Archive

2025

Browsing

Houston basketball’s Milos Uzan will forever be remembered in Cougars lore for his game-winning bucket against Purdue in the Sweet 16. A potential foul that would’ve negated the last possession entirely likely won’t, however.

It’s worth noting there are, of course, plenty of what-ifs through the course of a game. But a play between Uzan and Purdue’s Braden Smith felt especially important.

As Uzan prepped to run Houston’s last set in the 60-60 game with under 20 seconds left, he drove right before putting a slight shoulder into Smith, who appeared to play off the shove and set his feet for a push or charge. The referees let the teams play through it, however, which led into the Cougars’ game-winning inbounds play.

‘He got away with one there,’ color analyst Steve Lappas said on the game broadcast.

Uzan followed up the no-call foul with a perfectly dialed-up inbound play, as he found Joseph Tugler in the paint before Tugler immediately bounce-passed back to Uzan for the game-winning shot at the rim with 0.8 seconds left.

Uzan was magnificent in the game altogether, with a game-leading 22 points on 8-of-17 shooting with six assists and three rebounds on the night. He outdueled Smith, the Big Ten Player of the Year, who had an off-shooting night with seven points on 2-of-7 shots. Smith dished out a whopping 15 assists, though.

The men’s NCAA Tournament could be looking at a much different outcome if there was a foul called there, and it appears it could’ve gone either way in the moment.

Here’s a look at the potential push by Uzan late in Houston-Purdue on Friday night:

Did Milos Uzan foul vs Purdue?

Here’s a look at the potential foul on Uzan that wasn’t called late in Houston’s game-winning possession over Purdue:

The result was a Houston set on the baseline, which Uzan ultimately made with 0.9 seconds left to give Houston the win and send the Cougars to the Elite Eight to play Tennessee.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

BIRMINGHAM, Ala. – Sedona Prince and the No. 2 TCU women’s basketball team are enjoying the best season in program history.

The Horned Frogs knocked off Louisville 85-70 behind the 6-foot-7 center’s 19 points and 4 rebounds, advancing to the first Sweet 16 in men’s or women’s program history. TCU plays No. 3 Notre Dame on Saturday.

Where is Sedona Prince from? 

Sedona Prince is from Liberty Hill, Texas, outside of Austin. 

How old is Sedona Prince?

Prince is one of the oldest players in the tournament at 24 years old. This is her sixth year of college: She spent 2018-19 at Texas, then transferred to Oregon, where she sat out the 2019-20 season before playing two season for the Ducks. She has spent the last two seasons with TCU. 

How tall is Sedona Prince?

Prince is a 6-foot-7 center.

Sedona Prince stats this season

Prince has played in every game this season, averaging 17.5 points, 9.5 rebounds and 3.0 blocks. She leads the Big 12 in total blocks and is third in the NCAA, with 105 total. 

Sedona Prince’s NCAA Tournament stats so far

Prince had an outstanding first-round game against Fairleigh Dickinson, scoring 16 points and shooting 8-of-12 from the field, all from 2-point range. She also had 10 rebounds in the win, with four of them coming on the offensive glass. Against Louisville in the second round, she scored 19 points to go along with 4 rebounds, 3 assists and 3 blocks.

What did Sedona Prince do to change the landscape of the NCAA?

In 2022, while she was at Oregon, Prince posted a viral TikTok video calling attention to the difference between the men’s and women’s weight rooms at the Final Four sites. The video showed the women only had a stack of hand weights as opposed to the men’s fully equipped weight room. The video led to more equal resources and branding. Before then, the womens’ NCAA Tournament was not allowed to use the March Madness moniker. In addition, the video spurred an overall gender-equity review in college basketball. 

What allegations have been made against Sedona Prince in the past?

Prince has faced multiple assault and sexual abuse allegations, the latest coming in January, according to a Washington Post report. According to police, a TCU student reported Prince assaulted her and that Prince asked her to sign a non-disclosure agreement. Prince went to the police as well to report she had been assaulted and that she suffered a black eye. No charges have been filed.

Through her attorney, Prince denied all allegations against her and said she has never ‘abused anyone in her life, whether mentally, emotionally or physically.’

Other allegations date back to 2019, according to a Washington Post report, when a sexual misconduct lawsuit involving Prince was dismissed. 

Another woman accused Prince of pushing her off of an ATV, as detailed in videos on TikTok, photos and screenshots of text messages that were shared with the Post.

As a result, a petition was filed calling for her removal from the TCU team, which garnered more than 200,000 signatures. 

Will Sedona Prince be in the WNBA draft?

Prince is a sixth-year graduate student and will enter the WNBA draft after this season as she has exhausted her eligibility. She did not play in the 2022-23 season due to a torn ligament in her elbow.

What was Sedona Prince’s recruiting ranking?

Prince was ranked the eighth overall prospect by ESPN and was a McDonald’s All-American and Jordan Brand Classic participant in 2018. Prince enrolled at Oregon as a five-star recruit after originally enrolling at Texas.

Scooby Axson of USA TODAY contributed to this report. Cooper Burke is a student in the University of Georgia’s Sports Media Certificate program.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The 2025 women’s NCAA Tournament continues with more March Madness action from the Sweet 16 on Saturday.

A four-game slate today features some of the country’s top teams, including two No. 1 seeds: Texas and USC, which will be without JuJu Watkins. The Trojans star tore her ACL and is out for the rest of the tournament.

Saturday’s action begins with No. 2 seed TCU taking on No. 3 seed Notre Dame at 1 p.m. ET on ABC. That game will be followed by Texas facing No. 5 seed Tennessee, also on ABC. The evening slate will have No. 2 seed UConn squaring off against No. 3 seed Oklahoma on ESPN, and the night will end with ESPN televising USC against No. 5 Kansas State.

Watch women’s Sweet 16 games on Fubo (free trial)

Here is Saturday’s full Sweet 16 March Madness schedule and expert predictions from reporters across the USA TODAY Sports Network.

Women’s March Madness Sweet 16 predictions

Expert predictions and how to watch women’s NCAA Tournament Sweet 16 games on Saturday:

All times Eastern

No. 3 seed Notre Dame vs. No. 2 seed TCU

Time, TV, Live stream: 1 p.m. | ABC | ESPN+, Disney+ (Watch on Fubo)

Nancy Armour, USA TODAY: TCU 
Cora Hall, Knoxville News-Sentinel: Notre Dame 
Meghan L. Hall, For The Win: Notre Dame 
Cydney Henderson, USA TODAY: TCU 
Jordan Mendoza, USA TODAY: Notre Dame 
Cory Diaz, Lafayette Advertiser: Notre Dame 
Maxwell Donaldson, The Gadsden Times: TCU 

No. 5 seed Tennessee vs. No. 1 seed Texas

Time, TV, Live stream: 3:30 p.m. | ABC | ESPN+, Disney+ (Watch on Fubo)

Nancy Armour, USA TODAY: Texas 
Cora Hall, Knoxville News-Sentinel: Texas 
Meghan L. Hall, For The Win: Texas 
Cydney Henderson, USA TODAY: Texas 
Jordan Mendoza, USA TODAY: Texas 
Cory Diaz, Lafayette Advertiser: Texas 
Maxwell Donaldson, The Gadsden Times: Texas

No. 5 seed Oklahoma vs. No. 2 seed UConn

Time, TV, Live stream: 5:30 p.m. | ESPN | ESPN+ (Watch on Fubo)

Nancy Armour, USA TODAY: UConn 
Cora Hall, Knoxville News-Sentinel: UConn 
Meghan L. Hall, For The Win: UConn 
Cydney Henderson, USA TODAY: UConn 
Jordan Mendoza, USA TODAY: UConn 
Cory Diaz, Lafayette Advertiser: UConn 
Maxwell Donaldson, The Gadsden Times: UCon

No. 5 seed Kansas State vs. No. 1 seed USC

Time, TV, Live stream: 8 p.m. | ESPN | ESPN+ (Watch on Fubo)

Nancy Armour, USA TODAY: USC 
Cora Hall, Knoxville News-Sentinel: USC 
Meghan L. Hall, For The Win: USC 
Cydney Henderson, USA TODAY: USC 
Jordan Mendoza, USA TODAY: USC 
Cory Diaz, Lafayette Advertiser: Kansas State 
Maxwell Donaldson, The Gadsden Times: USC

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

When filling out a men’s NCAA Tournament bracket, people often get ridiculed for still having the top seeds remaining as the field dwindles toward the Final Four.

But with the Elite Eight field set, those that went chalk are looking smart. Only teams seeded No. 3 or better remain in March Madness.

With all four No. 1 seeds, three No. 2s and one No. 3 left, the combined seed total of 13 is the lowest in the Elite Eight since 2007.

It’s a dramatic difference from last year’s Elite Eight. Thanks to NC State’s Final Four run, the combined total was 32. It was even higher in prior years: 37 in 2023 and 47 in 2022 − the highest since seeding began in 1979.

This year’s total of 13 matches 2007 for the lowest ever.

It wasn’t an easy path for all of the Elite Eight participants, though.

Yeah, teams like Duke and Alabama cruised, but teams like Texas Tech and Houston needed buckets in the final seconds to avoid elimination.

However, the eight teams still standing reaffirm what’s been thought for much of the season: there is clear separation between those at the top of the sport and the rest.

Comparing the 2007 and 2025 Elite Eights, the one 18 years ago did have better team records entering the tournament. In 2007, the Elite Eight teams combined for a 226-39 record when the bracket was unveiled. This year, the teams were 223-45.

But looking at the metrics, it’s clear this year’s crop is in a class of its own. In 2007, the top six teams in KenPom made it, but there was the outlier in Oregon, which was No. 18. By definition, not the strongest team to make it. Meanwhile, all of the remaining teams this season are ranked in the top nine of KenPom. At No. 8 is Gonzaga, which fell just short to Houston in the second round, and No. 10 is Maryland, which lost to Florida on Thursday.

With complete dominance from the game’s best, it begs the question: is this what the NCAA Tournament is going to be like in the NIL era, or is this just an anomaly year where upsets just didn’t happen?

No matter the results on Saturday or Sunday, it will be hard to claim any team had a fluke run to the Final Four. Aside from Texas Tech, the remaining squads all had to play a single-digit seed in the Sweet 16, and whoever ends up in San Antonio will have to beat a top 12 overall seed to get there.

There were no Cinderella teams in the Sweet 16. Now, the Elite Eight will be filled with true national championship contenders. The last time all four top seeds made the Elite Eight was in 2016, but only one ended up advancing. With how things are looking, we could be on the cusp of the first all-No. 1 seed Final Four since 2008.

If not, it will still be a final weekend full of heavyweights.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

BOSTON — Ilia Malinin could attempt as many as seven quadruple jumps in his long program Saturday, as he seeks to defend his world championship title.

One of them could be the famous jump that only he can pull off: The quad axel.

Malinin, 20, is the only person in figure skating history to successfully land the quad axel in international competition − a milestone for a sport in which jumps have played an increasingly important role. It’s become Malinin’s calling card, part of the moniker that he adopted several years ago, when he changed his Instagram handle to ‘quadg0d.’ And you’re sure to hear a lot more about the quad axel as the 2026 Winter Olympics in Milan-Cortina approach.

So what’s the big deal with the quad axel, exactly? What makes it that much more difficult than any other quadruple jump? Here are the answers to those questions, and everything else you need to know about the jump.

What is a quad axel?

There are six types of jumps in figure skating: Toe loop, flip, lutz, salchow, loop, and axel. The differences between the jumps lie in the method of takeoff and landing.

For instance, the first three jumps on the above list − toe loop, flip and lutz − are toe jumps, in which the skater uses the toe pick on his or her skate to elevate off the ice. The other three (salchow, loop and axel) are edge jumps. Taking off or landing on the inside edge, versus the outside one, is what differentiates the jumps.

The axel is unique because it is the only jump in which a skater takes off facing forward and lands backwards. All of the other jumps have a backwards takeoff. The ‘quad’ part of the quad axel indicates that there are four rotations in the jump.

What makes the quad axel so difficult?

The short answer is that quads, in general, are extremely difficult − even for most Olympic skaters. And the axel is the most difficult of the jumps because of the front-facing takeoff. This means the quad axel actually consists of 4.5 rotations, rather than four. No skater has ever landed a quintuple jump.

But Mexican skater Donovan Carrillo said there’s way more to the mythical nature of the quad axel than that. Physically, he said, it’s an incredible feat.

‘It’s a jump where you start from one foot, then you do four rotations and a half, you land on the other foot. But you only have less than a second to achieve those four and a half rotations,’ Carrillo explained. ‘So physically, it’s so crazy that (Malinin) is doing that jump. Just thinking about it, it’s just so crazy.’

When did Ilia Malinin first land a quad axel?

Malinin first landed the quad axel in competition at the U.S. International Figure Skating Classic in Lake Placid, New York in September 2022. It was the first clean, fully-rotated quad axel to be performed in competition.

‘When I’m practicing it, it’s pretty easy for me to figure out how to get the right timing and everything to have it be a good attempt,’ Malinin said afterwards. ‘To do it in competition is a different story because you have nerves and pressure that can get in the way of that. So I have to treat it like I’m at home, and it feels pretty good.’

What is the point value of a quad axel in figure skating?

The quad axel has a base value of 12.5 points, which is a full point more than the second most difficult jump, the quad lutz. But skaters can also earn points for grade of execution on top of the base value, depending on the crispness and technical elements of the jump. Malinin’s quad axel at nationals, for instance, was actually worth 16.79 points.

Some in the figure skating community have argued that the quad axel is actually undervalued, given that only one person has ever done it. It’s similar to the debate around Simone Biles and her famed Yurchenko double pike vault.

Is the quad axel easy for Ilia Malinin?

There are times he certainly makes it look easy. But in a conference call before nationals earlier this year, he said he and the quad axel ‘have a really big love-hate relationship with each other.’

‘There’s days where it cooperates and I feel really confident about it, and there’s some days where I still need to work on it a little bit and touch it up,’ Malinin said. ‘It’s been pretty normal into my training routine in practices, but sometimes it still is the quad axel. So it really does still [require] that energy and that mental focus that I need to put into it.’

Contact Tom Schad at tschad@usatoday.com or on social media @tomschad.bsky.social.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

BOSTON — On April 9, 2022, Alysa Liu announced her retirement from figure skating. She was only 16, but it strangely made sense. All the early mornings, the rigorous training, the unrelenting pressure, the moments of her childhood she was missing: it was time for her to do something else. 

She had become the youngest U.S. women’s champion ever at 13, then she won the national title again at 14. She was so tiny that the skaters she defeated had to pull her up to the top rung of the medal podium. At 16, she competed in the 2022 Winter Olympics in Beijing, finishing sixth. She won the bronze medal at the 2022 world championships a month later, then soon afterward posted on Instagram that she was done with the sport. 

“I’m going to be moving on with my life,” Liu wrote.

Flash forward to Friday night, March 28, 2025. Liu, now 19 and unretired, sailed through her triple jumps as if without a care in the world in her four-minute long program, delivering a breezy, delightful and whimsical performance to become the first U.S. woman in 19 years to win the world championship — with the 2026 Winter Olympic Games little more than 10 months away.

“Just what the hell?” Liu said when she was done, laughing as she perfectly summed up one of the most remarkable comeback stories in her sport’s history. Skaters don’t just disappear, reappear and then win world titles — but that’s exactly what Liu just did.

“Even yesterday, I didn’t expect this,” she said, referring to holding the lead after Wednesday’s short program. “I didn’t have expectations coming in. I never have expectations coming into competitions anymore. It’s more of what I can put out performance-wise and I really met my expectations on that part today.”

She was competing with a new-found freedom, given a second chance at the sport and a life she loves. She cartwheeled through the entry walkway before taking the ice for the short program, and she did it again Friday night when her name was called for the medal ceremony. In this pressure-packed sport where one stumble on the slippery ice can ruin the dreams of a lifetime, few if any have handled their nerves better than Liu did here over the past three days.

It was noticeable to her competitors. “I feel like her cheerfulness, her kindness and the way she’s always so happy brought her to this position on top of the podium,” said three-time defending champion Kaori Sakamoto of Japan, who finished second. “In fact, I would say something has changed because she’s more bright, she’s happier now.”

In the time she was away from skating, Liu attended UCLA and did things she never was allowed to do when she was competing, like going skiing for the first time. Trying out a new sport ended up rekindling her love for her first one, so about a year ago, she began practicing again, hoping to get back into skating shape. Whatever her goal was, it definitely wasn’t this. 

She became the first American woman to win a world title since Kimmie Meissner in 2006, but there’s a difference in the timing, and significance, of those titles. Meissner won hers a month after the Olympic Games, while Liu’s victory leads right into the Olympic year. She has now become a medal favorite for the Milan Games, and if she were to win an Olympic medal of any color, she would become the first American woman to do so since Sasha Cohen won the silver medal in 2006, and before that, Sarah Hughes won the gold and Michelle Kwan the bronze in 2002. 

Whatever comes next for Liu will be both fascinating and unexpected. “I have never regretted anything in my life,” she said. “Every decision I’ve made, I’m so glad I did. It really brought me to this moment.”

A second chance at 19. Who wouldn’t take that? 

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

ATLANTA — If you’re old enough and you’ve followed Michigan State basketball long enough, you’ve felt what you felt Friday night before.

That sense of trouble, deep in an NCAA Tournament. And you’ve also seen MSU teams that just have something about them, to where they find a way in the end.

Friday night’s 73-70 MSU Sweet 16 win over Mississippi had traces of the Iowa State regional final game in 2000, and hints of the win over Kansas in the regional semifinal nine years later. You might be able to think of a few other throat-tightening MSU NCAA tournament games. Games the Spartans had to dig deep and survive against worthy competition, during legendary NCAA tournament runs.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Mark Twain’s famous advice to ‘buy land, they aren’t making it anymore’ couldn’t have found a more receptive audience than President Donald Trump, a real estate man at heart who covets a certain piece of property to our north.

Vice President JD Vance and Second Lady Usha traveled to the Island nation this week, visiting a U.S. Space Force base, in the firmest message yet that Trump means business when he says he wants to make Greenland part of America.

Notice that when Trump talks about foreign countries he almost always references the properties he owns there, a golf course in Scotland or a hotel in Dubai. He’s not merely boasting. He’s saying that he has skin in the game and therefore understands the country.

This is not a president who puts much store in intangible multilateral defense agreements that allow the United States to pay for the protection of Danish Greenland. No, he wants the land, not some complicated leasing agreement.

And is it such a crazy notion? We are the nation that pushed Lewis and Clark across the Rockies. We have acquired Alaska and Hawaii, Guam and all the little micro-islands nobody has been to.

The last time the United States grew in territory was in 1947 with the addition of the Marshall Islands and some others, but these last 78 years have been an outlier. Prior to that, America’s appetite for land was almost insatiable. 

So why not Greenland?

The only reason that Greenland is Danish to begin with is that 1,000 years ago some Vikings bumped into it. Since then it’s been too cold for anyone else to bother with it.

And while it ultimately should be up to the Greenlandic people to decide their sovereignty, that is not the only consideration in a world where control of the Arctic could mean control of the globe.

Trump’s interests, which is to say America’s interests, may well be best served by possessing the strategic nation.

More than anything else, what is standing in the way of a big beautiful deal to buy Greenland, something the United States tried to do after occupying and protecting the large island in World War II while Denmark was under German rule, is the post-Cold-War order of the past 40 years.

Under the neo-liberal bromides of leaders with good hair, the West, led by the U.S., came to view newly-minted borders in Europe and elsewhere as sacrosanct, fixed as the firmament, immovable, which runs counter to all of human history, including America’s. 

It kind of worked for a while. There has been no third world war, but even by the mid-1990s, the former Yugoslavia was descending into violent chaos, there is no peace in the Middle East, and Russia has spent decades redrawing its border with Ukraine in blood.

To Trump, and to many Americans who think like him, if countries like Russia are expanding, if China has an eye towards doing so, then we cannot sit on the sidelines, especially if the defense of the free world is conducted on our dime.

In chess, the early 20th century saw the emergence of the hyper-modern style in which the conventional wisdom that pawns must physically occupy the all-important center of the board was tossed aside in favor of powerful pieces controlling the center from a distance.

But unlike chess, geopolitics does not have a firm and discrete set of rules. So one can see why Trump prefers the idea of physically holding space, rather than allowing it to be protected by a vague collection of Western interests.

Because we have been conditioned by the post-Cold War order, it sounds strange when Trump refers to borders as ‘artificial lines.’ But it’s absolutely true: Borders are negotiated, and you might even think of them as a kind of real estate deal.

Nobody wants to go to war over Greenland, but that is no reason not to pitch this deal to the 57,000 people who live there. America has a lot to offer, and maybe Trump can make them an offer too good to refuse.

In any event, as Americans we should not be shocked by or shy about the idea of expanding our territory. It’s not just what Trump has always done, it’s in America’s DNA. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

As federal judges exceed records with an onslaught of nationwide orders blocking President Donald Trump’s orders, some have revisited how each was confirmed, and whether Republicans could have foreseen their rulings or done anything more to block them. 

Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., a member of the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee, told Fox News Digital in an interview, ‘This is why I think I voted against every Biden judge.’

He acknowledged that many of the judges in question were confirmed before his time, given he was first elected in 2018. 

‘People said to me, ‘Why don’t you ever vote for any of Biden’s judges?” he said. ‘This is why.’

‘Because if they’re not faithful to the rule of law, then you can bet they’ll just be looking for opportunities to intervene politically.’

Since Trump entered office, he has faced a slew of nationwide injunctions to halt actions of his administration, which exponentially outweighs the number his predecessors saw. So far in his new term, the courts have hit him with roughly 15 wide-ranging orders, more than former Presidents George W. Bush, Barack Obama and Joe Biden received during their entire tenures. 

Some of those who have ordered the Trump administration to halt certain actions are U.S. District Judges James Boasberg, Amir Ali, Loren AliKhan, William Alsup, Deborah Boardman, John Coughenour, Paul A. Engelmayer, Amy Berman Jackson, Angel Kelley, Brendan A. Hurson, Royce Lamberth, Joseph Laplante, John McConnell and Leo Sorokin. There are 94 districts in the U.S. and at least one district court in each state. These courts are where cases are first heard before potentially being appealed to higher courts. 

Several of these judges were confirmed in the Senate in a bipartisan manner, and some even prevailed with no opposition. There were others who were opposed by every Republican senator. 

One of the most controversial judges, Boasberg, known for blocking a key immigration action by the Trump administration, was confirmed by a roll call vote after being nominated by Obama in 2011. The vote was 96-0 and no Republicans opposed him. 

Former Trump attorney Jim Trusty told Fox News Digital, ‘I don’t think the Republicans ever expected quite the onslaught of lawfare that we’ve seen when President Trump is in office.’

‘The activist nature of some federal district court judges – issuing nationwide injunctions against the Executive Branch on a minute’s notice – is unfortunate and puts pressure on appellate courts, including SCOTUS, to fix these problems,’ he explained.

However, he said the real problem is ‘an army of lawyers’ who he said are trying to ‘bend and twist legal principles.’

‘They are spending their days devoted to stopping President Trump’s agenda even if it means siding with Venezuelan gang members who illegally entered the US,’ Trusty claimed. 

Andy McCarthy, a former assistant U.S. attorney and a Fox News contributor, told Fox News Digital, ‘Republicans could have done a much better job blocking Biden’s judicial appointments.’

He pointed to Biden’s recent time as a lame-duck president, specifically referring to nominees that ‘squeaked by’ due to Republican absences. 

‘Biden’s nominees were very radical and should have been opposed as vigorously as possible,’ he said. ‘These are lifetime appointments and the progressives filling these slots will be a thorn in the nation’s side for decades.’

However, former Deputy Assistant Attorney General John Yoo, made a point of saying, ‘There was no way to know how they would rule in future cases like these.’ 

He argued that senators can conduct their due diligence to the best of their abilities, but they can’t see into the future. 

‘The Senate has the right to reject nominees whom it thinks will interpret the Constitution incorrectly, but nominees also have an obligation not to promise how they might rule on cases once they join the bench,’ Yoo said. 

Thomas Jipping, senior legal fellow with the Edwin Meese III Center for Legal and Judicial Studies at the Heritage Foundation, noted to Fox News Digital that senators ‘can’t use the filibuster to defeat the judge,’ which makes blocking controversial nominees even more difficult. 

‘The only way to actually defeat someone’s confirmation is to have the majority of the votes,’ he explained. ‘If Republicans are in the minority, there has to be at least a few Democrats voting against the Democratic nominee to defeat someone.’

Fox News Digital reached out to former Republican Senate Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, to comment on how these judges were able to get confirmed. 

The senators were asked if they were still happy with how the judges were confirmed and their individual votes. They were also asked whether there was anything alarming in the judges’ records and if Republicans did enough to block certain confirmations. 

McConnell’s office pointed Fox News Digital to comments he made over the legislative recess at a press conference in Kentucky. 

‘The way to look at all of these reorganization efforts by the Administration is what’s legal and what isn’t… they’ll be defined in the courts,’ he told reporters in response to the legality of potentially shutting down the Department of Education. ‘I can understand the desire to reduce government spending. Every Administration – some not quite as bold as this one – have tried to do that in one way or another. This is a different approach… and the courts will ultimately decide whether the president has the authority to take these various steps. Some may have different outcomes, I’m just going to wait – like all of us in effect are going to wait, and see whether this is permissible or not.’

Grassley’s office pointed to a previous statement from the senator’s spokesperson, Clare Slattery. 

‘The recent surge of sweeping decisions by district judges merits serious scrutiny. The Senate Judiciary Committee will be closely examining this topic in a hearing and exploring potential legislative solutions in the weeks ahead,’ she said. 

The committee has notably slated a hearing on nationwide injunctions for next week. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A bit more than a month into the 2025 MLS season — the milestone 30th in league history — a number of surprise teams have emerged as the second enters its second month of play. Here are five that stand out, so far:

Charlotte FC — Are coming off a 4-1 demolition of former U.S. national team coach Bruce Arena’s San Jose Earthquakes. Charlotte’s only blemish so far is a 1-0 loss to Inter Miami on March 9.

Chicago Fire FC — Former USMNT coach Gregg Berhalter might have this sleeping giant finally in its proper place among the league’s elite.

Nashville SC — Former USMNT interim coach B.J. Callaghan has this team off to its best start since joining MLS, with its most impressive victory a 3-1 statement against …

Philadelphia Union — The Union were coming off a 2024 season in which they failed to reach the playoffs, ending a six-year postseason streak. The team fired longtime coach Jim Curtin and hired former St. Louis City coach Bradley Carnell. Heading into 2025, soccer football pundits didn’t have high expectations for the Union. Well, they are the co-leaders in the Supporters’ Shield race with …

Vancouver Whitecaps FC — While their fellow MLS Canadian clubs appear to be early Wooden Spoon candidates, the Whitecaps have been a huge surprise. The biggest shocker of all was a Concacaf Champions Cup upset of Liga MX powerhouse CF Monterrey.

MLS Matchday 6: What are this weekend’s games?

(All games available on MLS Season Pass on Apple TV.)

Saturday

New England Revolution vs. New York Red Bulls, 2:30 p.m. ET
Toronto FC vs. Vancouver Whitecaps FC, 2:30 p.m. ET
Colorado Rapids vs. Charlotte FC, 4:30 p.m. ET
Atlanta United vs. New York City FC, 7:30 p.m. ET
D.C. United vs. Columbus Crew, 7:30 p.m. ET
Inter Miami CF vs. Philadelphia Union, 7:30 p.m. ET
Chicago Fire FC vs. CF Montréal, 8:30 p.m. ET
FC Dallas vs. Sporting Kansas City, 8:30 p.m. ET
Minnesota United FC vs. Real Salt Lake, 8:30 p.m. ET
Nashville SC vs. FC Cincinnati, 8:30 p.m. ET
LA Galaxy vs. Orlando City SC, 10:30 p.m. ET
San Diego FC vs. Los Angeles FC, 10:30 p.m. ET
San Jose Earthquakes vs. Seattle Sounders FC, 10:30 p.m. ET

Sunday

St. Louis City SC vs. Austin FC, 2:15 p.m. ET (FOX)
Portland Timbers vs. Houston Dynamo, 7 p.m. ET

MLS game of the week: Inter Miami vs. Philadelphia Union

Date and time: Saturday at 7:30 p.m. ET
TV/streaming info: MLS Season Pass

It’s still very early in the season, but Saturday’s Eastern Conference showdown at Chase Stadium in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, features two of the top five teams in the current Supporters’ Shield standings. To the surprise of many, it’s the Philadelphia Union who are co-pacing the 30-team field through five games played. The Union’s hot start has been fueled by surprise early season Golden Boot candidate Tai Baribo, who leads the league with six goals.

Inter Miami is off to a strong start — as expected — and successfully navigating Concacaf Champions Cup play, too (speaking of which, they have a first leg of a quarterfinal in Los Angeles against two-time Champions Cup/League finalist LAFC on Wednesday). Lionel Messi only has appeared in two MLS games so far this season but has been a factor, scoring a goal and assisting on two others for undefeated Miami. Messi’s status for Saturday’s game is TBD.

Where can you watch MLS games?

All Major League Soccer games air on MLS Season Pass on Apple TV. Some select games are available for free on Apple TV and viewers only need an Apple ID to watch.

In a major push to reach more viewers this season, Comcast Xfinity and DirecTV customers can subscribe and watch MLS Season Pass through the TV providers, while T-Mobile users will be able to access MLS Season Pass for free.

MLS betting odds: Who is favorite to win 2025 championship?

According to BetMGM, Inter Miami CF (+333) is the current favorite to win the 2025 league championship, followed by Los Angeles FC (+700), Vancouver Whitecaps (+1400), Columbus Crew (+1400) and New York Red Bulls (+1600).

MLS 2025 season key dates

May 6-7: U.S. Open Cup Round of 32: MLS teams enter the competition
May 14-18: Rivalry week
June 14-July 13: Club World Cup
July 23: MLS All-Star Game, in Austin, Texas
July 29-Aug. 31: Leagues Cup
Oct. 18: Final day of regular season (MLS Decision Day)

This post appeared first on USA TODAY