Archive

2025

Browsing

The final game of Heisman finalist Dillon Gabriel’s college career will be Saturday, Feb. 1, as he suits up for the Reese’s Senior Bowl. This game offers an opportunity for college athletes to strut their stuff one last time in front of NFL scouts, all while repping their alma mater one last time. However, Oregon’s Dillon Gabriel is taking that last bit to a new level.

Gabriel has six years of college football under his belt, making him one of the more experienced players at this weekend’s game. His college football journey has been long, winding, and unconventional to say the least. That’s why, rather than representing just Oregon, the team he led to an undefeated regular season this year while snagging the No. 1 overall seed in the College Football Playoff, Gabriel will don a helmet that represents every step of his collegiate career.

Gabriel’s helmet will feature wings, representing his time with the Oregon Ducks, plus the Oklahoma and UCF logos on the right side and back of his helmet, respectively. Gabriel has already impressed scouts during Senior Bowl practice, even allegedly breaking a record for ball speed as well. His commitment to his former schools as well should also be a big plus for NFL organizations.

How long did Gabriel spend at each school?

Gabriel played his first three seasons of college football for the UCF Knights. He appeared in 26 games, tossing 70 touchdowns and just 14 interceptions during his time with the team. In 2020, he led the American Athletic Conference in both passing yards (3570) and passing touchdowns (32).

Gabriel entered the transfer portal following the 2021 season, spending the next two years with Oklahoma. He threw 55 passing touchdowns and in 2023, he led the Big 12 in passing yards (3660) and touchdowns (30). Still, despite his success, he opted for the transfer portal once again, landing in Eugene for his final year of eligibility.

Gabriel was obviously tremendous in his final season, finishing third in Heisman voting and leading the Oregon Ducks to an undefeated regular season and a Big Ten title.

How to watch the Senior Bowl:

Date: Saturday, Feb. 1

Time: 2:30 p.m. ET/11:30 a.m. PT

Location: Hancock Whitney Stadium in Mobile, Alabama

TV: NFL Network

Stream: NFL+

Will Dillon Gabriel be a first-round draft pick in the NFL draft?

Gabriel’s age compared to other top quarterback prospects is a bit of a deterrent for several NFL teams. Many organizations have him lower on their draft boards. However, given Gabriel’s immense success early on at Senior Bowl practice, there is a chance he climbs back into first-round status.

Many teams are in dire need of an upgrade at the quarterback position, and we’ve seen in the past that teams are willing to take massive leaps to grab their guy early if the need arises. Just last year, the Denver Broncos selected Bo Nix with the 12th overall pick after experts had spent months prediction Nix to be a Day 2 pick.

The NFL Draft is set to begin on Thursday, April 24.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

History was made in 2023 when Philadelphia’s Jalen Hurts and Kansas City’s Patrick Mahomes became the first two Black quarterbacks to start in a Super Bowl. It was a stunning moment.

‘To have two Black quarterbacks start in the Super Bowl, I think it’s special,’ Mahomes said at the time. ‘I’ve learned more and more about the history of the Black quarterback since I’ve been in this league. The guys that came before me and Jalen set the stage for this and now I’m just glad we can set the stage for kids that are coming up now. It’ll be a great game against two great teams and against another great quarterback. I’m excited to go out there and do what we can against a great team.’

‘I think it’s history,’ Hurts said. ‘I think it’s something that’s worthy of being noted and it is history. It’s come a long way. I think it’s only been seven African-American quarterbacks to play in the Super Bowl, so to be the first for something is pretty cool. I know it will be a good one.’

Yes, it was stunning. One for the history books.

But I would argue the fact that Hurts and Mahomes are back, playing in Super Bowl 59, is an equally important moment. Let me explain.

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

We are in the midst of one of the most vicious anti-Black eras in decades. This might be the most anti-Black this country has been in decades.

Trump has launched a war on DEI and make no mistake, the war they talk about is a war on Black Americans. Everyone knows this. Especially the opponents of DEI. They don’t even bother to try and hide it.

One of the most blatant anti-Black moves during this anti-DEI rush was the removal of training courses that included videos of the Tuskegee Airman. The videos, according to the Associated Press, were used as part of DEI training during basic training for Air Force troops. The Tuskegee Airmen are some of the greatest heroes this nation has ever produced.

Naturally, the move caused massive outrage (at least from decent people) and the order was reversed. But the point was made.

Where the importance of Mahomes and Hurts comes in, is they are a reminder of Black excellence. They’ll play the Super Bowl during Black History Month, another reminder of that excellence.

The core of what Trump is doing is portraying Black Americans as incompetent and incapable. It shouldn’t be lost on people that the NFL once felt this way about Black quarterbacks, for decades, in fact, essentially segregating Black athletes from playing the position. This also happened with Black head coaches. Black players and coaches persevered to the point where we have two Black quarterbacks playing in the Super Bowl a second time.

Mahomes has always understood the importance of historic moments like this.

‘I think you’ve seen over time,’ Mahomes said in 2023, ‘whenever a guy like Doug Williams or Michael Vick or Donovan McNabb go out and play great football it gives other guys like me and Jalen (who) have this platform and have this spot on another NFL team. If we can continue to show that we can consistently be great, I think it will continue to open doors for other kids growing up to follow their dreams and be a quarterback of an NFL team. It’s good we have guys like Jalen on the other team because he’s a great person and obviously a great quarterback.’

Mahomes and Hurts are also both so good they will obliterate this notion Trump is trying to push which is Black people are dregs and need DEI programs to succeed.

Well, you liberal idiot, Mahomes and Hurts didn’t have any DEI. They got to the Super Bowl based on merit.

What exactly is DEI? CNN interviewed seven DEI experts and business leaders who described it this way:

Diversity is embracing the differences everyone brings to the table, whether those are someone’s race, age, ethnicity, religion, gender, sexual orientation, physical ability or other aspects of social identity.
Equity is treating everyone fairly and providing equal opportunities.
Inclusion is respecting everyone’s voice and creating a culture in which people from all backgrounds feel encouraged to express their ideas and perspectives.

Why does that description scare so many people? It’s genuinely benign.

The country now is in a weird place. ‘Weird’ is one way to put it. Let’s just leave it at that. But there’s an anti-Black fervor that I haven’t seen in some time.

Mahomes and Hurts will counter that ugliness. Their play will be inspirational and, well, beautifully Black.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Ohio State, Texas, Penn State headline list of qualifiers that should be back in College Football Playoff, but list doesn’t stop there.
Georgia’s tough schedule and quarterback change casts some doubt on Bulldogs, but strength of schedule could tip scales.
Arizona State or the Big 12 field? Take the field.

They’ll be back. At least, they know they’re expected to be back.

Ohio State coach Ryan Day hadn’t even left Atlanta yet, after the Buckeyes won their first national championship in more than a decade, when he fielded his first question about next season’s expectations. Day surmised that a national championship won’t buy him much of a honeymoon with Buckeyes fans.

“Try losing the first game and see how that goes at Ohio State. We’ll see about that,” quipped Day, who regularly endures heat from Buckeyes fans despite losing just 10 games in six seasons.

Never mind losing, though, because “I think we have a great group coming back,” Day said.

No debate here.

In the four-team College Football Playoff era, teams commonly repeated as playoff qualifiers. Alabama qualified for that format in eight of 10 years, and Ohio State made that four-team bracket five times. Clemson qualified six consecutive years.

The 12-team playoff creates more margin for error and ups the chance for repeat qualifiers, especially from the Big Ten and SEC.

Which of this season’s 12 qualifiers will return to the playoff next season?

I’ll take a stab at that:

Ohio State

This season: National champion.

In or out of the playoff next season?: In.

Ohio State’s notable losses include quarterback Will Howard, both standout running backs and the backbone of the country’s No. 1 defense and its coordinator Jim Knowles. But, Day remains a recruiting machine, and talent flows in. Plus, star wide receiver Jeremiah Smith will return. Don’t expect Ohio State to be flawless against a schedule that includes Texas, Penn State, Illinois and Michigan. But, this playoff format doesn’t demand flawlessness from Ohio State, only 10 wins to make field.

Notre Dame

This season: National runner-up.

In or out next season?: In.

Notre Dame’s schedule remains favorable, offering an avenue to 10 wins, even if the roster might not be as strong. The Irish profile as the favorite in every game, including early season matchups with Miami and Texas A&M, a pair of projected Top 25 teams. A handful of defensive players will be tough to replace, but a cast of familiar faces is set to return on offense. The importance of quarterback CJ Carr recovering from an elbow injury cannot be overstated.

Penn State

This season: Semifinals.

In or out next season: In.

The NFL departure of defensive standouts like Abdul Carter and Kobe King stings, but Penn State’s offensive core remains intact, and the non-conference schedule is a breeze. Prepare for another James Franklin clinic: Losses to Ohio State and another ranked opponent, and wins against the slappies.

Texas

This season: Semifinals.

In or out next season: In.

Is Arch Manning the real deal? We won’t wait long to find out. The Longhorns open at Ohio State. A schedule that also includes games against Georgia, Florida and Texas A&M threatens Texas, but the Longhorns keep magnetizing talent, complete with the nation’s No. 1 recruiting class. I’m a believer in Manning, and he’s complemented with ample support.

Oregon

This season: Quarterfinals.

In or out next season: In.

Oregon did as well as any playoff qualifier at adding transfers to augment an already strong squad. Combine that haul with another standout recruiting class, and Dan Lanning built another good roster, even as stars like quarterback Dillon Gabriel exit. Gabriel’s backup, Dante Moore, becomes his heir. He’ll enjoy throwing to Evan Stewart and handing to transfer running back Makhi Hughes (Tulane). The schedule avoids Ohio State.

Georgia

This season: Quarterfinals.

In or out next season: In.

Georgia has been as consistently successful as any team throughout the past eight seasons, but the Bulldogs’ brutal SEC schedule – they’ll play Tennessee, Alabama, Auburn, Ole Miss, Florida and Texas – combined with a quarterback transition gives me pause. Its schedule strength also could keep Georgia afloat at 9-3, though, tipping the scales toward playoff qualification.

Arizona State

This season: Quarterfinals.

In or out next season: Out.

As Arizona State enters a future without do-it-all running back Cam Skattebo, I’m skeptical the Sun Devils will repeat as Big 12 champs. It’s not that Arizona State shouldn’t stay strong, but the Big 12 will remain as unpredictable as any league. And with perhaps only one bid available for a 16-team league, take the field.

Boise State

This season: Quarterfinals.

In or out next season: In.

The Broncos must march on without Heisman Trophy runner-up Ashton Jeanty, one of the most sensational running backs since Barry Sanders, but I trust Boise State and its offensive line more than the other Group of Five contenders.

Tennessee

This season: First round.

In or out next season: Out.

Tennessee failed to position enough talent around quarterback Nico Iamaleava. That showed in the Vols’ playoff loss to Ohio State, and it’ll be exposed again next season. Also, Tennessee said farewell to its star running back, top offensive linemen and best defensive lineman. With pivotal games against Alabama and Florida flipping to the road, the Vols regressing by a victory or two seems in play.

Indiana

This season: First round.

In or out next season: Out.

The Hoosiers must replace their quarterback, top running backs and key defensive pieces. Combine that with a stiffer schedule, and Indiana’s underdog story will be difficult to replicate. Staying relevant within the Big Ten will hinge on California transfer quarterback Fernando Mendoza.

SMU

This season: First round.

In or out next season: Out.

The Mustangs benefited from one of the ACC’s most favorable schedules. That changes in 2025, with a lineup that includes Clemson, Miami and Louisville. Quarterback Kevin Jennings’ return should keep SMU in the ACC’s top half, but he’s losing his best playmakers.

Clemson

This season: First round.

In or out next season: In.

Clemson returns a bevy of production, making it an ACC front-runner. The freshmen and sophomores who helped power Clemson to the playoff will return, along with veteran quarterback Cade Klubnik. Dabo Swinney maintains his standoffish approach to transfers, but he did make some additions to the team’s intact core which gives Clemson a top-10 profile for 2025.

Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network’s national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@gannett.com and follow him on X @btoppmeyer. Subscribe to read all of his columns.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Morally indignant Senate Democrats piled on President Donald Trump’s federal funding freeze Wednesday, with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., announcing a coordinated response with Democratic governors to come.

The Office of Management and Budget issued a memo on Monday issuing a pause on all federal grants and loans aiming to eradicate ‘wokeness’ and the ‘weaponization of government’ to improve government efficiency. The memo claims nearly $3 trillion was spent in 2024 on such assistance programs. 

The White House insists this freeze does not touch programs including Social Security, Medicare, or other entitlement payments, but Schumer called Trump’s action ‘chaotic,’ ‘careless,’ and ‘cruel’ at the Democratic leadership’s weekly press briefing. 

‘In one instant, in the blink of an eye, in the dark of night, Donald Trump committed one of the cruelest actions that I have seen the federal government do in a very long time,’ Schumer said, claiming Trump had shut off ‘billions, maybe trillions of dollars that average American families need.’ 

The minority leader said there are ongoing discussions between Capitol Hill Democrats and various Democratic governors on a coordinated response to Trump’s action. Two dozen blue state attorneys general have already announced legal action to keep the federal grant, loan and other aid flowing. 

Democrats said they have received an avalanche of phone calls from local officials, non-governmental organizations, charities and individual constituents demanding to know if OMB’s memo meant taxpayer dollars they rely on to serve people were about to disappear.

‘Chaos reigned. I got calls from a whole lot of Republican town supervisors and mayors, asking, what about flood prevention? What about sewer construction projects?’ Schumer said. He recounted additional calls from food bank operators, nonprofit groups that treat addiction and church groups worried they would not be able to make payroll.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told reporters Tuesday that the OMB memo would not impact individuals who receive direct assistance from the federal government. She described the pause as ‘temporary’ and likened it to simultaneous efforts by the Trump administration to freeze hiring and regulations in an effort to shrink the government. 

‘Federal agencies must temporarily pause all activities related to obligation or disbursement of all Federal financial assistance, and other relevant agency activities that may be implicated by the executive orders, including, but not limited to, financial assistance for foreign aid, nongovernmental organizations, DEI, woke gender ideology, and the green new deal,’ the memo, obtained by Fox Digital, reads. 

A federal judge on Tuesday imposed a stay on Trump’s action, delaying it until Monday as a torrent of lawsuits against the administration were announced this week.

New York Attorney General Letitia James on Tuesday led a coalition of 22 other attorneys general suing to stop the implementation of the memo.

In a statement from James’ office, she said the policy ‘puts an indefinite pause on the majority of federal assistance to states’ and would ‘immediately jeopardize state programs that provide critical health and childcare services to families in need, deliver support to public schools, combat hate crimes and violence against women, provide life-saving disaster relief to states, and more.’

Republicans have mostly backed Trump, insisting that the new presidential administration has a right to examine how taxpayer dollars are spent.

‘This is not unusual for an administration to pause funding and to take a hard look and scrub of how these programs are being spent and how they interact with a lot of the executive orders that the president signed,’ Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., told reporters, though he expressed hope that the White House would ‘further clarify what exactly will be impacted by this.’ 

Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash., the top Democratic appropriator, said Trump’s actions have endangered chances for a bipartisan spending agreement when the government funding deadline arrives in March.

‘It is extremely difficult to agree to a compromise on anything if the White House is going to assert that they control the funds, we don’t,’ Murray said. ‘So this is really putting that in jeopardy.’ 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The White House remains committed to freezing federal grants and loans aimed at ‘woke’ programs, Fox News has learned, despite the administration’s move to rescind the original Office of Management and Budget memo — effectively ending the legal battle and any ‘confusion’ for recipients. 

A federal judge on Tuesday paused the Trump administration’s Office of Management and Budget (OMB) memo, which aimed to freeze funding to various federal programs.

On Wednesday, the Trump administration rescinded the original memo. 

‘In light of the injunction, OMB has rescinded the memo to end any confusion on federal policy created by the court ruling and the dishonest media coverage,’ White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt told Fox News on Wednesday. ‘The Executive Orders issued by the President on funding reviews remain in full force and effect and will be rigorously implemented by all agencies and departments.’ 

Leavitt told Fox News that rescinding the memo ‘should effectively end the court case and allow the government to focus on enforcing the President’s orders on controlling federal spending.’ 

‘In the coming weeks and months, more executive action will continue to end the egregious waste of federal funding,’ Leavitt said. 

The memo, sent to federal agencies on Monday, issued a pause on all federal grants and loans aiming to eradicate ‘wokeness’ and the ‘weaponization of government’ to improve government efficiency. 

‘Federal agencies must temporarily pause all activities related to obligation or disbursement of all Federal financial assistance, and other relevant agency activities that may be implicated by the executive orders, including, but not limited to, financial assistance for foreign aid, nongovernmental organizations, DEI, woke gender ideology, and the green new deal,’ the memo, obtained by Fox Digital, reads. 

The pause was set to take effect at 5 p.m. Eastern Standard Time on Tuesday.

Democrats had criticized the Trump administration’s freeze of federal funds, arguing that President Trump is circumventing Congress and withholding congressionally appropriated funds, violating the Impoundment Control Act. 

U.S. District Judge Loren AliKhan for the District of Columbia, appointed by former President Joe Biden, imposed an administrative stay on Tuesday afternoon, pausing the Trump administration’s action.

The administrative stay pauses the freeze until Monday.

The White House stressed that despite the memo being rescinded, if money coming out of federal agencies is at odds with the president’s executive orders, for example, funding for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion programs, those funds will still be frozen. 

But programs including Social Security benefits, Medicare, food stamps, welfare benefits and other assistance going directly to individuals will not be impacted under the pause, according to Leavitt. 

Leavitt, during the White House press briefing on Tuesday, described the pause as ‘temporary,’ and noted that the Trump administration has executed other freezes throughout the government, including a regulatory and hiring pause. 

‘It’s incumbent upon this administration to make sure, again, that every penny is being accounted for honestly,’ Leavitt said. 

Additionally, Leavitt said that Trump’s newly created Department of Government Efficiency that aims to eliminate government spending and waste identified $37 million that was about to go to the World Health Organization, along with $50 million to ‘fund condoms in Gaza.’ 

‘That is a preposterous waste of money,’ Leavitt said. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

It didn’t take long for the confirmation hearing of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., President Donald Trump’s nominee for secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), to turn contentious as Senate Democrats grilled him.

The verbal fireworks exploded minutes into the Senate Finance Committee hearing on Wednesday, the first of two straight days of congressional confirmation hearings for the controversial vaccine skeptic and environmental crusader who ran for the White House in 2024 before ending his bid and endorsing Trump.

Kennedy repeatedly insisted that he was not ‘anti-vaccine’ and slammed multiple Democrat senators for pushing a ‘dishonest’ narrative against him that he has ‘corrected’ on national television many times. Democrats on the committee pointed to a slew of past comments from the nominee in which he questioned or disparaged COVID shots and other vaccines.

‘The receipts show that Mr. Kennedy has embraced conspiracy theories, quacks, and charlatans, especially when it comes to the safety and efficacy of vaccines. He’s made it his life’s work to sow doubt and discourage parents from getting their kids life-saving vaccines,’ Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, the top Democrat on the panel, charged in his opening statement.

Moments later, as Kennedy delivered his own opening comments and said ‘news reports have claimed that I am anti-vaccine or anti-industry. I am neither. I am pro-safety,’ a protester shouted out ‘you lie.’

The heckler was led out of the hearing room by Capitol Police, as was a second protester minutes later.

And another protester was spotted in the audience holding a sign reading, ‘Vaccines Save Lives, Not RFK JR.’ 

Democrats on the committee repeatedly pointed to Kennedy’s controversial vaccine views, including his repeated claims in recent years linking vaccines to autism, which have been debunked by scientific research.

They also spotlighted Kennedy’s service for years as chair or chief legal counsel for Children’s Health Defense, the nonprofit organization he founded that has advocated against vaccines and sued the federal government numerous times, including a challenge over the authorization of the COVID vaccine for children.

In his opening statement, which Fox News exclusively obtained ahead of the hearing, Kennedy spotlighted that ‘I believe vaccines play a critical role in healthcare. All of my kids are vaccinated. I’ve written books about vaccines. My first book in 2014, the first line of it is ‘I am not anti-vaccine’ and last line is ‘I am not anti-vaccine.’’

But he quickly faced a grilling from Democrats.

Wyden led off his questioning of Kennedy, the scion of the nation’s most storied political dynasty, by spotlighting a scathing letter from the nominee’s well-known cousin, Caroline Kennedy, which accused him of being a ‘predator’ and urged lawmakers to reject the nomination.

The senator also pointed to past Kennedy vaccine comments in podcasts, including one from 2020 when he said he ‘pay anything’ to be able to go back in time and not vaccinate his kids.

‘Are you lying to Congress today when you say you are pro-vaccine? Or did you lie on all those podcasts?’ Wyden asked.

Pushing back in a very heated exchange, Kennedy claimed that statements he made on podcasts have ‘been repeatedly debunked.’

And he vowed that he would do nothing to prevent Americans from obtaining certain vaccines.

‘I support the measles vaccine. I support the polio vaccine. I will do nothing as HHS Secretary that makes it difficult or discourages people from taking anything,’ Kennedy emphasized.

The next Democrat to question Kennedy, Sen. Michael Bennet of Colorado, accused him of peddling half-truths, peddling false statements.’

Benett grew heated as he asked Kennedy about other past comments, asking, ‘Did you say Lyme disease is a highly likely militarily engineered bioweapon?’

‘I probably did say that,’ Kennedy answered.

And Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, who has known Kennedy for decades – dating back to their days as law school students at the University of Virginia, told his friend ‘frankly, you frighten people.’

If confirmed, Kennedy would have control over 18 powerful federal agencies overseeing the nation’s food and health, including the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Food and Drug Administration, the National Institutes of Health and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.

The 71-year-old Kennedy launched a long-shot campaign for the Democratic presidential nomination against President Joe Biden in April 2023. But six months later, he switched to an independent run for the White House.

Kennedy made major headlines again last August when he dropped his presidential bid and endorsed Trump. While Kennedy had long identified as a Democrat and repeatedly invoked his late father, former Sen. Robert F. Kennedy, and his late uncle, former President John F. Kennedy – who were both assassinated in the 1960s – Kennedy in recent years built relationships with far-right leaders due in part to his high-profile vaccine skepticism.

Trump announced soon after the November election that he would nominate Kennedy to his Cabinet to run HHS.

In the two months since Trump’s announcement, it’s not just Democrats who’ve raised questions about Kennedy’s confirmation. Social conservative Republicans took issue with his past comments in support of abortion rights.

‘My belief is we should leave it to the woman. We shouldn’t have the government involved, even if it’s full term,’ Kennedy said as he ran for president. 

But since endorsing Trump, Kennedy has walked back his stance on abortion. And in an exchange Wednesday with Democratic Sen. Maggie Hassan of New Hampshire, Kennedy declared ‘I agree with President Trump that every abortion is a tragedy.’

Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, a former two-time Democratic presidential candidate, argued that Kennedy made a ‘major U-turn’ on abortion.

Kennedy was also questioned about how he would reform Medicare and Medicaid, the massive government health care programs used by millions of older, disabled, and low-income Americans.

‘I don’t have a broad proposal for dismantling the program,’ Kennedy said of Medicaid.

And he said that President Trump hadn’t asked him to cut the program but rather ‘asked me to make it better.’

Kennedy, whose outspoken views on big pharma and the food industry have also sparked controversy, vowed that ‘if confirmed, I will do everything in my power to put the health of Americans back on track.’

While Democrats may find common ground with Kennedy’s aim to shift the focus of the agencies he would oversee toward promotion of a healthy lifestyle – including overhauling dietary guidelines and take aim at ultra-processed foods – and getting to the root causes of chronic diseases, Kennedy lamented that they oppose him because he’s Trump’s nominee.

Now they’re against me because anything that President Trump does, any decision he makes, has to be lampooned, derided, discredited, marginalized, vilified,’ Kennedy argued.

With Republicans controlling the Senate by a 53-47 majority, Kennedy can only afford to lose the support of three GOP senators if Democrats unite against his confirmation. During Wednesday’s hearing, no Republicans appeared to oppose the nomination.

Republican Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina appeared to lean into the Democrats’ attacks on Kennedy, asking ‘I got a real quick question for you: Are you a conspiracy theorist?’ 

Kennedy answered that it ‘is a pejorative that’s applied to me mainly to keep me from asking difficult questions of powerful interests.’

GOP Sen. Steve Daines of Montana, a chemical engineer, spotlighted that there are several Republican doctors on the committee.

‘We believe in science. I’m thankful that you do, too,’ Daines said.

Republican Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, a physician who said he had a ‘frank conversation’ with Kennedy about immunizations when they met earlier this month, didn’t ask about vaccines during the committee hearing. Instead, he kept his questions to federal healthcare programs, including Medicare.

Meanwhile, GOP Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin took aim at Democrats on the committee for what he claimed was ‘hostility on the other side… I’m disappointed with it.’

The hearing ended three and a half hours after it began, with Kennedy departing the committee room to cheers from supporters.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The Senate will vote Wednesday on whether to confirm former Rep. Lee Zeldin to head the government’s leading agency on environmental rules and regulations.

President Donald Trump tapped Zeldin, who previously served as a congressman from New York’s 1st Congressional District from 2015 to 2023, to lead the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under his administration. During his tenure in Congress, Zeldin, an Army Reserve lieutenant colonel, launched a campaign for governor in New York, when he trailed only five percentage points in the largely Democratic state.

Zeldin underwent a confirmation hearing earlier this month, when he was questioned on climate change by members of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.

The Senate held a cloture vote for Zeldin on Wednesday afternoon, which ended the debate over his nomination. The chamber will now proceed to a final floor vote. 

If confirmed on Wednesday, Zeldin will head the agency that surveys environmental issues, provides assistance to wide-ranging environmental projects, and establishes rules that align with the administration’s views on environmental protection and climate change. 

During his confirmation hearing, Zeldin pledged that if confirmed, he would ‘foster a collaborative culture within the agency, supporting career staff who have dedicated themselves to this mission. I strongly believe we have a moral responsibility to be good stewards of our environment for generations to come.’

The latest round of voting comes as Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., continues to advance the confirmation process to push through Trump’s Cabinet nominees.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President Donald Trump’s nominee to lead the Commerce Department, Howard Lutnick, told senators the argument that tariffs cause inflation is ‘nonsense’ during a confirmation hearing on Wednesday.

‘The two top countries with tariffs, India and China, do have the most tariffs and no inflation,’ Lutnick noted. 

‘A particular product’s price may go up,’ he conceded, while arguing that levies would not cause broad inflation. ‘It is just nonsense to say that tariffs cause inflation. It’s nonsense.’ 

Lutnick testified before members of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee ahead of an impending committee and full Senate floor vote to confirm him to the Cabinet position. 

Inflation, which ticked as high as 9.1% in June 2022 under the Biden administration, became a defining issue in the 2024 election as Trump promised to bring household prices back down. 

Lutnick also said he prefers ‘across-the-board’ tariffs on a ‘country-by-country’ basis, rather than ones aimed at particular sectors or products. 

‘I think when you pick one product in Mexico, they’ll pick one product. You know, we pick avocados, they pick white corn, we pick tomatoes, they pick yellow corn. All you’re doing is picking on farmers.’

‘Let America make it more fair. We are treated horribly by the global trading environment. They all have higher tariffs, non-tariff trade barriers and subsidies. They treat us poorly. We need to be treated better,’ Lutnick went on. ‘We can use tariffs to create reciprocity.’

He said Trump, a longtime friend, was of a ‘like mind’ that tariffs need to be simple. ‘The steel and aluminum had 560,000 applications for exclusions,’ said Lutnick. ‘It just seems that’s too many.’ 

Trump recently signed an executive order directing the Commerce Department and the Office of the US Trade Representative to conduct a review of U.S. trade policy and tariff models, with a focus on China. Trump has said he intends to impose a 25% tariff on goods from Canada and Mexico on Feb. 1 amid concerns of mass migration and drug trafficking. He also said he would increase tariffs on China by 10%. 

Lutnick also sounded off about Europe treating the U.S. industry unfairly. 

I think our farmers and ranchers and fishermen are treated with disrespect overseas,’ he said.

‘Europe, for example, comes up with all these sort of policies, that our ranchers can’t sell steak. If you saw European steer and an American steer, it’s laughable. The American steers are three times this size. The steaks are so much more beautiful.

‘But they make up this nonsensical set of rules so that our ranchers can’t sell there.’ 

Lutnick said Chinese tariffs ‘should be the highest.’ 

‘But the fact that we Americans cannot sell an American car in Europe is just wrong. And it needs to be fixed,’ he said,

‘While they’re an ally, they are taking advantage of us and disrespecting us. And I would like that to end.’ 

His comments echoed those of Trump last week. 

‘The European Union is very, very bad to us,’ he said. ‘So they’re going to be in for tariffs. It’s the only way… you’re going to get fairness.’

The governments of Mexico, Canada and nations in Europe have prepared a list of their own U.S. imports that will face tariffs in a tit-for-tat trade war if Trump follows through on taxing their own goods as they’re brought into the U.S. 

Kaja Kallas, the European Union’s top diplomat, said Monday that European nations should unite to use their collective economic force against the U.S. if needed. 

‘As the United States shifts to a more transactional approach, Europe needs to close ranks,’ she said at a news conference in Brussels. ‘Europe is an economic heavyweight and geopolitical partner.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., was blasted by conservatives on social media on Wednesday over his contentious line of questioning toward President Donald Trump’s Health and Human Services (HHS) secretary nominee, Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

‘Frankly, you frighten people,’ Whitehouse told Kennedy while seemingly linking Kennedy’s skepticism of some vaccines to the first case of measles in Rhode Island since 2013. 

Americans are going to need to hear a clear and trustworthy recantation of what you have said on vaccinations, including a promise from you never to say vaccines aren’t medically safe when they, in fact, are, and making indisputably clear that you support mandatory vaccinations against diseases where that will keep people safe,’ Whitehouse said. ‘You’re in that hole pretty deep.’

Whitehouse, who attended law school with Kennedy where the two were friends, used the majority of his time to list concerns about Kennedy, allowing the HHS hopeful a small window at the end to address the line of questioning.

Whitehouse’s comments quickly drew criticism from conservatives on social media. 

‘Sen. Whitehouse (D-RI) beginning his confirmation ‘questioning’ of RFK Jr. by saying ‘I’m very experienced, so you’re just going to have to listen,’  then talking for 7 minutes nonstop is such a perfect picture of why Democrats are failing around the nation right now,’ Daily Signal columnist Tony Kinnett posted on X. 

‘You know what would be good?’ columnist John Podhortez posted on X. ‘Sheldon Whitehouse going away forever to an island. And not Rhode Island, which isn’t an island. More like St. Helena.’

‘Whitehouse delivers a droning monologue then tells RFK he’s out of time, can respond in writing,’ National Review senior writer Dan McLaughlin posted on X. 

‘What a jacka–,’ Twitchy.com editor Samantha Janney posted on X. ‘RFK Jr. should ask Sheldon about his membership at multiple whites-only clubs.’

Fox News Digital reached out to Whitehouse’s office for comment but did not immediately receive a response.

Opposition to Kennedy’s nomination has been fierce, with advocacy groups running ad campaigns urging senators to vote against his confirmation mainly due to his past skepticism of some vaccines. 

‘I want to make sure the Committee is clear about a few things. News reports have claimed that I am anti-vaccine or anti-industry. Well, I am neither; I am pro-safety,’ Kennedy said in his opening statement in front of the Senate Finance Committee.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Tuesday night’s Atlantic 10 basketball game between Virginia Commonwealth and Saint Louis was delayed for several minutes after a fight broke out in the stands.

The Billikens were leading 69-63 with 1:10 remaining in regulation when fans seated behind the VCU bench were wrestling with each other and fell across several rows of seats and onto the floor.

Play was halted as the participants were separated and escorted off the court.

The final 70 seconds concluded without incident as Saint Louis outlasted VCU 78-69.

Gibson Jimerson led the Billikens (13-8, 6-2) with 26 points, while Robbie Avila chipped in 14. For VCU, Zeb Jackson scored 15 points as the Rams (16-5, 6-2) saw their six-game winning streak come to an end. 

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY