Archive

2025

Browsing

After meeting with President Biden at the White House on Monday, Edmundo Gonzalez, the man who won Venezuela’s presidential election in July, traveled to Argentina and then Panama with the ballots to prove that he, not Nicolás Maduro, is Venezuela’s democratically elected leader.

‘We elected by a landslide, a good man and Edmundo Gonzalez. We have the proof of that victory, and the whole world knows it,’ María Corina Machado, a top leader in the Venezuelan opposition, told Fox News. ‘We won.’

Maduro’s inauguration is slated for Friday. The Venezuelan opposition has called for massive street protests to peacefully demand that Maduro, whose mafia-style autocratic leadership has nearly bankrupted the oil-rich nation, not be inaugurated.

‘What we need is for all American institutions understand that Venezuela is the most important conflict in the Western Hemisphere for national security of the U.S.,’ Machado said via Zoom from her safe house in Venezuela.

‘We can be the best ally the United States will have in the Americas, first of all, because we also are desperate to solve the migration problem in our region. We want those Venezuelans to come back in billions and voluntarily. And that will happen when they’ll see there’s a future in their country.’

Machado had the following message for President-elect Donald Trump: ‘Venezuela has a huge energy potential that will never be taken advantage of… We’re going to turn Venezuela from the criminal hub of the Americas into the energy hub of the Americas and have a strong partnership with the United States.’

Gonzalez, who Venezuela elected president in July, also met with incoming National Security Advisor Cong Michael Waltz of Florida while in Washington. Maduro has warned Gonzalez will be arrested if he returns to Venezuela. 

‘I want you to know how important it is also for the safety of the American people,’ Machado explained. ‘Solving this conflict in Venezuela, I believe that what happens in the next days in Venezuela depends not only the democracy, the future of our democracy, but the future of democracy in the region.’

Machado said the fall of the Assad regime in Syria is a cautionary tale for those in the military and judiciary who still support Maduro. The regime has sent secret police units to encircle her family members’ homes, sent a drone over her mother’s house and kidnapped President-elect Gonzalez’s brother-in-law on Tuesday.

‘Maduro has lost everything but fear and repression. Maduro lost all popular support, all legitimacy, and even he’s weakened or isolated internationally. What has he left? Russia, Iran, Hezbollah,’ Machado, a former member of Venezuela’s National Assembly, asked.

The Maduro regime also arrested two Americans one day after Gonzalez met with President Biden at the White House, accusing them of being mercenaries sent by the U.S. government. 

The State Department issued the following statement: ‘We are concerned about the reports of U.S. citizens detained in Venezuela. We are working to gather more information.  Due to privacy and other considerations, we have no further comment on these cases. Any claims of U.S. involvement in a plot to overthrow Maduro are categorically false. The United States continues to support a democratic solution to the political crisis in Venezuela.’

The State Department spokesman went on to warn U.S. citizens not to travel to Venezuela, because ‘Maduro and his associates have shown in the past, they may detain and jail, without justification or due process, U.S. citizens who enter Venezuela.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A group of more than 60 former Democratic and Republican attorneys general sent a new letter to Senate leaders Thursday urging the confirmation of Pam Bondi to head up the Department of Justice, praising what they described as Bondi’s wealth of prosecutorial experience— including during her eight years as Florida’s top prosecutor—that they said makes her especially qualified for the role. 

The letter was previewed exclusively to Fox News Digital and includes the signatures of more than 20 Democratic attorneys general or attorneys general appointed by Democratic governors. 

The group praised Bondi’s work across the party and state lines during her time as Florida’s attorney general and as a state prosecutor in Hillsborough County, where she worked for 18 years. 

‘Many of us have worked directly with Attorney General Bondi and have firsthand knowledge of her fitness for the office,’ the former attorneys general said in the letter. ‘We believe that her wealth of prosecutorial experience and commitment to public service make General Bondi a highly qualified nominee for Attorney General of the United States.’ 

The letter praised what signatories described as Bondi’s ‘unwavering’ commitment to public safety and the rule of law in her time in the Sunshine State, where she sought to crack down on violent crime, protect consumers and combat the opioid crisis— which was at its height when she was elected as attorney general in 2010.

Bondi ‘was and remains a valued and respected member of the State Attorney General community,’ they wrote. ‘Thus, we are confident that she will serve with distinction as United States Attorney General.’

The letter comes just hours after the Senate Judiciary Committee announced the official dates for Bondi’s confirmation hearing later this month.

Bondi is expected to be confirmed in the Republican-majority chamber. Earlier this week, a group of more than 100 former Justice Department officials sent a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee urging her confirmation.

Still, the new letter of support from the state attorneys general comes just hours after the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., issued a statement Wednesday evening expressing fresh reservations about Bondi following their meeting — citing in particular Bondi’s work defending President-elect Donald Trump in his impeachment proceedings and following the 2020 election.

‘The role of the Attorney General is to oversee an independent Justice Department that upholds the rule of law and is free of undue political influence,’ Durbin said in a statement. 

‘Given Ms. Bondi’s responses to my questions, I remain concerned about her ability to serve as an Attorney General who will put her oath to the Constitution ahead of her fealty to Donald Trump.’ 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

As immensely destructive wildfires continue raging through the greater Los Angeles area, the NFL has already put together an alternate plan in the event Monday night’s game between the NFC West champion Rams and Minnesota Vikings at SoFi Stadium, which is in neighboring Inglewood, cannot be safely played.

‘The NFL’s priority is the safety of the Los Angeles community. We are grateful for the tireless efforts of the first responders. Our hearts are with Los Angeles and everyone affected by the fires,’ read a statement distributed by the league Wednesday evening.

‘We continue to prepare to play the Vikings-Rams game as scheduled Monday night at SoFi Stadium. As with all games, there are contingency plans in the event a change in location is needed. In this instance, the game would be played on Monday night at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, AZ, if necessary.

‘We will continue to closely monitor developments in the area and will remain in contact with public officials, both clubs and the NFLPA.’

Rams players have offered support on social media, Cooper Kupp posting Wednesday on X: ‘Our thoughts and prayers are with everyone affected by the fires. Thank you to the firefighters, first responders, and everyone else doing their best in unfathomable circumstances.’

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

If a change is necessary, it wouldn’t be the first time the NFL moved a Monday night game from Southern California due to wildfires. A contest between the San Diego Chargers and Miami Dolphins in 2003 had to be shifted to Tempe, Arizona, then home of the Cardinals. The displaced Chargers lost 26-10.

The Bolts, who left San Diego in 2017 to relocate to LA, could again experience a disruption ahead of their wild-card game Saturday afternoon in Houston against the AFC South champion Texans. The Chargers altered their practice schedule Wednesday due to air quality issues.

***

Follow USA TODAY Sports’ Nate Davis on X, formerly Twitter, @ByNateDavis.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The ‘NBA of volleyball’ League One Volleyball (LOVB) is here.

Veronica Jones-Perry of Salt Lake was named the player of the match with 23 kills, six digs and one block.

‘It’s really cool seeing a lot of familiar faces across the net,’ Jones-Perry said after the match. ‘Really proud of my team. It was a fun environment to play in. Our team showed a lot of really great fight tonight. That’s something that we want to be about. I think we made that statement.’

LOVB (pronounced ‘love’) is made up of six teams that feature 10 of the 13 Team USA Olympians that won a silver medal at the Paris Games in 2024. Three-time Olympic medalist Kelsey Cook (2016, 2020, 2024) was the first athlete to commit to LOVB, joining LOVB Atlanta. Two-time Olympians Haleigh Washington and Jordyn Poulter (2020, 2024) is on LOVB Salt Lake.

‘Five years ago we had this dream that these Olympians who go and win medals at the Olympics shouldn’t come home and not have the NBA of volleyball to play in,’ co-founder Katlyn Gao said Wednesday. ‘This is the result of five years of building. We are creating a legacy league that is here to stay. … To see this community come together, from youth to pro, is absolutely incredible.’

Salt Lake took advantage of Atlanta’s six service errors in the opening set to take set one, 25-22. Atlanta had a 12-9 lead in the second set, but Salt Lake erased it with a 4-0 run to tie it up at 12-12. Atlanta had two set points, but dropped the second set to Salt Lake, 27-25. Cook opened the third set with an exclamation point with a kill, spurring a 5-1 run by Atlanta. Salt Lake wouldn’t stay down for long and erased its deficit yet again, but Atlanta didn’t let the third set slip away and won 25-21 to force a fourth set.

Although Atlanta had its moments, Salt Lake closed the fourth set on a 9-5 run to win 25-21 to claim LOVB’s first win.

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

A former FBI informant who prosecutors say fabricated a phony story of President Biden and his son Hunter Biden accepting $10 million in bribes from the Ukrainian gas company Burisma was sentenced Wednesday to six years in federal prison. 

Alexander Smirnov, a dual U.S.-Israeli citizen, has been behind bars since he was arrested last February on charges of making false statements to the FBI. 

The indictment came in connection with special counsel David Weiss’ investigation into Hunter Biden. Weiss later indicted Hunter on tax and gun-related charges, but President Biden granted him a sweeping pardon in December before his son was to be sentenced. 

The Justice Department tacked on additional tax charges against Smirnov in November, alleging he concealed millions of dollars of income he earned between 2020 and 2022, and Smirnov pleaded guilty in December to sidestep his looming trial.  

Smirnov was accused of falsely telling his FBI handler that executives from the Ukrainian energy company Burisma had paid then-Vice President Biden and his son $5 million each around 2015. Smirnov’s explosive claim in 2020 came after he expressed ‘bias’ about Joe Biden as a presidential candidate, according to prosecutors. The indictment says investigators found Smirnov had only routine business dealings with Burisma starting in 2017 — after Biden’s term as vice president.

Prosecutors noted that Smirnov’s claim ‘set off a firestorm in Congress’ when it resurfaced years later as part of the House impeachment inquiry into President Biden. The Biden administration dismissed the House impeachment effort as a ‘stunt.’

Before Smirnov’s arrest, Republicans had demanded the FBI release the unredacted form documenting the unverified allegations, though they acknowledged they couldn’t confirm if they were true.

‘In committing his crimes he betrayed the United States, a country that showed him nothing but generosity, including conferring on him the greatest honor it can bestow, citizenship,’ Weiss’ team wrote in court papers. ‘He repaid the trust the United States placed in him to be a law-abiding naturalized citizen and, more specifically, that one of its premier law enforcement agencies placed in him to tell the truth as a confidential human source, by attempting to interfere in a Presidential election.’

Prosecutors agreed to pursue no more than six years against Smirnov as part of his plea deal. In court papers, the Justice Department described Smirnov as a ‘liar and a tax cheat’ who ‘betrayed the United States,’ adding that his bogus corruption claims against the Biden family were ‘among the most serious kinds of election interference one can imagine.’ 

In seeking a lighter sentence, Smirnov’s lawyers wrote that both Hunter Biden and President-elect Trump, who was charged in two since-dropped federal cases by Special Counsel Jack Smith, ‘have walked free and clear of any meaningful punishment.’

His lawyers had asked for a four-year prison term, arguing that their client ‘has learned a very grave lesson,’ had no prior criminal record and was suffering from severe glaucoma in both eyes. Smirnov’s sentencing Wednesday in Los Angeles federal court concluded the final aspects of Weiss’s probe, and the special counsel is expected to submit a report to Attorney General Merrick Garland in accordance with federal regulations. Garland can decide whether to release it to the public. 

Smirnov will get credit for the time he has served behind bars since February. 

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Canada’s conservative movement could gain significant momentum in this election year as Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced his resignation amid mounting pressure from domestic critics and tariff threats from U.S. President-elect Donald Trump. 

Meanwhile, American conservative strategist Matt Shupe has been leading efforts in Calgary, training activists, consultants and volunteers on how to build winning campaigns, positioning the movement for potential gains in the post-Trudeau era.

‘From my own experience in Canada, I would describe it as California on steroids,’ Shupe, 39, who most recently was the spokesperson for ex-MLB star Steve Garvey’s Senate campaign in California, told Fox News Digital in an interview.

Shupe, who began political consulting 10 years ago and founded Praetorian Services, said Trudeau’s resignation is reminiscent of President Biden’s exit from the 2024 presidential race. 

‘They took a page out of the DNC playbook with what they did with Biden,’ Shupe said of Canada’s liberal flank. ‘If American politics serves as any sort of analog, that didn’t work for Kamala.’

Shupe noted that his conversations with Canadians suggest progressive policies have pushed even many liberals toward the center. Working with the Leadership Institute, a conservative mentorship and training organization, Shupe said leaders plan to apply lessons and data from U.S. elections to strengthen the prospects of Canadian conservatives.

‘The [conservative] movement has primarily attracted young people because they don’t have the prospects,’ he said. ‘They’re taxed so heavily there, the cost of living is so high compared to their income, and the cost of owning a home is so hard. Whenever I go there and talk to people my age or younger, even a little older, they all have the same complaints as people I talk to in San Francisco.’

Meanwhile, Canada’s firebrand conservative candidate Pierre Poilievre, who could become the nation’s next leader, has been compared to the likes of President-Elect Donald Trump, vowing to crack down on immigration, inflation and the budget deficit.

‘I think you’re seeing that with the left in Canada and in the United States, is that they just took everything too far, and they hit a threshold with people that it’s just gone too far,’ he said.

Poilievre, whose Conservative Party has nearly three times the support of committed voters (47% compared to 18% for the Liberals) in this year’s general election, was first elected to the House of Commons in 2004. The 45-year-old Calgary native became leader of the Canadian Conservatives in 2022 and has seen his party grow in popularity as Canadians have grown tired of 53-year-old Trudeau, whose Liberals formed the government in 2015.

The incoming Trump administration will likely soon deal with a Poilievre government as the Conservatives are poised to win the next Canadian election, which could come as early as this spring. When the House of Commons resumes sitting on March 24, the opposition parties are likely to defeat the minority Liberal government in a vote of no-confidence, which would trigger a national vote that presently favors the Conservatives.

In his Peterson interview, Poilievre acknowledged that Trump, who has proposed a 25% tariff against Canadian imports, ‘negotiates very aggressively, and he likes to win.’ But as prime minister, the Conservative leader said he would seek ‘a great deal that will make both countries safer, richer and stronger.’

Trudeau, after nearly a decade in power, has faced months of declining approval ratings amid growing frustration over rising inflation and the soaring cost of living.

I intend to resign as party leader, as prime minister, after the party selects its next leader through a robust nationwide competitive process,’ Trudeau told reporters Monday. ‘Last night, I asked the president of the Liberal Party to begin that process. This country deserves a real choice in the next election, and it is become clear to me that if I’m having to fight internal battles, I cannot be the best option in that election.’

‘As you all know, I am a fighter, and I’m not someone who backs away from a fight. Particularly when the fight is as important as this one is. But I have always been driven by my love for Canada, by my desire to serve Canadians and by what is in the best interests of Canadians, and Canadians deserve a real choice in the next election,’ Trudeau added. ‘And it has become obvious to me with the internal battles that I cannot be the one to carry the liberal standard into the next election.’

Fox News Digital’s Christopher Guly contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The Biden administration on Thursday announced an additional $500 million of military aid to Ukraine in a security package rushed out the door before President-elect Trump takes office.

Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin met with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy for the final time at Ramstein Air Base in Germany, where he made the announcement. Both officials used the occasion to urge the incoming Trump administration to continue to support Kyiv’s fight against Russia.

‘If Putin swallows Ukraine, his appetite will only grow,’ Austin warned at the 25th meeting of about 50 member nations who have joined forces to support Ukraine with an estimated $122 billion in weapons and support.

‘If autocrats conclude that democracies will lose their nerve, surrender their interests, and forget their principles, we will only see more land grabs. If tyrants learn that aggression pays, we will only invite even more aggression, chaos, and war.’

The latest U.S. security assistance to Ukraine includes missiles for fighter jets, support equipment for F-16s, armored bridging systems, small arms and ammunition and other spare parts and communications equipment.

The weapons package is funded by the presidential drawdown authority (PDA), meaning the weapons will come from U.S. stockpiles, expediting their delivery to Ukraine. 

Officials noted this is the Biden administration’s seventy-fourth tranche of equipment to be provided from Defense Department inventories for Ukraine since August 2021. 

This latest package leaves about $3.85 billion in funding to provide future arms shipments to Ukraine; if the Biden administration makes no further announcements, that balance will be available to Trump to send if he chooses.

Zelensky pleaded for the next administration to continue U.S. support for his country’s defensive war against Russian invaders. 

‘We’ve come such a long way that it would honestly be crazy to drop the ball now and not keep building on the defense coalitions we’ve created,’ Zelenskyy said. ‘No matter what’s going on in the world, everyone wants to feel sure that their country will not just be erased of the map.’

Member nations of the coalition supporting Kyiv, including the U.S., have ramped up weapons production since the Ukraine war exposed that stockpiles were inadequate for a major conventional land war.

The U.S. has provided about $66 billion of the total aid since February 2022 and has been able to deliver most of that total — between 80% and 90% — already to Ukraine.

‘Retreat will only provide incentives for more imperial aggression,’ Austin said Thursday. ‘And if we flinch, you can count on Putin to push further and punch harder. Ukraine’s survival is on the line. But so is the security of Europe, the United States, and the world.’

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

When Jimmy Carter began attending the First Baptist Church in Washington after becoming president, I thought it a unique opportunity to better understand his faith. He taught a Sunday School class as he had done for years in his native Plains, Georgia, and I joined it. 
 
Carter was an excellent teacher. He knew the Scriptures well and on one occasion he asked me to teach the class, which was an experience I shall never forget. 
 
After the service, we went downstairs for coffee. There was a basket on the table for people to pay 25 cents for the beverage. Carter reached in his pocket and found no money. He asked wife Rosalynn if she had brought any change. She had not. I said, ‘How far have we declined when the president of the United States can’t pay for coffee?’ I gave him a quarter and he laughed. 

 
Years later, after he had left the presidency, we met at a function and I reminded him of that time in the church basement. He reached in his pocket and this time had a quarter which he handed to me and said, ‘we’re even.’ I kept that quarter on my desk for years, unable to prove he gave it to me, but we both knew. 

When Carter announced during the 1976 presidential campaign that he was a born-again Christian, most of the media were flummoxed. John Chancellor of NBC News announced that he had looked up the term and ‘it is nothing new.’ If he had read the Bible that Carter read, he would have known this. Carter’s announcement and faithful church attendance attracted many newly energized evangelical voters which helped him defeat Gerald Ford in the November election. 

 
By 1980 most of those voters had abandoned him in favor of Ronald Reagan, not because they necessarily doubted Carter’s declaration of his faith, but because they disagreed with his application of it. Carter had made Sarah Weddington part of his administration. Weddington was the attorney who argued the Roe vs. Wade case before the Supreme Court, resulting in the overturning of all state election laws restricting the procedure. Carter also hosted a ‘White House Conference on Families,’ which included same-sex couples, anathema to most conservative Christians. 
 
No one should question the sincerity of another person’s faith, but its application is fair game for analysis. Mark Tooley of the Institute for Religion and Democracy says Carter’s faith was more in line with liberal Protestantism: ‘Although he professed admiration for Christian realist Reinhold Niebuhr, Carter’s accommodation of foreign adversaries, pseudo-pacifism, undermining of allies, and endless faith in personal diplomacy all more resembled the religious left’s utopian aspirations. It’s appropriate that Carter’s controversial UN Ambassador, Andrew Young, whom he removed for prematurely meeting PLO chief Yasir Arafat, later served as president of the National Council of Churches,’ a theologically and politically liberal organization. 

In 1979, at the National Prayer Breakfast in Washington, Roman Catholic Bishop Fulton J. Sheen began his remarks this way: ‘Fellow sinners.’ Turning to Carter, he added, ‘and that includes you, Mr. President.’ Carter laughed along with the audience. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Gov. Gavin Newsom is firing back at President-elect Donald Trump for comments he made Wednesday about the response to deadly wildfires currently devastating Southern California.

Trump spoke with reporters after attending meetings Wednesday on Capitol Hill and accused Newsom of not ‘[doing] a good job,’ but noted they ‘worked well together’ and would again when he takes office later this month.

‘It’s very sad because I’ve been trying to get Gavin Newsom to allow water to come – you’d have tremendous water up there, they send it out from the Pacific – because they’re trying to protect a tiny little fish,’ Trump said. ‘For the sake of a smelt, they have no water… It’s a mistake of the governor, and you could say, the administration.’

Newsom’s press office released a statement on social media following Trump’s remarks saying there was a reason for not using the pumps. 

‘LADWP said that because of the high water demand, pump stations at lower elevations did not have enough pressure refill tanks at higher elevations, and the ongoing fire hampered the ability of crews to access the pumps,’ Newsom’s press office wrote on X. 

His office added that the city used water tenders to supply water, which is a common tactic in wildland firefighting. 

Newsom’s office also dismissed claims there is a water shortage.

‘Broadly speaking, there is no water shortage in Southern California right now, despite Trump’s claims that he would open some imaginary spigot,’ Newsom’s office said.

The office posted a number of quotes from California officials saying water reliability and water supply are stable.

One of the comments said there was enough water to supply 40 million people for a year.

Earlier in the afternoon, Trump accused Newsom of refusing to sign a water restoration declaration and criticized him for the low fire containment.

‘Let this serve, and be emblematic, of the gross incompetence and mismanagement of the Biden/Newscum Duo. January 20th cannot come fast enough!’ Trump wrote on Truth Social. 

Newsom’s office said there was no such thing as a water restoration declaration.

They also noted that the supply and transport of water are unrelated.

‘Trump is conflating two entirely unrelated things: the conveyance of water to Southern California and supply from local storage,’ according to the post. ‘And again, there is no such document as the water restoration declaration – this is pure fiction.’

Still, Trump was not done with his criticism of Newsom. 

In a scathing late-night post on Truth Social, Trump said the wildfires were ‘all his fault!!!’

Trump also called on Newsom to resign.

‘One of the best and most beautiful parts of the United States of America is burning down to the ground,’ Trump wrote. ‘It’s ashes, and Gavin Newscum should resign. This is all his fault!!!’

In an interview with CNN’s Anderson Cooper earlier on Wednesday, Newsom was asked in general about Trump blaming him for the wildfire disaster.

‘One can’t even respond to it. I mean… you know, people are literally fleeing. People have lost their lives. Kids lost their schools. Families completely torn apart. Churches burned down,’ Newsom told Cooper. ‘This guy wanted to politicize it. I have a lot of thoughts, and I know what I want to say – I won‘t.’

Newsom went on to praise President Biden, saying he ‘didn‘t play politics.’ 

Biden visited a fire station Wednesday in Los Angeles alongside Newsom for a briefing from authorities on the raging wildfires.

The California wildfires, which ignited Tuesday afternoon, have already forced more than 100,000 people to flee their homes. The Los Angeles area fires are threatening at least 28,000 structures. At least five people were killed.

Newsom declared a state of emergency Tuesday after the Palisades fire grew to an unmanageable level.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

DALLAS — The best player remaining in the College Football Playoff is a 6-foot-3 man-child made of steel biceps and spring-loaded legs who can’t really be guarded by his fellow student-athletes. 

And my hope for 19-year-old freshman Ohio State receiver Jeremiah Smith is that the next two weeks are the last he’ll ever see of college football. 

It has been more than two decades since another Buckeyes star, Maurice Clarett, tried — and ultimately failed — to legally challenge the NFL’s eligibility rules that require football players to wait three years after high school before entering the draft. 

It’s time for someone to try again. And nobody has come along with a better case than Smith. 

“I mean, the guy’s NFL-ready,’ Oregon coach Dan Lanning said on New Year’s Day after Smith torched his team for 187 yards on seven receptions in the Rose Bowl. ‘He’s that talented.’ 

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

In a sport where evaluating players can be brutally tough, assessing Smith is comically easy. No nuance is required to see how intelligently he runs routes, how proficiently he catches the ball and how naturally he separates from defenders. Few, if any, receivers have ever come into college football as advanced as Smith.

NFL scouts and analysts generally agree that if he were eligible for this year’s NFL draft, he would be in play — if not the outright favorite — to be picked at No. 1. Friday’s CFP semifinal against Texas here at the Cotton Bowl is likely to be another tour de force by the nation’s most gifted freshman, showcasing why he already has all the skills necessary to be a bona-fide star in the NFL. 

But as things stand, Smith won’t be in the draft until 2027. 

That’s great for college football. It’s like winning the lottery for Ohio State and head coach Ryan Day. And it’s not even that bad for Smith, who is going to bank millions of dollars in name, image and likeness deals before he ever plays a down in the NFL. 

That last part is the major separator between Smith and Clarett, who said last year at a University of New Hampshire symposium that the issues leading to his dismissal from Ohio State in 2003 began with a desperate need for $2,000 to fix the transmission on his car. 

Those hard-won, long-overdue economic rights for college athletes mean that the most likely and easiest path for Smith is to play the next two years at Ohio State, win a Heisman Trophy and become a rich young man before he even walks across the stage to shake Roger Goodell’s hand. 

That’s the power of status quo: It benefits college football because stars have to stay three years; it benefits the NFL because they have a free minor-league system and it benefits current NFL players because they have a smaller pool of new players trying to take their jobs. With NIL money flowing, it isn’t even so bad these days for someone like Smith. There are a lot worse fates than having to spend two more years as the most popular and recognizable athlete on one of the best college campuses in America. 

But every now and then, it’s good to challenge the status quo.  

“Look, cases that we thought were settled precedent like Roe v. Wade — sorry to get on platform — but suddenly it is overruled. OK?” Shira Scheindlin, the former Southern District of New York judge who initially ruled in Clarett’s favor before it was overturned by the circuit court, said at the UNH symposium looking back on the 20-year anniversary of the case. “That didn’t make me happy, but they do it. So things change.”

Even at the time, there was wide disagreement about whether the NFL’s draft-eligibility rules violated antitrust laws.

Without getting too deep into the legal weeds, the NFL essentially argued that the rule was not subject to antitrust scrutiny under a non-statutory labor exemption.

Alan Milstein, the lead attorney for Clarett, argued there was no evidence that the rule was collectively bargained and that it actually pre-dated the first collective bargaining agreement with the NFL Players Association. It was simply part of the way the league had done business and that it was an illegal barrier to entering the NFL’s labor market. (The NFL did not agree with that characterization, for the record.)

In the end, Scheindlin ruled in Clarett’s favor, writing that the three-year rule ‘must be sacked.” 

The NFL took the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, where current Supreme Court judge Sonia Sotomayor authored the opinion that reversed Scheindlin’s ruling and kept the NFL rule in place. Clarett appealed to the Supreme Court, which declined to take the case in 2005, and there have been no serious challenges since. A spokesman for the NFLPA declined comment to USA TODAY Sports on whether it would support a player challenging the rule once again.

“I think there are grounds for reasonable people to differ on these issues, without a doubt,” Scheindlin said during the symposium.

But the thin lines on which Clarett’s case was decided 20 years ago underscore how fragile the NFL’s hold really has been on forcing players to go to college for three years. What if Milstein had filed the case in a different circuit that wasn’t in the NFL’s backyard? Would a Supreme Court with today’s makeup of six conservative justices have taken the case?

These are legitimate questions for which there are no clear answers, but the speculation is interesting. And the NFL obviously took it seriously: When it came time for a new CBA in 2006, this issue was part of the negotiations, and the three-year rule was written specifically into the agreement. 

Some sports law and antitrust experts, however, believe that these kinds of age-eligibility requirements could be challenged on different grounds — that those who are harmed most (like a Smith or Clarett) are outside the scope of collective bargaining. 

“To me, was a very important part of the argument (being a stranger to the bargaining unit entirely),’ Scheindlin said. “If they were to think about it today, the conservative group (on the Supreme Court) would be less concerned about the union’s feelings because those people are already players, are retired players, but they already had their shot at the NFL.”

The legal arguments are going to be far more complex than most of us non-lawyers can understand. But we all fundamentally can form an opinion on this: Does the three-year rule make sense?

In the NIL era especially, I’m not sure anymore. 

Two decades ago, there was a legitimate fear that athletes who weren’t physically or mentally ready for the NFL would rush to leave college as soon as possible, and you’d end up with a generation of washouts who didn’t get the big NFL payday and messed up their education/college development.

Now, valuable college players might be able to make as much or nearly as much money by staying an extra year as they would getting drafted in the middle of the third round. It’s just a completely different economic calculation. The idea that a college sophomore, or even perhaps an exceptional freshman, can’t physically compete in the NFL no longer should matter. Let the market decide. 

“The only reason anybody drafts somebody in the first round is because they’re ready to be drafted,” Milstein said at the symposium. “And the only reason they play is because they’re ready to play.”

Smith is, by all accounts, the rare college freshman ready to play in the NFL right now. And he should have that opportunity if he wants it. 

This post appeared first on USA TODAY