant,’ and he suggested he would not return in the near future.

Roberts at the time described the political atmosphere surrounding the address as ‘very troubling,’ and questioned whether it remained appropriate for the justices to attend if the event had devolved into what he characterized as a political ‘pep rally.’ Despite those concerns, Roberts has attended every State of the Union since becoming chief justice in 2005.

Thomas has also largely stayed away in recent years. After attending President Obama’s first address in 2009, he did not return, later describing the experience as uncomfortable for members of the judiciary given the partisan reactions inside the chamber.

While some justices have consistently opted out — including past members of the court — others have continued to attend as a matter of institutional tradition.

Fox News’ Shannon Bream and Bill Mears contributed to this report. 

Related Article

Trump gives grudging praise to liberal trio who helped sink his tariffs
This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., wore a round button to the State of the Union address that read ‘F— ICE,’ referring to U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

She also wore a message that read, ‘STAND WITH SURVIVORS RELEASE THE FILES,’ in an apparent reference to materials pertaining to the late Jeffrey Epstein. Other lawmakers could be seen wearing that message during the speech as well.

Tlaib was seated next to Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., a fellow member of the progressive cadre of lawmakers known as the ‘Squad.’ 

The two shouted during the president’s address. They also departed the speech early, reports indicate.

Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for comment on Wednesday morning.

President Donald Trump’s administration has been working to crack down on illegal immigration. 

But some politicians, including Tlaib, have called for the abolition of ICE.

‘ICE has no place in Michigan. This is an unaccountable and violent agency that terrorizes and brutalizes our communities every day,’ Tlaib said in a statement earlier this month.

‘We have all watched as ICE agents execute American citizens in broad daylight and detain and deport our immigrant neighbors with no regard for their wellbeing, right to due process, or the myriad other laws and court orders restricting their illegal operations,’ she said in the statement.

Related Article

Omar shouts ‘you are a murderer’ and ‘liar’ at Trump during State of the Union address
This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Presidential speechwriters sharply split late Tuesday after President Donald Trump delivered a record-breaking State of the Union address, drawing praise from allies and prompting early exits from some Democrats.

During his address, Trump focused on immigration enforcement, economic concerns and global trade issues as he occasionally sparred with Democrats like Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar, who, along with fellow ‘Squad’ member Rep. Rashida Tlaib of Michigan, left the chamber early, while Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, was booted after waving a sign condemning a recent Trump social media post.

Gene Hamilton, a former deputy White House counsel who has written speeches, told Fox News Digital that Trump delivered a ‘resounding speech’ and ‘could not have been more clear about the current state of our great nation.’

‘A vision of hope, prosperity, and strength, driven by strong borders, a strong economy, and a love of country.’

Hamilton said the speech was ‘juxtaposed’ against a swath of the Democratic caucus in the chamber that ‘wouldn’t even stand for the provision that the government’s first duty ‘is to protect American citizens, not illegal immigrants’.’

‘Donald Trump saved this country with his election in 2024. His administration will keep working every day to deliver real wins for the American people,’ said Hamilton, who worked in the first Trump administration and now works with America First Legal.

On the other side of the political spectrum, former Biden speechwriter Dan Cluchey told Fox News Digital that Trump did ‘less than zero to dispel the notion that he is living in his own reality.’

Asked if Trump succeeded in addressing the immigration crisis and affordability criticisms well enough, Cluchey said that while Americans endure ‘skyrocketing grocery, energy, and health costs, rising unemployment, and an economy that is growing more slowly today than in any year under President Biden, his only play is to tell families not to believe their own pocketbooks.’

‘[That] doesn’t work,’ said Cluchey, who co-hosted a SOTU watch party and speechwriting workshop across town at Georgetown University during Trump’s speech.

Asked about Trump’s ability to convey what he believed to be his administration’s successes, Cluchey said that dynamic ‘doesn’t really work when the claims you fabricate don’t square with people’s real lives.’

‘A willingness to lie brazenly about anything and everything has some utility when you’re campaigning, but it doesn’t hold up when you’re governing — and people are actually living through the constant stream of chaos, cruelty, and ineptitude,’ Cluchey said.

Cluchey added that Trump did not do enough to combat his critics, saying he instead came across as ‘self-obsessed and delusional as he always does.’

Unlike Hamilton, Cluchey believed Trump failed to change any minds in America with his remarks.

Hamilton separately countered that Trump did indeed reiterate that he has delivered on campaign promises.

‘For all the haters and ‘black-pillers’ who run their mouths incessantly, just one year of President Trump’s successes has dwarfed the accomplishments of entire administrations that preceded him,’ he said.

Michael Ceraso, a Democratic strategist with a background in speechwriting who worked with presidential candidates Pete Buttigieg and Bernie Sanders, offered a slightly different perspective, saying that as a Democrat, he wants a president who works toward collaboration and not someone who ‘speaks in monologues.’

‘As a voter, I may not like him. I may find his long form exhausting. But when he speaks, he never wavers from American exceptionalism,’ Ceraso said.

‘I see someone protecting our cities against those he deems a threat to democracy, revving up the economy, managing global partners, and defeating terrorism.’

Ceraso said, however, he misses former President Barack Obama and his message of intellectualism, curiosity and togetherness.

‘As a voter, I believe both parties are bad for this country.’

‘So I go with the guy who entertains me,’ Ceraso said.

Related Article

Democrats’ ‘Trump Derangement Syndrome’ on ‘full display’ with counter-State of the Union events, Johnson says
This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

USC and Notre Dame aren’t going to play their rivalry the next few seasons? You’ve got to be kidding.
Alabama-LSU will drop off annual docket after SEC schedule changes.
Nebraska-Oklahoma would be welcome by any college football fan who respects tradition.

The last round of SEC expansion re-established the Texas-Texas A&M rivalry, but conference realignment has taken more than it’s given on the rivalry front.

Not only that, but the SEC’s elimination of divisions also will stop some rivalries from occurring annually. Both inside and outside of the SEC, games that were once part of the fabric of college football are no longer played every year.

On this edition of ‘SEC Football Unfiltered,’ a podcast from the USA TODAY Network, hosts Blake Toppmeyer and John Adams highlight eight rivalry games they’d wish to save or restore on an annual basis. These are games that have either already gone away, or a series that will be interrupted in the near future.

Several of the rivalries have ties to current SEC schools, but the hosts also dip into Big Ten and Big 12 terrain to restore some lost rivalries.

We’re saving/restoring eight college football rivalries

Nebraska vs. Oklahoma: The 1971 matchup of these teams, pitting No. 1 versus No. 2, ranks among the greatest games ever played. Neither program is what it used to be, but anyone who respects college football’s tradition knows this game has a place on the annual calendar. — Adams

Nebraska vs. Colorado: After the Big 12 formed in the mid-1990s, Colorado replaced Oklahoma as Nebraska’s Thanksgiving week opponent, and this rivalry rose to the billing. Those who grew up on college football in the ’90s remember this as must-watch fare, alongside some Thanksgiving leftovers. — Toppmeyer

Southern Cal vs. Notre Dame: This storied rivalry that gave us the ‘Bush Push’ will undergo interruption. These teams are not scheduled to play each other for at least the next few years. So, let’s get this straight: Notre Dame will play SMU this season and USC will play Rutgers, but Notre Dame-USC will not occur. What a farce. — Adams

Michigan vs. Notre Dame: Notre Dame used to play USC, Michigan, Penn State and Miami, all in the same season. Come 2027, the Irish are scheduled to play none of those teams. Mercy. Golden Domes vs. Maize and Blue was once appointment viewing, and it would be again if the teams had the nerve to schedule each other. — Toppmeyer

Alabama vs. LSU: This game defined the SEC West for so many years. In some seasons, it defined the college football season, period. Both teams have other rivals, sure, but few games consistently match the stakes of this one, and there’s no love lost between these two. That’s good for any rivalry. — Adams

Florida vs. Tennessee: At the rivalry’s heyday in the 1990s and early 2000s, few games were better or more important. Steve Spurrier called East Tennessee home before he turned Gator. He brought so much juice to this series. Just because something isn’t what it once was doesn’t mean it can’t still be really good. That applies here. — Toppmeyer

Oklahoma vs. Oklahoma State: Start with the name, Bedlam. Few rivalries have a better name. In-state rivalries like this one are part of college football’s backbone. This here is a classic case of realignment interfering with a good rivalry. OU owns the series, but Oklahoma State scored some signature wins, including in the last installment in 2023. — Adams

Kansas vs. Missouri: There ought to be a rule: If ‘War’ is in the rivalry’s name, it must be played annually. Such is the case here. The Border War rivalry predates football, deriving its name from the bloody years of fighting between pro- and anti-slavery factions along the Kansas-Missouri border leading up to the Civil War. Missouri’s Big 12 exit interrupted the series until it renewed last year. After 2026, there’ll be another hiatus. Ah, realignment. — Toppmeyer

Also on this episode

∎ Toppmeyer and Adams react to Joey Aguilar losing his bid for another season as Tennessee’s quarterback. One host takes up for the NCAA’s quest to enforce its eligibility rules, while the other host has less sympathy for the NCAA.

Where to listen to SEC Football Unfiltered

Apple
Spotify
iHeart
Google

Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network’s national college football columnist. John Adams is the senior sports columnist for the Knoxville News Sentinel. Subscribe to the SEC Football Unfiltered podcast, and check out the SEC Unfiltered newsletter, delivered straight to your inbox.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The United States men’s ice hockey team was welcomed by ‘U-S-A’ chants as they were introduced by President Donald Trump at his 2026 State of the Union address on Feb. 24.

He congratulated the men’s team, as well as the women’s team, for capturing the gold medal at the 2026 Winter Olympic Games in Milan.

Among his remarks, Trump said he will present the Presidential Medal of Freedom, the United States’ highest civilian honor, to U.S. men’s national team goalie Connor Hellebuyck.

‘I’ve never seen a goaltender play as well as goalie Connor Hellebuyck,’ Trump said. ‘(42) shots on gold. And I asked him the one shot, the one where you put your stick in the back and it hit the neck of your stick and bounced off. You practiced that? Or was that a little lucky? He refused to answer that question.’

The majority of the men’s team roster was in attendance at Trump’s address.

Hellebuyck, honored to receive the medal, was all smiles as politicians gave him and the rest of the men’s team a standing ovation.

It was a team vote, according to Trump, however he’d ensure that his vote trumped everyone else’s.

How did Team USA ice hockey do at 2026 Winter Olympic Games?

Both the U.S. men’s and women’s national ice hockey teams defeated Canada in overtime, 2-1, to win the gold medal.

‘They beat a fantastic Canadian team in overtime, as everybody saw, as did the American women, who will soon be coming to the White House,’ Trump said during his State of the Union address. ‘We’re in the Oval Office before, and I just want to say a second, very big congratulations to Team USA.’

Who is Connor Hellebuyck?

Hellebuyck is a 32-year-old Michigan native. He is a goaltender for the Winnipeg Jets of the NHL.

He was selected by the Jets in the fifth round, 130th overall, of the 2012 NHL entry draft. Hellebuyck went to play college hockey at UMass Lowell, before playing for the St. John’s IceCaps, an affiliate of the Jets’ in the American Hockey League, the primary development league for the NHL.

Hellebuyck has played in Winnipeg since then, winning three Vezina Trophies and the NHL MVP award.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

President Donald Trump warmly greeted most of the U.S. Olympic men’s ice hockey team inside the Oval Office on Tuesday, Feb. 24, just two days removed from its thrilling overtime win against Canada in the gold medal game at the 2026 Winter Olympics. But there were reportedly five members of Team USA that did not make the trip with the NHL season set to resume on Wednesday.

Trump invited the men’s hockey team for a White House visit and to attend Tuesday’s State of the Union address to Congress when he spoke to players and coaches in the midst of their locker room celebration in Milan. Goalie Connor Hellebuyck, forward Matthew Tkachuk, center Dylan Larkin and golden goal scorer Jack Hughes and brother Quinn Hughes led the contingent of 20 Team USA members in attendance at the White House visit and could be at Trump’s State of the Union later Tuesday evening.

Celebrate Olympic hockey gold medals with our new book

These 5 U.S. hockey players are not at White House, Trump State of the Union

Jake Guentzel of the Tampa Bay Lightning, Colorado Avalanche forward Brock Nelson, Winnipeg Jets forward Kyle Connor, Dallas Stars goalie Jake Oettinger and Anaheim Ducks defenseman Jackson LaCombe are not in Washington, D.C., with the rest of their U.S. Olympic men’s hockey teammates, according to multiple reports.

The Denver Post reported Nelson didn’t go on the White House trip in order to be with his family before the Avalanche plays in Utah on Thursday. Guentzel is in Tampa, according to the Tampa Bay Times, despite not being on the ice for the Lightning’s practice on Tuesday. LaCombe is expected back in Southern California on Tuesday evening, according to the Sporting Tribune, and WFAA reported Oettinger was already back in Dallas before Tuesday’s White House visit began.

Connor was also back on the ice with the Winnipeg Jets for Tuesday’s skate, according to The Athletic, and then spoke with reporters about returning to his NHL team.

‘I’m just getting ready. We play on Wednesday,’ Connor said. ‘It’s a big second half so I just wanted to make sure I was ready.’

Did Trump invite the USA women’s hockey team?

Yes, but the gold medal-winning United States women’s hockey team declined an offer by the White House to attend Tuesday’s State of the Union address. The team cited ‘timing and previously scheduled academic and professional commitments’ as the reason.

When Trump called the U.S. men’s hockey team after its gold medal win and offered a military plane for the State of the Union and a White House visit, he also said, ‘I must tell you, we’re going to have to bring the women’s team, you do know that?’

Connor, on Tuesday, sidestepped questions about the president’s remarks during the U.S. team’s locker room celebration.

‘I don’t really have any thoughts on that,’ he said. ‘There’s so many things happening. We just won the gold medal and things are going on so I don’t really remember what he said. It’s such a whirlwind, just celebrating.’

‘We’re extremely happy for them,’ Quinn Hughes said during an interview on ABC’s ‘Good Morning America,’ and then referenced the reaction to Trump’s locker room remarks. ‘Obviously a lot going on right now on social media surrounding our team and their team, but in the last couple summers, we did a lot of training with them and I actually know a lot of those girls really well. We’re extremely happy to come.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

President Donald Trump said the U.S. women’s hockey team ‘will soon’ visit the White House after winning the gold medal at the 2026 Winter Olympics.

The announcement came moments after Trump welcomed in the U.S. men’s hockey team during his State of the Union address on Tuesday, Feb. 24. Both the men’s and women’s teams beat Canada 2-1 in overtime in the gold medal game.

Megan Keller scored the winning goal for the women. Jack Hughes scored for the men.

‘[The U.S. men’s hockey team] beat a fantastic Canadian team in overtime … as did the American women, who will soon be coming to the White House,’ Trump said.

It wasn’t immediately clear when the women’s team will visit the White House. A call to U.S. women’s hockey spokesperson Melissa Katz seeking comment from USA TODAY Sports was not immediately returned.

Celebrate USA hockey glory with USA TODAY front pages

Trump-USA women’s hockey controversy, explained

Trump’s statement during Tuesday’s address comes after his invitation to both teams to attend the State of the Union sparked controversy.

He added, jokingly, ‘I do believe I probably would be impeached’ if he didn’t invite the women’s team.

The comments sparked backlash and were amplified when the women’s team declined its invitation to visit the White House and attend Tuesday’s address, citing ‘timing and previously scheduled academic and professional commitments.’

The men’s team, save for five players, visited the White House and Oval Office earlier on Tuesday before appearing at the State of the Union.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

All but five members of the gold medal-winning USA men’s ice hockey team toured the White House and visited with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office on Tuesday, Feb. 24 ahead of planned attendance at Trump’s State of the Union address later Tuesday night.

The gold medal-winning women’s ice hockey team received the same invite, but will not be in attendance, USA Hockey said Monday, citing ‘timing and previously scheduled academic and professional commitments’ as the reason.

Here’s more information regarding why only the men’s team will be in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday night:

Why US women’s hockey team isn’t at State of the Union

A USA Hockey spokesperson said the women’s team did receive an invitation but wouldn’t be able to attend Tuesday’s events.

‘We are sincerely grateful for the invitation extended to our gold medal-winning U.S. Women’s Hockey Team and deeply appreciate the recognition of their extraordinary achievement,’ the spokesperson said. ‘Due to the timing and previously scheduled academic and professional commitments following the Games, the athletes are unable to participate. They were honored to be included and are grateful for the acknowledgment.’

Celebrate Olympic hockey gold medals with our new book

Trump call with US men’s hockey team

President Donald Trump called the men’s team after their 2-1 overtime win on Sunday and invited those players to the State of the Union and a White House visit, offering to transport them on a military plane.

He also said on the call, ‘I must tell you, we’re going to have to bring the women’s team, you do know that?’

The president added, jokingly, ‘I do believe I probably would be impeached’ if he didn’t invite the women’s team.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

INDIANAPOLIS – Sean Payton is still the undisputed shot-caller for the Denver Broncos but play-caller is an entirely different story.

Payton is turning over play-calling duties to newly-promoted offensive coordinator Davis Webb, confirming the move during his media session late Tuesday afternoon as the NFL’s scouting combine kicked off.

“I think he’ll be really good at it,” Payton said of Webb, who joined the Broncos staff as quarterbacks coach in 2023. “I know that’s like, ‘Man, are you going to give up play-calling?’

“I would only do that if I felt it would help our team.”

Webb, 31, is a rising star in the NFL coaching ranks who drew interest from multiple teams during the recent hiring cycle.

But still: Payton has called plays for at least the past 18 years when considering his 15-year tenure as New Orleans Saints and before that, as assistant head coach/quarterbacks coach for the Dallas Cowboys.

And this move comes weeks after the Broncos lost to the New England Patriots in the AFC championship game, the result marred by Payton’s decision that backfired when a fourth-and-one play failed after he bypassed a short field-goal attempt.

Payton didn’t link the move to the AFC title game and insisted that it was not influenced by any ultimatum from Webb.

Regardless, it’s stunning when considering Payton’s track record as one of the NFL’s most accomplished offensive minds.

“I’ll still be involved with what we do offensively, just like we do defensively,” he said. “But I do think he has a gift. I think he’s real sharp.”

Interestingly, Payton’s announcement during a 5 p.m. ET press conference came hours after Buffalo Bills GM Brandon Beane intimated the switch when asked about his team’s pursuit of Webb. New Bills coach Joe Brady, who broke into the NFL coaching ranks on Payton’s staff with the Saints, also alluded to Webb’s new play-calling opportunity.

“I know Brandon Beane announced it earlier to the media,” Payton said. “So, I saw him in the hallways, I thought, ‘You can come on, do my presser, too.’

“But no, I’m excited for him having that opportunity.”

–Contact Bell at jbell@usatoday.com or follow on X: @JarrettBell

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The viewership numbers from the men’s hockey championship game between the United States and Canada at the 2026 Winter Olympics are officially in.

History was made.

The gold medal game was the most-watched sporting event with a pre-9 a.m. ET start time in U.S. history, according to NBC.

An average of 18.6 million viewers tuned in to watch the U.S. and Canada battle for the top honors in men’s hockey. The game saw a peak viewership of 26 million.

The clash between the United States and Canada for the gold medal started at 8:10 a.m. ET (2:10 p.m. in Italy) on Feb. 22 at Santagiulia Ice Hockey Arena in Milan.

The Olympics saw an increase in viewership overall, NBC said.

The network averaged 23.5 million viewers throughout the international competition that lasted over two weeks, a Feb. 23 news release said.

The 2026 Milano Cortina Winter Games were the most most-viewed Winter Games since 2014, when the competition was staged in Sochi, Russia. Compared to the most recent Winter Games, the 2022 Olympics in Beijing, there was a 96% increase in viewership.

NBC’s viewership success has the network highly anticipating the next Olympic Games, which will be held in Los Angeles in 2028.

‘We can’t wait for the return of the Olympics to the United States with the Summer Olympics in Los Angeles in 2028 and are ecstatic to be the U.S. media home of five Olympic Games over the next decade,” NBC wrote in its release.

NBC Olympics President Gary Zenkel said in a statement that the outcome proved that ‘the American audience will gather in large numbers’ to experience the Olympic competition.

‘These Winter Games — superbly hosted across northern Italy, and produced and distributed by a team of 2,700 — reached blockbuster U.S. audiences of more than 50 million viewers each day, continuing the media dominance we experienced less than two years ago at the Paris Olympics,’ Zenkel said.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY