Archive

2025

Browsing

Justin Verlander will celebrate his 42nd birthday in a largely unfamiliar place — in a Cactus League training camp for a club leaning on his veteran chops to galvanize a young and emerging staff.

Verlander, the three-time Cy Young Award winner who’s said he wants to pitch until he’s 45 with at least 300 wins on his resume, will continue that quest with the San Francisco Giants after agreeing to a one-year deal Tuesday night.

It’s the first foray with a West Coast team for Verlander, who won his first Cy Young Award as a Detroit Tiger in 2011, then added two more Cy Youngs as a Houston Astros in 2019 and 2022. Verlander signed a two-year, $86.6 million deal with the New York Mets before the 2023 season, then was dealt back to Houston.

Now, he goes West for the first time, beginning this campaign with 262 wins and, once again, a lack of ace status on his staff.

All things Giants: Latest San Francisco Giants news, schedule, roster, stats, injury updates and more.

That distinction belongs to Logan Webb, who made his first All-Star appearance in pitching 204 2/3 innings last season. Verlander will slot in behind him along with returning veterans Robbie Ray (also a former AL Cy Young winner) and Jordan Hicks. Verlander will aim to provide innings and gravitas to ease the burden on a group of young pitchers that include lefty Kyle Harrison and right-hander Hayden Birdsong.

BIGGEST MLB QUESTIONS RIGHT NOW: Where will All-Star sluggers sign?

Yet the Giants surely know they won’t likely be getting vintage Verlander.

He pitched to a 5.48 ERA last season, and spent two stints on the injured list, the latter a two-month absence due to a neck ailment. Yet as recently as 2023, he was able to give the Astros and New York Mets 162 1/3 innings and a 3.49 ERA. A year earlier, he won the AL Cy Young with Houston after sitting out the entire 2021 season recovering from Tommy John surgery.

The Giants won’t expect such boffo results. But they’ll be happy to benefit from Verlander’s larger mission: A march to 300 wins and seemingly eternal life on the mound.

(This story was updated because an earlier version included a misidentified player.)

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

President-elect Trump on Wednesday morning filed an emergency petition to the United States Supreme Court in an effort to block his sentencing in New York v. Trump. 

Judge Juan Merchan set Trump’s sentencing in New York v. Trump for Jan. 10 after a jury found the now-president-elect guilty of falsifying business records in the first degree, stemming from Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s investigation. Trump pleaded not guilty to all charges and has appealed the ruling but was rejected last week by Merchan. 

‘President Trump’s legal team filed an emergency petition with the United States Supreme Court, asking the Court to correct the unjust actions by New York courts and stop the unlawful sentencing in the Manhattan D.A.’s Witch Hunt,’ Trump spokesman and incoming White House communications director Steven Cheung told Fox News Digital. 

‘The Supreme Court’s historic decision on Immunity, the Constitution, and established legal precedent mandate that this meritless hoax be immediately dismissed.’ 

Cheung said the ‘American People elected President Trump with an overwhelming mandate that demands an immediate end to the political weaponization of our justice system and all of the remaining Witch Hunts.’ 

He added: ‘We look forward to uniting our country in the new administration as President Trump makes America great again.’

Trump’s lawyers, in its petition to the high court, said it should ‘immediately order a stay of pending criminal proceedings in the Supreme Court of New York County, New York, pending the final resolution of President Trump’s interlocutory appeal raising questions of Presidential immunity, including in this Court if necessary.’ 

‘The Court should also enter, if necessary, a temporary administrative stay while it considers this stay application,’ the filing states. 

Trump attorneys also argued that New York prosecutors erroneously admitted extensive evidence relating to official presidential acts during trial, ignoring the high court’s ruling on presidential immunity. 

The Supreme Court, earlier this year, ruled that presidents are immune from prosecution related to official presidential acts. 

Trump’s legal team is arguing Merchan should not be permitted to move any further, and said their appeal on the ruling ‘will ultimately result in the dismissal of the District Attorney’s politically motivated prosecution that was flawed from the very beginning, centered around the wrongful actions and false claims of a disgraced, disbarred serial-liar former attorney, violated President Trump’s due process rights, and had no merit.’ 

‘In the meantime, the New York trial court lacks authority to impose sentence and judgment on President Trump—or conduct any further criminal proceedings against him—until the resolution of his underlying appeal raising substantial claims of Presidential immunity, including by review in this Court if necessary,’ the filing states. ‘As discussed herein, this Court should order an immediate stay of criminal proceedings against President Trump in the New York trial court, including but not limited to the criminal sentencing hearing scheduled for January 10, 2025, at 9:30 a.m.’ 

New York has to file a written response by Thursday at 10:00 a.m. 

The filing to the United States Supreme Court comes after a judge in New York on Tuesday denied Trump’s motion to stay the Jan. 10 sentencing, which is currently set for Friday, Jan. 10, at 9:30 a.m.  

Merchan set the sentencing date last week but said he will not sentence the president-elect to prison. 

Merchan wrote in his decision that he is not likely to ‘impose any sentence of incarceration,’ but rather a sentence of an ‘unconditional discharge,’ which means there would be no punishment imposed. 

Trump will be sworn in as the 47th President of the United States on Jan. 20. 

Trump has maintained his innocence in the case and repeatedly railed against it as an example of ‘lawfare’ promoted by Democrats in an effort to hurt his election efforts ahead of November. 

Fox News’ Shannon Bream and Bill Mears contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Most Americans believe President Biden will be remembered as a below-average president once he leaves office, according to a Wednesday poll.

The new poll from Gallup found that 54% of Americans say Biden will be remembered as either ‘below average’ (37%) or ‘poor’ (17%). Meanwhile, just 19% are confident he will have a positive legacy, with 6% saying he was ‘outstanding’ and 13% saying he was ‘above average.’

Just over a quarter of Americans, 26%, predict Biden will be remembered as an average president, the poll found.

Gallup’s poll ranked Biden alongside nine other recent presidents, and only President Richard Nixon proved to be less popular. Nixon received a net positivity rating of -42, compared to Biden’s -35. The next closest president was George W. Bush at -9.

Gallup noted that presidents who serve challenging terms like Biden typically see their approval ratings rise in the years after they leave office. The pollster noted that Presidents Jimmy Carter, Trump and Bush all benefited from this trend.

President-elect Trump’s first term received a net positivity rating of -4. The most popular president was John F. Kennedy, at +68, followed by Ronald Reagan at +38.

Gallup conducted the poll from Dec. 2 – 18, surveying 1,003 U.S. adults via cellphone and landline. The poll advertises a margin of error of 4%.

The poll came the same day that Biden acknowledged concerns about his age and discussed his legacy in an interview with USA Today in the Oval Office. He still claimed he would have won another term if he’d run against Trump, but he admitted he’s not sure if he could have lasted four more years.

‘Do you think you would’ve had the vigor to serve another four years in office?’ USA Today’s Susan Page asked.

‘I don’t know,’ Biden said. ‘That’s why I thought when I first announced, talking to Barack [Obama] about it, I said I thought I was the person. I had no intention of running after [my son] Beau died – for real, not a joke. And then when Trump was running again for re-election, I really thought I had the best chance of beating him.’

‘But I also wasn’t looking to be president when I was 85 years old, 86 years old. And so I did talk about passing the baton,’ Biden added, reflecting on concerns over his age, especially before he dropped out of the presidential race.

Biden says his ‘hope’ is that history remembers ‘that I came in and I had a plan how to restore the economy and reestablish America’s leadership in the world.’

‘I hope that my legacy is one that says I took an economy that was in disarray and set it on track to lead the world, in terms of the new sort of rules of the road,’ he said.

The White House declined to comment on the record when contacted by Fox News Digital regarding the poll.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President-elect Donald Trump announced that he would declare a national energy emergency on his first day in office, ending President Joe Biden’s restrictions on energy production, doing away with the electric vehicle mandate, ending incentives for renewable energy, and canceling Biden’s natural gas export ban.  

This is welcome news. America faces a national energy emergency because the Biden administration has created a serious and dangerous energy situation so damaging to ordinary people and our country that it requires immediate action. 

Trump can ensure that America does not walk down the same yellow brick road of Europe’s energy and climate policies. 

The danger of climate change measures is already hurting Europe. Europe’s manufacturing sector is closing down due to climate change regulations. Germany used to be renowned for its industry, but German industry expects a 3% fall in production in 2024, the third year of decline, with no uptick in 2025.  

German workers are losing their jobs because of climate regulations, with auto industry layoffs due to inexpensive Chinese EV imports. 

Biden’s climate change rules need to be changed to commonsense measures to prevent strengthening Chinese workers at the expense of Americans.  

His regulations have caused prices of electricity and transportation to rise, raising inflation. Higher electricity prices drive up inflation, disproportionately hurting poor people, small businesses and farmers. 

The worst is that these poorly considered climate regulations impoverish Americans and make China rich without lowering global emissions or temperatures. Four more years of Democrat green energy policies will indebt the nation through subsidies and high energy costs while only reducing global temperatures by a fraction of a degree by 2100. 

Trump’s energy emergency will help reverse the damage that Biden has caused.  

Final Environmental Protection Agency regulations require 70% of new cars sold in 2032 to be battery-powered electric or plug-in hybrid, up from 8% today, or face fines and mandatory purchases of credits. These cars are more expensive than gasoline-powered vehicles. The popular Chevy Silverado is $96,000 for an electric, $42,300 for a regular truck.  

Auto companies also have to deal with California auto regulations, and California’s Advanced Clean Car II Rules require all new vehicles sold in the Golden State to be plug-in hybrid or pure battery powered by 2035. This month EPA granted California a waiver for its rule because the Clean Air Act does not allow states to set more rigorous vehicle emission standards than the federal government.  

Another 13 states have signed up for California’s Advanced Clean Car II Rules. With the waiver, California and Biden can push car manufacturers to stop producing gasoline-powered vehicles. Trump seems likely to reverse the California waiver, which allows California to set standards in automobiles for the rest of the country. 

In order to get electric vehicles to sell, auto companies must price them lower and gasoline-powered vehicles higher. That means ordinary people face higher prices on the pickup trucks, SUVs and minivans that they want to buy. Higher new car prices translate into higher used car prices too, driving up transportation prices and contributing to inflation. 

The residential cost of electricity has risen by 32% since January 2021. With 50 states, each with their own ways of producing electricity, it’s clear that the required use of renewables leads to higher prices. This is because intermittent energy is more complicated to produce than continuous energy. The wind blows for free, and the sun shines for free, but integrating their energy into the electricity grid is more complicated and costly than running a natural gas generator continuously.   

The average U.S. residential electricity price is 17 cents per kilowatt-hour, and rates range from 11 cents per kilowatt-hour in Utah and Louisiana to 33 cents in California. (Hawaii, in the Pacific, has a higher rate.) Of the 10 states with the highest electricity prices, all but one has required use of renewables. Of the 10 states with the lowest electricity prices, all but one have no requirements for renewables.  

The worst is that these poorly considered climate regulations impoverish Americans and make China rich without lowering global emissions or temperatures. Four more years of Democrat green energy policies will indebt the nation through subsidies and high energy costs while only reducing global temperatures by a fraction of a degree by 2100. 

Trump can do away with incentives for wind and solar, which reduce production of electricity from natural gas, coal and nuclear power, and send electricity bills higher. He can also end the ban on new natural gas exports, which hurts our allies. 

Trump’s urgency is eminently sensible, because Biden’s solutions to climate change, which he calls ‘an existential threat,’ are making people poor. An emergency is a threat to ordinary people, and Americans are facing higher car prices, higher electricity prices, and job loss to China. This is a national energy emergency. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Federal Trade Commission Chair Lina Khan said Tuesday she hopes the incoming Trump administration will not let Amazon and Facebook parent Meta off the hook from pending  antitrust lawsuits by her agency with a “sweetheart deal.”

But, “I can’t predict what future people in my position are going to do,” Khan said on CNBC’s “Squawk Box.”

Khan’s comments come as Amazon chairman Jeff Bezos and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg have made apparent efforts to curry favor with President-elect Donald Trump.

Those efforts have included $1 million donations to Trump’s inauguration fund, and Bezos and Zuckerberg separately visiting the president-elect at Mar-a-Lago, his Florida home.

CNBC’s Andrew Ross Sorkin asked Khan how she views those moves.

Khan said, “It is true that the FTC has been very successful, including in its ongoing litigations against Amazon and Facebook.”

“And so it’s only going to be natural that those companies are going to want to come in and see, can they get some type of sweetheart deal, right?” said Khan, an appointee of President Joe Biden.

“Can they get some type of settlement that’s cheap, that settles for pennies on the dollar and … lets them escape from a liability finding in court?” she said.

Asked if she saw that happening under the next administration, Khan said, “I hope it won’t.”

“But again, I can’t predict that,” she added.

“We are set to go to trial against Facebook this spring, against Amazon in fall of 2026. Of course they would want a sweetheart deal, and I hope future enforcers wouldn’t give them that.”

Trump last month picked FTC Commissioner Andrew Ferguson to replace Khan, who as the agency’s boss has aggressively policed anticompetitive business practices.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

The Las Vegas Raiders are rebooting again.

The team on Tuesday fired Antonio Pierce after a 4-13 season, the head coach’s first full campaign in the top job. Pierce went 5-4 as the team’s interim coach to close out 2023.

Davis will now be hiring his sixth different full-time coach since taking over the franchise in 2011.

‘We appreciate Antonio’s leadership, first as an interim head coach and this past season as the head coach,’ the Raiders said in a statement announcing Pierce’s firing.

‘Antonio grew up a Raiders fan and his Silver and Black roots run deep. We are grateful for his ability to reignite what it means to be a Raider throughout the entire organization. We wish nothing but the best for Antonio and his family in the future.’

All things Raiders: Latest Las Vegas Raiders news, schedule, roster, stats, injury updates and more.

Pierce met with the media on Monday and said he hadn’t been given any reason to believe he wouldn’t be back next season. He added that all speculation regarding his job status was coming from ‘outside the building’ and said he did not envision making any changes to his coaching staff for 2025.

Owner Mark Davis had seemingly put Pierce on notice late in the year with his December remarks that he was dissatisfied with the Raiders’ results this year.

“I’m very disappointed, obviously. I want to see progress,” Davis said at the league meeting, according to The Athletic. “There’s no excuses. We have injuries and all of those things, but your team has to figure out how to get around those issues. The bottom line … is it comes down to me. And, if there’s going to be a finger pointed, it should be at me because, again, I’m the one who’s hiring the people who make the decisions on the field.’

Despite a 2-2 start, the Raiders’ season unraveled quickly thereafter. Three-time All-Pro wide receiver Davante Adams requested a trade prior to Week 5, and Las Vegas dealt him to the New York Jets on Oct. 15 for a conditional 2025 third-round draft pick. Pierce also ridiculed his team’s effort in a September loss to the Carolina Panthers, saying certain players made ‘business decisions’ in the game. Offensive coordinator Luke Getsy, quarterbacks coach Rich Scangarello and offensive line coach James Cregg were all fired after Week 9, with the team at the midpoint of what would become a 10-game losing streak.

Las Vegas won two of its final three games, but the late push wasn’t enough to salvage Pierce’s job.

A former Pro Bowl linebacker who played nine seasons in the NFL, Pierce joined the Raiders in 2022 as linebackers coach on Josh McDaniels’ staff. When the Raiders fired McDaniels and general manager Dave Ziegler midway through last season, Pierce took over as the interim coach and quickly made his mark, winning the support of Adams and Pro Bowl defensive end Maxx Crosby for the full-time role.

The change marks one of the first opportunities for new part-owner Tom Brady to leave his imprint on the organization. Davis said in December he wants the seven-time Super Bowl-winning quarterback to have a ‘huge voice’ in football operations. Davis also said he wants Brady’s insights in identifying the franchise’s next major investment at quarterback after the team rotated through Gardner Minshew, Aidan O’Connell and midseason pickup Desmond Ridder this season.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

A prominent fact-checking organization used by Facebook to moderate political content reacted to news that it will revamp its fact-checking to better avoid bias with an article outlining its disappointment and disagreement with the move. 

‘Lead Stories was surprised and disappointed to first learn through media reports and a press release about the end of the Meta Third-Party Fact-Checking Partnership of which Lead Stories has been a part since 2019,’ Lead Stories editor Maarten Schenk wrote on Tuesday in response to an announcement from Meta that it would be significantly altering its fact-checking process to ‘restore free expression.’

Lead Stories, a Facebook fact checker employing several former CNN alumni including Alan Duke and Ed Payne, has become one of the more prominent fact checkers used by Facebook in recent years. 

Fox News Digital first reported on Tuesday that Meta is ending its fact-checking program and lifting restrictions on speech to ‘restore free expression’ across Facebook, Instagram and Meta platforms, admitting its current content moderation practices have ‘gone too far.’ 

‘After Trump first got elected in 2016 the legacy media wrote nonstop about how misinformation was a threat to democracy,’ Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg said in a video message on Tuesday. ‘We tried in good faith to address these concerns without becoming the arbiters of truth. But fact-checkers have just been too politically biased and have destroyed more trust than they created, especially in the U.S..’

‘What political bias?’ the article from Lead Stories asks before explaining that it is ‘disappointing to hear Mark Zuckerberg accuse the organizations in Meta’s U.S. third-party fact checking program of being ‘too politically biased.’’

‘Especially since one of the requirements Meta imposed for being part of a partnership included being a verified signatory of the IFCN’s Code of Principles, which explicitly requires a ‘commitment to non-partisanship and fairness,’’ the article states. ‘In all the years we have been part of the partnership, we or the IFCN never received any complaints from Meta about any political bias, so we were quite surprised by this statement.’

Meta said in its announcement that it will move toward a system of moderation that is more in line with Community Notes at X, which Lead Stories seemed to take issue with. 

‘However, In our experience and that of others, Community Notes on X are often slow to appear, sometimes downright inaccurate and unlikely to appear on controversial posts because of an inability to reach agrement [sic] or consensus among users,’ Lead Stories wrote. ‘Ultimately, the truth doesn’t care about consensus or agreement: the shape of the Earth stays the same even if social media users can’t agree on it.’

Lead Stories added that Community Notes is ‘entirely non-transparent about its contributors: readers are left guessing about their bias, funding, allegiance, sources or expertise and there is no way for appeals or corrections’ while ‘fact-checkers, on the other hand, are required by the IFCN to be fully transparent about who they are, who funds them and what methodology and sources they use to come to their conclusions.’

Schenk added, ‘Fact-checking is about adding verified and sourced information so people can make up their mind about what to believe. It is an essential part of free speech.’

In a statement to Fox News Digital, Duke said that Lead Stories plans to press on.

‘Lead Stories will continue, although we have to reduce our output with no support from Meta,’ Duke said. ‘We are global, with most of our business now outside the USA. We publish in eight languages other than English, which is what will be affected.’

Some conservatives took to social media to blast Lead Stories over their article lamenting the change at Meta after years of conservative pushback to Facebook’s fact checkers as a whole on key news stories, including the suppression of the bombshell reporting on Hunter Biden’s laptop.  

‘Of all the fact-checking companies, Lead Stories is the worst,’ British American conservative writer Ian Haworth posted on X. ‘Couldn’t be happier that they’ll soon be circling the drain.’

The executive director of Politifact, a fact checker also used by Facebook, issued a strong rebuke of Zuckerberg following Tuesday’s announcement. 

‘If Meta is upset it created a tool to censor, it should look in the mirror,’ Aaron Sharockman said in a statement he posted on X following Zuckerberg’s announcement.

Sharockman fumed, ‘The decision to remove independent journalists from Facebook’s content moderation program in the United States has nothing to do with free speech or censorship. Mark Zuckerberg’s decision could not be less subtle.’

He threw back Zuckerberg’s accusation of political bias, stating that Meta’s platforms, not the fact-checkers, were the entities that actually censored posts. 

‘Let me be clear: the decision to remove or penalize a post or account is made by Meta and Facebook, not fact-checkers. They created the rules,’ Sharockman said.

At the conclusion of his Lead Stories post, Schenk wrote, ‘Even though we are obviously disappointed by this news, Lead Stories wishes to thank the many people at Meta we have worked with over the past years and we will continue our fact checking mission. To paraphrase the slogan on our main page: ‘Just because it’s now trending without a fact-checking label still won’t make it true.’’

Fox News Digital’s Gabriel Hays and Brooke Singman contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Mark Zuckerberg, who often bends with the political winds, is getting out of the fact-checking business.

And this is part of a broader effort by the Meta CEO to ingratiate himself with Donald Trump after a long and testy relationship.

After a previous outcry, Zuck made a great show of declaring that Facebook would hire fact-checkers to combat misinformation on the globally popular site. That was a clear sign that Facebook was becoming more of a journalistic organization rather than a passive poster of users’ opinions (and dog pictures).

But it didn’t work. In fact, it led to more info-suppression and censorship. Why should anyone believe a bunch of unknown fact-checkers working for one of the increasingly unpopular tech titans?

Now Zuckerberg is pulling the plug, announcing his decision in a video to underscore its big-deal nature:

‘The problem with complex systems is they make mistakes. Even if they accidentally censor just 1 percent of posts. That’s millions of people. And we’ve reached a point where it’s just too many mistakes and too much censorship. The recent elections also feel like a cultural tipping point towards once again prioritizing speech.’

Let me jump in here. Zuckerberg bluntly admits, with that line about ‘cultural tipping point,’ that he’s following the conventional wisdom–and, of course, the biggest tipping point is Trump’s election to a second term. And skeptics are portraying this as a bow to the president-elect and his team.

‘So we’re gonna get back to our roots and focus on reducing mistakes, simplifying our policies, and restoring free expression on our platforms…

‘We’re going to get rid of fact checkers’ and replace them with community notes, already used on X. ‘After Trump first got elected in 2016, the legacy media wrote nonstop about how misinformation was a threat to democracy. 

‘We tried in good faith to address those concerns without becoming the arbiters of truth. But the fact checkers have just been too politically biased and have destroyed more trust than they’ve created, especially in the U.S.’ 

It was Zuckerberg, along with the previous management at Twitter, that banned Trump after the Capitol riot. This led to plenty of Trumpian attacks on Facebook, and the president-elect told me he had flipped his position on banning TikTok because it would help Facebook, which he viewed as the greater danger.

Trump said last summer that Zuckerberg plotted against him in 2020 and would ‘spend the rest of his life in prison’ if he did it again.

The president-elect boiled it down in a posting: ‘ZUCKERBUCKS, DON’T DO IT!’

Here’s a bit more from Z: ‘We’re going to simplify our content policies and get rid of a bunch of restrictions on topics like immigration and gender that are just out of touch with mainstream discourse. What started as a movement to be more inclusive has increasingly been used to shut down opinions and shut out people with different ideas. And it’s gone too far.’ 

Indeed it has. And I agree with that. In 2020, social media, led by Twitter, suppressed the New York Post story on Hunter Biden’s laptop, dismissing it as Russian disinformation, though a year and a half later the establishment press suddenly declared hey, the laptop report was accurate.

Let’s face it: People like Zuckerberg and Elon Musk (now embroiled in a war of words with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer over an alleged coverup of gang rapes of young girls when Starmer was chief prosecutor) have immense clout. They are the new gatekeepers. With so-called legacy media less relevant–as we see with the mass exodus of top talent from Jeff Bezos’ Washington Post and the recent rise of podcasts–they control much of the public dialogue. And yes, they are private companies that can do what they want. 

At yesterday’s marathon news conference, a reporter asked Trump about Zuckerberg: ‘Do you think he’s directly responding to the threats that you have made to him in the past with promises?’

‘Probably. Yeah, probably,’ Trump said, twisting the knife a bit.

Meanwhile, having made the obligatory trek to Mar-a-Lago for dinner, the CEO has taken a number of steps to join forces with the new administration. And it doesn’t hurt that Meta is kicking in a million bucks to the Trump inaugural.

Zuck named prominent Republican lawyer Joel Kaplan as chief of global affairs, replacing a former British deputy prime minister. On ‘Fox & Friends’ yesterday, Kaplan said: 

‘We’ve got a real opportunity now. We’ve got a new administration and a new president coming in who are big defenders of free expression, and that makes a difference. One of the things we’ve experienced is that when you have a U.S. president, an administration that’s pushing for censorship, it just makes it open season for other governments around the world that don’t even have the protections of the First Amendment to really put pressure on US companies. We’re going to work with President Trump to push back on that kind of thing around the world.’

We’re going to work with President Trump. Got it?

What’s more, Zuckerberg is adding Dana White, chief executive officer of United Fighting Championship, to the Meta board. White is a longtime Trump ally, so MAGA now has a voice inside the company.

In other words, get with the program.

At his news conference, where Trump seemed angry about the latest court battles and plans to sentence him, the incoming president said–or ‘didn’t rule out,’ in journalistic parlance– ‘military coercion’ against two of his latest targets.

‘Well, we need Greenland for national security purposes,’ he said. And Americans lost many lives building the Panama Canal. ‘It might be that you’ll have to do something.’ 

He’s not going to use military force against either one. But his answer stirs the pot, as he knew it would.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

TGL, a new tech-infused golf league founded by Tiger Woods and Rory McIlroy, teed off its inaugural season on Tuesday following more than a year delay.

The Bay Golf Club, comprised of Ludvig Åberg, Wyndham Clark and Shane Lowry, defeated New York GC, made up of Matt Fitzpatrick, Rickie Fowler and Xander Schauffele, 9-2 at the SoFi Center in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida.

Each TGL match consists of 15 holes that are divided into two segments. The first session featured a 3-on-3 alternate-shot format known as ‘triples,” where three players from each team hit alternate shots across nine holes. In the final six holes, each golfer went head-to-head with a player from the opposing team in the “singles” phase of the competition.

Here is a full rundown of the best highlights and results from the TGL’s debut match.

TGL FORMAT: Rules, schedule, teams and everything to know about new golf league

Hole No. 15: Schauffele, Åberg tie

The final hole of the TGL match virtually took golfers to the Grand Canyon. Schauffele of New York GC narrowly missed a 32-foot chip shot to eagle and win hole No. 15 – a par-5, 729-yard hole. He rebounded with a five-foot birdie to tie the hole with Åberg.

Hole No. 14: Clark ties with Fitzpatrick

Clark nailed a 3-foot putt to tie hole No. 14 (par-3, 135 yards) vs. Fitzpatrick.

Hole No. 13: Fowler wins hole vs. Lowry

Fowler found his stride on hole No. 13 (par-4, 464 yards). He hit the fairway and green in two strokes and tapped in an easy putt to give New York GC its second point of the night. The Bay Golf Club is up 9-2.

Hole No. 12: Schauffele booed in head-to-head with Åberg

Schauffele of New York GC couldn’t get anything going on hole No. 12 (par-3, 200 yards). After a particularly rough shot that overshot the green completely, the crowd began to boo. ‘I would boo me too,’ said Schauffele, who conceded the hole to Åberg. Bay Golf Club now leads 9-1.

Hole No. 11: Clark defeats Fitzpatrick

Fitzpatrick of New York GC faced off against Clark of Bay Golf Club on hole No. 11 (par-4, 535 yards). Fitzpatrick had an opportunity to win New York GC’s second point of the night, but his eight-foot putt circled around the lip of the hole. The Bay Club is up 8-1.

Hole No. 10: Lowry wins first face-off vs. Fowler

The competition shifts to the ‘singles’ segment, where one player from each team goes head-to-head on each hole. Fowler of New York GC faced off against Lowry of Bay Golf Club on hole No. 10 (par-5, 616 yards).

Fowler incurred a one-stroke penalty after landing out of bounds on his first stroke. He was never able to recover.

Meanwhile, Lowry made quick work of hole No. 10. He landed in the rough on his first shot, found the fairway his next stroke and ended up on the green with his third shot. He attempted a 10-foot putt, but Fowler threw the flag down to disrupt his putt. The Bay Golf Club took the hole to go up 7-1 over New York GC and win the match.

Hole No. 9: New York GC finally on the board

New York GC entered hole No. 9 scoreless, but they had a little luck on their side. Fitzpatrick hit a chip shot that looked like it was going to end up in the rough, but the ball bounced back toward the green and ended up mere feet from the hole. New York GC picked up their first point and trail Bay Golf Club 6-1. 

Hole No. 8: Tie

Both teams had an opportunity to take hole No. 8 (Par-4, 528-yard). Lowry of Bay Golf Club missed a 16-foot putt for birdie, while Fowler of New York GC narrowly missed a 16-foot chip shot for birdie. Both teams conceded the putt on the next stroke to tie the hole.

Hole No. 7: Bay Golf Club cashes in on hammer; up 6-0

We have another hammer. New York GC threw down the hammer flag ahead of hole No. 7 (par-3, 235-yard hole). Bay Golf Club took advantage and added to their total score after Åberg knocked down a five-foot putt to win the hole. They lead 6-0. 

Hole No. 6: Tie

Both teams conceded putts to tie hole No. 6 (Par-4, 474 yards). Bay Golf Club still leads 5-0. 

Hole No. 5: Åberg birdies to give Bay Golf Club point

Two strokes. That’s all the Bay Golf Club needed to win hole No. 5 (Par-3, 179 yards). New York GC was closing in on its first point, but Åberg nailed a 32-foot putt to birdie the hole. Bay Golf Club now leads 5-0. 

Hole No. 4: Bay Golf Club 4, New York GC 0

The Bay Golf Club is rolling. The team, comprised of Shane Lowry, Wyndham Clark and Ludvig Åberg, picked up their fourth-straight point on hole No. 4 a Par-5, 582-yard hole named ‘Boomerang.’ Lowry drained a four-foot putt to win the hole. New York GC had an opportunity to get on the board, but Fowler missed a 10-foot putt to the right.

Hole No. 3: Bay Golf Club takes 3-0 lead

We have our first hammer! Wyndham Clark of Bay Golf Club threw a yellow hammer flag on hole No. 3 (Par-3, 188 yards) ahead of his putt, instantly doubling the value of the hole. No pressure, right? Although the stakes were high, Clark knocked down a seven-foot putt to give Bay Golf Club not one, but two points for an early 3-0 lead over New York GC. 

Hole No. 2: Tie

Hole No. 2 a Par-5, 590-yard hole called “Pick Yer Plunder” ended with a tie after both teams conceded putts on the physical green. Fitzpatrick had an opportunity to win the hole for New York GC and tie the score, but he missed a 12-foot putt. Bay Golf Club leads 1-0.  

Hole No. 1: Bay Golf Club takes first point

The Bay Golf Club teed off first on hole No. 1 a Par-4, 377-yard hole called the “Plank.” Lowry led his team off with a 280-yard drive on the simulator screen. Clark landed the next shot on the green and Åberg putt the ball in on the physical green zone to give Bay Golf Club the first point over New York GC. 

When is the TGL match between New York GC vs. Bay Golf Club?

The debut TGL match between the New York Golf Club and The Bay Golf Club is scheduled for Tuesday and tees off at 9 p.m. ET at the SoFi Center in Palm Beach Gardens, Florida.

How to watch the TGL match between New York GC vs. Bay Golf Club

The TGL match between the New York Golf Club and The Bay Golf Club will be televised nationally on ESPN with streaming available on ESPN+.

Live streaming is also available on Fubo, which has a free trial.

Watch TGL action with a Fubo subscription

TGL: New York GC vs. Bay Golf Club odds

The New York Golf Club are favorites to defeat The Bay Golf Club, according to BetMGM.

Odds as of Tuesday, Jan. 7

Moneyline: New York Golf Club (-125); The Bay Golf Club (+100)

TGL: New York GC vs. Bay Golf Club lineup

Here is the order for ‘triples,” the 3-on-3 alternate-shot format used for the first nine holes:

New York GC: Rickie Fowler, Matt Fitzpatrick, Xander Schauffele
The Bay Golf Club: Shane Lowry, Wyndham Clark, Ludvig Åberg

In the “singles” phase of the competition, each golfer will go head-to-head with a player from the opposing team throughout the final six holes. Here’s the matchups:

TGL odds tournament winner

Boston Common Golf are favored to win the inaugural season, according to BetMGM. Here are the remaining odds for the season.

Boston Common Golf (+350)
Los Angeles Golf Club (+400)
New York Golf Club (+400)
The Bay Golf Club (+400)
Atlanta Drive GC (+450)
Jupiter Links Golf Club (+800)

TGL predictions: New York Golf Club vs. Bay Golf Club

Golfweek: New York GC to beat The Bay Golf Club

Riley Hamel writes, ‘It’s tough to be confident with a pick before seeing how these matches are going to work, but I think this league is perfect for guys like Rickie Fowler. Talk some trash, hit some shots, talk a little more. I’ll take the favorites this time around, New York Golf Club at -125.’

Covers.com: Bay Golf to win first match

Neil Parker writes, ‘Still, I like the underdog Bay Golf Club because I peg Ludvig Aberg, Wyndham Clark, and Shane Lowry right behind Schauffele and well ahead of Matt Fitzpatrick and Rickie Fowler.

‘Additionally, the gap between Schauffele and Aberg is slim, and Aberg and Clark just topped both Schauffele and Fitzpatrick in the Sentry. I also like the collected ball-striking prowess of the Bay Golf Club more over the past year.’

Sports Illustrated: The Bay GC to win season

Iain MacMillan writes, ‘Los Angeles GC and Boston Common GC have all four members of the team inside the top 50 in the world but both teams also sit atop the odds list with much shorter odds than we can get with The Bay GC at +460.

‘With alternate shot playing a significant role in the outcome of matches, I’d much rather bet a team with depth than one that’s top-heavy.’

What is TGL?

TGL stands for TMRW Golf League, a reference to TMRW Sports, the name of company that Woods, McIlroy and Mike McCarley founded to get the league and several other projects off the ground.

It is a new tech-infused golf league in partnership with the PGA Tour that’s designed to combine the latest in golf technology with in-person competition. It will include a shot clock, timeouts and both team and individual match play. — Steve Gardner

Is Tiger Woods playing TGL golf?

Yes. Woods’ TGR Ventures owns the Jupiter Links Golf Club and Woods is on the team roster along with Max Homa, Tom Kim and Kevin Kisner. — Mark Giannotto

TGL location

The tech-infused TGL will debut with a matchup between the New York Golf Club and the Bay Golf Club at the SoFi Center. This venue, which spans 250,000 square feet, is a state-of-the-art technology center located on the campus of Palm Beach State College. The new facility can accommodate around 1,500 fans across three golf courses. — Elizabeth Flores

TGL format: Rules for the inaugural season

Each TGL match is a competitive showcase of skill and strategy, consisting of two intense sessions. The first session is a nine-hole, 3-on-3 alternate-shot format known as ‘triples.’ In the second session, golfers compete in singles, going head-to-head over six holes, with each player playing two holes. A shot clock set to 40 seconds adds to the pressure, as any shot clock violation incurs a one-stroke penalty.

Each hole is worth one point. If the teams are tied at the end of regulation, the match will proceed to overtime. During overtime, players compete head-to-head, and the team that lands their shot closest to the pin will be declared the winner. — Elizabeth Flores

We occasionally recommend interesting products and services. If you make a purchase by clicking one of the links, we may earn an affiliate fee. USA TODAY Network newsrooms operate independently, and this doesn’t influence our coverage.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

SAN DIEGO – Former Cleveland Browns tight end Kellen Winslow II has been denied again in his attempt to have his 14-year prison sentence reduced under new criminal justice reform laws.

The California Court of Appeal this time rejected his habeas corpus petition and said that Winslow’s claims are procedurally barred because he could have raised his claims on direct appeal several years ago but did not.

“A defendant cannot raise claims via a habeas corpus writ petition that could have been raised on direct appeal,” said the order denying Winslow’s petition.

Winslow, 41, was sentenced to 14 years in prison in March 2021 after being convicted of sex crimes against five women in San Diego County, including the rape of a woman who was unconscious in 2003 and the rape of a homeless woman in 2018. The former NFL first-round draft pick agreed to the sentence in a plea deal but since has sought to be resentenced under criminal justice reform laws that passed after his sentencing in 2021.

Winslow’s attorney told USA TODAY Sports he next will present his petition to the California Supreme Court.

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

Why Kellen Winslow II sought resentencing

His petition cited AB 124, a state law intended to help criminal defendants who previously experienced “psychological, physical, or childhood trauma.” AB 124 requires the court to impose a lower term of sentencing if the defendant has experienced such trauma, unless there are aggravating circumstances.

In Winslow’s case, he cited brain injuries from football and sexual abuse he experienced in childhood. A clinical psychologist previously found Winslow had symptoms of chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), which has been linked to head trauma in football.

Winslow sought a two-year reduction of his sentence “consistent with the new laws that have become effective since he went to prison,” according to filing in November from his attorney, Patrick Morgan Ford.

“Petitioner (Winslow) is not seeking to avoid punishment, but rather seeks a hearing to determine the impact of his brain injuries on the decision-making that led to the crimes he committed,” the filing stated. “The Legislature suggested that those who had suffered trauma and abuse as a child (sexual abuse in this case) may be less culpable than those convicted of the same offenses who were never burdened by such problems.”

Ford said Winslow was disappointed in the court’s decision but understands this is a difficult process.

‘He’s anxious to get home to his family, and also believes this is an important issue given the impact CTE has had on so many former NFL players,’ Ford said.

What was Winslow’s previous appeal?

Winslow previously filed an appeal of his sentence in 2021, when he sought 233 days of custody credit for time he spent on electronic monitoring. That appeal was pending when the new state laws went into effect, but Winslow’s attorney didn’t raise those issues at the time. The Court of Appeal said he should have raised those issues then and also rejected the suggestion by Winslow’s current attorney that Winslow didn’t raise these issues then because of ineffective counsel back in 2021-22.

“Even if we consider the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel, Winslow does not present any declaration from his prior counsel explaining why these claims were not raised on direct appeal,” said the order from the appeals court.

The appeals court noted there is at least a “conceivable reason” for Winslow’s appellate counsel to not have raised these claims on direct appeal in 2021-22.

“As noted by the Attorney General, applying these legislative changes to Winslow’s sentence may ultimately result in the plea agreement being vacated and Winslow receiving a prison term greater than his current sentence,” the appeals court said in its ruling.

All the players and the plays: Sign up for USA TODAY’s Sports newsletter.

Winslow said to be ‘role model in prison’

Winslow’s petition was considered by Justices Martin Buchanan, Julia Kelety and Jose Castillo, who issued their denial on Jan. 2. Winslow currently is serving time in Norco, California, and is not eligible for parole until  September 2028, according to state records.

He previously attempted to get his sentence reduced for similar reasons but was denied by a San Diego County judge in 2023. He then hired a new attorney, Ford, to file the latest petition in September. In a declaration submitted with that petition, Winslow said he felt ‘remorse for what I did to the victims in my case.’

Ford also noted in a November court filing that Winslow ‘has committed himself to self-improvement while in prison.’

‘He is committed to therapy, the Bible, self­ improvement and helping others,’ the filing stated. ‘He has been a role model in prison.’

Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. Email: bschrotenb@usatoday.com

(This story was updated to add new information.)

This post appeared first on USA TODAY