Archive

2025

Browsing

The NFL’s 2024 postseason field has been winnowed by nearly half following the conclusion of a highly unsatisfying wild-card round – five of the six contests decided by at least a 12-point margin.

Hopefully the quality of the games improves in the divisional round, which often unfolds as the most entertaining cluster of matchups on the NFL calendar. At minimum, it will feature what are theoretically the league’s two best teams, the Chiefs and Lions both returning to action following their hard-earned bye weeks. Sunday evening will showcase Lamar Jackson and Josh Allen, arguably the league’s two best players and the presumptive MVP finalists, in the weekend’s capstone pièce de résistance.

We’ve ranked the eight teams that still have a chance to play on Super Sunday, from worst to best, in terms of their championship viability, aka playoff power rankings (previous rank in parentheses):

8. Houston Texans (12)

A team that so frequently played to its level of competition this season – and sometimes decidedly failed to manage that – more than met the moment Saturday against the turnover-prone Los Angeles Chargers. But now the Texans not only have to overcome the rested, top-seeded Chiefs at Arrowhead, they have to overcome their own underwhelming playoff history. Houston is 0-5 all time in the divisional round (the losses by an average of 16.4 points) and 0-5 on the road in postseason.

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

7. Washington Commanders (11)

We noted last week that no rookie quarterback has ever taken his team to the Super Bowl, and Bo Nix’s Denver Broncos are already making tee times and resort reservations. But Jayden Daniels continues to perform beyond his years, the presumed Offensive Rookie of the Year coolly leading Washington to its first postseason win in nearly two decades. Yet it’s still worth wondering if he has enough help on either side of the ball to keep pace with the hungry Lions in their den, where they’ve scored 40+ points four times and exceeded 30 two other times at Ford Field this season.

6. Los Angeles Rams (7)

The offense was efficient in Monday night’s victory over the 14-win Minnesota Vikings. But a youthful defense was truly exceptional (9 sacks, 2 takeaways – one returned for a TD). It will have to show up again in Lincoln Financial Field’s far more hostile and frosty environs for the Rams to advance past the Eagles. It’s also worth wondering how long a team that’s been at least fueled in part by playing for its wildfire-ravaged city and been the recipient of the goodwill of the division-rival Arizona Cardinals can maintain its focus and motivation given the ongoing distractions in the everyday lives of the players, coaches and staff.

5. Buffalo Bills (5)

The Ravens are a serious obstacle in their path to Super Bowl 59. The Bills are 9-0 at Highmark Stadium, but they’ve also been getting off to slow starts for the past month – averaging fewer than 10 first-half points in their past four games. No matter how good Allen is and has been, that could be lethal against a Baltimore squad that’s been scoring just about at will over that same stretch.

All NFL news on and off the field. Sign up for USA TODAY’s 4th and Monday newsletter.

4. Baltimore Ravens (3)

The Bills are a serious obstacle in their path to Super Bowl 59, too. As noted previously, the Ravens have averaged 32.6 points in the five games since their Week 14 bye, though the 28 Baltimore posted in Saturday’s wild-card win against Pittsburgh was the fewest during that period. Yet if the defense continues to allow just 11.4 points on a weekly basis, scoring 28 will be more than sufficient. Bad Buffalo weather could be an equalizer, QB Lamar Jackson engineering three points in his only other postseason appearance in Western New York four years ago, when freezing temperatures and gusty winds neutralized the Ravens offense.

3. Philadelphia Eagles (4)

Their wild-card win wasn’t exactly akin to a preseason affair. But the Philly offense looked rusty – the Eagles sat key starters in Week 18, and QB Jalen Hurts was playing for the first time since suffering a concussion three weeks previously – which wasn’t really that big a deal given all the mistakes the Green Bay Packers made and the body count claimed by a voracious injury bug. The Eagles defense was dialed in Sunday, and it seems likely Hurts and Co. will be, too, given the team-wide acknowledgement that they didn’t live up to their capabilities.

2. Detroit Lions (2)

Given how hard they always play – even when nothing is explicitly at stake, which was the case in their Week 17 game at San Francisco – the week off had to be a huge benefit for a team that needed to chill and whet its appetite for more kneecaps. The down time also apparently means RB David Montgomery (knee) will rejoin an offense already oversaturated with ability, options and schematic variance. One X-factor will be the ability of an undermanned defense to handle Daniels, one of the few multi-dimensional quarterbacks Detroit has faced this season … and remember what Allen did to the Lions in Buffalo’s 48-42 win at Detroit last month.

1. Kansas City Chiefs (1)

There’s suddenly a Golden Raye of hope here. On to the football. Andy Reid, Patrick Mahomes and Co. have basically had the luxury of working unfettered in the playoff laboratory since Christmas. The team’s core players are refreshed (older ones like TE Travis Kelce and DT Chris Jones needed to be) as the elimination phase of their unprecedented Super Bowl three-peat bid arrives. And, some due respect to the Texans – they’ve lost four straight to the Chiefs since last beating them in 2019 – but K.C. is 6-0 in the divisional round since Mahomes was promoted to QB1 in 2018. That aside, despite unfailingly being in playoff mode when required, Reid’s team also raises the intensity level multiple levels in January. Game on.

***

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

MLB free agency has been ongoing since the end of the World Series. However, with less than two months until the start of spring training, the biggest remaining free agent is someone who’s never played in MLB before.

Free agent pitcher Rōki Sasaki is the latest superstar arm to come out of Japan. Given the success of guys like Shohei Ohtani, Yoshinobu Yamamoto, and Shota Imanaga in recent years, it makes sense why so many teams would want to add Sasaki to their squads.

Sasaki opened his free agency window on Dec. 9, meaning he only has 45 days – until January 23 – to make a signing decision, or he would be forced to play another year with the Chiba Lotte Marines of Japan’s Pacific League. The decision is coming soon, so here’s what to know about MLB’s next big Japanese pitcher.

Roki Sasaki stats

Sasaki has played four seasons with Chiba Lotte in Japan. Here are his career stats:

Follow every MLB game: Latest MLB scores, stats, schedules and standings.

ERA: 2.02
W-L: 30-15
IP: 414.2
SO: 524
SO per 9: 11.4
SO/BB: 5.76
WHIP: 0.883
HR per 9: 0.3

Sasaki boasts incredible velocity, bringing arguably the hardest fastball Japan has ever seen. Sasaki has reached as high as 102.5 mph, albeit during a warmup game for the 2023 World Baseball Classic. For reference, the highest velocity Ohtani has reached in MLB is 101.4.

In Sasaki’s first start of the 2023 World Baseball Classic. Sasaki threw 10 fastballs. Not one was under 100 mph. His splitter can reach over 90 mph as well, which would make it one of the deadliest putaway pitches in Major League Baseball.

On April 10, 2022, Sasaki threw arguably the greatest game in NPB history, tossing a perfect game with 19 strikeouts.

Rōki Sasaki measurements

Per Baseball-Reference, the 23-year-old Sasaki is 6-foot-2, 187 pounds, giving him roughly the same measurements as 2024 All-Star Matt Strahm. For comparison, Strahm’s average velocity on his fastball sat at just 93.4 mph in 2024.

Latest Rōki Sasaki rumors

On Monday, it was announced that both the San Francisco Giants, Texas Rangers, Chicago Cubs and New York Yankees were out of the running for Sasaki. As expected, the race for Sasaki will likely come down to the Los Angeles Dodgers and San Diego Padres, with the Toronto Blue Jays being considered longshots after Sasaki visited the club last week.

Sasaki’s signing window remains from Wednesday, Jan. 15 to Thursday, Jan. 23.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Educators and reading enthusiasts throughout the country rejoiced when cameras caught the Eagles’ leading receiver reading a book while he was on the bench late in the second half Sunday. Even better, the clip of Brown thumbing through his well-read copy of “Inner Excellence: Train Your Mind for Extraordinary Performance and the Best Possible Life” remains a topic of conversation several days after the game.

Clips of Brown reading are still circulating on social media. Eagles coach Nick Sirianni talked about it Tuesday and anchors on Philadelphia’s local Fox station were reading as their show began Monday. ‘Inner Excellence’ is now No. 1 on Amazon’s list of best-selling books, with one person writing, “A.J. Brown recommended this book, so I’m looking forward to reading it. Fly Eagles Fly.”

At a time when kids are reading at some of the lowest levels ever, Brown making reading all the rage could be a game-changer.

“We’re in a reading crisis,” said Sasha Quinton, executive vice president and president of School Reading Events at Scholastic.

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

“We need help. Somebody like A.J. Brown reading is so powerful not only for the child, but for parents, too, to inspire them. It’s carrying a dual impact, which is tremendous.”

It shouldn’t be a surprise to anyone that all of America is reading less. We were already spending more time on screens — computers, tablets, cell phones — before the pandemic, and that exploded during COVID when school, work and free time were all taking place online. Kids now spend 1.5 more hours on screens a day than they did before the pandemic, Quinton said.

That, coupled with a shift in teaching that emphasizes standardized testing, has meant kids do very little reading for fun anymore. In Scholastic’s most recent Kids & Family Reading Report, the number of kids aged 6 to 17 who said they read five to seven days a week dropped from 37% in 2010 to 28% in 2022. According to the latest American Time Use Survey, released last summer by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, adolescents aged 15 to 19 read for fun for just eight minutes a day.

More concerning, 53% of kids 12 to 17 in the Scholastic report said they didn’t enjoy reading books for fun or enjoyed it only a little.

The academic ramifications of that are obvious.

Kids who read develop a better capacity to comprehend and write because the grammar and vocabulary used in books is more complex than what’s found on social media, said Catherine Snow, a professor at the Harvard Graduate School of Education. They also develop better cognitive skills because they’re not only absorbing what they’re reading, they’re incorporating it with what they already know.  

“That integration is something that doesn’t happen if what you’re reading is little bits of trivia,” Snow said.

But it also has an impact in everyday life. Quinton said there are adults who cannot understand the labels of their medications or comprehend their doctor’s instructions because they don’t have the reading comprehension. The same for contracts and directions.

“The big message is there are opportunities for learning from reading a book that are being forfeited if kids never read books,” Snow said.

“We’re not going to get kids to read books just by telling them to,” Snow added. “Having this little nudge that one piece of a route to success for an athlete is knowing how to read and reading well and enjoying reading is a great message.”

Particularly for younger kids, Quinton said.

Studies have shown that interest in reading for fun begins declining around age 9. At that age, parents are no longer reading to their kids and kids are getting more involved in extracurricular activities. Like sports. They’re also starting to figure out who they are and what interests them. Like sports.

If those kids see Brown reading, or hear him say he likes reading, it might encourage them to pick up a book, too.

“Reading improves our students’ performances in the classroom. It also gives our scholars exposure to different cultures, people and places,” Tony B. Watlington Sr., superintendent of the School District of Philadelphia, said in a statement to USA TODAY Sports.

“Seeing Eagles receiver A.J. Brown read lets our children know that they can perform at an exceptional level in sports and in the classroom,” Watlington added. “They don’t have to choose.”

In fact, reading makes Brown an even better player.

Brown is a big reader — two books a month, mostly non-fiction — and said he finds that re-reading passages that made an impression on him between drives helps him stay focused and centered. He’s had a book with him on the bench each week; the wild-card game was just the first time anyone spotted it.

“When they see somebody reading on the sidelines, and choosing to do it, and it’s joyful for them and they’re using it to better themselves, it really does carry significant weight because kids want to emulate their heroes,” Quinton said. “It’s powerful.”

Athletes are often role models because of what they do on the field. Brown is setting a terrific example by what he does off the field, too.

Follow USA TODAY Sports columnist Nancy Armour on social media @nrarmour.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

When Bill Belichick fled to the college ranks in December, this season’s NFL coaching carousel seemingly was left without a figure who would loom over the search process. At least that was the case until Monday night.

That’s when news broke that Colorado coach Deion Sanders had been in touch with Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones, who earlier in the day confirmed the team was parting ways with Mike McCarthy after five years. Sanders himself later confirmed the connection.

‘To hear from Jerry Jones is truly delightful, and it’s intriguing,’ Sanders told ESPN’s Adam Schefter on Monday night. ‘I love Jerry and believe in Jerry. After you hang up and process it, and think about it, it’s intriguing. But I love Boulder and everything there is about our team, the coaches, our student body and the community.’

Even with no formal interview set, perhaps the biggest brands in football coaching and American team sports have now been linked to one another.

Sanders, 57, engineered rapid turnarounds both at Jackson State and Colorado. In his second season leading the Buffaloes, he posted a 9-4 mark while helping Travis Hunter win the Heisman Trophy. Between his impressive track record in the college ranks and Hall of Fame work as a cornerback for the Cowboys – including playing a key role in helping the franchise win its last Super Bowl title during the 1995 season – it’s easy to understand how the interest on Dallas’ part first materialized.

All things Cowboys: Latest Dallas Cowboys news, schedule, roster, stats, injury updates and more.

But as Sanders well knows, not all coaching jobs are comparable to one another – least of all the ones that involve working for Jones, the owner, general manager and decision-maker standing over all matters related to ‘America’s Team.’ And even with the two sides expected to continue discussions, several roadblocks or even potential deal-breakers could be ahead.

Here are seven reasons that Sanders’ candidacy with the Cowboys might eventually fizzle out – with the caveat that both sides could prove this piece wrong in the coming weeks:

1. There’s no easy path for the Cowboys to land Shedeur Sanders

Though Deion Sanders has long signaled he’s more than content to remain in Boulder, he did recently acknowledge intrigue in one potential setup at the pro level.

‘The only way I would consider (an NFL job) is to coach my sons,’ Sanders said last week on ‘GMA3: What You Need to Know.’

Sanders emphasized that would mean both football-playing sons: Shedeur, the quarterback who claimed the Johnny Unitas Golden Arm Award, and Shilo, a safety.

Jones certainly has been an advocate for folding family into one’s career – just watch his star turn during his ‘Landman’ cameo for confirmation. And finding a way to secure Shilo shouldn’t be too much of a problem for any franchise interested in the Sanders family. But getting a shot at the former might be a dead end for Dallas.

Put aside the Dak Prescott matter for one minute – we’ll come back to it. The Cowboys are currently set to pick 12th in the first round of April’s NFL draft. Shedeur Sanders, meanwhile, is widely projected to be a top-three selection in a class short on surefire Day 1 signal-callers. To move up to either of the first two spots currently owned by the Tennessee Titans and Cleveland Browns, respectively, the Cowboys might have to give up something resembling what the Chicago Bears ceded two years ago. The package to get to No. 1 featured wide receiver DJ Moore, the No. 9 overall pick, an additional first-rounder (which would become the top pick in 2024) and two second-rounders.

That would be quite the ask in any interview, especially given that Jones couldn’t negotiate with other teams from a position of strength in any scenario in which he tried to move up. But that’s all likely a pipe dream, anyway, in part because of point No. 2.

2. Trading Dak Prescott is a non-starter

Jones is just over four months removed from making Prescott the highest-paid player in league history with a four-year, $240 million extension. Even after a trying 7-10 campaign in which Prescott suffered a season-ending hamstring injury, moving on from the 2023 MVP runner-up and one of his personal favorites in order to embark on a costly pursuit of an unknown – albeit a talented one – would constitute a remarkable about-face for Jones.

It’s also entirely unviable.

Moving Prescott before June 1 would incur a dead cap hit of $103.2 million, according to Over The Cap, a figure that would be more 20% higher than the Denver Broncos’ record $85 million blow for releasing Russell Wilson.

There’s also the little matter of Prescott having a no-trade clause. That essentially means no dice in Dallas for a potential Shedeur and Deion pairing.

3. The personnel problem

Running into a wall in any potential push for Shedeur would be just one of the first of what likely would be many player-acquisition frustrations for Deion.

At Colorado, Sanders was able to rapidly reshape the team’s roster to his own liking through use of the transfer portal. In Dallas, he’d largely be saddled with holdovers from the McCarthy era, with Jones resisting all calls to give up his GM powers and annually refusing a wider reset. And with the Cowboys currently projected to be just above the cap threshold, according to Over The Cap, it’s a good bet that Jones will once again turn out his pockets in explaining why the team will yet again sit on the sidelines throughout most of the free agency action.

4. The financial elements might not add up for Jones

Securing Sanders would require Jones to pay an $8 million buyout to Colorado. The cost-conscious owner let his last two coaches’ contracts expire, so this additional fee might be hard for him to tolerate.

And any negotiation with Jones could prove difficult given how he has balked at dead money for coaches, including when speaking with USA TODAY Sports’ Jarrett Bell last summer about McCarthy’s lack of an extension last summer.

5. The experience factor

Maybe Jones is ready to take a leap of faith after his experience with McCarthy. But three of his last four hires have had NFL head-coaching experience, and the win-now mandate remains.

Like any college coach without previous experience leading a professional team, Sanders should be expected to have a learning curve if he makes the jump. Would Jones be able to tolerate that given the makeup of his veteran-laden team?

6. Assembling the right coaching staff could be tricky

Unlike Jim Harbaugh, Sanders can’t rely on past pro coaching connections and a robust existing staff to quickly assemble a group of pro-ready assistants. His most experienced aide for a potential transition would be offensive coordinator Pat Shurmur, whose units ranked in the bottom third of the league in scoring during three of his last four pro years as head coach of the New York Giants and offensive coordinator of the Denver Broncos. Is he equipped to ignite an attack that lost its spark and needs to establish something beyond the connection between Prescott and CeeDee Lamb? While Sanders might be able to lock in some of McCarthy’s assistants to help make a transition easier for everyone, the CEO-style head coach might find it hard to surround himself with the proper coaching support, at least in Year 1.

7. The talks might be mutually beneficial even if they lead nowhere

To be fair, there’s ample reason for both parties to explore this opportunity. But the upside for Sanders and Jones doesn’t hinge entirely on a partnership coming to fruition.

Sanders, who in November said he has his ‘kickstand down’ in Boulder, is seemingly due for a contract extension after outpacing expectations just two years into his five-year, $29.5 million deal. Talking over career options with the 82-year-old owner, who is free to spend as much of his estimated net worth of $16.6 billion on coaches as he likes, can’t hurt his cause.

Jones, meanwhile, has seized the spotlight in the middle of the NFL playoffs, with the Cowboys now set to dominate the sports discourse for the coming days.

Recall what he told ESPN’s Kalyn Kahler about her story on the Cowboys’ abundant fan tours.

‘The fact that you and I are talking about an issue that seems, to you, controversial, is very much a part of the plan that will create interest,’ Jones said, according to Kahler. ‘You will create a ton of interest.’

For the moment, at least, Jones and Sanders have done exactly that.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Winning an Olympic medal is a pinnacle moment for most athletes, but the well-earned piece of hardware has turned sour for some of the 2024 Paris Olympics competitors — but, they’ll be getting new ones, if they wish.

Monnaie de Paris, which produced the medals for the 2024 Summer Olympics and Paralympics, said it will ‘replace all damaged medals at the athletes’ request’ after multiple complaints about the medals deteriorating and tarnishing.

Shortly after U.S. skateboarder Nyjah Huston won a bronze medal in July, he revealed the award was already showing some wear and tear, adding the front of it was chipped and that it lost its shine. British diver Yasmin Harper also said the bronze medal she won in the women’s 3-meter synchronized springboard diving event had ‘small bits of tarnishing.’

Evidently, Huston and Harper weren’t the only ones that had complaints. French website La Lettre said more than 100 medals from the Games were returned due to the decline in quality. Now, months after the Olympics ended, a process to replace the medals will begin.

“The Monnaie de Paris has taken the issue of damaged medals very seriously since the first exchange requests in August, and has mobilized its internal teams,” it said in a statement to The Associated Press. ‘Since then, the company has modified and optimized its relative varnishing process. The Monnaie de Paris will replace all damaged medals at the athletes’ request during the first quarter of 2025.’

The International Olympic Committee also told the outlet that Paris organizers are in contact with the committees with athletes that have filed complaints, and the replacement process will start in the coming weeks.

USA TODAY Sports has reached out to Monnaie de Paris and the IOC for comment.

The medals were designed by Chaumet, a luxury French jeweler. Each weighing 18 grams, the most significant part of the medals is that every one of them includes a piece of original iron from the Eiffel Tower. The Eiffel Tower pieces were used in the hexagon shape in its iron color with the 2024 Olympic Games logo on it. The six metal appendages on the hexagon also came from the original Eiffel Tower.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

MELBOURNE, Australia — Novak Djokovic continued to build into the Australian Open with a 6-1, 6-7 (4), 6-3, 6-2 victory over Portuguese qualifier Jaime Faria in the second round on Wednesday, taking another step towards a 25th Grand Slam title.

For the top players, the first week of a major is all about finding a groove in the full heat of competition and Djokovic could not have wished for more from his first two opponents, both making their Grand Slam debuts.

On Monday, inspired American teenager Nishesh Basavareddy gave the 10-times Melbourne Park champion the runaround for the first hour of their first-round clash, and 21-year-old Faria presented another set of problems for Djokovic to solve.

Faria’s victory in the opening round was his first at tour level, while Djokovic moved out of a tie with Roger Federer to claim another record merely by taking to the court for his 430th Grand Slam match.

The gap in experience looked like a chasm in a one-sided opening set but Faria stormed back into the contest by winning the second set in a tiebreaker on the back of some fine ball-striking and all-court athleticism.

Djokovic, with one-time adversary Andy Murray again in his coaching box, broke for 4-2 in the third set, however, and fully quashed the threat offered by the world No. 125 in the fourth to set up a meeting with Czech Tomas Machac.

‘I love this court, I love competition,’ the 37-year-old Serbian said after reaching the third round of the Australian Open for the 17th time with his 14th ace of the match.

‘I think I responded well in the third set and particularly the fourth. He was playing lights-out tennis at the end of the second set and start of the third and I had to weather the storm.

‘I told him at the net, ‘the future is bright for you so carry on.’ ‘

Carlos Alcaraz rolls

After clubbing 14 aces in a whirlwind victory at the Australian Open on Wednesday, Carlos Alcaraz made no secret of his aspirations for his retooled serve.

‘Am I a serve bot?’ Alcaraz scribbled on a camera lens at Margaret Court Arena where he thrashed Japan’s Yoshihito Nishioka 6-0, 6-1, 6-4 to reach the third round.

Serving has been on the four-times Grand Slam champion’s mind at Melbourne Park after tweaking his motion in the offseason.

He was not thrilled with its performance in his first round win against Kazakh Alexander Shevchenko where he landed less than 60% of his first serves and had six aces.

Wednesday’s figures were more encouraging for the meticulous Spaniard, who more than doubled the ace count and won 32 out of 36 points (89%) on his first serve.

It came after a long service training session with coach Juan Carlos Ferrero on Tuesday.

‘I felt more comfortable on it, yes. I think the serve’s about confidence and feelings,’ he told reporters.

‘Today I felt great. The throw of the ball was great today, which it helps a lot in the serve today.’

Though having won the French Open and a second Wimbledon crown last year with his previous serving action, Alcaraz was unhappy with its accuracy and overall strain on the body.

The new movement is a little more relaxed with a looser wrist to try to improve timing.

Alcaraz said he still has much to improve on if he wants to rival the top ‘serve bots’ like American Reilly Opelka and Frenchman Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard.

As third seed with four Grand Slam titles under his belt, Alcaraz would seem a shoo-in for centre court scheduling at Melbourne Park but has played both his matches this year at Margaret Court Arena.

Players can submit their preferences to organisers but there are no guarantees they will be accommodated.

Alcaraz said he would rather play on Rod Laver Arena’s centre court, where women’s double defending champion Aryna Sabalenka and 10-times champion Novak Djokovic had the early slots on Wednesday.

But he was content to keep playing on the lesser courts if it meant an early night’s sleep.

‘Obviously I want to play on Rod Laver, but we have to see the schedule, as well. As I said many times, I don’t like to play night sessions.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming special envoy for Ukraine and Russia, Ret. Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg, recently said the United States must return to the policy of ‘maximum pressure’ and that the Iranian regime’s weakness has reopened what the future of Iran will look like.

‘I believe this year should be considered a year of hope, it should be considered a year of action, and it should be considered a year of change,’ Kellogg, who served in Trump’s first administration, said at an event sponsored by an Iranian opposition group, The National Council of Resistance of Iran, in Paris.

The retired lieutenant general said that Iran’s development and acquisition of a nuclear weapon would be the most destabilizing event for the Middle East. Kellogg reminded the opposition group that then-President Trump walked away from the Iran nuclear deal during his first term, even with opposition from those who served in the first administration.

‘For the United States, a policy of maximum pressure must be reinstated, and it must be reinstated with the help of the rest of the globe, and that includes standing with the Iranian people and their aspirations for democracy,’ Kellogg said.

Trump withdrew from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action, also known as the Iran nuclear deal, during his first term in 2018 and reapplied crippling economic sanctions. While some, including Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, applauded the move, the leaders of the United Kingdom, France and Germany had urged the president to remain committed to the deal.

The remarks, made just days before Trump is set to take office for his second term, are yet another signal of how a second Trump administration will face the threat posed by Iran in a new environment with much of the Middle East embroiled in conflict since the Oct. 7 terrorist attack on Israel. 

‘The beginning of the end of Iran’s primacy began, ironically, a year ago, on 7 October,’ Kellogg said.

Kellogg noted that pressures applied to Iran would not only be kinetic or military force, but must include economic and diplomatic as well.

Maryam Rajavi, president-elect of the Iranian opposition group, the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI), told the event that the fall of Syria’s longtime dictator, Bashar al-Assad, provided a unique opportunity for Iranians to remake their own future.

‘Khamenei and his IRGC were unable to preserve the Syrian dictatorship, and they certainly cannot preserve their regime in the face of organized resistance and uprising. The regime will be overthrown,’ Rajavi said.

Rajavi said it was a decisive moment in the history of Iran. The National Council of Resistance of Iran, according to Rajavi, has a path forward for a democratic Iran, which includes a step-by-step process after the overthrow of the current regime. A transitional government would be formed for a maximum of six months, and its main task would be to hold free elections for a Constituent Assembly and transfer power to the people’s representatives.

‘The overthrow of the mullahs’ regime is the only way to establish freedom in Iran and peace and tranquility in the region,’ a hopeful Rajavi said.

Kellogg championed these ideas and said a ‘more friendly, stable, non-belligerent, and a non-nuclear Iran’ must be the near term goal and that the United States needs to exploit Iran’s current weaknesses.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmail Baqaei slammed France for hosting what the Iranian government called a ‘terrorist group’ and accused the French government of violating its international legal obligations to prevent and fight terror.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President-elect Donald Trump’s pre-emptive tariff threat several weeks ago against the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa, among others) who want to usurp the U.S. dollar as the global currency was a prescient and powerful move. But as night follows day, a BRICS leader – China – immediately counter-punched: denying U.S. access to several critical minerals that America needs for national defense but now largely imports from BRICS countries. 

On New Year’s Day, China upped the ante. It added 28 U.S. defense industry companies to its export control list, which restricts the export to these companies of ‘dual use’ materials that have both commercial and defense uses. 

What does this mean? If the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) uses this to justify banning the export of components that contain critical materials such as rare earth permanent magnets – which I believe they will do – then the long-feared critical minerals war has begun. This was predicted on the pages of FoxNews.com in early 2023. 

China launched these attacks ostensibly in response to actions taken by the Biden administration. But China knows that throwing a critical minerals hook to the U.S. military serves several strategic goals that benefit both China and the BRICS cabal: 

It directly weakens U.S. national security without having to fire a shot.
It is a strong response to U.S. export restrictions without engaging in a lose-lose fight against America’s tariff master.
It should increase revenue to BRICs-based minerals producers, weaken global competitors, and potentially exacerbate inflationary pressures in the U.S.
It enables China and its BRICs allies to get into the ring with an opponent – the U.S. – that has in recent decades tied both hands behind its back in terms of critical minerals production.

But the BRICS nations may have made a serious miscalculation: they underestimate America’s ability to unleash a new era of ‘Mine, Baby, Mine’ under Trump. Domestic critical minerals mining in the U.S. – including in much-talked-about jurisdictions such as Greenland – is key to removing the dangerous leverage that BRICS nations hold over our economic and national security.

BRICS starts with a huge advantage over the U.S. They all have rich mineral resources and the will to extract their value to their own economic, military and geopolitical advantage. Collectively, they control or heavily influence global supply chains for rare earths, niobium, scandium, titanium metal, vanadium, nickel, antimony, cobalt, lithium, graphite, gallium, platinum and many others. The breadth and depth of this geopolitical power sends shivers down the spine of any serious U.S. military planner. 

For example, government-controlled entities in China and Russia manipulate critical minerals commodity pricing to grab market share. They surreptitiously flow their molecules through third parties to hide provenance and evade tariffs. They invest orders of magnitude more than the U.S. in minerals research, development and specialized workforce training, further cementing their huge competitive advantage. 

BRICS nations have even been reliably accused of fueling anti-mining sentiment in the U.S. by funneling money to global anti-mining activists that work to tie up U.S. mining projects in red tape and endless litigation.  

China provides the primary fulcrum of BRICS’ mineral leverage. Companies controlled by the CCP have helped China become the top producer and/or refiner of more than half of the 50 minerals the U.S. government has determined are critical. What’s more, the CCP is clearly willing to weaponize this advantage, as the latest moves to restrict U.S. access to certain critical minerals demonstrate.  

Make no mistake, restrictions on critical minerals exports to the U.S. will likely grow. At some point, such bans – especially if extended to the magnetic rare earth elements, as I believe are now inevitable – mean that newly built F-35s can’t fly, smart bombs turn dumb, advanced submarines can’t be built, and soldiers lose future supplies of night-vision goggles. 

How can the incoming Trump administration counter the BRICS minerals threat? In the interest of transparency, let me note that I am a 40+ year veteran of the mining industry and my team and I are today developing an advanced critical minerals project in Nebraska. I have a personal interest in seeing America ramp up mineral development. But I offer the following suggestions on behalf of the industry and, more important, U.S. national security. 

Provide low-interest loans to new mines that have already obtained all necessary federal, state, and local permits and which have earned strong buy-in from local communities.

Focus on polymetallic mines that can produce multiple critical minerals from a single orebody and can also expand production by recycling post-consumer waste streams, such as rare earth permanent magnets.
Expand the authority of the U.S. Department of Defense, through its Office of Strategic Capital and Title III programs, to become a major funding source for new mines. Also, enable the National Defense Stockpile to build a much larger store of a defense-critical minerals and to enter into forward purchase agreements with U.S. mines not yet in production.
Encourage the U.S. Export-Import Bank (EXIM) to accelerate debt financing of domestic critical minerals projects. To its credit, EXIM has already launched a first-in-its-history effort to finance domestic U.S. projects. What’s more, EXIM’s loan revenue has historically covered its operating costs and allowed it to generate net government revenues. Few government agencies deliver such value.
Waive National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) reviews for defense critical minerals projects that are not otherwise subject to NEPA but for the receipt of federal funding.

Companies controlled by the CCP have helped China become the top producer and/or refiner of more than half of the 50 minerals the U.S. government has determined are critical. What’s more, the CCP is clearly willing to weaponize this advantage, as the latest moves to restrict U.S. access to certain critical minerals demonstrate.  

Legislate reasonable limits on litigation timelines. It now takes an average of 29 years to get a mine online in the U.S. Only Zambia is worse.
Streamline federal permitting processes. The first Trump administration made excellent progress on this, but much of that was reversed by follow-on executive orders. Permitting reform via changes to U.S. statutes is a must.

The U.S. does mining and mineral processing more efficiently and with greater environmental care than any nation. Let’s restore and unleash the American entrepreneurial spirit and ‘Mine, Baby, Mine’ our way to a more prosperous and secure future. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Republican Florida Sen. Marco Rubio is bracing himself for the hot seat as he prepares to sit through the often-arduous confirmation hearing process on Wednesday with the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations as he vies to lead the State Department under the next Trump administration. 

Though Rubio is not expected to get off easy in front of the panel of his colleagues posed to pressure him on everything ranging from the war in Ukraine, conflict in the Middle East and a trade war with China, which Trump has threatened to drastically increase, he is expected to pass through more smoothly than other candidates Trump has slated for his Cabinet.

In an excerpt of Rubio’s remarks obtained by Fox News Digital ahead of his address to the Senate body, he highlights the security threats that have emerged following the end of the Cold War and the belief that democracy could succeed across the globe and international free trade was the way of the future.

‘While America far too often continued to prioritize the ‘global order’ above our core national interests, other nations continued to act the way countries always have and always will, in what they perceive to be in their best interest,’ the remarks read. ‘And instead of folding into the post-Cold War global order, they have manipulated it to serve their interest at the expense of ours.’

‘The postwar global order is not just obsolete; it is now a weapon being used against us,’ he added. 

Senate Democrat Whip Dick Durbin of Illinois already threw his support behind his Republican peer and on Monday said, ‘Sen. Rubio and I share many similar views on foreign policy and, as a result, have worked closely together in the Senate to move forward with legislation regarding human rights around the world.’

‘I believe Senator Rubio has a thorough understanding of the United States’ role on an international scale, has served with honor on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and is a good choice to lead the State Department. I plan to vote yes on his nomination when it comes before the Senate,’ Durbin said in a statement after a meeting in which they discussed security issues involving Russia’s threat in the Baltic Sea and the NATO alliance. 

Trump announced his nomination of Rubio for the top diplomatic job in November, which the senior member on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said was not only a ‘tremendous honor’ but a ‘tremendous responsibility.’

‘The job of the secretary of state is to execute on the foreign policy set by the elected president of the United States. And I hope to have the opportunity to do it, if my current colleagues here in the U.S. Senate confirm me so,’ he told reporters on the Hill. 

But Rubio’s commitment to execute the wishes of the executive office could also prove to be his most difficult hurdle, not only during Senate questioning but also in taking up the job should he be approved by the upper chamber. 

Trump has repeatedly made clear he expects unwavering loyalty from Cabinet members, advisers in the White House and even military leaders, and reports this week suggest the incoming administration may be planning on clearing house in the National Security Council to ensure the president is only surrounded by those who support his agenda, according to an Associated Press report. 

While Rubio and Trump see eye-to-eye on issues like U.S. support for Israel, remaining tough on China and opposing dictatorial powers in Latin America – all of which are unlikely to garner much opposition from Democrats in the Senate – there are issues that could prove tricky for the three-term senator to navigate.

Rubio and Trump have a history of exchanging barbs, particularly during the 2016 presidential race.

The duo have long patched up their hostilities in large part because Rubio has more closely aligned himself behind Trump, a move that has meant he is no novice when it comes to walking the political tightrope between appeasing Trump and pursing issues important to him.

This balancing act became evident on the campaign trail when Rubio was asked about controversial comments made by the Trump camp when it came to U.S. support for Ukraine and how to end the now three-year war.

‘I’m not on Russia’s side, but unfortunately the reality of it is that the way the war in Ukraine is going to end is with a negotiated settlement,’ Rubio said in a September interview with NBC’s ‘Meet the Press.’ 

Rubio dodged questions on whether he backed comments made by Vice President-elect JD Vance when he suggested Ukraine cede land to Russia and agree to a demilitarized zone along the current front lines.

Instead, he said, ‘I would be comfortable with a deal that ends these hostilities and that, I think, is favorable to Ukraine, meaning that they have their own sovereignty, that they don’t become a satellite state or a puppet state.’

Rubio also backed Trump after concern mounted over the now-president-elect’s position on NATO when he said he would encourage any nation, including Russia, to ‘do whatever the hell they want’ to any NATO nation not fulfilling their defense spending commitments.

‘Donald Trump is not a member of the Council on Foreign Relations,’ Rubio told CNN’s Jake Tapper in February. ‘He doesn’t talk like a traditional politician, and we’ve already been through this. You would think people would’ve figured it out by now.’

That said, Rubio in 2019 also helped reintroduce bipartisan legislation that would prohibit any president from unilaterally withdrawing from NATO without Senate approval, a move that Trump threatened during his first term and which remained a top concern that was echoed by Trump’s former NSC adviser, John Bolton, during the latest presidential race. 

Rubio’s unwavering outward loyalty to the incoming president could be tested if he is questioned about the president-elect’s expansionist rhetoric, like acquiring Greenland and the Panama Canal through the use of the U.S. military. 

Fox News Digital could not reach Rubio’s office for comment on where he stands on U.S. intervention in Greenland, which is technically under the protection of NATO so long as it remains a territory of Denmark, as well as the Panama Canal, which the U.S. gave back to Panama in 1999 but which Trump has accused China of taking over.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President-elect Donald Trump’s selection to be attorney general in his new administration faces the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday morning at a confirmation hearing. 

Trump tapped former Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi to lead the Department of Justice (DOJ) in late November after former Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla., withdrew from consideration. 

The Wednesday hearing begins at 9:30 a.m., and Bondi will be questioned by both Republican and Democrat members of the committee.

‘I hope that the Democrats give the same … courteous consideration to [her] that Republicans did of [Attorney General Merrick] Garland,’ Chair Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, told Fox News Digital ahead of the hearing.

‘[A]nd I hope people stay within their timeline, because we’ve got to move right along,’ he added.

Members of the committee include Grassley and Republican Sens. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina, John Cornyn of Texas, Mike Lee of Utah, Ted Cruz of Texas, Josh Hawley of Missouri, Thom Tillis of North Carolina, John Kennedy of Louisiana, Marsha Blackburn of Tennessee, Eric Schmitt of Missouri, Katie Britt of Alabama and Mike Crapo of Idaho. 

Also on the committee are ranking member Dick Durbin, D-Ill., as well as Democrat Sens. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota, Chris Coons of Delaware, Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut, Mazie Hirono of Hawaii, Cory Booker of New Jersey, Alex Padilla of California, Peter Welch of Vermont and Adam Schiff of California.

Durbin met with Bondi last week but emerged from their discussion with remaining concerns.
‘In today’s meeting, I raised concerns with Ms. Bondi regarding her record – one in which she served as a personal attorney to President-elect Trump, was a leader in the effort to overturn the 2020 election, and has echoed the President-elect’s calls for prosecuting his political opponents. In addition, Ms. Bondi has a long track record of opposing fundamental civil rights, including reproductive rights, voting rights, and LGBTQ+ rights,’ he said in a statement.

‘The role of the Attorney General is to oversee an independent Justice Department that upholds the rule of law and is free of undue political influence. Given Ms. Bondi’s responses to my questions, I remain concerned about her ability to serve as an Attorney General who will put her oath to the Constitution ahead of her fealty to Donald Trump,’ he added.

The ranking member is likely to question Bondi during the hearing on these same subjects. 

On Monday, Durbin outlined several concerns he has with Trump’s pick.

‘The obvious concern with Ms. Bondi is whether she will follow the bipartisan tradition of the post-Watergate era and oversee an independent Department of Justice that upholds the rule of law. Ms. Bondi is one of four personal lawyers to President-elect Trump who he has already selected for Department of Justice positions. She was a leader in the effort to overturn the 2020 election. She has echoed the President[-elect]’s calls for prosecuting his political opponents, and she has a troubling history of unflinching loyalty to the president-elect,’ he said in floor remarks.

The attorney general hopeful met with Grassley in early December, after which he said in a statement, ‘Pam Bondi is a well-qualified nominee with an impressive legal career, including eight years as Attorney General of the State of Florida and nearly two decades spent as a prosecutor. Bondi is prepared to refocus the Justice Department (DOJ)’s attention where it ought to be: on enforcing the law and protecting Americans’ safety.’

The Judiciary chair promised the committee would ‘move swiftly to consider her nomination when the 119th Congress convenes in January.’

Trump praised Bondi in his November announcement, writing in part, ‘For too long, the partisan Department of Justice has been weaponized against me and other Republicans – Not anymore.’

‘Pam will refocus the DOJ to its intended purpose of fighting Crime, and Making America Safe Again,’ he continued. ‘I have known Pam for many years — She is smart and tough, and is an AMERICA FIRST Fighter, who will do a terrific job as Attorney General!’

Since being picked by Trump, Bondi has received several influential endorsements. Recently, 60 former Democrat and Republican attorneys general urged senators to confirm her in a letter. Further, dozens of former Justice Department officials called on the Judiciary Committee last week encouraging them to confirm Trump’s choice.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS