Archive

2025

Browsing

UFC star Conor McGregor is running for president of Ireland but has not yet met the requirements to be on the ballot.
Elon Musk has formally endorsed McGregor’s candidacy and criticized Irish officials for allegedly trying to block it.
McGregor is running on an anti-immigration platform and is considered a longshot due to his lack of party affiliation and past legal issues.

UFC star Conor McGregor used a White House visit with United States President Donald Trump on St. Patrick’s Day to help launch his campaign to be the president of Ireland, and he is now turning to the same billionaire who helped Trump win in 2024 with his candidacy hanging in the balance.

Tesla founder Elon Musk officially got back into the political ring early Monday morning by formally endorsing McGregor, the controversial mixed martial arts champion. Musk also denounced Ireland deputy prime minister Simon Harris in the wake of reports he was urging local officials to vote along party lines and keep independent candidates such as McGregor out of the election.

McGregor, 37, isn’t yet eligible to be on the ballot and a Sept. 24 deadline to meet the ballot requirements is approaching. A presidential candidate in Ireland can only be nominated by at least 20 members of the Oireachtas (Ireland’s version of parliament) or at least four local authorities to be included on the presidential ballot, according to the country’s election laws.

‘Shame on Simon Harris for tyrannically blocking the will of the people of Ireland!’ Musk wrote on X. ‘Conor McGregor for President to save Ireland.’

Musk’s support of McGregor’s political ambitions in Ireland began months ago on social media. Last week, after McGregor posted a campaign video filmed in front of Dublin government buildings seeking ballot help, Musk replied on X: ‘No one will fight harder for the people of Ireland than Conor McGregor!’

McGregor, who is running on an anti-immigration platform, also released a photo this week from a FaceTime he recently conducted with Musk. ‘This is Superman level, folks,’ the caption read.

McGregor is seen as a longshot in the Oct. 24 presidential election due to a lack of party affiliation and a checkered past related to sexual assault allegations and violent behavior outside of UFC’s octagon, where he became one of the company’s most decorated, popular and polarizing fighters.

Musk’s most recent endorsement of McGregor drew a quick rebuke from Harris on Monday, according to The Journal in Dublin.

‘I see Elon Musk joined in today – and sure, why not?’ Harris said, while noting Musk is ‘backing a man who has been found civilly liable for rape in our courts. That’s the sort of man he believes should be president of Ireland. But thank God – he might have a say as to who is president of the United States of America, but he’s no say in terms of who the president of Ireland is.’

Previously, he pleaded guilty to assault over a 2019 incident in which he punched an elderly man during an argument inside a Dublin bar.

McGregor became one of the UFC’s biggest attractions beginning in 2008, and the first fighter to hold UFC championships in multiple divisions simultaneously. He owns a 22-6 career record. His last professional match occurred in 2021.

Musk’s involvement is part of McGregor’s recent push to get on the ballot and comes on the heels of social media posts last week filmed in an attempt to sway local councillors to consider him as an independent candidate. It represented a change in tone from an Aug. 27 social media post in which McGregor wrote, ‘I have it secured,’ in reference to what’s needed to be on the ballot.

‘Our councillors are the backbone of our communities. They work harder and deliver more for the people than those in the Oireachtas, who continue to fail this country time and again,’ McGregor wrote last week. ‘If you are a councillor who feels your voice is ignored, your hands tied, and your community overlooked, then I ask you to stand with me. Nominate me, and I will give you the platform and power to be truly heard.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

J.J. McCarthy led the Minnesota Vikings to a comeback victory over the Chicago Bears after a poor performance in the first three quarters.
McCarthy helped the Vikings score 21 unanswered points in the fourth quarter, overcoming an 11-point deficit.
The rookie quarterback is the first since Steve Young in 1985 to win his debut after trailing by 10 or more points in the fourth quarter.

CHICAGO — For three quarters, J.J. McCarthy was bad. Painfully bad. Bad as in, “Guy hasn’t played football in a year” bad.

But the fourth quarter? McCarthy was magic, reminding everyone why the Minnesota Vikings used the 10th pick in the 2024 draft on him.

The Vikings scored 21 unanswered points on the Chicago Bears in the fourth quarter Monday night, with McCarthy responsible for all but one of them. In digging the Vikings out of an 11-point hole, he also dug himself out of the kind of demoralizing performance that can leave a significant dent on a young quarterback’s confidence and development. (See Caleb Williams, 2024 season.)

“He stepped into the huddle — we were losing, I want to say late third, early fourth (quarter) and he goes, `Is there any place else you guys would rather be?’ That says a lot about you right there,” Aaron Jones said after the game.

“This kid is special. He’s different up here,” Jones added, pointing at his head. “I’ve been saying it the whole time.”

A lot more people will be saying it now.

McCarthy is the first quarterback to overcome a deficit of 10 points or more in the fourth quarter and win his debut since 1985, according to ESPN. The guy who did it back then? A guy named Steve Young.

“I told him at halftime, `You’re going to bring us back to win this game.’ And the look in his eye was fantastic,” Vikings coach Kevin O’Connell said.

McCarthy had not played a “real” football game in almost two years, since leading Michigan to the national title. He missed all of last year after tearing the meniscus in his right knee during the preseason, and barely played in the preseason this year — a decision that looked foolish for much of the game Monday night.

McCarthy looked flustered by the speed of the game and got harried when the Bears brought pressure. He was sacked on each of Minnesota’s first two drives and attempted one pass in each drive. With the Vikings in the red zone on their third drive, his throw to Justin Jefferson on third-and-8 was too low.

Minnesota also was whistled for delay of game twice in the first three quarters.

And in what surely looked like the dagger for the Vikings, McCarthy threw a pick-six on Minnesota’s first drive of the second half. Looking for Jefferson, McCarthy telegraphed his throw and Nahshon Wright stepped in front of it and took it 74 yards to give Chicago a 17-6 lead with 13:03 left in the third.

“You never want to earn wisdom that way,” McCarthy said, smiling sheepishly. “It sucks. It’s one of the worst things you could do as a quarterback, but you can’t do anything about it. You’ve got to focus on the next play.

“Just go out there and execute and play as one and move on from that.”

Williams and the Bears gave McCarthy some help, suddenly reverting to the team that endured a 10-game skid on its way to a 5-12 finish last year. Williams, who had looked much more poised in the first half, started making bad decisions, overthrowing his receivers and putting the ball in the wrong spots.

The rest of the Bears got sloppy, too, committing far too many stupid penalties.

But part of being an elite-level quarterback is being able to take advantage of an opponent’s misfortunes.

After Cairo Santos missed a 50-yard field goal attempt, McCarthy found his groove. He hit Jefferson for 17 yards and, three plays later, found him for a 13-yard touchdown. The Vikings attempted the two-point conversion, but Jonathan Owens shoved Josh Oliver out of bounds just in front of the end zone.

After a dismal three-and-out by the Bears — Williams was sacked and then nearly picked by Andrew Van Ginkel — McCarthy went right back to work, finding Jones for a 27-yard score. Minnesota went for the two-point conversion again, and this time McCarthy connected with Adam Thielen to put the Vikings up 20-17.

And they weren’t done yet.

McCarthy’s 10-yard pass to Jefferson put the Vikings at the Bears 14, and McCarthy ran in for the score on the next play, taking advantage of a hole created by T.J. Hockenson.

“That was one of my favorites, for sure,” McCarthy said, grinning.

McCarthy is the first to say he can play better. Will have to play better going forward.

But the learning curve for a young quarterback is steep, and bad losses — and bad play in bad losses — can make it seem insurmountable. McCarthy, and his team, now know that it’s not. That no matter how badly he plays, he can work his way out of it.

Because he did.

“There’s no way to deny, we don’t win this game unless J.J. plays the way he did in the second half. And, most importantly, he kept the belief of his football team behind him,” O’Connell said. “Now we know it’s possible.”

For McCarthy, it seems like anything is.

Follow USA TODAY Sports columnist Nancy Armour on social media @nrarmour.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Week 2 upsets did not significantly alter the forecasted College Football Playoff field.
Illinois improved its bowl projection with a road win, while Clemson’s projection slipped after a struggle.
Oklahoma and South Florida had impressive wins but are not yet considered playoff-worthy.

There were upsets in Week 2 but nothing that significantly changed the forecasted College Football Playoff field in this week’s bowl projections.

Illinois moved up a couple seeding places with an impressive road win at Duke, On the downside, Clemson slides back a couple spots after struggling against Troy. The Tigers now face a dangerous trip to Georgia Tech that will be a good litmus test on their prospects.

Two teams that had impressive weekends still are not yet deemed playoff-worthy.

Oklahoma knocked off Michigan but more difficult hurdles away the Sooners. So we’ll wait until a few SEC games to anoint them. Despite defeating two ranked opponents, South Florida likely needs to win the American title to make the field. Memphis and Tulane are significant hurdles to overcome, so odds, for now, are against the Bulls.

GET IN THE GAME: Play our college football survivor pool

PATH TO PLAYOFF: Sign up for our college football newsletter

Notes: Legacy Pac-12 schools in other conferences will fulfill existing Pac-12 bowl agreements through the 2025 season. Not all conferences will fulfill their bowl allotment. An asterisk represents a replacement pick. 

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

He has survived a multitude of bad losses and poor decisions, and the dumbing down of one of college football’s most iconic brands. 

But he can’t outlive this.

What saved Billy Napier’s job as the Florida coach in 2024, is the very thing that will get him fired in 2025: you can’t screw up the quarterback. 

Especially when he has generational-level talent. 

“Not good enough,” Napier said after Florida’s stunning loss last weekend to 18½-point underdog South Florida. “And it’s my responsibility.”

The irony of it all hangs like September humidity in The Swamp.

GET IN THE GAME: Play our college football survivor pool

PATH TO PLAYOFF: Sign up for our college football newsletter

When Florida athletic director Scott Stricklin announced midway through last season that Napier would return for 2025 – despite an overwhelming amount of on-field evidence that Napier wasn’t fit for the job – the thought process was straightforward. 

Napier needed time to develop freshman five-star quarterback DJ Lagway, whose rare skills could elevate the rest of the team. When Lagway’s performance did just that in the second half of 2024, it elevated expectations for 2025. 

More dangerous: it allowed Napier to double down on his wildly predictable offensive system and play calling. 

Instead of hiring a legitimate and experienced offensive coordinator and play caller at the end of 2024 to help Lagway develop into an elite player, Napier kept betting on himself. A bet that, until Lagway’s seven games as a starter, had crapped out on a weekly basis.

Now Lagway is trying to find himself in that same system, and if the first two games of the season are any indicator, he looks like he has regressed. Same accuracy issues, same poor decisions with the ball, same reckless throws.

Those issues could be overlooked last season when he was a freshman, and when his uber-talent took over. He was raw, but he was a highlight reel ― and you had to live with the mistakes.

Not anymore.

Napier told anyone who would listen this offseason that this was his best roster in four years at Florida, and that he finally had a winning culture set. He had an elite offensive line, and a group of dangerous skill players around Lagway.

Then big, bad South Florida strolled into Gainesville, and the sins of the past washed over it all.

The predictable offense. The unimaginative play calling. The same undisciplined operation where penalties eliminate touchdowns.

All of which falls on the shoulders of Lagway, and his critical second season of development.

The only thing it lacked from the previous three seasons was two players wearing the same number on the same play, or two units running onto the field at the same time with the game on the line. Or any of the countless other maddening coaching decisions of the past.

It did, however, reveal a new low: Baylor transfer defensive lineman Brendan Bett – he of the “winning culture” that was set in the offseason – spitting in the face of a South Florida player on the Bulls’ final, game-winning drive.

It also underscored this undeniable truth: when you lose with rare talent at the most important position on the field, you’re not just doing a disservice to the player and the program, you’ve officially exposed who and what you are as a coach. 

For all to see.

Some coaches never have the opportunity to coach an elite, NFL talent at quarterback, much less one who could be the most talented to ever play the position at the school. Some coaches do, and know enough to get out of the way and watch the magic happen. 

Gene Chizik at Auburn with Cam Newton. Ed Orgeron at LSU with Joe Burrow. Jimbo Fisher at Florida State with Jameis Winston.

The last thing any coach can do is be the reason an elite talent doesn’t reach his ceiling. But when does Stricklin, Napier’s staunchest ally in a sea of turmoil from the jump, finally see it?  

Because if he didn’t fire Napier in the middle of last season, he’s not going to do it now. 

If he didn’t fire Napier after last year’s embarrassing September home losses to Miami and Texas A&M – when Florida boosters came up with the millions in buyout cash needed – he sure isn’t going to fire him after yet another September punch to the gut in Gainesville (with buyout money that’s still available). 

If Napier wasn’t destined for unemployment after losses to Vanderbilt and Kentucky, and after needing a field goal at the end of a meaningless bowl game to extend Florida’s NCAA record of consecutive games avoiding a shutout, he’s not destined for it now.

If Napier wasn’t dead man walking after the fire drill episode of both the offense and field goal units on the field at the same time late in a(nother) home loss to a double-digit underdog (Arkansas), what else can he get away with?

If Stricklin will put up with a predictable offense that lacks imagination, and a defense that until recently has produced historically poor results, what else will he put up with?

If you go into every fall Saturday – I mean, every – with more trepidation than anticipation about which Florida team you’ll see, what more do you need to solidify what must be done?

If you keep hoping for the team that beat LSU and Ole Miss in 2024 to show up, and keep getting the product produced in every other meaningful game since 2022, you can hope in one hand and puke in the other. 

And they’ll look the same.

With or without generational talent at quarterback. 

Matt Hayes is the senior national college football writer for USA TODAY Sports Network. Follow him on X at @MattHayesCFB.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The White House revealed Tuesday that President Donald Trump ‘immediately directed’ his special envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff to inform Qatar of the ‘impending attack’ by Israel. 

Israel’s military targeted senior Hamas leadership in Doha, launching what it described as a ‘precise strike.’ Khalil al-Hayya and Zaher Jabarin were the two targets of the explosion that rocked the Middle Eastern nation’s capital, Fox News chief foreign correspondent Trey Yingst said Tuesday, citing reports. 

‘This morning, the Trump administration was notified by the United States military that Israel was attacking Hamas, which very unfortunately was located in a section of Doha, the capital of Qatar,’ White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said. ‘Unilaterally bombing inside Qatar, a sovereign nation and close ally of the United States that is working very hard and bravely taking risks with us to broker peace does not advance Israel or America’s goals.’

‘However, eliminating Hamas, who have profited off the misery of those living in Gaza, is a worthy goal. President Trump immediately directed special envoy Witkoff to inform the Qataris of the impending attack, which he did,’ Leavitt added.  

‘The president views Qatar as a strong ally and friend of the United States and feels very badly about the location of this attack,’ Leavitt said. 

Leavitt also revealed that Trump spoke to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu following the strike. 

‘The prime minister told President Trump that he wants to make peace and quickly. President Trump believes this unfortunate incident could serve as an opportunity for peace,’ Leavitt said at the White House press briefing. ‘The president also spoke to the emir and prime minister of Qatar and thanked them for their support and friendship to our country. He assured them that such a thing will not happen again on their soil.’ 

Witkoff and Secretary of State Marco Rubio were present for the call with the Qataris, Leavitt said. 

‘The president has always made it very clear that he wants peace in the Middle East, just like he sought that and accomplished that in his first term. He expects all of our allies and friends in the region – that includes both Qatar and Israel – to seek peace as well,’ Leavitt also said. ‘And he wants to see that happen. And he’s working with all of our allies in the region to get that done.’ 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

(This story has been updated to note Piotr Szczerek denied defending his behavior during an incident at the US Open.)

He said scores of people have said they will get the ball back from the angry, unidentified woman.

“Please don’t do anything to that lady,’’ Feltwell told USA TODAY Sports on Sept. 8. “Leave it alone. You know, somebody knows her and can talk to her, that’s different. But God, I don’t want people breaking in their house and stuff like that. The internet already messed her up pretty good.’’

The power of the internet has put adults behaving badly at sports events on notice.

Most recently, it was the home run ball controversy taking place during the game between the Phillies and Miami Marlins on Sept. 5 at LoanDepot Park in Miami.

About a week earlier, a CEO snatched a hat that Polish tennis star Kamil Majchrzak tried to hand to a young boy.

A statement posted on Facebook and attributed to Piotr Szczerek, the CEO of a Polish paving company, defended his behavior. But he denied making the statement and, slammed on social media, offered an apology.

The backlash on social media is like “informal sanctions,” a term used in criminology, said Alex Piquero, Professor & Chair of the Department of Sociology & Criminology, Arts & Sciences at Miami.

“These are how your peers and the people you value, how they’ll judge your behavior,’’ Piquero told USA TODAY Sports. “And I think that punishment alone, right there, is enough that if these people have any sense of moral conscience, they’re going to feel like the smallest human beings in this world.’’

He also said the incident, because it’s captured on video and on social media, will never go away. So what kind of deterrent might that serve for another adult on the verge of showing insensitivity to a child at a public sporting event – and the cameras watching.

“There’s always going to be some adult who does something stupid like that,’’ Piquero said. “They’re human beings. They want something and they don’t think about their actions until they’re forced to think about them. …

“I got to hope that someone out there believes that, next time this does happen, look, do the right thing. Give it to the kid.’’

With the angry woman still under assault on social media, Feltwell said, ‘I could say something like she got what she deserved, but I don’t know if she deserved that much.”

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

A Senate Republican charged that former President Joe Biden and top administration officials ‘demolished’ the constitutional guardrails for pardons by using an autopen.

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, wrote in a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, which was first obtained by Fox News Digital, that there are a list of ‘core constitutional requirements’ that must be met for pardons and granting clemency, and that the administration’s usage of an autopen likely ran afoul of those guardrails.

In the waning months of his presidency, the Biden administration commuted the sentences of roughly 1,500 inmates and pardoned 39 others in December. A little over a month later, the administration issued roughly 2,500 more commutations — the most ever by a president in a single day.

Cruz, who is a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee and chair of the Subcommittee on Federal Courts, Oversight, Agency Action, and Federal Rights, offered to provide Bondi assistance in ongoing investigations into the administration’s alleged abuse of the autopen.

He said that the clemencies were issued ‘based on broad criteria rather than case-by-case evaluations, and at least some were signed using an autopen of then-President Biden’s signature.’

‘These core Constitutional requirements, considerations, and expectations were demolished in the final months of the Biden administration for partisan and personal motives by President Biden, his family, and his top officials,’ Cruz said.

Cruz noted that the presidential pardon authority granted under Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution requires a chain of custody of sorts: there has to be an unbroken line from the president to a pardon being granted, he said.

‘Everyone involved in the process — government officials purporting to issue a pardon, the person to whom it is being granted, judicial and law enforcement officials, and most of all the American people — should have absolute confidence a pardon was granted at the president’s explicit direction,’ Cruz said.

But recent reports, and ongoing congressional investigations, have raised doubts over whether Biden explicitly directed the avalanche of pardons toward the end of his presidency.  

Cruz’s letter comes on the heels of a report from Axios that unearthed emails that showed Biden officials raised concerns with how the president’s team decided to make certain pardons and the frequent usage of the autopen.

Cruz said that the emails showed that the Biden White House ‘implemented a process that separated the President from officials responsible for signing pardons on his behalf.’

‘They could not know if they were doing so at the President’s direction, either on a case-by-case basis or as a matter of criteria,’ he said.

He argued that the doubts raised by recent reports, and the ongoing investigations by the Justice Department, risked a ‘constitutional crisis in which the other branches and the American people cannot have faith that the President’s Article 2 pardon power was legitimately deployed.’

‘If the integrity of the clemency process was broken by Biden officials, such that the relevant actions were not taken at the President’s direction, the status of the pardons and commutations would at a minimum be cast into doubt, and the officials involved in approving and using the autopens should be held accountable,’ Cruz said. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The fan who shoved Baltimore Ravens’ DeAndre Hopkins and Lamar Jackson won’t be able to attend NFL games for a long time. If ever.

The fan is banned “indefinitely” from Bills and NFL stadiums, Bills and league officials told USA TODAY Sports. The fan had been ejected after he shoved the two Ravens players.

ESPN was first to report the news.

The incident occurred after Hopkins’ one-handed 29-yard touchdown reception late in the third quarter that put the Ravens up 34-19. Hopkins and Jackson were celebrating behind the corner of the end zone when the fan shoved Hopkins in the helmet and then put hands on Jackson’s helmet.

Jackson responded by pushing the fan with two hands.

‘I seen him slap D-Hop … and he slapped me and he talking, so you know I just forgot where I was for a little bit,’ Jackson told reporters after the 41-40 loss. “But you got to think in those situations. You have security out there. Let security handle it. But I just let my emotions get the best of me. Hopefully, it don’t happen again. I learned from that.”

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

A Senate Republican charged that former President Joe Biden and top administration officials ‘demolished’ the constitutional guardrails for pardons by using an autopen.

Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, wrote in a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi, which was first obtained by Fox News Digital, that there are a list of ‘core constitutional requirements’ that must be met for pardons and granting clemency, and that the administration’s usage of an autopen likely ran afoul of those guardrails.

In the waning months of his presidency, the Biden administration commuted the sentences of roughly 1,500 inmates and pardoned 39 others in December. A little over a month later, the administration issued roughly 2,500 more commutations — the most ever by a president in a single day.

Cruz, who is a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee and chair of the Subcommittee on Federal Courts, Oversight, Agency Action, and Federal Rights, offered to provide Bondi assistance in ongoing investigations into the administration’s alleged abuse of the autopen.

He said that the clemencies were issued ‘based on broad criteria rather than case-by-case evaluations, and at least some were signed using an autopen of then-President Biden’s signature.’

‘These core Constitutional requirements, considerations, and expectations were demolished in the final months of the Biden administration for partisan and personal motives by President Biden, his family, and his top officials,’ Cruz said.

Cruz noted that the presidential pardon authority granted under Article II, Section 2 of the Constitution requires a chain of custody of sorts: there has to be an unbroken line from the president to a pardon being granted, he said.

‘Everyone involved in the process — government officials purporting to issue a pardon, the person to whom it is being granted, judicial and law enforcement officials, and most of all the American people — should have absolute confidence a pardon was granted at the president’s explicit direction,’ Cruz said.

But recent reports, and ongoing congressional investigations, have raised doubts over whether Biden explicitly directed the avalanche of pardons toward the end of his presidency.  

Cruz’s letter comes on the heels of a report from Axios that unearthed emails that showed Biden officials raised concerns with how the president’s team decided to make certain pardons and the frequent usage of the autopen.

Cruz said that the emails showed that the Biden White House ‘implemented a process that separated the President from officials responsible for signing pardons on his behalf.’

‘They could not know if they were doing so at the President’s direction, either on a case-by-case basis or as a matter of criteria,’ he said.

He argued that the doubts raised by recent reports, and the ongoing investigations by the Justice Department, risked a ‘constitutional crisis in which the other branches and the American people cannot have faith that the President’s Article 2 pardon power was legitimately deployed.’

‘If the integrity of the clemency process was broken by Biden officials, such that the relevant actions were not taken at the President’s direction, the status of the pardons and commutations would at a minimum be cast into doubt, and the officials involved in approving and using the autopens should be held accountable,’ Cruz said. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Among the files made public by the House Oversight Committee is a document that stands out for its tone: a glossy 238-page scrapbook that offers a rare and unusually intimate glimpse of Jeffrey Epstein’s self-curated network. 

The infamous ‘birthday book,’ compiled by Ghislaine Maxwell in 2003, for Epstein’s 50th includes what appears to be notes from former President Bill Clinton, Alan Dershowitz, as well as photographs that juxtapose girlfriends, animals, children’s drawings with financiers and politicians — a tableau that feels all the more unsettling today.

Maxwell wrote to Epstein at the beginning of the book that she wanted to ‘gather stories and old photographs to jog your memory about places, people and different events.’ She hoped he would ‘derive as much pleasure from looking through it’ as she did assembling it for him.

Later in the book, a photo of the two canoodling appears with a caption that reads ‘the first date,’ marked with the year 1991.

Maxwell was found guilty in 2021 of sex trafficking and other offenses, and is serving a 20-year prison term. Prosecutors said she played a central role in Epstein’s scheme, luring underage girls into what began as massages and escalated into sexual abuse.

Now 63 and incarcerated since her 2020 arrest, Maxwell told Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche in late August that she had no role in the sexual exploitation of minors. When asked about the ‘birthday book,’ she told Blanche that she could only remember some parts of it, adding that it had been years since she compiled it. 

Among the book’s entries is an apparent note from Bill Clinton, where the former Democratic president praises Epstein’s ‘childlike curiosity’ and his ‘drive to make a difference’ as well as the ‘[illegible] of friends.’

Dershowitz, a former Harvard University law professor who once represented Epstein during criminal investigations, used his birthday note to make a joke about influencing media coverage.

‘Dear Jeffrey, as a birthday gift to you, I managed to obtain an early version of the Vanity Unfair article. I talked them into changing the focus from you to Bill Clinton, as you will see from the enclosed excerpt. Happy birthday and best regards,’ the entry said.

Dershowitz has repeatedly denied wrongdoing as it relates to Epstein.

The birthday book also contained sentimental messages from family and friends. In one note, Epstein’s mother, Pauline Stolofsky Epstein, wrote that she’s been ‘very busy reminiscing since Ghislaine asked me to write about you.’ 

‘Jeff[,] you have been a good son since day one and we have been proud of you ever since,’ Epstein’s mother said.

‘I recall you refused to sleep [as a child] unless I read a story from Grandma’s Golden Book that she bought for 25c,’ she added. ‘At PTA meetings I begged your teachers to improve your handwriting.’

She also referenced Epstein’s life as a bachelor, as well as his prominent media shout-outs.

‘At age 21 Cosmopolitan magazine featured you as ‘Bachelor of the Month,’ Pauline Epstein wrote. ‘Today you still hold that title.’

‘Jeff, I’m so sorry that Dad can’t share the nachus [pride] we have regarding your achievements,’ she added. ‘He would have been overjoyed reading the article about you in the New York magazine.’ 

The book features hundreds of photos from throughout Epstein’s life until age 50, including pictures of him as a child and a teenager.

Some of the earlier images included family pictures, formal school photos and pictures of him hanging out with friends as a teenager.

The book also had revealing images of Epstein shirtless, Epstein embracing women and what appears to be a censored photo of him and Maxwell laughing and embracing in a pool. Pictures of mating lions and zebras were also included in the book.

A picture of a woman in a bikini was also included with the caption, ‘Visiting you down in Palm Beach. Can’t get a second of privacy with you and a camera around ha ha!’

Upon the files’ release, Rep. James Comer, R-Ky., chair of the House Oversight Committee, accused Democrats of previously ‘cherry-picking’ the documents.

‘Oversight Committee Republicans are focused on running a thorough investigation to bring transparency and accountability for survivors of Epstein’s heinous crimes and the American people,’ Comer said.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS