Archive

2025

Browsing

When we win a game in a team sport, what does it mean for our individual development, especially when kids are still growing and maturing?

It’s a question youth sports parents ponder, and it’s one Major League Soccer has wrestled with during the five years its MLS NEXT youth program has existed.

‘If we just have a bunch of dominant 13- and 14-year-olds that don’t end up being dominant 18-year olds, I think that’s a huge miss on the return on our investment,” said Luis Robles, MLS NEXT’s technical director and a former USMNT goalie. ‘So this is why we have to tinker with different ways to evaluate players.”

The organization will announce Wednesday a pilot program to evaluate its U13 and U14 age groups that looks beyond traditional results of games, focusing on complete performances of individuals. Its Quality of Play rankings move away from wins, losses and draws to measure progress of teams based on their players’ offensive and defensive actions, including their off-the-ball movements in games we sometimes don’t see.

This is the first time MLS NEXT will have a list of standings for teams in these age groups, but they will be ranked on this new metric rather than records, according to Robles, who spoke to USA TODAY Sports prior to making the new rankings public Wednesday.

‘We know that this is different,’ Robles said in an exclusive interview. ‘This is new. It could come off in the launch as gimmicky, but when you start to pull back and understand why we’re doing it, it’s a massive investment. But this is worth it, because then Major League Soccer and the national teams, long term, stand to gain the most. Our hope is that we’re developing better professionals.”

Robles spoke with USA TODAY Sports about what the move means for your player and the dramatic effect it could have on the youth soccer landscape.

Why is MLS NEXT making the change to Quality of Play rankings?

The program supplies about 90% of players to youth national teams, according to MLS NEXT GM Kyle Albrecht, and has never kept standings for these age groups. Robles said they want to lean more heavily on player progression without the added pressure of trying to win.

‘The question we try to answer is, ‘What role does competition play in player development?” Robles says. ‘It should play less of a role. It should be more about the training sessions, the technical ability, the formation of the player, helping them understand the game, solving the game with soccer.’

But if MLS wants to develop future national team players, Robles said, it must acknowledge how well players do in game-time situations.

“Part of development is competing,” he said, ‘What we saw with U.S. Soccer, and all the cynicism and criticism towards the players and the coaching and the results, you can’t help but admit that sometimes what it comes down to is just how well you do in a competition.”

How do MLS NEXT’s Quality of Play rankings work?

Analysts with TAKA, a video tool that takes a panoramic view of the field, will spend about 4 ½ hours on each game looking for significant offensive and defensive actions.

Each player will be scored for attack, defense and overall quality of play. Team rankings will be compiled based on players’ overall scores, which MLS hopes will more completely represent their overall caliber of play than the result of the game.

If you’re a weak-side defender and the ball is on the other side of the field, for example, it might seem insignificant when you adjust your position. But the new rankings will allow off-ball intelligence that could be scored.

Positive tactical intentions will be encouraged, even if the execution isn’t perfect. Robles said that in presentations to MLS NEXT academy directors, an example play was shown from a ‘very, very significant global, international’ with the vision to make a pass.

‘The end result was it was a turnover, but everyone wanted to find a way to say that is what we want to see our players doing,” Robles said. “We want them to have the courage to make that pass, because if the pass comes off, you’re going to get immediate gratification in the form of a shot or goal. But because the pass doesn’t come off, that play could lose meaning, even though it was a significant play, and that’s what we’re trying to capture, and that’s what quality of play is.

‘It’s just the aggregate analysis of significant moments, whether offensive, defensive, good or bad.”

What happens if a team tops MLS NEXT’s Quality of Play rankings?

While U13 and U14 teams in MLS NEXT previously had no year-end competitions, the top two or three teams per division (Robles hasn’t decided yet) will now be invited to compete at MLS NEXT Cup. The U13 and U14 age groups each have eight divisions.

The rankings will be adjusted based on quality of opponent, rewarding significant actions against better teams.

‘We don’t want it to be that this player is such a great attacking player when they play the minnows,” Robles says. ‘We want it to be that they’re doing it across the board. We want to see that the team is consistently playing well. Traditional standings isn’t the whole picture because a team could be mid-table, but it’s because they beat all the teams that they were expected to beat, but couldn’t beat a team that was above them.”

How much do stats and wins factor into MLS NEXT’s Quality of Play rankings?

‘Zero,” Robles says. ‘Naturally, if a team is scoring more goals, they probably have more significant moments on the positive. If a team is giving up a lot of goals, they’re going to have more significance in the negative. But what weight does it have in our decision making process? Zero.”

Why is MLS NEXT adding Quality of Play rankings specifically to U13 and U14?

There are just over 5,600 U13 and U14 players registered in MLS NEXT, more than 1/3 of the organization’s 16,000 players across the U.S. and Canada. They are the two most malleable age groups.

Robles referenced the book, ‘Outliers,’ in which author Malcom Gladwell tracked how American hockey players born in the first three months of the year were more likely to go pro.

They had been bigger and stronger when they were younger, and thus placed into a top-level national pipeline because they were fortunate enough to be born in January, February or March.

‘If you’re born in January, as opposed to someone that’s born in December in the same year, it’s 10% of muscle development,” Robles said. “You’re not even sure which direction that’s going. We have to find ways to be able to mitigate that.’

While Portugal’s Cristiano Ronaldo was born in February and identified early, Robles said, so was France’s Kylian Mbappé, a December baby who was fast but small. He ended up growing to be one of the world’s fastest players.

MLS NEXT seeks to find more late developers, even ones who are playing down an age level to develop their technical skills before they catch up with their age group from a physical standpoint.

“Are we picking players that are dominant at 13 and 14 that don’t end up becoming great at 17 and 18?” Robles says. “I think yes.”

COACH STEVE: How youth hockey brings out the worst in youth sports

Will Quality of Play rankings improve scouting?

Robles said the rankings will enable MLS Academy kids to ‘confidently’ know they’re being evaluated at all times through TAKA, and not just when they’re in front of scouts.

“Growing up, I would see a U.S. Soccer scout at one of my games wearing the badge and was there for 12 minutes,” Robles says. “How do they know if I’m a good goalkeeper after watching me for 12 minutes? Because it’s just not enough.

‘And now what we’re hoping is that more players that are already in our system are getting seen by MLS academy scouts to get more opportunities.”

There are 29 MLS academies and 122 elite academies within the 151 clubs that make up MLS NEXT. 

While MLS NEXT strives to develop players to compete on national teams, its new second tier of competition has opened up an opportunity for those who want to play at a high level but don’t necessarily view that goal as realistic. But what about playing in college?

Robles said college coaches, if they register with MLS NEXT, will have access to every player in the TAKA database.

What is the end game with MLS NEXT’s Quality of Play rankings?

Over time, MLS will be able to look back and track growth of players who ultimately achieve an elite level.

“You can now take that information, extrapolate it across the entire player pool, and start to identify more Aidan Morrises, Benjamin Cremaschis,’ Robles said. ‘We use those examples because they went through the full cycle, where they were at an elite academy. So when you look at a player who might have been in an elite academy first, who makes the move to an MLS Academy, who then goes the pathway of the homegrown and is now playing for the first team, you start to pull back those layers and look under the hood, and we haven’t been able to do that.’

MLS’ U15, U16, U17 and U19 players will continue to be ranked by traditional standings.

“We still want to prioritize developing (U13 and U14) players to be better professionals over just developing teams that win trophies,” Robles said. “I want more of those players to be in college with the prospect of going pro. I want more of those players getting a chance to represent our country at the national or international level.”

Steve Borelli, aka Coach Steve, has been an editor and writer with USA TODAY since 1999. He spent 10 years coaching his two sons’ baseball and basketball teams. He and his wife, Colleen, are now sports parents for two high schoolers. His column is posted weekly. For his past columns, click here.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The FBI received a record number of new agent applications in Director Kash Patel’s first full month leading the bureau, with the flood of law enforcement job-seekers nearly doubling the monthly average since 2016.

There were 5,577 new FBI agent applications submitted in March, Fox News Digital has learned. 

The last time the bureau saw a monthly figure even close to that number was April 2016, with 5,283 applications.

By comparison, the monthly average in 2023 was 2,797 applications, with 3,383 applications per month in 2024, according to FBI data reviewed by Fox News Digital.

‘Director Patel and Deputy Director (Dan) Bongino have put a major emphasis on restoring confidence in federal law enforcement and boosting new agent recruiting,’ FBI spokesman Ben Williamson told Fox News Digital Wednesday. ‘These record early returns certainly suggest the new FBI is heading in the right direction.’  

Since January, the FBI has seen more than 10,000 new agent applications, according to FBI data. 

In January, the first month of the Trump administration and the month of Patel’s nomination and confirmation hearing, the FBI saw 4,143 applications to join the bureau – the first time the bureau had seen a month of new agent applications in the 4,000s since August 2020. 

‘The record number of FBI job applications in March shows that people are inspired by Kash Patel’s commitment to restoring integrity and effectiveness at the bureau,’ Patel advisor Erica Knight told Fox News Digital Wednesday. ‘Americans are putting their trust in his leadership to rebuild the FBI and keep our communities safe.’ 

And, Knight told Fox News Digital, ‘this is just the beginning.’ 

‘Kash is dedicated to creating a stronger, more trusted FBI that serves the American people the way it was always meant to,’ Knight said. 

During his Senate confirmation hearing in late January, Patel illustrated the ‘erosion of trust’ at the bureau, pointing to polling revealing that ‘only 40% of Americans hold a favorable view of the FBI.’ 

‘This must change,’ Patel testified. ‘Public cooperation is vital for the bureau to solve crimes, and its declining reputation is already affecting recruitment efforts.’ 

The record number of new agent applications comes as Patel and Bongino put a heavy emphasis on new agent recruiting and restoring law enforcement morale by ‘letting good cops be cops.’ 

In March, Patel released an FBI recruitment video, showing the director in the field with agents and highlighting footage from the hostage rescue team facility urging people to join the team. 

The video ends with a graphic showing the FBI seal, and the words: ‘A renewed mission. A stronger future.’ 

‘Apply today at FBIJobs.gov,’ the video says. 

Patel and Bongino also have privately emphasized to their staff the importance of boosting local partner engagement. 

Sources familiar told Fox News Digital that Patel has instructed his team to offer full and total support to the families of fallen officers, while Bongino has personally reached out and met with the uniformed officers on FBI ground to thank them for their work that ‘often goes unnoticed.’

‘Our team will continue to recruit the best law enforcement personnel in the country,’ Williamson told Fox News Digital. ‘We hope to see even more brave men and women want to be a part of what we’re building.’ 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Vice President JD Vance said the message in a new docuseries echoed the direction of the Trump administration’s recent actions – and the rest of the world would be wise to take notice. 

He offered remarks Tuesday night at an exclusive screening of the film adaptation of author Rod Dreher’s ‘Live Not By Lies’ – first-hand interviews with civilian figures throughout the postwar period who embraced Christian values to blunt totalitarian regimes and efforts from Great Britain to Czechoslovakia when it was part of the Soviet bloc

Vance said he got to know Dreher after the writer asked to interview him about his book, ‘Hillbilly Elegy,’ before the now-vice president was a fixture on the political scene.

Before boarding a flight back to the U.S. from a vacation in the United Kingdom, Vance submitted written answers to Dreher and hoped for the best – his book was hovering around No. 1,000 on the Amazon list. By the time he landed in the U.S., Dreher’s write-up had propelled it to No. 16.

‘Hillbilly Elegy’ later inspired a Ron Howard film, and helped launch Vance into the spotlight as a nationally recognized figure. He would go on to win a seat in the Senate and eventually become vice president.

Dreher’s book and film, which featured interviews with notable dissidents of communism and totalitarianism in the Soviet bloc and even in England today, is a lesson for people of Christian and democratic values not to lose hope and ‘never stop fighting,’ Vance said.

He said that, without the courage to act in the face of government-compelled groupthink, the traditionalist West cannot ‘reclaim our civilization… rebuild prosperity and opportunity [or] rebuild the kind of society where we teach children the important virtues and skills to thrive; as opposed to trying to tear our kids down, which is what I think our education system does all too often.’

Without speaking up, people who seek liberty over tyranny cannot defeat the left-wing foreign policy groupthink that has become the ‘animating concept’ in too many Western nations, the vice president added.

‘We’re not going to solve any of these problems unless we have the courage to speak the truth, unless we have the courage to live the truth.’

One thing the traditionalist right struggles with is submitting to despair, Vance said.

‘This idea that because things were not going great in 2020, because things weren’t always going in our way electorally, we would give into this sense that the country that we love, the civilization that we love was always on a negative trajectory,’ he said.

‘And I say that as not a criticism of Rod, because I, myself, have sometimes felt in the lowest moments of American politics that, maybe, this country is just not going in the right direction.’

‘But I think that what we’ve learned over the last few months is that the American people, and I think Western peoples, are a hell of a lot more resilient than our elites give them credit for.’

Vance said ‘Live Not By Lies’ – a phrase itself coined by Soviet exile Alexander Solzhenitsyn in one of his famous oratories – means to maintain the same optimism that is at the root of Judeo-Christian theology and therefore the root of American traditions.

‘You have Western peoples calling out their governments pushing back on issues like migration and religious freedom in a way that we haven’t seen in 20 or 30 years – if we’ve ever seen it,’ he said.

‘If we keep on fighting and we keep working and we keep on having faith and we keep on pursuing the values that we know are right, I really do believe that we are going to see great things happen… all across the West. I know the president knows this.’

Vance said the message of ‘Live Not By Lies’ has been proven in the first months of the fledgling Trump-Vance administration.

‘We’ve gone from a country where we would harass and threaten and investigate and even arrest pro-life protesters to one where we’re encouraging pro-life activists to do what they can to persuade their fellow Americans,’ Vance said.

The film and book show British pro-life leader Isabel Vaughan-Spruce recounting being arrested essentially for praying outside an abortion clinic, and feature video of London police interrogating her on the street to find out what she was praying about.

‘A couple of months ago, we had social media censorship run amok. We were threatening people’s right of free expression for not saying the things that Silicon Valley technology companies told them to say,’ Vance went on.

‘Now I believe that we have more free speech on the internet today than we’ve probably had in 10 or 15 years. So we’re making progress.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

UNITED NATIONS – The DOGE Caucus just got a consulting offer from an initiative looking to remove waste in the United Nations. 

Dynamic Oversight for Global Efficiencies in the U.N. (DOGE-U.N.) is looking to help the caucus identify cost-cutting opportunities and hold the U.N. accountable.

‘Accountability should extend beyond domestic institutions to global organizations that America funds. And they all should operate with fiscal responsibility and proper oversight,’ DOGE-U.N. wrote in a letter to Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, who founded the Senate DOGE Caucus.

Last month, U.N. Secretary-General António Guterres announced the UN80 Initiative in honor of the 80th anniversary of the international organization. Despite speculation that the initiative was a response to Elon Musk’s work with DOGE, Guterres told reporters that it was completely unrelated. Guterres said the project is meant to handle the U.N.’s ongoing ‘liquidity crisis.’

‘For at least the past seven years, the United Nations has faced a liquidity crisis given the fact that not all member states pay in full, and many member states also do not pay on time,’ secretary-general spokesperson Stéphane Dujarric told Fox News Digital at the time. ‘This is about prudent spending planning to ensure that we can continue to fulfill our core functions and the mandates given to us by member states.’

Hugh Dugan, the head of DOGE-U.N., told Fox News Digital that this is an opportunity to reform the U.N., which has not undergone any significant overhaul since 2000. Dugan also emphasized that the U.N. should be under this type of scrutiny more frequently and not just when the U.S. is ‘frustrated with’ the organization.

Under Musk, DOGE first tackled waste at the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), which drew significant criticism. President Donald Trump listed several examples of the ways USAID allegedly wasted U.S. taxpayer dollars, including millions of dollars that went to diversity, equity, and inclusion programs in other countries.

Dugan told Fox News Digital that a significant portion of USAID funding was ‘funneled’ through U.N. entities. He believes the ‘money trail will definitely be taking us through many of those entities, whether it’s peacekeeping or a U.N. development program.’

In its letter, DOGE-U.N. lists several recommendations for the DOGE Caucus, including decentralizing New York-based U.N. entities to lower-cost countries, which the organization said could save ‘at least 40% in salaries alone.’ DOGE-U.N. also recommends an audit of the U.N.’s ongoing ‘liquidity crisis.’

The U.S. is not the only country rethinking its contributions to the international body. Dugan told Fox News Digital that other countries are also reevaluating their spending, but the U.S. is ‘the most colorful and biggest’ because of Musk.

Dugan ultimately pointed the finger at Guterres and told Fox News Digital that there are ‘whispers and grumblings among ambassadors’ who are allegedly dissatisfied with the secretary-general’s performance. Senior U.N. insiders allegedly told Dugan that they too are ‘very eager’ to see things turn around ‘sooner rather than later.’

Ernst’s office did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

OTTAWA – As Canadians brace themselves for President Donald Trump’s ‘Liberation Day’ of reciprocal tariffs on Wednesday, one political leader in Canada believes it could spark the start of a new era of Canada-U.S. relations free of cross-border taxes.

Maxime Bernier, who served as foreign affairs minister in former Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s Conservative government and now heads the right-wing People’s Party of Canada (PPC), told Fox News Digital in an interview from Halifax that it is ‘absolutely’ the time for Canada to remove all tariffs against the U.S.

He said the 25% duties the Canadian government, under then-Liberal Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, imposed on the U.S. in early February to counter Trump’s 25% tariffs against Canada ‘won’t hurt the Americans – it is hurting Canadians.’

New Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney said in a statement following his March 28 call with the president – the first contact between both leaders since Carney was elected Liberal leader by his party nearly three weeks before – that Canada would implement retaliatory tariffs in response to Wednesday’s U.S. ‘trade actions.’

The PPC leader said that Trump should be told that ‘the real reciprocal response’ to tariffs is ‘zero on our side, zero on your side.’

Bernier said that instead, Carney and his main rival, Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre, are being ‘fake patriots using a dollar-for-dollar trade war against Trump’ and telling Canadians: ‘That’s the best thing to do.’

‘We cannot impose counter-tariffs,’ said Bernier, who also served as industry minister in the Harper government. 

‘The Americans are 10 times bigger than us. We won’t win a trade war,’ he said, underscoring that retaliation will lead to a recession in Canada.

Former Canadian Conservative politician Tony Clement, who served alongside Bernier in Harper’s Cabinet, told Fox News Digital that ‘from an economic point of view,’ removing Canadian tariffs ‘makes a lot of sense’ and ‘may come to that at some point, but the public isn’t there right now.’

‘From a point of view of the emotional wounds of Canadians created by Trump and his annexation talk and tariffs, I’m not sure that a political voice would survive if it went down that public-policy route,’ said Clement, a former Canadian industry minister in the Harper government.

‘The mood of the people is outrage. I’ve never seen people in Canada this incandescently mad at the United States,’ he said, who is campaigning in the Toronto area for Poilievre’s Conservative Party ahead of the April 28 general election. ‘There is complete distrust of whatever Trump says because it can change within 24 hours.’

He said that both Poilievre and Carney have highlighted the importance of removing ‘the specter of tariffs for a long period of time – if you can trust Trump to be a bona fide negotiator.’

Eliminating Canadian tariffs, without a quid pro quo from Trump, could ‘show weakness to a bully,’ added Clement, who, prior to entering federal politics in 2006, served as a Cabinet minister in former Ontario Premier Mike Harris’ Progressive Conservative government.  

In the statement released following his recent conversation with Trump, Carney said that both leaders ‘agreed to begin comprehensive negotiations about a new economic and security relationship immediately following the election.’ 

Conservative strategist Yaroslav Baran, who served as communications chief for Harper’s successful Conservative 2004 leadership campaign, and director of war room communications for the Harper-led Tories during the 2004, 2006 and 2008 federal election campaigns, told Fox News Digital that under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), ‘trade in goods and services ought to be tariff-free’ between Canada and the U.S., excluding carveouts on the Canadian side for dairy, eggs, poultry and softwood lumber. 

However, Baran added that he ‘can’t see the removal of all Canadian tariffs on U.S. products as long as the U.S. has tariffs on Canadian products.’

Bernier acknowledged that while Trump’s tariffs will hurt Canadian exporters to the U.S., ‘the solution is to have a more productive economy with real free-market reforms’ in Canada through such measures as lowering corporate taxes, promoting internal trade and fostering growth in the country’s oil and gas industry, all of which are featured in the PPC’s election platform that includes the establishment of a ‘Department of Government Downsizing’ to abolish ‘ideologically motivated programs that promote wokeism,’ not unlike the Elon Musk-led Department of Government Efficiency.

The PPC leader also said that Canada should be willing to ‘put everything on the table’ under the USMCA ‘right now’ and before the trilateral trade deal is scheduled for a joint review next year.

According to Bernier, that should include ending the ‘cartel’ of supply management that sets quotas and prices, and protects Canada’s dairy, poultry and eggs sectors from foreign competition, which he described as ‘a communist system’ that finds Canadians paying twice the price of those agricultural products than Americans do in the U.S., and which also imposes duties – ranging from 150% to 300% — on U.S. imports of the same products beyond limits agreed to but yet to be reached under the USMCA. 

During the renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement in 2018 that led to the USMCA, the first Trump administration sought to have Canada’s supply management system eliminated.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., condemned the Senate filibuster as an ‘abuse of power’ in 2022, years before his party praised him for launching the ‘longest filibuster in U.S. Senate history’ on Tuesday.

Booker set the record for longest Senate floor speech at 25 hours and 5 minutes after starting to speak at 7 p.m. on Monday. 

The filibuster has been a deeply controversial tool for the Senate in recent years, with many Democrats condemning the practice during President Joe Biden’s administration as Republicans used it to foil his agenda.

‘The filibuster has been abused to stop reforms supported by the vast majority of Americans—from background checks to protecting the right to vote. We must stop this abuse of power,’ Booker wrote on X in January 2022.

Booker’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fox News Digital.

Former Senator Kyrsten Sinema, who was the lone Democrat to oppose abolishing the filibuster during Biden’s administration, has poked fun at Democrats who criticized her at the time.

‘Maybe it isn’t an old Jim Crow relic, after all,’ she quipped about Booker’s performance on Tuesday, referencing President Barack Obama’s description of the filibuster.

Sinema specifically called out Rep. Pramila Jayapal. D-Wash., who condemned the ‘Jim Crow filibuster’ just last year.

Jayapal changed her tune when Republicans were trying to pass a continuing resolution in March, urging Democrats in the Senate, ‘Don’t betray working families. Don’t give Trump and Elon Musk a blank check. Don’t be complicit in the slashing of government programs. Vote NO on cloture and NO on final passage of Republicans’ bad bill.’

Cloture is the Senate term for ending a filibuster, causing Sinema to chime in, ‘Just surprised to see support for the ‘Jim Crow filibuster’ here,’ she wrote.

Booker himself has flipped on the issue multiple times. He gave a firm defense of the filibuster in 2019 before his call to remove it in 2022.

He said at the time that Democrats ‘should not be doing anything to mess with the strength of the filibuster.’

‘I will personally resist efforts to get rid of it,’ he said.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A federal judge blocked President Donald Trump’s administration from firing federal probationary workers in 19 states and Washington, D.C., on Wednesday.

U.S. District Court Judge James Bredar’s order directs 18 federal agencies to ‘undo’ the ‘purported terminations’ of thousands of probationary federal workers before Tuesday, April 8th, though the order only applies to states whose attorneys general brought the case.

The states impacted by Wednesday’s ruling include Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Wisconsin and the District of Columbia.

Bredar’s order is only the latest move by federal courts to hamper Trump’s agenda, though it falls short of the nationwide injunctions used in other instances.

Since Trump entered office, he has faced a slew of nationwide injunctions to halt actions of his administration. So far in his new term, the courts have hit him with roughly 15 wide-ranging orders, more than former Presidents George W. Bush, Barack Obama and Joe Biden received during their entire tenures.

Some of those who have ordered the Trump administration to halt certain actions are U.S. District Judges James Boasberg, Amir Ali, Loren AliKhan, William Alsup, Deborah Boardman, John Coughenour, Paul A. Engelmayer, Amy Berman Jackson, Angel Kelley, Brendan A. Hurson, Royce Lamberth, Joseph Laplante, John McConnell and Leo Sorokin.

Former Speaker of the House Newt Gingrich condemned the wave of injunctions as a ‘judicial coup d’etat’ during testimony before a House Judiciary subcommittee on Tuesday.

The former lawmaker highlighted that the vast majority of judges filing injunctions or restraining orders against Trump’s executive actions have been appointed by Democrats.

‘If you look at the recent reports from various polling firms, clearly a majority of Americans believe that no single district judge should be able to issue a nationwide injunction,’ Gingrich responded.

‘Look, my judgment is as a historian. This is clearly a judicial coup d’etat. You don’t have this many different judges issue this many different nationwide injunctions – all of them coming from the same ideological and political background – and just assume it’s all random efforts of justice,’ he continued.

‘This is a clear effort to stop the scale of change that President Trump represents,’ he added.

Fox News’ Julia Johnson contributed to this report

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

PALM BEACH, Florida –  There was a good news/weird news mix on the Micah Parsons money meter watch coming from Jerry Jones on Tuesday at the NFL league meetings.

The good news for Parsons and the legion of championship-starved Dallas Cowboys fans: Jones is willing to offer a megabucks contract that would make the star edge rusher the highest-paid non-quarterback in NFL history with a deal in excess of $40 mil per year.

Word of Jones’ offer for a much-anticipated extension for the linchpin of Dallas’ defense, a significant breakthrough in stagnant negotiations, was first reported by Clarence Hill of All City DLLS. It comes on the heels of recent deals for Maxx Crosby, Myles Garrett and then Ja’Marr Chase that successively raised the bar on the “highest-paid non-quarterback” distinction. And Parsons, 25, is certainly worthy, supported by the four Pro Bowl selections and four double-digit sack seasons (52 ½ overall) in four seasons.

During a mid-day break, Jones confirmed this apparent progress to a small media group that included USA TODAY Sports.

Yet the flamboyant Dallas Cowboys owner also raised eyebrows with the weird news.

Jones has dealt directly with Parsons in discussing “every issue in the room,” as he put it, while bypassing David Mulugheta, one of the most respected agents in the NFL universe.

“The agent is not a factor here,” Jones said. “And I don’t know his name. I’m not trying to demean him in any way, but this isn’t about the agent. The agent doesn’t have one thing to do with what we’re doing when we get on a football field as a team. Micah does. To the degree I’m involved, I do.

“I’m not demeaning the agent. I’m saying anybody can do this. I mean, talk directly to the player. Frankly, most people who negotiate with me will tell you that they’re better off negotiating with me rather than anybody else.”

Still, even with the massive deal he’s seeking to close with Parsons, the optics are sideways. Jones contended that he’s not demeaning Mulugheta while doing exactly that. To not even know the name of the agent for your star pass-rusher?

That’s a straight diss, Jerry.

Jones mentioned that he is prone to deal directly with players, at least to some extent, dropping the names of Emmitt Smith and Deion Sanders (who were represented by the late, great Eugene Parker), Jason Witten and Tony Romo. In striking a deal last year that made Dak Prescott the NFL’s highest-paid player with a 4-year, $240 million extension averaging $60 million, Jones maintained that he was directly involved with the quarterback in addition to the work of agent Todd France.

And hey, some players, including Lamar Jackson, the Baltimore Ravens’ two-time MVP, don’t even use an agent.

But Parsons does. To not even acknowledge his name? Hmmm. That seems like something out of the horror stories from negotiations from decades ago, when teams ruled with an iron fist in contract talks. In this day and age of big NFL business, it’s way more common than not – and advisable — for a star player to enlist professional advisors.

Mulugheta, contacted by USA TODAY Sports, declined to comment.

Yet Parsons left little doubt on this particular component of getting a new deal, posting his sentiments on social media shortly after Jones’ comments about Mulugheta circulated.

“David is the best and I will not be doing any deal without David Mulugheta involved,” Parsons posted on X. “Like anyone with good sense I hired experts for a reason. There is no one I trust more when it comes to negotiating contracts than David! There will be no backdoors in this contract negotiation.”

Good, that Parsons quickly responded publicly to Jones and made it clear that to ultimately strike a deal, Jones will have to go through Mulugheta. You’d think that he would have already expressed that to Jones as they discussed “every issue in the room.”

When Jones was asked whether Parsons asked him to talk to Mulugheta, the team owner hemmed and hawed.

“Let’s see,” Jones said, after an extended pause. “After we were through, he called Stephen.”

Stephen Jones, Jerry’s oldest son, is the executive vice president and right-hand man involved in all of the Cowboys’ major decisions. Parsons undoubtedly told the Cowboys that a deal wouldn’t be done without Mulugheta’s involvement…and approval.

Yet Jerry added, “I’ve got the checkbook. So, all the fiddling around doesn’t make any difference.”

Ah, here’s to another layer of Cowboys drama.

Jones said that it was about a month ago when Parsons asked for his cellphone number, so that he could speak with the team’s owner (and GM) at any time. That was proactive enough, given that the prospect of a huge extension for Parsons has been on the horizon for more than a year – the next one after star wideout Cee Dee Lamb and Prescott were secured with long-term pacts.

Yet in icing out Parsons’ agent, the perception that Jones – a self-made billionaire – would create a negotiating advantage is hardly a stretch. And now it’s fair to wonder whether ego will become a factor, a year after the negotiations for Prescott and Lamb dragged on over the course of the entire offseason.

Steelers coach Mike Tomlin is more than happy to wait for quarterback Aaron Rodgers

Of course, Jones has a different view. In 1989, he paid a record $150 million to purchase the Cowboys prompting some people, he recalled Tuesday, to consider him an idiot.

Now the Cowboys are the most valuable sports franchise in the world, according to Forbes, with a valuation of $10.1 billion.

“Most everything I’ve had success with, I’ve overpaid for,” Jones said.

In Parsons’ case, the price just keeps going up. The deals for Crosby (3 years, $106.5 million), Garrett (4 years, $160 million) and Chase (4 years, $161 million) ensured that.

Or so it seems.

“I’ve never looked, when acquiring a financial decision, I’ve never looked at how other people are paying because more often than not, they’re not comparable situations,” Jones said. “They just happen to fit the timing and maybe happen to fit the position. What I do is what fits me and what fits the circumstances.”

Given the numbers that are coming in the projected deal for Parsons, which reflects a lot of respect for the talent provided by one of the NFL’s best players.

Yet the devil sure is working through some details.

Follow Jarrett Bell on social media: @JarrettBell

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

President Donald Trump, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., and Senate Budget Committee Republicans are meeting at the White House on Wednesday morning as discussions on how to extend the 2017 tax cuts continue and a key budget process to advance Trump’s agenda hangs in the balance. 

Notably, the meeting is taking place ahead of a Trump event in the Rose Garden, during which the president will discuss his new tariffs.

The Wednesday White House meeting is meant to be less of a debate on how to proceed and more of a final check-in to make sure all parties are on the same page, a source familiar told Fox News Digital.

Trump and Senate Republicans’ discussion is just the latest of several meetings on both the House and Senate sides, hammering out details on how to maneuver a House-passed budget reconciliation bill through the upper chamber. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was spotted leaving at least one of the congressional meetings on Wednesday and has been a fixture on Capitol Hill amid the reconciliation debate. 

Initially, there was stark disagreement between GOP leaders in the House and Senate over how to organize a reconciliation bill, which is a key tool for the Trump administration and Republican majorities, because it lowers the vote threshold in the Senate, bypassing the legislative filibuster. 

Senate Republicans largely preferred splitting the priorities of the Trump administration into two reconciliation bills, the first of which would address the southern border’s urgent needs and a later bill would extend Trump’s hallmark 2017 tax cuts. 

But House Republicans, who have less space for dissent with their slim majority, made it clear they would only accept one reconciliation bill that included border funding and tax cut extensions. 

The House and Senate both passed separate resolutions, but Trump has voiced his support for one bill on multiple occasions and Senate Republicans themselves described their resolution as a backup plan to the House’s. 

Now, the Senate is charged with taking up the House’s bill, including border and tax cuts, in order to complete the budget reconciliation process for Trump. 

Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., told Fox News he would be at the morning meeting at 11 a.m. He said he planned to bring up the debt limit, which will need to be extended soon. In particular, he wants to discuss raising the debt limit in the budget reconciliation resolution. 

According to the Republican, Trump hasn’t been highly communicative to Republicans about his position on the debt limit’s inclusion in this particular bill. 

But Kennedy believes they should raise the debt limit via reconciliation to ensure Republicans don’t need to negotiate with Democrats to avert default down the line. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Democratic Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona, who ditched his Tesla last month, refused to label recent violence at Tesla dealerships in protest of Elon Musk’s DOGE efforts as ‘domestic terrorism,’ a term that has been used by Republicans and the Justice Department. 

Certainly vandalism and it’s a crime,’ Kelly told Fox News Digital when asked if the violence at Tesla dealerships in response to DOGE amounted to terrorism.

‘It’s a significant crime, especially if you’re going to firebomb a car or vandalize somebody’s vehicle or even key somebody’s vehicle. They shouldn’t be doing it. And these should be investigated. And if people are caught, they should be prosecuted.’

Attorney General Pam Bondi and Elon Musk have both called the violence ‘domestic terrorism’ in recent weeks.

When pressed by Fox News Digital on not using the word terrorism, Kelly said, ‘I think we got to tread lightly on the whole terrorism word.’

We sometimes try to expand this thing, it kind of loses its focus. But when folks are vandalizing people’s vehicles or dealerships, it is wrong and it’s dangerous. Somebody is going to get hurt. And for that reason, we should put, you know, the full force of law enforcement to this problem and prosecute people.’

While Kelly went further than most top Democrats in condemning the violence, many in the party have faced criticism from conservatives for refusing to use the phrase ‘domestic terrorism’ to describe violent incidents against Tesla, including shots fired at a building, destroyed dealership windows, charging stations and cars set on fire, and vandalism of Tesla cars.

Fox News Digital recently reached out to over a dozen Democrats who previously railed against the dangers of domestic terrorism, asking them if they condemned the Tesla violence. None of the Democrats responded.

Kelly made headlines last month when he announced that he was ditching his personal Tesla because it was ‘a rolling billboard for a man dismantling our government and hurting people.’ 

Kelly added that he believes Musk turned out to be an ‘a–hole’ and later announced that he had switched to a Chevy Tahoe SUV.

The violence against Tesla has spurred outrage on the right as many Democrats remain silent. Rep. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., on Tuesday introduced a resolution in the House of Representatives that slams unnamed members of the Democratic Party, who it says, ‘have made calls for their supporters to incite and engage in domestic terrorism by attacking Tesla vehicles and facilities to protest Elon Musk.’

‘The definition of terrorism is the unlawful use of violence and intimidation in the pursuit of political aims. That is exactly what has been going on across the country at Tesla dealerships, and it is what innocent Americans who chose Tesla as their preferred vehicle are facing in the wake of violence from Radical Left-Wing domestic terrorists who hate President Donald Trump and Elon Musk,’ Boebert told Fox News Digital.

The resolution cites ‘at least’ 80 incidents of arson or vandalism against Tesla vehicles and 10 incidents of vandalism against Tesla dealerships, charging stations and facilities throughout the U.S. and Canada.

Incidents include individuals setting fire to cars and equipment by throwing Molotov cocktails, shooting up buildings and vehicles, and marking private property with words like ‘Nazi’ and ‘Long Live Ukraine.’

Among the incidents cited by the resolution is the March 18 attack in Las Vegas, in which a person dressed in black shot at Tesla cars at a Tesla collision center, ignited several of them with Molotov cocktails, and spray-painted the word ‘Resist’ on the front doors of the shop.

Fox News Digital’s Peter Pinedo contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS