Archive

2025

Browsing

The two-week window for NFL teams to apply the franchise tag to pending unrestricted free agents (UFAs) opened Tuesday.

Among stars with expiring contracts, the tag is often an unpopular mechanism as it hinders (or completely eliminates) the ability to negotiate with other clubs during free agency. And while the one-year tag pays well – generally speaking, its value is based on the average of the top five salaries at a player’s respective position – it doesn’t offer the security of a long-term contract and prevents players from approaching the top of their financial market … though for some, typically players not drafted in the first round, the tag is a welcome windfall after they’ve outperformed a rookie contract.

Yet tags can also be a precursor to a trade or simply a placeholder that allow a player and his camp more time to hammer out a long-term arrangement (see Lamar Jackson, circa 2023). However when those outcomes don’t materialize, they can lead to missed training camps, occasional early season absences or – like in the infamous case of former Steelers star Le’Veon Bell – skipping a whole campaign and an entirely altered career arc. Consequently, buyers tend to be leery – especially considering, as the Jackson case ostensibly proved, other teams are apparently completely unwilling to part with two first-round picks, the cost to lure away a franchised player.

As all 32 teams mull their tag options preceding the 4 p.m. ET deadline on March 4, here’s a bit of advice for each (notes: salary cap projections courtesy of Over The Cap; teams listed alphabetically):

Arizona Cardinals

Plenty of free agent money (nearly $70 million) in the bank for a team that seems very close to a postseason breakthrough … but no reason to use any in the tag space.

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

Atlanta Falcons

Be nice to keep C Drew Dalman, 26, but he doesn’t warrant the offensive line tag – effectively a left tackle tag – especially for a team that has to do nearly $12 million worth of belt tightening.

Baltimore Ravens

The big question is what they’ll do with Pro Bowl LT Ronnie Stanley. He’s fantastic when on the field and a key component of what was the NFL’s top-ranked offense in 2024. But he’ll be 31 next month, just played a full season for the first time and could cost nearly $25 million if tagged – and Baltimore would have to clear cap space to franchise him. Seems like the best play is to let Stanley assess his market while leaving the door open for him to re-sign.

Buffalo Bills

Not only are the perennial AFC East champions nearly $17 million over the cap, none of their significant free agents – WR Amari Cooper, CB Rasul Douglas, S Damar Hamlin – are at an age or performance level worthy of a tag. This could be a second straight offseason where Buffalo struggles to make noticeable additions or retentions.

Carolina Panthers

It appears like they might be on the way up after bottoming out. But no need for GM Dan Morgan to get too far over his skis with a fairly tight cap (about $17 million to spend) and no marquee free agent on his roster, which wasn’t the case last year when OLB Brian Burns was tagged.

Chicago Bears

GM Ryan Poles can best use his $60+ million on outside UFAs – maybe the O-line specifically with two starting spots about to be vacated – rather than consider a tag for anyone positioned to depart.

Cincinnati Bengals

The fate of WR Tee Higgins, who was franchised last year, might be the most compelling question of any free agent – he’s ranked No. 1 by USA TODAY Sports – this offseason. A second tag would grant a 20% bump to nearly $26.2 million for Higgins, the only franchised player in 2024 who didn’t ultimately sign an extension. With more than $46 million in cap space, the Bengals can afford to do it. The question is whether they should given their significant defensive needs – and at a time when WR1 Ja’Marr Chase and DE Trey Hendrickson, among the top players at their respective positions league-wide, are both seeking top-of-market compensation. QB Joe Burrow hasn’t been shy about his desire to keep all of the above. However the roster might be best served with a tag-and-trade approach to Higgins, which would better enable Cincinnati to pay Chase and Hendrickson and perhaps pick up draft picks to flesh out the depth chart’s weak points.

Cleveland Browns

They’re overspent by more than $31 million, most in the NFL after New Orleans. Zero reason to make one of this organization’s many pressing challenges worse.

Dallas Cowboys

Kickers aside, no position can be tagged more cheaply than a running back. Therefore, case to be made here to franchise Rico Dowdle, who’s only 26, coming off a breakout season (1,328 yards from scrimmage) and relatively low professional usage prior to 2024. But considering Dallas has no wiggle room at present and will need to create some to extend LB Micah Parsons, that case for Dowdle falls apart pretty quickly.

Denver Broncos

After paying former QB Russell Wilson handsomely not to play for them in 2024, the Broncos are now out of cap purgatory with nearly $35 million available. But they have no reason to devote a sizable chunk of that to any of their UFAs.

Detroit Lions

They couldn’t convert the NFC’s No. 1 playoff seed into their first-ever Super Bowl berth, so they probably should spend a good portion of their $45 million free agency budget for depth – not a tag for CB Carlton Davis III or anyone else – after being ravaged by injuries late in the 2024 season.

Green Bay Packers

Similar situation to the NFC North rival Lions in that the Pack can be competitive in free agency – and have been much more so recently – but need not reserve any of their bankroll for a tag … especially given the opportunity to perhaps reel in a veteran wideout.

Houston Texans

Their only noteworthy free agent is WR Stefon Diggs … who is 31 and coming off reconstructive knee surgery. Moving on.

Indianapolis Colts

C Ryan Kelly has been a faithful, accomplished player here for nine seasons. He’ll also be 32 at the start of next season. Might make sense to retain Kelly but at a more prudent price point.

Jacksonville Jaguars

G Brandon Scherff, 33, has been a standout for most of his decade in the NFL. But, like the case with Kelly, tags are generally reserved for players with their best years ahead of them.

Kansas City Chiefs

They have several key players on expiring deals: LB Nick Bolton, G Trey Smith and S Justin Reid. What they don’t have is cap room … or, as their failed three-peat highlighted, a serviceable left tackle or sufficient pass rush depth.

Las Vegas Raiders

Their new regime has more than $92 million in available cap space … but no UFAs worthy of a tag. Hard to believe the Silver and Black won’t be more aggressive in pursuing a quarterback in the coming weeks, but stands to reason new coach Pete Carroll will otherwise be more focused on resetting the culture than trying to immediately spend this team out of its AFC West talent deficit.

Los Angeles Chargers

OLB Khalil Mack, who turns 34 on Saturday, remains a very effective player … if not one you tag to the tune of $25+ million. RB J.K. Dobbins just turned 26 and comes off his first NFL season with more than 1,000 yards from scrimmage … but his injury history makes him a dicey proposition – especially with his positional tag likely to jump past $13 million. The Bolts would be better served targeting players like Higgins and Smith while trying to re-up Mack at a more reasonable rate.

Los Angeles Rams

Could be some significant moving parts here, the futures of Super Bowl 56 heroes Matthew Stafford and Cooper Kupp currently in flux, Kupp revealing that the Rams are looking to deal him. Either way, with more than $37 million available, the Rams are in position to tag Alaric Jackson, a 26-year-old who’s held down the left tackle spot for the past two seasons. And if they stick with Stafford, paying the premium for Jackson makes further sense.

Miami Dolphins

They’ve already begun cutting costs, parting with players like CB Kendall Fuller and RB Raheem Mostert. That will need to continue for this bloated roster if the Fins  want to tag talented S Jevon Holland – though easy to argue they’re better off letting him go in order to focus on a pair of lines with significant issues.

Minnesota Vikings

With $55 million in the player acquisition coffers, they could tag QB Sam Darnold – even at roughly $40 million – and that might be the optimal strategy given this year’s light supply of quarterbacks, whether in free agency or the draft, even if it precedes a trade that brings back more draft capital to help 2024 first-round QB J.J. McCarthy. But there’s also a case to just keep Darnold to see if he can replicate or improve upon his Pro Bowl breakout. Barring that, franchising CB Bryon Murphy Jr., 27, at half the cost of Darnold, is equally sensible, especially as a bridge to a long-term deal.

New England Patriots

A ton of needs and ton of cap room here – nearly $120 million at present, most in the NFL – but no need to resource any of those funds on any players about to shake loose here.

New Orleans Saints

As is the case most years, no cap credit card is more maxed out – the Saints $54 million overbudget in 2025, highest in the league. Though the cap gymnastics here will begin soon enough, no reason to make them more difficult by adding a tag to the mix.

New York Giants

Lot of issues here but worrying about where to allot a tag isn’t one of them.

New York Jets

Among their slew of free agents, 28-year-old CB D.J. Reed is the most appealing. But for a team in the midst of its latest reboot and with limited cap space (shy of $17 million) – not to mention with stars like WR Garrett Wilson and CB Sauce Gardner newly eligible for extensions – a tag doesn’t make sense.

Philadelphia Eagles

The recently crowned champs will likely be raided in free agency with LB Zack Baun, G/T Mekhi Becton, OLB/DE Josh Sweat and DT Milton Williams poised to hit the market. With only $18 million in cap space, using the tag probably isn’t judicious – especially since Baun isn’t a pass rusher and Becton isn’t a regular tackle (here anyway). But with fellow LB Nakobe Dean rehabbing from a major knee injury suffered last month, EVP/GM Howie Roseman might want to figure out some way to re-sign Baun, a Defensive Player of the Year finalist, while relying on his depth and the draft to backfill the other spots.

Pittsburgh Steelers

They more than $53 million available for free agency. Doesn’t mean they should overspend on potential departures such as QBs Justin Fields and Russell Wilson or RB Najee Harris. Fields, who turns 26 next month, seems like the wisest investment among that trio. But even if the Steelers somehow wind up in a bidding war for him, it certainly wouldn’t justify such a prohibitively expensive tag.

San Francisco 49ers

Copious fluidity here, from the presumption that QB Brock Purdy will get his long-awaited extension while WR Deebo Samuel currently sits on the trade block. The Niners have nearly $44 million in cap room, and a good portion could go to Purdy. But they could quite feasibly pay their quarterback and also tag S Talanoa Hufanga, 26, who’s two years removed from an All-Pro season and one from a major knee injury. However his age and position should make him a preferable option to CB Charvarius Ward, who’s almost 30.

Seattle Seahawks

Even if they had cap room and a free agent worthy of a tag, they’re better off (belatedly) importing more players – on both sides of the ball – who better fit the way coach Mike Macdonald wants to operate.

Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Great as it would be to keep Chris Godwin in the building, you can’t risk paying an aging wideout coming off a dislocated ankle anything close to $25 million for one season of labor.

Tennessee Titans

They have more than $44 million at their disposal but need to spend more wisely than they did in 2024. That means no tag and a careful assessment of the quarterback market, which can provide the Titans an upgrade – whether via free agency or the draft.

Washington Commanders

As far as the culture and talent have come here in the last year, HC Dan Quinn and GM Adam Peters will doubtless try to maintain (and augment) it tag-free – and have more than $75 million to assist with that aim – despite how reliable soon-to-be 35-year-old LB Bobby Wagner remains.

What is the NFL franchise tag?

It’s a one-year tender that provides a player with a significant raise from his current team but impedes his ability to test the free agent market. A tag’s value is based on a player’s position. Per the NFL CBA:

“The Nonexclusive Franchise Tender shall be a one year NFL Player Contract for (A) the average of the five largest Prior Year Salaries for players at the position . . . at which the Franchise Player participated in the most plays during the prior League Year, which average shall be calculated by: (1) summing the amounts of the Franchise Tags for players at that position for the five preceding League Years; (2) dividing the resulting amount by the sum of the Salary Caps for the five preceding League Years . . . ; and (3) multiplying the resulting percentage by the Salary Cap for the upcoming League Year . . . (the ‘Cap Percentage Average’) . . . ; or (B) 120% of his Prior Year Salary, whichever is greater.”

Tag values rarely decrease year over year.

Franchised players have until July 15 to reach a long-term deal with their team. Otherwise, they must play the 2025 season on the tag.

Non-exclusive franchise tag: They allow players to negotiate with other clubs. If the player signs an offer sheet with a different team, his current one has the option of matching it or letting him go and receiving two first-round draft picks as compensation – a scenario that hasn’t occurred since 1998. However players can be franchised and traded for alternative compensation if an arrangement is reached.

Exclusive franchise tag: A player receiving this version of the tag cannot negotiate with another team.

Transition tag: Slightly less lucrative than a franchise tag, it returns no draft compensation to a player’s original team if it declines to match an offer sheet.

How much are franchise tags worth?

The value for each tag in 2025 has not yet been finalized. The following are the tag values, by position, in 2024:

Quarterback: $38.3 million

Running back: $11.95 million

Wide receiver: $21.82 million

Tight end: $12.69 million

Offensive lineman: $20.99 million

Defensive end: $21.32 million

Defensive tackle: $22.1 million

Linebacker: $24.01 million

Cornerback: $19.8 million

Safety: $17.12 million

Kicker/punter: $5.98 million

Which players received the franchise tag in 2024?

Giants OLB Brian Burns: Franchised by the Panthers, he was later traded to New York and signed a five-year, $141 million contract.

Bengals WR Tee Higgins: Played last season on the $21.82 tag for wideouts.

Jaguars OLB Josh Hines-Allen: Eventually signed five-year, $141.3 million contract.

Bears CB Jaylon Johnson: Eventually signed four-year, $76 million extension.

Ravens DT Justin Madubuike: Eventually signed four-year, $98 million extension.

Colts WR Michael Pittman Jr.: Eventually signed three-year, $70 million extension.

Titans CB L’Jarius Sneed: Franchised by the Chiefs, he was later traded to the Titans and signed a four-year, $76.4 million contract.

Buccaneers FS Antoine Winfield: Eventually signed four-year, $84.1 million extension.

Patriots S Kyle Dugger (transition tag): Eventually signed four-year, $58 million extension.

All NFL news on and off the field. Sign up for USA TODAY’s 4th and Monday newsletter.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Colorado football coach Deion Sanders just finished another recruiting season in Boulder with the same highly unusual track record as before:

No in-home visits for recruits. No off-campus visits to high schools.

The university confirmed this after USA TODAY Sports requested records of any recruiting trips he’s made in the last year after not making any before that, either. The latest recruiting period for head coaches to make off-campus contact with player prospects ended earlier this month, shortly before national signing day on Feb. 5.

“Head coach Deion Sanders did not make any in-home or off-campus recruiting visits,” the university said recently.

This remains unique in college football as a completely different way of convincing recruits to play for a college team. It’s also worked for Sanders so far, as shown by his results on the field last year and the major upgrade in talent he’s made to Colorado’s roster since his hiring there in December 2022.

But wouldn’t he be even better at Colorado if he invested himself more in recruiting high school prospects?

That’s one way of looking at it, recruiting experts told USA TODAY Sports. His employment contract at Colorado even includes a $200,000 annual budget for him to use private air travel for recruiting, which he didn’t use.

On the other hand, off-campus recruiting for a head coach doesn’t matter nearly as much in this rapidly changing era of college football.

Sanders, 57, seems to be proving that singlehandedly, even if few other college coaches could get away with this approach. He’s meeting the moment in his own way after the rise of wide-open free agency for transfer players and recruits now picking schools based more on money and exposure than having the coach sit down to dinner at home with mom.

Here’s how it breaks down after his third winter recruiting season in Boulder:

What is Deion Sanders’ recruiting strategy?

Instead of the standard practice of visiting the homes and high schools of recruits – and having those recruits visit campus, too – Sanders has used his national fame to lure in recruits to meet him on campus only. He even recently started a weekly entertainment talk show on Tubi to help reach recruits and their families another way – on their screens.

“That’s how I recruit,” Sanders said last month on a different show, hosted by Tamron Hall on ABC. “I don’t go to nobody’s school or nobody’s house. I’m not doing that. I’m too old to be going to somebody’s school, somebody’s house. All the kids that I’m recruiting, as a matter of fact, they in the (transfer) portal. They’re grown men with kids. They don’t need me to come around their crib and try to convince them to come play for me, nah.”

Sanders primarily has recruited transfer players, who generally aren’t recruited with off-campus visits from head coaches like high school players are because they’re older and have been through the recruiting process before as high school players. Sanders’ latest recruiting class signed during the early signing period in December − 17 transfer players and 14 high school recruits. It ranked 27th nationally overall, according to 247Sports.

All the players and the plays: Sign up for USA TODAY’s Sports newsletter.

Using fame and media to cast wider recruiting net

Sanders made those comments in New York on Jan. 10, which came during the limited winter contact period when head coaches are allowed by NCAA rules to visit recruits at high schools or homes. But instead of being on the road recruiting like other head coaches, he was on a publicity tour to promote another show of his on Amazon Prime Video – the documentary series “Coach Prime,” which showcases his program in Boulder.

These are recruiting tools that other coaches would want but aren’t getting because they’re not as famous or in-demand as Sanders – a Tubi show, an Amazon Prime show and a publicity tour that even included him appearing on ‘The Late Show with Stephen Colbert’ last month on CBS. Sanders also grants access to three video bloggers who showcase his program regularly on YouTube, including his eldest son, Deion Jr., who has more than 530,000 subscribers.

All combined, it’s a recruiting outreach program of sorts that’s unlike any other program. And it casts a wider net with potential recruits than a visit to the local high school.

But the lack of off-campus recruiting still comes with risk.

What is the risk?

When he’s competing against other head coaches for top high school recruits, the other head coaches could use this against him by telling those recruits, “If Sanders cared as much about you as we do, why doesn’t he get to know you better by visiting you and your family at home like we are?”

Sanders doesn’t go to them, in other words. The recruits instead are asked to come to him on the Boulder campus. Other coaches do both – hosting recruits on campus and visiting them off-campus, too.

“I definitely think he’s chosen not to put in that needed effort to get all of the best kids in the class, but the way he’s doing it is definitely working for him,” said Adam Gorney, national recruiting director for Rivals.

Gorney noted Sanders signed a “good class” of prospects in December but thinks he’d do even better “if he really put the work in of getting on a plane somewhere and going to visit kids.”

“He’s taking a different approach to basically this whole thing,” Gorney told USA TODAY Sports in December. “Before Deion, there weren’t rap concerts in locker rooms after the game … There weren’t documentarians on the sidelines on every play. But I do wonder how much more he could do.”

How unusual is Deion Sanders’ recruiting approach?

USA TODAY Sports contacted several top teams in college football and found none that had a record of zero recruiting visits by a head coach. By contrast, LSU head coach Brian Kelly made 257 off-campus recruiting contacts from December 2022 to early February 2024, including 46 home visits, according to records obtained by USA TODAY Sports from LSU. Nebraska’s Matt Rhule made 486 off-campus contacts during that same time, school records show. At Alabama, Nick Saban’s home recruiting visits often became popular fodder on social media.

Rhule described it as a way to stake out territory.

“The best way to establish (recruiting) areas is to establish relationships with the (high school) coaches,” Rhule told USA TODAY Sports last April. “The best way to establish relationships with the coaches is to go be present and be at their school.”

Rhule declined to offer his opinion on Sanders’ approach. Sanders’ team beat Nebraska in 2023 but lost to Rhule’s team last year, 28-10.

Hall-of-Fame pitch to recruits

Sanders’ assistant coaches have made off-campus recruiting trips instead, just like other assistant coaches across the nation. But another recent assistant coaching hire by Sanders signals his commitment to his different approach. He hired Pro Football Hall of Famer Marshall Faulk as his running backs coach, even though he has no apparent coaching or recruiting experience.

Maybe Faulk doesn’t need that experience, and his name will be enough to draw recruits, especially if those players’ goal is to make money and move on to the NFL. Sanders seems to be banking on this. Colorado now has three Pro Football Hall of Famers on staff, including Sanders, Faulk and Warren Sapp, a graduate assistant coach.

None of the three have recruited off-campus. (By NCAA rule, Sapp is not allowed to recruit off-campus as a graduate assistant.)

Does that experience even matter, though?

It depends on the viewpoint – and results

Colorado offensive tackle Jordan Seaton was the nation’s No. 1 offensive tackle prospect for 2024 and came to Boulder from the IMG Academy in Florida despite not getting a home visit from Sanders.

He didn’t choose Colorado because of money, either. Colorado boosters and businesses haven’t provided nearly as much to CU players as those at schools like national champion Ohio State, which recently had a roster earning an estimated $20 million from name, image and likeness deals (NIL).

“NIL is cool, but the real money is in the league (NFL),” Seaton said in October.

Sanders can show him how to get there, along with many others on the Colorado staff with NFL experience. In April, the Buffaloes are expected to have two top picks in the NFL draft, starting what Sanders hopes is a pipeline from Boulder to the NFL.

It’s another way to appeal to future prospects, along with all of those cameras that follow Sanders. Colorado ranked 11th nationally last season with an average of 3.86 million viewers per game in the regular season, according to the school. The Buffs finished 9-4 last year, improving from 4-8 in 2023 and 1-11 before Sanders’ arrival in 2022.

Is Coach Prime ahead of the curve?

Meanwhile, the times are still changing as schools prepare to start paying players directly. Coaches are still adapting. Some have left because of it. Some tried new ways of doing things.

Similarly, the COVID-19 pandemic sparked changes in the way many companies do business. Before that, working from home wasn’t as much of a thing. But now it’s an efficient way to get the job done for some companies, with workers also saving time and money by not having to drive into the office every day.

Former Colorado head coach Gary Barnett sees the similarities.

“I sort of use that as an analogy with this whole situation,” Barnett told USA TODAY Sports last year. “My first reaction would be ‘Is this (recruiting approach) sustainable? Is this really the right thing to do?’ But if you look at it from the other side, it’s ‘All of that (travel) is a waste of money and time.’ ‘

Being different also doesn’t mean being wrong. History might even judge Sanders as being ahead of the curve. The jury’s out on it.

“It certainly wouldn’t be the way I would do it, but man, there’s a lot of changes that have occurred,” Barnett said of college football. “That doesn’t make me right. It just makes me old.”

Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. Email: bschrotenb@usatoday.com

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Cam Ward knows he will likely be peppered with questions about sitting out the second half of Miami’s Pop-Tarts Bowl 42-41 loss to Iowa State at the 2025 NFL combine.

The potential No. 1 overall pick has a simple answer to those queries mapped out, as he shared Monday before receiving the Davey O’Brien Award, given annually to college football’s top quarterback.

‘Okay, you’re either going to draft me or you’re not,’ Ward told the Associated Press. ‘If you don’t draft me, that’s your fault. You’ve got to remember you’re the same team that’s got to play me for the rest of my career, and I’ll remember that.’

Ward wouldn’t be the first quarterback to adopt a chip-on-the-shoulder mentality if he isn’t the top player selected. Kansas City Chiefs quarterback Patrick Mahomes has shown one throughout his career. He famously counted to 10 after scoring a touchdown during a 26-3 win over the Chicago Bears in 2019. Mahomes was the 10th pick in the 2017 NFL draft and the second quarterback off the board; the Bears selected Mitch Trubisky No. 2 overall.

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

Of course, vengeance-seeking quarterbacks don’t always achieve their end goals. Josh Rosen, the 10th pick in the 2018 NFL draft by the Arizona Cardinals, famously opined, ‘There were nine mistakes ahead of me.’ Rosen lasted just one season with the Cardinals and was out of the NFL by 2023.

Regardless of how Ward’s career goes, he doesn’t believe his sitting out the second half of the Pop-Tarts Bowl should impact him. He was also adamant the decision to split the game between himself and Emory Williams was predetermined by the coaching staff and him.

‘I just think we all got what we needed out of it. They seen things that they think they need to work on … for this season coming up. And they also knew, you know, what I had on the line,’ Ward said. ‘We feel like we’re doing what’s best for the program and myself. I mean, it was a hard decision, especially when, you know, some guys on our team didn’t play who I thought should have played. It was also, you know, those guys thought about their future the same way I thought about mine.’

As such, Ward harbors few regrets about his final collegiate game, during which he beat CaseKeenum’s record for the most career touchdown passes in Div. I history (156).

‘If I could do it again, I’d do it the same way,’ Ward said.

Still, one Ward has one lamentation about the contest.

‘I wish we could have ended up winning the game,’ he said. ‘If we had won the game, they wouldn’t have said nothing. And so, that’s usually how it goes. And you know, you just got to take it on the chin and just keep pushing.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Detroit Lions are facing the arduous task of replacing offensive coordinator Ben Johnson in 2025 after the 38-year-old took the Chicago Bears head coaching job.

Dan Campbell granted that assignment to John Morton, who spent the 2022 season with the Lions before spending a couple of seasons with Sean Payton’s Denver Broncos.

Suffice it to say that both Morton and Jared Goff are excited about the possibility of teaming up again. The veteran quarterback even credited the 55-year-old coach with being ‘a big part’ of his success during the 2022 season, when he made it back to the Pro Bowl after a three-year drought.

‘That was Ben’s first year as a coordinator and I think he helped Ben a ton,’ Goff told the Detroit Free Press of Morton at Super Bowl 59. ‘I think Ben would say that himself. But yeah, it’ll be exciting for him. I’m excited to work with him and get going.’

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

Morton shares Goff’s enthusiasm about the 2025 season and beyond. He believes that the familiarity between the two of them will be ‘big’ and allow Detroit to continue to build upon the success it enjoyed under Johnson.

‘I think it’s big because it all starts with the quarterback,’ Morton told Fox 2 Detroit’s Dan Miller when discussing his existing relationship with Goff and the Lions coaching staff. ‘Just kind of knowing him – and when I was here, I was in the quarterback room. So, I have a feel of what he likes, what he doesn’t. That’s important as a play-caller. We’ll continue here when the players come back and stuff, so I’ll get to know more about him and the plays that he really likes a lot and what they’ve been doing good here.’

Morton is particularly intent on listening to Goff, Campbell and other members of the Lions offense as he takes over as the team’s play-caller. He made it clear that he isn’t trying to reinvent Detroit’s offense, which was the top-scoring unit in the NFL last season.

‘They’ve already established a philosophy here,’ Morton said. ‘It’s just my job to continue the vision of how Dan wants things. We’ll tinker with things here and there, and we’ll see how we can make it better.’

Improving upon Johnson’s offense, which ranked top five in both points and yards per game in his three seasons with Detroit, won’t be an easy task.

But if Goff and Morton show early synergy in 2025, losing Johnson may be more of a bump in the road than a death knell for Detroit’s Super Bowl chances.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

MEDLEY, Fla. – The second half of Unrivaled’s inaugural season continues Tuesday as the 3-on-3 women’s basketball league approaches its postseason.

Angel Reese and the Rose (3-4) will meet Rhyne Howard and the Vinyl (3-4) in the first of two games at 7:30 p.m. ET.

Sabrina Ionescu and the Phantom (2-5) will face Tiffany Hayes, Kayla McBride and the Laces (4-3) in the second game an hour later.

Only four of the six Unrivaled clubs will reach the playoffs. The semifinals are set for March 16, and the final is scheduled March 17.

Here’s everything you need to know about Unrivaled’s games Tuesday night, and stay tuned for live updates from USA TODAY Sports:

How to watch Unrivaled games Tuesday night on TV

Unrivaled is available on cable television on TNT in the United States, and TSN+ in Canada.

Watch: Unrivaled games on Sling TV

How to live stream Unrivaled games on Tuesday night

Unrivaled games are also available to live stream on Max, and internationally on YouTube.

Unrivaled standings

Here are the Unrivaled standings heading into the second half of the season:

Lunar Owls (8-0)
Laces (4-3)
Rose (3-4)
Vinyl (3-4)
Phantom (2-5)
Mist (2-6)

Rose (3-4) vs. Vinyl (3-4) preview

The Rose hope to extend a two-game winning streak, while the Vinyl hope to break a four-game skid in tonight’s game.

Chelsea Gray leads Unrivaled with 44 assists, while Reese is first in offensive rebounds (3.1) and fourth in total rebounds per game (9.6) for the Rose. Kahleah Copper won’t be available for the Rose due to a right leg injury.

Dearica Hamby is Unrivaled’s third-leading scorer (21.2 points) and the fourth-leading rebounder (10.4), while Rhyne Howard (13.2 points) and Arike Ogunbowale (13.0) round out the Vinyl’s starting lineup.

Phantom (2-5) vs. Laces (4-3) preview

The Laces hope to have five players active for tonight’s game. Tiffany Hayes (concussion protocol), Kate Martin (left leg), Alyssa Thomas (right leg) are out for tonight’s game.

Kayla McBride is second in Unrivaled with 24.7 points, but questionable to play due to a left leg injury. Jackie Young is also questionable with a left leg injury. Stefanie Dolson is healthy and available.

The Laces have Natisha Hiedeman, Betnijah Laney-Hamilton and Kiki Jefferson signed to player-relief contracts. If McBride or Young play, Jefferson would not be eligible to play.

The Phantom hopes to snap a two-game skid behind its stars Ionescu, Brittney Griner and Satou Sabally. Ionescu had a breakout game for the Phantom on Jan. 31, where she had 38 points, nine rebounds and eight assists in the club’s last win against the Rose.

Napheesa Collier wins Unrivaled 1-on-1 tournament

Napheesa Collier of the Lunar Owls won Unrivaled’s 1-on-1 tournament, taking home $200,000 after eliminating Aaliyah Edwards in the final. Collier’s Lunar Owls teammates each received $10,000 for her victory.

Edwards earned $50,000 as a runner-up, while Arike Ogunbowale and AzuráStevens each earned $25,000 as semifinalists.

What is Unrivaled?

Six teams with 36 of the best women’s basketball players in the world, including Sabrina Ionescu and Brittney Griner, will compete in the 3-on-3, full court games.

Where is Unrivaled playing games?

Games will be played at Wayfair Arena in Medley, Florida, which is in the Miami metropolitan area, about 7 miles from Miami International Airport.

Unrivaled team names and rosters

Laces: Stefanie Dolson, Tiffany Hayes, Kate Martin, Kayla McBride, Alyssa Thomas, Jackie Young, Natisha Hiedeman (relief player contract), Betnijah Laney-Hamilton (relief player contract), Kiki Jefferson (relief player contract).
Lunar Owls: Shakira Austin, Napheesa Collier, Skylar Diggins-Smith, Allisha Gray, Courtney Williams, Cameron Brink (IR).
Mist: DiJonai Carrington, Aaliyah Edwards, Rickea Jackson, Jewell Loyd, NaLyssa Smith (relief player contract), Breanna Stewart, Courtney Vandersloot.
Phantom: Natasha Cloud, Brittney Griner, Sabrina Ionescu, Marina Mabrey, Satou Sabally, Katie Lou Samuelson.
Rose: Kahleah Copper, Chelsea Gray, Lexie Hull, Angel Reese, Azura Stevens, Brittney Sykes.
Vinyl: Aliyah Boston, Rae Burrell, Jordin Canada, Dearica Hamby, Rhyne Howard, Arike Ogunbowale.

Unrivaled rules to know 

Unrivaled games start with three seven-minute quarters, and games end when the target winning score is reached in the fourth quarter. The target winning score is 11 points higher than the highest team’s score after the third quarter, known as the Elam Ending. 
Players also take just one free throw after being fouled: A free throw equals two or three points depending on the shooting foul. 
How long is the Unrivaled court size? It is 72 feet long by 49.2 feet wide. NBA and WNBA courts are 94 feet long and 50 feet wide. 

We occasionally recommend interesting products and services. If you make a purchase by clicking one of the links, we may earn an affiliate fee. USA TODAY Network newsrooms operate independently, and this doesn’t influence our coverage.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Initial discussions between Trump administration officials and Russia in Saudi Arabia Tuesday marked a ‘significant milestone’ in securing peace between Russia and Ukraine, according to the White House press secretary. 

Secretary of State Marco Rubio, White House National Security Advisor Michael Waltz and Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff met in Riyadh with Russian president Vladimir Putin, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov and Putin’s foreign affairs advisor Yuri Ushakov to hash out ways to end the conflict. Ukraine was absent from the negotiations in Saudi Arabia. 

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt declined to provide specifics about the discussions, but she said the Trump administration was committed to brokering a peace deal to end the conflict between the two countries. 

‘What I will tell you is that today, sitting down at the table was a significant first step toward peace,’ Leavitt told reporters at the White House on Tuesday. 

 

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said during a joint press conference with Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan Tuesday that an invitation to the talks wasn’t extended to Ukraine and that he was postponing a scheduled trip to Saudi Arabia until March. 

Zelenskyy has stressed that Ukraine must be involved in negotiations, and said Sunday that Ukraine wouldn’t accept a peace deal if his country were absent from negotiations. 

But Leavitt said that everyone would have a seat at the negotiating table — including other European allies — as the Trump administration seeks to advance a peace deal. 

‘We’re ensuring that all parties are heard,’ Leavitt said in an interview with Fox New’s ‘America Reports’ Tuesday. ‘But you have to speak to both sides of the war in order to truly negotiate a deal and problem solve. And this is a significant first step toward peace.’

Leavitt said that President Donald Trump was in correspondence with Zelenskyy, and spoke with other European allies like French President Emmanuel Macron Monday. Additionally, she said that Trump will meet with the United Kingdom’s Prime Minister Keir Starmer at the White House next week. 

Trump and Zelenskky also spoke over the phone Wednesday about the negotiations, and Zelenskyy said he relayed that he believes Putin isn’t interested in peace with Ukraine. 

‘I said that [Putin] is a liar,’ Zelenskyy said in an interview with NBC’s ‘Meet the Press’ that aired Sunday. ‘And he said, ‘I think my feeling is that he’s ready for these negotiations.’ And I said to him, ‘No, he’s a liar. He doesn’t want any peace.”

While Zelenskyy voiced gratitude for U.S. support, he said that there is no ‘leader in the world who can really make a deal with Putin without us, about us.’ 

‘I will never accept any decisions between the United States and Russia about Ukraine,’ Zelenskyy said on ‘Meet the Press.’ 

 

But Trump has offered reassurances that Zelenskyy would be involved in peace conversations, and told reporters Sunday on the tarmac at Palm Beach International Airport in West Palm Beach, Florida that Ukraine would get a seat at the negotiating table. 

The first action the U.S. plans to take following the meetings with Russian officials is to ‘reestablish the functionality of our respective missions in Washington and in Moscow,’ Rubio told reporters from The Associated Press and CNN. 

‘For us to be able to continue to move down this road, we need to have diplomatic facilities that are operating and functioning normally,’ Rubio said, according to a State Department transcript. 

Russia invaded Ukraine in February 2022, and Trump vowed on the campaign trail in 2024 that he would work to end the conflict if elected again. 

Fox News’ Emma Colton and Andrea Margolis contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A federal judge on Tuesday declined to block Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency from accessing government data or firing federal employees. 

U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan declined to grant the plaintiffs’ request to issue a temporary restraining order, citing what she said was their failure to demonstrate evidence of ‘irreparable harm’ caused by DOGE’s access. 

‘Plaintiffs legitimately call into question what appears to be the unchecked authority of an unelected individual and an entity that was not created by Congress and over which it has no oversight,’ Chutkan, an Obama appointee, said Tuesday. 

‘In these circumstances, it must be indisputable that this court acts within the bounds of its authority. Accordingly, it cannot issue a TRO, especially one as wide-ranging as Plaintiffs request, without clear evidence of imminent, irreparable harm to these Plaintiffs. The current record does not meet that standard.’

 

The decision from Chutkan is a blow to the coalition of 14 Democratic state attorneys general who sued last week to temporarily restrict DOGE’s access to federal data about government employees.

Plaintiffs argued that the leadership role held by Musk, a private citizen, represents an ‘unlawful delegation of executive power’ and threatened what they described as ‘widespread disruption’ to employees working across various federal agencies and government contractors.

‘There is no greater threat to democracy than the accumulation of state power in the hands of a single, unelected individual,’ said the lawsuit, filed by New Mexico Attorney General Raul Torrez.

Attorneys general from Arizona, California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington also joined him in the request.

While Judge Chutkan at times appeared sympathetic to the views brought by Torrez and other plaintiffs during Monday’s hearing, she also suggested she was not convinced that plaintiffs had adequately satisfied the high legal standard of ‘imminent harm’ required for a temporary restraining order.

‘The things I’m hearing are troubling indeed, but I have to have a record and findings of fact before I issue something,’ Chutkan said Monday.

The hearing is the latest in a growing flurry of emergency lawsuits filed across the country seeking to block or restrict DOGE’s access to sensitive government data.

Similar legal challenges are playing out in federal courts across the country, from New York and Maryland to Virginia and D.C., with plaintiffs citing fears of privacy breaches, layoffs and possible retaliation from DOGE.

DOGE, the Musk-led agency, was created via executive order earlier this year. Its status as a temporary organization within the White House gives DOGE and its employees just 18 months to carry out its goals of optimizing the federal government, streamlining its operations, and, of course, doing it all at a lower cost.

DOGE’s wide-ranging mission, combined with its lack of specifics, have sparked fresh concerns from outside observers, who have questioned how, exactly, the group plans to deliver on its ambitious optimization goals in such a short amount of time.

But Musk and his allies have wasted little time racing to do just that. They’ve spent the past month racing to deliver on what they see as one of President Donald Trump’s biggest campaign trail pledges: reducing bloated federal budgets, aggressively slashing government waste, and firing or putting on ice large swaths of federal employees. 

The Justice Department, for its part, argued on Monday that the DOGE personnel in question are ‘detailed’ U.S. government employees who are entitled to access the government data under provisions of the Economy Act.

Recent court victories have also buoyed DOGE’s operations – allowing them, at least for now, to continue carrying out their sprawling operation.,

As Chutkan noted Monday, fears and speculation alone are not enough to curtail DOGE access: plaintiffs must prove clearly, and with evidence, that their workings have met the hard-to-satisfy test of permanent or ‘irreparable’ harm.

Late last week, U.S. District Judge John Bates, a George W. Bush appointee, also rejected a request to block DOGE from accessing records of three government agencies, writing in his own opinion Friday that plaintiffs ‘have not shown a substantial likelihood that [DOGE] is not an agency.’

For plaintiffs, the TRO defeats have made it increasingly unclear what, if any, hope they might have to secure near-term injunctive relief.

Plaintiffs representing the 14 Democratic states argued Monday that DOGE’s broad agency access violates the appointments clause of the U.S. Constitution. 

That clause requires Cabinet and other high-level leaders in the U.S. government to be nominated by a president and confirmed by a Senate majority vote – a lengthy process designed to help vet an individual’s fitness to perform in the role to which they were appointed.

They argued that the ‘expansive authority’ granted to DOGE is not ‘merely academic.’

Already, plaintiffs said, Musk has ‘cut billions of dollars from agency budgets, fired agency personnel, and that he has moved to, in his words, ‘delete’ entire agencies.’

Trump ‘does not have the constitutional authority to unilaterally dismantle the government,’ the attorneys general said. ‘Nor could he delegate such expansive authority to an unelected, unconfirmed individual.’

And while Chutkan appeared to share in plaintiffs’ assertion that at least some of DOGE’s actions appear to be ‘serious and troubling,’ she maintained that a deliberate fear is not enough to grant the request to block their access immediately.

‘You’re talking about a generalized fear,’ she said of their DOGE complaints. ‘I’m not seeing it so far.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The U.S. and Russia on Tuesday took steps to improve diplomatic ties after Secretary of State Marco Rubio met with top officials from Moscow in a move to find an end to the war in Ukraine. 

Speaking to reporters following the 4.5-hour meeting held in Saudi Arabia between Rubio and his Russian counterpart, Sergey Lavrov, the secretary of state said the first move would be in reestablishing the ‘functionality of our respective missions in Washington and in Moscow.’

‘For us to be able to continue to move down this road, we need to have diplomatic facilities that are operating and functioning normally,’ Rubio said. 

Rubio said there were three additional steps the U.S. planned to pursue, which included establishing a ‘high-level team’ to help negotiate the end of the war in Ukraine – though he did not mention if this would be headed by the special envoy to Ukraine and Russia, retired Lt. General Keith Kellogg.

The Trump administration will also be looking to expand geopolitical and economic relations with Russian President Vladimir Putin and the Kremlin. 

Rubio did not go into detail on how or when the U.S. would agree to lift the heavy sanctions put on Russia following its illegal invasion, but said that at some point ‘the European Union (EU) is going to have to be at the table’ because they too have strict sanctions in place.   

Concerns over EU involvement in negotiating a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia have been mounting as the Trump administration increasingly takes on Moscow. 

Reporters questioned Kellogg about EU involvement following the Munich Security Conference that concluded Monday, but he would not confirm whether an EU representative will be officially included at any negotiations, despite direct concerns over European security. 

Rubio responded to questions regarding concerns that the EU and Ukraine are being abandoned by the Trump administration and said, ‘No one is being sidelined here.’

‘But President Trump is in a position – that he campaigned on – to initiate a process that could bring about an end to this conflict, and from that could emerge some very positive things for the United States, for Europe, for Ukraine, for the world,’ the secretary said. 

Rubio confirmed the final agreement to come out of the lengthy meeting on Tuesday was that the five men involved in the meeting – which included Rubio and Lavrov, as well as Trump’s national security advisor, Michael Waltz, special Mideast envoy Steven Witkoff and Putin’s foreign affairs advisor, Yuri Ushakov – would remain ‘engaged’ to ensure negotiations continue to progress in a ‘productive way.’

Neither the office of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy nor the EU immediately responded to Fox News Digital’s questions regarding their reactions to the day’s meeting.

Zelenskyy, who was supposed to arrive in Saudi Arabia on Wednesday, canceled his trip on Tuesday, which according to a Reuters report, was a move to counter any ‘legitimacy’ of the U.S.-Russia talks that were held without a Ukrainian delegation. 

Kellogg’s team confirmed for Fox News Digital that he is set to meet with Zelenskyy this week during his trip to Kyiv. 

Zelenskyy, like some EU leaders, has said he will not accept any ceasefire negotiations that are not made through coordinated efforts with Kyiv. 

‘Ukraine and Europe – in the broad sense, including the European Union, Turkey and the United Kingdom – must be involved in discussions and the development of necessary security guarantees together with the United States, as these decisions shape the future of our part of the world,’ he said in an address following a meeting with Turkish President Reccep Erdoğan on Tuesday.

Reports on Tuesday also indicated that European leaders were looking to reconvene at a ‘second emergency Ukraine summit’ to discuss Ukraine and Europe’s security.

The State Department did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital’s questions. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Seven House Republicans have been named to a new task force dedicated to weighing the declassification of some of the U.S.’ most infamous ‘secrets.’

Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., as expected, will lead the explosive panel – formally known as the Task Force on the Declassification of Federal Secrets. It will operate under the House Oversight Committee and its chairman, Rep. James Comer, R-Ky.

The list, though short, signals House GOP leaders are letting the conference’s conservative wing take the wheel on this investigation.

In addition to Luna, the task force will also include members of the often rebellious House Freedom Caucus such as Reps. Lauren Boebert, R-Colo., Eli Crane, R-Ariz., and Eric Burlison, R-Mo.

Also on the panel is Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., who has made headlines on several culture war issues over the last year.

Rep. Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., who frequently collaborates with Luna on issues relating to unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs) in Congress, is on the panel as well, as is first-term Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas.

‘Bad day to be a classified government secret,’ Mace wrote on X.

Burlison wrote on the site, ‘A Government cloaked in secrecy has been a tool for control.’

Luna pledged to seek ‘truth and transparency’ in a written statement announcing the task force last week. 

She pledged to ‘give Americans the answers they deserve’ on the assassinations of President John F. Kennedy and Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., Jeffrey Epstein’s client list, COVID-19, UAPs, and the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks.

Luna said when announcing the list of members, ‘We have assembled a team of dedicated leaders who have consistently fought for transparency and full disclosure.’

‘Our mission is simple: to ensure these documents are released swiftly and in their entirety, giving the American people the truth they deserve,’ Luna said.

Comer said of the list, ‘Ensuring government transparency for the American people is a core mission of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.’

‘The Republicans on Rep. Luna’s task force are steadfast champions of transparency, and I am confident they will vigorously pursue and deliver the truth on critical issues,’ Comer said.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

During Mettler-Toledo’s earnings call earlier this month, executives found themselves fielding a barrage of questions about one key topic: tariffs.

The Ohio-based maker of industrial scales and laboratory equipment had already opened the call by breaking down the expected impact from President Donald Trump’s still-evolving trade policy. But when the event transitioned to the question-and-answer portion, the inquiries from analysts seeking further detail about potential tariffs were constant.

“Uncertainty remains across many of our core markets and the global economy,” Finance Chief Shawn Vadala said on the Feb. 7 call. “Geopolitical tensions remain elevated, and include the potential for new tariffs that we have not factored into our guidance.”

Mettler-Toledo’s experience wasn’t unique. America’s largest companies are getting inundated with queries about how or if Trump’s salvo of promises on issues ranging from international trade to immigration and diversity will alter businesses.

A CNBC analysis shows multiple core themes tied to Trump’s policies are popping up on the earnings calls of S&P 500-listed companies at an increasing clip. Take “tariff.” Just weeks into the new year, the frequency of the word and its variations on earnings calls hit its highest level since 2020 — the last full year of Trump’s first term.

On top of that, new acronyms and phrases, like the “Gulf of America” or “DOGE,” have found their way into these meetings as the business community assesses what Trump’s return to power means for them.

Curiously, Trump himself wasn’t racking up mentions on these calls. Many uses of the word “trump” in transcripts reviewed by CNBC referred to the verb, rather than the president.

Still, a review of call transcripts shows how key words tied to Trump’s policies have quickly become commonplace. With the first earnings season of 2025 more than 75% complete, the comments offer an early glimpse into how these companies view the new administration.

One of the most talked about policies has been Trump’s tariff plans. The president briefly implemented — and then postponed — 25% taxes on imports to the U.S. from Mexico and Canada. He also separately slapped China with a 10% levy and imposed aluminum and steel tariffs. Then, on Thursday, he discussed a plan to impose retaliatory tariffs on other trading partners on a country-by-country basis.

Given the uncertainty, it’s no surprise tariffs are a hot topic. The topic has come up on more than 190 calls held by S&P 500 companies in 2025, putting it on track to see the highest share in half of a decade.

The frequency picked up late last year as Trump’s return to the White House became clear. About half of calls in 2024 that mentioned forms of the word took place in the fourth quarter, according to a CNBC analysis of data from FactSet, a market research service.

“Studying tariffs has been at the top of the list of things that we’ve been doing,” said Marathon Petroleum CEO Maryann Mannen on the energy company’s Feb. 4 earnings call.

Several companies said they were not factoring potential impacts from these levies into their guidance, citing uncertainty about what orders will actually go into place. Others just aren’t sure: At Martin Marietta Materials, CFO James Nickolas said the supplier’s profits could either benefit or take a hit from tariffs depending on what form ultimately takes effect.

While Generac didn’t calculate how these import taxes could affect future performance, CEO Aaron Jagdfeld said the generator maker is ready to mitigate the financial hit by reducing costs elsewhere and raising its prices. Camden Property Trust CEO Richard Campo said a company analysis shows proposed tariffs would push up costs for materials from Canada and Mexico like lumber and electrical boxes. These comments offer support to the idea that Trump’s tariffs may drive up consumer prices and fan inflation.

Zebra Technologies CFO Nathan Winters said price increases could help mitigate profit pressure. Auto parts maker BorgWarner, meanwhile, anticipates another year of declining demand in certain markets, which CFO Craig Aaron attributed in part to potential headwinds from these levies.

Cisco’s R. Scott Herren agreed with other executives on the lack of clarity, describing the tariff situation as “dynamic” on the networking equipment maker’s earnings call last week. Still, the CFO said the company has planned for some variation of Trump’s tariff proposals to take effect and is expecting costs to increase as a result.

“We’ve game planned out several scenarios and steps we could take depending on what actually goes into effect,” he said.

The topic of immigration, meanwhile, has already come up on the highest share of calls since 2017.

Trump has promised mass deportations of undocumented immigrants during his second term in office. Cracking down on immigration has been a core component of Trump’s political messaging since he ran in part to “build the wall” between the U.S. and Mexico for his first term. Critics assert that his plans would shock the labor market and could result in higher inflation.

Immigration mentions tend to tick up during the first year of a new administration, CNBC data shows. But 2025 has surpassed the first years of Joe Biden’s presidency and Barack Obama’s second term, underscoring Trump’s role in elevating the issue within U.S. businesses.

Some companies grouped immigration with tariffs as drivers of broader unpredictability within the economy. Nicholas Pinchuk, CEO of toolmaker Snap-On, described anecdotes of strong demand for repair services from its clients, but said they were still stressed by red flags in the economic backdrop.

“It’s clear the techs are in a good position. But that doesn’t make them immune to the macro uncertainty around them: ongoing wars, immigration disputes, lingering inflation,” Pinchuk said. “Although the election is in the rear mirror and the new team may be more focused on business expansion, there’s a rapid fire of new initiatives. … It’s hard not to be uncertain about what’s up.”

Firms in a variety of sectors took questions about what changes in the composition of America’s population would mean. AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile all fielded questions about whether a slowdown in immigration would hurt demand for certain phone plans. Michael Manelis, operations chief at apartment manager Equity Residential, said in response to an immigration-related inquiry that it hasn’t seen any upticks in lease breaks from tenants being deported.

In the Southern California market, real estate developer Prologis CEO Hamid Moghadam said deportations can decrease the pool of workers and, in turn, drive up employment costs in the region. That can exacerbate pricing pressures already expected as the Los Angeles community rebuilds in the wake of last month’s wildfires.

Other businesses insisted deportations wouldn’t create labor shortages for their operations because all of their workers are legally authorized. One such company, chicken producer Tyson Foods, said it hasn’t had factories visited by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement or seen any declines in worker attendance.

“We’re confident that we’ll be able to continue to successfully run our business,” CEO Donnie King said on Feb. 3.

Topics that gained newfound relevance with Trump’s return to office have also already started emerging.

DOGE — the acronym for the new Department of Government Efficiency led by Tesla CEO Elon Musk — has been mentioned on more than 15 calls, as of Friday morning. This department has put Wall Street on alert as investors wonder if contracts between public companies and federal agencies could be on the chopping block with Musk’s team slashing spending.

Iron Mountain’s mine that stores government retirement records was ripped as an example of inefficiency by Musk during a visit to the Oval Office. But surprisingly, CEO Bill Meaney said the push for streamlining can actually benefit other parts of its business.

“As the government continues to drive to be more efficient, we see this as a continued opportunity for the company,” he said last week.

Executives at Palantir, the defensive technology company that was a top performer within the S&P 500 last year, are similarly hopeful. Technology Chief Shyam Sankar described Palantir’s work with the government as “operational” and “valuable,” and is hopeful that DOGE engineers will be “able to see that for a change.”

“I think DOGE is going to bring meritocracy and transparency to government, and that’s exactly what our commercial business is,” Sankar said during the company’s Feb. 3 call. “The commercial market is meritocratic and transparent, and you see the results that we have in that sort of environment. And that’s the basis of our optimism around this.”

He noted some concerns among other government software providers, and called those agreements “sacred cows of the deep state” during the call.

Elsewhere, the so-called Gulf of America has been a point of divergence after Trump’s executive order renaming what has long been known as the Gulf of Mexico. Chevron used the moniker Gulf of America repeatedly in its earnings release and on its call with analysts late last month. But Exxon Mobil, which held its earnings call the same day, opted instead to refer to the body of water as the Gulf of Mexico.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS