Archive

2025

Browsing

The revival of the Detroit Lions has been one of the best NFL storylines the past two years. Detroit snapped a playoff win drought that spanned over three decades and just capped off a team record 15-win regular season.

The success of the team has obviously been noticed by one of the city’s favorite sons: Hall of Fame running back Barry Sanders.

“What coach (Dan) Campbell has done, what (general manager) Brad Holmes has done has been miraculous,’ Sanders said to USA TODAY Sports on behalf of Sleep Number. ‘It really goes back to every decision that they made, personnel wise and how they treat the players. Coach Campbell’s in-game philosophy, he’s really changed the story about the Lions.

‘You see how he does things like going for it on fourth down, giving his team so many more opportunities. And it’s not even a question, right? So much of everything that’s happened can be attributed to what they’ve done and their philosophy. That’s why I feel confident going forward. They have the ingredient, and they understand the kind of players they’re looking for. I’m excited to see what we do next season.”

The Lions are one of 12 NFL teams to have never won a Super Bowl. Sometimes teams get close before they finally get over the hump. The Philadelphia Eagles just won their second Super Bowl title. But before that quarterback Jalen Hurts and the Eagles were defeated by the Kansas City Chiefs in Super Bowl 57 and they lost to the Tampa Bay Buccaneers in the wild-card round the following year.

Detroit’s gotten close the previous two seasons.

The San Francisco 49ers rallied from a 17-point deficit to beat the Lions in the 2023 NFC championship game. Last season ended unceremoniously as the NFC’s No. 1 seed Lions lost to the Washington Commanders in the divisional round of the playoffs. Detroit had 16 players on injured reverse at the time of their playoff loss to Washington. Injuries certainly took a toll on the team down the stretch.

Yet, Sanders believes the agony of defeat the last two years could be beneficial for the Lions going forward.

“I hope the experience we had in 2023 against the Niners was a learning experience. And even this year, winning home field advantage and losing to a young Commanders team. Hopefully that was a learning experience. All those things I think can help a team understand what it takes when you get into the playoffs. (Playoff) football is a different monster,” Sanders said. “Sometimes it just takes kind of getting there and getting close and not quite getting there. If you have the good fortune of being in that situation again, then you realize there is no margin for error or very little margin for error.”

One of the main reasons Sanders believes the Lions have the capability to get over the hump is the two-headed monster they boast in the backfield. David Montgomery’s averaged over four yards a carry and has 25 rushing touchdowns in two seasons in Detroit. While Jahmyr Gibbs has emerged as a star. Gibbs compiled a career-high 1,412 rushing yards in his sophomore season and led the NFL with 20 touchdowns from scrimmage.  

“I think it’s the best dual combo in the NFL. David Montgomery, he’s been a great running back in the NFL for many years. Putting him with this Lions offensive line, and then you see what Jahmyr Gibbs was able to do last season,” Sanders said. “I feel like last year was more of a breakout season for (Gibbs). He eclipsed 1,000 yards. Just the type of exciting, dynamic plays that he’s able to make. His speed and his vision. They are the best duo in the in the NFL, and there’s no reason to believe that’s going to change anytime soon. If a Super Bowl is in our future, in the near future, then you would think that those two guys would be a big part of it.”

The combination of Gibbs and Montgomery running behind a stout offensive line, combined with four-time Pro Bowl quarterback Jared Goff, two-time first-team All-Pro wide receiver Amon-Ra St. Brown and what’s slated to be a healthy defense, the Lions remain a contender and are projected to win their third straight NFC North title. Maybe past experiences can help propel the Lions if they earn another playoff berth.

“We still have a great nucleus. We still have coach (Dan) Campbell and we’re still one of the top teams in the NFC,” Sanders said. “We won the division again last year. Minnesota isn’t far behind, but I feel like we’re still the team to beat in that division.”

Follow USA TODAY Sports’ Tyler Dragon on X @TheTylerDragon.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Congressional Republicans are looking at a variety of options to stand up against what they see as ‘activist judges’ blocking President Donald Trump’s agenda.

Many of those options will likely be discussed at the House Judiciary’s hearing on the matter next week, which sources expect to be scheduled for April 1.

Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., huddled privately with Republicans on the House Judiciary Committee Tuesday afternoon to coalesce lawmakers around a bill up for a vote next week that would limit federal district court judges’ ability to issue nationwide injunctions.

One source familiar with discussions told Fox News Digital that Johnson suggested Republicans could look at other options as well, something conservatives are looking for. House Freedom Caucus member Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., told Fox News Digital that the legislation was a ‘good start.’

NORRA Act

The No Rogue Rulings Act has support from both the White House and House GOP leadership. It’s expected to get a House-wide vote Tuesday or Wednesday of next week.

Led by Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., the legislation would force most district court judges to narrow most orders to the most relevant scope, therefore blocking them from pausing Trump’s policies across the U.S.

No Republican lawmaker has publicly expressed doubts about the bill, but conservatives have warned they want to see more from Congress on activist judges.

FUNDING

Both Johnson and top members of the House Judiciary Committee have floated using Congress’ power of the purse to rein in activist courts.

‘We do have authority over the federal courts,’ Johnson said at his weekly press conference. ‘We do have power over funding, over the courts, and all these other things. But desperate times call for desperate measures, and Congress is going to act.’

But Congress controls government spending through several different mechanisms. Lawmakers have the power to set annual appropriations levels, to rescind that funding via a rescission package, and even leverage funding outside of Congress’ yearly appropriations via the budget reconciliation process.

‘I think we need to look at… funding scenarios. Now, that takes a little time; you’ve got to work through either the appropriations, rescissions or reconciliation process, depending on where it’s appropriate,’ Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, chair of the House Judiciary Committee’s subcommittee on the Constitution, told Fox News Digital last week – while stressing he was not ‘for or against’ any specific scenario.

IMPEACHMENT

Several Republicans have introduced resolutions to impeach various federal judges for blocking Trump’s agenda, but there appears to be little appetite within the House GOP to pursue that lane.

Johnson signaled he was against the move during a closed-door meeting with Republicans on Tuesday morning, noting just 15 federal judges have been impeached in U.S. history.

‘There was some innuendo there that, you know, impeachment has been reserved for judges with high crimes and misdemeanors, not because you disagree with his decisions,’ one House Republican said of Johnson’s message. 

Conservatives could attempt to force House GOP leaders to act by classifying their impeachment legislation as a ‘privileged resolution,’ meaning the House must hold at least a chamber-wide procedural vote on the measure within two legislative days.

But it’s not clear that will be pursued, either. Two Republicans who filed such resolutions – Reps. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, and Derrick Van Orden, R-Wis. – said they did not have current plans to make their resolutions privileged.

It’s not a totally dismissed option, however, as leaders, including House Judiciary Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, continue to insist nothing is off the table.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Trump administration officials say the Atlantic ‘conceded’ that its article providing a firsthand account of a Signal group chat involving the nation’s top national security leaders discussing an attack on terrorists in Yemen did not contain ‘war plans.’

‘The Atlantic has conceded: these were NOT ‘war plans,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt posted to X Wednesday morning. ‘This entire story was another hoax written by a Trump-hater who is well-known for his sensationalist spin.’

National security advisor Mike Waltz posted to X Wednesday, ‘No locations. No sources & methods. NO WAR PLANS. Foreign partners had already been notified that strikes were imminent. BOTTOM LINE: President Trump is protecting America and our interests.’ 

The Trump administration came under fire from Democrats and other critics Monday after the Atlantic magazine published an article revealing that top national security officials discussed a planned strike in Yemen against terrorist forces in a Signal group chat that also included the editor-in-chief of the Atlantic. 

The Atlantic’s Jeffrey Goldberg published a firsthand account Monday of what he read in the Signal group chat, called ‘Houthi PC Small Group,’ after he was added to the chain March 13 alongside high-ranking federal officials stretching from Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth to Waltz and Trump chief of staff Susie Wiles. 

Monday’s article was headlined: ‘The Trump Administration Accidentally Texted Me Its War Plans.’

Trump administration officials have repeatedly argued since the release of the article that no classified information was included in the Signal correspondence. 

On Wednesday morning, the Atlantic published a follow-up story that included direct texts from the Signal chat, but notably did not include the phrase ‘war plans’ in its headline, instead characterizing the texts as ‘attack plans.’ The phrase ‘war plans’ was included in the Wednesday piece as quotes attributable to the administration pouring cold water that they shared classified information in the chat. 

A spokesperson for the Atlantic defended that the outlet did expose a ‘war plan’ in its Wednesday report, pointing Fox News Digital to a screenshot included in the piece of Hegseth’s messages related to F-18s and drone strikes that were accompanied by timestamps for the operation. 

‘If this information – particularly the exact times American aircraft were taking off for Yemen – had fallen into the wrong hands in that crucial two-hour period, American pilots and other American personnel could have been exposed to even greater danger than they ordinarily would face,’ the report stated. 

The Department of Defense does not specifically define what constitutes a ‘war plan,’ according to the U.S. Army War College, though war plans are understood as in-depth plans for an ‘overarching strategy.’ 

‘If we consider war to be a political act between two or more states, nations, or other polities, a war plan must consider the totality of those polities’ potential political objectives, industrial capabilities, and military options for the expected duration of the conflict,’ the Army War College posted in 2020 in an explainer article headlined, ‘What’s in a War Plan?’ 

‘A war plan develops a concept to win a war militarily and politically; it is the detailed ways and means of an overarching strategy. A review of two historical examples of such planning offer approaches to overcome organizational and institutional obstacles to effective comprehensive war planning.’ 

Officials with the Trump administration continued on X that the Atlantic’s report was a ‘hoax’ for initially describing the chat as containing ‘war plans.’ 

‘So, let’s me get this straight. The Atlantic released the so-called ‘war plans’ and those ‘plans’ include: No names. No targets. No locations. No units. No routes. No sources. No methods. And no classified information. Those are some really s—– war plans. This only proves one thing: Jeff Goldberg has never seen a war plan or an ‘attack plan’ (as he now calls it). Not even close. As I type this, my team and I are traveling the INDOPACOM region, meeting w/ Commanders (the guys who make REAL ‘war plans’) and talking to troops. We will continue to do our job, while the media does what it does best: peddle hoaxes,’ Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth posted to his personal X account Wednesday. 

A Department of Defense memo from 2023 under the Biden administration detailed that while Signal was approved for some use by government officials, the platform could not be used to ‘access, transmit, process non-public DoD information.’ 

The Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), the federal office in charge of ensuring cybersecurity at all levels of the government, published a ‘best practice’ for ‘highly targeted’ government officials in December 2024 advising ‘highly targeted’ government officials to use Signal as an extra precaution against potential hackers. 

CISA’s ‘Mobile Communications Best Practice Guidance’ defined as highly targeted individuals as high-ranking government officials or politicians who are ‘likely to possess information of interest to these threat actors.’ The document specifically addressed high-targeted politicos and officials, though it noted the guide was ‘applicable to all audiences.’ 

‘Adopt a free messaging application for secure communications that guarantees end-to-end encryption, such as Signal or similar apps,’ the guidance states. ‘CISA recommends an end-to-end encrypted messaging app that is compatible with both iPhone and Android operating systems, allowing for text message interoperability across platforms. Such apps may also offer clients for MacOS, Windows, and Linux, and sometimes the web. These apps typically support one-on-one text chats, group chats with up to 1,000 participants, and encrypted voice and video calls. Additionally, they may include features like disappearing messages and images, which can enhance privacy.’ 

Signal’s popularity grew in the past few months, after it was discovered that Chinese-linked hackers were targeting cellphone data in the U.S., including data belonging to President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance during the campaign, Politico reported Tuesday. 

The texts released in the Atlantic’s article Wednesday show military and national security leaders discussing timing of the attack on the Houthis in Yemen, such as Hegseth notifying the chat that jets had taken off for the operation. 

‘1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package),’ Hegseth said in one message. 

‘1345: ‘Trigger Based’ F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME – also, Strike Drones Launch (MQ-9s)’ he added, according to the report. 

Trump told NBC News Tuesday that a staffer in Waltz’s office included the journalist in the high-profile group chat, but did not reveal the staffer’s identity or if the individual would face disciplinary action. 

‘It was one of Michael’s people on the phone.A staffer had his number on there,’ Trump told NBC News in a phone interview when asked how Goldberg was added to the high-profile chat.

Trump defended Waltz in comment to Fox News earlier Tuesday, as well as during his NBC interview. 

‘He’s not getting fired,’ Trump told Fox News of Waltz. 

The president said the incident was a ‘mistake,’ though there was ‘nothing important’ in the Signal text thread. 

‘Michael Waltz has learned a lesson, and he’s a good man,’ Trump said in the NBC interview. 

The president added that Goldberg’s inclusion in the group chat had ‘no impact at all’ on the strike in Yemen. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

CIA Director John Ratcliffe said the Signal chat texts published by The Atlantic Wednesday revealing the so-called ‘attack plans’ targeting Yemen’s Houthi rebels prove he ‘did not transmit classified information.’ 

Ratcliffe, speaking during a House Intelligence Committee hearing on worldwide threats, told lawmakers ‘With regard to that article, I also would appreciate the opportunity to relay the fact that yesterday I spent four hours answering questions from senators as a result of that article that were intimating that I transmitted classified information because there were hidden messages.’ 

‘Those messages were revealed today and revealed that I did not transmit classified information, and that the reporter who I don’t know, I think intentionally intended it to indicate that,’ Ratcliffe continued. ‘That reporter also indicated that I had released the name of an undercover CIA operative in that Signal chat. In fact, I had released the name of my chief of staff who was not operating undercover. That was deliberately false and misleading.’ 

‘I used an appropriate channel to communicate sensitive information. It was permissible to do so. I didn’t transfer any classified information. And at the end of the day, what is most important is that the mission was a remarkable success is what everyone should be focused on here, because that’s what did happen, not what possibly could have happened,’ he also said. 

In messages published Wednesday, The Atlantic quoted Hegseth as saying in the Signal group text chat ‘TEAM UPDATE: TIME NOW (1144et): Weather is FAVORABLE. Just CONFIRMED w/CENTCOM we are a GO for mission launch. 1215et: F-18s LAUNCH (1st strike package). 1345: ‘Trigger Based’ F-18 1st Strike Window Starts (Target Terrorist is @ his Known Location so SHOULD BE ON TIME – also, Strike Drones Launch (MQ-9s),’ Hegseth apparently wrote in a screenshot of a text message released Wednesday by The Atlantic.  

 ‘1410: More F-18s LAUNCH (2nd strike package). 1415: Strike Drones on Target (THIS IS WHEN THE FIRST BOMBS WILL DEFINITELY DROP, pending earlier ‘Trigger Based’ targets). 1536 F-18 2nd Strike Starts – also, first sea-based Tomahawks launched,’ Hegseth reportedly continued, before adding ‘we are currently clean on OPSEC [operational security]’ and ‘Godspeed to our Warriors.’ 

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard vowed during a Senate Intelligence Committee hearing Tuesday that there was ‘no classified material’ in the messages. 

‘My answer yesterday was based on my recollection, or the lack thereof on the details that were posted there. What was shared today reflects the fact that I was not directly involved with that part of the signal chat and replied at the end, reflecting the effects, the very brief effects that the national security advisor had shared,’ Gabbard said Wednesday when asked about the matter. 

‘So it’s your testimony that less than two weeks ago, you were on a Signal chat that had all of this information about F-18s and MQ-9 Reapers and targets on strike. And you, in that two-week period, simply forgot that that was there. That’s your testimony?’ Ranking Member Jim Himes, D-Conn., asked her. 

‘My testimony is I did not recall the exact details of what was included there,’ Gabbard said. 

‘That was not your testimony,’ Himes responded. ‘Your testimony was that you were not aware of anything related to weapons, packages, targets and timing.’ 

‘As the testimony yesterday continued on, there were further questions, related to that, where I acknowledged that there was conversation about weapons,’ Gabbard said. ‘And, I don’t remember the exact wording that I used, but I did not recall the specific details that were included.’ 

At one point in Wednesday’s Senate hearing, Lt. Gen. Jeffrey Kruse, the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, said there were ‘operational details’ in the Signal messages. 

Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi, D-Ill., and Rep. Jason Crow, D-Colo., also joined other Congressional Democrats calling for the resignation of Secretary of State Pete Hegseth over the leak. 

‘There can be no fixes. There can be no corrections until there is accountability. And I’m calling on the administration to move forward with accountability,’ Crow said.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

After playing just 32 games in the minor leagues and being asked to learn a new position this spring, Cam Smith was a longshot to make the Houston Astros’ opening day roster.

But that was before he opened eyes with his bat early in camp and never stopped hitting. The 22-year-old was the centerpiece of the offseason trade that sent star outfielder Kyle Tucker to the Chicago Cubs, but he was seen mostly as an important piece of the Astros future.

Instead, he’s now part of the present as the team’s opening day starter in Tucker’s old spot, right field.

In a touching moment, the Astros secretly invited Smith’s family to deliver the good news.

Astros manager Joe Espada gathered the players together before Tuesday’s exhibition game in Houston for a special announcement.

“I always said if someone tells me, ‘Joe, you’re going to the big leagues, who would be the first person you would call?” he said as Smith’s mother, Stephanie Hocza, walked in.

“So Cam, do you know why we’re here?” asked Hocza, who was accompanied by family members including his grandmother and stepdad. “You made the roster.”

Smith’s tearful reaction was priceless.

Who is Cam Smith?

Smith was the Cubs’ first-round pick (14th overall) in last year’s draft after he starred as a third baseman at Florida State.

But when the Astros made Tucker, a three-time All-Star, available on the trade market, the Cubs were willing to send Smith, third baseman Isaac Paredes and pitcher Hayden Wesneski to Houston.

Smith destroyed Grapefruit League pitching this spring with a .342/.419/.711 slash line in 43 plate appearances — essentially hitting his way onto the Astros roster, while at the same time adapting to a new position in the outfield.

‘I always thought it was possible,’ Smith later told reporters. ‘I had a great group of guys to help me out to get here today. I always thought it was a possibility for it to happen. And we’re here today talking about it now. So I’m very blessed.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

For the 16 teams remaining in the NCAA Tournament, winning two games is all that’s left from making a trip to San Antonio for the Final Four.

All four No. 1 seeds remain, and the SEC’s fingerprints are all over the Sweet 16 with seven teams left in the field. The Big Ten and the Big 12 have four teams each, and Duke is left holding up the banner in the ACC.

Here’s what to know about the Sweet 16:

Who is in the Sweet 16?

Here’s who’ll be playing to punch their ticket to the Elite Eight starting Thursday:

(1) Duke
(1) Florida
(1) Houston
(1) Auburn
(2) Michigan State
(2) Alabama
(2) Tennessee
(3) Texas Tech
(3) Kentucky
(4) Purdue
(4) Arizona
(4) Maryland
(5) Michigan
(6) Ole Miss
(6) BYU
(10) Arkansas

Sweet 16 bracket

Here’s who will tip off starting March 27:

Thursday, March 27:

(2) Alabama vs. (6) BYU
(1) Florida vs. (4) Maryland
(1) Duke vs. (4) Arizona
(3) Texas Tech vs. (10) Arkansas

Friday, March 28

(2) Michigan State vs. (6) Ole Miss
(2) Tennessee vs. (3) Kentucky
(1) Auburn vs. (5) Michigan
(1) Houston vs. (4) Purdue

As for the Elite Eight matchups, here’s how they would break down:

(1) Auburn OR (5) Michigan vs. (6) Ole Miss OR (2) Michigan State (South final)
(1) Duke OR vs. (4) Arizona vs. (2) Alabama OR vs. (6) BYU (East final)
(1) Florida OR vs. (4) Maryland vs. (3) Texas Tech OR vs. (10) Arkansas (West final)
(1) Houston OR (4) Purdue vs. (2) Tennessee OR vs. (3) Kentucky (Midwest final)

Sweet 16 teams by conference

The SEC leads the way with a record seven teams in the Sweet 16. The Big 10 and the Big 12 each have four teams and the ACC’s lone representative left in the tournament is Duke.

Here’s a quick rundown of the remaining quads in the 2025 NCAA Tournament and which conference they represent:

(1) Duke: ACC
(1) Florida: SEC
(1) Houston: Big 12
(1) Auburn: SEC
(2) Michigan State: Big Ten
(2) Alabama: SEC
(2) Tennessee: SEC
(3) Texas Tech: Big 12
(3) Kentucky: SEC
(4) Purdue: Big Ten
(4) Arizona: Big 12
(4) Maryland: Big Ten
(5) Michigan: Big Ten
(6) Ole Miss: SEC
(6) BYU: Big 12
(10) Arkansas: SEC

Here’s how you can catch the Sweet 16 starting Thursday night (all times Eastern):

Thursday, March 27

(2) Alabama vs. (6) BYU, 7:09 p.m. | CBS (stream with free trial from FUBO)
(1) Florida vs. (4) Maryland, 7:39 p.m. | TBS/truTV (stream with Sling TV)
(1) Duke vs. (4) Arizona, 9:39 p.m. | CBS (stream with free trial from FUBO)
(3) Texas Tech vs. (10) Arkansas, 10:09 p.m. | TBS/truTV (stream with Sling TV)

Friday, March 28

(2) Michigan State vs. (6) Ole Miss, 7:09 p.m. | CBS (stream with free trial from FUBO)
(2) Tennessee vs. (3) Kentucky, 7:39 p.m. |  TBS/truTV (stream with Sling TV)
(1) Auburn vs. (5) Michigan, 9:39 p.m. | CBS (stream with free trial from FUBO)
(1) Houston vs. (4) Purdue, 10:09 p.m. |  TBS/truTV (stream with Sling TV)

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

President Donald Trump is expected to be joined by female members of Congress at the White House on Wednesday for the launch of a Republican Women’s Caucus.

The initiative is being led by Rep. Kat Cammack, R-Fla., according to an invitation obtained by Fox News Digital via another source attending the event.

The caucus’s goal will be to ‘champion GOP women members’ legislative priorities,’ ‘support GOP women in a variety of endeavors on the national stage,’ and ‘push for representation in leadership positions.’

Its mission on leadership is particularly notable, considering the only woman leading a House committee in the 119th Congress is House Rules Committee Chairwoman Virginia Foxx, R-N.C. 

The caucus is expected to be led by female Republicans in the Senate as well, though it’s not immediately clear by whom.

The White House had announced Trump would participate in a Women’s History Month event but did not specify what it would entail.

Fox News Digital reached out to Trump and Cammack’s office for comment but did not hear back by press time.

The invitation also encourages Republican lawmakers joining the caucus to send the group their top three legislative priorities.

It’s not a new initiative for Cammack, who has forged a path as a leader on women’s issues in the past. She and Rep. Susie Lee, D-Nev., previously co-led the Bipartisan Women’s Caucus in the 118th Congress.

That is now being led by Reps. Monica De La Cruz, R-Texas, and Emilia Sykes, D-Ohio, and co-vice chairs Reps. Nicole Malliotakis, R-N.Y., and Janelle Bynum, D-Ore.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Russia will be absent from the 2025 World Figure Skating Championships due to the ongoing war in Ukraine.
Some Russian figure skaters have switched nationalities to continue competing internationally.
The International Skating Union has developed a narrow pathway for a limited number of Russian athletes to potentially qualify for the 2026 Olympics.

BOSTON — The 2025 world figure skating championships at TD Garden this week will feature the best skaters, coaches and judges from every corner of the world − with one notable exception.

For the third consecutive year, Russia will be absent.

Since its invasion of Ukraine at the end of the 2022 Winter Olympics, Russia has been largely sidelined from the world of international sports, with prominent international federations moving to either place strict neutrality requirements on the participation of Russians at their world championships or opting to ban them altogether.

In figure skating, their absence has been particularly noticeable. Prior to the country’s ban, Russia had won more medals at the world figure skating championships than any other country. And it had been particularly dominant in women’s singles, with five of the six world champions between 2015 and 2021 all hailing from Russia.

The continued exclusion of Russia from international figure skating has prompted some of its former athletes to leave and continue competing for other countries. It’s opened the door for new talent, including women from Japan and the U.S., to make world podiums. And it’s raised questions about when Russian figure skaters might return − and whether such a return might come in time for the 2026 Winter Olympics in Milano-Cortina.

‘It’s something that’s completely out of our control,’ American ice dancer Evan Bates said last week. ‘We can never control who’s going to be let in and what the political ramifications are. It’s just completely outside of our scope of control. And the more that we focus on it, it really detracts from where our focus needs to be.’

Ice dancers Gleb Smolkin, Diana Davis now compete for Georgia

Over the past three years, the Russian Figure Skating Federation has continued to host its own separate figure skating competitions, including a national championship in December. And although Russia is formally ostracized from this week’s world championships, there will continue to be signs of its outsized influence on the sport.

At least six skaters competing in Boston this week previously represented Russia but switched nationalities following the country’s sports ban in 2022. That includes ice dancers Gleb Smolkin and Diana Davis, who competed for the Russian Olympic Committee at the 2022 Olympics but now represent Georgia.

‘It was pretty difficult, because it was very unclear what’s going to happen,’ Smolkin said. ‘The only thing that was clear was competing for Russia, we wouldn’t be able to for quite a lot of time. And we proved ourselves right, unfortunately.’

Smolkin said he and Davis opted to represent Georgia because Davis’ mother, Eteri Tutberidze, is of Georgian heritage. (Tutberidze drew scrutiny in Beijing as the coach of burgeoning Russian star Kamila Valieva, whose positive doping test became one of the dominant storylines of the Games.) The ice dancers will continue to represent Georgia even if or when Russia’s ban is lifted, Smolkin said.

‘There is still a Russian-speaking community inside of the ice, people who are able to speak Russian,’ he added, when asked about the impact of Russia’s formal exclusion from the world championships. ‘We’re just athletes and we’re here to perform and that’s it.’

Russians hopeful they will be allowed to return

The International Olympic Committee allowed some athletes from Russia − and Belarus, which has faced similar bans − to compete as neutrals at the 2024 Summer Olympics, but only if they met a strict set of conditions. Russian leaders, however, have expressed hope that their situation might soon change.

The United States, which had been staunchly supportive of Ukraine during President Joe Biden’s time in office, has softened its stance on the war and Russia under Donald Trump. The White House has tried to work with Russia to negotiate an end to the war, and it announced separate agreements with Russia and Ukraine over a ceasefire in the Black Sea on Tuesday.

There is a possibility that the IOC’s stance on Russia could similarly shift following the election last week of its new president, Kirsty Coventry of Zimbabwe. Russian president Vladimir Putin and Belarussian president Alexander Lukashenko were quick to congratulate Coventry following her win, and Russian sports minister Mikhail Degtyarev expressed hope that a new IOC president would result in a new IOC policy toward Russia.

‘We are waiting, in this era of a new leader, for the Olympic movement to become stronger, more independent and more prosperous and that Russia will return to the Olympic podium,’ Degtyarev said on a messaging app last week, according to Reuters.

When asked specifically about the potential reinstatement of Russia, Coventry only spoke broadly about the need to protect athletes from conflict areas and develop an IOC policy around the issue. She will formally take the office in June.

While the IOC could give the final OK for Russian and Belarussian athletes to return at the 2026 Milan Games, the decision is first in the hands of the International Skating Union, the federation that oversees the qualifying process.

The ISU announced late last year that, following a recommendation by the IOC, it had developed a narrow pathway for Russian athletes to work toward Olympic qualification. That pathway is so narrow, in fact, that it only will allow one athlete or team in each of figure skating’s disciplines to compete at a single qualifying event, in Beijing in September. That would mean that, barring any changes, Russia would have no more than six figure skaters at the 2026 Olympics.

‘The ISU has maintained its condemnation of the invasion of Ukraine,’ the organization said in a news release.

In Olympic circles, the general assumption has been that Russia’s status in figure skating and other major sports would change when the war in Ukraine ends. And it’s unclear, of course, when that end will come or whether it is getting closer.

Ukrainian skater Kyrylo Marsak is skeptical. He said the war upended his life, prompting him to move to Finland to continue training − and, in turn, pulling him away from his family. He said his father is in the Ukrainian military, and he’s only able to visit his family about once a year.

‘Of course it’s making pressure on me, because I’m worrying about them,’ Marsak said. ‘This whole situation is really difficult to deal with. But as I said, the skating is something that makes me take it easier.’

As for the return of Russian athletes to competition, the 20-year-old said it should happen only when Ukraine is safe.

‘We need some pretty good safety guarantees from most countries, from the U.S. and from Europe,’ he said. ‘Then Ukrainians could sleep calmly.’

Contact Tom Schad at tschad@usatoday.com or on social media @tomschad.bsky.social.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Los Angeles Dodgers will have another stop to make in the naion’s capital next month before they begin a series with the Washington Nationals: the White House.

The Dodgers on Tuesday announced they have accepted an invitation to the White House to celebrate the World Series title they won last November over the New York Yankees.

‘It’s certainly a huge honor to get the invitation to the White House,’ Dodgers manager Dave Roberts said before the team’s exhibition game against the Los Angeles Angels. ‘It allows us to celebrate our 2024 championship. To my understanding, every World Series champion gets that honor, so it’s a great honor for all of us.’

This will be the second trip to the White House in four years for Roberts and many of the Dodgers players. The team was honored during Joe Biden’s presidency after they won the title the end of the COVID-19-shortened 2020 season.

The announcement comes on the heels of the Department of Defense temporarily removing an article from its official website lauding the accomplishments of former Dodgers star Jackie Robinson’s military service.

The article was apparently taken down as part of the Trump Administration’s directive to eliminate diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives. But after a brief public outcry, the page was restored.

Roberts, a frequently vocal supporter of diversity efforts in Major League Baseball, said he was unaware of the controversy and it did not play a factor in the team’s decision.

‘I respect the position,’ Roberts said. ‘It’s the highest office in our country, certainly in the world, so, looking forward to it.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Despite its relatively short existence, the UFL has already forged what it has characterized as a positive relationship with the NFL.

The NFL has worked collaboratively with many of the recent spring-league start-ups to test new rules that could potentially enhance the game. This process has helped the NFL discover its dynamic kickoff, which debuted during the 2024 season, and has also allowed the league to assess data on onside kick alternatives and technological innovations to improve its broadcasts.

While the current relationship between the UFL and NFL is mutually beneficial, many are curious as to whether they could eventually expand their partnership. After all, the NFL is the lone major North American sport not to have a minor-league system, so could the league eventually consider loaning some of its back-end roster candidates to the UFL?

‘Boy, I would love that,’ UFL executive vice president Daryl Johnston told USA TODAY in a phone interview.

Could UFL, NFL teams ever share players?

Johnston was quick to clarify there had not been any discussions about a potential path for the UFL and NFL to share players. However, he opined that such an arrangement could benefit both parties.

Why? Because it would allow players more time to get live, on-field reps, which he believes is key in player development.

‘With the restriction in [practice] time at the collegiate level, the restriction in [practice] time at the professional level, sometimes the detail and the time on task is not enough for these guys to really understand,’ Johnston said.

Johnston believes NFL coaches would agree with his assessment, citing a 2019 conversation he had with Philadelphia Eagles offensive line coach Jeff Stoutland in 2019 as evidence.

At the time, Johnston was the general manager of the San Antonio Commanders, a member of the short-lived Alliance of American Football (AAF). He and Stoutland were discussing Eagles offensive tackle Jordan Mailata, who was a rugby star before the Eagles selected him in the seventh round of the 2018 NFL draft.

‘The greatest thing in the world would be for Jordan to come down to you and be able to play football and see it at game speed,’ Johnston recounted Stoutland saying.

That’s why Johnston believes the NFL and UFL creating a partnership would be ‘tremendous’ for both leagues. It would add an influx of talent to the spring league while enabling NFL teams to get fringe roster prospects in need of more seasoning – like Mailata in 2019 – live game reps in major roles.

Houston Roughnecks head coach CJ Johnson agrees with Johnston and is confident such a deal will happen sooner rather than later.

‘I guarantee you it’s coming right down the pipe,’ Johnson told USA TODAY of a UFL and NFL player-sharing partnership in a phone interview.

Johnson’s belief stems from the 63-year-old’s communications with NFL personnel. He noted that he has ‘a lot of contacts’ from his 12 NFL seasons with the New Orleans Saints and Chicago Bears and the tone of his discussions with them changed markedly entering his third spring-league season.

‘They are on board with helping us with players,’ Johnson said. ‘Players that they probably want to take an extra look at, [I] call my buddies and they always tell me.’

‘They’ve been phenomenal,’ Johnson added. ‘The first year, not so much. The second year was a click better. But this year, that’s the thing: the partnership with the NFL and the spring league is going really well.’

So, while nothing is imminent for a UFL and NFL player sharing program, the spring league remains hopeful it could be a part of its long-term future.

‘I definitely think the timing is getting to that point where it could be a really, really good fit and a win-win for both sides,’ Johnston said. ‘So hopefully, that’s a conversation we can get on the table here in the near future.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY