Archive

2025

Browsing

No one likes to lose, but in the SEC it’s not that harmful to take a loss given how tough the conference is. But there are still a few games where a loss is not only bad, but catastrophic — especially when you’re living on the edge.

Arkansas proved how devastating it can be when you don’t take care of business.

The Razorbacks had really been picking up steam recently, with quality victories against teams like Kentucky and Missouri. It had gone from a team teetering in First Four territory to moving into a No. 10 seed in the latest edition of USA TODAY Sports’ Bracketology. But now, John Calipari’s squad looks headed back into ‘last four teams in’ territory thanks to an inexcusable loss to SEC-worst South Carolina.

Losing to the Gamecocks, who entered the day with only one conference win, wasn’t going to look good. But it’s how Arkansas lost that makes it even worse.

It was almost like there was a lid on the basket for Arkansas. It couldn’t score at all. It took more than 17 minutes to score 10 points and trailed 32-14 at halftime. By the time Arkansas scored 20 points, there was 12 minutes left and it was down by 27 points. It trailed by 35 points at one point. The Razorbacks were able to score 33 more points the rest of the way to make it seem like it wasn’t a total disaster, but it still was a 19-point loss to the Gamecocks.

Thanks to a day where it shot 28.8% from the field and 13.6% from 3-point land, Arkansas now makes a return to the bubble. Saturday was a big resume hit; the Razorbacks have a losing record in both Quad 1 and Quad 2 games − a 6-12 combined mark.

In a time where every game is under a magnifying glass, the ‘gimme’ games need to be handled. If they end in losses, it could be the reason why a team doesn’t hear its name called on Selection Sunday − something the Hogs didn’t expect with Calipari at the helm. Arkansas caps the penultimate week of the regular season in bad fashion and leads the winners and losers of teams on the NCAA Tournament bubble.

Winners

Georgia

In the bubble game of the week, the Bulldogs not only came out victorious — they looked good doing so. Georgia controlled the host Longhorns for nearly the entire contest thanks to a few runs in the first half that made the deficit too big for Texas to overcome. The second half the Bulldogs were practically on cruise control with a lead that ballooned to 27 points at one point.

The win capped off what was arguably the best week for any team in the country. Georgia was really fading in the tournament picture but turned it around with a wild victory over Florida on Tuesday for a much-needed Quad 1 victory. That win catapulted it from out of the projected field entirely to the ‘first four out.’ The Bulldogs then picked up a second Quad 1 win with the defeat of the Longhorns, continuing their move up the seed line. They made the most of their final two Quad 1 opportunities in the regular season and are winning the shoving match with their fellow SEC bubble teams.

North Carolina

While teams like Arkansas have clouds over their neighborhoods, the Tar Heels are enjoying their stroll around town with the skies shining Carolina blue. North Carolina didn’t have much trouble against ACC-worst Miami, beating the Hurricanes by 19 points for its fifth straight win.

Beating the Hurricanes is not impressive. In fact, none of the past five wins were against anybody good and none helped improve the lowly 1-10 Quad 1 record North Carolina owns. But the Tar Heels are doing the only thing they can do with an easy stretch of opponents: win and watch the chaos around them commence. Bubble teams are suffering some bad losses, but none are happening in Chapel Hill. That’s helping North Carolina inch closer toward the projected field. The game against Duke next week is one that can really determine North Carolina’s fate, but kudos to the Tar Heels for steadying the ship late in the season.

Xavier

When opportunity arises, it’s best to make the most of it. And, oh, did Xavier make a big-time statement on Saturday. The Cintas Center was rocking as the Musketeers pulled off a dominant run late in the second half against the Big East’s second-place team, Creighton, winning their first straight, 83-59. Playing against one of the most effective offenses in the country, it was Xavier that was really scoring at will.

Like North Carolina, Xavier has stayed in the tournament picture thanks to wins against inferior opponents. But Saturday was the first against a tournament contender since it first lost to the Bluejays more than a month ago. The Musketeers needed to prove they could beat quality team. Did they ever, scoring a 22-point victory. Unfortunately it wasn’t a Quad 1 game, something Xavier needs with just a 1-8 record in such instances, but it was certainly the most impressive outcome it could have hoped for. The selection committee won’t be able to ignore this win. Sean Miller’s team inches closer toward cracking the projected field.

Indiana

The climb of the Hoosiers continues. Indiana won its third straight game Saturday, beating Washington on the road with relative ease. An Oumar Ballo layup three minutes into the game gave Indiana a lead it never surrendered. It made nearly half of its shot attempts in the victory.

It’s been an impressive rise for Indiana, which didn’t look like a tournament team two weeks ago but has built the momentum off the win over in-state rival Purdue since then. The win over the Huskies was a Quad 2 victory and not all that impressive given they’re at the bottom of the Big Ten standings, but thanks to some blunders from teams in the projected field, Indiana is inching closer toward getting a spot in the First Four, something that sounded ludicrous weeks ago.

Losers

Oklahoma

Back and forth the Sooners go, as Oklahoma now likely finds itself out of the projected field once again after another defeat. In a very winnable game against Mississippi, the Sooners were down by nine points with eight minutes left when freshman guard Dayton Forsythe shot his team back into the game. With one minute left, Oklahoma had a two-point lead. But the defense couldn’t keep the lead, allowing Mississippi’s Sean Pedulla to make a go-ahead 3-pointer with 19 seconds left that wound up being the game-winning shot.

The win fell right through Oklahoma’s hands and not only is it a second straight loss, it’s now seven defeats in the last eight outings, effectively cancelling out the win over Mississippi State. The Sooners are now 4-12 in the SEC − third worst − and have a 5-10 Quad 1 record. They will likely be outside of the projected field next week. Wins in the last two regular-season games may be a necessity.

Texas

The SEC is proving to be a challenge for the newcomers. Texas saw its tournament chances fade with another loss. The Longhorns had home-court advantage against Georgia but didn’t show much fight in what turned out to be a crushing 16-point loss.

Texas’ slide down the bracket will continue with its third straight loss. It’s been a nightmare in Austin. Texas was headed into a very winnable stretch with South Carolina, Arkansas and Georgia in consecutive matchups. But it dropped all of the games and has six losses in the last seven contests. The Longhorns entered the stretch with a 3-1 Quad 2 record; they’re now 3-4 in those contests, which in no way helps with a 4-9 Quad 1 mark. Things need to start clicking fast if Texas wants to remain in the field.

Nebraska

The struggles in Lincoln continue with Nebraska suffering its third consecutive loss, another defeat at the hands of a team nowhere close to playing in the NCAA Tournament. Against a sneaky Minnesota team, the Cornhuskers trailed by as much as 19 points in the second half before storming back to make it a ballgame in the final minutes. They took a one-point lead with nine seconds left and looked like they’d avoid disaster. Until Minnesota’s Brennan Rigsby drilled a 3-point bucket with four seconds to go to stun the home crowd.

Minnesota isn’t a horrible team, but when a Quad 3 opponent comes into your building and you’re on the fringe of the NCAA Tournament, you better win. Nebraska ended up suffering its first Quad 3 loss that, from a resume standpoint, might be the worst loss a bubble team suffered on Saturday. Something like this can’t happen for a team with a NET ranking of No. 54. It’s been a free fall for a team that looked like it was trending toward being a single-digit seed in the bracket less than two weeks ago. One of those ‘first four out’ teams may be in place to take the Cornhuskers’ spot.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The most highly-anticipated NFL combine on-field workouts took place Saturday Lucas Oil Stadium when running backs, wide receivers and quarterbacks took the field to showcase their skills.

Cam Ward, Shedeur Sanders, Ashton Jeanty and Tetairoa McMillan didn’t work out in Indianapolis but there were other notable QBs, RBs and WRs who participated in Saturday’s combine drills.

There was plenty of attention on the field as NFL teams attempt to make assessments on some of the top skill position prospects in the 2025 NFL draft. Which players helped or their hurt draft stock?

Here are USA TODAY Sports’ winners and losers from Day 3 of the 2025 NFL Combine:

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

NFL combine winners and losers

Winner: Virginia Tech running back Bhayshul Tuten

Tuten’s 40-yard dash time is the fourth fastest 40 by a running back since 2003.

Winner: North Carolina running back Omarion Hampton

The downhill runner ran a 4.46 40-yard dash. His production score was an 84, fourth among qualifying running backs, per Next Gen Stats.

Winner: Texas wide receiver Matthew Golden

The Texans product produced a total score of 82, the sixth best among wide receivers at the combine, per Next Gen Stats.

Winner: Missouri quarterback Brady Cook

Cook was cooking in the passing drills. The 6-2, 214-lb. QB was accurate during intermediate and deep passing drills. The Missouri product outperformed Jaxson Dart and Will Howard, who are both projected to be drafted ahead of him.

Loser: Arizona State running back Cam Skattebo

The bulldozing running back skipped most of the drills at the NFL combine. His most notable absence was in the 40-yard dash. NFL Network’s Stacy Dales reported on the broadcast that Skattebo is dealing with a left hamstring injury that is considered to be a ‘low-grade’ issue.  

Skattebo is considered a mid-round pick in many mock drafts, but scouts have concerns about his speed.

Loser: Texas wide receiver Isaiah Bond

Bond raised eyebrows when he told reporters he planned to break the NFL combine 40-yard dash record. The wideout claimed that he planned to run a 4.20 or a 4.1.

Unfortunately for the wide receiver, he didn’t back up his big talk.

Bond’s fastest time of the day was 4.39, and he posted the mark on his second 40 attempt. Bond’s bold prediction made his 4.39 somewhat underwhelming. The time was well behind former Texans WR and current Chiefs wideout Xavier Worthy’s combine all-time record of 4.21 seconds.

A 4.39 is a great time for a wide receiver, but Bond’s confident proclamation came back to bite him. His time won’t hurt his draft stock but Golden, his Texas teammate, had a better overall performance.

Loser: Hand measurements

Someone’s got some explaining to do.

Jalen Milroe’s hands were measured at 8 3/4 inches at the Senior Bowl just a few weeks ago. At the NFL combine, Milroe’s hands measured in at 9 3/8 inches, half an inch bigger than they were in Mobile, Alabama.

Barring an epic hand growth spurt, somebody doesn’t know how to accurately measure hands in Mobile or Indianapolis. Milroe will definitely prefer the latter of the two measurements.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

LOS ANGELES — As Southern California closed in on a victory over rival UCLA, JuJu Watkins swatted a shot from Gabriela Jaquez and stared down the broadcast camera on the baseline.

It officially cemented what seemed inevitable: Los Angeles belongs to Watkins. Now, she and the Trojans are coming to overtake the rest of the country. 

The stakes were high on Saturday, and everyone inside a star-studded Pauley Pavilion knew it. The Big Ten regular-season championship was on the line, but so was the claim of being the top dog in the City of Angels. Implications so massive, siblings and Basketball Hall of Famers Cheryl and Reggie Miller were sitting courtside together, each representing their alma mater. 

There was so much buildup. Could the Bruins make adjustments and get revenge on the team across town en route to winning the conference title? Massive lines formed outside Pauley Pavilion as fans came to see the team the NCAA Tournament selection committee had tabbed as No. 1 in the top 16 reveal two days ago.

But Watkins took her first shot – a 3-pointer – and just like in their first meeting, it perfectly swished through the net. It was a sight that happened often, and the Trojans led from start to finish in an 80-67 victory.

Clinching the conference title in your rival’s arena? Four straight wins against them? With three massive billboards of you gracing the city?

Put the crown on Watkins’ head – and don’t mess with the signature bun.

“I would be remiss to say playing UCLA doesn’t motivate me extra,” she said.

UCLA is probably getting tired of seeing Watkins dissect it. She put up 30 points – 23 in the first half – with five assists, three rebounds and three blocks. In the past four meetings against the Bruins, she’s averaged 33.3 points, 8.5 rebounds. 4 blocks and 3.5 assists per game. 

Watkins’ performance was enough to claim the city. It was her teammates who showed the Trojans are capable of taking more.

The rest of the women’s college basketball world groaned when former Stanford forward Kiki Iriafen came back home to play for the Trojans in her final season. A dominant big to go along with a star guard in Watkins? Almost impossible to go against.

It took some time, but Iriafen has really come to play up to her firepower. After she sat out most of the first half due to foul trouble, she took the load off Watkins’ shoulders out of halftime with 15 points and six rebounds in the last 30 minutes. She commanded the post offensively and was knocking down jumpers, providing a lethal 1-2 punch. When she arrived at USC, she said a major priority was to provide relief for Watkins, helping Watkins in those moments where it felt like she was doing it all. But it’s more than just relief; it’s a two-headed monster. 

“I’m a very lucky coach to have these two. They’re the best duo in the country,” USC coach Lindsay Gottlieb said of her stars. “These two are unguardable. I think they’re both playing their best basketball now, which is scary.’

Watkins and Iriafen draw all the headlines, but you can’t forget about the supporting cast. Rayah Marshall, a vocal leading senior, played magnificent with her assignment on UCLA star center Lauren Betts, who finished with just 11 points. Freshman Kennedy Smith continued to play tough defense, and fellow first-year player Avery Howell hit back-to-back 3-point shots in the fourth quarter that were essentially the daggers. 

It was a complete effort that left Bruins head coach Cori Close hitting her fists on the press conference table, aware of how much the Trojans dominated. 

“Just really pissed off we didn’t show up and do our jobs,” she said. “Credit to USC. They were tougher.’

Many head coaches feel like Close after playing the Trojans. For as talented as it’s proven to be, USC hasn’t gotten the national respect it should have. Maybe it was the early loss to Notre Dame, or the tough defeat to Iowa a month ago. 

But that loss to the Hawkeyes awoke something in the Trojans. They all hated the taste of that defeat and didn’t want to experience it again. 

Since losing to Iowa, USC has won seven straight, including two wins against the Bruins and dominance over a highly-ranked team in Ohio State. 

The Trojans are hot at the right time and they’ll head into the Big Ten tournament as the No. 1 seed. With a successful trip to Indianapolis, they’ll be a No. 1 seed again when the NCAA Tournament bracket is revealed on March 16. From that point, it’s tough to argue anyone looks capable of taking them down.

Look around the country. UCLA just lost to them again, Notre Dame is in a little slump, South Carolina had a few slips and Connecticut already lost to USC. Besides Texas, everyone is taking some big punches and the Trojans just keep on landing them.

What’s made this season so intriguing in women’s college basketball is that the race for the national championship is wide open. A case for making it to Tampa for the Final Four could be made for several teams. But at this point, USC is making it known it’s ready to book its trip. 

“We’re not done. There’s a lot more,” Gottlieb said.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Late Saturday, Washington D.C. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson ruled that President Donald Trump violated federal law in firing Hampton Dellinger, head of the Office of Special Counsel. Jackson’s decision is forceful, well-written, and arguably wrong under existing precedent. Indeed, it may have just set up an appeal that both presidents and professors have long waited for to reinforce presidential powers.

Appointed by President Joe Biden, and the son of the respected liberal scholar and Clinton acting Solicitor General Walter Dellinger, Hampton Dellinger was confirmed by the Senate for a five-year term beginning in 2024. He sued after receiving an email with a perfunctory termination notice shortly after Trump’s inauguration. The various inspector generals were also terminated and, at the time, some of us raised concerns over compliance with underlying federal statutes. The issue was not likely the outcome, but the process for such removals. However, while many objected to the helter-skelter approach to such terminations, there may be a method to this madness. Indeed, this ruling may be precisely what the Trump administration is seeking as the foundation for a major new constitutional challenge.

Dellinger’s claim is based in large part on the Civil Service Reform Act, which provides that the Special Counsel ‘may be removed by the President only for inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.’ 5 U.S.C. 1211(b). The notice gave none of these grounds for the termination even though ‘inefficiency’ and ‘neglect’ are a fairly ambiguous and malleable rationale.

Judge Jackson held that the firing clearly violated the controlling statute and that the Act itself was constitutional. She emphasized that, while there are grounds for presidents to claim the power for at-will terminations, those cases have tended to be offices that carry out executive functions. Jackson described the Special Counsel as an essentially harmless office vis-à-vis executive authority.

‘Special Counsel acts as an ombudsman, a clearinghouse for complaints and allegations, and after looking into them, he can encourage the parties to resolve the matter among themselves,’ she wrote. ‘But if that fails, he must direct them elsewhere.’

She noted that earlier cases supporting the executive power to fire executive officials involved ‘restrictions on the President’s ability to remove an official who wields significant executive authority. The Special Counsel simply does not.’

Judge Jackson has a good-faith reliance on her narrow reading of existing precedent. However, it is far from conclusive and brushes over some striking conflicts with prior rulings of the Supreme Court. Jackson insisted that a contrary ruling would undermine the very point of the special counsel office, which she identified as its independence. However, that is the very point that has irked both Democratic and Republican presidents for years.

In 1978, President Jimmy Carter objected on these grounds. The Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel explained that, ‘[b]ecause the Special Counsel [would] be performing largely executive functions, the Congress [could] not restrict the President’s power to remove him.’ 2 Op. O.L.C. 120, 121 (1978).

It is unclear whether the current Supreme Court would agree with an exception for minor or de minimus intrusions. Many scholars and judges believe that a president either has Article II authority to fire executive branch officials or he does not.

Notably, there are only four single agency heads who were given tenure protection by Congress: the directors of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), the commissioner of Social Security, and the Special Counsel. In 2020, the Court ruled in Seila Law LLC v. CFPB that Congress had violated Article II by granting tenure protection to that sole agency head, writing:

‘The CFPB’s single-Director structure contravene[d] [Article II’s] carefully calibrated system by vesting significant governmental power in the hands of a single individual accountable to no one.’ Id. at 224.

Then, in 2021, in Collins v. Yellen, the Court rejected the same claim as to the director of the FHFA. That opinion came with language that directly opposes Jackson’s rationale. The Court found Seila Law to be ‘all but dispositive’ on the question and expressly rejected the argument that this would change depending upon ‘the nature and breadth of an agency’s authority.’ The Court held that the ‘[c]ourts are not well-suited to weigh the relative importance of the regulatory and enforcement authorities of disparate agencies.’

Given these cases, lower courts clearly got the message – a message amplified by President Joe Biden, who appointed Dellinger. On the third ‘independent’ position, the commissioner of Social Security, Biden’s Office of Legal Counsel declared that ‘the best reading of Collins and Seila Law‘ is that ‘the President need not heed the Commissioner’s statutory tenure protection.’ Two circuits (the Ninth and Eleventh) have ruled consistently with that interpretation in favor of executive authority to remove such officers.

Ultimately, Dellinger can be removed even if this decision stands. The Trump Administration could have easily cited a basis like inefficiency or neglect. The question is why it decided not to do so. Clearly, it could just be a chainsaw approach to cutting positions. However, it may also reflect a desire for some in the administration to challenge lingering case law limiting executive powers. In other words, they seem to be spoiling for a fight.

The reason may be Humphrey’s Executor v. United States (1935), which established the right of Congress to create independent agencies. It found that Congress could, without violating Article II powers, provide tenure protection to ‘a multimember body of experts, balanced along partisan lines, that performed legislative and judicial functions and was said not to exercise any executive power.’ The Court in cases like Seila Law cited that precedent for one of the exceptions to executive power. It also cited an exception for giving tenure protection to ‘certain inferior officers with narrowly defined duties,’ under Morrison v. Olson (1988). Jackson cited both cases and those exceptions in shoehorning the Special Counsel into a narrow band of quasi-executive positions.

What may be overlooked in the filings of the administration before the Supreme Court in the Dellinger case was this line in a footnote: ‘Humphrey’s Executor appears to have misapprehended the powers of ‘the New Deal-era [Federal Trade Commission]’ and misclassified those powers as primarily legislative and judicial.’ It went on to suggest that the case is not only wrongly decided but that the Justice Department ‘intends to urge this Court to overrule that decision.’

Described by the Court as ‘the outer-most constitutional limits of permissible congressional restrictions on the President’s removal power,’ the Trump Administration appears set to try to redraw that constitutional map.

That is why Jackson’s opinion may not only be expected but welcomed by the Trump administration. It is hunting for bigger game than Dellinger and Judge Jackson just gave it a clear shot for the Supreme Court.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

INDIANAPOLIS – So many eyes have been on trained on Cam Ward lately – those of NFL coaches, scouts, executives, fans and even his peers at the scouting combine this week.

But nobody was watching more closely Friday than Ward’s parents.

Most recently an All-American quarterback for the University of Miami (Fla.), Ward answered questions from a crush of media members surrounding his podium from all sides like a relentless pass rush. Off to one side, his mother, Patrice, and father, Calvin, paid rapt attention to their son’s answers.

And then the inevitable query came, the one wondering whether Ward was getting any blowback from NFL teams for sitting out the second half of last season’s Pop-Tarts Bowl after he’d just set a new Division I record for career touchdown passes (158) prior to halftime. (Miami eventually lost the game to Iowa State after coughing up the lead in the second half but, per a CBS report, never planned to play Ward beyond the second quarter.)

“No discussion at all,” Ward said of the controversy. “At the end of the day, it’s March. Bowl game’s in December. At some point, you’ve got to move on. I’ve never lived my life in the past, I don’t who would want to live their life in the past.

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

“I’ll take it on the chin, you know, I’ll just keep pushing every day.”

That direct answer issued, Patrice Ward then turned to her husband and broke into a huge smile.

It was the best part of a news conference that Ward, who might be the No. 1 overall pick in April’s draft, essentially seemed to ace and should only further boost his stock for the quarterback-needy clubs atop the board.

“I’m willing to do anything, you know, that it takes to win a football game, whether it’s being a gunslinger all day or if I have to hand the ball off a couple times,” said Ward.

“At the end of the day, I know what type of player I am, (and) the teams should know what type of player they’re getting in me. And so, you know, I’m just going out there and trying to do my best for myself and my future teammates.”

Ward’s previous teammates – and there have been quite a few – seem to swear by him.

“Playing with Cam Ward was great. He came into the program, he changed it all, we all learned from him, and we just became one once he got into the facility,” Hurricanes receiver Jacolby George told USA TODAY Sports.

“His personality was a big part of how we played our season and how we did so good. I feel like he’s the reason why we had that winning season, and he’s the reason we stuck together.”

Said Miami tight end Elijah Arroyo of his former quarterback: “He’s the ultimate guy, ultimate teammate. Everybody sees what he does on the field and his confidence and everything. But the biggest thing I’d say is just the type of leader he is. From Day One, he brought the team together.

“He’s not afraid to hold people accountable. He wants to win, and he holds the team to a certain standard.”

Miami went 10-3 in 2024, Ward’s only season in Coral Gables, after he transferred in following two seasons at Washington State. Prior to that, his college career began inauspiciously in San Antonio at the University of the Incarnate Word, an FCS program – and the only school to offer him a scholarship after a high school career spent playing in a Wing-T offense.

“At the end of the day, you never know where football will take you,” said Ward.

Soon, it’s likely to take him to a struggling NFL operation. Ward has already met with the Tennessee Titans, Cleveland Browns, New York Giants, Las Vegas Raiders and New York Jets – all teams slotted among the draft’s top seven picks and all in need of a franchise quarterback. He was clearly very familiar with all of those squads’ circumstances yet focused on the positive aspects of landing with any of them.

“It’s crazy to see how everything can change, so I’m not worried about no spotlight,” said Ward, who also played very well at Wazzu during the two years before the Pac-12 splintered.

“At the end of the day, the camera’s gonna find you if you’re a franchise quarterback somewhere. So I just put my head down and work every day.”

And the work paid off in college. Ward led the country with 39 touchdown passes in 2024 on his way to being named the ACC’s Player of the Year and winning the Davey O’Brien Award as college football’s best quarterback.

In addition to an alpha persona, he’s got a high-velocity, accurate arm and is more than capable of making things happen with his legs when required – though Ward says his best on-field trait is “winning from the pocket.”

“If you can’t win in the pocket,” he said, “you’ll never be successful.”

That seemed to be part of a pattern. Ward, who won’t work out during the combine’s quarterback drills Saturday, was quick to cite his intangibles as strengths – mindset, preparation, approach, work ethic, maximization of opportunities – rather than his estimable physical ability.

And he oozed confidence and maturity amid a no-frills demeanor, parrying criticism with thoughtful answers. After being asked about the Pop-Tarts Bowl, he engaged with the notion that he holds onto the ball too long at times.

“If you have time in the pocket, why would you not hold the ball and let your receivers get open?” Ward retorted – while crediting the ‘Canes line for giving him the luxury to extend plays.

“If you’re able to make plays out of structure, of course you’re going to hold the ball and try to make a play to get your receivers open.”

Yet it is Ward’s leadership that seems likely to serve him best as he moves forward into what’s likely to be – at least initially – a challenging situation. And he already seems to have a pretty good idea of how to initially relate with established professionals who may not be readily inclined to listen to a 22-year-old.

“Just holding people accountable,” Ward said of his approach, nothing he also wouldn’t be scolding teammates he’s just getting to know. “I’m not no rah-rah guy. At this point in your career in the NFL, you shouldn’t need somebody to motivate you every day, you have to be self-motivated. That’s the type of person I am, that’s the type of leader I am.

“Throughout college, I’ve grown to be more vocal. But at the end of the day, it’s all about leading by example,” he continued. “The quarterback will always be the highest-paid player on the team, and he has to showcase that skill every Sunday and every day throughout the facility to his teammates. I just think I’ll be one of those guys in the long run, and I’m looking forward to it.”

And, just maybe, Ward will make the fans and teammates at his next destination just as proud as his parents are.

All NFL news on and off the field. Sign up for USA TODAY’s 4th and Monday newsletter.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Months after war broke out between Russia and Ukraine, then-President Joe Biden had a fiery private phone call with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, which included Biden allegedly losing ‘his temper’ and calling on Ukraine to ‘show a little more gratitude’ towards the U.S. for its support, a resurfaced 2022 NBC News report shows. 

‘Biden had barely finished telling Zelenskyy that he had just greenlighted another $1 billion in U.S. military assistance for Ukraine when Zelenskyy started listing all the additional help he needed and wasn’t getting,’ according to an NBC report published in November 2022, recounting a prior June 2022 call that Biden and Zelenskyy shared. 

‘Biden lost his temper, the people familiar with the call said. The American people were being quite generous, and his administration and the U.S. military were working hard to help Ukraine, he said, raising his voice, and Zelenskyy could show a little more gratitude,’ the report continued. 

The reported tense exchange on the phone came just months after Russia invaded Ukraine on Feb. 24, 2022. The pair’s relationship ‘only improved’ following the phone call, Biden administration officials told NBC at the time. 

Fox News Digital reached out to Biden’s office on Sunday morning for additional comment on the 2022 phone call but did not immediately receive a reply. 

The report resurfaced over the weekend, following President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance’s fiery meeting with Zelenskyy, which included the VP pressing the Ukraine leader on his gratitude for the U.S.’s assistance across the years, and Trump asking Zelenskyy to leave the White House – stipulating that he can return ‘when he is ready for Peace.’

The White House meeting grew tense in approximately its final 10 minutes, after Vance said that peace would be reached between Russia and Ukraine through U.S. diplomacy efforts.

‘Mr. President, with respect, I think it’s disrespectful for you to come into the Oval Office to try to litigate this in front of the American media,’ Vance told Zelenskyy. ‘Right now, you guys are going around and forcing conscripts to the front lines, because you have manpower problems. You should be thanking the president for bringing it, to bring it into this country.’ 

‘Have you’ve ever been to Ukraine that you say what problems we have?’ Zelenskyy shot back. 

‘I’ve actually watched and seen the stories and I know that what happens is you bring people, you bring them on a propaganda tour,’ Vance continued. ‘Mr. President, do you disagree that you’ve had problems bringing people into your military? And do you think that it’s respectful to come to the Oval Office of the United States of America and attack the administration that is trying to, trying to prevent the destruction of your country?’ 

Zelenskyy continued that under war, ‘everybody has problems, even you,’ and that the U.S. would feel the war ‘in the future.’

‘Don’t tell us what we’re going to feel,’ Trump shot back at Zelenskyy. 

‘You’re gambling with the lives of millions of people,’ Trump added at another point during the exchange. ‘You’re gambling with World War III. You’re gambling with World War III. And what you’re doing is very disrespectful to the country, this country.’

Vance interjected, asking Zelenskyy whether he had ‘said thank you once this entire meeting.’ He also added that Zelenskyy ‘went to Pennsylvania and campaigned for the opposition in October’ and that he should ‘offer some words of appreciation for the United States of America and the president who’s trying to save your country.’

Congress has appropriated $175 billion since 2022 for aid to Ukraine, according to the Council on Foreign Relations, though exact monetary figures on how much the U.S. has provided to Ukraine vary based on what is considered aid. 

Total European assistance to Ukraine between January 2022 and December 2024 totals roughly $138.7 billion, according to German think tank the Kiel Institute. The U.S. contributed $119.7 billion during that same timeframe, Fox Digital previously reported. 

Trump continued in his remarks to Zelenskyy that ‘the problem is, I’ve empowered you to be a tough guy, and I don’t think you’d be a tough guy without the United States.’

‘And your people are very brave. But you’re either going to make a deal or we’re out. And if we’re out, you’ll fight it out. I don’t think it’s going to be pretty, but you’ll fight it out. But you don’t have the cards. But once we sign that deal, you’re in a much better position. But you’re not acting at all thankful. And that’s not a nice thing. I’ll be honest. That’s not a nice thing,’ Trump said. 

Zelenskyy left the White House shortly after. The Trump administration canceled a planned press conference with Zelenskyy later that day, while a planned speaking event featuring the Ukraine leader at a Washington, D.C.-based think tank was canceled.  

Zelenskyy did join Fox News’ Bret Baier for an exclusive interview on Friday evening, where he was pressed on whether he would apologize to Trump. U.S. leaders, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio, called on Zelenskyy to apologize for the Oval Office meeting, but the Ukraine president bucked the calls during the Baier interview, while adding that he respects Trump and the U.S.

‘I’m very thankful to Americans for all your support. You did a lot. I’m thankful to President Trump and to Congress for bipartisan support,’ he responded when asked about an apology. ‘You helped us a lot from the very beginning, during three years of full-scale invasion, you helped us to survive.’

‘No, I respect the president and I respect American people. . . . I think that we have to be very open and very honest, and I’m not sure that we did something bad,’ he added when asked again whether he believes he owes Trump an apology. 

Zelenskyy traveled to the UK over the weekend, meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who told local media that he had spoken with Trump and French President Emmanuel Macron regarding the UK and France taking the reins on crafting a plan for peace that will eventually be presented to the U.S. 

European leaders are slated to travel to London on Sunday to further discuss a peace plan. 

Fox News Digital’s Diana Stancy contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Chicago Blackhawks defenseman Seth Jones said during the 4 Nations Face-Off break that he ‘would like to give myself a chance to win in my career.’

His wish was granted on Saturday when the 31st-place Blackhawks traded him to the defending Stanley Cup champion Florida Panthers.

The Panthers send goalie Spencer Knight to Chicago, plus a 2026 conditional first-round pick that could become a 2027 pick. The Blackhawks retain 26% of Jones’ remaining contract, which runs through 2029-30 at a cap hit of $9.5 million. Florida also gets a 2026 fourth-round pick.

Grading Saturday’s trade between the Blackhawks and Panthers:

Panthers trade grade: B

Jones is a right-shot defenseman, which is coveted around the league, and he averages more than 24 minutes a night. The Panthers lost defenseman Brandon Montour (a right shot) and Oliver Ekman-Larsson to free agency after their Cup win, so Jones fills some of that loss. His numbers haven’t popped recently but how much of that was being on a bad team? His combined -108 over four seasons in Chicago should improve on a better team. Jones’ long-term contract will help with defenseman Aaron Ekblad and Nate Schmidt in the final years of their contract. Knight was supposed to eventually replace Sergei Bobrovsky as the Panthers’ top goalie, but it didn’t look like it was going to happen.

Blackhawks trade grade: B

This story has updated with new information.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Gervonta “Tank’’ Davis didn’t lose the fight, but he lost his aura of invincibility.

His fight Saturday with heavy underdog Lamont Roach Jr. ended in a majority draw.

Davis (30-0-1) and Roach (25-1-2) traded big shots over the 12-round lightweight fight at New York’s Barclays Center and, incredibly enough, Roach ended the fight on his feet.

The judges scored it 115-113 (for Davis), 114-114 and 114-114.

“Hopefully we can get a rematch,’’ Davis said.

Before the fight, Davis said Roach would be the most skilled boxer he’s faced. It was no exaggeration, even though Davis did retain his WBA lightweight world title.

“For sure, Lamont is a great fighter. He’s got the skill, like I said before,’ Davis said. ‘He got punching power.’’ 

Both fighters were cautious early, but by midway through the fight, punches were flying and landing.

“I’m one of the best fighters in the world, and I showed that tonight,’’ Roach said, indicating he wants a rematch. “I want to run it back for sure.’’

Davis-Roach controversy

Is Davis’ hairdresser to blame for Roach having to settle for a majority draw Saturday night?

Or is referee Steve Willis to blame?

Early in the ninth round, Davis took a knee.

Willis may have been able to rule it a knockdown, which would have resulted in a one-point deduction for Davis on all three judges’ scorecards.

But Willis allowed Davis to go to his corner without penalty. The fighter later said the incident was all the result of getting his hair done.

“I just got my hair done two days ago,’’ Davis said during a post-fight interview in the ring, explaining that sweat led to grease getting into his eye.

The explanation apparently did not go over well with the crowd, which booed.

“Damn, why you all booing?’’ said Davis.

One of the judges scored the fight 115-113 in favor of Davis and two scored it 114-114. A one-point deduction presumably would have changed two judges’ scorecards to 114-113 in favor of Roach and the third judge 114-113 for Davis – creating a split-decision victory for Roach.

“If that’s a knockdown I win the fight,’’ Roach said. But in welcoming a rematch, he also said, “It is what it is.’’

Gervonta ‘Tank’ Davis vs. Lamont Roach Jr. declared majority draw

Round 1

Lamont Roach Jr. throws a right to the body. It misses. But he’s still on his feet. Call it a victory for Roach. Gervonta “Tank’’ Davis showing no interest in opening up early. Roach throws a couple of jabs and that could be enough to seal this round. Half a dozen and Davis finally throws a punch – a right that does not land. Roach is the aggressor, but with caution. Davis scores with a halfhearted left. Roach 10, Davis 9.

Round 2

Roach opens with a couple of left jabs and this remains tactical. He throws a right. And a left. Davis looks to be content watching the punches miss. Davis lures Roach into the corner but Roach won’t take the bait. He keeps a wise distance. Davis fires a hard left. Then a right. But nothing for the highlight reel. Davis slightly more active. Slightly. Roach 20, Davis 18.

Round 3

Roach attacks with a left. Davis fends it off. Boxers still very careful here, although Roach is the technical aggressor. Davis fires a left and a right but looks tentative. Davis smiles as he sees Roach flinch. Davis scores with a left and Roach answers with a nice left. Scores with a chopping right. Davis connects with a left. Roach 29, Davis 28.

Round 4

Roach out quick behind left jabs. Davis unleashes a nice left and scores to the body. Roach wraps him up and fires a right. Davis loosening up, on his toes and fires a couple of rights. Neither connect, but he’s busier. A little showmanship from Davis. But where’s the big punch? Roach lands a nice left while Davis is complaining to the ref. Roach 38, Davis 38.

Round 5

Roach is the aggressor, but not showing a ton of confidence as he “stalks.’’ Fires his jab. He squeezes a right through Davis’ high guard. But Davis is deflecting most of the punches coming his way. Not a fan-friendly affair to this point. They trade lefts and Roach shows some aggression. Davis connects with a solid left and Roach looks agitated. Roach talking to Davis and closes the round with a jab to Davis’ face. But Davis scored effectively to the body. Davis 48, Roach 47.

Round 6

Davis, angered by a potential low blow, unleashes a flurry of punches. Roach’s body is the target. Davis unloads with a left with KO power, but it misses. They’re at the center of the ring now, and Davis lets fly with a couple of lefts to the body. Roach answers, only to be hit again. Davis connects with both hands and looks increasingly confident. Davis lands another good left. Davis 58, Roach 56.

Round 7

Roach marches forward and fires a left and right, then doubles up to the body. Not sure if anything landed. Davis smiling. Takes a left, and answers with a left. Davis surges behind two lefts. Connects with an uppercut. Roach scores but takes a hard left and then a hard right. Davis sticks out his tongue. Roach lands a hard right! And a second right. Roach showing courage. Great exchange as the round ends, and Roach puts together his best round. Davis 67, Roach 66.

Round 8

Roach inching forward but showing more caution now. May be able to give CompuBox the round off. Roach throws a double jab and Davis darts in only to be tied up. They exchange punches. Davis lands a hard right and then looks stunned by a counter right. Roach lands another solid right and eats a left, but he’s on his feet. Bell rings and Davis taps Roach as if acknowledging his worthy effort. Davis 76, Roach 76.

Round 9

Roach standing his ground. Takes a left and fires back with a right. Davis takes a knee. He went to his corner for an unspecified reason. Davis unloads and Roach fires right back. Davis is firing with that KO power, and Roach counters with a big right. Roach not backing down. Roach connects with another hard right. Roach 86, Davis 85. 

Round 10

Action slows. But Davis scores with a left hook to the body and a combination. Davis lands a left and Roach connects with a harder right. Again, standing his ground and then moving forward. Davis lands two lefts and Roach fires back with the jab. But it’s Tank’s round. Roach 95, Davis 95.

Round 11

Roach out quick again behind his jab. They trade more big punches. Davis scores with a big left and digs into the body. Bu Roach storms back. Roach may be growing fatigued. And just like that, he lands another right. Roach lands a big right. Catches a body shot. They are, center of the ring, exchanging big shots. Davis warned for a low blow. Davis throwing heavy leather, and Roach up to the challenge. Davis 105, Roach 104.

Round 12

Round begins. Davis looks skyward with some confusion. He better stay focused on Roach. They open with a nice exchange. Davis tries to bait Roach. Davis darts in, takes a punch. Delivers a left. More nice exchanges here, and Roach getting the better of it. Davis lands a left, but Roach counters. Roach moving forward. Roach grabbing Davis by the ankles. Holding on. Roach takes a right as the bell rings, but it’s harmless. Davis 114, Roach 114. 

Gary Antuanne Russell def. Jose Valenzuela by unanimous decision

Coming off the first loss of his career, Russell turned in a sterling performance.

He threw almost 1,000 punches and dominated Valenzuela with relentless pressure while winning the WBA super lightweight title.

The staggering numbers from Compu Box: During the 12-round fight, Russell threw 957 punches and landed 252, including 175 power punches.

The swelling and bruising on Valenzuela’s face attested to the power behind the punches.

The judges scored it 119-109, 119-109, 120-108 as Russell, 28, improved to 18-1.

In his previous fight, Russell lost to Alberto Puello by split decision – his first defeat. On Saturday, Puello defended his WBC super lightweight world title

Valenzuela, 28, who landed fewer than half as much punches as Russell did Saturday, fell to 14-2. 

Round-by-round analysis:

Round 1: Gary Antuanne Russell sporting flashy gold shorts. Fires some rapid-fire punches with some matching gold-colored gloves. Jose Valenzuela answers with a big shot, but Russell with a powerful right. Russell 10, Valenzuela 9.

Round 2: Russell opens up firing quickly again. Valenzuela answers with his own jab. Scores with a right – right to the kisser. But Russell displays even more speed and connects to the body. Russell stalks. Russell lands a hard right late. Russell 20, Valenzuela 18.

Round 3: Russell throwing punches as if intending to win by pure output. He’s scoring too. Valenzuela has yet to find much rhythm. Lands another flurry. Valenzuela connects, but Russell fights right back with body shots. Russell cornered, and yet he connects with two shots. Russell 30, Valenzuela 27.

Round 4: Russell comes out stalking and, yep, more flurries of punches. Valenzuela connects with an overhand left, but Russell looks unfazed. Valenzuela shows more precision, but his output doesn’t match Russell’s. Russell 40, Valenzuela 36. 

Round 5: Russell pressures again, stalking Valenzuela and throwing those rapid-fire punches. Valenzuela finally answers with authority. Lands a pretty left cross. Russell goes back to his game plan and tags Valenzuela up against the ropes. But Valenzuela finishes strong. Russell 49, Valenzuela 46. 

Round 6: Russell shows no let-up. Leading with that right jab and keeping up with pressure. Valenzuela lands and Russell quickly answers. Trading some heavy punches. Russell 59, Valenzuela 55.

Round 7: They come out slugging. Valenzuela shows aggression, but nothing is slowing Russell. It’s target practice for Russell. Russell has Valenzuela on the ropes and he fights back. Only to have Russell close with a surge. Russell 69, Valenzuela 64.

Round 8: Valenzuela lands a hard left. Russell responds with a fierce left of his own. Valenzuela still looks puzzled by the pressure. Russell showing no fatigue. Eats a left and answers with three lefts. Another big exchange. Russell 79, Valenzuela 73.

Round 9: Russell stalking again, and connects with right hooks early. Giving Valenzuela little breathing room. Valenzuela connects and pays the price: The bruising on his face deepens. Valenzuela goes on the offense and eats big punches as a result. Russell loading up and Valenzuela looks to be in trouble. Valenzuela takes a beating. Russell 89, Valenzuela 82.

Round 10: Russell out with his signature energy. Valenzuela understandably tentative. Russell in control. Russell 99, Valenzuela 91.

Round 11: Ringside doctor inspects Valenzuela and lets the fight continue. Poor guy. Russell taking punches, and landing about three for every one he takes. Russell pounding away now. Russell wraps up Valenzuela briefly. The first sign of fatigue? They’re tangled up and Russell may need a breather after finishing the round with a flourish. Russell 109, Valenzuela 100.

Round 12: Ringside doctor inspects Valenzuela’s face again. The bout will go on. Russell firing fast and fierce. Valenzuela moving forward before covering up. He delivers a body shot but that won’t be nearly enough to hurt Russell. Valenzuela lands a big uppercut and Russell responds with a furious left. Russell lost his mouthpiece but not his aggression. Impressive exchange as the round ends, but there’s no doubt about the winner. Russell 119, Valenzuela 109.

Alberto Puello def. Sandor Martin by split decision

Puello didn’t seem to mind the scattered boos after the decision was announced following the 12-round super lightweight fight.

After all, Puello retained his WBC super lightweight title. He did it with a willingness to trade punches at the center of the ring and finished strong.

Martin had his moments in the championship rounds, but he also had blood dripping from his nose.

The judges scored it 115-113, 113-115, 116-112 in favor of Puello, the 30-year-old from the Dominican Republic who improved to 24-0.

Martin, the 31-year-old Spaniard, fell to 42-4.

Round-by-round analysis:

Round 1: Both fighters open by throwing crisp rights. Martin presses forward as things turn more tactical. Translation: limited action. They trade punches again and Puello gets the best of it. Martin stalks again and they mix it up without landing any significant blows. Puello 10, Martin 9.

Round 2: Martin stalks. Puello moves. Martin shows some hesitation. Martin scores with a left and Puello counters with a hard right. Martin lands a hard right and evades a shot late. Puello 19, Martin 19.

Round 3: Tangled up early. Martin throws a couple of hard jabs and left. Puello works Martin against the ropes and a nice exchange ensues. Martin 29, Puello 28.

Round 4: Tied up again early and Martin sneaks in a body shot. He looks quick as he throws a couple of rights. Martin lands two lefts as remains the aggressor. Martin targets the body, with success. Nice exchange. Both fighters willing to get hit for the chance to hit. Martin 39, Puello 37.

Round 5: Martin connects with a hard left and follows up with a combination and then digs into Puello’s body. Puello shows some aggression, but Martin answers blow for blow. Big swing and a miss by Puello. Martin shows good defense. Martin 49, Puello 46.

Round 6: Martin scores early with the left. Puello shows urgency too. Starts to stalk. Now they trade at the center of the ring, and Martin scores with body shots. Puello answers with a hard right, then jabs. But the round ends with Puello whiffing with a right and Martin landing. Martin 59, Puello 55.

Round 7: They both come out swinging. Sharp exchange at the center of the ring. Puello finally connects with authority. Scores with a double jab and draws blood, too. Martin 68, Puello 65.

Round 8: Puello opens with a big right hook, but Martin stands his ground. He’s quickly throwing punches rather than defending himself. Inside fighting commences and Puello lands a nasty left followed by a solid right. Puello looking more comfortable. Action picks up. Puello’s power more evident as Martin’s bleeding from the nose. Martin 77, Puello 75.

Round 9: Martin comes out slugging and lands several body shots. All inside boxing now as exchanges ensue. Martin looks most effective in close quarters. Trading big shots. Martin throwing punches with more urgency and authority. Big miss again by Puello. Martin 87, Puello 84.

Round 10: Bell rings and slugging ensues. No running. Just trading punches at the center of the ring. They’re tangled up and Puello uses the opportunity to land a hard right before Martin chases after him. Puello connects with another brutal body shot. Leather flying. Martin 97, Puello 93.

Round 11: Straight they go to the center of the ring and slug. Puello appears to hurt Martin with a wicked left. Puello showing more authority. Puello slickly dodges a couple of punches as the round ends. Martin 106, Puello 103.

Round 12: More of the same. Straight to the center of the ring they go. Martin circling and scores with the right. He allows Puello to stalk and responds with body shots. Puello showing no sense of urgency, much less desperation. Then suddenly he smothers Martin. Martin 116, Puello 112.

Yoenis Tellez def. Julian Williams by unanimous decision

It was experience vs. youth, and it was a mismatch.

Tellez, the 24-year-old Cuban, bloodied and battered Williams, the 34-year-old from Philadelphia, in a 12-round super welterweight fight.

Tellez improved to 10-0, won the interim WBA super welterweight title and clearly won Williams’ respect. The judges scored the fight 118-110, 117-111 and 119-109.

Williams, a former WBA and IBF super welterweight champion, landed dozens of jabs. But his face told the story: He was bleeding from under both eyes and the lip.

Tellez got hit, but not nearly as hard as he hit, punishing Williams with a hard right and assortment of punches.

Round-by-round analysis:

Round 1: Julian Williams out quick behind the jab. Yoenis Tellez’s pink gloves waiting for action. There flies a jab from Tellez. More lefts follow as Tellez becomes and aggressor. But Williams scores with two hard rights and a left hook. Williams 10, Tellez 9.

Round 2: Williams opens with a couple of jabs and Tellez responds with heavy fire. Tellez stalking as Williams fires the jab, then combinations. Williams landing with more power. Tellez finishes strong, but too late. Williams 20, Tellez 18.

Round 3: Tellez comes out the aggressor. Williams still firing jabs to keep his opponent at bay. Tellez breaks through with effective body punches and a big uppercut. Williams urgently moves forward out of the corner and Tellez retreats. Tellez delivers with solid combination and Williams backpedals. He’s bleeding over the left eye as the round ends. Williams 29, Tellez 28.

Round 4: Tellez stalks again. Williams showing some effectiveness with the jab as Tellez needs time to find an opening.  Action has slowed. Now Tellez is using his jab to close the distance, and Williams responds with expert use of his jab and a couple of hard body shots. Tellez counters with an uppercut. Williams 38, Tellez 38. 

Round 5: Williams lands combinations, but it’s not enough to stop Tellez. The young Cuban keeps marching forward and the swelling on Williams’ face is evident. Tellez continues to pepper Williams’ face with jabs while unloading heavier punches when the opportunity presents itself. Tellez 48, Williams 47.

Round 6: Tellez pushing forward behind that jab and uncorks an overhand right. Lands two body shots and Williams looks non-threatening. Williams stands his ground, but his face is taking a beating. Another strong finish for Tellez. Tellez 58, Williams 56.

Round 7: Williams looks wary. Or is it weary? Maybe both. Tellez is 10 years younger and looks fresh. Williams lands a combination, but Tellez counters with a nasty left hook. The action is turning increasingly lopsided in favor of the pink-gloved Tellez. Tellez 68, Williams 65.

Round 8: Williams opens fast with a couple of jabs. He lands a good right, but Tellez looks unconcerned. They trade solid body shots. Tellez stalks again and drives a left into Williams’ midsection. Catches up to Williams and lands two flurries of punches. Tellez 78, Williams 74.  

Round 9: Williams fires a couple of hard jabs. Tellez responds with heavier punches. Williams looks content to stick-and-move-and-get-stuck-with-punches. Williams bleeding profusely under both eyes. He absorbs some big body punches before countering with solid punches. They’re trading jabs. Williams can use an ice facial. Tellez 88, Williams 83. 

Round 10: Tellez comes out … looking for the KO? But he heats a couple of jabs before responding with three big rights. Williams connects with jabs and Tellez answers with jabs to the body. Tellez has Williams on the ropes and he scores repeatedly. The assault continues. Tellez 98, Williams 92. 

Round 11: With the round set to begin, the ringside physician inspects Williams’ bloody face. The fight ensues. Williams lands a flurry of shots, but none hurt Tellez, who hurts Williams with an uppercut and an assortment of shots. Tellez 108, Williams 101.

Round 12: Williams’ trainer imploring the boxer to land a liver shot to Tellez. Williams looks whupped. He’s firing shots with his left, but Tellez starts to punish Williams with body shots and an accompaniment of blows. Tellez clubs Williams a few more times before the bell for good measure. Tellez 118, Williams 110.

Johan Gonzalez def. Jarrett Hurd by split decision

Hurd, the former unified super welterweight champion, announced his retirement moments after losing to Gonzalez in the 10-round middleweight bout.

Hurd held the IBO and IBF super welterweight titles in 2019, but did not turn back the clock against Gonzalez. He found himself under attack from the outset and looked mostly lackluster until the final rounds.

The judges scored it 96-94, 94-96, 98-92 in favor of Gonzalez, the 33-year-old from Venezuela who improved to 36-3.

Hurd, 34, started out his career 23-0. But it ends after he went 2-4-1 in his final seven fights.

David Whitmire def. Angel Munoz by unanimous decision

Whitmire, also known as “The Body Snatcher,’’ lived up to his nickname during the six-round welterweight bout.

Whitmire punished Munoz with body shots and did some meaningful headhunting, too.

Munoz managed to stay on his feet and connected with hooks, but he lacked the power to hurt Whitmire.

All three judges scored it 60-54 for Whitmire, 19, who improved to 9-0. Munoz, 22, dropped to 7-1. 

Deric Davis def. Jamal Johnson by TKO

Davis knocked Johnson down twice in the first round of their super lightweight bout for a TKO victory.

The first knockdown came on a body shot. Johnson’s mouthpiece went flying as he went tumbling to the canvas. The second knockdown came on a left hook that dropped Johnson and prompted the referee to call the fight with 1:04 left the first round.

Davis, 22, improved to 6-0 while recording his fifth first-round stoppage.

Johnson, who entered the ring wearing a black mask, fell to 2-1.

Gervonta ‘Tank’ Davis vs. Lamont Roach time 

Prelimary fights begin at 6 p.m. ET with the main event card beginning at 8 p.m. ET. The Davis-Roach fight has an approximate ring walk of 11 p.m. ET.

Gervonta ‘Tank’ Davis vs. Lamont Roach fight card

Main Card

WBA lightweight title fight: Gervonta Davis vs. Lamont Roach
Super lightweight: Jose Valenzuela vs. Gary Antuanne Russell
WBC super lightweight title fight: Alberto Puello vs. Sandor Martin
Super welterweight: Yoenis Tellez vs. Julian Williams

Prelims

Middleweight: Jarrett Hurd vs. Johan Gonzalez
Super featherweight: Geo Lopez vs. Grimardi Machuca
Super welterweight: Cristian Cangelosi vs. Jarrod Tennant
Super welterweight: Dwyke Flemmings Jr. vs. Florent Dervis
Welterweight: David Whitmire vs. Angel Munoz
Super bantamweight: Alexis De la Cerda Landin vs. Sharone Carter
Super middleweight: Nasheed H. Smith vs. Tariq Green
Lightweight: Deric Davis vs. Oscar Eduardo Gonzalez Jr.

Where is the Gervonta ‘Tank’ Davis vs. Lamont Roach fight? 

This WBA lightweight championship fight will get underway on Saturday at Barclays Center in Brooklyn.

Davis vs. Roach card start time

Main card: 8 p.m. ET / 5 p.m. PT (Amazon Prime PPV)
Prelims: 6 p.m. ET/ 3 p.m. ET (Prime Video)

How to watch Gervonta ‘Tank’ Davis vs. Lamont Roach fight 

Coverage starts at 8 p.m. ET for the main event card and will be available on Amazon Prime PPV. Preliminary bouts starting at 6 p.m. ET available on Prime video.

Watch Davis vs. Roach with Amazon Prime PPV

Gervonta Davis vs. Lamont Roach fight odds

All available odds are for moneyline bets as of Friday, according to BetMGM. (Check for new odds before adding to file)

Main Card

WBA lightweight title fight: Gervonta Davis (-2000) vs. Lamont Roach (+750)
Super lightweight: Jose Valenzuela (-110) vs. Gary Antuanne Russell (-120)
WBC super lightweight title fight: Alberto Puello (-135) vs. Sandor Martin (+100)
Super welterweight: Yoenis Tellez (-1600) vs. Julian Williams (+650)

Prelims

Middleweight: Jarrett Hurd (-120) vs. Johan Gonzalez (-110)
Super featherweight: Geo Lopez vs. Grimardi Machuca
Super welterweight: Cristian Cangelosi vs. Jarrod Tennant
Super welterweight: Dwyke Flemmings Jr. vs. Florent Dervis
Welterweight: David Whitmire vs. Angel Munoz
Super bantamweight: Alexis De la Cerda Landin vs. Sharone Carter
Super middleweight: Nasheed H. Smith vs. Tariq Green
Lightweight: Deric Davis vs. Oscar Eduardo Gonzalez Jr.

Gervonta Davis vs. Lamont Roach predictions

CBS Sports: Pick Gervonta Davis

Brent Brookhouse writes: ‘While Roach is right that the amateur fights between the two do provide some direct knowledge of being in the ring with the champ, it also overlooks that, even as teenagers, Davis was the better fighter. That hasn’t changed as the years have ticked by. Davis is too smart, too disciplined and too powerful for Roach. The challenger may win an early round or two given Davis’ tendency to start slowly while he scouts out his opponent and figures out where the openings are to hurt them. But once Davis gets rolling, it will likely be a matter of time before he lands some big shots to end things.’

Yahoo Sports: Davis KO

Darshan Desai writes: ‘I expect Roach to have success in the early rounds at long range and occasionally catch Davis in exchanges due to his reach advantage, similar to the success Rolando Romero had against Davis. But Roach leaves himself open to counters, and I expect Davis to capitalize devastatingly in the second half of the fight.’

Boxing Scene: Jim Lampley picks Davis

David Greisman writes, according to Lampley: ‘Even if Tank did not possess his shocking punching power, he would be an elite lightweight on the basis of his crafty boxing, southpaw style advantage, clever footwork and visible killer instinct,” Lampley said. “But it is pure power that really sets him apart. He doesn’t just beat his opponents. He annihilates them in breathtaking, often scary fashion.’

Boxing News: Oscar De La Hoya picks Davis

The site reported that Oscar De La Hoya said: ‘I think Lamont Roach is a terrific fighter, he might be a little over his head with Gervonta Davis. Gervonta Davis is, I mean, to say the least. He’s a beast. He really is. He’s (Gervonta Davis) a tremendous fighter. He’s a dedicated fighter when it comes to training and fighting and making sure that he’s in optimal conditions when he steps inside that squared circle. It’s gonna be a tough night for Roach, but you can never count him out.”

Has Tank Davis ever been knocked down?

Officially, Davis never has been knocked down. But that’s a matter of debate. In 2020, during the first round of his fight against Leo Santa Cruz, Davis ended up on the canvas. The referee did not rule it a knockdown – but judge for yourself.

What is not in dispute is the Davis’ highlight-reel KO that ended the fight in the sixth round.

Who is Tank Davis’ girlfriend Vanessa Posso?

Vanessa Posso, Davis’ girlfriend, is the mother of two of the boxer’s three children. She is a model with her own jewelry line called “Rich Girlz.’

Gervonta Davis vs. Lamont Roach live stream

Coverage starts at 8 p.m. ET and will be available on Amazon Prime PPV with prelim fights available on Prime Video.

We occasionally recommend interesting products and services. If you make a purchase by clicking one of the links, we may earn an affiliate fee. USA TODAY Network newsrooms operate independently, and this doesn’t influence our coverage.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The NASCAR Cup Series hits the Lone Star State for the first road-course race of the 2025 season, when the Circuit of the Americas hosts the EchoPark Automotive Grand Prix on Sunday.

It will be a big change of pace for drivers after opening the season with superspeedway events at Daytona and Atlanta. In addition to going from fast, pack-style racing on the high-banked ovals to adjusting to multiple left and right turns on the Austin, Texas, road course, drivers will also have to adapt to a shorter, reconfigured circuit.

The section from Turn 7 through the Turn 11 hairpin was eliminated, reducing the course from 3.41 miles (same as the Formula One U.S. Grand Prix) to 2.4 miles. But the shorter circuit means the number of laps has increased, going from 68 to 95.

Qualifying will also be extremely important – unlike Daytona and Atlanta – as the past two race winners at COTA – William Byron in 2024 and Tyler Reddick in 2023 – started on the front row.

Who will be the first road warrior of 2025? Here’s all the information you need to get ready for Sunday’s EchoPark Automotive Grand Prix:

SCHEDULE: How to watch NASCAR Cup Series races in 2025

NEWSLETTER: Sign up to get sports news and features delivered daily

What time does the NASCAR Cup race at COTA start?

The EchoPark Automotive Grand Prix starts at 3:30 p.m. ET (2:30 p.m. local) at Circuit of the Americas in Austin, Texas.

What TV channel is the NASCAR Cup race at COTA on?

Fox is broadcasting the EchoPark Automotive Grand Prix and has a pre-race show beginning at 2:30 p.m. ET (1:30 p.m. local).

Will there be a live stream of the NASCAR Cup race at COTA?

The EchoPark Automotive Grand Prix can be live streamed on Max and the FoxSports app. Viewers can also stream the race on Fubo, which is offfering a free trial to new subscribers.

Watch NASCAR at Circuit of the Americas on Fubo (free trial)

How many laps is the NASCAR Cup race at COTA?

The EchoPark Automotive Grand Prix is 95 laps around the 2.4-mile road course for a total of 228 miles. The race will feature three segments (laps per stage) — Stage 1: 20 laps; Stage 2: 25 laps; Stage 3: 50 laps.

Who won the most recent NASCAR Cup race at COTA?

What is the lineup for the EchoPark Automotive Grand Prix at COTA?

(Car number in parentheses)

(45) Tyler Reddick, Toyota
(23) Bubba Wallace, Toyota
(9) Chase Elliott, Chevrolet
(77) Carson Hocevar, Chevrolet
(99) Daniel Suarez, Chevrolet
(88) Shane Van Gisbergen, Chevrolet
(5) Kyle Larson, Chevrolet
(8) Kyle Busch, Chevrolet
(1) Ross Chastain, Chevrolet
(34) Todd Gilliland, Ford
(11) Denny Hamlin, Toyota
(16) AJ Allmendinger, Chevrolet
(54) Ty Gibbs, Toyota
(87) Connor Zilisch, Chevrolet
(24) William Byron, Chevrolet
(71) Michael McDowell, Chevrolet
(4) Noah Gragson, Ford
(19) Chase Briscoe, Toyota
(20) Christopher Bell, Toyota
(38) Zane Smith, Ford
(48) Alex Bowman, Chevrolet
(47) Ricky Stenhouse Jr., Chevrolet
(22) Joey Logano, Ford
(17) Chris Buescher, Ford
(12) Ryan Blaney, Ford
(6) Brad Keselowski, Ford
(3) Austin Dillon, Chevrolet
(60) Ryan Preece, Ford
(7) Justin Haley, Chevrolet
(41) Cole Custer, Ford
(35) Riley Herbst, Toyota
(43) Erik Jones, Toyota
(42) John Hunter Nemechek, Toyota
(10) Ty Dillon, Chevrolet
(21) Josh Berry, Ford
(2) Austin Cindric, Ford
(51) Cody Ware, Ford

We occasionally recommend interesting products and services. If you make a purchase by clicking one of the links, we may earn an affiliate fee. USA TODAY Network newsrooms operate independently, and this doesn’t influence our coverage.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Friday’s extraordinary Oval Office meeting between President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy went off the rails, leaving hopes for a U.S.-brokered peace deal between Russia and Ukraine in question. Here are some reasons why things went wrong, and where it leaves efforts to end the war.

Zelenskyy does not grasp—or deliberately ignores—the bitter truth: Those with whom he feels most affinity (Western globalists, the American Left, the Europeans) have little power in 2025 to help him. And those whom he obviously does not like or seeks to embarrass (as with his Scranton, Penn. campaign-like visit in September 2024) alone have the power to save him. For his own sake, I hope he is not being ‘briefed’ by the Obama-Clinton-Biden gang to confront Trump, given their interests are not really Ukraine’s as they feign.

. Zelenskyy acts as if his agenda and ours are identical. So, he keeps insisting that he is fighting for us despite our two-ocean-distance that he mocks. We do have many shared interests with Ukraine, but not all by any means: Trump wants to ‘reset’ with Russia and triangulate it against China. He seeks to avoid a 1962 DEFCON 2-like crisis over a proxy showdown in proximity to a nuclear rival. And he sincerely wants to end the deadlocked Stalingrad slaughterhouse for everyone’s sake.

. The Europeans (and Canada) are now talking loudly of a new muscular antithesis, independent of the U.S. Promises, promises—given that would require Europeans to prune back their social welfare state, frack, use nuclear, stop the green obsession, and spend 3-5% of their GDP on defense. The U.S. does not just pay 16% of NATO’s budget, but also puts up with asymmetrical tariffs that result in a European Union trade surplus of $160 billion, plays the world cop, patrolling sea-lanes and deterring terrorists and rogue states that otherwise might interrupt Europe’s commercial networks abroad, as well as de facto including Europe under a nuclear umbrella of 6,500 nukes.

. Zelenskyy must know that all of the once-deal-breaking impediments to peace have been settled. Ukraine is now better armed than most NATO nations, but will not be in NATO, and no president has or will ever supply Ukraine with the armed wherewithal to take back the Donbass and Crimea. So, the only two issues are a) how far will Putin be willing to withdraw to his 2022 borders and b) how will he be deterred? The first is answered by a commercial sector/tripwire, joint Ukrainian-US-Europe resource development corridor in Eastern Ukraine, coupled with a Korea-like DMZ; the second by the fact that Putin, unlike his 2008 and 2014 invasions, has now incurred a million dead and wounded to a Ukraine that will remain thusly armed. 

What are Zelenskyy’s alternatives without much U.S. help—wait for a return of the Democrats to the White House in four years? Hope for a rearmed Europe? Pray for a Democratic House and a third Vindman-like engineered Trump impeachment? Or swallow his pride, return to the White House, sign the rare-earth minerals deal, invite in the Euros (are they seriously willing to patrol a DMZ?), and hope Trump can warn Putin, as he did successfully between 2017-21, not to dare try it again?

. If there is a cease-fire, a commercial deal, a Euro ground presence, and influx of Western companies into Ukraine, would there be elections? And if so, would Zelenskyy and his party win? And if not, would there be a successor transparent government that would reveal exactly where all the Western financial aid money went? 

Zelenskyy might see a model in Netanyahu. The Biden Administration was far harder on him than Trump is on Ukraine, suspending arms shipments, demanding cease-fires, prodding for a wartime, bipartisan cabinet, hammering Israel on collateral damage—none of which Westerners have demanded of Zelenskyy. Yet Netanyahu managed a hostile President Biden, kept Israel close to its patron, and, when visiting, was gracious to his host. Netanyahu certainly would never before the global media have interrupted and berated a host and patron president in the White House. 

. If Ukraine has alienated the U.S., what then is its strategic victory plan? Wait around for more Euros? Hold off an increasingly invigorated Russian military? Cede more territory? What, then, exactly are Zelenskyy’s cards he seems to think form a winning hand? 

. If one views carefully all the 50-minute tape, most of it was going quite well—until Zelenskyy started correcting Vance firstly, and Trump secondly. By Ukraine-splaining to his hosts, and by his gestures, tone, and interruptions, he made it clear that he assumed that Trump was just more of the same compliant, clueless moneybags Biden waxen effigy. And that was naïve for such a supposedly worldly leader. 

. March 2025 is not March 2022, after the heroic saving of Kyiv—but three years and 1.5 million dead and wounded later. Zelenskyy is no longer the international heartthrob with the glamorous entourage. He has postponed elections, outlawed opposition media and parties, suspended habeas corpus and walked out of negotiations when he had an even hand in spring 2022 and apparently even now when he does not in spring 2025.

Quo vadis, Volodymyr?

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS