Archive

2025

Browsing

A former top aide in President Donald Trump’s first administration is arguing that Republicans raising taxes on wealthy Americans ‘makes no sense.’

Marc Short, the former chief of staff to ex-Vice President Mike Pence, was an integral part of negotiations for Trump’s 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA). He also served in Trump’s first White House as director of legislative affairs from 2017 to 2018.

‘Raising taxes on America’s highest earners and biggest job creators makes no sense. I don’t understand why there are some inside the current administration who are pushing Congress to raise the top rate, because again, these are America’s job creators,’ Short said.

‘So many small businesses file taxes as individuals. And so you’re actually going to be raising taxes on many small businesses, not just individuals.’

Congressional Republicans are working on a massive piece of legislation that Trump has dubbed his ‘big, beautiful bill,’ aimed at advancing his policies on tax, border security, immigration, energy, defense and the national debt.

The tax policy portion is expected to be the costliest, and House negotiators are working on identifying a number of areas to cut a total of at least $1.5 trillion to offset the new spending.

A source familiar with Trump’s thinking told Fox News Digital he’s considering allowing the rate on individuals making $2.5 million or more to revert from 37% to the pre-2017 39.6%. 

It will help pay for massive middle- and working-class tax cuts as well as protect Medicaid, the source said.

The TCJA lowered the tax rate for the top income bracket — currently $609,350 for single filers — to 37%, a cut that’s expiring at the end of this year.

Creating a new, higher tax bracket for people earning significantly more than that would help pay for extending the 2017 tax cuts as well as implementing Trump’s new priorities: eliminating taxes on tips, overtime pay and retirees’ Social Security checks.

But Short, who helped get the 2017 package passed, dismissed those new Trump priorities as short-sighted political sweeteners.

‘I feel like some of the administration’s new requirements are somewhat gimmicky. I’m not sure many Americans who earn their income based on tips are even paying taxes on those tips right now. And I think we should begin to extend that to say no tax on overtime,’ he said.

Short said those changes would create ‘a lot of additional hurdles for businesses to comply with.’

‘I think the no tax on Social Security, it seems like what we’re trying to do is different from 2017, when we passed the Tax Cuts and Job Act,’ he said. ‘We tried to simplify the tax code, make it flatter and fair for all Americans, as opposed to creating carve-outs for certain constituencies.’

Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for a response to Short’s remarks.

Some conservative groups like the Heritage Foundation and Americans for Prosperity are also wary of a potential tax hike for the wealthy.

Richard Stern, director of the Hermann Center for the Federal Budget at the Heritage Foundation, said the group is opposed to efforts to raise tax rates to 40% or higher.

‘Congress needs to get its fiscal house in order, but it must do so by tightening its own belt, not by forcing American taxpayers to tighten theirs. A higher top tax rate would be counterproductive, discouraging hard work and entrepreneurship,’ Stern said.

Americans for Prosperity chief government affairs officer Brent Gardner said in a statement, ‘Raising taxes on any American should be completely off the table.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A group of investors sued UnitedHealthcare Group on Wednesday, accusing the company of misleading them after the killing of its CEO, Brian Thompson.

The class action lawsuit — filed in the Southern District of New York — accuses the health insurance company of not initially adjusting their 2025 net earning outlook to factor in how Thompson’s killing would affect their operations.

On Dec. 3 — a day before Thompson was fatally shot — the company issued guidance that included net earnings of $28.15 to $28.65 per share and adjusted net earnings of $29.50 to $30.00 per share, the suit notes. And on January 16, the company announced that it was sticking with its old forecast.

The investors described this as “materially false and misleading,” pointing to the immense public scrutiny the company and the broader health insurance industry experienced in the wake of Thompson’s killing.

The group, which is seeking unspecified damages, argued that the public backlash prevented the company from pursuing ‘the aggressive, anti-consumer tactics that it would need to achieve’ its earnings goals.

‘As such, the Company was deliberately reckless in doubling down on its previously issued guidance,’ the suit reads.

The company eventually revised its 2025 outlook on April 17, citing a needed shift in corporate strategy — a move that caused its stock to drop more than 22% that day.

‘The company denies any allegations of wrongdoing and intends to defend the matter vigorously,’ a UnitedHealthcare spokesperson said in a statement.

Thompson’s fatal shooting on the streets of New York City in broad daylight sent shockwaves across the nation.

Luigi Mangione, the 27-year-old man accused of the killing, has pleaded not guilty to federal and state charges against him. The legal defense fund for Mangione surpassed the $1 million mark in donations on Tuesday.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Bird, 44, is one of the most successful players in women’s basketball history. She won five Olympic gold medals and four World Cup titles for USA Basketball. In the WNBA, she led the Seattle Storm to four championships throughout her 20-year career after helping the UConn Huskies win two NCAA championships in college.

Bird, who will be inducted in the Naismith Basketball Hall of Fame this September, will be responsible for a hefty chunk of the women’s team’s success, taking on the ‘Grant Hill’ role for the team, making her in charge of things like player roster and coaching staff decisions for events like the Olympics and World Cup.

“It’s really exciting,’ the 13-time WNBA All-Star said. ‘I know what it feels like to represent your country as a player. I know what it feels like to stand on the podium as a player. So now that I’m retired, to continue to be able to have impact, to continue to be a part of representing (this) country and part of a gold medal organization feels like a natural next step for me.”  

In previous years, a committee had been used to determine the rosters and coaches for these events. However, Bird’s expertise and respect in the basketball community seemingly has earned her the power to make those decisions on her own moving forward.

“At this point really every experience that I had along my journey as a player is going to play a role,” Bird said. “There are just certain situations I’ve been in; there are certain experiences I’ve had throughout my time as a player that I’m sure at some point will show up and I’ll be able to tap into.  

“I know myself and I am a quick learner. The way that I played the game had a lot of understanding in it, so I expect the learning curve to go quickly.” 

Bird won Olympic gold medals at Athens in 2004, Beijing in 2008, London in 2012, Rio de Janeiro in 2016 and Tokyo in 2021.

Will the men’s national team make the same shift?

The men’s national team does not need to. They’ve operated with a managing director for nearly two decades at this point, dating back to Jeff Colangelo, who took on the role from 2005 to 2021. Grant Hill took over the role in 2021, hence why Bird’s new position is being referred to as the ‘Grant Hill role.’

Much like how Hill now reports to the men’s national team day-to-day operations manager Sean Ford, Bird will now report to Briana Weiss in a similar manner.

When does the women’s national team play next?

The next big event for the women’s national team will be the FIBA World Cup in September 2026, with the first qualifying event for the tournament set to take place in November this year.

The short timeframe between now and the qualifying event makes Bird’s life much tougher as she’ll have to navigate a field of worthy candidates for the roster and coaching staff all while meandering through politics in her decisions. It’s hard to forget the drama that ensued ahead of the 2024 Paris Olympics when it was announced that Caitlin Clark had been left off the roster.

Sue Bird making moves as a podcaster as well

Coincidentally, news of Bird’s new position comes at a time when Bird also is announcing the start of a new WNBA podcast with Vox Media titled ‘Bird’s Eye View.’ The podcast is set to debut May 16 and will be available on most major podcast platforms such as Spotify, YouTube and Apple.

The show will cover WNBA news with Bird offering her expert opinions and analysis while speaking with several influential figures from around the league.

‘It’s going to be rooted in the ways in which the conversation that I can have might be different from an analyst or journalist. It’s going to be player to player, in a sense,’ Bird told The Hollywood Reporter.

(This story has been updated with official announcement and quotes.)

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

President Donald Trump is considering a small tax increase for wealthy Americans to help pay for his priorities to boost the middle and working classes.

A source familiar with Trump’s thinking told Fox News Digital that Trump is considering allowing the rate on individuals making $2.5 million or more to increase by 2.6%, from 37% to 39.6%.

He quietly pushed Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., on the idea in a phone call on Wednesday, two people familiar with conversations told Fox News Digital.

It comes as Republicans work on a massive piece of legislation advancing Trump’s priorities on taxes, border security, immigration, energy, defense and the national debt, which the president has dubbed his ‘big, beautiful bill.’

Differing projections show the bill is likely to add trillions of dollars to the country’s deficit over the next 10 years, so fiscal hawks are looking for ways to mitigate that and set up America for a less bloated government down the line by pairing the new priorities with deep spending cuts elsewhere.

The tax portion of the bill is expected to be the costliest portion. 

Republicans are hoping to extend the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) as well as pay for newer Trump priorities like eliminating taxes on tips, overtime wages and retirees’ Social Security.

TCJA previously lowered taxes for the highest bracket from 39.6% to 37%, but that’s set to expire at the end of 2025. Trump wants to restore that top bracket, albeit for people making significantly more money than the current threshold. The current top tax bracket is $609,350 for single income earners.

The source familiar with Trump’s thinking said doing so would help pay for his ‘massive’ tax cuts for the middle and working classes, as well as protect Medicaid coverage for millions of Americans.

Punchbowl News first reported details of the Trump-Johnson phone call.

It’s not clear yet what Republicans will decide, or even if they will ultimately decide to raise taxes on the highest earners – but details are expected to emerge in the coming days.

The Ways & Means Committee, the House’s tax-writing panel, is expected to meet on Tuesday afternoon to advance that portion of Trump’s bill.

Talks about potential tax hikes on the wealthy have triggered a deep rift within the Republican Party. 

Mainstream conservatives have balked at discussions of raising rates on anyone, arguing it would have a negative impact on job creators, while populist and more moderate Republicans have floated such ideas in order to pay for Trump’s priorities to benefit the middle and working classes.

‘Raising taxes on America’s highest earners and biggest job creators makes no sense,’ Marc Short, a former chief of staff to ex-Vice President Mike Pence and a key part of TCJA negotiations, told Fox News Digital.

‘I don’t understand why there are some inside the current administration who are pushing Congress to raise the top rate, because again, these are America’s job creators.’

Other Republicans told Fox News Digital in recent weeks that they believe the idea could be popular, however.

‘I’m open-minded to what the president or the treasury secretary may have in mind. And I would want to see some numbers behind it and how it would have an effect on the economy,’ conservative Rep. Marlin Stutzman, R-Ind., told Fox News Digital in late April.

‘What I’ve heard from people in the upper tax brackets is, you know, they’re willing to pay more as long as they know that it’s paying the debt down. They don’t want to see it go toward more spending.’

Fox News Digital reached out to the White House and Johnson’s office for comment.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A pair of hawkish, Trump-supporting Senate Republicans say that any ‘lasting’ Iran nuclear deal would need to be approved by Congress, ideally through a two-thirds majority treaty vote. 

But scoring a two-thirds majority in the Senate for treaty ratification would require Iran to fulfill a series of steep demands. In addition to getting rid of all of its enriched uranium and centrifuges, GOP lawmakers say it would need to dismantle its ballistic missile program and cease all support for terrorist groups across the Middle East.

‘If they want the most durable and lasting kind of deal, then they want to bring it to the Senate and have it voted on as a treaty,’ Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark., said in response to a question from Fox News Digital. 

‘That was one reason why President Obama’s deal was so weak,’ Cotton went on. ‘An agreement between the American president, whoever he or she may be, and a foreign leader, can be reversed by future presidents, which President Trump rightly did seven years ago today.’

In 2015, Cotton led an open letter signed by Senate Republicans to Iranian leaders warning that any nuclear agreement not approved by Congress could be undone by a future administration. The move was widely viewed as a direct effort to undermine President Barack Obama’s ongoing negotiations.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., echoed the call for congressional oversight, saying that ‘at a minimum’ any deal must go through the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act (INARA), which passed Congress in 2015 with resounding bipartisan support and guarantees lawmakers a chance to review any accord reached with Tehran.

Graham said he had told Secretary of State Marco Rubio there was ‘no way’ to get 67 votes to ratify a treaty agreement without Iran totally dismantling its nuclear and missile programs and support for terrorism. 

The senators also drew a parallel with the so-called 123 agreements – the legal frameworks that govern U.S. civil nuclear cooperation with foreign nations. These agreements require strict safeguards to prevent the development of nuclear weapons.

‘It’s also customary in some cases for the Congress, not just the Senate, to pass ordinary legislation that supports the so-called 123 agreements,’ Cotton noted, suggesting that any comprehensive deal with Iran should be treated with similar legislative rigor.

Cotton and Graham spoke to reporters after introducing a resolution outlining ‘acceptable’ terms of an Iran deal, including total cessation of uranium enrichment. 

According to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Iran has amassed enough highly enriched uranium to potentially build several nuclear weapons if it chose to do so – though U.S. intelligence assessments maintain that Tehran has not yet made a decision to weaponize.

Both U.S. and Israeli officials have ramped up their threats against the regime. Trump has made clear that if talks go south, the U.S. will engage in direct military action to thwart Iran’s nuclear program. 

Graham suggested the regime only has ‘weeks’ to acquiesce to a deal. 

‘We’re not talking about long, protracted negotiations,’ the South Carolina Republican said. ‘We’re talking weeks, not months, not years. The potential of Iranian breakout looms large here. Israel’s desire to bring closure to this issue looms large here.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Five Major League Soccer teams are valued at more than $1 billion, and 14 others are among the top 50 most valuable soccer clubs in the world, according to evaluations released by Sportico this week.

Los Angeles FC ($1.28 billion), Inter Miami ($1.19 billion), L.A. Galaxy ($1.11 billion), Atlanta United ($1.08 billion) and New York City FC ($1 billion) are the most valuable franchises in MLS.

When Sportico first released its listing in 2023, no MLS team eclipsed the $1 billion valuation. LAFC, Atlanta United, Inter Miami and the Galaxy were the only clubs to reach the threshold in 2024. New York City FC, which will open its new stadium Etihad Park in 2027, is a newcomer to the list in 2025.

While MLS is unable to match revenue levels like the top clubs in Europe, factors like cost controls, modern stadiums, a single-entity structure that fosters ownership collaboration and the lack of relegation keep MLS values stable and on the rise, according to Sportico. The values also include real estate and related businesses.

Among the other 14 MLS clubs on the top 50 list:

– Two clubs exceed $800 million: Austin FC ($865 million) and Seattle Sounders ($825 million) are ranked 23rd and 25th, respectively.

– Seven clubs exceed $700 million: Columbus Crew ($730 million), Toronto FC ($725 million), FC Cincinnati ($725 million), D.C. United ($720 million), Portland Timbers ($720 million), Charlotte FC ($705 million), Philadelphia Union ($705 million).

– Five others exceed $600 million in value: St. Louis City SC ($655 million), Minnesota United ($655 million), Sporting Kansas City ($650 million), New York Red Bulls ($645 million), Nashville SC ($640 million).

Real Madrid ($6.53 billion), Manchester United ($6.09 billion), FC Barcelona ($5.71 billion), Liverpool ($5.59 billion) and Bayern Munich ($5.21 billion) make up the Top 5.

Top MLS club valuations

LAFC: $1.28 billion (16)
Inter Miami: $1.19 billion (17)
L.A. Galaxy: $1.11 billion (18)
Atlanta United: $1.08 billion (19)
New York City FC: $1 billion (20)
Austin FC: $865 million (23)
Seattle Sounders: $825 million (25)
Columbus Crew: $730 million (33)
Toronto FC: $725 million (34)
FC Cincinnati: $725 million (35)
D.C. United: $720 million (36)
Portland Timbers: $720 million (37)
Charlotte FC: $705 million (39)
Philadelphia Union: $705 million (40)
St. Louis City SC: $655 million (42)
Minnesota United: $655 million (43)
Sporting Kansas City: $650 million (44)
New York Red Bulls: $645 million (45)
Nashville SC: $640 million (46)

Most valuable soccer clubs in the world

Real Madrid: $6.53 billion
Manchester United: $6.09 billion
FC Barcelona: $5.71 billion
Liverpool: $5.59 billion
Bayern Munich: $5.21 billion
Manchester City: $5.16 billion
Arsenal: $4.49 billion
Paris Saint-Germain: $4.26 billion
Tottenham Hotspur: $3.68 billion
Chelsea: $3.57 billion  
Atletico de Madrid: $1.85 billion
Borussia Dortmund: $1.83 billion
Juventus: $1.81 billion
AC Milan: $1.34 billion
Inter Milan: $1.3 billion
LAFC: $1.28 billion
Inter Miami: $1.19 billion
L.A. Galaxy: $1.11 billion
Atlanta United: $1.08 billion
New York City FC: $1 billion

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

For the second game in a row, the Boston Celtics blew a massive lead. And, for the second game in a row, the New York Knicks stunned Boston on its home floor.

Prior to Wednesday night, no team had rallied from 20-point deficits to win consecutive playoff games, but the Knicks made history behind oppressive defense, crisp offensive execution and resourceful play in their 91-90 triumph at the TD Garden.

The Knicks outscored the Celtics by 13 in the fourth quarter and closed the game on an extended 38-17 run to take a commanding 2-0 lead in their Eastern Conference semifinal series, with Game 3 set for Saturday afternoon in Madison Square Garden.

Here are the winners and losers from Game 2 between the New York Knicks and Boston Celtics.

WINNERS

Comeback Knicks

For the fifth time — out of their six victories this postseason — the Knicks erased a fourth-quarter deficit to secure a come-from-behind victory. Although logic suggests this pace to be wildly risky and unsustainable, New York keeps finding ways to win in the clutch.

It’s starting with defense, with the Knicks ramping up their intensity down low, tempting opposing teams to settle for perimeter jumpers. And then, on offense, the Knicks are operating with speed, ruthless efficiency and are selecting high-percentage shots.

Mikal Bridges: closer

He had entered the fourth quarter having missed all eight of his shot attempts and hadn’t recorded a single point. Yet, Mikal Bridges willed New York’s comeback, going 6-of-10 and scoring all 14 of his points in the final period.

And, for the second consecutive game, Bridges sealed a New York victory on a steal, highlighting his value as a two-way player.

LOSERS

Celtics collapse (again) in fourth

The Celtics have lost both fourth quarters in this series by a combined margin of 55-33, a staggering net margin of -22. Boston has been in a shooting slump, yes, but its apathy and avoidance of contact and physicality in fourth quarters is alarming. Boston held a 73-53 lead with 2:15 left in the third quarter.

That means the Celtics allowed New York to outscore them by a margin of 38-17 in just a little more than 14 minutes of game time. It’s one thing to miss shots; it’s entirely different when a team — the defending champions, at that — is outworked on its home floor for the second game in a row.

3-point shooting is costing Celtics the series

On Monday, the Celtics set a record for most missed 3-pointers in a single playoff game, with 45. On Wednesday, Boston missed 30 more, making even more history; that now marks the most misses from beyond the arc in consecutive postseason games.

The Celtics have combined to go 25-of-100 from 3-point range in Games 1 and 2. Sometimes teams go cold. The issue is that Boston is not doing nearly enough to overcome its sluggish perimeter shooting. If anything, the Celtics are doubling down, settling for far too many 3s in fourth quarters.

In both fourth quarters, the Celtics are now a combined 4-of-26 (15.4%) from beyond the arc. Boston has elite wings who can carve into the paint and score. At its best, it moves the ball crisply to find mismatches and open looks. Yet the Celtics are letting the ball stagnate and are hoisting up 3s deep in the shot clock. It’s costing them the series.

Knicks start slowly

Perhaps there was some comfort or complacency that came from stealing Game 1, but the Knicks missed the first seven shots they took and fell into a 7-0 deficit just minutes into the game.

New York finished the first period shooting just 26.1% from the field (6-of-23), including 12.5% from 3-point range (1-of-8). The 13 points New York scored in the frame was its lowest scoring first quarter in a postseason game since 2003.

Boston missing extended Kristaps Porziņģis minutes

Stretch center Kristaps Porziņģis, arguably, is Boston’s X-factor. At 7-foot-2, he’s a decent rim protector, but his real value lies in his range and ability to draw out opposing bigs to the perimeter. Yet, Porziņģis, who’s managing a non-COVID upper respiratory illness that forced him to miss eight games in early March, didn’t start Wednesday and played just 13:53.

When he was on the court, however, Porziņģis was effective, draining 3-of-5 shots for eight points, adding four rebounds — three of which were offensive.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Former Detroit Tigers center fielder Chet Lemon, a member of the 1984 World Series champions, died May 8 at his home in Apopka, Fla.

He was 70 years old.

‘He was sleeping on his reclining sofa,’ Gigi Lemon, his wife, said. ‘He just wasn’t responsive.’

Since Chet retired from the Tigers in 1990, he suffered a series of clots and at least 13 strokes, leaving him unable to walk or talk.

He was diagnosed with polycythemia vera, a rare blood disease that causes bone marrow to make too many red blood cells. Over the past 30 years, he had been to the hospital more than 300 times.

In September 2024, Lemon returned to Detroit for the Tigers celebration of the 1984 World Series champions. That year, he hit .287 with 20 home runs in 141 games, leading the Tigers alongside Alan Trammell and Kirk Gibson. During the celebration, Lemon and Trammell shared a personal moment in a suite at Comerica Park, surrounded by their teammates.

‘You know how much you were a part of us,’ Trammell said to a giddy Chet. ‘We wouldn’t have won it without you. You know that.’

It was an emotional reunion.

‘I’m so thankful for the time we spent together last summer,’ Trammell said in a statement. ‘Today is a sad day or us. He will be dearly missed.’

‘I think it added some more months,’ Gigi said. ‘He was able to see his teammates. I thought that was so important.’

After returning to Florida, Lemon moved into his own home. He threw out the first pitch at a college baseball game at the University of Central Florida. He was going out to restaurants and spending time with his family.

He seemed happier.

‘The trip to Detroit, I think, it just sparked him,’ Gigi said. ‘I don’t know the medical terms, or if there was such a thing as more blood flowing through some areas, but he just seemed to be so happy.’

Lemon played in MLB from 1975-90, making his MLB debut with the Chicago White Sox at age 20. He spent the final nine years of his career, beginning in 1982, with the Tigers — traded from the White Sox to the Tigers for Steve Kemp in November 1981. He was a three time All-Star: 1978-79 with the White Sox, and 1984 on the Tigers’ most recent World Series champion.

‘Chet was the kindest of men and always had that great smile on his face,’ Lance Parrish, former Tigers catcher, said in a statement. ‘He was also a fierce competitor on the baseball field and a great teammate. I loved him like a brother.” 

‘I always believed my job as a pitcher was made easier when Chet was behind me in center,’ pitcher Dan Petry said in a statement. ‘I’ll never forget his laughter and infectious smile. His athleticism on the field always stood out, but he was an even better teammate and friend.’

The Oakland Athletics selected Lemon with the No. 22 overall pick in the first round of the 1972 draft out of Fremont High School in Los Angeles. He was born in Jackson, Miss., but moved to Los Angeles when he was six months old, raised in Compton, Calif.

After his playing career ended, Lemon began coaching youth baseball in Florida.

He served as the head coach at Eustis High School, leading the Panthers to a state championship in 2003. He also founded Chet Lemon’s Juice, an elite travel baseball program that produced many future MLB players, including Prince Fielder and Zack Greinke.

‘The Detroit Tigers join all of baseball in mourning the passing of Chet Lemon,’ the team said in a statement: ‘While he was a World Series Champion and All-Star on the field, perhaps his biggest impact came off of it. That includes creating the Chet Lemon Foundation, and dedicating much of his post-playing career to youth baseball development.’

Lemon was first married to Valerie Jones, with whom he had four children: Geneva, born in 1972, Chester Jr. in 1977, David in 1981, and Marcus in 1988. The couple divorced in 1990. In the early 1990s, Lemon married Gigi Partee, his wife of more than 30 years. They had one daughter, Brianna, born in 1998.

‘At this time, memorial information has not been set,’ Chet’s youngest son, Marcus, shared on Instagram. ‘We will be posting information in the coming days. But at this time as a family we want to thank everyone for their kind words and support.’

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The home team can win a game in the NBA’s conference semifinals.

The Oklahoma City Thunder restored normalcy – at least for four quarters – to a strange, exciting and unpredictable playoff season.

The Thunder became the first home team in seven games to win in the second round of the playoffs this season, defeating Denver 149-106 in Game 2 Wednesday and tying the series at 1-1 with a record-setting offensive performance.

With all the comebacks happening in the playoffs, few leads are safe. Up 78-43 late in the second quarter and 124-76 after three quarters, Oklahoma City had a lead that was insurmountable.

It was a great response from the Thunder, who squandered an 11-point lead in the final 4:31 of Denver’s Game 1 victory.

Game 3 is Friday in Denver (10 p.m. ET, ESPN).

Nuggets-Thunder Game 2 winners

Thunder offense

The Thunder scored 87 points – IN THE FIRST HALF! That set an NBA record for most points in the first half of a playoff game, surpassing the 86 points Cleveland scored against Golden State in the 2017 Finals. It also equals the most points in any half of a playoff game, matching the 87 points Milwaukee scored against Denver on April 23, 1978.

Oklahoma City shot 58.8% from the field (30-for-51), 43.5% on 3-pointers (10-for-23) and 94.4% on free throws (17-for-18) in the first two quarters.

In the first half, the Thunder led by as many as 35 points – 84-49 with 1:32 left in the second quarter – and took an 87-56 lead into halftime.

The Thunder were eight points away from tying the record for most points scored in a playoff game (157, set by Boston against New York on April 28, 1990). Their 149 points were a franchise playoff record.

Oklahoma City’s depth

Ten Thunder players scored in the first half, including six players in double figures, and by game’s end, 14 Thunder players had scored, and the five starters reached at least 12 points, led by MVP finalist Shai Gilgeous-Alexander’s game-high 34 points and eight assists.

Jalen Williams had 17 points and seven assists, and Chet Holmgren had 15 points, 11 rebounds, two assists, two blocks and two steals.

Thunder’s defense on Nikola Jokic

Denver MVP finalist Nikola Jokic, a three-time MVP, had just 17 points (6-for-16 shooting), eight rebounds and six assists – not even close to the 42-point, 22-rebound, six-assist, two-block performance he had in Game 1.

Oklahoma City, which had the best defense in the league this season, made sure Jokic didn’t control and/or take over the game like he’s capable of doing. A concerted, physical effort from the Thunder was the difference.

Nuggets-Thunder Game 2 losers

Denver’s defense

The Nuggets allowed a playoff-record 87 points in the first half, were outscored 52-28 in points in the paint, outscored 26-5 in fastbreak points and gave up nine dunks.

It was just way too easy for the Thunder, who had the No. 3 offense in the regular season, scoring 119.2 points per 100 possessions.

Michael Porter Jr.’s offense

Porter wasn’t the only Nuggets player who struggled offensively. Aaron Gordon, who made the game-winning 3 in Game 1, had just 10  points on 3-for-12 shooting. Jokic, as mentioned, didn’t dominate the way he can, and Christian Braun was 1-for-6.

But Porter, who averaged 18.2 points and 7.0 rebounds and shot 50.4% from the field and 39.5% on 3s in the regular season, had just eight points on 2-for-10 shooting in Game 2 and is now just 3-for-18 from the field in the series.

Porter is not on the injury report but he sustained a shoulder injury in the first round against the Los Angeles Clippers and his left shoulder was wrapped against the Thunder.  Playing hurt is admirable, but the Nuggets have been outscored by 40 points in Porter’s 49 minutes through two games.

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

TUSCALOOSA, Ala. – You can think you know what it’s like to coach Alabama, as an SEC newcomer, and replace Nick Saban.

You can think you know, but do you really know until you’ve experienced it?

Well, anyway, Kalen DeBoer’s experienced it now. He endured a bumpy debut season, highlighted by wins against LSU and Auburn, but marred by losses to Vanderbilt and Oklahoma, en route to a 9-4 finish. DeBoer shoots it straight. He won’t try to recast last season as something it wasn’t, which was a season that fell short of expectations.

He’s moving forward with a team that upgraded at certain positions like defensive back and wide receiver but must transition to a new starting quarterback.

DeBoer addressed these topics and more when I sat down with him in April. Here is a portion of that interview, with questions and answers lightly edited for clarity and brevity.

In January, you said the expectation here is to be at a championship level, and Alabama didn’t meet that expectation last season. Why did you feel the team fell short of the championship expectations?

DeBoer: This is a program that expects to be front and center. That’s what I expect. That’s wherever I’ve been. You come here to do the things that you need to do to give yourself a chance when the postseason comes to be in those moments.

Bill Walsh used to say, “Champions are champions before they’re champions.” When we talk about being champions, to me, the championships are results of doing things that champions do and that winners do throughout the whole process.

BEST OF BEST: Our ranking of college football’s top 25 coaches, including where Kalen DeBoer ranks

Was there something missing from that process last year?

DeBoer: No, I think there’s steps to it.

When you’re at the top, it’s hard enough to stay at the top when you have continuity. Now, you take away any continuity, … and it’s going to be hard to maintain that level. But, I feel like we are taking the steps.

You’ve got to go through some hard times, I feel. More times than not, you go through the hard times to actually realize the big moments.

I was part of, as a coordinator, multiple semifinal losses and championship game losses before we actually realized the championships we were able to be a part of when I was a head coach a couple years later. Those semifinal-type losses, we finally won those a couple years later, and then all of a sudden, it just takes off.

That’s been what this program has been about, is using experiences and get the right people and continuity, especially with coach Saban for so many years.

Alabama fans and fans at some other SEC hubs, they focus on everything, from what the coach says at the press conference to other minutiae. One thing I know some fans commented on last year was that you coached a game in a T-shirt. How do you deal with something that seems minute, but it’s becoming a story?

DeBoer: I understand the impact I want to make and why I do what I do to where I just always go back to, where’s my heart? Where’s my head? As long as I’m keeping the right perspective about things, that will help me keep my whole team and staff in the right place, just focused on the moment.

You know that everything is going to be analyzed – literally everything – but, again, that’s what you signed up for, and I’m good with that. I just want to try to bring as many people together. There’s going to be people who are always against you, right? That’s college football. That’s rivalries. That’s you being devoted to your team, and I love that. It’s special, because this is the pro team here. There isn’t an NFL or NBA or Major League Baseball team in Alabama. This is it. That’s awesome. I love it.

How does bringing in offensive coordinator Ryan Grubb, with whom you worked at previous stops, help this program?

DeBoer: He’s obviously a great coach. He and I obviously are aligned in many ways. We’re similar in so many ways, and his passion for coaching and why he does what he does is one thing, but offensively, he adds to what we had and takes us to another level. There’s a belief that I obviously have in him, but, fortunately, there’s other coaches on staff that have worked for him, too. The efficiency, the continuity adds to what we did last year. He can help take it to another level.

What can quarterback Ty Simpson bring to this offense that maybe was needed?

DeBoer: He’s super talented. He can get the ball where it needs to be. He’s an upperclassman now, so his experiences, you expect him to learn from what he’s seen in his time here.

He’s a guy that players, I think, see as a productive quarterback but also one who’s fun to be around, a good dude. He’s got to continue to balance the leadership piece. Any quarterback needs to not just be seen as a guy but their guy. That’s what you want. You want someone who, at the quarterback position, everyone will fall in line with and do anything for, because he’s their quarterback.

That competition continues to happen. We are not where we need to be yet, but Ty certainly has all the traits to win championship games for us. I really believe that, but I also believe we have a couple other quarterbacks who have it in them to do the same thing.

When you say the quarterback position is not where it needs to be yet, can you put your finger on what’s missing?

DeBoer: Just consistency at an extremely high level. We have high expectations for our program. We have high expectations for every guy who steps on the football field. The growth has been good. We’re taking big steps, but we want to see that from Ty continue to happen as he goes through the summer and into fall camp. If we just felt good about where we’re at right now, it wouldn’t be enough, but we do know he has the potential to do those things for us to be at the level we need to be.

How different will this offense look? Jalen Milroe was unique in some of the things he could do with his athleticism.

DeBoer: Much of the offense is the same offense. It’s how those concepts come together

We wanted Jalen to have a good share of opportunities in his hands, running the football, giving him concepts where he can throw it on time and get the ball delivered to other players, but also times where you let him create. That balance, I think, is hardest when you have a quarterback like him, is letting him have the ball hands long enough but also not too long.

I think all these quarterbacks are really good athletes. I think Ty would surprise you with his quickness. Keelon Russell is a really good athlete. Austin Mack is a big-bodied guy who’s becoming faster and faster, and he can make people miss and run around the edge. Don’t let him get a full head of steam.

They all have athleticism and ability to run and use their feet as well, but obviously Jalen was just different that way, so we had to utilize his strengths.

Your wide receivers, would you say you upgraded there?

DeBoer: I think that’s accurate. The guys that are in the program, especially the top two with Germie Bernard and Ryan Williams, those guys are taking the next steps, and I can tell you that they’re improving, … and they’re elevating as leaders, too. It starts with those two.

We really did a great job hitting on Isaiah Horton (a transfer from Miami), who physically has a presence, but he’s really smooth. He’s going to make people miss after he catches the ball, too.

The high school guys that have come in, there’s no question that these guys have bright futures. And then there’s guys that are just going into Year 2 or Year 3 here that I’m super excited about it.

Is there another position group where you see improvement?

DeBoer: The defensive backfield, as a whole, is the one that’s just completely different than what it was a year ago.

It’s a position group that’s got quickness, speed, length, a quiet confidence about them and takes a lot of pride in being very productive.

They have a desire to be elite. I’m excited about that position group.

People outside of the program will say you’re facing a lot of pressure in Year 2. How are you feeling about that?

DeBoer: You can only worry about what you can control. Just be diligent on the things you can control. That’s what you’re going to focus on.

Even when I was a player, the way I handled things, I always think: They’re never as good as you think. They’re never as bad as you think.

Never overreacting is key. If I do that, guess what, our players will probably do that, too. But, there’s also got to be a level of intensity and confidence.

Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network’s national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@gannett.com. Follow him on X @btoppmeyer.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY