A new bill is aiming to give Californians more work-life balance by restricting when employers can contact them during off hours.

So-called “right to disconnect” laws have already made headlines overseas. If passed, California would be the first state in the U.S. to try it.

Under the bill proposed by San Francisco Assemblymember Matt Haney, California companies would have to better specify employee “compensated” hours.  

In turn, employees wouldn’t be expected to respond to calls, texts, or emails outside that timeframe — a welcomed change for remote workers like Rob Hayes.

“It feels like I have to set my phone on silent certain times, not open up my computer certain times. If I don’t right now I kind of feel like I would be left behind or not seen as someone who works hard, so I think it’s really beneficial,” said the Solano County resident. 

The state’s labor commission could investigate and fine employers for interrupting employees’ personal time. Management expert professor Amira Barger believes the bill addresses workplace equity issues.

“We are dealing with an epidemic of burnout and that’s part of how we got here,” said the Cal State East Bay professor. “This is a necessary adaptation as we look towards the future of work. Employees are demanding more of employers and they are demanding a new value proposition of what work looks like.”

The bill makes exceptions for emergencies, scheduling and collective bargaining. But also aims to create boundaries in business that assembly member Haney says are missing.

“California created many of these technologies that allow people to be available 24/7, we should also lead the way in making sure we can make them sustainable for work-life balance,” he said.

But California’s Chamber of Commerce argues the bill is a step backwards for workplace flexibility and fails to consider California’s longstanding laws regarding hours worked and compensation.    

Haney disagrees, saying he feels it actually does the opposite while also creating a stronger workforce.

“I’m hopeful that this increases the competitiveness of California’s industries and helps people to come back to work, or come to work in California,” he said. “I think this is actually going to help our competitiveness as a state for industries, for highly skilled workers.”

Ford Motor is delaying production of a new all-electric three row SUV, as it shifts to offer hybrid options across its entire North American lineup by 2030.

The Detroit automaker on Thursday said it will continue to invest in EVs, but it is postponing production of the large SUV at a plant in Canada from 2025 to 2027 to allow for the market to mature more.

The shift in EV plans is the latest for Ford and the entire automotive industry as adoption has been slower than many expected and production costs remain high.

Ford last year said it would delay or cancel $12 billion in planned spending on new EVs due to the shifting market conditions as well as challenges to profitably building and selling the vehicles.

“As the No. 2 EV brand in the U.S. for the past two years, we are committed to scaling a profitable EV business, using capital wisely and bringing to market the right gas, hybrid and fully electric vehicles at the right time,” said Jim Farley, Ford president and CEO. “Our breakthrough, next-generation EVs will be new from the ground up and fully software enabled, with ever-improving digital experiences and a multitude of potential services.”

In the first quarter of 2024, Ford’s electric vehicle sales increased by 86% from subdued levels a year earlier. Hybrid sales for the automaker rose 42% year over year, while sales of Ford’s traditional vehicles with internal combustion engines were up 2.6%.

Disney CEO Bob Iger said his company is not interested in sending messages in its movies and TV shows.

In an interview with CNBC on Thursday morning, Iger said Disney’s No. 1 mission is to capture broad — if increasingly diverse — audiences.

‘Infusing messaging is not what we’re up to,’ he said. ‘We need to be entertaining.’

Iger was speaking one day after his leadership received a vote of confidence from stakeholders in the face of an aggressive activist shareholder campaign led by billionaire Nelson Peltz, who had taken the company to task for its lackluster stock performance in recent years.

Peltz had also hit out at the company in an interview with the Financial Times for having dabbled in ‘woke’ commentary.

“Why do I have to have a Marvel that’s all women?’ Peltz asked. ‘Not that I have anything against women, but why do I have to do that? Why can’t I have Marvels that are both?’ In comments Peltz made about the blockbuster Marvel film, ‘Black Panther,’ he asked, ‘Why do I need an all-Black cast?”

That sentiment has also been echoed by Elon Musk, who joked on April Fool’s Day that he had been appointed head of diversity, equity and inclusion at the company. In the run-up to Wednesday’s shareholder vote, Musk also endorsed Peltz.

On Thursday, Iger told CNBC’s David Faber that he ‘ignore[s]’ Musk.

Musk’s comments ‘have no relevance to the Walt Disney Company,’ Iger said.

The Disney chief executive viewed the episode as little more than a ‘distraction’ given that the company was already focused on strategic priorities like making the Disney+ streaming platform profitable and nailing down the company’s succession plan.

Peltz, Iger said, ‘didn’t have any new ideas.’

The interview came a day after Iger won a key battle against a group of outside investors who’d sought to bring a slate of new board members tasked explicitly with increasing shareholder value.

Even with that victory, Iger still faces the daunting task of returning Disney to sustained growth after a decade of lackluster performance, at least when measured by its share price, which at about $119, has not changed much from the levels seen 10 years ago.

Among the company’s other priorities: integrating Hulu into Disney+; breathing new life into flagship properties like Marvel and Star Wars; transitioning ESPN into the new, streaming-and-gambling focused sports consumption era after decades of cable TV dominance; and navigating the complex culture war politics that continue to wrack America.

‘This activist move could wake Disney up and force it to spread its wings,’ said Brian Stutland, chief investment officer at Equity Armor Investments. He said Disney has tended to focus on creating media properties with strong tie-ins to its parks, but said that could now change.

‘It could force them into becoming more ‘Hollywood’ than just Star Wars and superheroes,’ Stutland said. ‘If they can accomplish that, then the stock and the company are going to be in good shape.’

Disney has a host of other media and studio resources at its disposal through its acquisitions of ESPN and 21st Century Fox, Stutland said — properties that should make it one of the dominant streaming players going forward.

‘They can become a lower cost way for people to get entertainment,’ Stutland said. While some additional initial spending may be required, Disney+ is already near profitability, so it shouldn’t be a problem, he said.

In the CNBC interview, Iger said Disney’s streaming business needs to increase user engagement, reduce marketing costs, “program more smartly” outside the U.S. market and crack down on password-sharing, among other initiatives.

Separately, the 73-year-old Iger has also faced questions about who will succeed him — especially in light of the failed tenure of Bob Chapek, who Disney named as its CEO in 2020 only to see Iger return two years later. CNBC’s Alex Sherman reported that Dana Walden, co-chair of Disney Entertainment, the arm of the company in charge of movies and TV shows, is a strong contender for the top job. She would be the company’s first female CEO and one of the few among America’s 50 largest companies.

‘She comes from a Hollywood background,’ Stutland said. ‘That’s what they need to do, is to focus on that.’

Iger began his career running errands for productions at ABC. He moved to Disney in 1995 after its acquisition of ABC, and has served as an executive there ever since.