Archive

2025

Browsing

After all the hyperbole and histrionics, all the wasted millions in legal fees, we now see the crux of the situation. 

Wait, it did less than that. It brought the fantasy of what could be. And Clemson followed. 

If you’re shocked by the latest twist in the ACC vs. Florida State and Clemson lawsuits that’s now in the makeup phase of the program, you clearly haven’t been following along. It was nearly three months ago that Florida State athletic director Mike Alford told USA TODAY Sports, “We never said we wanted to leave the ACC” — after his university spent months, and millions in legal fees, doing just that.

It was last summer when multiple people from the Big Ten told USA TODAY Sports that the league never had direct or indirect talks with Florida State, and wasn’t interested in adding the Seminoles, which the league deemed a “bad partner” that was trying to break up the ACC in search of greener financial pastures.

While we can argue the merits of Florida State and Clemson’s reasons for trying to escape the ACC – and I agree with a few – there is no argument about the foundation of the case. 

Florida State and Clemson had no leverage. 

Had. No. Leverage. 

Florida State’s grand plan was to get out of the ACC, and then become an attractive candidate for the Big Ten. Who among us wouldn’t want the blue blood football program, and sudden mercenary, for hire?

That’s right, FSU – and Clemson, to a lesser extent because it wasn’t publicly grandstanding – decided to risk its A-rating media properties brand on a whim and a hope.

Then kept doubling down.   

It is here where we introduce Hernan Cortes, the famous Spanish conquistador, who in 1519 ordered his ships to be burned after landing in Mexico to prevent retreat and motivate his crew to succeed in the new land.

Florida State burned the ships knowing it didn’t have back channel negotiations with the Big Ten, or any semblance of a landing place if it were successful in its lawsuit against the ACC. 

The Seminoles did it all knowing it signed the ironclad Grant of Rights agreement with the ACC not once (in 2013), but twice (again in 2016). Did it knowing ESPN would never, ever walk away from, or alter, a favorable media rights deal with the ACC through 2036.

Florida State did it knowing the ACC knew it held all the cards – and by all the cards, I mean all the cards – and wasn’t negotiating with a rogue member. 

Only after it was clear last summer that FSU had no landing spot if it left the ACC, and that capital investment wasn’t the answer, did the school arrive at the negotiating table with the ACC — burned ships smoldering in the background. 

FSU and Clemson have legit arguments in this fight. Without them, there is no ACC football. Who in their right mind wants to watch Wake Forest and Syracuse go it for four quarters on a perfectly good Saturday afternoon?

Especially when Tennessee vs. Florida is on another network. Or Michigan vs. Penn State, or Georgia vs. LSU or Ohio State vs. Southern California or any other combination of SEC and Big Ten games you can imagine. 

ESPN is paying for Florida State and Clemson football in the ACC media rights deal, and to a lesser extent, Miami and as many Notre Dame games as it can get. FSU and Clemson feel as though the rest of the ACC earns off their brands, and that’s a legitimate argument. 

But Vanderbilt and the Mississippi schools (among others) earn off SEC blue bloods, and Purdue, Indiana and Rutgers (among others) earn off Big Ten blue bloods. 

That’s a partnership. 

While football is the fuel, there are other benefits of conference partnership (at the top of the list, scheduling for every other sport) that hold critical value to an efficient engine. 

If and until college football decides to break away from the rest of college sports and become a quasi-professional league of 50-60 teams that can afford it, this is the conference affiliation setup moving forward. 

That the ACC has agreed on a revenue distribution model based on television viewership – a big get for Florida State, Clemson, Miami and North Carolina – is remarkable in its generosity. 

The ACC didn’t have to do anything. They have the contract on their side, a contract Florida State twice signed and learned after months and millions in legal wrangling, couldn’t be broken. 

The only incentive the ACC had to get a deal done with its wayward schools was protecting its brand. Meanwhile, Florida State and Clemson didn’t have a landing spot even if each paid an estimated half a billion dollars in financial obligations to leave the ACC.

All three were damaging their brands with each argument in court, and only one had leverage.

This is what happens when you bring fantasy to a gun fight. 

Matt Hayes is the senior national college football writer for USA TODAY Sports Network. Follow him on X at @MattHayesCFB.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Live Fast Motorsports has a new driver for their NASCAR Cup Series car, and it’s a veteran motor sports racer and a woman.

Katherine Legge, 44, will make her debut in the series this Sunday at Phoenix Raceway in the Shriners Children’s 500, becoming the 17th woman ever to compete in a Cup race. Legge will drive the No. 78 DROPLiGHT Chevrolet Camaro.

This will also be the first time in seven years that a woman has competed in the NASCAR Cup Series, with Danica Patrick last making an appearance in 2018.

‘I don’t want to just be a female driver for the sake of ticking a diversity box, right?’ said Legge. ‘I want to be there on merit, and I want to be a good example for everybody that’s coming up behind me.’ She continued, ‘I have to prove competence at the end of the day, right?  Don’t think anybody expects me to go out and set the world on fire and be competitive because it’s the most competitive championship in the world. I just don’t want to make any mistakes and look silly or look incapable. I think the competitiveness will come with experience.’

Live Fast Motorsports, co-owned by driver B.J. McLeod and wife Jessica McLeod, field a part-time entry in the Cup Series. B.J. McLeod finished 22nd driving the No. 78 car at Atlanta, but he failed to qualify for the season-opening Daytona 500 and did not compete in the most recent race at Circuit of the Americas. With only 37 entries slated for Phoenix, Legge is assured of a starting spot on Sunday.

What to know about Legge’s motor sports career and women in NASCAR:

Katherine Legge’s auto racing career

Legge, who was born in Guildford, England, has five starts in the NASCAR Xfinity Series, most recently in 2023 when she recorded her best finish: 14th at Road America in Elkhart Lake, Wisconsin. In February, she finished 39th in the ARCA Menards Series’ Ride the ‘Dente race at Daytona International Speedway.

Legge is most well-known, however, as an IndyCar driver, competing in 19 races in the NTT IndyCar Series across four seasons (2012, 2013, 2023 and 2024) and 28 in CART (2006 and 2007), earned a combined seven top-10s.

She has raced in the legendary Indianapolis 500 four times, and in 2023, she set the record for the fastest-ever qualifying time by a woman.

Legge’s biggest success has come as a sports car driver. She has competed in 92 IMSA Weathertech SportsCar Championship races sine 2014, winning four times and scoring 11 podium finishes.

NASCAR cited Legge’s recent participation on ‘high-speed ovals’ in approving her to race in the Cup Series.

When was the last time a woman competed in NASCAR Cup Series?

Danica Patrick was the last woman to compete in the NASCAR Cup Series.

Her final race was the 2018 Daytona 500, where she finished 35th. In total, Patrick made 191 Cup starts between 2012 and 2018, amassing seven top-10 finishes in that span. Twice, Patrick finished top-25 in the NASCAR Cup Series standings, finishing 24th in both 2015 and 2016.

Sixteen female drivers have run at least one race in the Cup Series, including Hall of Famer Janet Guthrie, who drove in 33 races between 1976-80. The NASCAR Hall of Fame awarded Guthrie the Landmark Award in 2024.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The controversial non-call when Gervonta ‘Tank’ Davis took a knee during his fight against Lamont Roach Jr. Saturday is under review by the New York State Athletic Commission (NYSAC), the NYSAC said in a statement issued Monday.

‘A technical issue” may have prevented the commission from acting during the fight at Barclays Center in Brooklyn, New York, according to the statement.

The bout ended in a majority draw, and the critical moment could have swung the outcome in Roach’s favor.

That incident occurred in the ninth round when Davis dropped to a knee and headed back to his corner. Referee Steve Willis started a mandatory 10-count before allowing Davis to resume fighting without penalty — after Davis got his eyes wiped with a towel.

Davis later said he took a knee and headed to the corner because he had grease in his eye, the result of getting his hair done two days before the fight.

Ruling it a knockdown would have led to a point deduction for Davis and presumably changed the outcome of the fight.

‘During the round in question, following the commission’s request for the replay video, there was a technical issue preventing the commission from receiving it within the allotted time for review,’ the statement read. ‘Therefore, the referee’s in-ring decision was relied upon and the fight continued. The commission is dedicated to preserving the integrity of combative sports and is committed to working with all promotions and production teams on behalf of the athletes, officials and fans to ensure technical issues do not occur in the future that prevent delivery of ringside instant replay feeds to the commission’s officials when needed.’

The judges scored the 12-round fight 115-113 (in favor of Davis), 114-114, 114-114.

Davis (30-1-1, 28 KOs) was a heavy favorite entering the fight against Roach (25-1-2, 10 KOs).

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Colorado football coach Deion Sanders delivered a stern message to his team Monday about penalties, Band-Aids and earrings – a lecture designed to grab his players’ attention about something they’ve sometimes lacked in his first two seasons.

Discipline.

The Buffaloes committed the third-most penalties in the nation in 2023 (107) and the most in the Big 12 Conference in 2024 (100). He reminded his team about it Monday after returning to campus in Boulder following some time away in Texas.

“Last in the conference in penalties, right?” Sanders said to his team, as documented on Well Off Media, a YouTube channel run by his eldest son Deion Jr. “So that means no discipline, right?”

Sanders then singled out an unidentified player who apparently had showed up for the team workout wearing bandages over his earrings. Sanders has prohibited earrings while in uniform and during meetings.

“We got one cat out here with Band-Aids over his ears,” Sanders said. “What that mean? That means `I’m gonna wear my earrings, but I’m gonna put a Band-Aid over them, because I ain’t gonna listen to y’all because I ain’t got no discipline.’ Does that mean that? What that mean? What that mean? That mean you gonna do you right? Forget us. Anybody else out here with earrings in? Anybody else besides one dude?”

Sanders gave the player a warning, telling him he’d be on the “first thing smoking” if he did it again – a reference to transportation out of town.

“Come out here like that again, please,” Sanders told him. “I promise you you’ll be on the first thing smoking. You got that?”

“Yes sir,” the player replied.

“Discipline,” Sanders said. “Discipline.”

The Buffs finished 9-4 in Sanders’ second season last year and will begin the third spring practice season under him March 11. They begin the 2025 season Aug. 30 at home against Georgia Tech.

Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. Email: bschrotenb@usatoday.com

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The facts remain the same as they were on the day Pete Rose was permanently banned from baseball.

Pete Rose bet on the game.

Pete Rose bet on the game while he was playing and managing.

Pete Rose bet on his own team while he was playing and managing.

There is ample evidence to support this, and Rose himself acknowledged he sold out the game he supposedly loved.  

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

“My actions, which I thought were benign, call the integrity of the game into question,’ he wrote in his 2004 autobiography.

That, and only that, is what Major League Baseball commissioner Rob Manfred should consider as he reportedly weighs a request from Rose’s family to reinstate the all-time hits leader so he can be eligible for the Hall of Fame. If Manfred is actually entertaining the idea — and given his indifference to the game’s institutions, it wouldn’t be a surprise — he ought to draft his resignation letter right now because he’ll have stripped baseball of all credibility.

At one point, Manfred recognized that, telling the Baseball Writers Association of America in 2023 that Rose had violated “what is sort of rule one in baseball.”

“The consequences of that are clear in the rule,” Manfred said then. “The rules are different for players. It’s part of the responsibility that comes with the privilege of being a major league player.’

Nothing about that has changed. Neither should Rose’s banishment.

No doubt Manfred is feeling pressure from President Donald Trump, who said on social media Saturday that he would pardon Rose and criticized his exclusion from the Hall of Fame. But given that Trump incited the Jan. 6 insurrection, has 34 felony convictions for falsifying business records and was found by a civil jury to have sexually abused a woman, he’s not exactly the best person to be doling out lessons in moral clarity.

If Manfred caves, he’ll be betraying the game just like Rose did.

What keeps MLB (for now), the NFL and every other major professional sport from being the WWE is fans believe in their legitimacy. There might be grousing about the calls Patrick Mahomes gets or the way the ping-pong balls fall for the NBA draft lottery but, deep down, fans know that the games they’re watching are real and not staged. They know Shohei Ohtani’s brilliance isn’t choreographed and Paul Skenes’ dominance isn’t manufactured.

That is not a small thing. The leagues can command billions in media rights deals, ticket sales and all the like because fans are confident they’re not being had. When they shell out to go to a game or pay for that streaming service so they can watch a playoff game or buy the jersey of their favorite player, they do so with the assurance that the outcome hasn’t been pre-determined. That a fix was not in.

All of that is undermined if there’s tacit approval for gambling on the game by anyone who is directly involved in it. It doesn’t matter that Rose was banished 35 years ago or that he died last year. If Manfred erases the bright line that Bart Giamatti set in banning Rose, what’s to stop someone else from stepping over it? Or the public from assuming players are?

As NFL commissioner Roger Goodell told Calvin Ridley in banning the receiver for a year for gambling, “Your actions put the integrity of the game at risk, threatened to damage public confidence in professional football and potentially undermined the reputations of your fellow players throughout the NFL.”

It’s true that MLB, like the other pro leagues, has cozied up to the gaming industry in recent years as sports betting becomes pervasive in American society. But the hypocrisy of that is a debate for another day.

The question for Manfred is whether the sanctity of the game means anything. By gambling on baseball, Rose put that integrity at risk and jeopardized the very foundation of the game. He was deserving of a lifetime ban then, and he’s still deserving of it now.

Follow USA TODAY Sports columnist Nancy Armour on social media @nrarmour.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The WrestleMania 41 picture is taking shape following the stunning Elimination Chamber and Monday Night Raw.

All four main championship matches for WWE’s spectacle are set, as the last domino to fall was the Women’s World Championship match on Monday between title-holder Rhea Ripley and Iyo Sky. Sky stunned the WWE world by capturing the title, and she has an opponent awaiting her in Las Vegas in Bianca Belair, who won the opportunity on Saturday.

The other match recently determined was for the Undisputed WWE Championship, which will see Cody Rhodes take on John Cena. The bout pits two faces of a generation, but the build-up for it took a massive turn after Cena turned heel and attacked Rhodes in one of the biggest shockers in wrestling history.

Of course, plenty more matches will be added to the two-day event in the coming weeks, but with the ones with the biggest implications set, here’s a look at the WrestleMania card with less than seven weeks to go.

WrestleMania 41 match card

Undisputed WWE Championship match: Cody Rhodes (c) vs. John Cena
WWE Women’s Championship match: Tiffany Stratton (c) vs. Charlotte Flair
World Heavyweight Championship match: Gunther (c) vs. Jey Uso
Women’s World Championship match: Iyo Sky (c) vs. Bianca Belair

When is WrestleMania 41?

WrestleMania 41 will take place on April 19-20 at Allegiant Stadium in Las Vegas.

When are WrestleMania 41 championship matches?

Which night the championship matches take place haven’t been announced yet, as the complete weekend card won’t be determined until all matches have been determined. However, one certainty is the Undisputed WWE Championship match between Rhodes and Cena will take place Sunday night on April 20 as the top main event metch of WrestleMania 41.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

President Donald Trump is expected to showcase the avalanche of activity during his first six weeks in the White House when he heads to Capitol Hill on Tuesday to deliver a primetime address to Congress and the nation.

‘Best Opening Month of any President in history,’ Trump wrote in a social media post last week, as he touted his accomplishments – many of them controversial – since his Jan. 20 inauguration.

Trump, on the eve of his first major speech to Congress during his second presidential administration, vowed that ‘TOMORROW NIGHT WILL BE BIG. I WILL TELL IT LIKE IT IS!’

However, the latest polls indicate Americans are divided on the job he’s done so far in the White House.

Trump stands at 45% approval and 49% disapproval in one of the latest polls, a Marist College for PBS News and NPR. Additionally, a CNN survey, also conducted last week, put the president’s approval rating at 48%, with 52% disapproving. 

Meanwhile, Trump’s approval ratings were slightly above water in other new polls, including one for CBS News that was also in the field in recent days and released over the weekend.

With the president an extremely polarizing and larger-than-life politician, it is no surprise that the latest polls indicate a massive partisan divide over Trump’s performance. The surveys spotlight that the vast majority of Democrats give the president a big thumbs down, while Republicans overwhelmingly approve of the job he is doing in office.

While Americans are split on Trump’s performance, the approval ratings for his second term are an improvement from his first tour of duty, when he started 2017 in negative territory and remained underwater throughout his four-year tenure in the White House.

One reason – Trump nowadays enjoys rock solid Republican support.

‘He never had support among Democrats in the first administration, but he also had some trouble with Republicans,’ Daron Shaw, a politics professor and chair at the University of Texas, noted.

Shaw, who serves as a member of the Fox News Decision Team and the Republican partner on the Fox News Poll, emphasized ‘that’s one acute difference between 2017 and 2025. The party’s completely solidified behind him.’

Trump has been moving at warp speed during his opening six weeks back in the White House with a flurry of executive orders and actions. His moves not only fulfilled some of his major campaign trail promises, but also allowed the returning president to flex his executive muscles, quickly put his stamp on the federal government, make major cuts to the federal workforce and also settle some long-standing grievances.

Trump as of Monday had signed 81 executive orders since his Jan. 20 inauguration, according to a count from Fox News, which far surpasses the rate of any recent presidential predecessors during their first weeks in office.

Expect Trump in his address to Congress and the nation to showcase the moves – many of them controversial – that he has taken so far. That includes a high-profile crackdown on immigration, threatening tariffs on major trading partners, including Canada and Mexico, and upending the nation’s international agenda and freezing foreign aid.

‘It’s been a flooding-of-the-zone here every day, often multiple times a day,’ Lee Miringoff, director of the Marist Institute for Public Opinion, told Fox News Digital. ‘We’re just seeing a lot of things happening with little time for the public to digest. The net effect of it all is there’s a sense, on the part of the public, that some things are moving just a little too fast.’

While an improvement over his first term, Trump’s approval ratings are lower six weeks into his presidency than any of his recent predecessors in the White House.

Shaw noted that neither Trump nor former President Joe Biden ‘started out with overwhelming approval. This is not like the honeymoon period that we historically expect presidents to enjoy….Historically the other side gives you a little bit of leeway when you first come in. That just doesn’t happen anymore.’

Biden’s approval rating hovered in the low to mid 50s during the first six months of his single term as president, with his disapproval in the upper 30s to the low to mid 40s. 

However, Biden’s numbers sank into negative territory in the late summer and autumn of 2021, in the wake of his much-criticized handling of the turbulent U.S. exit from Afghanistan and amid soaring inflation and a surge of migrants crossing into the U.S. along the nation’s southern border with Mexico.

Biden’s approval ratings stayed underwater throughout the rest of his presidency.

‘He just got crippled and never recovered,’ Shaw said of Biden.

An average of all the most recent national polls indicates that Trump’s approval ratings are just above water. However, Trump has seen his numbers edge down slightly since returning to the White House in late January, when an average of his polls indicated the president’s approval rating in the low 50s and his disapproval in the mid 40s.

‘The honeymoon is over, and he’s actually governing, and that typically does bring numbers down,’ veteran political scientist Wayne Lesperance, the president of New Hampshire-based New England College, told Fox News Digital. ‘I expect the numbers to continue to slip as the changes in Washington really do begin to impact people’s everyday lives.’

Shaw noted that Trump’s ‘rating on the economy is about minus four, which is 25 points better than Biden. He’s above water on immigration. His best issue right now is crime. He’s plus ten on crime.’

However, Shaw emphasized that inflation, the issue that helped propel Trump back into the White House, remains critical to the president’s political fortunes.

‘If prices remain high, he’s going to have trouble,’ Shaw warned.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Former Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., is fundraising off Friday’s explosive Oval Office meeting last week that left Europe and other U.S. allies shaken and frustrated.

Cheney’s group, Our Great Task, emailed donors suggesting that President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance and Department of Government Efficiency leader Elon Musk were ‘tools of the Kremlin.’

‘Too many leaders in Washington are afraid to speak the truth, afraid to stand up for the fundamental values and institutions that safeguard our Republic. And now, Donald Trump is attempting to put America on Putin’s side as he continues his brutal assault on Ukraine,’ the message read.

‘Here’s some truth: Putin invaded Ukraine. NATO is the most successful military alliance in history. Since 1945, American leadership has ensured freedom and security for ourselves and millions of others around the world. Together with our allies, we defeated the Soviet Union — an evil empire that had to build gulags and walls to keep its own people in.’

She accused Trump of ‘appeasement’ tactics with Russia’s strongman president, Vladimir Putin.

‘Donald Trump, JD Vance and Elon Musk have made clear who they are. Only naive fools—or tools of the Kremlin—would abandon NATO, side with Russia, and demand Ukraine surrender in the face of Putin’s brutal aggression,’ her email continued.

‘We all have an obligation at this moment to be the guardrails of democracy, to speak truth to power to defend the rule of law, American freedom, and the Constitution itself.’

It ended with the appeal, ‘Please join me today — donate now to help elect leaders of courage and honor, to show that the determination of those who love freedom is greater than the dedication of those who would destroy it.’

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was kicked out of the White House by Trump’s top foreign affairs officials on Friday after an intense meeting where he and U.S. leaders traded verbal jabs in front of dozens of journalists and the rest of the world.

He had been in Washington to sign an anticipated deal giving the U.S. access to profits from Kyiv’s rare earth mineral deposits. 

Instead, the meeting devolved into Zelenskyy and Vance talking over each other, with Trump accusing Zelenskyy of toying with World War III.

The Ukrainian leader wanted more assurances of security guarantees beyond the vague contours of the deal, which Trump officials criticized.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on ‘Sunday Morning Futures’ over the weekend of Zelenskyy’s demands, ‘It’s just ridiculous. His requests were ridiculous. They were not reasonable.’

There is still no public resolution as of Monday afternoon, but the sit-down fractured the continuously shrinking bloc of Republicans who support continued aid to Ukraine.

Rep. Don Bacon, R-Neb., compared Trump and Vance to Democrats of the late 20th century who favored Soviet appeasement and said the U.S. was now ‘on the wrong side’ of the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

Others, like Reps. Mike Lawler, R-N.Y., and Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa., lamented that Russia came out the winner in the fight but did not place blame on Trump.

And Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., known as both a top Trump ally and Ukraine supporter, praised the president’s handling of the situation and called on Zelenskyy to step away from leadership.

When Fox News Digital reached out for comment on Cheney’s email, White House spokesperson Anna Kelly simply replied, ‘Who?’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The advocacy group Concord Coalition has tapped former Rep. Carolyn Bourdeaux, D-Ga., to lead its new ‘fiscal responsibility’ group aimed at lowering the country’s $36 trillion in national debt. 

Concord Action said they will lead a grassroots effort to achieve a ‘sustainable’ national budget. In an exclusive interview with Fox News Digital ahead of the launch, Bourdeaux, the group’s president and executive director, previewed Concord Action’s plan to pressure Congress to balance the budget. 

‘We are getting ready to launch Concord Action, which will complement the Concord Coalition and is intended to build on all the grassroots energy out there around the debt and deficit, to try to start moving the needle in Congress to bring fiscal responsibility and fiscal discipline to Washington,’ Bourdeaux said. 

Bordeaux, who represented Georgia’s 7th Congressional District for one term beginning in 2021, worked on bipartisan legislation to tackle the national budget crisis during her tenure.She was a member of the Blue Dog Task Force on Fiscal Responsibility and Government Reform, a national group that says it’s committed to reducing the federal deficit through bipartisan policy development.

Georgia had a Republican-led legislature while Bourdeaux led Georgia’s Senate Budget and Evaluation Office from 2007 to 2010. Bourdeaux played an advisory role to the Georgia State Senate in balancing the budget during the 2008 economic downturn.

‘I was director of Georgia’s Senate Budget and Evaluation Office during the Great Recession,’ Bourdeaux said. ‘I helped Georgia balance its budget during the worst fiscal crisis in modern memory. One message coming out of that is it can be done. I was working largely with the Republican leadership to balance the budget. But when we did that, those budgets passed by broad and bipartisan majorities. So this can be done through our regular democratic processes. I want to bring that sensibility to what we’re working on here in Concord.’

Bordeaux said to expect a digital campaign with a newsletter to get the public involved in Concord Action’s grassroots efforts. There will also be a town hall element to build energy on the ground. 

A 2024 Fox News Voter Analysis found the economy was the top issue for Americans, with 4 in 10 voters saying inflation was the most important factor in their vote. Voters had a negative view of the economy, with almost two-thirds rating the economy as not good, 40%, or downright poor, 24%. 

As the country approaches another government shutdown deadline and Congress begins budget negotiations for fiscal 2026, Bordeaux said it’s a necessary time to launch Concord Action. 

‘I think the issue of the debt and deficit is particularly salient to everyone,’ Bordeaux said. ‘We’ve obviously just been through inflation. We’ve seen interest rates rise. So it really is top of mind for lots of Americans right now.’

Concord Action said they will pressure Congress to stop adding to the federal debt and create a ‘sustainable budget’ through ‘fiscal responsibility.’

‘We just experienced some pretty serious inflation, and it was driven in part by the deficit in the growing debt,’ Bordeaux said. 

‘We are $36 trillion in debt right now just based on our current trajectory. The Congressional Budget Office thinks we will add another $25 trillion to that,’ she said. ‘We are spending more on just the interest on debt than we spend on national defense, more than we even spend on Medicare. It’s really starting to put a lot of pressure on a lot of big priorities that we have for this country. It is extremely important that we address this now.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President Donald Trump will make the first address of his second term to a joint session of Congress on Tuesday. His first six weeks were dominated by ongoing executive actions, redefining international relations and government efficiency efforts. Political strategists shared with Fox News Digital what to expect from Trump’s big speech. 

Republican strategists say Trump should tell the story of his first six weeks, drawing contrast with former President Joe Biden’s administration. Meanwhile, Democrats are focused on what they say is Trump’s failure to lower prices. 

Sen. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., is tasked with the party’s rebuttal. 

‘Trump is going to contrast himself with the previous administration. The previous administration was weak and directionless. No one knew who was in charge. No one really understood what the Biden administration stood for. There couldn’t be a more dramatic change from Biden to Trump,’ political columnist Kristin Tate said. 

Republicans say Trump should highlight the themes of his first six weeks and explain how his executive actions reflect his greater vision for the country. 

‘He needs to tell a story. He needs to weave in all the things he’s done, all this progress over the last month into a story and a theme and tell it,’ Republican strategist Matt Gorman said. ‘He did it really well during his inauguration. It’s a status update. I think it’s really important that he weaves all of these actions and all the things he’s done into one big story about what it means for us as Americans but also what it means for his vision for the next three and four years.’

Republican strategists told Fox News Digital that Trump should tell Americans how he has already delivered on key campaign promises, including slowing illegal border crossings, reversing Biden’s green energy policies, his ‘de-weaponization’ of the Justice Department and his work to eliminate DEI.

‘I expect, and he will, take a victory lap on some of those items because it represents promises made, promises kept. But then he needs to cast the forward-facing vision: Where do we go from here? What are the big-ticket legislative items? How do we get past this legislative debate over one big bill or two separate initiatives and focus on what those bills contain, because time is fleeting,’ said Republican strategist Colin Reed.

Reed said Trump should focus on ‘the legislative priorities and go beyond just the executive orders.’ And as leaders grapple with the fallout of Trump’s heated meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Friday, Reed said Trump could reset the narrative on Tuesday night. 

‘For everything that’s happened over the last few days on foreign policy, I think it’s an opportunity for him to reset the narrative on what he wants to do domestically,’ Reed said. ‘The events of Friday are going to obviously cast a shadow over tomorrow. But look, President Trump is in many ways dealing with the leftover mess [of] his predecessor on the global front. In his mind, the issues he’s facing, the challenges that happened in Ukraine would not have happened on his watch. He still has the residue of the Biden administration to deal with. That’s going to be an overarching narrative for the foreseeable future,’ Reed added.

To contrast Trump’s speech, the Democratic National Committee argues that Trump is failing to deliver on his campaign promise to lower costs and boost the economy. DNC Chair Ken Martin has been traveling the country leading up to Tuesday night, telling Americans about the chaos Trump and Elon Musk are creating throughout the U.S. 

During Trump’s fifth address to a joint session of Congress, Democrats and Republicans agreed that he is unlikely to invite new Americans into the fold. 

‘He’s president for everyone, but I don’t expect Democrats to suddenly have a change of heart. They’re trying to figure out less what they think about Trump and more what they’re going to do about him. And they don’t have an answer for the latter at all. They’re very much in an era of confusion right now in their party, trying to figure out what they stand for and how they’re going to adjust to actually get a majority of voters, again, just to support them,’ Gorman added. 

Brad Bannon, president of Bannon Communications Research, said Trump has done very little in his first few weeks to appeal to anyone beyond his ‘base MAGA vote.’

‘I don’t see any sign that he’s trying to appeal to anybody who didn’t vote for him last year,’ Bannon said. ‘He has control of Congress, a compliant Supreme Court. It seems to me everything he’s done … has been to appeal to the people who already support him, and he’s not making any effort to reach out. I would be very surprised if he does Tuesday night.’

Tate, however, urged Trump to extend an olive branch to moderate Democrats during his speech.

‘I even believe that he is going to reach out across the aisle and throw some compliments to some of the more moderate Democrats. He really needs to do this. Sen. [John] Fetterman from Pennsylvania would be a great first choice to highlight as a Democrat who is not blinded by hateful partisanship but is rather looking to find common ground to help everyday Americans,’ she said.

‘Trump has a lot to be proud of, and rest assured he will shine a light on all of those grand achievements which have taken place in such a short period of time, and he is going to paint a grand vision for the future of America, including not just what America represents, but what it can be at its finest,’ Tate continued. 

Trump has the headlining speech Tuesday night, but Democrats also have an opportunity with Slotkin’s response to frame their own message about what the Democratic Party stands for. Bannon said Trump won because Americans believed the country was headed in the wrong direction. 

‘Democrats would be making a mistake if their response to Trump is just trying to preserve the status quo,’ he said. ‘I think Democrats have to be bold and go bold. Not only a need to defend the worthiness of programs that Trump is arbitrarily cutting, but they need to go beyond that and define the Democratic Party version of what they would do to change the status quo. That’s Trump’s biggest appeal. He appeals to people who are unhappy with the status quo, and Democrats will fall into a trap if they just say, ‘Well, we have to preserve what we already have.”

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS