Archive

2025

Browsing

College basketball’s newest postseason tournament will be significantly shrunk next season.

The College Basketball Crown will return for 2026, Fox Sports and AEG announced on Monday, July 21. However, the field will be cut in half from the inaugural edition, going down from 16 teams to eight.

The tournament, which will remain in Las Vegas and be played April 1-5, will feature the top two teams from the big Ten, Big 12 and Big East that didn’t receive an NCAA Tournament bid, as well as two wild card selections determined by its committee.

Name, image and likeness prizes are the big selling point for the tournament. In 2025, champion Nebraska received a $300,000 prize pool for winning the tournament, while Central Florida got $100,000 as the runner-up. Semifinalists Boise State and Villanova each got $50,000 for their respective finishes.

‘We launched the College Basketball Crown to create more opportunities for elite competition during the thrilling college basketball post-season – and we saw an incredible response from fans, conferences, and players for the inaugural tournament,’ Fox Sports executive vice president Jordan Bazant said in a statement.

Why is College Basketball Crown field is smaller?

While it’s a positive sign the tournament will return, it’s notable how the field is cut in half. In the 2025 tournament, 16 teams were in, with guaranteed spots for the Big Ten, Big 12 and Big East.

However, teams like Indiana, Iowa, Ohio State and West Virginia turned down invitations, even though they were the next best teams left in their respective conferences.

It has become an ongoing trend for squads that just miss out on the tournament. When teams don’t hear their names called on Selection Sunday, it usually means players hit the transfer portal, leaving rosters in doubt of whether it will have a suitable lineup to play in. The NIT and other smaller postseason tournaments have dealt with the same issues.

With a smaller field, the College Basketball Crown could have a better field for its bracket, and it comes with possible expansion of the NCAA Tournament in 2026. Still, there is a chance the best teams left in each of conference could decline any postseason invitation, which would leave the College Basketball Crown to go down the conference standings to fill its spots.

Still, the College Basketball Crown was a success in terms of non-NCAA Tournament postseasons. It averaged 260,000 viewers on Fox and FS1, higher than the NIT on ESPN’s platforms at 212,000 viewers. The championship game between the Cornhuskers and Knights − which went against the women’s basketball national championship − averaged 822,000 viewers, the most for a non-NCAA Tournament postseason game.

College Basketball Crown 2026 schedule

The 2026 College Basketball Crown will be played April 1-5 at the MGM Grand Garden Arena and T-Mobile Arena in Las Vegas, and it will air on Fox and FS1.

Quarterfinals: April 1-2 at MGM Grand Garden Arena
Semifinals: April 4 at T-Mobile Arena
Final: April 5 at T-Mobile Arena

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The 2025 NFL Draft saw nine defensive linemen selected in Round 1. This year’s rookie class features many promising talents on the interior and at edge, including former Texas A&M defender Shemar Stewart.

Thanks to an incredible performance at the NFL combine, the Cincinnati Bengals drafted Stewart in the first round at No. 17 overall.

Nearly three months later, Stewart remains the only unsigned pick from the first round of the 2025 NFL Draft. Stewart’s representation and the Bengals front office have yet to agree on a rookie contract due to a dispute in language regarding guarantees.

Cincinnati started training camp for their rookies on July 18 and Stewart was not in attendance as the negotiations continue.

Stewart was a key part of a talented defensive line at Texas A&M last season and still has one year of NCAA eligibility left after three years with the team.

These negotiations could drag on through training camp and that leaves some wondering if Stewart could return to College Station for 2025.

Here’s what to know about Stewart’s future options as training camp gets going for veterans in Cincinnati this week.

Can Shemar Stewart go back to college?

As his contract negotiations continue, Stewart’s been back at Texas A&M to work out with his former teammates but he cannot return to the school this fall.

Because Stewart has been drafted by an NFL team, current NCAA rules prevent him from returning to Texas A&M in 2025. Stewart and his representation could take this to court to change those bylaws.

It’s not fully clear but Cincinnati would very likely still hold Stewart’s rights as the No. 17 overall pick from the 2025 NFL Draft.

Texas A&M coach Mike Elko said July 17 that the team has no intention of having him play for them this season.

‘Shemar has been around,’ Elko told ESPN. ‘He’s very comfortable in our program. Really likes what we do training wise. He’s been training, getting ready for his season this year with the Bengals. We wish him the best.’

Shemar Stewart contract update

Bengals de facto general manager Duke Tobin and owner Mike Brown both provided updates on negotiations with their top pick.

‘I don’t blame Shemar,’ Tobin said. ‘He’s listening to the advice he’s paying for. I don’t understand the advice… We’re treating him fairly.’

The Bengals are trying to change the language of the contract to potentially void future guarantees. Stewart’s representation wants the same contract previous Bengals first-round picks signed.

Brown got more into specifics when asked about the negotiations.

‘I hesitate to get into the details but basically it turns on whether out years are guaranteed if he gets involved in conduct detrimental to football,’ Brown told reporters. ‘Detrimental to football in recent years has been violence to women, that’s the one that comes to mind.

If we get a player who gets involved in something like that or does something that is just unacceptable, guess what? I don’t want to pay him. I really don’t. If he’s sitting in jail, I don’t think I ought to be paying him.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The B1G rig ran out of gas. The SEC drained its fuel.

The Big Ten waged an all-out pursuit to rig the College Football Playoff with a stacked deck of automatic bids. Its plan for playoff evolution stalled after facing resistance from rival conferences.

The Big Ten lacked support from the SEC, a necessary ally, to advance a 16-team playoff that would preassign half the bids to the Big Ten and SEC.

SEC commissioner Greg Sankey extinguished what little life remained for the Big Ten’s auto-bid-laden plan when he put his foot down last week at his conference’s media days. If the SEC doesn’t secure one of the expanded playoff plans it desires, Sankey said, then it’s comfortable sticking with the current 12-team playoff format. And the SEC doesn’t want the Big Ten’s plan.

Well, that’s that then.

Big Ten’s College Football Playoff plan stalls without SEC support

The 12-team playoff will be in place for 2025. The format for 2026 and beyond remains under debate. To expand the playoff, the SEC and Big Ten would need to align behind a plan by a Dec. 1 deadline.

Sankey referenced multiple playoff plans the SEC remains willing to consider. Notable by its omission: The Big Ten’s plan that would earmark 13 of 16 spots as automatic bids preassigned to conferences.

“We’re going to have 5+7, 5+9, (or) 5+11,” Sankey said.

The Big 12 and ACC support the 5+11 plan. The SEC retains interest in it, too.

In the math equations Sankey mentioned, the “5” means five automatic bids – one each going to the five-best conference champions. The second number in the equation means the number of at-large bids.

“We’ll continue to debate whether expansion beyond 12 is appropriate,” Sankey said.

That debate won’t, apparently, include the Big Ten’s favored 4+4+2+2+1+3 plan, which would have awarded four automatic bids to the Big Ten, four more to the SEC, two apiece to the ACC and Big 12, and one to the next-best conference champion, leaving three at-large bids.

The SEC soured on this auto-bid plan in the spring, and, in Sankey’s annual state-of-the-conference address, he offered no sign of retreating toward the Big Ten’s plan.

No individual conference wields the authority to unilaterally push through an expanded playoff. College Football Playoff executive director Rich Clark told reporters last month that playoff expansion would require the SEC and Big Ten to agree upon a plan. What if they can’t agree? That’s a win for the status quo.

“We have a 12-team playoff, (including) five conference champions,” Sankey said. “That could stay if we can’t agree.”

Big Ten commissioner Tony Petitti will get the next word in this debate when his conference’s media days begin this week. But, really, what can he say?

Sankey insists the SEC is comfortable staying at 12 if it can’t achieve one of its preferred playoff expansion plans. If that’s the case, then the Big Ten’s pursuit of a 4+4+2+2+1+3 playoff has died on the vine.

To which I say, good riddance.

The 12-team playoff relies on a committee of subjective and imperfect humans to select most of the field, but subjectivity and imperfection are insufficient grounds to scrap this system in favor of a playoff that would pre-emptively reward conferences based on their history, brand and clout, instead of letting on-field results determine bid allocation.

Big Ten, SEC alliance fizzles amid competing interests

Early last year, the SEC and Big Ten announced a pact to work together to chart college sports’ future. Stakeholders from the two super conferences met multiple times and discussed playoff expansion possibilities. Much like the Big Ten’s previous alliance with the ACC and Pac-12, the bromance between the Big Ten and the SEC fizzled in the face of competing interests.

There’s ‘no rift’ between Sankey and Petitti, the SEC commissioner said on his conference’s television network last week, but they have ‘different views.’

The Big Ten, according to multiple reports, might be willing to compromise in favor of a 5+11 playoff if the SEC and ACC add another conference game and join the Big Ten and Big 12 in playing nine conference games.

That’s a fine wish, but the Big Ten lacks the muscle to force another conference to change its schedule. Sankey would like the SEC add a ninth conference game, but his membership has resisted his preference.

The Big Ten played its playoff hand, but it lacked the cards to win the bet.

“You always want to have a really good set of cards,’ Sankey said. ‘You want to have a good hand to play, right? I think we have the best hand.”

The Big Ten is running out of moves.

Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network’s national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@gannett.com and follow him on X @btoppmeyer.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

INDIANAPOLIS — Fashion and culture collided with basketball on Friday during the 2025 WNBA All-Star weekend.

USA TODAY’s Studio IX was on site with Wasserman Basketball and Ally for The Collective’s WNBA All-Star VIP party. Throughout the night, several of the biggest names in women’s basketball stopped by to walk the red carpet, take photos and mix and mingle. While in attendance, USA TODAY asked players questions that many people want to know the answers to, such as, ‘What is something you would never be caught dead wearing?’

‘Bootcut leggings,’ Dallas Wings rookie Paige Bueckers said, smiling. ‘Sorry. No offense.’

Indiana Fever guard and All-Star 3-point contest participant Lexie Hull also offered her thoughts. ‘Low-rise jeans,’ Hull revealed, shaking her head and also smiling through clear disdain. ‘I hate them.’

Sending thoughts and condolences to lovers of bootcut leggings, low-rise jeans and shark boots everywhere.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Former Obama administration officials named in new revelations surrounding the origins of the Trump-Russia investigation have been silent amid allegations they ‘manufactured’ intelligence that led to the opening of the yearslong probe.

On Friday, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard declassified documents revealing ‘overwhelming evidence’ that demonstrated how, after President Donald Trump won the 2016 election against Hillary Clinton, then-President Barack Obama and his national security team laid the groundwork for what would be the yearslong Trump–Russia collusion probe.

Gabbard said the documents revealed that Obama administration officials ‘manufactured and politicized intelligence’ to create the narrative that Russia was attempting to influence the 2016 presidential election, despite information from the intelligence community stating otherwise.

The new documents name former President Barack Obama, top officials in his National Security Council, then-Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, then-CIA Director John Brennan, then-National Security Advisor Susan Rice, then-Secretary of State John Kerry, then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch, and then-Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe, among others.

Gabbard, on Monday, sent a criminal referral to the Justice Department related to those findings. DOJ officials did not share further details on whom the criminal referral was for.

Gabbard told Fox News Digital that this ‘is not a partisan issue,’ but one that ‘concerns every American.’

‘The information we are releasing today clearly shows there was a treasonous conspiracy in 2016 committed by officials at the highest level of our government,’ Gabbard told Fox News Digital. ‘Their goal was to subvert the will of the American people and enact what was essentially a years-long coup with the objective of trying to usurp the President from fulfilling the mandate bestowed upon him by the American people.’

Gabbard said the ‘egregious abuse of power and blatant rejection of our Constitution’ by Obama-era officials ‘threatens the very foundation and integrity of our democratic republic.’

‘No matter how powerful, every person involved in this conspiracy must be investigated and prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, to ensure nothing like this ever happens again,’ Gabbard said. ‘The American people’s faith and trust in our democratic republic, and therefore the future of our nation, depends on it.’

Gabbard added: ‘As such, I am providing all documents to the Department of Justice to deliver the accountability that President Trump, his family, and the American people deserve.’

Gabbard’s criminal referral comes just a week after CIA Director John Ratcliffe sent a criminal referral for Brennan.

FBI Director Kash Patel opened a criminal investigation into Brennan and former FBI Director James Comey for potential wrongdoing related to the Trump-Russia probe, including allegedly making false statements to Congress, Justice Department sources told Fox News Digital.

None of the former Obama-era officials have responded to Fox News Digital’s request for comment.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Former special counsel David Weiss got little support from the Department of Justice (DOJ) when he sought lawyers to help prosecute President Joe Biden’s son Hunter, Weiss told Congress during a recent closed-door interview.

Amid delicate plea deal negotiations between Hunter Biden and Weiss in 2023, Weiss said he asked the DOJ deputy attorney general’s office for a team of trial lawyers and received a single resume, according to a transcript of the interview reviewed by Fox News Digital.

‘Actually, as I think about the sequencing, I had started to reach out myself directly to offices or people that I knew and make my own inquiries,’ Weiss told House Judiciary Committee staff of his struggle to hire lawyers for the sensitive job of trying the president’s son.

Weiss appeared on Capitol Hill for the interview in June as part of the committee’s inquiry into the DOJ’s years-long investigation and prosecution of Hunter Biden.

Now no longer a DOJ employee, Weiss spoke candidly for hours with the committee, shedding new light on his interactions with the Biden DOJ and giving fresh insight into why Hunter Biden was never charged with certain violations.

Who is David Weiss?

Weiss was appointed U.S. attorney of Delaware during the first Trump administration and began investigating Hunter Biden at that time. Former Attorney General Merrick Garland made Weiss special counsel in August 2023 after a plea agreement with Hunter Biden fell apart.

Republicans had accused Weiss of offering Hunter Biden a ‘sweetheart’ plea deal that involved only misdemeanors. But in an unusual move, a judge rejected the deal, leading Weiss to instead bring two successful indictments against the then-first son, one for illegal gun possession and another for nine tax charges, including three felonies.

Weiss came under enormous scrutiny by Republicans and Democrats for his handling of the investigation, which had become a hyper-political national news story centered on the salacious behavior and wrongdoings of Hunter Biden, a recovering drug and alcohol addict, and allegations that Joe Biden was complicit in his son’s crimes.

Republicans claimed Weiss was not tough enough on Hunter Biden, while Democrats said he was being treated more harshly than a typical defendant because he was the president’s son. Joe Biden ultimately granted an unconditional pardon to his son, a move widely criticized by members of both parties.

Weiss gets ‘one resume’

Weiss said during the interview that he was ‘fortunate enough to obtain a couple very excellent prosecutors,’ a reference to the two DOJ attorneys who handled trial preparations for Hunter Biden.

But, Weiss also indicated that when he first requested lawyers in the spring of 2023, he had to be self-sufficient in finding them and that the deputy attorney general’s office was unhelpful. Weiss noted he did not deal directly with former Deputy Attorney General Lisa Monaco at all and assumed she was recused from Hunter Biden’s cases.

Weiss said that at one point he ran into the director of the Executive Office for United States Attorneys, which handles recruitment, at an event and asked if any hiring progress had been made.

Weiss did not ‘have a whole lot of success’ during that conversation, he said.

‘What do you mean, you didn’t have success? … They didn’t give you lawyers?’ a committee aide asked.

‘I got one resume,’ Weiss replied.

The aide asked, ‘Nobody wanted to come prosecute Hunter Biden?’

‘I don’t want to say that because I don’t know that they weren’t trying to find people,’ Weiss said. ‘All I know was I didn’t get a whole lot of resumes.’

Weiss eventually gained two attorneys, Leo Wise and Derek Hines, who went on to secure a conviction by a jury in Delaware after a week-long trial on gun possession charges and a guilty plea to all nine of Hunter Biden’s tax charges.

A committee aide pressed Weiss on why he felt there was ‘such a drought’ of help at DOJ headquarters.

‘As I said a moment ago … I did not receive a lot of resumes in response to my initial request,’ Weiss said, noting that eventually the DOJ’s Public Integrity Section assisted him.

Asked if the Public Integrity Section helped him because Weiss proactively reached out, Weiss replied, ‘Probably.’

Burisma tax years and FARA

For his testimony, the Trump DOJ gave Weiss permission in a letter to talk to Congress about Hunter Biden’s cases. The department noted, however, that it could not authorize Weiss to talk about the former first son’s confidential tax information.

Weiss suggested, though, that he would have charged Hunter Biden for the 2014 and 2015 tax years if he could have.

‘To the extent I can put together — and this is general — a case that involves more years than not and allows me to more fully develop allegations about a course of conduct and a scheme, that’s better for the prosecution,’ Weiss said. ‘So it’s not like I’m looking to cut out years generally when you’re pursuing a tax investigation.’

During the years in question, Hunter Biden was raking in $1 million per year as a board member of the Ukrainian energy company Burisma while his father, then vice president, was overseeing foreign policy with Ukraine. The scenario became ripe for questions about conflicts of interest, in part because of suspicious interactions between Hunter Biden and the Obama State Department.

In Weiss’s final special counsel report, he dodged explaining why he brought charges of failure to pay taxes and tax evasion against Hunter Biden only for the tax years after 2015, citing Joe Biden’s pardon. Now, Weiss said, he would be more willing to talk about it if he were legally allowed to do so.

Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, pressed Weiss, saying the ‘political aspects of Burisma’ raised ‘glaring’ questions about the prosecutorial decisions made for the years for which Hunter Biden avoided charges.

‘I understand,’ Weiss replied. ‘Absolutely. Yes. And I wish that I could address it. But it’s my understanding that, for me to trip into 2014 and ’15 is a violation of [U.S. code].’

Weiss also told the committee his team had no serious discussions about charging Hunter Biden under a foreign lobby law called the Foreign Agents Registration Act.

‘We just couldn’t put together a sufficient case,’ Weiss said.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Iran on Monday confirmed it will not give up its nuclear enrichment program in an exclusive interview with Fox News’ Bret Baier and Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, set to air at 6 pm on Monday’s ‘Special Report.’ 

Araghchi confirmed that the U.S.’s top ambition in preventing Tehran from further developing a nuclear weapon by blocking all enrichment capabilities is unlikely to come to fruition, despite threats of intense international sanctions.

‘We cannot give up enrichment because it is an achievement of our own scientists. And now, more than that, it is a question of national pride,’ Araghchi said. ‘Our enrichment is so dear to us,’ he told Bret Baier, anchor and executive editor of Special Report, in a clip released before the full interview airs.

The foreign minister confirmed that the extent of the damage to its nuclear facilities caused by the U.S. strikes last month was ‘serious,’ but he would not comment on whether any enriched uranium survived the strikes.

‘Our facilities have been damaged – seriously damaged,’ Araghchi said. ‘The extent of which is now under evaluation by our atomic energy organization.

‘But as far as I know, they are seriously damaged,’ he added, noting that the damage has also currently ceased all enrichment capabilities for the time being. 

Iran has maintained that it was not seeking a nuclear weapon, but in the lead up to the Israeli and U.S. strikes, security experts were sounding the alarm that Tehran was likely capable of producing at least one nuclear weapon in a matter of days, and several warheads in a matter of weeks. 

While nuclear enrichment is a process needed for nations that also rely on nuclear power, Iran’s nuclear energy usage amounts to less than one percent of the nation’s energy consumption. 

The U.S. has suggested that given the low amounts of nuclear energy which Iran relies on, it should join a consortium that could potentially involve nations like the UAE and Saudi Arabia for its enriched uranium needs for civil nuclear power use. 

But Iran has repeatedly rejected this proposal, with Iranian Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei also referring to Tehran’s capabilities as a source of national pride just last month.

‘The number of countries in the world that have achieved a complete nuclear fuel cycle is perhaps fewer than the number of fingers on a person’s two hands,’ Khamenei said in early June. ‘We’re capable of producing nuclear fuel starting from the mine and all the way to the power plant.’

But Iran also faces immense international sanctions and even greater arms restrictions should it fail to reach a nuclear agreement by the end of August – though it is unclear if that agreement must include the U.S. or just European nations including France, Germany and the U.K., also referred to as the E3.

Iranian officials will not only be meeting with its top allies and chief adversaries to the West, Russia and China, on Tuesday, but Tehran is also set to hold talks on Friday with officials from the E3.

Washington and Tehran have yet to resume talks following the U.S. strikes last month.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., is blasting people within her own party for ‘lying’ about her position during a key round of government funding votes late last week.

‘Google is free. If you’re saying I voted for military funding, you are lying. Receipts attached,’ Ocasio-Cortez wrote alongside several screenshots showing her vote ‘no’ on Republicans’ military funding bill.

‘Drag me for my positions all you want, but lying about them doesn’t make you part of the ‘left.’ If you believe neo-nazis are welcome and operating in good faith, you can have them!’

The New York City Democrat got broadsided from her left over her vote on a specific amendment aimed at blocking U.S. funding for Israel’s Iron Dome, though it did not make it into the final bill – which Ocasio-Cortez voted against.

The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) criticized the progressive firebrand for voting against an amendment by Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Ga., to block $500 million in Congress’ annual defense spending bill that was aimed at helping fund Israeli missile defense systems.

‘An arms embargo means keeping all arms out of the hands of a genocidal military, no exceptions. This is why we oppose Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’[s] vote against an amendment that would have blocked $500 million in funding for the Israeli military’s Iron Dome program,’ the DSA said over the weekend.

The DSA noted she did vote against the defense funding bill itself, thereby ‘voting against funding for the imperialist military-industrial complex and the Israeli genocide.’

The group added, however, ‘We were further deeply disappointed by her clarifying statement on her position on the Iron Dome.’

‘Along with other US-funded interceptor systems, the Iron Dome has emboldened Israel to invade or bomb no less than five different countries in the past two years,’ the DSA said.

‘The fact that Representative Ocasio-Cortez acknowledges that Israel is carrying out this genocide makes her support for military aid all the more disappointing and incongruous. We urge the representative to continue voting against the Iron Dome, whether it is part of a larger defense spending bill or as a stand-alone bill.’

The DSA commended Reps. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich.; Ilhan Omar, D-Minn.; Summer Lee, D-Pa., and Al Green, D-Texas, for voting against the amendment.

Fox News Digital reached out to Ocasio-Cortez’s campaign and congressional office for comment.

She posted on X after the vote, ‘Marjorie Taylor Greene’s amendment does nothing to cut off offensive aid to Israel nor end the flow of US munitions being used in Gaza. Of course I voted against it.’

‘What it does do is cut off defensive Iron Dome capacities while allowing the actual bombs killing Palestinians to continue. I have long stated that I do not believe that adding to the death count of innocent victims to this war is constructive to its end,’ she said.

‘That is a simple and clear difference of opinion that has long been established. I remain focused on cutting the flow of US munitions that are being used to perpetuate the genocide in Gaza.’

The clash exemplifies how Israel continues to drive an ideological wedge within the Democratic Party. 

It’s not the first time Ocasio-Cortez caught heat from the progressive base for failing to take a critical enough stance on Israel.

In 2021, the New York Democrat cried on the House floor after voting ‘present’ on funding Israel’s Iron Dome defense system.

‘Yes, I wept,’ she wrote in an open letter to constituents after the incident. ‘I wept at the complete lack of care for the human beings that are impacted by these decisions. I wept at an institution choosing a path of maximum volatility and minimum consideration for its own political convenience.’

The overall bill that passed last week calls for $832 billion in defense funding for fiscal year 2026.

That’s separate from the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), another annual bill that sets defense and national security policy each fiscal year – essentially detailing how those funds will be spent.

Greene’s amendment to strip $500 million going toward Israeli missile defense programs lost in a lopsided 6-422 vote.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

WASHINGTON — One hundred games into a season is typically long past time a ballclub has its identity firmly established. Yet the San Diego Padres know it’s not too late to show the world exactly how good they are.

And more specifically, to prove to club president A.J. Preller that their squad is worthy of the aggressive moves for which he’s so renowned.

“We need to show him what we’re capable of,” All-Star outfielder Fernando Tatis Jr. tells USA TODAY Sports, “to see what kind of bold move he’ll make.”

For now, the Padres have proven they’re playoff caliber: They hold down the final wild card spot in the National League and lurk just 3 ½ games behind the Los Angeles Dodgers in the NL West.

They began the second half by winning two of three games at Washington, the start of a 10-game humidity tour that will afford them climate-controlled indoor baseball in Miami before four games at St. Louis precede a return to San Diego’s saner dew points.

It was on this almost exact trip last year – also the first after the All-Star break – that the Padres won seven of nine games, going from .500 team to a club that gave the Dodgers the hardest punch of the playoffs before losing a five-game NL Division Series.

And after that post-break burst, Preller juiced up the bullpen, swinging deals to land All-Star relievers Jason Adam and Tanner Scott, a just reward for a club that earned it.

Now, these Padres face something of a last dance. Oh, it’s never over in San Diego, not when veterans like Manny Machado ($350 million through 2033), Xander Bogaerts ($280 million, 2033) and Tatis ($340 million, 2034) are wrapped up well into the next decade, and eight other players locked into multi-year deals through at least 2027.

But a mini-window of sorts is closing: Starting pitchers Dylan Cease and Michael King, the major pieces of their pivot to deal Juan Soto to the New York Yankees, are free agents after this season.

The extent to which San Diego attempts to retain them this winter, or backfill the rotation via free agency, should be telling about the near-term fate of the franchise, which lost its franchise scion when owner Peter Seidler passed away in November 2023.

While overflow crowds at Petco Park and the many long-term commitments ensure the Padres will stay competitive, coming years may suggest a re-tooling or at least easing the foot up on the gas.

For now, though, there’s still a pennant to chase, and a case to make.

“This is the stretch,” says Cease, who shrugged off a first half in which he posted a 4.88 ERA to strike out 10 in his first start after the break. “Obviously all the games are important. But this is really, probably going to define who we’re going to be at the end of the day.”

With a president of baseball operations surely watching closely.

“I don’t think in terms of that,” says Cease, “but the better position we’re in you know the more aggressive he’s probably more willing to be.

“But he’s probably going to be aggressive either way.”

And Preller would be augmenting a club that, despite its 54-45 record, knows there’s a little more in the tank.

‘Didn’t let ’em breathe’

The Padres were hard to miss at the July 15 All-Star Game, what with five representatives led by Tatis and MVP candidate Manny Machado.

Yet the remainder of their reps came from one unit: The bullpen.

They were well-earned nods, with Robert Suárez leading the majors with 28 saves and Adam (2.05 ERA) and lefty Adrian Morejon (1.83 ERA, 0.81 WHIP) dominant almost every time out.

Yet Adam and Morejon have already pitched in 48 games, one less than the major league leaders in that category. Jeremiah Estrada has logged 47 appearances.

And the Padres have played 55 games decided by two runs or less, second-most in the majors.

Fortunately, they’re 34-21 in such games, yet the bullpen has burned a lot of high-leverage fuel to prop them up, and the sustainability questions will swirl if there are any late-inning hiccups.

To put it bluntly: The Padres need to start kicking some teams’ butts.

“Didn’t let ‘em breathe,” an approving manager Mike Shildt said after the Padres jumped the Nationals in an 8-1 victory to claim the series Sunday. “If we continue to do that – we add on – watch out.

“This team will be even more dangerous than it already is.”

That victory was jump-started by Machado and Tatis drawing first-inning walks and Bogaerts jumping All-Star MacKenzie Gore for a first-inning grand slam; it was 5-0 after one inning and 8-0 after three.

And it continued Bogaerts’ tear; he’s raised his batting average 40 points since June 19, his .382 average second in the majors in that stretch.

Bogaerts, who turns 33 Oct. 1, has had an uneven first two years in San Diego, his OPS falling 102 points to .688 last season. Yet he’s back at his familiar shortstop post and exemplifying this Padre group’s ethos: Make good swing decisions, get the ball in play, catch the ball and run the bases aggressively and smartly.

Bogaerts’ 16.2% strikeout rate is his best since 2015, when he was 22 and in his first full season with Boston. The Padres’ 695 strikeouts are fewest in the NL – 68 less than the nearest playoff contender, the Cubs.

“Just trying to swing at strikes,” says Bogaerts, who has stolen 16 bases in 17 attempts. “Keep working and keeping the same routine.”

Shildt is a bit more effusive.

“Just looks under control. Balanced. Everything looks smooth. He’s got a lot of (stolen bases), right there with Tati. And he’s playing as good a shortstop as anybody in baseball. 

“We’re getting an All-Star version of Bogey.”

A division shot, a shot in the arm

As they pass the 100-game mark in Miami, the Padres can feel good in who they are, and what is at stake.

“I know we have a good team,’ says Bogaerts. ‘We have to play some really good baseball. We have a tough stretch coming up and a big second half, so hopefully we can get there.”

Indeed, 29 of their next 35 games are against teams with winning records; the Padres are just 20-32 against teams better than .500 this season.

Things aren’t optimal, but you can see help from here. King, currently on the injured list with a pinched nerve in his right shoulder, is throwing bullpen sessions and hopes for an August return. In his stead, Nick Pivetta – signed when the veteran righty hit a free agent road bump due to the qualifying offer – is pitching better than he has in his nine-year career.

Jackson Merrill, who probably should have won NL Rookie of the Year honors last year, has been slowed by a pair of IL stints yet still has a runway to salvage the rest of his sophomore season. And for better or worse, they’ll be done with the Dodgers by Aug. 24 after playing them six times in a 10-game stretch.

Of their final 27 games, 10 are against the Colorado Rockies and Chicago White Sox, the two worst teams in baseball.

“We have a chance to win the division out here,” says Tatis. “We got a lot of baseball ahead of us. It’s a matter of taking care of business and staying consistent.”

And then there is the deadline. The Padres’ needs are not unlike almost every other contender: A starting pitcher. Another outfield or DH bat, preferably right-handed. And perhaps another reliever, though the Padres are dealing from a position of strength rather than the relief misery many other clubs find themselves in.

“There is great talent in this room,” says catcher Martin Maldonado, the 38-year-old veteran of six Houston Astros playoff runs. “The pitching staff is amazing.”

In fact, the Padres believe, whatever additions arrive can only build upon something solid. Perhaps they will push them to a division title, a round deeper in the playoffs. Point is, the Padres have put themselves in position to reap those rewards.

“Almost every facet of the game we’ve been good,” says Shildt, citing the consistency of the team’s at-bats as the last piece to slide into place.

“I do feel like we’re in a good spot and trending to a great spot.”

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

While the Washington Commanders and Cleveland Guardians have held their current names for a few years now, the teams and their past mascots – the Redskins and Indians, respectively – were thrown back into national conversation by President Donald Trump over the weekend.

Trump said in a social media post on July 20 that the Guardians and the Commanders, each playing their fourth season under their new names in 2025, should revert back to their old names.

‘The Washington ‘Whatever’s’ should IMMEDIATELY change their name back to the Washington Redskins Football Team. There is a big clamoring for this. Likewise, the Cleveland Indians, one of the six original baseball teams, with a storied past. Our great Indian people, in massive numbers, want this to happen,’ Trump’s post on Truth Social said.

‘Their heritage and prestige is systematically being taken away from them. Times are different now than they were three or four years ago. We are a Country of passion and common sense. OWNERS, GET IT DONE!!!’ Trump concluded.

Later Sunday afternoon, July 20, Trump threatened to restrict the Commanders from building on the old RFK Stadium site if the franchise doesn’t change its name.

‘I may put a restriction on them that if they don’t change the name back to the original ‘Washington (name),’ and get rid of the ridiculous moniker, ‘Washington Commanders,’ I won’t make a deal for them to build a Stadium in Washington,’ Trump posted.

The president’s most recent comments come after he previously said on social media in October 2013 that the president should not be telling the Redskins to change their name, because our country has ‘far bigger problems.’

Here’s a timeline of each franchise’s name changes.

Timeline of Washington Commanders name change

Here’s a timeline of key events in the evolution of the Washington Redskins to the Washington Commanders.

May 2013: Former team owner Dan Snyder said in an interview with USA TODAY the Redskins name would never change.
July 2020: The Washington Redskins announced it would undergo a ‘thorough review of the team’s name’ in the wake of nationwide racial injustice protests spurred in part by the death of George Floyd. Later in the month, the franchise announced it would go by the ‘Washington Football Team’ until further notice.
February 2022: Washington’s NFL team revealed it will be the Commanders, a tribute to Washington’s military ties.
July 2023: A partnership led by investor Josh Harris officially acquires the Washington Commanders.
August 2024: Harris reiterates that the team would not return to its old name for ‘obvious reasons.’

Timeline of Cleveland Guardians name change

Here’s a timeline of key events in the evolution of the Cleveland Indians to the Cleveland Guardians.

January 2014: Indians change primary logo from Chief Wahoo to the block-C. Chief Wahoo remained on the home cap and sleeves.
January 2018: Major League Baseball announces the Indians will discontinue the use of Chief Wahoo on their uniforms beginning with the 2019 season.
July 2020: Cleveland announces review of its team name in response to racial injustice protests around the U.S.
December 2020: Owner Paul Dolan announces the team will change its name.
July 2021: Cleveland announces plans to change its name to the Guardians at the conclusion of the 2021 season.
November 2021: Progressive Field begins selling Guardians merchandise at the team store.

In a meeting with reporters Sunday, July 20, Guardians’ president of baseball operations Chris Antonetti said that he was unaware of Trump’s statements prior to the meeting and that changing the name back to the ‘Indians’ was ‘not something [he has been] tracking or [has] been paying a lot of attention to.’

‘We’ve gotten the opportunity to build the brand as the Guardians over the last four years and are excited about the future,’ said Antonetti.

Antonetti did not provide any indication that the team plans on reverting to its former name.

Gabe Hauari is a national trending news reporter at USA TODAY. You can follow him on X @GabeHauari or email him at Gdhauari@gannett.com.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY