Archive

2025

Browsing

A group of high powered investors want to raise billions to form a new international basketball league, according to people familiar with the matter.

The new organization would offer players equity, those people said.

The investors aim to raise $5 billion for the league, which could serve as a rival to the NBA if it can offer big-money deals to players, similar to how LIV Golf lured away PGA Tour players.

It’s unclear which players the league would target or when it could start.

Maverick Carter, LeBron James’ longtime friend and business partner, is advising a group that includes investment firm SC Holdings’ Jason Stein and Daniel Haimovic, Skype co-founder Geoff Prentice and former Facebook executive Grady Burnett.

A representative for James said he is not involved in the effort and declined to comment on whether the Los Angeles Lakers star has been approached to participate.

The group is working with UBS and Evercore to help raise the money, which is expected to come from a mix of sovereign wealth funds, institutional investors and wealthy individuals, the people said.

The unnamed league is expected to play games in eight cities around the world, spending two weeks in each city, following a model similar to Formula 1. The league will consist of 12 teams — six men’s and six women’s teams.

Singapore is one of the markets where games will take place, the people said. It’s unclear what the other seven markets will be.

Representatives for the NBA didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

But a source familiar said they were not aware of the plan for the league before reports about it emerged Wednesday. Bloomberg first reported the news.

In recent years, the NBA has ramped up its international presence, with a league in Africa and games abroad ranging from China to the UAE, Mexico City and Paris. The league also had a record-tying 125 international players tip off in the 2024 season.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Stay classy, Los Angeles.

The Los Angeles Rams took out a full-page ad in the Friday edition of the Arizona Republic to thank the Arizona Cardinals’ owners, staff and local community after they played their first playoff game this year at State Farm Stadium on Monday night.

‘In times of adversity, true integrity is shown,’ the ad reads. ‘Arizona, you were there for us when we needed it most.

‘We are grateful to the Bidwill Family, the entire Arizona Cardinals staff, and the local community who took us in without hesitation and with gracious hospitality.

‘From all of us at the Los Angeles Rams, THANK YOU.’

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

Los Angeles was set to host its wild-card matchup against the Minnesota Vikings before spreading wildfires in the area forced the Rams to relocate the site of the game. The Cardinals offered their stadium for use and even sent two team planes to Los Angeles to pick up Rams players, staff and family members and bring them to Arizona ahead of last weekend’s game.

The Rams went on to defeat the Minnesota Vikings, 27-9, and will play the Philadelphia Eagles in the divisional round Sunday, but they didn’t forget to express their gratitude first to those who made it possible.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

One of the most fascinating NFL coaching candidates is Minnesota Vikings defensive coordinator Brian Flores. Fascinating is one way to describe him. Controversial is another. Talented works, too. So does fearless trailblazer.

Flores, according to various reports, has drawn head coaching interest. The NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport said on X that Flores was scheduled to meet with the Jets and Jaguars on Friday and Bears on Saturday.

It all makes sense. Flores is a brilliant tactician who transformed the Vikings’ defense into one of the best units in the league. He deserves another chance to be a head coach.

But would an NFL team really hire Flores as a head coach again? That is the question and there’s an extremely specific reason for asking it: Flores still has an active lawsuit against the NFL for racial discrimination. It’s there. Still there. (Looks again.) Yep, still there.

Flores filed his suit in 2022 and he’s been a head coaching candidate in a previous cycle. But this is different because Flores is coming off a season where he was a catalyst for why the Vikings were so dominant.

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

This moment makes Flores one of the most fascinating head coaching candidates in league history. What happens next with Flores is actually bigger than a coaching search. It goes to a pertinent query: Can NFL owners overlook Flores’ racial discrimination lawsuit against the league? Can the league let things go?

You’ll have to excuse me if I don’t necessarily trust the NFL on issues of race. The league essentially banned Colin Kaepernick after he started one of the great athlete protest moments in American history.

However…

While I don’t see the Jets hiring Flores, several people that I trust in and around the NFL, who are just as skeptical as I am when it comes to NFL teams and race, feel that Flores actually has a legitimate shot with some other owners. None of this is sourcing or hardcore reporting but more of a belief some owners genuinely don’t care about the lawsuit.

In a way, Minnesota is proof that this could be true. The Vikings hired Flores and no one on the team cared about the suit. They welcomed him.

“Obviously, diversity is important to me as well,’ Flores said during his introductory news conference. ‘I’m not going to run away from that. But when I walk in this building, you see diversity, really, across the board in every department. That’s exciting too. So, those are things that are ongoing. Obviously, the lawsuit is ongoing, but I’m where my feet are. Right now, my feet are right here in Eden.’

In fact, there are likely some teams that agree with Flores. Also, the league office would love for Flores to become a head coach again because to them it would prove that the Flores lawsuit was without merit. I’m not saying that’s the actual case; I’m saying that’s how the league office would see it.

Perhaps the biggest obstacle for Flores isn’t the lawsuit. Instead, it’s what he did as coach of the Dolphins. Flores was the Miami coach from 2019-2021. His tenure there was, well, rocky. Quarterback Tua Tagovailoa said on a podcast that Flores was a ‘terrible person.’ Flores later responded: “Look, I’m human. So, that hit me in a way that I wouldn’t say was positive for me. But at the same time, I’ve got to use that and say, ‘Hey, how can I grow from that, or how can I be better?’ And that’s really where I’m at from that standpoint.

“Do I feel like that’s me? No. But how can I grow from that situation and create a world where that’s not the case where anyone says that about Brian Flores?”

Another thing teams will likely ask Flores about was something quarterback Ryan Fitzpatrick said on a recent podcast. Fitzpatrick would later emphasize how much he liked Flores but his words were his words.

“Brian Flores has been a really hot name, and I think the further removed we get from his tenure in Miami, the more people kind of forget about how that ended — and the better his name becomes,” said Fitzpatrick. “He went to Pittsburgh and got to learn under Mike Tomlin and see how he led. And now he’s been in Minnesota with Kevin O’Connell.’

“I think the interesting thing about Brian Flores when I think about him and being able to play under him for a few years is which version of Brian Flores are we getting?’ Fitzpatrick added. ‘In Year 1 with Miami … (the Dolphins) got rid of every good player they had; that was jokingly called the ‘Tank for Tua’ year. Halfway through that year, we hadn’t won a game yet, and there was a shift in the way he was approaching his job. He was likable. He was relatable. He demanded a lot out of the players, but he was also able to get the version of his players — and I really appreciated him for that.”

Then, Fitzpatrick said, things began to shift.

“As his tenure went on in Miami, he kind of became unrecognizable,” Fitzpatrick continued. “A lot of the staff he brought over from New England — that was where he cut his teeth in the NFL; was there for 15-plus years as an assistant. I think he’s going to have a really hard time. If you’re interviewing him as a head coach, I think in the interviews, he’ll be likable, he’ll be relatable.

“But, when people say, ‘Give me somebody from Miami that coached under you as a reference, so we can talk to them,’ I think he burned a lot of bridges there. I think he alienated himself from the entire staff. Instead of … having the humility to ask questions, to collaborate, I think by the end of his time there, he became a dictator. He ruined a lot of relationships that he built up through the NFL. And his ego grew so big that there wasn’t room for anyone else.”

All of this is why Flores’ potential candidacy is so fascinating. We haven’t really seen anything like it. Ever.

We also have no idea how it’s going to end.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

A federal judge in Denver this week addressed an ongoing issue in the bankruptcy case of Colorado football player Shilo Sanders:

How much privacy should Sanders be given related to his business dealings in this case?

Judge Michael E. Romero urged the parties involved to make progress on their disputes about this matter but also reminded Sanders’ attorney that Sanders’ overall financial situation is now a “public record.”

“This is a bankruptcy case, and the finances of Mr. Sanders is public record, so some of that information is going to be for the public to understand and everyone to understand,” Judge Romero said.

Sanders, son of Colorado football coach Deion Sanders, filed for bankruptcy in October 2023 after falling into more than $11 million in debt, almost all of it owed to one person – a former security guard at his school in Dallas named John Darjean.

Why is the privacy of Shilo Sanders’ information at issue?

Shilo Sanders, 24, is seeking to free himself of his debt in bankruptcy court − a taxpayer-funded judicial system in which one of the prices of trying to erase such debt is to go through a transparent, public process for it.

But he still wants certain aspects of his business information to be private and under a protective order that shields it from public disclosure, particularly his deals with those paying him for his name, image and likeness (NIL).

“The reason we’re having these hearings relates to Mr. Sanders and his present financial situation and how that information will get disseminated to creditors, the (bankruptcy) trustee, Mr. Darjean and anyone else who’s interested, as every other bankruptcy debtor is before this court,” Judge Romero said during a status conference in the case this week. “This is a transparent process, but the question is how widely disseminated (it will be). Eventually everyone is going to know. It will be fully public eventually, most likely, at least certain aspects of it. There will be certain aspects that will always be confidential, but in general, details will come out.”

Shilo Sanders’ NIL deals are a big part of it

After filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy, Shilo’s finances are undergoing scrutiny from the bankruptcy trustee who is in charge of gathering his non-exempt property for the bankruptcy estate on behalf of Shilo’s creditors. In this case, Darjean also is fighting Shilo’s attempt to discharge the debt because he wants to collect on all of what Shilo owes him.

Darjean won an $11.98 million default judgment against Shilo in 2022 after suing Shilo and accusing him of severely injuring him during an assault by him in 2015, when Shilo was 15 years old and Darjean was trying to confiscate his phone at school. Shilo previously claimed he acted in self-defense but didn’t show up at trial to contest it in 2022.

Now as the bankruptcy case proceeds on multiple fronts, the trustee and Darjean are seeking detailed information from Sanders about his finances. But Sanders’ attorneys also want to guard against certain information being shared or disclosed in court as part of the public proceedings.

The judge said the “primary reason” for meeting in conference this week was the discovery evidence that is being requested of Shilo Sanders, his related NIL entities and family members. He wants to determine ‘to what extent that can be disclosed and under what condition.”

Shilo Sanders’ attorney, Keri Riley, said her client is trying to make sure he doesn’t violate confidentiality agreements in his NIL deals.

“Initially, the protective orders that we’ve proposed are really targeted to protect the confidential business information of the debtor (Shilo Sanders),” Riley told the judge this week. “Obviously he is a party to, or… his entities are a party to a number of name, image, likeness agreements that are fairly new in the world of college sports and are in fact confidential business information. A lot of them have confidentiality clauses and we don’t believe should be part of the public disclosure.”

Where does this bankruptcy case stand now?

The issues involving protective orders were not resolved yet, but the judge made clear he wanted them to be soon so the case can proceed with the discovery of evidence. He also denied a previous request by Darjean to expand the investigation into Shilo’s finances with so-called Rule 2004 examinations of Shilo and Deion Sanders. The judge instead said Darjean could pursue discovery of evidence through other means.

The case still appears to be months away from closing after Shilo recently completed his final college football season at Colorado. This week, the trustee in the case issued three subpoenas seeking financial information about Shilo from the University of Colorado, Wells Fargo bank and Redpoint Financial Group, an accounting firm, to help assess and round up Shilo’s property and financial condition on behalf of creditors.

The trustee also is pursing affidavits from Shilo’s family, including Deion Sanders, after Darjean previously raised the issue that Shilo may be funneling his earnings to a trust held by his father.

The trustee’s attorney, Peter Cal, said in court this week that he was going to work with Shilo’s attorney to get affidavits from Deion Sanders and Shilo’s mother to “make sure they provide sufficient information so the (bankruptcy) trustee understands… whether there’s any money in those trusts that belong to the bankruptcy estate and whether any money has been used that the bankruptcy estate is entitled to.”

No jury trial on nature of the alleged incident in 2015

In December, Romero denied a summary judgment request by Darjean, who had asked the court to rule that Shilo’s debt cannot be discharged under the law because it resulted from a “willful and malicious” injury inflicted by Shilo, the debtor. The judge’s denial of this request means that issue is headed to trial instead, but no trial date has been set. That narrow issue relates to Shilo’s state of mind during his incident with Darjean in 2015 and whether it was “willful and malicious.”

Darjean’s attorney, Ori Raphael, agreed this week to have that trial decided by the judge instead of a jury.

If the judge sides with Darjean, Shilo would be on the hook to pay back the debt, including from future earnings.

Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. Email: bschrotenb@usatoday.com

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Six teams with 36 of the best women’s basketball players in the world, including Sabrina Ionescu and Brittney Griner, will compete in 3-on-3, full court games for the next nine weeks.

Four of the six teams will compete in the league’s playoffs semifinal games March 16, leading to the March 17 final. There will also be a mid-season 1v1 tournament in February to determine the best one-on-one player in the league.

Games will be played at Wayfair Arena in Medley, Fla., which is in the Miami metropolitan area, on mostly Fridays, Saturdays and Mondays. There is one Thursday and one Tuesday game during the season, and the semifinals are on a Sunday. TNT will broadcast all Friday and Monday games, while TruTV handles Saturday broadcasts. All games will be available to live stream on Max.

Here’s the full Unrivaled schedule, and how to watch games during the league’s first season.

Unrivaled Schedule

Friday, Jan. 17

Mist vs. Owls, 7 p.m. (TNT)
Rose vs. Vinyl, 8 p.m. (TNT)

Saturday, Jan. 18

Phantom vs. Laces, 2 p.m. (TruTV)
Owls vs. Rose, 3 p.m. (TruTV)

Monday, Jan. 20

Vinyl vs. Phantom, 8:30 p.m. (TNT)
Laces vs. Mist, 9:30 p.m. (TNT)

Friday, Jan. 24

Phantom vs. Mist, 7:15 p.m. (TNT)
Laces vs. Vinyl, 8:15 p.m. (TNT)

Saturday, Jan. 25

Mist vs. Rose, 6 p.m. (TruTV)
Lunar Owls vs. Phantom, 7 p.m. (TruTV)

Monday, Jan. 27

Vinyl vs. Lunar Owls, 7:30 p.m. (TNT)
Rose vs. Laces, 8:30 p.m. (TNT)

Friday, Jan. 31

Phantom vs. Rose, 7:15 p.m. (TNT)
Laces vs. Lunar Owls, 8:15 p.m. (TNT)

Saturday, Feb. 1

Mist vs. Vinyl, 6 p.m. (TruTV)
Rose vs. Laces, 7 p.m. (TruTV)

Monday, Feb. 3

Mist vs. Phantom, 7:30 p.m. (TNT)
Lunar Owls vs. Vinyl, 8:30 p.m (TNT)

Friday, Feb. 7

Phantom vs. Lunar Owls, 7:15 p.m. (TNT)
Mist vs. Rose, 8:15 p.m. (TNT)

Saturday, Feb. 8

Vinyl vs. Laces, 6 p.m. (TruTV)
Lunar Owls vs. Mist, 7 p.m. (TruTV)

Monday, Feb. 10

1v1 Tournament, 7 p.m. (TV TBD)

Thursday, Feb. 13

1v1 Tournament, 6:30 p.m. (TV TBD)

Friday, Feb. 14

1v1 Tournament, 7:30 p.m. (TV TBD)

Tuesday, Feb. 18

Vinyl vs. Rose, 7:30 p.m. (TNT)
Laces vs. Phantom, 8:30 p.m. (TNT)

Friday, Feb. 21

Rose vs. Lunar Owls, 7:15 p.m. (TNT)
Vinyl vs. Mist, 8:15 p.m. (TNT)

Saturday, Feb. 22

Lunar Owls vs. Laces, 6 p.m. (TruTV)
Phantom vs. Vinyl, 7 p.m. (TruTV)

Monday, Feb. 24

Rose vs. Phantom, 7:30 p.m. (TNT)
Mist vs. Laces, 8:30 p.m. (TNT)

Friday, Feb. 28

Laces vs. Vinyl, 7:15 p.m. (TNT)
Phantom vs. Mist, 8:15 p.m. (TNT)

Saturday, March 1

Vinyl vs. Lunar Owls, 6 p.m. (TruTV)
Rose vs. Mist, 7 p.m. (TruTV)

Monday, March 3

Laces vs. Rose, 7:30 p.m. (TNT)
Lunar Owls vs. Phantom, 8:30 p.m. (TNT)

Friday, March 7

Phantom vs. Laces, 7:15 p.m. (TNT)
Lunar Owls vs. Rose, 8:15 p.m. (TNT)

Monday, March 10

Mist vs. Lunar Owls, 7:30 p.m. (TNT)
Rose vs. Vinyl, 8:30 p.m. (TNT)

Sunday, March 16

Semifinal, 7:15 p.m. (TV TBD)
Semifinal, 8:15 p.m. (TV TBD)

Monday, March 17

Final, 7:30 p.m. (TV TBD)

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

MEDLEY, Fla. — Angel Reese is happy at work.

‘We get to workout, use the weight room, create new bonds/friendships, get treatment, get massages, use the sauna, getting 2 meals a day, and then a facial before I leave for the day??? yea i love it here,” Reese shared in a social media post.

It may not seem like a lot to ask for a professional basketball player, but they’re things WNBA players like Reese have not been accustomed to — until Unrivaled began this month.

The new 3-on-3 women’s basketball league founded by WNBA stars Napheesa Collier and Breanna Stewart — begins play Friday with goals to break barriers in women sports and sports leagues in general.

Six teams with 36 of the best women’s basketball players in the world, including Sabrina Ionescu and Brittney Griner, will compete in 3-on-3, full-court games for the next nine weeks leading to the March 17 final. The games will broadcast on TNT, TruTV and Max.

Unrivaled wants to be a viable offseason option for players, instead of them logging major minutes and miles overseas outside of the WNBA season. It is challenging the pay scale in the sport, offering ownership and equity instead of just a WNBA salary that pales in comparison to their NBA counterparts.

Collier says the 36 players involved can earn up to 15% equity depending on their WNBA accolades. Unrivaled president Alex Bazzell told SB Nation in December the total salary pool is $8 million, which makes the league’s average salary around $222,222 for the nine-week season ending March 17. The average base salary for WNBA players last season was less than $120,000, according to data from Spotrac.

‘There’s such an explosion in women’s sports right now, and it kinda felt like everyone was profiting instead of the women in the sport,” Collier said during an interview Tuesday on TNT. ‘Something we knew from the very beginning is we wanted to give equity to every player that played so we can start to grow that generational wealth and start to pay these players what we think we deserve.”

The league also provides necessities such as proper nutrition, facilities, equipment to weight train and rehabilitate, and child care. Through a partnership with beauty brand Sephora, there’s also a branded makeup room to glam up before interviews or after practices and games.

During interviews with reporters Thursday, multiple players said they hope the amenities and player experience they have with Unrivaled can be used as a bargaining chip when the WNBA’s collective bargaining agreement will be reviewed at the end of the 2025 season.

“This is what women deserve, waking up every day and just not having to worry about anything,’ Reese said. “I come in here. I get breakfast. I get treatment. I can come in and get in the gym anytime. … I just have everything here that I need, and everybody has everything here we need.”

Unrivaled will play and broadcast its games from a Mediapro North American production warehouse that has been turned into a basketball facility. The building, roughly 7 miles from Miami International Airport, is outfitted with an arena, an adjacent practice court and team locker rooms.

The players and coaches moved to South Florida in early January to kick off the league, living in an apartment building about five minutes away from the facility. They’ll suit up for six basketball clubs: Laces, Lunar Owls, Mist, Phantom, Rose and Vinyl. And they’ll introduce the basketball world to a new style of the sport.

Games are played Fridays, Saturdays and Mondays. Tuesdays are off days.

“It’s a really fun style of basketball,” said Laces coach Andrew Wade, an assistant with the WNBA’s Washington Mystics. “Obviously, taking two players off the court, so everyone’s involved in every action. The court is just shorter, and so there’s possessions happening every five seconds. You’re basically always in the action. Then the other piece, too, is these are the best players in the world. Every single game is an all-star game of just the best of the best.”

More than that, Unrivaled is an opportunity to further expand the booming footprint of women’s sports in the United States.

The league has raised $35 million in funding through big-name investors, such as former U.S. women’s soccer stars Alex Morgan and Megan Rapinoe, former NBA player Carmelo Anthony, NBA star Giannis Antetokounmpo, Olympic swimming legend Michael Phelps, actors Ashton Kutcher and Mila Kunis, basketball coach Steve Nash, golfer Michelle Wie, South Carolina basketball coach Dawn Staley, USC standout Juju Watkins and tennis star Coco Gauff.

Marc Lasry, the former owner of the Milwaukee Bucks, and Linda Henry, a Fenway Sports Group partner and the owner and CEO of Boston Globe Media, are also among the league’s investors.

“This is a breath of fresh air,” Reese said. “Like, who doesn’t want to be in Unrivaled?”

(This story was updated to add a new photo gallery.)

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The members of the Republican National Committee, in a vote that was never in doubt, on Friday re-elected chair Michael Whatley to continue steering the national party committee. 

‘This organization has got to be the tip of the spear. And as your chairman, I promise this organization will be the tip of the spear to protect Donald Trump,’ Whatley said, as he spoke after the unanimous voice vote at the RNC’s annual meeting, which was held this year in the nation’s capital ahead of Monday’s inauguration of President-elect Trump. 

Whatley, a longtime Trump ally and a major supporter of Trump’s election integrity efforts, who was serving as RNC general counsel and chair of the North Carolina Republican Party, was named by Trump last March as chair as the former president clinched the 2024 GOP presidential nomination. Whatley succeeded longtime RNC chair Ronna McDaniel, whom Trump no longer supported.

In an exclusive interview with Fox News Digital on the sidelines of the RNC’s winter meeting, Whatley says his job going forward in the 2025 elections and 2026 midterms is straight forward.

‘It’s really critical for us to make sure that the Trump voters become Republican voters,’ Whatley told Fox News Digital on the sidelines of the RNCs’ winter meeting, which is being held in the nation’s capital.

Republicans enjoyed major victories in November’s elections, with President-elect Trump defeating Vice President Kamala Harris to win back the White House, the GOP flipping control of the Senate from the Democrats, and holding on to their razor-thin majority in the House.

Whatley, who was interviewed on Thursday on the eve of the formal RNC chair vote, said the GOP needs ‘to cement those gains’ made in the 2024 elections.

‘We’re going to go right back to the building blocks that we had during this election cycle, which is to get out the vote and protect the ballot,’ Whatley emphasized. 

The RNC chair pointed to ‘the lessons that we learned’ in the 2024 cycle ‘about going after low propensity voters, about making sure that we’re reaching out to every voter and bringing in new communities,’ which he said helped Republicans make ‘historic gains among African American voters, among Asian American voters, among Hispanic voters, young voters and women voters.’

Speaking a couple of days before the president-elect’s inauguration, Whatley emphasized that once Trump’s in the White House, ‘we’re going to go right back to the RNC. We’re going to roll up our sleeves and get to work. We’ve got a couple of governor’s races…that we’re going to be working on in ‘25.’

But Whatley said ‘everything is focused on ‘26,’ when the party will be defending its majorities in the House and Senate, ‘because that is going to determine, from an agenda perspective, whether we have two years to work with or four. And America needs us to have a four-year agenda.’

‘What we’re going to be doing is making sure that we are registering voters,’ Whatley said. ‘We’re going to be…communicating with the folks that we need to turn out.’

Pointing to the 2024 presidential election, he said ‘it’s the same fundamentals.’

But he noted that ‘it’s not just seven battleground states’ and that the 2026 contests are ‘definitely going to be a very intense midterm election cycle.’

While Democrats would disagree, Whatley described today’s GOP as ‘a common sense party…this is a party that’s going to fight for every American family and for every American community.’

Referring to former Democrats Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard, whom Trump has nominated to serve in his second administration’s cabinet, Whatley touted ‘the fact that we have two former Democratic presidential candidates who are going to be serving in the president’s cabinet. That shows you that this is a commonsense agenda, a commonsense team, that we’re going to be moving forward with.’

In December, Trump asked Whatley to continue during the 2026 cycle as RNC chair.

‘I think we will be able to talk when we need to talk,’ Whatley said when asked if his lines of communication with Trump will be limited now that the president-elect is returning to the White House. ‘We’re going to support the president and his agenda. That does not change. What changes is his ability from the White House to actually implement the agenda that he’s been campaigning on.’

The winter meeting included the last appearance at the RNC by co-chair Lara Trump. The president-elect’s daughter-in-law is stepping down from her post.

She stressed that it’s crucial the RNC takes ‘the opportunity the voters have given us’ to ‘continue to expand the Republican brand.’

The elder Trump is term-limited and won’t be able to seek election again in 2028. Vice President-elect Sen. JD Vance will likely be considered the front-runner for the 2028 GOP nomination.

Whatley reiterated what he told Fox News Digital in December, that the RNC will stay neutral in the next race for the GOP nomination and that the party’s ‘got an amazing bench.’

‘You think about the talent on the Republican side of the aisle right now, our governors, our senators, our members of Congress, people that are going to be serving in this administration. I love the fact that the Republican Party is going to be set up to have a fantastic candidate going into ’28,’ he highlighted.

Unlike the DNC, which in the 2024 cycle upended the traditional presidential nominating calendar, the RNC made no major changes to their primary lineup, and kept the Iowa caucuses and the New Hampshire primary as their first two contests.

Asked about the 2028 calendar, Whatley reiterated to Fox News that ‘I have not had any conversations with anybody who wants to change the calendar, so we will wait and see what that looks like as we’re going forward. We’re at the RNC meetings this week and having a number of conversations with folks, but that is not a huge push.’

‘I don’t think that changing the calendar really helped the Democrats at all,’ Whatley argued. ‘And I think that us, making sure that we are working our system the way that we always have, is going to be critical.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk and tech entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy’s newly created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) is eying a proposal that would slash federal diversity and inclusion programs, according to a new report.

DOGE is tasked with eliminating government spending, waste and streamlining efficiency and operations, and is expected to influence White House policy on budget matters. 

The proposal circulating among DOGE advisors is a 19-page report from the Wisconsin Institute for Law and Liberty, a conservative and libertarian nonprofit organization, the Washington Post reports. 

Specifically, the document claims that there is more than $120 billion annually spent on ‘diversity, equity and inclusion’ initiatives like Agriculture Department grants and loans for minority farmers and ranchers – efforts the organization claims are unconstitutional. 

Although it’s unlikely that the entirety of those funds will face complete elimination, sources told the Post that these diversity efforts will likely face cuts to free up spending. DOGE advisors have viewed the document, and it is making its rounds through the committee, the Post reports. 

‘That’s been sent down from on high, that all this DEI stuff has to go,’ someone familiar with DOGE’s early plans told the Post. ‘Once all these guys get confirmed, and he’s the president on Jan. 20, this is going to happen fast and furious.’

Musk is expected to occupy space in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building which is directly beside the West Wing and where the majority of office space for White House staffers exists, the New York Times reported this week. 

While Musk and transition officials have discussed the nature of the billionaire’s access to Trump post-inauguration, solidified plans are pending, according to the Times, which noted that special passes are usually required in order to freely visit the West Wing.

DOGE is not part of the federal government, but the committee is expected to suggest executive orders for the Trump administration and partner with the Office of Management and Budget on new initiatives.

Altogether, DOGE seeks to slash $2 trillion from the federal government budget through cuts to spending, government programs and the federal workforce.

Even so, that plan may be a bit ambitious. Musk recently said that eliminating $2 trillion from the federal budget might not be realistic, and cutting $1 trillion was a more likely outcome. 

‘I think we’ll try for $2 trillion. I think that’s like the best-case outcome,’ Musk said during tech trade show CES this month in Las Vegas. ‘But I do think that you kind of have to have some overage. I think if we try for $2 trillion, we’ve got a good shot at getting $1 [trillion].’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President-elect Donald Trump said on Friday that he needs ‘time to review’ the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold a federal law banning TikTok unless it divests from its Chinese parent company before Jan. 19 – the day before Trump is set to be sworn in.

Trump added that ‘everyone must respect’ the high court’s decision.

‘The Supreme Court decision was expected, and everyone must respect it,’ Trump said in a statement posted to Truth Social. ‘My decision on TikTok will be made in the not too distant future, but I must have time to review the situation. Stay tuned!’

The statement came moments after Trump reportedly told a small group of journalists by phone that the law banning TikTok ‘ultimately goes up to me, so you’re going to see what I’m going to do’ after taking office.

‘Congress has given me the decision, so I’ll be making the decision,’ Trump said, according to CNN, which first reported the remarks.

Trump’s Truth Social post appears to take a more deferential tone towards the nation’s highest court, including its decision to uphold the bipartisan divestiture law passed last April with wide bipartisan support.

‘There is no doubt that, for more than 170 million Americans, TikTok offers a distinctive and expansive outlet for expression, means of engagement, and source of community,’ the court wrote in the unsigned ruling. ‘But Congress has determined that divestiture is necessary to address its well-supported national security concerns regarding TikTok’s data collection practices and relationship with a foreign adversary.

‘For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the challenged provisions do not violate petitioners’ First Amendment rights. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is affirmed.’

Trump has sought to delay the law from taking force. Attorneys for the president-elect filed a brief with the Supreme Court last month, asking justices to delay any decision until after Trump’s inauguration Jan. 20.

But lawmakers disagreed. 

Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., told the Supreme Court in a filing of his own that Congress explicitly set the Jan. 19 date for the divestiture clause to take force since it ‘very clearly removes any possible political uncertainty in the execution of the law by cabining it to an administration that was deeply supportive of the bill’s goals.’

This is a breaking news story. Check back shortly for updates. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The Biden administration on Friday maintained that it will not actively enforce a federal law set to ban the Chinese-owned social media app TikTok, instead punting any action to the incoming Trump administration.

The Supreme Court issued a ruling earlier in the day upholding the looming ban, which is set to go into effect on Sunday.

‘The Administration, like the rest of the country, has awaited the decision just made by the U.S. Supreme Court on the TikTok matter. President Biden’s position on TikTok has been clear for months, including since Congress sent a bill in overwhelming, bipartisan fashion to the President’s desk: TikTok should remain available to Americans, but simply under American ownership or other ownership that addresses the national security concerns identified by Congress in developing this law,’ White House Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said in a statement shortly after the decision was handed down. 

She added: ‘Given the sheer fact of timing, this Administration recognizes that actions to implement the law simply must fall to the next Administration, which takes office on Monday.’

A U.S. official told the Associated Press on Thursday that Biden would not enforce the ban that is set to take effect the day before he is to leave office. Such a move inadvertently leaves the social media app’s fate in the hands of President-elect Donald Trump and his incoming administration. 

‘There is no doubt that, for more than 170 million Americans, TikTok offers a distinctive and expansive outlet for expression, means of engagement, and source of community,’ the Supreme Court wrote in its unsigned Friday ruling. ‘But Congress has determined that divestiture is necessary to address its well-supported national security concerns regarding TikTok’s data collection practices and relationship with a foreign adversary.’

The court continued: ‘For the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the challenged provisions do not violate petitioners’ First Amendment rights. The judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit is affirmed.’

Just last year, Congress required that TikTok’s China-based parent company ByteDance divest the company by Jan. 19. The law was subsequently signed by Biden.

When the law was passed, Congress specifically noted concerns over the app’s Chinese ownership, which members said meant the app had the potential to be weaponized or used to amass vast amounts of user data, including from the roughly 170 million Americans who use TikTok.

During oral arguments, Biden administration lawyers argued that the app’s Chinese ownership posed a ‘grave’ national security risk to American users. TikTok’s lawyers, on the other hand, argued that such a ban restricted free speech protections under the First Amendment.

First Amendment challenges must be analyzed under strict scrutiny, which places a higher burden of proof on the government when attempting to justify the constitutionality of a law. In this case, the First Amendment protections in question must be crafted to serve a compelling government interest, narrowly tailored to achieve that interest.

Fox News Digital’s Breanne Deppisch contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS