Archive

2025

Browsing

Starbucks announced another stage in its leadership shake-up on Tuesday, as CEO Brian Niccol will bring in two more executives who spent time at his former employer Taco Bell while dividing key leadership roles.

“As we focus on our ‘Back to Starbucks’ plan, we need a new operating model for our retail team, with clear ownership and accountability and an appropriate scope for each role,” Niccol said in a letter to employees shared on the company’s website.

Before spending six years at Chipotle, Niccol served as CEO of Yum Brands’ Taco Bell. Since starting at Starbucks in September, he has already poached some of his former colleagues to help with his transformation of the coffee giant. For example, he tapped Chipotle and Yum Brands alum Tressie Lieberman as Starbucks’ global chief brand officer in the fall.

The newest changes to the Starbucks organization include splitting the role of North American president into two jobs. The company’s current North American president, Sara Trilling, will depart the company. Trilling has been with Starbucks since 2002.

Starting in February, Meredith Sandland will hold the role of chief store development officer. Sandland is currently CEO of Empower Delivery, a restaurant software company. Previously, she served as chief operating officer of Kitchen United and as Taco Bell’s chief development officer.

Additionally, Mike Grams will join the company in February as North America chief stores officer. Grams has been with Taco Bell for more than 30 years, starting as a restaurant general manager and working his way up to become the chain’s global chief operating officer, according to his LinkedIn.

Both Sandland and Grams will be tasked with implementing Niccol’s vision to go “back to Starbucks.” The strategy includes decreasing service times to four minutes per order, making its stores more welcoming and cozy, as well as slashing the menu.

Arthur Valdez, Starbucks’ chief supply officer, also plans to leave the company. He joined in 2023 after seven years at Target. Starbucks has already identified his replacement and will share that news in the coming weeks, Niccol said in the letter.

Starbucks is expected to report its fiscal first-quarter earnings after the bell on Tuesday. Wall Street is expecting the company’s same-store sales to fall for the fourth consecutive quarter as consumers in the U.S. and China opt to get their caffeine fix elsewhere.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Tom Brady was officially approved to buy a minority stake in the Las Vegas Raiders in October 2024. The former NFL quarterback turned Fox broadcaster faced a long approval process but eventually cleared the hurdles needed to let him join the Raiders.

Raiders owner Mark Davis acknowledged he was excited about Brady’s role with the team during a Tuesday news conference introducing Pete Carroll and John Spytek as Las Vegas’ new head coach and general manager combination.

‘Bringing in Tom Brady was bringing in somebody on the football side that I had been lacking having here in the organization,’ Davis told reporters, per ESPN.

Davis also explained Brady will fill the role the Raiders had hoped Jon Gruden would when the team initially hired him ahead of the 2018 NFL season.

All things Raiders: Latest Las Vegas Raiders news, schedule, roster, stats, injury updates and more.

‘He was somebody that I brought in and really expected to be that person on the football side that would bring stability to the organization,’ Davis said of Gruden. ‘He had a 10-year contract and all that, and his head was chopped off. And we were put in a really bad position as an organization.’

Gruden coached parts of four seasons with the Raiders before he stepped down from his role early in the 2021 NFL season after emails containing racist, homophobic and misogynistic remarks he sent while working for ESPN were leaked to the media. He has not held a full-time coaching role since and currently works for Barstool Sports.

The Raiders are now onto their third different full-time head coach since Gruden’s departure, and fourth overall including 2021 interim coach Rich Bisaccia. Neither Josh McDaniels nor Antonio Pierce were given two full seasons to turn around Las Vegas’ franchise.

Davis expressed confidence Carroll – who will become the oldest coach in NFL history when he leads the Raiders into Week 1 – would be able to provide the Raiders with some stability in his new role, along with Spytek.

‘We want to build something here and again, that’s been the process and that mindset all along,’ Davis said. ‘Like I said, it got offset or kind of blown up when Jon Gruden was sent away and so we’ve been trying to get it right since then and we’ll see, but I’ve got patience to get it right, and I think we’ve got the people now – again I’ve always felt that results are what speak to me and that’s what we’ll see.’

The Raiders posted a 22-31 record in Gruden’s three-plus seasons, good for a .415 winning percentage,. Since then, Las Vegas has gone 25-38 (.397 winning percentage) and lost its only playoff appearance in 2022, under Bisaccia, to the Cincinnati Bengals 26-19.

Comparatively, Carroll has a career record of 170-120-1 and has posted a winning record in 11 of his past 12 seasons. The Raiders are coming off a 4-13 season, so the former Seattle Seahawks leader will have his work cut out adhering to his positive trend.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The university has accused the NCAA of “grossly overreaching” and “wildly overcharging” the Michigan football program, which was hit with 11 violations in a notice of allegations, many of which stemmed from the NCAA’s probe into an alleged sign-stealing operation led by former Wolverines staffer Connor Stalions.

Michigan’s response came in a 137-page document, a portion of which Yahoo Sports obtained and reported the details of on Tuesday.

Included in Michigan’s response are defenses of former coach Jim Harbaugh, current Wolverines coach Sherrone Moore and, interestingly, Stalions, the former recruiting assistant who resigned in 2023.

Michigan believes the NCAA’s notice of allegations, which it received last August, has “numerous factually unsupported infractions, exaggerates aggravating factors and ignores mitigating facts” and that the alleged sign-stealing operation offered the program “minimal relevance to competition.”

The university later requested that the NCAA apply “common sense and commitment to fairness” to the case, an approach that would require college sports’ governing body to treat it as a “Level II standard case.” Of the 11 alleged violations by the Wolverines, six are Level I infractions, the most serious charge the NCAA can assess to a member institution.

Michigan asserts that NCAA investigators have not proven “any coaches were aware of, much less participated in” Stallions’ sign-stealing scheme.

Perhaps the most notable coach included in the NCAA’s notice of allegations is Moore, who was the Wolverines’ offensive coordinator in 2023 and was elevated to head coach after Harbaugh left for the Los Angeles Chargers in January 2024, weeks after Michigan won the College Football Playoff championship.

Moore allegedly deleted 52 text messages between him and Stalions the day that news of the NCAA’s investigation into sign-stealing broke in October 2023. While Michigan acknowledges the deleted texts, it added that they were “innocuous and not material to the investigation” and noted that Moore cooperated fully with the investigation. In the school’s response, Moore said that he didn’t delete the messages to “hide anything,” attributing it instead to being “extremely angry” about the alleged misconduct and how it could harm the program.

Several texts between Moore and Stalions were about sign-stealing, which is a common practice among college programs, but none were about advance in-person scouting.

Michigan also refutes some of the NCAA’s findings on Stalions, who the university said attended only one game. Eight other games were attended by low-level Wolverines staffers and others were attended by Stalions’ friends and family, the latter of which Michigan believes does not violate NCAA rules.

While advance in-person scouting, the method the Wolverines allegedly used to record the signals of upcoming opponents, is against NCAA rules, Michigan asserts that “an enormous amount” of the signal decoding was “permissibly done” with television and other publicly available footage.

The response also touched on an allegation against Harbaugh, who the NCAA said failed to cooperate between Oct. 20, 2023 and Jan. 24, 2024 by not producing text and phone records from his personal cell phone. Michigan dismissed the claim as “without merit.”

The ongoing and intensifying saga between the NCAA and Michigan will soon head to a hearing before the NCAA’s Committee on Infractions, which is likely to happen over the next several weeks.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Gabby Thomas is as smart as she is fast, a three-time Olympic champion sprinter who graduated from Harvard and then went on to get a master’s in epidemiology. Yet over the weekend, racist trolls flooded her X page with nasty comments belittling her intelligence and achievements.

This is what X has become: a toxic cesspool whose owner embraces, encourages and amplifies the very worst of humanity.

And it ought to be a blaring warning to the NFL, NBA, college athletics and all the other folks in the sports world who are ignoring the alternative to it.

Ordinarily hyper-sensitive to their images and petrified of anything that could threaten them, most teams, leagues and athletes are blithely continuing to use X despite the looming PR nightmare. They don’t seem to realize that as Elon Musk does more and more awful things, and X degrades further and further, it’s their follow counts and reputations that will take the hit.

I doubt the NBA wants porn ads adjacent to its account. Or members of the Proud Boys liking its highlight videos. I can only imagine the heartburn NFL commissioner Roger Goodell felt when he saw Musk make Nazi jokes on the same platform where the league has its largest social media presence and then, two days before Holocaust Remembrance Day, suggest the German people should just “move beyond” their “past guilt” over the atrocities of World War II.

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

But this is what they are choosing. And given the skyrocketing number of people who are opting for Bluesky, it is most definitely a choice.

Bluesky defangs trolls. Musk feeds, waters and walks them twice a day.

“The value of Bluesky to athletes is that, because it’s moderated, players can engage and talk to their fans, without being overwhelmed by idiots,” Mark Cuban, the former owner of the Dallas Mavericks who has become a Bluesky enthusiast, said in an email. 

“Bluesky with moderation allows leagues, brands, players, celebs to engage with fans,” Cuban wrote. “I see it every day. The quality ratio is about 90 pct on Bluesky vs about 50 pct or less on X.”  

Yet the NWSL is the only one of the major professional sports leagues to be actively using Bluesky. According to Sportico, the NFL and NBA only operate on platforms where they have agreements, which often include financial incentives, and they do not have ones with Bluesky. The WNBA and NBA at least allow their teams to have Bluesky accounts; the NFL does not.

It’s hard to abandon social media sites where you’ve built up significant followings, as the leagues, their broadcasters and many athletes have on X. The NBA has almost 48 million followers on X; the NFL has 37 million. LeBron James has almost 53 million followers on X; Patrick Mahomes has 2.6 million.

It’s also hard to abandon it when X continues to be where people make news. (Full disclosure: I still have an X account solely for that reason, using the alert function so I can see what people I cover post.)

But as more and more people move to Bluesky, including sports influencers like Pat McAfee, Mina Kimes, Ian Rapoport and Monica McNutt, there’s an opening for the leagues to replicate that fan base.

Bluesky reached 20 million users in mid-November, tripling its userbase in just three months. It was nearing 30 million by Monday afternoon.

“I think the only missing pieces for Bluesky are real-time news and scores, which is rapidly being added, and a few verticals,” Cuban said. “I think that changes over time.”

The beauty of Twitter was as a second-screen community, allowing fans to interact, get additional information and, eventually, get replays. It was like watching the game from a broadcast control room with all of your closest friends. That was missing from Bluesky initially, but it’s gaining steam.

When the refs robbed the Buffalo Bills of a first down on Josh Allen’s QB sneak early in the fourth quarter, the reaction on Bluesky was reminiscent of Twitter in the old days.

“As it grows, it will only be increasingly valuable,” Cuban said. “The social media space has bifurcated into unmoderated vs. moderated. It sure looks like most people prefer moderation and a less hateful site.” 

And as Musk and X increasingly lean into their worst tendencies, that will only pick up pace.

The Guardian and Le Monde, France’s paper of record, have already stopped posting on X. After Musk’s hand gesture that sure looked like a Nazi salute at last week’s inauguration, moderators of the NFL, NBA, Formula 1 and soccer communities on Reddit banned links to X.

“We have reached this decision after taking recent events and strong sentiment from our community into account,’ the /r/NBA moderators said in a post. ‘While we try our best to stay neutral and apolitical, we do not believe taking a stance against Nazi symbolism is or should be a political issue. Hate speech and the promotion of it has never been tolerated in our community.”

Social media is supposed to be fun and informative, a way to reach people you otherwise wouldn’t. When it becomes a haven for white supremacists, neo-Nazis and others who don’t value democracy or diversity, it’s time to leave.

Follow USA TODAY Sports columnist Nancy Armour on social media @nrarmour.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Cleveland Browns are coming off a disappointing 2024 NFL season that saw them post a 3-14 record. Despite their struggles, the team isn’t looking to move on from star edge rusher Myles Garrett as it looks to rebuild.

Browns general manager Andrew Berry was asked Tuesday during a Senior Bowl media availability with three Cleveland beat writers whether he would consider trading Garrett for an offer involving two first-round picks.

‘Do you say I’m not interested?’ a beat writer asked, per Mary Kay Cabot of Cleveland.com.

‘Correct,’ Berry responded. ‘You can put that on the record.’

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

Garrett has been with the Browns since 2017, when Cleveland selected him with the No. 1 overall pick. He has starred for the team, posting 102.5 sacks over his first eight NFL seasons and earning four first-team All-Pro nods. He was named the AP’s Defensive Player of the Year in 2023 and has recorded at least 12 sacks in seven consecutive campaigns.

With that in mind, it’s little surprise Cleveland would want to keep Garrett. Pro Football Focus graded him as the second-best edge defender in 2024 behind only Aidan Hutchinson, who played in just six games before a season-ending leg injury.

Garrett won’t turn 30 until December, so he should have plenty of good years left in the tank, provided he can stay healthy.

That’s part of the reason Berry implied Cleveland was hoping to sign Garrett to an extension and make him a member of the Browns for life.

‘I don’t want to go into contract discussions. I wouldn’t do that publicly,’ Berry said. ‘But I think you can assume that we do anticipate at some point doing a third contract with Myles. We want him to retire here.’

Time will tell whether Berry and Co. can achieve that goal, but they have plenty of time during which to hold contract talks. Garrett will play the 2025 NFL season on the penultimate year of a five-year, $125 million extension he signed with the Browns in 2020.

All the NFL news on and off the field. Sign up for USA TODAY’s 4th and Monday newsletter.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

When two headstrong colleagues are swinging sledgehammers in unison, there is harmony.

When two stubborn people are not swinging sledgehammers in unison, someone – and perhaps both – is bound to get bludgeoned.

That’s what is happening with Miami Heat star Jimmy Butler and team president Pat Riley.

A once prosperous relationship has deteriorated.

On Monday, the Heat suspended Butler for the third time this month. The most recent suspension is indefinitely and for a minimum of five games which takes the Heat through the Feb. 6 trade deadline, which means in all likelihood, Butler will never play another game for the Heat.

It is an unfortunate situation, and it’s the kind of drama the league doesn’t need. Butler, the Heat and the NBA league office will be relieved when the split is official.

It is also a stunning implosion. It wasn’t long ago that Heat coach Erik Spoelstra said of Butler, “He should’ve been in a Heat uniform long ago. It feels like he’s about what we’re about, and we’re about what he’s about” and Butler said of the Heat, “I really enjoy playing for this coach, for this organization with the guys that I’ve got riding with me. And I’m constantly smiling because I am happy. I’m home and everything about this organization fits me. Everything about the guys on this roster fits me.’

Butler is not smiling, is not happy and the organization no longer fits him, and the Heat can’t wait until Butler is no longer in a Heat uniform. The Heat appearances in the 2020, 2023 Finals are memories.

These breakups do not happen overnight. It’s usually not one thing but many things. Flaws aren’t so obvious – or they’re ignored – in the fun, early days of romance.

Miami didn’t give Butler an extension, and his on-court role has been reduced this season. But the friction had been growing before this season, and Riley has had limited communication with Butler over the past two seasons.

Butler’s bluntness once worked with Miami. Now, it’s unwelcomed, especially with Butler recently challenging Riley to get on the court and participate in a drill as Butler worked out near the end of a recent suspension.

Butler is known for making life uncomfortable for teams – it’s not the kind of “being comfortable with the uncomfortable’ the Heat prefer – and he did it with Minnesota and Philadelphia near the end of his time with both of those teams.

But this isn’t all on Butler. Riley, one of the NBA’s great all-time coaches and executives, isn’t perfect. His desire to compete has led to acrimony with LeBron James and Dwyane Wade as they left the Heat for other teams. To be fair, Riley’s way has worked. It has produced championships, and Wade won three titles and a Finals MVP with the Heat, and James won two titles, two Finals MVPs and two regular-season MVPs with Miami.

Looking at this ordeal through the lens of how Butler left previous teams and how other stars grew weary of the Heat, this outcome was inevitable. It worked … until it didn’t.

Butler and Riley feel they’re being pushed in directions they don’t want to go, and neither likes that so they feel they have no choice but to do what they’re doing.

Their steadfast resolve to do things their way has gotten them both far. They’ve gone as far together as they can go.

A trade needs to happen before this split becomes more embarrassing.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The UEFA Champions League wraps up its first-ever 36-team group stage Wednesday, with 18 simultaneous games that will determine which teams advance, and who crashes out at the first hurdle.

This season’s changes include a ‘Swiss model’ group stage format that sees every team play eight games for the right to move on to the knockout stage. While some giants like Liverpool, Barcelona, Arsenal, and Inter Milan have proceeded to the top of the standings, the new system has opened the door to some surprises: Dutch side Feyenoord and French debutants Brest currently sit ahead of perennial contenders like Bayern Munich, Real Madrid, and Juventus.

The biggest potential shock is further down the table, where Manchester City — winners of four straight Premier League titles — faces a must-win match against Club Brugge. Anything less than a victory will see one of global soccer’s biggest powers on the sidelines in the knockout stage.

Here’s what to know about the new Champions League format and how to watch the final set of group-stage games.

Champions League format: How does group stage work?

For 2024-25, the Champions League made its first significant format change in many years. That included an expansion of the pool of teams to qualify, as well as extending the knockout stage to include one more round.

The long-standing set-up saw 32 teams divvied up into eight groups of four, with the top two teams from each group moving on to a round-of-16 knockout round. From there, it was simple: come out on top in a pair of games against your opponent (one at home, one away), and you advance, with the final two teams left playing a one-game final at a venue picked well in advance.

This season’s Champions League is much different. 36 teams qualified for the tournament proper, and the many small groups have been replaced by one huge table pooling every participant. UEFA — despite growing discontent over how many games top-tier professional teams are being asked to play — has given each group-stage qualifier an eight-game schedule (up from six in years past). The Champions League now features 189 total games, an increase of 64 from the previous format’s 125.

Each team plays four home games, and four away, with UEFA using the ‘Swiss model’ seen in international chess to sort a schedule. The eight teams who put together the best performance over that spell advance directly to the round of 16, while the bottom 12 sides in the table are eliminated.

For the remaining 16 teams, advancement into a new ‘knockout phase play-off’ round awaits. UEFA will use standing order as a form of seeding, but curiously will include a draw to actually pair teams. For example, the teams that finish ninth and 10th will be placed into one pot, while the teams in 23rd and 24th (the final two berths to the knockout stage) will be in another.

The draw will then pair one team from each pot, meaning the ninth-placed team will play either the 23rd- or 24th-placed team. This process will continue for the teams in 11th and 12th (paired with the teams that finish 21st and 22nd) and so on, with each pairing playing home-and-away games February 11-12 and 18-19.

The winners of those games will join the top eight group-stage participants in the round of 16, which will be sorted in a similar process to (in theory) give the best-performing teams a lesser foe. From that point on, the tournament returns to a normal rhythm, with the eight winners proceeding to quarterfinals, semifinals, and a final on May 31 at the Allianz Arena in Munich.

Champions League: Schedule for Wednesday games

All matches kick off at 3 p.m. ET. Home teams listed first.

Aston Villa vs. Celtic
Bayer Leverkusen vs. Sparta Prague
Borussia Dortmund vs. Shakhtar Donetsk
Young Boys vs. Red Star Belgrade
Barcelona vs. Atalanta
Bayern Munich vs. Slovan Bratislava
Inter Milan vs. Monaco
Red Bull Salzburg vs. Atlético Madrid
Girona vs. Arsenal
Dinamo Zagreb vs. AC Milan
Juventus vs. Benfica
Lille vs. Feyenoord
Manchester City vs. Club Brugge
PSV vs. Liverpool
Sturm Graz vs. RB Leipzig
Sporting CP vs. Bologna
Brest vs. Real Madrid
Stuttgart vs. Paris Saint-Germain

How to watch Champions League group stage: Time, TV channel, streaming

The conclusion of the 2024-25 Champions League group stage will see all 18 simultaneous games streamed on Paramount+, with one game — Juventus vs. Benfica — being broadcast on CBS Sports Network.

Fans can stream that latter game on Fubo, which is offering a free trial for new subscribers.

Date: Wednesday, Jan. 29
Time: 3 p.m. ET (12 p.m. PT)
TV: CBS Sports Network (Juventus vs. Benfica only)
Streaming: Paramount+ for all games, Fubo (Juventus vs. Benfica only)

Watch the Champions League group stage on Paramount+

We occasionally recommend interesting products and services. If you make a purchase by clicking one of the links, we may earn an affiliate fee. USA TODAY Network newsrooms operate independently, and this doesn’t influence our coverage.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

A letter signed by 77 Nobel laureates opposing the confirmation of Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary nominee Robert F. Kennedy Jr. being touted as a reason to oppose him is almost entirely composed of political donors, many of them who supported Democrat campaigns.

‘In view of his record, placing Mr. Kennedy in charge of DHHS would put the public’s health in jeopardy and undermine America’s global leadership in the health sciences, in both the public and commercial sectors,’ more than 75 Nobel laureates wrote in an open letter published by the New York Times last month. 

A Fox News Digital review found that at least 60 of the signatories are political donors, mostly to Democratic campaigns, including Steven Chu, who served as former President Barack Obama’s secretary of Energy. Chu gave $5,400 to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign in 2016. 

Nobel Medicine Laureate Joseph L. Goldstein, who also signed the letter, has donated tens of thousands of dollars to Democrats, including former Rep. Beto O’Rourke, former President Joe Biden and the Democrat-aligned SMP Super PAC.

American economist George A. Akerlof, who is married to Biden Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, also signed the letter on top of donating $25,000 to Biden in 2020 and $20,000 to the DCCC in 2018.

Akerlof signed a letter in June of last year warning of the economic dangers of electing President Donald Trump back into office, which was amplified by the Biden campaign and other Biden surrogates and also littered with signatories who have either donated to Biden or supported him politically in the past.

Akerlof, who donated nearly $90,000 to Democrats between the 1990s and 2022, also signed a letter supporting Build Back Better, and signed a letter in 2020 calling Trump’s re-election effort ‘selfish and reckless.’

Louis E. Brus, an American chemist who signed the letter, is a frequent Democrat donor, including sending $2,000 to Biden’s campaign.

Chemists Walter Gilbert, Johann Deisenhofer, Alan Heeger and Brian K. Kobilka also donated to Democrats, including Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, former Vice President Kamala Harris, Obama, and Sen. Elizabeth Warren. 

Other signatories include Planned Parenthood donor David Baltimore, John Kerry donor Michael Rosbash, former President Bill Clinton NIH Director Harold E. Varmus and Adam Schiff donor Kip Stephen Thorne. 

‘If there’s one thing Americans should understand about politics, it’s that things are rarely as they seem,’ Camryn Kinsey, executive director of Confirm 47, told Fox News Digital. ‘This letter appears to be nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt by special interests to block a critical Cabinet nomination. The fact that one of the signers is a former Obama Cabinet official, and that the majority are Democrat donors, tells you everything you need to know.’

Kennedy is also facing a million-dollar opposition campaign from Protect Our Care, which is backed by the dark money group Sixteen Thirty Fund that is not required to disclose its donors, Politico reported.

The dark money fund is a group ‘committed to tackling society’s biggest social challenges’ such as climate change and gun reform, brought in $181 million, spending about $141 million in 2023.

Kennedy, who has been criticized by both sides of the aisle for previous positions on vaccines and his stance on abortion, will have his first confirmation hearing Wednesday at 10 a.m. 

On top of facing opposition from experts in the New York Times letter and other petitions, Kennedy has faced support in the medical community, including an initiative backed by IMA Action, a coalition of over 15,000 healthcare professionals, who are rallying support for Kennedy.

‘Our coalition is broad, highly active and deeply committed to much needed healthcare reform,’ Lynne Kristensen, Communications Director for IMA Action, said in a statement. ‘We’re going to push back against the falsehoods of the Pharma-financed opposition to RFK Jr., and our healthcare professionals will be exceedingly active with their home state senators, policy makers and public health agencies.’

‘The Kennedy and other HHS confirmations are about restoring health to America’s healthcare system, and IMA Action is excited for health reform to be at the forefront of the national conversation.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President Donald Trump’s nominee for secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), will emphasize that he is not ‘anti-vaccine’ when he appears Wednesday in Congress at the first of two straight days of Senate confirmation hearings.

‘I want to make sure the Committee is clear about a few things. News reports have claimed that I am anti-vaccine or anti-industry. Well, I am neither; I am pro-safety,’ Kennedy will say in his opening statement in front of the Senate Finance Committee.

The statement was shared first with Fox News ahead of the appearance by Kennedy, who, if confirmed, would have control over 18 powerful federal agencies, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

And Kennedy will emphasize he’s not ‘the enemy of food producers. American farms are the bedrock of our culture and national security … I want to work with our farmers and food producers to remove burdensome regulations and unleash American ingenuity.’

The hearing, as well as a Thursday hearing in front of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee (a courtesy hearing as only the Senate Finance Committee will vote on Kennedy’s confirmation), are expected to be contentious because of Kennedy’s controversial vaccine views, including his repeated claims linking vaccines to autism, which have been debunked by scientific research.

Kennedy also served for years as chair or chief legal counsel for Children’s Health Defense, the nonprofit organization he founded that has advocated against vaccines and sued the federal government numerous times, including a challenge over the authorization of the COVID vaccine for children.

After Trump’s convincing November presidential election victory, Kennedy has said he won’t ‘take away anybody’s vaccines.’

And in his opening statement at his confirmation hearing, Kennedy will spotlight that ‘all of my kids are vaccinated, and I believe vaccines have a critical role in healthcare.’

But he will also say, ‘In my advocacy, I have disturbed the status quo by asking uncomfortable questions. Well, I won’t apologize for that. We have massive health problems in this country that we must face honestly.’

HHS is a massive federal department, with approximately 90,000 people and an annual budget of roughly $1.7 trillion. And Kennedy has said he wants to shift the focus of the agencies he would oversee toward promotion of a healthy lifestyle and the root causes of chronic diseases, which has garnered some bipartisan support in Congress.

Kennedy has said he would aim to overhaul dietary guidelines and take aim at ultra-processed foods, among other initiatives.

‘American farms are the bedrock of our culture and national security,’ Kennedy is expected to say in his opening statement. ‘I want to work with our farmers and food producers to remove burdensome regulations and unleash American ingenuity.’

He will warn that ‘the United States has worse health than any other developed nation, yet we spend far more on healthcare — at least double; and in some cases, triple.’

And he will ‘thank President Trump for entrusting me to deliver on his promise to make America healthy again.’ 

‘Should I be so privileged to be confirmed, we will make sure our tax dollars support healthy foods. We will scrutinize the chemical additives in our food supply. We will remove the financial conflicts of interest in our agencies. We will create an honest, unbiased, science-driven HHS, accountable to the President, to Congress, and to the American people. We will reverse the chronic disease epidemic and put the nation back on the road to health,’ Kennedy is expected to say.

The 71-year-old Kennedy, the longtime environmental activist and crusader who is the scion of the nation’s most storied political dynasty, launched a long-shot campaign for the Democrat presidential nomination against then-President Biden in April 2023. But six months later, he switched to an independent run for the White House.

Kennedy made major headlines again last August when he dropped his presidential bid and endorsed Trump. While Kennedy had long identified as a Democrat and repeatedly invoked his late father, former Sen. Robert F. Kennedy, and his late uncle, former President John F. Kennedy – who were both assassinated in the 1960s – Kennedy in recent years built relationships with far-right leaders due in part to his high-profile vaccine skepticism.

Trump announced soon after the November election that he would nominate Kennedy to his Cabinet to run HHS.

Opposition to Kennedy’s nomination has been fierce, with advocacy groups running ad campaigns urging senators to vote against his confirmation.

Kennedy, in his opening statement, will ‘thank my wife Cheryl, who is with us here today; and all the members of my large extended family, for the love that they have so generously shared. Ours has always been a family devoted to public service, and I look forward to continuing that legacy.’

But many members of the Kennedy family were very vocal in their opposition to his primary challenge against Biden as well as his independent White House run.

And on the eve of his confirmation hearing, his well-known cousin, Caroline Kennedy, sent a letter to senators on Tuesday that charged Kennedy as one who ‘preys on the desperation of parents and sick children’ and whose actions ‘have cost lives.’ 

She seemed to be referring to Kennedy’s connection to a measles outbreak in 2019 in the Pacific Island nation of Samoa, where 83 people died.

Among those vocal in their opposition to Kennedy is Democrat Gov. Josh Green of Hawaii, a former emergency room physician who traveled to Samoa to help treat the deadly measles outbreak, including vaccinating tens of thousands of individuals.

‘Our people deserve a Health and Human Services Secretary who champions science, supports vaccines, and is committed to lowering costs while safeguarding health care access,’ the governor said in a statement. ‘Mr. Kennedy’s lack of experience raises serious concerns about the future of critical programs like Medicare and Medicaid.’

It’s not just Democrats who have issues with Kennedy.

Social conservative Republicans aiming to curtail abortion rights take issue with his past comments in support of abortion rights.

On the eve of the confirmation hearing, former Vice President Mike Pence’s Advancing American Freedom public advocacy group launched a modest ad campaign opposing Kennedy based on his abortion views.

‘We need leadership that defends life and protects the most vulnerable—not radical policies that undermine our values,’ the group wrote in a social media post.

Kennedy met with senators again on Tuesday, on the eve of his confirmation hearing, but didn’t take shouted questions from reporters.

But veteran Trump administration official Katie Miller told Fox News Digital that Kennedy’s ‘prepared and excited’ for the hearings.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

‘I could be sitting at the front row at an award show and I still don’t feel like a cool kid.’
– A 22-year-old Taylor Swift, already a superstar well along her path to world dominion

Threaded through this past momentous January week, amid the grand pomp of an American inauguration, the peaceful handover of power, the breathless flurry of executive orders, the debates over pardon limits, the frigid temperatures, the euphoria and the dysphoria within the United States populace, the prayers, and the partying, there have been a few peculiar memes about Donald Trump’s new status.

Not as the 47th (and 45th) POTUS, not as a fella with a mandate and mojo to spare, not as a former/current leader returning to the Oval Office with newfound clarity and purpose. 

The topic: Is Donald J. Trump cool? And, relatedly, can he be considered, at last, a full-fledged, fully accepted, member of the American president’s club, a club so exclusive there are only four other living members, and only 45 members in total, since 1789?

Trump certainly was not uniformly greeted as a worthy colleague when he first took office in 2017, following his shock and awe defeat of more than a baker’s dozen of top tier Republican contenders and his epic vanquishing of Hillary Clinton and the Clinton dynasty. 

The snide and dismissive remarks from bold-faced politicians and celebrities, the mocking of Trump’s credentials as a potential policy maker and self-appointed sage, continued throughout the campaign season, well beyond 2016’s Election Day, and all the way through his first term in office.

Barack and Michelle Obama themselves remained stony-faced as they handed over the metaphorical White House keys, and had nary a kind word during the run of Trump’s first administration. Admittedly, the Obama-Trump chronicle had started on a cruel and sour note, with Trump’s accusations about Obama’s birthplace and legitimacy, and both sides trading insults and expressions of mutual disdain. 

(Example 1: Obama on Trump, insisting voters would never elect Trump in 2016 because they knew ‘that being president is a serious job… It’s not hosting a talk show or a reality show, it’s not promotion, it’s not marketing, it’s hard. It’s not a matter of pandering and doing whatever will get you in the news on a given day.’ Example 2: Trump on Obama: ‘He’s a terrible president. He’ll probably go down as the worst president in the history of our country. He’s been a total disaster.’)

Trump, meanwhile, never expected to be accepted by the president’s club when he took office in 2017, and said as much. In any case, he was busy with the big job, its tasks huge and unfamiliar even for a global icon who had, at least on the surface, achieved massive success with nearly every new professional venture, from real estate magnate to best-selling author to blockbuster television star. 

Whether one considers Trump’s first White House go-round impressive, disastrous, or somewhere in between, it was unquestionably shambolic, dominated by a cult of personality and punctuated by wild Trump tweets, in-house melodrama, and unceasing national nitpicking. The confusion and ugliness of the storming of the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, served as an apposite sendoff to Trump’s chaotic, polarizing term.

Even while living inside the White House, Trump remained an outsider of sorts, allowed conceptual entry into the winner’s circle, but held back in the outer borough by a perceived barrier of grace, personality, milieu and taste. For all Trump’s money and celebrity, whether in Manhattan or in Washington, the Queens-born billionaire had never come across as an elite, which is why a 2016 blue collar focus group voter in New Hampshire blithely described him as ‘someone just like me.’

During his first term, the magazine covers and New York Times profiles that Trump coveted were accompanied by withering headlines and scornful narratives. The media landscape was harsh and unsettled, reflecting the unprecedented political chasms in the country. Trump’s interactions with foreign dignitaries often were scrutinized more for stylistic superficialities and culture clashes rather than for political or diplomatic achievements.

Trump had no choice but to shake off the slings and slights, and embed himself more firmly in the embrace of his MAGA base. After four years in office and lessons learned from his 2020 loss to Joe Biden, Trump regrouped and came back strong. He had assists from unlikely sources: a hostile left-leaning media scrum that overplayed its hand and turned off free thinking voters and independents; backfiring federal and state lawfare efforts; and a cover-up of President Biden’s mental decline that led to bedlam within the Democratic Party.

Trump played it smart, showing growth and relative discipline. After surviving two assassination attempts during the summer of 2024, he showed depth and heart. When he won the 2024 election, he showed confidence and conviction.

But what about cool?

It sure looked cool when Trump and Obama were seated together on Jan. 9 at the funeral service for President Jimmy Carter, a celebration of the Georgian’s long life and abundant contributions to the country. Forty-four and 45/7 chatted away, heads together, smiling, chuckling, the two raddest cats in a sea of power and prestige. Kamala Harris, teeth gritted, sat in the tangibly frigid front pew with the Bidens; Bill Clinton was relegated to an aisle seat, spotlight pointed elsewhere. 

Afterward, Trump acknowledged the rapprochement. ‘Boy, they look like two people that like each other,’ Trump said of the visuals. ‘And we probably do. We have a little different philosophies, right? But we probably do. I don’t know. We just got along. But I [get] along with just about everybody.’

That rapprochement may have been short-lived, however. Several weeks later, at Trump’s inauguration on Jan. 20, lip-readers claim Obama cheekily murmured to George W. Bush, ‘How can we stop what’s happening?’ with 43 offering a smirk in reply.

Nevertheless, having been granted the greatest political mulligan in American history, Trump has scored the only prize that ever eluded him – status as a two-term president. And this time around, he has a far more comprehensive and specific vision of what he hopes to accomplish and how he wishes to be remembered when he leaves office in four years.*

Just days into his term, Trump, irrevocably changed by two attempts on his life, and carrying with him the experience of four years in the White House and four years out, may have something more important than cool: a purpose. Trump can weave together some of his greatest strengths: the bulwark of his MAGA fan base, his gifts as history’s greatest presidential television producer, and his profound desire to depart the office, whenever that might be, as one of the POTUS GOATS. 

So really, who needs to be cool?** 

To return once again to the wise and formidable Taylor Swift: ‘My life doesn’t gravitate towards being edgy, sexy, or cool… I’m imaginative, I’m smart, and I’m hardworking.’

For President Trump and for all of us, those are words to live by.

*Cue the murmurs about lifting the two-term limit on the presidency. 

**Cool presidents: Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, Andrew Jackson, Abraham Lincoln, Ulysses Grant, Theodore Roosevelt, FDR, JFK (although for some, really more mysterious and glamorous than cool), LBJ, Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush, Barack Obama. 

Uncool presidents: John Tyler, Franklin Pierce, Chester B. Arthur, Richard Nixon.

So indifferent to being cool they became cool: George Washington, Jimmy Carter.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS