Archive

2025

Browsing

A new ESPN 30 for 30 film details the life and career of pioneering sportscaster Stuart Scott.
Scott revolutionized sports broadcasting by incorporating hip-hop culture and catchphrases into his reports.
The film uses never-before-seen footage and interviews with colleagues, athletes, and family to tell his story.

How can you tell a story in just 77 minutes about someone who meant so much to so many people?

Maybe a better question is, how strong is perseverance when faced with insurmountable odds in both work and life?

Filmmaker Andre Gaines (“The One and Only Dick Gregory”, “The Dutchman”) faced that dilemma head-on when trying to answer those questions and many more while telling the story of beloved sportscaster Stuart Scott.

Scott is the subject of ESPN’s latest 30 for 30 film: “Boo-Yah: A Stuart Scott Portrait,” which premieres on Dec. 10 at 9 pm ET on ESPN, the ESPN app, and Disney+.

“It’s a triumphant story, but also a tragic one,” Gaines, who also produced the film, told USA TODAY Sports. “Hopefully, we will celebrate his life, as opposed to linger on his death.”

For his part, Gaines does a more than admirable job, blending storytelling that allows the subject to tell the story without being heavy-handed in its message, using never-before-seen footage, and Scott’s own self-shot home videos.

Scott, who died at age 49 in 2015 after a more than seven-year battle with appendix cancer, revolutionized sports broadcasting with a distinctive style that he created, cultivated, and ultimately perfected, while challenging the public – especially those who didn’t look like him – to accept it.

Let’s face it, ESPN and its studio shows were a by-the-numbers production, and although they were popular because there was nothing else like it on cable television, they certainly had no semblance of style until Scott arrived in 1993, at the start of ESPN2.

Scott realized that hip-hop was a major force in mainstream America and inserted catchphrases like “cool as the other side of the pillow” or “Michael (Jordan) was like butter because he’s on a roll.” That is some culture-changing stuff, and it is still being talked about today, in the age of everyone trying to become viral, just because, not necessarily because they had talent like Scott.

Those who experienced it felt the brilliance and ease with which someone can be unapologetically true to themselves while doing their job with excellence and touching many lives, whether others choose to follow in their footsteps or not. 

Those who didn’t get it – and still don’t – were a vocal minority, especially people who wasted their time sending Scott racist letters and phone messages, including one Scott played in one of his home videos, to drive home his point.

That is a significant theme in the film, as Scott received constant blowback for his style – from outsiders and even some inside the Bristol headquarters – despite ESPN hiring him for that very reason because he was different.

Gaines said he didn’t name names and pick on those executives or anyone else who complained about Scott’s unique style. If there is one slight grumble about the film, that’s it.

In a documentary format or anything that is based on someone’s life, all sides need to be picked apart. In the science of truth-telling, sometimes feelings get hurt or not-so-flattering reminders of unacceptable or even racist behavior and speech come to light, and that’s ok.

Gaines began the project nearly two years ago, interviewed 50 people, and said he had enough footage for a four-or five-part series.

Scott’s story begins in Chicago and North Carolina, and he never intended to become a sportscaster. Originally, Scott wanted to be a football player, but he was diagnosed with Keratoconus in high school, a rare eye disease that would affect him for the rest of his life. That eye issue became more complicated when he was preparing a story about the New York Jets training camp; all the while, his true hope was that he could actually make the team.

While catching footballs from a jug machine, one hit him in the eye where he had good vision, setting off a chain of events that included him barely being able to see while doing his job.

The film really takes off when Scott’s former colleagues, including Chris Berman, Rich Eisen, Robin Roberts, athletes like Charles Barkley and Shaquille O’Neal, and his loved ones, especially his daughters Taelor and Sydni, who showed incredible grace throughout, are interviewed. These interviews provide more insight into a man whose work ethic was unmatched, but that trait, combined with long work-related absences, ultimately led to the end of his marriage.

The film’s last 25 minutes are not for the weary, (Gaines warns viewers to have their tissues handy) detailing Scott’s final years, from his courageous fight with cancer to his last public appearance before the 2014 ESPY Awards, where he poignantly said, “You beat cancer by how you live, why you live, and the manner in which you live.”  

There is a montage of photos near the film’s conclusion featuring Scott, including some from the last few weeks of his life – set to Donny Hathaway’s “A Song for You” – that are incredibly heartbreaking but also highlight the remarkable life of a man who left us too soon, and most importantly, left a bigger, more significant mark. The film’s strength in allowing the viewer to determine what that is and how it applies to them can’t be understated.

There is no doubt: amid the constant debate, sports morning shows, and podcasts from athletes and celebrities alike, Scott paved the way for them to monetize their brands through mass-consumption platforms, for better or worse.

“With Stuart, what’s interesting is that he was able to maintain that position in his personality for the times to catch up with him,” Gaines said. “Thankfully, in his short life, he was able to enjoy some of the spoils of that.”

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Ohio State is down but not out, even as Indiana roars.
Controversial CFP bracket choice Miami can spring an upset against Texas A&M.
Put some respect on Texas Tech, too.

The College Football Playoff bracket is finalized, but the grievances will continue until the games begin. OK, let’s be real, they’ll continue after the games begin.

The 12-team bracket means more drama than the four-team format, but also more criticisms of the CFP committee.

Some of those are worthy criticisms. We might need to rethink the bracket format. Something seems off when unranked Duke had a better chance of selection than No. 14 Vanderbilt.

Here are seven College Football Playoff bracket hot takes burning on my brain:

1. Playoff selections weren’t the problem. Process is.

Notre Dame didn’t possess a superior resume than Alabama or Miami. Let’s get that out of the way.

The Irish had some factors in their favor, but not enough to definitively outweigh the arguments of Alabama or Miami. I push back on anyone saying the Irish got “snubbed.” That implies they were clearly a better choice than Alabama or Miami. They weren’t.

The issue is not the selection of Alabama and Miami, but rather the path to reaching that decision, the optics of which look bizarre at best and downright fishy at worst.

The committee told you for weeks it favored Notre Dame over Miami. Many of us disputed that logic, because Miami beat the Irish in Week 1. But, the committee maintained every week that Notre Dame was the better team.

Now, suddenly, it values Miami more, because Brigham Young lost to Texas Tech in the Big 12 championship game. Seriously, that’s the reasoning offered by CFP committee chairman Hunter Yurachek.

BYU lost to Texas Tech for a second time, the Cougars dropped in the rankings, and somehow that compelled the committee to validate a head-to-head Miami-Irish result it had rebuffed for weeks.

Makes sense, right? Not really.

The committee also decided Alabama’s pathetic performance in a 28-7 loss to Georgia in the SEC championship game didn’t matter at all. The Crimson Tide didn’t budge an inch in the seeding, making it the only ranked team to lose a conference championship and not drop in the rankings.

I respect the choice of Alabama and Miami for the final at-large spot. I have no respect for how the committee arrived at this selection.

2. Automatic bids weaken bracket, need rethinking

Duke won the ACC despite playing fewer than half the teams in its conference. Think about that. The Blue Devils won the 17-team ACC while facing just eight conference peers.

That’s an insufficient sample size to declare a team eligible for an automatic bid.

Automatic bids were a worthy idea when conferences were smaller, but now that conferences are so big, a team can win its conference crown while playing only about half the membership.

Conferences can keep their championship games. That’s up to them. But, CFP stakeholders need to seriously reconsider whether auto bids are a bug, and not a feature, for the playoff.

The committee didn’t admit Duke, but the Blue Devils’ ACC title nonetheless became a wrench in the works, because CFP rules dictate five conference champions must earn automatic bids.

That paved the way for the selection of two Group of Five teams with auto bids. The inclusion of Tulane and James Madison cheapen this bracket. Nobody can say with a straight face either of those teams are among the nation’s 12-best teams.

I don’t want to dump on the little guy, and I’m not trying to rob the Blue Devils of their conference crown, but when five-loss Duke and James Madison have a better chance of earning playoff selection than 10-2 Vanderbilt, something’s broken.

Keep the bracket’s size at 12 teams. But, rethink how bids are allocated.

3. Altering CFP bye rules proved a worthy change

If CFP stakeholders had not changed the bye rules this past offseason, then Tulane would’ve gotten a bye. The same Tulane team that lost to Mississippi by 35 points.

The rules for the 12-team bracket in place last season dictated only conference champions could receive a bye. Those rules were tweaked after in the offseason so that the top four teams got byes, no matter whether they won a conference title.

At the time, I questioned whether that was a knee-jerk change. I was wrong. It was a worthy change.

The rules alteration allowed Ohio State to nab the No. 2 seed, instead of the No. 5 seed, and Tulane is No. 11 instead of No. 4, which would’ve been its seed under last year’s rules.

Yes, indeed, a good adjustment.

4. Indiana earns a great draw

Oregon’s No. 1 seed last season became a booby trap, paired with the committee seeding Ohio State No. 8. The Ducks’ prize for going undefeated in the regular season became a rematch with the nation’s most talented team in the quarterfinals. Didn’t go well for Oregon, you’ll recall.

In this second iteration of the 12-team bracket, No. 1 Indiana drew a much better fate than Oregon did. There’s no behemoth on the No. 8 seed line akin to 2024 Ohio State. Just Oklahoma.

The Sooners have a supreme defense that could slow down Indiana star Fernando Mendoza, if Oklahoma handles No. 9 Alabama in the first round. But, the Sooners have offensive limitations. So does Alabama.

Indiana is equipped to win a slugfest. It proved that in its Big Ten title game win over Ohio State. If the Hoosiers can get their offense rolling a bit against a good defense in the quarterfinals, their opponent won’t be equipped to keep up.

5. Texas Tech a beast below the radar

After the SEC championship game, I mentioned to a fellow scribe I thought one of four teams would win the national championship.

“Who’s the fourth?” he responded.

Texas Tech.

Who are the other three?

Indiana. Ohio State. Georgia.

No one sane would dispute the first three. I’m not sure how anyone who watched Texas Tech twice crush Brigham Young could argue with the fourth.

The Red Raiders’ defense is pure ferocity. Remove the conference logo patch, and you might think this is a Kirby Smart defense.

Texas Tech’s only loss came without starting quarterback Behren Morton, who missed the Arizona State game with an injury.

Indiana’s bracket draw is undeniably better than the bitter pill Oregon got handed last year, but the Hoosiers will be on upset alert if they face Big Oil U. in the semifinals.

6. Upset special: No. 10 Miami beats No. 7 Texas A&M

Miami enters the playoff on a heater, after blowouts of Syracuse, North Carolina State, Virginia Tech and Pittsburgh. The Aggies wobbled in, needing a furious comeback to survive South Carolina, then losing to Texas.

If an official would’ve flagged Texas A&M for holding on Sept. 13 in South Bend, the Aggies wouldn’t be in this bracket.

No flag emerged, and so no argument with Texas A&M’s bid, but it’s vulnerable to an upset if good Carson Beck makes the journey to Kyle Field and bad Carson Beck stays home.

7. National champion prediction: Ohio State

The Buckeyes’ path to winning a national championship did not substantially stiffen by their movement from the No. 1 to the No. 2 seed line.

Hoosiers fans will cherish their Big Ten championship long after the days when a Curt Cignetti statue is erected, and a national championship is absolutely in play for Indiana, but neither of Ohio State’s last two national titles included an undefeated record.

The Buckeyes can get off the mat this time, too.

Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network’s senior national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@gannett.com and follow him on X @btoppmeyer.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

There’s no nifty little trinket awarded to the team that “wins” the winter meetings. And no, satisfying the media-industrial complex by being the most active team doesn’t count.

Still, as 30 Major League Baseball clubs converge on the synthetic exterior of Orlando for baseball’s annual transactions bazaar, some franchises could stand to make a little noise. Of course, the three-day affair is no hard deadline to add or subtract personnel, and many bold-faced names will loiter on the market, perhaps into the new year.

But proximity can certainly breed activity. With that, we examine five teams who could – or should – shake things up this week:

Boston Red Sox

Their quick strike to reel in Sonny Gray shows evidence of a winter plan they’d like to execute with dispatch. And there’s little ambiguity regarding two of the top free agent targets to which they’ve been consistently linked: Alex Bregman and Pete Alonso.

Both are Scott Boras clients who suffered through a long December a year ago as draft-pick compensation was attached to their free agency. This time around, they are truly free agents, with Bregman bringing the perk of familiarity with the Red Sox.

Bregman’s one season in Boston – he opted out of the final two seasons of a $120 million deal to do this again – was a smash, save for injuries that limited him and his .821 OPS to 114 games. Still, Boston climbed out of .500-ville and made the playoffs for the first time since 2021.

We know Boras clients can linger on the market. Yet there are few secrets with these guys and, after one trip around the sun last winter, agent and players know what’s out there. With Boston’s desperate need to fortify its lineup – and still armed with most of the $250 million cost savings from the Rafael Devers deal – a quick strike for one (both?) of these guys is logical.

Baltimore Orioles

Their money was no good last winter, when Corbin Burnes declined their aggressive offer to stay near his Arizona home and now, the Orioles have no choice but to reel in pitching help.

It stood to reason they might get outbid for Dylan Cease, whose elite strikeout rate earned him a $210 million deal with the rival Toronto Blue Jays. But drop down a tier, and the fit could be just about right.

Left-hander Framber Valdez would be a strong and not thoroughly cost-prohibitive match in Baltimore. Durable, playoff-tested and originally signed by the Houston Astros when current Orioles baseball chief Mike Elias was scouting director, Valdez would provide a crucial anchor for an Orioles staff with several question marks.

The early smoke has indicated Elias has been in on all the key free agent targets – Cease, Valdez, Zac Gallen and Ranger Suarez. In a winter in which the Orioles simply cannot come up empty in their pitcher search, jumping quickly into the market could be particularly important here.

Arizona Diamondbacks

They hold one of the more valuable trade chips this winter: An All-Star hitter on a team-friendly deal who can bolster anyone’s infield. And if and when they deal Ketel Marte, the Diamondbacks will still have an economically friendly core to build around in shortstop Geraldo Perdomo – who finished fourth in NL MVP voting – and right fielder Corbin Carroll.

So, they have options. And they can look around an NL West in which the Dodgers will find it doubly hard to three-peat (that tax bill for October pitcher usage will come due), the Padres are receding financially and the Giants might suddenly grow wary of all the nine-figure deals they’re suddenly carrying and believe they can sneak through the field.

It’s unfortunate they’ll be without Burnes in 2026 due to Tommy John surgery in June, but jumping into the pitching market will both help backfill the likely loss of Gallen but also equip them for a future that includes Burnes. A team with holes to fill and options to create further flexibility.

Toronto Blue Jays

The winter parlour game of free agency got a lot more interesting once these guys jumped in annually. Perhaps their Cease signing will be the loudest noise they make, but it’s not likely.

And it won’t be for lack of effort. The Blue Jays may face an either-or situation with regard to top free agent prize Kyle Tucker and their own superstar, infielder Bo Bichette. Unless they truly want to become New York North, Strong and Free, signing both seems unlikely – it would put total commitments to just three players (including $500 million man Vladimir Guerrero) over $1 billion.

Yet they cannot afford to miss on both if they want to maintain these best of times – and the Cease signing indicates they will try like hell to improve on their runner-up finish in the finals. Always keep an eye on these dudes.

Detroit Tigers

Oh, we’re not expecting Tarik Skubal to move. The public appetite for Big Transaction often tramples over the fact that some teams actually want to win.

Combine that with the fact that there’s no universe in which the Tigers get “market value” for a two-time AL Cy Young Award winner and yep, there’s likely no offer that could move them to move Skubal.

Instead, think of this as their all-in year.

Ownership and baseball ops chief Scott Harris fully realize retaining Skubal is probably impossible. Thus, the Tigers’ “win curve” may never bend more north than it will in 2026. That’s probably why they’ve been connected once again to Bregman, who turned down $171 million from them last season.

If nothing else, the Bregman engagement indicates they’re not willing to trudge to an AL Central title or a third wild card while leaning too hard on the Zach McKinstrys and Wenceel Perezes of the world, whose best usage might be in a lesser role.

No, it makes sense for the Tigers to go for it now. And maybe make a little noise this week.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Jake Paul’s biggest test in the boxing ring ‒ literally ‒ is nearly here.

The YouTube influencer-turned-boxer is scheduled to fight two-time heavyweight champion Anthony Joshua in an eight-round boxing event broadcast by Netflix this month in Miami. Paul enters the match with a 12-1 professional record, including seven knockouts, but many of his opponents have been older or retired.

Joshua, 36, should present a tougher challenge even though he’s also closer to the end of his career than the beginning. He has a 28-4 career record and 25 wins by knockout. This will be Joshua’s first fight since a fifth-round loss to Daniel Dubois in September 2024 that led to elbow surgery. Joshua, who typically competes in the heavyweight division, will need to weigh in at 245 pounds for this match.

Paul usually fights at cruiserweight, with his weight ranging from 183 to 227 pounds in his previous bouts. The size advantage enjoyed by Joshua is among the intriguing elements presented by Paul’s latest attempt to climb the boxing ranks.

Here’s what else to know ahead of Paul vs. Joshua, including an updated schedule and how to watch:

When is Jake Paul vs Anthony Joshua?

Jake Paul will enter the ring to face Anthony Joshua on Friday, Dec. 19, in a sanctioned heavyweight fight.

Date: Friday, Dec. 19
Time: 8 p.m. ET / 5 p.m. PT
Location: Kaseya Center (Miami)
TV: None
Stream: Netflix

How to watch Jake Paul vs Anthony Joshua

The Jake Paul-Anthony Joshua fight will be available exclusively on Netflix. Fans can watch it with any Netflix subscription plan at no extra pay-per-view fee.

Jake Paul vs Anthony Joshua fight card

Card details according to Netflix:

Jake Paul vs. Anthony Joshua: Heavyweight bout
Anderson Silva vs. Tyron Woodley: Cruiserweight bout
Alycia Baumgardner vs. Leila Beaudoin: Unified Super Featherweight World Champion bout
Cherneka Johnson vs. Amanda Galle: Undisputed Bantamweight World Champion bout
Yokasta Valle vs. Yadira Bustillos: WBC Strawweight World Champion bout
Avious Griffin vs. Justin Cardona: Welterweight bout
Keno Marley vs. Diarra Davis Jr.Cruiserweight bout

Jake Paul vs Anthony Joshua fight rules

The Jake Paul vs. Anthony Joshua fight will consist of eight three-minute rounds. The fighters will wear 10-ounce gloves, which is the standard for heavyweight bouts.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Department of Health and Human Services has altered the official portrait of a transgender former Biden administration official to display the individual’s birth name, rather than adopted name.

The former official, who currently goes by Rachel Levine, achieved the rank of admiral and served in President Joe Biden’s administration as an assistant secretary for health. Levine was born a male and was the first transgender person to secure a Senate confirmation.

Up until the government shutdown this year, Levine’s portrait plaque in the HHS offices featured the name ‘Rachel Levine,’ but it now displays the official’s birth name, ‘Richard Levine.’

‘Our priority is ensuring that the information presented internally and externally by HHS reflects gold standard science. We remain committed to reversing harmful policies enacted by Levine and ensuring that biological reality guides our approach to public health,’ HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said in a statement.

Levine responded to the move both personally and through a spokesman in statements to NPR.

‘During the federal shutdown, the current leadership of the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health changed Admiral Levine’s photo to remove her current legal name and use a prior name,’ Adrian Shanker, a spokesman for Levine, told NPR, going on to describe the move as an act ‘of bigotry against her.’

‘I’m not going to comment on this type of petty action,’ Levine told the outlet.

Levine was a steady source of controversy during the Biden administration, claiming that there was ‘no argument’ regarding effectiveness and safety of transgender medical procedures, and claiming that hormone blockers ought to be used to stop children from ‘going through the wrong puberty.’

‘Gender-affirming care is medical care,’ Levine said in 2023. ‘Gender-affirming care is mental health care. Gender-affirming care is literally suicide prevention care.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President Donald Trump and Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., have been taking shots at each other on social media Monday, following Greene’s Sunday night appearance on ’60 Minutes’ in which she drew the president’s ire.

Greene, who is set to retire from Congress when her term ends in January, said during the interview that Republicans are ‘terrified’ of not going along with Trump and being the subject of an angry Truth Social post. During the interview, Lesley Stahl asked Greene, ‘Are you MAGA?’ Greene replied, ‘I am America first.’

Trump took to the social media platform Monday morning with his sights set on Greene.

‘The only reason Marjorie ‘Traitor’ Brown (Green turns Brown under stress!) went BAD is that she was JILTED by the President of the United States (Certainly not the first time she has been jilted!). Too much work, not enough time, and her ideas are, NOW, really BAD – She sort of reminds me of a Rotten Apple! Marjorie is not AMERICA FIRST or MAGA, because nobody could have changed her views so fast, and her new views are those of a very dumb person,’ Trump declared in part of a lengthy Truth Social post on Monday.

Greene fired back, repudiating the president’s assertion.

‘I AM AMERICA FIRST,’ she declared in a post on X, adding the American flag emoji. ‘Thank you for your attention to this matter.’

Her post included a graphic indicating she received $0 from the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), and that she ‘condemns Israel for committing genocide.’ Next to that was another graphic indicating that for Trump, there had been millions in ‘independent expenditures & campaign contributions received from pro-Israel interest groups.’ 

Fox News Digital reached out to Greene’s office on Monday for additional comment, but she did not immediately respond.

Greene had also been going after Trump over the weekend, before her interview aired.

In a Sunday post on X, Greene claimed Trump turned on her after she ‘stood with the Epstein Survivors.’ She also said the president had fired off ‘harsh accusatory replies and zero sympathy’ after she alerted him about threats made against her adult son’s life.

A White House official told Fox News Digital that the messages Greene cited had been referred to the FBI.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

One of the few U.S. lawmakers who have seen classified footage of the U.S. military’s strikes against a suspected drug boat off the coast of Venezuela believes the public should get to see the evidence, too.

‘I think it’s really important that this video be made public. It’s not lost on anyone, of course, that the interpretation of the video, which you know, six or seven of us had an opportunity to see last week, broke down precisely on party lines,’ Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn., said in an interview with ‘Face the Nation’ on Sunday.

‘I know how the public is going to react, because I felt my own reaction,’ Himes added.

Democrats quickly condemned the administration when news first broke that the U.S. Department of War had ordered a second strike to eliminate survivors who had somehow escaped an initial strike.

Republicans, by contrast, largely came to the defense of the strike, arguing that the administration had taken the necessary steps to eliminate narco-traffickers that President Donald Trump had designated as terrorists.

The War Department has ordered over 20 different strikes on small boats in the Caribbean, targeting what it calls drug smuggling activity. 

Only one strike is thought to have had multiple attacks to eliminate survivors.

‘I think it’s important for Americans to see it because, look, there’s a certain amount of sympathy out there for going after drug runners,’ Himes said. ‘But I think it’s really important that people see what it looks like when the full force of the United States military is turned on two guys who are clinging to a piece of wood and about to go under, just so that they have sort of a visceral feel for what it is that we’re doing.’

Himes said his estimation of the video turned on the defenselessness of the targets. 

‘These guys — and this is why the American people need to see this video — these guys were barely alive, much less engaging in hostilities,’ Himes said.

In addition to viewing the footage, Himes said he had met with Adm. Frank Bradley, suggesting that Bradley had received pressure to carry out the strikes.

‘Anyone who has ever worked with Adm. Bradley will tell you that he has a storied career and that he is a man of deep, deep integrity. And frankly, I have no reason to doubt that,’ Himes said.

‘An apparently good man like Adm. Bradley is placed in a context where he knows that if he countermands an order that he is perhaps uncomfortable with, it is very likely that he’ll be fired,’ Himes said.

The details of the communication surrounding the second strike and its ordering remain unclear. 

The House of Representatives and the Senate both opened inquiries into the strikes late last month. When asked about their progress, Sen. Roger Wicker, R-Miss., chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, declined to describe the probe but said lawmakers would evaluate all relevant evidence.

‘The investigation will be done by the numbers,’ Wicker said.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Congress is moving to limit the Pentagon’s ability to pull forces out of Europe and South Korea, easing concerns among allied governments.

The 2026 National Defense Authorization Act, finalized by House and Senate negotiators and released Sunday evening, keeps force presence at roughly its current levels in both regions. It states that the U.S. cannot reduce its forces in Europe below 76,000 without submitting an assessment and certifying to Congress that such a move would not harm U.S. or NATO security interests.

The bill places restraints on reductions below 28,500 in South Korea. Any drawdown would require the Pentagon to assure Congress that deterrence against North Korea would not be weakened, confirm that allies were consulted, and provide both a national security justification and an assessment of regional impact.

The legislation also requires the U.S. to retain the position of Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR), NATO’s top military post, codifying into statute a role traditionally held by an American general.

These limits follow reports that the Pentagon had considered reducing forces in Europe and South Korea and even relinquishing the SACEUR position. Whether those ideas reflected genuine planning or were intended as pressure on allies to invest more in their own defenses, U.S. leaders have recently signaled they are stepping back from such moves even without congressional restrictions.

During a meeting last week with U.S. national security officials and European leaders, American officials told their counterparts that Europe must be prepared to bear the brunt of NATO’s defense responsibilities by 2027, three European officials familiar with the meeting told Fox News Digital.

The U.S. plans to hold onto the SACEUR position but will offer some other senior NATO military posts to European nations, officials said. They also noted that Washington has no near-term plans for major troop reductions in Europe.

‘We’ve been very clear in the need for Europeans to lead in the conventional defense of Europe.  We are committed to working through NATO coordination mechanisms to strengthen the alliance and ensure its long-term viability as European allies increasing take on responsibility for conventional deterrence and defense in Europe,’ Pentagon press secretary Kingsley Wilson said in response. 

Earlier this year, the Army pulled a rotating brigade stationed largely in Romania back to the United States, prompting European allies to question whether that move might signal the beginning of broader U.S. force drawdowns on NATO’s eastern flank.

The NDAA — the yearly must-pass package outlining the Pentagon’s spending and policy priorities — is expected to move swiftly to a House vote this week. Congress aims to have the legislation on the president’s desk before Christmas.

The bill also includes $400 million for the Ukraine Security Assistance Initiative over two years and an amendment specifying when the Pentagon may reclaim equipment purchased for Ukraine but not yet delivered: only when the equipment is urgently needed for an ongoing or imminent U.S. contingency operation and failing to use it would risk loss of life or critical mission failure.

This provision follows the Pentagon’s decision earlier this year to pause delivery of certain U.S.-funded military equipment to Ukraine.

Over the weekend, War Secretary Pete Hegseth described South Korea and several European nations as ‘model allies.’

‘Model allies that step up, like Israel, South Korea, Poland, increasingly Germany, the Baltics and others, will receive our special favor,’ he said at the Reagan National Defense Forum. ‘Allies that still fail to do their part for collective defense will face consequences.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The Senate is readying for a vote on extending expiring Obamacare premium subsidies, but the proposal on the table is all but certain to fail.

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., unveiled Senate Democrats’ long-awaited plan to prevent the subsidies from lapsing, which Senate Republicans nearly universally panned. A vote on the plan is expected on Thursday.

‘I mean, it’s obviously designed to fail,’ Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., told Fox News Digital.

Schumer’s proposal would extend the subsidies for another three years without any of the reforms demanded by the GOP. And bipartisan talks that have been ongoing since the government shutdown ended have virtually ground to a halt.

Thune said when the proposal fails, ‘if they want to have a serious conversation about a real solution, that can get underway.’

‘But, you know, we haven’t decided yet exactly what we’re going to do. But what that signals, though, and evidences, is they’re just not serious,’ he said.

Senate Republicans have not landed on their own proposal and may not before the upper chamber leaves Washington, D.C., next week until the start of the New Year.

There are several plans circulating among Republicans to choose from, but none have gained enough traction or support to hit the floor in a possible side-by-side vote.

The subsidies, which were initially passed under former President Joe Biden during the COVID-19 pandemic and then enhanced to virtually remove any income caps — one of the many sticking points for Republicans — are set to expire by the end of the year.

While the Senate struggles to find a way forward, lawmakers are quick to point the finger at who would own the subsidies’ expiration.

Senate Republicans contend that it’s Schumer and Senate Democrats who are to blame, given that they set the subsidies to sunset by the end of this year when they controlled the Senate. And Senate Democrats argue that Republicans would own the issue since they have yet to produce their own proposal.

Schumer argued that Republicans have ‘chosen to do nothing, absolutely nothing,’ as the deadline creeps closer. And he believes that Senate Democrats’ plan could succeed, despite a likely insurmountable math problem.

‘It is not a nonstarter, 13 votes could solve the problem,’ Schumer said. ‘That’s where the onus should be.’

But the plan is a nonstarter for Republicans for several reasons, including the lack of reforms, the length and that it has no inclusion of Hyde Amendment language that would prevent taxpayer dollars from funding abortions — a tricky issue that has largely derailed bipartisan negotiations.

Meanwhile, Republicans are eyeing a proposal that would send the subsidy money directly to Americans in the form of Health Savings Accounts (HSAs), a plan first pushed by Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., and then co-opted by President Donald Trump.

Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., has been working on an HSA plan that he presented, among other ideas, last week to Senate Republicans during their closed-door lunch. Still, lawmakers exited the meeting and left Washington by the end of the week, without a counteroffer to Senate Democrats’ dead-on-arrival proposal.

‘The president gave the marching orders. We’re working on it. We want to deliver it,’ Cassidy told Fox News’ Shannon Bream.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Kentucky is now 5-4 with all the losses against ranked teams, and it hasn’t looked good in any of them.
Iowa State’s manhandling of Purdue puts the Cyclones on the national stage and title picture.

When playing a neutral-site game, it’s tough dealing with the opposing team fans taking over the arena, booing you endlessly. But it’s much worse when that booing is coming from your own fan base.

That was the case in Nashville on Friday, Dec. 5, when Big Blue Nation was disgusted with what it witnessed. It took Kentucky nine minutes to make a shot. By the time that happened, Gonzaga was already up 19-5. The boos rained down for the majority of the night as the Bulldogs routed the Wildcats by 35 points, the fourth-largest loss in program history.

Now Kentucky is in serious trouble.

The loss to Gonzaga came on the heels of the home collapse against short-handed North Carolina, when Kentucky went more than 10 minutes without a made shot to keep the Tar Heels alive. UNC took advantage and escaped Rupp Arena with a win.

The Wildcats are 5-4, and its an ugly record. The five wins all against mid-major competition. The four losses against ranked opponents, and three of them were hardly competitive.

It’s already disaster time in Lexington and we’re not even 10 games into the season. Mark Pope has to be feeling his seat getting warmer.

This is a team that was top-10 in recruiting and in the transfer portal, yet it can’t shoot against good teams. This season, the Wildcats are shooting 47.4% from the field and 31.9% from deep. But against Power conference teams, they’re just 38.2% from the field and 24.3% from 3-point land.

It all falls on Pope, and he’s aware.

‘All the boos that we heard tonight were incredibly well-deserved, mostly for me,’ Pope said after the Gonzaga loss.

Things have to change quickly because it won’t get easier. Indiana and St. John’s are still on the schedule before the SEC gauntlet starts.

The demise of the Wildcats headlines the past weekend of college hoops. Here’s more that caught my eye:

Iowa State’s emphatic statement

Not only did Iowa State beat No. 1 Purdue, the Cyclones completely manhandled the Boilermakers. Iowa State continued its stellar offensive start to the season by going into Mackey Arena and beating Purdue by 23 points.

Coming into the game, the Cyclones shot a nation-leading 55% from the field and a 43.3% 3-point percentage. Against a stout defense, Iowa State wasn’t slowed down at all with a 54.1% field goal percentage and 47.8% from deep. After starting the second half on a 13-2 run, Iowa State never let Purdue get within single digits and silenced one of the most hostile crowds in the country.

Given the circumstances, it’s by far the best result of the season. Iowa State has been tough under TJ Otzelberger, but it felt like it wasn’t being taken seriously. This team wins by an average of 30 points per game, the best in Division I. This should put the entire country, and especially the Big 12, on notice.

The Cyclones got star guard Tamin Lipsey back from injury, and this veteran-led squad is playing like one of the top teams in the country.

Who should be No. 1?

With Purdue’s loss, a new No. 1 should emerge. The only problem is you can justify three teams getting the nod: Arizona, Michigan and Duke.

Let’s start with the Wolverines, which followed up its dazzling in the Players Era Festival performance with a 41-point romp over Rutgers. In the past four games, the Wolverines have two ranked wins and have won by an average margin of 37.7 points. They average 93.7 points per game, but did look shaky to start the season.

Then there’s Arizona and its team full of playmakers. The Wildcats just stomped Auburn by 29 points for their fourth ranked win of the season, which includes a road win at Connecticut. Arizona hasn’t been as dominant as Michigan, but the Wildcats have been consistent against all opponents.

Last but certainly not least is Duke. The Blue Devils went into Michigan State and left with a gritty win over the undefeated Spartans. That’s the third straight ranked win and fourth overall on the season, and Cameron Boozer is playing like the best player in the country, averaging 23.6 points per game, second-most in the country.

So who should be No. 1? At this moment, it has to go to Arizona. The Wildcats have been more steady than Michigan, and the wins are more impressive than Duke. Arizona and Duke do share a common opponent in Florida, and the Gators nearly took down the Blue Devils. There isn’t a wrong answer to this, especially when its still early December, but at this point, Arizona looks like the top team in the country.

What’s going on with Tennessee?

After beating Houston in the Players Era Festival, Tennessee has lost three consecutive games, the latest coming against Illinois thanks to a poor second half performance. It’s strange because Rick Barnes’ team looked so good in the first seven games, but it’s been a mess since then.

It starts with the heavy load carried by guards Ja’Kobi Gillespie and Nate Ament. In the past three games, Tennessee has taken 186 shots, and the duo accounted for 48.4% of them. What’s worse is the duo is shooting 30% during this stretch. The Volunteers need more production from the rest of the team. Tennessee has another test in Louisville coming up.

Star of the week: Hannes Steinbach

Much has been made of the stellar freshman class, but there’s another newcomer making a name for himself.

Meet Washington forward Hannes Steinbach, who put on a show in his return from an ankle injury. Against UCLA, Steinbach scored a career-high 29 points and notched 10 rebounds, playing a big part in the near comeback against the Bruins. On Saturday, Dec. 7, the Huskies played Southern California and were down by as much as 18 points before Steinbach led a strong second half, propelling the Huskies for the come-from-behind win. He scored 14 points in the final 20 minutes and finished with 24 points and 16 rebounds, his fifth straight game with a double-double.

Steinbach is becoming a dominant force, and what’s even scarier is he’s deadly from 3-point land when he chooses to shoot. He averages 18.5 points and 12.5 rebounds per game, which is second-most in the country. Don’t be surprised to see more of Steinbach as conference play approaches, and the Huskies are a team to watch in the Big Ten.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY