Archive

2025

Browsing

Dustin Pedroia garnered a handful of nicknames during his playing days including ‘Pedey’ and the ‘Muddy Chicken.’ But nothing summarized his career better than the ‘Laser Show.’

‘I call every one of my hits lasers, because that’s just how I feel,’ Pedroia said once in a New Balance commercial.

Known for his hard-nosed style of play, the 5-foot-9 Pedroia, a four-time All-Star and Gold Glove second baseman carved out what could be a Baseball Hall of Fame career.

It didn’t take long for him to become a household name.

The Boston Red Sox drafted him in the second round in 2004.

Follow every MLB game: Latest MLB scores, stats, schedules and standings.

In 2007, he won the American League Rookie of the Year and helped the Red Sox to a World Series championship.

In 2008, he won the AL MVP award.

In 2013, he helped the Red Sox to another World Series title.

Pedroia is a legend in Boston, with few Red Sox players in history more beloved than him.

Unfortunately, in 2017, then-Baltimore Orioles third baseman Manny Machado slid into Pedroia at second base injuring his knee, with multiple surgeries over the next few years leading to his retirement.

‘Unfortunately, I just got caught in the wrong position and that was it,’ Pedroia said. ‘But I think I’m at peace with everything knowing that I did my best and the training staff and the doctors did everything we possibly could’ve to try to continue to play baseball.

‘And we made it back. I played nine games (in 2018-19) when 90% of the doctors said there’s zero chance you could play. I’m proud of that. The way it ended, it ended that way, and that’s OK. I just hope I did enough during the time I had to play to impact everyone. That’s the only thing I care about.’

Pedroia definitely made a lasting impact, especially in Boston.

Pedroia played the second-most games at second base in franchise history, behind only Hall of Famer Bobby Doerr. Pedroia’s 11 consecutive Opening Day starts at second from 2007-17 marks the second-longest streak in Red Sox history at any position, behind only Carl Yastrzemski’s 12 straight in left field from 1961-72.

He also ranks in the top 10 in Red Sox franchise history in hits (eighth), doubles (sixth), runs scored (10th), stolen bases (sixth), extra-base hits (eighth), total bases (eighth) and at-bats (ninth). Pedroia finished with a .299 career batting average, second among second baseman in Boston history.

Was it good enough for Cooperstown? Here’s a closer look at Pedroia’s Hall of Fame candidacy:

The case for Dustin Pedroia

Pedroia’s career started off fast, but ended too soon.

He is the only player ever to win Rookie of the Year, MVP and a Gold Glove, along with a World Series championship in his first two full seasons. Only nine other players have accomplished those feats in their entire career. He is one of three to win RoY and MVP in back-to-back seasons, joining Cal Ripken Jr., Ryan Howard and Kris Bryant (Fred Lynn and Ichiro Suzuki are the only players to win Rookie of the Year and MVP honors in the same season).

And from 2007-17, spanning his first full season to his last, only one second baseman produced a higher bWAR than his 53.3 − Robinson Canó, 60.5. He led all second basemen with 102 defensive runs saved. Only five players in all of baseball had more DRS over that span, regardless of position.

Pedroia also was big in October. He helped lead the Red Sox to two World Series titles. One of his best performances came in Game 7 of the 2007 AL Championship Series against Cleveland , going 3-for-5 with five RBI and a home run to lead the Red Sox to the Fall Classic in his rookie season.

The case against Dustin Pedroia

Because Pedroia’s career was cut short by injury and he only had 6,777 career plate appearances, he falls short of what most voters consider to be a slam-dunk Hall of Fame case. He never reached landmark career numbers like most Hall of Famers − 1,805 hits and 140 home runs don’t rank well among those in Cooperstown.

And with a 51.9 career Wins Above Replacement (WAR), he ranks 22nd among all second baseman.

Voting trends

Pedroia is one of 14 players making their ballot debut − a group headlined by pitcher CC Sabathia and outfielder Ichiro Suzuki. Through 142 public ballots in Ryan Thibodaux’s Hall of Fame voting tracker, Pedroia has received 19 votes, totaling 12.5% support.

Bottom line

Pedroia’s a long shot, but he should stay on the ballot for many years. Despite a injury-shortened career, his credentials during his 14-year span should be deeply considered.

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Recently, I stated on social media that the collapse of the Pittsburgh Steelers wasn’t the fault of Mike Tomlin. I was called a clown, buffoon, goof, idiot, moron and clown a second time. And that was just by my mom.

A number of Steelers fans erupted saying how wrong I was. My main point: the roster is the problem, not Tomlin. Their main point: Tomlin helps develop the roster and he’s lost a step as a head coach. The latter point is absolutely laughable and when you dig into the Steelers, really dig into them, and compare their personnel to all the teams that made this season’s playoffs, you see just how little Tomlin had to work with.

The Tomlin narrative that he’s lost a coaching step persists because it’s an easy one to digest. Same with this belief that the Steelers need a fresh voice. Yet both of those things are wrong. In the NFL, it’s all about talent. A good coach can maximize talent but that only goes so far. You need the players.

Maybe in past years, some of the team’s early playoff exits were because of Tomlin. But not this year. The team just doesn’t have enough receiving weapons to be a serious threat. No coach could go far with this offense.

This isn’t about Pro Bowlers. The Pro Bowl is political and not always a true representation of a franchise’s talent level. This is about what I see with my own two eyes.

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

It’s clear the Steelers had the worst roster in the playoffs. In some cases, far worse.

Let’s break it down:

Vikings: The quarterback might be a question, true, but they have Justin Jefferson. There are also talented pieces all over this roster. The Steelers’ best offensive player is George Pickens, who sometimes wants to play hard, sometimes doesn’t, and like, dude, sometimes gets to the stadium when he wants to get there.

Tomlin has tolerated this type of behavior from receivers before and it’s true that’s a Tomlin problem. But also, it shouldn’t be on Tomlin for a professional player to behave, you know, professionally.

Rams: Wide receiver Puka Nacua has the potential to be a generational talent. This roster easily outdoes the Steelers’.

Commanders: They have quarterback Jayden Daniels. Not much to say after that.

Lions: Are you kidding?

Kansas City: C’mon.

Buccaneers: Baker Mayfield over Russell Wilson. A young running backs group, and wide receiver Mike Evans is still staggeringly good.

Packers: We’re still deciphering quarterback Jordan Love but the future looks bright. Better overall receivers than Pittsburgh and an emerging group of defenders.

Eagles: Not even close.

Chargers: This one is actually the closest. Justin Herbert has issues in big games but many general managers and coaches would run over multiple grandmas to get him. Safety Derwin James is one of the most underrated players in the league.

Speaking of James and defense, that side of the ball in Pittsburgh is hugely problematic. Are there schematic issues that are Tomlin’s fault? Sure. But the team’s big star, T.J. Watt, utilized a cloaking device in the final four games of the season. He didn’t have a sack and that includes the playoff game against the Ravens.

Texans: Wide receiver Nico Collins is a superstar and he’s just one of several excellent pass catchers. They also have running back Joe Mixon, who is far better than Najee ‘Zero point eight yards a carry’ Harris.

Ravens: Nope.

Broncos: Bo Nix is a franchise passer. That Broncos defense (most of the time) is actually what the Steelers’ defense thinks it is.

Bills: LOL.

Hey dork, you’re shredding Pittsburgh’s roster, but Tomlin has input into its composition, dum dum.

Input isn’t the same as final say.

Overall, when Tomlin says ‘the standard is the standard,’ he’s referring to an era that no longer exists. That ‘standard’ time was when the Steelers had players like Jerome Bettis, Ben Roethlisberger, and Troy Polamalu. They don’t have a fraction of those players now. Hines Ward ain’t walking through that door.

So go ahead. Blame Tomlin. It’s a free country. But look at that roster. Really look at it.

Is it that good?

Is it?

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The partnership between WWE and TNA will continue.

“We look forward to growing and evolving our partnership with TNA Wrestling and its outstanding group of athletes by creating new opportunities to further the development of our talent and to elevate the viewer experience at home,” WWE senior vice president of talent development creative Shawn Michaels said in a statement.

The agreement will be something wrestling fans have gotten accustomed to over the past year. WWE’s NXT stars will be available to appear on TNA programming and TNA stars will be available to appear on NXT. Talent from both sides will also be able to appear on WWE premium live events and TNA pay-per-views.

Things really got going just a year ago when former TNA Knockouts World Champion Jordynne Grace took part in the 2024 Royal Rumble. After that, it was almost a weekly occurrence for stars from each company to appear on the other brand’s shows.

Notable moves include when Grace competed against Roxanne Perez for the NXT Women’s Championship at NXT Battleground and viral sensation Joe Hendry went for the NXT Championship against Ethan Page at NXT No Mercy. Other instances include The Rascalz going on WWE programming and NXT’s Arianna Grace, Tatum Paxley, Izzi Dame, Wendy Choo, among others, appearing on TNA shows.

When WWE chief content officer Paul ‘Triple H’ Levesque was asked after SummerSlam 2024 why this crossover started, he said he wanted to find something that would benefit WWE and whatever promotion it was working with. The trade-off would be the other company could be on WWE’s elevated platform, while its talent could get time against other stars and learn different styles of wrestling. The moves have been met with praise from both sides.

“This partnership between TNA wrestling and WWE has been the perfect example of business done right,” Hendry previously told USA TODAY Sports. “Business done right is where every single party wins.”

It doesn’t appear it will take long for the official partnership to commence. TNA’s Genesis 2025 pay-per-view on Sunday in Dallas is being advertised as NXT as well, hinting there could be some WWE roster appearance on the show.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The USA TODAY Sports way-too-early Top 25 for the 2024 season was released last January in the tight window between two major events: Michigan’s win against Washington for the national championship and Nick Saban’s retirement from Alabama.

That’s why we had the Crimson Tide ranked No. 2 in our early lookahead. Why would we pick against the greatest coach in college football history? As for the defending national champions, former Michigan coach Jim Harbaugh had yet to officially leave for the Los Angeles Chargers and starting quarterback J.J. McCarthy was days away from declaring for the NFL draft. We ranked the Wolverines No. 3 in our projection, which also made sense.

At least we have excuses for those two misses. Looking back at our way-too-early list shows some major errors in judgment, from oversize optimism in teams such as LSU, Oklahoma and Virginia Tech through the general undervaluing of the Big Ten.

Our way-too-early Top 25 for the 2025 season will be released after Monday night’s championship game between Notre Dame and Ohio State. Before looking ahead, let’s look back at last year’s list to see which teams we got right, which we got went wrong and which we got very, very wrong:

Nailed it!

No. 4 Texas (13-3)

This is right around where Texas will land in the final US LBM Coaches Poll after coming in second in the SEC and winning a pair of College Football Playoff games before losing to the Buckeyes in the Cotton Bowl. While the Longhorns maximized a relatively easy schedule, this team met expectations by making the national semifinals for the second year in a row.

No. 11 Clemson (10-4)

Clemson won the ACC, as we predicted, before losing to Texas in the opening round of the playoff. It wasn’t a particularly pretty season for the Tigers. They were blown out by Georgia in the opener and lost convincingly Louisville at home. But they managed to get into the conference title game when Miami fell to Syracuse in Week 14 and took advantage by beating SMU.

No. 23 Memphis (11-2)

Memphis didn’t end up as the best team in the Group of Five — we didn’t have Boise State ranked — but will end up in this range in the Coaches Poll after closing out the year with wins against Tulane and West Virginia.

Not too bad, honestly

No. 1 Georgia (11-3)

OK, so Georgia didn’t reclaim the national championship or even win a playoff game, ending the year with a loss to Notre Dame in the Sugar Bowl. But the Bulldogs did win the SEC, beating Texas twice along the way, and might have advanced deeper into the playoff had starting quarterback Carson Beck not suffered a season-ending injury in the conference championship game.

No. 6 Notre Dame (14-1*)

We were largely on the mark with the Fighting Irish, writing that the offseason additions of offensive coordinator Mike Denbrock and quarterback Riley Leonard “make the Fighting Irish one of the leading contenders for the playoff.” They had an awful loss to Northern Illinois but haven’t lost since and are one win from their first title since 1988.

No. 7 Oregon (13-1)

The good news: Oregon was picked second in the Big Ten, behind only Michigan. The Ducks closed the regular season as the only unbeaten team in the Bowl Subdivision. The bad news: We had the eventual Big Ten winner all the way down at No. 7, greatly underestimating how powerful the Ducks and the league would be in 2024.

No. 12 Tennessee (10-3)

This is close to accurate for the Volunteers in terms of their final ranking. But our Top 25 had Tennessee ranked as the seventh-best team in the SEC, which qualifies as a miss. The Volunteers beat Alabama and made the playoff, but failed to make an impression against Ohio State.

No. 14 Missouri (10-3)

We were a little bit too bullish on Missouri. The Tigers’ only win against a Power Four opponent with more than seven wins came against Iowa in the Music City Bowl. They survived close games against Vanderbilt, Auburn and Oklahoma at home to get to double-digit wins.

Close, but still off the mark

No. 5 Mississippi (10-3)

Hard-to-believe losses to Kentucky and Florida cost the Rebels a playoff berth and the chance for the program’s first top-five finish in over 60 years. But our hearts were in the right place — this might have been the best team in the SEC when everything was clicking. Sadly, that didn’t happen often enough.

No. 9 Ohio State (14-2*)

The Buckeyes and Penn State were extremely undervalued as part of our overall misfire with Big Ten. Ohio State did finish the regular season ranked No. 7 in the Coaches Poll, though, before turning in a dominant run to Monday’s championship game.

No. 15 Penn State (13-3)

This was about a 10-spot miss on the Nittany Lions. “If all goes right, Penn State could win the Big Ten or at least land an at-large playoff bid,” we wrote, with questions about the health of the offensive line and whether Drew Allar would take a step forward under new offensive coordinator Andy Kotelnicki.

No. 24 Iowa (8-5)

Iowa won’t finish in the Top 25 after the bowl loss to Missouri. But the Hawkeyes lost to Iowa State by a point and UCLA by a field goal, so they were close to justifying this ranking and even factoring into the at-large playoff picture.

We have excuses

No. 2 Alabama (9-4)

Alabama dropped down the SEC standings under first-year coach Kalen DeBoer. The Crimson Tide’s season was defined by losses to Vanderbilt and Oklahoma during the regular season and to Michigan in the ReliaQuest Bowl.

No. 3 Michigan (8-5)

Losing Harbaugh, McCarthy and a slew of high-profile contributors in the wake of the championship game doomed Michigan’s chances of a repeat under new coach Sherrone Moore. But the Wolverines closed with wins against Ohio State and the Tide to regain some momentum and could finish in the Top 25.

No. 17 Washington (6-7)

Given the exodus of talent after the loss to Michigan, we should’ve been much more cynical about Washington’s chances at succeeding as new members of the Big Ten. In our defense, DeBoer was expected to return with the Huskies in 2024. We wrote, “based on his track record, it seems very unlikely that Washington drops off the national map.”

No. 22 Kansas (5-7)

One of a whopping nine teams in our early Top 25 to finish with a losing record, Kansas had five losses by single digits and won three games in a row against ranked competition in November. In other words, the Jayhawks were very close to being the team we expected last January.

What were we thinking?

No. 8 Oklahoma (6-7)

Here’s where things start getting ugly. When it comes to Oklahoma, we said the play of quarterback Jackson Arnold and the offensive line “will determine if this team can be in the playoff mix.” Neither panned out, and the offense was miserable. Watching Texas hit the ground running in the SEC made things even worse. The only saving grace was a defeat of Alabama that allowed the Sooners to extend their bowl streak to 26 consecutive seasons, though that resulted in a bad loss to Navy.

No. 10 LSU (9-4)

Hyped as a major contender in coach Brian Kelly’s third year with quarterback Garrett Nussmeier taking over for Jayden Daniels, LSU lost to Southern California in the opener and then dropped three in a row to Texas A&M, Alabama and Florida to disappear from the playoff picture.

No. 16 Utah (5-7)

Injuries played a role, especially at quarterback with Cam Rising expected back at full health. That didn’t happen. And after a 4-0 start, the Utes lost seven in a row, ending the year tied for second to last in the Big 12 and suffering the program’s first losing finish since 2013.

No. 19 Southern California (7-6)

USC never found a rhythm as new members of the Big Ten and barely sneaked into the postseason after losing close games to Michigan, Minnesota, Maryland and Washington. Overrating the Trojans is a habit we plan on breaking with our way-too-early list for 2025.

No. 21 North Carolina State (6-7)

While overshadowed by other ACC flops such as Florida State, Virginia Tech and North Carolina, N.C. State should be counted among the biggest disappointments in the Power Four. Hampered by injury issues, the Wolfpack were blown out by Tennessee early and lost four games by a single possession.

No. 25 Virginia Tech (6-7)

The program’s expected breakthrough never came to fruition. At least the Hokies were competitive in every loss, with only the defeat to Minnesota in the Mayo Bowl coming by more than 10 points.

We really messed up

No. 13 Arizona (4-8)

Coach Jedd Fisch would eventually replace DeBoer at Washington. At the time, though, Arizona was seen as the early favorite in the remade Big 12. While the coaching change and player departures played a role, we were clearly way off about the Wildcats.

No. 20 Oklahoma State (3-9)

Oklahoma State went unbeaten in non-conference play and then wouldn’t win again, finishing dead last in the Big 12 and nearly leading to the end of coach Mike Gundy’s tenure. Don’t look for the Cowboys to get the benefit of the doubt in the future.

Florida State division

No. 18 Florida State (2-10)

The Seminoles are in a class by themselves. Do we get any credit for having them No. 18, lower than most way-too-early lists? Nope. FSU will go down not just as the biggest disappointment of the 2024 season but as one of the biggest duds of the era.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Pam Bondi, President-elect Trump’s nominee to lead the Department of Justice, was involved in a sharp clash with Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., on Wednesday as the California senator quizzed Bondi over whether she would prosecute Trump’s political opponents.

Schiff, a vocal critic of the president-elect, asked Bondi about whether she would investigate former Special Counsel Jack Smith and also former Rep. Liz Cheney.

‘I’m asking you sitting here today whether you are aware of a factual predicate to investigate Liz Cheney,’ he said.

‘Senator, no one asked me to investigate Liz Cheney, that is a hypothetical,’ she said.

She then turned the tables on Schiff, noting the crime rate in California.

‘You know what we should be worried about? The crime rate in California is through the roof. Your robberies are 87% higher than the national average,’ she said. ‘That’s what I want to focus on, senator.’

Schiff said that Bondi’s answers suggested she doesn’t have the independence to say ‘no’ to the president. He then asked her if she would tell Trump he lost the 2020 election. Bondi accused Schiff of ‘playing politics’ and of leaking Rep. Devin Nunes’ memo.

‘What I can tell you is I will never play politics, you’re trying to engage me in a gotcha,’ she said.

Schiff shot back, asking her if she would advise against blanket pardons by President-elect Trump and suggesting she would not be able to look at every file on day one.

‘You’ll be able to review hundreds of cases on day one. … Of course you won’t,’ Schiff said.

Bondi was furious at Schiff’s comments.

‘I’m not going to mislead this body or you, you were censured by Congress, senator, for comments just like this that are so reckless,’ she said. 

Schiff was censured in 2023 for promoting claims that Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign colluded with Russia, a vote that made Schiff just the third member of the House to be censured since the turn of the century.

The incident was one of a number of sharp exchanges that the former Florida AG had with Democrat lawmakers. She was asked by Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., about the weaponization of the DOJ.

‘It would not be appropriate for a prosecutor to start with a name and look for a crime?’ Whitehouse said during his line of questioning. ‘It’s a prosecutor’s job to start with a crime and look for a name. Correct?’

Bondi responded by highlighting the federal government’s investigations into Trump.

‘Senator, I think that is the whole problem with the weaponization that we have seen the last four years and what’s been happening to Donald Trump,’ Bondi said. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President-elect Donald Trump is set to return to the White House and will be sworn in later this month. Even those who aren’t attending live can watch Inauguration Day events at home. The inauguration will air live on major broadcast networks, including Fox News. Audiences can stream the proceedings online through digital sources, including the White House’s live stream. The official time for the swearing-in ceremony is at 12 pm EST on Jan. 20.

This inauguration is the 60th and will be themed ‘Our Enduring Democracy: A Constitutional Promise.’ Celebrate the occasion at home with your own Inauguration Day party. Here are some items to help you celebrate and make the occasion memorable:

Cake topper: $9.99

Make patriotic cupcakes topped with Donald Trump and JD Vance flags to serve to guests. These flag appetizer toothpicks are perfect for bakeries, parties or any gathering where you want to add a special decorative touch. These Republican elephant cupcake toppers, $14.99 at Walmart, include 24 paper cutouts and stickers.

Donald Trump Cardboard Cutout: $54.95 

This life-size cutout is the perfect accessory for a photo booth. Your guests will love taking a photo with President-elect Donald Trump.

Patriotic tablecloth: on sale for $7.99

Line your table with patriotic flair. These red, white and blue tablecloths will quickly transform your space and are disposable for an easy clean-up.

Inauguration Day napkins: $43.65

These beverage napkins from Zazzle, which come in a pack of 50, are a great way to mark the historic occasion. They are printed with the President-elect’s image and make a great keepsake.

Presidential Inauguration banner: $13.99

Show your pride with this Inauguration Day banner, which is perfect for hanging outside or on the wall as a party decoration.

Election Balloons: $12.09

No part is complete without balloons. Make this giant mylar republican elephant balloon from Walmart the focal point of your arrangement. This set, $11.49 on Amazon, comes with 32 balloons, some printed with the image of the President-elect.

Trump-Vance 2024 America First paper cups: $12.96

These paper cups from Zazzle are a commemorative way to serve beverages on Inauguration Day. Keep warm or cool drinks in your cup with the optional lid. Buy Trump-themed paper plates and cups for $11.99 on Amazon. 

Inauguration day plates: $11.92

Serve snacks on the day on a plate from Zazzle that they’ll want to take home. These Inauguration Day paper plates are sold in sets of eight and are customizable.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Vice President-elect JD Vance, in a role that he’s likely to repeat with frequency in the years ahead, hosted a top-dollar fundraiser that attracted some of the leading figures and donors in President-elect Trump’s political orbit.

The $250,000-a-plate fundraiser, which was confirmed to Fox News by a source familiar with the details, was held Wednesday at Le Bilboquet, a French restaurant in Palm Beach, Florida, located just a few miles from Trump’s Mar-a-Lago club, which has long served as the former and future president’s political headquarters.

Among those in attendance was the president-elect’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., who is a top friend and political ally of Vance, and who pushed hard last summer for the elder Trump to name Vance, then the junior senator from Ohio, as his running mate on the 2024 Republican Party’s national ticket.

A number of Trump mega donors, including billionaire investor John Paulson and tech entrepreneur David Sacks, as well as tech and cryptocurrency titans, also attended, according to the source. 

The money hauled in at the fundraiser, which will likely top seven figures, will go toward MAGA Inc., the top super PAC that supported Trump during his two-year campaign to win back the White House in 2024.

With Trump term-limited and prevented from running again for re-election in 2028, Vance is seen as the heir-apparent to the president-elect’s America First movement and MAGA world of devout supporters. He will likely be considered the frontrunner when the next GOP presidential nomination race formally kicks off following the 2026 midterm elections.

Hosting and headlining top dollar fundraisers that attract the leading donors in Trump’s political orbit will likely enhance Vance’s position as the politician best equipped to carry on the president-elect’s legacy in 2028.

Politico was first to report news of the Vance fundraiser.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

House Republicans are eyeing new limits on food stamps driven by Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s mission to ‘Make America Healthy Again.’

Rep. Josh Brecheen, R-Okla., is leading ‘The Healthy SNAP Act’ to bar most junk foods from being eligible for purchase under the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), he first told Fox News Digital.

‘President Trump has been given a mandate by the majority of Americans to Make America Healthy Again, and those in his administration, like RFK Jr. and Senator Marco Rubio, have directly advocated for eliminating junk food purchases with SNAP,’ Brecheen told Fox News Digital.

‘If someone wants to buy junk food on their own dime, that’s up to them. But what we’re saying is, don’t ask the taxpayer to pay for it and then also expect the taxpayer to pick up the tab for the resulting health consequences.’

Brecheen’s bill would bar the use of food stamps to buy ‘soft drinks, candy, ice cream, prepared desserts such as cakes, pies, cookies, or similar products,’ according to legislative text obtained by Fox News Digital.

Seven Republicans have backed the legislation as co-sponsors.

As the Oklahoma Republican referenced, Secretary of State nominee Rubio did back efforts to reform SNAP last year.

He unveiled a bipartisan bill with Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., to enable the federal government to collect more data on SNAP purchases and ‘add improving nutrition security and diet quality to Congress’ declaration of policy for SNAP.’

Rubio had also called for a crackdown on SNAP funds going toward junk food in a Wall Street Journal op-ed last year.

Brecheen said of his bill, ‘In addition to the obvious health improvements, this bill will also result in significant savings in taxpayer funds for such programs as Medicaid, where approximately 1 in 4 Americans (79 million total) are currently enrolled.’

‘Federally funded healthcare for obesity and obesity-related diseases has reached $400 billion per year, according to the Senate Joint Economic Committee (JEC) 2023 report. We can’t afford to go down this road any longer as a nation,’ he said.

Republicans embracing a focus on nutrition and health is a notable shift from even a decade ago, when conservatives pushed back on former first lady Michelle Obama’s effort to get more nutritional meals in schools.

Kennedy, who was a self-described Democrat before running for president as an Independent candidate, has driven a significant shift in the national dialogue on the issue since forging a relationship with President-elect Donald Trump.

Trump tapped Kennedy to be his secretary of Health and Human Services – though his history of vaccine skepticism may make his confirmation an uphill battle.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President Biden was widely panned by conservatives on social media after warning in his final speech to the nation of an ‘oligarchy taking shape in America.’

‘That’s why my farewell address tonight, I want to warn the country of some things that give me great concern,’ Biden said in his farewell speech on Wednesday night. ‘And this is a dangerous — and that’s the dangerous concentration of power in the hands of a very few ultrawealthy people, and the dangerous consequences if their abuse of power is left unchecked. Today, an oligarchy is taking shape in America of extreme wealth, power and influence that literally threatens our entire democracy, our basic rights and freedoms and a fair shot for everyone to get ahead.’

‘We see the consequences all across America. And we’ve seen it before.’

Conservatives on social media quickly reacted to that comment with criticism pointing to the billionaires that Biden has associated with over the years, including liberal megadonor George Soros, who he recently awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom.

Fox News Digital previously reported on several billionaires who donated to President Biden’s re-election campaign last year, including Laurene Powell Jobs, the widow of Steve Jobs, and Alphabet Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt.

‘Joe Biden didn’t call out Iran, China, or the wars he helped create in his farewell speech—but he attacked American citizens, calling them ‘oligarchs’ and ‘a threat to democracy,’’ GOP Congresswoman Nancy Mace posted on X. ‘A fitting end to a presidency defined by blame and failure.’

Mace added in another post, ‘Joe Biden discussing democracy, a free press, institutions and the abuse of power in his final farewell speech is rich.’

‘Joe Biden, who just awarded the Medal of Freedom to George Soros and gave his own son a free pass for any and all federal crimes he committed over the course of a decade, now wants you to know that oligarchies are bad,’ conservative commentator Matt Walsh posted on X.

‘Yes, Biden, opponent of the wealthy and powerful…who just gave the nation’s highest civilian honor to…George Soros, Hillary Clinton, Ralph Lauren (net worth $11 billion), and Magic Johnson (net worth $1.6 billion)’ American Compass managing editor Drew Holden posted on X. 

‘Biden’s oligarchy warning, while with merit, rings hollow from the leader of a party fueled by billionaires,’ former White House correspondent Ron Fournier posted on X. ‘Truth is, the monied class rules both halves of the corrupt duopoly.’

‘INCREDIBLY RICH for Biden to warn about ‘power concentrated in the hands of a few wealthy people’ when their entire political apparatus has been fueled by Arabella Advisors and George Soros for decades,’ Republican communicator Matt Whitlock posted on X.

Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for comment but did not immediately receive a response.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

One effective way to spot potential market opportunities on a sector level is to regularly monitor  Bullish Percent Index (BPI) readings for each sector. Sector-focused BPIs tell you the percentage of stocks generating Point & Figure Buy Signals. From that point on, you can drill down to specific industries to find ETFs or stocks presenting tradable opportunities.

On Wednesday morning, following an encouraging CPI report and a strong kick-off to quarterly bank earnings, the BPI for the financial sector ($BPFINA) dramatically rose.

FIGURE 1. BPI FOR FINANCIAL SECTOR ($BPFINA). After a selloff, 56% of stocks in the financial sector triggered P&F buy signals.Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

After hovering above the 70% line for months, a threshold that signals potential overbought conditions, $BPFINA declined in December, falling short of touching the “oversold” threshold of 30%. On Wednesday, it jumped above 50%, a line that favors the bulls as it indicates that over 50% of stocks within the sector are generating P&F buy signals.

In addition to a tempered CPI report, one which followed a similar PPI reading from the previous day, strong bank earnings were a key driver behind Wednesday’s dramatic market rally, particularly the big players: JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Goldman Sachs (GS), Wells Fargo (WFC), and Citigroup (C).

Let’s use PerfCharts to compare the SPDR S&P Bank ETF (KBE), our bank industry proxy, to these four names. KBE provides an equal-weighted representation of small-, mid-, and large-cap bank stocks, giving a wider context to view relative performance.

FIGURE 2. PERFCHARTS OF KBE, JPM, GS, WFC, AND C. Note that all four banks are outperforming KBE.Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

This quick view tells you that in the last year, the “big four” have been outperforming the broader banking industry. Wells Fargo and Goldman Sachs are leading the pack, followed by JPMorgan Chase and Citigroup.

Suppose, however, you wanted to take a diversified position by going long KBE, anticipating the possibility that the banking industry might see a favorable year, especially under the new White House administration. Take a look at a daily chart of KBE.

FIGURE 3. DAILY CHART OF KBE. After losing bullish momentum, KBE is at a juncture that is neither definitively bullish nor bearish. Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

Here are a few key observations about the chart:

The ZigZag line clearly shows the swing points identifying when the uptrend and near-term downtrend were broken (remember, uptrend = HH and HL, and the opposite is true of a downtrend).The orange circles highlight the nearest swing low and high points, both of which were breached, making the near-term uptrend or downtrend uncertain at this time.For the downtrend to resume, KBE would have to fall below $53, the November low (see blue dotted line) that served as support.For a new uptrend to take place, KBE must stay above $53 and eventually break above potential resistance at $58 (see red dotted line) before challenging the two November highs.

In short, it’s a wait-and-see moment. If you entered early, a stop-loss below $53 or any of the consecutive swing low points (see ZigZag) can be helpful.

If you’re considering investing in individual banking stocks, among the four big banks reporting outstanding earnings results, Citigroup made a new 52-week high. I identified this using the StockCharts New Highs Dashboard panel.

FIGURE 4. NEW HIGHS TOOL. Citigroup made a new 52-week high on Wednesday morning and is worth a closer look.

Let’s take a closer look. Below is a daily chart of Citigroup.

FIGURE 5. DAILY CHART OF CITIGROUP.  A steady uptrend culminating in a bullish yet parabolic jump.Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

A couple of main points:

Citigroup saw a tremendous jump Wednesday as its Q4 earnings beat Wall Street’s expectations; analysts’ fundamental targets have been revised to as high as $102, with $80 as the median price target.The Relative Strength Index (RSI) barely entered overbought territory (see orange circle), indicating strong momentum.The Accumulation/Distribution Line (ADL) is recovering after a prolonged drop in money flows.The On Balance Volume (OBV) shows significant buying pressure.

As Citigroup makes new highs, its parabolic move may be countered by a slight pullback. If so, the scenario is straightforward. If you look at the ZigZag lines and the support levels of the two most recent swing lows (see dotted blue lines), you can identify the prices that, if broken, could call the stock’s uptrend into question.

These levels, both of which should serve as support, are especially critical for any trader who has opened a long position. Also, monitor the $74 range that coincides with the last two consecutive swing high points. While these highs are near the current price, they could still act as a support level if the stock pulls back.

If you’re looking to enter a position, it may be wise to wait and observe how the price reacts to any of the support levels before deciding to go long. If the price falls below these levels, additional support could emerge at subsequent swing lows. However, in the case of a significant reversal, you would need to reassess the trend to determine whether support levels represent buying opportunities or merely temporary rally points in a bearish trend.

At the Close

Financials are showing signs of recovery and renewed momentum, with $BPFINA crossing a key bullish threshold. Strong bank earnings are driving market sentiment, with  Citigroup making a new 52-week high.

What to do: Add Citigroup to your ChartLists. Use a basic support and resistance perspective to guide your decisions and watch the swing points to determine the status of the trend.

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.