Archive

2025

Browsing

President Donald Trump accepted an invitation on Thursday from King Charles III for a second state visit to the United Kingdom.

The invite came in a letter presented to Trump by U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who is meeting with Trump at the White House regarding ending the war in Ukraine.

‘This is really special. This has never happened before. This is unprecedented,’ Starmer said as he was sitting next to Trump in the Oval Office. 

‘I think that just symbolizes the strength of the relationship between us. This is a very special letter. I think the last state visit was a tremendous success,’ he continued. ‘His majesty the king wants to make this even better than that.’ 

‘What I haven’t got yet is your answer,’ Starmer then said, drawing laughs. 

‘The answer is yes, on behalf our wonderful First Lady Melania and myself, the answer is yes and we look forward to being there and honoring the king and honoring really your country,’ Trump responded. ‘Your country is a fantastic country.’ 

Trump described Charles ‘beautiful’ and ‘wonderful man.’ 

‘I’ve gotten to know him very well actually, first term and now, a second term,’ he added. 

Starmer said he would ‘happily’ take Trump’s acceptance of the invite to King Charles III.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., claimed earlier this month that ‘no president’ has presided over more plane crashes during his first month in office than President Trump. But data obtained by Fox News Digital shows there were more plane crashes during that same time period under President Biden. 

‘No president has had more planes crash in their first month in office than Donald Trump,’ Swalwell posted on X Feb. 17, a comment viewed over 7 million times on X. 

Department of Transportation data provided by a senior administration official contradicts that data and shows more plane crashes during the first few weeks of President Biden’s term.

Swalwell had posted in response to a small plane crash in Georgia that left two dead.  

There were 55 aviation accidents in the United States between Biden’s inauguration Jan. 21, 2021, and February 17, 2021, compared to 35 during the same period for Trump.

Worldwide there were 91 aviation accidents during that same time period for Biden and 50 during Trump’s first few weeks. 

‘Eric Swalwell is a habitual liar and fraud, who continues to beclown himself every single day because he suffers from a debilitating and severe case of Trump Derangement Syndrome that has rotted his brain,’ White House communications director Steven Cheung told Fox News Digital. 

‘As an elected official, he should actually tell the truth for once, but it’s understandable he’s incapable of that since he has Fang Fang on his mind all day.’

Swalwell told Fox News Digital in a statement he was referring to commercial airliners, although his initial post stated ‘planes.’

‘There have been two U.S. commercial airliner crashes, where people died or were seriously injured in Trump’s first month,’ Swalwell said. ‘Please show me a president who had more in their first month.’

Several Democrats have blamed Trump for high-profile plane crashes in recent weeks, including Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who suggested Trump’s cuts to the FAA were to blame in the Toronto crash, which resulted in serious injuries but no deaths. 

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt pushed back at the time, pointing out that the ‘crash unfortunately took place in Canadian airspace with Canadian air-traffic controllers overseeing it.’  

She then disputed the Democratic attack line about Trump firing FAA officials. 

‘And the facts about the FAA are that no air-traffic controllers have been let go by Secretary Duffy or this new administration. In fact, Secretary Duffy has put great emphasis on hiring the best and the brightest air-traffic controllers who want to be part of the FAA,’ she argued.

Fox News Digital’s Gabriel Hays contributed to this report

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

United Kingdom Prime Minister Keir Starmer is meeting with President Donald Trump on Thursday at the White House hours after Trump told his Cabinet that he wouldn’t provide security guarantees to Ukraine ‘beyond very much.’ 

Trump, who met with French President Emmanuel Macron at the White House on Monday regarding Ukraine, is expected to sit down with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy tomorrow in Washington. 

The meeting between Trump and Starmer will include much discussion about the president’s efforts to bring the conflict to an end through a peaceful resolution, a senior administration official said. They will later hold a joint press conference at 2 p.m. ET.

As Trump was greeting Starmer Thursday, the president was asked if he was confident he could get a peace deal done on Ukraine, to which he replied ‘We can and we will.’

‘On issues like Ukraine, thank you for changing the conversation to bring about the possibility that now we can have a peace deal,’ Starmer later said alongside Trump in the Oval Office. ‘And we want to work with you to make sure that peace deal is enduring, that it lasts, that it’s a deal that goes down as a historic deal, that nobody breaches. And we’ll work with you, to make sure that absolutely happens.’

Starmer pushed the United States on Wednesday to provide a security ‘backstop’ for any potential European peacekeepers in Ukraine, according to Reuters. 

‘I’m absolutely convinced that we need a lasting peace, not a ceasefire, and for that to happen we need security guarantees,’ he was quoted as saying. ‘Precisely what that layers up to, what that looks like, is obviously a subject of intense discussion.’ 

Starmer reportedly added that his ‘concern is if there is a ceasefire without a backstop, it will simply give him [Putin] the opportunity to wait and to come again because his ambition in relation to Ukraine is pretty obvious, I think, for all to see.’ 

However, Trump said Thursday that ‘I don’t like to talk about peacekeeping until we have a deal. I like to get things done.’

‘We have to make a deal first. Right now, we don’t have a deal,’ he added.

Trump also said during a Cabinet meeting Wednesday that ‘I’m not going to make security guarantees beyond very much, we’re going to have Europe do that, because… Europe is their next-door neighbor. But we’re going to make sure everything goes well.’ 

‘I’ve had very good conversations with President Putin. I’ve had very good conversations with President Zelenskyy. And until four weeks ago, nobody had conversations with anybody,’ Trump said Wednesday. ‘It wasn’t even a consideration. Nobody thought you could make peace. I think you can.’ 

‘We’re going to do the best we can to make the best deal we can for both sides,’ Trump added. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The Trump administration’s lawyers have spent significant time in court this month fighting dozens of requests filed by legal groups, labor organizations and a litany of other state and local plaintiffs across the country – and so far, most judges haven’t granted these requests.

The courts ‘are rightfully saying we don’t have jurisdiction over this,’ or, in certain cases, that plaintiffs ‘aren’t proving harm,’ Fox News legal editor Kerri Kupec Urbahn, a former spokesperson for Attorney General Bill Barr, said of the numerous legal challenges to Trump’s agenda. 

The lawsuits, totaling more than 80, are aimed at blocking or reversing some of Trump’s most controversial actions and executive orders. 

Nearly all plaintiffs are seeking, in addition to the long-term injunctive relief, a temporary restraining order, or TRO, from a federal judge that would block the order or policy from taking force until the merits of the case can be heard. 

Almost all these requests for emergency relief have been rejected in court, with judges noting that plaintiffs lacked standing, and ordering both parties to return for a later hearing date to consider the merits of the case.

Some Trump allies and legal commentators have criticized the many lawsuits as a way for plaintiffs to skip over the traditional administrative appeals process and take their case directly to the courts instead – a pattern they say has prompted the wave of rejections by federal judges. 

There is an internal review process for agency-specific actions or directives, which can be challenged via appeals to administrative law judges or an agency-specific court. 

But doing so for executive orders or presidential actions is much more difficult.

According to information from the Code of Federal Regulations and the Federal Register, a president’s executive order can be revoked or modified only by the president or via the legislative branch, if the president was acting on authority that had been granted by Congress.

Since the latter is not immediately applicable to the Trump-era orders many of the lawsuits hinge on, that leaves the courts as one of the limited arbiters for determining whether to let stand the orders or action in question. 

That means the requests for injunctive relief are considered in a sort of two-part wave of proceedings, since most – if not all – Trump-era complaints include both the request for the TRO and for the preliminary injunction. 

The TRO requests are the first wave of ‘mini-arguments’ to come before U.S. judges tasked with reviewing the complaints. 

They are heard immediately and require plaintiffs to prove they will suffer irreparable injury or harm if their request for relief is not granted— a difficult burden to satisfy, especially when the order or policy has not yet come into force. 

(As one judge remarked earlier this month, the court cannot grant TRO requests based on speculation.)

The courts then order both parties to re-appear at a later date to consider the request for preliminary injunction, which allows both sides to present a fuller argument and for the court to take into account the harm or damages incurred. 

‘The bottom line is that courts typically do not grant requests for emergency relief at the start of a lawsuit,’ Suzanne Goldberg, a Lawfare contributor and professor at Columbia Law School, wrote in a recent op-ed. 

‘Instead, they wait to decide what remedies a plaintiff deserves, if any, until after each side makes its legal arguments and introduces its evidence, including evidence obtained from the other side through the discovery process.’

These near-term court victories have buoyed Trump allies and the Department of Government Efficiency, allowing DOGE, at least for now, to continue carrying out their ambitious early-days agenda and claiming ‘victory.’ 

‘LFG,’ Elon Musk cheered on X recently, in response to a court’s rejection of a request from labor unions seeking to block DOGE access to federal agency information.

Other accounts have praised the overwhelming court rejections of emergency restraining orders as evidence that the Trump administration, and DOGE, are ‘winning’ – a characterization that legal experts warn is largely premature.

In fact, they’ve noted, the slow-moving legal challenges and nature of the court calendar are features, not bugs.

This includes efforts to block or curtail DOGE from accessing internal government information or firing agency employees; lawsuits aimed at blocking the Trump administration’s transgender military ban; and complaints seeking to block the release or public identification of FBI personnel involved in Jan. 6 investigations, among many other things.

But that’s not because every one of these actions is legitimate. Rather, legal experts say, the near-term ‘victories’ hinge on the limited power a judge has to intervene in proving emergency relief, or granting temporary restraining orders.

Judges, including U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, noted previously that fear and speculation alone are not enough to curtail DOGE access: plaintiffs must prove clearly, and with evidence, that their workings have met the hard-to-satisfy test of permanent or ‘irreparable’ harm.

Rule 65 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure states that plaintiffs must be able to show evidence that a rule, action or policy in question will result in ‘immediate, irreparable harm’ to satisfy a TRO request. 

That’s a difficult burden of proof, and a near impossible one for plaintiffs to satisfy, especially for an action that has not yet taken effect. 

One exception is the Trump administration’s ban on birthright citizenship. 

The request for immediate relief, was granted by multiple U.S. district courts judges, who sided with plaintiffs in ruling that hundreds of children born in the U.S. were at risk of real harm. 

It was also upheld by a U.S. appeals court last week, setting the stage for a possible Supreme Court fight.

But barring that, most of the lawsuits will play out in the longer-term, Goldberg, wrote in the Lawfare op-ed.

‘Stepping back, the current litigation landscape of TROs and preliminary injunctions may seem quite extraordinary… But considered in context, these many provisional orders suggest that even more extraordinary are the government’s threatened actions, both in their likely unlawfulness and their potential for irreparable harm,’ she said.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Billionaire Elon Musk, now also a senior adviser to President Trump, met with Senate Republicans in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) Caucus on Thursday at the White House to discuss the work they’ve been doing and to get briefed on DOGE’s findings. 

The meeting was led by caucus Chairwoman Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, who has spearheaded efforts to audit and cut bloat in the government for years. 

‘The Senate DOGE Caucus has hit the ground running to save taxpayer dollars,’ Ernst told Fox News Digital in an exclusive statement. ‘I was proud to bring my colleagues together to coordinate efforts with Elon, so we can continue to streamline our work. We are just getting started to make government more efficient and protect taxpayers to ensure Washington works for the American people.’

The discussion was the first opportunity for senators in the caucus to hear from Musk directly regarding the discoveries he and DOGE have made. 

The goal of the gathering was to share work between the Senate and Musk’s DOGE, and to discuss how they could be most helpful in the legislature, Ernst’s office shared with Fox News Digital.

At the White House, Musk told senators that DOGE’s work is essential and detailed his plans to create savings, a source familiar told Fox News Digital. 

During the meeting, they presented to Musk the various areas that senators are already focused on, using a divide and conquer strategy. Some of the Republicans have targeted government spending, while others have sought to address the national debt, concerning flows of money to labs like the Wuhan Institute of Virology and much more. 

The senators further talked with Musk about how congressional action could make Washington, D.C., more efficient going forward and protect American taxpayers from funding extravagant projects. 

In attendance at the meeting were Sens. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, Mike Lee, R-Utah, Rick Scott, R-Fla., Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., Steve Daines, R-Mont., Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, Cynthia Lummis, R-Wyo., Roger Marshall, R-Kan., James Risch, R-Idaho, Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, Jon Husted, R-Ohio, Ron Johnson, R-Wis., Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, John Cornyn, R-Texas, Tommy Tuberville, R-Ala., Tim Sheehy, R-Mont., Eric Schmitt, R-Mo., Katie Britt, R-Ala., Pete Ricketts, R-Neb., and John Hoeven, R-N.D.

Musk similarly met with President Donald Trump and his Cabinet at the White House on Wednesday.

The White House’s DOGE spokesperson did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy are set to sign a landmark mineral deal Friday that represents a breakthrough in their relationship, but leaves the work of hashing out the financial details for a later date.

‘This is in some ways an agreement to make an agreement,’ said Doug Klain, policy analyst at Razom for Ukraine.

Even so, it was an abrupt turnaround from last week, when Zelenskyy rejected the initial terms for a deal. Trump, finding Zelenskyy ungrateful for U.S. help, declared him to be a ‘dictator’ and said Ukraine ‘never should have started’ the war. 

So how did both parties turn things around? Here’s what we know about the deal so far: 

Reconstruction investment fund 

Unlike an earlier iteration of the deal, the newest version, approved by the Ukrainian Cabinet on Wednesday, establishes a fund with joint U.S.-Ukraine ownership instead of 100% U.S. ownership. 

Ukraine’s Prime Minister Denys Shmyhal said Wednesday Ukraine would be funneling half of its revenues from future oil, gas and mineral projects into the fund, with some of that money being reinvested for more development. The deal would exclude existing natural resources projects. 

The deal says that once both sides sign on to the initial framework, negotiations will begin on a ‘subsequent agreement’ on who will control how much of the fund and its operation.

Two sides still far apart on grant repayment 

The U.S. initially demanded Ukraine offer $500 billion worth of its rare earths and other minerals as back payment for about $185 billion in aid. The latest versions of the deal do not include a concrete figure for how much of the mineral revenues the U.S. would receive or the size of the stake the U.S. would hold in the fund. 

At a Wednesday news conference, Zelenskyy still said his country would not be repaying the U.S. for any of the aid that has already been allocated. 

‘I will not accept (even) 10 cents of debt repayment in this deal. Otherwise, it will be a precedent.’ 

But Trump seemed satisfied with the latest negotiations. 

‘We’re doing very well with Russia-Ukraine. President Zelensky is going to be coming on Friday. It’s now confirmed, and we’re going to be signing an agreement,’ he said Wednesday. 

The agreement has little in the way of details on how the U.S. would benefit financially.

‘Perhaps U.S. companies will be contracted to do all the work of extraction, and could make big profits that way; perhaps the U.S. government would award itself an annual sum from the fund; or perhaps there would be a stipulation that U.S. companies could purchase the minerals at discounted rates,’ explained Peter Harris, a political science professor at Colorado State and fellow at restraint-minded group Defense Priorities. 

But rare earth mining is a long and arduous process. ‘It could be decades before anyone makes a dime from Ukraine’s untapped natural resources,’ said Harris. 

What Ukraine wants from the deal: security guarantees

Ukraine is looking for help from across the world to keep Russia out in the future if they can agree on terms to end the war. 

But Zelenskyy is desperate for U.S. participation since he does not believe European security guarantees alone are enough to deter Russian President Vladimir Putin from invading again.

U.S. officials have insisted America will not put boots on the ground. ‘I’m not going to make security guarantees beyond very much – we’re going to have Europe do that because we’re talking about Europe is their next-door neighbor,’ Trump said Wednesday.

U.S. officials have also told Ukraine to read between the lines: if the U.S. has significant financial interests, potentially even workers on the ground in the region, it will defend those interests. 

‘The Ukrainians are not quite convinced by that argument,’ said Klain. ‘It’s reminiscent of 1994, the agreement Ukraine made with the U.S., Russia and others to give up its nuclear arsenal, and the U.S. would say, ‘If anybody threatens your sovereignty, we’ll have your back.”

‘Ukraine does not want to get burned again.’

The agreement includes a vague reference that ‘supports Ukraine’s efforts to obtain security guarantees needed to establish lasting peace,’ according to the Kyiv Independent. 

Harris said a ‘backdoor security guarantee’ through a minerals deal amounted to ‘bad policy’ for the U.S. 

‘It [does not] serve the U.S. for large numbers of American workers to be stationed in an unstable post-conflict zone,’ he said. ‘Uncertain access to Ukraine’s natural resources is not worth risking a NATO-Russia war.’ 

Putin dangling Russian-controlled minerals to Trump 

Ukraine controls over 100 major deposits of critical minerals, according to the Kyiv School of Economics, along with some oil and gas reserves. Its reserves hold titanium, lithium, graphite, rare earths and other minerals key to the energy and tech sectors. 

Trump wants revenues from the minerals as repayment, but he could also be looking to break China’s monopoly on the rare earth metals used in phones, solar panels and other electronics. 

Putin, meanwhile, said he is open to offering the U.S. access to rare minerals, including those from Russia’s ‘new territories’ – those captured in its war on Ukraine. 

He said a U.S.-Ukraine mineral deal is not a concern and Russia ‘undoubtedly has, I want to emphasize, significantly more resources of this kind than Ukraine,’ in televised remarks. 

‘As for the new territories, it’s the same. We are ready to attract foreign partners to the so-called new, to our historical territories, which have returned to the Russian Federation,’ he added.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Lewis Hamilton’s move to Ferrari is one of the biggest storylines heading into the 2025 Formula One season.

Hamilton won six of his seven F1 titles with Mercedes-AMG Petronas, and with Ferrari will pursue his eighth championship – which would break a tie with Michael Schumacher for the most in the sport’s history.

The F1 season begins March 16 with the Australian Grand Prix, while the three races in the United States will be May 4 in Miami, Oct. 19 in Austin, Texas, then Nov. 22 in Las Vegas.

Reigning F1 champion Max Verstappen of Red Bull has won the last four championships, following Hamilton’s reign of titles in 2008, 2014, 2015, 2017, 2018, 2019 and 2020.

Hamilton, 40, has 105 career wins in Formula One — 84 with Mercedes after his first 21 with McLaren. After 12 seasons with Mercedes, Hamilton felt it was time for a change.

“You can’t stand still for too long,” Hamilton told TIME Magazine in a profile published Wednesday. “I needed to throw myself into something uncomfortable again. Honestly, I thought all my firsts were done. Your first car. Your first crash. Your first date. First day of school. The excitement I got by the idea of, ‘this is my first time in the red suit, the first time in the Ferrari.’ Wow. Honestly, I’ve never been so excited.”

Here are five interesting things Hamilton said in the Time article:

Hamilton is ‘built different’

Hamilton has a chance to pursue F1 history with his eighth championship, but he’ll have to fend off some of the sport’s rising stars like Verstappen (27 years old), McLaren’s Lando Norris (25), and even his new Ferrari teammate Charles LeClerc (27).

‘Don’t ever compare me to anybody else,” Hamilton said. ‘I’m the first and only Black driver that’s ever been in this sport. I’m built different. I’ve been through a lot. I’ve had my own journey. You can’t compare me to another 40-year-old, past or present, Formula One driver in history. Because they are nothing like me. I’m hungry, driven, don’t have a wife and kids. I’m focused on one thing, and that’s winning. That’s my No. 1 priority.”

Why Hamilton moved to Ferrari

Hamilton’s previous work with Ferrari team principal Frédéric Vasseur is one of the instrumental reasons why he made the switch. They spoke about the move in December 2023, the article said.

‘We’re in a time of reimagining the future, re-imagining what really dreaming is about,” Hamilton said. “I’m going to Ferrari, man, and that’s the biggest dream.”

Hamilton’s opinion of himself in Ferrari red

Hamilton’s first image of himself wearing a Ferrari suit came while he was washing his hands in front of a mirror in ‘the loo” – or restroom.

‘The suit looked so good on me,” Hamilton said with a laugh. ‘I’m like, Damn.”

Hamilton has high hopes for ‘F1” movie this June

Like Netflix’s ‘Formula One: Drive to Survive” series has gained worldwide exposure for F1, Hamilton said he hopes the new “F1” movie can attract new fans.

‘F1’ stars Brad Pitt and was co-produced by Hamilton, Jerry Bruckheimer and others.

‘It’s going to blow away anything that’s ever been done in Formula One before,” Hamilton said.

“Netflix has been huge,” Hamilton added. ‘This is going to be even bigger, on more of a global scale.” 

Hamilton’s retirement outlook

Hamilton is getting started all over again at Ferrari. So, there’s no thoughts of when he’ll leave the sport just yet.

‘What I can tell you is, retirement is nowhere on my radar,” says Hamilton. ‘I could be here until I’m 50, who knows.”

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Nearly a decade into his career, the guard has managed to carve his path and win an NBA title in 2022.

He is currently on his second stint with the Golden State Warriors, who are currently eighth in the Western Conference standings.

If the season ended today, the Warriors would be included in the NBA’s play-in tournament, which gives the 7th through 10th-seeded teams from each conference an opportunity to play in the postseason.

The Warriors are 31-27 throughout the first 58 games of the 82-game season. The Warriors will play the Magic in Orlando at 7 p.m. ET.

All things Warriors: Latest Golden State Warriors news, schedule, roster, stats, injury updates and more.

Payton has averaged 5.4 points, 2.8 rebounds and 1.3 assists in 13.4 minutes per game. He’s started in 10 of the 46 games he’s played for Golden State this season.

Payton spoke with USA TODAY to share some insight on various topics related to the league and his career.

Gary Payton II on playing with new teammate Jimmy Butler

Payton and the Warriors want to make a strong push toward the postseason.

The Warriors acquired Jimmy Butler from the Miami Heat before the deadline, adding him to a roster featuring Stephen Curry and Draymond Green.

“The Jimmy addition is amazing,” Payton said. “His skill, his IQ and what he brings. … Jimmy is just a dog. He loves to hoop.”

Through his first seven games with the Warriors, he’s averaged 18 points, six rebounds and 5.4 assists.

“He goes out there and plays his heart out and he is a great fit for us. He can play big or small but just that addition to what Draymond and Steph bring for us, it’s just amazing. … We will continue to figure it out and get him accustomed to everything but it won’t be too hard. He is a high IQ level guy and loves to play the right way.”

The Warriors have won six of their first seven games with Butler on the court.

Butler signed a two-year, $113 million contract extension with Miami on Feb. 6 before he was traded to Golden State. Butler has averaged 18.3 points, 5.3 rebounds and 4.3 assists during his 14-year career.

While Butler is expected to be a key player for Golden State, Payton is in the final year of a three-year deal he initially signed with the Portland Trail Blazers in 2022. He signed the deal seven months before he was traded back to Golden State.

The nine-year veteran exercised the $9.13 million player option he had on his contract to remain with the Warriors for this season.

While it remains unclear where he will play next season, Payton did not hold back about his aspirations for the future.

Bringing basketball back to Seattle

Payton was born and raised in Seattle, where his father spent 13 years as a star player for the Seattle SuperSonics.

While the city no longer has a basketball team, Payton remembers growing up when the basketball team was present before leaving for Oklahoma City.

There’s been speculation over the years that the NBA will expand in the future, leaving some to be vocal about Seattle’s need to be a front-runner to host a franchise again.

“Personally, that’s all I’ve ever wanted since they’ve left,” Payton explained. “Growing up and being around the Sonics and the KeyArena and now being in the position I’m in today, I’ve always wanted to go back home and play.

“Hopefully, in the next couple of years, they can figure it out and bring it back and that my dad is a part of it.”

There’s no deadline set for an announcement regarding the league officially expanding. Still, the NBA has made it a point to host preseason games in Seattle in recent years, which may indicate some level of interest by both the city and the league.

The Climate Pledge Arena, which was previously named the KeyArena from 1995-2018, hosts the NHL’s Seattle Kraken and the WNBA’s Seattle Storm. The arena finished its renovations in 2021, the same year the hockey team was founded.

“I think (Seattle) still deserves a men’s hoop team,” Payton said. “They are doing an amazing job with the Storm and now the Kraken down there. It’s a great fan base and the city has proved that they deserve the Sonics back.”

The Kraken upset the Colorado Avalanche in the first round of a seven-game series in the 2023 Stanley Cup playoffs, becoming the first NHL team to win its inaugural playoff series against a defending champion.

The Storm was founded in 2000 and did not leave with the NBA franchise for its move to Oklahoma City. The WNBA became the primary professional basketball team in town, winning four league championships (2004, 2010, 2018, 2020).

Payton expands his investments beyond basketball

Payton recently invested in a Black-owned water bottle brand called Suplmnt. He secured an equity stake in the company founded by Jarius Morris, aligning with the mission to promote hydration and cultural impact.

“My best friend and business partner presented me with this water bottle and wanted me to check it out,” Payton said. “A few weeks went by and I was using the bottle everywhere and the feedback I was getting was crazy.”

Morris created this brand to encourage Black and Brown communities to drink more water and empower others.

The water bottles were designed to make drinking water easy and fashionable through a dedicated focus on the art and culture portrayed in the bottle designs.

“I discovered the isolated water space pretty late in the game,” Morris said. “Water bottles have been around for a long time but I never heard of some of them prior to me discovering them. I did more research and realized that the reason I didn’t hear of these brands is because they weren’t typically targeting the urban demographic; it was more toward outdoor and the environment, so I wanted to get something that resonated with the culture.”

Payton thought highly enough of the bottles that he used them as a Christmas gift idea for his teammates. He also enjoys the different laser-printed designs available and how they can play into his everyday fashion. 

“This is pretty smooth,” Payton said about the bottle. “So from there, it was just a part of my everyday life before I was even invested.”

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

INDIANAPOLIS – One year ago, Adam Peters didn’t have a quarterback as he confronted his first offseason as general manager of the Washington Commanders. He didn’t even know what a “scrum” with the media meant. 

At his second scouting combine in the big chair he has discovered both, with Jayden Daniels the reigning Offensive Rookie of the Year and Peters participating in his fair share of meetings with the media.  

He and head coach Dan Quinn will need answers for a second straight busy offseason, with 28 members of the 2024 roster set to become free agents, an elite wide receiver in Terry McLaurin poised for a contract extension and a defensive-line stalwart in Jonathan Allen given permission to explore a trade. 

Still, “it feels a lot better than last year,” Peters said Tuesday. 

Peters and Quinn have daily discussions about the best way to improve the team, especially in the wake of a first year that exceeded expectations and the turnaround from 4-13 to a 12-5 campaign, which ended with a loss to the Super Bowl champion Philadelphia Eagles in the NFC Championship Game. 

All things Commanders: Latest Washington Commanders news, schedule, roster, stats, injury updates and more.

“It’s going be a challenge every year,” Peters said. “Not just last year, not just this year, but next year’s going to be a new set of challenges.

“There was a lot we had to accomplish and I thought we did a really good job. And this year, I mean, we still have a lot of challenges, so having Jayden is great, obviously, but you still want to build the team the right way with the right type of people.” 

Entering this offseason knowing what a ‘Commander’ is

The most important thing Quinn knows now that he didn’t this time in 2024 is “the definition of a Commander.” At its core, that player possesses competitiveness and is a person who loves football and connecting with his teammates. 

That makes combine week more purposeful this time around because it’s no longer conjecture – they’ve seen what “a Commander” is in practice. 

“We’re looking forward to following up on that this year, especially now that we know who we are even more clearly,” Quinn said Wednesday.

Washington’s 2024 roster had 28 free agents but Quinn said he didn’t have a specific number of how many he wanted to bring back. But in his mind, there are two types of free agents as he considers who will be on his team in 2025 – the ones who were on the Commanders last year, and those on other teams. He said he’s also counting on the 2024 rookie class developing and making big jumps. 

Some took on significant roles during their first season – Daniels notwithstanding. Brandon Coleman, a third-round pick, became the starting left tackle and cornerback Mike Sainristil, a second-rounder, was a starter by the end of the season.  

To figure out the areas Washington will be active in player acquisition doesn’t require a degree in forensics. Start with the Commanders’ depth chart, Peters said. 

“Which, there’s a few places that we don’t (have any players),” he said.  

Depth at running back, wide receiver and tight end are all issues on the offensive side of the ball. Defensive line is a big question mark currently, although it is regarded as the strongest position group at the top of the 2025 draft class. 

For Peters, the puzzle-solving begins by figuring out which positions may have stronger players available in the draft versus free agency and vice versa. 

“Going into the offseason, into March really, just understanding the totality of the classes and understanding where you can best use your assets,” Peters said.  

The Jon Allen question 

On Tuesday, the team said Allen has been given the opportunity to seek a trade. 

“These kinds of decisions and things you have to come up with are always tough, right?” Peters said. “…He’s been a great person for this franchise for a long time.’

The conversations that lead to a player given the chance to explore other employment opportunities can be tough to have, said Peters, “but you always want to have them civilly, and we have.” 

If there is no deal to be made, Allen could be a cut candidate. Allen is due $15.5 million this season but that base salary is not guaranteed, according to NFL.com. 

This is the time of the sport’s calendar when football and business intersect and that’s reality, Quinn said. 

“No team is the same year-to-year,” he said. “We know that. 

“That’s not specific to one player. It’s specific to the whole team.” 

Defensive line prototypes

One area that’s abundantly clear for addressing is the pass rush, especially if Allen – who missed half of the season with a torn pectoral muscle – is on the move. Veterans Dorance Armstrong and Dante Fowler, who led the team in sacks last season, followed Quinn from the Dallas Cowboys to the Commanders last offseason, but being younger at the spot would be wise. 

The ideal pass rusher in Quinn’s mind is someone with initial quickness and capable of “beating somebody to the punch.”

That sounds similar to Peters’ ideal version of a pass rusher. He wants someone who is physical and relentless, a prospect “who’s got that get-off and, really, to be really good in this league, I think you have to have both speed and power.” 

Finding weapons for Jayden Daniels 

Part of Daniels’ encore to a sensational rookie season will depend on how the front office supplies him with targets. Veteran tight end Zach Ertz became a trusted target for Daniels down the stretch and is certainly a candidate to be re-signed. Receivers Olamide Zaccheaus and Noah Brown also emerged.  

Whether it’s those players back in the burgundy and gold or fresh blood, Quinn said players at skill positions will have one thing in common. 

“We want to attack, man. So, however we can find ways to do that, we will,” said Quinn, who noted the Commanders had the most no-huddle snaps outside of running two-minute drills in the NFL. “That’s part of our edge. So finding guys that can play in space, play with quickness, be violent with their cuts.”  

What about Bobby Wagner? 

Whether linebacker Bobby Wagner, who became a mentor to Daniels last year, will return in 2025 is a question mark, and Quinn said to the reporters gathered they’d have to ask his agent – a tongue-in-cheek comment, of course, because the linebacker represents himself.

But Wagner was still top of mind for Quinn on Wednesday when he was describing the type of players he wants in the building. 

“Somewhere – I have not talked to him today – but somewhere Bobby Wagner is getting better,” Quinn said. “I don’t know where it is or what it looks like or how he’s doing it but that’s the type of attitude we want to chase.”

High marks 

The Commanders jumped from 32nd to 11th in the NFL Players’ Association’s annual report card, based on more than 1,600 player surveys across the league. 

Quinn was happiest about the treatment of families score (B+), saying the families of everyone in the organization make sacrifices so they can do their role with the Commanders. 

“So to have that right there – team travel – all those, to me, reflect back to (owner Josh Harris) and the vision of what it can be,” Quinn said. “I couldn’t be more proud to be part of it.” 

Quinn himself was the highest-rated coach, and he was still talking about chasing improvement anyway. Play style and identity were his main priorities in year one. 

Yet Quinn still wanted proof – results. Hope is one thing, Quinn said, and in the second half of the season, he saw hope turn into belief. 

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

INDIANAPOLIS – Just when you thought debate about the legality of the Philadelphia Eagles’ signature “Tush Push” play came and went like, well, three years ago, it has emerged as an item this week with NFL movers and shakers assembling for the league’s annual scouting combine.

Never mind whether they can stop it. (Nope.) Should it even be legal?

The Green Bay Packers made the debate official by submitting a proposal to the league’s competition committee to ban the short-yardage play – where teammates push quarterback Jalen Hurts from behind in a rugby-flavored mashup – that could be headed to a vote by NFL owners in a few weeks.

“I’ll let the competition committee discuss that,” Washington Commanders coach Dan Quinn scoffed on Wednesday. “Until then, we’ve got to find ways to try to stop them. That’s our job.”

Maybe some of this is wrapped in old-fashioned jealousy. The Eagles, who converted 39 of 48 “Tush Push” plays for first downs or touchdowns during the 2024 campaign, including postseason, are the new Super Bowl champions. And those Packers, well, saw their season end with a setback at Philadelphia in the first round of the NFC playoffs.

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

You know what they say: Break up the “Tush Push.” (Or something like that.)

“It should’ve been illegal three years ago,’ Atlanta Falcons coach Raheem Morris contended during an NFL Network interview on Tuesday. ‘No, the ‘Tush Push’ play, I’ve never been a big fan. There’s no other play in our game where you can absolutely get behind somebody and push them, pull them off, do anything.

“I never really understood it, and why that was legal. So, I’m definitely going to be one of those guys voting against that.” 

It’s striking to note that until the Packers submitted their proposal, the “Tush Push” was nowhere near a priority for the competition committee, according to Troy Vincent, the NFL’s executive vice president of football operations. The committee held extensive meetings over three days this week to review and discuss myriad matters, including potential rules changes.

Now the committee will be forced to take a deeper dive (no pun intended) into the play, which some suspect increases injury risk.

“I just feel like the health and safety of our players has to be at the top of our game, which it is,” Buffalo Bills coach Sean McDermott said during his combine media session. “The techniques that are used with that play have been potentially contrary to the health and safety of the players. You have to go back, though, in fairness to the injury data on the play. The optics on it, I’m not in love with.’

Vincent understands the injury concern – and there’s nothing quite like the health and safety elements to move the needle on rules changes, as illustrated with the dynamic kickoff rule the league instituted last season.

Yet there’s one pertinent detail: When it comes to the “Tush Push,” there’s no injury data – as in zero injuries, Vincent maintained – to support an argument for banning the play.

Still, as McDermott alluded to, the optics might make you shudder. Vincent acknowledged there’s pause when pondering the pressure on the vertebrae and back of the neck, when players are in prone positions. And, of course, as is the case for any short-yardage collision, there’s the general risk that comes with bodies flying.

“There’s only so many ways you can stop that play,” Vincent said during a briefing Wednesday with a small group of media, including USA TODAY Sports. “You see ‘backers … the ‘backers down in Washington, they were coming over the top, trying to time it up and they missed and were falling on their heads. Those discussion points are on the table.”

Here’s to hoping this discussion goes nowhere – and that Hurts and the Eagles won’t be stunted by the rule book when they ramp up on the quest to repeat as Super Bowl champs. They’ve perfected a play, including timing and the alignment details that keeps penalty flags to a minimum, so let them have at it.

Other teams have tried their own variations, to varying degrees of success. Let them keep trying. And never mind the idea that it’s considered an automatic conversion for the Eagles. Just stop it. And not with a new rule.

‘I almost feel a little insulted because we work so hard at that play,’ Eagles coach Nick Sirianni said of the debate, alluding to techniques that have to be on point.

“It’s not an easy play to practice. The fact that it’s an automatic, we work really, really hard at it and our guys are talented at this play. It’s a little insulting to say just because we’re good at it, so it’s automatic. We work really hard at it.’ 

Todd Bowles knows. The Tampa Bay Buccaneers coach doesn’t see the need for a new rule. Instead, he points to creative strategies as the key.

That might seem surprising, coming from Bowles. Like Morris, Bowles has a deep background on defense. Then again, game recognizes game.

“The safety of it is always going to be a question because it’s a rugby-style play, but I have nothing against it,’ Bowles told Pro Football Talk. ‘You found guys that are being creative and found the niche and how to gain an edge in this league and that’s what we as coaches try to do on a daily basis.

“Now it’s up to defensive coaches to try to gain an edge to try to stop it. That’s the challenge of it every time someone brings something new, whether it’s on offense or defense. I’m all for it that way.’

Which sounds like quite the Brotherly Love.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY