Archive

2025

Browsing

Colorado coach Deion Sanders has faced criticism for his team’s clock management in several games.
In a recent loss to Georgia Tech, Sanders did not use two remaining timeouts in the final minute.
The article details six specific games since 2023 where clock management was a potential issue for Colorado.

BOULDER, CO — Colorado football coach Deion Sanders got a little defensive this week when asked about the final 67 seconds of his team’s 27-20 loss against Georgia Tech on Aug. 29.

It’s a sore subject – clock management.

“Let’s just get the cat of the bag, all right?” Sanders said about it at a news conference Tuesday.

Even the best coaches have struggled with clock management in the NFL and in college football. In this case, Sanders had two timeouts left but didn’t use them after his team fell behind 27-20 with 1:07 left.

If Sanders had used those timeouts, the Buffaloes (0-1) could have had more time to get in better position to tie or win. USA TODAY Sports consulted with a football clock-management expert to explain why and also analyze other clock-management issues under Sanders, whose team hosts Delaware on Saturday.

“It sounds like he needs to read my book and appoint a clock assistant who ensures that my best practice rules are always adhered to,” said John T. Reed, who wrote a book entitled Football Clock Management.

Here are six times since 2023 that clock-management issues could have cost Sanders the game, ranked by severity.

No. 1: Colorado gifts extra time to North Dakota State

This one nearly ended in disaster for the Buffaloes in their season opener in 2024. They had a 31-26 lead with 2:19 left when they got the ball at their own 25-yard line. All they needed to do is run out the clock to end the game. Running the ball and staying inbounds is a good way to do that. But quarterback Shedeur Sanders instead threw five passes on his first six snaps, including a deep throw on first down with 1:41 left, which fell incomplete to stop the clock at 1:34.

The Buffs then punted the ball back to North Dakota State, who got one last chance to win the game with 31 seconds left at their own 8-yard line.

“You run the ball on first down… game could be over right now,” ESPN announcer Roddy Jones said.

It wasn’t. The Bison ran six plays for 88 yards in 31 seconds, including a 49-yard Hail Mary completion that ended four yards short of the end zone as time expired. Colorado won, 31-26.

Afterward, Deion Sanders said his son Shedeur was trying to spread the love to his receivers when he should have killed the clock.

“Every second you leave on the clock unnecessarily may be the one your opponent uses to beat you,” says the book by Reed, a graduate of West Point and Harvard Business School.

No. 2: Sanders saves two timeouts vs. Georgia Tech, 2025

Down 27-20 with 1:07 left at its own 25-yard line, Colorado had a chance to tie or win. On first down, quarterback Kaidon Salter threw a short pass to running back Micah Welch, who was tackled inbounds for a 2-yard loss with 1:02 left. Instead of using one of his two timeouts to stop the clock, Colorado allows the clock to tick down to 45 seconds left before the next play.

“Do you call a timeout there?” Deion Sanders said Tuesday. “No, you’re right there. You don’t call a time out there. You gotta go. You gotta go. You’re running tempo, right? “

The next play – another pass – goes for 11 yards, with the receiver being tackled inbounds with about 39 seconds left and one yard short of the first down. Then on third-and-1 , the play doesn’t start until 29 seconds are left. Salter got the first down on a run but took some extra time running toward the sideline out of bounds with 18 seconds left.

“The clock stopped, OK?” Sanders said. “Scramble play, he ran out of bounds. The clock stopped, right. Now we throw the ball out of the end zone. Clock stopped. So when was the time to call timeout?”

Reed said he “should have called timeout after the two inbounds plays” at the beginning of the drive. Nearly 30 seconds ticked off without it.

Colorado ended up throwing a failed Hail Mary pass from the 50-yard line as time expired and lost the game. Sanders never used his two remaining timeouts.

No. 3: Colorado bungles series vs. Oregon State, 2023

Colorado was down 7-3 and got the ball at its own 4-yard line with 49 seconds left before halftime. If the Buffs had kept the ball on the ground and run out the clock, that would have been the score at halftime.

Instead, quarterback Shedeur Sanders attempted two passes that fell incomplete on first and second down before handing the ball off for no gain on third down. This gave the Beavers time to score after they took a timeout with 36 seconds left.

After Colorado punted the ball back to Oregon State, the Beavers returned the punt 28 yards and then got a 20-yard touchdown catch on the next play, helping them stake a 14-3 lead with 16 second left in the half. Colorado lost the game, 26-19.

“That’s on me,” Deion Sanders told ESPN at halftime.

Reed said Colorado “should have stuck to inbounds running plays, maybe even taking a knee.”

“On your own 4 with :49 left before half in a game where you had not been moving the ball, your win probability, while probably below .500 will be best preserved by conservative runs to get away from the end zone,” Reed said.

No. 4: Colorado runs out of time vs. Southern California, 2023

Colorado fell behind 34-7 in the second quarter but came back in the second half, only to run out of time in a 48-41 loss. Colorado had used its final second-half timeout with 6:44 left in the game. Then when they got the ball down by 48-34 with 5:58 left, they appeared to lack urgency and ran five running plays on a 10-play touchdown drive that took 4:15 off the clock. USC got the ball back with 1:43 left and ran three plays to end the game.

Deion Sanders indicated afterward he burned a timeout earlier in the half because of personnel issues.

“I’d rather take a timeout than risk six points not having 10 people on the field,” he said. He added that “in those moments, the now is more important than the future.”

No. 5: Utah hogs ball after Buffs burn early timeouts, 2023

Utah won this game, 23-17, after getting the ball with 7:25 left in the game and then running out the rest of the clock. That’s half of a quarter with Utah just sitting on the ball and averaging 37 seconds per play on that last possession – 12 plays for 49 yards, including four first downs.

The game ended as time expired and Utah facing third-and-14. With better clock management, Colorado might have gotten another chance.

Obviously, it would have helped if the Buffs had stopped Utah on defense in the end to get the ball back. But Colorado also didn’t help itself in the third quarter, when the Buffs burned two of its three second-half timeouts in the first 10 minutes of the half, including one after their first play of the second half.

As a result, Colorado ended up with only one timeout at the end, which it used with 1:41 left.

Sanders said he burned that early timeout to avoid a 5-yard penalty related to player substitution.

“Burning a timeout to avoid a 5-yard penalty is a clock management mistake,” Reed said.

That’s because he said a timeout can enable a team to start as many as seven plays that each themselves can stop the clock, with each play taking about six seconds.

“I hate burning time outs in odd-numbered quarters and raise hell about them,” Reed said. ““They are best used late in the half.”

No. 6: Buffs use no timeouts in second half vs. Stanford, 2023

The Buffs led 29-0 at halftime and then watched as Stanford scored on every single possession in the second half to force overtime before winning, 46-43.

That’s poor defense and poor offense. But guess how many timeouts the Buffs used to stop the bleeding in the second half?

Zero.

All they needed was one stop. A strategic timeout or three could have helped kill Stanford’s momentum.

Colorado’s next game against Delaware kicks off at 3:30 p.m. ET Saturday on Fox.

Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. Email: bschrotenb@usatoday.com

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Our picks to play in and win Super Bowl 60.
Forecasting the complete playoff fields for the AFC and NFC.
Who wins league MVP? Rookies of the Year? Which lineman takes home first Protector of the Year hardware? We make our predictions.

The 2025 NFL regular season gets underway Thursday night at Lincoln Financial Field, where the reigning Super Bowl champion Philadelphia Eagles will host the archrival Dallas Cowboys to kick off Week 1.

Five months from now, we’ll know if the Eagles will be in position to defend their crown, who might be in their way − or which team vanquished them on the road to Super Bowl 60 in Santa Clara − whether or not the Cowboys made the right call by trading Micah Parsons, not to mention which players will have earned individual accolades during the upcoming campaign.

But USA TODAY Sports’ staff of NFL experts appreciate that you demand predictions and projections for these questions now − whether it’s forecasting who will appear on Super Sunday, who will be the league’s MVP and its top rookie honorees, or even which offensive lineman becomes the first to win the newly created Protector of the Year award.

Premature envelopes, please … and don’t hold us to these.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is set to testify on Capitol Hill on Thursday, a week after turmoil engulfed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Lawmakers on the Senate Finance Committee, which has jurisdiction over the HHS, will hear from Kennedy on President Donald Trump’s healthcare agenda, dubbed by the secretary as the Make America Healthy Again movement.

While the committee does not directly oversee the CDC, the recent firing of former CDC Director Susan Monarez, the wave of high-level officials departing and other moves at the agency taken under Kennedy’s tenure are expected to dominate the line of questioning from both Republicans and Democratic lawmakers on the panel.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, who is a member of the panel, told reporters that Kennedy would face ‘hard questions’ from committee members, particularly over frustrations over Monarez, who was confirmed by the Senate less than a month before her ouster.

‘He’s gotta take responsibility… we confirm these people,’ the South Dakota Republican said. ‘We go through a lot of work to get them confirmed. And they’re in office a month?’

Speculation has swirled over the reason behind Monarez’s firing given her differing stance on vaccines compared to Kennedy, who spent much of his presidential campaign and tenure as secretary going after the efficacy and safety of vaccination, particularly those for COVID-19.

Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., who chairs the Senate health committee and was the deciding vote that propelled Kennedy to a role in the Trump administration, is also set to question the secretary.

Last week, he demanded that the federal government’s vaccine advisory panel, which was filled with Kennedy’s handpicked replacements after he recently booted the original panel members, postpone its scheduled meeting in September until ‘significant oversight’ was carried out by his committee, and charged that any recommendations made by the advisory panel should be rejected until then.

Cassidy told Fox News Digital that he was working on just what the oversight measures would look like and expected to announce his plans soon. In the meantime, he noted that he was supportive of Kennedy and Trump’s commitment to ‘radical transparency,’ but noted that his main concerns were about children’s health.  

‘It isn’t about R versus D. It isn’t about, you know, internecine fights within the Republican Party. It is about children and grandchildren, and will they die or be at risk of dying from vaccine-preventable disease,’ Cassidy said. ‘Now we’ve got to get to the truth of this.’

He also argued that members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices are supposed to receive materials to review before making vaccine recommendations and decisions, but questioned where the information would be coming from in the wake of several senior members of the CDC making their exit after Monarez’s firing.

‘We’ve got to have some sort of radical transparency into what scientific justification is being used for that,’ he said. ‘Is it a political appointee? Well, to say a political appointee is making scientific recommendations. Who’s a political appointee? I mean, are they a doctor, a PhD, or are they a political appointee? Our concern is they might just be political appointees, but we’re going to find that out.’

Sen. Steve Daines, R-Mont., another member of the Senate Finance Committee, told Fox News Digital that his line of questioning would focus on the abortion drug Mifepristone and its safety, but added that it was ‘fair’ for lawmakers to have debate over Kennedy’s leadership of the CDC and HHS.

‘It’s typical for any secretary that comes up, but I’m sure many of these issues that have been raised are related to some concerns. These questions are going to be asked, and I’m grateful that the Secretary will be there to explain what he sees going on and the path forward,’ he said.

Meanwhile, Kennedy defended his moves at the CDC in a Wall Street Journal opinion piece on Tuesday and contended that ‘President Trump has asked me to restore that trust and return the CDC to its core mission.’

He wrote that steps have already been taken to ‘eliminate conflicts of interest and bureaucratic complacency’ at the agency, and that leaders who ‘resisted reform’ had already been replaced.

‘Most CDC rank-and-file staff are honest public servants,’ Kennedy said. ‘Under this renewed mission, they can do their jobs as scientists without bowing to politics. The agency will again become the world authority on infectious-disease policy.’

‘First, the CDC must restore public trust — and that restoration has begun,’ he continued. ‘It won’t stop until America’s public-health institutions again serve the people with transparency, honesty and integrity.’

Fox News Digital reached out to the HHS for comment but did not hear back immediately. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A new NFL season brings hope to fanbases across the league. All 32 teams have a fresh outlook entering this season compared to when they last took the field for games in January – or February, if you’re the Philadelphia Eagles or Kansas City Chiefs.

The new season brings some changes on the field beyond just the starting players, coaching staffs or front offices. New rules typically accompany the start of a new season and 2025 is no different.

Fans will notice some changes to the kickoff procedure, overtime, celebrations and instant replay. There’s also going to be some new technology in the footballs themselves during the game to help improve quality of play.

That’s a lot to get in order as the Eagles and Dallas Cowboys ring in the new season in primetime on Thursday, Sept. 4 from Lincoln Financial Field in Philadelphia.

We’re here to help you get everything in order ahead of Week 1 of the regular season.

NFL rule changes for 2025

Kickoff changes

Last season saw massive changes to NFL kickoffs that are permanent for the 2025 season. Teams will still be kicking from their 35-yard line with all players (except the kicker) lined up at the receiving team’s 40-yard line. Receiving teams will have at least nine players in the ‘set up zone’ between their own 35- and 30-yard lines.

Rule changes this year will affect touchbacks. The receiving team will now get the ball at their 35-yard line if the kickoff goes into or beyond the end zone, a change from the 30-yard line last year. If the ball bounces into the end zone, the receiving team will get the ball at their own 20-yard line.

Overtime possession changes

In 2025, the postseason and regular season overtime rules will be the same. Each team will have a chance to possess the ball in overtime. After a three-minute intermission, overtime will last 10 minutes at most.

Each team will have an opportunity to possess the ball and the team with more points after the first possession wins. If the score is still tied after the first possession for both teams, the next score wins.

If the team kicking off to start overtime scores a safety on the initial possession, the team that kicked off is the winner.

Replay rule changes

Replay officials can now assist on more plays than in 2024. Last year, replay officials at the league offices in New York could help during replay reviews and some administrative issues. This year they’ll be able to step in for more situations and help provide objective rulings.

Here are the situations in which replay officials can help in 2025:

Spot of the ball or foul;
Complete or incomplete pass;
Touching of the ball or a line;
Penalty enforcement;
Confirmation of down;
Game clock administration;
Possession of a loose ball;
Player down by contact when not ruled down on the field;
Late hits out of bounds.

Replay officials can also assist for ruling on the following penalties:

Roughing the passer (when only based on a hit to the passer’s head or neck area)
Intentional Grounding;
Unnecessary roughness based on forcibly contacting a runner when he is out of bounds or hitting a defenseless player’s head or neck area;
Twisting, pulling or turning the facemask or helmet;
Horse-collar tackle;
Tripping;
Roughing or running into the kicker.

‘Nose-wipe’ celebration penalty

The ‘nose-wipe’ gesture popularized by Dallas Cowboys wide receiver CeeDee Lamb is now added to the list of celebrations that will draw an unsportsmanlike conduct penalty for 15 yards. The league claims that this gesture is related to gang activity.

Onside kick changes

NFL teams can now declare an onside kick at any point of the game so long as they are trailing. Last season, this was only allowed in the fourth quarter. These kicks will now be booted from the 34-yard line instead of the 35-yard line.

Hawk-Eye technology

Sony and the NFL partnered for this new technology to determine if a ball is crossed the line to gain for a first down. The new system uses six high-definition cameras positioned in each NFL stadium to determine where the ball is on the field. These cameras are controlled in the instant replay booth and will be the primary spotting system instead of a chain crew.

This system was trialed behind-the-scenes in 2024 and first deployed during the 2025 Hall of Fame Game.

The idea behind this is to speed up measurements for first downs and prevent potentially inaccurate measurements.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Philadelphia Eagles defeated the Kansas City Chiefs 40-22 in Super Bowl 59 to cap off their 2024 season.
Despite the championship, the Eagles are not receiving the typical buzz of a reigning Super Bowl victor ahead of the 2025 season.
Philadelphia returns most of its dominant offense, including star running back Saquon Barkley and its signature ‘Tush Push’ play.

The Philadelphia Eagles capped off a dominant 2024 season with a 40-22 Super Bowl 59 thrashing of the Kansas City Chiefs. Philadelphia’s victory denied Kansas City an unprecedented three-peat and unofficially established the Eagles as the NFL’s new team to beat.

But you wouldn’t necessarily know it from the buzz – or lack thereof – surrounding the Eagles ahead of the 2025 NFL season.

Sure, the Eagles have gotten some love ahead of the upcoming campaign. Sportsbooks still favor Nick Sirianni’s squad to win the NFC, and they are among the league’s Super Bowl favorites as well.

Even so, the enthusiasm surrounding the Eagles doesn’t appear to match that of other recent Super Bowl victors.

What gives? Perhaps the Eagles are a victim of circumstance. They haven’t made many splashy changes to their team during the offseason while others in their conference – notably the Dallas Cowboys, Detroit Lions, Green Bay Packers and Minnesota Vikings – have, for better or worse.

Or maybe it’s because NFL fans and analysts remain hyper-focused on the dynastic Chiefs, who have won five of the last six AFC titles and carry a headline-making duo of Patrick Mahomes and Travis Kelce as their top players.

Whatever the case, the Eagles deserve more love than they have received ahead of the 2025 NFL season. Here’s why Philadelphia should be viewed as the Super Bowl 60 favorites.

The Eagles have impressive continuity on offense

The Eagles sported one of the NFL’s best offenses during the 2024 NFL season. The unit ranked eighth in yards per game (367.2), seventh in points per game (27.2) and sixth in offensive EPA while rivaling the Baltimore Ravens for the title of the NFL’s best rushing offense across all categories.

Some may be worried about the Eagles continuing to perform at a high clip in 2025 after offensive coordinator Kellen Moore took the New Orleans Saints coaching job during the offseason.

That said, the Eagles are returning 10 of the 11 players that started Super Bowl 59 to their offense in 2025. The lone exception is right guard Mekhi Becton, who signed with the Los Angeles Chargers in free agency.

Replacing Becton – who thrived as a run blocker in his lone season with the Eagles – won’t necessarily be easy for Philadelphia. His projected replacement, 2023 third-round pick Tyler Steen, graded 75th among 77 qualified guards last season, per Pro Football Focus.

Still, that’s just one potential hole about which the Eagles must worry on offense. And if top-tier offensive line coach Jeff Stoutland can help Steen take another step forward, Philadelphia’s offense could come out of the gates humming given the personnel’s familiarity with one another.

Saquon Barkley remains one of the best RBs in the NFL

Barkley was one of the Eagles’ shiny, new additions ahead of the 2024 campaign. There was optimism about what the free agent signee might do in his first season, but he vastly exceeded those expectations.

Barkley should continue to be a major weapon running behind an offensive line that helped him average a whopping 3.8 yards before contact last season, 0.5 yards per carry more than any other running back. The 28-year-old also still has a great top speed; he had four of the 14 fastest ball carrier speeds in the NFL last season, per NFL’s Next Gen Stats.

Does that mean Barkley will reach 2,000 yards again? Probably not, especially since he handled a whopping 480 touches last season, playoffs included.

Still, Barkley is in his prime and should be an explosive, three-down workhorse as the focal point of Philadelphia’s ground-dominant offense.

The ‘Tush Push’ is still legal

As if you needed another reason to love the Eagles offense in 2025, the NFL’s competition committee decided not to ban the team’s signature ‘Tush Push’ play during the offseason.

The Eagles were tough to stop in short-yardage situations because of the Tush Push. They converted 39 of their 48 attempts of the modified QB sneak into first downs or touchdowns last season, according to CBS Sports, good for a success rate of 81.25%.

With that weapon available, the Eagles should once again be among the NFL’s best short-yardage teams. That will allow them to extend drives thanks to Jalen Hurts’ powerful legs and wear opponents out using their elite running game.

The defense has young talent and an elite veteran coordinator

While Philadelphia’s starting offense remains largely the same as the one it had last year, its defense will look a lot different. The team parted with Milton Williams, Josh Sweat, Darius Slay and CJ Gardner-Johnson during the offseason, which shook up the team’s depth along the defensive front and in the secondary.

The good news for the Eagles? The team has a wealth of young talent in each position group, which should be ready to step into larger roles. Howie Roseman has always hoarded talent along the defensive line but has increasingly spent high-end draft capital on defensive backs like Quinyon Mitchell, Cooper DeJean, Sydney Brown and Andrew Mukuba to balance the roster.

Asking these players to step into bigger roles certainly comes with some risk, but having Vic Fangio should quell concerns about the Eagles’ stop unit taking any major step back.

Fangio, 67, has spent 24 years as an NFL defensive coordinator or head coach. Since 2018, he has coached four of his six defenses to top-10 scoring finishes and four to top-10 finishes in total yards allowed. That includes last season’s Eagles defense, which ranked No. 1 in yards allowed, No. 2 in points allowed and No. 2 in defensive EPA.

The Eagles remain without a big-time challenger in the NFC

The Eagles won the NFC last season. Who is to stop them from doing so again in 2025? There are many candidates, but all come with significant question marks.

The Lions were the NFC’s No. 1 seed last season, but they lost their offensive and defensive coordinators, Ben Johnson and Aaron Glenn, to coaching jobs. Meanwhile, star center Frank Ragnow retired, which will add uncertainty to a Detroit offense that was already facing questions without Johnson available.

The Washington Commanders surprised many with a run to the NFC championship game last season, but are they ready to take another leap forward? If not, they may not yet be ready to surpass the Eagles, who went 2-1 against them last season and beat them 55-23 in the NFC championship game.

The Vikings and Rams were both playoff teams last season, but each is facing a question at quarterback. Minnesota is turning to first-year starter J.J. McCarthy to lead a loaded offense while Los Angeles is trusting 37-year-old Matthew Stafford to lead it as he battles a bad back. Both quarterbacks could pan out, but if they don’t, the Vikings and Rams could have lower floors than expected.

The Packers may be the most intriguing of the 2024 playoff teams that could challenge the Eagles. They traded for Micah Parsons on eve of the season, and he should provide a significant boost to their Super Bowl chances. Even so, Parsons is battling a back injury while quarterback Jordan Love, who was banged up often last season, missed most of the preseason because of a finger injury.

Several other NFC teams – namely the Tampa Bay Buccaneers and San Francisco 49ers – could work their way into the Super Bowl conversation, but the Eagles clearly have a leg up on their competition at present. A top challenger will eventually emerge, but at present, it’s hard to argue against the Eagles as the favorites to win their third NFC championship of the last four years.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Argentina will host Venezuela in a 2026 World Cup qualifying match, which is the defending World Cup champions’ last scheduled home match in the foreseeable future.

Messi, 38, acknowledged the significance of the occasion in a recent postgame interview with Inter Miami last week.

“It’s going to be a very special game for me because it’s the last one in the qualifying round I don’t know if there will be friendlies or more games after that,” Messi said during a postgame interview with Apple TV after Inter Miami’s win against Orlando City in the Leagues Cup semifinals on Aug. 27.

“It’s a very special game, which is why my family will be there with me – my wife, my children, my parents, my siblings, and everyone else that can, including my wife’s whole family. And that’s how we’re going to experience it.”

“After that, as I said, I don’t know what will happen, but that’s our intention,” Messi added.

Argentina has already qualified for the 2026 World Cup to be co-hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico, but Messi has yet to officially declare he will play in the tournament for the sixth time in his career.

Messi is under contract with Inter Miami through the end of the 2025 MLS season, with reported ongoing negotiations to sign an extension with the club.

Argentine national team coach Lionel Scaloni acknowledged the occasion during a press conference Wednesday, while adding the club would look to plan another match for Messi in Argentina when the time is right.

‘[Thursday] will be a beautiful, exciting game. Surely, it won’t be his last game in Argentina, and I saw that from the point of view that, if he decides it will be his last, we’ll make sure he gets to play another one,’ Scaloni said regarding Messi. ‘We’ll find the right moment, because he deserves it.’

When and where is the Argentina vs. Venezuela match?

The Sept. 4 match begins at 7:30 p.m. ET (8:30 p.m. in Argentina) at Mâs Monumental in Buenos Aires.

How to watch Argentina vs. Venezuela on Sept. 4?

The match will be broadcast on Universo and can be streamed on Fubo.

Watch Argentina vs. Venezuela on Fanatiz PPV

Is Messi going to play?

For the reasons listed above, it appears very likely Messi will play with Argentina against Venezuela.

When is the next time Messi will play with Argentina after Venezuela match?

Argentina will visit Ecuador on Sept. 9 to conclude Conmebol World Cup qualifying, but it’s possible Messi will return to South Florida as Inter Miami prepares for the last stretch of the 2025 MLS season.

Will Messi play with Argentina in October or November?

Messi could potentially participate in four more Argentina friendly matches later this year.

Argentina is planning to play two friendly matches in the United States between October 6-14 with locations and opponents to be determined. These friendlies would coincide with Inter Miami’s MLS season, potentially creating a scheduling conflict for Messi.

Argentina will also play two friendly matches between Nov. 10-18 in in Luanda, Angola, and Kerala, India with opponents to be determined. These friendlies would fall under a FIFA international window.

Messi’s upcoming schedule with Inter Miami and Argentina

Sept. 4: Argentina vs. Venezuela (World Cup qualifying)
Sept. 9: Ecuador vs. Argentina (World Cup qualifying)
Sept. 13: Charlotte FC vs. Inter Miami, 7:30 p.m. (MLS regular season)
Sept. 16: Inter Miami vs. Seattle Sounders, 7:30 p.m. (MLS regular season)
Sept. 20: Inter Miami vs. D.C. United, 7:30 p.m. (MLS regular season)
Sept. 24: New York City FC vs. Inter Miami, 7:30 p.m. (MLS regular season)
Sept. 27: Toronto FC vs. Inter Miami, 4:30 p.m. (MLS regular season)
Sept. 30: Inter Miami vs. Chicago Fire, 7:30 p.m. (MLS regular season)

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Saquon Barkley rushed for 2,005 yards in 2024, his first season with the Philadelphia Eagles.
Historically, running backs see a significant drop in production the year after rushing for 2,000 yards.
Barkley’s projected stats for 2025 are 308 carries, 1,694 rushing yards, and 10 touchdowns.

Saquon Barkley became the ninth 2,000-yard rusher during his first season with the Philadelphia Eagles. Can he do it again in 2025?

On the surface, Barkley would look like a candidate to become the NFL’s first two-time, 2,000-yard rusher. The 28-year-old is in his prime and plays for one of the best and most run-heavy offenses in the NFL.

But Barkley also handled a major workload in 2024. He handled 482 touches, including the playoffs, and it isn’t clear whether that high volume of usage will impact him as he enters the 2025 NFL season.

Add in that no running back has even topped 1,500 rushing yards in the year following a 2,000-yard campaign and it’s hard to guarantee Barkley will be able to reach historic heights again in 2025.

How well will Barkley do in his second season with the Eagles? Here’s a look at a stat projection for his season and why he could still make history even if he doesn’t reach 2,000 yards rushing in 2025.

NFL 2,000-yard rushers

The NFL has seen nine players record 2,000 rushing yards in a single season during its history. They are as follows:

1973: O.J. Simpson, Bills – 2,003
1984: Eric Dickerson, Rams – 2,105
1997: Barry Sanders, Lions – 2,053
1998: Terrell Davis, Broncos – 2,008
2003: Jamal Lewis, Ravens – 2,056
2009: Chris Johnson, Titans – 2,006
2012: Adrian Peterson, Vikings – 2,097
2020: Derrick Henry, Titans – 2,027
2025: Saquon Barkley, Eagles – 2,005

How do NFL running backs fare after 2,000-yard seasons?

Typically, running backs see a noticeable decline in production in the season following their 2,000-yard campaigns. It isn’t necessarily because they lack opportunities.

The NFL’s previous eight 2,000-yard rushers averaged just 2.5 fewer carries per game in the season following their 2,000-yard campaign. However, they experienced an average decline of 41.2 rushing yards per game despite the relatively similar opportunities.

The reason for the precipitous step-back? No NFL running back has averaged more than 4.5 yards per carry in the season following their 2,000-yard campaign. As a group, they have averaged 4.3 yards per carry; by comparison, the eight averaged a collective 5.6 yards per carry during their 2,000-yard seasons, with Davis’ 5.1 yards per carry in 1998 serving as the lowest average.

Below is a look at the average, per-game stats of running backs during their 2,000-yard seasons:

Carries: 23.1
Rushing yards: 129.9
Rushing TDs: 0.9
Yards per carry: 5.6

And here is a look at the per-game stats in the season following:

Carries: 20.6
Rushing yards: 88.7
Rushing TDs: 0.6
Yards per carry: 4.5

Even so, only two of the eight running backs have failed to eclipse 1,000 rushing yards in the campaign following their 2,000-yard season. Both players, Davis and Henry, were impacted by injuries that limited them to four and eight games respectively.

So, while 2,000-yard rushers typically see a drop-off, they still usually remain high-caliber starting running backs.

Who has the most rushing yards after a 2,000-yard season?

Barry Sanders owns the record for the most single-season rushing yards recorded immediately following a 2,000-yard season. Sanders ran for 1,491 yards during the 1999 season, which turned out to be his final NFL season.

Sanders was also the lone running back to record an increase in carries in the year following his 2,000-yard season. He ran the ball 335 times in 1998 before seeing that number increase to 343 in his final season.

Saquon Barkley stat projection 2025

Carries: 308
Rushing yards: 1,694
Rushing TDs: 10
Yards per carry: 5.5

Could Barkley become the first back to record multiple 2,000-yard seasons? That may prove difficult. That said, a path exists for Barkley to surpass Sanders’ record for a 2,000-yard season follow-up.

Barkley averaged a career-high 5.8 yards per carry last season, and much of that was buoyed by his elite offensive line. His blockers helped him to rack up an average of 3.8 yards before contact per run; Jahmyr Gibbs (3.3) and Derrick Henry (3.1) were the only other running backs league-wide to average better than 3 yards before contact per carry.

Philadelphia is returning four of its five starting offensive linemen from last season, with the lone exception being right guard Mekhi Becton, who signed with the Los Angeles Chargers. So long as 2023 third-round pick Tyler Steen proves to be a capable replacement, the blocking in front of Barkley should remain strong.

If that’s the case, Barkley will have more big-play potential than most backs around the NFL thanks to his blazing speed. Barkley led the league in runs of 40-plus yards (7) and recorded four of the 14 fastest speeds by a ball-carrier during the 2024 NFL season. His top speed of 21.93 mph was good for fourth-best in the league behind only Dallas Cowboys receiver KaVontae Turpin (22.36), Jacksonville Jaguars receiver Brian Thomas Jr. (22.15) and Gibbs (22.03).

If Barkley can continue to generate explosive plays, that will significantly boost his chances of once again topping the league’s rushing leaderboard.

Finally, it’s worth noting Barkley sat out the Eagles’ Week 18 game because the team had already clinched the NFC East and wasn’t in the running for the conference’s No. 1 seed. If he plays all 17 games in 2025, that would give him an extra contest to rack up yardage, which could give him a boost as he looks to repeat his 2,000-yard feat.

Still, while there are many reasons to be bullish on Barkley’s potential, it’s also worth noting he handled 482 total touches last season, including the playoffs. The Eagles may want to slightly limit his touches to avoid any significant fatigue or wear-and-tear, so he shouldn’t be expected to exceed his career-high carry total (345) from the previous season.

That slight regression should keep Barkley from going over 2,000 yards again, but Eagles fans can still expect him to be among the best running backs in the NFL.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Ashley Biden, daughter of former President Joe Biden and former first lady Jill Biden, wrote on social media that it was ‘one of the hardest summers of my life.’

The post comes after a summer during which the former first daughter faced two main challenges: her divorce and her father’s cancer diagnosis.

‘August 2025. The summer of 2025 was one of the hardest summers of my life. I have been preparing for the fall (my fav season) and now ready for the RISE,’ she wrote as the caption of a carousel of summer photos. ‘Grateful for the support of friends and family. Grateful that I took the time/space to grieve, process and heal. Grateful for peace of mind, new beginnings, new seasons, and a rediscovered strength and love for myself.’ 

She ended the caption with ‘#SturgeonMoon2025’ – a reference to the August full moon – followed by a string of emojis.

Last month, Ashley Biden shared a photo of her with her ex-husband and another woman, who the former first daughter identified as the doctor’s ‘girlfriend.’

She captioned the Instagram story, ‘my husband and his girlfriend holding hands,’ and posted it with the Notorious B.I.G. song ‘Another,’ featuring Lil’ Kim, the New York Post reported. 

The outlet also noted that the Instagram story was posted just hours before Ashley Biden filed for divorce from her husband of 13 years. 

The story appeared on Aug. 10 and was deleted shortly after it was posted. While it appeared to be aimed at her husband, the people in the image faced away from the camera and were not immediately identifiable.

The Post also reported in August that in a separate Instagram story, which was also deleted, Ashley Biden posted herself walking through a park giving a thumbs-up while ‘Freedom’ by Beyoncé played.

Ashley Biden’s divorce filing states the marriage is ‘irretrievably broken’ and requests spousal support while the divorce is pending, according to filings reviewed by Radar Online.

She married Dr. Howard Krein in 2012 with a ceremony blending her Catholic faith with his Jewish heritage, followed by a reception at the Biden family’s lake house in Wilmington. 

At the time, then–Vice President Joe Biden praised his future son-in-law, telling People magazine: ‘This is the right guy. And he’s getting a helluva woman.’

At the 2024 Democratic National Convention, Ashley Biden recalled her father’s role in her wedding to Krein, saying, ‘At the time, my dad was vice president, but he was also that dad who literally set up the entire reception. He was riding around in his John Deere 4-wheeler, fixing the place settings, arranging the plants, and by the way, he was very emotional.’

In May, Biden’s office confirmed he had been diagnosed with an ‘aggressive form’ of prostate cancer.

‘While this represents a more aggressive form of the disease, the cancer appears to be hormone-sensitive which allows for effective management. The [former p]resident and his family are reviewing treatment options with his physicians,’ Biden’s team shared in a statement.

Ashley Biden made a similar Instagram reflection post at the end of May, writing: ‘May 2025. Heartbroken yet HOPEFUL. MAY I have the courage to handle all that life throws at me (us). So very grateful for all the love + support.’

‘Life is tough my darling, but so are YOU,’ she added at the time.

On the same day, she also posted a picture of herself with her parents and seemingly pushed back against rumors that her family had covered up her father’s cancer diagnosis while he was in the White House.

Fox News Digital’s Jasmine Baehr contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Senate Republicans are grappling with President Donald Trump’s move to cancel $4.9 billion in foreign aid funding and what the ramifications could be on the looming deadline to fund the government.

Senate Democrats previously warned after the GOP’s first go-round with clawbacks that any further attempt to gut congressionally-approved funding would be a red line, and that it could lead to Democratic lawmakers withholding their support for a short-term government funding extension, known as a continuing resolution (CR).

The Trump administration’s decision last week to go forward with a pocket rescission, which skirts the 45-day window needed for a typical clawback package, rattled Senate Democrats and has alarmed some Republicans about finding a path forward to keep the government open.

‘The last thing in the world we need to do is to give our Democrat colleagues any reason not to try to move forward with the appropriations process,’ Sen. Mike Rounds, R-S.D., said.

‘That does concern me, and once again, we need to get the appropriations process back on track,’ he continued. ‘We’re going to do whatever we can to get this thing through this year. We’re committed to it. It’s better if Congress takes back its authority on this. Quit doing continuing resolutions, do the appropriations process.’

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., on the other hand, was all for the move and wasn’t worried about the impact it could have on a shutdown.

‘I’m concerned about more spending from those negotiations,’ he told Fox News Digital. ‘Again, you’re not going to get me concerned about anything that cuts spending or reduces the size and scope across government. I’m all for it, no matter how we do it.’

Still, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., will likely need Democratic support to advance any spending bills, let alone a CR by Sept. 30, through the upper chamber’s filibuster threshold, given that a handful of Republicans never vote for funding extensions.

Rounds and other members of the Senate Appropriations Committee are in favor of barreling forward with passing spending bills and have so far been successful in advancing three with bipartisan support.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who in July warned that Trump’s first $9 billion clawback package would have ‘grave implications’ on the appropriations process, has maintained that congressional Democrats were united in their desire to continue working on spending bills with Republicans.

He warned that Republicans would ‘face their greatest test under the Trump administration,’ to either work across the aisle or face a shutdown.

‘However, as near the funding deadline, Republicans are once again threatening to go at it alone, heading our country towards a shutdown,’ Schumer said.

Thune has also remained committed to seeing lawmakers pass the dozen bills needed to fund the government, but acknowledged ‘inevitably, it looks like [we] need a CR for some time for the foreseeable future.’

And he warned that Democrats may try to use the latest clawback package ‘as an excuse’ to not fund the government.

‘That’s all it’ll be is an excuse, because they know that I’m committed, Sen. [Susan] Collins is committed, our conference is committed to working constructively to try and fund the government through the normal appropriations process,’ he said.

Meanwhile, some Republicans questioned if turning toward clawbacks was the best way to tackle spending cuts and argued that such measures were already baked into the annual appropriations process.

When news of the package surfaced, Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins, R-Maine, charged that efforts to claw back ‘appropriated funds without congressional approval is a clear violation of the law.’

Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., told Fox News Digital he wasn’t worried about the legality of the move so much as whether turning to the clawbacks was ‘the most efficient way to get at spending cuts.’

‘I think the appropriations process is a better way, and we’ve had some success, and I’d like to keep that momentum going and try to, you know, avoid a shutdown and get back to regular order,’ he said.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A group of anonymous federal judges is criticizing the Supreme Court for overturning lower court rulings and siding with President Donald Trump’s administration with little to no explanation, NBC News reported Thursday.

NBC spoke with 12 federal judges, appointed by Democratic and Republican presidents including Trump, who pointed to a trend of lower court decisions being overturned by emergency rulings from the high court. These cases often see prominent members of Trump’s administration lashing out at lower court judges before their cases are overturned.

Ten of the 12 judges argued the Supreme Court should offer more explanation when overturning such decisions, saying emergency rulings in such cases imply poor work on the part of lower court judges.

‘It is inexcusable,’ one judge said of the Supreme Court. ‘They don’t have our backs.’

That judge also said they have received death threats for issuing rulings that counter Trump’s agenda. Trump himself and some of his top officials have spoken out against judges issuing unfavorable rulings.

When Judge James Boasberg sought to block the administration’s deportation flights to El Salvador, Trump argued he should be ‘IMPEACHED’ on social media.

When various judges issued rulings blocking Trump’s tariff agenda in March, White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller argued it was a ‘judicial coup.’

The judge who described the Supreme Court’s actions as inexcusable predicted that ‘somebody is going to die’ if criticism from top Trump officials continues, according to NBC.

Another judge said lower courts are being ‘thrown under the bus.’

‘It’s almost like the Supreme Court is saying it is a ‘judicial coup,’’ a third judge told the outlet.

A fourth judge, however, appointed by President Barack Obama, conceded that several judges had been out of line with their rulings against Trump.

‘The whole ‘Trump derangement syndrome’ is a real issue. As a result, judges are mad at what Trump is doing or the manner he is going about things; they are sometimes forgetting to stay in their lane,’ that judge said.

‘Certainly, there is a strong sense in the judiciary among the judges ruling on these cases that the court is leaving them out to dry,’ the judge continued. ‘They are partially right to feel the way they feel.’

The Supreme Court’s public information office did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS