Archive

2025

Browsing

BRADENTON, Fla. – Sure, it’s the season of eternal hope in Major League Baseball, but after the defending champions spent much of the winter commandeering talent and unlocking their vast resources, consternation is king.

From New York Yankees owner Hal Steinbrenner to legions of smaller-market fans insistent that the playing field must be leveled, the Los Angeles Dodgers are forcing the haters to cry foul, to insist that billion-dollar outlays each winter and establishing a beachhead for international talent is just a tad excessive.

Yet executives for rival teams faced with slaying the Dodgers know money doesn’t buy everything.

Championship parity has been well-chronicled since the Yankees’ run of three consecutive World Series titles ended in 2000; no one’s repeated since then.

Follow every MLB game: Latest MLB scores, stats, schedules and standings.

In this high-information era in baseball, however, the path to both the playoffs and a pennant can take many routes. And while the game’s past quarter century has vastly altered the industry, some combination of organizational intelligence and work environment, resources and ownership desire to win are likely the most important factors to success.

As the Dodgers aim for their 13th consecutive playoff berth this season, it’s evident that those factors are now unleashed with the full force of the game’s unbreakable machine.

“They’ve been one of the best-run organizations for forever,” Atlanta Braves general manager Alex Anthopoulos tells USA TODAY Sports. “They always have a great team. They make the playoffs every year. They’re going to be at the top end of the payroll structure, they draw 4 million fans a year. They just make good decisions.

“They’ve earned it. They’ve earned all of it. They’ve earned their World Series. I expect the large-market, well-run clubs with resources to do what they’re doing and get better.

“I don’t understand the concern or complaints. It doesn’t make any sense to me.”

So, what matters most for success? It helps to ask those that have seen all ends of the payroll spectrum.

Fix the alignment

David Stearns ascended to an assistant general manager role in Houston as the Astros were breaking the industry more than a decade ago, was tapped to run the show in small-market Milwaukee and now has an enviable position in New York: Spending Steve Cohen’s money.

Yet the Mets’ president of baseball operations hasn’t strayed from the nation-building practice he developed in Milwaukee, where the Brewers remain a consistent playoff participant three seasons after he stepped down from the top job there.

It absolutely doesn’t hurt when your boss finds $765 million to commit to Juan Soto. It also doesn’t much matter when the infrastructure can’t maximize that investment.

“What’s most important is alignment,” says Stearns when asked whether the money, the culture or the organizational commitment is key to franchise happiness. “From ownership through the front office through the clubhouse, coaches and players – that’s what we’re seeking.

“And ensuring that everyone is rowing in the same direction, has the same core principles – that is the most powerful of all. And all those other things – resources and aptitude – plays into that.”

The Mets have the potential to become Dodgers East, if only because the financial structure is in place thanks to their large market and Cohen’s estimated $21.5 billion net worth. Yet Stearns finds value looking back on what worked so well in Milwaukee, where the Brewers have made the playoffs six times in the past seven seasons.

“There are tremendous people there, at all levels of the organization there are just really, really talented,” he says. “Great coaches, great scouts, the front office is filled with people who one day will lead organizations if they want to and have a lot of success doing it.

“They have an ownership group that is extremely competitive and wants to do everything within their power to win. That is a big group of very skilled and talented people who work very well together, and they will continue to produce great results.”

In Milwaukee, Stearns navigated the financial parameters that come with working in the nation’s 38th-largest media market. In Houston, the Astros were on the leading edge of ruthless efficiency, with many of their practices adopted throughout the industry.

Yet in his new job, he’s not about to stand in front of the franchise owner and say, “Mr. Cohen, paying Juan Soto $765 million is simply not efficient!”

“I don’t view anything that Steve has done during his ownership tenure as irrational,” says Stearns, whose club will carry a payroll of around $320 million and owe tens of millions more in luxury tax penalties. “I think he’s operating with different levels of constraints than other organizations are. He has different priorities than other organizations.

“My job is to ensure we’re making decisions that allow us to compete continuously at a really high level for a long time. That doesn’t preclude spending money now. We just have to make sure that we’re also setting ourselves up well for the future.”

The vast majority of big league franchises will not have access to the revenues the Dodgers and Mets and Yankees and Red Sox enjoy. How, then, to close the gap?

Know thyself, for one.

Decide what to be and go be it

Ben Cherington took over the dying embers of the Red Sox’s mini-dynasty and worked the edges to produce a 2013 World Series title in Boston. His time with the Pirates has been more challenging, with the automatic constraint of owner Bob Nutting essentially sitting out the free agent market, even as Pittsburgh is ranked 27th in Nielsen market size while San Diego, say, ranks 30th.

Cherington draws some inspiration from across Lake Erie, where the Cleveland Guardians have identified one great thing that they do – acquiring and developing pitching – and reached the playoffs six of the past nine years, including the 2024 ALCS.

“Cleveland is a team I really respect,” says Cherington. “The teams that I perceive the most consistently successful, agnostic to resources, are the ones that are the most dogged about constant innovation and improvement in all aspects of team-building. But also, very clear about what they’re going to sell out to in those areas.

“They’re not trying to do a thousand new things a day. They’re confident in what they’re going to do. They sell out to that.”

Cherington says the Dodgers’ ability to replenish talent when employees leave for promotions makes them a model. And in a copycat industry, conviction and innovation can be separators.

“Those teams don’t put themselves in position where they’re chasing someone else’s tactic,” he says. “If you wait to see, ‘Oh, one team’s doing that. We’ve got to catch up to that,’ you’re going to be consistently chasing that.

“It’s, where do we zig where no one has yet? The good organizations are willing to do that.”

Culture clubs

And it doesn’t hurt when the front office isn’t a bad place to work. The Tampa Bay Rays have been outkicking their revenue streams for nearly 20 years and reached the postseason five consecutive years until 2024.

Sure, they lose talent beyond the players they can’t afford – three former Rays proteges are chief baseball officers across the big leagues. But many, many more stick around.

“I was there for 15 years. I worked with the same people for a long period of time,” says second-year Miami Marlins GM Peter Bendix. “They are phenomenal people and ultimately, this game is about that: Players are people. Front office people are people. Fans are people.

“It’s all about having people pull in the right direction, as one. It’s a really hard thing to achieve. You have 200-plus staff and 165-plus players to try to get everyone pulling in the right direction.

“But when you do, you can really unlock some incredible things.”

Like Stearns, current Rays GM Erik Neander cites “alignment, top to bottom,” as a crucial attribute, and what he calls “a shared, deep understanding of your situation.”

“Just knowing who you are,” he says. “Continuity – we’ve had unbelievable continuity without complacency.”

Neander and Bendix and incoming St. Louis GM Chaim Bloom all worked under former Rays GM Andrew Friedman, who now runs the show at Dodger Stadium. It’s been a meticulous buildup, now spanning more than a decade, but like an indomitable football team, the Dodgers are essentially unbeatable in all three phases of the game.

Only one has to do with owner Mark Walter’s checkbook.

“The constant there is Andrew Friedman,” says the Braves’ Anthopoulos, who worked as an assistant GM for Friedman in between chief baseball officer jobs in Toronto and Atlanta. “He did it in Tampa with no resources and he’s done it there.

“Management is what it comes down to. They have the best GM in the game. Put resources in it, it will likely increase your odds. But I competed against him with Tampa in the AL East. What’s the common denominator? Andrew Friedman.

“I expect them to be good as long as he’s there.”

He’s not the only one: When Shohei Ohtani signed his $700 million contract, his only opt-out clause was tied to whether Friedman or Walter, the owner, were no longer in their respective positions.

The signing of Japanese right-hander Rōki Sasaki best illustrates that the Dodgers are a destination regardless of cash flow, since Sasaki’s signing bonus was restricted to teams’ international signing pool.

But he chose L.A., as did countryman Yoshinobu Yamamoto when similar $325 million offers were available elsewhere. Of course, the money helped.

But the brainpower and desire to win are just as palpable.

“It’s really hard to get to the top of the mountain without all three of them in some combination,” says Baltimore Orioles executive vice president Mike Elias.

“Those guys have everything going for them right now.”

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Dallas Cowboys hired Klayton Adams to serve as the team’s offensive coordinator under new head coach Brian Schottenheimer.

Adams already knows exactly what he wants to see from Dallas’ offense in his first-ever stint as an NFL offensive coordinator.

‘The same thing that I want from every player on offense, and that is to create violence in the game,’ Adams told Cowboys.com. ‘Be aggressive, run, hit, I think that every decision that we make schematically needs to lean that direction.’

‘So if there’s gray area, what is going to allow these guys to play more free and run and hit and be violent?’

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

Schottenheimer’s vision for the Cowboys offense will dictate part of that. The 51-year-old is set to call his own plays in his first-ever head coaching stint after Mike McCarthy handled those duties during their previous two seasons together.

As such, Adams knows it will be key for the duo to be on the same page as they look to get the most out of a Dallas offense that ranked 17th in yards and 21st in points per game during the 2024 NFL season.

‘Trying to mesh what the vision of what he wants is because he’s going to call the plays, and so I think it would be dumb on my part to try to force a lot of things on that call sheet that he doesn’t want to call or he doesn’t feel comfortable calling.’ Adams explained about his process of tailoring his offense to Schottenheimer’s preferences.

What might that look like? One would presume it be more run-heavy than Dallas’ offense was recently under McCarthy. The Cowboys ranked 14th and 24th in rushing attempts per game during the 2023 and 2024 seasons. Schottenheimer has coached five offenses that ranked top-seven in rushing attempts during his 14 years as an NFL offensive coordinator.

That should align with Adams’ tough-minded philosophy and his background as an offensive line coach. It’s also why the 42-year-old is enthusiastic about pairing up with Schottenheimer, even if it will take some time for them to get in sync.

‘We’re really excited. I’m very excited to work with him and just to continue to learn each other a little bit,’ Adams said. ‘We’re going to get out into some practices and talk through some things and I’m going to see some things differently, he’s going to see some things differently, and it’s going to be a growing process.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

As the SEC and Big Ten debate how to stack the College Football Playoff deck, their actions are as pathetic as they are unnecessary.
SEC, Big Ten are home to incredible football programs. Why should they need preordained CFP bids? Aren’t they good enough to earn the bids on merit?
SEC, Big Ten leaders reportedly considering an expanded playoff with bids preassigned to conferences.

If you’ve played Candyland or Go Fish with a toddler, you know they rig the rules to help them win. Maybe, they haven’t learned how to lose gracefully, or they’re accustomed to getting their way. Eventually, they grow up and realize nobody wants to play with a cheater, and, anyway, games are more fun if they’re not rigged.

The folks running the SEC and Big Ten apparently never learned that. They’re acting like 4-year-olds while steering the College Football Playoff’s future, debating how they can rig the bracket to reduce their chance of losing.

It’s weak, and it’s pathetic, and, if they keep it up, they might find that the audience grew tired of their immature gamesmanship and lost interest in the product.

The 12-team playoff – a postseason format forged from a mindset of fairness and created with painstaking compromise – will last for one more season.

After this 2025 season, control of the College Football Playoff shifts into the hands of the SEC and Big Ten. Those two conferences will reshape the playoff as they see fit. Petulance guides their actions.

The more pitiful development is how the bids in this reformatted playoff would be assigned. At least half of the bids within a 14- or 16-team playoff would be reserved for the SEC and Big Ten before the season even kicks off, in one format the conferences are exploring, according to reporting by Yahoo! Sports.

The idea within a 14-team format would work like this: Four automatic bids for the Big Ten, four for the SEC, two apiece for the ACC and Big 12, one for the Group of Five and one at-large bid. Call this the 4+4+2+2+1+1 format. Just rolls off the tongue, doesn’t it?

Or, in a 16-team format, tack on an additional two at-large bids for three at-large bids total.

Either format would reduce the CFP selection committee’s role in selecting the most deserving teams.

In other words, the SEC and Big Ten would begin the season knowing that, no matter how their teams fare, their two conferences would account for no fewer than 50% of the playoff bids.

And, so what if one of these conferences experienced a down year? No problemo, thanks to the built-in security blanket of preassigned bids.

What a farce.

As for teams in other conferences, well, they’d be playing Candyland against immature children demanding that their pieces be placed halfway to the finish line before the first card flips.

Stacking College Football Playoff deck unnecessary move

The incredible petulance of this plan is trumped by how unnecessary this is. The SEC and Big Ten don’t need to stack the deck to be fairly rewarded. They built the two best conferences, housing incredible programs, backed by enviable war chests. The product speaks for itself.

If a 16-team were in place last season, the SEC would have snagged six bids, based on the final College Football Playoff committee rankings, followed by the Big Ten (four), ACC (three), Big 12 (one), Group of Five (one), plus Notre Dame. In other words, bid distribution would have looked a lot like what the SEC and Big Ten mull preordaining.

The SEC and Big Ten fearing that the playoff selection committee would treat their teams unfairly without automatic bid protection bases itself in paranoia rather than reality. Historically, the committee smiles upon teams from those two leagues. The Big Ten and SEC teamed up to snag nearly 60% of the bids in the first 12-team playoff. Nothing wrong with that. They earned those spots on the field. Why are they so afraid they can’t earn a lion’s share of the bids in the future unless they jigger the rules?

Should SEC be rewarded for its history?

An SEC acolyte might argue the conference’s history supports it receiving postseason protections. An SEC team won the national championship 13 times in a 17-year span from the 2006 through 2022 seasons. Then, Big Ten teams won the last two national championships, and the Big Ten supplied half of the CFP semifinalists in two of the past three years.

The SEC’s run of dominance, in particular, proved impressive in its longevity, but the postseason in other sports rewards present success, not the history books. The MLB playoffs don’t reserve a spot for the Yankees just because they own 27 World Series titles.

They used to prove its elitism with performance rather than demanding postseason representation based on conference affiliation, before the season started.

Hijacking the playoff seems like a reckless way to build audience. If you’re a Texas Tech, Oklahoma State or Washington State fan, why passionately engage in a sport in which power- and money-hungry leaders disrupted rivalries via conference realignment, and now the SEC and Big Ten want to manipulate the playoff, too?

These two leagues successfully seized control after threatening to collect their toys and go start their own playoff, unless everyone agrees to play by their rules.

What a shame for college football’s playoff, because games played with a stacked deck quickly become stale, as anyone who’s played Candyland with a 4-year-old knows.

Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network’s national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@gannett.com and follow him on X @btoppmeyer. Subscribe to read all of his columns.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

President Donald Trump’s return to the White House appears to have sparked a change in tune on K Street, the heart of lobbyist influence in Washington, D.C., as several prominent lobbyist voices are now pledging to work with the new president after previously criticizing him.  

‘Manufacturers are ready to work with @realDonaldTrump to roll back the federal regulatory onslaught, unleash American energy and build on the success of the pro-growth Trump Tax Cuts,’ Jay Timmons, president and CEO of the National Association of Manufacturers (NAM), posted on X after Trump’s victory, adding in a press release that he congratulates Trump on ‘on his historic victory and strong performance across manufacturing intensive states.’

The praise of Trump comes after years of vigorously criticizing him, including after the January 6 riot, when he said that Trump ‘incited violence in an attempt to retain power, and any elected leader defending him is violating their oath to the Constitution and rejecting democracy in favor of anarchy.’

Additionally, Timmons called on then-Vice President Mike Pence to invoke the 25th Amendment and remove Trump from office.

‘What we saw on January 6th was absolutely one of the most horrifying things that any of us who love America could have ever witnessed,’ Timmons said.

Timmons also said that Trump’s handling of the coronavirus appeared to have been ‘weaponized, and it became a political tool.’

Timmons also had a long history of praising the Biden administration for its accomplishments, saying that he ‘built a substantial legacy’ in four years and celebrating Biden’s work on the coronavirus when he was elected by saying ‘it is fantastic to have a partner in the White House’, adding that ‘we felt like we were fighting this fight, frankly, all alone for the last year.’

In a statement to Fox News Digital, a NAM spokesperson said, ‘President Trump wants to grow manufacturing in the United States. The NAM is working with him to do that.’ 

Shortly after Biden announced he was dropping out of the presidential race, NAM put out a press release saying that Biden ‘Has Rallied the World to the Cause of Democracy.’ NAM would then invite Trump to call into their board meeting a little over a month before the presidential election, where he discussed taxes, energy, and regulations stifling the manufacturing industry.

Stephen Ubl, president and chief executive officer of PhRMA, also spoke out about January 6, calling it ‘appalling,’ and took issue with some aspects of Trump’s agenda items, including his executive order push to ‘Buy American,’ which Ubl said would create ‘even more barriers to innovation and efforts to develop a vaccine for COVID-19.’

Ubl’s company, along with other organizations, filed a lawsuit in 2020 ‘against the Trump administration’s new rules for lowering drug prices.’

Ubl, who has donated at least $15,000 to Democrats, has struck a more positive tone since Trump’s victory, posting on X that he is ‘committed to working with the Trump administration and the new Congress to make our health care system work better for patients while preserving our unique ecosystem that enables greater innovation and lower costs for patients.’ 

Ubl met with Trump at Mar-a-Lago in early December, and PhRMA donated funds to Trump’s inauguration. 

‘With President Trump now officially sworn into office, I look forward to working with his administration to address key challenges facing our industry and fighting for solutions to help patients access and afford the treatments they need,’ Ubl posted on X in January. 

Neil Bradley, the vice president of the Chamber of Commerce, said after January 6 that Trump’s words and actions ‘have no place in a free and Democratic society’ and the New York Times reported that he said the chamber is ‘evaluating how lawmakers voted last week during the electoral vote certification process and how they vote in the coming days when the House moves to impeach Mr. Trump when making decisions about donations.’

Bradley was also critical of President Trump’s decision to end DACA, saying in 2017 that it ‘runs contrary to the president’s goal of growing the U.S. economy.’

Bradley, a Democratic donor who donated to former GOP Rep. Liz Cheney after she voted to impeach Trump, said after Trump’s election that ‘his actions are a long overdue change in direction that will help unleash the American economy, resulting in more innovation and faster growing paychecks for American workers.’

Shortly after Trump’s victory, the Business Roundtable (BRT) put out a press release saying that it ‘congratulates President-elect Donald Trump on his election as the 47th President of the United States.’

‘We look forward to working with the incoming Trump Administration and all federal and state policymakers.’

Before Trump’s re-election, several members of the BRT were highly critical of Trump, including CEO Joshua Bolten, who called Trump unfit for office in 2016, before he joined BRT in 2017, and donated to prominent Trump critic Liz Cheney in 2021 and 2022. 

Bolten also donated to Trump critic and former GOP Rep. Adam Kinzinger in 2021 after he voted to impeach Trump. 

Kristen Silverberg, president and COO of BRT, signed a letter opposing Trump’s election in 2016, before she joined BRT in 2019, and donated several thousand dollars to Cheney’s re-election efforts after she voted to impeach Trump, FEC records show. 

Records also show that Silverberg donated multiple times to Nikki Haley’s presidential campaign against Trump in the Republican primary in 2023, as well as Chris Christie’s campaign in the same primary. 

BRT hosted President Trump twice during CEO Quarterly Meetings with Bolten and Silverberg at the helm, and the group also met with then-vice presidential candidate JD Vance during their Q3 2024 meeting with CEOs in September. 

The organization pointed to Bolten and Silverberg making no public anti-Trump statements since 2016 and said they have worked ‘closely’ with both Trump administrations on important policy initiatives. The organization also said that donations to Cheney, a former colleague, were for her reelection and not her anti-Trump efforts.

‘Business Roundtable worked with President Trump to advance tax reform and USMCA during his first term, and we look forward to working together in his second to continue advancing economic policies that expand opportunity for all Americans,’ BRT spokesperson Michael Steel told Fox News Digital. ‘Those policies include extending and strengthening the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, securing major regulatory and permitting reforms, and ensuring a skilled U.S. workforce.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) still employs more people than it did in 2019, despite ‘Democrat hysteria’ over recent cuts within the department’s agencies, Fox News Digital exclusively learned. 

A senior Trump administration official told Fox News Digital that there have been 6,000 departures from HHS since Jan. 20, Inauguration Day. The agency, however, still employs nearly 6,000 more people than it did in 2019, including more than 2,000 employees at the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) relative to 2019 numbers, and 1,200 employees at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 

Hiring at HHS ballooned between fiscal year 2019 and 2024, the senior Trump administration official said, with 17% more full-time employees by 2024. Fifty percent of overall jobs in the U.S. that were created in 2024 were indirect or direct government jobs, the official added. 

‘Democrat hysteria about essential offices in HHS being culled — again, every operating division has either more or roughly stagnant headcount relative to’ fiscal year 2019, a senior Trump administration official told Fox News Digital. 

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was confirmed and sworn-in as the nation’s 26th secretary of Health and Human Services on Thursday, when President Donald Trump also signed an executive order creating the Make America Healthy Again Commission, which is ‘investigating and addressing the root causes of America’s escalating health crisis.’ The commission initially will focus its investigations into childhood chronic diseases, such as autism. 

News reports spread shortly after Kennedy’s confirmation that widespread layoffs were headed to HHS employees, including within the CDC and FDA. The Trump administration is in the midst of working to streamline the federal government by cutting overspending and stamping out potential fraud or mismanagement, which has included mass layoffs at various agencies. 

The head of the FDA’s food division, Jim Jones, submitted his resignation letter Monday, according to various news reports, arguing the administration’s ‘indiscriminate firing’ of staff in his division will be a ‘roadblock to achieving the Secretary’s stated objectives of making America healthy again.’

‘I was looking forward to working to pursue the Department’s agenda of improving the health of Americans by reducing diet-related chronic disease and risks from chemicals in food,’ Jones said. ‘It has been increasingly clear that with the Trump Administration’s disdain for the very people necessary to implement your agenda, however, it would have been fruitless for me to continue in this role.’

Federal employees also staged a protest outside HHS in Washington, D.C., on Friday, while a cohort of academic unions around the country are rallying the science community to join another protest outside HHS on Wednesday, billed as a ‘National Day of Action.’

The Trump administration explained to Fox News Digital that those who were terminated over the weekend included probationary employees — who are individuals recently hired by the agency and still under consideration for long-term employment. 

‘Not people carrying longtime essential ‘institutional’ knowledge,’ the admin official said of those terminated. 

The recent HHS culling over the weekend did not include key personnel focused on emergency preparedness and response within the Administration for Strategy Preparedness and Response (ASPR), the CDC and other divisions of HHS, nor did it cull research scientists at the CDC or National Institutes of Health, or frontline healthcare providers at the Indian Health Service, employees working on Medicare and Medicaid at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or those reviewing and approving drugs or conducting inspections at FDA. 

Additionally, employees working on refugee resettlement within the Administration of Children and Families were exempt from the weekend layoffs. 

‘Cuts we made at HHS over the weekend did not compromise health and safety of Americans,’ the admin official added.

Kennedy vowed during his Senate confirmation hearings that he would scrutinize the department’s previous modus operandi, remove potential financial conflicts and ensure tax dollars were spent on both bolstering healthy foods for Americans, and providing ‘unbiased’ scientific reports. 

‘We will make sure our tax dollars support healthy foods. We will scrutinize the chemical additives in our food supply. We will remove the financial conflicts of interest in our agencies,’ he told the Senate Finance Committee in describing his goals. ‘We will create an honest, unbiased, science-driven HHS, accountable to the president, to Congress, and to the American people.’

Both Kennedy and Trump pledged on the campaign trail to ‘Make America Healthy Again,’ including directing their focus on autism among youths in recent years. The recently minted MAHA commission will investigate chronic conditions for both adults and children, including those related to autism, which the White House said affects one in 36 children.

The commission is expected to publish ‘an assessment that summarizes what is known and what questions remain regarding the childhood chronic disease crisis, and include international comparisons,’ within 100 days of the commission’s founding. Within 180 days, it is expected to ‘produce a strategy, based on the findings of the assessment, to improve the health of America’s children,’ Fox Digital reported. 

Since Kennedy’s confirmation, state-level lawmakers have introduced a wave of bills aimed at advancing priorities championed by Kennedy and the MAHA movement, including prohibiting junk food like candy and soda from school lunches and other bills aimed at amending state vaccine rules. 

Fox News Digital’s Alec Schemmel contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The USA-Canada championship game is the 4 Nations Face-Off final that people had expected.

The most-represented country in the NHL (Canada) vs. the second-most represented. Two two-time Stanley Cup-winning coaches behind the benches in the USA’s Mike Sullivan and Canada’s Jon Cooper. A Stanley Cup winner in net (Canada’s Jordan Binnington) vs. an award-winning goalie in the USA’s Connor Hellebuyck. Multiple MVPs and other award winners are on the rosters.

Plus, their first meeting in the round robin was intense, starting off with three fights in the first nine seconds of the 3-1 USA victory.

Here are 10 players who can make a difference in Thursday’s championship game (8 p.m. ET, ESPN):

USA goalie Connor Hellebuyck

He has allowed only two goals in two games and is the front-runner to win a second consecutive Vezina Trophy and third overall with a league-best six shutouts. If Canadian skaters can get past the stout U.S. defense, there’s a 6-foot-4 goaltender awaiting them.

Canada defenseman Cale Makar

He missed the first USA-Canada game with an illness. His mobility will make a difference in Canada’s attack this time. He’s the NHL’s top-scoring defenseman with 63 points and 26 power-play points. He has averaged 26 minutes in his two games.

Canada forward Sidney Crosby

Canada’s captain is 37 and is tied for the tournament lead with five points. He had a 26-game international winning streak before the loss to the USA. Crosby comes up big in big international games. He scored the overtime goal against the USA in the 2010 Olympics gold-medal game. He also scored in the 2014 Olympic final and was MVP of the 2016 World Cup of Hockey. He had a goal and assist in a must-win game against Finland.

Canada forward Connor McDavid

He scored a high-speed goal against the USA last week but USA defenseman Charlie McAvoy played a physical game against him after that. McAvoy is injured and the Americans will have to figure out how to shut McDavid down.

USA forward Matthew Tkachuk

He’s expected to be available to play after missing the Sweden game. Tkachuk had two goals in the opener and orchestrated a fight in the second game.

USA forward Brady Tkachuk

He left the Sweden game after crashing into the net. Like his brother, he has two goals, 11 shots and a fight. He has been throwing his body around in the tournament, including several big hits on Monday before his injury.

Canada forward Nathan MacKinnon

He had a two-goal game against Finland after being shut out by the USA. The NHL’s leading scorer and reigning MVP needs another big game in the final.

USA forward Jack Eichel

He’s centered the Tkachuks, starting in the later stages of the Finland game. If the brothers are affected by their injuries, Eichel will have to play a bigger role guiding the offense.

USA defenseman Zach Werenski

The NHL’s third-leading scorer among defensemen is tied with Crosby with five points in the tournament.

Canada goalie Jordan Binnington

He won Game 7 of the 2019 Stanley Cup Final in Boston’s TD Garden. Can he pull off another championship win in the arena? He has made big saves but also has let in a few soft goals. Canada was breezing against Finland before the Finns scored three quick goals to cut their deficit to 4-3.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Things keep going from bad to worse for Kansas.

Brigham Young blitzed the Jayhawks out of the gate and Kansas didn’t know what hit it, losing 91-57 on the road Tuesday in one of the largest defeats in program history. It’s the latest poor game in what has turned into a dreadful stretch for the preseason No. 1 team.

The game was played at a jammed-packed Marriott Center in Provo with Kansas making its first trip to BYU since 1960. The Cougars played off the energy and got off to a fast start, drilling shots from beyond the 3-point line. BYU started the game on a 22-7 run. Although Kansas showed some life to cut the deficit to single digits with eight minutes left in the half, the Cougars got the momentum back with an 8-0 run and Kansas never responded.

BYU led by 20 points at halftime − the largest halftime deficit for Kansas this season − and a quick 10-0 run early in the second half pushed the lead out even further and turned the contest into a big-time blowout. Kansas coach Bill Self could only throw his hands in the air as his team trailed by as much as 38 points in the second half.

The game simply came down to BYU knocking down shots and Kansas having a cold night. One of the most effective shooting teams in the country, the Cougars shot 51.5% from the field and made 14 3-pointers on 36 attempts (38.9%). Kansas shot a measly 36.5% and a dreadful 9-for-32 (28.1%) from beyond the arc.

Worst losses in Kansas history

Tuesday’s 34-point loss was tied for Kansas’ worst defeat under Bill Self, who has been the head coach since 2003. It matched a loss to Southern California in the 2021 NCAA Tournament. A look at the worst setbacks in team history:

March 2, 1900: Lost by 40 points to Nebraska
Dec. 23, 1974: Lost by 37 points to Kentucky
Feb. 18, 2025: Lost by 34 points to BYU
March 23, 2021: Lost by 34 points to Southern California
Feb. 7, 2000: Lost by 33 points to Oklahoma State
Nov. 18, 2014: Lost by 32 points to Kentucky
Dec. 7, 2000: Lost by 31 points to Wake Forest
Feb. 28, 1916: Lost by 31 points to Missouri
March 9, 2024: Lost by 30 points to Houston
Jan. 17, 1976: Lost by 30 points to Missouri
Dec. 6, 1969: Lost by 30 points to Kentucky

Kansas’ struggles continue

Tuesday was, without a doubt, the newest low point of Kansas’ season. The No. 1 team in the preseason USA TODAY Sports Coaches Poll, the Jayhawks got out to a 12-3 start on the campaign with quality wins against Duke and Michigan State.

But as Big 12 play has ramped up, the Jayhawks have not found consistency. They have some head-scratching losses and blowout defeats. Kansas had no chance at Iowa State in January and there was the improbable comeback by Houston 10 days later.

Although it got revenge on the Cyclones, it did suffer further losses to Baylor, in-state rival Kansas State and had a poor showing against Utah on Saturday. The Jayhawks are 5-6 in their last 11 games.

The poor streak has Kansas at 17-9 and just 8-7 in conference. Now tied for sixth in the Big 12, the Jayhawks are on track to miss out on the double-bye in the conference tournament and would have to play in the second round.

Kansas has also seen its projected spot in the NCAA Tournament fall. In the first USA TODAY Sports Bracketology of the season, it was slated to be a No. 3 seed. In the recent edition, it’s now projected to be a No. 5 seed, and could tumble down further after Tuesday’s blowout loss.

The tough stretch is eerily similar to last season for Kansas. After beginning the 2023-24 season at No. 1 in the USA TODAY Sports coaches poll and jumping out to a 13-1 start, the Jayhawks stumbled to a 10-10 finish that included four losses of at least 20 points, including in the second round of the NCAA Tournament against Gonzaga.

This story was updated with new information.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Carolina Panthers have settled their backup quarterback spot behind starter Bryce Young ahead of free agency.

Andy Dalton has agreed to a two-year contract to return to the Panthers, the team announced Tuesday. The new deal is worth $8 million, according to multiple reports.

Dalton, 37, was temporarily installed as the starter last season when coach Dave Canales benched Young after an 0-2 start. The 14-year veteran went 1-4, throwing for 989 yards and seven touchdowns with six interceptions.

But after Dalton sprained his thumb in a car accident in late October, Young resumed his position as the team’s first-string quarterback. The No. 1 pick in the 2023 NFL draft did not relinquish the role and capped the year with seven touchdown passes in his final three games.

‘I’d say we’ll take it week to week, but there are no more weeks,” Canales said after the 44-38 win over the Atlanta Falcons in Week 18. ‘Bryce is our quarterback. I’m so proud of the way he just took the challenge and just grew every week.”

All things Panthers: Latest Carolina Panthers news, schedule, roster, stats, injury updates and more.

Young has lauded Dalton’s mentorship in the two seasons throughout the two have played with each other.

‘Me and Andy are super close,’ Young told reporters in January. ‘From when I first got here, just being able to talk with him through things, him having perspective on a situation that I had never been a part of, I was always leaning on him, always having conversations and just from a day-to-day basis.’

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

President Donald Trump’s nominee to lead the Federal Bureau of Investigation picked up support from a key Republican senator on his road to confirmation. 

Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., said Tuesday that he would vote to confirm Kash Patel to serve as FBI director for a 10-year term. 

‘I’ve spoken to multiple people I respect about Kash Patel this weekend—both for and against,’ Cassidy, chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, wrote on X. 

‘The ones who worked closely with Kash vouched for him. I will vote for his confirmation,’ Cassidy said. 

The Senate overcame a procedural hurdle on Patel’s nomination Tuesday with a party-line 48-45 vote, setting up a final vote on his nomination likely Thursday.

The Senate Judiciary Committee advanced Patel’s nomination in a 12-10 party-line vote to be considered by the whole upper chamber of Congress last Thursday. After Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats held Patel’s nomination for seven days, the committee’s chair, Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, defended Patel last week ahead of the vote. 

Grassley said Patel ‘spent his whole career fighting for righteous causes’ and has ‘been a public defender, representing the accused against the power of the state.’

 

‘He’s been a congressional staffer, investigating the partisan weaponization of our legal system. And he’s served in key national security roles, protecting Americans from foreign enemies,’ Grassely told the committee. ‘He’s received support from former FBI agents, former federal and state prosecutors, and organizations representing more than 680,000 law enforcement officers. But Mr. Patel’s resume, his accomplishments and his support aren’t why he’s the best man for the job.’

Grassely said Patel ‘should be our next FBI Director because the FBI has been infected by political bias and weaponized against the American people.’ 

‘Mr. Patel knows it, he’s exposed it, and he’s been targeted for it,’ he said, describing how Patel was ‘instrumental in exposing Crossfire Hurricane,’ and ‘he showed that the Democratic National Committee funded false allegations against President Trump, that the DOJ and FBI hid information from the FISA court to wiretap a presidential campaign and that an FBI lawyer lied in the process.’ 

‘As reward for his efforts to uncover the truth, he was attacked by the media, and the DOJ secretly subpoenaed his records,’ Grassley said. ‘I know a thing or two about this kind of retaliation.’ 

At his confirmation hearing last month, Patel clashed with committee Democrats after he refused to share his grand jury testimony in the since-dropped classified documents case against Trump, as well as over Patel’s defense of Jan. 6 rioters and critique of the ‘deep state.’ Democrats had pushed for a second confirmation hearing for Patel, but Grassley denied that request. 

Trump nominated Patel in November, moving to replace former FBI Director Chris Wray. Trump tapped Wray to lead the FBI in his first administration but later accused him of weaponizing the agency. 

Two Republican senators, Susan Collins of Maine and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, have not confirmed whether they will vote in support of Patel. 

Both Collins and Murkowski notably voted against Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s confirmation, for which Vice President JD Vance cast the tie-breaking vote. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy lashed out at President Donald Trump on Wednesday, suggesting that Trump is in a ‘disinformation space’ regarding peace talks with Russia.

Zelenskyy made the comments to reporters in Kyiv after canceling a trip to Saudi Arabia, where the U.S. and Russia held peace talks earlier in the week. 

‘Unfortunately, President Trump – I have great respect for him as a leader of a nation that we have great respect for, the American people who always support us – unfortunately lives in this disinformation space,’ Zelensky said.

Zelenskyy’s canceled trip to Saudi Arabia was widely seen as a rebuke of the agreements Trump’s team made with Russian counterparts during their Tuesday meeting there. Trump also followed up the meeting with aggressive criticism of Zelenskyy and Ukraine.

‘Today I heard, ‘Oh well, we weren’t invited.’ Well, you’ve been there for three years. You should’ve ended it after three years. You should’ve never started it. You could’ve made a deal,’ Trump said, appearing to suggest Ukraine was at fault in the war.

Trump envoy Keith Kellog, a retired 3-star general, arrived in Kyiv to hold talks with Zelenskyy on Wednesday. Ukrainian officials have emphasized that any peace deal will require U.S. security guarantees in order to ensure Russia does not continue the violence.

‘We understand the need for security guarantees,’ Kellog told Ukrainian media.

‘It’s very clear to us the importance of the sovereignty of this nation and the independence of this nation as well…. Part of my mission is to sit and listen,’ he added.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio led the U.S. delegation in Saudi Arabia, meeting with Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.

State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce also confirmed that Rubio’s team agreed to ‘lay the groundwork for cooperation’ with Russia on various issues in addition to Ukraine. They also agreed to appoint ‘high-level teams’ to begin working on a path to ending the conflict in Ukraine.

Their proposed framework for a peace agreement would see a ceasefire, followed by elections in Ukraine and the signing of a final agreement.

Reports from multiple foreign diplomatic sources say forcing Ukraine to hold new elections could be a key part of a peace deal. Both the U.S. and Russia believe Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has a low chance of winning re-election, the sources say.

‘Putin assesses the probability of electing a puppet president as quite high and is also convinced that any candidate other than the current President of Ukraine will be more flexible and ready for negotiations and concessions,’ the diplomatic sources said in a readout of the meeting.

Fox News’ Jacqui Heinrich and the Associated Press contributed to this report

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS