Archive

2025

Browsing

To understand what makes the Dow Jones tick, you have to first understand one of the key differences between the Dow Jones and the S&P 500 indices. There are a few, but none more critical than the following:

Index Weighting

The S&P 500 is market-cap weighted, meaning that companies with the highest market capitalization have a stronger hand in moving the S&P 500 index value. Currently, these are the companies that play the largest role in moving this benchmark index, including their weighting:

AAPL – 7.58%NVDA – 6.59%MSFT – 6.27%AMZN – 4.11%GOOGL – 4.02%

These are 5 of the Mag 7 stocks and they carry 28.57% of the entire weighting of the benchmark S&P 500 index. It’s easy to see how the S&P 500 can be swayed easily by the performance of just these 5 stocks.

Well, guess what? We need a cute lil name for the Top 5 price-weighted stocks in the Dow Jones, because their collective weight is 32.43% of the entire Dow Jones Industrial Average. The Dow Jones, by contrast, is a price-weighted index. The highest priced stock carries the most weight, while the lowest priced stock carries the least weight. Market capitalization plays NO role in the weighting. Want to know who the “Fabulous 5” are? Here ya go:

GS – 8.25%UNH – 7.29%MSFT – 6.07%HD – 5.60%CAT – 5.22%

All 5 of these stocks now trade beneath their declining 20-day EMAs and only one (MSFT) still shows a 20-day EMA above its 50-day SMA. In other words, 4 of the 5 have experienced “death crosses”, which are bearish technical developments.

Looking at the RRG

Here’s another way to look at the change that’s taken place within the Fabulous 5, just over the past 5-6 weeks. But before we do that, let’s first pull up the chart of the entire Dow Jones:

Heading into December, there was a solid uptrend on the Dow’s absolute chart and mostly sideways relative action after a very strong relative performance in July. Since early December, even late November, everything has headed south on the Dow Jones.

We can now take a look at an RRG as of early December to show how the Fab 5 were leading at that time:

This shows how each of the Fab 5 were performing relative to the benchmark S&P 500. 4 of the 5 were situated on the right side of the chart in the leading or weakening quadrants. This means they were relative leaders. Now, just a handful of weeks later, check out how these 5 stand relative to the S&P 500:

All 5 are currently residing on the left side of this chart, indicative of relative weakness, not strength. Momentum is building in the majority of the companies, so if that continues, we could begin to see relative outperformance of the Dow Jones again. For now, though, caution is the word.

One last thing. I’ve updated my Dow Jones Components ChartList and have numbered them 1 to 30, in price order, which reflects the highest-weighted to lowest-weighted stocks in the Dow Jones. I’m sorting this ChartList based on 1-month performances (SCTR scores are also reflected):

Of the 7 worst 1-month performers, 5 of them are in the Top 7 in terms of market weight. In other words, many of the worst recent performers in the Dow Jones also happen to be among the most heavily-weighted. Also, it’s important to note that many of the top-weighted Dow Jones stocks are also among the worst relative performers, as measured by SCTR scores (StockCharts Technical Rank, a form of relative strength). This combination is what has been crushing the Dow Jones. Until this changes, the Dow Jones will remain under relative pressure vs. the other major indices.

My Favorite Dow Jones Component

There are a number of ways to rank the potential of the various Dow Jones component stocks for 2025 and, obviously, it depends on your criteria. But I’ll be providing my FAVORITE Dow Jones stock (and why) for 2025 in Monday’s EB Digest, our 100% free newsletter. If you’re not already an EB Digest subscriber, and you’d like to check out my pick for 2025, please CLICK HERE and enter your name and email address. Again, it’s completely free and there’s no credit card required!

Happy trading!

Tom

The 2025 Baseball Hall of Fame ballot is stacked with second basemen.

Ian Kinsler is one of three on the ballot, joining former Arizona State University teammate Dustin Pedroia and Chase Utley. He’s also one of 14 players appearing on the ballot for the first time.

The Hall of Fame is comprised of 348 elected members, including 275 former major league players. Of those, only 20 are second basemen − one of the fewest by position. The last second baseman to join the gang in Cooperstown was Craig Biggio in 2015.

Kinsler was a true second baseman. He played 15,857 innings in the field, with all but three of those innings at second.

His case for the Hall is an interesting one. He was known for his intensity and was an above-average player in multiple facets of the game. He could hit for power, run and was an excellent fielder.

Follow every MLB game: Latest MLB scores, stats, schedules and standings.

The 17th-round pick in the 2003 draft played 14 seasons in the majors, mostly with the Texas Rangers (2006-2013) and Detroit Tigers (2014-17). He had short stints with the Los Angeles Angels (2018), Boston Red Sox (2018) and San Diego Padres (2019), then went on to represent Team Israel in 2021 at the Tokyo Summer Olympics. He was a member of the 2018 World Series champion Red Sox and retired with a .269 batting average, 257 home runs, 909 RBI and 243 stolen bases.

Here’s a closer look at Kinsler’s Hall of Fame candidacy:

The case for Ian Kinsler

Kinsler’s credentials begin with Wins Above Replacement. His WAR of 54.1 is the 19th-highest for a second baseman in history. His WAR is also higher than eight second basemen who are already in the Hall.

During the prime of his career from 2007-2016, he had WAR of 48.5, which ranked sixth among position players during that span. He trailed only Robinson Cano (57.5), Adrian Beltre (56.2), Albert Pujols (55.3), Miguel Cabrera (54.8) and Pedroia (50.6).

Kinsler was also known for his power and speed. He retired with 257 homers, eighth-most among second basemen in baseball history, and 243 stolen bases. He’s one of seven second basemen with 200-plus homers and 200-plus stolen bases.

He’s also one of only three second baseman in history to record a 30-30 season, accomplishing the feat in both 2009 and 2011.

And his 185 homers out of the leadoff spot are the fifth-most in MLB history, behind Rickey Henderson, Mookie Betts, George Springer and Alfonso Soriano.

The case against Ian Kinsler

Kinsler retired with 1,999 career hits, falling just short of a milestone that most Hall of Fame candidates have on their resume. His 1,999 hits also rank 29th among second basemen.

He also falls short in traditional measuring sticks. For example, of the 179 players who logged at least 4,000 plate appearances and 50% of their games at second base, his career batting average of .269 ranks 89th.

And lastly, his case is hurt by the lack of accolades. Over 14 seasons, he only had four All-Star appearances and two Gold Gloves.

Voting trends

Kinsler is one of 14 players making their ballot debut − a group headlined by pitcher CC Sabathia and outfielder Ichiro Suzuki. Through 119 public ballots in Ryan Thibodaux’s Hall of Fame voting tracker, Kinsler had only received four votes, totaling 3.2% support. He’ll need about 16 more votes to reach 5% in the final tally and stay on the ballot.

Bottom line

There’s a better chance that Kinsler falls off the ballot in his first year than he ever receives 75% of the vote.

Inducted into the Rangers Hall of Fame in 2022, Kinsler helped Texas win the American League pennant in 2010 and 2011 and holds the club records for a second baseman with a .273 batting average, 156 home runs and 539 RBI over 1,066 games from 2006-2013.

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

(This story has been updated with new information)

Defense wins championships.

It’s an overused sports saying, but one that Ohio State football’s Jack Sawyer proved once again to be true.

With the game on the line in the fourth quarter of Friday’s College Football Playoff semifinal at the Cotton Bowl, the Buckeyes’ 6-foot-5 defensive lineman stripped the ball from Texas quarterback Quinn Ewers and returned it to the house for an 83-yard touchdown.

It’s the longest scoop-and-score in the history of the College Football Playoff per ESPN’s broadcast.

Watch: Jack Sawyer scores touchdown on stripped fumble

To make Sawyer’s moment even sweeter, it came again his freshman-year roommate at Ohio State: Ewers transferred to Texas after one season at Ohio State and has become one of the top quarterbacks in college football with the Longhorns.

‘Can’t say enough about Jack Sawyer. He’s a guy who loves being a Buckeye. He loves his teammates. He’s done everything we asked him to do,’ Ohio State coach Ryan Day told ESPN’s Laura Rutledge postgame about Sawyer. ‘He’s everything that we could possibly ask for in a captain.

He added: ‘He just became a legend at Ohio State.’

Here’s a look at Day and Sawyer sharing a moment on the field after Sawyer’s touchdown:

Sawyer’s scoop-and-score was the fourth play of a crucial goal-line stance by Ohio State’s defense, after defensive pass interference penalties were called back-to-back on Lathan Ransom and Jermaine Mathews Jr., respectively, put Texas at the 1-yard line.

On first-and-goal, Ohio State held Texas running back Jerrick Gibson to no gain. Ransom then tackled Quintrevion Wisner for a loss of 7 yards on second-and-goal, before Ewers threw an incomplete pass on third down. Then came Sawyer’s play that etched his name further into Ohio State history.

‘Just means everything to me,’ Sawyer, who grew up a Buckeyes fan and lived 30 minutes away from Ohio Stadium in Pickerington, Ohio, told ESPN’s Holly Rowe on being able to make the play.

‘I was just put in a good position by the coaches. I saw the ball popping out right to me after I tackled him. I was just thinking, I just got to keep saying my feet because like I said, I almost blacked out when I scooped it and saw anything but green grass ahead of me.’

Before heading into the locker room to celebrate the win, Sawyer even shared with Rowe what Ewers said to him as the two trotted of the field.

‘He said, ‘Screw you’ and started laughing,’ Sawyer with a laugh. ‘That’s my boy. Obviously we roommates when he was here. Got a lot of respect for him and the rest of the Texas team. I mean, that’s a great team that took it four quarters. They had a great season, shout out to them too.

Sawyer finished with three total tackles, two broken-up passes, two quarterback hurries, a sack, a forced fumble and touchdown on the night against Texas.

Ohio State held to beat Texas 28-14 following Sawyer’s heroics, sending the Buckeyes back to the CFP national championship game.

No. 8 seed Ohio State will now face No. 7 seed Notre Dame at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta on Monday, Jan. 20.

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

(This story has been updated to change or add a photo or video)

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

President-elect Donald Trump indicated that he plans to push 100 — or around 100 — executive orders after assuming office, senators and reports have indicated, with the number varying slightly.

Trump, who will take office later this month on Jan. 20, met with Senate Republicans on Wednesday.

During a Thursday morning appearance on ‘Fox & Friends’ Sen. Markwayne Mullin, R-Okla., said that Trump indicated that there are almost 100 executive orders to address issues like border security and U.S. energy.

‘He threw that out — 100 — there could be like 100 EOs, yeah. I believe him.’ Sen. Kevin Cramer, R-N.D., noted to The Hill.

Senators were provided previews regarding some of what they were informed would be 100 executive orders, two sources noted to Axios. Stephen Miller, who Trump has tapped to serve in his new administration, discussed plans for using executive authority to tackle border and immigration beginning day one, the outlet reported.

The Associated Press claimed that Trump is readying more than 100 executive orders beginning day one, and had informed GOP senators during the meeting. ‘There will be a substantial number,’ Sen. John Hoeven, R-N.D., noted according to the outlet.

Fox News Digital emailed a Trump spokesperson with a request for comment on Saturday, but did not receive a response in time for publication. 

Signing scads of executive orders would enable Trump to unilaterally push his agenda after returning to the Oval Office, but GOP lawmakers also plan to work with him to enact his legislative priorities as well.

House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., have both declared their intent to push the president-elect’s agenda.

‘Biden is doing everything possible to make the TRANSITION as difficult as as possible, from Lawfare such as has never been seen before, to costly and ridiculous Executive Orders on the Green New Scam and other money wasting Hoaxes. Fear not, these ‘Orders’ will all be terminated shortly, and we will become a Nation of Common Sense and Strength. MAGA!!!’ Trump declared in a post on Truth Social earlier this week.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

On Friday night, Texas will take on Ohio State in the Cotton Bowl, with an appearance in the College Football Playoff championship game on the line.

If the Longhorns lose, it may very well be the final game of their starting quarterback’s college career.

Ewers has been the Longhorns’ starter each of the past three seasons and has another season of eligibility remaining, should he choose to use it. 

This season, he has completed 66.5% of his passes for 3,189 yards, 29 touchdowns and 11 interceptions while leading his team to a 13-2 record and a semifinal appearance. Many of his most important statistics are worse than they were in 2023, when he completed 69% of his passes for 3,479 yards, 22 touchdowns and six interceptions and helped guide the Longhorns to a Big 12 championship and their first College Football Playoff appearance.

Interest in Ewers’ future comes from a number of different angles.

Should he enter the 2025 NFL draft, as he seemingly indicated to ESPN he would, he’s widely regarded as one of the best quarterbacks in the class. If he remains in college, though, there’s a question of whether he would hold on to the starting job at Texas, where redshirt freshman and former five-star recruit Arch Manning has served as his backup the past two seasons, or whether he would enter the transfer portal, where he would immediately become one of the most sought-after quarterbacks available.

On Dec. 31, On3 Sports reported that Ewers had been offered a $6 million name, image and likeness deal to transfer. The report, which cited unnamed sources, did not name specific schools courting Ewers.

‘I think that’s selfish of me to be even thinking about it or looking at that,’ Ewers said earlier this week ahead of the Cotton Bowl. ‘I owe my teammates the best version of me right now. I can’t be looking forward or I’ll trip on the rock that’s sitting right in front of me. I’ve got to be locked in on what’s right here.’

Ewers entered the college game with no shortage of hype. He was the No. 1 overall recruit nationally in the 2021 recruiting class, according to 247 Sports, and is one of the highest-graded quarterback prospects in the history of recruiting websites.

The Southlake, Texas, native began his college career at Ohio State, where he became one of the first college athletes with a known NIL deal. He spent one season serving as a backup to C.J. Stroud with the Buckeyes before transferring after the 2021 season and committing to Texas.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Three plays later, Texas was facing fourth-and-goal from the 8-yard line. The Longhorns’ scoring opportunity turned into a disastrous 14-point swing for Ohio State, as Jack Sawyer strip-sacked Quinn Ewers and returned the fumble 83 yards for a touchdown. It arguably was the most pivotal play in the Buckeyes’ 28-14 win.

The second-most pivotal play may have come two downs earlier. After all, how did the Longhorns move back seven yards after facing first-and-goal at the 1?

Texas and coach Steve Sarkisian dialed up a toss to the left sideline, which was run down by Ohio State safety Caleb Downs. Though he didn’t make the tackle, he forced Quintrevion Wisner back far enough that Ohio State was able to tackle him for the huge loss.

‘That’s one of those plays, if you block it all right, you get into the end zone,’ Sarkisian said after the game. ‘We didn’t, and we lost quite a bit of yardage.’ 

Here’s how social media reacted to Texas’ play call in the important moment:

Social media reacts to Texas’ toss play vs Ohio State

Here are the best reactions to Texas’ toss play call late in the fourth quarter against the Buckeyes on Friday night:

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

As 2025 kicked off, many Americans began their quest for a healthier year ahead by committing to more exercise, a renewed focus on mental well-being, a healthier diet, and ‘Dry January’ (that is, a month without alcohol consumption). Then U.S. Surgeon General Vivek Murthy released his latest advisory linking alcohol to an increased risk of cancer.  

Specifically, the advisory highlighted an increased risk in mouth, throat, esophagus, voice box, breast (in women), liver, and colon and rectum cancers among those who consume any amount of alcohol. Further, the report states that alcohol consumption leads to 100,000 cancer cases and 20,000 cancer-related deaths in the U.S. each year, making it the third leading preventable cause of cancer after tobacco and obesity. 

I believe many of us have long suspected alcohol was not necessarily ‘good’ for us. But what I think we did not know – or perhaps did not want to fully acknowledge – was just how bad it could be for our health. In fact, 60% of Americans report being unaware of the relationship between alcohol and cancer. Hopefully, this advisory begins the process of educating the public of this important health-related link. 

Since the advisory’s publication, Americans have raised numerous questions about what the government may do next, what the findings mean for them, and how they should consider the findings in their daily lives.  

Here’s what to know and to keep in mind. 

How does alcohol cause cancer? 

From a 30,000-foot view, alcohol damages your DNA, which increases your cancer risk. This occurs through several different mechanisms. For example, our DNA can be damaged by acetaldehyde, the toxic metabolite alcohol is broken down to in our body, or by the oxidative stress alcohol causes.  

Alcohol also alters hormone levels in our body, such as estrogen, which likely explains alcohol’s relationship with increased breast cancer risk. Not only does alcohol directly damage our DNA, but it also increases the absorption of cancer-causing chemicals, or carcinogens, into the body. So, while we may think of a glass of wine or beer as calming or relaxing for our body, it – in fact – does the exact opposite, causing inflammation.  

What comes next? 

The advisory lays the groundwork for action – by the government, physicians and our fellow Americans. 

Murthy suggests that the surgeon general’s warning label on alcohol be updated to clearly note the link between alcohol and cancer. Such a labeling change would require an act of Congress, and I believe this should be done quickly on a bipartisan basis. What’s one thing we can all rally behind? Reducing cancer among our family, friends and neighbors. 

However, this is not a ‘silver bullet’ strategy. While one study assessing cigarette warning labels showed that more comprehensive, larger, and graphic labels better communicate health risks of smoking to the public, another suggested they did not have an actual effect on smoking behavior.  

So, if we extrapolate what this may mean for the future impact of an updated surgeon general’s warning label on alcohol, the effect may be nominal. Further, it is important to note that this was the result despite the cancer risk being substantially higher for cigarettes than alcohol when they’re consumed at comparable amounts. 

But updating the warning label is a start to the needed education to raise general awareness and physician ‘buy-in’ that Murthy also highlights are important ‘action items.’ We must work collaboratively to increase knowledge of the alcohol and cancer risk relationship, not only in the media but in more personal settings, such as doctors’ offices and across our local communities. A targeted strategy is needed to deliver on the potential of an education program to reduce alcohol consumption. 

Lastly, we must always make sure that policy follows the latest, up-to-date science. It’s OK to not know, but we need to be clear with the public when that is the case. For example, the current definition of moderate drinking (one drink or less per day for women and two drinks or less per day for men [one drink is 12 ounces of beer, five ounces of wine, or 1.5 ounces of liquor]) is relatively arbitrary and using it as a ‘scientific’ guide can be misleading and confusing. As Murthy noted, we must reassess these definition ‘cut-offs.’ 

What are some of the limits of what we know? 

While the current research overwhelmingly shows a link between alcohol consumption and cancer, the details of what we do not know also matter. The evidence suggests that cancer risk is directly proportional to the amount of alcohol consumed, meaning that if you drink more alcohol, your risk of cancer increases. This makes sense – alcohol is a toxin and the more toxins you put in your body, the worse it should be for you. 

But is it only the quantity that matters? Does the risk differ by alcohol ‘quality’ (for example, a natural wine or high-quality wine versus one with more additives) or type of alcohol? Is there a ‘safe’ limit? What role does genetics play? Do other preventative measures, such as healthy, clean eating and exercise, ‘offset’ your cancer risk from alcohol use, and – if so – by how much?   

These questions highlight only some of what we do not know, and it is important to note that they do not discredit the central fact – alcohol and cancer are directly linked. But what it does show is that there is more research to be done, especially to reduce some of the bias, or confounders, in the current data used to date. This makes sure the most complete evidence is available to guide education and policy making.

From a 30,000-foot view, alcohol damages your DNA, which increases your cancer risk. 

So, what does all of this mean for you? 

We should commend Murthy for bringing this information into the national spotlight. Information is empowering, and now – after reading this piece – I’m confident you can make a more knowledgeable decision for yourself about how much and how often to drink alcohol. 

From my perspective, I strongly believe that moderation is key, and I will continue to stress this as a physician and follow this approach in my own life. While many may stop drinking alcohol altogether after this advisory was published, I urge all others to strive to moderate their intake.  

Personally, I will still enjoy a social beer here or a glass of wine there. At the same time, however, I plan to decrease my alcohol consumption overall. It’s an individual decision, and as a cancer survivor (testicular cancer) myself, I still want to ‘live my life’. 

Ultimately, I challenge all of us to take a step each day to be a bit healthier – eat better, drink less, work out more and support our mental and spiritual health and well-being. 

The opinions, thoughts, and ideas expressed in this article are those of the author only and not necessarily those of any employers or institutions of which he is affiliated.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The stock market is in pullback mode with the S&P 500 EW ETF down 5.15% over the past month and down 1% year-to-date. This makes it a good time to monitor relative performance and create a relative strength watch list. Stocks and ETFs holding up best during pullbacks often lead when the market regains its footing. Today’s report will show a starter list and analyze the chart for an AI Robotics ETF.

The table below shows 1-month and year-to-date performance for a selection of industry group ETFs. With the S&P 500 EW ETF down on both timeframes, ETFs with gains are holding up well and ETFs with smaller losses show relative strength (less weakness). Five ETFs are up on both timeframes and holding up well in the face of broad market weakness.

Note that this list is simply the first cut. I would make a further cut by insuring that the ETF is in a long-term uptrend. For example, the Clean Energy ETF (PBW) is below its 200-day SMA and would not make the cut. The Medical Devices ETF (IHI) and Robotics AI ETF (ARTY) are in long-term uptrends, and make the cut. Let’s look at ARTY. A recent Chart Trader report/video highlighted the recent breakout in IHI.

The chart below shows ARTY hitting a new high in early December and price above the rising 200-day SMA. ARTY is in a long-term uptrend. There was a big breakout in mid October, an oversold reading in late October and then a 17% run to new highs. ARTY then formed a pennant and broke out with a surge earlier this week, only to fall back the last three days. Overall, I think the pennant breakout is still bullish and this is a throwback to the breakout zone. A break below the pennant lows would negate this pattern and argue for a deeper correction.

Chart Link

The middle window shows the price-relative (ARTY/RSP Ratio) breaking above its 200-day SMA in late November. ARTY shows relative strength and the price-relative hit a new high in early January. The lower window shows %B, which I use to identify oversold conditions within an uptrend. A dip below 0 means the close is below the lower Bollinger Band. This means there was a pullback within the uptrend, which is an opportunity.

I will be following ARTY and other leading ETFs closely in the Chart Trader reports and videos. Our reports warned of the breakout in the 10-yr Treasury Yield in before Christmas (HERE) and we also showed how to distinguish between a robust bounce and a dead cat bounce (HERE).

Click here to take Chart Trader trial and get immediate access.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////

The inaugural 12-team College Football Playoff bracket has been narrowed down to the final two teams.

The No. 7 seed Notre Dame Fighting Irish will face off against the No. 8 seed Ohio State Buckeyes in the College Football Playoff national championship game at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta on Jan. 20 after punching their tickets in the Orange Bowl and Cotton Bowl, respectively.

Both teams benefitted from the expanded playoff field. Instead of a four-team playoff format that was used the last decade, the CFP bracket officially expanded to 12 teams this season. Despite Notre Dame suffering an early loss to Northern Illinois and Ohio State dropping two games – to Oregon and rival Michigan – both teams’ playoff hopes remained alive. Now, they are one win away from their ultimate dream.

ORANGE BOWL: Notre Dame edges Penn State to reach CFP title game

COTTON BOWL: Ohio State upends Texas to reach CFP title game

Ohio State is looking for its first national championship since 2014, while Notre Dame is vying for its first national championship since 1988. Here’s everything you need to know about the CFP national championship game:

When is the CFP national championship game?

The College Football Playoff national championship game between the Notre Dame Fighting Irish and the Ohio State Buckeyes is scheduled for Monday, Jan. 20 at 7:30 p.m. ET at Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta.

How to watch the CFP national championship game?

The national championship game between the Notre Dame Fighting Irish and the Ohio State Buckeyes will broadcast nationally on ESPN.

The game can also be live streamed on ESPN+, the ESPN app and Fubo, which is offering a free trial.

Watch the CFP national champioship game on Fubo

CFP national championship game: Date, time, TV

Date: Monday, Jan. 20
Location: Mercedes-Benz Stadium in Atlanta
Time: 7:30 p.m. ET
TV: ESPN

College Football Playoff scores

How did we get here? Here are the scores from all the College Football Playoff games leading up to the championship, from semifinals to quarterfinals and first-round games:

College Football Playoff semifinals

Thursday, Jan. 9

Orange Bowl: No. 7 Notre Dame 27, No. 6 Penn State 24

Friday, Jan. 10

Cotton Bowl:No. 8 Ohio State 28, No. 5 Texas 14

College Football Playoff quarterfinals

Tuesday, Dec. 31

Fiesta Bowl: No. 6 Penn State 31, No. 3 Boise State 14

Wednesday, Jan. 1

Peach Bowl: No. 5 Texas 39, No. 4 Arizona State 31 (OT)
Rose Bowl: No. 8 Ohio State 41, No. 1 Oregon 21

Thursday, Jan. 2

Sugar Bowl:No. 7 Notre Dame 23, No. 2 Georgia 10
The Sugar Bowl was postponed one day as a result of the deadly attack in New Orleans.

College Football Playoff first round

No. 1 Oregon, No. 2 Georgia, No. 3 Boise State and No. 4 Arizona State all had first-round byes.

Friday, Dec. 20

Game 1: No. 7 Notre Dame 27, No. 10 Indiana 17

Saturday, Dec. 21

Game 2: No. 6 Penn State 38, No. 11 SMU 10
Game 3: No. 5 Texas 38, No. 12 Clemson 24
Game 4: No. 8 Ohio State 42, No. 9 Tennessee 17

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

We occasionally recommend interesting products and services. If you make a purchase by clicking one of the links, we may earn an affiliate fee. USA TODAY Network newsrooms operate independently, and this doesn’t influence our coverage.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

There is something incredibly satisfying about watching the Washington Commanders’ resurgence and knowing that, somewhere, it’s got to be driving Dan Snyder nuts.

For almost a quarter of a century, that miserable, misogynistic and mean-spirited man owned one of the NFL’s crown jewels and for almost that entire time, the team was as awful as he was. Six playoff appearances in 24 years, and only one postseason win this century. Just two seasons with double-digit wins. Scandal after scandal after scandal after scandal.

Snyder finally sold the team in the summer of 2023 and, lo and behold! Two seasons later, the Snyder-less Commanders are back in the playoffs. With the fourth-best record in the NFC, no less.

“Thank you guys for everything,” current Commanders owner Josh Harris told his team after it clinched a playoff berth. “Playoffs!”

Having a winning team in Washington is good for the NFL, which has seen big ratings for Commanders games this year. It’s good for the long-suffering fans of the franchise, too, who endured one embarrassment after another from Snyder.

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

Mostly, though, it’s good for all of us, who needed to believe that karma would eventually get its due. Who needed the reassurance of knowing you cannot get away with being a garbage human.

Sure, Snyder is still a very wealthy man, thanks to the $6 billion Harris and his fellow investors paid for the Commanders. He escaped appropriate punishment for a laundry list of wrongdoings, which included sexual harassment of employees and fostering a toxic and abusive workplace.

But the Commanders were Snyder’s lifelong love, his fandom dating back to when he was a kid and he’d go to games with his dad. Now that the Commanders are finally enjoying success, when they’re no longer among the NFL’s pariahs and pathetics, Snyder has no claim to it.

He can’t strut into the box reserved for the opposing team’s owner or hold court on the field ahead of Sunday’s wild-card game against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers. Should he turn up at Raymond James Stadium, his demand to be recognized as “Mr. Snyder” will be greeted with the eye roll it always deserved.

The Commanders are somebody else’s team now, and the glow of their accomplishments this season is reflecting on someone else. It’s schadenfreude that was long overdue.

Some might say it’s petty to revel in Snyder’s disappointment but … too bad. Team owners are, often, a pretty shameful bunch. In the NFL alone, Jimmy and Dee Haslam broke the bank to sign an unrepentant sexual predator, then tried to justify it by smearing the women. Houston Texans owner Cal McNair used a racist slur at a team golf outing. Los Angeles Rams owner Stan Kroenke, Los Angeles Chargers owner Dean Spanos and Las Vegas Raiders owner Mark Davis gave their loyal fans the middle finger when they left town to chase shiny new stadiums.

But Snyder was in a class by himself, the worst owner in all of sports.

He clung to his team’s former racist nickname for years, despite overwhelming sentiment against it. Only after sponsors started distancing themselves from the team did he finally relent. He couldn’t get a stadium deal done in Virginia, Maryland OR the District of Columbia.

He was ordered by the NFL to pay $60 million following an investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct and financial improprieties against him. This is not to be confused with the $10 million fine the Commanders had to pay after a previous investigation found a toxic and misogynistic culture permeating the team.

And let’s not forget the Congressional investigations of both Snyder and his franchise!

“The Commanders can’t have it both ways,” U.S. Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., said during the House Committee on Oversight and Reform’s June 2022 hearing on allegations of a toxic workplace. “You can’t be constantly asking the public for subsidies and investment, and then not observing basic laws that govern the workplace.”

But Snyder had long acted as if he were above reproach, be it from the NFL, the fans or outside investigators. He didn’t care if he rubbed everyone the wrong way or that he was doing damage to both the franchise and league he claimed to love so much. Snyder was the owner of Washington’s football team, and he was going to do as he damned well pleased.

Except win. That he could never manage, and the Commanders’ quick turnaround under Harris is a further indictment of Snyder’s incompetence.

Getting back to the playoffs is a triumph for the Commanders. Doing it without Snyder gloating and getting the credit makes the resurgence that much sweeter.

Follow USA TODAY Sports columnist Nancy Armour on social media @nrarmour.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY