Archive

2025

Browsing

In a second Donald Trump administration, the pro-life movement is trying to nail down its cultural messaging to adapt to a post-Dobbs era. It may get the boost it needs as a $30 million investment is being made through a membership-only organization, Fox News Digital has learned.

Key figures in the pro-life movement, including Leonard Leo, Ray Ruddy and Princeton Professor Robert George, sent a letter Tuesday morning to major pro-life organizations about the new venture fund, which is being chaired by David Bereit, the founder of the pro-life organization 40 Days for Life. 

‘We need to build more capacity and help meet the needs of those who are facing an unexpected pregnancy,’ Bereit told Fox News Digital in an interview. ‘If we want to say to them, ‘You can do better than abortion,’ we need to say, ‘We will help you,’ and we need to provide the support, the resources and the tangible organizations that will walk with them.’

As the executive vice president of the Federalist Society, Leo helped vet and recommend conservative judicial nominees, including those who later contributed to the overturning of Roe v. Wade in 2022. 

Ruddy is a long-time pro-life philanthropist. 

George is a conservative philosopher and legal scholar at Princeton University who co-founded the American Principles Project. Rising as an influential voice in the pro-life movement, George has written extensively on the moral and philosophical arguments for opposing abortion.

The group also announced the creation of the Life Leadership Conference, a members-only coalition featuring influencers and philanthropists ‘who know how to achieve genuine victories.’ Bereit will also be at the helm of the conference, which will manage the venture fund.

The memo states that while the Supreme Court has reversed the ruling of Roe v. Wade, ‘today a whole new set of challenges’ faces the pro-life movement, which will require strong messaging to combat. Some of those challenges include combating the push to enshrine abortion into state constitutions.

Voters in Arizona, Colorado, Maryland, Missouri, Montana, Nevada and New York all approved state-level abortion referendums last year. 

‘It should come as no surprise that, with the passage of time and changes in circumstance, old strategies for building public support and advancing the pro-life cause in legislatures and courts need to be rethought and, in some cases, revised,’ the memo states. ‘Some groups have adapted and are charting winning strategies. Some are posting more losses than gains and are redefining what it means to win in ways that risk making the movement weaker and less effective.’

‘What’s more, the battle over abortion never was, and must never be allowed to become, simply about making sure the issue is delegated to the right government actors,’ the memo continued in part. ‘The Life Leadership Conference is setting the bar higher. Our coalition will work tirelessly to provide genuine protection to unborn babies and practical assistance to pregnant women in need.’

As such, Bereit added the group’s goal is to usher in ‘a new era of life-saving action and culture-shaping innovation.’

Abortion emerged as a key issue in the 2024 election, with former Vice President Kamala Harris and the Democratic Party advocating for expanding federal abortion access. In contrast, President Donald Trump supported state-level restrictions, arguing for a more localized approach to the issue, including a ban on most abortions after 15 weeks.

In one of his first executive actions, Trump pardoned 23 pro-life protesters – several of whom were elderly – imprisoned for violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE) Act under the Biden administration’s Department of Justice.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

It may not feel like spring everywhere, but it does in Florida and Arizona. And for baseball fans, that’s all that matters as MLB teams have gathered at their respective spring training camps to get ready for the 2025 season.

Fantasy baseball season is also on the way, and to help you get ready for your upcoming drafts, USA TODAY Sports will have all the information and analysis you need to begin your championship quest.

To get things started, here is our initial list of the top 200 overall players for this season. They’re based on a standard 12-team Rotisserie league with 20-game eligibility for each position. We’ll keep the list updated throughout the preseason, so keep checking back for the latest rankings. Plus, we’ll continue to add links to more fantasy baseball content as it’s published.

Fantasy baseball top 200 players for 2025

Follow every MLB game: Latest MLB scores, stats, schedules and standings.

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fast.Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Aaron Rodgers’ New York Jets era is done after two seasons, and Gang Green already has rumored ties to one pending free agent quarterback.

ESPN’s Jeremy Fowler reported on ‘SportsCenter’ that the Jets could be a ‘sleeper option’ for Steelers quarterback Justin Fields. The 25-year-old is coming off of a debut season with Pittsburgh that featured 10 regular-season appearances and a 4-2 record in six starts.

New York is only one of several quarterback-needy teams that will be looking to fill that roster hole in free agency. Fields will be an especially intriguing option for those teams. He’s a dual-threat signal-caller who could serve as a solid ‘bridge’ option for teams that hope to draft a young quarterback in the next year or two.

Here are five possible landing spots for Fields this offseason:

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

Justin Fields landing spots

Field will have several suitors as one of the best young quarterbacks in the free agent market this offseason. These five teams are some of the most likely landing spots:

New York Jets

The Jets were tied to Fields by ESPN NFL reporter Jeremy Fowler in a Monday edition of ‘SportsCenter,’ when he called New York a ‘sleeper option’ to land the pending free agent. With veteran Aaron Rodgers out of the building, the Jets have a major need to fill at the game’s most important position.

Fields is a nice fit in New York for a few reasons, with one of the biggest being the supporting cast he’d have around him. Even if the Jets trade away receiver Davante Adams, their new quarterback would get to throw to wide receiver Garrett Wilson, tight end Tyler Conklin and running back Breece Hall.

In addition, new head coach Aaron Glenn will be looking to bring the Jets’ defense back to a level of excellence that will help take some pressure off of Fields and the offense. That isn’t to say that the offense would be neglected either. Glenn’s choice for offensive coordinator, former Lions passing game coordinator Tanner Engstrand, could also help develop Fields further after his success in Detroit with quarterback Jared Goff.

Pittsburgh Steelers

The Steelers are another obvious choice for Fields’ future. Before Fowler’s report on the quarterback’s connection to the Jets, ESPN’s senior NFL reporter said on Friday’s ‘SportsCenter’ that both Fields and Pittsburgh were open to having the quarterback stick around.

In (an admittedly small sample size of) six starts with the Steelers in 2024, Fields had career-high numbers in completion rate (66.3%) and passer rating (93.9). Through that first third of the season, the former Bears starter was also on pace for career highs in passing yards (3,134) and total touchdowns (28) as well as a career low in interceptions (three).

Pittsburgh has a significant decision to make with both Russell Wilson and Fields set to hit free agency. Wilson was the favored option entering last year, but his injury allowed his younger backup the chance to start and shine. And though the veteran started 6-1 when he returned from his calf injury, he also went 0-5 in the final four games of the regular season and one playoff game. The door is open for Fields to take back the starting job with the Steelers.

New York Giants

New York’s other team is in a strange spot at quarterback. The Daniel Jones extension decision still looms large as a stain on the current regime’s resume, and the Giants now need a new quarterback after they cut ties with the former first-round pick last season. While Big Blue could wait for the draft, they’re also in the awkward position of holding the third overall pick behind two other quarterback-needy teams in a draft that has only two consensus top quarterbacks.

Enter Fields, a young, dual-threat quarterback who still has a high ceiling with the right environment. Giants head coach Brian Daboll was once the offensive coordinator with the Bills and helped coach and develop a young, dual-threat quarterback while he was there. While Fields fits a very different dual-threat quarterback mold than Josh Allen, Daboll does have a track record of success, even if recent disappointments mean it can be called into question.

Should Fields join the Giants, he could have one of the best supporting casts he’s ever had in his career. Receiver Malik Nabers and running back Tyrone Tracy Jr. are both coming off of excellent rookie debuts, and adding a quarterback in free agency means New York could be in on drafting two-way star Travis Hunter. Hunter, who played both wide receiver and cornerback at a high level for Colorado, could further elevate Fields’ supporting cast.

Las Vegas Raiders

The Raiders are in a similar spot to the Giants in that they don’t currently have a long-term answer at quarterback. Like New York, they also don’t hold a good position in the 2025 NFL draft to guarantee they can draft one.

Fields is a good fit for Las Vegas as a potential ‘bridge’ option. If the Raiders draft a quarterback in the later rounds or choose to wait until next year, Fields could be a more veteran presence to start in the interim. At the same time though, the 25-year-old will get a real shot at winning a long-term starting job in Las Vegas under new head coach Pete Carroll.

Carroll has built a strong résumé of working with quarterbacks – both young and experienced – and bringing out their potential. He was USC’s head coach for both Carson Palmer and Matt Leinart when they won the Heisman Trophy, and he also worked with fellow first-round pick Mark Sanchez in college. In the pros, Seahawks quarterbacks Russell Wilson and Geno Smith found their fair shares of success with Carroll at the helm. Adding in Chip Kelly’s voice as the offensive coordinator also profiles well for Fields’ fit in Sin City.

Fields would have a good head coach in Carroll, a number one pass-catching weapon in tight end Brock Bowers and a relatively low set of expectations in Las Vegas. There’s real potential for the former Bears starter to find ways to thrive with the Raiders.

New Orleans Saints

The Saints are in a tough spot. Veteran quarterback Derek Carr has not performed at the level of a franchise quarterback New Orleans had hoped for when it signed him to a four-year, $150 million contract two years ago. The NFC South contenders also don’t really have a great younger option either. Both Jake Haener and Spencer Rattler struggled in their 2024 outings.

Fields may be a relatively inexpensive option for the cap-troubled Saints to look into during free agency. He’d get to work with offensive mind Kellen Moore, a former quarterback himself, and potentially compete with Carr for the starting job this year and beyond.

Fields would also have a solid group of receivers to work with if they stay healthy in 2025. Chris Olave and Rashid Shaheed are a sneaky strong one-two punch on the outside, and running back Alvin Kamara is a more than capable receiver out of the backfield as well. If New Orleans can build a stronger offensive line, look no further than what Moore’s offense looked like with the Eagles to envision a Fields-led Saints offense: a strong run game led by a star running back, complemented by a dual-threat quarterback that can thrive off of play-action.

Honorable mentions: Tennessee Titans and Cleveland Browns

The Titans and Browns are possible, but unlikely fits for Fields.

As the holders of the top two picks in the 2025 NFL draft, respectively, Tennessee and Cleveland are in a prime position to draft their quarterbacks of the future. While Fields could fill in as a veteran bridge option that allows either Cam Ward or Shedeur Sanders to develop behind him, it’s unlikely that a 25-year-old pending free agent would be very willing to be such an obvious stopgap for one of the draft’s top picks.

In addition, either team’s offer almost certainly would be below the value Fields could likely find elsewhere. Teams with more obvious and pressing needs for a starting quarterback, even if only temporarily, likely would spend more on a free agent signal-caller than a team preparing to draft their young gunslinger of the future.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

U.S. and Russian officials held diplomatic talks in Saudi Arabia without any Ukrainian officials present on Tuesday.

The groups, led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and his Russian counterpart, Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, are seeking terms for a peace agreement in Ukraine as well as negotiating a potential meeting between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. They have proposed a framework that could involve a ceasefire, elections in Ukraine followed by the signing of a peace agreement.

State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce also confirmed that Rubio’s team agreed to ‘lay the groundwork for cooperation’ with Russia on various issues in addition to Ukraine. They also agreed to appoint ‘high-level teams’ to begin working on a path to ending the conflict in Ukraine.

Reports from multiple foreign diplomatic sources say forcing Ukraine to hold new elections could be a key part of a peace deal. Both the U.S. and Russia believe Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has a low chance of winning re-election, the sources say.

‘Putin assesses the probability of electing a puppet president as quite high and is also convinced that any candidate other than the current President of Ukraine will be more flexible and ready for negotiations and concessions,’ the diplomatic sources said in a readout of the meeting.

Zelenskyy has said his country would never accept peace terms negotiated by the U.S. and Russia without Ukrainian involvement. Trump has vowed that Ukraine will be involved in the larger process.

Trump envoy Steve Witkoff emphasized on Sunday that the ongoing meeting in Riyadh is more about ‘trust building’ than getting into the details of an actual peace agreement.

Zelenskyy urged Trump not to trust Putin in a phone call last week.

‘I said that [Putin] is a liar,’ Zelenskyy said of the call. ‘And he said, ‘I think my feeling is that he’s ready for these negotiations.’ And I said to him, ‘No, he’s a liar. He doesn’t want any peace.” 

The Ukrainian leader nevertheless said he believes Putin is a ‘little bit scared’ of Trump.

Also excluded from Tuesday’s talks are any European representatives, a notable absence given the stern rebuke of European allies delivered by Vice President JD Vance at the Munich Security Conference last week.

Some European allies are taking the cue, with U.K. Prime Minister Kier Starmer announcing that he is willing to put British troops on the ground in Ukraine to ensure its security as part of a peace deal.

‘I do not say that lightly,’ he wrote in the Daily Telegraph. ‘I feel very deeply the responsibility that comes with potentially putting British servicemen and women in harm’s way.’

‘But any role in helping to guarantee Ukraine’s security is helping to guarantee the security of our continent, and the security of this country,’ he added.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A federal judge President Donald Trump once described as ‘the most evil person’ is now hearing a lawsuit brought by blue states to stop the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) from accessing government data. 

First named to the bench in 2013 by then-President Barack Obama, U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan of the District of Columbia Court rose to notoriety in 2021, when she presided over the criminal investigation into Trump’s alleged efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election. Though, her role Monday centered on whether billionaire Elon Musk’s DOGE should be blocked from accessing government data or firing federal employees. 

Chutkan is a longtime legal foe of the current president – at least, if her actions from her more than 10 years on the bench are any indication.

In 2021, Chutkan rejected Trump’s claims of presidential immunity in the 2020 election interference case. The decision was later overturned by the Supreme Court, whose ruling considerably expanded the notion of immunity for U.S. presidents. 

The judge did little to remedy any strained tensions in the months that followed. Beyond boasting the harshest sentencing record for all criminal defendants that appeared before her for their roles in the Jan. 6 U.S. Capitol riots, Chutkan has been outspoken about her view of the day. After Trump moved to pardon and grant clemency to the more than 1,500 convicted, she said the president’s actions ‘cannot whitewash the blood, feces and terror that the mob left in its wake.’

‘And it cannot repair the jagged breach in America’s sacred tradition of peacefully transitioning power,’ she continued. 

Chutkan also denied Trump’s attempt to block the release of records requested by the House Select Committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack, supplying them with some 1,800 pages of documents despite the staunch opposition from Trump’s legal counsel. Trump famously described her, in response, as the ‘most evil person.’ 

These actions and words have made her a target of Trump allies.

In 2024, Chutkan was the victim of a ‘swatting’ attack in her Washington, D.C., home, where police responded to what was later determined to be a false shooting report. 

While it seems unlikely she will side with the states to block DOGE access to federal government data, her record of opposition to Trump’s agenda is unlikely to reassure Trump and his supporters. 

During the first Trump administration, Chutkan was criticized by administration officials for many actions they saw as harmful to their policy agenda. In 2018, she temporarily halted the U.S. from blocking the abortions of illegal teenage immigrants – a ruling that was later overturned.

The following year, she ruled then-Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos had illegally delayed implementing an Obama-era special education equity rule, which required states to identify and correct for racial disparities in special education programs across the country. She ordered the administration to begin implementing the program ‘immediately,’ despite requests from Education Department officials who said they needed more time to do so.

She has also not been shy about using her position on the bench to criticize Trump’s actions. 

Following Trump’s decision to grant a mass pardon of the 1,600 criminal dependents involved in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, Chutkan reportedly had to reassure Capitol Police who were at the scene that the ‘rule of law still applies,’ as Politico reported last month.

However, she added at the time, ‘I’m not sure I can do that very convincingly these days.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Current Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy slammed former Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg in a post on X, accusing the Biden-era official of ‘mismanagement.’

He leveled the criticism when responding to a post in which Buttigieg wrote, ‘The flying public needs answers. How many FAA personnel were just fired? What positions? And why?’ 

Duffy responded, blasting Buttigieg.

‘Mayor Pete failed for four years to address the air traffic controller shortage and upgrade our outdated, World War II-era air traffic control system. In less than four weeks, we have already begun the process and are engaging the smartest minds in the entire world,’ Duffy declared.

Prior to serving in the Biden administration, Buttigieg served as the mayor of South Bend, Indiana.

‘Here’s the truth: the FAA alone has a staggering 45,000 employees. Less than 400 were let go, and they were all probationary, meaning they had been hired less than a year ago. Zero air traffic controllers and critical safety personnel were let go,’ Duffy continued.

He accused Buttigieg of utilizing the Department of Transportation ‘as a slush fund for the green new scam and environmental justice nonsense,’ and claimed ‘that over 90% of the workforce under his leadership were working from home – including him. The building was empty!’

‘When we finally get a full accounting of his mismanagement, I look forward to hearing from him,’ he declared.

Buttigieg fired back, ‘At least one of the claims here (concerning telework rates) is demonstrably false, so forgive us for seeking more specifics on the rest. Is the Secretary claiming, and will he show, that none of the hundreds of FAA personnel he just fired were important to safety?’

In a post on Sunday, Duffy had indicated that individuals from SpaceX were slated to visit the Air Traffic Control System Command Center on Monday.

‘The safety of air travel is a non-partisan matter. SpaceX engineers will help make air travel safer,’ Elon Musk replied.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

As someone who fought in the bureaucratic trench wars of the first Trump administration, I was a surprised as anyone by the stunning rapidity of DOGE leader Elon Musk’s blitzkrieg into the heart of the federal bureaucracy. Within a matter of days, President Donald Trump seized control of a federal bureaucracy that he had never brought fully under control during his first term.   

A slower, more deliberate approach could have averted lawsuits and reduced collateral damage to the parts of the bureaucracy worth keeping. Yet the experiences of the first Trump administration gave Trump and DOGE good reason to believe that such an approach would bog down.               

One of the chief lessons Trump learned from his first administration was that senior career bureaucrats, left to their own devices, were willing and able to sabotage him. The most disturbing insubordination was the Crossfire Hurricane scandal and the ensuing Mueller probe or investigation into Russian collusion, the crimes of which would today be considered comparable to Watergate if the mainstream media gave them due attention.   

Prior to Trump’s election in 2016, senior FBI official Peter Strzok and FBI Director James Comey authorized spying on Trump campaign officials, some of which they justified through inaccurate FISA applications and bogus information in the Steele dossier.   

Once Trump was elected, FBI bureaucrats like Kevin Clinesmith and Brian Auten and Justice Department lawyers like Bruce Ohr and Dana Boente kept the espionage going through additional acts of duplicity.  

The weaponization of the government against Trump and his supporters extended into federal agencies. The Defense Department abused the security clearance system to oust Adam Lovinger after he identified the misuse of government funds to entrap Trump associates.   

At USAID, career bureaucrats employed similar tactics against me because I had reported several of them for corruption. The agency’s security director, ethics attorney and inspector general — the people who were supposed to safeguard ethics — took part in the moral turpitude.  

During his first term, Trump also learned that federal bureaucrats were intent on slow rolling or completely obstructing his policies. Dr. Anthony Fauci, former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, surreptitiously orchestrated a March 2020 report dismissing the Wuhan lab leak theory, which he then used to undercut White House efforts to hold the Chinese government accountable for the deadly catastrophe.  

Career lawyers at the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights division impaired the division’s investigations and prosecutions by refusing to work on matters such as affirmative action, religious liberty and biological males in women’s sports. USAID bureaucrats deliberately concealed the agency’s humanitarian programs in Syria because they feared Trump would terminate the programs if he learned about them.  

Prior to serving in the first Trump administration and learning about Crossfire Hurricane, I would not have believed that senior career bureaucrats would systematically subvert the White House and its policies. While there might be a bad apple here or there, it seemed implausible that substantial numbers of senior officials would have both the audacity and the authority to act.  

Experience led me, along with Trump and many other Republicans, to conclude that subversion was widespread, and hence subversives needed to be removed from the federal bureaucracies henceforth. Late January, perhaps not coincidentally, USAID became the first agency where large numbers of senior bureaucrats were sidelined for resisting White House policies. 

While those unfamiliar with the nation’s past may depict the Trump offensive as a radical break with tradition, fierce resistance to bureaucracy dates back to the nation’s founding. In 1776, Americans voiced a deep suspicion of government bureaucrats and cited it as a reason for breaking from Britain. The Declaration of Independence asserted that Britain had ‘erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.’ 

Presidents of both right and left have at various times belittled the federal bureaucracy and demanded its reduction in size and power. President Andrew Jackson restricted government employment to four years because with lengthier service men were ‘apt to acquire a habit of looking with indifference upon the public interests.’ President Bill Clinton cut the federal civilian work force by 427,000 during his two terms in office. 

While the federal bureaucracy is bloated and should be shrunk, it cannot be eliminated. As the founders of this nation recognized, sinful human nature necessitates the existence of a government for certain purposes, such as enforcing the law, protecting against foreign enemies, and regulating commerce. 

And as long as we have government, we need bureaucrats. Some bureaucrats need to be retained from one administration to the next to ensure that some people know how to keep the machines running. Congress should act, however, to make the firing of underperforming or insubordinate employees much easier than it is today. 

The experience of the first Trump administration also showed that reining in the bureaucracy requires improving not only in bureaucrats but also the presidential appointees who serve in the agencies. By law, career bureaucrats are required to follow the directions of political appointees, and most of the ones I encountered did so.  

Thus, political appointees who are competent, ethical and committed to the administration’s principles can steer the ship in the right direction once the subversive bureaucrats and excess baggage have been offloaded. 

One reason why bureaucrats got away with so much during Trump’s first term was that too many political appointees lacked the desire or the courage to confront them. The first Trump administration came to power without a reservoir of such people from which to draw.  

For this reason, Trump and those around him spent the last several years screening individuals for these jobs. Some of his picks have provoked controversy, even among his allies, but thus far the new team appears capable of taming a bureaucracy that was never brought to heel the last time around. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

SAN FRANCISCO – Milwaukee Bucks All-Star Giannis Antetokounmpo spoke the truest of words before Sunday’s All-Star Game.

“You cannot force anybody to play hard if he doesn’t want to,” Antetokounmpo said.

In a meaningless exhibition game played with just two months left in the regular season and the playoffs lurking for several All-Stars, it’s almost impossible to get a competitive game.

That hasn’t stopped the NBA from changing the format to try.

As gracious All-Star host and game MVP Steph Curry said Sunday in the aftermath of another format change in which All-Stars played a mini three-game tournament: “It was a good step in the right direction to reinvigorate the game in some way, and then you tinker with it again next year and see what changes you can make.

“I don’t want to compare it to any other era because the world has changed. Life is different. The way people consume basketball is different. It’s not going to look like it used to. But it can still be fun for everybody.”

More true words.

All-Star games across all sports aren’t what they used to be, and that’s OK. Sunday’s game wasn’t awful – and that’s not the endorsement the league wants – with some entertaining moments, and the absence of an eyesore score in the upper 100s/lower 200s. The various stoppages that delayed play sapped energy from the night and I’m not sure the finished product was what the NBA sought.

And the hopeful skeptic in me wonders if the NBA All-Star Game can be what the league wants. (And I’m opposed to adding more prize money to the pool for players as motivation. The optics of that are unpleasant.)

It’s not time to scrap the All-Star Game yet.

Though replacing the game with other non-Saturday events should be something the NBA is discussing internally. One-on-one and three-on-three games. Different shooting contests. It can still be a celebration for the league, players and fans. The NBA can’t keep having a never-ending conversation about this game.

And I’m not sure NBC, which gets the All-Star Game next season as part of the league’s new 11-year, $76 billion deal, is ready for that either. Though next season will be a challenge with NBC also showing the 2026 Milan Cortina Olympics.

There were portions of Sunday’s mini-tournament that worked. There was a modicum of defense, fewer uncontested dunks, a little less 3-point chucking – save for Curry who gets a free pass with his range and on his homecourt.

Getting rid of the Rising Stars participation should be high on the league’s to-do list. As Curry continued to speak truths, he said, “The All-Star experience on Sunday is very sacred, and you have to work your way into that.”

There is a lot of talk about an All-Star Game featuring international players vs. U.S. players. Antetokounmpo supported that, saying, “Oh, I would love that. I think that would be the most interesting and most exciting format. … For sure, I’d take pride in that. I always compete, but I think that will give me a little bit more extra juice to compete.”

However, among this season’s 24 All-Stars, there were only seven with international connections. It’s a numbers game. Yes, a record-tying 125 international players were on opening night rosters, proving how global the game is now. But there were still more than 325 U.S. players on opening night rosters.

It sounds fun, but the international squad would have to add players who otherwise might not make an All-Star team, and Curry’s comment about the event being sacred doesn’t lend itself to that idea.

Free suggestion for next season: Keep the eight-player-per-team format by divvying up the 24 All-Stars into three teams, eliminate the Rising Stars squad and the first team to win two games to 40 points is the All-Star champion. The first two teams play, and winner stays to play the third team – just like a pickup game. If the winner of the first game lost the second game then the winner of the second game would play the loser of the first game. There would be no more than four games.

Or each team plays each other in a round robin with one game consisting of a 15-minute quarter – and the team with the highest score is the champ. You can come up with various tiebreakers if two or more teams had the same points total after two games.

And keep the night moving.

Follow NBA columnist Jeff Zillgitt on social media @JeffZillgitt

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

NFL free agency begins in March.

Veteran quarterback Aaron Rodgers is slated to hit free agency after the New York Jets announced they are moving in a different direction. Rodgers is set to join a group of free-agent quarterbacks that includes Sam Darnold, Russell Wilson and Justin Fields.

Multiple NFL teams are void of a starting quarterback. Is Rodgers the best available quarterback on the open market? Or should QB-needy clubs pursue a younger signal-caller in Fields, who appears to be beginning to tap into his potential?

USA TODAY Sports analyzes the best fits for the top free-agent quarterbacks this offseason.

NFL free agent QB best fits

Aaron Rodgers (2024 team: Jets)

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

The Jets announced on Feb. 13 that they are parting ways with Rodgers. New York will likely release Rodgers with a post-June 1 designation. That means the Jets must carry Rodgers on their roster until March 12, the start of the NFL’s league year. Rodgers is permitted to sign elsewhere on March 13.

Rodgers, 41, doesn’t perform at the four-time MVP level he once did, but he’s still a starting-caliber QB. He started to play better during the later portion of last season. He had a 90-or-above passer rating in four of his final five starts in New York.

The Las Vegas Raiders don’t have a starting-caliber quarterback on their roster. Even in his 40s, Rodgers is an upgrade from Aidan O’Connell and Gardner Minshew. Rodgers would be a solid bridge QB while the Raiders look for a QB of the future.

Unfortunately for Rodgers, the Pittsburgh Steelers are perhaps the only QB-needy team that possesses a ready-to-win roster. However, Steelers offensive coordinator Arthur Smith’s scheme is better suited for Russell Wilson or Justin Fields. Furthermore, Steelers safety DeShon Elliott publicly scoffed at the idea of the team signing Rodgers.

Sam Darnold (2024 team: Vikings)

Is Darnold the quarterback who helped lead the Vikings to a 14-2 record through 17 weeks or the QB who withered down the stretch?

It’s likely somewhere in the middle.

Darnold enjoyed career-highs in every significant statistical quarterback category this season, including yards (4,319), touchdowns (35) and passer rating (102.5), but he regressed in Week 18 and during Minnesota’s wild-card loss to the Los Angeles Rams. He had a 55.5 passer rating in the regular-season finale and followed that performance up with an interception, a fumble and indecisive play in the postseason.   

In totality, Darnold’s 2024 season was much improved from what we’ve previously seen from the journeyman. The Vikings could re-sign Darnold, but will they really sit J.J. McCarthy another year?

I believe Darnold should return to New York, but this time in a blue uniform.

Russell Wilson (2024 team: Steelers)

Wilson passed for 16 touchdowns to just five interceptions in 11 regular-season games. He had a 6-5 record as a starter and helped the Steelers earn a playoff berth. The Steelers might re-sign Wilson. He quietly had a solid year in Pittsburgh and even earned a Pro Bowl invite.

The 36-year-old QB still throws a nice moon deep ball, but his game has become limited to long passes or check downs. Wilson rarely throws intermediate passes or delivers balls in tight windows. Is that a byproduct of waning arm strength?

Wilson doesn’t maneuver as he once did but can still cook when playing off-script.

A short-term deal with the with the Steelers seems logical for both sides.

Justin Fields (2024 team: Steelers)

Is Fields ready for another starting opportunity? He had a 4-2 record as Pittsburgh’s starter before Russell Wilson took over the job.

To Fields’ credit, he improved as a pocket passer in 2024. He had a career-best 93.3 passer rating last season, albeit in a short sample size.

The Steelers are likely to keep either Wilson or Fields. Fields turns 26 in March and has a higher ceiling. His dual-threat ability is a good fit in Arthur Smith’s system. Can Fields’ passing ability continue to trend upward? I believe the answer is yes.

Fields in the Big Apple would be intriguing.

Jameis Winston (2024 team: Browns)

Super Bowl 59 festivities proved that Winston’s got a future in television. Fans enjoy the charismatic quarterback.

TV can wait for a while, though, because the well-traveled QB still has football left in him. Winston possesses above-average arm strength, is experienced and a good guy to have in the locker room.

Winston’s play can be erratic. His propensity to give the football away resulted in demotions at practically all his stops (Tampa Bay, New Orleans and Cleveland). He isn’t a long-term answer but he’s a serviceable starter or a high-end backup.

The Falcons are inevitably going to move on from Kirk Cousins. Winston could fill in as Atlanta’s backup behind Michael Penix Jr.

Follow USA TODAY Sports’ Tyler Dragon on X @TheTylerDragon.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

TEMPE, Ariz. ― Oh yes, you better believe Mike Trout saw it.

He stays off social media, but is well aware of the recent rankings from MLB Network that had him as only the 39th-best player in baseball.

He understood it, but you better believe it provided all the motivation he needed to prove everyone wrong once again this year.

‘Oh yeah, oh yeah …,’ he said, smiling. ‘Stuff like that fires you up a little bit.’

Trout realizes he has played only 111 games the past two years for the Los Angeles Angels, and hasn’t played more than 140 games since 2016. But still, he’s a three-time MVP, 11-time All-Star and a future Hall of Famer.

Follow every MLB game: Latest MLB scores, stats, schedules and standings.

‘They’re going off the last couple of years,’ Trout said Monday morning, ‘and I haven’t been there. So, that’s their ranking.

‘I know where I stand.’

Trout arrives into camp for his 15th season, and this time, as the Angels’ new right fielder.

Angels manager Ron Washington and GM Perry Minasian met privately with Trout on Sunday and informed him that he’s moving from center field to right field, and will also be used as a DH once a week.

Simply, the Angels believe that switching positions will provide a better chance for him to stay healthy.

‘He could play anywhere,’ Minasian said. ‘If we asked Mike Trout to play shortstop, he’d do it. He’s that kind of guy. For us, it’s just keeping him on the field. There’s no secret. He’s dying to play.

‘For us, taking the load off in center field is really important, and not having that responsibility. … In our situation, we think it’s best for the team.’

Trout, 33, has been the Angels’ everyday center fielder since 2014, and he hasn’t played right field since 2012, and only 17 games in his career.

Yet, if the move helps keep him healthy and is better for the team, he says he’s all for it.

Besides, if nine-time Gold Glove center fielder Torii Hunter can be asked by the Angels to move from center field to right field, who’s he to argue?

‘They threw everything on the table, what’s best for me body-wise, keep me on the field,’ Trout said. ‘Came to the conclusion that I’m going to go to right field. I’ll try it out, see where it goes.’

Former Angels manager Joe Maddon broached the idea two years ago of Trout moving out of center field, but he balked and remained in center until now.

‘I knew it was coming,’ Trout said. ‘I just got to get used to it. … Trying to preserve the legs and go out and there and run some balls down in right.’

Trout knows it certainly will be different playing right field but plans to talk to Hunter, a special assistant in the Angels’ organization, to collect his thoughts when he comes to camp. He also plans to speak to Hall of Famer Ken Griffey Jr. this week. Griffey, a 10-time Gold Glove winner, moved from center field to right field in 2007 at the age of 37.

‘There’s a lot of guys that moved to right field that I’m going to talk to,’ Trout said. ‘Just see the difference and just go out there and get comfortable in the spring.’

Washington says he has no doubt Trout will easily be able to make the transition from center field to right, but wants to emphasize communication with the new center field tandem of Jo Adell and Mickey Moniak with Trout with balls hit into the right-center gap.

‘We don’t need nobody running into Mike Trout,’ Washington said, ‘so ya’ll better make certain that ya’ll understand when a ball is put in a certain area, somebody is going behind and somebody is going on front. The communication has to be constant to avoid collisions.

‘That’s what we pounded because we don’t want nobody running into Mike Trout because I don’t think Mike is going to run into them..’

Trout has endured an assortment of enough injuries during the past four years without adding a new one to his resume. Trout hit 10 home runs with 14 RBI in his first 29 games last year, stealing six bases, but then tore the meniscus in his left knee in late April, and suffered the same injury attempting to rehab in the minors.

It was just the latest injury-plagued season after playing in only 36 games in 2021 because of a calf injury, 119 games in 2022 because of a bad back and 82 games in 2023 with a fractured hand.

He came to camp lighter, saying he feels ‘more like myself,’ and won’t play any differently than in the past.

‘I’m not going to limit myself,’ Trout said. ‘I can still play the game hard. That’s the only way I know how to play. But just limit the overall beatdown and the wear and tear. …

‘That’s the biggest thing. You know, the last few years have been tough.’

Now, with less ground to cover in right field, more games as a DH, could lead to more games out of the trainer’s room.

‘I think trying to limit the crazy plays, and I think moving to right field helps a little bit,’ Trout said. ‘Center field, you’re running gap to gap. I think mixing in DH, just stuff like that, is going to be a see-how-I-feel thing. If I come in feeling something, or feeling sore, if I need a day off, it’s just open communication with Wash, the front office and the coaches, and I’m good with that.’

Trout still has six years and $212 million left on his contract, so he’s certainly not going anywhere. He remains the face of the franchise and has a full no-trade clause. If he ever again resembles the perennial MVP candidate that hit .308 with a 1.009 OPS, averaging 35 homers and 92 RBI a year from 2012-2019, maybe it could jump-start the Angels into contention. They have been to the postseason only once in Trout’s career.

If nothing else, a monster year could bring back the discussion whether the Angels would be better off trading him, using the savings to help them get back to being a power in the AL West.

That’s a discussion for another day.

For now, Trout is back, with a new position, and fired up to prove a whole lot of people wrong.

‘Oh yeah,’ he said.

Follow Nightengale on X: @Bnightengale

This post appeared first on USA TODAY