Archive

2025

Browsing

A spokesperson for Kamala Harris confirmed to Fox News on Friday that the former vice president’s Secret Service protection has been revoked by President Donald Trump.

The spokesperson added that there was no reason given as to why it was removed.

A senior White House official told Fox News Digital that vice presidents usually have a Secret Service detail for only six months after departing office.

A source briefed on the matter also told Fox News that the decision to revoke Harris’ Secret Service protection was made yesterday and that is when the Secret Service was notified.

Former President Joe Biden signed an executive memorandum before leaving office which extended Harris’ protection for an additional year after the normal six months that former vice presidents received in the past.

On Thursday, Trump rescinded that memorandum and Harris’ Secret Service protection officially ends on Sept. 1.

The move comes as Harris is set to kick off a tour for her upcoming book ‘107 Days’ in late September.

The tour is scheduled to visit major American cities in its opening days, including New York City, Philadelphia and Los Angeles.

This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

An American energy leader is warning that several progressive ‘green’ environmental groups opposing President Donald Trump’s nuclear energy plans are linked to a ‘web of dark money’ groups with ties to former President Barack Obama and other Democrats.

Jason Isaac, CEO of the American Energy Institute, warned during an interview with Fox News Digital that while claiming to stand for the planet, these groups ‘have prioritized ideology over innovation’ and are ‘driven by green activists and groups deeply tied to the Democratic Party.’

‘You follow the money, you’ll see where it leads. It leads straight to partisan mega-donors, foreign interests, and failed climate crusaders,’ Isaac said. ‘This isn’t about the environment. It’s about political control over America’s energy future and our energy dominance.’

Isaac’s comments follow Trump’s signing of several executive orders in May to ‘usher in a nuclear renaissance’ by cutting red tape to accelerate advancements in nuclear technologies. In one of the orders, Trump said that ‘abundant energy is a vital national- and economic-security interest’ and ‘in conjunction with domestic fossil fuel production, nuclear energy can liberate America from dependence on geopolitical rivals.’

However, several environmentalist groups, such as the Union of Concerned Scientists, Nuclear Threat Initiative, Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth, the Sierra Club and several individuals have been critical of Trump’s actions as unscientific.  

In late July, the Union of Concerned Scientists published a statement lambasting Trump, saying that ‘since the Inauguration, the administration has systematically destroyed federal scientific systems.’

UCS published a report that claimed the Trump administration is advancing a ‘systematic effort to suppress climate science and dismantle actions to address the climate crisis that will increase costs and suffering, particularly for disadvantaged communities, while boosting fossil fuel pollution and profits.’

A Fox News Digital review of UCS donors found that the group has received financial support from left-wing donors like the Tides Foundation, whose 2023 U.S. tax return shows it has helped bankroll anti-Israel protests on college campuses, and the Alliance for Global Justice, which in turn is a fiscal sponsor of the Samidoun Palestinian Prisoner Solidarity Network, a group the U.S. Department of the Treasury later designated as ‘a sham charity that serves as an international fundraiser for the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP) terrorist organization.’ 

UCS has also received support from the U.S. Energy Foundation, which Fox News Digital previously reported was spun off from the same foundation as the Energy Foundation China.

Meanwhile, Nuclear Threat Initiative, another group that has been publicly wary of Trump’s nuclear agenda, was co-founded by Ted Turner, who once urged other countries to adopt China’s one-child policy, and led by CEO Ernest Moniz, who was secretary of energy under Obama.

Other Nuclear Threat Initiative leaders have links to Democratic causes through political contributions, such as the group’s president, Joan Rohlfing, who donated to former President Joe Biden and former Vice President Kamala Harris, its vice president, Scott Roecker, who has donated to the Democratic National Committee, and its senior director, Nickolas Roth, who donated to Biden. 

A spokesperson for NTI told Fox News Digital that the organization ‘actively supports the rapid expansion of safe, secure, and cost-effective nuclear energy through the Nuclear Scaling Initiative (NSI), in partnership with the Clean Air Task Force and the EFI Foundation.’

‘NSI’s goal is to enable the scaling of more than 50 gigawatts of nuclear capacity annually across the globe by the 2030s—advancing climate goals, energy security, nonproliferation, and economic development.’

The spokesperson added that NTI is a ‘nonprofit, nonpartisan global security organization’ while pointing to a New York Post letter to the editor from Roecker pushing back on allegations of bias. 

Another group, Friends of the Earth, which has actively urged the world to ‘reject’ Trump, has a history of far-left endorsements and contributions. In 2020, Friends of the Earth endorsed Black Lives Matter and called for defunding the police. The group has also endorsed the Green New Deal and said the U.S. must ‘provide finance for people in developing countries commensurate with what science and justice demand.’

During the 2020 election, Friends of the Earth Action endorsed Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., for the Democratic presidential nomination. In 2024, the group endorsed Harris for president.

Since 2015, Friends of the Earth Action PAC has donated thousands to Democratic or progressive candidates and causes, according to data gathered by OpenSecrets.

For its part, the Sierra Club, which routinely pushes back against Trump on its social media account, has had an even more extensive history of advancing progressive causes.

In 2020, the Sierra Club supported defunding the police, saying, ‘The problems with policing can’t be solved through piecemeal reforms or getting rid of ‘a few bad apples.’’

The group also endorsed the Green New Deal, calling it a ‘big, bold transformation of the economy to tackle the twin crises of inequality and climate change.’

It has also said it is ‘committed to being an anti-racist organization.’ In 2020, the group even condemned its founder, naturalist John Muir, for using racist language in the 1800s, saying it was ‘time to take down some of our own monuments.’

The Sierra Club Foundation has, in turn, received significant support from George Soros’ Open Society Foundations, left-wing Swiss megadonor Hansjorg Wyss’s Wyss Foundation, and The Climate Imperative Foundation, which infamously pushed the Biden administration’s move to ban gas stoves.

Greenpeace, which is well known for its dramatic climate protests, including boarding an oil vessel, has been a vocal critic of Trump for years, accusing the president of ‘defying science.’

Greenpeace has received support from New Venture Fund, whose website states that its day-to-day operations are managed in part by Arabella Advisors, the behemoth philanthropy services firm that also manages left-wing ‘dark money’ funds. According to a 2017 tax filing, Greenpeace has also received funding from the Silicon Valley Community Foundation, which in turn receives funding from Mark Zuckerberg, Reed Hastings, and Jack Dorsey.

In 2020, Greenpeace touted that a staff member was involved in creating a ‘Vision for Black Lives’ platform and fully endorsed the program that called for reparations and a ‘guaranteed minimum livable income for all Black people.’ The program also supported cutting funding from law enforcement and decriminalizing ‘all drug-related offenses and prostitution.’

The group has provided funding to progressive state committees like the Colorado League of Responsible Voters, Colorado Rising for Health & Safety, and Democratic candidates and causes.

Speaking with Fox News Digital, Isaac described the groups opposing Trump’s nuclear push as a ‘whole web of dark money-funded partisan and foreign-tied organizations.’

I don’t think they want to solve the problem,’ he said, adding, ‘these groups are about control, they’re about driving the cost of energy up and driving access to energy down so they can control the narrative and control every aspect of our lives.’

Will Hild, executive director of Consumers’ Research, told Fox News Digital, ‘the reality is the green agenda is a hodgepodge of anti-human activists who have adopted the green agenda as their religion, coupled with megalomaniacs and political operatives exploiting climate issues to push a broader ideological agenda.’

‘What we have seen for years is so-called ‘green’ groups pushing an anti-nuclear agenda that defies science, common sense, and the interests of the American people,’ he said.

NTI has been publicly wary of Trump’s nuclear expansion, while UCS, Friends of the Earth, the Sierra Club and Greenpeace have been heavily critical of the administration’s actions on environmental issues more generally. 

‘Nuclear energy is statistically the safest, cleanest, and most reliable source of power we have, yet the left is doing everything they can to shut it down,’ Hild went on. He criticized these ‘activist groups’ for ‘the damage they’re doing to our economy, our security, and our future in pursuit of an extreme climate ideology.’

Steve Milloy, who is a senior policy fellow at the Energy and Environment Institute and served on Trump’s 2016 transition team for the Environmental Protection Agency, also chimed in, calling the current moment ‘a critical turning point for the future of energy.’

‘For decades, radical environmental groups have tried to block nuclear energy, despite its unmatched record for safety and reliability,’ he said. ‘By championing nuclear power, the President is putting science, technology, and common sense ahead of the outdated, anti-energy green agenda pushed by the Left.’

Fox News Digital also reached out to the Sierra Club, Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth, and UCS for comment but did not receive a response.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

There is no question that President Donald Trump is deserving of the Nobel Peace Prize. Nations, statesmen and elected officials around the globe have seen the fruits of his labor to bring peace to different hemispheres. 

The big question is, ‘Is there a real pathway for President Trump to actually receive the Nobel Peace Prize?’ I believe there is. But it’s a pathway that must be flawlessly executed. 

And in doing so, it’s important to understand the history of the Nobel Peace Prize and the actual process for awarding it. We can also gain insight from how a former Trump appointee led an international organization to receive it. And we can learn from how a former Republican president worked to end a war and received the Nobel Peace Prize despite protests from Norwegian and Swedish politicians and media.

The Nobel Prizes were established by the will of the famed Swedish industrialist and inventor, Alfred Nobel. Nobel was the inventor of dynamite and, at the time of his death in 1896, was the owner of Bofors, the Swedish armaments manufacturer. 

I personally became intrigued with the Nobel Prizes while doing consulting work for Bofors in the late 1990s and visiting Karlskoga, Sweden, a number of times.

Nobel’s will provided for prizes in physics, chemistry, physiology or medicine, literature and peace. A Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences was added in 1968. The original prizes have been awarded since 1901. 

In his will, Nobel provided that the prizes were to be awarded by different Swedish entities, with the exception of the Nobel Peace Prize, which was to be awarded ‘by a committee of five persons to be elected by the Norwegian Storting [Parliament].’ Today, the Norwegian Nobel Committee is responsible for selecting Nobel Peace Prize laureates. Appointed by the Norwegian Parliament, it should surprise no one that historically its members have been former members of Parliament and cabinet ministers.

Only ‘qualified nominators’ can submit a name for the Nobel Peace Prize. These include members of national assemblies, national governments, current heads of state, previous recipients, certain university professors and directors of peace research institutions. 

This explains why President Trump has been nominated by numerous members of Congress, several nations, heads of state and university professors. Nominations are due on Jan. 31 each year, followed by a multi-stage selection process. The winner is announced in early October, with the award ceremony taking place on Dec. 10 every year at Oslo City Hall.

Make no mistake, this is a very political process. I served for a number of years on the board of the Norwegian-American Foundation. I remember when the Nobel Peace Prize was awarded to President Barack Obama for ‘the promise’ of his vision. My Norwegian friends were flabbergasted. 

The running joke in Norway was that he received it because a couple of left-wingers on the Committee wanted a chance to meet him and have a photo-op. In Trump’s case, you actually have a president who has resolved conflicts and helped to bring peace to different regions of the world.

In addition to the formal nominations, I believe there are key actions supporters of President Trump can undertake to maximize his chances. Consider these: 

, the former NATO secretary-general, is back in the current Labour government’s cabinet serving as finance minister. Following Trump’s victory last November, Stoltenberg said that during Trump’s first term, they had ‘established a good and reliable working relationship.’ He further noted that they ‘got things done,’ and that ‘NATO had become stronger.’ A former Labour prime minister, he could be helpful with one or two members of the committee. In fact, committee member Gry Larsen is a member of the Labour Party and served as state secretary for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs when Stoltenberg was prime minister. 

, founded by former Norwegian Prime Minister Kjell Magne Bondevik, is considered much less political than the Norwegian Nobel Institute. It has a history of actually being in the field promoting peace and strengthening democratic political institutions and processes. I met with him as he was laying the foundation for the center and heard his vision. An ordained Lutheran minister, he’s the former head of the Christian Democratic Party. Current committee member Anne Enger served as Bondevik’s deputy during his first term as prime minister. And committee member Kristin Clemet served as Bondevik’s minister of education during his second term.

Either through the ambassador when he’s confirmed, or through the current charge d’affaires, the embassy needs to take a proactive role in making the case for President Trump to the Norwegian media and institutions. 

: Former South Carolina Gov. David Beasley received the prize as the Trump-appointed executive director of the World Food Program (WFP) in 2020. The WFP had been nominated numerous times over 40 years, but it was under a Trump appointee’s leadership that it finally happened. Insights on how Beasley and the WFP interacted with Norwegian authorities can be helpful. 

: The Republican president received the Nobel Peace Prize despite protests from liberal Norwegian politicians and Swedish media. His efforts to end the Russo-Japanese War were too meritorious and couldn’t be ignored. Likewise, President Trump supporters can make a similar case with the conflicts that he has helped to end. The embassy can play a big role in articulating this.

On the merits, President Trump deserves the Nobel Peace Prize. But this is a political process, and his supporters need to work the process. 

A Norwegian friend reminded me that the prize is supposed to consider achievements over a period of time. He pointed to President Trump’s brokering the Abraham Accords during his first term as laying a foundation for real peace in the Middle East. 

He’s right. President Trump’s achievements during his first term, combined with what he’s done so far in his second term, have earned him the Nobel Peace Prize.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

It only took the first game of Week 1 to deliver the first upset of the 2025 college football season.

South Florida quarterback Byrum Brown shined and the defense dominated Boise State to soundly defeat the No. 25 Broncos 34-7 in Tampa on Thursday, Aug. 28.

Despite the loss of Heisman Trophy runner-up Ashton Jeanty, Boise State entered the season as the Group of Five’s top College Football Playoff contender after making appearance in the 12-team field last season. The Broncos were the only Group of Five team ranked in the preseason US LBM Coaches Poll. It looked like Boise State could continue the momentum after taking a 7-0 lead in the first quarter.

But it was all Bulls after that.

South Florida scored 34 unanswered points, including a fake punt in the third quarter that resulted in a touchdown and extended the lead to double digits. Boise State’s offense was out of sorts, with two fumbles in the first half stopping any momentum. Playing desperate in the second half, the Broncos couldn’t convert fourth down attempts that resulted in South Florida touchdowns. The game was well wrapped up in the fourth quarter.

Brown was the star of the day, completing 16-of-24 passes for 210 yards while running for two touchdowns and 43 yards on 14 carries.

The loss of Jeanty clearly hurt the Broncos. Last season, they were eighth in the country in rushing yards per game at 240.4. Against South Florida, the Broncos finished with 122 rushing yards, while quarterback Maddux Madsen struggled completing passes with a 25-for-46 mark with 225 passing yards.

It’s the first ranked win for South Florida since 2016, which snapped a 19-game losing streak against ranked opponents.

What USF win, Boise State loss means

The race to represent the Group of Five in the playoff is wide open, and a new contender has been added.

Boise State’s chances of a repeat appearance drastically drop with the blowout loss and it will surely be out of the coaches poll by Week 2. It makes it a tougher hill to climb back into playoff consideration since the only loss it suffered in the regular season in 2024 was a three point loss to Oregon.

Now the Broncos will likely need a perfect rest of the season, which will be tough given they play at Notre Dame to start October. They also play another Group of Five contender in UNLV.

With the Group of Five spot seemingly open, South Florida enters the conversation as coach Alex Golesh continues to turn things around in Tampa; the Bulls are coming off back-to-back 7-6 seasons with bowl wins after they went 1-11 in in 2022 before hiring Golesh.

Even with a statement win to start the season, South Florida still has a daunting starting schedule. It will play at Florida in Week 2 and then host Miami the following week for three straight games against ranked opponents to start the season. A road trip to Memphis is also on the schedule.

However, another upset win could really catapult the Bulls into playoff consideration.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

NEW YORK — US Open champions Naomi Osaka and Aryna Sabalenka were both asked about their thoughts concerning the verbal confrontation between Taylor Townsend and Jelena Ostapenko on Wednesday, Aug. 27 that occurred following their match at the USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center.

Ostapenko ripped Townsend’s net-cord etiquette after her 7-5, 6-1 second-round loss to the American on Court 11, saying her opponent had “no class” and “no education.” The 28-year-old from Latvia did not attend a post-match press conference last night but instead took to social media to share her side of the story.

‘Today after the match I told my opponent that she was very disrespectful as she had a net ball in a very deciding moment and didn’t say sorry, but her argument was that she doesn’t have to say sorry at all,’ she said. Ostapenko also denied being a racist after she posted her initial comments online.

Osaka, a two-time US Open champion, was asked about her initial reaction to the incident after her 6-3, 6-1 second-victory over Hailey Baptiste on Thursday, Aug. 28.

‘I mean, it’s really difficult to say,’ Osaka, the No. 23 seed, said. ‘I think obviously it’s one of the worst things you can say to a Black tennis player in a majority White sport. And granted, I know Taylor, and I know how hard she’s worked and I know how smart she is, so she’s the furthest thing from uneducated or anything like that.

‘But if you’re like genuinely asking me about the history of Ostapenko, I don’t think that’s the craziest thing she’s said. I’m going to be honest. I think it’s ill-timing and the worst person you could have ever said it to. And I don’t know if she knows the history of it in America. But I know she’s never going to say that ever again in her life. But, yeah, I mean, it was just terrible. Like, that’s just really bad.’

Aryna Sabalenka weighs in on Ostapenko controversy

Sabalenka, the world’s No. 1 player, has herself been in the spotlight when she has said some things post-match. After she lost the French Open final in June to Coco Gauff, Sabalenka attributed her defeat to the poor weather conditions in Paris and dismissed Gauff’s play.

She later apologized, and the two were actually seen on social media dancing together at Wimbledon’s Centre Court.

Sabalenka, the reigning US Open champion, was also asked about the two players and said she talked to Ostapenko after the match and at first did not know about the incident.

‘Well, I have to say that she’s nice. You know, she just sometimes can lose control. She has some things in life to face and some struggles,’ Sabalenka said.

‘I was just trying to help her to, maybe, I don’t know, just not, like, face it more in mature way, but I was just trying to help her to settle down and kind of, like, just was someone she could speak to and just let it go.

‘You know, I think she just sometimes can just lose control over her emotions, which pretty tough.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Dallas Cowboys traded star edge rusher Micah Parsons to the Green Bay Packers.
Cowboys owner Jerry Jones has a long and complex history of trades, some successful and others not.

The Dallas Cowboys just traded edge rusher Micah Parsons to the Green Bay Packers. Done deal. Official.

It’s only the latest chapter in the ups and downs of Cowboys owner/general manager Jerry Jones’ trade history.

Early in Jones’ tenure as team owner, which began in 1989, his savvy moves as the head of the team’s personnel decisions helped construct a powerhouse. The Cowboys won three Super Bowls in four years, all of which were within the first seven years of Jones’ ownership.

Since the team’s last title in the 1995 season, Dallas has not returned to a conference championship game, let alone a Super Bowl.

USA TODAY Sports examined some of the most notable moves in Jones’ trade history – both good and bad – in the wake of his decision to send Parsons to the Packers.

Here’s what to know:

Jerry Jones trade history

1989: The Herschel Walker Trade

Cowboys received:

LB Jesse Solomon
LB David Howard
CB Issiac Holt
DE Alex Stewart
Vikings’ first-, second- and sixth-round picks in 1990
Vikings’ first- and second-round picks in 1991 (conditional on cutting Solomon and Howard)
Vikings’ first-, second- and third-round picks in 1992 (conditional on cutting Holt and Stewart)

Vikings received:

RB Herschel Walker
Cowboys’ third- and 10th-round picks in 1990
Chargers’ fifth-round pick in 1990
Cowboys’ third-round pick in 1991

Chargers received:

RB Darrin Nelson

To date, this trade is considered the single most lopsided trade in NFL history.

Minnesota hoped Dallas would hold onto the five players it traded after the Cowboys started the season 0-4. Then-head coach Jimmy Johnson had other ideas. He quickly moved to dump all four of the players who reported to Dallas – Nelson did not, hence the Chargers’ involvement in the trade – to recoup the Vikings’ draft picks.

The Cowboys went on to use the extra draft capital they acquired to make aggressive deals in ensuing drafts, trading up and landing players who became key contributors to future title-winning teams.

1990: Up to 17th overall pick in the NFL draft (Emmitt Smith)

Cowboys received: No. 17 overall pick in 1990 NFL Draft
Steelers received: No. 21 (TE Eric Green), No. 81 (DT Craig Veasey) overall picks in 1990 NFL Draft

The No. 21 overall pick in the 1990 draft was one of the first-round picks Minnesota had traded to Dallas in the Walker trade. The Cowboys went on to use it in a package to trade up four spots and draft Smith, the future Hall of Fame running back who helped the Cowboys win their three Super Bowls.

Smith won an NFL MVP and Super Bowl MVP after the 1993 season. Green played five seasons with the Steelers, making two Pro Bowls with the team. Veasey played two years for Pittsburgh.

1992: Charles Haley trade

Cowboys received: DE Charles Haley
49ers received: 1993 second-round pick, 1994 third-round pick

Haley began his career in San Francisco, where he led the 49ers in sacks for six straight years and won two Super Bowls. But by 1992, Haley had butted heads with too many people in the San Francisco locker room, including legendary wide receiver Jerry Rice – according to former teammate Dexter Carter – and head coach George Seifert.

It led to the Niners trading away the then-three-time Pro Bowler to their conference rival. Haley went on to play five years in Dallas, recording 172 tackles and 34 sacks, and helping the Cowboys win three Super Bowls. He was enshrined in the Pro Football Hall of Fame as a member of the class of 2015.

1992: Thomas Everett

Cowboys received: S Thomas Everett
Steelers received: 1993 fifth-round pick

Everett missed the first two games of the 1992 season while – ironically – holding out for a contract. Jones took advantage of the holdout by sending a fifth-rounder to Pittsburgh for the standout safety – 315 tackles, 16 interceptions and four forced fumbles in his first five years with the Steelers.

Everett went on to play two seasons for the Cowboys. He recorded two interceptions in the team’s Super Bowl 27 victory over the Buffalo Bills, and in 1993, he made his first and only career Pro Bowl. Everett also recorded an interception in the Cowboys’ NFC championship game victory over the 49ers that year.

2000: Joey Galloway

Cowboys received: WR Joey Galloway
Seahawks received: 2000 first-round pick, 2001 first-round pick

One of the biggest stumbles in Jones’ history as a general manager came at the turn of the century. Looking to replace a retiring Michael Irvin at wide receiver, Jones sent two first-round picks to Seattle for Galloway.

Galloway had tallied more than 1,000 yards in three of his first four seasons but missed all but eight games in his fifth year thanks to – once again, ironically – a contract holdout.

The wideout never reached nearly the same heights in his four years in Dallas. He tore his ACL in his first game with the Cowboys and only had one season with more than 900 yards. Seattle, meanwhile, used the No. 19 overall in the 2000 draft it acquired from Dallas to select running back Shaun Alexander, who won an MVP five years later.

2008: Roy Williams

Cowboys received: WR Roy Williams, 2010 seventh-round pick
Lions received: 2009 first-, third- and sixth-round picks

A second notable fumbled trade by Jones happened a bit later in the decade.

Williams was a trade deadline acquisition by the Cowboys in 2008. Jones worked quickly to also sign him to a five-year extension to keep him in Dallas through the 2014 season before he had even played a snap with his second team.

Williams failed to record more than 600 yards in a single season during his two and a half years in Dallas, though he did score 13 touchdowns for the Cowboys. Jones released him before the 2011 season, after Williams had played just one year of his extension.

2018: Amari Cooper

Cowboys received: WR Amari Cooper
Raiders received: 2019 first-round pick

Ten years later, Jones made another trade deadline move that sent away a first-round pick for a wide receiver. This one aged a little better than his previous two first-round-for-wide-receiver trades.

Cooper was Jones’ solution to replace Dez Bryant, whom the team had released ahead of the 2018 season after eight years in Dallas. The Cowboys went 7-2 down the stretch after the Cooper acquisition and finished the year 10-6, enough to win the NFC East.

In his first full year with the Cowboys, Cooper set career-high marks in yards (1,189) and touchdowns (8) en route to his fourth career Pro Bowl nod. However, Dallas finished 8-8 and missed the playoffs. Cooper played two more years in Dallas, recording 1,979 more yards and 13 more touchdowns before conceding the lead receiver role to CeeDee Lamb in 2021 and making his way to the Browns via trade before 2022.

Despite Cooper’s solid production with Dallas, the team only made the playoffs twice – in his first and last seasons – and went 1-2 in the postseason.

2025: George Pickens

Cowboys received: WR George Pickens, 2027 sixth-round pick
Steelers received: 2026 third-round pick, 2027 fifth-round pick

It’s unclear as of yet how this trade will age for Pickens and the Cowboys.

What is known is that Jones did not give up a first-round pick in this trade to acquire another team’s leading receiver. Pickens will join Lamb in a Dallas receivers room that has lacked depth behind their lead wideout since Cooper’s departure.

The former Steeler is coming off a 900-yard, three-touchdown outing in his third and final season in Pittsburgh, a notable drop from the 1,140 yards and five scores Pickens had in 2023.

2025: Micah Parsons

Cowboys received: 2026 first-round pick, 2027 first-round pick, DT Kenny Clark
Packers received: Micah Parsons

Like with Pickens, it’s too early to tell how this one will age for Jones.

It’s the second big trade on this list that features Jones and Dallas trading away a player, with the other being the Walker trade to Minnesota.

Parsons is 26, a year younger than Walker was when he was traded, and had been selected to a Pro Bowl in each of his first four seasons. He was one of two players in NFL history to record at least 12 sacks in each of his first four seasons. And according to Pro Football Focus editor John Owning, the Cowboys were the best defense in the NFL by EPA per play with Parsons on the field and the worst defense in the NFL by the same metric without him.

Time will tell how this trade ages, but its early reaction has been one of befuddlement across the NFL world.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

NEW YORK – The problems with Coco Gauff’s serve have been well-documented, with one of the most basic maneuvers in tennis costing the two-time Grand Slam champion matches.

But Gauff, who at times was emotional, persevered once again on Thursday night, in front of a packed crowd at Arthur Ashe Stadium. She can put those concerns away for at least one more day, advancing with an error-filled 7-6 (7-5), 6-2 second-round victory over unseeded Donna Vekic of Croatia.

Gauff moves on to play in the third round against Poland’s Magdalena Fręch.

Gauff, the No. 3 seed and 2023 US Open champion, had eight double faults and 18 unforced errors, and managed to convert 67% of her first serves in play.

Gauff got off to a rocky start and was broken on opening serve, which ended in a double fault. She found herself down two games before battling back, breaking Vekic, who had her own issues with her serve, double-faulting three times in the third game alone.

Vekic, a 2024 Paris Olympics silver medalist, had 10 double faults and 35 unforced errors (mostly balls hit into the net), and received treatment on her right arm from the medical staff. She wasted an opportunity serving for the first set when she was immediately broken, sending the set to a tiebreak, where Gauff’s fewer mistakes were the difference.

Gauff knows she hasn’t played her best during the first two rounds and needed nearly three hours to beat her first-round opponent, Australian Ajla Tomljanović 6-4, 6-7 (2-7), 7-5, double-faulting 10 times during that match.

Coco Gauff vs. Donna Vekic result, highlights

Gauff defeated Vekic 7-6 (7-5), 6-2

Gauff takes first set in tiebreak

After receiving treatment on her arm, Vekic served for the first set but was immediately broken, sending the first set to a tiebreak. Neither player got command during the tiebreak, going back and forth with mostly unforced errors, before Gauff settled the issue with a forehand winner and an error by Vekic to take the set 7-6 (5).

Vekic gets medical treatment

Vekic is receiving treatment on her right arm from the medical staff and is set to serve for the first set, which has been poorly played with dozens of unforced errors and double faults.

Vekic struggling with her serve

Vekic has already double-faulted six times in the first set, including three times in the third game. Gauff failed to take advantage at times and after taking four games in a row after being down 0-2, Vekic has rallied to even up the match.

Gauff down early

Gauff’s serve betrayed her to start the match as she was broken, double-faulting to give Vekic the first game. She was blitzed in the second game and will have to dig out of a hole to get back in the match.

Coco Gauff and Donna Vekic enter stadium court

Expecting a packed house at Arthur Ashe Stadium as Gauff is introduced to loud applause. Gauff’s serve has been the subject of her game lately, so it will be interesting if she can get off to a good start tonight. Vekic, a 29-year-old from Croatia, is ranked No. 49 in the world and is expected to play aggressively from the start.

What time is Coco Gauff vs. Donna Vekic?

Coco Gauff will face off against Donna Vekic in the second-round of the 2025 US Open on Thursday at 7 p.m. ET on Arthur Ashe Stadium at the USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center.

Watch Coco Gauff at the US Open on Fubo

How to watch Coco Gauff vs. Donna Vekic: US Open TV channel, stream

Time: 7 p.m. ET
Location: USTA Billie Jean King National Tennis Center (New York)
TV: ESPN
Streaming: ESPN+, Fubo

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fast. Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Trump administration’s latest allegations of mortgage fraud have raised questions about a long-standing housing issue known as owner-occupancy mortgage fraud. But that type of fraud can be difficult to prove, experts say.

President Donald Trump announced in a Truth Social post on Monday night that he was removing Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook. He cited allegations made by Federal Housing Finance Agency Director Bill Pulte that Cook committed mortgage fraud by claiming homes in two different states as her primary residence at the same time.

Cook’s attorney on Tuesday said Cook will file a lawsuit to challenge her removal.

“President Trump has no authority to remove Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook,” the lawyer, Abbe Lowell, said in a statement.

The Justice Department has also recently targeted Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., and New York Attorney General Letitia James with similar mortgage fraud allegations.

Here are the key things to know about owner-occupancy mortgage fraud, according to experts.

The main reason a borrower could be motivated to claim a primary residence on a mortgage application is to get a lower interest rate for that home.

Typically, mortgages for a primary residence have lower interest rates and homeowner’s insurance costs, said Keith Gumbinger, vice president of mortgage website HSH.

Mortgage interest rates are generally 0.5% to 1% higher for investment properties than for primary homes, according to Bankrate. Homeowners also typically pay about 25% more for insurance as a landlord compared with a standard homeowners policy, according to the Insurance Information Institute.

Owner-occupied means “you’re going to live there the majority of the time,” Gumbinger said. But there are limited exceptions, including for military service, parents providing housing for a disabled adult child or children providing housing for parents, according to Fannie Mae.

If a homeowner changes primary residences, they need to inform their mortgage lender that the original property is no longer owner-occupied, Gumbinger said.

There are also federal and state tax benefits for primary residences, according to Albert Campo, a certified public accountant and president of Campo Financial Group in Manalapan, New Jersey.

For example, when an owner sells a home and makes a profit, they can take a capital gains exemption worth up to $250,000 for single filers or $500,000 for married couples filing jointly, as long as they meet certain IRS rules, including owner occupancy for two of the past five years.

For tax purposes, a homeowner can have only one primary residence at a time.

When a taxpayer owns more than one home, proving which one is the primary residence is “always based on facts and circumstances,” Campo said. For example, a primary residence is typically where an owner spends most of their time, votes, files their tax returns and receives mail, he said.

A 2023 report from the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia found that more than 22,000 “fraudulent borrowers” misrepresented their owner-occupancy status, out of 584,499 loans originated from 2005 to 2017. The data was based on a subsample from more than 15 million loans originated during this period.

Typically, the fraudulent borrowers took out larger loans and had higher mortgage default rates, the authors found.

However, this type of fraud may be “difficult to detect until long after the mortgage has been originated,” the authors wrote.

“There is a difference between the court of law and the court of public opinion,” Jonathan Kanter, a law professor at Washington University in St. Louis and a former assistant attorney general, told CNBC’s “Squawk Box” last week when asked about Cook. “In the court of law, this is small ball and very difficult to prove.”

“You’d have to establish not only that she filled out the form incorrectly, but she had the specific intent to deceive, to defraud banks, as opposed to just making a mistake,” he said.

During fiscal year 2024, 38 mortgage fraud offenders were sentenced in the federal system, according to the United States Sentencing Commission’s interactive data analyzer. That number is up slightly from 34 offenders in 2023, but down from 426 offenders in 2015, the earliest date in that tool’s dataset. The U.S. Sentencing Commission data does not break out the types of mortgage fraud.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

NEW YORK – The expression ‘costs an arm and a leg’ dates back at least a century, but it indeed remains relevant in today’s inflation-rampant times … especially if you are planning to attend, eat, drink, or buy any sort of souvenir at the US Open over the next two weeks.

If your stomach and wallet can handle it, and you don’t have to take out a second mortgage to afford the trip to Flushing Meadows, this year’s cornucopia of food and drink choices at the final Grand Slam of the year is sure to turn some heads.

Let’s start with the drinks, where smiling (or annoyed, depending on the time of day) bartenders are situated at battle stations every couple of feet. They’re ready to charge your credit card and pour you a popular US Open staple, the Honey Deuce, which is responsible for nearly two decades of fans stumbling and bumbling around the grounds with impunity to the ire of the New York City Police Department.

This mixture of Grey Goose vodka, lemonade, and raspberry liqueur, topped with three honeydew melons that represent tennis balls, will cost you $23. But at least you get the collector glass that comes with the drink.

The United States Tennis Association sold 556,000 Honey Deuces during last year’s tournament (and 2.8 million have been sold since 2011, according to Grey Goose). For you math majors, the organization pocketed nearly $12.8 million off that drink alone in 2024, more than enough to pay the two singles champions, who will take home $5 million each for their victorious runs through the tournament.

Or, if you really want to live on the wild side, the newest drink on the menu is the $39 Watermelon Slice, from IHG Hotels & Resorts, the tournament’s official hotel sponsor. It comes in a neon-green wine glass shaped like a tennis ball, with a nice, healthy wedge of – you guessed it – watermelon, to top it off. The drink features an interesting Moët & Chandon Champagne, watermelon juice, elderflower liqueur, and lime. Taste buds, be damned.

But for some, the food and other amenities are not all they’re cracked up to be.

Mark Ruggiero, a retired pediatrician from Gardnerville, Nevada, said he had the Honey Deuce about 12 years ago and hasn’t had one since.

“I really liked it for about four hours, and after about the third one, I started to not like it as much,” he said.

Ruggiero, who was seated near courtside with his friends Phil and Diane Sheridan while snacking on donuts bought at Doughnut Plant at Grand Central Station, had some pointed advice for those coming to the Open.

“Bring some snacks,” he said, even though security prohibits any outside food and beverages, including water, from being brought inside the stadium grounds. “But there is some food that’s reasonably priced,’ he added.

If wine and spirits aren’t your thing, you could (theoretically) bring an empty water container and enjoy free H2O from the numerous water fountains around the complex, or spend $9 for a 750 ml bottle of Evian or $8.50 for a fountain drink.

When it comes to food, the talk of the US Open is the famous Golden Nugget chicken with caviar from COQODAQ, which can be found at Arthur Ashe Stadium’s club level and in the Food Village; if that’s your fix or piques your curiosity, six ‘golden nuggets’ will cost you a cool Benjamin, just for that dish alone, which features Petrossian caviar and crème fraîche. Also, prepare to shell out an Andrew Jackson for sides like macaroni and cheese or a dessert, like the $19 peaches and cream froyo.

‘There’s something magical about the combination of caviar and chicken nuggets. It’s unexpected, it’s playful, and it feels like a celebration,’ Simon Kim, CEO and Founder of Gracious Hospitality Management (COQODAQ, COTE Korean Steakhouse) told USA TODAY Sports. ‘That’s exactly what the US Open is – a celebration of sport, culture, and indulgence. Our goal has always been to create a high-low experience, where something as simple as a chicken nugget, which everyone loves, becomes elevated when paired with world-class caviar.’

COQODAQ, a Korean fried chicken restaurant in Manhattan located at 12 East 22nd Street, offers other US Open exclusive menu items, such as the ‘Gangnam Style’ crispy chicken sandwich, as well as exclusive off-menu surprises. The classic nuggets box, featuring three signature sauces and pickled radish, is priced at $26.

Kim said they sold about 100,000 chicken nuggets last year at the Open and expect to double that number in 2025.

You also can’t go wrong with a Maine lobster roll from Red Hook Lobster Pound, which will run you around $40. And for foodies who want to chow down just for the sake of gluttony, Hill Country Barbecue will more than fulfill those needs, with a sliced brisket sandwich ($26) or a loaded barbecue nachos ($24).

(This story was updated to add videos.)

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The NFL and Nike unveiled eight new ‘Rivalries’ uniforms for the AFC East and NFC West teams.
The uniforms celebrate local traditions and team legacies with unique designs.
The uniforms will be worn once during the 2025 season in a divisional rivalry game.

After four months of anticipation, particularly among those who fancy themselves football fashionistas, the NFL and Nike revealed their new “Rivalries” uniforms Thursday morning – kits that make a departure from the fairly conservative looks the league has featured for most of its hundred-plus years of existence.

Effectively cousins to the NBA’s popular ‘City Edition’ uniforms or Major League Baseball’s ‘City Connect’ jerseys, the ‘Rivalries’ unis present looks – if ones that may not be embraced by traditionalists – that will make the AFC East and NFC West teams that wear them this season pop for viewers while attempting to celebrate the local ethos of those clubs.

‘Everyone loves good rivalries, which have the power to connect and transform athletes, fans, teams and entire communities,’ Nike relayed in a press release regarding the uniforms it first teased on the second day of the 2025 NFL draft.

‘The 2025 Rivalries uniforms will celebrate storied local traditions and unite fan communities with designs unique to select cities and teams.

‘The designs are rooted extensively in the legacies and inspirations true to each team, serving as authentic, competitive expressions of community pride while giving athletes and fans an opportunity to connect like never before.’

NFL UNIFORM POWER RANKS: Which teams are dressed best? Worst?

The new uniforms for all eight teams – and they all had direct input into their customized threads – will be worn once this season during a home game against a division rival (details below). They will then become part of the club’s uniform closet for the next three years.

The league’s other 24 teams will get their own ‘Rivalries’ uniforms in future years, two additional divisions to be added to the rotation annually through the 2028 season.

‘Rivalries will bring fresh energy to the field with each new uniform, while providing a platform to amplify the community and hometown pride that is rooted in each NFL fan,’ said Taryn Hutt, the NFL’s vice president of club marketing, said in a statement.

The new ‘Rivalries’ jerseys and associated gear and apparel will be available at nike.com, NFLshop.com and fanatics.com starting Sept. 10.

The league will literally look quite different in 2025 as eight teams – the Bills, Browns, Steelers, Chargers, Commanders, Packers, Saints (a new helmet and a new/old jersey) and Buccaneers – previously revealed new throwback and/or alternate uniform looks earlier this summer.

USA TODAY Sports was granted an early look at the ‘Rivalries’ uniforms, and they certainly demand a ranking of their own, so here goes – from best to worst:

1. Arizona Cardinals

Did you hear about the haboob (better known as a dust storm) that engulfed Phoenix on Tuesday? Apparently it also sand-blasted the Cards’ new uniforms – to glorious effect.

Arizona’s ‘Rivalries’ unis appear pockmarked by sand and feature a reimagined state flag on the shoulder (a callback to the flag also pops off the helmet bumper). The flag, jersey number and pant stripes are outlined with copper trim, an ode to the official metal of Arizona. Literally a gritty look, the official theme of the Cardinals’ Rivalries unis is “Built to Last.”

2. Seattle Seahawks

They’re a close second, mainly because – I think – going predominantly with ‘Wolf Grey’ for the jerseys and pants might be a slight miss. But a “High-Decibel Zone” presentation meant to honor the team’s loud, proud, vocal fans is pretty sweet − Pearl Jam, Nirvana, Heart and Seattle’s other legendary rock bands surely approving. A soundwave pattern ripples across the shoulders and down the pants, appropriate given this team has set off seismometers in Seattle amid playoff touchdowns, like Marshawn Lynch’s epic one in a 2011 wild-card upset of New Orleans.

‘Hawks fans are further honored with “12s” embedded throughout the uniform including a cascade of them within the jersey numbers. The “Beetle Green,” aka iridescent green, trim is a nice change from the typical ‘Action Green’ that looks like highlighter ink.

But the coolest element is the helmet, a metallic chrome dome with bluish-green coloring that’s been much better executed than the black-and-gold two-tone crowns the Jaguars wore a few years ago.

3. Buffalo Bills

Nike’s hype video will make “Game of Thrones” fans wonder if the Bills will be now playing north of the Wall (they do have a new stadium under construction after all, but unclear if it’s rising in Westeros).

As for the uniforms, they’re quite iced out – similar to the Vikings’ “Winter Warrior” look, complete with silver numbers and helmet logo. Buffalo’s ‘Rivalries’ duds carry a ‘Cold Front” lable, and fans will be thrilled to see “Bills Mafia” stitched inside the collar. But the coolest detail is the silvery, texturized charging buffalo logo on the sleeve.

4. New England Patriots

If the Bills are north of the Wall, then the Pats seem based somewhere near the Iron Islands. Their “Nor’Easter” uniforms feature a sharp “Storm Blue” jersey “inspired by the New England fog.” The shoulder and tapered pants striping boast reflective silver material “designed to represent beams of light shining off the lighthouse connected to Gillette Stadium.” Also unveiled, a new “NE” logo appearing on the jersey’s sleeves.

The collar is busy but not in a bad way, encompassed by six red stars representing each state in New England. “We Are All Patriots,” which owner Robert Kraft declared after the team’s first Super Bowl win in 2002 – just five months after 9/11 – is written inside of it. Solid.

5. San Francisco 49ers

They clearly want you to know their fan base is known as the “Faithful,” the word written in gold script above the jersey numbers while “Faithful to the Bay” rings the collar’s interior. The red jersey numbers are presented in a slick “saloon font” and trimmed in a vibrant gold the team has never really featured aside from its helmets.

Given how the team has incorporated a cream color into its overall palette recently – noticeably on its website and social accounts – it is a bit disappointing the Niners went with a primarily black uniform. But this “For the Faithful” version is the team’s best homage yet to the California gold rush for which it’s named.

6. New York Jets

Sadly, its best aspect – “Gotham City Football Club” written in Gothic font and topped by the Jets’ plane logo – rests inside the neckline. The colors (“Empire Green,” black and gray) are meant to serve as a callback to Hall of Fame QB Joe Namath, who led the NYJ to their only Super Bowl nearly 57 years ago. The helmet, which has a stripe down the centerline, looks nice, but the Gothic jersey nubmers are shaky. The graphics on the sleeves and chest logo are a whiff, evoking a manhole cover … though the Jets often wind up in the gutter.

We’ll continue to wish this team would go whole hog on intimidating military airframes or, if Gotham is going to be the theme, give us something more Batman-adjacent. Alas.

7. Los Angeles Rams

Nike can be forgiven given a team that’s played in Cleveland, L.A. (twice), Anaheim and St. Louis doesn’t have especially deep roots. So the Rams’ “Midnight Mode” really just renders them yet another squad with a nearly black (midnight blue) alternate, though the sleeves do a better job showcasing the team’s iconic horns. “Rams House” is stitched inside the collar – even though SoFi Stadium is notoriously often overrun by visiting teams’ fans. The dark helmet does somewhat recall the ones worn by the ‘Greatest Show on Turf’ teams led by Hall of Fame QB Kurt Warner in STL.

8. Miami Dolphins

Feels like we’re reverting to the 1990s – it was a better time, right? – with more teams wanting a black-ish version uniform in their closet. Miami’s “Dark Waters” unis are meant to convey speed and South Florida’s night life in what’s officially a “dark pitch-blue” uniform with hits of “Turbo Green,” and the club’s standard aqua and orange. Meh, we’re not fooled. Missed opportunity not pivot to something closer to a “Miami Vice” feel.

When will the ‘Rivalries’ uniforms be worn in 2025?

Arizona Cardinals: Sept. 25 vs. Seattle Seahawks

Buffalo Bills: Oct. 5 vs. New England Patriots

Los Angeles Rams: Nov. 16 vs. Seattle Seahawks

Miami Dolphins: Sept. 29 vs. New York Jets

New England Patriots: Nov. 13 vs. New York Jets

New York Jets: Dec. 7 vs. Miami Dolphins

San Francisco 49ers: Jan. 4, 2026 vs. Seattle Seahawks

Seattle Seahawks: Dec. 18 vs. Los Angeles Rams

This post appeared first on USA TODAY