Archive

2024

Browsing

HARTFORD, Conn. — So long as she’s healthy, Simone Biles is going to the Paris Olympics.

The obvious was reaffirmed with her big win at the U.S. Classic, where Biles finished almost two points ahead of Shilese Jones, an all-around medalist at the last two world championships. Brought back some of her big skills for the first time since the Tokyo Games, too.

There are four other spots on the U.S. team, however, and performances at Classic gave an indication of who will be joining Biles in Paris.

Here’s a look at the contenders, with the national championships and Olympic trials still to come:

Locks

Shilese Jones. She’s a close second to Biles as far as gimmes. Jones has established herself as one of the world’s best gymnasts the last two seasons, winning the silver medal behind Brazil’s Rebeca Andrade at the 2022 worlds and claiming the bronze behind Biles and Andrade last year.

Selecting a team isn’t as easy as picking the top five all-arounders. While teams compete four of their five gymnasts on each event in qualifying and get to drop the lowest score, they compete three gymnasts in the finals and have to count every score. One fall and the gold could be gone. Two or three, and you might not get any spot on the medals podium.

Having gymnasts who are consistent is important. But so is having a team that can put up big scores across all events. Jones is consistent – her lowest score Saturday was a 14, for a floor routine Jones said is ‘still building’ – and she gives the Americans a monster score on uneven bars. Her 15.25, for a routine she’s upgraded since last season, was the second-highest score of the night, on any event.

‘Just getting that out of the way … is definitely boosting my confidence,’ Jones said.

Almost there

Suni Lee. The reigning Olympic all-around champion had the highest score on balance beam Saturday. While she didn’t compete in uneven bars, her signature event, what she’s shown in training has been impressive and would give the United States three big scores – her, Jones and Biles – on the event.

Lee also expects to upgrade her vault and to clean up her floor routine. This was the first time she’s competed floor in more than a year, since a kidney ailment derailed her final season at Auburn and severely limited her training.

‘It was really important for me to go out there and fight those demons, compete a floor routine,’ Lee said. ‘It’s been a while. Obviously not the routine that I want for the upcoming competitions but I really just wanted to get out there and compete again.’

Lee and coach Jess Graba are confident she’ll be ready to do the all-around at the national championships, which are May 30 through June 2 in Fort Worth, Texas. If she does, she gives the Americans a third formidable all-arounder, something few other countries can match.

‘It’s going to come down to bars and beam for me,’ she said. ‘… I’m hungrier to be able to be in the all-around. That’s been the main priority but we all know, I’m the strongest on those two.’

Jade Carey. The Americans need another big vault score, and Carey would provide that. She’s also strong on floor, where she’s the reigning Olympic champion. Carey was fifth on floor Saturday night, but remember this was her first competition after doing NCAA at Oregon State, and her routine is likely to look different by the Olympic trials next month.

Making a case

Jordan Chiles. The Tokyo Olympian also just wrapped up the NCAA season, at UCLA, but made a case for herself with a solid performance on all four events. Chiles might not give the United States a massive score on any one event, but she doesn’t leave any holes, either.

‘I think realizing that I had the potential,’ Chiles said of the difference between this season and last, when she struggled with the transition from NCAA to elite.

‘A lot of the time, you say you want to do something and you never know what’s going to happen, because there’s a lot of eyes on you and expectations,’ Chiles added. ‘When you put that aside, you realize, ‘I’m going to just step forward into it and be the person I need to be and put every effort I need into each and every practice.”

Kaliya Lincoln. Remember what I said about needing three strong scores on every event? Her 14 on floor exercise tied with Jones for second-highest on the event. The combination of Biles, Jones, Lee and Carey covers vault, bars and beam, and Lincoln would give the Americans options on floor exercise.

Keep your eye on

Tiana Sumanasekera and Leanne Wong. They might not have been spectacular, but they were solid and look to have room to improve. If anyone above them slips up, they could be right there to fill the spot. Or claim one of the alternate spots.

Now, this is not to say other gymnasts can’t still make a case for themselves. There are still two meets to go before the Olympic team is announced, after all. But Classic is the meet where people begin to separate themselves, and this one was no different.

Follow USA TODAY Sports columnist Nancy Armour on social media @nrarmour.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The NCAA softball tournament field is set with 64 teams all fighting to reach the Women’s College World Series. The big question is whether any team can knock off Oklahoma. The Sooners, who start as the No. 2 seed, will be going for a record fourth consecutive title. But there are a host of teams hoping to knock them off, including Texas, Tennessee and Florida.

The road to the WCWS in Oklahoma City starts spread across 16 regional locations. One team from each site advances to super regionals, where eight head-to-head matchups in best-of-three series will determine the field that plays for the national title.

NCAA softball tournament super regionals

(Best-of three series)

All times Eastern

At Austin, Texas

Friday, May 24

Texas A&M (43-13) at Texas (50-7), 6 p.m. | ESPN2

Saturday, May 25

Texas A&M (43-13) at Texas (50-7), 5 p.m.

Sunday, May 26

Texas A&M (43-13) at Texas (50-7), TBA, if necessary

At Norman, Okla.

Thursday, May 23

Florida State (45-14) at Oklahoma (52-6), 7 p.m. | ESPN2

Friday, May 24

Florida State (45-14) at Oklahoma (52-6), 8 p.m.

Saturday, May 25

Florida State (45-14) at Oklahoma (52-6), TBA, if necessary

At Knoxville, Tenn.

Friday, May 24

Alabama (36-17) at Tennessee (43-10), 4 p.m. | ESPN2

Saturday, May 25

Alabama (36-17) at Tennessee (43-10), 3 p.m.

Sunday, May 26

Alabama (36-17) at Tennessee (43-10), TBA, if necessary

At Gainesville, Fla.

Friday, May 24

Baylor (35-21) at Florida (49-12), noon | ESPN2

Saturday, May 25

Baylor (35-21) at Florida (49-12), 11 a.m.

Sunday, May 26

Baylor (35-21) at Florida (49-12), TBA, if necessary

At Stillwater, Okla.

Friday, May 24

Arizona (37-16-1) at Oklahoma State (47-10), 8 p.m. | ESPNU

Saturday, May 25

Arizona (37-16-1) at Oklahoma State (47-10), 7 p.m.

Sunday, May 26

Arizona (37-16-1) at Oklahoma State (47-10), TBA, if necessary

At Los Angeles

Thursday, May 23

Georgia (43-17) at UCLA (34-10), 9:30 p.m. | ESPN2

Friday, May 24

Georgia (43-17) at UCLA (34-10), 10 p.m.

Saturday, May 25

Georgia (43-17) at UCLA (34-10), TBA, if necessary

Friday, May 24

At Columbia, Mo.

Friday, May 24

Duke (50-6) at Missouri (46-16), 2 p.m. | ESPN2

Saturday, May 25

Duke (50-6) at Missouri (46-16), 1 p.m.

Sunday, May 26

Duke (50-6) at Missouri (46-16), TBA, if necessary

At Stanford, Calif.

Friday, May 24

LSU (43-15) at Stanford (46-14), 10 p.m. | ESPNU

Saturday, May 25

LSU (43-15) at Stanford (46-14), 9 p.m.

Sunday, May 26

LSU (43-15) at Stanford (46-14), TBA, if necessary

NCAA softball tournament regionals

At Austin, Texas

Friday, May 17

Game 1: Texas 5, Siena 0

Game 2: Northwestern 7, Saint Francis (Pa.) 2

Saturday, May 18

Game 3: Texas 14, Northwestern 2

Game 4: Saint Francis (Pa.) 1, Siena 0

Game 5: Northwestern 4, Saint Francis (Pa.) 1

Sunday, May 19

Game 6: Texas 7, Northwestern 0

Texas advances to super regionals

At Norman, Okla.

Friday, May 17

Game 1: Oregon 8, Boston University 0, 5 innings

Game 2: Oklahoma 9, Cleveland State 0, 6 innings

Saturday, May 18

Game 3: Oklahoma 6, Oregon 3

Game 4: Boston University 8, Cleveland State 0, 5 innings

Game 5: Oregon 8, Boston University 2

Sunday, May 19

Game 6: Oklahoma 3, Oregon 2

Oklahoma advances to super regionals

At Knoxville, Tenn.

Friday, May 17

Game 1: Virginia 7, Miami (Ohio) 0

Game 2: Tennessee 3, Dayton 0

Saturday, May 18

Game 3: Tennessee 12, Virginia 0

Game 4: Miami (Ohio) 4, Dayton 0

Game 5: Virginia 6, Miami (Ohio) 0

Sunday, May 19

Game 6: Tennessee 6, Virginia 0

Tennessee advances to super regionals

At Gainesville, Fla.

Friday, May 17

Game 1: Florida 6, Florida Gulf Coast 0

Game 2: South Alabama 1, Florida Atlantic 0

Saturday, May 18

Game 3: Florida 9, South Alabama 1

Game 4: Florida Gulf Coast 3, Florida Atlantic 2

Game 5: South Alabama 5, Florida Gulf Coast 1

Sunday, May 19

Game 6: Florida 9, South Alabama 1, 5 innings

Florida advances to super regionals

At Stillwater, Okla.

Friday, May 17

Game 1: Kentucky 4, Michigan 3

Game 2: Oklahoma State 6, Northern Colorado 0

Saturday, May 18

Game 3: Oklahoma State 6, Kentucky 2

Game 4: Michigan 4, Northern Colorado 2

Game 5: Michigan 4, Kentucky 2

Sunday, May 19

Game 6: Oklahoma State 4, Michigan 1

Oklahoma State advances to super regionals

At Los Angeles

Friday, May 17

Game 1: Virginia Tech 5, San Diego State 1

Game 2: UCLA 9, Grand Canyon 0, 5 innings

Saturday, May 18

Game 3: UCLA 7, Virginia Tech 6

Game 4: Grand Canyon 9, San Diego State 7

Game 5: Grand Canyon 4, Virginia Tech 1

Sunday, May 19

Game 6: UCLA 9, Grand Canyon 1, 5 innings

UCLA advances to super regionals

At Columbia, Mo.

Friday, May 17

Game 1: Washington 8, Indiana 7

Game 2: Nebraska-Omaha 3, Missouri 1, 9 innings

Saturday, May 18

Game 3: Nebraska-Omaha 3, Washington 2

Game 4: Missouri 5, Indiana 1

Game 5: Missouri 4, Washington 1

Sunday, May 19

Game 6: Missouri 5, Nebraska-Omaha 1

Game 7: Missouri 1, Nebraska-Omaha 0, 9 innings

Missouri advances to super regionals

At Stanford, Calif.

Friday, May 17

Game 1: Mississippi State 1, Cal State Fullerton 0

Game 2: Stanford 8, Saint Mary’s 6

Saturday, May 18

Game 3: Stanford 2, Mississippi State 1

Game 4: Cal State Fullerton 6, Saint Mary’s 0

Game 5: Cal State Fullerton 7, Mississippi State 0

Sunday, May 19

Game 6: Cal State Fullerton 8, Stanford 1

Game 7: Stanford 4, Cal State Fullerton 2

Stanford advances to super regionals

At Baton Rouge, La.

Friday, May 17

Game 1: Southern Illinois 5, California 4

Game 2: LSU 5, Jackson State 0

Saturday, May 18

Game 3: LSU 4, Southern Illinois 1

Game 4: California 15, Jackson State 0, 5 innings

Game 5: Southern Illinois 3, California 2

Sunday, May 19

Game 6: LSU 9, Southern Illinois 0, 5 innings

LSU advances to super regionals

At Durham, N.C.

Friday, May 17

Game 1: South Carolina 2, Utah 1

Game 2: Duke 6, Morgan State 1

Saturday, May 18

Game 3: Duke 8, South Carolina 0

Game 4: Utah 1, Morgan State 0

Sunday, May 19

Game 5: South Carolina 5, Utah 1

Game 6: Duke 10, South Carolina 1

Duke advances to super regionals

At Athens, Ga.

Friday, May 17

Game 1: Liberty 6, Charlotte 3

Game 2: Georgia 8, UNC Wilmington 0, 5 innings

Saturday, May 18

Game 3: Liberty 7, Georgia 3

Game 4: Charlotte 5, UNC Wilmington 0

Game 5: Georgia, 5 Charlotte 0

Sunday, May 19

Game 6: Georgia 14, Liberty 5

Game 7: Georgia 3, Liberty 2

Georgia advances to super regionals

At Fayetteville, Ark.

Friday, May 17

Game 1: Arizona 14, Villanova 3, 5 innings

Game 2: Arkansas 3, Southeast Missouri State 2

Saturday, May 18

Game 3: Arizona 2, Arkansas 1

Game 4: Villanova 4, Southeast Missouri State 1

Game 5: Villanova 7, Arkansas 2

Sunday, May 19

Game 6: Arizona 9, Villanova 4

Arizona advances to super regionals

At Lafayette. La.

Friday, May 17

Game 1: Louisiana-Lafayette 8, Princeton 0, 5 innings

Game 2: Baylor 3, Mississippi 1

Saturday, May 18

Game 3: Baylor 8, Louisiana-Lafayette 0

Game 4: Princeton 4, Mississippi 2

Game 5: Louisiana-Lafayette 2, Princeton 1, 9 innings

Sunday, May 19

Game 6: Louisiana-Lafayette 13, Baylor 0, 5 innings

Game 7: Baylor 4, Louisiana-Lafayette 3

Baylor advances to super regionals

At Tuscaloosa, Ala.

Friday, May 17

Game 1: Southeastern Louisiana 6, Clemson 2

Game 2: Alabama 1, USC Upstate 0

Saturday, May 18

Game 3: Alabama 6, Southeastern Louisiana 3, 9 innings

Game 4: Clemson 8, USC Upstate 0, 6 innings

Game 5: Southeastern Louisiana 6, Clemson 2

Sunday, May 19

Game 6: Alabama 12, Southeastern Louisiana 2, 5 innings

Alabama advances to super regionals

At Tallahassee, Fla.

Friday, May 17

Game 1: Central Florida 11, Auburn 6

Game 2: Florida State 3, Chattanooga 2

Saturday, May 18

Game 3: Florida State 5, Central Florida 1

Game 4: Auburn 9, Chattanooga 0, 5 innings

Game 5: Auburn 2, Central Florida, 12 innings

Sunday, May 19

Game 6: Florida State 10, Auburn 4

Florida State advances to super regionals

At College Station, Texas

Friday, May 17

Game 1: Texas State 4, Penn State 2

Game 2: Texas A&M 6, Albany 2

Saturday, May 18

Game 3: Texas A&M 1, Texas State 0

Game 4: Penn State 9, Albany 3

Game 5: Texas State 8, Penn State 4

Sunday, May 19

Game 6: Texas A&M 8, Texas State 0

Texas A&M advances to super regionals

Women’s College World Series bracket, schedule

At Devon Park, Oklahoma City (all times Eastern).

Thursday, May 30

Game 1: TBD vs. TBD, noon, ESPN

Game 2: TBD vs. TBD, 2:30 p.m., ESPN

Game 3: TBD vs. TBD, 7 p.m., ESPN2

Game 4: TBD vs. TBD, 9:30 p.m., ESPN2

Friday, May 31

Game 5: Game 1 loser vs. Game 2 loser, 7 p.m., ESPN2

Game 6: Game 3 loser vs. Game 4 loser, 9:30 p.m., ESPN2

Saturday, June 1

Game 7: Game 1 winner vs. Game 2 winner, 3 p.m., ABC

Game 8: Game 3 winner vs. Game 4 winner, 7 p.m., ESPN

Sunday, June 2

Game 9: Game 5 winner vs. Game 8 loser, 3 p.m., ABC

Game 10: Game 6 winner vs. Game 7 loser, 7 p.m., ESPNU

Monday, June 3

Game 11: Game 7 winner vs. Game 9 winner, noon, ESPN

Game 12: Game 7 winner vs. Game 9 winner, 2:30 p.m., ESPN, if necessary

Game 13: Game 8 winner vs. Game 10 winner, 7 p.m., ESPN2

Game 14: Game 8 winner vs. Game 10 winner, 9:30 p.m., ESPN2, if necessary

Wednesday, June 5

Championship series Game 1: TBD vs. TBD, 8 p.m., ESPN

Thursday, June 6

Championship series Game 2: TBD vs. TBD, 8 p.m., ESPN

Friday, June 7

Championship series Game 3: TBD vs TBD, 8 p.m., ESPN, if necessary

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Terms of the deal were not announced by the Hurricanes, however The Athletic announced it was a five-year contract extension. The coach’s contract was due to expire on July 1.

‘Rod has been instrumental to the success we’ve had over the last six seasons,’ Hurricanes general manager Don Waddell said. ‘Ever since he joined the organization 24 years ago, Rod has embodied what it means to be a Hurricane. We hope to keep him a Hurricane for life.’

Assistant coaches Jeff Daniels and Tim Gleason, video coach Chris Huffine and goaltending coach Paul Schonfelder also agreed to multi-year contract extensions, the team announced.

NHL PLAYOFFS CONFERENCE FINALS: Scores, schedule, times, TV, matchups

All things Hurricanes: Latest Carolina Hurricanes news, schedule, roster, stats, injury updates and more.

GAME 6: Chris Kreider hat trick rallies Rangers past Hurricanes, into Eastern Conference finals

Brind’Amour, 53, has guided the Hurricanes to the playoffs in each of the five seasons he has been at the helm, posting a 278-130-44 regular-season record in the process. He won the Jack Adams Award as the NHL’s coach of the year in 2021.

The Hurricanes finished second in the Metropolitan Division this season with a 52-23-7 record and 111 points, three points shy of the New York Rangers. The Rangers eliminated the Hurricanes in six games during their Eastern Conference semifinal series.

As a player, Brind’Amour collected 1,184 points (452 goals, 732 assists) in 1,484 career NHL games with the St. Louis Blues, Philadelphia Flyers and Hurricanes.

Brind’Amour served as the captain of the Hurricanes during the franchise’s lone Stanley Cup championship in 2006 and won the Frank J. Selke Trophy as the NHL’s top two-way forward in 2006 and 2007

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

You know them. The ones who go all out to win, whether it’s travel baseball or church league basketball.

“Everything was about manipulating the game,” says the three-time Pro Bowl tight end turned broadcaster and father of three. “Every youth baseball game, you’re like, ‘We gotta find a way to win it.’ ”

Now picture Olsen in the other dugout. He’s 6-5 and has played nearly a decade and a half in the NFL. He has lived and breathed sports most of his life. If anyone truly understood the players, he thought, it was him. He was still throwing off tacklers for the Carolina Panthers when he began coaching his sons, and he was ready to run through a wall for the players on his team.

They were 7.

“I learned a lot about maybe the ways that I thought we should approach youth sports might not have been real positive for everyone else,” Olsen told the crowd at Johns Hopkins University as emcee of last week’s Project Play Summit. “That’s a conversation for another day and a couch and psychologist, I guess.”

Olsen and his wife, Kara, have constantly found themselves at dinner with friends “pretending to care about what’s going on in your life,” then delving into kids sports after five minutes.

What team are they on?

How many days a week do you practice?

What tournaments are you entering?

Sound familiar? Olsen realized nobody has completely figured out how to manage youth sports. It’s a process we continue to learn from each other.

To that end, Olsen has brought together parents, coaches, pro athletes, Olympians, and medical and health experts the past two years to go on an informed journey through his Youth Inc. podcasts. This “all-encompassing” adventure, as he calls it, is just beginning.

Olsen still plans to continue his role as an NFL broadcaster this fall, even as Tom Brady enters the Fox TV booth. (‘As of now,’ Olsen says of his affiliation with Fox.) But he is also all in as a “a professional youth sports dad/coach,” he says.

At last week’s summit, Olsen shared five lessons we can use to help navigate youth sports’ nebulous waters.

(Questions and responses are edited for length and clarity.)

1. The value of youth sports has ‘nothing to do’ with the actual sport

Olsen grew up in the Jersey suburbs of New York as the son of a high school football coach and physical education teacher. Like all of our upbringings, it shaped his approach to parenting sons Tate, 12, and T.J, 11, and daughter Talbot, 11.

His father, Chris, regularly led Wayne Hills High to state championship games. Olsen and his brothers, Christian and Kevin, were the waterboys and ballboys, idolizing the players Dad coached.

“It’s not luck,” Chris might tell them. “It’s a lot of hard work.”

The Olsen brothers, who all went on to play major college football, learned about dedicating yourself to a larger entity, a core value that remains ingrained within sports today.

USA TODAY: How would you describe yourself as a sports parent?

Greg Olsen: Everything that we preach in our house is, whether it’s a team I coach or a team someone else coaches, you are fully committed to that team. If there’s optional practices, we’re in. We are not missing. We’re not picking and choosing when we go.

I’m a big believer that the vast majority of what these kids are getting out of youth sports has nothing to do with the actual sport.

I want my kids to learn accountability. I want my kids to learn how to be told things they otherwise might not want to hear by authority figures they may or may not like; no different than in school with a teacher that may not be their cup of tea. I think that’s life. That’s the way it goes. So we teach the process, putting in the work. Did you do everything in your power this week? And if the weekend tournament goes well, it rewards that work. If you skipped a workout, then how do you expect to have success?

We don’t ever preach, ‘You have to win every game.’ We don’t ever preach, ‘You have to be the star player.’ But you do have to play up to your standards. You do have to give your team their best effort. You do have to be coachable. You do have to display good attitudes after you strike out. If you slam the bat … it’s not gonna be a fun conversation for you driving home. Those are the things that we emphasize. And they’re non negotiable in our house. Whether you win or lose the game is completely secondary.

Coach Steve: How to be a good loser, like Caitlin Clark

2. Youth sports isn’t about winning games

What is it that makes us winners? It’s not just winning all the time.

“I worked for Nick Saban for four years, and he never talked about winning,” Maryland football coach Mike Locksley, who also participated in the Project Play Summit, told USA TODAY Sports. “He always talked about the process of winning.

“De-emphasize winning and make it about your development.”

Olsen agrees.

USA TODAY: What is your biggest piece of advice for beginners looking to get into youth sports?

GO: I think the longer I’ve done it, the more I’ve just become clear that if development drives winning, you’re good. The idea should be to win as a byproduct of the improvement, the investment into the kids, teaching them how to do the skills of the sport, how to compete, how to be competitive. We believe that if we do all those things over a long period of time, we’ll continue to get better (and) we will win as a result. If you’re gonna beat us, you gotta just be flat out better than us. And the longer we’ve done it as my kids have gotten older, and we’ve seen the super teams and the guest playing and chasing a different weekend tournament with a different team. I stop and say, ‘What is the goal?’ Is the goal to be in a race to be, ‘Who’s the best 12-year-old?’ Or is the goal to be, ‘Who’s the best 18 year old, 20 year old?’

No one looks back in high school and says, ‘Hey, but remember (at) 11 years old, you guys lost that girls basketball tournament in Myrtle Beach.’

Coach Steve: When should your kid start to specialize in a sport?

3. Define success by how you emerge from the experience, not where you end up. There is a difference.

Olsen and his brothers didn’t grow up thinking they would be college or professional football players. Their biggest goal was to run out on the field and play for their dad on Friday nights like all those guys before them.

Today, our kids’ athletic futures always seem to be in the back of our minds. We are setting ourselves up for disappointment at the end of our kids’ sports journey, which is also something we can celebrate.

USA TODAY: You said up on the stage that you didn’t really think about the next level until deep into high school. Is that’s still something that can happen in today’s world?

GO: I think it has to. We never, ever talked about college. We never, ever talked about going to play professionally. If you’re doing all this work for your son or daughter under the impression that you’re only doing it for the return on investment, you should stop doing it. Because the odds are just not in your favor that it’s ever gonna pay off. We’re doing it because I want my kids to play for their middle school baseball, football, girls basketball, whatever. And then one day, be in a position that they can play for their varsity high school team. And get all those experiences, play with their friends, play in the community, learn what that’s all about.

If they play beyond that, great. I’m not saying it’s not a good long-term goal. I just think too many parents these days, their rationale for the money, the training, the travel, the spending, the jumping teams, the moving high schools, is because the only goal is, ‘We have to make college.’ I tell my kids all the time, ‘If we don’t reach that goal is that a failure?’ It’s only a failure if you didn’t do everything in your power along the way to have success. If you do, if you work your butt off through high school and you have a great high school career and that’s where your sports your ends, that’s a success. And I think sometimes we put the destination as the goal instead of the journey.

4. Don’t coddle your kids. Let them compete – and struggle – to learn the lessons of life.

Project Play, designed by the Aspen Institute, strives to build healthy communities through sports. It’s an especially important tool for kids whose families can’t afford to pay for travel sports.

At the Project Play Summit, I learned about organizations like Every Kid Sports and Leveling the Playing Field, which cover youth sports registration fees and provide equipment for income-restricted families.

As a city council member in 2015, Baltimore mayor Brandon Scott helped jump-start what is now known as the Volo Kids Foundation, a free access program that has expanded to eight U.S. cities.

Scott grew up in Baltimore running track and playing baseball, basketball and football through his local rec center. He excelled at running and carries its lessons with him today.

“We took that into life, really, and think about how we challenge each other and push each other,” he told USA TODAY Sports. “We’re constantly pushing each other to see how we can be the best version of ourselves. And that’s really what you learn from sports: you learn how you’re gonna to deal with adversity, deal with pressure situations. … How to be a leader.”

They are skills similar to what Olsen learned from his dad, and ones we can impart on our kids through their teams.

USA TODAY: For parents whose kids are just getting into youth sports or want to keep them in it, what is your advice?

GO: Put them in environments where they can grow and don’t be afraid for them to every once in a while fail. If the team’s continuing to grow, and maybe at this point, other girls or boys are further ahead, other teams are further ahead, that’s OK. Find great coaches, find people that are willing to invest in the kids.

I’m a big stickler for developing the skills of the sport, but more importantly the skills of life: Being told the truth. Being honest with yourself, even if you don’t like it. That’s a hard lesson for a lot of kids, especially these days because people don’t like telling kids the truth. People want to make their kids lives easy. I’d rather my kids struggled now so they learn how to deal with life as they get older.

Steve Borelli, aka Coach Steve, has been an editor and writer with USA TODAY since 1999. He spent 10 years coaching his two sons’ baseball and basketball teams. He and his wife, Colleen, are now sports parents for a high schooler and middle schooler. His column is posted weekly. For his past columns, click here.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

This is the starting lineup for the 2024 Indianapolis 500. The 200-lap race is scheduled for Sunday, May 26, on the 2½-mile Indianapolis Motor Speedway oval. 

The Indy 500 starting lineup features 11 rows of 3 drivers each, established through two days of qualifying. Scott McLaughlin’s 234.220 mph qualifying effort is the best for a pole position winner in race history.

Speeds for Rows 1-2 were established in the Fast Six on May 19, and speeds for Rows 3-4 were set in the Fast 12; speeds for Rows 5-10 were set on May 18; speeds for Row 11 were established in last chance qualifying on May 19.

Includes starting position, (car number), driver name (R-rookie; W-Indy 500 winner), engine, team and 4-lap qualifying speed average. All cars have Dallara chassis and use Firestone tires.

2024 Indy 500 Row 1

(3) Scott McLaughlin, Chevrolet, Penske, 234.220

2. (12) Will Power (W), Chevrolet, Penske, 233.917

3. (2) Josef Newgarden (W), Chevrolet, Penske, 233.808

2024 Indy 500 Row 2

4. (7) Alexander Rossi (W), Chevrolet, Arrow McLaren 233.090

5. (17) Kyle Larson (R), Chevrolet, Arrow McLaren, 232.846

6. (14) Santino Ferrucci, Chevrolet, AJ Foyt, 232.692

2024 Indy 500 Row 3

7. (21) Rinus VeeKay, Chevrolet, Ed Carpenter Racing, 232.610

8. (5) Pato O’Ward, Chevrolet, Arrow McLaren, 232.584

9. (60) Felix Rosenqvist, Honda, Meyer Shank, 232.305

Row 4

10. (75) Takuma Sato (W), Honda, Rahal Letterman Lanigan, 232.171

11. (27) Kyle Kirkwood, Honda, Andretti Global, 230.993

12. (23), Ryan Hunter-Reay (W), Dreyer & Reinbold-Cusick, 230.567

2024 Indy 500 Row 5

13. (26) Colton Herta, Honda, Andretti Global, 232.316

14. (10) Alex Palou, Honda, Chip Ganassi Racing, 232.306

15. (6) Callum Ilott, Chevrolet, Arrow McLaren, 232.230

2024 Indy 500 Row 6

16. (11) Marcus Armstrong (R), Honda, Chip Ganassi Racing, 232.183

17. (20) Ed Carpenter, Chevrolet, Ed Carpenter Racing, 232.017

18. (4) Kyffin Simpson (R), Honda, Chip Ganassi Racing, 231.948

2024 Indy 500 Row 7

19. (98) Marco Andretti, Honda, Andretti Global, 231.890

20. (06) Helio Castroneves (W), Honda, Meyer Shank, 231.871

21. (9) Scott Dixon (W), Honda, Chip Ganassi Racing, 231.851

2024 Indy 500 Row 8

22. (78) Agustin Canapino, Chevrolet, Juncos Hollinger Racing, 231.847

23. (41) Sting Ray Robb, Chevrolet, AJ Foyt Racing, 231.826

24. (33) Christian Rasmussen (R), Chevrolet, Ed Carpenter Racing, 231.851

2024 Indy 500 Row 9

25. (66) Tom Blomqvist (R), Honda, Meyer Shank, 231.578

26. (77) Romain Grosjean, Chevrolet, Juncos Hollinger Racing, 231.514

27. (8) Linus Lundqvist (R), Honda, Chip Ganassi Racing, 231.506

2024 Indy 500 Row 10

28. (45) Christian Lundgaard, Honda, Rahal Letterman Lanigan, 231.465

29. (24) Conor Daly, Chevrolet, Dreyer & Reinbold-Cusick, 231.243

30. (30) Pietro Fittipaldi, Honda, Rahal Letterman Lanigan, 231.100

2024 Indy 500 Row 11

31. (51) Katherine Legge, Honda, Dale Coyne Racing, 230.092

32. (28) Marcus Ericsson (W), Honda, Andretti Global, 230.027

33. (15) Graham Rahal, Honda, Rahal Letterman Lanigan, 229.974

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

A helicopter carrying Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi crashed in Iran’s East Azerbaijin province Sunday into a fog-shrouded forest. 

As multiple emergency crews instigated search-and-rescue operations, speculation mounted as to what would happen in the event of Raisi’s death, and what it would mean for Iran’s internal affairs.   

Fox News Digital spoke with Behnam Ben Taleblu, an expert on Iranian security at the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies (FDD), to discuss the implications for Iran’s domestic politics. 

The helicopter crash, Taleblu noted, comes after years of growing protests in the streets against the regime, as well as plummeting participation in elections. 

‘Raisi was a symbol of the hard right shift of what’s left of the governing elite of the Islamic Republic of Iran,’ Taleblu said. ‘It represents kind of this second generation where, loyalty and zeal rather than capability and competence were key factors in his political ascension.’ 

Taleblu noted that Raisi has had blood on his hands for decades, having been involved in the mass execution of prisoners in the late 1980s.

Raisi, now 63, previously ran Iran’s judiciary. He ran unsuccessfully for president in 2017 against Hassan Rouhani, the relatively moderate cleric who as president reached Tehran’s 2015 nuclear deal with world powers.

In 2021, Raisi became president of Iran in an election that saw all of his potentially prominent opponents barred from running under Iran’s vetting system. He swept nearly 62% of the 28.9 million votes, the lowest turnout by percentage in the Islamic Republic’s history. Millions stayed home and others voided ballots.

While a powerful position on paper, Raisi has ‘no domestic organic social support base,’ Taleblu said. ‘He’s really a vehicle for the ultra hard-right consolidation in Iranian Islamic politics.’ 

Raisi has long been seen as a protégé to Iran’s supreme leader and a potential successor for his position within the country’s Shiite theocracy. But with Raisi potentially out of the way, Taleblu said, ‘the short list would have gotten even shorter.’ 

‘Another person on that shortlist, that would benefit significantly from this is Ayatollah Ali Khamenei’s son, Mojtaba, who right now basically wields power without accountability. And many, allege that he is interested in becoming the next supreme leader, or that he may be jockeying to become the next Supreme leader as well,’ Taleblu said.

Iran ultimately is run by its 85-year-old supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. But as president, Raisi supported the country’s enrichment of uranium up to near-weapons-grade levels, as well as it hampering international inspectors as part of its confrontation with the West.

Raisi also supported attacking Israel in a massive assault in April that saw over 300 drones and missiles fired at the country in response to a suspected Israeli attack that killed Iranian generals at the country’s embassy compound in Damascus, Syria — itself a widening of a yearslong shadow war between the two countries.

He also supported the country’s security services as they cracked down on all dissent, including in the aftermath of the 2022 death of Mahsa Amini and the nationwide protests that followed.

The monthslong security crackdown killed more than 500 people and saw over 22,000 detained. In March, a United Nations investigative panel found that Iran was responsible for the ‘physical violence’ that led to Amini’s death after her arrest for not wearing a hijab, or headscarf, to the liking of authorities.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Lawyers for two IRS whistleblowers who informed Congress about the Hunter Biden criminal probe are seeking an inspector general investigation into Special Counsel David Weiss, alleging he ‘hid and twisted’ information – prompting more angst on Capitol Hill amid inquiries into Biden family conduct and alleged politicization of the Justice Department.

Empower Oversight, the legal group representing IRS special agents Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler, allege that Weiss’ team – in a March 11 federal court filing – deliberately misled the public by suggesting an unnamed federal agency was investigating the two whistleblowers for misconduct. However, the vague reference to the ‘potential investigation(s)’ is a reference to a probe the whistleblowers sought, alleging the Justice Department and IRS were retaliating against them for their disclosures.

Shapley and Ziegler testified last year to Congress alleging political considerations led the Justice Department and the Internal Revenue Service to go soft on its probe of Hunter Biden’s finances. Now, they have taken fire from both the defense and prosecution, noted House Oversight and Accountability Chairman James Comer, R-Ky.

‘Gary Shapley and Joseph Ziegler, the two brave IRS whistleblowers who made legally protected disclosures to Congress about misconduct within the Justice Department, have been attacked by Hunter Biden’s legal team,’ Comer told Fox News Digital.

‘Special Counsel Weiss has been part of this smear campaign as he misled the public that the IRS whistleblowers were under investigation when in fact they were not,’ Comer continued. ‘Ever since Special Counsel Weiss got caught trying to give Hunter Biden a sweetheart plea deal, he’s been trying to cover his tracks. There must be accountability for this misconduct.’

Empower Oversight wants two Justice Department agencies – the Office of Inspector General and the Office of Professional Responsibility – to investigate the conduct by Weiss’ office.

‘David Weiss has been retaliating against Gary Shapley ever since Shapley objected a year and a half ago to letting the statute of limitations lapse on 2014 felony tax charges against Hunter Biden,’ Tristan Leavitt, president of Empower Oversight, told Fox News Digital. ‘Weiss then learned from internal IRS communications that Shapley had been telling his IRS chain of command about Weiss’ office pulling punches in the Hunter Biden probe.’

In a letter this week, representatives for the two whistleblowers also asked the Office of Special Counsel – an independent whistleblower protection agency known as OSC, not to be confused with Weiss’s office – to clarify for the record that the two agents are not under investigation.

‘Weiss’ response is exactly why Shapley filed a whistleblower retaliation complaint with OSC in the first place,’ Leavitt continued. ‘DOJ OIG or OPR need to investigate to see whether Weiss’ office intentionally misled the public in order to further retaliate against the IRS whistleblowers.’

Reached by Fox News Digital, Weiss spokesperson Kim Reeves declined to comment for this story.

In 2023, Hunter Biden entered a plea deal with Delaware U.S. Attorney Weiss’ office. However, Shapley and Ziegler – who worked on the investigation – presented the House Ways and Means Committee and the House Oversight Committee with new information about the case. Shortly thereafter, a federal judge rejected the agreement.

After that, Attorney General Merrick Garland gave Weiss special counsel status, allowing him to bring charges outside his jurisdiction. Weiss secured an indictment on a gun charge in Delaware and a tax evasion case in California.  

In February, Hunter Biden’s lawyers filed a motion to dismiss the tax case in California, arguing in part that Shapley and Ziegler made disclosures that put political pressure on prosecutors.

The March 11 filing by Weiss’ office in federal court in the Central District of California was in opposition to the motion to dismiss the case, and attempted to rebut that claim about the influence of whistleblowers – though in doing so, suggested they were under investigation.

The Weiss response to the motion to dismiss said Shapley and Ziegler ‘made unsubstantiated claims that prosecutors’ decision-making in this investigation was infected by politics.’ It adds the ‘IRS has taken responsible steps to address Shapley and Ziegler’s conduct.’ It directs the court to Exhibit 2, redacted from the public.

The Weiss team explains redactions in Exhibit 2 are because, ‘Here, the potential investigation(s) may involve allegations of wrongdoing, and the potential investigation(s) could be frustrated, not served, if the public were allowed access to these materials in the midst of the potential investigation(s).’

On May 14, the advocates for the IRS whistleblowers wrote a letter to the Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz and Office of Professional Responsibility Counsel Jeffrey Ragsdale.

‘Weiss’ office hid and twisted the significance of OSC’s investigation into the whistleblowers’ own allegations that the IRS and Special Counsel Weiss retaliated against them,’ the letter to DOJ internal watchdog officials says. ‘Rather than acknowledging the truth that OSC is investigating the reprisal against the whistleblowers, the DOJ filing falsely suggested to the public that some unnamed agency was investigating the conduct of the whistleblowers themselves.’

The letter was signed by Leavitt, Empower Oversight founder Jason Foster, as well as attorneys Marke Lytle and Justin Gelfand.

The same day, the four signed a lengthier letter to the OSC acting principal deputy counsel, Karen Gorman. The letter notes the vague reference to investigations in Exhibit 2 was an OSC probe of the IRS and Justice Department initiated by Shapley and Ziegler. Whereas, the Weiss filing suggested the investigation is targeting Shapley and Ziegler.  

The letter to Gorman says the OSC should ‘not allow the Justice Department to mischaracterize your work for the purposes of a retaliatory attack on the reputation of whistleblowers who have done nothing wrong.’

An OSC spokesperson acknowledged receipt of the letter to Fox News Digital, but could not confirm or deny the existence of an open investigation.

The OSC has been under scrutiny for other reasons loosely related to the case involving President Biden’s son. The president appointed Hampton Dellinger, a former colleague of Hunter Biden at a law firm, to run the agency. Dellinger has recused himself from this case.

‘However, it would be entirely improper if the rest of OSC were to stay silent as the Biden Justice Department mischaracterizes OSC’s work probing the reprisal against the IRS whistleblowers in the Hunter Biden case,’ the letter to Gorman says. ‘Accordingly, we respectfully request that you correct the record as soon as possible.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

It’s hard to watch the incessant gavel-to-gavel coverage of former President Donald Trump’s trial in Manhattan without feeling like you’re traveling in a time warp back to 2016. We’re back reliving the ‘Access Hollywood’ tape and talk of how Trump would have never been elected except porn star Stormy Daniels accepted a six-figure check to keep quiet.  

The richest vein of hypocrisy on this adultery-mangles-electability question flows through the Clintons. Hillary Clinton appeared on MSNBC’s ‘Morning Joe’ to denounce Trump for squashing the bimbo stories. It was typically shameless. She said: ‘I think the defendant, the former president, knew exactly what he was doing when he went to such great lengths to try to squash, bury, kill stories, pay off people because he understood the electoral significance of them.’  

The cast of ‘Morning Joe’ treated Clinton as a therapist for their Trump angst, and no one interrupted and asked about all the squashing, burying and killing of stories that Hillary Clinton engaged in when she and Bill Clinton first sought the White House in 1992.  

On the cusp of the Gennifer Flowers allegations breaking in January of that year, Hillary Clinton was telling Margaret Carlson of Time magazine, ‘My marriage is solid, full of love and friendship, but it’s too profound to talk about glibly.’ 

But after Flowers asserted she had a 12-year affair with Bill Clinton, Hillary and Bill appeared on ’60 Minutes,’ and Hillary claimed women being questioned about their relationship with Bill were her friends. ‘We reached out to them. I met with two of them to reassure them they knew they were friends of ours. I felt terrible about what was happening to them.’ 

In retrospect, one can smell what Hillary was cooking. She was pressuring potential accusers to stay quiet, but pitching it on national TV as just chatting things over with friends. 

One can only imagine how Melania Trump processed the Stormy Daniels tale, but paying a nondisclosure agreement isn’t exactly maintaining your innocence. That’s why the Democratic prosecutors in New York are pumping this out on CNN and MSNBC, every hour on the hour. Theleft thinks those religious conservatives are bothered by this, and it should cause them to vote for someone else, preferably that ‘devout Catholic’ Joe Biden. 

But Hillary has always waged war on anyone who would seek to damage her and Bill’s future in politics, and the media have always gushed over her warfare. At the end of the Year of Our Intern in 1998, Time magazine was aglow.  

Reporters Nancy Gibbs and Karen Tumulty oozed that ‘as she pursued the private rescue of a marriage and the public rescue of a presidency, she was the one person who seemed to see the larger story and shaped its telling.’ 

The ‘larger story’ was the ‘vast right-wing conspiracy.’ In this election cycle, Democratic prosecutors lobbed 91 felony charges at Trump, and the networks largely refuse to even describe them as Democrats, let alone a vast left-wing conspiracy.  

Time managing editor Walter Isaacson even wrote that they wanted to name her ‘Person of the Year’ in 1998 for her, um, ‘dignity.’ That’s how they describe Hillary lying for months that Bill didn’t have sexual relations with That Woman. ‘Her strength and her almost surreal ability to assert her dignity were remarkable to some and mystifying to others.’ 

On the cusp of the Gennifer Flowers allegations breaking in January of that year, Hillary Clinton was telling Margaret Carlson of Time magazine, ‘My marriage is solid, full of love and friendship, but it’s too profound to talk about glibly.’ 

This kind of copy is why most Americans don’t trust the ‘mainstream media.’ They don’t report stories as much as they ‘shape’ them for the benefit of their political allies.  

Tim Graham is director of media analysis at the Media Research Center and executive editor of the blog NewsBusters.org. To find out more about Tim Graham and read features by other Creators Syndicate writers and cartoonists, visit the Creators Syndicate website at www.creators.com. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Courts in the United Kingdom are considering whether to nix mandatory wigs for barristers amid concerns the dress code requirement is ‘culturally insensitive.’ 

‘Following questions from barristers about wigs and hair discrimination, the Bar Council set up a working group to consider court dress in the context of all protected characteristics,’ a spokesperson for the Bar Council, which represents barristers in England and Wales, said in a statement to The Telegraph. ‘The findings of the working group are currently being discussed with the judiciary as part of our regular dialogue on equality and diversity matters.’

Several Black barristers have lodged complaints that the traditional headpieces discriminate against Afro-Caribbean hair. Though no permanent change has been decided, judges are reviewing proposals made by the Bar Council, and a decision is expected this fall at the earliest, the Telegraph reported. 

‘Senior judges are in active discussions with the Bar Council about the findings of their working group on court dress,’ a spokesperson for the judiciary also told the newspaper. ‘We welcome these discussions as part of our continuing joint work on diversity and inclusion in the legal profession.’

Michael Etienne, a Black barrister with an afro hairstyle, branded the compulsory wigs as hair discrimination, a form of racism, in 2022, sparking public debate after he was ordered to wear the headpiece or face disciplinary action. The wigs, traditionally made of horsehair, are not required in all courtrooms. They haven’t been compulsory in family, civil or Supreme Court cases since 2007.

Leslie Thomas KC, a Black legal professional in London, told the Telegraph he believes the required wigs to be a ‘ridiculous costume’ that represents a ‘culturally insensitive climate’ at the Bar.

‘The wigs certainly should go. There isn’t any place in a modern society for barristers to be wearing 17th-century fashion,’ Thomas told the newspaper, suggesting the judiciary do away with other ‘archaic’ court dress, as well, such as wing collars, bands and collarettes. 

He said a dress code that instead solely requires barristers to wear a black gown with smart business wear underneath ‘would bring the profession into the 21st century.’

Rachel Bale, a mixed-race barrister with curly afro hair, pointed to religious exemptions already in place for Sikhs who wear turbans and Muslims who wear headscarves, suggesting to The Telegraph that barristers should be able to opt out for cultural reasons. She argued that wigs are often ‘not fit for purpose’ for naturally Black hairstyles.

‘Something overlooked often in Black culture is that your hair is so inexplicably important and it is completely interwoven with your identity,’ she told the newspaper. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

House Republican Conference Chair Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., on Sunday defended a recent speech she delivered to the Israeli Knesset in Jerusalem, torching President Biden’s ‘betrayal of the importance of the U.S.-Israel alliance.’ 

Stefanik, who is meeting with Israeli leaders at the same time Biden’s national security adviser Jake Sullivan is also visiting Jerusalem, appeared on ‘Fox News Sunday’ after speaking at the parliament building. Fox News host Shannon Bream asked the third-highest ranking House Republican if the concept broadly adopted in the 1940s of leaving partisan politics at the water’s edge and minority leaders refraining from criticizing a sitting American president while abroad was now ‘out the door.’ 

But the congresswoman, reportedly on former President Trump’s 2024 VP shortlist, shot back that she had been ‘invited to talk about my work when it comes to combating antisemitism and my strong record when it comes to U.S./Israel support.’ 

‘The world needs to know, and Israel needs to know, that the House Republican majority stands strongly with Israel,’ Stefanik said. ‘That this equivocation, this weak, failed leadership that we are seeing from Joe Biden, that’s not where the American people are, that’s not where the United States Congress is. And it’s not reflective of the legislation that we passed that Joe Biden signed into law. So, it is important for the world to hear. The world is looking for moral leadership, Shannon. And it’s important that House Republicans step up to fill that void, which we have under Speaker Johnson’s leadership.’ 

 

Stefanik said the main focus of her speech ‘was that the American people stand strongly with Israel, as do House Republicans,’ referencing how on Thursday the House passed legislation that rebuked Biden for pausing a shipment of bombs to Israel, seeking to force the weapons transfer. 

Debate over the bill showed Washington’s deeply fractured outlook on the Israel-Hamas war. The White House and Democratic leadership scrambled to rally support from a House caucus that ranges from moderates frustrated that the president would allow any daylight between the U.S. and Israel to progressives outraged that he is still sending any weapons at all. The bill passed comfortably 224-187 as 16 Democrats joined with most Republicans to vote in favor. Three Republicans voted against it.

‘You’ve had equivocation after equivocation from Democrats, led by Joe Biden, or whether it’s Chuck Schumer calling for a new leader replacing Prime Minister Netanyahu, that is not the place – that is not the type of leadership we need to be seeing from the highest levels of the United States of America,’ Stefanik said. ‘And that’s one of the focuses that I had today in my speech at the Knesset, that House Republicans stand strongly with Israel at their time of existential need.’

‘Oct. 7 was the bloodiest day for the Jewish people since the Holocaust,’ she added. ‘We want to make sure Israel has all the resources, no equivocation that it comes to eradicating Hamas.’ 

Amid concern that tens of thousands of people have been injured and killed in Gaza, Bream noted that Amnesty International sounded the alarm that U.S. weapons are being used in violation of international and U.S. laws. Stefanik, in response, said Hamas uses civilians as shields, while ‘Israel has great respect when it comes to human rights’ and ‘that’s why the United States stands fully with Israel, and that’s why they need to be a voice of truth, as those antisemitic propaganda are being shared around the world and being shared by perpetrators who support this terrorism.’ 

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS