Archive

2025

Browsing

Messi and the World Cup champions will be on the road playing against Chile at Estadio Nacional Julio Martínez Prádanos in Santiago, Chile.

It’s unclear whether Messi will start or come off the bench, Argentine national team coach Lionel Scaloni said Wednesday.

Argentina has already qualified for the 2026 World Cup, and could use this match to play several young players on its roster. Several players are also suspended or won’t play to rest after long seasons.

Knowing it’s one of the few times Messi will wear his Argentina jersey this year, expect to see him in action representing his beloved home country.

When is the Chile vs. Argentina match?

Chile will host Argentina on Thursday at 9 p.m. ET (10 p.m. in Argentina).

How to watch Chile vs. Argentina match on TV and live stream?

The match will be broadcast by TYC Sports Internacional USA on DirecTV, YouTube TV, Sling TV and Fubo. Fanatiz also has a pay-per-view live stream available.

Here’s a link to watch the match on Fubo.

Is Messi playing tonight in Chile?

Messi’s status as a starter or substitute will be confirmed when Argentina announces its starting lineup for the match.

What did Argentina coach Lionel Scaloni say about Messi?

‘We haven’t decided yet whether he’ll start the game or not. I need to talk to him, especially because it would be good to know how he’s feeling physically. We’ve talked about a lot of things, but not about this specifically,’ Scaloni said about Messi Wednesday.

‘We’re in a position where we can try other things, and in principle, he’s available to play. We’ll see. He had a good game last Saturday, so this guy is ready to play. We’ll decide how he is.’

How fit is Lionel Messi before Argentina match in Chile?

Messi, 37, is coming off one of his best stretches in 2025, scoring five goals in his last three matches with Inter Miami in Major League Soccer. He was named MLS Player of the Month after seven goals and four assists in seven matches in May. He scored two goals with three assists in Inter Miami’s 5-1 win against Columbus Crew last Saturday.

When was the last time Messi played with Argentina?

Messi last played with the national team in November: He was scoreless as Argentina lost 2-1 to Paraguay on Nov. 14, 2024, and had the assist to Lautaro Martinez in a 1-0 win over Peru on Nov. 19, 2024.

Playing with Argentina before the MLS Cup playoffs last year, Messi was scoreless in a 1-1 draw against Venezuela on Oct. 11, 2024, then exploded with a hat trick and two assists in a 6-0 victory over Bolivia on Oct. 15, 2024.

Lionel Messi’s upcoming schedule with Argentina, Inter Miami

June 10: Argentina vs. Colombia, 8 p.m. ET (World Cup qualifying)
June 14: Inter Miami vs. Al Ahly, 8 p.m. ET (Club World Cup in Miami)
June 19: Inter Miami vs FC Porto, 3 p.m. ET (Club World Cup in Atlanta)
June 23: Inter Miami vs. Palmerias, 9 p.m. ET (Club World Cup in Miami)

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The SEC keeps finding new reasons to not add a ninth conference game to its football schedule.

Throughout the four-team College Football Playoff era, the SEC ruled that postseason format, so it found insufficient incentive to add another conference game.

When the scheduling debate resurfaced two years ago, some SEC members expressed reluctance to add another conference game without additional compensation from its media partner. ESPN didn’t sweeten the pot. The SEC stayed at eight.

The latest excuse? Many SEC coaches feel loath to welcome a ninth conference game without first knowing the College Football Playoff format for 2026 and beyond.

What’s next, no ninth SEC game until there’s peace in the Middle East?

I’m losing my appetite for this eight-or-nine debate.

The number should be 10 – as in, every power-conference team should play a minimum of 10 games against Power Four opponents.

MAN WITH PLAN: Lane Kiffin pushes promising 16-team playoff model

BIG DECISION: SEC’s Greg Sankey can be hero or villain in playoff debate

SEC craves more CFP respect while playing cupcake games

The SEC routinely insists it should gain preference from the playoff selection committee because of its run of national championship dominance the past 20 years, plus its strength of schedule. I won’t argue that the SEC often boasts the strongest top-to-bottom conference.

The SEC’s pandering to the playoff committee, though, plays weak considering how the conference structures its schedule. Teams only play half the other members of their 16-team conference, and most only play one Power Four non-conference opponent, while supplementing the schedule with a few layup games.

In this era of the ever-expanding playoff, it is time for the SEC to curtail its feast of cupcake games. Either stay at eight conference games, or go to nine – so long as it adds up to 10 games against real competition.

Power Four teams playing more games against legitimate opponents – and fewer games against directional schools – would provide clarity to the playoff’s at-large selection process.

By comparison, TCU and Baylor will play a nation-leading 11 games against Power Four competition.

Let’s not spare the ACC, either. The ACC joins the SEC in playing eight conference games, while their Big Ten and Big 12 peers play nine. Most ACC schools, at least, will play 10 games against power-conference opponents, if you include Notre Dame as a power foe.

Alternative to a ninth SEC game? Play another Power Four school

Prominent SEC voices continue to trumpet that the committee erred by rejecting three 9-3 teams from the inaugural 12-team playoff, and that the committee does not sufficiently reward the SEC’s schedule.

“I have a hard time seeing Ole Miss, Alabama, and South Carolina not being in the best teams last year,” Georgia coach Kirby Smart said, in reference to 9-3 teams that didn’t make the playoff.

I maintain the committee flubbed by selecting two-loss SMU, which beat nobody of substance and lost its two games against Top 25 opponents. Mississippi, which smashed Georgia after suffering a résumé-staining loss to Kentucky, would have been a better choice.

And yet, the SEC’s three-loss also-rans could have tempted the committee more if they’d played and won another conference game or at least played and won an additional game against a Power Four opponent, instead of creaming a Championship Subdivision school.

We don’t know how the committee would view a 9-3 SEC team that played 10 games against Power Four competition.

We do know what the committee thought of the SEC’s 9-3 teams that played only nine games against power-conference foes. They thought them undeserving of a playoff bid.

If Florida, which plays Miami and Florida State, goes 9-3 this season, it likely would have a stronger case for an at-large bid than the SEC’s three-loss teams last season.

The same is true of South Carolina, which plays Virginia Tech and Clemson for 10 Power Four games. Alabama’s games against Wisconsin and Florida State give the Tide 10 games at the big-boy table, too.

Those teams stand in exception to the SEC’s majority that choose a path of lesser non-conference resistance.

The SEC keeps floating the myth that the playoff committee does not respect strength of schedule. That’s untrue.

Indiana won 11 games last season, but the Hoosiers’ soft schedule meant Indiana ranked behind four other at-large playoff qualifiers that won fewer games. Also, the SEC’s three-loss teams reached the playoff’s doorstep largely because of their strength of schedule. Another marquee victory could help get a three-loss team across the playoff’s threshold.

I can understand the SEC’s reluctance to add a ninth conference game. Another league game would guarantee another loss to half the conference. Those additional losses would hinder playoff pursuits across half the league.

The alternative to a ninth SEC game, though, should not be a game against Weasel Tech or Seventh-Grade State. Schedule another opponent from the big leagues.

Non-conference scheduling includes the hurdle of needing two to tango. Not every power-conference team wants to play an SEC foe. Nebraska ducked out of its series with Tennessee. Wake Forest canceled on Ole Miss.

Still, the SEC cannot relent. SEC coaches would be wise to keep the pedal down on this blue-sky idea of a Big Ten-SEC challenge.

The SEC insists it wields the nation’s strongest conference and that the committee should honor it as such.

That argument holds merit, but the case would become easier to prove if SEC teams scheduled fewer games against Coastal Cupcake and more games against power-conference peers.

Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network’s national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@gannett.com and follow him on X @btoppmeyer.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Shaquille O’Neal hovered over two children, leaned down and shared a secret.

“Do you know how I made $900 million?’’ he asked in a moment taped three years ago. “Just by listening to my mommy and daddy. Make sure you listen to your parents.’’

Well, boys and girls, it’s slightly more complicated than that, even for a 7-foot-1 basketball legend who pulled off this feat: retire from the sport that helped make you rich and famous, then get even more rich and famous.

TV commercials. Licensing deals. Other partnerships. O’Neal, 14 years removed from his Hall of Fame career that included four NBA championship rings and three Finals MVPs, seems to be cashing in everywhere.

On Wednesday, June 4, Netflix premiered a six-episode docuseries called ‘Power Moves with Shaquille O’Neal’ about the 53-year-old taking over as president of Reebok in 2023. (Shaquille O’Neal’s Jersey Legends Productions partnered with Sony Pictures Television on the show.) This week, he will provide commentary during NBA TV’s coverage of Game 1 and Game 2 of the NBA Finals between the Oklahoma City Thunder and Indiana Pacers.

“Shaq’s ubiquity today is unmatched and what makes it even more fascinating is that it’s post-career,’’ Stacy Jones, a marketing expert and CEO of Hollywood Branded, told USA TODAY Sports. “Most athletes peak in visibility during their prime and Shaq totally flipped that script.’’

O’Neal was unavailable for an interview this week, according to his representatives.

Perry Rogers and Colin Smeeton, who have both worked closely with O’Neal for about 20 years, help paint a vivid picture of how O’Neal turned his millions in NBA wages into more millions — and became a household name.

Before O’Neal retired in 2011, Rogers said, he read professional athletes on average lose 4% of the public’s awareness after their playing careers end. “And that freaked me out,’’ Rogers, who once worked as O’Neal’s agent, told USA TODAY Sports.

Also, O’Neal would be losing steady income — his playing salary that earned him a total of $286 million, according to Spotrac.com.

The trick was figuring out how to generate more money.

Shaq’s instincts lead to big bucks

It was July 2011, a month after O’Neal officially retired, and ESPN and TNT (then known as Turner) were courting him as a potential NBA analyst. Rogers said he wanted to wait for offers from both networks and use them as leverage.

Then, O’Neal spoke.

“He goes, ‘Perry, you heard the pitches,’ ” Rogers recalled. “On the one hand, Turner just said that they’re relationship people, that they don’t need me, but they want me. I’m a relationship guy.

“Then you heard (an ESPN executive) say, ‘Hey, I’m the most competitive (expletive) in the world. I’ll build a whole show around you.’ And what that means is if (ESPN) doesn’t beat (TNT), I’m going to be taking the full blame. I’m not going to have time to develop. I don’t have these reps yet.’’

Rogers, who relayed the anecdote to USA TODAY Sports, said he complied with O’Neal’s wishes and promptly negotiated a deal with TNT.

The network’s Emmy-winning ‘Inside the NBA’ studio show proved to be an ideal platform to keep O’Neal visible. He needed time to develop his skills as a TV analyst. He also found the right chemistry working alongside former NBA players Charles Barkley and Kenny Smith, and six-time Emmy winner Ernie Johnson. The quartet is headed to ABC/ESPN next season and O’Neal has agreed to a contract extention worth more than $15 million a year, according to Front Office Sports.

“One thing that’s great about Shaquille is he lets you manage him,’’ Smeeton told USA TODAY Sports. “But at the same time, he trusts his instincts, and we certainly trust his instincts.’’

Shaq surrounds himself with talent

O’Neal did not treat retirement as an opportunity to take up golf and lounge by the pool.

‘That’s just not the way he’s wired,” said Smeeton, who works day-to-day on the Shaq brand. ‘He’s wired for ‘OK, I still have this drive that made me one of the best players of all time. Now how am I going to apply that to other parts of my business?’ And that was music to our ears.”

Leonard Armato, O’Neal’s first agent, played a key role in helping shape the Shaq brand into a lucrative entity before the two parted ways in 2001 for undisclosed reasons. But without Armato and later without his basketball career, the brand kept booming. Rogers and Smeeton, who began working with O’Neal after the split with Armato, helped refine the Shaq brand.

In 2015, Sports Illustrated published a list of O’Neal’s top 50 endorsements. The full list continues to balloon and includes the likes of Carnival Cruise Line, DraftKings, Hershey’s, Papa John’s and BeatBox Beverages. He also is deeply invested in the food services business, owning more than 30 Big Chicken franchises, which serve some of his childhood favorites. He once owned 155 Five Guys, the burger and fries joint, according to Yahoo Finance.

“Whether during basketball games, NFL games or programming beyond, Shaq has staying power that competes with just about any other celebrity,’’ said Tyler Bobin, senior brand analyst at iSpot.tv, a company that tracks TV and streaming advertising.

With help from the likes of Rogers and Smeeton, the Shaq brand has focused on “the fun business.’’ That’s led to O’Neal serving as an ambassador of fun in a slew of new TV commercials. In a campaign for Carnival Cruise Line, O’Neal plays the role of the company’s CFO — ‘Chief Fun Officer.”

Perhaps their biggest play came a decade ago, when Rogers and Smeeton brokered a deal to sell 51% of the Shaq brand to Authentic Brands Group. O’Neal, in turn, has become the second-largest individual shareholder in the company that owns brands for such luminaries as Muhammad Ali, Marilyn Monroe and David Beckham and whose subsidiaries include Champion and Reebok, which Authentic acquired in 2022 at the behest of O’Neal.

Smeeton indicated the partnership with Authentic has helped propel O’Neal toward the $1 billion threshold for lifetime earnings.

“If he’s not already there,’’ said Smeeton, who joined Authentic in 2019, “he’ll be there soon.”

Shaq: ‘My biggest mistake was ruining my family’

The strength of O’Neal’s brand has been tested. By O’Neal himself.

During the most recent episode of his podcast, “The Big Podcast with Shaq,’’ O’Neal referred to the infidelities he has said led to divorce from his ex-wife, Shaunie.

“I am the voice for those that made a lot of mistakes and want to recover from the mistakes,’’ said O’Neal, who has six children, including four with Shaunie. “Because I always say, my biggest mistake was ruining my family by being dumb.’’

There have been other setbacks for O’Neal. Like two civil lawsuits, one stemming from his endorsement of the FTX cryptocurrency exchange and another stemming from involvement with the Astrals Non-Fungible Tokens project, which he settled this year for a total of $11 million.

O’Neal and other celebrities were accused of misleading consumers into promoting unregistered securities for FTX and promoting unregistered securities for Astrals.

But the Shaq brand has taken no discernible hit.

Corporate America keeps lining up to partner with O’Neal, who in 2024 played a hands-on role in developing Shaq-a-Licious XL Gummies (cannabis free) with The Hershey Company.

‘He gets involved on a deeper level, and brands love that,” said Jones, the CEO at Hollywood Branded. ‘His involvement isn’t just about exposure, it’s about strategic value. He shows up, he promotes and he often contributes behind the scenes. That’s a big reason why brands keep coming back.”

O’Neal also has protected his business interests by steering clear of controversial political issues, said Kimberly A. Whitler, associate professor of business administration at the University of Virginia.

“That model – to maximize the number of consumers who support and appreciate the celebrity – requires focusing on creating broad appeal,’’ Whitler told USA TODAY Sports. “They do this by remaining largely apolitical, so they can appeal to liberals, independents, and conservative consumers.’’

Shaq building his empire off Michael Jordan’s blueprint – with one exception

Michael Jordan is the blueprint when it comes to athletes developing brands, Jones said.

“He took his athletic legacy and elevated it into a luxury brand and that quiet, high-end exclusivity plays perfectly into his legacy,’’ she said.

O’Neal has embraced something else: the common man.

New Air Jordan sneakers can cost upwards of $200. O’Neal’s branded shoes on Shaq.com are available for $29.95.

Rather than attempting to mimic Jordan’s luxury brand, O’Neal’s Big and Tall Collection is housed at JCPenney, with ribbed Polo shirts available for $17.49. Then there’s his deal with The General, the insurance company known for affordable car insurance rates.

“I called Shaquille and said, ‘Hey, look, we’re talking to these folks. I don’t know how you feel about it,’ ” Rogers aid. “And Shaquille goes, ‘Do it.’ (I said), ‘Hold on a second. I haven’t talked to you about anything. Why do you like this?

“And he said, ‘I had The General for my insurance company. I know what it means to need affordable insurance.’ ”

Sometimes, with the cameras rolling and without, O’Neal has given away pizzas, shoes, clothes and hugs. He has bought other people vans, engagement rings and heaven only knows what else.

In 2024, he received the Muhammad Ali Humanitarian of the Year Award for raising millions of dollars for charitable efforts through the Shaquille O’Neal Foundation.

Last month, at the end of the last episode of ‘Inside the NBA’ on TNT, O’Neal told the show’s stage manager “we put our money together and bought you a gift.’’ He handed her a Louis Vuitton gift bag.

Said Barkley, “Shaq, in fairness, you should buy all the gifts. You got the most money.’’

(This story was updated to add new information.)

This post appeared first on USA TODAY
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump called Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz a ‘sick puppy’ who should not have landed on the Democrats’ 2024 presidential ticket. 

‘He’s a sick puppy, that guy, that poor guy. I feel sorry for him,’ Trump said Thursday from the Oval Office while meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. ‘But, they made a bad choice with him.’

Trump’s comments followed a reporter asking Trump about his relationship with Elon Musk after the former Department of Government Efficiency chief repeatedly assailed the ‘big beautiful bill,’ the sweeping legislation that will fund the Trump administration’s agenda and touted by the president as key legislation that demands GOP unity for passage. 

Musk was a key ally of Trump’s during the campaign cycle, holding rallies in the top seven battleground states to rally support, including in Pennsylvania. 

Trump remarked that the Democrat Party should have tapped Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro to join former Vice President Kamala Harris as her running mate on the presidential ticket, but instead chose Walz.

‘Elon endorsed me very strongly. He actually went up and campaigned for me. I think I would have won. Susie would say I would have won Pennsylvania easily anyway, even if the governor had the real governor, not the governor, for a Minnesota,’ Trump said before calling Walz a ‘sick puppy.’ 

‘But if you picked Shapiro or anybody else, I spoke to him recently about his, you know, his house being set on fire, which was terrible. But if they picked him, I would have won Pennsylvania,’ he added, referring to how Shapiro’s home was targeted by arson while his family slept back in April. 

Walz joined Harris on the Democrat ticket in August 2024, just days after President Joe Biden dropped out of the race in July 2024 amid mounting concerns over his mental acuity, giving way to Harris at the top of the ticket. The Harris campaign had just more than 100 days between Biden dropping out and rallying support for the Harris-Walz ticket before Election Day on Nov. 5. 

After the election, Walz revealed he would run for president in 2028 if the opportunity presented itself. 

‘Well, I had a friend tell me, ‘Never turn down a job you haven’t been offered,’’ Walz told the New Yorker in March when asked if he would run for president. 

‘If I think I could offer something … I would certainly consider that,’ he said. ‘I’m also, though, not arrogant enough to believe there’s a lot of people that can do this.’

He said that under the correct circumstances and if he had the right ‘skill set’ for the 2028 race, ‘I’ll do it.’

‘You might do it?’ the New Yorker asked. 

‘I’ll do whatever it takes,’ Walz said. ‘I certainly wouldn’t be arrogant enough to think that it needs to be me.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

A federal judge on Thursday ordered the Trump administration to restore millions of dollars in grant funding for AmeriCorps and to reemploy thousands of employees, ruling that the administration’s abrupt dismantling of the organization violated federal law. 

U.S. District Judge Deborah Boardman agreed to reinstate thousands of terminated AmeriCorps employees across 24 U.S. states and D.C., which sued the administration earlier this year over the steep cuts to the agency ordered by the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE.

She also ordered the Trump administration to restore hundreds of millions of dollars in congressionally approved funding for AmeriCorps programs, which were also slashed by DOGE earlier this year.

Boardman sided with plaintiffs in ruling that the Trump administration likely violated administrative procedures by ordering the abrupt cancellations and terminations, without a proper notice or comment period. 

While the decision does not require the Trump administration to keep the jobs in place indefinitely, it does require it to provide adequate notice before doing so.

AmeriCorps, an agency created by Congress more than two decades ago, had an operating budget of roughly $1 billion prior to this year, when it found itself squarely in the crosshairs of DOGE, the agency previously headed up by Elon Musk and tasked with eliminating wasteful spending.

In granting the preliminary injunction Thursday, Boardman said the 24 states have adequately demonstrated they are likely to suffer ‘irreparable harm’ from the gutting of AmeriCorps, absent court intervention, and that the balance of equities ‘heavily favors’ plaintiffs seeking injunctive relief.

‘Any harm the defendants might face if the agency actions are enjoined pales in comparison to the concrete harms that the States and the communities served by AmeriCorps programs have suffered and will continue to suffer,’ she said in the ruling. 

The preliminary injunction comes after DOGE in April abruptly announced it would be putting roughly 85% of all AmeriCorps staffers on leave.

It also announced mass Reduction of Force, or RIF, for AmeriCorps staff, and sent notice that they were planning to cut $400 million in grants and other funding from the agency. 

In their lawsuit, attorneys general from the 24 U.S. states and D.C. urged the court to reverse the cuts and terminations across AmeriCorps, citing the risk of irreparable harm, as well as the administration’s failure to properly notify employees of their terminations. 

Plaintiffs alleged that the Trump administration and DOGE had acted beyond the scope of their authority in gutting AmeriCorps, an agency created by Congress, without proper notice. 

They also asked the judge to halt the cuts to roughly $557 million in congressionally approved funding.

Importantly, the judge said Thursday that the order only applies to the states that joined the lawsuit. 

The news was praised on social media by New York Attorney General Letitia James, who described it as a victory, noting: ‘Over 200,000 AmeriCorps staff and volunteers work hard every day to care for our communities.’

‘This ruling ensures their valuable work can continue,’ she said.

Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro said the decision to halt the cuts to AmeriCorps will ‘help communities respond to natural disasters, support seniors and veterans, and keep our trails clean across Pennsylvania.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Elon Musk and President Donald Trump’s feud about the ‘Big Beautiful Bill’ continued on Thursday when the tech billionaire responded to the president’s criticism in a post on X.

‘Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate. Such ingratitude,’ Musk wrote in a post responding to Trump’s remarks about him.

While speaking with reporters in the Oval Office, Trump said that he was ‘very disappointed’ by Musk’s vocal criticisms of the bill. The president claimed that Musk knew what was in the bill and ‘had no problem’ with it until the EV incentives had to be cut.

‘I’m very disappointed because Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anybody sitting here, better than you people. He knew everything about it. He had no problem with it,’ Trump said. ‘All of a sudden, he had a problem. And he only developed the problem when he found out that we’re going to have to cut the EV mandate.’

Musk pushed back on the president’s claim in another post on X and said that ‘this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!’

The Tesla founder has been a vocal critic of the Trump administration and Republicans over the last few days because of the legislation that the president has pushed. Musk has taken to calling it the ‘Big Ugly Bill’ and at one point advocated for a ‘Slim Beautiful Bill.’

Earlier on Thursday, Musk highlighted Trump’s old posts that seemingly align with the tech billionaire’s current positions and objections to the Big Beautiful Bill. 

Musk has also faced criticism from House Speaker Mike Johnson, who said on Wednesday that he was ‘surprised’ by the former DOGE leader’s objections to the legislation. The Republican lawmaker said that he and Musk, whom he considers a ‘friend,’ had a ‘great conversation’ about the bill on Monday. Johnson told reporters on Wednesday that Musk was ‘flat wrong’ about the legislation.

Meanwhile, there are several Republicans who have expressed solidarity with Musk, including Rep. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., and Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah. Additionally, Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., said that Musk was right to be concerned that AMericans are ‘quickly becoming debt slaves.’

Now that the bill has passed the house, it’s up to the Senate to meet Trump’s July 4 deadline.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

As criticism mounts from within Biden’s world against former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre and her new book, one ex-aide lambasted the now-Independent ombudswoman as ‘kinda dumb’ — a tweet he deleted but later stood by.

Timothy Wu, now a Columbia Law professor, was former President Joe Biden’s ‘architect’ of antitrust policy whose faculty bio claims he also coined the progressive term ‘net neutrality’ in 2002.

In a now-deleted tweet, Wu wrote: ‘from a [White House] staff perspective, the real problem with Karine Jean-Pierre was that she was kinda dumb.’

‘[She had n]o interest in understanding harder topics. Just gave random incoherent answers on policy,’ Wu added in the trashed tweet.

The X account ‘I work with my word’ replied to the original tweet, calling it ‘pretty racist,’ and the tweet was later deleted, but the reply remained.

Below the reply, Wu added a new line of commentary, saying the Biden White House was ‘full of genius-level Black women. [Jean-Pierre] was not one of them.’ 

In response to another X user asking Wu whether Trump White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt understands executive policy, the professor said a good ombudsperson will ‘meet with policy staff and try and understand what the administration is doing and why.’

After Wu’s original tweet, fellow former Biden adviser Symone Sanders Townsend wrote on X that Democrats ‘going on the record or on background to call Karine ‘dumb’ or ‘stupid’ have crossed a line.’ ‘You can have a valid criticism about how she did the job, but let’s not walk down the road of disrespect,’ Sanders Townsend said.

Fox News Digital reached out to Wu via his Columbia faculty office, where he has taught since 2006.

The former Biden adviser was also a Democratic primary candidate for New York’s lieutenant governorship in 2014, and also worked in the Obama administration and at the Federal Trade Commission.

Jean-Pierre announced Wednesday that she left the Democratic Party and has become an Independent while revealing her upcoming book: ‘Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines.’

She was mocked and criticized by several people in Biden’s orbit besides Wu, including one who said, ‘I wouldn’t ignore what Karine has to say, but it’s not an account in which much weight will be invested — just like her briefings.’

‘At noon on that day [that Biden left office], I became a private citizen who, like all Americans and many of our allies around the world, had to contend with what was to come next for our country. I determined that the danger we face as a country requires freeing ourselves of boxes. We need to be willing to exercise the ability to think creatively and plan strategically,’ Jean-Pierre said of her new Independent streak.

Fox News Digital’s Brian Flood and The Associated Press contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Following news that two Chinese nationals were charged with allegedly smuggling a ‘dangerous biological pathogen’ into the United States to study at a U.S. university, Fox News Digital spoke to an expert on China who said the arrests should be a wake-up call to the country. 

‘I was entirely unsurprised, which is a sad commentary, but it speaks to the Chinese Communist Party, the CCP wants to kill Americans,’ Michael Sobolik, a senior fellow at the Hudson Institute focusing on U.S. and China relations, told Fox News Digital after FBI Director Kash Patel announced the arrests of the two Chinese nationals. 

‘Look at what they’ve done with smuggling fentanyl precursors into our country to kill Americans, look at the effects of them failing to stop the spread of COVID-19,’ Sobolik said. ‘Dead Americans. The fact that they want to target Americans here within the United States with pathogens and with bioweapons. This is the Chinese Communist Party. This is what they do. They’re in a cold war with the United States. They want to become the most powerful nation in the world and they wanna make the world safe for their tyranny and unsafe for freedom. And they’re coming for us here at home.’

The couple are accused of smuggling a fungus called Fusarium graminearum, which scientific literature classifies as a ‘potential agroterrorism weapon,’ according to the Justice Department. Federal prosecutors note that the noxious fungus causes ‘head blight,’ a disease of wheat, barley, maize, and rice, and ‘is responsible for billions of dollars in economic losses worldwide each year.’ 

The Justice Department also says fusarium graminearum’s toxins cause vomiting, liver damage, and ‘reproductive defects in humans and livestock.’ 

According to the criminal complaint, one of the accused allegedly received Chinese government funding for her work on the pathogen in China. 

The couple are accused of bringing the pathogen into the U.S. to study at a University of Michigan laboratory, which raises more concerns about Chinese nationals infiltrating American universities.

Last month, a bombshell report out of Stanford University shed light on the influence of spies from the Chinese Communist Party that the student newspaper says have likely infiltrated the prestigious institution and other universities nationwide to gather intelligence.

‘American higher education is addicted to the Chinese Communist Party,’ Sobolik told Fox News Digital. ‘It’s addicted to easy money that has come from Beijing for decades. It’s addicted to international students that pay full tuition, many of which are then coerced and pressured by the Chinese embassy and consulates and other networks to spy for the party and report back.’

‘American universities need to finally open their eyes and stop being willfully blind to the threat of the CCP. They’re vectors for intelligence gathering. They are vectors for these threats that target Americans on our own soil. That’s unacceptable. If sovereignty means anything, we need to be able to protect Americans within the borders of the United States. And universities cannot continue to be willing accomplices of the Chinese Communist Party.’

A Chinese embassy official said Wednesday he was unaware of the case involving two Chinese nationals charged with smuggling a ‘dangerous biological pathogen’ into the U.S. for university research.

‘I don’t know the specific situation, but I would like to emphasize that the Chinese government has always required overseas Chinese citizens to abide by local laws and regulations and will also resolutely safeguard their legitimate rights and interests,’ said Liu Pengyu, spokesperson for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Embassy in the U.S.

Fox News Digital’s Danielle Wallace and Charles Creitz contributed to this report

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

President Donald Trump maintained his belief that former President Joe Biden didn’t have ‘much of an idea what was going on’ when he served as president when asked Thursday to respond to Biden’s dismissal of an investigation into his administration’s use of an autopen. 

‘He was never for open borders. He was never for transgender for everybody. He was never for men playing in women’s sports. I mean, he changed,’ Trump said Thursday from the Oval Office during a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. ‘I mean, all of these things that that changed so radically. I don’t think he had any idea… I said it during the debate and I say it now, he didn’t have much of an idea what was going on.’ 

‘Essentially, whoever used the autopen was the president, and that is wrong,’ he added. ‘It’s illegal. It’s so bad, and it’s so disrespectful to our country.’ 

Trump sent a memo to the Department of Justice Wednesday directing Attorney General Pam Bondi to investigate whether Biden administration aides conspired to deceive the public about his mental state, and simultaneously used an autopen to sign key presidential actions. 

‘In recent months, it has become increasingly apparent that former President Biden’s aides abused the power of Presidential signatures through the use of an autopen to conceal Biden’s cognitive decline and assert Article II authority,’ Trump wrote. ‘This conspiracy marks one of the most dangerous and concerning scandals in American history. The American public was purposefully shielded from discovering who wielded the executive power, all while Biden’s signature was deployed across thousands of documents to effect radical policy shifts.’

Biden responded to the memo Wednesday evening, brushing it off as ‘ridiculous’ and a ‘distraction’ put forth by the GOP. 

‘Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn’t is ridiculous and false,’ Biden said. ‘This is nothing more than a distraction by Donald Trump and congressional Republicans who are working to push disastrous legislation that would cut essential programs like Medicaid and raise costs on American families, all to pay for tax breaks for the ultra-wealthy and big corporations.’ 

Trump continued in his Thursday comments that the Biden administration’s use of an autopen is one of the biggest political scandals in U.S. history, remarking that autopens are typically used to send mass amounts of letters – not for official presidential actions. 

‘I sign important documents. Usually, when they put documents in front of you, they’re important. Even if you’re signing ambassadorships or – and I consider that important, I think it’s inappropriate,’ Trump continued. ‘You have somebody that’s devoting four years of their life or more to being an ambassador. I think you really deserve that person deserves to get a real signature, not a, not an autopen signature.’ 

The president added that he can easily identify autopen signatures from genuine pen-to-paper signatures due to ‘two little pinholes from pulling the paper’ that are found on documents. 

‘I think it’s very disrespectful to people when they get an autopen signature,’ Trump said. ‘Autopens, to me are used when thousands of letters come in from young people all over the country, and you want to get them back and, you know, people use autopens for that to send, a little signature at the bottom of a letter. We have thousands of them. We get thousands of letters a week, and it’s not possible to, you know, though I’d like to do it myself, but you can’t do it. That’s where autopens start and stop.’ 

Autopen signatures are automatically produced by a machine, as opposed to an authentic, handwritten signature.

The conservative Heritage Foundation’s Oversight Project first investigated the Biden administration’s use of an autopen earlier in 2025 and found that the same signature was on a bevvy of executive orders and other official documents, while Biden’s signature on the document announcing his departure from the 2024 race varied from the apparent machine-produced signature.

The reports led to speculation that Biden aides had approved of executive orders and sweeping pardons, not the president. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

France and Spain face off in the UEFA Nations League semifinals Thursday, with the winner advancing to face Portugal in Sunday’s final. This marks the fourth edition of the biennial competition, with France winning in 2021 and Spain the defending champion from 2023.

The showdown in Stuttgart, Germany also pits Spain’s teenage sensation Lamine Yamal against France star Ousmane Dembélé, two of the favorites to win the Ballon d’Or award as the world’s best player this year.

Yamal, just 17 years old, helped Spain win Euro 2024 and wrapped his second full season for Barcelona that included a Spanish league title. Meanwhile, Dembélé led Paris Saint-Germain to its first-ever UEFA Champions League crown, another French title and has 35 goals in all competitions for club and country.

It’s a rematch of last year’s Euro semifinal, with Spain getting a goal from Yamal en route to a 2-1 win, going on to defeat England in the final.

Follow along for updates and highlights:

Where to watch Spain vs. France in UEFA Nations League

TV channel: Fox Sports
Streaming: Fubo

Watch France vs. Spain on Fubo

What time is Spain vs. France today?

Kickoff is scheduled for 3 p.m. at the MHPArena in Stuttgart, Germany.

France vs. Spain Nations League odds

Odds via BetMGM as of 12:30 p.m. ET, June 5

Regular time result:

Spain +130
Draw +230
France +210

To advance:

Spain -150
France +115 

To win UEFA Nations League:

Portugal +138
Spain +175
France +250

Cristiano Ronaldo sends Portugal back to Nations League final

Cristiano Ronaldo scored the winner as Portugal fought back to beat Germany 2-1 on Wednesday and reach the Nations League final.

Germany took the lead in the 48th minute, as Florian Wirtz headed in unmarked in the box, following a pinpoint lobbed pass from Joshua Kimmich.

However, Portugal turned the match around, first equalising through substitute Francisco Conceicao in the 63rd minute, before Ronaldo tapped in five minutes later to send the visitors into the final.

Spain and France will clash in the other semi-final on Thursday to decide who will face Portugal in the decider on Sunday.

– Reuters

France Nations League squad

Goalkeepers: Mike Maignan (AC Milan), Lucas Chevalier (Lille), Brice Samba (Rennes)

Defenders: Ibrahima Konaté (Liverpool), Benjamin Pavard (Inter), Theo Hernandez (Milan), Lucas Hernandez (PSG), Loic Badé (Sevilla), Malo Gusto (Chelsea), Pierre Kalulu (Juventus), Clément Lenglet (Atlético Madrid), Lucas Digne (Aston Villa)

Midfielders: Aurélien Tchouaméni (Real Madrid), Mattéo Guendouzi (Lazio), Manu Koné (Roma), Adrien Rabiot (Marseille), Warren Zaïre-Emery (PSG)

Forwards: Désiré Doué (PSG), Bradley Barcola (PSG), Ousmane Dembélé (PSG), Kylian Mbappé (Real Madrid), Randal Kolo Muani (Juventus), Michael Olise (Bayern), Marcus Thuram (Inter), Rayan Cherki (Lyon)

UEFA Nations League bracket, schedule

Quarterfinals (March 20/23)

Spain 5, Netherlands 5 (Spain advances on penalties)
France 2, Croatia 2 (France advances on penalties)
Portugal 5, Denmark 3 (extra time)
Germany 5, Italy 4

Semifinals (June 4/5)

Portugal 2, Germany 1
France vs. Spain

Third-place game – June 8

Germany vs. France/Spain loser

UEFA Nations League final – June 8

Portugal vs. France/Spain winner

This post appeared first on USA TODAY