Archive

2025

Browsing

Carl Finley was a high school principal working in Dallas in 1961. He was 37, and he had never lived outside of Texas, aside from serving in World War II.

Late that year, he met with his cousin, Charlie, who had bought the Kansas City Athletics the previous year.

“Dad said he looked really beat up, not physically, but mentally,” Nancy Finley, Carl’s daughter, told USA TODAY Sports. ‘And I remember Mom made a comment about that, too. His hair was disheveled. He just didn’t look like the Charlie they knew. That’s when Charlie asked Dad to join him.”

Charlie Finley, who was an insurance broker, had never been an athlete or worked in baseball administration. Neither had Carl, who didn’t expect the arrangement to last more than a couple of years.

“He was nervous about the whole thing,’ Nancy says of her father. ‘Dad had gone to SMU law school, and had a master’s in journalism. He liked to constantly be in it or learning something. And Charlie liked that about him.’

Together, they became partners who launched the team’s tenure in Oakland that started in 1968.

That run officially ends Monday, when the A’s host their first home game in Sacramento. The team intends to move permanently to Las Vegas in 2028.

Carl was the franchise’s on-site eyes and ears while his cousin ran the insurance business that funded the team from Chicago. He helped transform a perennial loser once known as a feeder team for the Yankees through trades into a World Series champion from 1972-74.

After her parents divorced, Nancy moved from Dallas to live with him during her school-aged years, an experience she captured in the book “Finley Ball” that helps preserve the memories of her late father and controversial cousin who loved outrageous promotions.

Nancy later became a model and paralegal and lived in the Bay Area until 2020. She shares memories of Oakland, from ‘Hot Pants Day’ to the Finleys’ unexpected sale of the team to building lasting friendships and ties to the era the A’s are leaving behind.

(Questions and responses are edited for length and clarity.)

What was it about your dad’s scouting strategy that worked so well?

When he started with the team the summer of 1962, he mainly observed how Charlie handled things. Then Dad was offered a percentage ownership, and would live where the team was based (in Kansas City).

He started visiting our farm team in Birmingham, Alabama, to observe the players. He was fortunate to have former MLB players like Eddie Robinson, Ed Lopat and Hank Bauer in the KC front office.

Dad’s goal with Charlie was to build a winning team “from scratch.” Dad preferred to view the high schoolers first. Charlie agreed. Anytime a report came in about a young man who played very well, Dad or Charlie (or both) would personally visit the location to check it out for themselves. Dad told me he was instrumental in signing Vida Blue.  He was very proud of Vida.When the team learned it had to move from Kansas City because of increased rent, is it true only location with a ready-to-move-into stadium was Oakland?

Yes, Dad said he knew he would get a call from them at least once a month, maybe more. It would be like a telemarketer today, or one of those calls you get all the time, and they would call and say, “we just want you to remember we’re here.” And because they heard rumors in the paper that Charlie wanted to move, which wasn’t true, they started calling, and they were annoying to Dad. Oakland was not where we intended to go. I found a message from Charlie. It’s from September 1967 and it says he had been to Seattle, and it’s beautiful. And can we go there? And Dad answered, “No,” exclamation mark, because Dad had already started coordinating the move to Oakland.

But Oakland did appear to be the only place they claimed they were turnkey. “Oh, you won’t have to do anything here. You won’t have to wait.” Dad really wanted Dallas, of course.

What do you remember about the Coliseum?

When you go in, you always look at the green, the field, then nothing but gray. I mean cinder blocks. And I’m thinking, “Where’s the color?” The office had this really tacky looking linoleum floor with stains on it. We kept hearing it had just been built. And Dad said, “Yeah, they’re going to send someone in to take care of that.” That was the only thing left to do. And we kept waiting, which just really seems strange because they didn’t have to do that much – just make the floors look better, do something with the lighting that flickers.

But aside from that, the Coliseum makes a really good presentation when you’re driving from the from either way on the freeway.

So what is your feeling about the team leaving Oakland?

I’m sad. In a way, they haven’t gone because Sacramento isn’t really that far. People with season tickets lived in Sacramento. We had people coming in from Fresno.

The one time we wanted to get out of our lease was because of the offer from Denver in ’77. And that offer was good. It would have kept Dad and Charlie, and things looked pretty bleak for us and so Oakland would not allow it. They said no. And OK, so we had no choice. It seemed like Oakland just had they became aggressive. Their aggression came out. I don’t know where that went, because I said to my husband, where is their aggression when they need it?

What are your fondest memories of those days?

We had really intriguing promo items; it wasn’t just always bobbleheads. I guess the most interesting promo item was, I think, was when we gave away Hot Pants perfume to everyone wearing ‘hot pants’ of the first 5,000 people. And I liked that, because I was in charge of the boxes coming in, and I got to spray that stuff all over the place. Some of the men wanted it for their girlfriend, and if it fell, it didn’t break, because it had sort of had a bouncy effect, whatever they made it out of.

I heard you say somewhere about how the Yankees were the team he particularly wanted to beat.

I think it was because, in the beginning, at that time, I heard that Kansas City had been like a minor league team for the Yankees. What’s odd is a lot of Dad and Charlie’s good friends were former Yankees. Now Billy Martin (who managed the A’s from 1980-82) was an example. But he and Charlie seemed to sort of grate on each other. So when dad wanted negotiate for Billy and ’79, he told Charlie he that he had to do it; Charlie had to stay out of it. Dad told Charlie, please don’t call him late at night if you have anything on your mind or you just want to talk. I heard Dad lecturing him, like for this to work, you have to follow this. Dad was pretty strict about that, because he knew that Charlie could make one of those calls, say something just who knows what, and then Billy might get offended. And there was a big change with Charlie that year. Charlie was hands off with Billy, but no one’s even noticed that.

Tell me about the lawsuit that led to Charlie to sell the team.

That is what caused us to move. Nothing else. Other books talk about Charlie’s divorce. Charlie’s divorce happened in ’74 and there was nothing hanging over his head at that time, but out of the blue after ’79 started, we’re served a lawsuit by the City of Oakland, Alameda County, and the Coliseum board. And one cause of action was our players were not up to MLB standards. And we had brought Rickey Henderson in that year. I teased Rickey. I used to say, “You’re one of our not up to standard players.” Some of the things they say is there – we haven’t done anything with our boosters., we haven’t had any promo days … it’s odd that they did that after we had won three in a row. It hadn’t been too long.

Now we had that dismissed. Our attorneys went in that summer, it was thrown out, but still it was what the lawsuit said and accused us of that was hard to get over. Dad had some friends in, I guess, the Sheriff’s Department, FBI, who said that they were concerned about our safety, not Charlie, but the two of us, since we lived in that area, because the media stuff was so bad against us that an overzealous fan might hurt us and think it’s OK or feel like a hero, because it would be okay to hurt a Finley.c

I think one problem was we gave our players too much freedom because we let them talk to the press. We did not ask in advance, what are you going to talk about, like they do now. And I think that was too much. Dad and Charlie did not believe you should restrict anyone talking to anyone. They’re adults. And that sort of backfired. So that probably led to some things, because what would happen was some of some press people would call our players and ask, well, are you happy with Finley today, or something like that.

Deep inside, I don’t think he wanted to sell, but then he knew he would have to eventually, but we had more wins in us. I know we did.

What about a memory of a favorite player?

Catfish Hunter was one of them. And, yeah, I understand what happened with the Yankees. He saw fine print where Charlie was ever late with something that they could break it. And Charlie was always late with that payment. (Laughs.) But I was at the honor when it was out that Catfish had ALS. There was an honor for him at the stadium (in 1999). I remember Catfish couldn’t use his hands, but that was all he looked he looked perfect besides that. And I saw tears coming out of his eyes. Dad was there. Charlie was deceased, and the players were all sort of gathering around Dad and Catfish. I saw the family getting back together, and probably memories of  everyone before, and why did we waste all this time?

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Auburn basketball experienced a brief injury scare in the second half of Sunday’s Elite Eight game vs. No. 2 seed Michigan State.

At the 10:47 mark of the second half at State Farm Arena in Atlanta, Tigers star forward Johni Broome appeared to sustain an elbow and leg injury.

The injuries came at the basket at the end of a play where Michigan State’s Freddie Fidler missed a layup inside the paint. Broome immediately went down on the floor and appeared to have fallen into an awkward position on his left leg.

Broome, whose wrist was treated by Auburn medical staff moments before the nasty fall, was immediately brought back to the Tigers locker room for further testing.

As Broome was walking off the court, he was seen walking gingerly.

Here’s the latest injury updates on Broome:

What is Johni Broome’s injury?

Broome appeared to injure his left leg and his right elbow on his fall in the second half against Michigan State.

Though Broome returned to the game, and got a rebound and made a 3-pointer upon his return, Broome was seen favoring his left arm late in the game and was not using his right to get rebounds. Broome’s x-rays were negative, per CBS’ Tracy Wolfson, but the full extent of his injuries were unknown in-game.

Johni Broome injury updates

Broome exited the Tigers’ Elite Eight game vs. Michigan State with apparent elbow and leg injuries. He had his elbow wrapped up in ice during Auburn’s postgame news conference with the media in Atlanta.

CBS’ Tracy Wolfson reported that Broome told Auburn coach Bruce Pearl that he couldn’t push through it as he headed to the locker room for further testing.

‘As you mentioned Ian, Johni Broome is dealing with those two injuries. He is in the locker room right now. Bruce Pearl asked Johni as he was walking off the court if he was okay and he looked at him and said no. He told his teammates to finish the game.’

After being looked at in the locker room, Broome checked back into the game at the 5:29 mark of the second half and secured a rebound and hit a 3-pointer in quick succession. Wolfson later reported that Broome’s X-rays were negative in the locker room.

Broome, who hit a 3-pointer on his first shot back, gave a thumbs up to CBS broadcasters Grant Hill and Bill Rafferty during teammate Denver Jones’ free throw attempts to acknowledge that he is all right.

Johni Broome comments on injury

Broome said postgame that once he learned he was cleared to return, he wanted to so he ‘can help his teammates.’

‘Went to the locker room. We have a good support staff. I checked my arm out. The (doctor) said nothing is wrong with it (or) anything serious, so at that moment I just wanted to help my teammates. And that is coming out and playing,’ Broome said.

Bruce Pearl comments on Johni Broome injury

Pearl told reporters that he did not receive a diagnosis from the team’s doctors on Broome’s injury when he came out of the locker room. He then said that Auburn won’t know the actual extent of Broome’s injury until tomorrow, but is expecting his elbow to be ‘pretty sore.’

‘I didn’t get any diagnosis. When Johni came out of the locker room, I had not talked to the doctor. But I asked him (Broome) if he is good to go and he said, ‘I am,” Pearl said.

He added: ‘I don’t think we are going to really know until tomorrow whether it was a slight hyperextension or whatever that way. Obviously the doctors were able to examine it and determine there was no damage. I bet it will be pretty sore tomorrow though.’

This story has been updated with new information

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The John Cena farewell tour is approaching the biggest time in WWE: WrestleMania.

Three months have gone though Cena’s final year in WWE and it’s already been a wild ride for the 16-time WWE champion. Not only did he secured a WWE title match at WrestleMania 41 against Cody Rhodes, but he shockingly turned heel when he attacked Rhodes in a vicious assault of the champion.

Since then, Cena has been in the ring to justify his actions, and while every time he shows up means people may have gotten to see him one last time, there’s curiosity of how many of those appearances will be actual matches. With the clock ticking down, here’s what we know about Cena’s next match:

When is John Cena’s next match?

Don’t expect it to happen before WrestleMania.

The Undisputed WWE Championship match against Rhodes is expected to be Cena’s next match. He’s been advertised to appear at Raw on Monday, March 31, but it will be to speak with Rhodes again.

After that, Cena isn’t scheduled to have any more WWE appearances until WrestleMania. The WWE title match typically closes the two-day event, so Cena’s next match will be April 20 at Allegiant Stadium in Las Vegas.

John Cena’s 2025 matches

When Cena announced his retirement plan at Money in the Bank 2024, he said he planned to make 30-40 appearances in 2025. So far this year, Cena has made five appearances. He made his first one at the Raw on Netflix debut.

Cena has only had two matches in 2025: the men’s Royal Rumble match and men’s Elimination Chamber match. He’s scheduled to appear at Raw on March 31, and that would mean he’s made six appearances in 2025. WrestleMania 41 is scheduled to be his seventh showing and third match of the year.

When will John Cena be at WWE in 2025?

After Monday, WrestleMania 41 is Cena’s next scheduled showing. WWE does have dates for when Cena is supposed to appear next. Those dates and events are:

Saturday Night’s Main Event: May 24 ∣ Tampa, Florida
SmackDown: May 30 ∣ Knoxville, Tennessee
SmackDown: June 13 ∣ Lexington, Kentucky
SmackDown: June 20 ∣ Grand Rapids, Michigan

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

For the first time since 2008, the Final Four will consist entirely of No. 1 seeds, with No. 1 overall seed Auburn becoming the last to join Florida, Duke and Houston in San Antonio after a 70-64 win over Michigan State in Atlanta.

Every team’s path has been different. For Houston, it has been marked by stifling defense in the face of an exceptionally difficult region. For Florida, it has involved a pair of huge comebacks and some clutch shooting down the stretch. For Duke, it has been almost alarmingly easy, with the Blue Devils averaging a margin of victory of 23.5 points per game. And for Auburn, it has featured wins over a pair of Big Ten schools to get to the final weekend.

One side of the bracket will feature Auburn vs. Florida in an SEC showdown between the conference’s regular season and tournament champions. The other side will see Cooper Flagg, Kon Knueppel and the vaunted Blue Devils taking on a Houston team led by coach Kelvin Sampson, who has carved out a bit of a legend in Space City ahead of his second Final Four appearance with the Cougars.

Here’s the full list of teams to make the Final Four in 2025:

Who is in the Final Four?

No. 1 Florida (West)
No. 1 Duke (East)
No. 1 Houston (Midwest)
No. 1 Auburn (South)

Final Four schedule

This section will be updated.

Saturday, April 5

Game 1: No. 1 Auburn vs No. 1 Florida | 6:09 p.m. on CBS | Fubo (free trial)
Game 2: No. 1 Houston vs No. 1 Duke | 8:49 p.m. on CBS | Fubo (free trial)

Men’s March Madness bracket

All times Eastern.

East Region

First round

No. 1 Duke 93, No. 16 Mount St. Mary’s 49
No. 9 Baylor 75, No. 8 Mississippi State 72
No. 5 Oregon 81, No. 12 Liberty 52
No. 4 Arizona 93, No. 13 Akron 65
No. 6 BYU 80, No. 11 Virginia Commonwealth 71
No. 3 Wisconsin 85, No. 14 Montana 66
No. 7 Saint Mary’s 59, No. 10 Vanderbilt 56
No. 2 Alabama 90, No. 15 Robert Morris 81

Second round

No. 1 Duke 89, No. 9 Baylor 66
No. 4 Arizona 87, No. 5 Oregon 83
No. 6 BYU 91, No. 3 Wisconsin 89
No. 2 Alabama 80, No. 7 Saint Mary’s 66

Sweet 16

No. 2 Alabama 113, No. 6 BYU 88
No. 1 Duke 100, No. 4 Arizona

Elite Eight

No. 1 Duke 85, No. 2 Alabama 65

Final Four

No. 1 Duke vs. No. 1 Houston

Midwest Region

First round

No. 1 Houston 78, No. 16 SIU-Edwardsville 40
No. 8 Gonzaga 89, No. 9 Georgia 68
No. 12 McNeese State 69, No. 5 Clemson 67
No. 4 Purdue 75, No. 13 High Point 63
No. 6 Illinois 86, No. 11 Xavier 73
No. 3 Kentucky 76, No. 14 Troy 57
No. 7 UCLA 72, No. 10 Utah State 47
No. 2 Tennessee 77, No. 15 Wofford 62

Second round

No. 1 Houston 81, No. 8 Gonzaga 76
No. 4 Purdue 76, No. 12 McNeese 62
No. 3 Kentucky 84, No. 6 Illinois 75
No. 2 Tennessee 67, No. 7 UCLA 58

Sweet 16

No. 2 Tennessee 78, No. 3 Kentucky 65
No. 1 Houston 62, No. 4 Purdue 60

Elite Eight

No. 1 Houston 69, No. 2 Tennessee 50

Final Four

No. 1 Houston vs No. 1 Duke

South Region

First round

No. 1 Auburn 83, No. 16 Alabama State 63
No. 9 Creighton 89, No. 8 Louisville 75
No. 5 Michigan 68, No. 12 UC San Diego 65
No. 4 Texas A&M 80, No. 13 Yale 71
No. 6 Ole Miss 71, No. 11 North Carolina 64
No. 3 Iowa State 82, No. 14 Lipscomb 55
No. 10 New Mexico 75, No. 7 Marquette 66
No. 2 Michigan State 87, No. 15 Bryant 62

Second round

No. 1 Auburn 82, No. 9 Creighton 70
No. 5 Michigan 91, No. 4 Texas A&M 79
No. 6 Ole Miss 91, No. 3 Iowa State 78
No. 2 Michigan State 71, No. 10 New Mexico 63

Sweet 16

No. 2 Michigan State 73, No. 6 Ole Miss 70
No. 1 Auburn 78, No. 5 Michigan 65

Elite Eight

No. 1 Auburn 70, No. 2 Michigan State 64

Final Four

No. 1 Auburn vs No. 1 Florida

West Region

First round

No. 1 Florida 95, No. 16 Norfolk State 69
No. 8 UConn 67, No. 9 Oklahoma 59
No. 12 Colorado State 78, No. 5 Memphis 70
No. 4 Maryland 81, No. 13 Grand Canyon 49
No. 11 Drake 67, No. 6 Missouri 57
No. 3 Texas Tech 82, No. 14 UNC-Wilmington 72
No. 10 Arkansas 79, No. 7 Kansas 72
No. 2 St. John’s 83, No. 15 Omaha 53

Second round

No. 1 Florida 77, No. 8 UConn 75
No. 4 Maryland 72, No. 12 Colorado State 71
No. 3 Texas Tech 77, No. 11 Drake 64
No. 10 Arkansas 75, No. 2 St. John’s 66

Sweet 16

No. 1 Florida 87, No. 4 Maryland 71
No. 3 Texas Tech 85, No. 10 Arkansas 83 (OT)

Elite Eight

No. 1 Florida 84, No. 3 Texas Tech 79

Final Four

No. 1 Florida vs. No. 1 Auburn

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan reportedly called for the destruction of Israel during Eid al-Fitr prayers at the Çamlıca Mosque in Istanbul on Sunday.

The Jerusalem Post reported that Erdoğan said ‘May Allah, for the sake of his name ‘Al-Qahhar,’ destroy and devastate Zionist Israel.’ His call for the annihilation of the Jewish state has drawn fierce condemnation, particularly from Israeli officials.

In response to his remarks, Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar stated on X, ‘The dictator Erdogan revealed his antisemitic face,’ adding that ‘Erdogan is dangerous to the region, as well as to his own people, as has been proven in recent days,’ Sa’ar referred to the widespread protests in Turkey and added, ‘Let’s hope NATO members understand how dangerous he is, and not before it’s too late.’ 

Following his comments, Turkey’s foreign ministry issued a statement that read, in part, ‘We categorically reject the outrageous statement made by the Foreign Minister of the Netanyahu government.

‘These disrespectful and baseless allegations are part of an effort to cover up the crimes committed by Netanyahu and his associates,’ adding, ‘We will continue to stand by the innocent civilians targeted by Israel and to defend their rights.’

In a social media post, Israel’s foreign ministry demanded clarity on whether Erdoğan denies his antisemitic views, emphasizing the president’s problematic actions both domestically and internationally. 

‘What bothered the Turkish Foreign Ministry? Here’s a way to clarify the dictator’s words: Clearly state that Erdogan is not an antisemite, that he is not an obsessive hater of the Jewish state.’ 

The post underscores the growing concern over Erdoğan’s intentions toward Israel.

The tensions between Turkey and Israel go beyond Erdoğan’s support for Hamas, although that remains a central issue. Hamas, which carried out the brutal massacre of more than 1,200 Israelis on October 7, 2023, has long had Turkish backing. Erdoğan’s refusal to denounce Hamas, describing them as a legitimate political party, has angered Israel and much of the international community.

The diplomatic relationship between Turkey and the U.S. has also been under scrutiny. While Turkey’s domestic actions, like cracking down on political opponents, including the arrest of Istanbul’s mayor Ekrem İmamoglu, have sparked unprecedented protests, U.S. officials are attempting to stabilize relations. On March 26, Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan, discussing Turkey’s potential support for a Russia-Ukraine ceasefire and other geopolitical issues, despite recent internal turmoil.

‘Turkey’s strongman Recep Tayyip Erdogan is facing the worst domestic political crisis of his career. The streets are flooded now with protesters who are outraged over the arrest of opposition leader Ekrem Imamoglu, restrictions on the internet, and other authoritarian maneuvers,’ Jonathan Schanzer, executive director of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, told Fox News Digital.

‘To deflect, Erdogan has engaged in blistering rhetoric against Israel. This comes amidst Erdoğan’s unflinching financial and political support for Hamas since the October 7 war erupted, not to mention Erdoğan’s support for the al-Qaeda government in Syria, which also poses a threat to Israel,’ Schanzer said.

The tensions between Turkey and Israel are not limited to Hamas support. Erdoğan’s actions in Syria, where Turkey has backed Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, who overthrew the Assad regime and gained control over parts of the country, have further strained relations with Israel, leading to growing concerns over Ankara’s role in fostering instability on Israel’s borders.

Before Erdoğan’s most recent threats against Israel, Trump administration officials had indicated that they may lift restrictions on defense contracts with Turkey, including the potential reinstatement of Turkey’s F-35 program participation. This comes after a phone call between Presidents Trump and Erdoğan on March 21, which may pave the way for a change in policy that could potentially allow the sale of the F-35s to Ankara.

As a NATO member, Turkey plays a pivotal role in the alliance’s security framework. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The Taliban’s supreme leader said Sunday there is ‘no need’ for Western laws in Afghanistan, noting that democracy is dead as long as sharia laws are in place.

Hibatullah Akhundzada was speaking during a sermon marking Eid al-Fitr, an Islamic holiday, at the Eidgah Mosque in the southern city of Kandahar.

‘There is no need for laws that originate from the West. We will create our own laws,’ Akhundzada said as he emphasized the importance for Islamic laws, according to audio of his message that was published on X by the Taliban government’s chief spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid.

The Taliban’s interpretation of sharia has resulted in restrictions for Afghan women and girls, who have been denied an education, working roles in many job fields and from appearing in most public spaces.

These laws have isolated the Taliban in the international community, but they have still been able to establish diplomatic ties with some countries, including China and the United Arab Emirates.

Akhundzada has taken a stronger approach on policy since the Taliban seized control of Afghanistan in 2021 during the chaotic withdrawal of U.S. and NATO troops from the region, despite some officials initially promising a more moderate government.

The terror group’s supreme leader criticized the West in his remarks on Sunday by saying non-believers were unified against Muslims and that the U.S. and other countries were united in their hostility toward Islam, pointing to the Israel-Hamas war in Gaza.

Akhundzada said democracy had come to an end in Afghanistan and sharia was in effect. He also argued that supporters of democracy were attempting to separate the people from the Taliban government.

The Taliban have no credible opposition inside or outside the country, although some senior figures within the government have criticized the leadership’s decision-making process and concentration of power in Akhundzada’s circle.

Some Taliban members want greater engagement on the world stage and to eliminate harsher policies to attract more support from outsiders.

In recent months, there has been increased engagement between the Taliban and the U.S. under President Donald Trump, mostly due to prisoner exchanges and releases.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

In response to an executive order, President Donald Trump’s team will present him with a plan for creating the Golden Dome, a missile defense shield meant to guard against attacks that are increasingly difficult to defeat. This effort will demand innovative thinking, collective will and rapid action.   

Since my tenure as director of the Missile Defense Agency in the early 2000s, an integrated network of sensors based in space, land and sea paired with ground-based interceptors has effectively deterred rudimentary missile attacks on our homeland from Iran, North Korea and others. But as they continue to improve their capabilities and as we look at a resurgent Russia and aggressive China, we need to build our next-generation missile defense. 

The window to defeat ballistic missiles heading to targets in the US is less than 40 minutes and can be as brief as 10 or 15 minutes if launched from a submarine closer to its target. Being able to intercept a substantial number of warheads in-flight provides significant deterrence to an attacker, thereby saving millions of lives and the infrastructure of the U.S. 

Our existing missile-defense system cannot easily defeat some of our adversaries’ more modern, sophisticated weapons. Neutralizing these threats will require a move away from the status quo and the development of the Golden Dome, a next-generation missile-defense shield.  

The Golden Dome initiative builds on past projects, including President Ronald Reagan’s Strategic Defense Initiative and Brilliant Pebbles, which proposed deploying lightweight spacecraft to intercept and destroy Soviet missiles. Technical and financial constraints led to the demise of these early efforts.  

With current technology, including advancements in Artificial Intelligence, satellite manufacturing and peer-to-peer networking, it is now feasible to deploy a space-based, missile-defense layer — one that is capable of tracking and intercepting ballistic missiles in their boost/ascent and mid-course trajectories. That would fill a critical gap in our current Missile Defense System, destroying ballistic missiles earlier, and preventing catastrophic loss of life.   

We can do this — and we must.     

Imagine a constellation of thousands of satellites communicating with each other via a robust space peer-to-peer communications network. Each satellite has the knowledge of every other satellite, and they all serve as both threat sensors and hit-to-kill interceptors. In fact, the networking concept has already proven its effectiveness on the battlefield in Ukraine. 

Soon after Russia’s invasion, the Ukrainian army devised a system based on Uber’s peer-to-peer ridesharing network. Their software, dubbed GIS Arta, uses an algorithm to determine which artillery or missile units are best positioned to respond to each threat. A constellation of satellites can operate on this same principle, allowing the most effective satellites in the constellation to swarm on an incoming missile and become hit-to-kill vehicles. 

We’ve known that a system akin to this has been necessary for many years, but the technology has only recently made it so that implementation of a lower earth orbit swarming intercept system was within our reach.  

My colleagues and I at Booz Allen began briefing policymakers on the practical implementation of such a system last summer and stepped up our cadence of conversations after the election. We were gratified to see the concept included as a policy priority in the days immediately after Trump was inaugurated. 

It is important to understand that no shield or system can defeat every missile launched by our adversaries. However, the capability and capacity now exists to defeat single and multiple missile launches, thereby creating strategic deterrence — or ‘peace through strength,’ in the words of both Reagan and Trump. We must force our adversaries to account for the possibility of a successful defense and subsequent retaliatory strike. 

Constructing a constellation of satellites like this requires substantial investment, but it offers a commensurate reward at a lower total cost than current systems. Estimates suggest that we can create and deploy a constellation of up to 2,000 linked satellite interceptors at roughly the same or lower cost as the price tag for developing and deploying one element of today’s system — the 44 ground-based interceptors currently installed in Alaska and California and the associated global radars.  

SpaceX’s Starlink alone has an estimated 7,000 small satellites currently in low-earth orbit and serves as a potential model for deployment. For a defense system charged with safeguarding countless lives and trillions of dollars in assets, this would be money well spent. 

Golden Dome will require collaboration among many companies and bold new partnerships. The Department of Defense must act quickly to appoint a lead agency for the effort, preferably one that has actually deployed integrated missile defense systems and shot down an uncooperative space satellite in the past, such as the Missile Defense Agency.  

The quicker Congress expedites the confirmation of appointees to senior defense positions to lead this effort, the better. And Congress will need to fully fund the Golden Dome vision. 

We cannot allow unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles to stifle our progress. We need to break down traditional silos around technical requirements, acquisition processes, and budget authority, placing them under one team empowered to make swift decisions to drive development and fielding. 

The Golden Dome project represents the best of American ingenuity and an ambitious, extraordinary opportunity to fortify our standing as the premier military force across — and above — the globe. We must do whatever it takes to cast this protective net over our homeland.  

With China’s continued advances in AI capabilities, they are almost certainly thinking about how these recent innovations can be deployed to defend their mainland. Just as in the global competition among nations to be the first to develop Artificial General Intelligence, being the first to deploy a truly effective national missile defense system ensures a nation’s pre-eminence while the rest of the world races to catch up. Golden Dome must be built first; the alternative is too terrible to contemplate. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President Donald Trump said Sunday that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is trying to back out of a rare earth deal with the U.S., adding if he does that he is going to have ‘some problems.’

‘I think Zelenskyy, by the way, he’s trying to back out of the rare earth deal, and if he does that, he’s got some problems – big, big problems,’ Trump said while speaking to reporters on Air Force One on Sunday. ‘We made a deal on rare earths, and now he’s saying, ‘well, you know, I want to renegotiate the deal.’ He wants to be a member of NATO. Well, he was never going to be a member of NATO. He understands that, so, if he’s looking to renegotiate the deal, he’s got big problems.’

Zelenskyy said last month that Ukraine is ready to sign an agreement on minerals and security with the U.S. at any time, noting that the agreement is seen as a step toward greater security and solid security guarantees.

Zelenskyy’s statement came after a visit to the White House where the two leaders were expected to sign an agreement on rare Earth minerals. But the visit turned sour, and Zelenskyy was kicked out of the president’s home with no deal in hand.

While speaking to reporters on Sunday, Trump said he and his team were making progress on a ceasefire deal between Ukraine and Russia.

One reporter asked if Trump would say his relationship with Russian President Vladimir Putin was at its lowest point.

The president said no, adding he did not think Putin was going to go back on his word for a partial ceasefire. He also said deals are made with people whether you like them or not.

Trump explained that Putin had said some things over the last few days about Zelenskyy not being credible, adding he was not happy about that. But, Trump added, he thinks Putin is going to be good. He also said he would not want to put secondary tariffs on Russia.

The U.S. put secondary tariffs on Venezuela, which Trump said has had a ‘very strong impact.’

‘You know that every ship just got out and left. A lot of them left. They dropped the hoses right into the ocean, and they left. They didn’t want to be there for a minute because they didn’t want those tariffs to catch on,’ Trump said. ‘But they didn’t want me to see them there. So, Venezuela and secondary tariffs, all secondary tariffs, are very strong, because essentially it says if you disobey our orders, you cannot do business in the United States of America, and that’s the catch.’

Trump said he plans to hit all the countries across the board with tariffs.

‘If you look at the history, and you look at what’s happened to us…take a look at trade with Asia, and I wouldn’t say anybody is doing it as fairly or nicely,’ Trump said. ‘We’re…going to be much more generous than they were to us.’

Trump also addressed questions about possibly running for a third term, which earlier in the day he said he was ‘not joking’ about.

Initially, Trump told reporters he was not looking at a third term, noting that people have spoken with him about a possible third term.

He said the 2020 election, in which he lost to now former President Joe Biden, was ‘totally rigged,’ but he would not take credit for a third try.

Trump also said his administration has had the best 100 days than any other president.

‘I was with some very important people today, and they said they’ve never seen turnaround as fast as this,’ he said.

As reporters continued to press him about a third term, though, Trump quickly shot them down.

‘I don’t want to talk about it,’ he told one reporter. ‘I don’t want to talk about a third term now. We have a long time. We have almost four years to go.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Even a casual reader of history will have noticed over the past many years that the antiseptic term Common Era (CE) has slowly but surely replaced the elegant Anno Domini (AD) as the marker of the time period that began 2,025 years ago in most historical works.

Though at first glance this may appear to be a minor change, it most definitely is not, and given the Trump administration’s brave and much-needed work to repair the damage done by wokeness, it’s possible that the damage here could be reversed.

Before getting to how an executive order bringing back AD would work, let’s first take a look at why it is so necessary to restore it to our written works of history.

Anno Domini is not only a description, it is an explanation. It is directly telling us that the reason we call this year 2025 is that Christ lived 2,025 years ago. It’s not just some happy accident that Jesus lived at this time. His life is the entire basis of the chronological system.

This keeps us in communion with over 1,000 years of our own history, from old books that used, ‘In the year of our Lord, ….’ to 20th Century classics of history that used the classic and traditional AD.

Now, progressive historians, which accounts for all but about six of them, insist that all they are doing by using Common Era instead is separating religion from the ‘scientific’ or at least empirical, study of history. But this is an easily disproven lie.

The names of our months, for example, are taken from Roman gods, and yet nobody thinks we should change the name of March so it isn’t derived from a Pagan god of war. The difference is that, like all things leftist, this is really about power.

Months named after Roman gods do not bother progressives because they do not view ancient Roman Paganism as part of a dominant culture that has to have its power over society weakened by the enlightened. But this is exactly how they view Christianity.

Put another way, Leftist historians are convinced that using AD imposes Christianity on non-Christians, and therefore a more neutral, or dare I say, common term should be used instead.

This is nonsense. There was never any significant group of people living outside of ivy-covered walls and ivory towers who were even remotely bothered by the term AD before the historians started in with this silliness.

You’d sooner find a bodega owner in the Bronx who wants to be called ‘Latinx.’

Moreover, this change from AD to CE is part of a much broader attempt to erase Christianity not just from public life, but from the history of the West as a whole, of which it is unquestionably the most important force.

Christianity didn’t grow up alongside Western civilization, it IS Western civilization, or at least was until about 10 minutes ago. Not only do progressives want Christian heritage and tradition removed from our society’s present and future, they want to erase it from our past.

As to the restoration of AD in our history books, there is a huge step that President Trump could take by executive order. With the swipe of a Sharpie, he could require that all books documents produced by the federal government or with federal funding use the more accurate and descriptive term Anno Domini.

It really is not too late to make CE a quirky footnote, used during a brief tenure of academic madness in the early 21st Century. Given how much federal funding university book publishers receive, the change could come very quickly.

Of course, such a move by Trump would occasion bloody howls of censorship and accusations of stomping out academic freedom. But American taxpayers, Christian or otherwise, should not be paying for the Left’s mission to tear Christianity from the heart of our civilization.

Sometimes it’s the little things, the ones which don’t seem to matter, that wind up mattering the most, because it starts with who cares if a man wants to wear a dress, and then its surgery on kids. It starts with leveling the playing field and winds up at ‘no white males need apply.’

The erasure of Anno Domini is one of these times, one of these canaries in a coalmine for our society, and the time is now to restore it to its rightful place.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

For the first time since 2008, the Final Four will consist entirely of No. 1 seeds, with No. 1 overall seed Auburn becoming the last to join Florida, Duke and Houston in San Antonio after a 70-64 win over Michigan State in Atlanta.

Every team’s path has been different. For Houston, it has been marked by stifling defense in the face of an exceptionally difficult region. For Florida, it has involved a pair of huge comebacks and some clutch shooting down the stretch. For Duke, it has been almost alarmingly easy, with the Blue Devils averaging a margin of victory of 23.5 points per game. And for Auburn, it has featured wins over a pair of Big Ten schools to get to the final weekend.

One side of the bracket will feature Auburn vs. Florida in an SEC showdown between the conference’s regular season and tournament champions. The other side will see Cooper Flagg, Kon Knueppel and the vaunted Blue Devils taking on a Houston team led by coach Kelvin Sampson, who has carved out a bit of a legend in Space City ahead of his second Final Four appearance with the Cougars.

Here’s the full list of teams to make the Final Four in 2025:

Who is in the Final Four?

No. 1 Florida (West)
No. 1 Duke (East)
No. 1 Houston (Midwest)
No. 1 Auburn (South)

Final Four schedule

This section will be updated.

Saturday, April 5

Game 1: No. 1 Auburn vs No. 1 Florida | 6:09 p.m. on CBS | Fubo (free trial)
Game 2: No. 1 Houston vs No. 1 Duke | 8:49 p.m. on CBS | Fubo (free trial)

Men’s March Madness bracket

All times Eastern.

East Region

First round

No. 1 Duke 93, No. 16 Mount St. Mary’s 49
No. 9 Baylor 75, No. 8 Mississippi State 72
No. 5 Oregon 81, No. 12 Liberty 52
No. 4 Arizona 93, No. 13 Akron 65
No. 6 BYU 80, No. 11 Virginia Commonwealth 71
No. 3 Wisconsin 85, No. 14 Montana 66
No. 7 Saint Mary’s 59, No. 10 Vanderbilt 56
No. 2 Alabama 90, No. 15 Robert Morris 81

Second round

No. 1 Duke 89, No. 9 Baylor 66
No. 4 Arizona 87, No. 5 Oregon 83
No. 6 BYU 91, No. 3 Wisconsin 89
No. 2 Alabama 80, No. 7 Saint Mary’s 66

Sweet 16

No. 2 Alabama 113, No. 6 BYU 88
No. 1 Duke 100, No. 4 Arizona

Elite Eight

No. 1 Duke 85, No. 2 Alabama 65

Final Four

No. 1 Duke vs. No. 1 Houston

Midwest Region

First round

No. 1 Houston 78, No. 16 SIU-Edwardsville 40
No. 8 Gonzaga 89, No. 9 Georgia 68
No. 12 McNeese State 69, No. 5 Clemson 67
No. 4 Purdue 75, No. 13 High Point 63
No. 6 Illinois 86, No. 11 Xavier 73
No. 3 Kentucky 76, No. 14 Troy 57
No. 7 UCLA 72, No. 10 Utah State 47
No. 2 Tennessee 77, No. 15 Wofford 62

Second round

No. 1 Houston 81, No. 8 Gonzaga 76
No. 4 Purdue 76, No. 12 McNeese 62
No. 3 Kentucky 84, No. 6 Illinois 75
No. 2 Tennessee 67, No. 7 UCLA 58

Sweet 16

No. 2 Tennessee 78, No. 3 Kentucky 65
No. 1 Houston 62, No. 4 Purdue 60

Elite Eight

No. 1 Houston 69, No. 2 Tennessee 50

Final Four

No. 1 Houston vs No. 1 Duke

South Region

First round

No. 1 Auburn 83, No. 16 Alabama State 63
No. 9 Creighton 89, No. 8 Louisville 75
No. 5 Michigan 68, No. 12 UC San Diego 65
No. 4 Texas A&M 80, No. 13 Yale 71
No. 6 Ole Miss 71, No. 11 North Carolina 64
No. 3 Iowa State 82, No. 14 Lipscomb 55
No. 10 New Mexico 75, No. 7 Marquette 66
No. 2 Michigan State 87, No. 15 Bryant 62

Second round

No. 1 Auburn 82, No. 9 Creighton 70
No. 5 Michigan 91, No. 4 Texas A&M 79
No. 6 Ole Miss 91, No. 3 Iowa State 78
No. 2 Michigan State 71, No. 10 New Mexico 63

Sweet 16

No. 2 Michigan State 73, No. 6 Ole Miss 70
No. 1 Auburn 78, No. 5 Michigan 65

Elite Eight

No. 1 Auburn 70, No. 2 Michigan State 64

Final Four

No. 1 Auburn vs No. 1 Florida

West Region

First round

No. 1 Florida 95, No. 16 Norfolk State 69
No. 8 UConn 67, No. 9 Oklahoma 59
No. 12 Colorado State 78, No. 5 Memphis 70
No. 4 Maryland 81, No. 13 Grand Canyon 49
No. 11 Drake 67, No. 6 Missouri 57
No. 3 Texas Tech 82, No. 14 UNC-Wilmington 72
No. 10 Arkansas 79, No. 7 Kansas 72
No. 2 St. John’s 83, No. 15 Omaha 53

Second round

No. 1 Florida 77, No. 8 UConn 75
No. 4 Maryland 72, No. 12 Colorado State 71
No. 3 Texas Tech 77, No. 11 Drake 64
No. 10 Arkansas 75, No. 2 St. John’s 66

Sweet 16

No. 1 Florida 87, No. 4 Maryland 71
No. 3 Texas Tech 85, No. 10 Arkansas 83 (OT)

Elite Eight

No. 1 Florida 84, No. 3 Texas Tech 79

Final Four

No. 1 Florida vs. No. 1 Auburn

This post appeared first on USA TODAY