Archive

2025

Browsing

Who are the top players in college football? EA Sports is giving possible answers.

With College Football 26 set to be released July 10 − July 7 for early access − EA Sports announced the top offensive and defensive players in the game, as well as who is at the top of each position.

It should be no surprise the top of the list include Heisman Trophy contenders, including the cover athletes of the game in Ohio State receiver Jeremiah Smith and Alabama receiver Ryan Williams. Other notable people include the other stars of major programs like Notre Dame, Texas and Clemson. While the rankings don’t mean a team will actually have success in the upcoming season, it does give a good indicator of who are the top College Football Playoff contenders.

Here are the top players in EA Sports College Football 26:

EA Sports College Football 26 top offensive players

Jeremiah Smith, Ohio State, receiver: 98 overall
Ryan Williams, Alabama, receiver: 95 overall
Jeremiyah Love, Notre Dame, running back: 95 overall
Jordyn Tyson, Arizona State, receiver: 94 overall
Kadyn Proctor, Alabama, tackle: 94 overall
Spencer Fano, Utah, tackle: 94 overall
Ar’maj Reed-Adams, Texas A&M, guard: 93 overall
Eli Stowers, Vanderbilt, tight end: 93 overall
Franicis Mauigoa, Miami, tackle: 93 overall
Nicholas Singleton, Penn State, running back: 93 overall

EA Sports College Football 26 top quarterbacks

Cade Klubnik, Clemson: 92 overall
Garrett Nussmeier, LSU: 92 overall
Drew Allar, Penn State: 92 overall
Sam Leavitt, Arizona State: 91 overall
Lanorris Sellers, South Carolina: 91 overall

EA Sports College Football 26 top running backs

Jeremiyah Love, Notre Dame: 95 overall
Nicholas Singleton, Penn State: 93 overall
Isaac Brown, Louisville: 93 overall
Jonah Coleman, Washington: 93 overall
Mahki Hughes, Oregon: 92 overall

EA Sports College Football 26 top receivers

Jeremiah Smith, Ohio State: 98 overall
Ryan Williams, Alabama: 95 overall
Jordyn Tyson, Arizona State: 94 overall
Elijah Sarratt, Indiana: 93 overall
Eric Rivers, Georgia Tech: 92 overall

EA Sports College Football 26 top tight ends

Eli Stowers, Vanderbilt: 93 overall
Tanner Koziol, Houston: 92 overall
Max Klare, Ohio State: 91 overall
Oscar Delp, Georgia: 90 overall
Jack Endries, Texas: 90 overall

EA Sports College Football 26 top offensive lineman

Kadyn Proctor, Alabama: 94 overall
Spencer Fano, Utah: 94 overall
Francis Mauigoa, Miami: 93 overall
Ar’maj Reed-Adams, Texas A&M: 93 overall
Jordan Seaton, Colorado: 92 overall

EA Sports College Football 26 top defensive players

Caleb Downs, Ohio State, safety: 96 overall
Anthony Hill Jr., Texas, linebacker: 95 overall
T.J. Parker, Clemson, edge: 95 overall
Dylan Stewart, South Carolina, edge: 94 overall
Jermod McCoy, Tennessee, cornerback: 94 overall
Peter Woods, Clemson, defensive tackle: 94 overall
Colin Simmons, Texas, edge: 93 overall
Leonard Moore, Notre Dame, cornerback: 93 overall
Keldric Faulk, Auburn, edge: 93 overall
Dillon Thieneman, Oregon, safety: 93 overall

EA Sports College Football 26 top edge rushers

T.J. Parker, Clemson: 95 overall
Dylan Stewart, South Carolina: 94 overall
Colin Simmons, Texas: 93 overall
Keldric Faulk, Auburn: 93 overall
David Bailey, Texas Tech: 93 overall

EA Sports College Football 26 top defensive tackles

Peter Woods, Clemson: 94 overall
Christen Miller, Georgia: 92 overall
Tim Keenan III, Alabama: 92 overall
Dontay Corleone, Cincinnati: 92 overall
Rayshaun Benny, Michigan: 91 overall

EA Sports College Football 26 top linebackers

Anthony Hill Jr., Texas: 95 overall
Kyle Louis, Pittsburgh: 93 overall
Suntarine Perkins, Mississippi: 93 overall
Gabe Jacas, Illinois: 92 overall
Austin Romaine, Kansas State: 92 overall

EA Sports College Football 26 top cornerbacks

Jermod McCoy, Tennessee: 94 overall
Leonard Moore, Notre Dame: 93 overall
Chandler Rivers, Duke: 93 overall
Avieon Terrell, Clemson: 92 overall
Malik Muhammad, Texas: 92 overall

EA Sports College Football 26 top safeties

Caleb Downs, Ohio State: 96 overall
Dillon Thieneman, Oregon: 93 overall
Rod Moore, Michigan: 92 overall
Bud Clark, TCU: 92 overall
Terry Moore, Duke: 92 overall

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Cleveland Browns are one step closer to moving to the suburbs. They had already bought the plot of land, and on Monday night, they got the public funding.

Ohio governor Mike DeWine signed a new budget into law on Monday that allocates $600 million in unclaimed funds to partially fund the Browns’ new stadium project in the southeastern Cleveland suburb, according to 92.3 The Fan. The budget decision came three days after the Haslam Sports Group officially purchased a 176-acre plot of land for $76 million, according to Cuyahoga County Fiscal Office via Sportico.

The Browns originally revealed the plans to move to Brook Park in August 2024, at the time calling it ‘a modern, dynamic, world-class venue that would greatly enhance the fan experience and enable the State of Ohio and our region to compete for some of the biggest events in the world 365 days a year.’

The Browns estimate the project to build a new, domed stadium will cost $2.4 billion in total. They’ve now received $600 million from the state of Ohio for the stadium, and the team expects to use an additional $400 million from Brook Park’s income taxes for the new Huntington Bank Stadium.

Haslam Sports Group has also committed $2 billion to mixed-use area development surrounding the stadium.

Though they’ve officially received the public funding, the Browns still have a bit to go before they can begin building the stadium. According to the Columbus Dispatch, former Ohio Attorney General Marc Dann and former state Rep. Jeff Crossman announced they would immediately file a lawsuit if the state budget included funding the Browns’ stadium project with unclaimed funds.

That said, Gov. DeWine already helped the Browns clear another potential road bump by adjusting language in the Modell Law.

The law is nicknamed after infamous former Browns owner Art Modell, who moved the team to Baltimore in 1996. Its actual title is Ohio Revised Code 9.67, which requires any Ohio-based team to give their city six months’ notice to allow ‘political subdivision or any individual or group of individuals who reside in the area the opportunity to purchase the team.’

DeWine passed an amendment that changes language in the Modell Law to only apply to teams attempting to leave the state.

With the Ohio governor backing their project and providing a sizable portion of the state’s budget, the Browns are pushing ahead. Team principal owner Jimmy Haslam says he hopes to break ground in Brook Park by early next year.

‘We respect the firm commitment and leadership that Governor DeWine, and the Ohio Senate and House have shown in their collaborative work to find a responsible way to support such a transformative project, one that will create a generational impact for our region and the State,’ the Haslams said in a statement.

‘Our fans deserve a world-class facility, and we are committed to building a state-of-the-art enclosed stadium that resonates with Cleveland, highlighting our loyal and passionate fans and the Dawg Pound, while also incorporating innovation, bold design, and an immersive experience. The new enclosed Huntington Bank Field will be completely fan-centric, a first-of-its-kind design in the NFL, and a dynamic venue that draws visitors from across Ohio and beyond, for concerts and significant sporting events throughout the year.

‘This premiere facility will anchor a major lifestyle and entertainment development and be a catalyst for one of Northeast Ohio’s largest economic development projects ever and something our community will be proud of and can enjoy for years to come. We appreciate the support of State leaders and their belief in this transformative project.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Bobby Bonilla Day is an annual opportunity to poke fun at the New York Mets, but the club’s infamous deal that pays Bonilla $1.19 million every year until he’s 72, is sort of the reason the team ended up with one of its all-time greats.

Bonilla played just 60 games for the Mets in 1999 and rather than paying him the $5.9 million he was owed for 2000, the club agreed to make yearly payments of $1.19 million for 25 years – with 8% interest – starting in July 2011.

Coming off a trip to the NLCS in 1999, New York had World Series hopes heading into 2000 – and $5.9 million was a big salary back then, with most of the league’s payrolls in the $50 million range. Saving that money in 2000 by dumping Bonilla, the Mets were able to upgrade in the offseason, trading for pitcher Mike Hampton, coming off a 22-4 season with the Houston Astros – with a $5.75 million salary.

The lefty won 15 games with a 3.14 ERA in 2000 and was named NLCS MVP as the Mets reached the World Series for the first time since 1986.

Hampton left the Mets after one season, signing a $121 million deal with the Rockies, citing the state’s school system. (‘I’ve got a son that’s working on his master’s, and my other son’s on the dean’s list … so I guess the school system worked out all right,’ Hampton joked 20 years later.)

But Hampton leaving gave the Mets a compensation pick in the 2001 draft.

With that pick – the 38th overall selection – the Mets selected third baseman David Wright.

Wright went on to become one of the best players in franchise history, trailing only Tom Seaver in WAR and is the club’s career leader in runs, hits, total bases and RBIs. Wright spent his entire career with the Mets, debuting in 2004 and making his final appearance in 2018. He was a seven-time All-Star and won two Gold Glove Awards at the hot corner, but injuries cut his career short.

The Mets will retire his number in July 2025, making him the 10th player to earn the honor and first who spent their entire career with the organization.

Wright debuted on the Baseball Hall of Fame ballot in 2024, receiving 6.1% of the vote to earn another year on the ballot. In 2025, his vote share ticked up to 8.1%, but there’s almost no chance he ever reaches the 75% threshold required for election.

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

It can pay handsomely to be a professional athlete, and these days the biggest contracts are going to basketball and baseball players.

Oklahoma City Thunder guard and NBA MVP Shai Gilgeous-Alexander agreed to a four-year, $285 million contract extension on Tuesday, making him the highest-paid player in the league with an average salary of $71.3 million per season when the deal kicks in the 2027-28 season.

By comparison, Dallas Cowboys quarterback Dak Prescott is making $60 million per season, Edmonton Oilers center Leon Draisaitl is making an average of $14 million as the National Hockey League’s highest paid player, and Los Angeles Dodgers superstar Shohei Ohtani makes $70 million a season, but $680 million of that total is being deferred, and scheduled to paid out starting in 2034.

Here are the biggest contracts in NBA history, in terms of value and annual salary:

Highest-paid NBA players, by total contract value

Jayson Tatum, Boston Celtics, five years, $313 million
Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Oklahoma City Thunder: four years, $285 million
Jaylen Brown, Boston Celtics: five years, $285 million
Nikola Jokic, Denver Nuggets: five years, $276 million
Cade Cunningham, Detroit Pistons: five years, $269 million
Evan Mobley, Cleveland Cavaliers: five years, $269 million
Bradley Beal, Phoenix Suns: five years, $251 million
Anthony Edwards, Minnesota Timberwolves: five years, $244 million
Tyrese Haliburton, Indiana Pacers: five years, $244 million
Giannis Antetokounmpo, Milwaukee Bucks: five years, $228 million

Highest-paid NBA players by annual average salary

Shai Gilgeous-Alexander, Oklahoma City Thunder: $71.3 million
Joel Embiid, Philadelphia 76ers: 64.3 million
Jayson Tatum, Boston Celtics: $62.8 million
Giannis Antetokounmpo, Milwaukee Bucks: $58.4 million
Anthony Davis, Dallas Mavericks: $58.4 million
Jaylen Brown, Boston Celtics: $57 million
Jimmy Butler, Golden State Warriors: $55.4 million
Nikola Jokic, Denver Nuggets: $55.2 million
Bam Adebayo, Miami Heat: $55.116 million
Karl-Anthony Towns, New York Knicks: $55.1 million
Devin Booker, Phoenix Suns: $55.1 million

Richest contracts in North American sports history

Juan Soto, New York Mets: 15 years, $765 million
Shohei Ohtani, Los Angeles Dodgers: 10 years, $700 million
Patrick Mahomes, Kansas City Chiefs: 10 years, $450 million
Mike Trout, Los Angeles Angels: 12 years, $426.5 million 
Mookie Betts, Los Angeles Dodgers: 12 years, $365 million
Aaron Judge, New York Yankees: nine years, $360 million
Manny Machado, San Diego Padres: 11 years, $350 million
Francisco Lindor, New York Mets: 10 years, $341 million
Fernando Tatís Jr., San Diego Padres: 14 years, $340 million
Bryce Harper, Philadelphia Phillies: 13 years, $330 million

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Like most people who had their smartphones or computers in front of them as the Miami Dolphins and Pittsburgh Steelers swung a June 30 trade that sent cornerback Jalen Ramsey (and tight end Jonnu Smith) to the Steel City and safety Minkah Fitzpatrick back to South Beach, Jason McCourty’s reaction changed once the full details became known.

Because at first, the ESPN analyst assumed Ramsey would be fitting into a secondary that included Fitzpatrick. Then McCourty’s twin brother and former NFL teammate Devin texted him with the update that Fitzpatrick was the primary compensation returned to the Dolphins.

Which leaves the Steelers without a three-time All-Pro at free safety but an upgrade at cornerback – and some added flexibility when it comes to lining up against the high-powered offenses in the AFC North.

‘I love this addition for the Steelers, just because it adds a ton of versatility,’ Jason McCourty told USA TODAY Sports.

After Devin’s text update, Jason started to think about where Ramsey – who is receiving a $1.5 million raise and making $26.6 million total in 2025 – would line up for Steelers head coach Mike Tomlin. Free safety is a possibility because of that patented aggressiveness and instincts, along with experience playing inside and outside cornerback.

But the Steelers are losing Fitzpatrick’s experience within the role as the center fielder of the defense and the communication that comes along with it.

‘I think those are big shoes to fill,’ McCourty said. ‘That’s why I’m so curious to see exactly where they see Ramsey to fit – because when you’re paying this much money, I don’t know if you’re going to just stick a guy like that at free safety. You typically want him covering the other team’s best wide receivers.

‘It says a lot about what (the Steelers) felt about Minkah Fitzpatrick. Because you make this trade and you give Jalen Ramsey a bit of a pay bump as well. So if (Ramsey) is playing free safety, that says a lot about it. But I am excited for the Steelers with this move.’

Steelers’ secondary has options after Jalen Ramsey trade

The Fitzpatrick-Ramsey trade was the most recent revamping of the Steelers’ secondary. The team signed cornerback Darius Slay and safety Juan Thornhill this offseason. Joey Porter Jr. is a starting outside corner, while Beanie Bishop Jr. had a nice rookie season in 2024 as the nickel corner.

Even though Slay, 34, and Ramsey, 30 ‘aren’t in the prime of their careers, both are still playing at a high level,’ said McCourty, who posted on social media about the trade and the replies immediately referenced the age of Ramsey and Slay.

‘You’re like, ‘These guys can’t play anymore’ but I think guys like Slay and Ramsey are still playing at a high level,’ he added.

Steelers-Dolphins trade: Who won and lost as Jalen Ramsey, Minkah Fitzpatrick get moved?

Multiple secondary lineups is why a guy like Ramsey can be a ‘chess piece’ for the Steelers’ coaching staff. Slay and Porter Jr. are more entrenched in their roles as sideline corners. Ramsey can be moved anywhere.

‘Now you have the opportunity to do so much with that secondary, especially when you have versatile pieces and guys who can play multiple roles,’ McCourty said.

What direction are Dolphins going?

Under general manager Chris Grier and head coach Mike McDaniel, the Dolphins made it to the postseason in 2022 and 2023 but fell off late in those campaigns. The organization hasn’t won a playoff game since the 2000 season.

Now they’ve parted with Smith, who arguably had the best season of his career in 2024, and Ramsey, who leaves behind a largely unproven secondary (aside from Fitzpatrick).

Jalen Ramsey trade grades: Who won deal between Steelers, Dolphins?

‘They don’t have a lot of guys who have been proven year after year that have had success in this league,’ McCourty said. ‘You look at the trade from their standpoint, and you’re like ‘What direction are they going in as a team?”

But Fitzpatrick is back in the fold – this time without a position change forced on him by the coaching staff as Brian Flores tried to in 2019, which precipitated his trade to the Steelers two games into that season.

‘It worked out for both parties, because Minkah went to Pittsburgh and became a monster,’ McCourty said.

Now the ‘monster’ is back in Miami.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The NBA free agency period is off and running, and some of the biggest names in the game are already off the market. Teams can negotiate deals and announce trades during this moratorium period, which ends July 6, when all signings can become official.

Lakers star LeBron James, Clippers guard James Harden and Timberwovles forward Julius Randle have each reportedly agreed to return to their teams for the 2025-26 season. Kyrie Irving has re-signed with the Dallas Mavericks, while Russell Westbrook and Chris Paul are some other veteran guards who will continue to chase a championship.

This story will be updated as the best remaining free agents sign contracts:

Myles Turner reaches deal with Milwaukee Bucks, per report

The Milwaukee Bucks waived guard Damian Lillard and will take the remainder of his salary to sign free agent forward Myles Turner, reports ESPN.com.

Turner was one of the core pieces in the Pacers making it to the NBA Finals, and his departure will be a big blow for the Pacers, especially with the Achilles’ injury to Tyrese Haliburton, which can ultimately sideline him for the whole upcoming season.

Jonathan Kuminga, G, Golden State Warriors, restricted free agent

Kuminga has established himself as a reliable third scoring option in Golden State behind Steph Curry and Jimmy Butler, as he averaged 15.3 points, 4.6 rebounds, and 2.2 assists, missing significant time this season with an ankle injury.

Josh Giddey, G, Chicago Bulls, restricted free agent

In his first season with the Bulls, Giddey averaged 14.6 points and 7.2 assists and is looking to cash in on his good season. He made $8.35 million last season and could be looking to make four times that amount if he returns to Chicago.

Malik Beasley, G, Detroit Pistons, unrestricted free agent

Beasley’s free agency is officially on hold after he was implicated in a federal gambling investigation. Before the news came out, he was looking at a potential three-year, $42 million deal.

DeAndre Ayton, C, Portland Trail Blazers, unrestricted free agent

Ayton became a free agent after agreeing to a contract buyout with the Blazers. The No. 1 pick of the 2018 draft averaged 14.4 points and 10.2 rebounds in 40 games last season.

Al Horford, C, Boston Celtics, unrestricted free agent

Horford can be a valuable asset to a team looking for a veteran presence and a three-point shooter coming off the bench. The 39-year-old still played 60 games for a Boston team that is looking for a reset after trades and the injury to Jayson Tatum.

When is NBA free agency? Dates, times and offseason schedule

NBA free agency officially began on Monday, June 30, at 6 p.m. ET. Teams and players can now start agreeing to the terms of a contract. Teams and players, however, will have to wait until July 6 for contracts to be officially signed.

The biggest stories, every morning. Stay up-to-date on all the key sports developments by subscribing to USA TODAY Sports’ newsletter.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Senate has completed consideration of President Donald Trump’s $3.3 trillion, 940-page agenda bill, sending it back to the House of Representatives to sync up before hitting the commander in chief’s desk for his signature.

It first passed the House by just one vote in late May, and now it must advance through the chamber one more time before it can be signed into law.

That’s because the Senate made some key changes to the legislation, chiefly to pass the ‘Byrd Bath’ process in which its various measures are weighed for whether they adhere to the strict guidelines of the budget reconciliation process.

Republicans are using budget reconciliation to pass Trump’s agenda on taxes, the border, energy, defense and the national debt. It allows the party in power to pass fiscal legislation while sidelining the minority – in this case, Democrats – by lowering the Senate’s threshold for passage from 60 to 51. 

Here are some of the key changes between the two versions:

Medicaid

Stricter work requirements have been the crown jewel for the GOP, being included in both versions. The bill would require ​​able-bodied, childless adults between the ages of 18 and 64 to work at least 80 hours a month to maintain their benefits, or by ​​participating in community service, going to school or engaging in a work program.

But there are more divisive changes, like tweaks to the Medicaid provider tax rate. The rate change would, year-by-year, lower the provider tax in Medicaid expansion states from 6 %to 3.5%. The plan was tweaked to comply with Senate rules, and now starts in fiscal year 2028. 

The House bill, in comparison, would have frozen states at their current rates and placed a moratorium on new provider taxes.

It’s a sticking point for moderate House Republicans who could see their states be forced to foot more of the bill for Medicaid than they currently do, risking politically damaging cuts to the program.

The Senate bill also includes a $50 billion fund to help rural hospitals in a bid to ease the concerns of Republicans in their own chamber.

Debt ceiling

The Senate bill aims to raise the debt limit by $5 trillion, $1 trillion higher than the House bill called for.

The U.S. national debt is currently just over $36 trillion.

A failure to raise that limit – also called the debt ceiling – before the U.S. government runs out of cash to pay its obligations could result in a downgrade in the country’s credit rating and potential turmoil in financial markets.

Trump has made it a priority for congressional Republicans to deal with the debt ceiling and avoid a national credit default.

A bipartisan agreement struck in 2023 suspended the debt ceiling until January 2025.

Multiple projections show the U.S. is poised to run out of cash to pay its debts by sometime this summer.

Taxes

The Senate version of the legislation provides more generous corporate tax benefits than the House version, while placing limits on Trump’s newer policies, eliminating taxes on tips and overtime pay.

Both bills sought to permanently extend the income tax brackets of Trump’s 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA).

The Senate bill makes permanent some corporate tax breaks that the House bill only temporarily expanded. It also makes permanent the standard deduction for personal income taxes, while the House bill only extended it through 2028.

The Senate bill would also allow people to deduct taxes on up to $25,000 of tipped wages. That deduction would begin to phase out for people making $150,000 per year or $300,000 as a married couple.

On the House side, the deduction is eliminated for both married and single filers making above $160,000. There is no cap of any kind on the amount that can be deducted, however.

Those same income differences are at play between the Senate and House versions of Trump’s ‘no tax on overtime pay’ promise. Whereas the Senate bill would allow people to deduct up to $12,500 in overtime pay, the House version did not include a stated limit.

Artificial Intelligence

The House version of the bill would have effectively blocked states from implementing their own AI regulations – a provision that was stripped out of the Senate bill even despite negotiations with critics to salvage the measure.

Sen. Masha Blackburn, R-Tenn., led the Senate GOP opposition to the measure, arguing it would prevent states from shielding populations who are vulnerable to the pitfalls of AI.

After talks with key senators fell through, Blackburn and Sen. Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., co-sponsored an amendment to remove that provision. It passed 99 to 1.

Outside of Washington, 17 Republican state governors wrote to Congress objecting to the AI moratorium. 

‘This is a monumental win for Republican governors, President Trump’s one, big beautiful bill, and the American people,’ Arkansas Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, one of the signatories, wrote on X after it was removed.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

USAID will no longer send foreign assistance across the globe, with the State Department taking over any such programs that President Donald Trump’s administration wishes to continue, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced Tuesday.

Rubio made the announcement in a Tuesday statement, saying USAID had for decades failed to ensure the programs it funded actually supported America’s interests. The State Department will take over foreign assistance programs beginning July 1, he said.

‘Beyond creating a globe-spanning NGO industrial complex at taxpayer expense, USAID has little to show since the end of the Cold War. Development objectives have rarely been met, instability has often worsened, and anti-American sentiment has only grown,’ Rubio wrote.

‘This era of government-sanctioned inefficiency has officially come to an end. Under the Trump Administration, we will finally have a foreign funding mission in America that prioritizes our national interests. As of July 1st, USAID will officially cease to implement foreign assistance. Foreign assistance programs that align with administration policies—and which advance American interests—will be administered by the State Department, where they will be delivered with more accountability, strategy, and efficiency,’ he continued.

The move comes after the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) gutted USAID as part of Trump’s effort to remove waste, fraud and abuse from the federal government.

The agency came under fire for many funding choices, including allocating $1.5 million for a program that sought to ‘advance diversity, equity and inclusion in Serbia’s workplaces and business communities’ and a $70,000 program for a ‘DEI musical’ in Ireland.

As a result, Rubio announced on March 11 that the State Department had completed a six-week review and would cancel more than 80% of USAID programs — cutting roughly 5,200 of USAID’s 6,200 programs.

Democrats have blasted the Trump administration’s efforts to trim foreign aid programs, and many activists have protested the plans. Actress Charlize Theron lashed out at the administration on Monday.

‘The world feels like it’s burning because it is,’ Theron said at the annual Charlize Theron Africa Outreach Program Block Party, according to Variety.

‘Foreign aid cuts brought HIV and AIDS programs in my home country of South Africa to an absolute standstill,’ Theron said. ‘All of this is not just detrimental, it’s dangerous. People will lose their lives. Many have already, unfortunately, and at a frightening rate. It’s absolutely heartbreaking to see this kind of unnecessary suffering.’

Theron also criticized recent immigration raids in Los Angeles and claimed that women and LGBTQ people are also under threat of ‘being erased.’

‘Here in Los Angeles, in the U.S. and across the globe, we are moving backwards fast. Immigration policy is destroying the lives of families, not criminals. Women’s rights are becoming less and less every day, queer and trans lives are increasingly being erased, and gender-based violence is on the rise. This isn’t just policy, it’s personal. F— them,’ she said.

Theron emphasized, however, that there is hope in ‘standing up, organizing, protesting, voting and caring for each other, and refusing to accept that this is the new normal.’ She touted her charity as an example.

Fox News’ Diana Stancy and Lindsay Kornick contributed to this report

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The House of Representatives is expected to take up the Senate’s modified version of President Donald Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ this week.

The Senate passed the bill after a marathon weekend session, which included Democrats forcing a read-through of the entire 940-page text. Vice President JD Vance cast the tie-breaking vote.

The bill first passed the House in late May by just one vote – and Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., will have a margin of just three Republicans to advance it again.

Both moderate and conservative House Republicans still had various concerns about the bill as of the weekend, but it’s not immediately clear if it will be enough to force GOP leaders to pause their ambitious timeline of getting the bill to the president’s desk by Fourth of July.

‘The House will work quickly to pass the One Big Beautiful Bill that enacts President Trump’s full America First agenda by the Fourth of July. The American people gave us a clear mandate, and after four years of Democrat failure, we intend to deliver without delay,’ House GOP leaders said in a joint statement.

‘This bill is President Trump’s agenda, and we are making it law. House Republicans are ready to finish the job and put the One Big Beautiful Bill on President Trump’s desk in time for Independence Day.’

Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., told Fox News Digital on Monday that the House could start voting as early as Wednesday at 9 a.m. on the first procedural hurdle, with final passage possible later that day or Thursday.

House GOP leadership held a brief call with lawmakers on Saturday to discuss their expectations on the timing of the bill, while also urging them to air concerns with their Senate counterparts directly – rather than on social media.

Meanwhile, Majority Whip Tom Emmer, R-Minn., and his team began taking temperatures in the House GOP conference remotely on Sunday, even as the Senate still considered the bill.

‘We want to get on this as soon as possible, so be prepared,’ Emmer told lawmakers, Fox News Digital was told.

But a source familiar with whip team operations told Fox News Digital on Sunday that conservative fiscal hawks had concerns about the Senate’s version of the bill, particularly after the parliamentarian said key provisions must be stripped out.

Republicans are using the budget reconciliation process to fast-track a massive bill advancing Trump’s agenda on taxes, the border, defense, energy and the national debt. 

Budget reconciliation allows the party in power to sideline opposition – in this case, Democrats – by lowering the Senate’s threshold for passage from 60 votes to 51. But the legislation must adhere to certain guidelines, including only adding measures that deal with the federal budget or national debt.

The parliamentarian is a nonpartisan, unelected Senate staffer who helps guide the chamber through its complex procedures. The parliamentarian is chosen by the Senate majority leader, without term limits, and is typically selected from someone already working in the parliamentarian’s office due to their deep knowledge of its mechanisms.

Measures deemed non-germane to the final bill included a provision banning Medicaid funding from covering transgender medical services and a measure aimed at slashing funding to states that allow illegal immigrants to use Medicaid services.

But the Senate made its own changes to the House bill even without the parliamentarian’s input; the Senate added a $50 billion rural hospital fund to offset concerns from Senate Republicans about Medicaid cuts still in the bill.

A provision was also added late Saturday morning that raised tax deductions for whale hunters, an apparent bid to court Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, who had various concerns about the bill.

The Senate bill would also increase the debt limit by $5 trillion, compared to the House bill’s $4 trillion. The U.S. debt is currently over $36 trillion.

House Freedom Caucus Policy Chair Rep. Chip Roy, R-Texas, wrote a lengthy post on X listing his issues with the bill.

‘The Senate BBB has a deficit problem. 1) CBO shows the Senate bill misses the House framework by $651 billion EXCLUDING interest. Even adjusted for dynamic growth revenues – interest in light of front-loaded cost vs. backloaded savings lifts cost to $1.3 Trillion,’ he began.

Among his other issues were the debt limit increase and the added benefit aimed at Alaska.

‘There remain numerous substantive problems – from illegals on benefits to funding sex change operations, no REINS Act regulatory relied,’ he posted.

Roy told reporters on Tuesday that he was not confident in the final vote happening by July 4, ‘I think the odds are hell of a lot lower than they were even 48 hours ago, or 72 hours ago.’

Rep. Greg Steube, R-Fla., said on ‘Fox Report’ on Sunday, ‘If it does pass the Senate and comes over with those significant changes, it changes the framework that we agreed upon in the House from a spending perspective.’

‘When you do that, there are a lot of us that are going to have pause because we’re not cutting as much spending as we wanted to cut previously because of decisions that the parliamentarian has made. So it’s going be challenging,’ Steube said.

Meanwhile, multiple House GOP moderates are threatening to vote ‘no’ over Medicaid cuts – specifically, changes that would shift a greater cost burden onto states that expanded their Medicaid populations under ObamaCare.

A source close to Rep. Young Kim, R-Calif., told Fox News Digital that she would vote against the bill if the Senate did not adhere to the House’s Medicaid language on Saturday.

Rep. David Valadao, R-Calif., said in a public written statement, ‘I’ve been clear from the start that I will not support a final reconciliation bill that makes harmful cuts to Medicaid, puts critical funding at risk, or threatens the stability of healthcare providers across [California’s 22nd Congressional District].’

‘I urge my Senate colleagues to stick to the Medicaid provisions in H.R.1 – otherwise, I will vote no,’ Valadao wrote.

On the lawmaker-only call Saturday, both Johnson and Scalise urged Republicans to keep their negotiations and concerns about the bill private.

‘They’re not going to be reading your social media, so putting it there doesn’t help. You need to reach out to them directly, they’re in the thick of it,’ Johnson said, Fox News Digital was told.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Senate Republicans rallied to send President Donald Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ back to the House, notching a major victory in their record-shattering march toward getting the legislation signed into law.

Nearly every Republican in the upper chamber coalesced to advance Trump’s $3.3 trillion megabill, save for Sens.Thom Tillis, R-N.C., Rand Paul, R-Ky, and Susan Collins, R-Maine. No Senate Democrat crossed the aisle to support the bill.

Vice President JD Vance’s tie-breaking vote was needed to push the bill across the finish line – unlike on Saturday, when the Ohio Republican descended on Capitol Hill in anticipation of a tight vote to proceed with debate on the bill.

That comes after Republican leadership tried to win over the votes of Collins and Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, with sweeteners in the final, amended version of the bill. 

The bill now heads to the House, where fiscal hawks in the House Freedom Caucus are frustrated with what they say are shallow spending cuts, and moderates are concerned over cuts to Medicaid. All have warned that they may not support the bill. 

Still, Republican leaders have made clear that they intend to have the bill on Trump’s desk by Friday.

Many House Republicans, including Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., called on the Senate to change as little as possible. A product that could pass the House was front of mind for some Senate Republicans as the day dragged on. 

‘We’re talking to the House,’ Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., said. ‘We know they’re going to have some issues over there, just like we had some issues when it came over here, too. But we think we’re going to pass a bill that they can pass.’

House Ways and Means Chair Jason Smith, the chief tax writer in the House, said he was ‘optimistic’ about the bill on his way to the Senate floor Tuesday morning. 

‘We’re moving to the point that we’re getting more balance, and what I’ve said all along is let’s have balance in the bill,’ the Missouri Republican said. ‘We’re going to get this done, we’re going to get this to the president by July 4.’ 

Republicans pushed the chamber from the end of June to the beginning of July after a marathon weekend that saw a high drama unfold on the Senate floor, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., bleed time, hours of mostly one-sided debate, the occasional protest in the Senate gallery, a grueling blast of amendments and the penultimate vote to move the ball forward for the president’s ambitious agenda.

The blur from Monday to Tuesday, like the weekend slog before it, was not without its own dramatics.  

Senate Democrats tried numerous times to shelve the legislation during the ‘vote-a-rama,’ while Republicans sought to revive certain measures that were scrapped – like provisions that would have booted illegal immigrants from Medicaid – or amendments to sate key Republican holdouts. 

And before the bill was put on the floor for a final vote, last-minute deals were struck and changes made in a ‘wraparound’ amendment to attract holdouts. 

Included was the doubling of the rural hospital fund to $50 billion, which was pushed by Collins, and a rollback of the start date of supplemental nutrition assistance program (SNAP) work requirements for states with higher payment error rates, like Alaska. 

Trump’s ‘big, beautiful bill’ is crammed with his and congressional Republicans’ legislative priorities, including billions for the Pentagon and to bolster the White House’s border and immigration agenda, the permanent extension of his 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, deep spending cuts and an effort to reform Medicaid.

Senate Republicans have pitched the bill as a way to both turbocharge the economy and as a means to prevent Trump’s first-term tax cuts from expiring. They have simultaneously used it as a vehicle to achieve deep spending cuts in the neighborhood of $1.5 trillion.

But Senate Democrats have railed against the package for the millions it could boot off of Medicaid and the trillions it could add to the federal deficit.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released two sets of scores Saturday and Sunday that reflected both current policy and current law. Under current policy, the bill would tack on just over $507 billion over the next decade. But under current law, the package would add roughly $3.3 trillion.

Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., countered that when it came to spending, Senate Democrats were being hypocritical. 

‘I’ve been here a long time,’ Thune said. ‘And I’ve not been involved in a single spending debate and fight in which Republicans were trying to spend less, and Democrats were trying to spend more, with one exception. 

‘And that’s national security,’ he continued. ‘Democrats are always willing to cut defense but never want to cut anywhere else.’

But Schumer accused Trump of ‘lying’ about the bill, particularly over the nature of proposed cuts to Medicaid and the economic growth potential tied to the tax package. 

And in one final act of defiance ahead of the bill’s final passage, Schumer had the official title of the legislation ‘The One Big, Beautiful Bill Act’ nixed. 

‘The American people will not forget what Republicans do in this chamber today,’ Schumer said. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS