Archive

2025

Browsing

A first-term House Republican and military veteran is eyeing a bid for Sen. Thom Tillis’ North Carolina Senate seat after the GOP lawmaker announced he would not run for re-election, a source close to the congressman told Fox News Digital.

Rep. Pat Harrigan, R-N.C., a former Army Special Forces Officer who was deployed to Afghanistan, was elected to represent North Carolina’s 10th congressional district in November 2024.

It comes after President Donald Trump pledged to find a primary challenger for Tillis over the senator’s decision to vote ‘no’ on a key procedural hurdle to advance the commander-in-chief’s ‘big, beautiful bill.’

Harrigan was elected to replace former House Financial Services Committee Chairman Patrick McHenry, R-N.C.

He’s among the first to express interest in Tillis’ seat in what could shape up into a crowded Republican primary race ahead of the 2026 midterms.

Rep. Tim Moore, R-N.C., another first-term House Republican, is also considering a bid for Tillis’ Senate seat, a source familiar with his plans told Fox News Digital.

Moore is the former speaker of the North Carolina state House of Representatives.

Tillis revealed he would not run for re-election in a bombshell statement on Sunday afternoon, criticizing the current political environment.

‘Too many elected officials are motivated by pure raw politics who really don’t give a damn about the people they promised to represent on the campaign trail. After they get elected, they don’t bother to do the hard work to research the policies they seek to implement and understand the consequences those policies could have on that young adult living in a trailer park, struggling to make ends meet,’ Tillis said.

‘As many of my colleagues have noticed over the last year, and at times even joked about, I haven’t exactly been excited about running for another term. That is true since the choice is between spending another six years navigating the political theatre and partisan gridlock in Washington or spending that time with the love of my life Susan, our two children, three beautiful grandchildren, and the rest of our extended family back home.’

The statement came on the second continuous day that senators are wrestling with the ‘one big, beautiful bill,’ a vast piece of legislation advancing Trump’s agenda on tax, immigration, energy, defense, and the national debt.

Tillis said he had objections to the bill’s spending cuts targeting Medicaid, arguing they would be damaging to rural communities and hospitals in North Carolina.

The senate voted 51-49 to begin debate on the legislation late on Saturday. Tillis and Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., were the only two Republicans to vote ‘no.’

Trump posted on Saturday, ‘Numerous people have come forward wanting to run in the primary against ‘Senator Thom’ Tillis. I will be meeting with them over the coming weeks, looking for someone who will properly represent the Great People of North Carolina and, so importantly, the United States of America. Thank you for your attention to this matter!’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Senate Democrats’ delay tactic has finally come to a close, but Senate Republicans are still a ways out from voting on President Donald Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill.’

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., forced clerks on the Senate floor to read aloud the entirety of the Senate GOP’s version of Trump’s megabill on Saturday. In all, reading the 940-page legislative behemoth bled well into Sunday and took nearly 16 hours.

Schumer announced that he would be forcing the clerks to read the bill ahead of the ultimately successful, albeit drama-filled, procedural vote. And after forcing the reading of the bill, he said on X, ‘Republicans are squirming.’

‘I know damn well they haven’t read the bill, so we’re going to make them,’ he said.

It’s an oft-unused strategy Schumer and Senate Democrats deployed as part of the pain campaign against Republicans, who have iced them out from having input on the president’s agenda.

The last time Senate clerks were forced to read the entirety of a bill on the floor was in 2021, when Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., similarly objected and demanded that former President Joe Biden’s American Rescue Act be read aloud.

Now with the reading dispensed, lawmakers will trudge onward with 20 hours of debate evenly divided between both Democrats and Republicans. Senate Democrats are expected to squeeze every second from their allotted time, while Senate Republicans will likely only use a couple of hours at most.

That time on the GOP side will be used by those already critical of the bill, like Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. While his support for final passage is unlikely, he is not the only headache that Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., may have to worry about.

Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., is unlikely to change his mind and vote for final passage – despite Trump bashing him on social media and threatening a primary challenger – unless substantial changes are made to the Medicaid adjustments in the bill.

Tillis further steeled his resolve against the bill when he announced his retirement from Washington at the end of his term, opting against a likely grueling primary battle. 

Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, who supported the legislation through the first test, also wants to see real changes to the Medicaid provider tax rate.

Then there are the fiscal hawks who held the vote hostage on Saturday night as they negotiated with Thune, with the help of Vice President JD Vance, to get an amendment to make changes to the federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP), which is the amount that the federal government pays for Medicaid to each state.

Changes to FMAP are not popular among most Senate Republicans, save for fiscal hawks looking for steeper cuts in the colossal bill. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Senate Republicans and Democrats remain divided on the Medicaid issue hours after President Donald Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ passed a key Senate vote Saturday night.

Sen. Jim Banks, R-Ind., and Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., both appeared on ‘Fox News Sunday’ to discuss Trump’s legislation in the wake of the 51-49 vote.

Banks argued that the Medicaid reforms would only affect certain people.

‘The Medicaid reforms would affect able-bodied Americans, those who are sitting at home who can work, who don’t work, who don’t have a sick kid or a sick mom, they shouldn’t receive Medicaid without working,’ he said. ‘And on top of that, the bill would take Medicaid away from illegal immigrants.’

Coons conceded there are states that are using their state funding to provide healthcare ‘for people who are undocumented,’ though argued that Trump’s $900 billion cuts to the program ‘are not about throwing people off of Medicaid who are not here legally.’

‘They are about imposing more and more requirements on the beneficiaries of Medicaid,’ the Democrat said.

Banks argued that taxes for everyday Americans will go up if the bill doesn’t get passed.

‘If we don’t pass this bill, everyone’s taxes on average will go up $2,000 a household, and that’s not fair to the regular Americans who work hard every day,’ he said.

Lingering concerns in both chambers about Medicaid — specifically the Medicaid provider tax rate and the effect of direct payments to states — energy tax credits, the state and local tax (SALT) deduction and others proved to be pain points that threatened the bill’s survival.

Coons, however, said that Americans who don’t believe the Democrats’ standpoint should listen to Sen. Tom Tillis, R-N.C., who, along with Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., voted against the bill.

‘Don’t believe me. Listen to Senator Tom Tillis,’ Coons said. ‘He’s been saying loudly this bill is a bad deal for the middle class. It’ll raise healthcare costs and throw millions off of needed health care.’

On Sunday morning, Trump slammed both Tillis and Paul on social media. 

Hours later, Tillis announced he would not seek reelection.

Following the vote, Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., demanded that the text of the behemoth bill be read aloud before debates begin. After 14 hours, Senate clerks were still about 120 pages short of finishing reading aloud the 940-page text.

Once the reading is finished, the two parties will each get about 10 hours to debate on the bill. 

The timeline puts a likely Senate vote-a-rama on the bill in the early morning hours of Monday. A final passage vote could happen between late morning and late Monday night.

Fox News Digital’s Alex Miller and Fox News’ Tyler Olson contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

ATLANTA — One of the biggest FIFA Club World Cup matches is took place earlier today, featuring an all-time great and a reigning champion. However, the results were not as tight as fans were hoping.

Lionel Messi and Inter Miami from Major League Soccer faced Champions League winners Paris Saint-Germain in the Club World Cup round-of-16 match at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta, Georgia. It was the biggest match played by an MLS club in the league’s 30-year history, and it came against the European champions. U.S. fans were already salivating at the possibility of being able to hold something over European soccer fans’ heads. That didn’t quite happen though.

As Lionel Messi faced his former squad, PSG seemed to be playing with purpose, opening the scoring quickly and laying constant pressure on Miami, pushing them out to a 4-0 lead in the first half. From then on, PSG took their foot off the gas, allowing Miami to get a few good chances, but ultimately never mounting much of a comeback.

Here’s everything that happened during the Inter Miami-PSG matchup.

FINAL: PSG 4 – 0 Inter Miami

This one was all PSG from the get-go. Although Inter Miami had a few solid chances in the second half, they were only after Paris Saint-Germain had taken a step back trying to hold their 4-0 lead.

The final ten minutes of the first half were devastating for Miami fans, as PSG put three goals on the board in quick succession, one of which was an own goal off the chest of Toto Aviles, who was only in the game to replace the injured Nick Allen.

Fans were hoping Miami could at least avoid the shutout, but after Miami’s best chance, a free kick from just outside the PSG box, was blocked away with ease, it was clear that Miami was out of their depth. PSG has been arguably the best team in the tournament so far, and their dominant run continued today. They’ve now outscored opponents in the Club World Cup a combined 11-0. That’s right. They’ve yet to be scored on. They’ll face the winner of Flamengo vs. Bayern Munich in the next round.

Miami free kick from just outside PSG box

With just three minutes to go, Miami earned their best chance of the game. After a foul from just outside the PSG penalty area, Messi was given a free kick and a solid look at the PSG net.

Sadly, that look didn’t amount to much. Messi’s shot bounced off a PSG defender in the front line. Donnarumma’s sheet remains clean as PSG looks ready to advance to the final eight.

Donnarumma with first tough save of the game

Miami has been much tougher in the second half, but they remain scoreless. Thankfully, they’ve had a few opportunities. In the 80′ minute, their best chance came when Messi was able to put a header on net. Unfortunately, PSG keeper Donnarumma was ready, stretching out his arms to make the save. PSG remains on top, 4-0.

Miami gets first good chance of game

Although it’s clear that PSG is taking their foot off the gas in the second half, making several substitutions taking out some of their best players from the first half, Miami is finally starting to cook.

Just four minutes into the second half, Messi has able to place a cross into the PSG penalty area for Luis Suarez. Unfortunately, the cross was intercepted by PSG keeper Donnarumma, but if that effort is any indication of Miami’s chances, perhaps they’ll be able to earn a goal or two before all is said and done.

PSG Goal: Hakimi (45+3′)

As if it wasn’t a big enough lead already, PSG finished off the first half with one final attack that resulted in another score. A shot off the crossbar, bounced right into the foot of Achraf Hakimi, who only had to tap the ball into the open net. Miami looks defeated, and have had fewer opportunities than PSG has goals. The game might already be out of reach, but Miami needs to figure something out to show that they are capable of even putting up a fight.

PSG leads 4-0 heading into halftime.

PSG Goal: Miami own goal, Aviles (45′)

The cracks are finally showing. After several close calls, Miami has surrendered two goals before the halftime break. This one was especially demoralizing though as it was an own goal off a PSG cross.

Even worse, the own goal came off the body of Toto Aviles, a replacement player for Noah Allen, who was injured earlier in this game.

PSG Goal: Joao Neves (39′)

PSG had been knocking on the door ever since their first goal of the game. A series of offsides, close clears, and constant attacks could only last so long. After a tremendous pass into Miami’s penalty area, PSG had a 4-on-3 and after a tremendous move inside from Fabian Ruiz, a quick pass into the middle for Joao Neves gave PSG a 2-0 lead. Miami keeper Ustari never stood a chance.

PSG’s back press causing massive problems for Miami

PSG has been pursuing the ball relentlessly, even when Miami is in possession and Miami has not been able to handle the press. The hard defense has caused massive problems for Miami, who’ve yet to touch the ball inside the PSG penalty area. In fact, PSG keeper Donnarumma has only had two touches so far in this game:

after a clear from Miami, Donnarumma came out to lightly pass the ball back to his outfield
A Miami cross that gently rolled into Donnarumma’s arms

Miami will need to find an answer to Paris Saint-Germain’s defensive tactics if they want to put up any sort of fight.

Yellow Card: Barcola, PSG (22′)

After another strong push from PSG, Miami keeper Ustari slipped on the field, but the referee called the fall on Barcola who was nearby as Ustari attempted to clear. Barcola was granted the first yellow card of the game. PSG still leads 1-0.

Inter Miami injury update

Inter Miami’s Noah Allen, one of the club’s best young defenders, is coming off with a hamstring injury in the 17th minute. It’s a big loss for Inter Miami vs. PSG, but Toto Aviles will replace him in the game. And barely a minute into his relief appearance, Aviles has picked up a yellow card for sliding in front of an offensive player.

PSG offsides prevents another score

Paris Saint-Germain has been hounding Miami all game. Most recently, PSG had another chance to score off a corner kick and even got the ball behind Miami keeper Ustari, but an offsides called the goal back. While PSG was clearly offsides, it’s still concerning for any Miami fan or Messi fan how close PSG came again already just 18 minutes into the contest.

PSG 1 – 0 Inter Miami

In just the sixth minute of the game, Inter Miami finds themselves in a 1-0 deficit. Off a free kick from just outside the Miami box, Joao Neves found the back of the net via a header off a beautiful cross. The ball slid under the outstretched right arm of the Miami keeper, putting the French squad up.

Messi, Inter Miami arrive to Atlanta for Club World Cup match

Lionel Messi, Luis Suarez and Inter Miami have entered the building.

What time is the Inter Miami-PSG match?

The match begins at noon ET (1 p.m. in Argentina, 6 p.m. in Paris.)

Where to watch Inter Miami-PSG match live stream link?

The match is available to live stream for free on DAZN.

Watch Inter Miami vs. Paris Saint-Germain live on DAZN

How to watch the Inter Miami-PSG match on TV in the US?

The match will be broadcast on TNT and TruTV in English; Univision and TUDN in Spanish.

Is Lionel Messi playing today? Inter Miami starting lineup

Yes, Messi will play. He was announced in Inter Miami’s starting lineup. It will be in his first match since his 38th birthday June 24.

Is Ousmane Dembélé playing today? PSG starting lineup

Dembélé, one of the frontrunners for this year’s Ballon d’Or as the world’s best player, is listed as a substitute for the match. He hasn’t played in the Club World Cup due to a quad injury.

Inter Miami vs. PSG score prediction

Paris Saint-Germain 3, Inter Miami 1: This may not look pretty for Lionel Messi’s side and Major League Soccer. But just getting to this point in the Club World Cup is valiant enough. Messi scores a goal, but Inter Miami is outclassed by the Champions League winners. — Safid Deen

Inter Miami vs. PSG betting odds

Inter Miami is the biggest underdog of any team in the Club World Cup round of 16. Here are the betting odds for the match, according to BetMGM:

Paris Saint-Germain: -550
Draw: +725
Inter Miami: +1250
Over/under: 3.5 goals

Why did Lionel Messi leave Paris Saint-Germain?

Messi’s two-year spell at PSG was complicated, particularly upon his return to Paris from the 2022 World Cup triumph – having led Argentina to victory over France in the final. Imagine having to live and work in the same country you just delivered heartbreak to. Fans voiced their displeasure with Messi, who was also suspended by the club in May 2023 for taking an unsanctioned trip to Saudi Arabia the day after a match.

When did Lionel Messi join Inter Miami?

Messi joined Inter Miami in July 2023, joining the MLS club co-owned by Jorge Mas, Jose Mas and soon-to-be Sir David Beckham.

Who does Inter Miami/PSG winner face in Club World Cup quarterfinals?

The winner of Sunday’s Inter Miami-PSG match will face the winner of Sunday’s 4 p.m. ET match between Bayern Munich (Germany) and Flamengo (Brazil).

How has Inter Miami performed in the Club World Cup?

Messi and Inter Miami won a match, and settled for a draw in two others during the Club World Cup group stage. But they were able to advance as a Group A runner-up. They beat FC Porto (Atlanta), and drew against Al-Ahly (Egypt) and Palmeiras (Brazil).

How has Paris Saint-Germain fared in the Club World Cup?

PSG won Group B of the tournament: They beat Atlético Madrid 4-0, lost 1-0 to Botafogo (Brazil), and beat the Seattle Sounders 2-0 during the group stage.

When is Lionel Messi’s birthday?

Messi turned 38 years old on June 24, 2025. He will turn 39 during World Cup 2026. Check out these photos from his birthday celebration last week:

Will Lionel Messi re-sign with Inter Miami?

Messi is under contract with Inter Miami through the 2025 MLS season. The club hopes he re-signs a contract extension to remain through, at least 2026. It’s possible Messi could sign a longer extension.

Will Lionel Messi play in the World Cup?

Messi has not yet declared whether he will play in the 2026 World Cup, co-hosted by the United States, Canada and Mexico. If he does, it would be his sixth World Cup and he would help Argentina defend its 2022 crown.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

ATLANTA — David Beckham says his right wrist is recovering well after having surgery to repair an old injury he sustained during his playing career.

Beckham wore a sling to elevate his heavily bandaged right forearm, while in attendance Sunday, June 29, for the FIFA Club World Cup match between Inter Miami, a team he co-owns, and Paris Saint-Germain, the last club he played for in 2013.

‘It’s an old injury that needed surgery, but it’s all good,’ Beckham said in an interview with DAZN before the match. ‘It’s all good.’

News of Beckham’s surgery was first shared in social media posts by his wife, Victoria, in the last week.

As for the Inter Miami-PSG match at Mercedes-Benz Stadium, Beckham said the contest raised some emotions.

‘To be honest, it’s quite an emotional match for me. Obviously, the team that we own is playing probably the best team in the world right now. And who would’ve thought?” Beckham said.

‘For me to finish my career in Paris, the way I did with this club, was very special. I only spent six months there, but it felt like 16 years.’

Beckham started his career with Manchester United, winning six Premier League titles with the English club. He also played for Real Madrid, the L.A. Galaxy in Major League Soccer, and AC Milan before his final year with Paris Saint-Germain.

He played 115 matches for England, including 59 games as captain. He is the only English player to score in three different World Cups.

Beckham, 50, is arguably the most famous sportsman in England’s history. He will be awarded a knighthood by King Charles III.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

SPIELBERG, Austria ― Max Verstappen suffered his first retirement of the Formula One season on Sunday, June 28, after a collision with Mercedes’ Kimi Antonelli on the opening lap of Red Bull’s home Austrian Grand Prix.

Lando Norris won the race from pole position in a McLaren one-two after fending off championship-leading teammate Oscar Piastri.

The four-time world champion Verstappen had started seventh on the grid, with Italian rookie Antonelli ninth, at a circuit where he has won a record five times.

Antonelli, who clearly caused the Turn Three collision, also retired and the safety car was deployed.

‘I’m out, I got hit like crazy,’ Verstappen, third in the championship going into the race, said over the team radio.

‘Sorry about that, I locked the rear,’ Antonelli told his team.

The retirement ended a run of 31 grands prix in the points for the Dutch driver, whose fans throng in their thousands to the Red Bull Ring.

The race had started later than scheduled after Carlos Sainz’s Williams was stuck on the grid as cars moved away for the formation lap.

Sainz eventually got going and returned to the pitlane, where his car’s brakes caught fire before being extinguished by mechanics with smoke still billowing out as he was pushed back and into retirement.

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fast.Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Nearly all the universal injunctions blocking President Donald Trump’s agenda were issued by just five of the nation’s 94 federal district courts, a statistic that the administration said lays bare the Left’s strategy of lawfare.

Trump and Attorney General Pam Bondi spoke at a news conference Friday just after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 6-3 decision that district judges, the lowest-level jurists in the federal system, cannot impose nationwide injunctions. Bondi noted that out of 40 nationwide injunctions issued since Trump retook the White House, 35 came out of five districts perceived as liberal.

‘Active liberal… judges have used these injunctions to block virtually all of President Trump’s policies,’ Bondi said. ‘No longer. No longer.’

Nationwide injunctions are court orders that prevent the federal government from implementing a policy or law. They have a cascading effect impacting the entire country, not just the parties involved in the court case, and have been used against the Trump administration at a vastly higher rate than previous administrations. 

Trump’s first administration faced 64 injunctions out of the total 127 nationwide injunctions issued since 1963, Fox News Digital previously reported. There were 32 injunctions issued against the Bush, Obama and Biden administrations collectively since 2001, meaning the first Trump administration was on the receiving end of double the amount of nationwide injunctions than his two predecessors and successor combined, according to an April 2024 edition of the Harvard Law Review. 

Bondi pointed to the five district courts – Maryland, Washington, D.C., Massachusetts, California and Washington state – calling it ‘crazy’ that such an overwhelming number of nationwide injunctions originated in those jurisdictions. Conservatives have accused the Left of bringing their cases in liberal judicial districts stocked with Democratic-appointed judges.

Fox News Digital looked at the five district courts and how judges in them have issued sweeping injunctions that have hampered Trump’s federal policies. 

U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland

The Supreme Court agreed this year to take up three consolidated cases involving nationwide injunctions handed down by federal district judges in Maryland, Massachusetts and Washington state related to Trump’s birthright citizenship executive order. 

The U.S. District Court for Maryland was one of the courts nationwide that issued an injunction against Trump’s January executive order to end the practice of granting birthright citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants. Maryland U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman issued the injunction in February following a lawsuit brought by five pregnant illegal immigrant women in the state, which was followed by other district judges in Washington state and Massachusetts ordering injunctions of their own. 

The Maryland district court also issued a separate preliminary injunction against the Trump administration’s executive orders ending federal support for diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) programs in February. 

The court recently came under fire from the Trump administration when the Department of Justice filed lawsuits against each of the 15 federal judges on the Maryland federal bench earlier this month for automatically issuing injunctions for certain immigration cases. The injunctions have prevented the Department of Homeland Security from deporting or changing the legal status of the immigrant in question for two business days.

‘President Trump’s executive authority has been undermined since the first hours of his presidency by an endless barrage of injunctions designed to halt his agenda,’ Bondi said in a press release of the state’s automatic injunction practices.  ‘The American people elected President Trump to carry out his policy agenda: this pattern of judicial overreach undermines the democratic process and cannot be allowed to stand.’

U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California

Judges on the bench for the Northern District of California have issued at least six significant injunctions hampering policies put forth by the Trump administration this year. The Northern California district court includes counties such as San Francisco, Sonoma and Santa Clara. 

Back in March, Judge William Alsup, for example, granted a preliminary injunction ordering federal agencies to reinstate probationary employees fired under the Trump administration’s efforts to slim down the size of the federal government. Judge Susan Illston granted a temporary pause in May to the Trump administration’s federal reductions in force initiatives, and Judge William Orrick granted a separate injunction in April that prevented the Trump administration from withholding federal funds from areas deemed sanctuaries for illegal immigrants. 

Federal judges on the Northern California bench also issued injunctions to block the enforcement of Trump administration polices related to organizations that promote DEI and LGBTQ programs and to prevent the administration from terminating the legal visa status of international students. 

U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has issued at least six signigicant injunctions against the Trump administration this year, including Judge James Boasberg’s March injunction preventing the Trump administration from deporting violent illegal immigrant gang members under the Alien Enemies Act – which received widespread backlash among conservatives.  

‘People are shocked by what is going on with the Court System. I was elected for many reasons, but a principal one was LAW AND ORDER, a big part of which is QUICKLY removing a vast Criminal Network of individuals, who came into our Country through the Crooked Joe Biden Open Borders Policy! These are dangerous and violent people, who kill, maim and, in many other ways, harm the people of our Country,’ Trump posted to Truth Social in March following Boasberg extending his restraining order against the use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport illegal immigrants with alleged ties to gangs, such as Venezuelan criminal organization Tren de Aragua (TdA).

Federal Judge Loren AliKhan issued a preliminary injunction in January barring the Trump administration’s freeze on federal grant disbursements through various federal agencies; Judge Paul Friedman blocked the Trump administration from targeting foreign service workers’ collective bargaining rights in May; and Judge Ana Reyes granted a nationwide injunction in March barring the Pentagon from enforcing Trump’s executive order banning transgender individuals from serving in the U.S. military. 

Judges on the court have also issued injunctions targeting the Trump administration’s plans to dismantle the federally-funded state media network Voice of America, and another that blocked the Bureau of Prisons from implementing a Trump executive order restricting transgender healthcare and accommodations for federal inmates. 

U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts

The U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts has issued at least four significant injunctions against the Trump administration this year, including the nationwide preliminary injunction barring Trump’s executive order ending the practice of granting birthright citizenship to the children of illegal immigrants. 

Other injunctions issued this year include Judge Julia Kobick this month blocked Trump’s presidential action requiring passports to reflect a person’s biological sex and not their gender identity, and another that involved the Trump administration’s efforts to end a Biden-era parole program for hundreds of thousands of migrants from Afghanistan, Latin America and Ukraine.

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Ahead of the Supreme Court’s ruling limiting the scope of nationwide injunctions, judges on the District Court for the Western District of Washington issued a handful of injunctions targeting Trump policies, including joining courts in Maryland and Massachusetts earlier this year blocking Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship for children of illegal immigrants. 

Judge Jamal Whitehead issued a preliminary injunction in February halting Trump’s January executive order suspending the U.S. Refugee Assistance Program. While another federal judge on the bench in March granted a nationwide preliminary injunction blocking Trump’s executive order barring transgender individuals from serving in the military.

The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington includes counties such as King – home to Seattle – Snohomish and Clark. The two courts for the Western District of Washington and the Northern District of California are both in the 9th Circuit. 

Trump celebrated the Supreme Court’s ruling restricting the scope of federal judges’ powers to grant nationwide injunctions as ‘a monumental victory for the Constitution.’

‘The Supreme Court has delivered a monumental victory for the Constitution, the separation of powers, and the rule of law in striking down the excessive use of nationwide injunctions… I was elected on a historic mandate, but in recent months, we’ve seen a handful of radical left judges effectively try to overrule the rightful powers of the president to stop the American people from getting the policies that they voted for in record numbers. It was a grave threat to democracy,’ Trump said on Friday. 

SCOTUS’ ruling followed the Trump administration filing an emergency appeal with the highest court in March, when the then-acting solicitor general, Sarah Harris, sounded the alarm that nationwide injunctions had hit ‘epidemic proportions’ under the second Trump administration. She noted that the federal government faced 14 universal injunctions in the first three years of the Biden administration, compared to 15 leveled against the Trump admin in one month alone. 

Universal injunctions were also a sticking point for officials in the first Trump administration, who railed against the flow of injunctions ordered against the 45th president’s policies and laws, including the former chiefs of the Department of Justice. 

‘Courts issued an average of only 1.5 nationwide injunctions per year against the Reagan, Clinton and George W. Bush administrations, and 2.5 per year against the Obama administration,’ former Assistant Attorney General Beth Williams said in February 2019.  

‘In President Trump’s first year in office, however, judges issued a whopping 20 nationwide injunctions – an eight-fold increase. This matches the entire eight-year total of such injunctions issued against President Obama during his two terms. We are now at 30, matching the total number of injunctions issued against the first 42 presidents combined.’

Fox News Digital’s Andrew Mark Miller, Breanne Deppisch and Ashley Oliver contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Sen. Thom Tillis, one of the two Republicans to vote against advancing President Donald Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill,’ plans to retire from the Senate at the end of his term.

The North Carolina Republican announced on Sunday that he would not seek reelection in the 2026 cycle. Tillis would have been among the most vulnerable Republicans running next year and faced threats from Trump to face a challenger after his vote against the president’s agenda Saturday night.

The lawmaker voted against advancing the bill and is likely to vote against final passage, because deep Medicaid cuts inside the colossal bill brought on changes to the Medicaid provider tax rate.

Tillis railed against the slow death of bipartisanship in Washington in a statement.

‘In Washington over the last few years, it’s become increasingly evident that leaders who are willing to embrace bipartisanship, compromise, and demonstrate independent thinking are becoming an endangered species,’ he said.

Tillis gave a shout-out to former Sens. Joe Manchin and Kyrsten Sinema for their unwillingness to not ‘cave to their party bosses to nuke the filibuster for the sake of political expediency.’

‘They ultimately retired, and their presence in the Senate chamber has been sorely missed every day since,’ he said.

‘It underscores the greatest form of hypocrisy in American politics. When people see independent thinking on the other side, they cheer,’ he continued. ‘But when those very same people see independent thinking coming from their side, they scorn, ostracize, and even censure them.’

He said that the choice broke down to spending time with his family, or spending another six years in Washington navigating ‘the political theater and partisan gridlock.’

‘It’s not a hard choice, and I will not be seeking re-election,’ he said.

However, Tillis did give himself wiggle room to rebuke Trump over the next 18 months, as he did earlier this year when he refused to support Ed Martin, the president’s pick to serve as the U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia. The decision scuttled Martin’s nomination. 

‘I look forward to having the pure freedom to call the balls and strikes as I see fit,’ he said. 

His decision to retire tees up what will likely be a competitive race in North Carolina, and one that Democrats will look to pounce on quickly.

Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee spokesperson Maeve Coyle said in a statement shortly after Tillis’ decision that his choice ‘not to run for re-election is another blow to Republicans’ chances as they face a midterm backlash that puts their majority at risk.’ 

‘Even Tillis admits the GOP plan to slash Medicaid and spike costs for families is toxic – and in 2026, Democrats will flip North Carolina’s Senate seat,’ she said.  

However, National Republican Senatorial Committee Chair Tim Scott, R-S.C., contended that Trump would remain a huge factor in the upcoming midterm cycle given that he has won North Carolina three times and that the state has been represented by two Republican senators for over a decade. 

‘That streak will continue in 2026 when North Carolinians elect a conservative leader committed to advancing an agenda of opportunity, prosperity, and security,’ he said. 

It also comes after Trump spent much of Saturday evening blasting Tillis as a ‘grandstander’ and vowing to interview potential primary challengers, while Vice President JD Vance, Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., and his leadership team worked over holdout fiscal hawks.

‘Numerous people have come forward wanting to run in the Primary against ‘Senator Thom’ Tillis,’ Trump said on Truth Social. ‘I will be meeting with them over the coming weeks, looking for someone who will properly represent the Great People of North Carolina and, so importantly, the United States of America. Thank you for your attention to this matter!’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Chelsea advanced in the FIFA Club World Cup on June 28, getting three extra-time goals to defeat Benfica 4-1 in their Round of 16 encounter.

Following the victory, Chelsea’s manager wasn’t in a celebratory mood.

Enzo Maresca lambasted the nearly two-hour weather delay that interrupted the match at Bank of America Stadium in Charlotte, describing it as “a joke,” before launching into broader criticisms of the beleaguered event and FIFA’s decision to stage it in the United States.

With four minutes remaining in regulation, and Chelsea leading 1-0 courtesy of a Reece James free-kick goal in the 64th minute, the match was paused due to lightning in the area. It led to a 113-minute delay, with officials waiting for a storm to pass through the area. The match ended at 8:38 p.m. ET, more than four-and-a-half hours after it began.

After just one goal between the teams before the delay, Chelsea and Benfica combined for four goals the rest of the match. Benfica’s Ángel Di María converted a penalty kick in stoppage time to tie the game and send it into extra time. In the second 15-minute period of extra time, Chelsea scored three goals in nine minutes, with Christopher Nkunku’s 108th-minute goal serving as the game-winner.

“After the break, the game changed completely,” Maresca said after the match when asked about the difficulty of the lengthy delay and its effect on the game. “I think for me, personally, it’s not football. It’s already seven, eight, nine games that they suspended. It’s a joke, to be honest. It’s not football. It’s not for us.”

“You cannot be inside (for that long). I can understand that for security reasons, you are to suspend the game. But if you suspend seven, eight games, that means it is probably not the right place to do this competition.”

With the win, Chelsea will take on Brazilian club Palmeiras at the Lincoln Financial Field in Philadelphia on July 4 in the quarterfinals.

As Maresca noted, the Club World Cup has been beset by a slew of weather-related stoppages that have disrupted the flow of matches.

Chelsea’s win became the sixth Club World Cup game, and first of the event’s knockout stage, to be subjected to a weather delay. It was Benfica’s second experience with one, as its 6-0 win against Auckland City on June 20 in Orlando was held up by thunderstorms for two hours.

It’s one of several problems the Club World Cup has endured. Ticket sales and attendance have lagged throughout the event, with photos of half-full or largely empty venues circulating on social media. The official attendance for the Chelsea-Benfica game was 25,929 in a stadium with a seating capacity of nearly 75,000. The 48 group-stage games of the tournament had a combined one million empty seats.

Those woeful crowds and persistent thunderstorms have raised questions and concerns about next year’s World Cup, which will be held across 16 cities in North America, 11 of which are in the United States. Seven of the U.S.-based venues are outdoors and lack retractable roofs, leaving them vulnerable to the thunderstorms that are common across the country during the summer months.

“It’s a fantastic competition,” Maresca said. “It’s a Club World Cup. It’s top. We are happy to be in the last eight. We are happy to win all these kind of things. But something happens, six, seven games suspended, probably the one[s] that they decide, they need a reason, because it’s not normal to suspend a game. In a World Cup, how many games are suspended? Zero, probably. In Europe, how many games? Zero. We are here, two weeks, they’re already suspended six, seven games. There is some problem for me, personally.”

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

JOHNS CREEK, Ga. – It has been nearly 16 years since Richard Seymour felt the sting of a certain type of NFL business. In the prime of a Hall of Fame career, Seymour was abruptly traded from the NFL penthouse to what must’ve seemed like the outhouse.

The week of the season opener in 2009, the New England Patriots shipped the dominant defensive lineman and his collection of three Super Bowl rings to the Oakland Raiders.

Call it a classic Bill Belichick move. Cut ties too early rather than too late. Nothing personal, just cold NFL “bidness” that fetched the premium return of a first-round draft pick. And Seymour never saw it coming.

His world was flipped upside down to such a degree – Richard and his wife, Tanya, had four young children, and the new school year was starting – that it prompted then-Raiders owner Al Davis to fire off a “five-day letter” threatening a season-long suspension when Seymour didn’t immediately report.

And look at him now.

Seymour, 45, owns a piece of the Las Vegas Raiders. His deal to purchase a stake of the franchise from Mark Davis – reportedly a 0.5% slice  – was approved by NFL owners in October 2024 at the same time Tom Brady’s package with Knighthead Capital Management’s Tom Wagner for a 10% share was finalized.

Turns out, that stunning trade worked out much better than Seymour would have imagined at the time. Talk about another type of NFL business.

“Sometimes, you don’t know what God has planned for you,” Seymour told USA TODAY Sports, reflecting during an expansive interview at a suburban Atlanta coffee shop. “If I never got traded, I don’t think I’d have become an NFL owner.”

An NFL owner. Let that sink in. Seymour didn’t generate the type of headlines that Brady did in buying into the Raiders, and his share doesn’t compare to Brady’s slice, yet it is so significant on multiple levels. In a league that has never had a Black majority owner, Seymour is part of a growing number of limited partners with stakes in NFL franchises who happen to be Black, the lineup including former athletes Earvin “Magic” Johnson, Serena and Venus Williams, Warrick Dunn and Charles Woodson, in addition to financial power broker Mellody Hobson and former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice.

That Seymour had significant support during his lengthy process from NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell, among other NFL heavyweights, is no coincidence. Goodell has repeatedly talked up the desire to increase ownership paths for minorities, and in Seymour’s case apparently backed up the sentiment as a key resource.

“Obviously, it’s important to have representation when we speak about a league that is 70% Black,” Seymour said, referring to the player population. “You want representation at every level, from ownership to management, front office, whatever it is. You just want to make sure it’s the right people and that voices are heard.”

Now consider the pure business play. The Raiders ranked as the NFL’s seventh-most valuable franchise in 2024 on Forbes’ annual list with a valuation of $6.7 billion. That’s nearly double what it was deemed worth when Seymour and Davis began discussing the possibility of doing business in 2020, the year the franchise moved from Oakland with a sweetheart deal that includes a swank, publicly-subsidized stadium.

“What we’re seeing in terms of the growth in these valuations is only going up because of the impact of live sports in the entertainment space,” Derrick Heggans, CEO of Shepherd Park Sports Properties, told USA TODAY Sports.

Heggans, a former NFL attorney who was not involved in Seymour’s deal with the Raiders, matched Woodson with Cleveland Browns owners Jimmy and Dee Haslam, leading to the Hall of Fame defensive back’s recent purchase of a 0.5% stake in the Browns. Heggans also facilitated the deals that allowed former NBA stars Tracy McGrady and Vince Carter, and former MLS star Jozy Altidore, to purchase stakes in the Buffalo Bills from Terry and Kim Pegula. And he brokered the transactions that resulted in former Olympic gymnast Dominique Dawes and prolific film producer Will Packer buying stakes of the Atlanta Falcons from Arthur Blank.

“Think about it: It doesn’t matter if you paid $50 million for a limited partner stake or if you’re the controlling owner, you’re an owner of the asset,” Heggans said. “So, as it increases, whatever amount you put in increases. So, if I were looking at it purely as an investment and I could see that year-to-year, the growth could be anywhere from 15 to 20 percent, and there’s a long history that this is only going to continue to go up, it’s an investment that most people don’t have the opportunity to get access to. But if you do, it can do tremendous things for you.”

Flying beer cans. The NFC East. Super Bowl opponents. Nothing is stopping Howie Roseman

Seymour said that Al Davis, who passed away in 2011, promised him a role in the front office after his playing career ended. The two developed a tight bond, including frequent chalk-talk visits, during Seymour’s four seasons playing for the Raiders. Yet after he finished his 12-year career, Seymour was more committed to raising his children than working in the front office. He ultimately sought an equity stake instead.

“It was a dream for me,” said Seymour, a Gadsden, S.C. native who starred at Georgia. “My relationship with Al opened the door to me and Mark’s relationship.”

There were times, though, when Seymour wondered whether his bid would fall through. At one point, he was aligned with a partner. Then, when other NFL franchises sold, the value of the Raiders – and conceivably the value of buying in – increased. Plus, with Brady pursued by Davis for a stake separate from Seymour’s, there may have been questions about the value formulas and other conditions of the respective shares.

And, of course, to pass muster with the NFL’s finance committee, there was extensive vetting.

Seymour, also co-founder of a venture capital firm, 93 Ventures, would not divulge financial details of his Raiders purchase, but allowed: “It started one way, but then, in business, things kind of shift and change. Teams sell, whether it’s the Broncos (a then-record $4.65 billion in 2022) or the Commanders (a record $6.05 billion in 2023), and the landscape of the NFL changes, too. So, I had to adapt to the new landscape. I stayed competitive to make sure we got a deal done.”  

He also leaned on a long-term relationship. Seymour said that Patriots owner Robert Kraft helped him navigate through the process.

“It was to the point that Mark even said we should get Mr. Kraft involved,” Seymour said.

Kraft provided insight for big-picture matters, including long-term sustainability, Seymour said. And as a member of the finance committee chaired by Kansas City Chiefs owner Clark Hunt, Kraft was crucial in helping to structure the financial terms of Seymour’s deal.

“He made sure I had my ducks in order in terms of the legalities of what was going to be looked at, what they wanted and how,” Seymour said. “Just the order of the process, and he kind of helped me streamline.”

Heggans knows all too well about the NFL’s strict standards and what can be involved in the vetting.

“It’s very extensive,” he said. “They asked one of my LPs recently about parking tickets when he was in college.”

Of course, the conduct of NFL owners – the principal ones — can be subjected to much scrutiny. And for far more serious matters than parking tickets. Buzz has escalated in recent days after it was revealed that a report from an independent arbitrator suggested collusion by team owners to resist fully guaranteed contracts for players. Stay tuned.

In Seymour’s case, though, the scrutiny of a different type was worth it to gain admittance in an exclusive club. When he was enshrined in Canton in 2022, he became Hall of Famer No. 360 – the Pro Football Hall of Fame assigns each inductee a number that undoubtedly amplifies the prestige of the honor – and now he’s in an even more exclusive club.

“As I ask regular people, if you will, when was the last time you had access to 30 billionaires, most people can’t say that they do,” Heggans said. “But once you’re approved by the NFL you are one of a very small number. Whether you have a limited stake or a controlling stake, you’re in the same club. And there are a lot of people that do different types of business together.”

As much as Seymour expresses pride in achieving a milestone, he hardly sees his Raiders stake as the ceiling. He is just getting started, while Davis and Larry Delson, a Raiders board member, have afforded him the opportunity to take a “holistic approach” into the business of the franchise.

He has visions of owning stakes in NBA and MLB franchises, which is what Johnson, the NBA legend with whom he has consulted, has done with a vast portfolio built over decades, which now includes the NFL.

A rising star coach. Will the NFL let him shine?

The ultimate goal? Seymour wants to someday become the majority owner of an NFL franchise.

“But you’ve got to take steps toward that,” he said.

Asked if he has $10 billion laying around to make that happen, Seymour chuckled.

Then, he replied, “I know people that have it.”

Seymour’s calls multi-billionaire Robert F. Smith, a mentor. Smith has long been considered a leading candidate to become the first Black majority NFL owner, and was in the running to purchase the Broncos, which were ultimately sold to the group headed by Rob Walton.

“What I’ve learned about deals is that it’s best to get in,” Seymour said. “And once you get in, it’s better to navigate from the inside instead of trying to fight from the outside. To grow and to get more. You’ve got to have a seat at the table first. I’ve done several other deals where it may not have been where I wanted to be in deal originally, but five years later you look up and can see where you’re headed.”

In other words, history has shown Seymour that trading up can be a great option.

Follow Jarrett Bell on social media: On X: @JarrettBell

On Bluesky: jarrettbell.bsky.social

This post appeared first on USA TODAY