Archive

2025

Browsing

Boeing has lost more than $2 billion and counting on its Starliner spacecraft after a rough year in which the capsule’s first astronaut flight turned into a headache for NASA.

The Starliner program reported charges of $523 million for 2024 — its largest single-year loss to date — Boeing reported in a filing on Monday. The company noted that Starliner is under a fixed-price contract from NASA, so “there is ongoing risk that similar losses may have to be recognized in future periods.”

Since 2014, when NASA awarded Boeing with a nearly $5 billion fixed-price contract to develop Starliner, the company has recorded losses on the program almost every year.

Boeing’s program competes with Elon Musk’s SpaceX, which has flown 10 crew missions for NASA and counting on its Dragon capsules.

Last summer, Boeing’s first crew flight went awry after part of the capsule’s propulsion system malfunctioned. While Starliner delivered astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams to the International Space Station, NASA made the decision to bring Starliner back empty and use SpaceX to return the crew early this year — an agency choice that recently became politicized.

Neither Boeing nor NASA have provided details on how or when they plan to resolve the Starliner propulsion issue.

Boeing last week confirmed that Starliner Vice President Mark Nappi was leaving his role, Reuters reported, with the company’s ISS program manager John Mulholland named as his replacement. Mullholland previously led the Starliner program from 2011 to 2020.

Nearly four months ago, NASA said it was keeping “windows of opportunity for a potential Starliner flight in 2025,” but scheduled SpaceX to fly both its crews on missions launching in spring and late summer. NASA then specified that “the timing and configuration of Starliner’s next flight will be determined once a better understanding of Boeing’s path to system certification is established.”

The agency has not given an update on Starliner since making those comments in October.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Anheuser-Busch is set to flood the zone on Super Bowl Sunday.

A big game staple for almost all of the past 50 years, the beverage giant will be impossible to miss from kickoff to the final gun of Super Bowl 59, with a whopping 3 ½ minutes of ad time touching four of their biggest brands.

Their big buy – the rate for 30 seconds on Fox’s broadcast was up to about $8 million – makes them the No. 1 alcohol advertiser on the game, this just four years after its legacy label, Budweiser, sat out the game altogether.

AD METER: Vote on the best 2025 Super Bowl commercials

Not so in 2025, where equine staples and stars of stage, screen and sport indicate Anheuser-Busch is adopting a most aggressive stance.

AD METER 2025: Sign up to rate all the commercials from the big game!

“This is a privilege that our company and brands get associated with this massive moment in culture,” says Kyle Norrington, Anheuser-Busch’s chief commercial officer.

“It means a lot, not only to our marketing team but to the 65,000 people in our Anheuser-Busch system that make this the moment it deserves to be in culture in America. We don’t take that privilege lightly.”

Clydesdales: Back to the basics

The last add to the Super Bowl lineup was its most iconic: Anheuser-Busch elevated Budweiser from a regional to a national spot after getting positive internal feedback on its spot starring yet another Clydesdale.

This time, “First Delivery” highlights a Clydesdale foal who shows his keeper that he’s ready for a chance to join the pack. It is, Norrington says, the 47th Super Bowl ad featuring a Clydesdale.

“We hear from our fans that Super Bowl is just not the same without the iconic Clydesdales,” says Norrington. “(First Delivery) reinforces that we’ve been delivering since 1876 and will continue for decades to come.”

Beyond the Clydesdales, Peyton Manning is proving to be something of a horse for Anheuser-Busch, himself.

The longtime Bud Light ambassador completes a troika with comedian Shane Gillis and pop star Post Malone after the latter two teased their Super appearance in an ad during the conference championship games.

They comprise the Big Men on the Cul-de-Sac, charged with enlivening tract-home afternoons with some macrobrew and barbecue. Manning and Post Malone are reunited for a second consecutive year.

Stella Artois enlists Matt Damon, David Beckham

Meanwhile, the fast-growing Michelob Ultra label takes its active-lifestyle mien to a higher level, with septuagenarian performers Catherine O’Hara and Willem Dafoe posing as pickleball hustlers, the better to cop Ultras off unsuspecting athletes such as Sabrina Ionescu, shot put gold medalist Ryan Crouser and NFL Hall of Famer Randy Moss.

Moss will appear on the Super Sunday screen two months after surgery to remove a cancerous mass from his bile duct.

We’ll respect Randy’s privacy at this moment,” says Norrington. “He’s been an amazing partner, a Hall of Famer and is very excited about this ad coming to life, as are we.”

Another athlete who seized prominence in the late ‘90s, soccer star David Beckham, teams with Matt Damon to round out Anheuser-Busch’s brand attack. Their Stella Artois spot, “David and Dave,” pits the pair as long-lost brothers reunited around beer.

It won’t be the last we’ll see of the duo, as Norrington notes the Super Bowl spot kicks off “a fully-integrated campaign from now until the end of the year.”

AD METER 2025: Vote on best commercials

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

NEW ORLEANS – Less than a day after Roger Goodell so eloquently amplified the NFL’s commitment to DEI to kick off another ultimate week of hype and excellence came word that the most popular sports league in the nation has decided to scrap its “End Racism” slogan from a marquee end zone spot during Super Bowl 59.

What a fumble.

Sure, you can’t hate on the “Choose Love” and “It Takes All Of Us” messaging that will be stenciled at the back of the end zones at the Caesars Superdome on Sunday – when more than 200 million viewers are expected to watch at least part of the clash between the Kansas City Chiefs and Philadelphia Eagles.

Yet it’s an opportunity blown at a time when “End Racism” is a theme that clearly needs to be expressed in our nation – and, given the global audience the NFL efforts to grow, needs to be coming from our nation.

That’s doubly true when considering another bit of pregame news that surfaced on Tuesday: President Donald Trump is coming.

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

Trump, who irresponsibly and hatefully blamed DEI for the mid-air collision near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport last week that cost the lives of 67 people while heroic first responders were still recovering bodies from the Potomac River, will be the first sitting president to attend a Super Bowl.

That’s one person who needs to see “End Racism” messaging – if only as a subliminal reminder of social responsibility. But obviously as something even deeper.

The NFL maintains its Super 59 end zone slogans acknowledge a series of deadly national tragedies this year – including the crash of a medical jet in Philadelphia, the devastating wildfires in Los Angeles, the New Year’s attack in the French Quarter, blocks from the Superdome, and of course the collision outside Washington, D.C., that involved an Army helicopter and a commercial regional jet.

Still, the NFL doesn’t have to kick aside the pointed message acknowledging racism in our society while showing respect for the other tragedies. The “End Racism” slogan has widely been part of NFL end zone imagery since 2021, when an apparent “racial reckoning” was ignited after the heinous death of a Black man, George Floyd, fueled protests and a wave of DEI actions from corporate America.

Now, with Trump back in the White House launching an attack on DEI programs and principles – and alternatively appointing some loyalists with sketchy credentials to key roles – the timing couldn’t be worse for the NFL to drop its “End Racism” slogan.

The NFL, as powerful as it is, should stand on its slogan as a matter of principle. Make a bold statement, no matter “who dat” is in the dome.

Talk about taking five steps back.

“We got into diversity efforts because we felt it was the right thing to do for the National Football League, and we’re going to continue those efforts because we’ve not only convinced ourselves, I think we’ve proven to ourselves that it does make the NFL better,” Goodell said during his state-of-the-NFL news conference on Monday, when I asked about the league’s DEI commitment in the face of the Trump administration and a trend in corporate America that has seen too many companies roll back their DEI efforts.

Goodell added: “We’re not in this because it’s a trend to get into or a trend to get out of it. Our efforts are fundamental in trying to attract the best possible talent to the NFL, both on and off the field.”

The Commissioner wasn’t speaking specifically about the change in the end zone slogan, which didn’t come to light until Tuesday morning with a report by Mike Silver in The Athletic. Goodell alluded to the Rooney Rule – which stipulates that NFL teams must interview at least two external minority candidates for head coach and general manager positions – and is one of the pillars of the league’s DEI efforts.

That’s still noble, even as debate continues about the effectiveness of the Rooney Rule and results with hirings and firings raise suspicions about commitments by some to equal opportunities.

Yet clearly, action speaks louder than words in all of this. In dropping the end zone slogan that acknowledges racism, the NFL may have inadvertently sent another message – we don’t care about it that much – to a large swath of its fan base that is too often marginalized.

Goodell, for all that he has done to diversify the ranks at league headquarters and to support DEI programs, should know better.

Remember, the NFL is constantly watched and scrutinized. When it engages as a socially responsible corporate leader – or not – that gets noticed, too.

Then again, maybe it’s just a coincidence that we’ve learned of the “End Racism” slogan dump just when Trump happens to be pegged to attend the Super Bowl. Or just plain dumb luck.

Regardless, it’s bad optics for the NFL.

It makes me wonder: Is the NFL threatened by Trump? If you think the league – with its massive TV ratings and soaring franchise values – should feel insulated from any attacks from the president, think again.

Remember Colin Kaepernick and the national anthem protests?

When Trump, during a rally, blasted players for their protests, it illustrated just how big of a target the NFL can be. Now it’s fair to wonder whether the league is sensitive to the possibility of further attacks.

In 2024, the NFL was one of more than a dozen companies targeted by America First Legal, founded by Stephen Miller, which charged that the DEI programs were unlawful and discriminatory against white people – and requested that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) investigate the league.

That action, which included a letter to Goodell, didn’t move the needle with the NFL.

Yet Miller, an advisor during the first Trump administration, is now deputy chief of staff and U.S. Homeland Security advisor. Given the anti-DEI actions and rhetoric in play from the White House, it’s not a stretch to think that Goodell and Co. might be a bit nervous about the possibility of an attack against the Rooney Rule, a key component of larger DEI strategies for the league.

True, it takes all of us. And we need to choose love. Yet in this social environment, there are some messages – especially as attached to the event that will draw the biggest audience of the year – that the NFL should not be afraid to express.

Follow Jarrett Bell on X @JarrettBell.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Pretty much any coach in the country will tell you the number next to their team’s name doesn’t matter, but when it comes to the NCAA men’s basketball tournament, that digit can influence whether a team is a one-and-done participant or on its way to the Final Four.

Of course, having the top seeds won’t ensure a national championship, but it certainly makes the quest for one easier. The better seeded teams get to start the tournament closer to home − greater chance for bigger fan presence − and can get favorable draws while others may have to go through a gauntlet. As the tournament nears, teams are jockeying for position in the field, trying to give themselves the best chance for success in March.

Getting into the tournament is one thing, but it’s a whole other challenge to ensure the best possible path to the Final Four. Here are the times on the rise in the latest USA TODAY Sports Bracketology, and which teams are stumbling down the seed line.

Rising:

Florida

Current projected seed: No. 1 (West)

The Gators became the third SEC team projected to be a top seed, and Florida has the resume to back it up. Although they didn’t look good in a 20-point loss to a depleted Tennessee team Saturday, the Gators have navigated conference play and already owns a victory against the Volunteers. Florida can really make a strong case for its positioning on the road against Auburn on Saturday.

All the players and the plays: Sign up for USA TODAY’s Sports newsletter.

Texas A&M

Current projected seed: No. 3 (Midwest)

A team contending for a double-bye in the SEC tournament, Texas A&M continues to stockpile on those precious Quad 1 victories with seven of them, the fourth most in the country. The Aggies have won four of their last five games, with the lone defeat coming on a last-second shot against Texas. They are also in one of the easier stretches in its conference schedule, giving the Aggies a prime opportunity to stay hot.

Texas Tech

Current projected seed: No. 4 (Midwest)

The hottest team in the Big 12 is Texas Tech with seven consecutive wins, including a defeat of Houston last weekend. Ranked No. 8 in the NET rankings, the Red Raiders have overcome some bad early season losses with some of the best victories in the conference − they are the only team that can say it has beaten both teams at the top in Arizona and Houston.

St. John’s

Current projected seed: No. 6 (East)

Look who is on top of the Big East. Rick Pitino has New York City rocking with a 11-1 conference record and St. John’s riding a nine-game win streak, the program’s longest since 1984-85. The Red Storm are coming off their best win of the year against Marquette. With 20 wins already, St. John’s can improve its stock by capitalizing on Quad 1 opportunities with only two wins in the category.

Arizona

Current projected seed: No. 4 (East)

Who thought in middle December that Arizona would be contending for a Big 12 title? After a 4-5 start, the Wildcats have gone 12-1 since then, stacking up five Quad 1 wins in the process. After the overtime thriller against Iowa State, Arizona has positioned itself well to be a top four seed and potential being able to play out West in the first weekend of the tournament.

UCLA

Current projected seed: No. 9 (West)

UCLA flirted with the bubble when it couldn’t get a win to start January, and have now moved its way into being a single-digit seed thanks to a six-game win streak. The latest victory came Tuesday against Michigan State, the top team in the Big Ten. The offense has found life and the Bruins are in the running for a double-bye in the conference tournament.

Falling

Iowa State

Current projected seed: No. 2 (West)

Did Caleb Love’s buzzer-beating heave break Iowa State? Since the Arizona guard sank an incredible 3-pointer to force overtime against the Cyclones, they’ve two more times, both in bad fashion. The fell to Kansas State at home over the weekend and then didn’t put up much of a fight Monday against Kansas. The three-game skid has Iowa State tumbling out of the No. 1 seed picture unless it can get healthy quickly.

Oregon

Current projected seed: No. 6 (West)

Oregon started the season with one of the best resumes − a 9-0 record and five Quad 1 victories. However the Ducks have struggled in their first season in the Big Ten, losers of three in a row and four of their last five. They fell to a conference dweller in Minnesota on the road and came back to the West Coast to get trounced by UCLA before losing to Nebraska on Sunday. The eight Quad 1 victories are worth making the tournament, but Oregon isn’t looking like a team that deserves a top 16 seed.

Connecticut

Current projected seed: No. 8 (South)

Connecticut is the team that loves to surprise. One day it looks bad in a loss to Xavier, the next it grinds out a tough road victory against Marquette. Regardless, the impressive wins are starting to cancel out the horrid loses and the odds of making the second weekend aren’t looking good for the defending back-to-back champions. Freshman forward Liam McNeeley is expected to return, and the Huskies will need all the help to find consistency.

Mississippi State

Current projected seed: No. 5 (East)

The grind of the SEC is starting to get to teams like Mississippi State, and it’s resulting in the Bulldogs falling out of the projected top 16. The current stretch hasn’t been kind to Chris Jans’ team with three losses in the last four games. The Bulldogs couldn’t support Josh Hubbard against Alabama, and the offensive struggles continued in a 27-point home loss to Missouri.

North Carolina

Current projected seed: First four out

The brand can only take a team so far. North Carolina has played itself out of the tournament with four losses in five games, and some of those contests being complete head scratchers. Yes, it was going to be nearly impossible to go into Cameron Indoor Stadium and beat a really good Duke team, but the Tar Heels shouldn’t be losing to Stanford at home and collapsing at Pittsburgh. A 1-9 Quad 1 record is not pretty.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

NEW ORLEANS — Saints defensive end Cam Jordan said New Orleans is a head coach and a healthy season away from being championship contenders. 

The Saints are the only team left with a head coaching vacancy after Dennis Allen was fired in November following a 23-22 loss to the Carolina Panthers in Week 9, marking the team’s seventh straight loss after opening the season 2-0. Special team coach Darren Rizzi took over as interim coach in Week 10, but the depleted Saints limped to the finish line and missed the playoffs for the fourth consecutive season with a 5-12 record. 

Although the Saints have experienced “terrible luck” with the injury bug, Jordan said New Orleans should be considered a prime landing spot for any future head coach with its current roster, although he doesn’t think his team receives the respect they deserve.

NEW ORLEANS SAINTS: Best coaching candidates options

All things Saints: Latest New Orleans Saints news, schedule, roster, stats, injury updates and more.

Jordan said the main priority of the Saints new coach will be keeping players healthy and available throughout the entire season.

“Over the past three years our biggest problem has been health related issues on marquee players,” he said. “If you look at our roster when we started (the season)… we’re like, ‘Man, we can be special.’ By week three of four, we’re like, ‘Man, we need to find some more players.’”

Saints quarterback Derek Carr missed seven games with various injuries last season, including an oblique injury that sidelined him three games and a fractured hand and concussion that prematurely ended his season in Week 14. WR Rashid Shaheed missed 11 games due to injury. Center Erik McCoy missed 10 games. WR Chris Olave missed nine games. The injury list goes on. 

“I always feel like my roster can always compete, when healthy,” Jordan said. “When healthy we beat the bricks off teams, as you saw the first two games. Then after that, it was almost comical. We need our center. We need our guard. We need our quarterback.”

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt slammed Democrats Wednesday for their criticism of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), calling it ‘unacceptable’ and ‘incredibly alarming.’ 

‘Some elected Democrats are so steamed about DOGE – Congresswoman LaMonica McIver says we are at war. Ilhan Omar says we might actually see somebody get killed. And Chris Van Hollen says we have to fight this in the Congress, we have to fight this in the streets. So what now?’ Leavitt was asked by Fox News’ senior White House correspondent Peter Doocy. 

‘It’s unacceptable, the comments that have been made by these Democrat leaders, and frankly, they don’t even know what they’re talking about, because President Trump was elected with a mandate from the American people to make this government more efficient,’ Leavitt responded. 

‘He campaigned across this country with Elon Musk vowing that Elon was going to head up the Department of Government Efficiency and the two of them with a great team around them were going to look at the receipts of this federal government and ensure it’s accountable to American taxpayers. That’s all that is happening here,’ Leavitt continued. ‘And for Democrat officials to incite violence and encourage Americans to take to the streets, is incredibly alarming, and they should be held accountable for that rhetoric.’ 

Leavitt also said during her daily White House press briefing, ‘If you heard that type of violent, enticing rhetoric from our side of the aisle, from Republican leaders on Capitol Hill, I think there would be a lot more outrage in this room today.’ 

On Tuesday, Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., said, ‘What we are witnessing here is the biggest heist in American history.’ 

‘This is the most corrupt bargain we’ve ever seen in American history: Elon Musk gives $250 million to elect Donald Trump, and Donald Trump turns over the keys to United States government to Elon Musk and his billionaire friends and his cronies,’ Van Hollen said during a protest outside the Treasury Department in Washington, D.C. 

‘Are we going to let that stand? Hell no, we are not going to let that stand,’ Van Hollen added, later vowing, ‘We have to fight this in the courts, we have to fight this in the Congress, we have to fight this in the streets. We need to fight this all over America.’ 

‘Shut down the city! We are at war!’ Rep. LaMonica McIver, D-N.J., shouted into a microphone. 

On Monday morning, hundreds of employees for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) reported they were locked out of the agency’s computer system and that its headquarters in Washington, D.C., was closed on Monday.  

The agency’s fate is hanging in the balance as DOGE is working on an apparent overhaul of the agency. 

‘The level of disrespect actually is criminal because there are crisis response teams that are around the world that really rely on having access to their emails – having access to apps that they can utilize if there’s danger to them,’ Rep. Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., told MSNBC, according to The Hill. ‘All of those accesses are cut off.’  

‘So we might actually see somebody get killed. An American who works for the American government might be harmed in some of those countries that they’re operating in,’ she reportedly added. 

Fox News’ Emma Colton and Louis Casiano contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The Senate chair of the DOGE Caucus is exposing a ‘demonstrated pattern of obstructionism’ at the U.S.’ top aid agency in a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, outlined how the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) has been ‘stonewalling’ her office for years as she sought documents to ensure taxpayer dollars weren’t wasted at the agency, which is now under the microscope of billionaire Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 

‘USAID’s spending shows a blatant disregard for the wishes of American taxpayers, and it is time to disrupt the system,’ Ernst told Fox News Digital. ‘The agency has been wasting millions of tax dollars on things like tourism in Lebanon, Sesame Street in Iraq, sending Ukrainians to Paris Fashion Week and so much more.’

In one instance, the Iowa Republican claims USAID misled her staff to believe that details about funds going to businesses in Ukraine were classified, funds that in some instances were used for travel to fashion shows and film festivals. 

In 2024, after months of delays, USAID finally agreed to offer Ernst’s staff a review of recipients of taxpayer-funded assistance to businesses in Ukraine, according to the letter. 

But the agency insisted the documents be reviewed in a sensitive compartmented information facility (SCIF), suggesting the records would be classified. 

‘These requirements were all presented to my staff under the false pretense that this data was classified,’ Ernst wrote to Rubio. ‘Only after demanding to speak to your USAID Office of Security, my staff uncovered that this data was, in fact, unclassified.’

Ernst said that based on her staff’s review, it appears that over 5,000 Ukrainian businesses received U.S. taxpayer-funded assistance, with awards of up to $2 million each. 

That trade assistance was in some instances used to bankroll business owners attending glamorous film festivals and fashion shows in cities like Berlin, Paris and Las Vegas. 

She also accused the agency of ‘misleading’ her office on the costs of indirect aid. Negotiated indirect cost agreements (NICRA) allowed contractors to use more than 25 percent of the total award on costs like ‘rent for a partner’s corporate headquarters, advocacy costs, and other miscellaneous expenses.’

READ ERNST’S LETTER BELOW. APP USERS: CLICK HERE

Ernst said her staff reached out in November 2022 asking USAID for information on NICRAs with grant recipients. The agency responded, ‘USAID does not have a system to track or report on this data, as it is not possible to compare indirect costs between for-profit and nonprofit organizations,’ according to Ernst. 

In February 2023, Ernst followed up with a link to a publicly reported NICRA database that USAID confirmed does exist.

The agency then said that it ‘protects the confidential business information of its implementing partners, including NICRAs… outside the scope of a formal oversight request by a committee of jurisdiction.’

Then, Ernst partnered with former House Foreign Affairs Chairman Michael McCaul to give USAID the request from a ‘committee of jurisdiction.’ 

‘Even then, USAID refused to permit my staff to acquire the documents or take substantive notes on the NICRA rates. The lack of transparency was alarming because the NICRA rates far exceeded staff’s expected range of indirect costs allowed.’

Ernst said: ‘In the wake of this series of significant misjudgments and oversight obstruction by USAID, it is of the utmost importance to conduct a full and independent analysis of the recipients of USAID assistance.’

She also pointed to Chemonics, a government contractor that USAID’s inspector general found over-billed the U.S. government by $270 million through fiscal year 2019. Chemonics led a $9.5 billion USAID project to improve global health supply chains that, ‘led to 41 arrests and 31 indictments related to illicit resale of USAID funded commodities on the black market, and fueled ongoing allegations that Chemonics falsely portrays its projects’ outcomes to secure future contracts with USAID,’ Ernst wrote. 

‘No more stonewalling,’ said Ernst. ‘We need to scrutinize every last dollar being spent by this rogue agency.’

In a notice posted on its website Tuesday night, USAID announced that all direct hire staff would be placed on leave globally, except for designated personnel responsible for mission-critical functions, core leadership and specially designated programs. 

The Trump administration is now exploring merging the agency with the State Department and Rubio has been appointed its acting director. 

Rubio told reporters in El Salvador the ‘functions of USAID’ must align with foreign policy and called it a ‘a completely unresponsive agency.’

Democratic lawmakers, meanwhile, staged a protest outside the USAID headquarters on Tuesday, arguing that the agency is essential for flexing U.S. soft power throughout the world, preventing and monitoring disease outbreaks, and safeguarding U.S. national security.

‘USAID is the backbone of America’s soft power, helping to stabilize fragile regions and protect U.S. interests abroad,’ said Reps. Greg Meeks, top Democrat on the Foreign Affairs Committee, and Sara Jacobs,Calif., top Democrat on the Africa subcommittee. 

‘Weakening it will fuel global crises, endanger American security, embolden other nations like China and Russia, and leave the Trump Administration solely responsible for the fallout.’ 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

: The Senate will look to beat House Republicans to the punch next week on plans to enact President Donald Trump’s agenda via the budget reconciliation process.

Ahead of a weekly lunch meeting hosted by Senate Steering Committee Chairman Rick Scott, R-Fla., a plan was unveiled by Senate Budget Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., to push for a committee vote next week on a first bill, with plans for an additional reconciliation bill later in the year, a Senate Republican source told Fox News Digital. 

The first bill would include Trump’s priorities for border security, fossil fuel energy and national defense. The second bill would focus on extending Trump’s tax policies from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA).

Senior White House staffers were also present at the Wednesday lunch, the source said.

It comes amid some infighting within the House GOP about what level of spending cuts to seek in order to offset the costs of Trump’s priorities. An expected vote this week to advance a resolution through the House Budget Committee is now likely poised for next week as well.

The first step in the reconciliation process is marking up and advancing a bill through the Senate and House budget committees.

House leaders had intended to make the first move in the process. The Senate passing their own bill first, however, would essentially force the lower chamber to contend with whatever product comes from the other side of Capitol Hill rather than start from a position of their own choosing.

It would also shift gears to a two-pronged reconciliation bill blueprint, something opposed by the House Ways & Means Committee and House GOP leaders.

Proponents of the one-bill approach are concerned about leaving Trump’s tax cuts, which expire at the end of this year, on the back burner. House Ways & Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, R-Mo., previously referenced the fact that Republicans have not passed two reconciliation bills in one year since the 1990s, when they had a much larger majority.

Trump has said he prefers ‘one big, beautiful bill,’ but would be open to two.

Graham has notably been liaising with the House Freedom Caucus leaders on the subject all week, two sources told Fox News Digital. The caucus has preferred a two-pronged approach, in line with many Senate Republicans. 

By lowering the threshold for Senate passage from 60 votes to 51 out of 100, reconciliation allows the party in power to skirt its opposition to advance its agenda – provided the items included relate to budgetary and other fiscal matters. The House of Representatives already has a simple majority threshold.

But with razor-thin margins in the House and Senate, Republicans can afford precious little dissent to still get their priorities over the finish line.

Spending hawks on the House Budget Committee had balked at multiple offers by GOP leaders on a ‘floor’ for cutting back federal funding, calling for the baseline to be set at least at $2 trillion.

They’re also seeking assurances that House GOP leaders have a firm plan in place for those cuts.

Multiple House Republicans leaving their Wednesday morning conference meeting signaled they were growing anxious about the Senate jamming them with their own reconciliation bill.

‘I think there’s a lot of frustration right now,’ one House GOP lawmaker said. ‘There’s some concern now that if we don’t move forward with something soon, that the Senate is going to jam us.’

‘What we’re worried about is losing the opportunity. I think we’re more likely to cut than they are,’ a second GOP lawmaker said.

Johnson brushed off concerns that the Senate will act first in comments to reporters earlier this week, maintaining the House will take the initial step.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

The hostages held by Hamas since Oct. 7, 2023 are starting to come home, and it’s been a cause for celebration in Israel. Even before the inauguration, the Trump administration took the reins of driving a hostage deal and keeping pressure on the parties to keep the releases on schedule. For that, they have the gratitude of an entire nation.

But there is much work left to do.

My son, Itay, a U.S. citizen, was not on the list of those being released in the first phase of the deal. With the posturing and public statements from both sides claiming victory, coupled with the uncertainty surrounding the second phase of the deal, many hostage families like mine are concerned that it could collapse.

After nearly 500 days, all of the hostages’ families pray for a framework with a clear, detailed process regarding how every last hostage, dead or alive, would be released. We rejoice with the families of the hostages but are also envious, asking when will we be reunited with our family members?

Even today, after the deal has been partially implemented, there is still doubt that the deal will come to fruition. Over 30 hostages have been murdered in captivity since Oct. 7, and the bodies of the deceased hostages, set to be returned only in the subsequent phases of the deal, may be lost forever. No family deserves to live without a place to mourn their loved ones.

Because President Trump is a skilled dealmaker and has appointed people with similar skillsets, such as Middle East Envoy Steve Witkoff, I would like to provide my thoughts in business terms on the pathway to seal the Deal of the Century.

Before becoming the father of a U.S. hostage, I worked as a mergers and acquisitions dealmaker, and indeed, I find the current situation highly similar to the M&A process. In an acquisition, two sides negotiate for an extensive period of time to reach the first phase of the deal, commonly known as the signing date. The signing date details how the parties will continue to negotiate to get to the ‘closing’ date in good faith and delineates the valuable assets needed to be held in escrow to ensure that such a deal is indeed reached. Similarly, it is imperative that the U.S. and Qatar negotiators demand that both sides put valuable assets into ‘escrow’ and constantly create new leverage points so that failing to finalize the deal would be too costly for either side.

President Trump has been involved in numerous complicated real estate transactions and has almost always got the deal done. He understands these dynamics all too well and thus, is perfectly suited to this job. His understanding of deal dynamics has been critical to the initial hostage release. Now is the time for President Trump to continue to clear the table and release all of the hostages to enable him to focus on the main goal: the Deal of the Century.

I believe the Deal of the Century, comprising of normalization in the Middle East, can and must be struck before the window of opportunity for long-term regional stability is closed yet again. President Trump invited Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the White House this week as the first foreign leader to the White House. I trust President Trump has a new game plan in place to create the Deal of the Century that will lead to long-term stability in the Middle East and release the remaining hostages, including six U.S. citizens.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that President Donald Trump isn’t committing to deploying U.S. troops to Gaza after suggesting on Tuesday that the U.S. would ‘take over’ the Gaza Strip. 

‘It’s been made very clear to the president that the United States needs to be involved in this rebuilding effort, to ensure stability in the region for all people,’ Leavitt told reporters Wednesday at a White House press briefing. ‘But that does not mean boots on the ground in Gaza. It does not mean American taxpayers will be funding this effort. It means Donald Trump, who is the best dealmaker on the planet, is going to strike a deal with our partners in the region.’

Leavitt said that Trump is an ‘outside-of-the-box thinker’ who is ‘a visionary leader who solves problems that many others, especially in this city, claim are unsolvable.’ 

Trump announced Tuesday that the U.S. would ‘take over’ the Gaza Strip in a ‘long-term ownership position’ to deliver stability to the region. 

‘The U.S. will take over the Gaza Strip, and we will do a job with it, too,’ Trump said Tuesday evening in a joint press conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. ‘We’ll own it and be responsible for dismantling all of the dangerous, unexploded bombs and other weapons on the site.’

‘Level the site and get rid of the destroyed buildings, level it out, create an economic development that will supply unlimited numbers of jobs and housing for the people of the area,’ he said. ‘Do a real job. Do something different. Just can’t go back. If you go back, it’s going to end up the same way it has for 100 years.’

Trump said that ‘all’ Palestinians would be removed from Gaza under his plan. But Leavitt described their removal as ‘temporary’ during the rebuilding process and said that Trump and his team were sorting out specific details with allies in the region regarding next steps. 

‘Again, it’s a demolition site right now,’ she said. ‘It’s not a livable place for any human being. And I think it’s actually quite evil to suggest that people should live in such dire conditions.’ 

But the proposal for the U.S. to take over Gaza has sparked massive backlash, including from the Palestinian, Iran-backed militant group Hamas, designated by the U.S. as a terrorist organization. 

‘What President Trump stated about his intention to displace the residents of the Gaza Strip outside it and the United States’ control over the Strip by force is a crime against humanity,’ a senior Hamas official told Fox News on Wednesday.

Trump’s statements also left Democratic lawmakers in shock. 

‘I’m speechless, that’s insane,’ Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., told Jewish Insider. ‘I can’t think of a place on Earth that would welcome American troops less and where any positive outcome is less likely.’

Some Republicans also voiced caution, and Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., told Jewish Insider that the proposal ‘might be problematic,’ but that he would ‘keep an open mind.’ 

‘We’ll see what our Arab friends say about that,’ he said. ‘I think most South Carolinians would not be excited about sending Americans to take over Gaza.’ 

Meanwhile, Sen. Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., didn’t appear fazed by the remarks. 

‘I think he wants to bring a more peaceful, secure Middle East and put some ideas out there,’ Thune told reporters on Wednesday. 

Fox News’ Emma Colton and Greg Norman contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS