Archive

2024

Browsing

President Biden’s administration is implementing a new rule to make it more difficult to fire federal workers as former President Trump promises to revamp the workforce to weed out the ‘deep state.’ 

Early Thursday, the White House released a statement from the Democratic incumbent president regarding ‘the final rule to protect nonpartisan civil servants.’ 

Biden said his administration was announcing ‘protections for 2.2 million career civil servants from political interference, to guarantee that they can carry out their responsibilities in the best interest of the American people.’ 

‘Day in and day out, career civil servants provide the expertise and continuity necessary for our democracy to function,’ the statement said. ‘They provide Americans with life-saving and life-changing services and put opportunity within reach for millions. That’s why since taking office, I have worked to strengthen, empower, and rebuild our career workforce.’ 

Biden deemed the rule to be ‘a step toward combatting corruption and partisan interference to ensure civil servants are able to focus on the most important task at hand: delivering for the American people.’ 

The Office of Personnel Management, the government’s chief human resources agency, on Thursday implemented new regulations barring career civil servants from being reclassified as political appointees, or as other at-will workers, who are more easily dismissed from their jobs. It comes in response to ‘Schedule F,’ an executive order Trump issued in 2020 that sought to allow for reclassifying tens of thousands of the 2.2 million federal employees and thus reduce their job security protections, according to the Associated Press. 

Biden nullified Schedule F upon taking office, but if Trump were to revive it during a second administration, he could dramatically increase the around 4,000 federal employees who are considered political appointees and typically change with each new president. How many employees might have been affected by Schedule F is unclear. 

House Committee on Oversight and Accountability Chairman James Comer, R-Ky., torched the Biden administration’s final rule, arguing it insulates federal workers from accountability:

‘OPM’s final rule is yet another example of the Biden Administration’s efforts to insulate the federal workforce from accountability,’ Comer said in a statement. ‘The federal workforce exists to serve the American people, yet many Americans have a deep and growing distrust of the federal bureaucracy. The Biden Administration’s rule will further undermine Americans’ confidence in their government since it allows poor performing federal workers and those who attempt to thwart the policies of a duly elected President to remain entrenched in the federal bureaucracy. We need more accountability for the unelected federal bureaucracy, not less.’ 

Comer said with this rule, ‘the Biden Administration believes it is more important to protect the federal bureaucracy, rather than taking steps to increase the American people’s confidence in it. The House Oversight Committee will continue to conduct rigorous oversight of the federal workforce and will examine legislative solutions to make the unelected, unaccountable federal workforce more accountable to the American people.’ 

The National Treasury Employee Union used freedom of information requests to obtain documents suggesting that federal workers such as office managers and specialists in human resources and cybersecurity might have been subject to reclassification — meaning that the scope of Trump’s order might have been broader than previously believed, the AP reported. 

The new rule could counter a future Schedule F order by spelling out procedural requirements for reclassifying federal employees, and clarifying that civil service protections accrued by employees cannot be taken away regardless of job type. It also makes clear that policymaking classifications apply to non-career, political appointments and cannot be applied to career civil servants.

‘It will now be much harder for any president to arbitrarily remove the nonpartisan professionals who staff our federal agencies just to make room for hand-picked partisan loyalists,’ National Treasury Employees Union President Doreen Greenwald said in a statement.

Good government groups and liberal think tanks and activists have cheered the rule. They viewed cementing federal worker protections as a top priority given that replacing existing government employees with new, more conservative alternatives is a key piece of the conservative Heritage Foundation’s nearly 1,000-page playbook known as ‘Project 2025.’

That plan calls for vetting and potentially firing scores of federal workers and recruiting conservative replacements to wipe out what some Republicans have decried as the ‘deep state’ governmental bureaucracy.

The nation’s most prominent conservative think tank recommended an overhaul of the Department of Justice and the FBI to combat a ‘radical liberal agenda.’ 

The Biden administration’s rule, which runs to 237 pages, is being published in the federal registry and is set to formally take effect next month. The Office of Personnel Management first proposed the changes last November, then reviewed and responded to 4,000-plus public comments on them. Officials at some top conservative organizations were among those opposing the new rule, but around two-thirds of the comments were supportive.

If Trump wins another term, his administration could direct the Office of Personnel Management to draft new rules. But the process takes months and requires detailed explanation on why new regulations would be improvements — potentially allowing for legal challenges to be brought by opponents.

Fox News’ Kaitlin Spraugue and the Associated Press contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

No Labels, the influential centrist group that had been working for over a year towards launching a bipartisan, third-party 2024 presidential ticket, is giving up its effort.

The organization on Thursday announced in a statement that ‘No Labels is ending our effort to put forth a Unity ticket in the 2024 presidential election.’

‘Americans remain more open to an independent presidential run and hungrier for unifying national leadership than ever before. But No Labels has always said we would only offer our ballot line to a ticket if we could identify candidates with a credible path to winning the White House. No such candidates emerged, so the responsible course of action is for us to stand down,’ the group explained.

The announcement came a week after the group suffered a major loss with the death of former longtime Sen. Joe Lieberman, the Democratic Party’s 2000 vice presidential nominee and a 2004 presidential candidate who later became an independent and was a No Labels founding co-chair.

In public, Lieberman was a tireless defender of the group’s push for a third-party ticket. And privately, he was a key player in No Labels’ recruitment efforts.

Lieberman also repeatedly emphasized that Americans were anything but enthused about a 2024 rematch between President Biden and former President Donald Trump, and he regularly pushed back against warnings from Democrats that a No Labels ticket would pave a path to victory for Trump in November.

Last month, in announcing the formation of a committee to vet contenders for the potential bipartisan ticket, Lieberman wrote that ‘if No Labels is unable to find candidates who meet this high threshold, then we simply will not offer our ballot line to anyone.’

Hours before Lieberman’s death, former Republican Gov. Chris Christie of New Jersey became the latest high-profile politician to decline to join a 2024 No Labels ticket, along with fellow Republicans in former Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan and Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp, and moderate Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia.

There was also plenty of speculation that former U.N. ambassador and former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley, who was the final 2024 GOP presidential nomination rival to Trump before she ended her White House run earlier this month, would consider running on a No Labels ticket. No Labels had expressed interest in her earlier this year.

But Haley repeatedly nixed joining a No Labels ticket, most recently in an interview last month on ‘FOX and Friends.’

New Hampshire Gov. Chris Sununu, another vocal GOP critic of Trump, was also courted. No Labels repeatedly reached out to Sununu and indicated in conversations that he was one of their top choices based on focus group data, a source familiar with those conversations confirmed to Fox News. 

‘The Governor politely entertained their appeals, and indicated at numerous stages throughout the conversations that he had no interest in serving on their ticket. They reached out again at the beginning of March, and he once again told them no,’ the source said.

Complicating No Labels efforts was independent presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. 

The longtime environmental activist and high-profile vaccine skeptic who is the scion of the nation’s most storied political dynasty is grabbing plenty of attention as he polls higher than any other third-party White House contender since Ross Perot over three decades ago.

Despite the announcement, No Labels continues its mission of obtaining ballot access across the country. The group on Thursday announced that it has officially qualified for the ballot in 21 states.

‘Having gained ballot access in 21 states and spurred a national conversation on the need for another choice in politics, No Labels is excited to build on our momentum to continue pursuing big ideas that promote unity and give voice to America’s commonsense majority,’ the group said in its statement.

And No Labels pledged that ‘we will remain engaged over the next year during what is likely to be the most divisive presidential election of our lifetimes. We will promote dialogue around major policy challenges and call out both sides when they speak and act in bad faith.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

President Biden warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu that U.S. policy in Gaza could change if the Israeli military doesn’t do more to improve the humanitarian situation.

During a phone call with his Israeli counterpart on Thursday, Biden stressed that Israel’s strikes on ‘humanitarian workers and the overall humanitarian situation are unacceptable,’ according to a White House readout of the call.

The same sentiment was echoed later Thursday by both Secretary of State Antony Blinken and White House national security communications adviser John Kirby, with Blinken telling reporters that the U.S. would shift gears ‘if we don’t see the changes that we need to see,’ according to a report from the Jerusalem Post.

Meanwhile, Kirby warned that the changes in Israeli policy needed to change within ‘hours and days’ and that the administration was expecting an announcement soon from Israel.

‘The President made very clear his concerns and the prime minister acknowledged those concerns,’ Kirby said.

According to the White House readout of the call, Biden stressed the need for an ‘immediate cease-fire,’ arguing such a move would be ‘essential to stabilize and improve the humanitarian situation and protect innocent civilians.’

The 30-minute call came after seven aid workers with the World Central Kitchen were killed by Israeli airstrikes this week, adding to growing concerns about the humanitarian situation in Gaza as Israel’s siege on the small strip of land has continued for over five months.

The two leaders also discussed Iranian threats against Israel, with the White House stressing that Biden ‘made clear that the United States strongly supports Israel in the face of those threats.’

Nevertheless, Kirby stressed the need for Israel to change how it is approaching the current invasion.

‘What we want to see are some real changes on the Israeli side,’ Kirby said. ‘And if we don’t see changes from their side, there will have to be changes from our side.’ 

All this comes as a Times of Israel report on Thursday claimed Hamas appeared to reject an Egyptian offer of a cease-fire proposal. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

House Republicans are expected to vote on renewing a controversial federal government surveillance tool when they return from recess next week, multiple sources told Fox News Digital.

Two House GOP aides and a GOP lawmaker – all who spoke on the condition of anonymity – said the House could take up Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which is set to expire on April 19 if Congress does not act soon. One of the aides said plans are still fluid.

Section 702 has been both credited with preventing terror attacks on U.S. soil and accused of being a vehicle for spying on U.S. citizens.

It lets the government keep tabs on specific foreign nationals outside the country without first obtaining a warrant to do so, even if the party on the other side of those communications is a U.S. citizen on U.S. soil.

The debate over its renewal has been intense, and it’s made unlikely allies out of hard-liners on the left and right alike over accusations it tramples on Americans’ civil rights. The FBI has been accused of improperly using Section 702 to spy on Black Lives Matter protesters in the summer of 2020 as well as people who rioted at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021.

‘Freedom surrendered is rarely reclaimed. Next week, Congress once again confronts an opportunity for reform and accountability of [FISA],’ Rep. Warren Davidson, R-Ohio, one of the tool’s critics, wrote on X, formerly Twitter, on Thursday.

‘Demand a debate and recorded vote to require warrants to search American citizens’ data, to limit the scope of collection, and to stop the government from avoiding warrants by buying data that would require a warrant or subpoena.’

Section 702’s supporters, which include national security hawks and moderates on both sides, point out that Section 702 is critical to avoiding another Sept. 11, 2001-style attack and have accused its detractors of trying to gut the program to the point of inoperability. 

It’s not immediately clear what a FISA renewal would look like – multiple plans to do so have fallen apart already. 

Most recently, a compromise bill put together by negotiators for the House Intelligence and Judiciary committees was abruptly pulled from the House floor schedule after Republicans on the Intelligence panel threatened to tank the legislation.

Three sources close to the Intelligence Committee told Fox News Digital at the time that it was about an amendment that would have forced law enforcement to seek a warrant before obtaining communications that involved a U.S. citizen.

‘That would be the equivalent of a police officer needing a warrant before running a license plate,’ one of the three sources said.

Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., who supported the warrant amendment, hit back at the Intelligence Committee’s reform efforts at the time, saying, ‘Intel didn’t want the Judiciary [amendments]. See, the Judiciary Committee is the committee of jurisdiction. That’s where it should’ve gone.’

But the third source close to the Intelligence Committee said those on the panel ‘are the ones that see the threats to our nation up close and personal every day.’

An earlier proposal to hold votes on dueling bills and send the highest vote-getter to the Senate had also been scrapped. One had been by the House Judiciary Committee, which would have vastly restricted the program, and another by the House Intelligence panel would have made improvements to transparency and accountability pipelines.

Fox News Digital reached out to Johnson’s office for comment but did not hear back at press time.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Indices Analysis Summary

Continuing from the previous article, the analysis of the various rankings for the indices shows that the data in the table is robust and accurate. In summary, there are two types of overall trendiness measures; Trendiness One uses all of the data to determine trendiness, and Trendless uses only the trending data determined by the filtered wave value and the trend length. Of course, Trendiness One is the complement of Trendless analysis. They are still measuring trendiness, just in two different arenas. There are also two measures of Up Trendiness using the same concept.

This could have just as easily been a ranking of down trendiness, but I think up trendiness is more prevalent in most markets.

Appendix B contains a number of tables that show the tables ordered by their ranks, which makes it easier to find the ranking you are looking for. The following tables show various subsets of the All table just analyzed.

Domestic Trendiness

Table 10.14 contains only the domestic issues.

International Trendiness

Table 10.15 contains only the international issues.

Commodity Trendiness

Table 10.16 contains only the commodity-based issues.

Sector Trendiness

Table 10.17 contains only the sector-related issues.

Data with History Prior to 2000

Table 10.18 contains all the issues that have data that began prior to 2000. This table contains more issues than the following two tables, as each of them reduces the number of issues by increasing the amount of data by using an earlier starting date.

Data with History Prior to 1990

Table 10.19 contains all the issues that have data that began prior to 1990.

Data with History Prior to 1980

Table 10.20 contains all the issues that have data that began prior to 1980. This is the table with the longest set of data and hence, the fewest number of issues.

Trend Analysis on the S&P GICS Data

Next, I’ll conduct a similar study on the 95 S&P GICS Sectors, Industry Groups, and Industries. This is a different study in that the parameters for determination of trending markets were greatly expanded. The number of days for trend determination was tabulated for days from 15 to 65. The filtered wave percentage was also expanded from 5% to 11%. All of the analysis that was included in the previous section was done on these 95 sectors and industry groups.

The Global Industry Classification Standard (GICS) is an industry taxonomy developed by MSCI and Standard & Poor’s (S&P) for use by the global financial community. The GICS structure consists of 10 sectors, 24 industry groups, 68 industries, and 154 subindustries into which S&P has categorized all major public companies. The system is similar to ICB (Industry Classification Benchmark), a classification structure maintained by Dow Jones Indexes and FTSE Group.

S&P Sectors, Industry Groups, and Industries

The numerical identification is exactly the same used by Standard & Poor’s in their GICS classification methodology. Most, but not all, of the GICS database began in 1989; in fact, there were only 21 series that did not begin in 1989. When viewing the analysis that follows, you can cross-reference this table if one particular sector or industry seems to trend outside the average, then check the start date as it might not have enough data for good analysis. Table 10.21 shows all the GICS data and each starting date.

GICS Total Summary

Table 10.22 shows the robustness of the analysis. It is entirely too much data to put into a table in a book, but is displayed here merely as proof (only partial data is shown). The raw data will be removed for the remainder of this analysis, only showing the average rankings and relative rankings. This is a table that shows the total trend (up and down) for all the raw data used in the analysis, with filtered waves from 5% to 11% and trend lengths from 15 to 65 days. The table is presented here just to give you an idea as to how much analysis went into this. A summary table follows that is much easier to view.

The GICS Summary tables are shown below, but without the vast amount of raw data — only the name of the classification, the average of all the raw calculations, and the relative rank of each. Following these tables are tables using the same analysis that was conducted previously on the 109 indices.

GICS Summary

Table 10.23 contains all of the averages of the various filtered wave and trend days analysis categorized into Total Trendiness, Uptrends, Downtrends, and the ratio of up to downtrends. You will notice that there are missing data in the U/D Ratio column. This is because of a couple of different things.

There were a few of the series that just did not have a long enough data history.When you mix a small filtered wave with a long trend expectation, you will find that some series just do not have an Uptrend, a Downtrend, or both. Division does not work well with a zero for numerator or denominator.

On first glance at the above table of all GICS issues, it could be noticed that all of the ones that have numerical codes starting with the number 3 are ranked high in the Total Trendiness. While I think this is poor analysis, let’s see if there is anything there.

Oh my, yes there is — all of them are part of Consumer Staples or Healthcare. Both of these sectors are typically defensive in nature and usually with less volatility. If you refer to the table at the beginning of this section that has 109 market indices, it also contains 16 sectors or industries. Consumer Staples is ranked in that table using Trendiness One as number 3, while the Healthcare sector is ranked number 14. Remember that these are relative ranks, but the results confirm that Staples and Healthcare are good trending issues.

Does this hold up for other defensive issues such as Utilities and Telecom? The Utilities sector and the Electric Utilities industry rank 14 and 13 in overall trendiness; however, the other utility industries do not rank high. Telecom sector ranks 23, with diversified telecom industry at 25 and wireless at 89. It should also be noted, when doing this type of analysis, that the wireless data begins 4 years later than the other, but I don’t see that as a hindrance.

GICS Summary Table (With Inadequate Periods of Analysis Removed)

Let’s now look at which GICS issues are not good at trending (Table 10.24). The top five are Internet Software and Services, Internet and Catalog Retail, Health Care Technology, Office Electronics, and Construction Materials. With this wide dispersion of industries, let’s first check the data. First note that of the 95 GICS issues, only 20 (21 percent) have data less than the majority, which all begin in 1989. Four of the poor trending issues are in this category. Only Construction Materials began in 1989. Since this analysis is measuring relative trendiness, one would then need to go to each individual issue and chart it as was done in the previous section.

GICS Table for All Trends Up to and Including 30 Days

Table 10.25 shows the analysis on the GICS data in the same manner as the earlier analysis on the 109 market indices. A review of the details in that section might be helpful.

Trend Analysis in Secular Bear Markets

Table 10.26 shows the trend analysis for the periods when the Dow Industrials was in a secular bear market. Although these results are not as robust as the research in this chapter, and uses the 21-day trend without a move of more than 5% as the measure, it does show, by example, the message. Without studying the markets, one might assume that secular bear markets are mainly downtrending markets. Hopefully this table dispels that notion and shows that, during secular bear markets, a strong tendency to trend still exists.

If there is a single takeaway from all this analysis on market trends, it is this: markets trend. Herding causes demand, which is the opposite of economic supply and demand. The stock market is a demand event. Some issues trend better when in uptrends than in downtrends, while the reverse holds true for some. From the tables in this chapter and in the appendix, you should be able to discern which indices, sectors, or industries are better for trending.

On this week’s edition of Stock Talk with Joe Rabil, Joe demonstrates how to use the “Big Green Bar” candlestick pattern. This candlestick provides great confirmation on certain types of entry points, and can also be helpful for exits. Joe finishes up the show covering the stock requests that came in through this week, including GBTC, MMM, and more.

This video was originally published on April 4, 2024. Click this link to watch on StockCharts TV.

Archived episodes of the show are available at this link. Send symbol requests to stocktalk@stockcharts.com; you can also submit a request in the comments section below the video on YouTube. Symbol Requests can be sent in throughout the week prior to the next show.

In this edition of StockCharts TV‘s The Final Bar, Dave welcomes Sean McLaughlin of All Star Charts. Sean shares his outlook for the Ark Innovation Fund (ARKK) and energy stocks (XLE) and how to employ options strategies to bet on particular outcomes. David tracks the afternoon selloff which created bearish candlestick patterns for META, NFLX, and AMZN.

This video originally premiered on April 4, 2024. Watch on our dedicated Final Bar page on StockCharts TV!

New episodes of The Final Bar premiere every weekday afternoon. You can view all previously recorded episodes at this link.

With March’s foray into free agency leaving the shelves of the veteran market stripped clean, the NFL “offseason” has reached something of a pause – though word hasn’t reached the Bills and Texans yet. Regardless, anticipation is quickly building toward one of the league’s marquee events, the 2024 draft set to commence just three weeks from today in Detroit.

The draft is sure to change the complexion of the football landscape anew as teams utilize their final major opportunity to shape rosters heading into the upcoming season. But as we await the dispersal of rookies, seems like a good time to see how the clubs currently stack up (previous rank in parentheses):

1. Kansas City Chiefs (1): Fairly smooth offseason thus far for the two-time defending champions … at least until WR Rashee Rice’s apparent ‘Fast & Furious’ moment in Texas over the weekend. Otherwise? All-Pro DT Chris Jones was extended, while CB L’Jarius Sneed was effectively swapped out for speedy WR Hollywood Brown. A question remains at left tackle, and there could be further tinkering at wideout. Doesn’t feel remotely premature to pencil K.C. in for a ninth straight AFC West crown – at minimum.

2. San Francisco 49ers (2): They’ve advanced at least as far as the conference title game three years running. Yet whenever this franchise gets tantalizingly close to its sixth Lombardi Trophy, it seems a catastrophic injury is around the corner – though maybe the overtime loss in Super Bowl 58 will ward off the injury bug after the catastrophic emotional blow suffered by the Niners. Recent heartbreaking history aside, the NFC champs remain nicely positioned for another title run in what will likely be QB Brock Purdy’s final year on his criminally cheap rookie contract … and maybe WR Brandon Aiyuk’s final year in the Bay Area. Won’t hurt to have six picks in the draft’s first four rounds.

3. Baltimore Ravens (4): They took a collective hit in free agency without seemingly suffering an irreplaceable loss. They also appeared to add the perfect bellcow in two-time league rushing champ Derrick Henry, whose presence could catapult QB Lamar Jackson to a third MVP trophy. Still some holes to fill – whether internally, via the draft or unemployed vets – but this team is going to remain a serious problem and, with Henry aboard, one unlikely to again stray from its identity at the worst possible time.

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

7. Philadelphia Eagles (10): They’ve subbed out inexperienced coordinators for proven ones (OC Kellen Moore, DC Vic Fangio). They’ve lost legendary team leaders Jason Kelce and Fletcher Cox to retirement – their estimable wisdom couldn’t save the 2023 squad – but have young talent ready to step in. And the additions of RB Saquon Barkley, DE Bryce Huff, WR3 DeVante Parker and DB C.J. Gardner-Johnson should more than offset the departure of LB Haason Reddick and others. And, naturally, EVP/GM Howie Roseman has an extra second-rounder at his disposal. If this team underachieves again, it won’t be for a lack of ability.

8. Houston Texans (9): The roster around breakout QB C.J. Stroud appeared marginally improved (if far more expensive) following free agency, the major arrivals being veteran DE Danielle Hunter and RB Joe Mixon. Then WR Stefon Diggs was acquired Wednesday, likely further bolstering Houston’s chances to reach the AFC championship game for the first time. However no first-round pick here after trading it during last year’s draft to get DE Will Anderson Jr. and subsequently sending the final Round 1 selection obtained in the Deshaun Watson deal to Minnesota.

10. Los Angeles Rams (8): If they’re not already at a weird intersection, it’s quickly approaching. After a surprising 2023 revival, legendary DL Aaron Donald has flexed into the sunset, QB Matthew Stafford seems to be in year-to-year mode himself and Cooper Kupp may now be WR2. But a team set to welcome a first-rounder for the first time since 2016 should remain a legit NFC threat … at least for 2024.

12. New York Jets (15): The trade for Reddick appears like the latest deft move by GM Joe Douglas, who’d already revamped his offensive line during free agency before signing WR Mike Williams. Douglas is wheeling and dealing for his job (plus HC Robert Saleh’s) and still has the 10th pick of the draft, which should bring another premium player to a high-ceiling/low-floor roster – which, naturally, remains dependent on Rodgers, who’s now 40.

14. Dallas Cowboys (7): They could be forgiven for sitting out the first wave of free agency. But HC Mike McCarthy’s seat has to feel that much hotter as his roster effectively remains in salary cap gridlock with scant draft capital to enlist reinforcements.

17. Pittsburgh Steelers (17): They seemed to upgrade significantly at quarterback after adding Russell Wilson and, shortly thereafter, Justin Fields. But the debate about whom to play is already afoot while wondering if either can elevate the Steelers beyond the postseason’s fringes.

25. Tennessee Titans (31): A highly aggressive offseason approach – one that’s so far brought the likes of Sneed, WR Calvin Ridley and RB Tony Pollard, among others – perhaps illustrates the lack of philosophical alignment between GM Ran Carthon and former HC Mike Vrabel. A pretty penny should mean a more competitive product, assuming sophomore QB Will Levis takes to Callahan’s playbook.

***

Follow USA TODAY Sports’ Nate Davis on X, formerly Twitter @ByNateDavis.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The voice on the other end of the line boomed.

‘Great day to be a Wolfpack!’ Dereck Whittenburg said at the outset of a phone call this week.

Just about every day has been a great day to be part of the North Carolina State Wolfpack during March Madness – especially for people like Whittenburg, a key member of the school’s 1983 national championship team that went on a magical postseason run 41 years ago.

This week, the current NC State men’s and women’s teams will be playing at the Final Four, with the former never having been ranked in the USA TODAY Sports Coaches Poll all season.

“It shows you all things are possible,’ Whittenburg said. “We showed that 41 years ago.’

FOLLOW THE MADNESS: NCAA basketball bracket, scores, schedules, teams and more.

During the team’s 40-year reunion last year, Whittenburg commemorated its history. He gave each of his former teammates a plaque that included pieces of the court from The Pit, the arena in Albuquerque, New Mexico, where NC State won the national championship. (The court had been replaced and was in storage.) On each plaque, lettering on one piece of the court reads, “The Pass,’ and lettering on the second piece of the court reads, “The Dunk.’

It’s a reference to the final seconds of the 1983 national championship game, when Whittenburg launched the ball toward the basket from more than 30 feet away. It fell short of the rim, whereupon NC State’s Lorenzo Charles grabbed the ball and dunked, giving NC State a 54-52 upset victory over the Houston Cougars – a team that included Hakeem Olajuwon and Clyde Drexler – and sent Wolfpack coach Jim Valvano racing around the court, looking for someone to hug.

Cozell McQueen, a starter on NC State’s 1983 team, said he and a handful of Whittenburg’s former teammates had the top piece of the court on their plaques sanded down and replaced the word “Pass’ with “Shot.’

Said McQueen, “We tell him all the time, ‘Whitt, own up to it. That’s one of the greatest airballs you ever shot, man.’ ‘

Terry Gannon, the sixth man on the 1983 team, said, “We’re talking trash 41 years later to each other, just like we were back in 1983.’

NC State was playing with house money at 1983 Final Four

The 1983 team and 2024 team appear bound by a similar attitude, said Ernie Myers, who was a freshman guard in 1983.

“Now here comes DJ Burns, laughing, jolly, throwing left hooks all day long off the glass,’ Myers said of the standout center for this year’s Wolfpack. “We were playing with house money. And this team is playing with house money as well.’

To secure a bid to the NCAA Tournament, the 1983 NC State team had to beat a North Carolina team that featured Michael Jordan and a Virginia team anchored by Ralph Sampson. Then, awarded a No. 6 seed for the NCAA Tournament, Myers said the team felt no pressure. They survived and advanced – Valvano’s catchphrase – before knocking off No. 1 seed Houston.

Myers recalled an ESPN documentary about the 1983 team, when Valvano said he had one bed check, “And all the beds were there.’ Chuckling, Myers said the team had no curfews, and players went out in Albuquerque the week of the Final Four.

“I can’t get into details, but we had a good time,’ he said. “That’s all I can say. We weren’t sitting in the room, worried if we were going to win or not, I’ll tell you that.’

Coach Jim Valvano, the dreamer

During the preseason, Valvano devoted one practice to cutting down the nets – just like they would if the team won the national championship, according to Gannon.

“You bring the ladder out and you practice cutting down the nets,’ he said. “That was V.’

He also recalled Valvano in Duke Hospital, struggling with cancer, which took his life in 1993.

“Several of us would go see him and spend time with him,’ Gannon said. “I remember being there and his whole thing was, ordinary people do extraordinary things every day. And the idea of the (V Foundation for Cancer) was him not wanting to give in while laying there dying of cancer.’’

V Foundation, formed the same year Valvano died, has awarded more than $350 million in grants since its inception, the foundation announced last year.

Group chats keep teammates close

A group-text chat has helped players from the 1983 team remain connected.

“Every day, somebody’s posting something in the chat,’ McQueen said. ‘Could be middle of the day or wee hours in the morning.’

The chat includes include reminiscences about not only Valvano but also Charles, the 6-7 forward who died in a car crash in 2011. His last-second dunk in the national championship game remains a staple of Final Four highlights.

“That guy right there, Lorenzo, there will never be another guy like him,’ McQueen said, getting choked up as he talked about his former roommate. “(He) was a real powerful guy, but he was like a teddy bear. Lo would get a kick out of when he wouldn’t smile, people thought he was upset, and he wanted to see how they were going to respond.

“And then he would just bust out with that million-dollar smile.’

1983 Wolfpack players remain a team

Thurl Bailey, the leading scorer on the 1983 team, wrote a book titled “Team of Destiny.’ In it, Bailey acknowledged more than just the team’s famous coach and prominent players.

“I talk about a walk-on named Tommy DiNardo,’ Bailey said. ‘Because he may not have got a single minute in the championship game, but he showed up every single day for practice to try to kick my ass.

“And that made me better, it made us bond better.’

DiNardo got married March 16 in Raleigh, North Carolina, the same day NC State played North Carolina in the ACC championship game the Wolfpack had to win to secure an automatic tournament bid.

At the wedding reception, the game was on a big-screen TV. NC State beat North Carolina, 84-76, and several players from the 1983 team attended, according to Gannon.

“So it’s a group of teammates that very much are still a team, four decades later,’ he said.

Alvin Battle, a reserve forward on the 1983 team who attended the wedding, said he is one of several players who has spoken to members of this year’s team. He said he relayed the words Valvano famously spoke at the ESPYs the month before he died.

‘Our thing always was, ‘Don’t give up, don’t ever give up,’ ‘ Battle said. ‘From Jimmy V, we say that all the time because we’ve lived it, and we know you never give up.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

As the college basketball world waits to crown its men’s champion, the coaching carousel spins inexorably on.

Several major conference programs made moves early to get a jump on the market, while others are still weighing decisions. Thus far, there will be 11 schools in the sport’s five remaining power leagues that will be under new management in the 2024-25 season, and dozens more in the so-called mid-major conferences. There are sure to be others as openings are filled and more dominoes tumble.

Here are the changes to date in the top-tier leagues, with a few other notable moves at other programs that have enjoyed recent success.

ACC

Louisville

Who’s out? Kenny Payne was sent packing after a second dismal season at a program accustomed to much more success.

FOLLOW THE MADNESS: NCAA basketball bracket, scores, schedules, teams and more.

Who’s in? Pat Kelsey will look to revive the Cardinals’ program. He brings 261 career victories and back-to-back NCAA tournament appearances from his most recent stop at the College of Charleston.

SMU

Who’s out? Yes, this will be an ACC program next year. The decision to part ways with Rob Lanier after two seasons came as something of a surprise. For his part, Lanier landed on his feet at Rice.

Who’s in? The Mustangs, meanwhile, turn to Andy Enfield, who had mixed results at Southern California.

Stanford

Who’s out? Jerod Haase was let go after eight seasons with the Cardinal, a stint that produced no NCAA tournament appearances.

Who’s in? Kyle Smith takes on a new challenge after taking Washington State on its improbable ride in the final year of the Pac-12 as we know it.

Big East

DePaul

Who’s out? The school parted ways with Tony Stubblefield a full month and a half out from the end of what would be yet another season of futility in the Big East.

Who’s in? Considering the Blue Demons’ two decades in the wilderness, landing Chris Holtman might give their long-suffering fans a ray of hope.

Big Ten

Michigan

Who’s out? It was working for a while for former Fab Fiver and favorite son Juwan Howard, who took the Wolverines to the Elite Eight in 2021. But his five-year run bottomed out with just three Big Ten victories and significant turmoil within the program this season.

Who’s in? Dusty May was bound to head for greener pastures in the wake of last season’s out-of-the-blue Final Four campaign at Florida Atlantic. Reportedly in talks for several other openings, he eventually accepted the Michigan gig shortly after this year’s first-round exit with the Owls.

Ohio State

Who’s out? There’s no disputing that the Buckeyes weren’t living up to their talent, but the decision to dismiss Chris Holtmann a month before the conclusion of the season was still a stunner. Presumably, the move was made at the time to put the wheels in motion for an outside hire.

Who’s in? Ultimately though, the team’s late push that led to a quarterfinal appearance in the NIT was enough to convince administrators that interim coach Jake Diebler was the right man for the job after all. How he’ll handle bringing in his own recruits and coaching a full season remains to be seen, but there’s no doubt he won the respect of his current team.

Southern California

Who’s out? Andy Enfield had mixed results at USC, admittedly not a basketball-first athletic department. It’s fair to say his decision to pursue the SMU opening wasn’t exactly discouraged.

Who’s in? The Trojans didn’t waste time and plucked Eric Musselman from Arkansas. Musselman won 111 games in five seasons with the Razorback and made consecutive Elite Eight appearances in 2021 and 2022.

Washington

Who’s out? Mike Hopkins came into the season with a warm chair, and another sub-.500 conference record and the program’s impending move to the Big Ten meant it was time for a change.

Who’s in? Once again, the Utah State job proved to be a stepping stone. Danny Sprinkle comes to Seattle after just one year in Logan, albeit a successful one featuring a Mountain West regular-season title and an NCAA tournament victory.

Big 12

Oklahoma State

Who’s out? Mike Boynton took the Cowboys to the Big Dance just once in his seven-year stint in Stillwater. The plug was pulled after this year’s 4-14 conference finish, tied for last in the expanded league.

Who’s in? Steve Lutz comes to OSU after just one season at Western Kentucky. Before that, he was at Texas A&M-Corpus Christi. Notably, he’s taken his team to the NCAA’s each of the last three years.

West Virginia

Who’s out? Interim coach Josh Eilert was thrust into a difficult situation last summer following the ignominious end to Bob Huggins’s lengthy career. The school officially announced it would seek a new hire after a 9-23 finish.

Who’s in? Darian DeVries comes to Morgantown after multiple 20-win campaigns and three appearances in the Big Dance at Drake.

SEC

Arkansas

Who’s out? The Razorbacks had slipped below .500 this season after making three consecutive NCAA tournaments, so the timing might have been right for all parties for Eric Musselman to move on when Southern California came calling.

Who’s in? The job should be an attractive one, a program with championship history in a major conference. But it’s a bit late in the cycle for Arkansas to be initiating a search.

Vanderbilt

Who’s out? Though there were signs of improvement over the five-year tenure of Jerry Stackhouse, the school decided to make a move following a 9-23 season.

Who’s in? It’s a hard place to win in a highly competitive league, but the hire of Mark Byington from James Madison has increased the expectations around the Commodores’ program. The Dukes went 32-4 this year and toppled Wisconsin in the Big Dance.

Other significant hires

As often happens during these cycles, several of the above transactions left some desirable mid-major programs looking for the right replacement to maintain their winning ways. Some of these hires in turn cause subsequent job postings. That was not the case at Western Kentucky, however, as the school quickly elevated assistant Hank Plona to succeed Lutz. Duquesne also kept things in house, promoting assistant Drew Joyce to succeed retiring coach Keith Dambrot in the aftermath of the Dukes’ memorable Atlantic 10 title and NCAA tourney win.

Here’s how some other recent dancers filled their openings.

College of Charleston

In a bit of a twist after losing Kelsey to Louisville, the Cougars brought in former Cardinals head coach Chris Mack to try and keep them atop the Coastal Athletic Association.

Drake

The Bulldogs turned to the Division II ranks and brought in Ben McCollum to succeed DeVries. An Iowa native, McCollum won four D2 titles during a 15-year stint at Northwest Missouri State.

Florida Atlantic

Dusty May’s departure wasn’t unexpected give the success of the two previous seasons, and the Owls moved quickly to bring aboard Baylor assistant John Jakus.

James Madison

The Dukes went with Morehead State coach Preston Spradlin hoping to maintain their Sun Belt success. Spradlin took the Eagles dancing as Ohio Valley champs for a second time this season. Morehead has yet to hire his replacement.

Utah State

The Aggies clearly have a pretty good track record, though they were probably hoping not to be back on the carousel quite so soon. The next guy hoping to take USU dancing is Jerrod Calhoun, who is coming off back-to-back 20-win campaigns at Youngstown State.

The rest of the hires

Bryant: Phil Martelli Jr.

Cal Poly: Mike DeGeorgie

Canisius: Vacant

Central Arkansas: John Shulman

Charleston Southern: Saah Nimley

Coastal Carolina: Justin Gray

Cornell: Vacant

Detroit Mercy: Vacant

Eastern Washington: Vacant

Fairfield: Chris Casey

Florida A&M: Vacant

Fresno State: Vacant

Gardner-Webb: Jeremy Luther

Hampton: Ivan Thomas

Houston Christian: Craig Doty

Illinois-Chicago: Rob Ehsan

IUPUI: Paul Corsaro

Long Beach State: Vacant

Loyola Maryland:: Josh Loeffler

Marshall: Cornelius Jackson

Mercer: Ryan Ridder

Missouri State Cuonzo Martin

Morehead State: Vacant

Old Dominion: Mike Jones

Pacific: Dave Smart

Pepperdine: Vacant

Rice Owls: Rob Lanier

Saint Louis: Vacant

Siena: Gerry McNamara

South Carolina Upstate: Dave Dickerson

Southern Illinois: Scott Nagy

Tennessee-Martin: Jeremy Shulman

Texas Rio Grande Valley: Vacant

Texas-San Antonio: Austin Claunch

Western Carolina: Tim Craft

Western Kentucky: Vacant

William & Mary: Brian Earl

Wright State: Clint Sargent

Youngstown State: Vacant

This post appeared first on USA TODAY