Archive

2025

Browsing

The Seattle Mariners may not bother investing in quality free agent hitters, though they’re certainly not averse to retaining their own players when the price is reasonable.

The Mariners and Platinum Glove catcher Cal Raleigh have agreed on a six-year, $105 million contract extension, ESPN reported. The deal will buy out Raleigh’s final three years under arbitration and keep him in Seattle during what would have been his first three years as a free agent.

Raleigh, 28, was due to make $5.6 million this season in his first year of salary arbitration. Instead, his $17.5 million average annual value will kick in this season and tie him to the Mariners through 2030.

While Raleigh is just a career .218 hitter, he hit 30 and 34 home runs the past two seasons and accrued 4.7 WAR in 2024, when he won his first Gold and Platinum gloves while handling the Mariners’ peerless pitching staff.

Those pitcher-catcher relationships will continue through the end of this decade, a key facet to the Mariners’ extremely pitching-centric approach. Their rotation of Logan Gilbert, Luis Castillo, Bryce Miller, George Kirby and Bryan Woo combined for a 3.38 ERA, tops in the American League and second only to Atlanta in the major leagues.

It was their flaccid offense that kept them out of the playoffs for the 22nd time in 23 years, though, and the Mariners did little to solve that problem, adding only first baseman Donovan Solano and re-signing infielder Jorge Polanco in free agency.

Yet the catching will be spoken for. And Raleigh joins center fielder Julio Rodriguez as long-term pieces of Seattle’s puzzle; Rodriguez signed an extension that guarantees him $209 million over 12 years, with various club and player options that vary based on his performance. 

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The women’s college basketball world was hit with a heartbreaker late Monday night when one of its stars, USC guard JuJu Watkins, went down with a season-ending injury in the second round of the NCAA Tournament.

Watkins, who was named one of four finalists for the Naismith National Player of the Year on Wednesday, sustained a reported torn ACL injury in the first quarter of No. 1 seed USC’s second-round win against No. 9 seed Mississippi State at Galen Center in Los Angeles.

During an appearance on ESPN 104.5 Baton Rouge on Tuesday, LSU women’s basketball coach Kim Mulkey offered her thoughts and prayers to the Trojans star guard.

‘Let me say this, guys, before I hang up. JuJu Watkins is a star in our game and she went down last night with an ACL injury on really things you do in a game,’ Mulkey said Tuesday. ‘Nobody did anything dirty, it was just so sad to watch and see. And I just knew when she went down that it was torn. You just know by the look of the knee, by the reaction on her face.’

She added: ‘(Watkins is) such a great ambassador of our game and that’s going to be the talk of the playoffs from here on.’

Mulkey, who was inducted into the Naismith Basketball Hall of Fame in 2020, also gave a message to USC and Trojans coach Lindsay Gottlieb as they prepare for their second consecutive Sweet 16 appearance by pointing to one of her own players, Sa’Myah Smith.

‘This is fixable. This is fixable. Sa’Myah Smith is a great example of that,’ Mulkey said. ‘She’s been through two ACL tears, one of each knee.’

Watkins ends her sophomore campaign ranked fifth in the nation in scoring, averaging 23.9 points per game.

Mulkey and her program will take the floor in the Sweet 16 on Friday, March 29 against No. 2 seed NC State at 7:30 p.m. ET at Spokane Arena in Spokane. As for USC, the Trojans are set to play their first game without Watkins on Saturday, March 29 against No. 5 seed Kansas State at 8 p.m. ET also in Spokane.

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The NBA regular season is nearly done, with tensions high as teams jockey for the final few spots in this year’s playoffs.

While the top spots in both conferences seem secure — the Oklahoma City Thunder have clinched the top spot in the West, and the Cleveland Cavaliers have a 4.5-game edge in the East as the season winds down — there is drama guaranteed further down the standings.

In the East, teams like the Chicago Bulls and Miami Heat are hoping to avoid a collapse to hold off the Toronto Raptors for the final play-in round berths. Over in the West, the Memphis Grizzlies, Golden State Warriors, Los Angeles Clippers, and Minnesota Timberwolves are in a four-horse race to avoid the play-in round entirely by finishing in the top six.

Here is the current NBA playoff picture, including magic numbers, standings, and predictions.

Latest NBA Standings

Here are the NBA standings as of the afternoon of Tuesday, March 25.

Eastern Conference

1. Cleveland Cavaliers: 57-14 (D)
2. Boston Celtics: 53-19 (P)
3. New York Knicks: 44-26
4. Indiana Pacers: 42-29
5. Milwaukee Bucks: 40-31
6. Detroit Pistons: 40-32
7. Atlanta Hawks: 35-36
8. Orlando Magic: 34-38
9. Chicago Bulls: 32-40
10. Miami Heat: 30-41
11. Toronto Raptors: 25-47
12. Brooklyn Nets: 23-49
13. Philadelphia 76ers: 23-49
14. Charlotte Hornets: 18-53
15. Washington Wizards: 15-56

Western Conference

1. Oklahoma City Thunder: 59-12 *
2. Houston Rockets: 46-26
3. Denver Nuggets: 45-28
4. Los Angeles Lakers: 43-28
5. Memphis Grizzlies: 43-28
6. Golden State Warriors: 41-30
7. Los Angeles Clippers: 40-31
8. Minnesota Timberwolves: 41-32
9. Sacramento Kings: 35-36
10. Phoenix Suns: 35-37
11. Dallas Mavericks: 35-37
12. Portland Trail Blazers: 32-40
13. San Antonio Spurs: 31-39
14. New Orleans Pelicans: 20-53 (e)
15. Utah Jazz: 16-56 (e)

* Clinched conference; (e) – eliminated; (D) clinched division; (P) – clinched playoff spot

Play-In Teams: NBA playoff race

The NBA playoff structure allows 20 total teams into the postseason (10 from each conference). The top six teams in the regular season qualify directly for the first round, while those finishing between seventh and 10th place participate in the play-in round. Here is the play-in outlook with teams’ total games back of first.

Eastern Conference

Based on the current standings, any team from the third-place New York Knicks and the Philadelphia 76ers down to 13th could still mathematically end up in the play-in round.

3. New York Knicks: 12.5 games back
4. Indiana Pacers: 15 GB
5. Milwaukee Bucks: 17 GB
6. Detroit Pistons: 17.5 GB
7. Atlanta Hawks: 22 GB
8. Orlando Magic: 23.5 GB
9. Chicago Bulls: 25.5 GB
10. Miami Heat: 27 GB
11. Toronto Raptors: 32.5 GB
12. Brooklyn Nets: 34.5 GB
13. Philadelphia 76ers: 34.5 GB

Western Conference

The Western Conference is slightly less settled. The Oklahoma City Thunder have clinched the conference regular-season title, but the only other teams that are guaranteed not to see the playoff round are the New Orleans Pelicans and Utah Jazz, which have both been eliminated.

2. Houston Rockets: 13.5 games back
3. Denver Nuggets: 15 GB
4. Los Angeles Lakers: 16 GB
5. Memphis Grizzlies: 16 GB
6. Golden State Warriors: 18 GB
7. Los Angeles Clippers: 19 GB
8. Minnesota Timberwolves: 19 GB
9. Sacramento Kings: 24 GB
10. Phoenix Suns: 24.5 GB
11. Dallas Mavericks: 24.5 GB
12. Portland Trail Blazers: 27.5 GB
13. San Antonio Spurs: 27.5 GB

NBA playoff scenarios: Latest Magic Numbers

Eastern Conference

In the East, the Cleveland Cavaliers and Boston Celtics have clinched a spot in the first round of the playoffs. Four teams — the New York Knicks, Indiana Pacers, Milwaukee Bucks, and Detroit Pistons — are assured of a place in the play-in round at the least.

Here are the magic numbers for those four teams to guarantee themselves entry into the first round:

3. New York Knicks: 3 games away
4. Indiana Pacers: 5
5. Milwaukee Bucks: 7
6. Detroit Pistons: 7

The next four teams in the East still have a mathematical chance to climb into the top six and claim a first-round place. Below are their magic numbers to clinch a berth in the play-in round:

7. Atlanta Hawks: 1 game away
8. Orlando Magic: 2
9. Chicago Bulls: 3
10. Miami Heat: 5

The rest of the teams in the Eastern Conference cannot get into the first round, but three still have a shot at the play-in round. While the Charlotte Hornets and Washington Wizards have no chance to join the postseason, there are three teams still in the hunt.

Below is each team’s magic number in terms of how many losses they can afford and still stay alive in the playoff chase as they do not control their destiny.

11. Toronto Raptors: 6 games away
12. Brooklyn Nets: 3
13. Philadelphia 76ers: 4

Western Conference

The only team to lock up a first-round spot is the Thunder, who have clinched the No. 1 seed in the Western Conference playoffs. The Houston Rockets and Denver Nuggets have sealed a place in the play-in round, but still have work to do to guarantee themselves a berth in the first round.

Here are their magic numbers to avoid the play-in round:

2. Houston Rockets: 6 games away
3. Denver Nuggets: 6

The next seven teams in the standings are all rather tightly bunched up, heightening the playoff race tension. Here are their magic numbers to clinch a play-in spot:

4. Los Angeles Lakers: 2 games away
5. Memphis Grizzlies: 2
6. Golden State Warriors: 5
7. Los Angeles Clippers: 4
8. Minnesota Timberwolves: 6
9. Sacramento Kings: 10
10. Phoenix Suns: 10

Finally, there are three teams outside the postseason at the moment who could still climb the ladder and get in. The New Orleans Pelicans and Utah Jazz are mathematically eliminated, but this trio still has hope. Here are their magic numbers in terms of how many losses a team needs to lose a chance to qualify for the playoffs. These teams essentially do not control their destiny:

11. Dallas Mavericks: 10 games away
12. Portland Trail Blazers: 7
13. San Antonio Spurs: 9

Latest NBA bracket predictions

Bleacher Report: Current standings hold in East, Warriors into West play-in round

Joe Tansey doesn’t see any of the East’s playoff outsiders taking a postseason berth out of someone else’s hands. While he does predict a shuffle in the standings over these final few weeks of the regular season, Tansey sees Atlanta, Orlando, Miami, and Chicago going into the play-in.

In the West, the story is much the same. Tansey’s predictions see Denver inching ahead of Houston for the No. 2 seed, and the Clippers leapfrogging Golden State for the final guaranteed spot in the first round. That would send the Warriors into the play-in round, along with Minnesota, Sacramento, and Phoenix.

Basketball-Reference: Simulation sees few changes from current standings.

Basketball-Reference’s simulations see the East’s current top 10 all holding their positions, which would mean a play-in round that pits Chicago against Miami in the 9-vs-10 game, while Atlanta and Orlando will play in the 7-vs-8 game.

In the West, despite a razor-thin margin separating the Kings, Mavericks, and Suns, the simulation says Phoenix has a 64.8% chance of missing the playoffs entirely. The model also slightly favors Minnesota moving up to seventh, which would ensure a home game in the play-in round against the Clippers. Still, it figures to go down to the wire, with Golden State given just a 53.3% chance of securing the final spot in the first round.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

SUN VALLEY, Idaho — Used to be, Lauren Macuga was best known for her collection of bucket hats and colorful shirts with American flags all over them.

Now it’s her skiing that’s getting all the buzz.

Macuga went from an up-and-comer to a legitimate medal contender at next year’s Milan-Cortina Olympics this season. And it happened almost as fast as she skis.

She raised eyebrows in December by winning two super-Gs in a lower-tier event at Copper Mountain, finishing ahead of eventual overall champion Federica Brignone. A month later, Macuga got her first World Cup victory, in the super-G at St. Anton, Austria.

She medaled in her very first world championships, winning the bronze in super-G. And earlier this month, she was second in a World Cup downhill in Kvitfjell, Norway.

With one race left at the World Cup finals, the 22-year-old is the top U.S. woman in the overall standings.

“It’s just been chaos. But it’s been fantastic,” Macuga said Tuesday after finishing 15th, good enough to earn her points, in her first-ever World Cup giant slalom race. “I couldn’t have asked for a better season. I mean my team, the support and just, it’s literally just been so fun.”

Fun is the operative word in the Macuga family.

Dan and Amy Macuga (pronounced muh-SUE-gah) moved their family to Park City, Utah, when their kids were small. Name a snow sport, and it can be done in Park City because of the facilities left over from the 2002 Olympics, and the Macuga kids tried most of them.

Lauren and her brother Daniel gravitated to ski racing. Younger sister Alli took to moguls. Older sister Sam loved the thrill of ski jumping.

Mind you, this was meant to just be a fun thing, a way for the kids to stay active. Not produce future Olympic hopefuls.

And yet, that’s where they are, with Lauren, Alli and Sam all on their respective national teams and Daniel racing on one of the lower circuits.

“I don’t know how we got here,” Amy Macuga said. “It just all suddenly happened. It’s pretty surreal.”

Or chaos, as Lauren Macuga happily describes it. (Sam even carried a sign with “Chaos Cougs” on Tuesday.)

Amy Macuga uses a spreadsheet to keep her kids’ schedules straight, as well as another to track who is taking care of the family pets while they crisscross the globe. The siblings make frequent use of the location functions on their phones to keep tabs on where the others are.

And sometimes there’s a little intervention by the travel gods.

Earlier this season, Sam was in the Munich airport when someone came up behind her at baggage claim. Turns out, Lauren was flying through Munich, too, and had spotted her sister.

“She scared me so bad! I was like, `I’m hallucinating. Lauren, what are you doing here?’” Sam said, laughing at the memory. “It was so funny. We sent a selfie to our family.”

With the exception of Daniel, the whole family was in Sun Valley over the weekend. Though the downhill race Saturday was canceled and Lauren had her first-ever “did not finish” in the super-G, it didn’t put a damper on what has been a breakout season for the burgeoning star.

Macuga was in the top five in seven of her 19 races, and in the top 10 in another three. Though she wound up fourth in the team combined at the world championships, she had the fastest downhill run in the event.

Macuga finished the season fourth in the downhill standings, and sixth in super-G.

“My expectations for the season were high, but I definitely surpassed them. Which has been so exciting,” she said before the World Cup finals began. “My super-G expectations were definitely high and my downhill, I was hoping it was as good last year and now it’s just as good as my super-G. It’s really cool to … say, `If I can put my best skiing down, it can be a really good run.’”

Her success, along with her bubbly personality and made-for-NBC family story, will put Macuga squarely in the spotlight ahead of next year’s Olympics. While that kind of attention can be daunting, Macuga is made for it.

Even before she was challenging for podiums, Macuga stood out from other skiers with her goofy hats. It started four years ago, she said, when she spotted a cute bucket hat with mushrooms on it and wore it in the finish area. It quickly became her signature and, in a sport where athletes can be anonymous once they take off their helmets, has helped make Macuga a fan favorite.

Keep skiing like this, and she could pick up some new, shinier accessories at the Milan-Cortina Olympics.

“(This season gave me) a lot of confidence and it’s so cool. But it’s also crazy to be like, no, I still have to work hard through the summer,” Macuga said. “Yeah, I’m sitting very well right now, but it’s all up to next year and you can’t just sit around and do nothing.

“It actually gets me more excited to work harder to try to get even better for the Olympics.”

Follow USA TODAY Sports columnist Nancy Armour on social media @nrarmour.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

President Donald Trump’s choice to lead the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Johns Hopkins School of Medicine professor Dr. Marty Makary, cleared a key vote in the Senate on Tuesday, the last such test before his final confirmation vote. 

The Senate voted 56-44 to invoke cloture on the nomination. 

A final vote to confirm the FDA nominee is slated for after 8 p.m. Tuesday. 

Makary, a former Fox News medical contributor, went before the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) earlier this month and answered various questions on vaccines, chronic illness, food safety and abortion. 

During his hearing, the nominee faced scrutiny over an FDA vaccine meeting that was reportedly postponed at the last minute. 

‘So if you are confirmed, will you commit to immediately reschedule that FDA Vaccine Advisory Committee meeting to get the expert views?’ Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., asked Makary at the time. 

He responded that he ‘would reevaluate which topics deserve a convening of the advisory committee members on [Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee] and which may not require a convening.’ 

When this response wasn’t good enough for Murray, Makary flipped the question, telling her to confront the Biden administration. ‘Well, you can ask the Biden administration that chose not to convene the committee meeting for the COVID vaccine booster,’ he said. 

He was referring to the Biden administration in 2021 pushing through FDA approval for a COVID-19 booster for everyone over the age of 18. 

‘The FDA did not hold a meeting of the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee on these actions,’ read a press release at the time, ‘as the agency previously convened the committee for extensive discussions regarding the use of booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines and, after review of both Pfizer’s and Moderna’s EUA requests, the FDA concluded that the requests do not raise questions that would benefit from additional discussion by committee members.’

Committee member Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, criticized the administration’s move, saying, ‘We’re being asked to approve this as a three-dose vaccine for people 16 years of age and older, without any clear evidence if the third dose for a younger person when compared to an elderly person is of value.’

Makary has long been a critic of the administration he is poised to lead. He wrote an opinion piece in 2021, calling for ‘fresh leadership at the FDA to change the culture at the agency and promote scientific advancement, not hinder it.’

‘We now have a generational opportunity in American healthcare,’ he said at his hearing. ‘President Trump and Secretary Kennedy’s focus on healthy foods has galvanized a grassroots movement in America. Childhood obesity is not a willpower problem, and the rise of early-onset Alzheimer’s is not a genetic cause. We should be, and we will, be addressing food as it impacts our health.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The full Senate voted Tuesday evening to confirm President Donald Trump’s pick to lead the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Dr. Jay Bhattacharya.

The party-line vote followed approval from the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, which also voted along party lines to advance Bhattacharya, leading to today’s full Senate vote.  

A physician, Stanford professor of medicine and senior fellow at the university’s Institute for Economic Policy Research, Bhattacharya was a leading voice during the COVID-19 pandemic against lockdown measures and vaccine mandates. 

He was one of the co-authors of the Great Barrington Declaration, a document published in October 2020 by a group of scientists advocating against widespread COVID lockdowns and promoting the efficacy of natural immunity for low-risk individuals as opposed to vaccination.

Bhattacharya was probed by the Senate HELP Committee earlier this month over various issues related to his potential role as NIH director. However, for much of the hearing, he was forced to defend the president’s decision to cut certain research funds at NIH, including a 15% cap on indirect research costs, also known as facilities and administrative costs, dispersed by the NIH.

Bhattacharya would not explicitly say he disagreed with the cuts, or that, if confirmed, he would step in to stop them. Rather, he said he would ‘follow the law,’ while also investigating the effect of the cuts and ensuring every NIH researcher doing work that advances the health outcomes of Americans has the resources necessary.

‘I think transparency regarding indirect costs is absolutely worthwhile. It’s something that universities can fix by working together to make sure that where that money goes is made clear,’ Bhattacharya said of the indirect costs going to universities, hospitals and research clinics from the NIH. 

In addition to addressing questions about the Trump cuts, Bhattacharya also laid out what he called a new, decentralized vision for future research at NIH that he said will be aimed at embracing dissenting ideas and transparency, while focusing on research topics that have the best chance at directly benefiting health outcomes of Americans. Bhattacharya added that he wants to rid the agency’s research portfolio of other ‘frivolous’ efforts that he says do little to directly benefit health outcomes.

‘I think fundamentally what matters is do scientists have an idea that advances the scientific field they’re in?’ Bhattacharya said last week during his confirmation testimony. ‘Do they have an idea that ends up addressing the health needs of Americans?’

Prior to his confirmation, Bhattacharya, alongside several other scientists, including Trump’s pick to head the Food and Drug Administration, Dr. Marty Makary, launched a new research journal focused on spurring scientific discourse and combating ‘gatekeeping’ in the medical research community. The journal, the Journal of the Academy of Public Health (JAPH), aims to spur scientific discourse by publishing peer reviews of prominent studies from other journals that do not make their peer reviews publicly available.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

About USA TODAY Sports’ 30 Days to the NFL draft series: Every five days, we will focus on a unique aspect of the 2025 draft, which is April 24-26.

In his two years at the University of Colorado, Shedeur Sanders became the most accurate passer in Division I college history dating back almost seven decades, according to data from Sports Reference.

Still, it’s a rare mock draft that puts Sanders ahead of former Miami (Fla.) quarterback Cam Ward, who many expect could be selected first overall by the Tennessee Titans – but will likely be picked ahead of Sanders in any case.

Certainly completion rate isn’t the only metric teams are looking for when they make their decisions at the NFL draft, which will occur from April 24-26 at the Green Bay Packers’ iconic Lambeau Field in Wisconsin. But consider just how much completion rates have jumped in recent years in college and the NFL – whether it be a higher volume of short passes or just improved accuracy.

Unable to view our graphics? Click here to see them.

If there’s any question of how important the measure has become, four of the five quarterbacks selected in the first-round of the 2024 NFL draft are on Sport Reference’s list of the 250 most accurate passers. The list dates back to 1956.

J.J. McCarthy, picked 10th in 2024 with the class’s top career completion rate of 67.6%, didn’t qualify for the list because he was 162 passes short of the 875 pass-attempt minimum. Bo Nix, picked 12th in 2024, holds the single-season record for completion percentage at 77.4%.

Perhaps more importantly for NFL teams looking for quarterbacks in April, the three passers widely considered as first-round picks in most mock drafts – Ward, Sanders and Mississippi’s Jaxson Dart – are all among the top 100. Jalen Milroe, projected by some as a first-round pick, completed 64.3% of his 663 passes at Alabama. He would tie for 108th on the career list if made the minimum number of pass attempts.

Top college quarterbacks based on competition percentage

While Sanders leads the 2025 draft class in career completion percentage, Ward had the best numbers during the 2024 season for the two most important passes: touchdowns and interceptions.

Ward’s touchdown-to-interception ratio of 5.6 in 2024 – FBS-leading 39 TD passes against seven interceptions – is just a few ticks below the No. 1 overall pick of the 2024 draft, Caleb Williams, who had a ratio of 6.0 in his final year at Southern California. Dart’s 4.8 touchdown-interception ratio is the second best among likely top picks.

How final college seasons compare among quarterbacks

Below, the number of touchdowns and interceptions the 2025 draft-class quarterbacks (in bold) threw last season compared to some of the NFL’s top quarterbacks in their final college seasons. Quarterbacks ranked by touchdown-interception ratios:

Of course, there’s no perfect measure to determine how a college quarterback will perform at the NFL level. One number – passer efficiency rating – tries to rank quarterbacks by completions, touchdowns, interceptions and yardage. Even that number’s predictive powers can be hit and miss.

It’s interesting to note the wide range of college passer-efficiency ratings among some of the NFL’s top quarterbacks. Although they combine the same set of statistics, the college number is computed differently than the NFL passer rating, so they’re listed in order below rather than charted.

How college and NFL passer ratings compare

Latest USA TODAY mock draft puts Cam Ward first

Unlike the 2024 draft, when Caleb Williams was almost universally projected to go No. 1 overall to the Chicago Bears (which ultimately happened), the vast majority of mock drafters have not settled on Ward as the top pick this year.

Ward, Sanders, his Colorado teammate Travis Hunter and Penn State’s Abdul Carter have all been suggested as potential No. 1 picks. In USA TODAY’s most recent mock draft, Ward is selected first, and Sanders is picked by the New York Giants with the third pick. Click here to learn more about the other potential first-round picks.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Stanford fired Troy Taylor on Tuesday, less than one week after an ESPN report outlined instances in which he had allegedly bullied and belittled female athletic staffers during his two seasons as the Cardinal’s football coach.

Former Stanford star quarterback Andrew Luck, now the program’s general manager, announced the move.

‘After continued consideration it is evident to me that our program needs a reset,’ Luck said in a statement. ‘In consultation with university leadership I no longer believe that Coach Taylor is the right coach to lead our football program. Coach Taylor has been informed today and the change is effective immediately.’

Luck said a search for the next coach has begun, and an acting coach may be named for the 2025 season.

Taylor, 56, received a warning by the university in February 2024, with ESPN reporting that he signed a letter acknowledging that he could be fired if the conduct continued.

A few months later, he was cited in second investigation for ‘an ongoing pattern of concerning behavior.’

‘I willingly complied with the investigations, accepted the recommendations that came out of them, and used them as a learning opportunity to grow in leadership and how I interact with others,’ Taylor said in a statement released through Stanford following ESPN’s report.

‘I look forward to continuing to work collaboratively and collegially with my colleagues so that we can achieve success for our football program together.’

Under Taylor’s watch, Stanford posted consecutive 3-9 seasons.

Taylor built a 30-8 record over three seasons at Sacramento State before joining the Cardinal after David Shaw — the winningest head coach in school history — stepped down following the 2022 season.

Luck, who became the Stanford GM on Nov. 30, was with the Cardinal from 2008-11.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

President Donald Trump defended National Security Advisor Michael Waltz during an ambassador meeting on Monday, as his administration faces fierce backlash over the recent Signal text chain leak.

Waltz, whose staffers had unknowingly added The Atlantic editor-in-chief Jeffrey Goldberg to a Signal group chat where Secretary of State Pete Hegseth and others discussed sensitive war plans, has come under fire for the blunder. Speaking to a room full of reporters, Trump said he believes Waltz is ‘doing his best.’

‘I don’t think he should apologize,’ the president said. ‘I think he’s doing his best. It’s equipment and technology that’s not perfect.’

‘And, probably, he won’t be using it again, at least not in the very near future,’ he added.

Goldberg was added to the national security discussion, called ‘Houthi PC Small Group’, earlier in March. He was able to learn about attacks against Houthi fighters in Yemen long before the public.

‘According to the lengthy Hegseth text, the first detonations in Yemen would be felt two hours hence, at 1:45 p.m. eastern time,’ Goldberg wrote in his piece about the experience. ‘So I waited in my car in a supermarket parking lot. If this Signal chat was real, I reasoned, Houthi targets would soon be bombed. At about 1:55, I checked X and searched Yemen. Explosions were then being heard across Sanaa, the capital city.’

Though Goldberg’s inclusion in the chat did not foil the military’s plans, the national security breach has still stunned both supporters and critics of the Trump administration. During the Tuesday meeting, Trump also said that he was in contact with Waltz over whether hackers can break into Signal conversations.

‘Are people able to break into conversations? And if that’s true, we’re gonna have to find some other form of device,’ Trump said. ‘And I think that’s something that we may have to do. Some people like Signal very much, other people probably don’t, but we’ll look into it.’

‘Michael, I’ve asked you to immediately study that and find out if people are able to break into a system,’ he added.

In response, Waltz assured Trump that he has White House technical experts ‘looking at’ the situation, along with legal teams.

‘And of course, we’re going to keep everything as secure as possible,’ the national security official said. ‘No one in your national security team would ever put anyone in danger. And as you said, we’ve repeatedly said the attack was phenomenal, and it’s ongoing.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The federal office in charge of ensuring cybersecurity at all levels of the government cited the use of encrypted messaging app Signal as a ‘best practice’ for ‘highly targeted’ government officials, the Biden-era document shows. 

Fox News Digital found that the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) outlined in a guide for federal employees late last year that encrypted messaging platforms such as Signal better protected officials against foreign enemy hackers amid a Chinese-linked cyber breach. CISA is an office under the Department of Homeland Security’s umbrella that is charged with ensuring cybersecurity across all levels of government. 

Under the Biden administration in 2024, CISA released a ‘Mobile Communications Best Practice Guidance’ for ‘highly targeted individuals,’ who were defined as high-ranking government officials or politicians who are ‘likely to possess information of interest to these threat actors.’ The document specifically addressed high-targeted politicos and officials, though it noted the guide was ‘applicable to all audiences.’ 

‘CISA strongly urges highly targeted individuals to immediately review and apply the best practices below to protect mobile communications. Highly targeted individuals should assume that all communications between mobile devices – including government and personal devices – and internet services are at risk of interception or manipulation. While no single solution eliminates all risks, implementing these best practices significantly enhances protection of sensitive communications against government-affiliated and other malicious cyber actors,’ the guide reads. 

The document, published in December, details that highly-targeted government officials should use ‘end-to-end encrypted communications’ as part of its ‘best practices’ advice. End-to-end encryption is understood as a secure method of communication, where a sender’s message is encrypted and can only be decrypted by the recipient of the message. 

The CISA guidance specifically cited that government officials should download ‘end-to-end encrypted communications’ platforms to their cellphones and computers, specifically citing Signal as an app to download to comply with the best practices. 

‘Adopt a free messaging application for secure communications that guarantees end-to-end encryption, such as Signal or similar apps,’ the guidance states. ‘CISA recommends an end-to-end encrypted messaging app that is compatible with both iPhone and Android operating systems, allowing for text message interoperability across platforms. Such apps may also offer clients for MacOS, Windows, and Linux, and sometimes the web. These apps typically support one-on-one text chats, group chats with up to 1,000 participants, and encrypted voice and video calls. Additionally, they may include features like disappearing messages and images, which can enhance privacy.’ 

Signal is an encrypted messaging app that operates similarly to texting or making phone calls, but with additional security measures that help ensure communications are kept private to those included in the correspondence. 

Signal’s popularity grew in the last few months, after it was discovered that Chinese-linked hackers were targeting cellphone data in the U.S., including data belonging to President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance during the campaign, Politico reported this week. 

‘CISA is releasing this best practice guidance to promote protections for mobile communications from exploitation by PRC-affiliated and other malicious cyber threat actors,’ the CISA guidance states, referring to the Chinese cyber breach in 2024. 

Fox News Digital reached out to CISA for additional comment or information on the use of Signal among government employees, but did not immediately receive a reply. 

The guidance was released months before the Trump administration came under fire from Democrats and other critics after it was revealed top national security officials discussed a planned strike in Yemen against terrorist forces in a Signal group chat that also included the editor-in-chief of the Atlantic. 

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg published a first-hand account on Monday of what he read in the Signal group chat, called ‘Houthi PC Small Group,’ after he was added to the chain on March 13 alongside high-ranking federal officials stretching from Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth to national security advisor Mike Waltz and Trump chief of staff Susie Wiles. 

The Atlantic’s report set off condemnation among Democratic lawmakers, who have slammed the Trump administration for risking national security by using an app to communicate about a planned attack on Iran-backed Houthi terrorists in Yemen. 

‘This is one of the most stunning breaches of military intelligence I have read about in a very, very long time,’ Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said in a floor speech on Monday. 

CIA Director John Ratcliffe appeared before the Senate Intelligence Committee on Tuesday morning for an annual hearing on the global threats facing the U.S., and was also grilled about the Signal group chat. 

The CIA chief confirmed he was in the group chat that included the Atlantic’s editor-in-chief, adding that Signal was already downloaded on his computer when he was sworn in as director in January, and that the app has a long history as a communication platform for government employees that stretched to the Biden administration. 

‘One of the first things that happened when I was confirmed as CIA director was Signal was loaded onto my computer at, the CIA, as it is for most CIA officers, one of the things that I was briefed on very early, Senator, was by the CIA records management folks about the use of Signal as a permissible work use,’ he said. 

‘It is, that is a practice that preceded the current administration to the Biden administration,’ he continued. 

A former Biden national security official confirmed to the Associated Press that the previous administration used Signal if a staffer was granted permission to download the app on their White House-administered phones. The staffers, however, were told to use it sparingly, according to the report. 

‘It is my understanding that the Biden administration authorized Signal as a means of communication that was consistent with presidential recordkeeping requirements for its administration, and that continued into the Trump administration,’ Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., said during an appearance on ‘Fox & Friends’ on Tuesday morning. 

A Department of Defense memo from 2023 under the Biden administration detailed that while Signal was approved for some use by government officials, they could not use the platform to ‘access, transmit, process non-public DoD information.’ CISA’s guidance related to Signal was released after the Department of Defense guidance. 

The Trump administration has defended the group chat, saying it did not include sensitive information, and that the Atlantic’s story ‘is nothing more than a section of the NatSec establishment community running the same, tired gameplay from years past.’

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt posted to X on Tuesday that ‘no classified material was sent to the thread’ and that ‘no ‘war plans’ were discussed.’

White House communications director Steven Cheung slammed the Atlantic’s coverage in an X post on Tuesday afternoon as an example of ‘anti-Trump forces’ trying to ‘peddle misinformation.’ 

‘From the ‘Russia, Russia, Russia’ hoax of the first term to the fake documents case of the last four years… at every turn anti-Trump forces have tried to weaponize innocuous actions and turn them into faux outrage that Fake News outlets can use to peddle misinformation,’ Cheung posted to X. 

Trump told NBC News on Tuesday that a staffer in Waltz’s office included the journalist in the high-profile group chat, but did not reveal the staffer’s identity or if the individual would face disciplinary action. 

‘It was one of Michael’s people on the phone.A staffer had his number on there,’ Trump told NBC News in a phone interview when asked how Goldberg was added to the high-profile chat.

Trump defended Waltz in comment to Fox News earlier on Tuesday, as well as during his NBC interview. 

‘He’s not getting fired,’ Trump told Fox News of Waltz. The president said the incident was a ‘mistake,’ though there was ‘nothing important’ in the Signal text thread. 

‘Michael Waltz has learned a lesson, and he’s a good man,’ Trump said in the NBC interview. 

The president added that Goldberg’s inclusion in the group chat had ‘no impact at all’ on the strike in Yemen. 

The Signal group text leak comes roughly 10 years after news broke that then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton used a private email server for official government correspondence. 

Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for additional comment on the Signal chat leak, but did not immediately receive a reply. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS