Archive

2025

Browsing

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., is demanding specifics from a group of congressional Democrats who urged military service members to ‘refuse illegal orders.’

Graham sent letters to a cohort of congressional Democrats, all with backgrounds in the military or intelligence community, featured in a now-viral video where they urge service members to refuse illegal orders.

The six lawmakers featured in the video were Sens. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., and Mark Kelly, D-Ariz., along with Reps. Maggie Goodlander, D-N.H.; Jason Crow, D-Colo.; Chris Deluzio, D-Pa.; and Chrissy Houlahan, D-Pa.

They reiterated the lines, ‘You can refuse illegal orders,’ or ‘You must refuse illegal orders,’ as they went on to charge that service members do not have to carry out orders from higher-ups that they believe violate the Constitution.

Notably, none of the lawmakers dove into which orders they believed were illegal in the video.

Graham, who served three decades in the Air Force and worked as an Air Force Judge Advocate General (JAG), wrote in six letters to each of the lawmakers that he took ‘the issue of unlawful orders very seriously.’

‘I cannot find a single example of an illegal order during this administration, but as a Member of Congress, I believe you owe it to the country to be specific as to which orders you believe are unlawful,’ Graham said.

‘However, to say that I am disturbed by your video encouraging service members and Intelligence Community professionals to refuse ‘unlawful orders’ is an understatement,’ he continued. ‘In that regard, could you please provide clarity on what orders, issued by President Trump or those in his chain of command, you consider illegal?’

The video, and Graham’s letters, come on the heels of rising questions among lawmakers about the legality of President Donald Trump’s authorization of strikes on alleged drug boats in the Caribbean, and in the wake of the administration’s deployment of the National Guard to blue cities across the country.

Members of the military have an obligation to follow lawful orders from their superiors, but they can ignore orders deemed illegal, according to the Uniform Code of Military Justice — the standardized military justice system enacted in 1951.

When asked to get into specifics, Slotkin’s office pointed Fox News Digital to an interview the senator had with TMZ, where she explained that the video was made in response to service members ‘reaching out to us saying, ‘I don’t know what to do if the commander in chief orders me to do something that is illegal.’’

Slotkin, who was a CIA officer, said service members aren’t ‘trained in police techniques. They’re not trained in arresting, detaining American citizens, crowd control, raids on homes, and they were worried that they could be asked to do those things, that protests could get bad in a place like Chicago, and they could be asked to do these things.’

Fox News Digital reached out for comment from Kelly, Crow, Houlahan, Goodlander and Deluzio but did not immediately hear back.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance were not invited to the funeral for former Vice President Dick Cheney, Fox News has confirmed.

Cheney’s funeral is scheduled for mid-morning on Thursday at the National Cathedral in Washington, D.C. It is traditional for sitting U.S. presidents to attend funerals for past presidents and vice presidents, but Trump has had a uniquely poor relationship with Cheney’s family in recent years. News of the president’s exclusion was first reported by Axios.

Cheney’s daughter, former Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., helped lead the House investigation into Trump’s role in the storming of the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

Both Liz and her father endorsed former Vice President Kamala Harris during the 2024 presidential campaign.

The elder Cheney, who went from the plains of Casper, Wyoming, to a decades-long public career as a Republican congressman, Defense secretary, White House chief of staff and one of the most powerful American vice presidents ever, died at age 84 earlier this month.

‘Richard B. Cheney, the 46th Vice President of the United States, died last night, November 3, 2025. He was 84 years old. His beloved wife of 61 years, Lynne, his daughters, Liz and Mary, and other family members were with him as he passed,’ his family said in a statement obtained by Fox News. ‘The former Vice President died due to complications of pneumonia and cardiac and vascular disease.’

‘For decades, Dick Cheney served our nation, including as White House Chief of Staff, Wyoming’s Congressman, Secretary of Defense, and Vice President of the United States,’ the statement continued.

‘Dick Cheney was a great and good man who taught his children and grandchildren to love our country, and to live lives of courage, honor, love, kindness, and fly fishing,’ his family said. ‘We are grateful beyond measure for all Dick Cheney did for our country. And we are blessed beyond measure to have loved and been loved by this noble giant of a man.’

Cheney had a long history of cardiac problems, including five heart attacks. He received a heart transplant on March 24, 2012, at a Virginia hospital after nearly 21 months on a waiting list.

Cheney, who served as vice president for two terms under President George W. Bush, was one of the most powerful and controversial men ever to hold that position. He was a driving force behind America’s ‘war on terror,’ including the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. 

Fox News’ Michael Dorgan contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Favorites could take care of business and things could go according to plan in the SEC, Big Ten, Big 12 and even the ACC, should Georgia Tech and Virginia cross the finish line with just one conference loss.

But of the Power Four leagues, the ACC remains the Power Four league most likely headed for chaos with just two weeks remaining until conference championship games.

That’s not great news for the conference, which might have a slew of contenders battling for a title-game appearance but could end up sending only its champion into the College Football Playoff.

A tipping point comes this Saturday. Georgia Tech could lock down a trip to Charlotte, North Carolina, by beating Pittsburgh. But a loss opens up a range of possibilities that include Miami playing for the ACC title despite two conference losses.

The other three also have the possibility of some wild permutations should upsets happen in the final two weeks.

Here’s where each race stands in the Power Four and the possible tiebreakers that will impact which teams play for conference titles:

SEC conference tiebreakers

Contenders: Texas A&M (7-0), Georgia (7-1), Mississippi (6-1), Alabama (6-1).

The conference race won’t be determined until Texas A&M meets No. 18 Texas and Alabama takes on Auburn in the Iron Bowl after Thanksgiving. That would be your two teams advancing to Atlanta if both teams win.

If A&M loses and Alabama wins, the Crimson Tide would face Georgia, which is already in the clubhouse at 7-1 and would edge out the Aggies thanks to a better record against four common league opponents. If Alabama loses and A&M wins, the Aggies will face Georgia because of the Bulldogs’ win against Mississippi.

In the case of losses by A&M and Alabama, the title game would pit the Georgia and Ole Miss, which would finish ahead of the Aggies by virtue of a stronger conference opponent winning percentage. And if the Aggies, Tide and Rebels all lose, A&M would backdoor into a matchup against Georgia.

Big Ten conference tiebreakers

Contenders: Indiana (8-0), Ohio State (7-0), Southern California (6-1), Oregon (6-1), Michigan (6-1).

As in the SEC, the Big Ten race could stick to the script: Indiana beats Purdue to secure the first Big Ten championship game appearance in program history and meets Ohio State, which beats Michigan.

At this point, there’s no reason to think the Hoosiers will faceplant against the woeful Boilermakers. If they do, though, and then Oregon beats Southern California on Saturday and Michigan tops Ohio State a week later, the loss to Purdue would drop Indiana into fourth place in the final standings and send the Ducks and Wolverines to Lucas Oil Stadium.

Let’s take that hard-to-imagine scenario off the table and lock the Hoosiers into the championship game. We will also assume no other upsets among the contenders.

Indiana would meet Oregon if the Ducks top USC and Michigan beats OSU. If USC wins on Saturday and the Wolverines win, the Trojans will finish in second place and face the Hoosiers because of a stronger conference opponent winning percentage.

In the case of an Indiana win, Michigan’s path to the Big Ten championship game requires a win against the Buckeyes and then the winner of Oregon and USC losing the following weekend — the Ducks to Washington or the Trojans to UCLA.

Big 12 conference tiebreakers

Contenders: Texas Tech (7-1), Brigham Young (6-1), Utah (5-2), Houston (5-2), Arizona State (5-2), Cincinnati (5-2).

Texas Tech is locked into the championship game by beating West Virginia next Saturday. Tech can also advance with a loss should Brigham Young lose one of two against Cincinnati and Central Florida.

The Cougars are in with a clean finish. They could also lose once and earn a rematch with the Red Raiders if Arizona State drops one of two against Colorado and Arizona. In this case, BYU breaks a three-way tie with Utah and Houston thanks to the head-to-head win against the Utes and a better record against common conference opponents than the Cougars.

Arizona State is looming if BYU stumbles. If BYU loses once and ASU and Utah win out, the Sun Devils will return to the Big 12 title game because of a perfect record against three common conference opponents. If the Utes lose once to leave a two-way tie, ASU will advance because of a win against Texas Tech.

Losses to BYU and Tech have left Utah with a very narrow path to the championship game. To get there, the Utes would need to beat Kansas State and Kansas while BYU loses twice and ASU loses once.

There is also an extremely slim possibility of a seven-way tie for second place that breaks Utah’s way thanks to a win against ASU and the highest conference opponent winning percentage.

Cincinnati has a long-shot chance which includes wins against BYU and TCU and losses by Arizona State, Utah and Houston.

ACC conference tiebreakers

Contenders: Georgia Tech (6-1), Virginia (6-1), Pittsburgh (5-1), SMU (5-1), Miami (4-2), Duke (4-2).

Georgia Tech ends ACC play on Saturday against Pittsburgh. Virginia takes on Virginia Tech next weekend. SMU still plays Louisville and California. Miami closes at Virginia Tech and at Pittsburgh.

If Georgia Tech, Virginia and SMU win out, the Yellow Jackets would finish first because of their win against Wake Forest, which beat the Cavaliers and Mustangs. Virginia would finish ahead of SMU by conference opponent winning percentage.

Virginia will face Duke if the Cavaliers beat the Hokies, the Panthers beat Georgia Tech and SMU lose one of two. Under the same criteria, Pittsburgh would face Virginia by also beating Miami in the season finale.

A lane is opening for Miami to play for the ACC crown despite losses to Louisville and SMU. To get there, the Hurricanes have to win out while Georgia Tech loses to Pittsburgh and Virginia Tech tops Virginia.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Is it time for the NFL to take a page out of soccer’s playbook and sublet its stars?
It would certainly be nice to see Myles Garrett with a team positioned to make a deep playoff run as he toils with Cleveland for a ninth season.
In addition to Garrett, these five other stars would also be prime loan candidates in 2025.

One can get some loopy ideas, especially when one subjects oneself to 14 hours of NFL football on any given Sunday.

Take last weekend for instance.

Aside from those who live in South Florida, inside the Beltway or have a fantasy team anchored by De’Von Achane, then there was little reason to get up early to watch the Week 11 matchup between the Miami Dolphins and Washington Commanders … unless you were curious to see the visuals from the league’s first-ever regular-season contest from Madrid – which included Real Madrid’s Bernabéu Stadium, perhaps European fútbol’s preeminent palace.

Sunday night’s, uh, fixture between the Eagles and Lions featured two teams with Super Bowl aspirations – even if one could argue each might be a pivotal player away from World Cup, er, Lombardi glory. If only they could sublet another player.

Wait, what?!?!

Full transparency, I’m no kickball enthusiast – unless “Ted Lasso” or “Welcome to Wrexham” is about to resume. Soccer is replete with drawbacks – such as ties (I mean draws), offsides, fake injuries, hooligans, midseason Cups (like the moronic one the NBA continues clinging to) and FIFA. But it does have some otherwise intriguing aspects to its tableau – think promotion/relegation and spectacular venues such as Bernabéu.

And the loan system. Can you imagine that in the NFL?

Maybe you’re thinking the league’s transfer window – trade deadline, I mean trade deadline – just expired earlier this month. That is true, of course, and a few big names, namely ex-New York Jets Quinnen Williams and Sauce Gardner, joined new sides. Yet, like in most leagues, most NFLers who are dealt in the middle of a season are often sub-star-caliber and literally are rentals, sent to a new team for what’s probably a temporary hitch as their existing contract runs out – essentially what happened with new Eagles OLB Jaelan Phillips, Seahawks WR Rashid Shaheed and Jaguars WR Jakobi Meyers.

But consider the possibilities – and additional interest – if the league implemented a loan window after the trade deadline? I’m talking about the opportunity of a team allowing a superstar to play elsewhere, probably for the remainder of a given season (or maybe an additional year) in return for draft picks (maybe), prospects (maybe) or even salary cap space (which currently can’t be exchanged) in addition to whatever would be saved when the gaining team picked up the player’s paychecks for the term of the rental. This might also be an avenue to give younger, unproven guys developmental playing time elsewhere if they’re buried on the depth chart of a good team.

And I get it, football is an inherently riskier sport than fútbol, and a club and its fan base would certainly suffer some degree of agita watching one of their key guys selling out while in harm’s way and in another uniform, if only temporarily. But everyone has a price point. And there’s also an argument to be made that a bond between a player and organization could be strengthened if he was liberated – if only for a finite period of time – to pursue a Lombardi Trophy elsewhere.

With this wild proposal in mind, here are six players I wish were eligible for loans in 2025 – for the greater good of their teams, but mostly for them personally.

DE Myles Garrett, Cleveland Browns

He has to be the premier example here, right? In case you’d forgotten, he requested a trade prior to Super Bowl 59 earlier this year, even penning a goodbye letter to Browns fans. A four-year, $160 million extension in March unsurprisingly changed Garrett’s mind as it made him the league’s highest-paid non-quarterback at the time. Yet he’s enduring a similar fate in 2025 as previous campaigns, playing extraordinary football in the dark, on pace for a single-season record 25½ sacks – 10 coming over the past three games (all losses), including four in Sunday’s defeat to Baltimore.

Said Cleveland safety Grant Delpit: “I mean he’s the greatest of all time. He’s the best I’ve seen do it. I’m glad that he’s on my team.”

But imagine if the No. 1 pick of the 2017 draft wasn’t – at least not exclusively. What if the Browns could double deal, just a little bit, but ultimately keep the guy who could wind up being the greatest player in franchise history not named Jim Brown while also obtaining (needed) assets to upgrade Garrett’s supporting cast − all while affording him the opportunity to chase the ring he claimed he wanted so badly earlier this year? And how fascinating would it be to learn what teams might be willing to bid in order to borrow a guy for a half-dozen games or so? Sure, the notion of a dude playing his entire career in one helmet is romantic … even if every team has three helmets now. It also basically never happens. That hasn’t diluted Tom Brady’s ties to New England or Peyton Manning’s to Indianapolis or Jerry Rice’s to San Francisco.

The NFL is predicated on competitive balance, and loans would theoretically only disrupt that temporarily – while potentially adding another highly riveting component to the later stages of the regular season, when circumstances are always going to force some clubs by the wayside, regardless of conditions.

“Free Myles” … even if we’re merely furloughing him.

(And Cleveland needs to update the above social post.)

Playoff career: One win in two postseason appearances over his first eight seasons.

Ideal “loan” fit – Patriots: New England is tied for the league’s best record (9-2), has – by far – the most unused cap space in the league ($52 million-plus, per OverTheCap) and no dominant pass rusher on an eighth-ranked defense.

DE Maxx Crosby, Las Vegas Raiders

If Garrett is in a tier unto himself, Crosby is right below him. A talented, relentless, loyal soldier who’s remarkably straightened out his life and blossomed into a leader with the franchise that drafted him – and he and the Raiders remain mutually dedicated after he signed his own three-year extension earlier this year – Crosby nevertheless remains tethered to an organization that seems stuck in a perpetual rebuild. Hopefully he eventually plays for a Sin City winner, but it’d be nice if he could finally showcase his talents for one elsewhere.

Playoff career: Zero wins in one postseason appearance over his first six seasons.

Ideal “loan” fit – Lions: Detroit still hasn’t found a certifiable wingman for fellow DE Aidan Hutchinson, who was routinely enveloped Sunday night by the Eagles’ O-line. Borrowing Crosby would make opponents pay for double-teaming anyone on the edge.

OLB Brian Burns, New York Giants

He’s in the midst of a career year, Burns’ 13 sacks trailing only Garrett (15) league-wide. But that spectacular effort won’t last beyond 17 games with the flatlined G-Men, Burns no closer to his first-ever playoff trip.

Playoff career: No appearances over his first six seasons.

Ideal “loan” fit – Panthers: After he was traded last year, let’s send Burns back to Charlotte, where he toiled for his first five seasons and already knows much of the building and DC Ejiro Evero. The Panthers are currently hovering just outside the projected NFC playoff field and don’t have a defender with more than three sacks. A brief get-together with their former flame could be hot stuff for both parties.

DT Jeffery Simmons, Tennessee Titans

The Titans once again have the league’s worst record but have identified Simmons, a three-time Pro Bowler, as part of their future and opted not to trade him. But if they could loan him? He’s not Aaron Donald, but who is? However Simmons is certainly on par with Williams, who fetched a first- and second-round pick plus more from Dallas, and can certainly crush a pocket that so many of the league’s elite passers rely upon in January. Here’s hoping Simmons lasts long enough to reach another postseason game in Nashville – but sure would be nice if he was guaranteed one under a different situation.

Playoff career: Two wins in three postseason appearances (none since 2021) over his first six seasons.

Ideal “loan” fit – 49ers: Granted, Simmons isn’t an off-ball linebacker or pass rusher who could fill in more seamlessly for Fred Warner or Nick Bosa, the Niners’ injured defensive stalwarts. But Simmons could wreck shop from the inside for a unit that values D-line depth but had already been largely revamped by free agency before losing its two best players.

TE Trey McBride, Arizona Cardinals

He’s been more than living up to the four-year, $76 million contract he signed earlier this year, albeit for a team that’s taken a major step back in 2025. If he’s not the league’s best tight end at present, McBride is certainly the most productive, his 71 catches, 718 yards and seven TDs all tops at the position entering Week 12.

Playoff career: No appearances over his first three seasons.

Ideal “loan” fit – Packers: What a Band-Aid McBride would be for a Super Bowl hopeful forging ahead without injured Tucker Kraft.

RB Bijan Robinson, Atlanta Falcons

Maybe it’s somewhat premature to suggest loaning a potential superstar, one who scored two more touchdowns in obscurity during Sunday’s come-from-ahead loss to Carolina. But Robinson, now in his third season but eligible for his first mega-money extension in 2026, seems headed down the Saquon Barkley road with the ill-constructed Falcons, who are quickly squandering the prime years of a player whose position almost certainly limits his professional longevity. And given what a real-time highlight reel the luminous Robinson is capable of being, he’s the kind of high-wattage star and personality who deserves the opportunity to flourish on grander platforms.

Playoff career: No appearances over his first two seasons.

Ideal “loan” fit – AFC West: Can you imagine if the Chiefs, Broncos and Chargers got to fight over Robinson as a potential temp? Kansas City doesn’t run the ball particularly well and would surely love to make another move to spark their expected playoff push; Denver just lost RB J.K. Dobbins to a foot injury that will probably end his season; and the Bolts have been trying to get by without injured Omarion Hampton and Najee Harris. But Robinson to K.C. might be especially … special? Seeing what he could do during a deep postseason run while leveraging his multi-dimensional ability with the game’s most clutch quarterback would be something to behold.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Europe’s new qualifying format for the 2026 World Cup includes a 16-team second round, with four pods of four teams fighting for UEFA’s final spots in next summer’s tournament.

Four-time champion Italy finds itself in the playoffs and will need to win two matches to avoid missing out on a third consecutive World Cup. UEFA has 16 places in the 2026 World Cup, one-third of the expanded field and 12 teams have already secured their spots.

The semifinals will be played on March 26, 2026, with the higher-ranked teams hosting and the final in each bracket set for March 31.

Here’s what to know for the UEFA World Cup qualifying playoffs:

UEFA World Cup playoffs bracket, qualifiers for 2026

Path A

Semifinals – March 26, 2026

Northern Ireland at Italy
Bosnia and Herzegovina at Wales

Final – March 31, 2026

Northern Ireland/Italy winner at Bosnia and Herzegovia/Wales winner

Path B

Semifinals – March 26, 2026

Sweden at Ukraine
Albania at Poland

Final – March 31, 2026

Albania/Poland winner at Sweden/Ukraine winner

Path C

Semifinals – March 26, 2026

Romania at Turkey
Kosovo at Slovakia

Final – March 31, 2026

Romania/Turkey winner at Kosovo/Slovakia winner

Path D

Semifinals – March 26, 2026

North Macedonia at Denmark
Republic of Ireland at Czechia

Final – March 31, 2026

North Macedonia/Denmark winner at Republic of Ireland/Czechia winner

When is the UEFA World Cup qualifying playoff?

All eight semifinals will be played on March 26, 2026, and the four finals on March 31.

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fast.Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Of the 48 spots in the expanded World Cup 2026 field, 42 have been secured.

Despite the World Cup draw taking place on Dec. 5, six spots still will be up for grabs during tournaments played in March.

While UEFA holds a 16-team playoff to determine that confederation’s final four World Cup berths, a six-team intercontinental tournament will take place for two additional spots.

The intercontinental playoff tournament that will take place during the FIFA international window from March 23 through March 31. Bolivia, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Iraq, Jamaica, New Caledonia and Suriname will compete for two World Cup spots in a tournament held in Mexico.

Here’s what to know about FIFA’s intercontinental playoffs:

World Cup intercontinental playoff bracket

The six teams are seeded based on the latest FIFA world rankings. The two highest-seeded nations – DR Congo (No. 56) and Iraq (58) – were automatically placed into the finals of two separate brackets. The remaining teams – Jamaica (70), Bolivia (76), Suriname (123) and New Caledonia (149) – were drawn into the semifinals. The two Concacaf teams – Jamaica and Suriname – were placed in separate brackets.

Semifinal 1: New Caledonia vs. Jamaica
Semifinal 2: Bolivia vs. Suriname
Final 1: New Caledonia-Jamaica winner vs. DR Congo
Final 2: Bolivia-Suriname winner vs. Iraq

When is the intercontinental playoff?

The World Cup qualifying intercontinental playoffs will be held in March 2026.

Where is World Cup intercontinental playoff?

The four matches in the 2026 intercontinental playoffs will be played in Mexico, a co-host of the summer’s World Cup. Matches will be held at the Estadio Akron in Guadalajara and the Estadio BBVA in Monterrey.

How did these teams qualify for the intercontinental playoff?

Bolivia was the seventh-place finisher in CONMEBOL, the soccer federation of South America.
Democratic Republic of the Congo won a four-team playoff in Africa, defeating Cameroon in the semifinal and Nigeria in a penalty shootout in the final.
Iraq won a two-legged playoff against the United Arab Emirates.
Jamaica was one of the two best group runners-up in qualifying in Concacaf, the soccer federation of North America, Central America and the Caribbean.
New Caledonia was the runner-up in the Oceanian confederation’s qualification.
Suriname was one of the two best group runners-up in Concacaf qualifying.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

U.S. taxpayers are footing nearly $250 million a year in SNAP benefits spent on fast-food meals across just nine states, most of which are blue states, according to Republican Iowa Sen. Joni Ernst.

Nine states, including Arizona, California, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, New York, Rhode Island and Virginia — all of which are Democrat-run states except for Virginia — are opted into a SNAP program called the Restaurant Meals Program (RMP), which has spent nearly $250 million a year on hot meals, including fast-food, Ernst’s office found. 

The modern day Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program was established in 1964 under the Food Stamps Act to provide basic food needs such as meats and fruits and vegetables to financially vulnerable Americans. Hot foods or foods ready for immediate consumption were not eligible for purchase under the program as its main mission was to provide staple foods to be prepared at home. 

A 1977 loophole, however, allowed states to opt into a program called the Restaurant Meals Program, which was established to allow homeless individuals who do not have a kitchen to purchase prepared meals using SNAP benefits, according to Ernst’s office. The eligibility for the program expanded in the following years to include disabled individuals, the elderly and their spouses, according to the office. 

Nine states are opted into the program, which requires participating restaurants to sign an agreement with the state that is then authorized by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, which oversees the SNAP program writ large. Restaurants that participate in the program were historically a small group but have since expanded, most notably in California in the Biden era, Ernst’s office said. 

California expanded its program statewide, for example, in 2021 that allowed restaurants to accept CalFresh benefits via SNAP at a swath of top fast-food chains stretching from McDonald’s to Domino’s Pizza to Jack in the Box. 

Ernst’s office found that from June 2023 to May 2025, more than $475 million in taxpayer dollars funded Restaurant Meals Program meals at fast-food establishments. During that same time period, $524 million in taxpayer funds were spent through the Restaurant Meals Program overall, meaning California accounted for more than 90% of the nation’s total Restaurant Meals Program funds from June 2023 to May 2025, according to the office. 

‘The ‘N’ in SNAP stands for nutrition not nuggets with a side of fries,’ Ernst told Fox News Digital. ‘I wish I was McRibbing you but $250 million per year at the drive-through is no joke and a serious waste of tax dollars. I hate to be the one to say McSCUSE ME, but something needs to be done because taxpayers are not lovin’ it.’

The data found that between June 2023 and May 2025 $41.4 million funds went through Restaurant Meals Program in Arizona, $3.6 million in New York, $1.3 million in Michigan, $995,900 in Rhode Island, $649,000 in Massachusetts, $479,000 in Illinois, $308,500 in Virginia and $8,600 in Maryland. 

Ernst’s introduced legislation Thursday, dubbed the McSCUSE ME Act, to rein in the scope of the Restaurant Meals Program. Specifically, the bill would continue allowing homeless, elderly and disabled individuals to continue using the program, but ending spousal eligibility. 

The legislation also would reel in which vendors are able to participate in the program, specifically restricting fast-food vendors in favor of grocery stores that have hot bars to better ensure availability of healthy prepared food options. The legislation would also require states to produce public annual reports showing how many vendors participate in the Restaurant Meals Program, the number of participating beneficiaries and total costs for the program, Fox News Digital learned. 

The report and legislation comes after the U.S. government just emerged from the longest government shutdown in history, at 43 days, that included putting the food assistance program under heightened scrutiny over fraud and concern as recipients saw disruptions to their access. 

Upon the reopening of the government, the Trump administration is requiring all SNAP beneficiaries to reapply for the program in an effort to prevent fraud. 

Federal spending on SNAP overall climbed to record highs under the Biden administration, Fox News Digital previously reported, at $128 billion in 2021 and $127 billion in 2022 during the pandemic. By the Biden administration’s final year, SNAP cost $99.8 billion.

Fox News Digital’s Amanda Macias contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The way fans watch baseball is about to drastically change, as Major League Baseball tears the Band-Aid off its distribution model and pivots toward a future where linear television and streaming coexist, even if it comes at a cost to both sports leagues and consumers.

The upshot? Welcome back, NBC. All is forgiven, ESPN. And with any luck, “buffering” won’t be a word on fans’ lips as Netflix steps onto the scene.

The league and its new/old distribution partners announced on Nov. 19 broadcast agreements covering the 2026-28 seasons. Various details or frameworks of the agreements have been reported in recent months, but it remains a lot for the average consumer to ingest.

What will it all look like come March? From the most casual fan to the hardcore seamhead, here are a few details as MLB’s new broadcast era dawns: 

NBC/Peacock: Sunday Night Baseball and the wild-card round

This game of musical chairs was fast-tracked in February, when ESPN opted out of the final three years of its deal with MLB to broadcast its franchise Sunday Night Baseball and the four wild-card series that kick off the postseason.

The remainder of that deal was for $1.65 billion over three years, a sum agreed upon before the cord-cutting crisis and general collapse of the cable model was further exacerbated. ESPN took the chance to escape.

Now, it’s NBC taking over the Sunday night franchise, and while it may be jarring to see the game’s nationally-televised weekly jewel shift from its original home at ESPN, old heads will recognize baseball’s natural home on NBC.

In the modern Nielsen era, NBC broadcast every World Series from 1968-1976, then alternated years with ABC until CBS’s ill-fated four-year run as primary rightsholder from 1990-93. NBC’s last national dalliance with MLB came in the 1999 World Series, after which Fox Sports acquiree exclusive rights to the Fall Classic.

That won’t change anytime soon: Fox and Warner Bros. Discovery – or, Turner, as you might recognize it – remain MLB’s primary partners, with regular-season games and one league championship series apiece each year through 2028.

After that, however, all bets are off, and we could see in a near-term future World Series rights back on the market and potentially divvied up among multiple rightsholders.

For now? Baseball will tuck into NBC’s canon of prime time Sunday night programming – even if Sunday Night Football and the NBA may boot baseball to Peacock for all but the summer months.

ESPN: An all-30 strategy

For the more hardcore fan, the biggest adjustment might be ESPN taking its $1.65 billion from Sunday Night Baseball and essentially using it to purchase the highly popular MLB.TV package.

The network will control rights for all 30 out-of-market teams and take over the six essentially orphaned markets in which MLB took on production and distribution, largely due to the collapse of Diamond Sports and the regional sports network model.

While MLB will continue producing the in-market games, the agreement allows ESPN to sell or distribute local TV rights for a half-dozen teams. Five of the teams – the Cleveland Guardians, San Diego Padres, Arizona Diamondbacks, Minnesota Twins and Colorado Rockies – already had their games produced by MLB. A sixth, the Seattle Mariners, will join that mix and fall under ESPN’s auspices this year.

ESPN will also broadcast 30 weeknight games per season. It will continue broadcasting the Little League Classic in August and have rights to games on Memorial Day and the standalone slot the Thursday following the All-Star break, which this year will pit the New York Mets against the Philadelphia Phillies on July 16.

The tonnage makes sense for ESPN, driving consumers to its screens of all sizes during the summer months, when its bread-and-butter of football and collegiate sports are dark. The Athletic reported the $150 annual cost for MLB.TV is expected to remain the same, but it of course gives ESPN significant options to bundle with its larger suite of broadcast inventory.

Subscription fatigue: How much is too much?

That’s something consumers will have to decide. And some of the content will likely fall under a brand they’re already paying for.

Netflix will take over coverage of the Hone Run Derby this July and also broadcast the standalone opening night game between the New York Yankees and San Francisco Giants. Consider it beta testing for a potentially deeper investment for the streaming giant, which with the NFL and boxing has dipped its toes into live sports.

At a reported 302 million subscribers, many homes won’t have to do much to access the popular Derby.

Peacock is another story. The NBC streaming offshoot is reportedly stuck at 41 million subscribers. Perhaps adding MLB to the Olympics and the one NFL wild card game it broadcasts will move the needle a little, but as of now, a Peacock household remains the exception and not the rule.

The true inflection point will come in September 2026, when eight teams will have their wild card series broadcast on NBC – with at least part of that inevitably kicked over to Peacock.

So, just what is being asked of the consumer who wants to watch their favorite team plus the jewel events in a frictionless fashion?

Well, consider that in-market streaming of your favorite team runs around $30 a month. Throw in Peacock for around $15 a month. Another $20 or so for Netflix. That’s roughly $65 already – and you haven’t yet figured out how to pay for Fox Sports and Turner come playoff time.

For the out-of-market hardcore fan or insatiable ball enthusiast, add another $150 annually for MLB.TV.

That’s a fair investment to stay up with the game. Yet it’s also the cost of doing business – for both league, network and consumer – in this atomized age.

And check back in 2028, when MLB’s entire slate of TV rights – the World Series, All-Star Game and playoffs, MLB.TV and the Sunday night package – will all be back on the market, for the highest bidders.That’s also around the time commissioner Rob Manfred might hope to unify all – or at least most – of MLB’s local television product. Sure, 2026 will bring a lot of disruption to how the game is consumed. But change is only just beginning.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Atlanta Braves announced Wednesday night that they have re-signed closer Raisel Iglesias to a new deal for the 2026 season.

Iglesias signed a one-year, $16 million deal to remain with the team. He spent the previous three-plus seasons in Atlanta after being traded by the Los Angeles Angels.

Iglesias, 35, has a 15-12 record as a member of the Braves, recording 97 saves in 218.2 innings pitched. He has allowed 157 hits, 69 runs and 19 home runs and struck out 239.

His 253 career saves are the fourth most among active players. The Cuban pitcher also finished first in the National League this past season with 57 games finished. He is also fourth among active players in that category with 459.

Later Wednesday night, the Braves announced they had acquired infielder Mauricio Dubon from the Astros for infielder Nick Allen.

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

NFL fans woke up to the news Sunday morning that New York Jets cornerback and special teams contributor Kris Boyd was in critical but stable condition after being shot in the abdomen.

Today, Boyd took to Instagram to share an update from the hospital.

‘God is real, God is Powerful!’ he wrote with a photo of him smiling in a hospital bed. ‘I’m sorry I have no words at the moment..Just grateful! I’m coming along, starting to breathe on my own now. Sincerely appreciate everyone! [sic]’

Jets coach Aaron Glenn addressed what happened for the first time today as well.

‘Once I heard about the situation and I’m talking about Kris in general, the first thing I thought about: he just had a kid,’ Glenn said. ‘I’m thinking about his wife, and I’m thinking about his kid. And i want to make sure that he’s okay and that’s the only thing that really went through my mind.

There’s a process to this which I wont get into but I’m happy the fact that he’s going to come out of this thing really, really well.’

A spokeswoman for the New York Police Department told USA TODAY Sports that officers responded to a 911 call at around 2 a.m. ET and found a 29-year-old man with a gunshot wound to the abdomen, later revealed to be Boyd. The NYPD did not confirm the victim was Boyd due to department policy.

The team stated they were aware of the matter and did not comment initially before confirming what happened on Monday. His teammates took to social media to send well wishes, including defensive lineman Jermaine Johnson II.

The Jets were not playing on Sunday when Boyd was shot because they were in action for ‘Thursday Night Football’ In Week 11. New York is on the road again this week to take on the Baltimore Ravens.

Boyd was placed on injured reserve during training camp due to a shoulder injury and was expected to miss the entire 2025 season. He was drafted in the seventh round of the 2019 NFL Draft by the Minnesota Vikings and also played for the Arizona Cardinals and Houston Texans.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY