Archive

2025

Browsing

We are now in the heart-pounding final two weeks of the NBA season, with teams fiercely battling for those precious postseason spots. The intensity of the playoff race is palpable, with every remaining game a potential game-changer, holding the power to either make or break their chances for a shot at the NBA title.

Several teams have already secured their spots in the playoffs, but the race for the top spots is far from over. The Oklahoma City Thunder have claimed the No. 1 seed in the Western Conference, but the battle for the No. 2 spot is a neck-and-neck race between the Houston Rockets and the Denver Nuggets, with the Los Angeles Lakers hot on their heels in the No. 4 position.

Meanwhile, in the Eastern Conference, the Cleveland Cavaliers, Boston Celtics and the New York Knicks all have claimed a playoff spot.

The top six teams from each conference automatically qualify for the playoffs, but the real drama unfolds with the No. 7 seed through No. 10 seed. These teams will engage in a nail-biting play-in tournament, where every game is a battle for a chance to enter the NBA Playoffs.

When is the NBA Play-In Tournament?

The Play-In Tournament will begin on April 15 and end on April 18, where seeds 7 through 10 will play in a tournament-like format for a chance to move on to the NBA Playoffs.

In the first games of the Play-In Tournament, the No. 7 seeds will host the No. 8 seeds. The winner of this game will secure a spot as the No. 7 seed in their respective conference, while the team that loses will have one more opportunity to compete.

In the second games of the Play-In Tournament, the No. 9 seeds will host the No. 10 seeds, with the winning team moving to the final game, and the team that loses will be eliminated and enter the NBA draft lottery.

In the final games of the Play-In Tournament, the teams that lost the first matchup will host the winners of the No. 9 vs. No. 10 seed games. The winners of these games will advance to the NBA Playoffs as the No. 8 seed, while the losing team will be eliminated and enter the NBA draft lottery.

Playoff picture: Who has clinched a spot?

The top six teams in each conference will earn a playoff spot. The winners of the Play-In Tournament will move on to the first round of the playoffs, which begins on Saturday, April 19.

Here are the teams that have clinched a playoff spot:

Western Conference:

Oklahoma City Thunder, clinched No. 1 seed in the Western Conference
Houston Rockets, clinched at least a Play-In tournament spot
Denver Nuggets, clinched at least a Play-In tournament spot
Los Angeles Lakers, clinched at least a Play-In tournament spot
Memphis Grizzles, clinched at least a Play-In tournament spot
Golden State Warriors, clinched at least a Play-In tournament spot
Minnesota Timberwolves, clinched at least a Play-In tournament spot
LA Clippers, clinched at least a Play-In tournament spot

Eastern Conference

Cleveland Cavaliers, clinched at least a playoff spot
Boston Celtics, clinched at least a playoff spot
New York Knicks, clinched at least a playoff spot
Milwaukee Bucks, clinched at least a Play-In tournament spot
Indiana Pacers, clinched at least a Play-In tournament spot
Detroit Pistons, clinched at least a Play-In tournament spot
Orlando Magic, clinched at least a Play-In tournament spot

NBA playoff bracket: Match-ups for current standings

Standings as of April 1:

Western Conference

No. 1 seed Cleveland Cavaliers vs. No. 8 seed via Play In Tournament
No. 2 seed Boston Celtics vs. 7 seed Play In Tournament
No. 3 seed New York Knicks vs. 6 seed Milwaukee Bucks
No. 4 seed Indiana Pacers vs. 5 seed Detroit Pistons

Eastern Conference:

No. 1 seed Oklahoma City Thunder vs. No. 8 seed via Play In Tournament
No. 2 seed Houston Rockets vs. 7 seed Play In Tournament
No. 3 seed Denver Nuggets vs. 6 seed Golden State Warriors
No. 4 seed Los Angeles Lakers vs. 5 seed Memphis Grizzlies

NBA standings

Here are the NBA standings as of the afternoon of Tuesday, April 1.

Eastern Conference

1. Cleveland Cavaliers: 60-15 (D)
2. Boston Celtics: 55-19 (D)
3. New York Knicks: 47-27
4. Indiana Pacers: 43-31
5. Detroit Pistons: 42-33
6. Milwaukee Bucks: 40-34
7. Atlanta Hawks: 36-38
8. Orlando Magic: 36-39
9. Chicago Bulls: 33-41
10. Miami Heat: 33-41
11. Toronto Raptors: 28-47
12. Brooklyn Nets: 24-51 (e)
13. Philadelphia 76ers: 23-52 (e)
14. Charlotte Hornets: 18-56 (e)
15. Washington Wizards: 16-58 (e)

Western Conference

1. Oklahoma City Thunder: 62-12 *
2. Houston Rockets: 49-26
3. Denver Nuggets: 47-28
4. Los Angeles Lakers: 45-29
5. Memphis Grizzlies: 44-30
6. Golden State Warriors: 43-31
7. Minnesota Timberwolves: 43-32
8. Los Angeles Clippers: 42-32
9. Dallas Mavericks: 37-38
10. Sacramento Kings: 36-38
11. Phoenix Suns: 35-40
12. Portland Trail Blazers: 32-43
13. San Antonio Spurs: 31-43
14. New Orleans Pelicans: 21-54 (e)
15. Utah Jazz: 16-59 (e)

* Clinched conference; (e) – eliminated; (D) clinched division

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Mass layoffs reportedly began Tuesday in Health and Human Services agencies as part of the department’s ‘restructuring’ to align with President Donald Trump’s executive order, ‘Implementing the President’s ‘Department of Government Efficiency’ Workforce Optimization Initiative,’ as agencies undergo merges and significant downsizing.

The restructuring is expected to bring down 82,000 federal health employees to 62,000.

The department has been preparing to make major cuts in recent weeks across its health agencies, especially pertaining to administrative costs and DEI-related spending.

According to the HHS, the layoffs ‘will save taxpayers $1.8 billion per year’ and ‘streamline’ functions of the department while ensuring that essential services like Medicare and Medicaid continue without disruption. The announcement of the layoffs came last week.

The HHS oversees several major agencies that will likely see some sort of restructuring: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Food and Drug Administration (FDA), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), Administration for Children and Families (ACF), Administration for Community Living (ACL), Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR).

‘We aren’t just reducing bureaucratic sprawl. We are realigning the organization with its core mission and our new priorities in reversing the chronic disease epidemic,’ HHS Secretary Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. said in a statement. ‘This Department will do more – a lot more – at a lower cost to the taxpayer.’

The new plan will reduce the number of HHS divisions from 28 to 15. One of the key changes includes the creation of the Administration for a Healthy America (AHA), which will combine several agencies, including the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration to ‘break down artificial divisions between similar programs.’ In addition, HHS is reorganizing its regional offices, cutting them down from 10 to 5.

Other changes, according to the HHS, include the creation of a new assistant secretary for enforcement to tackle fraud and abuse in federal health programs.

Another major focus of the restructuring is addressing America’s growing ‘epidemic of chronic illness.’ The plan focuses on clean food, water, and air, while working to eliminate environmental toxins that contribute to health problems. The CDC will also gain additional authority by absorbing the Administration for Strategic Preparedness and Response (ASPR), which handles national disaster and public health emergencies.

‘Over time, bureaucracies like HHS become wasteful and inefficient even when most of their staff are dedicated and competent civil servants,’ Kennedy said. ‘This overhaul will be a win-win for taxpayers and for those that HHS serves. That’s the entire American public, because our goal is to Make America Healthy Again.’

The Associated Press reported Tuesday morning there were hundreds of federal health employees wrapped around the HHS building in two lines to find out whether they still had a job. 

Former FDA Commissioner Dr. Robert Califf wrote in a LinkedIn Post Tuesday morning that the ‘FDA as we’ve known it is finished,’ adding that ‘most of the leaders with institutional knowledge and a deep understanding of product development and safety no longer employed.’

‘I believe that history will see this a huge mistake. I will be fad if I’m proven wrong, but even then there is no good reason to treat people this way. It will be interesting to hear from the new leadership how they plan to put ‘Humpty Dumpty’ back together again,’ Califf wrote.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Voters in two states are casting general election ballots for the first time since November, when they sent President Donald Trump back to the White House.

Wisconsin will choose a new justice on the state Supreme Court, which has a 4-3 liberal-leaning majority. Florida is holding special elections in two deep-red districts last held by Reps. Matt Gaetz and Michael Waltz.

At stake: court decisions over abortion, unions and voting rights in Wisconsin, and the size of the Republican majority in the U.S. House.

Democrats have been counting down to this moment. 

Off-year and special elections are typically low-turnout affairs, which, in the Trump era, has often given Democratic-leaning voters a louder voice. 

 

That could deliver liberals a win and an ongoing majority in Wisconsin, and/or a strong performance in the Florida races.

Even so, Republicans are favored to win those two Florida races, and a cash injection from Elon Musk has kept the Wisconsin race competitive.

Whatever happens, it is too early to draw conclusions about either party’s long-term prospects. The electorates that decide the midterms and beyond look different and won’t cast ballots for more than a year and a half.

Wisconsin

Key race

In the state Supreme Court race, Dane County Judge Susan Crawford and Waukesha County Judge Brad Schimel look to replace outgoing Justice Ann Walsh Bradley, the court’s longest-serving member, who announced last April that she would not seek a fourth 10-year term.

Wisconsin Supreme Court seats are officially nonpartisan, but voters as well as the state’s party establishments routinely rally behind certain candidates based on their judicial philosophies and records.

Crawford has the backing of Democrats and progressives, including an endorsement this week from former President Barack Obama. Schimel has support from Republicans and conservatives, including Trump and Elon Musk.

Why it matters

This will be the first indication of the state’s political climate since Trump recaptured the White House. 

Liberal-leaning justices gained a 4-3 majority on the court in 2023 for the first time in 15 years after Justice Janet Protasiewicz won a seat previously held by a conservative jurist. Bradley’s retirement gives conservatives an opportunity to retake the majority ahead of high-profile cases on abortion, unions and voting rights.

Turnout and early voting

As of March 1, there were more than 3.8 million active registered voters in Wisconsin. Voters in the state do not register by party.

About 1.8 million votes were cast in the 2023 spring election for state Supreme Court. That was 51% of registered voters and roughly 40% of the voting age population at the time.

About 25% of voters cast their ballots before Election Day. 

As of Monday, more than 674,000 ballots had been cast before Election Day.

Counties to watch

In any statewide election in Wisconsin, Democrats tend to win by large margins in the populous counties of Milwaukee and Dane (home of Madison), while Republicans win by wide margins in the smaller, more rural counties that stretch across most of the state.

Republican candidates also tend to rely on strong showings in the WOW counties of Waukesha, Ozaukee and Washington in suburban Milwaukee, which help counter Democratic advantages in urban areas.

Results

Expect first reported results shortly after 9 p.m. ET, when polls close. 

Election night tabulation ended at 2:30 a.m. ET in the 2023 spring election and at 5:47 a.m. ET in the November general election, both with more than 98% of the total vote counted.

Recounts

Recounts are not automatic in Wisconsin, but a trailing candidate may request one if the winning vote margin is less than a percentage point.

Florida

Key races

6th Congressional District

The 6th Congressional District sits on the Atlantic Coast and includes Daytona Beach. Republican presidential candidates have carried all six counties in the district for the last four presidential elections.

In GOP Rep. Michael Waltz’s old district, the candidates are Republican state Sen. Randy Fine and Democrat Josh Weil, a public school educator in Osceola County.  

Fine represents a Brevard County-based state Senate district located outside the boundaries of the Palm Coast-area U.S. House seat he hopes to fill. He won a three-way primary on Jan. 28 with Trump’s endorsement.

Trump carried the district in 2024 with 65% of the vote. Waltz received about 67% of the vote in his final House re-election bid.

1st Congressional District

The 1st Congressional District borders Alabama on the Gulf Coast in the westernmost part of the Florida panhandle. It is home to both Naval Air Station Pensacola and Eglin Air Force Base. The district is among the most reliably Republican areas of the state.

Republican Jimmy Patronis and Democrat Gay Valimont are running to replace Rep. Matt Gaetz, who resigned from the House last year.

Patronis is the state’s chief financial officer. He received Trump’s endorsement in a crowded primary. Valimont is a gun control activist.

Trump received about 68% of the district vote in 2024, slightly outperforming the 66% Gaetz received in his re-election bid.

Why they matter

Control of the U.S. House is not at stake, but the outcome of the special elections could give congressional Republicans some breathing room in the narrowly divided chamber. Republicans hold 218 seats, the minimum needed for a majority in a fully seated House. Democrats hold 213 seats, with two additional vacant seats most recently held by Democratic lawmakers.

Meanwhile, Democrats hope that strong fundraising in both districts is an indicator the races will be more competitive than they were in the last election just five months ago.

Turnout and early voting

Voter participation tends to be much higher in presidential general elections than in elections held at other times.

As of today, about 205,000 ballots had been cast across the two districts, about 53% from Republicans and about 33% from Democrats. 

Counties to watch

6th Congressional District

Trump and Waltz performed best in Putnam County, where they both received about 74% of the vote. Their worst county in comparison was Volusia, where Trump received 58% and Waltz received about 60%. Waltz slightly outperformed Trump in every county in the district.

1st Congressional District

The part of Walton County that falls within the 1st District is the most reliably Republican of the four counties. Escambia is the least Republican in comparison, although Trump and Gaetz still received 59% and 57% of the county vote, respectively.

Results

Expect first reported results in the 6th District shortly after 7 p.m. ET. The last vote update of the night in the 2024 general election was just before midnight, with about 99% of the vote counted. 

In the 1st District, expect results shortly after 8 p.m. ET. The 2024 general election night tabulation ended at 1:33 a.m. ET with about 99% of the total vote counted.

Recounts

Machine recounts in Florida are automatic if the vote margin is 0.5% of the total vote or less. If the machine recount results in a vote margin of 0.25% of the total vote or less, a manual recount of overvotes and undervotes is required.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A 2025 NCAA women’s basketball tournament that started with 68 teams is now down to just four.

The Final Four is an accomplishment in and of itself for a team, something that will be proudly displayed on a banner and earn a group of players a place in the hearts and minds of their fans for years. Still, it’s a step in the journey, not a destination. Every squad that makes it to the biggest stage in college basketball does so with the same goal: to win a national championship.

This week, the women’s basketball teams at South Carolina, UConn, Texas and UCLA will head to Amalie Arena in Tampa, Florida, with the same dreams of cutting down the nets with confetti on the court at the end of the event.

Who has the best chance to leave Florida with a trophy?

Here’s a look at the odds for the 2025 women’s basketball Final Four:

Who is predicted to win women’s March Madness?

Odds courtesy of BetMGM as of Tuesday, April 1

If the Final Four plays out according to its odds, a familiar face from a familiar program will be hoisting the NCAA championship trophy on April 6.

Coach Geno Auriemma and the UConn Huskies are the betting favorite to take home the national championship, at -130 odds. No. 2 seed UConn’s actually the lowest-seeded team of the four remaining squads, with the other three participants being No. 1 seeds.

The Huskies have been dominant through their first four games of the tournament, though, winning each of those matchups by at least 14 points and by an average of 35 points. Over the team’s past three games, star guard Paige Bueckers is averaging 35 points per game while shooting 59.1% from the field and 61.9% from 3-point range.

Should Bueckers and her team beat No. 1 overall seed UCLA in the national semifinals and either South Carolina or Texas in the title game, it would be the 12th NCAA championship for the Huskies, the most of any Division I women’s basketball program.

South Carolina, the reigning national champion, has the next-best odds, at +250. The Gamecocks’ only three losses this season are to the other three teams in the Final Four. They lost to UCLA, 77-62, on Nov. 24, 2024; to Texas, 66-62, on Feb. 9; and to UConn, 87-58, on Feb. 16.

Women’s March Madness national championship odds

Odds courtesy of BetMGM as of Tuesday, April 1

UConn (-130)
South Carolina (+250)
Texas (+600)
UCLA (+700)

Final Four picks for women’s March Madness

Odds courtesy of BetMGM as of Tuesday, April 1

No. 1 South Carolina vs. No. 1 Texas

Spread: South Carolina (-4.5)
Over/under: 127.5
Moneyline: South Carolina (-225) | Texas (+185)

No. 2 UConn vs. No. 1 UCLA

Spread: UConn (-8.5)
Over/under: 135.5
Moneyline: UConn (-450) | UCLA (+325)

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

PALM BEACH, Florida – Imagine Travis Hunter and Malik Nabers catching passes from Russell Wilson or Jameis Winston, then Hunter being a standout defender when he isn’t on offense.

It’s a vision that could become a reality for the New York Giants in 2025.

Hunter, the dynamic two-way football star who played cornerback and wide receiver at Colorado, could be the Giants’ choice with the No. 3 overall pick in the 2025 NFL draft later this month.

Count Giants coach Brian Daboll as one of many NFL evaluators intrigued by Hunter’s potential.

“It took a long time to evaluate him because there’s a lot of tape. It’s really remarkable what he’s done at that level – not really getting rest,” Daboll said of Hunter during NFL owners’ meetings on Tuesday. “He’s been a fun player to evaluate, to meet, to talk with. He’s a heckuva player.”

The Giants are in a peculiar position in the draft behind the Tennessee Titans and Cleveland Browns.

All three teams desperately need franchise quarterbacks.

However, the Giants’ signing of Wilson and Winston this offseason – after moving on from Daniel Jones last season – appear to be responses to prevailing thoughts before the draft.

The Titans could select Miami quarterback Cam Ward with the No. 1 pick, and the Browns could take Colorado quarterback Shedeur Sanders, son of Deion, with the second pick.

And so, the Giants could be out on two of the bright quarterback prospects, but in decent enough shape with a former Super Bowl champion in Wilson, and Heisman Trophy winner in Winston.

Daboll said he’s watched every passing play of Wilson’s career from stops with the Seattle Seahawks, Denver Broncos and the Pittsburgh Steelers as he begins to formulate next season’s Giants offense.

He believes the NFL experience Wilson and Winston bring to the table could help.

“I’ve watched (Wilson). I’ve watched what I think he can do well. I’ve watched on stuff that I think maybe he can help us with. And I’d say the same thing about Jameis,” Daboll said.

“So again, we have two guys that have played a lot of football, that have seen a lot of things, and I’m looking forward to work with both guys.”

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

WEST SACRAMENTO, Calif. — They stood in line for hours before the gates opened Monday, snapped pictures and tried to fully comprehend the enormity of the moment.

For the first time, an authentic regular-season Major League Baseball game was being played in Sacramento, California.

They may not be called the Oakland Athletics any longer, but they are still the Athletics, playing in front of a sellout crowd of 12,192 against the Chicago Cubs at Sutter Health Park, proud to call West Sacramento their new home.

It wasn’t a game the Athletics will show on their season highlight reel, routed, 18-3, with Cubs catcher Carson Kelly hitting for the cycle, but it was still a new beginning.

“We’ve been embraced here,’’ A’s manager Mark Kotsay says, “in every which way.’’

They had all of the pomp and circumstance just like every other home opener in their history, but nothing was quite like this night. The entire Athletics team wore No. 24 in honor of the late Hall of Fame outfielder Rickey Henderson. Henderson’s three daughters threw out the ceremonial first pitches. Dave Stewart, the legendary A’s pitcher who was one of Henderson’s best friends, was on hand, too.

It was an emotional evening for Stewart, born and raised in Oakland. He hated leaving the Coliseum, but seeing the euphoria, all of the joy, fans stopping and taking pictures of him as he tried to get to his suite, let him understand what it meant for the people of Sacramento.

“You know, it’s not the best of feeling that this isn’t happening in Oakland,’’ Stewart said, “but the other piece of this is that I’m part of the organization, whether I work for them or not. My number’s retired here. I’m in their Hall of Fame. It’s a good period right now for the A’s.’’

The crowd thoroughly appeared to enjoy themselves from the opening introductions where the Athletics came through the center field wall, the video tributes for Henderson, the moment of silence, the flyover and the glorious moment they furiously waved their gold towels when shortstop Jacob Wilson hit the A’s first home run in the third inning.

“People are excited, the community seems excited, to have us here,’’ A’s outfielder Brent Rooker says, “and the city has been very welcoming to us as individuals and as a group as a whole.’’

The lingering hostility in Oakland, at least for this night, vanished into the cool 50-degree air. It wasn’t until the end of the sixth inning, with the A’s getting blown out, when there were a few scattered, “Sell the Team’’ chants as they headed towards the exits.

Before the game, fans exuberantly chanted, “Let’s Go Oakland,’’ as if they were still back in the Coliseum. A’s owner John Fisher, who rarely attended games after he announced they were leaving Oakland for Las Vegas in three years, was even warmly cheered for bringing the A’s to Sacramento in the interim.

“I can’t believe we’re here, this is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity,’’ said Melanie Huitt, sitting in row 22, seat 13 and 14 with her husband, Dennis. “This is a dream come true, for all of us who are from here. Now we get to see every single major-league team here.’’

Sure, there were a few glitches. Athletics reliever Osvaldo Bido walked through the back gate at Sutter Heath Park, tried to open the clubhouse door, and only saw Chicago Cubs players. He retreated, stepped outside, and not understanding English, finally was escorted to his own clubhouse.

There were 150 credentialed media members for the inaugural game, prompting A’s officials to use a makeshift tent for interviews before the game, but the howling wind and rattling of metal made it a bit uncomfortable. One reporter was nearly hit by a fly ball during batting practice while leaving the clubhouse.

A’s veteran pitcher Luis Severino, who signed the richest contract in A’s history with a three-year, $67 million deal, says the A’s delivered on all of their promises, but is already worrying how he was going to navigate going from the dugout to the clubhouse while walking through the center field gate during a game. It may be commonplace in the minor leagues, but it’s the only stadium in the major leagues with the inconvenience.

“So, if you have a bad game,’’ said Severino, who’s scheduled to start Tuesday, “some fans can let you know right away. That’s our reality, so we have to embrace it.’’

Candlestick Park in San Francisco, which hosted its last baseball game on Sept. 30, 1999, was the last major-league ballpark not to have their dugout attached to the clubhouse. Yet, there’s not a single active player who had the experience of playing at Candlestick, as Cubs manager Craig Counsell subtly discovered.

“I was telling the players the last park that I remember where the clubhouses weren’t attached to the dugout was Candlestick,” Counsell said, “and they just kind of looked at me with a blank stare… It’s just different. We all get afraid of different, but we’ve all done this before so it’s no big deal. …

“You just do it. We’re playing major-league baseball game every night, so you just embrace it, and do it.’’

Counsell drew the same kind of blank stares when he tried to convince reporters that he saw an actual River Cat the nickname of Sacramento’s Triple-A team, while walking to the ballpark, even though it was actually a water otter.

The Athletics were pleasantly surprised to see just how modern and luxurious their new clubhouse was at the San Francisco Giants’ Triple-A park, roomy enough for a ping-pong table in the middle with a new weight room, gym and dining area.

The Cubs now know what it’s like for visiting teams at Wrigley, but despite being the smallest visiting clubhouse in baseball, there were minimal complaints.

“I got a big-league locker, I’ve got all of the tools that I need, and it’s a privilege to put on a major league uniform,’’ Cubs veteran shortstop Dansby Swanson said. “We’re just very, very fortunate to play this game, no matter when or where, no matter what the stadium is, no matter where it may be located, it doesn’t matter.

“This is a major-league baseball game that should never be taken for granted.’’

There wasn’t a single Cubs player who publicly voiced his discontent at playing a major-league game in a minor-league stadium, and if anyone was upset, they were keeping their opinions private.

“My opinion doesn’t really matter, it’s where we’re at,’’ Cubs veteran infielder Justin Turner said. “It’s obviously unfortunate for all of the great fans in Oakland. I feel for them, but it’s a great opportunity for people up here in Sacramento to get a chance to have a major-league team for a couple of years.

“As far as whether it’s a good thing or a bad thing, I guess we’ll find out.’’

Despite all of the euphoria at Sutter Health Park, it still was emotional for the players who called Oakland home, particularly for Cubs second baseman Nico Hoerner, who was born and raised in Oakland.

“I’d rather be playing in Oakland,’’ Hoerner said. “Oakland is special place for me. …It’s really sad. It’s a very storied franchise and a place that is integral to a lot of people’s experience of being in the East Bay, and families that had generations of fans and a lot of passion. …

“I feel for fans in Oakland, baseball fans, sports fans in general. All three teams [A’s, Raiders and Warriors] being gone in a very short span is hard-hit to an entire community. Three teams have created a lot of joy for a lot of people.

“I think sports plays a great role and place, and to have all of that stripped away very quickly is a really challenging thing.’’

Then, again for players like A’s reliever Tyler Ferguson, who grew up in Sacramento and has lived in the city for the past five years, there’s nothing like being at home again. He was the most popular man in spring training advising his teammates where to live, telling them about the best restaurants, coffee spots and nightlife. He plans to do a pamphlet with the team chaplain, who lives in the Sacramento area.

“To be playing in Sacramento, basically at home and in the big leagues,’’ Ferguson said, “is a really cool experience for me. The fans are very excited. A couple of times I was back this offseason, people that aren’t huge baseball fans are buying season ticket and are excited to have major league baseball in Sac.’’

Still, for those A’s longtime employees who have been uprooted, and abandoning their loyal legion of small, but passionate fan group, Ferguson certainly understands their pain. He hopes the A’s fans still stick with them, whether they’re in Sacramento now or Las Vegas later.

“I understand the frustration that fans have had over the past few years,’’ Ferguson said, “but we hope that they rally behind this team here in Sacramento while we’re here. We’re still the Athletics. Hopefully, people will be excited to come support us and we win a lot of baseball games.’’

The A’s believe the sellout crowds, the fans’ enthusiasm, the community’s support, could play a role in their path to the postseason before they depart for Las Vegas. They went from 50 victories to 69 in the last year, and believe they can be a potential contender this season.

Who knows, the better the A’s play, the more fans they attract, and the more people that come to Sacramento, the A’s could be a walking billboard for the chamber of commerce?

“This is a big-league city,’’ A’s veteran reliever T.J. McFarland says. “There’s a lot going on here. So, I think everyone’s going to be, I shouldn’t’ say surprised, because it’s a nice city, the state capital, but it’s going to be a really nice fit.’’

Best of all, the A’s say, is that all of the questions about the A’s uncertainty, their move from Oakland, their future in Sacramento, should now finally end. Finally, they can talk about, well,  baseball again.

“I hope questions from you guys turn into more of baseball-related questions,’’ McFarland said, “as exposed to the external factors that we have no say in. I’d love to answer normal ones again.

“Hopefully, this passes, everyone gets normalized, and it’s like all right, “Let’s pop open the hood and figure out who’s actually on this team and actually how good they actually are.

“If we do what we think we can do, and win games, we’re going to prove all of the people wrong that are saying things won’t be different. For us, we have a little chip on our shoulder.’’

So, the A’s aren’t about to let one game, one clunker on their glorious opening night, ruin an entire summer.

“My hope, my vision, is that it feels like a very big SEC college baseball game in terms of the energy that we bring with the capacity that’s allowed,’’ said Rooker, who attended Mississippi State. “It’s going to be a unique environment, and it offers an opportunity to bring major league baseball to a city that hasn’t previously had it, to help us continue to further develop and build our fan base.

“I think we’re fully ready to embrace it.’’

Follow Nightengale on X: @Bnightengale

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Carbon monoxide poisoning is believed to be the reason behind the death of the son of a former Yankees star, according to officials.

Tests revealed that the room Miller Gardner, 14, the son of former New York Yankees outfielder Brett Gardner, stayed in while on vacation in Costa Rica had high levels of carbon monoxide, Rándall Zúñiga, the director of Costa Rica’s Judicial Investigation Agency, OIJ, said in a statement posted to YouTube on Monday.

It’s possible that the teenager could have died from ‘breathing in these gases that are so dangerous,’ said Zúñiga in Spanish.

The lethal gas could have come from a ‘specialized machine room’ located next to the Gardner family’s hotel room, according to Zúñiga.

USA TODAY has reached out to OIJ for more information.

What happened to Miller Gardner?

On March 21, Miller’s body was found in a hotel room in Manuel Antonio, a resort area on Costa Rica’s Pacific Coast, reported NBC News and CNN.

Miller is the son of former New York Yankees player Brett Gardner, who played 14 seasons in the MLB. Brett retired after the 2021 season. He was also part of the Yankees’ championship team in 2009, was named an All-Star in 2015, and won an American League Gold Glove in 2016.

The teen’s parents shared news of his death Sunday afternoon via the Yankees’ social media accounts. The family said he and other family members got sick while on vacation in Costa Rica.

“We have so many questions and so few answers at this point, but we do know that he passed away peacefully in his sleep on the morning of Friday, March 21st,” they wrote.

Officials confirmed Gardner’s son did not die of asphyxiation

Costa Rican officials initially told media outlets, including NBC News and CNN, that Miller Gardner, 14, appeared to have died by asphyxia after a possible intoxication tied to food.

‘A consultation was conducted with the doctor from the Forensic Pathology Section of the Judicial Investigation Agency, and the preliminary ruling ruled out asphyxiation as the cause of death,’ Juan Pablo Alvarado García of the Judicial Investigation Agency (OIJ) told USA TODAY Tuesday afternoon.

‘No macro-level abnormalities were observed in the respiratory tract upon inspection of the body,’ he added.

Officials will send samples to the OIJ’s Forensic Science laboratories for histology, toxicology, and neuropathology, García said. There will also be a study done at the Costa Rican Institute for Research and Teaching in Nutrition and Health at the University of Costa Rica.

Teen ‘lived life to the fullest,’ family says

Miller, who passed away Friday, March 21, was the youngest of two sons. 

His parents said in their statement that he loved football, baseball, golf, hunting, fishing, and his loved ones. They said they are struggling to come to terms with life without the teenager and his “infectious smile.”

“He lived life to the fullest every single day,” his family wrote.

“It wasn’t just Brett who literally grew up in this organization for more than 17 years,” the Yankees wrote. “So did his wife, Jessica, and their two boys, Hunter and Miller.”

An obituary for Miller online reads, ‘The void Miller’s passing leaves in the hearts of his family, friends, teammates, teachers, coaches and others will be felt for years.’

The family is looking to honor Miller’s memory by asking people to make donations to Make-A-Wish Foundation, a non-profit that aims to make wishes for sick children come true.

Julia is a trending reporter for USA TODAY. Connect with her on LinkedIn, Instagram and TikTok: @juliamariegz, or email her at jgomez@gannett.com

Saleen Martin is a reporter on USA TODAY’s NOW team. She is from Norfolk, Virginia – the 757. Email her at sdmartin@usatoday.com.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

A normally sleepy procedural vote ended in drama for the House of Representatives after a rebellion by nine Republicans against their own party forced chamber proceedings for the week to grind to a halt.

It puts the future in question for two key bills backed by the Trump administration that were slated to get a vote on Wednesday and Thursday, respectively.

Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., told reporters that votes were canceled for the rest of the week in comments condemning the mutiny.

‘It’s a very disappointing result on the floor there, a handful of Republicans joined with all the Democrats to take down a rule. That’s rarely done. It’s very unfortunate,’ Johnson said. ‘That rule being brought down means that we can’t have any further action on the floor this week.’

A ‘rule vote’ is not an expression of support or opposition for any specific measure. Rather, it’s a procedural hurdle, normally falling along party lines, that allows for the House to begin debate and eventually vote on whatever bills the rule is covering.

In this case, the ‘rule’ would have allowed for debate and floor consideration of bills that would have limited district judges’ ability to levy nationwide injunctions and would have mandated proof of citizenship to register to vote, respectively.

It comes amid a weekslong battle over the ability to vote remotely for new parents in Congress.

It’s an embarrassing setback for House Republican leadership, who put on a full court press for both pieces of legislation.

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., has been leading a bipartisan push for legislation that would allow new parents in the House to vote remotely for 12 weeks surrounding their child’s birth.

She attempted to force the bill onto the floor via a mechanism called a ‘discharge petition,’ which would effectively end-run leaders to hold a House-wide vote on legislation, provided the petition gets support from a simple majority of the House.

Lawmakers rarely, if ever, lead discharge petitions against their own party. But Luna’s was poised for success with support from Democrats and some fellow Republicans. 

House GOP leaders attempted to block it, however, by inserting language in an unrelated ‘rules’ package on Monday night that would have effectively prevented Luna’s bill from getting a vote.

That sparked a backlash among Republicans who either supported Luna’s efforts or opposed leaders’ attempts to change previously agreed-upon House rules – and in most cases, a combination of both.

Meanwhile, a source familiar with the House Rules Committee told Fox News Digital that some Republicans on that panel were frustrated at being kept in the dark by House leaders until the final moments before their committee vote on Tuesday morning. All Republicans on the committee voted for the rule, however.

Reps. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., Jeff Van Drew, R-N.J., Greg Steube, R-Fla., Ryan Mackenzie, R-Pa., Nick LaLota, R-N.Y., and Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., were among those who voted to kill the rule.

Democrats broke out into applause after the legislation failed.

House GOP leaders could still call an emergency session of the House Rules Committee to consider modified language that does not target discharge petitions.

One House Republican, however, suggested it was better for lawmakers to be sent home for the week.

‘Lots of torn up feelings. Might be better to press pause for a couple of days,’ that GOP lawmaker said.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Russia has initiated its largest military draft in 14 years as reports indicate Russian President Vladimir Putin is preparing a spring assault on Ukraine despite ongoing peace negotiations to end the three-year war. 

Putin has called up 160,000 men as part of the country’s bi-annual conscription drive as Russia seeks to beef up its military ranks.

According to the legislation, citizens aged 18 to 30 will be called up for mandatory military service through June 15. The spring draft marks the largest conscription campaign since spring 2011, when 200,000 men were called up for service. Last year, 150,000 men were called, following 134,500 in 2022.

The Kremlin and Defense Ministry insist the latest conscripts are not being sent into combat and that the draft is unrelated to the war in Ukraine. Russian authorities say troops deployed to Ukraine only include volunteers who signed contracts with the military.

Some draftees, however, fought and were taken prisoners when the Ukrainian military launched an incursion into Russia’s Kursk region in August.

Putin said late last year that Russia should increase the overall size of its military to almost 2.39 million and its number of active servicemen to 1.5 million.

It comes as a report suggests the Kremlin is preparing a six- to nine-month offensive across the Ukrainian front, potentially stretching over 1,000 kilometers, according to The New Voice of Ukraine. Potential targets include Sumy, Kharkiv and Zaporizhzhya oblasts, as well as the Kursk Oblast, where they’ve seen recent success.

The offensive is also aimed at maximizing pressure on Ukraine and strengthening the Kremlin’s negotiating position in ceasefire talks, Ukrainian government and military analysts said.

Meanwhile, U.S.-led talks attempting to broker a ceasefire deal appear to have stalled. The U.S. has struggled in its efforts to secure an immediate 30-day ceasefire, despite Moscow saying it agreed with a truce ‘in principle.’ 

Rebekah Koffler, a former DIA intelligence officer who specializes in Russia’s war-fighting strategy and Putin’s thinking, told Fox News Digital that Putin’s goal with his conscription drive is to prolong the fighting.

‘There’s no ceasefire and no peace plan between Russia and Ukraine to be had,’ said Koffler, the author of a best-selling book ‘Putin’s Playbook.’ ‘What President Trump seeks is regretfully, unachievable. Putin’s goal is to keep fighting, in order to compel Ukraine to capitulate.’

Trump is trying to secure a peace and rare earth minerals deal, while on Sunday the president said he did not think Putin was going to go back on his word for a partial ceasefire.

Koffler, meanwhile, said the latest conscription numbers are intended to ensure that the correlation of forces on the battlefield and in reserves, continues to favor Russia. 

‘Now that Germany and France are considering to deploy reassurance forces into Ukraine, Putin is factoring in those numbers, so he is increasing his force’s posture, to deter such a deployment or failing to prevent it by force.’

‘Putin has prepared Russia for a long, protracted conflict, in which he wants the Russian forces to be ready to fight till the last Ukrainian and the last missile in the NATO arsenal,’ Koffler said.

She said Putin is also considering the possibility of having a direct kinetic war with NATO, in the event that NATO decides to deploy forces into the theater in Ukraine. 

‘So, he intends for these mobilization numbers as a deterrence value and battlefield utility, if it comes to that.’

Fox News’ Rachel Wolf and The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A well-known economist who was believed to be trying to influence the Trump administration’s economic policies in the lead-up to the inauguration is facing criticism for his opposition to President Donald Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) efforts in line with the resistance from some of his group’s top donors. 

‘Elon Musk is not actually a popular person, and the frame of politics that the DOGE crew is pushing is not an effective brand of politics,’ American Compass founder and chief economist Oren Cass told Politico in February. 

Also in February, Cass wrote a piece for UnHerd, titled ‘Why DOGE will fail: There isn’t an easy button for everything,’ where he argued that ‘DOGE is haphazardly cutting expenditures without even knowing what they are.’

Cass has a long history of criticizing Musk, including last year when he took shots at Musk’s personal character and said in a post on X that Musk’s values are not aligned with the interests of the American people after the tech billionaire opened a factory in China. 

In March 2024, Cass posted that Musk has ‘already committed to upholding core socialist values’ to placate the Chinese Communist Party for financial gain. 

Fox News Digital previously reported on Cass positioning himself as an ally of the Trump administration and that a significant chunk of American Compass’ funding comes from a handful of foundations tied to liberal causes, including almost $2 million from the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation and the Omidyar Network, which is led by a founder described as ‘notable for funding liberal-in-conservative clothing groups that target former president Donald Trump and his supporters.’

The Hewlett Foundation gave nearly $2 million, 44.1% of total funding, to American Compass from 2020-2023, including a startup grant, while Pierre Omidyar, of the Omidyar Network, gave $550,000, 11.3% of total funding, from 2020-2023.

Both the Hewlett Foundation and Omidyar Network have resisted the Trump administration. 

Hewlett Foundation Director Of Economic And Society Initiative Jennifer Harris has been critical of Musk and DOGE’s efforts on X, including riposting a criticism doubting that DOGE cuts would result in actual savings and sharing a post that said, ‘The Air Crashes Of The Past Two Days Show Us The Obvious: The Man In Charge Of @DOGE Runs Companies That No One Would Miss If They Disappeared Tomorrow. If Good Government Disappears, People Die.’ 

The Atlantic posted a piece in February with the headline, ‘DOGE Is Failing on Its Own Terms.’ The bottom of that article stated, ‘Support for this project was provided by the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation.’

The Omidyar Network has been active behind the scenes pushing resistance against Musk and the Trump administration, the Washington Examiner reported in November, and has opposed Musk in various forms and previously backed corporate boycotts against Musk, the Washington Free Beacon reported.

Along with his criticism of DOGE, Cass has been a vocal opponent of another one of the Trump administration’s top priorities, tax cuts.

Despite Cass offering some praise of Trump, he has been a longtime critic of Trump’s 2017 tax cuts, calling them an ‘expensive failure’ and saying Trumpism is facing an ‘inevitable expiration’ and adding in September 2020 that Trump is ‘building no intellectual foundation, no institutional infrastructure and no policy agenda.’

‘Oren Cass is a former Romney staffer upset that Trump is cutting taxes and cutting government spending, DOGE shouldn’t care about the political assessment of a man who just lost a local school board election,’ Mike Palicz, director of Americans for Tax Reform, told Fox News Digital.

David McIntosh, Club for Growth president, told Fox News Digital in a statement, ‘So American Compass opposes the Trump tax cuts, and now Elon Musk’s work to cut federal government waste, it’s almost like he’s just a paid-puppet of the left – oh wait, he is.’

After Trump’s 2024 election victory, Cass continued to signal opposition to Trump’s tax policy. 

‘Well, I think we have today a politics where both candidates go around talking about how they`re just going to cut everybody`s taxes,’ Cass told PBS on Nov. 10. ‘And, of course, everybody likes a tax cut. But I don`t think those are the things that are going to turn our economy in a much better direction.’

During another interview earlier this year, Cass said one of the things he thought was ‘most encouraging’ was that there are no ‘mini Trumps’ and that he is ‘extremely encouraged’ by the post-Trump-era Republican leaders he is seeing.

‘American Compass advocates for limited government and a commitment to paying for the government that we have rather than leaving the bill to our children,’ Cass told Fox News Digital in November. ‘Anti-tax zealots can lobby for larger deficits if they want, but conservatives are under no obligation to follow them into the fiscal ditch.’ 

In a statement to Fox News Digital, a Hewlett Foundation spokesperson said, ‘The Hewlett Foundation funds grantees across the ideological spectrum, including American Compass—specifically for its efforts to prioritize American prosperity and American workers.’

Fox News Digital reached out to the Omidyar Network and American Compass for comment.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS