Archive

2025

Browsing

The Miami Heat plan to suspend forward Jimmy Butler after he missed a team flight, a person with knowledge of the punishment told USA TODAY Sports.

The person requested anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly until the Heat announced the suspension.

It is Butler’s second suspension this month. The Heat on Jan. 3 suspended him seven games for “multiple instances of conduct detrimental to the team over the course of the season and particularly the last several weeks. Through his actions and statements, he has shown he no longer wants to be part of this team. Jimmy Butler and his representative have indicated that they wish to be traded, therefore, we will listen to offers.”

Butler returned from his suspension Friday and has played in Miami’s past three games – a loss to Denver, a victory against San Antonio and a loss to Portland. He is expected to miss Thursday’s game at Milwaukee and Saturday’s game at Brooklyn, according to ESPN.

The Butler-Heat saga continues to be a distraction for Miami, which is 21-21 and competing for a postseason spot with several other Eastern Conference teams hovering around .500.

On Tuesday, the Suns acquired three first-round draft picks in a trade with Utah to help facilitate a deal that would land Butler. It is not an easy trade to make. Suns guard Bradley Beal would have to waive his no-trade clause, and more than likely, a third or fourth team would need to be involved.

The trade deadline is February 6.

Follow NBA reporter Jeff Zillgitt on social media @JeffZillgitt

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Aaron Glenn is hoping to bring the Jets to Gang Green-er pastures.

The Jets have reportedly hired Glenn as their next head coach on Wednesday, replacing Robert Saleh (and interim head coach Jeff Ulbrich). The now-former Lions defensive coordinator has risen the ranks from scout to coordinator and now gets his first shot at head coaching.

There may be no tougher position than the one Glenn will find himself in. The Jets are coming off a dreadful 5-12 season mired with organizational turmoil. Yeah, yeah: What else is new?

You mix that with a huge question mark in Aaron Rodgers’ future and the NFL’s longest playoff drought and it’s a recipe for pain.

Oh, and the last and only Lombardi trophy in the case came before Joe Namath was modeling pantyhose and yukking it up with Farrah Fawcett.

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

While all of that isn’t necessarily new waters for Gang Green, they can be choppy for a new head coach. Enter Glenn, who will aim to answer New York’s long-standing question at head coach.

So, who comes out on top as big winners and losers for this hiring? USA TODAY Sports takes a look:

Winners

New York Jets…

Let’s start with the obvious. While the Jets have a tendency of stepping on rakes, hiring head coaches has seldom been a problem during the Woody Johnson era.

New York has routinely hired the top candidates during their coaching searches (save Adam Gase), even though hindsight shows more failures than successes: Herm Edwards, Eric Mangini, Rex Ryan, Todd Bowles and Robert Saleh were all highly respected and well-credentialed head-coaching candidates, but none were able to overcome ‘Same Old Jets’ syndrome.

Landing Glenn, a highly respected coach, leader and former Jet is a massive win for the Jets in their efforts to try and shake free of the disappointment of the Robert Saleh-Joe Douglas regime.

….But specifically, the Jets defense

Social media isn’t real, but it may offer some insight to the truth.

On the Jets’ official Instagram post after the interview announcement of Aaron Glenn, Jets defensive lineman Quinnen Williams responded with a simple, two-emoji response: A couple of crossed fingers.

The Jets defense, which took a massive step back after the firing of Robert Saleh this season, still has plenty of talent to compete. With young and veteran stars at key positions, Glenn and his defensive staff will be entrusted to squeeze the most out of this group and rebound to its pre-2024 successes.

That shouldn’t be a difficult ask, especially when you consider the work that Glenn did with an undermanned unit in Detroit this past season.

Aaron Glenn

Glenn is another obvious winner in this situation, even if he is landing with a Jets organization is currently messier than a Target aisle on Black Friday.

Glenn has reportedly considered the Jets a ‘dream job,’ and gets his opportunity in 2025 after interviewing with the organization in 2021. Ultimately, the team hired top candidate Robert Saleh, and it didn’t work out for a myriad of reasons.

While he’s a Humble, Texas native, getting an opportunity to walk the hallways of the Jets facility will be something of a homecoming for Glenn. The 1994 Jets first-round pick made his bones as player in New York before spending to with the Texans, Cowboys, Jaguars and Saints. New York gave him his first NFL front office job as a scout in 2012.

Glenn likely understands the market, the expectations and the pressures of the gig. Whether or not that means he’ll succeed remains to be seen, but it’s clear he knows what he’s getting into.

The NFC North

The NFC North has to be celebrating the departure of Glenn from the division. Even with the insane amounts of injuries on defense this year, Detroit was still competitive with the pieces they had until their playoff elimination.

While Dan Campbell has proven to be more than a capable head coach, replacing coordinators is never a guarantee of success. Campbell’s staff-building chops will be put to the test with the next hires for the Lions.

Losers

Detroit Lions

A 15-2 Lions season ended with not one, but three big losses: The one to the Commanders in the divisional round and the losses of both Glenn and offensive coordinator Ben Johnson.

As mentioned, rebuilding a staff is never an easy task, doubly so when you lose two key coordinators in one offseason. The Lions are still plenty talented and will likely be at or near the top of the NFC North in 2025, but continuity is key in the NFL.

Unless the next defensive coordinator proves himself to be a capable Glenn replacement, the Lions are in a tough position. Having to turn the keys over to two new guys, even if familiar, puts them in a very tenuous spot.

Aaron Rodgers

While Rodgers’ plan for the future has yet to emerge from the darkness, the Jets passer potentially learning a new offense and playing for another head coach as his career nears its end can’t be overly enticing for the passer.

It’s unclear what Glenn’s (or the Jets’ new GM’s) plan is for Rodgers, but it’s hard to paint Rodgers as a winner here for anything other than uncertainty.

Now 41, Rodgers has made it clear that he plans to take some time to think about his future this offseason. Whether that’s in Florham Park in September or a jungle in Peru remains to be seen.

New Orleans Saints

The Saints were considered one of the worst available jobs this hiring cycle, and despite strong ties to Glenn, they couldn’t close the deal.

New Orleans is left holding the bag with the top of the coaching market drying up. They may still come out of their coaching search a winner if they land Mike McCarthy, but any time an organization misses out on a top coaching target, it’s a loss.

Any head coach who takes this job will have his work cut out for him. The Saints are in proverbial cap hell with roster questions and an incumbent quarterback that might steer some candidates away.

Rex Ryan

Arguably the biggest loser in Glenn’s hiring is Rex Ryan.

Ryan spent the better part of the last five months campaigning for office in front of a camera on ESPN, which eventually led to an interview with the Jets a few weeks ago.

Ryan’s interview awakened a certain sect of fans who viewed his tenure in Florham Park through rose-colored beer goggles. The Jets placating Ryan with an interview feels a bit like having lunch with an ex-girlfriend or ex-boyfriend: You talk about the good times, you reminisce over the first date, but sooner or later, you realize why you got home one day and found all of your clothes in trash bags on the street outside your apartment.

Ryan did help guide the Jets to two straight AFC championship games, but what followed was four seasons of winning – kind of. Instead, Ryan and the Jets won New York tabloid back pages for all the wrong reasons. He got a second chance at NFL head coaching with the Bills, but missed out on playoffs both seasons he was at the helm.

The courtesy interview should be enough to keep Ryan happy.

…Well, until the A-block of ‘First Take’ following the first Jets loss in 2025.

All the NFL news on and off the field. Sign up for USA TODAY’s 4th and Monday newsletter.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

On Tuesday, President Donald Trump issued an executive order revoking President Lyndon Baines Johnson’s Executive Order 11246 from September of 1965 (and many other similar orders and memoranda from over the decades since). Trump’s new order is true to the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the 14th Amendment. Trump’s order can be read here. 

The horrible turn taken by Johnson towards ‘counting by race,’ was a deep one, a turn extended by the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) in the 1978 Bakke decision and only finally and fully repudiated by SCOTUS in recent years is now federal policy that can be enforced by the Civil Rights Division at DOJ and the Office of Civil Rights at Department of Education. 

This is neither a ‘liberal’ nor a ‘conservative’ action. It is the Constitution speaking, as the Constitution was amended to eradicate the great stain of slavery after the long and bloody Civil War.

The path to the original public meaning of the 14th Amendment has taken from 1868, when the 14th Amendment was ratified, until Tuesday to complete: Citizens of the United States may not have penalties inflicted upon them or awards given them based on any immutable characteristic or religious belief. No institution, from Harvard College, founded long before the Constitution was ratified, or the local convenience store, may lawfully violate this first principle of the 14th Amendment. 

Do not discriminate on the basis of race, gender, ethnicity or religious belief. Period. 

The 19th century SCOTUS took a horrible turn in the Slaughterhouse Cases which mangled the interpretation of the 14th Amendment and then the Plessy decision and the Supreme Court righted itself in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954. The Congress enshrined the core principle above in the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Johnson did not understand what he launched, but in the past 20 years, ‘counting by race, gender, sexual orientation,’ along with hardships and discrimination against people of faith have taken deep root in government and elite institutions. 

The Supreme Court has flailed for almost 50 years to finally, and I hope irreversibly, settle on what Abraham Lincoln, Dr. Martin Luther King and most recently Chief Justice John Roberts has concisely and eloquently stated in the 2007 case Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 when he wrote, ‘The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.’ 

The chief justice lacked sufficient originalist allies on the highest court to infuse this bedrock principal of sound constitutional law into every fiber of government at every level of government until President Trump nominated and the United States Senate confirmed three new justices during Trump’s first term. Now the originalist majority is a solid six votes. 

Trump’s executive order may be challenged. I hope it is.  

The Supreme Court, built in part by President Trump, has already affirmed the original meaning of the 14th Amendment and the Civil Rights Act of 1964 in recent years. Let any institution challenge this new EO and they will discover it is on the firmest of constitutional grounds. 

Bravo to the many hands that crafted it and especially to President Trump who signed it.

Hugh Hewitt is host of ‘The Hugh Hewitt Show,’ heard weekday mornings from 6am to 9am ET on the Salem Radio Network, and simulcast on Salem News Channel. Hugh wakes up America on over 400 affiliates nationwide, and on all the streaming platforms where SNC can be seen. He is a frequent guest on the Fox News Channel’s news roundtable hosted by Bret Baier weekdays at 6pm ET. A son of Ohio and a graduate of Harvard College and the University of Michigan Law School, Hewitt has been a Professor of Law at Chapman University’s Fowler School of Law since 1996 where he teaches Constitutional Law. Hewitt launched his eponymous radio show from Los Angeles in 1990.  Hewitt has frequently appeared on every major national news television network, hosted television shows for PBS and MSNBC, written for every major American paper, has authored a dozen books and moderated a score of Republican candidate debates, most recently the November 2023 Republican presidential debate in Miami and four Republican presidential debates in the 2015-16 cycle. Hewitt focuses his radio show and his column on the Constitution, national security, American politics and the Cleveland Browns and Guardians. Hewitt has interviewed tens of thousands of guests from Democrats Hillary Clinton and John Kerry to Republican Presidents George W. Bush and Donald Trump over his 40 years in broadcasting. This column previews the lead story that will drive his radio/TV show today.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said Wednesday that the looming tariffs that President Donald Trump is expected to slap on U.S. trading partners could be viewed positively.

Despite fears that the duties could spark a global trade war and reignite inflation domestically, the head of the largest U.S. bank by assets said they could protect American interests and bring trading partners back to the table for better deals for the country, if used correctly.

“If it’s a little inflationary, but it’s good for national security, so be it. I mean, get over it,” Dimon told CNBC’s Andrew Ross Sorkin during an interview at the World Economic Forum in Davos. “National security trumps a little bit more inflation.”

Since taking office Monday, Trump has been saber-rattling on tariffs, threatening Monday to impose levies on Mexico and Canada, then expanding the scope Tuesday to China and the European Union. The president told reporters that the E.U. is treating the U.S. “very, very badly” due to its large annual trade surplus. The U.S. last year ran a $214 billion deficit with the E.U. through November 2024.

Among the considerations are a 10% tariff on China and 25% on Canada and Mexico as the U.S. looks forward to a review on the tri-party agreement Trump negotiated during his first term. The U.S.-Mexico-Canada Trade Agreement is up for review in July 2026.

Dimon did not get into the details of Trump’s plans, but said it depends on how the duties are implemented. Trump has indicated the tariffs could take effect Feb. 1.

“I look at tariffs, they’re an economic tool, That’s it,” Dimon said. “They’re an economic weapon, depending on how you use it, why you use it, stuff like that. Tariffs are inflationary and not inflationary.”

Trump leveled broad-based tariffs during his first term, during which inflation ran below 2.5% each year. Despite the looming tariff threat, the U.S. dollar has drifted lower this week.

“Tariffs can change the dollar, but the most important thing is growth,” Dimon said.

Dimon wasn’t the only Wall Street CEO to speak of tariffs in a positive light.

Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon, also speaking to CNBC from Davos, said business leaders have been preparing for shifts in policy, including on trade issues.

“I think it turns into a rebalancing of certain trade agreements over time. I think that rebalancing can be constructive for U.S. growth if it’s handled right,” Solomon said. “The question is, how quickly, how thoughtfully. Some of this is negotiating tactics for things over than simply trade.”

“Used appropriately, it can be constructive,” he added. “This is going to unfold over the course of the year, and we have to watch it closely.”

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Buckle up. 

President Donald Trump is back in the White House and moving at warp speed.

In his inauguration address, the new president vowed that things across the country would ‘change starting today, and it will change very quickly.’

And moments later, White House deputy chief of staff Taylor Budowich took to social media to tease, ‘Now, comes SHOCK AND AWE.’

They weren’t kidding.

Trump signed an avalanche of executive orders and actions in his first eight hours in office, which not only fulfilled major campaign trail promises, but also allowed the returning president to flex his executive muscles as well as settle some longstanding grievances.

The president immediately cracked down on immigration, moved towards a trade war with top allies and adversaries, reversed many policies implemented by former President Biden, including scrapping much of the previous administration’s federal diversity actions and energy and climate provisions.

He also sparked a major controversy by pardoning or commuting the sentences of roughly 1,500 supporters who took part in the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol in an unsuccessful attempt to upend congressional certification of Biden’s 2020 election victory. Among those whose sentences were commuted included some who violently assaulted police officers on one of America’s darkest days.

Trump also fired some top government officials, made a high-profile half-trillion dollar tech investment announcement, held unscripted and wide-ranging, informal, and impromptu news conferences during his first two days back at the White House, and even renamed the Gulf of Mexico the Gulf of America.

‘I think it’s brilliant how they’ve been handling it, to immediately meet the moment with action. It’s exactly what he needs to do and its exactly what the people voted for,’ veteran Republican strategist Kristin Davison told Fox News.

‘Americans vote for decisive, fast action, and true leadership. And Trump understands that more than anyone. I think he and his team knew how important it was out the gate to show that they heard what the people wanted and are answering with leadership,’ Davison argued.

Longtime Republican consultant Alex Castellanos agreed

‘He’s flooding the zone. He’s making a case for action. He’s demonstrating action. He is rallying a wave of American support for a massive transformation of government,’ Castellanos, a veteran of numerous GOP presidential campaigns, told Fox News. 

Seasoned Democratic strategist Joe Caiazzo didn’t dispute Trump’s frenetic actions.

‘The pace of this shouldn’t be surprising to anyone. Trump made it abundantly clear he was going to act quickly, he was going to act boldly, and he was going to do exactly what he told voters he would do,’ Caiazzo said.

But he argued that ‘the things he is doing is going to directly negatively impact working families from coast to coast. It’s also a signal he has no respect for the rule of law.’ 

Asked if Trump’s actions were what Americans voted for this past autumn, Caiazzo replied ‘of course not. What Americans voted for was cheaper groceries. What Donald Trump is going to give us is a litany of policies that work to deteriorate our institutions, that work to enrich the wealthy and solidify his standing among the oligarchy in this country.’

There’s another reason for Trump’s fast pace – even though he’s the new president, he’s also a term-limited and lame-duck president. And by Labor Day, much of the political world will start looking ahead to the 2026 midterm elections.

‘This is his second term. He’s got to move quickly,’ Davison emphasized.

Trump’s show of force in the opening days of his second administration is also in contrast to eight years ago, when he first entered the White House.

The president and his team are much more seasoned the second time around, and the supporting cast is intensely loyal to Trump.

‘In the past administration, there would be logjams and bottlenecks because there were people who didn’t agree with him,’ a senior White House source told Fox News. ‘Now we have a whole infrastructure and staff that’s built around him, in support of him. When he says something, it’s getting done. It’s testament to him and the team that he built.’

Credit is also being given to White House chief of staff Susie Wiles, who, as co-campaign manager of Trump’s 2024 presidential bid, kept the trains on the tracks.

‘What Susie has done is look at the totality of Trump and found the best players and put them in the best positions to support the president. Trump is surrounded by Trump people who’ve all proven themselves over the years not just to be loyal but ultra-competent operators,’ added the adviser, who asked for anonymity to speak more freely.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Democratic lawmakers grilled President Donald Trump’s pick to lead the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on a series of issues Wednesday, ranging from abortion to the constitutionality of the Impoundment Control Act. 

While Republicans argue that Russell Vought is qualified for the role because he served as Trump’s OMB director during the president’s first term, Democrats like Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., have labeled Vought an ‘ultra-right’ ideologue. 

Vought appeared before the Senate Budget Committee on Wednesday for a confirmation hearing and defended his previous statements that the Impoundment Control Act is unconstitutional — an issue Democrats claim should disqualify him from leading the Office of Management and Budget.

The law, adopted in 1974, stipulates that Congress may oversee the executive branch’s withholding of budget authority, and affirmed that Congress holds the power of the purse. Ultimately, the law bars the executive branch from circumventing Congress and withholding appropriated funds.

The first Trump administration and Vought have come under fire after the Office of Management and Budget held up $214 million in military aid for Ukraine in 2019, a decision that ultimately led to Trump’s first impeachment.

‘You’re quite comfortable assuming that the law doesn’t matter and that you’ll just treat the money for a program as a ceiling… rather than a required amount,’ Senate Budget Committee ranking member Jeff Merkley said. ‘Well, the courts have found otherwise.’

Additionally, the Supreme Court also ruled in 1975 that the executive branch cannot impound funds without congressional oversight. 

In that case, Train v. City of New York, the Supreme Court determined the Environmental Protection Agency must use full funding included in the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, even though then-President Richard Nixon issued orders not to use all the funding. 

Lawmakers have pointed to this case in Vought’s confirmation hearings as further evidence that the executive branch cannot tie up funding Congress has approved. 

Even so, Vought told lawmakers in multiple exchanges he believes the Impoundment Control Act is unconstitutional, because presidents historically could spend less than what Congress had approved prior to the Impoundment Control Act, and that Trump campaigned on that position.

Democrats aren’t the only ones worried about Vought’s views on the Impoundment Control Act. Senate Budget Committee chair Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said he also shared some concerns and would disclose them at a markup hearing for Vought’s nomination. 

Vought also faced questioning on his views regarding abortion, given his connection as an author of Project 2025, a political initiative The Heritage Foundation released in 2023 that called for policy changes, including instituting a national ban on abortion medication. 

Other proposals included in Project 2025 include eliminating the Department of Education, cutting DEI programs, and reducing funding for Medicare and Medicaid. 

‘You have said that you don’t believe in exceptions for rape, for incest, or the life of the mother,’ said Democratic Sen. Patty Murray of Washington. ‘Is that your position?’

‘Senator, my views are not important. I’m here on behalf of the president,’ Vought said. 

Trump has repeatedly stated that he backs abortion in certain instances, and stated that ‘powerful exceptions’ for abortion would remain in place under his administration.

Meanwhile, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., pressed Vought on whether healthcare is a ‘human right.’ Sanders has previously introduced legislation called the Medicare for All Act that would establish a federal, national health insurance program. 

‘Do you think we should join every other major country on Earth and say, ‘You know what? Whether you’re poor, you’re rich, you’re young, you’re old, healthcare is a human right,’’ Sanders said. ‘We have the richest country in the history of the world. Do you think we should do what every other major country on Earth does?’

Vought declined to disclose specifics, but said that he believed it’s critical to provide ‘legitimate, evidence-based outcomes for people within the healthcare system, and to make sure that we tailor all of the dollars that are spent toward that.’ 

After serving as director of the Office of Management and Budget under the first Trump administration, Vought founded the Center for Renewing America in 2021. The organization claims its mission is to ‘renew a consensus of America as a nation under God,’ according to its website. Vought also served as the vice president of Heritage Action for America. 

Meanwhile, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. said his meeting with Vought only exacerbated his concerns about the nomination. 

‘I walked out of the meeting even more deeply troubled,’ Schumer said on the Senate floor on Wednesday. ‘Of all the extremists President Trump could have picked for OMB, he picked the godfather of the ultra-right.’

Vought has repeatedly told lawmakers that he would uphold the law and that his personal views aren’t important — carrying out Trump’s vision is what matters. 

The OMB is responsible for developing and executing the president’s budget, as well as overseeing and coordinating legislative proposals and priorities aligned with the executive branch. 

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President Donald Trump’s Republican allies in the House say he is better positioned than ever to enact his legislative agenda, entering the White House armed with nearly a decade’s worth of knowledge about Washington.

‘The first time, he was a great businessman, but he didn’t know Washington. He’s got it down now,’ said Rep. Jeff Van Drew, R-N.J., a close ally of Trump’s who switched parties to better align with him during his first term. ‘He’s totally prepared for this. Last time he was learning. He’s learned. He’s ready to go.’

Multiple House GOP lawmakers who served in Congress during Trump’s first term described a man who is returning to D.C. both with a triumphant electoral victory and a sharp understanding of how Capitol Hill and the wider D.C. network works.

Several said the changes are manifesting in his and his team’s near-constant communication with Republican lawmakers and in the people he’s hiring for his team.

‘He knows now that Washington is generally going to push back, and they’re going to do what they want to do — whether you call it the deep state or the establishment or the uniparty. I think he’s very aware, and I think he’s comporting his actions to address those issues,’ said Rep. Scott Perry, R-Pa. ‘He understands that personnel is policy, so he’s trying to get the right people in place, not because they’re loyal to him, but because they’re loyal to the agenda that the people want.’

Within hours of being sworn in Monday, Trump held public events where he signed dozens of executive orders to enact promises he made on the campaign trail.

All the while, he’s stayed in close contact with Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., as well as summoning a flurry of House Republicans to Mar-a-Lago earlier this month to discuss the GOP agenda.

Rep. Marlin Stutzman, R-Ind., a former founding member of the House Freedom Caucus who served in the House from 2010 to 2017 and who is back for another term, noticed a marked difference from former Speaker Paul Ryan’s era.

‘It didn’t seem he and Speaker Ryan were on the same page coming into Congress. I saw them have discussions about the election and rallies, and they just had different perspectives, which I think is unfortunate because it was a real missed opportunity for a lot of things to be done,’ Stutzman said.

‘This time, he knows Washington, he has a great team he’s pulling together and I think his team will be that much more disciplined and focused on the four-year window to get as much done as possible.’

Rep. Gary Palmer, R-Ala., a former member of House GOP leadership, also remarked on Trump’s focus on Congress.

‘His first term was clearly a populist campaign. He had really smart people, but they didn’t have any congressional experience,’ Palmer said. ‘That’s not happening now. They’ve worked very closely with us. I feel like we’re all on the same page about what needs to be done.’

Freshman Rep. Jeff Crank, R-Colo., who had been a talk radio host before his political career, noted that the media environment Trump walked into had been a more receptive one compared to 2016.

‘He sort of broke the media complex. He seemed like – the media folks who in 2016 were resisting him, now they’ve realized, ‘Well, maybe this was censorship that we were doing, and that’s maybe not the best thing for our business model,’’ Crank said. ‘But, whatever it is, they’ve sort of joined up with him, right, in a lot of ways.’

A significant part of Trump’s D.C. education came during the four years he was out of office, Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., a longtime ally, said. But he and others agreed that, at his core, Trump has not changed.

‘There’s no question that he is better than had he raced into a second term. He is the same man, though. He knows what he believes,’ Issa said.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Newly sworn-in Secretary of State Marco Rubio will travel to Panama for his first international trip as the nation’s top diplomat, Fox News has learned. 

Though details are still being worked out, the visit could come as early as next week. 

The planned trip comes after repeated vows by President Donald Trump – who returned to the White House on Monday – to take back the Panama Canal.

Trump mentioned the Panama Canal again during his inaugural address on Monday, claiming that it was now in the hands of China and vowing to take it back. 

‘China is operating the Panama Canal. And we didn’t give it to China, we gave it to Panama, and we’re taking it back,’ Trump said. 

Panamanian President José Raúl Mulino responded forcefully to Trump’s comments on Wednesday saying, ‘we reject in its entirety everything that Mr. Trump has said. First, because it is false and second, because the Panama Canal belongs to Panama and will continue to belong to Panama.’  

The U.S. built the canal in the early 1900s under then President Theodore Roosevelt as it looked for ways to facilitate the transit of commercial and military vessels between its coasts. Washington relinquished control of the waterway to Panama on Dec. 31, 1999, under a treaty signed in 1977 by then President Jimmy Carter. 

News of Rubio’s trip was first reported by Politico and could include other Central American countries like Guatemala and El Salvador, where Rubio is expected to address a top priority of curbing mass migration that he outlined earlier this week. 

State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce tells Fox News that ‘Secretary Rubio is prioritizing the region because it’s where we live,’ adding ‘we won’t continue to ignore the region as other administrations have.’ 

She added: ‘Engaging with our neighbors is a vital element in addressing migration, supply chains, and economic growth, which are key to Secretary Rubio’s pursuit of foreign policy focused on making America strong, prosperous, and safe.’

Fox News Digital’s Adam Shaw and The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The year is done. All assignments have been completed, for better or worse. Sorry, but there is no opportunity for extra credit.

Now that the dust has cleared on Ohio State’s national championship, it’s time to hand out report cards in the form of season grades for every team in the Bowl Subdivision. An annual tradition, the grades consider overall performance compared to preseason expectations, with added weight given to how a team performs in key games against rivals and other high-profile opponents.

Remember that grades are given on a scale relative to these expectations. That helps explain the difference between Marshall and Mississippi, for example.

While both teams went 10-3, the Thundering Herd earn an A grade for winning the Sun Belt, the program’s first conference championship since 2014. The Rebels drew a B+ for bad losses to Kentucky and Florida that cost them a College Football Playoff berth.

Similarly, Vanderbilt gets an A- for going 7-6 while the same record earned a dismal C- for Southern California.

Four teams drew the elite A+ grade, led by Indiana. The Hoosiers had the most successful regular season in program history under new coach Curt Cignetti. Four teams landed on a D-, including Arizona and Purdue. And three teams were handed the dreaded F, led by Florida State.

LOOKING AHEAD: Our way-too-early college football Top 25 for 2025

Ohio State earned an A, not an A+, despite Monday night’s victory over Notre Dame. That’s because of the Buckeyes’ regular-season loss against Michigan, which drops them a peg despite the most remarkable postseason run in FBS history.

As with every great professor or talent evaluator — say, like a member of the playoff selection committee — the grades ignore the names and focuses only on results. That’s led to some poor report cards for some of the biggest programs in the country.

Dinged by losses to the Commodores and Oklahoma, Alabama gets a C after going 9-4 under first-year coach Kalen DeBoer. Michigan’s 8-5 gets a C+, lifted by wins against Ohio State and the Crimson Tide to end the year. Oklahoma is given a C+ after landing with a thud as new members of the SEC.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Fox News host Sean Hannity revealed he told President Donald Trump after the 2020 election loss that a return to the White House four years after the Biden administration would be ‘bigger’ than a consecutive win, comparing it to Winston Churchill’s return as prime minister following World War II.

‘Maybe I shouldn’t disclose this, but I will, and it was after the 2020 election, and you asked me a question. And we’ve known each other for 30 years, so we have a friendship and we have a professional relationship,’ Hannity said in his exclusive interview with Trump on Wednesday. 

‘And the question you asked me, ‘maybe in the end, it will be better that if I came back in four years.’ And we talked about history. After World War Two, Winston Churchill was thrown out, but they brought him back. Grover Cleveland, the only other American president that did not serve consecutive terms,’ he continued. 

Churchill served as prime minister twice, from 1940-1945 and again from 1951 to 1955. Trump is the second U.S. president to serve two, non-consecutive terms behind President Grover Cleveland, the nation’s 22nd and 24th president. 

Hannity explained that he believed ‘it would be bigger if you came back.’ Trump agreed that it’s already shaping up that way after three days in office. 

‘It’s turning out to be bigger. And I think one thing is happening is people are learning that they can’t govern and that their policies are terrible. I mean, they don’t want to see a woman get pummeled by a man in a boxing ring?’ he said. 

Trump sat down for his first interview in the White House on Wednesday after he was sworn in as the 47th president on Monday. 

‘They don’t want to see men in women’s sports … They don’t want to have transgender for everyone. They don’t want a child leave home as a boy and come back two days later as a girl. A parent doesn’t want to see that, and there are states where that can happen. They don’t want to see taxes go through the roof like this,’ he continued. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS