Archive

2025

Browsing

The UFL is investigating an incident involving Michigan Panthers wide receiver Samson Nacua, who appeared to slap a fan after Saturday night’s game against the host St. Louis Battlehawks.

‘The UFL is aware of the incident that took place last evening at the conclusion of the Michigan Panthers vs. St. Louis Battlehawks game in St. Louis. League officials are currently investigating the matter,’ the UFL said in a statement on Sunday.

The 27-year-old Nacua, whose younger brother Puka Nacua is a star receiver for the Los Angeles Rams, is seen on video lunging toward, and making contact with, a spectator who is leaning over the railing. The fan was apparently heckling Samson Nacua after the Battlehawks defeated the Panthers, 32-27.

Audio from the video also appears to capture the sound of Nacua making contact with the fan.

Nacua made three catches for 46 yards in the game. In five games, he has seven receptions for 116 yards and one touchdown. The Panthers (3-2) are tied for first in their division with the Birmingham Stallions.

Nacua played four seasons at Utah and one at BYU, finishing with 1,344 yards and 14 touchdowns on 103 catches in his career.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Would you believe the San Francisco Giants won on a walk-off hit with the bases empty and the hit didn’t make it past the pitcher’s mound?

It’s exactly what happened as chaos took over inside Oracle Park on Sunday as the NL West-leading Giants continued their magical start to the season with a walk-off winner over the Texas Rangers in a play you have to see to believe.

With the game tied 2-2 in the bottom of the ninth, Heliot Ramos was first batter up. Ramos got soft contact off Rangers pitcher Luke Jackson’s slider as it dribbled toward Jackson. Ramos hustled down to first base as Jackson tried an off-balance throw to get the out, but the ball went past first baseman Jake Burger. The Giants left fielder comfortably cruised to second base on the error, but with no Rangers player close to the ball, Ramos risked going to third.

Burger tried to throw Ramos out at third, but the throw was errant and Ramos took off again. He slid into home plate as the throw was late, securing a stunning 3-2 victory as pandemonium erupted from the home crowd.

‘The Giants win the game on a Little League home run. Tell me you’ve seen that one before,’ NBC Sports Bay Area play-by-play announcer Duane Kuiper said.

The official score gave Ramos a hit, and two errors by the Rangers capped off the play. Longtime Giants radio announcer Jon Miller summarized the play perfectly.

‘He hit it no further than 60 feet from home plate. And then the Rangers did the rest,’ Miller said.

While it might have been a lucky, wild way to win, it’s been that kind of season for San Francisco so far. It’s the fifth walk-off win of the season for the Giants in just 29 games in 2025. The team leads MLB in walk-off wins this season and it’s the most the franchise has done in April in a single season.

San Francisco currently leads the NL West at 19-10, half a game ahead of the Los Angeles Dodgers, and the second-best record in baseball, half a game behind the New York Mets.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Now complete, the 2025 NFL draft will go down as one of the league’s more memorable ones – though it’s destined to mostly be remembered for Colorado QB Shedeur Sanders’ free fall to the fifth round, which made Aaron Rodgers’ infamous wait 20 years before seem like a mere glitch.

The Sanders saga aside, this draft also produced the drama, head-scratching decisions and OMG moments inherent to the annual “Player Selection Meeting.” And speaking of any draft’s endemic components, it’s now time to prematurely grade its results … about three years before that’s a remotely fair exercise. But we eat from microwaves far more routinely than slow cookers, right?

One note about the report card methodology: As I grade each team, the goal is to pull back for a big-picture look at its performance holistically rather than judging from a narrow perspective that doesn’t include trades and other considerations that more accurately frame the decisions.

With that in mind, here are your ridiculously hasty 2025 NFL draft grades, with team classes ranked from best to worst:

1. New England Patriots (A)

A team that had to get a transfusion of offensive talent – regardless of circumstances, but especially to give QB Drake Maye a fighting chance in his second NFL season – wisely spent its first four picks on that side of the ball. First-round OT Will Campbell, second-round RB TreVeyon Henderson, third-round WR Kyle Williams and third-round C Jared Wilson will likely not only play significant snaps as rookies – even if they’re not all necessarily starters – but could all have exceptional impacts. Henderson’s could be the most noticeable given his ability to thrive on every down – though the large chunks he rips off as a runner and the protection he provides on passing downs should most benefit Maye.

2. New York Giants (A-)

They might have gotten the draft’s best player in OLB Abdul Carter, who could be a reasonable facsimile of fellow Penn Stater Micah Parsons … even if Carter doesn’t understand he’s not worthy of wearing GOAT OLB Lawrence Taylor’s No. 56. But to get back into the first round for QB Jaxson Dart, essentially at the cost of two third-rounders and with no reason to play him prematurely with Russell Wilson and Jameis Winston round, might be the move that truly gets this franchise back on course … while keeping HC Brian Daboll and GM Joe Schoen in their posts. All that aside, good odds that bulldozing fourth-round RB Cam Skattebo winds up as the favorite pick of Big Blue’s starved fans.

3. Las Vegas Raiders (A-)

No. 6 overall pick Ashton Jeanty was one of this draft’s few apparent blue-chippers and should instantly catalyze what was the league’s worst ground game in 2024. Aside from being inspirational, second-rounder Jack Bech might immediately emerge as new QB Geno Smith’s top wide receiver. Third-rounders Darien Porter, a corner, and Charles Grant, an offensive tackle, could wind up as high-quality starters at mid-range draft cost. Seemingly nice debut by rookie GM John Spytek.

4. New York Jets (A-)

Notable that they hired a defensive-minded coach – and one of the best corners in franchise history – in Aaron Glenn only to opt for an offensive-centric draft, and one that seemed modeled on the Lions blueprint Glenn saw work so well as their defensive coordinator. First-round RT Armand Membou and second-round TE Mason Taylor, son of former Jets OLB Jason Taylor, should either provide immediate help to new QB Justin Fields … or whomever replaces him in a year or two. Third-round CB Azareye’h Thomas will be tested opposite Sauce Gardner but represents good value. Fourth-round WR Arian Smith is pure speed, which could open the field for Mason and WR Garrett Wilson. Glenn and rookie GM Darren Mougey nicely drove the fairway on their first tee shot.

5. Pittsburgh Steelers (B+)

Let’s call this a progress report grade – at least until they officially have Rodgers in the building (though worth noting that HC Mike Tomlin didn’t seem too worried about it during an NFL Network interview Saturday). But assuming Rodgers ultimately arrives, he should walk into a locker room that’s more talented than the version that qualified for the playoffs last season. First-round DL Derrick Harmon could be the next Cam Heyward, even as he plays alongside the perennial All-Pro in the short run. Fourth-round OLB Jack Sawyer should juice a pass rush that already had plenty of it beyond T.J. Watt and Alex Highsmith. But the real delta here could be third-round RB Kaleb Johnson, perhaps a substantial upgrade from departed Najee Harris and who ought to really thrive if a heavily resourced offensive line fully jells in 2025. And getting Ohio State QB Will Howard in Round 6 at least indicates something of a developmental plan for a team that’s spun its wheels behind center since Ben Roethlisberger retired.

6. Dallas Cowboys (B+)

It might not have been exactly what the fan base was hoping for – Jeanty – but owner Jerry Jones and his front office generally do a pretty solid job this time of year. Aside from being a bully on the field, first-round G Tyler Booker not only fills a need but could provide fresh leadership in the locker room in time. Second-round DE Donovan Ezeiruaku and third-round CB Shavon Revel Jr. were certainly worthy of being taken a round earlier than they were. Fifth-round RB Jaydon Blue brings sub-4.4 speed if not the background to suggest he can shoulder the load on the ground. Receiving depth behind WR CeeDee Lamb still looms as a significant question.

7. Philadelphia Eagles (B+)

EVP/GM Howie Roseman isn’t satisfied unless he’s made a few trades, added blockers … and reeled in a University of Georgia defender. Check, check and check, ex-Bulldogs LB Smael Mondon Jr. arriving in Round 5. Nearer the top, it’s also very Roseman to get a sublime talent such as multi-dimensional LB Jihaad Campbell, who could fill multiple needs in Philly once his shoulder is sound, at the end of Round 1. Same goes for second-round S Andrew Mukuba. Sixth-round QB Kyle McCord could blossom into a quality backup in time. And, yes, Roseman added three O-linemen.

8. Green Bay Packers (B+)

Nice to see them break their 23-year streak of not taking a wideout in Round 1, especially considering what Matthew Golden can bring to this offense in terms of game-changing speed and clutch plays. GM Brian Gutekunst stuck with the TLC theme for the offense, adding OT Anthony Belton in the second round and a nice toy in the third with plus-sized WR Savion Williams (6-4, 220) – the classic “find a way to get the ball into his hands” guy.

9. Houston Texans (B+)

Already set up nicely in 2026 with extra picks in Rounds 2, 3 and 4 – two courtesy of the Laremy Tunsil trade to Washington – GM Nick Caserio did a nice job working the board this year, too. And the focus was helping QB C.J. Stroud after a slight sophomore slump largely beyond his control. Moving forward, he’ll operate behind a promising blocker – second-rounder Aireontae Ersery – on a new-look line and will be throwing to talented former Iowa State WRs Jayden Higgins (Round 2) and Jaylin Noel (Round 3), who round out a receiver group that was wiped out at times in 2024.

All NFL news on and off the field. Sign up for USA TODAY’s 4th and Monday newsletter.

10. Jacksonville Jaguars (B+)

Mid-rounders like CB Caleb Ransaw, OL Wyatt Milum and RB Bhayshul Tuten all have nice upside, lightning fast and powerful Tuten in particular. But rookie GM James Gladstone’s first draft will be completely defined by the bold move to trade up three spots for WR/CB Travis Hunter with the second overall pick – a gambit that also cost the Jags their second-rounder and a first in 2026. Yet Hunter just might be the generational prospect worth the price – especially if he can become a security blanket for QB Trevor Lawrence while Brian Thomas Jr. hits the home runs. And maybe Hunter provides situational reps at corner.

11. Denver Broncos (B+)

They got a ‘joker’ … on defense. DB Jahdae Barron might turn out to be a steal with the 20th pick and could elevate an already formidable D to the elite tier. Second-round RB RJ Harvey will give the ground game needed horsepower, though it remains to be seen who primarily shares the load since he wouldn’t seem well suited at his size (5-8, 205) to take 20 touches a game in the NFL. Third-round WR Pat Bryant has a chance to chip in early.

12. Seattle Seahawks (B+)

GM John Schneider and HC Mike Macdonald sure have been busy transforming the roster during a frenetic offseason. That continued in a draft that should be a boon to the present and possibly the longer-range future. First-round OL Grey Zabel addresses a clear and present need at guard. Second-round S Nick Emmanwori, whom Schneider moved up for, could be the next coming of Kam Chancellor. Second-round TE Elijah Arroyo will also have a chance to be a significant presence in a new-look passing attack. But the obvious wild card is third-round QB Jalen Milroe, a tantalizing prospect whom the Seahawks should have the luxury of developing on a reasonable timeline … especially if new QB1 Sam Darnold retains his newly found Pro Bowl form.

13. Tennessee Titans (B)

This haul will rise or fall depending on the success, or lack thereof, realized by No. 1 overall pick Cam Ward. And while there’s not a ton of doubt the Titans got this year’s best quarterback – and filled a glaring need in doing so – what’s less clear is how good Ward actually is. After pulling out of the 2024 draft – when he likely would have been no better than the sixth quarterback selected – he truly blossomed at the University of Miami. Whether that success and his alpha personality translate to Nashville is TBD, but rookie GM Mike Borgonzi was confident enough in Ward to resist the significant trade overtures he received. As for the rest of Borgonzi’s first crop? Meh?

14. Kansas City Chiefs (B)

After watching their defense and blocking collapse in Super Bowl 59, HC Andy Reid and GM Brett Veach targeted fortifications – first-round LT Josh Simmons the most intriguing, particularly if he’s available ahead of schedule coming off the torn patellar tendon he suffered last October. Reid expressed confidence in Simmons’ progress, so the Chiefs might have committed quite the heist. Second-round DT Omarr Norman-Lott, third-round DE Ashton Gillotte and third-round CB Nohl Williams could all provide valuable reps immediately, the latter potentially allowing All-Pro Trent McDuffie to revert to slot duties.

15. New Orleans Saints (B)

There’s a reason underrated GM Mickey Loomis has been on the job for a quarter century. Good chance he just about perfectly married value to need with his first three selections, who might all be starters in 2025: First-round OT Kelvin Banks Jr., second-round QB Tyler Shough and third-round DL Vernon Broughton. Third-round S Jonas Sanker and fourth-round LB Danny Stutsman could find themselves in prominent roles – and making an impact – soon enough.

16. Baltimore Ravens (B)

From a football perspective, they got two standouts in the first two rounds with S Malaki Starks and OLB Mike Green, respectively – each addressing what are among the few needs for one of the league’s powerhouses, Starks likely to start from Day 1. Green led FBS with 17 sacks in 2024 and could make an immediate splash, too. Still, as much as GM Eric DeCosta defended Green’s selection, it’s a pretty bad organizational look. The Ravens have significant issues here currently with K Justin Tucker (who they are apparently in the process of replacing with sixth-rounder Tyler Loop) and in their past – yet chose a guy with multiple sexual assault allegations in his past (Green has denied both). Baltimore is a more talented football team today than it was a week ago, but at what cost?

17. Indianapolis Colts (B)

First-round TE Tyler Warren fell into their lap at No. 14 – and could be ideal for a team that ought to be running the ball while providing help to its muddled quarterback situation … which has a new ingredient in sixth-rounder Riley Leonard, most recently of Notre Dame. Second-round DE JT Tuimoloau arrives at the intersection of value and need.

18. Detroit Lions (B)

It’s gotten to a point where GM Brad Holmes and HC Dan Campbell are almost above reproach as it pertains to their roster-building acumen. Did DT Tyleik Williams seem like a bit of a reach at the end of Round 1? Maybe … but you tell Holmes and Campbell they’re wrong. Second-round G Tate Ratledge seems made to order for this culture while patching a hole.

19. Tampa Bay Buccaneers (B)

GM Jason Licht is another guy – one who doesn’t seem to get deserved credit – who does a heckuva job in the draft-and-develop space. A bit surprising the Bucs went with a wideout – Emeka Egbuka – in Round 1, but he’s among this draft’s safest players … and Mike Evans isn’t getting any younger (though Egbuka’s game more closely resembles Chris Godwin’s). The team needed reinforcements at corner, and second-rounder Benjamin Morrison and third-rounder Jacob Parrish should check that box nicely. Might have been nice to see NT Vita Vea get some help on the D-line, though.

20. Los Angeles Rams (B)

Not especially sexy, but second-round TE Terrance Ferguson, third-round OLB Josaiah Stewart and fourth-round RB Jarquez Hunter should all be able to claim instant roles on a team that could be the biggest threat to the Eagles in the NFC next season. But the big win was GM Les Snead obtaining the Falcons’ first-rounder in 2026, which he might need for QB Matthew Stafford’s successor.

21. Atlanta Falcons (B)

They’re not afraid, that’s for sure – and the decision to take QB Michael Penix Jr. at No. 8 a year ago has aged well despite all the handwringing at the time. This year, GM Terry Fontenot snagged OLB Jalon Walker at No. 15, potentially one of this draft’s best selections – particularly given the Falcons’ years-long inability to rush the quarterback. Yet dealing back up to No. 26 for OLB James Pearce – generally nothing wrong with doubling down – will likely render as the tipping point. Pearce’s talent is undeniable, so there was a reason he was still available at that juncture. Also, Fontenot mortgaged that 2026 first-rounder to get him – quite a risk since this team doesn’t exactly appear ready to win the Super Bowl given it still hasn’t managed to win the NFC South since 2016. Safeties Xavier Watts (Round 3) and Billy Bowman Jr. (Round 4) will add juice to a secondary that shed Justin Simmons.

22. San Francisco 49ers (B)

This defense badly needed attention, so credit GM John Lynch for earmarking his first five picks on it. First-round DE Mykel Williams and second-round DT Alfred Collins could help Nick Bosa get back to being the dominant player he should be. Third-round LB Nick Martin ought to flourish alongside All-Pro Fred Warner.

23. Washington Commanders (B-)

It was a lighter class in part because veteran CB Marshon Lattimore came at the price of a third- and fourth-rounder at last year’s trade deadline, a transaction that has yet to bear sufficient fruit. Still, GM Adam Peters did a nice job while picking OT Josh Conerly Jr. in the first round and CB Trey Amos in the second. Fourth-round WR Jaylin Lane could capably take over for departed Dyami Brown as the deep threat.

24. Buffalo Bills (B-)

A team that seems oh-so-close to its first Super Bowl win didn’t seem to come out of this draft with that player or two who seem capable of putting it over the top. We’ll see how the trade up for DT T.J. Sanders in the second round plays out, but going heavy on defense – including Round 1 CB Maxwell Hairston and Round 3 DE Landon Jackson – seems sensible given how the AFC East champs faltered on that side of the ball down the stretch in 2024.

25. Chicago Bears (B-)

GM Ryan Poles, who’s known for his aggressive maneuvers, continues to build out the support system for second-year QB Caleb Williams. But did Poles hit the optimal notes? Time will tell if first-round TE Colston Loveland was the correct choice over Warren. Poles also stood pat at No. 39 and wound up with WR Luther Burden III, who loosely compares to Deebo Samuel, but Chicago missed out on what appeared to be this draft’s top running back prospects. Poles did wind up with three stabs in Round 2, and DT Shemar Turner might have been the best of the trio (OT Ozzy Trapilo being the other).

26. Arizona Cardinals (B-)

Could be an especially wide variance of outcomes with their first two picks, first-round DT Walter Nolen and CB Will Johnson – the latter’s knee likely to determine if he was a steal or a player with diminishing returns. Third-rounder Jordan Burch joins a D-line that may be morphing from weakness to strength.

27. Los Angeles Chargers (C+)

Nothing wrong with amassing quality depth. But what if it’s overly redundant? First-round RB Omarion Hampton might not need long to displace fellow banger Najee Harris, but would a back like Henderson have provided a better change-of-pace option? Second-round WR Tre Harris is a nice player but not the deep threat this passing game seemingly needs. Outside corner and tight end remain open questions.

28. Cincinnati Bengals (C)

From a macro perspective, they resourced their draft properly by investing heavily in the defense and offensive line – this team’s major issues in 2024 giving up too many points and its ongoing penchant for getting QB Joe Burrow sacked three times a week. But first-round DE Shemar Stewart is your classic boom-or-bust prospect – how often does that work out in Cincinnati? – and going for a pair of linebackers afterward seemed a bit … odd. The best thing that arguably “happened” was retaining 2024 Defensive Player of the Year runner-up Trey Hendrickson on the roster, though it’s past time to address his woefully underfunded contract.

29. Carolina Panthers (C)

They might have overspent on WR Tetairoa McMillan at No. 8. And they might have struck gold on OLB Nic Scourton at No. 51. Fourth-round RB Trevor Etienne is a nice player, though it’s worth wondering if GM Dan Morgan should have attacked other parts of the roster given the presence of recently extended RB Chuba Hubbard and newly signed Rico Dowdle in the backfield.

30. Minnesota Vikings (C)

Previous deals left them with one pick in the top 100, though taking G Donovan Jackson was prudent with QB J.J. McCarthy coming back from his knee injury … even if Jackson is a Buckeye protecting a Wolverine. Otherwise, a team that spent freely in free agency seemed largely relegated to targeting depth, including backup QB Sam Howell via a pick swap.

31. Miami Dolphins (C-)

They absolutely needed to get tougher in the trenches – on both sides of the ball. So from that standpoint, spending their only picks ahead of the fifth round on DT Kenneth Grant (Round 1) and G Jonah Savaiinaea (Round 2) made sense. Conversely, were they both slight reaches relative to their draft position or even the best available options at their respective positions? The team’s spotty track record, especially on the O-line, makes one wonder.

?. Cleveland Browns (I – for incomplete)

Think this assessment is a copout? Fine. But there’s no legitimate way to know what to make of this until the bigger picture comes into focus – at least a year from now. It’s tough to even know where to begin.

But let’s start with Thursday, when the Browns stunningly vacated the No. 2 spot and opportunity to take Hunter, the 2024 Heisman Trophy winner quite possibly a generational prospect – not to mention one who seemingly would have fit well onto this roster and was glowingly praised by GM Andrew Berry the week before the draft. But Berry punched out and wound up with DT Mason Graham (No. 5 pick) and battering ram RB Quinshon Judkins (No. 36 pick) as part of the compensation – both very good football players and doubtless Week 1 starters. Second-round LB Carson Schwesinger should also be instantly productive, while electric fourth-round RB Dylan Sampson could be a fantastic foil to Judkins, who paired so well with Henderson at Ohio State.

But what to make of the quarterback situation, which was the scintillating tandem of Joe Flacco and Kenny Pickett a week ago? By obtaining Jacksonville’s 2026 first-rounder, the Browns seemed well positioned to draft a passer next year, which is expected to have far better options as it pertains to the slingers likely inbound from NIL land. Taking former college star Dillon Gabriel, most recently of Oregon, in Round 3 added intrigue to the mix – which, sure, fine.

But by taking Sanders in the fifth round, the quarterback situation is now as muddled as ever (and this is a team that’s been paying Deshaun Watson a fully guaranteed $230 million to be horrible), the body language of Berry and HC Kevin Stefanski after taking Sanders leading many to wonder if owner Jimmy Haslam had mandated the pick. Put such speculation aside, and Berry and Stefanski tried to downplay it afterward. Stefanski is a two-time Coach of the Year who’s gotten a ton out of this roster – when Watson isn’t on the field, and he won’t be in 2025 after multiple Achilles surgeries. Yet the worse the Browns are next season – and, just maybe, the worse Sanders is (and after all the NFL has already put him through) – the better the shot Cleveland will have to get a 2026 rookie quarterback who could quite reasonably be clearly better than anyone currently on this depth chart.

So, yeah … get back to me in a year.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The NBA officiating crew chief from the outfit that ate its whistle during a crucial no-call late in the Knicks victory over the Pistons on Sunday indicated after the game that a foul should’ve been enforced, denying Detroit the chance to win the game at the foul line.

Tim Hardaway Jr. released a 3-point attempt at the buzzer. Josh Hart defended.

“During live play, it was judged that Josh Hart made a legal defensive play,” crew chief David Guthrie said in a pool report released Sunday afternoon. “After postgame review, we observed that Hart makes body contact that is more than marginal to Hardaway Jr. and a foul should have been called.”

A foul call would’ve sent Hardaway to the line for three free throws; one conversion would’ve tied the score, two would’ve won the game.

This season, Hardaway converted free throws at an 85.5% clip.

Facing a one-point deficit, the Pistons inbounded the ball with 11.1 seconds left. All-Star guard Cade Cunningham crossed over Knicks forward OG Anunoby to create enough space to get off a shot from the left elbow. The shot rimmed out and in the ensuing battle for possession, the ball trickled over to Hardaway in the corner.

Hart, anticipating the shot, jumped in the air as Hardaway gathered his feet to shoot. As Hardaway jumped to attempt the shot, Hart glanced the right side of Hardaway’s body, impacting his shooting motion.

“You go back and look at the film, (Hart) leaves his feet and there’s contact on Tim Hardaway’s jump shot,” Pistons coach J.B. Bickerstaff said after the game. “I don’t know any other way around it: there’s contact on his jump shot. The guy leaves his feet, he’s at Timmy’s mercy — I repeat, there was contact on his jump shot.”

The Knicks took a 3-1 series lead, with Game 5 on Tuesday in Madison Square Garden now becoming a potential closeout scenario. In NBA history, only 13 teams have rallied from a 3-1 deficit in the playoffs to win their respective series and advance.

Now, after the crushing defeat, the Pistons will try to be the 14th.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Los Angeles Lakers are in trouble.

The sixth-seeded Timberwolves are just one victory from eliminating the third-seeded Lakers after taking Game 4 116-113 for a 3-1 lead in their first-round Western Conference series.

The Timberwolves overcame a 10-point deficit to start the fourth quarter and relied on strong offensive performances from All-Star guard Anthony Edwards and forward Julius Randle. Edwards had 43 points, nine rebounds and six assists, and Randle scored 25 points.

Minnesota, which reached the conference finals last season, had just enough offense and just enough defense to overcome 27 points, 12 rebounds and eight assists from Lakers star LeBron James and 38 points from star Luka Doncic.

Trailing by 10 to start the fourth quarter and behind 99-90 with 8:26 remaining in the fourth, the Timberwolves outscored the Lakers 26-14 down the stretch.

Jaden McDaniels’ three-point play with 39.5 seconds left put Minnesota ahead 114-113. The Lakers called timeout, but James committed a turnover followed by an Edwards turnover. Minnesota challenged the call, arguing Edwards was fouled before losing possession – and won the challenge, giving Edwards two free throws.

He made both for a 116-113 lead, and Austin Reaves missed a 3-pointer to end the game.

Game 5 is Wednesday in Los Angeles (10 p.m. ET, TNT).

Just 13 teams have come back from a 3-1 deficit, and it hasn’t happened since 2020 when Denver did it twice.

Read what you missed from Game 4 of the Lakers and Timberwolves:

Timberwolves 116, Lakers 113: Highlights

3Q: Lakers 94, Timberwolves 84

The Los Angeles Lakers opened the third quarter with a 14-0 run, grabbed a double-digit lead and ended the third quarter with a 94-84 lead.

The offensive prowess of Los Angeles Lakers stars LeBron James and Luka Doncic is just slightly better than the production of Minnesota Timberwolves stars Anthony Edwards and Julius Randle.

Will that hold through the fourth quarter?

Doncic has 31 points, and James has 27 points, 11 rebounds and six assists and is on pace to play 40-plus minutes for the third consecutive game. Rui Hachimura has 20 points for the Lakers.

Edwards has 27 points, five rebounds and four assists, and Randle has 25 for the Timberwolves.

Minnesota’s Rudy Gobert was issued a flagrant foul one for a forearm to the back of James’ head and Timberwolves coach Chris Finch was given a technical foul with 31.8 seconds left in the quarter, helping the Lakers take a 10-point lead.

Halftime: Timberwolves 61, Lakers 58

It was all Anthony Edwards and Julius Randle for the Minnesota Timberwolves in the first half of Game 4 vs. the Los Angeles Lakers.

It was all LeBron James and Luka Doncic for the Lakers.

And the Timberwolves are up 61-58 at halftime.

Edwards had 19 points, four rebounds and four assists, and Randle scored 21 points in the opening two quarters.

James scored 22 points and delivered seven assists, and Doncic had 21 points in the first half. Lakers forward Rui Hachimura was the only other player in double figures in points with 10.

Midway through the second quarter, James and Doncic had scored 34 of Los Angeles’ 44 points. James, who played 22 of 24 minutes in the first half, also had more than half of his points on free throws, going 12-for-14 from the foul line.

The game has other statistical oddities: Doncic has just one assist and one rebound, and the Lakers have just three points from their bench.

1Q: Lakers 32, Timberwolves 28

Luka Doncic, who was dealing with a stomach illness the past two days, scored 13 points, and LeBron James had nine points, three rebounds and two assists as the Los Angeles Lakers owned a 32-28 lead over Minnesota after the first quarter of Game 4 on Sunday.

The Lakers shot 47.8% from the field but let a 32-22 lead dwindle to a four-point lead to close the quarter.

Julius Randle has a team-high 13 points for the Timberwolves who shot just 34.6% from the field in the opening quarter. Anthony Edwards found scoring late in the quarter and has nine points.

What time is Lakers vs. Timberwolves?

Game 4 of the NBA playoff series between the Los Angeles Lakers and Minnesota Timberwolves is scheduled to begin at 3:30 p.m. ET on Sunday, April 27 at the Target Center (Minneapolis).

How to watch Lakers vs. Timberwolves game: TV, stream

Time: 3:30 p.m. ET/12:30 p.m. PT
Location: Target Center (Minneapolis)
TV: ABC
Stream: Fubo, YouTube TV

Watch Lakers vs. Timberwolves on Fubo

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Andrew Novak and Ben Griffin emerged the winners of the only team play event of the 2025 PGA Tour.

The duo captured the title at one golf’s most unique events in the Zurich Classic of New Orleans on Sunday.

The stroke-play team event is the only such tournament on the calendar this year, and the team of Novak and Griffin not held onto two-stroke lead they had entering the final round at TPC Louisiana, but survived play getting suspended due to weather.

Novak and Griffin won with a final score of 28-under-par, narrowly beating the team of Nicolai Højgaard and Rasmus Højgaard by one stroke. After the second place finishers birdied on the 18th hole, Novak and Griffin just needed par to secure the title, and that’s exactly what they did.

Here’s the breakdown of the purse at the 2025 Zurich Classic of New Orleans, including payout in order of finish:

Zurich Classic prize money 2025: Winner payout, purse

This year’s total purse for the 2025 Zurich Classic is $9.2 million. Per the PGA, here is a breakdown of how that prize money will be doled out, from the winner to 90th place.

1st: Andrew Novak and Ben Griffin (-28), $1,656,000
2nd: Nicolai Højgaard and Rasmus Højgaard (-27), $1,002,800 
3rd: Jake Knapp and Frankie Capan III (-26), $634,800
T4th: David Lipsky and Dylan Wu (-25), $450,800
T4th: Taylor Dickson and Trace Crowe (-25), $450,800
T4th: Karl Vilips and Michael Thorbjornsen (-25), $450,800
T4th: Luke List and Henrik Norlander (-25), $450,800
T8th: Chad Ramey and Justin Lower (-24), $287,500
T8th: Isaiah Salinda and Kevin Velo (-24), $287,500
T10th: Jacob Bridgeman and Chandler Phillips (-23), $250,700
T10th: Hayden Buckley and Braden Thornberry (-23), $250,700
T12th: Matteo Manaseero and Cristobal Del Solar (-22), $213,900
T12th: Chris Gotterup and Quade Cummins (-22), $213,900
T12th: Nick Taylor and Adam Hadwin (-22), $213,900
T12th: Ryan Gerard and Danny Walker (-22), $213,900
T12th: Sepp Straka and Brice Garnett (-22) $213,900
T12th: Rory McIlroy and Shane Lowry (-22), $213,900
T18th: J.T. Poston and Keith Mitchell (-21), $140,300
T18th: Ricky Castillo and William Mouw (-21), $140,300
T18th: Nate Lashley and Hayden Springer (-21), $140,300
T18th: Aaron Rai and Sahith Teegala (-21), $140,300
T18th: Trey Mullinax and Robby Shelton (-21), $140,300
T18th: Ryo Hisatsune and Takumi Kanaya (-21), $140,300
T24th: Steven Fisk and Tim Widing (-20), $88,504
T24th: Sam Stevens and Max McGreevy (-20), $88,504
T26th: David Skinns and Ben Taylor (-19), $73,692
T26th: Vince Whaley and Anders Albertson (-19), $73,692
T28th: Paul Peterson and Thomas Rosenmueller (-18), $68,080
T28th: Kevin Tway and Bud Cauley (-18), $68,080
T28th: Nco Echavarria and Max Greyserman (-18), $68,080
31st: Kris Ventura and Antoine Rozner (-17), $59,800
T32nd: Thomas Detry and Robert MacIntyre (-16), $57,040
T32nd: Davis Riley and Nick Hardy (-16), $57,040
T32nd: Cam Davis and Adam Svensson (-16), $57,040
35th: Brandt Snedeker and Chez Reavie (-15), $49,680
36th: Kevin Chappell and Tom Hoge (-14), $47,380
37th: $45,080
38th: $43,240
39th: $41,400
40th: $39,560
41st: $37,720
42nd: $35,880
43rd: $34,040
44th: $32,200
45th: $30,360
46th: $28,520
47th: $26,680
48th: $25,208
49th: $23,920
50th: $23,184
51st: $22,632
52nd: $22,080
53rd: $21,712
54th: $21,344
55th: $21,160
56th: $20,976
57th: $20,792
58th: $20,608
59th: $20,424
60th: $20,240
61st: $20,056
62nd: $19,872
63rd: $19,688
64th: $19,504
65th: $19,320
66th: $19,136
67th: $18,952
68th: $18,768
69th: $18,584
70th: $18,400
71st: $18,216
72nd: $18,032
73rd: $17,848
74th: $17,664
75th: $17,480
76th: $17,296
77th: $17,112
78th: $16,928
79th: $16,744
80th: $16,560
81st: $16,376
82nd: $16,192
83rd: $16,008
84th: $15,824
85th: $15,640
86th: $15,456
87th: $15,272
88th: $15,088
89th: $14,904
90th: $14,720

2025 Zurich Classic of New Orleans: How to watch, schedule, TV

CBS will carry live coverage of the final round of the 2025 Zurich Classic of New Orleans starting at 3 p.m. ET, as will the Golf Channel (1-3 p.m. ET).

Streaming options include ESPN+ and Peacock, while fans can catch the action with a free trial of Fubo.

Date: Sunday, April 27
Location: TPC Louisiana (Avondale, Louisiana)
TV channel: CBS (3-6 p.m. ET), Golf Channel (1-3 p.m. ET)
Streaming: Fubo, ESPN+, Peacock

Watch the Zurich Classic of New Orleans on Fubo

(This story was updated to add more information.)

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The first round of the NFL draft is typically the most watched part of the league’s event, but plenty of people were still tuned into the weekend, likely because of Shedeur Sanders.

After the first round of the 2025 NFL Draft drew 13.6 million viewers across ESPN and NFL Network – second-highest ever – according to Nielsen, viewership remained strong on Day 2. There were 7.3 million viewers across rounds two and three on ABC, ESPN2 and NFL Network, according on Nielsen fast national figures.

It was the second-most watched second day of the NFL draft on record, and up more than 40% from 2024 viewership, NFL Media said.

There’s no definitive reason as to why viewership rose during the 2025 edition, but it can likely be pointed to the drama surrounding Sanders and his fall. He was projected to be a first-round pick, and possibly a top three selection by some experts. Instead, Sanders didn’t see his name get called in the first round as it was the biggest story of day one.

As people waited to see if Sanders’ name would be called on Day 2, Tyler Shough, Jalen Milroe and Dillon Gabriel were selected while the former Colorado quarterback didn’t get selected in the second or third round, creating further interest as to when Sanders would be selected. There was plenty of debate during the draft coverage as to what led to Sanders’ slide, resulting in some interesting speculation and fiery disputes.

Sanders ended up hearing his named called on the third day of the draft as he was the 144th overall pick, selected in the fifth round by the Cleveland Browns. Viewership numbers for day three haven’t been released yet, but given how there was an increase on Day 2, the figures could be higher for the final four rounds.

Even without the Sanders dilemma, the 2025 NFL Draft was still a success in terms of attendance. The three-day attendance for the draft was 600,000, shattering the pre-draft estimate of 250,000. It was equal to the 2019 draft in Nashville. The all-time record for draft attendance was set last year in Detroit with 775,000 attendees.

All the NFL news on and off the field. Sign up for USA TODAY’s 4th and Monday newsletter.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

LOUISVILLE, Ky. — If you’ve stumbled upon the new Netflix documentary series “Race for the Crown,’ which chronicles the lead-up to last year’s Kentucky Derby all the way through the Triple Crown, you’d get the sense that horse racing is a sport of private jets, eccentric billionaires and corporatized trainers collecting dozens of high-priced 2-year olds hoping just one will be good enough to get in the starting gate on the first Saturday in May. 

And that depiction is … not exactly wrong. 

Especially these days, the reality is that oil sheikhs, massive racing partnerships and ultra-wealthy American moguls buy up so much of the top-end horse flesh and send them to such a small handful of high-profile trainers that the odds are stacked almost impossibly against someone like Ethan West. 

Who is Ethan West? In more ways than one, he’s the ultimate Derby anomaly – but also the kind of personality that gives the race its mystique as the greatest two minutes in sports. 

Not only is West a relative unknown who races mostly at Turfway Park outside of Cincinnati and cheaper tracks in Indiana, Ohio and Pennsylvania, he’s a mere 32 years old, has only had a trainer’s license for seven years and is bringing a horse named Chunk of Gold to the Derby that was purchased for $2,500.

And here’s the best part: He actually has a decent chance to win. 

‘It’s a lot of hard work, even more luck,’ West told USA TODAY Sports after his horse drew the No. 19 post position. ‘It’s unbelievable. I really don’t have any other words to put into it.’

One of the great things about the Derby is that even if Chunk of Gold were to take the roses on Saturday, he wouldn’t be among the top handful of shocking winners in the 151-year history of the race. 

That bar has been set impossibly high by the likes of Rich Strike coming home at 80-1 three years ago, Mine that Bird emerging from New Mexico to win at 50-1 in 2009 or Canonero II coming out of Venezuela as a laughingstock before blowing past everyone to win by daylight in 1971. 

Coming off a pair of solid second-place finishes in the Louisiana Derby and Risen Star Stakes in New Orleans, the quickly-improving Chunk of Gold wouldn’t be a total stunner. 

But even Canonero II, who was famously sold to his Venezuelan owners as a yearling for $1,200, wasn’t as humbly priced when you consider that he would have cost around $9,000 in inflation-adjusted dollars today. 

When you consider the whole package – a relatively new trainer who has only won 168 career races at any level going up against multiple Hall of Famers and a $2,500 horse in the same starting gate as Derby favorite Journalism, who was purchased for $825,000 – that’s where the true magic of the Kentucky Derby resides. Not in a hedge fund guy who dresses for the race track like he’s headed to Studio 54 and has Ace of Spades bottles in his refrigerator to celebrate a seven-figure Thoroughbred purchase, as the Netflix show suggested by focusing on 2008 Derby-winning owner Michael Iavarone. 

‘People love our story,’ West said. ‘Young trainer, smaller owner. We’ve come a long way.’

Even the way West got into horse racing is pretty unusual. Whereas a lot of the successful young trainers like Chad Brown or Brad Cox entered the sport by doing low-level work around prominent barns and learned the craft by working their way up the apprenticeship ladder, West didn’t have an obvious path to a training career. 

Introduced to the game by his grandparents, who owned a couple horses that ran at the Indiana tracks near where he grew up, it was actually his older brother Aaron who first pursued training as they both picked up odd jobs around the local track to make some money. Then after he graduated high school, the brothers leased a training center in Russell Springs, Kentucky, where they started a business that focused on raising and training younger horses.

‘That grew, and one of us had to go back to the racetrack,’ West said. ‘That was me. I didn’t have a family at the time so I did the racetrack traveling back and forth and then in 2018 I took a license out on my own and started my own (stable). It’s unorthodox. Most kids have a foot into it, they have a dad in the business or a mentor they can follow under. We were just kind of winging it and now we both have our own productive businesses.’

While working in Russell Springs, West of course had heard about Terry Stephens, arguably the town’s most prominent resident and the owner of a steel manufacturing company that ranks among the country’s biggest chain-link fence distributors. 

West knew of Stephens but did not know him personally. It just so happened, though, that Stephens purchased a half-interest in the horse last year from Chris Melton, who also runs a Kentucky-based training center and had originally purchased him at a 2-year old auction for $2,500.  

Originally slated to go to a trainer in Maryland, Stephens preferred that the horse run in Kentucky and his advisor recommended West based on a prior relationship. After Chunk of Gold impressively won his debut, Stephens – who owned a piece of 2021 Derby fourth-place finisher O Besos – bought out the rest of the horse for $100,000. The first time West met Stephens in person was in February before Chunk of Gold ran second in the Risen Star, putting him in contention for the Derby. 

‘We’re so proud of the horse,’ West said. ‘He’s brought us a long way. It’s easy to say, ‘Oh, we’re going to get this horse to the Kentucky Derby, but now here we are. It’s cool. I really don’t know how to put it into words.’

Now a father of three whose wife, Paige, is a racetrack photographer, West’s life could change in significant ways over the coming weeks. Regardless of how Chunk of Gold performs on Saturday, just having this platform at the Derby will give him the kind of name recognition and credibility that could open doors into a level of horse racing that typically takes longer than seven years as a trainer to achieve. 

‘Whether you’re training horses down there or up here, the horse still comes first,’ he said. ‘It’s your responsibility to get them in the spot where they can compete whether they’re a mediocre horse or a notch below or above, turf, dirt, that’s our job to figure out. That’s all the same. But with the media, the publicity, it’s a whole new world.’

And then, of course, there’s the most important question: Can he win? That’s what the connections for all 20 horses have to figure out this week, but West thinks Chunk of Gold has a case. Though he’s won just once in four starts, he’s taken forward steps in each race and shown the ability to overcome some adversity in each of his three second-place finishes. That portends well for a Derby where it’s hard to avoid traffic trouble in a 20-horse field, and Chunk of Gold should be positioned somewhere in the middle of the pack early and give himself a chance coming around the final turn. 

Is he good enough? Time will tell. But the mere fact that a $2,500 horse and a 32-year old trainer who’s never won a Grade 1 stakes can compete for the sport’s most coveted prize shows another side – and arguably a better side – of horse racing that you’re not going to see on Netflix. 

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Austin Cindric held off Ryan Preece down the stretch to win the Jack Link’s 500 as the NASCAR Cup Series returned to action after a bye week on Sunday at Talladega Superspeedway in Talladega, Alabama.

The Fords of Cindric and Preece ran 1-2 side-by-side in front of the Chevrolets of William Byron and Kyle Larson with 17 laps to go. The pair raced tight but clean off Turn 4 for the final time, with Cindric’s No. 2 Team Penske car edging Preece’s No. 60 by 0.022 seconds for his third career win in his 125th start.

On the day’s final pit stop, Cindric’s crew turned in the quickest service on the No. 2 car, which gridded 25th as it hit pit road.

The victory was just Ford’s third in the past 10 Talladega events.

Larson and Byron finished third and fourth, while Joey Logano ended up in fifth.

Polesitter Zane Smith was 21st. Ryan Blaney, the 2023 series champion, wrecked out in the first caution and was 39th in his fourth DNF this season.

After Smith led them to green following his first career pole qualifying spot, his No. 38 Ford was quickly under attack for the lead by Austin Dillon, Michael McDowell and Kyle Busch.

However, the Toyota contingent soon formed on the top line of the 2.66-mile superspeedway and blew past the Fords and Chevys toward the front in the 60-lap Stage 1.

Two laps after pitting, Busch and Brad Keselowski wrecked coming toward pit road. Three-time Talladega winner Blaney and Alex Bowman also received damage.

With 10 laps to go in the segment, there was more trouble after Christopher Bell and Chris Buescher spun down to the apron while running side by side on the front row. Bell’s No. 20 crashed into the inside wall in the 188-lap race’s hardest hit.

In a four-car bowtie brigade, Larson recorded his first Talladega stage win, though he was soon sent to the back for speeding on pit road. The Chevys of Byron, Ricky Stenhouse Jr. and Chase Elliott took the next three spots.

Bubba Wallace maxed the bonus points by holding off Logano and Larson, who overcame his speeding infraction, to win Stage 2. Cindric was fourth.

With 50 laps to go, five Toyotas led five Fords and two Chevrolets as the manufacturers teamed up and went two-wide instead of three abreast.

Talladega race results

Results for the NASCAR Cup Series Jack Link’s 500 at Talladega Superspeedway, via The Tennessean:

Austin Cindric, No. 2 Team Penske Ford
Ryan Preece, No. 60 RFK Racing Ford
Kyle Larson, No. 5 Hendrick Motorsports Chevrolet
William Byron, No. 24 Hendrick Motorsports Chevrolet
Joey Logano, No. 22 Team Penske Ford
Noah Gragson, No. 4 Front Row Motorsports Ford
Chase Elliott, No. 9 Hendrick Motorsports Chevrolet
Carson Hocevar, No. 77 Spire Motorsports Chevrolet
Alex Bowman, No. 48 Hendrick Motorsports Chevrolet
Bubba Wallace, No. 23 23XI Racing Toyota
Daniel Suarez, No. 99 Trackhouse Racing Chevrolet
Austin Dillon, No. 3 Richard Childress Racing Chevrolet
Michael McDowell, No. 71 Spire Motorsports Chevrolet
Ricky Stenhouse Jr., No. 47 HYAK Motorsports Chevrolet
Cole Custer, No. 41 Haas Factory Team Ford
Tyler Reddick, No. 45 23XI Racing Toyota
Chase Briscoe, No. 19 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota
Todd Gilliland, No. 34 Front Row Motorsports Ford
Ty Gibbs, No. 54 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota
Erik Jones, No. 43 Legacy Motor Club Toyota
Zane Smith, No. 38 Front Row Motorsports Ford
Ross Chastain, No. 1 Trackhouse Racing Ford
Denny Hamlin, No. 11 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota
Riley Herbst, No. 35 23XI Racing Toyota
Ty Dillon, No. 10 Kaulig Racing Chevrolet
AJ Allmendinger, No. 16 Kaulig Racing Chevrolet
Justin Haley, No. 7 Spire Motorsports Chevrolet
Josh Berry, No. 21 Wood Brothers Racing Ford
Kyle Busch, No. 8 Richard Childress Racing Chevrolet
Anthony Alfredo, No. 62 Beard Motorsports Chevrolet
Shane van Gisbergen, No. 88 Trackhouse Racing Chevrolet
John Hunter Nemechek, No. 42 Legacy Motor Club Toyota
Cody Ware, No. 51 Rick Ware Racing Ford
JJ Yeley, No. 44 NY Racing Team Chevrolet
BJ McLeod, No. 78 Live Fast Motorsports Chevrolet
Chris Buescher, No. 17 RFK Racing Ford
Christopher Bell, No. 20 Joe Gibbs Racing Toyota
Brad Keselowski, No. 6 RFK Racing Ford
Ryan Blaney, No. 12 Team Penske Ford

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

‘Simone never would have made it in my gym.’

Aimee Boorman has heard that line, over and over, from other coaches when they talk about the gymnast she helped lift to heights never seen within their sport.

‘They say it with a sense of pride,’ Boorman tells USA TODAY Sports, ‘and it’s like, ‘So you realize how many potential Simones you have pushed out of your gym?’ ‘

Biles was the kid who always loved the gymnastics part, but not the work that went into making her the best. Some days she just wanted to go home.

Those characteristics didn’t necessarily change as she grew into the decorated champion America knew. Boorman, though, was willing to manage them in a way others wouldn’t.

Biles’ coach from age 7 through her four-gold-medal performance at the 2016 Rio Olympics remembers her as one of her more challenging pupils.

‘If everybody is just strict and obedient, you grow stale as a coach,’ Boorman says. ‘So when you have somebody who’s throwing something new at you all the time, on an emotional level, on a personality level, you gotta grow. And I think some of those other coaches weren’t willing to grow.

‘When people say, ‘Well, there’s only going to be one Simone,’ I’m like, ‘That’s not true.’ You have to know how to manage that athlete to get them to the point they could be a Simone.’

Boorman’s approach – nurturing, forgiving, even relenting – was novel to coaching within a sport of forced discipline and regulation. She lays out her methodology, ingrained in her by a tumultuous childhood experience, in ‘The Balance: My Years Coaching Simone Biles.’

The book, which was released last week, reveals a back story of how athletes develop and mature but also how they can have giggles on their face before and after their most triumphant Olympic moments.

Boorman and co-author Steve Cooper spoke with us about facing unique challenges while coaching and parenting our athletes and how we can overcome them in unexpected ways.

‘Nothing about Simone’s greatness was inevitable,’ Cooper said during our Zoom interview. ‘It was a process. It wasn’t just luck.’

‘If it wasn’t fun, she wasn’t having any part of it’: Without love for a sport, it’s difficult to move forward

Boorman is often asked if she knew when Biles would become superstar. The answer: When she became one.

‘Up until that point, anything can happen,’ she says, ‘and any given day, if Simone didn’t have that passion and that love for gymnastics inside of her, she could be like, ‘I’m done. I’m gonna go run track.’ ‘

Boorman recalls the joy she felt as a young girl in the early 1980s, when she first flung herself from the bars of Lakeshore Academy in Chicago, but also how quickly a reckless coach drained it from her.

No matter how long she stood on the balance beam, her arms raised until they were numb trying to get Coach Jeremy’s attention, he wasn’t satisfied. His name is a pseudonym, but also an extreme archetype for an era of the sport: No positive reinforcement, no acknowledgement of effort and sometimes little hope.

‘That constant negative input made me have total lack of belief in myself,’ she says.

And yet, like most kids, Aimee yearned to please him. She arrived early one day, straining to grab his undivided attention by working out on her own. She broke her leg. Then he ignored her for months until she finally quit.

 ‘I was really useless to him because I couldn’t compete,” she says.

She was pulled back when she coached preschool kids after school a couple of years later. There was something bright within them that she used to feel, something we can so easily push out of young athletes if we don’t nurture it. It was a light she saw in a 7-year-old who bounced around Bannon’s, the gym north of Houston where Boorman started working as a young adult.

Simone Biles couldn’t sit still, but when she did, she pushed herself up off the ground with her arms and slid her legs from straight in front of her to a position in which she was lying on her stomach.

‘What she was doing is not normal,’ Boorman says. ‘We knew that she was going to be able to learn very quickly, but she was just a little girl, and she didn’t like to do the conditioning, and she didn’t want to have to take extra turns. She just wanted it to be fun. And when it wasn’t fun, she wasn’t having any part of it. She didn’t want to be involved at all.’

COACH STEVE: 70% of kids drop out of youth sports by 13. Why?

‘There is no possible way you could disappoint me’: Every day, even a bad one, is an opportunity to move forward

Like other kids, Biles had fears. One was a mental block on her beam series. Boorman would ask her to complete it three times, but would never leave her out there too long like Jeremy had done. They would just come back the next day and try again, a give-and-take that would continue throughout their time together.

‘There were times that she would come in the gym in the morning and she would have a sense of dread about what she was going to have to do based on what she did or didn’t finish the day before,’ Boorman says. ‘And I hope that when she walked in and saw me, and I was like, ‘Good morning,’ and I was very light with her, that then she could go, ‘OK, wait a minute. Maybe I’m not in trouble. Maybe I didn’t disappoint her.’ ‘

Boorman, through the torture, had felt like she was letting Coach Jeremy down. To this day, she tells her students, ‘There’s no possible way you could disappoint me.’

It’s up to them, not her, what they became. It’s her job to support what they want.

‘As a coach, you could never want it more than the athlete,’ she says, ‘and if you do want it more than the athlete, then there’s a problem. I know a lot of overzealous young coaches who are like, ‘Oh, but I want an Olympian,’ but you’re never going to have an Olympian because that’s what you want.

‘If we focus too much on the championship and on that win, then we’re losing the human in the process.’

She likes to live in a ‘compliment sandwich,’ where constructive criticism is surrounded by praise of effort, even on so-called bad days. Those are a matter of perspective, anyway.

‘I have an elite gymnast (who) had been out of the gym for a couple of months, not really training, and she came back in and successfully did a skill that she hadn’t done in two months, and she was like, ‘That was terrible,’ ‘ Boorman says. ‘And I was like, ‘You haven’t done it in two months, and you did it. We’re going to celebrate those wins, and it’s going to be better tomorrow.’

Boorman wanted her students to be comfortable around her so they would express themselves. That way, she could see deep inside and better understand them.

‘Simone’s not a person to go (in) the corner and go through her stuff in her head to get her in the zone,’ she would learn. ‘She has to be there, completely relaxed, cheering on other people. And then when the green light goes on for her to compete, she’s like, game on. But she doesn’t waste any of that in her mind. In her mind, that focus is a waste. Other athletes are completely different.

‘So it doesn’t say anything about what process is correct, but it’s what process is best for each athlete. So for younger coaches who are bringing up the athletes who are not elite yet, you have to give them all of the different tools, and they’re going to find out which process works best for them.’

‘Its just gymnastics’: The needs of the athlete – not those of the coach – have to come first

Biles realized her connection with ‘Coach Aimee’ at 13, when she was invited to a U.S. women’s national team development camp and saw teammates who weren’t as close with their coaches.

They all trained under the strict orders of the program, which wasn’t for Biles.

‘People who are ridiculously talented don’t have to work that hard,’ Boorman says. ‘So when she had to work hard because she was struggling with something, she was not the most pleasant to be around, because it was very frustrating for her and it was easy for her to give up. I can say she was incredibly dedicated. I can’t say she was an incredible hard worker. She knew it became the job that she chose to do and coming in and putting in the hours and everything. But I’ve known a lot of people who are much harder workers, I guess is the gentle way is to say it.’

Martha Karolyi, the program leader, called Biles sloppy and lazy at one of her early visits to camp. Boorman says that killed her confidence, and she declined their next invitation.

Biles didn’t start training a lot of hours until she was 16 or 17.

‘If we had focused on the refinement earlier, she could have been winning meets earlier, but there was also the risk of burnout,’ Boorman says.

Those mid-teen years coincided with what Boorman calls the toughest days coaching Biles.

‘It was never, ‘I don’t want to do this, I want to do this,’ ‘ Boorman says. ‘But there were the normal teenage antics, the head butting and things like that. And so I had to be very strategic about when I would push and when I would let go. I know this can be construed as you’re kicking somebody out of practice, but there would be days that I would say, ‘I think practice should be over for today because we’re not getting anywhere. Neither one of us is having fun.’

‘And sometimes she was like, ‘Bye,’ and other times she’s like, ‘No, I’m sorry. I want to get this done. I’m just frustrated.’ But no matter what every day was, we turned the page.’

Ahead of the U.S. Classic in 2013 in Chicago, Boorman says Biles intentionally fell off the apparatus, jumped off the beam and let herself fall on her vaults. It was her way, her coach said, of controlling an environment where she didn’t want to work.

Boorman wouldn’t force Biles through workouts, but she would let her fail in competition to make a point. When she took a nasty fall, they moved on to the next event.

‘I’ve always been a big supporter of family vacations and take the day off,’ Boorman says. ‘We need mental health days. When I was a gymnast, there was no such thing, and I think that there’s too many sports in general, they want you to come in when you’re sick, when you’re tired, when you’re mentally exhausted, because that’s going to build character. And I just disagree with it. I feel like, if you take one day off and you rest, you’re going to come back so much stronger.

‘It’s just gymnastics. You shouldn’t be risking your health just to achieve a sports goal.’

When she was no longer working with Boorman, Biles removed herself from the 2020 Games when she developed ‘the twisties.’ She had concluded, Boorman says, that ‘the Olympics were not more important than her life.’

‘I think somewhere in her she knew it was going to be OK, and I think that was probably because early on in her career, it was OK to just pull yourself from the competition,’ says Cooper, Boorman’s co-author.

Overcoming ‘the twisties’ in 2016: ‘You only have to live up to your own expectations’

The twisties occur when a gymnast can’t tell where he or she is in the air. Biles also beat them ahead of the Rio Olympics, which Boorman details in her book.

She was 19 and had won three all-around world championship titles in a row and feeling the weight of being the favorite in her first Olympics.

Instead of forcing twists, Boorman temporarily removed them from Biles’ routine, which relieved the pressure.

‘And each day I would say, ‘OK, do you feel like twisting today?’ And she’d be like, ‘Well, yeah, but I think I can only go off beam.’ And so she would only do her beam dismount.’ She wouldn’t twist off bars or floor or falls.

‘It would be baby steps from there. She might come in one day and say, ‘OK, I think I’m ready to do this today.’ And then she would start to do it and be like, ‘No.’ And I’m like, ‘OK, don’t worry about it. There’s so many other things we can do.’ And then instilling that confidence in her that she wasn’t going to lose her skills was important as well.’

They were relying on the repetition they had already done.

‘We had taken so many years to refine them that the muscle memory was there,’ Boorman says. ‘We just had to clear out her brain.’

They gradually noticed she was cured over time, like the way we notice other peoples’ children growing, then realize ours are, too.

‘I always told her that she wasn’t responsible for other people’s expectations of her,’ Boorman says. ‘That was their problem and shame on them for setting those expectations. She only had to live up to her own expectations.’

(This story was updated to add new information.)

Steve Borelli, aka Coach Steve, has been an editor and writer with USA TODAY since 1999. He spent 10 years coaching his two sons’ baseball and basketball teams. He and his wife, Colleen, are now sports parents for two high schoolers. His column is posted weekly. For his past columns, click here.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY