Archive

2025

Browsing

Naama Levy, one of the four female IDF soldiers released from Hamas captivity on Saturday, is speaking out for the first time.

‘After 477 days, I’m finally home,’ Levy wrote on Instagram. ‘I’m safe and protected, surrounded by family and friends, and I am feeling better by the day.’

In the post, Levy expressed her gratitude to ‘Israeli combat soldiers and the Israeli people,’ saying she saw how they were fighting for her release. ‘Thank you all. I love you,’ Levy wrote.

On Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas terrorists kidnapped Levy alongside Liri Albag, Daniella Gilboa, Karina Ariev, and Agam Berger. All the girls, except Berger, were released as part of Israel and Hamas’ ceasefire deal.

Levy revealed that she was alone most of the time for the first 50 days of captivity. However, once she was reunited with the other soldiers taken from her base, they stuck together and ‘strengthened each other every day until our release and also after it.’

‘We are waiting for Agami and the rest of the hostages to return so we can complete the recovery process.’

Berger, who Levy mentioned in the post, is expected to be released on Thursday along with Arbel Yehoud and an unnamed male hostage.

A video of Levy on the day she was kidnapped went viral. She was seen wearing a black shirt and blood-soaked gray sweatpants as an armed man pulls her from a Jeep. Her ankles slashed, Levy was clearly struggling to walk after her apparently violent abduction. Levy became a symbol for the plight of the female hostages and victims of Hamas’ surprise attacks.

In a November 2023 essay for The Free Press, Levy’s mother, Ayelet Levy Shachar, emphasized that though the video of her daughter’s kidnapping was seen around the world, it was ‘totally unrepresentative of the life she had led until October 7.’

‘When she is released, I pray that the image of her abduction, and the experience of what that image represents, isn’t how she comes to see the world,’ Shachar wrote at the time.

Upon Levy, Albag, Gilboa and Ariev’s release, the Hostages and Missing Families Forum Headquarters said that ‘their return today represents a moment of light in the darkness, a moment of hope and triumph of spirit, while serving as a painful reminder of the urgency to bring back the 90 hostages still in Gaza.’

More than 15 months into the Israel-Hamas war, which started with the brutal surprise attacks on Oct. 7, 2023, dozens of hostages remain in Gaza.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Senate Democrats have obtained a whistleblower report claiming that President Donald Trump’s nominee to lead the FBI, Kash Patel, violated protocol during a hostage rescue mission in October 2020.

But national security officials who served in the first Trump administration pushed back on that narrative.

The whistleblower letter, obtained by Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., claimed that Patel leaked news that two Americans and the remains of a third were being transferred to U.S. custody from Yemen, where they had been held hostage by Houthi rebels. The whistleblower claims Patel leaked news of the trade to the Wall Street Journal hours before the hostages were actually in U.S. custody, potentially endangering the deal.

The protocol of the multi-agency group in charge of the mission was to withhold information about hostage deals until the subjects were both in U.S. custody and their families had been notified, according to the whistleblower.

A transition official pushed back on the report in a statement to Fox News Digital on Tuesday, saying Patel has a ‘track record of success.’

‘Mr. Patel was a public defender, decorated prosecutor, and accomplished national security official that kept Americans safe,’ the official said. ‘He has a track record of success in every branch of government, from the court room to congressional hearing room to the situation room. There is no veracity to this anonymous source’s complaints about protocol.’  

In the October 2020 case, the deal went forward without any issues, with the two Americans and the remains of the third being transferred to U.S. custody. In exchange, the U.S. arranged for the release of some 200 Houthi fighters being held prisoner in Saudi Arabia.

Alexander Gray, who served as Chief of Staff for the White House National Security Council under Trump’s first administration, also called the allegations ‘simply absurd.’

Robert C. Obrien, who served as National Security Advisor from 2019 to 2021, argued that the whistleblower was jeopardizing decades of bipartisan work on hostage deals by coming forward.

Senate Democrats delivered the whistleblower letter on Monday morning to Acting FBI Director Brian Driscoll, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Acting Treasury Secretary David Lebryk and Secretary of State Marco Rubio, CBS News reported.

The report comes just days before Patel is set to appear before the Senate Judiciary Committee for an extensive confirmation hearing.

The Senate’s ‘advice and consent’ role allows the body to review the president’s appointments and provide oversight on key positions. The picks require a majority vote in the Senate with Republicans holding a 53-47 vote advantage over Democrats.

Patel has called for radical changes at the FBI and was a fierce and vocal critic of the bureau’s work as it investigated ties between Russia and Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign.

He held numerous national security roles during the first Trump administration and was the chief investigator in the congressional probe into alleged Trump-Russia collusion, uncovering government surveillance abuse that led to the appointment of two special counsels: one who determined that there had been no such collusion and another who determined the entire premise of the FBI’s original investigation was bogus.

Patel was an integral part of the creation of a memo released by then-Chair Devin Nunes in February 2018, which detailed the DOJ’s and FBI’s surveillance of former Trump campaign aide Carter Page under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

He’s been a loyal ally to Trump for years, finding common cause over their shared skepticism of government surveillance and the ‘deep state’ — a catchall used by Trump to refer to unelected members of government bureaucracy.

Fox News’ Michael Dorgan contributed to this report

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s decision to freeze foreign aid over the weekend included pulling millions of dollars-worth of U.S. funding for ‘condoms in Gaza,’ a White House official told Fox News Digital. 

The revelation came as the official explained that a separate memo from the Office of Management and Budget will temporarily pause grants, loans and federal assistance programs pending a review into whether the funding coincides with President Donald Trump’s executive orders, such as those related to ending diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), the Green New Deal, and funding nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) ‘that undermine the national interest.’ 

‘If the activity is not in conflict with the President’s priorities, it will continue with no issues,’ the White House official told Fox News Digital. ‘This is similar to how HHS [Department of Health and Human Services] stopped the flow of grant money to the WHO [World Health Organization] after President Trump announced the U.S. withdrawal from the organization. Or how the State Department halted several million dollars going to condoms in Gaza this past weekend.’ 

Fox News Digital reached out to the State Department on Tuesday seeking additional information. 

In her first-ever briefing Tuesday, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said that the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and the OBM found ‘that there was about to be $50 million taxpayer dollars that went out the door to fund condoms in Gaza.’

‘That is a preposterous waste of taxpayer money. So that’s what this pause is focused on, being good stewards of tax dollars,’ Leavitt told reporters. She said DOGE and OBM also found $37 million was about to be sent to the WHO before Trump’s executive order breaking ties with the global health body.

The Jerusalem Post reported in 2020 that scores of condoms were being used to create IED-carrying balloons that winds would carry into southern Israel, raising alarm on schoolyards, farmlands and highways. 

At the time, the Post reported that the improvised explosive devices – floated into Israel via inflated contraceptives – burned thousands of hectares of land and caused ‘millions of shekels of damage.’ It’s not clear if the practice continues. 

Just two days after the Oct. 7, 2023, attacks, which involved Hamas terrorists brutally raping some of the approximately 1,200 people killed in southern Israel and hundreds of others brought back into Gaza as hostages, a global NGO known as the International Planned Parenthood Federation (IPPF) released a statement regarding the resulting war and escalating violence. 

The NGO claimed that any blockade of aid shipments into Gaza would infringe on their ‘enormous gains made in life-saving sexual and reproductive healthcare in this region.’ 

‘Palestinians are systematically denied sexual and reproductive healthcare and rights,’ the executive director of a corresponding NGO, the Palestinian Family Planning and Protection Association (PFPPA), said at the time. ‘Our health system has been repeatedly targeted and depleted by the Israeli occupation, and the more it disintegrates, the more it will hinder the full realization of these rights for women and girls.’

On Sunday, Rubio paused all U.S. foreign assistance funded by or through the State Department and U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) for review. 

The move came in response to Trump’s executive order, ‘Reevaluating and Realigning United States Foreign Aid,’ issued last week directing a sweeping 90-day pause on most U.S. foreign assistance disbursed through the State Department.

The State Department said Sunday that Rubio was initiating a review of ‘all foreign assistance programs to ensure they are efficient and consistent with U.S. foreign policy under the America First agenda.’

‘President Trump stated clearly that the United States is no longer going to blindly dole out money with no return for the American people. Reviewing and realigning foreign assistance on behalf of hardworking taxpayers is not just the right thing to do, it is a moral imperative. The Secretary is proud to protect America’s investment with a deliberate and judicious review of how we spend foreign assistance dollars overseas,’ a State Department spokesperson said Sunday. 

‘The mandate from the American people was clear – we must refocus on American national interests,’ the statement added. ‘The Department and USAID take their role as stewards of taxpayer dollars very seriously. The implementation of this Executive Order and the Secretary’s direction furthers that mission. As Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said, ‘Every dollar we spend, every program we fund, and every policy we pursue must be justified with the answer to three simple questions: Does it make America safer? Does it make America stronger? Does it make America more prosperous?’’ 

Rubio had specifically exempted only emergency food programs and military aid to Israel and Egypt from the freeze on foreign assistance.

On Monday, at least 56 senior USAID officials were placed on leave pending an investigation into alleged efforts to thwart Trump’s orders, the Associated Press reported, citing a current official and a former official at USAID. 

An internal USAID notice sent late Monday and obtained by the AP said new acting administrator Jason Gray had identified ‘several actions within USAID that appear to be designed to circumvent the President’s Executive Orders and the mandate from the American people.’ ‘As a result, we have placed a number of USAID employees on administrative leave with full pay and benefits until further notice while we complete our analysis of these actions,’ Gray wrote.

The senior agency officials put on leave were experienced employees who had served in multiple administrations, including Trump’s, the former USAID official said.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

In baseball, there’s bat flips and celebrations, and then there’s what Junior Caminero did Monday night.

The Tampa Bay Rays infielder is currently playing for the Leones del Escogido in the Dominican Professional Baseball League — managed by future Baseball Hall of Famer Albert Pujols — and led his team to the league championship series against Tigres del Licey.

After splitting the first three games of the series, the championship round was sent to a decisive Game 7. In the top of the ninth inning, it was tied at five and Caminero went up to the plate.

In one of the most epic of scenes, Caminero took a 104 mile per hour pitch to center field and the ball went over the great wall at 411 feet to give his team the late lead. The entire Leones team erupted from the dugout and Caminero made sure to soak up every moment of the clutch hit, celebrating with his teammates and around the diamond as the announcer had an incredible reaction.

Caminero had good reason to celebrate the homer. It ended up being the game-winning run, as Leones held Tigres scoreless in the bottom of the ninth to win the championship and end the chance of a three-peat title.

Follow every MLB game: Latest MLB scores, stats, schedules and standings.

It surely was a home run celebration you wouldn’t typically see in MLB, but was absolutely one of the most electric reactions one could ever witness. Perhaps it could be something the U.S. could see in 2025. Caminero made his MLB debut in 2023 at the age of 19 and played in 43 games last season.

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news fast. Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Dominik Shine was on his way to buy skates for his 21-month-old son when his phone rang.

The trip to buy skates was off. In its stead, a trip to Detroit, to Little Caesars Arena, and a long-awaited NHL debut for the Detroit Red Wings.

‘We’re pretty excited about winning that game,’ coach Todd McLellan said minutes after Monday’s 5-2 victory over the Los Angeles Kings, ‘but we’re really excited that he was part of it.’

The Wings (24-21-5) rolled off a third consecutive victory at Little Caesars Arena, rallying from an early two-goal deficit. They did so with a patched-up lineup because veteran forwards Patrick Kane (upper body), J.T. Compher (upper body) and Vladimir Tarasenko (unwell) were unavailable. Tyler Motte’s return eased things a bit, but not enough, and so at 10:30 a.m., assistant general manager Shawn Horcoff called Shine.

‘It was amazing,’ Shine said. ‘I was driving my son to get some ice skates, actually. It was crazy. I’m so thrilled for myself but also my parents and everyone who put in hard work to get me to where I’m at.

‘Being a kid from Detroit, it’s something you dream about – pretend you’re on the Red Wings, or put on a jersey – but to actually be able to wear it in a regular-season game is something I’ll cherish forever.’

Not everyone he wanted, though, made it to LCA.

‘My parents landed in Maui yesterday for a vacation so they could not make it,’ Shine said. ‘I thought that was pretty funny. My mom’s probably a little upset. They were watching from the beach. But I had a ton of family and friends here.’

What made it so special is that Shine is 31 and has been a career minor leaguer, appearing in 462 games for the Grand Rapids Griffins of the American Hockey League. He joined the organization on an amateur tryout on March 14, 2017, following his senior season at Northern Michigan University, and has posted 72 goals and 98 assists in his AHL career.

That’s a long time to go without being called up, and Shine admitted to wondering if it would ever happen.

‘There was a point last year where I had my first child,’ he said. ‘In the American league you’re away from your family a lot, and I was kind of thinking about maybe being done. And then once I had my kid, I realized it’s really special for him to see me play, so I thought I’d play one more year and see what happens. I just can’t believe – to be here today, it’s amazing.’

During warmups, Shine’s wife, Taylor, was by the boards with their little boy, Cooper.

‘He recognized it was me,’ Shine said, smiling. ‘He’s just starting to be aware of his surroundings. To have him look at me and smile, I can’t put it into words.’

Before Shine could suit up for the Red Wings, he had to be signed to a two-way NHL contract – and he got one that lasts through 2025-26, adding a measure of job security. Then he went out – wearing No. 50 – and played a solid and safe 10 minutes.

‘I thought he performed just like we thought he would,’ McLellan said. ‘I didn’t know Dominik Shine, and shame on me, existed this morning. That’s how new we are to the organization, too. So when it’s time to call people up, you rely on the staff.

‘I found out about his story today and it was motivational for our group. It was a good choice. He earned the contract, he earned his way here and he earned his keep tonight.’

While McLellan only joined the organization on Dec. 26, one of the players who scored Monday, Elmer Söderblom, is well familiar with Shine from being teammates with the Griffins. Seeing Shine debut was special for Söderblom, too.

‘It’s so fun to see,’ Söderblom said. ‘I’ve been playing with Shiner for multiple years now, so it’s so exciting to see him out there. All the hard work he’s put in, he deserves it. It was really fun to watch.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

With the hiring of Brian Schottenheimer, Dallas Cowboys owner Jerry Jones maintained his stance of being ‘all in’ during his first meeting with the media since parting ways with Mike McCarthy two weeks prior.

Jones also used the introductory news conference Monday to respond to the idea that he would only hire somebody he could control.

‘I know I get my proverbial (expletive) kicked over needing people in my comfort zone. Without this thing being about me in any way, if you don’t think I can’t operate out of my comfort zone, you’re so wrong, it’s unbelievable,’ Jones said. ‘This is as big a risk you can take, as big a risk as you can take – no head-coaching experience.

‘Let me share something with you. With all of that, you just heard him reference his osmosis, his family, anybody in this room that doesn’t believe the apple doesn’t go far from the tree has missed it someplace down the road, especially if there was an effort to make it that way, and there was an effort.’

The Cowboys announced the hiring of Schottenheimer, a longtime offensive coordinator with X teams but no previous head-coaching experience, Friday.

All things Cowboys: Latest Dallas Cowboys news, schedule, roster, stats, injury updates and more.

The numerous coaches and players Schottenheimer, the son of late former NFL head coach Marty Schottenheimer, has been exposed to throughout his coaching career appealed to Jones.  

‘How often do you have a chance to take advantage of all of that at 50 years old, which is a puppy?” Jones said. “Yet he’s had 25 years being around the kinds of things he’s going to draw from. “I like his package. I like that experience.’

None of Jones’ previous head-coaching hires – from Jimmy Johnson to Chan Gailey – were driven by X’s and O’s, he said.

Jones said that he has taken more risk in the last five years than in the rest of his life put together. This hiring process was thorough, despite the Cowboys holding formal interviews with just four candidates.

“It’s ridiculous to think that you can make a decision to coach the Cowboys relative to the number of interviews that you might have,” Jones said.

He added: “What I’m here to tell you is this was a thorough, thorough process, shaded by whatever my experiences have been.”

Jones also had a message for Cowboys fans who were unimpressed by Schottenheimer’s promotion.

“What I would say (to) the fans is that, yes to some – and it might be couched to some as a less-than-glamorous hire – what I would say to you is I got (by) taking shots,’ Jones said.

“Don’t think for one minute I won’t take a shot. This was risky. This is risky.

“I’m all in here.”

Jones said Schottenheimer impressed him when the owner observed meetings. He watched Schottenheimer display deference to experience and his boss, McCarthy.

“I’ve watched him bite his lip sometimes when he didn’t necessarily agree with that direction, but he bit his lip, as his daddy would have told him,” Jones said.

Yet Jones was complimentary of McCarthy, as he’d been over the past few months.

‘Mike McCarthy left some good stuff here,’ Jones said. ‘One of them was Brian. Mike McCarthy is a hell of a coach.’

But it was time for a change.

“I’ve heard it criticized (that) we spent five days getting to come to that decision. We did come to that decision. One of the reasons we came to that decision is because there was this decision available to us as well – one of the reasons,” Jones said. “Schotty has fantastic support among our players. Key players. Real support. And they’ve seen him when he was on top, they’ve seen him when it didn’t work out so well. That’s an advantage here. That’s a real advantage. That was big. That was real big.”

For those who said the process looked “disjointed” or “untimely,” regarding the days of meetings between McCarthy and Jones as both coach and team floated in limbo, the time helped inform the owner’s decision to not re-sign McCarthy.

“That time, those days to go through many things that we should and wanted to talk about, that caused us to arrive at that,” he said. “But what we have is an opportunity to take some of the very best things that are here in place, Mike’s doing, some of those very-best things, change some of that, add to it, and be better for that.”

Schottenheimer’s offensive philosophy might be more old-school than other coaches, Jones said. But that wasn’t a detractor. But Jones is confident in Schottenheimer’s ability to blend his style with the modern necessities and with an eye toward future evolution.

“That’s rare to come in here with this kind of energy. This kind of ‘I’m gonna show ‘em.’ That’s rare to combine those two things,” Jones said. “Yeah, there’ll be change. But we’ll use many things we have in place now.”

One thing that won’t be the same is the head coach.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

There’s good news and bad news when it comes to the ticket prices for Super Bowl 59.

The good news? It won’t be cost as much as last year. The bad news? It’s still take thousands of dollars to get into and is near the top of most expensive games in Super Bowl history.

Arguably the grandest sporting event in the U.S. each year, hundreds of millions of people tune in to see who will be NFC champions, with thousands more able to view the title game inside the stadium − for quite the price. This year’s game features the Philadelphia Eagles and Kansas City Chiefs, and there are plenty of storylines from Kansas City’s quest for a historic three-peat to Philadelphia’s plan for revenge in the Super Bowl 57 rematch. In short, there’s plenty of reasons to want to attend the game in-person, and it will cost a hefty penny to watch inside the Caesars Superdome in New Orleans.

‘A lot of excitement,’ Adam Budelli, StubHub spokesperson, told USA TODAY Sports. ‘Tickets are moving.’

Get your Super Bowl 59 tickets at StubHub

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

How much do Super Bowl 59 tickets cost?

This year’s Super Bowl tickets are at lower prices compared to the same point as last year, according to StubHub. The average ticket price is $8,076, StubHub said, a decrease of 14% from the same time last year. Other secondary marketplace sellers like SeatGeek and TickPick also report decreases in price this year.

Last year, the average price was around $9,365 on the secondary market the day before the game, according to TickPick.

Super Bowl 59 ticket prices

While the average price of the game is higher than the cheapest ticket, it still costs more than $5,000 to get into Caesars Superdome. With 13 days left before kickoff, the cheapest ticket to the game can be found on TickPick for an all-in price of $5,762 as of Monday afternoon.

StubHub: $4,824 ($6,515 with fees).
TickPick: $5,762 all-in.
SeatGeek: $4,627 ($6,258 with fees).
Gametime: $4,796 ($6,498 with fees).
Ticketmaster: $5,895 ($7,132 with fees).
TicketSmarter: $5,027 ($7,045 with fees).
Vivid Seats: $4,727 ($6,522 with fees).

Obviously, the cheapest tickets in the stadium will be further away from the action, like the 600 sections on the end zone sides.

Why are Super Bowl 2025 tickets so expensive?

Super Bowl ticket prices have continued to climb as the years have gone on, and several factors, from who the teams are and their history in title games, could help the cost fluctuate. But one reason they are slightly cheaper than last year is because the 2024 game was in Las Vegas.

‘Vegas is such an approachable city across the country, regardless of what your fan base is,’ Budelli said, adding it was the first time the title game was played in the Sin City.

However, there are some reasons why this year’s game isn’t too far from the prices of last season. It is a Super Bowl 57 rematch, giving Philadelphia fans a chance to get revenge on the team that beat them in 2023. On the flip side, Kansas City could become the first team in league history to win three consecutive Super Bowls.

‘For a chance to see your team be the first ever to win three-straight Super Bowls, there’s a lot of different reasons why the Chief fans are going to show up in strong numbers,’ Budelli said. ‘Philadelphia in general, it’s fair to say that’s a tremendous sports town. They support their teams all the way throughout the regular season, and it’s really no different than how they show up in the postseason.’

The game being played in New Orleans also aids to the demand. One of the top tourist cities in the country, there will be plenty of buzz with events taking place around the city’s famed Bourbon Street. Budelli added it’s common for people to go to the host city and enjoy the festivities before deciding whether to buy tickets for the game.

Super Bowl 59 ticket trends

About 24 hours after the teams in the Super Bowl were determined, there’s been a heavy flock of Pennsylvania residents booking their tickets to the game. Both StubHub and SeatGeek reported fans in the state are responsible for the most of the out-of-state purchases. StubHub added this is also the most demand there has been for a Super Bowl involving the Chiefs.

When is the best time to get tickets for Super Bowl 59?

Ticket prices are typically the highest in the first hours and days following the conference championships due to the teams being known and a major rush to secure tickets. After that initial buzz is gone, then it may be a good time to look at tickets as prices usually drop.

‘Typically we say you want to wait. Let this kind of first 48-72 hours kind of go by, get a sense of where that markets going,’ Budelli said. ‘Realistically, that window is kind of probably anywhere from Wednesday to mid-next week as things should settle.’

But if there’s one thing to avoid doing, is waiting until the last days before the game. In recent years, prices have actually risen one-to-two days before the game.

‘That Friday, Saturday, more and more people will start getting into town, and that’s where some of that anxiety and purchasing is really a matter of supply and demand at that point,’ Budelli said.

One thing to remember when buying tickets for the Super Bowl is to buy from a verified marketplace and since tickets for the game are mobile only, do not buy from anyone trying to sell physical tickets to the game.

Super Bowl ticket prices history

Here’s what the average ticket cost for this year’s and the five preceding Super Bowls, per SeatGeek:

Super Bowl 58: $12,128 (Allegiant Stadium, Las Vegas — San Francisco 49ers vs. Kansas City Chiefs).
Super Bowl 57: $8,907 (State Farm Stadium, Glendale, Arizona — Kansas City Chiefs vs. Philadelphia Eagles)
Super Bowl 56: $10,322 (SoFi Stadium, Inglewood, California — Los Angeles Rams vs. Cincinnati Bengals)
Super Bowl 55: $11,840 (Raymond James Stadium, Tampa, Florida — Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs. Kansas City Chiefs in reduced capacity)
Super Bowl 54: $6,569 (Hard Rock Stadium, Miami Gardens, Florida — Kansas City Chiefs vs. San Francisco 49ers)

We occasionally recommend interesting products and services. If you make a purchase by clicking one of the links, we may earn an affiliate fee. USA TODAY Network newsrooms operate independently, and this doesn’t influence our coverage.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

CIA Director John Ratcliffe warned his agents of ‘changes’ to come under his leadership in a memo obtained by Fox News Digital. 

‘There will be changes during my tenure as director,’ the new leader of America’s top spy agency wrote in an agency-wide workforce message. Ratcliffe is currently reviewing all top staff and planning to put his own fingerprints on the senior level of the agency, Fox News Digital has learned. 

‘We will collect intelligence in every corner of the globe, no matter how dark or difficult. We will produce insightful, objective, all-source analysis, never allowing political or personal biases to cloud our judgment or infect our products,’ Ratcliffe went on in his email. 

‘And we will conduct covert action at the direction of the President, going places no one else can go and doing things no one else can do.’ 

As agents conduct work in what Ratcliffe defined as the ‘most challenging national security environment in our nation’s history,’ he promised the CIA would be the ‘ultimate meritocracy.’

‘Our shared mission will bind us together.’

A source familiar with Ratcliffe’s thinking said, ‘This was a message to Agency’s workforce that the John Brennan era, the Gina Haspel era, the eras of promoting leftwing political agendas or subverting the President — those days are over.’ 

Haspel was President Donald Trump’s CIA director from 2018 to 2021 – while Ratcliffe was Trump’s director of national intelligence. Brennan headed up the agency under former President Barack Obama.  

‘I’m sure it’ll rub some of the political activists burrowed in there the wrong way, but there are a lot of red-blooded, mission-focused agency officers reading this and cheering him on,’ the source added.

Ratcliffe is also looking for ways to streamline the agency’s many tech-focused offices – the directorate of digital innovation; directorate of science and technology; transnational and technology mission center; office of the chief technology officer; and directorate of analysis, which has been developing AI-powered tools – to stake out clear lines of authority and tasks. 

‘Nobody comes to CIA to be somebody. Our successes remain hidden. Even our medals are presented behind closed doors, our sacrifices memorialized by stars on a marble wall. But each one of those stars represents somebody who wanted to do something, regardless of whether history would know their name,’ Ratcliffe continued. 

‘That’s what makes this place special. That’s what we must preserve.’

Ratcliffe was confirmed by the Senate last Thursday in a 74-25 vote. 

Under its new director, the CIA released a new assessment of the COVID-19 origin which favors a lab origin with ‘low confidence.’ 

The review was ordered by former President Joe Biden’s National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan toward the end of Biden’s time in office. 

The agency has maintained for years it did not have enough intelligence to conclude whether COVID-19 originated in a lab or a wet market in Wuhan, China.

Ratcliffe recently told Breitbart News he no longer wanted the CIA to sit ‘on the sidelines’ of the debate over the origins of Covid-19. He has long said he believes the virus originated in the Wuhan Institute of Virology. 

‘I had the opportunity on my first day to make public an assessment that actually took place in the Biden administration, so it can’t be accused of being political,’ he told ‘Sunday Morning Futures’ host Maria Bartiromo on Sunday.  

‘And the CIA has assessed that the most likely cause of this pandemic that has wrought so much devastation around the world was because of a lab-related incident in Wuhan, so we’ll continue to investigate that moving forward.’ 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Dr. Dorothy Fink, acting secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), announced that the agency would begin reevaluating its current practices to ensure they are not utilizing federal dollars to promote non-medically necessary abortions.

HHS’s Office of Civil Rights has been tasked with investigating whether the agency’s programs, regulations and guidance are following federal guidelines under the Hyde Amendment, according to a Monday announcement from Fink. The review, Fink noted, will be conducted via guidance issued by the Office of Management and Budget.

‘The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, through the Office for Civil Rights, is tasked with enforcement of many of our nation’s laws that protect the fundamental and unalienable rights of conscience and religious exercise,’ Fink said in the announcement. ‘It shall be a priority of the Department to strengthen enforcement of these laws.’ 

The announcement from Fink is in line with President Donald Trump’s Jan. 24 executive order calling on all executive agencies to enforce laws under the Hyde Amendment, which prevents the use of federal funds for non-medically necessary, elective abortions. Trump’s Jan. 24 executive order also rescinded two executive orders implemented by President Joe Biden that sought to loosen restrictions on abortion in the wake of the Supreme Court’s decision to strike down Roe v. Wade. 

‘Congress has enacted the Hyde Amendment and a series of additional laws to protect taxpayers from being forced to pay for abortion,’ stated a ‘fact sheet’ published Saturday by the White House. ‘Contrary to this longstanding commonsense policy, the previous administration embedded federal funding of elective abortion in a wide variety of government programs.’

Notably, Fink’s announcement about the agency-wide review came amid an external communications freeze implemented by the Trump administration. While essential agency functions have been permitted to continue under the freeze, these functions are not supposed to be promoted until it is over, according to a memo reportedly sent to officials at the National Institutes of Health (NIH) from NIH acting Director Matthew Memoli.

Fox News Digital reached out to Fink and HHS to inquire about why this announcement about reevaluating its practices to ensure they align with the Hyde Amendment was permitted amid the communications freeze, but did not hear back in time for publication. 

In addition to announcing HHS’ plans to reevaluate programs under the Hyde Amendment, Fink’s announcement also praised the Trump administration’s decision to immediately rejoin the international Geneva Consensus Declaration on Promoting Women’s Health and Strengthening the Family. 

According to a memo from the State Department, the declaration seeks to ‘secure meaningful health and development gains for women,’ ‘protect life at all stages,’ ‘defend the family as the fundamental unit of society,’ and ‘work together across the United Nations system to realize these values.’ Fink said in her Monday announcement that HHS’s Office of Global Affairs intends to support the U.S.’ efforts as part of this coalition.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The White House has issued a memo that temporarily suspends federal grants, loans and other financial assistance programs for executive departments pending an assessment of the funding. 

The Wall Street Journal first reported the memo, saying it was sent out by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) around 5 p.m. on Monday. 

A White House official told Fox News Digital that the memo was initially ‘misreported’ and does not constitute a funding freeze on federal financial assistance across the board. The official said the pause is expressly limited to programs, projects, and activities that may be impacted by President Donald Trump’s executive orders, such as ending diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI), the Green New Deal, and funding nongovernmental organizations that the White House suspect undermine national interest. 

The memo exempts any program that provides direct benefits to Americans from the review process. That includes Social Security, Medicare and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), the official said. 

‘This is a good government measure to ensure that taxpayer money is being spent in accordance with law and the President’s policies,’ the official said in defense of the memo. ‘The Biden Administration forced their extreme ideological views into every corner of government and weaponized the government against the American people. They were taking actions up until the last hours trying to tie the hands of President Trump from delivering for the American people.’ 

The White House official told Fox News Digital that the pause is not yet in effect and ‘was designed to give agencies lead time to begin determining which programs are not affected and which programs will need to be reviewed for conformity with the President’s executive orders.’ The official further explained that the directive includes a ‘safety valve’ that the pause ‘shall only occur as consistent with law, which will allow agencies to review spending in conformity with applicable laws.’ 

‘If the activity is not in conflict with the President’s priorities, it will continue with no issues,’ the White House official told Fox News Digital. ‘This is similar to how HHS [Department of Health and Human Services] stopped the flow of grant money to the WHO [World Health Organization] after President Trump announced the U.S. withdrawal from the organization. Or how the State Department halted several million dollars going to condoms in Gaza this past weekend.’  

The memo, which takes effect Tuesday at 5 p.m., said agencies ‘must temporarily pause all activities related to obligation or disbursement of all Federal financial assistance, and other relevant agency activities that may be implicated by the executive orders, including, but not limited to, financial assistance for foreign aid, nongovernmental organizations, DEI, woke gender ideology, and the Green New Deal,’ according to the Journal. 

The memo reportedly said the federal government spent more than $3 trillion on federal assistance, including grants and loans, in the 2024 fiscal year and that the pause allows ‘time to review agency programs and determine the best uses of the funding for those programs consistent with the law and the President’s priorities.’

Each agency must ‘complete a comprehensive analysis of all their Federal financial assistance programs to identify programs, projects and activities that may be implicated by any of the President’s executive orders,’ the memo continued, according to the Journal, adding that the pause must be applied ‘to the extent permissible under applicable law.’ 

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., condemned the memo, telling the Journal that pausing the funding puts ‘billions upon billions of community grants and financial support that help millions of people across the country’ at risk. 

‘It will mean missed payrolls and rent payments and everything in between: chaos for everything from universities to non-profit charities, state disaster assistance, local law enforcement, aid to the elderly, and food for those in need,’ Schumer said, adding that Congress approved the funding for the federal assistance programs.

However, the White House official denied that the memo would result in any devastating effects on programs, explaining to Fox News Digital that the OMB explicitly instructed agencies to identify programs with immediate deadlines so that ‘exceptions can be granted without any program impact.’ It does not constitute a permeant stop of the funds. 

The pause ‘could be as short as a day if an agency determines that the funds at issue do not conflict with the Administration’s policies,’ the official said. ‘To act as faithful stewards of taxpayer money, new administrations must review federal programs to ensure that they are being executed in accordance with the law and the new President’s policies. If the pause will have an adverse impact, the memo expressly provides that agencies can seek exemptions on a case-by-case basis.’

The memo included a footnote that said Medicare, Social Security benefits and assistance provided directly to individuals were exempt from the pause, but its otherwise broad language caused confusion Monday night among some federal employees, as administrators requested advice from their internal counsel regarding which programs the pause applied to and how the departments should respond, one source told the Journal. 

The memo included a Feb. 10 deadline for agencies to submit a thorough summary of all paused programs, projects and activities to the Office of Management and Budget.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS