Archive

2025

Browsing

Over the course of his distinguished college basketball coaching career, Rick Pitino has won national championships with two different programs and led a third to a Final Four. He has written several books and been a fixture of the motivational speaking circuit. He has even played himself in movies like “He Got Game” and “Blue Chips.”

On Thursday night, though, he appeared on a different kind of stage.

Less than a week after his St. John’s team won its first outright Big East championship in 40 years, Pitino was a guest on NBC’s “The Tonight Show” with host Jimmy Fallon to discuss his team’s season, share some interesting stories from his life and career, and sing a sea shanty (yes, you read that right).

Appearing on the show the same night as actors Alan Cumming and Parker Posey, Pitino recounted how he accepted one of his first college coaching jobs, as an assistant coach under Jim Boeheim at Syracuse – on his wedding night. With no job at the time, Pitino told his wife he’d step away for an hour to interview for the position. Three hours later, he returned.

“I said ‘I’ve got great news — I got a job,’” Pitino said. “Now, I didn’t tell her I was interviewing for the Syracuse University job. I said ‘Two problems. One, it’s Syracuse, New York.’ She says ‘Upstate New York? Syracuse? With 120 inches of snow?’ I said ‘Yes, but it’s a great job and Jim Boeheim’s terrific.’”

The other piece of bad news? He was starting the job immediately and had to go on a recruiting trip the following day, meaning the newly wedded couple’s honeymoon to Hawaii was going to have to be postpooned.

Thankfully for the Pitinos, the visit proved to be worth it. Pitino’s post-wedding recruiting jaunt was to Cincinnati to see a promising young player named Louis Orr, who signed with Syracuse and went on to become an All-American for the Orange, as well as one of 25 members of the program’s all-century team.

After two years at Syracuse, Pitino got his first full-time head coaching gig at Boston University, and the rest, as they say, is history.

“We never had a honeymoon to Hawaii, but we’ve had quite a few trips after that,” Pitino said, with a smile.

Pitino later joked that his wife “left me a year later” when Fallon asked how long they stayed together. He and his wife, Joanne, are set to celebrate their 50th wedding anniversary next year.

Pitino also shared a story from even earlier in his life, when he and his friend Al Skinner, who went on to become the coach at Boston College, decided to play college basketball at UMass because of the opportunity to be teammates with the legendary Julius Erving. 

There was one problem, though — back when the Long Island natives began their college careers, freshmen had to play on freshmen teams. By the time they joined the school’s varsity squad as sophomores in 1971, Erving had left college early to sign a contract with the Virginia Squires of the American Basketball Association.

Pitino wasn’t St. John’s’ lone representative on the NBC airwaves Thursday night. In the days leading up to the show’s taping, it was announced that Pitino’s entire Red Storm team would be with him, raising the natural question of how a coach and his 13-player squad would all fit on “The Tonight Show” stage.

As it turned out, it was for a pre-recorded sketch, with Fallon, Pitino and his St. John’s players singing a sea shanty that was a play on the Red Storm’s nickname.

In its second season under Pitino, St. John’s is No. 6 in the latest USA TODAY Sports Coaches Poll, its highest ranking since the 1990-91 season. With a 26-4 record and a conference title already locked up, the Red Storm will wrap up its regular season Saturday with a game at No. 20 Marquette.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The U.S. is continuing to share some defensive intelligence with Ukraine to protect against incoming Russian strikes, despite an announced pause in intel sharing that raised alarm bells, Fox News Digital has learned.

Three sources familiar with the decision confirmed that intelligence related to force protection and incoming threats would continue. Federal intelligence, the work of the CIA, FBI and human intelligence, has ceased, as has data that helps with offensive Ukrainian strikes against Russians. 

Another intelligence source said to expect the pause to be ‘very temporary in nature,’ and that the sharing of all data could resume in the coming days. 

The intelligence pause had prompted confusion and alarm from Ukraine and its allies, as its parameters were not entirely clear. However, U.S. intelligence has been a lifeline for Ukraine’s forces: defense experts say that ceasing all data-sharing would be a bigger blow to Ukrainian forces than losing military aid from the U.S. 

‘Ukraine had one single advantage on Russia: information superiority. With that gone, Kyiv would be in trouble,’ said Can Kasapoglu, a defense fellow at the Hudson Institute. ‘Europe does not have enough strategic enablers capacity to fill in the vacuum,’ said Kasapoglu. 

The National Security Council declined to comment on what military intelligence was still being shared, as did the Pentagon. 

A pause in offensive military intelligence means ‘The selective sharing of intelligence creates a strategic imbalance, forcing Ukraine into a primarily defensive posture.’ former military intelligence officer Matthew Shoemaker said. 

‘Even if Ukraine would still receive intelligence for incoming threats, the lack of offensive intel limits their ability to preemptively neutralize potential threats. This puts Ukraine in a more reactive posture, potentially increasing their vulnerability to Russian attacks,’ he continued.  

‘It restricts their capacity to disrupt Russian supply lines, command centers, and staging areas behind enemy lines.’

However, if intelligence sharing resumes quickly, it was likely a tactic to put pressure on Ukrainians at the negotiating table. ‘It suggests that it was more a signal to Ukrainian policymakers that the U.S. can turn off assistance at will.’ 

CIA Director John Ratcliffe said Wednesday that President Donald Trump had asked for the pause on intelligence sharing but said it could be lifted as soon as Ukraine signaled it was ready for a ceasefire. 

‘I think if we can nail down these negotiations and move toward these negotiations and, in fact, put some confidence-building measures on the table, then the president will take a hard look at lifting this pause,’ National Security Adviser Mike Waltz said.

U.S. intelligence is believed to be used to track Russian movements and identify targets, as well as for operating U.S.-supplied High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems and U.S. Army Tactical Missile Systems.

France and the United Kingdom have said they would step in to fill the gaps where U.S. intelligence has ceased, but the U.K. said it would not share data that originated with the U.S. but is shared through the Five Eyes alliance. 

After a blow-up fight in the Oval Office last week between Trump, Vice President JD Vance and President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, U.S. officials have agreed to meet with a Ukrainian team in Saudi Arabia next week. 

Trump also teased possible new sanctions on Russia on Friday, his first public threat against the Kremlin since taking office. The president has grown increasingly frustrated with Russia ramping up its strikes on Ukraine at the same time he has been pushing for a ceasefire. 

Based on the fact that Russia is absolutely ‘pounding’ Ukraine on the battlefield right now, I am strongly considering large scale Banking Sanctions, Sanctions, and Tariffs on Russia until a Cease Fire and FINAL SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ON PEACE IS REACHED. To Russia and Ukraine, get to the table right now, before it is too late. Thank you!!!’ Trump posted on Truth Social.

However, the president seemed optimistic about the prospects for peace on Thursday. 

‘I think what’s going to happen is Ukraine wants to make a deal, because I don’t think they have a choice,’ he said. ‘I also think that Russia wants to make a deal, because in a certain, different way, a different way that only I know, only I know, they have no choice either.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are coming together to crack down on Chinese-backed companies’ ownership of land in the continental U.S.

It comes as the Trump administration appears on the precipice of a trade war with Beijing, as China promises to retaliate against what its foreign minister called ‘arbitrary’ tariffs from Washington.

‘It is in the interest of the United States to review purchases of American farmland by foreign entities to protect our farms and agricultural production from our foreign adversaries, especially China,’ Rep. Randy Feenstra, R-Iowa, the House Republican leading the bill, told Fox News Digital.

‘But for far too long, our government has repeatedly failed to enforce the laws on the books, monitor foreign purchases of our farmland, or assess financial penalties on those who break our laws.’

The bill is also being led by Rep. Kristen McDonald Rivet, D-Mich., and in the upper chamber by Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa.

It would direct the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States, a body tasked with analyzing the national security implications of specific foreign investments in the U.S., to review any purchase of American farmland by a foreign entity that exceeds 320 acres or $5 million.

The bill is also aimed at establishing a public database on foreign ownership of U.S. farmland through the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), and requires the Secretary of Agriculture to partner with the Secretary of Homeland Security on an annual threat assessment report on foreign ownership of U.S. farmland.

‘Allowing China or other foreign competitors to buy up large swaths of American farmland puts our national security and food supply at risk,’ McDonald Rivet told Fox News Digital. ‘This bill is a key step towards protecting American interests from falling into the hands of bad actors abroad, especially China.’

Ernst blamed the U.S. government’s ‘outdated system’ for allowing ‘China’s malign influence to threaten our security by buying up our nation’s land.’

‘I’m drawing a line in the sand to overhaul this flawed way of doing things, increase reporting and transparency, strengthen oversight of the influence of our foreign adversaries, and force the sale of foreign-owned land,’ Ernst said.

No foreign country directly owns U.S. land, but Chinese-backed companies own a small fraction of American farmland – a number that has risen considerably in recent years.

A 2023 plan by Chinese company Fufeng Group to buy land near a sensitive military base in Grand Forks, North Dakota, alarmed lawmakers and other federal officials, and was blocked over national security concerns.

Chinese entities’ ownership of U.S. farmland went up 30% between 2019 and 2020, according to a 2021 USDA report.

Meanwhile, China recently warned it was ready for a war over export taxes with the U.S. after President Donald Trump levied an additional 10% tariff on Chinese goods just days after returning for his second term.

‘If war is what the US wants, be it a tariff war, a trade war or any other type of war, we’re ready to fight till the end,’ China’s embassy posted on X.

Chinese-backed companies currently own 384,000 acres of U.S. farmland, according to the most recent government data.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The Trump administration appealed a federal judge’s decision Thursday that the administration’s firing of a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) member was illegal – the same day that the former head of the Office of the Special Counsel announced he was dropping his suit against President Donald Trump on similar grounds. 

U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell ordered Thursday that NLRB member Gwynne Wilcox be reinstated after she had been fired by Trump earlier this year. Wilcox filed suit in D.C. federal court, arguing that her termination violates the congressional statute delineating NLRB appointments and removals. 

‘A President who touts an image of himself as a ‘king’ or a ‘dictator,’ perhaps as his vision of effective leadership, fundamentally misapprehends the role under Article II of the U.S. Constitution,’ Howell wrote in her Thursday opinion. 

The Trump administration filed its appeal to the U.S. Appeals Court for the D.C. Circuit shortly after the decision was issued. The administration wrote in its appeal that it intended to request a stay of the order pending appeal, ‘including an immediate administrative stay’ from the appellate court. 

In her Thursday opinion, Howell had some harsh words for the president, writing that his ‘interpretation of the scope of his constitutional power – or, more aptly, his aspiration – is flat wrong.’

‘At issue in this case is the President’s insistence that he has authority to fire whomever he wants within the Executive branch, overriding any congressionally mandated law in his way,’ Howell wrote. 

Howell’s decision came on the same day that Hampton Dellinger, a Biden-appointee previously tapped to head the Office of Special Counsel, announced that he would be dropping his suit against the Trump administration over his own termination. 

‘My fight to stay on the job was not for me, but rather for the ideal that OSC should be as Congress intended: an independent watchdog and a safe, trustworthy place for whistleblowers to report wrongdoing and be protected from retaliation,’ Dellinger said in a statement released Thursday. 

Dellinger’s announcement was preceded by a D.C. appellate court’s Wednesday holding that sided with the Trump administration. 

The court issued an unsigned order pausing a lower court order that had reinstated Dellinger to his post. 

‘Thank you to the countless DOJ lawyers working around the clock each and every day to defend the President’s actions and uphold the Constitution against baseless attacks,’ a Department of Justice spokesperson told Fox News at the time. 

Dellinger said in his announcement that he believes the circuit judges ‘erred badly’ in their Wednesday decision, saying that it ‘immediately erases the independence Congress provided for my position.’

‘And given the circuit court’s adverse ruling, I think my odds of ultimately prevailing before the Supreme Court are long,’ Dellinger said. ‘Meanwhile, the harm to the agency and those who rely on it caused by a Special Counsel who is not independent could be immediate, grievous, and, I fear, uncorrectable.’

Similar to Wilcox, Dellinger sued the Trump administration in D.C. federal court after his Feb. 7 firing. 

He maintained the argument that, by law, he can only be dismissed from his position for job performance problems, which were not cited in an email dismissing him from his post.

The Supreme Court had previously paused the Trump administration’s efforts to dismiss Dellinger. The administration had asked the high court to overturn a lower court’s temporary reinstatement of Dellinger. 

Fox News’ Jake Gibson, Bill Mears, Shannon Bream, and David Spunt contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Seattle Seahawks wide receiver DK Metcalf requested a trade ahead of 2025 NFL free agency.

‘Everything is in a very cordial, professional place,’ Schneider told Seattle Sports 710. ‘Obviously DK has requested a trade, and we are entertaining that. We are talking to a ton of teams, taking offers, seeing what that looks like.’

However, the long-time Seahawks executive also expressed he wished Metcalf’s request had been made public at a different time.

‘Probably not intentional, but very disappointed in the timing,’ Schneider said. ‘We wanted this to be a very special day. We wanted it to be Tyler Lockett day.’

News of Metcalf’s trade request broke on Wednesday, March 5, less than an hour after the Seahawks released Lockett after 10 seasons in Seattle. The Seahawks ran an all-day social media campaign honoring Lockett – who ranks second in franchise history in receiving yards and receiving touchdowns behind only Pro Football Hall of Famer Steve Largent – and shared his best moments with the franchise.

But nationally, attention was centered on Metcalf’s future and potential landing spots.

‘I felt bad for Tyler,’ Schneider lamented. ‘The TV’s all about DK instead of Tyler Lockett. It kind of correlates with his whole career. This guy is one of the most underrated wide receivers in NFL history.’

Nonetheless, Schneider didn’t blame Metcalf for the way the situation unfolded and was complimentary of the six-year veteran’s work ethic.

‘He’s a great worker, he’s a pro, he shows up all the time, it’s just really important to him,’ Schneider said. ‘And I get where he’s coming from to a certain extent. He’s 27 years old, he has very high expectations for himself and he should. So there’s no harm, no foul. We’ll get through this.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

INDIANAPOLIS — UCLA spent three months atop the polls, didn’t lose a game until mid-February and was projected — twice — to be the overall No. 1 seed in the women’s NCAA Tournament.

And none of it means squat.

Still licking their wounds from the thumping they got from crosstown rival USC last weekend, the Bruins held a players-only film session early Monday morning. As they rewatched the game, they were brutally honest with themselves and one another, taking accountability and promising a performance like that won’t happen again.

It can’t. March doesn’t give do-overs.

“It was tough. There were a lot of things that we don’t want to hear, but they have to be said for the better of the team,” Lauren Betts said. “It was a good experience for all of us to say, ‘OK, let’s just have this moment, let’s get it all out now and then we can move on from this and get better.’ Because we don’t have time to focus on that game. We have bigger things coming up.

‘It’s March. You don’t have time for feelings,’ Betts added. ‘We have to win games.’

Starting Friday night, when the Bruins play Nebraska in the quarterfinals of the Big Ten tournament. UCLA beat the Cornhuskers 91-54 in their only meeting this season.

For much of the season, UCLA looked like a juggernaut. The Bruins opened with 23 consecutive wins, all but one of them by double digits. That included an early-season upset of defending national champion and then-No. 1 South Carolina.

No one had an answer for Betts, offensively or defensively, while Kiki Rice was a steady presence who could cut your heart out if opponents weren’t careful.

But something shifted with UCLA’s first loss to USC. The Bruins were lucky to get by Michigan State at home and had to claw their way back to beat Iowa. After setting the tone all season and daring opponents to match it, UCLA was now shaky.

Then came Saturday’s loss to USC in their regular season rematch.

JuJu Watkins has a way of making teams look discombobulated, but this was more than that. The Bruins started slow and out of sync, turning the ball over 11 times in the first half alone. They showed some life in the third quarter but couldn’t sustain it.

With two minutes still to play, the Trojans led by 19 and USC chants were echoing throughout Pauley Pavilion.

The loss cost UCLA the regular-season Big Ten title and dropped the Bruins to the No. 2 seed in this week’s conference tournament. It also moved them off the No. 1 seed line for the NCAA Tournament, if only temporarily.

“Obviously we didn’t get done what we wanted to get done in the Big Ten championship game,” Rice said earlier this week.  

Teams used to success respond one of two ways to adversity: They either fall apart completely, or they use it as fuel to get better. The Bruins decided they were going to be the latter.

Rice and Gabriela Jaquez called the Monday morning film session, but no one fought them. The players had watched the film on their own already, so they knew where the fault lines were and came ready to own them.

The session lasted about an hour and 20 minutes, Rice said, only ending because they had a regularly-scheduled practice. But the impact was obvious immediately.

“That was probably one of our best practices in a while,” Rice said. “We felt really refreshed, got after it and competed. I think we had a new energy and a new commitment to everything we want to get done.”

There’s never any one problem or one player responsible when a team hits a rough patch, and UCLA is no different. But if there’s a theme, it’s forgetting that this is a team game and focusing on personal performances because you expect the wins will come as they always have.

“Our big thing right now is ‘we over me,’ ” UCLA coach Cori Close said. “I don’t think we ever totally lost sight of it, but I think we lost the power of it. If everybody doesn’t sacrifice for winning, winning suffers. Every single person.

“It sounds so cliché,” Close added, “but I really think that’s the difference.”

That renewed commitment is likely to get a test this weekend. Apologies to the rest of the Big Ten, but USC and UCLA are clearly the best teams in the conference and are likely to meet in Sunday’s tournament championship game.

The Bruins wouldn’t have it any other way.

“We still have a lot to prove,” Rice said. “I’d definitely love to see them again. Whether it’s in the Big Ten tournament or the NCAA Tournament, I definitely want another shot at them.”

UCLA was the best team this season. It took a loss to remind the Bruins of that.

Follow USA TODAY Sports columnist Nancy Armour on social media @nrarmour.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

INDIANAPOLIS – The NFL is set up to push all 32 of its teams toward .500 – or eight or nine wins, as the case may be, until the league jams the long-anticipated 18th regular-season game onto the schedule.

But generally speaking, the deeper you go into the playoffs, the worse your draft position. The more you shell out for free agents one year, the less you’re able to spend the next. The more games you win in the regular season, the tougher your schedule is when the next one rolls around.

However, the savvy organizations find the cheat codes that separate them from the pack.

The Chiefs haven’t played in five of the past six Super Bowls because they’re lucky – or even because they have a quarterback, Patrick Mahomes, who might be regarded as the best of all time whenever he hangs up the cleats. Perhaps nearly as important is their stability and continuity, Andy Reid heading into his 13th season with the organization – all of that time spent with current GM Brett Veach, who’s worked for and with Reid in various capacities going back to the coach’s days in Philadelphia. Their rapport and shared philosophy explain why this franchise is typically several steps ahead of the competition, whether it’s drafting for anticipated needs, or moving on from seemingly indispensable players like former WR Tyreek Hill or All-Pro OL Joe Thuney, who was traded earlier this week.

“(W)e’re fortunate to have enough nucleus of good players that will be joining us and giving us an opportunity to have a productive ‘25 season and still compete,” Reid said at last week’s scouting combine.

As it pertains to roster construction, he added that it’s “all part of trying to bring the best people in that you can for your team. You can’t help but try to figure out how the pieces fit in the puzzle there, and we’ll work together and then inevitably, (they) can complement one another and win games for you.”

But while the Chiefs are again dealing with champagne problems, another club has a more foreboding K.C. issue. Among the Falcons’ myriad challenges is determining what to do with now-backup QB Kirk Cousins.

“We’re having all of those discussions,” GM Terry Fontenot said at the combine. “That’s the critical part right now. It starts with our roster. We’ll make sure we make the right decisions. Get in a good place with the cap. Then we have to make the right decisions in free agency.”

However, for teams like the Falcons and Chiefs, cheat codes notwithstanding, there seem to be far fewer decisions to make in 2025 due to their specific circumstances. Unlike the better-resourced teams poised to have highly impactful offseasons in 2025, these eight – ranked from most to least able to affect change – could struggle to make headway (salary cap projections courtesy of Over The Cap):

8. Seattle Seahawks

Significant roster churn is already underway for a team that seems to be in the process of becoming more philosophically aligned with the way second-year HC Mike Macdonald wants to play – which is with suffocating defense complemented by ball-control offense, almost precisely what the ‘Hawks weren’t in 2024. GM John Schneider can address several deficiencies with $32-plus million to spend and eight draft picks. But if he winds up trading WR DK Metcalf, the void will be tough to fill regardless of what he might bring in exchange.

7. Kansas City Chiefs

Offloading Thuney, 32, cleared $16 million in cap room even if he didn’t fetch nearly the return (a fourth-rounder next year) that Hill did in 2022. Thuney’s departure goes a long way toward paying for the $23.4 million franchise tag recently applied to RG Trey Smith. However, the AFC champs are still $3 million overspent, don’t have a reliable left tackle, will likely lose LB Nick Bolton and S Justin Reid, among several others, to the open market and only have six draft picks – most coming at the end of each round – to partially reload the roster. They’d also like to lay the groundwork to extend defensive stalwarts George Karlaftis and Trent McDuffie with both a year away from what will be cap-stretching fifth-year rookie options.

“Every offseason, there seems to be a unique challenge, and this will be no different,” said Veach.

6. Miami Dolphins

At least they’re set at the offensive skill positions, assuming Hill has successfully completed his damage control after shutting himself down in the team’s Week 18 loss to the New York Jets last season? Regardless, not a ton of quality or depth elsewhere on this roster – both lines, in particular, areas of significant concern. S Jevon Holland headlines the Fins’ fleet of free agents. But with only $12 million in cap space and a cluster of Day 3 draft picks, it appears Miami will be forced into something of a youth movement, if not necessarily blue-chip youth.

5. Baltimore Ravens

Similar situation in Charm City, where the AFC North champions don’t have much in the free agency bank (about $10 million) but have a load of draft choices, if concentrated in the later rounds. But unlike the Dolphins, the Ravens may also have to switch kickers given the salacious allegations surrounding Justin Tucker. But he’ll likely be easier to replace than Pro Bowl LT Ronnie Stanley, who’s scheduled to reach free agency.

4. Houston Texans

And the theme continues in Space City, where the AFC South champions’ budget hovers around $14 million while the draft quiver holds just six selections. It adds up to a much less aggressive approach than last year … though kudos to GM Nick Caserio for obtaining WR Christian Kirk from the division rival Jacksonville Jaguars on Thursday for a song, i.e. a 2026 seventh-rounder.

3. Tampa Bay Buccaneers

They’re pretty much capped out and only have six whacks at the draft board. But after a massive reinvestment in their own players last year – QB Baker Mayfield, LT Tristan Wirfs, WR Mike Evans and FS Antoine Winfield Jr. among them – that’s probably OK given it returned yet another NFC South crown. And if underrated GM Jason Licht can finagle a bit more room to keep WR Chris Godwin, so much the better.

2. New Orleans Saints

About one-sixth of their 2025 cap is tied up in three players who are long gone: CB Marshon Lattimore, WR Michael Thomas and QB Jameis Winston. And yet the Saints, who annually treat the cap like a kid who can’t pay down a high-interest credit card, still have $40 million they need to shed by Wednesday – which doubtless means more restructures like the one C Erik McCoy recently agreed to. Having the extra third-round pick obtained from Washington in last year’s Lattimore trade will help, but rookie HC Kellen Moore will likely be relying heavily on the draft for roster replenishment given the team’s cap constraints.

1. Atlanta Falcons

In the aftermath of a disappointing season, they still need to trim $5 million off the cap and own just four draft picks – their third-rounder belonging to New England and fifth-rounder forfeited for a tampering violation.

“You know, it is (a) tough market, because we are talking to a lot of players right now,” Fontenot said. “A lot of agents. Obviously, players on our roster.”

But it could get worse than trying to figure out how to re-sign 26-year-old C Drew Dalman.

Much worse.

Keeping Cousins means carrying the most expensive backup quarterback ever. Cutting him would incur a $65 million dead cap hit, including an additional $25 million accelerated onto this year’s bottom line (though Atlanta could spread that out with a post-June 1 designation). Given how the 36-year-old played in 2024, trading him seems like a non-starter unless – again – the Falcons are willing to eat a good chunk of Cousins’ contract.

“Yeah, we understand that it’s not ideal to have a quarterback at that cap number,” said Fontenot. “Now, when we gave him that contract, the expectation was for him to be the starter at this point. So, that is a good number for a starting quarterback. But now that he’s the backup, when we say we’re comfortable, we’re talking about the total funds allocated to the quarterback position. That’s already baked in.”

Unless second-year QB Michael Penix Jr. is superhuman in his first season as the full-time starter, seems more than likely that this team is already baked.

All NFL news on and off the field. Sign up for USA TODAY’s 4th and Monday newsletter.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Lloyd Howell is quick to declare the sentiment of NFL players when the topic is broached – and like repeatedly – about an 18-game season.

They hate the idea.

“The majority of the guys I’ve talked to about it, they already feel that 17 is long enough,” Howell, executive director of the NFL Players Association, told USA TODAY Sports during an interview at the recent NFL combine, reiterating previous statements.

Then again, money talks. And Howell, 58, realizes the expansion of the NFL season is firmly planted as an expectation – “We know fans love football and they want more football,” NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell said during Super Bowl week. That won’t go away.

No, it can’t happen without re-opening the collective bargaining agreement between the league and players who currently receive 48.5% of NFL revenues. But with the NFL set to christen a new league year and free agent market next week with another record salary cap, $279.2 million per team, it’s fair to wonder how much bigger the numbers would be with an 18-game slate.

“It’s just not as simple as saying, ‘Play more games. All revenue calculations account for that, so that’s more money in your pocket,” Howell said. “Oooh, slow down. What about guarantees? What if I get hurt with a longer season? What about my benefits? The list goes on and on. So, we’re all about making sure our guys are informed. Being prepared if that becomes a reality.”

Of course, as much as the NFL has pushed on 18 games for years, it’s all still preliminary talk now. The last time the regular season was expanded, adding a game in 2021, the 11-year CBA struck in 2020 under then-union chief DeMaurice Smith was barely approved by players, with a narrow 1019-959 margin. And there was no shortage of criticism that the NFLPA didn’t get enough in return for agreeing to a 17-game season.

‘As I understand how we got to 17, the guys at the time felt some kind of way,” said Howell, elected in June 2023 to succeed Smith. “So, if there is a silver lining to it, we’re talking about it now. There’s nothing imminent. There’s been no formal negotiation or conversation or anything like that. Guys are aware, so you’ve taken out the surprise factor.”

Goodell, meanwhile, routinely floats the idea of dropping another preseason game while adding a regular season game.

“Roger talks to the media or he says something, and it gets everyone’s attention,” Howell said. “I was asked about it during Super Bowl week. You may or may not have heard my response: No one I’ve talked to wants to play 18 games.”

The CBA expires after the 2030 season but can be modified at any point. Undoubtedly, the NFL’s decision on whether to opt-out of media rights deals, including Fox and CBS packages after the 2029 season and the Disney package (ABC/ESPN) after the 2030 campaign, looms as a significant trigger that weighs on the CBA with players. The NFL’s media rights deals are reportedly worth $110 billion over 11 years, extending through 2033.

“Everything in this business is business,” said Howell, preparing for meetings with the NFLPA board of player reps that begin on Tuesday in Maui. “So, if you want to look at it through the lens of business and there’s an upcoming inflection point around TV, I think everyone can appreciate TV as probably the largest revenue contributor to this business. So, if that’s the catalyst to then say, ‘Hey, Lloyd, we have to negotiate the length of this season because it’s part of what the providers would sign up to,’ OK, game on.

“But right now it’s just conjecture.”

Still, Howell seems well-suited to guide the NFLPA at this point in its history, alongside union president Jalen Reeves-Maybin. Although a level of tension between the league and players union is inherent, the circumstances are vastly different than when Howell’s predecessor began his 14-year tenure. When Smith succeeded the late Gene Upshaw as the union chief in 2009, he stepped into an intense labor war and inherited a looming lockout.

And Smith, a bombastic former prosecutor who seemingly saw a good scrap as a badge of honor, may have been perfect for the union at that point – even while overmatched against NFL owners.

Howell, who spent 34 years with a major consulting firm, Booz Allen Hamilton, from which he retired as chief financial officer and treasurer, is scoring points in NFLPA circles as a consensus-builder. Some agents raved about the collegial tone of their seminar in Indianapolis last week, which Howell opened by declaring that the union needed the input and influence of the agents – contrasting the vibe from previous years.

During his first year-and-a-half on the job, Howell didn’t just meet with players while visiting each NFL team. He also had individual sessions with nearly every NFL owner as he familiarized himself with the landscape and dynamics.

As he eyes the next labor deal, he is hardly drawing a line in the sand. But he knows. The NFL, with revenues well above $20 billion per year, is progressing on its mission for a more significant global footprint on top of the prospect of growing its media rights packages.

And hey, while remembering how Upshaw – despite numerous work stoppages and court battles – used to preach that you can’t “kill the golden goose,” it’s essential to note that the NFL’s salary cap has risen more than $54 million over two years. And while nine quarterbacks carry average salaries of at least $50 million, Las Vegas Raiders defensive end Maxx Crosby just signed a three-year, $106.5 million extension that makes him the highest-paid non-quarterback in league history.

It’s a good time for labor peace.

“You cannot be at odds with your workforce,” Howell said. “You should never be talking about lockouts. You should never be talking about strikes. Because why? That hurts everybody.

“We’ll see. Baseball’s on the cusp of their next CBA negotiations. The WNBA is in the midst of theirs. Sports is thriving in general.”

In the meantime, Howell is intent on having a plan in place that reflects the priorities of his membership. Maybe that includes a modified offseason, another bye week, more guaranteed contracts, lifetime benefits, larger rosters, and then some.

Sure, there are no official negotiations at the moment. But just wait.

“My job is to make sure that we’re ready,” Howell said. “If they open up next week, I don’t want to be and I don’t want our members to be caught flat-footed because our head’s in the clouds. I want us to be ready because it’s a business, and you have to be ready for any opportunities that come our way.”

Which ultimately might be wrapped in an 18-game season.

Follow Jarrett Bell on social media @JarrettBell

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

ESPN personality Stephen A. Smith has no aspirations to get into politics, but that doesn’t mean he doesn’t want to talk about the topic.

Smith and ESPN have reached agreement on a new five-year contract worth at least $100 million that will give him that opportunity, according to The Athletic. Under the new deal, Smith will remain on “First Take,’ a morning sports talk show he’s starred on since 2012. However, the media personality will step back from other obligations and appearances on the network to enter into the political media arena.

Smith’s name has been floated as a potential presidential Democratic nominee for 2028, but Smith shot down the idea and told USA TODAY Sports he doesn’t ‘give a damn about the office.’ He said he’s more interested in holding politicians accountable and would ‘salivate’ at the opportunity to verbally spar with candidates, much like he does on his sports shows.

‘I know the one thing that I want more so than the presidency is … to be on a debate stage debating those presidential candidates,’ Smith told USA TODAY Sports in early February. ‘I want to be on a debate stage going up against a bunch of politicians that’s going to try to sell to America that they have your best interest at heart.’

Smith will have the opportunity to discuss politics on other networks. In doing so, Smith will reportedly step back from being a regular on “NBA Countdown,” ESPN’s top NBA pregame show, after the network signed a licensing deal with TNT Sports for “Inside The NBA.” (Smith will still make guest appearances on the program as warranted.)

Smith disclosed that he voted for former Vice President Kamala Harris in the 2024 presidential election, but he’s been critical of both the Democratic and Republican parties recently. He’s shared his political views during various appearances on other networks, including ABC’s ‘The View,’ Fox News’ ‘The Sean Hannity Show’ and HBO’s ‘Real Time With Bill Maher.’

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Hostages freed from Gaza visited President Donald Trump in the Oval Office to tell him that his re-election to the White House gave them hope after hundreds of days in Hamas captivity. 

In a Thursday press event, U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff told reporters that seven people freed from Gaza, along with some of their loved ones, met with the president this week to share their horrific stories of abduction, severe abuse and time in captivity.

One Israeli hostage, Omer Shem Tov, who was freed on Feb. 22, told the president that he believed Trump had ‘been sent by God’ to secure their release.

‘They talked about how they heard about his election, and they were uplifted,’ Witkoff said of the meeting.  ‘They were elated waiting for him because they knew he was going to help them get rescued.’

Witkoff, who described the event as ’emotional,’ also reiterated the Trump administration’s commitment to securing the release of more hostages.

Reports this week revealed that the Trump administration has begun directly negotiating with Hamas – a revelation that apparently frustrated Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Details of the negotiations remain unclear, though reports suggested the Trump team had proposed a 60-day ceasefire and the release of an additional 10 hostages – though who would be included in the next release remains unclear as there are 25 hostages still assessed to be alive, including one American.

‘Edan Alexander is very important to us as – all the hostages are – but Edan Alexander is an American, and he’s injured. And so, he’s a top priority for us,’ Witkoff told reporters.

Witkoff confirmed that Adam Boehler, special envoy in charge of hostages, had been involved in the recent negotiations attempting to secure the second phase of the ceasefire agreement which is supposed to see the release of the remaining hostages. 

‘We feel that Hamas has not been forthright with us. And it’s time for them to be forthright with us,’ Witkoff said.  ‘Edan Alexander would be a very important show.’

Trump issued another warning on social media this week, telling Hamas to release all hostages immediately. Though Hamas has thus far responded by saying they will only begin the release of more hostages if a second phase in the ceasefire is agreed to.  

There are 59 hostages still held by Hamas, including one individual who was taken by the terrorist group separate from the October 2023 attacks.

Some 35 hostages are assessed to have been killed by Hamas and whose bodies are still being held, including four Americans: Omer Neutra, Itay Chen, Gadi Haggai and Judi Weinstein Haggai – all of whom are believed to have been killed on Oct. 7, 2023. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS