Archive

2024

Browsing

Former USMNT standout Landon Donovan was named the interim coach of the NWSL club on Friday. Donovan will get right to work – his first game as interim head coach will be on Tuesday in San Diego’s Concacaf W Champions Cup opening match against Santa Fe FC in Panama City, Panama.

“We are thrilled to have Landon (Donovan) join the club and lead the team for the remainder of the season, including the first-ever Concacaf W Champions Cup,’ Wave FC sporting director and general manager Camille Ashton said in a statement on Friday. ‘Landon’s level of knowledge, understanding, and experience as both a player and a coach, provides us with a leader that can help guide this club to where we want to be – in a playoff position and competing for a championship. His passion for this city and growing the game, along with having a player-first mentality, make him a natural fit for this club.” 

Donovan is succeeding former interim coach Paul Buckle, who will return to ‘personal commitments’ after leading the team through the summer following Casey Stoney’s firing in late June. ‘We want to thank Paul for his professionalism and honoring his commitment to see us through this summer window,” Ashton said.

Donovan, a California native, is one of the greatest American soccer players of all time. He won six MLS Cups (2001, 2003, 2005, 2011, 2012, 2014) while playing for the San Jose Earthquakes and LA Galaxy and earned the league’s Golden Boot honor in 2008.

On the international stage, Donovan made 157 appearances for the United States men’s national team from 2000-2014. He currently holds the record for most international assists (58) and is tied with Clint Dempsey for the most international goals scored by an American player (57). He’s the only American to eclipse 50 assists and 50 goals in his international career.

The Wave FC lineup includes Olympic gold medalist Alex Morgan and Naomi Girma, who won an Olympic gold medal with the USWNT at the 2024 Paris Olympics earlier this month. San Diego Wave FC is 10th in the NWSL standings, as of Friday evening.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

MASON, Ohio — In a tournament littered with upsets thus far, Friday reached a new level at the Cincinnati Open.

Veteran Gael Monfils (ranked No. 46 in the world), who hadn’t won a set in two previous matchups against Carlos Alcaraz, resumed play against the World No. 3 Friday on Center Court having dropped the first set Thursday night.

‘I felt like it was the worst match that I’ve ever played in my career,’ Alcaraz said in his post-match press conference.

The 37-year-old Monfils is the second-oldest player to defeat a top-3 player this century, trailing only Roger Federer, who at 38 defeated Novak Djokovic in the 2019 Nitto ATP Finals. Monfils was 8-30 all-time against top-3 players heading into the matchup with Alcaraz.

When play resumed Friday, Alcaraz, who is chasing a return to the top of the ATP rankings, couldn’t find the form that put him on the doorstep of a quarterfinal berth the night before.

The 21-year-old phenom destroyed a racket after Monfils held serve for a 3-1 lead in the third set and couldn’t break the elder Frenchman, who is one victory away from his first Cincinnati Open quarterfinals appearance since 2011.

‘I don’t know what happened,’ Alcaraz said, adding that Center Court was faster than the surfaces on previous practice sessions. ‘I couldn’t control myself. I couldn’t be better. So this match, it was impossible to win, and that’s all.’

Alcaraz heads to New York, Monfils plays again Friday

Alcaraz needed at least a quarterfinals berth in Cincinnati to pass Novak Djokovic for the No. 2 spot in the ATP Rankings. Now staying put at No. 3, Alcaraz heads to New York looking to win his second U.S. Open in three years.

Monfils will play during Friday’s night session against Holger Rune for a spot in the Cincinnati Open quarterfinals.

► The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fast.Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Famed dirt-track racing legend Scott Bloomquist died Friday in a single-plane crash near the city of Mooresburg in Hawkins County, Tennessee. He was 60.

The Hawkins County Sheriff’s Office said a small plane crashed Friday morning into a barn near the Bloomquist family farm and the Scott Bloomquist Racing team shop in Mooresburg. The lone person on board was Bloomquist, according to the sheriff’s office. The FAA investigation into the crash is ongoing.

The World of Outlaws Late Models series released a statement on Bloomquist’s death, saying the ‘legendary’ driver’s ‘passion for the sport and innovative mind will be deeply missed by all.’

The county’s rescue squad first reported news of a crash via Facebook at 7:47 a.m. Friday.

Bloomquist was known as one of the premier dirt super late model drivers from the late 1980s through the 2010s, winning 33 World of Outlaws Late Model races and 94 Lucas Oil Late Model races among a long list of accomplishments on dirt. He last won the Lucas Oil Late Model series season title in 2016.

Tributes have been posted across social media throughout Friday morning by Bloomquist’s friends and competitors.

‘Scott Bloomquist was one of a kind, and he’s probably the smartest guy I’ve ever been around when it comes to dirt racing. What he could do behind the wheel of a racecar was matched by the ingenuity he put into building his racecars. He was a force on the track and off, with a personality as big as his list of accomplishments. He made dirt racing better with a presence that will be greatly missed,’ former NASCAR champion Tony Stewart wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter.

More Bloomquist tributes from the motor racing world

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Members of minority groups in Bangladesh spoke to Fox News Digital about the violence and mistreatment they have faced following the government’s collapse earlier this month, all using false names for fear of reprisal.

Violence, even murder and the burning down of minority-owned businesses, places of worship and residences have been a major problem since the government of former Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina was overthrown following violent protests. Bangladesh is 90% Muslim, with some Christians but mostly Hindus and Buddhists making up the rest of the population.

Sathya, a Hindu from Chittagong, told Fox News Digital that the Hasina government ‘wasn’t the best’ towards the Hindu minority, pointing out cases of land-grabbing of Hindu homes and temples under her governance, but suggested that they faced better treatment than under other governments – ‘the lesser evil,’ but only when ‘we are out of options.’  

‘Hindus have always been the ‘scapegoats’ and were blamed whenever there was an economic crisis or other political issue that we had no control over,’ Sathya said. Indian outlet the Deccan Herald reported that 278 Hindu-owned locations have been ransacked since Hasina fled the country. 

He claimed that if a Hindu home sat empty, squatters would intrude and start building, and the government and legal system would do little to help protect Hindu land rights. Mobs would walk in and take whatever they wanted, such as furniture, cash and food.

Even within the Muslim community, the Ahmadiya sect has faced persecution from the Sunni majority who call them ‘heretics,’ Ali, told Fox News Digital. ‘Our group has also been increasingly targeted just like the Hindus and other religious minorities.’

A Bangladeshi citizen who now lives in the U.S., says that when he looks at his homeland, he sees ‘no law and order’ and that ‘Hindus have to stay vigilant, especially at night, worried that our homes will be raided and looted.’ 

‘The government seems to not care about minorities,’ he said while withholding his name. ‘A hotline was provided for Hindus to call if they are targeted, but nobody answers the phone number provided.’ 

‘Even though the region in general is a Buddhist minority today, Buddhism originated not far from here in nearby Nepal and has had a very long history here and is one of the major world religions. We wonder why the rest of the world stays silent when we are in such a crisis,’ Rajarshi, told Fox News Digital. 

He felt that the latest violence portrays that any group that is not Sunni is not safe. ‘What’s the use of all of us having fought for independence from Pakistan if we are told we have no place in this country now?’ 

While Christians make up a tiny minority of the country’s population, Fox News Digital recently reported that the organization Open Doors, which tracks discrimination of Christians worldwide, ranked Bangladesh as having ‘very high’ persecution levels, claiming that ‘converts to Christianity face the most severe restrictions, discrimination and attacks.’

‘Religious beliefs are tied to the identity of the community, so turning from the locally dominant faith to following Jesus can result in accusations of betrayal,’ the group wrote on its website. ‘Bangladeshi converts often gather in small house churches due to the risk of attack.’

Earlier this week Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi wrote on social media platform X that he had spoken with the country’s interim leader Professor Muhammad Yunus, and the duo had ‘exchanged views on the prevailing situation.’

‘Reiterated India’s support for a democratic, stable, peaceful and progressive Bangladesh,’ Modi wrote. ‘He assured protection, safety and security of Hindus and all minorities in Bangladesh.’ 

The Washington Post reported that Modi’s government had pressured the United States to ease up on criticism of then-Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, and the Biden administration complied – even putting plans for further sanctions against the Bangladeshi government on hold. 

The U.S. State Department told Fox News Digital that ‘Our sustained engagement on democracy and human rights in Bangladesh and around the world speaks for itself,’ and added that ‘We do not comment on our private diplomatic communications.’

Bangladesh re-elected Hasina’s Awami League party in January, extending its rule, which had started in 2008, prompting student protests at universities that ultimately spilled out into nationwide demonstrations against the party’s rule. 

Both the party and its leader have faced accusations of ‘iron-fisted’ and authoritarian rule, with many claiming the 2014 and 2018 elections as ‘shams’ since the opposition either boycotted or were reduced to a ‘hopeless minority,’ according to the New Yorker. 

Shrinking employment and high inflation marred the Awami League’s last term, and the economic stress proved too much for many, especially a new policy that implemented a quota for civil service work – thereby withholding coveted jobs in what the protesters claimed was a kleptocratic move. 

Ultimately, Hasina resigned and fled to India, taking many by surprise but allowing the protesters to have the change they wanted, which included putting humanitarian and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Professor Muhammad Yunus in place as the chief adviser to the interim government ahead of fresh elections in November.

Student protesters plan to create a new party to contest the elections and end the two-party monopoly that has burdened the country for almost two decades, Reuters reported. The student groups at the center of the protest want to talk with citizens across the country before deciding on their platform and will finalize their decision in a month. 

‘We don’t have any other plan that could break the binary without forming a party,’ Tamid Chowdhury, one of the student coordinators at the center of the push to oust Hasina, told reporters. 

Another student said that the ‘spirit of the movement was to create a new Bangladesh, one where no fascist or autocrat can return.’ 

‘To ensure that, we need structural reforms, which will definitely take some time,’ Nahid Islam, a protester who took up a role in Yunus’s temporary cabinet, explained. 

Reuters contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

An ad campaign targeting fast-food chains and a TikTok-viral appetizer helped Chili’s same-store sales climb nearly 15% in its latest quarter.

But Kevin Hochman, CEO of parent company Brinker International, told CNBC that the chain’s strong performance is just a sign that customers are finally catching onto the chain’s two-year turnaround.

Shares of Brinker have climbed 53% this year, bringing its market value up to $2.99 billion. However, the stock closed 10.7% lower Wednesday after the company disappointed analysts with weaker-than-expected earnings and a conservative outlook for its fiscal 2025.

Shares were up 7% in afternoon trading on Thursday, rebounding from what BMO Capital Markets called an “overreaction” from investors. KeyBanc Capital Markets also upgraded the stock on Thursday, saying that its quarterly results were misunderstood.

Forecast aside, Chili’s made even StreetAccount’s same-store sales estimates of 8.6% growth look cautious. Its 14.8% same-store sales growth puts it in rare company, joining Chipotle and Wingstop as the few public restaurants reporting strong traffic and same-store sales growth at a time when many consumers are pulling back their spending, putting pressure on the industry. Chili’s casual-dining rivals like Applebee’s, owned by Dine Brands, and Bloomin’ Brands’ Outback Steakhouse, reported same-store sales declines for their latest quarters.

“This is just a whole ’nother step change in the business,” Hochman said. “I think sky’s the limit for this brand.”

About 60% of Chili’s growth in its latest quarter came from its $10.99 Big Smasher meal, according to Hochman. The chain promoted the deal by taking aim at fast-food rivals in TV ads.

“We had tapped into this insight that we were seeing in social media months prior, that customers were upset about where fast-food prices were going,” Hochman said. “The advertising clearly touched a nerve on that.”

Another successful menu item for Chili’s this quarter was its Triple Dipper, which lets diners select three appetizers and dips. The item went viral on TikTok in May. Hochman estimates that the Triple Dipper accounted for about 40% of the chain’s sales growth.

But the popularity of both the Triple Dipper and the Big Smasher created new problems for Chili’s. Its restaurants have to be prepared to serve the influx of customers, many of whom were trying Chili’s for the first time or returning after a long time away. Hochman said Chili’s has been investing in labor for the last two years — from hiring bussers to adding more cooks — but those steps pressured its bottom line this quarter.

Chili’s turnaround has touched more than just its workforce, according to Hochman.

Under his leadership, the company has spent the last two years trying to grow sales profitably. Chili’s has culled its menu, shedding about 22% of items.

Brinker has also ended some less profitable strategies to attract customers. Chili’s doesn’t offer as many coupons as it once did, and Brinker pulled the plug on its Maggiano’s Italian Classics virtual brand.

At the same time, Chili’s also leaned into value ahead of the competition, who are now rolling out their own deals. But Hochman is confident that Chili’s can hold onto its lead — and the new customers that TikTok and TV ads have brought.

“We’ve been advertising our value for almost 18 months, and a lot of folks are coming late to the game, and sometimes it’s more aggressive value, and they just don’t have the awareness that we have, because we’ve been at it a while,” he said.

But as Brinker heads into a new fiscal year, holding onto its new customers could prove to be difficult. A plethora of restaurants, from McDonald’s to Outback Steakhouse, have unveiled value meals meant to appeal to diners seeking discounts. And customers could keep cutting back their restaurant visits to save money. Prices for food away from home, which have risen 4.1% over the last 12 months, have stayed relatively sticky.

For Brinker’s fiscal 2025, which kicked off in July, the company is anticipating earnings per share of $4.35 to $4.75 and revenue growth of 3% to 4.6%. Investors were expecting a stronger outlook for growth, given Chili’s recent success. But Brinker is playing it safe in case the economy worsens.

“It’s important for our team to set goals that we think are achievable,” Hochman said.

″[The economy] certainly has taken a turn for the worse in the past three to four months,” he added.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

The three years following the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan have been a deadly game of cat and mouse for employees and allies of U.S. and NATO forces left behind under Taliban rule. Among the de facto government’s targets are thousands of Afghan prosecutors trained by U.S. personnel to enforce the rule of law and prosecute terrorists.

As the Taliban rapidly gained Afghan territory in the summer of 2021, they released convicted terrorists from government jails across the country. The Taliban had been conducting deadly attacks to target Afghan prosecutors for years before taking over Kabul on Aug. 15. The newly-released prisoners were out for revenge against the prosecutors who put them behind bars.

Joe Maida IV was a former Texas prosecutor who supported the Afghan legal system’s growth inside the country between 2006 and 2013 and worked on Afghan policy at U.S. Special Operations Command and with Special Operations and Combating Terrorism at the Pentagon through 2019. He told Fox News Digital that ‘The Taliban continues to hunt down individuals who supported the Afghan government.’ In addition to military personnel, Maida says the Taliban ‘are seeking out terrorism prosecutors for retribution. They’re doing that by sending special teams to the provinces, but then also writing letters to the mosques to identify these individuals, who then disappear.’

Saeed, who spoke to Fox News Digital on condition that he is identified by a pseudonym, is the executive director of the Afghan Prosecutors Association and was a prosecutor in the Attorney General’s Office of Afghanistan. Saeed provided an Excel file the Afghan Prosecutors Association has compiled containing details about 32 prosecutors and their family members who have been killed since July 5, 2021. 

Victims’ manners of death are gruesome. Most were shot, either in a public location or at their homes. Some were killed by anonymous gunmen, while others were specifically murdered by the Taliban. Two prosecutors were killed by improvised explosive devices. Others were arrested and tortured. Three victims were women. More than a third of the entries included photos of the victim after their death. 

Saeed said that an additional 100 prosecutors have been injured since the U.S. withdrawal, and another 50 are believed to be ‘locked up in Taliban prisons and their fate is unknown.’ 

About 1,000 of the 3,800 prosecutors believed to be in practice prior to August 2021 have fled to European countries, Saeed estimates. He said that 1,500 who remain stuck in Afghanistan are ‘in need of urgent assistance.’ Saeed believes that about 500 prosecutors fled to Pakistan, Tajikistan and Iran, where they live in ‘a state of despair’ amid harassment and forced deportations. 

Legal professionals who protected women’s rights have also seen their efforts made null and void under the Taliban. One of thousands of hidden Afghan legal professionals, Amina spoke to Fox News Digital on condition that she was referred to by a pseudonym. Amina said she was ‘on the verge of qualifying to be a lawyer’ when the government collapsed. In 2021, Amina was working as an assistant lawyer in the Kabul courts, focusing on domestic violence cases.

According to a report by the United States Institute for Peace, divorce is no longer a legal option for women in Afghanistan, with the Taliban issuing a blanket revocation of all divorce decrees granted by the prior Afghan government in March 2023. With domestic abuse shelters closed since August 2021, women experiencing violence at the hands of their husbands are now taken to Taliban jails, where some Afghan women have reportedly been raped and even murdered by the Taliban.

Amina says she has felt personally responsible for not ‘doing enough to educate women about human rights.’ She now devotes herself to educating Afghan women online and providing mental health consultations for Afghans in crisis. ‘This is the time that my people need me,’ she explained. 

Many U.S.-based attorneys have joined the fight to support Afghan prosecutors, including East Baton Rouge District Attorney Hillar Moore. As a member of the Association of Prosecuting Attorneys (APA), Moore has been supporting prosecutors in their fight to remain alive in Afghanistan. Moore told Fox News Digital that the APA is in touch with ‘hundreds of prosecutors who are now begging for help.’ He estimates that about 20% of Afghan prosecutors and judges were women and are at special risk inside their country. 

Unlike military translators and employees of American institutions, prosecutors did not serve the U.S. directly and are not eligible for special immigrant visas. Legislative efforts to extend access to the SIV program, including the Afghan Adjustment Act and Afghan Allies Protection Act, have not gained passage in Congress. 

Some legislators have expressed concern about the vetting process for Afghan refugees. Moore explained that prosecutors ‘have been vetted repeatedly’ and have ‘passed background checks that most American citizens could never pass,’ which informs his opinion that ‘there’s little to fear and much to be gained by helping these people resettle in the United States.’ 

To help prosecutors reach safety three years after the U.S. withdrawal, Moore said the APA is raising funds to move the 1,500 prosecutors living in hiding in Afghanistan to safe third countries. The estimated cost will be around $15 million, about $10,000 per family.

There is some hope that government support for prosecutors is forthcoming. Moore said that the State Department ‘has been more receptive to including former prosecutors, especially women,’ in the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP). Moore reported that the APA has been working on getting prosecutors’ applications ready for review. 

A State Department spokesperson did not respond to questions about whether it is working to include prosecutors in the USRAP. The spokesperson said that the State Department ‘remain[s] focused on honoring our promises to these allies and are grateful to the Americans from all walks of life who have helped us welcome more than 160,000 Afghans to communities across the United States during the past three years.’ 

Saeed was referred to the Priority-1 program within the USRAP three months ago and recently received his notification of acceptance. He now awaits his interview and at least 12–18 months of processing. 

Saeed desperately longs for peace. In 2020, he was targeted for death by Talibs released from prison. After the Taliban searched his home in December 2022, he fled to Pakistan to protect himself and his family. Saeed says he still experiences ‘a hopeless and problematic situation’ inside Pakistan, where the cost of living is high and refugees cannot work or seek education for their children. 

Threats of deportation continue to loom, with Pakistan deporting thousands of Afghan refugees illegally into the country in November 2023. Though Afghans with letters verifying they have a pending application for a pathway to safety in the U.S. were meant to be protected from deportation, a source who asked to remain anonymous told Fox News Digital that in July, Pakistan deported some Afghans with USRAP referrals. A State Department spokesperson told Fox News Digital that they ‘have no comment on this specific incident.’ 

The issue of aiding prosecutors is personal for Kevin Rardin, a career prosecutor with the Memphis District Attorney’s office, who was also a Judge Advocate in the Army Reserves. As the legal advisor to the commander of the U.S. and NATO training mission, Rardin was a mentor for his Afghan counterparts. He told Fox News Digital that ‘the worst days of my deployment came 13 years after I left the country, in August 2021.’ 

‘You don’t have to be a lawyer to understand that this is wrong. You just have to be a decent person with moral principles,’ Rardin continued. ‘When I was in Afghanistan, Afghans protected me. They kept me out of trouble, they introduced me to their culture. They accepted me, I ate with them. They included me. And now we just up and left. You can’t call yourself a human being and do that.’ 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The Los Angeles Dodgers placed All-Star right-hander Tyler Glasnow on the 15-day injured list Friday with right elbow tendonitis.

To take his spot on the roster, the Dodgers recalled left-hander Justin Wrobleski, who started Friday’s game at St. Louis.

Glasnow, who turns 31 next week, is headed to the IL for the second time in the past two months. He was unable to pitch in July’s All-Star Game because of back tightness.

In his ninth major league season, the oft-injured Glasnow already has career highs in starts (22) and innings pitched (134) this season. He is 9-6 in his first season with the Dodgers and has a 3.49 ERA.

In 149 career appearances (110 starts) for the Pittsburgh Pirates (2016-18), Tampa Bay Rays (2018-23) and Dodgers, the native of Southern California is 39-33 with a 3.81 ERA.

All things Dodgers: Latest Los Angeles Dodgers news, schedule, roster, stats, injury updates and more.

Wrobleski, 24, made his major league debut on July 7 and went 0-1 with a 4.05 ERA in four starts.

The Dodgers’ starting staff has struggled with injuries this season. Right-hander Yoshinobu Yamamoto is nearing a return from a shoulder injury, while Walker Buehler just returned from Tommy John surgery and a separate bout with hip inflammation.

Clayton Kershaw has made four starts after offseason shoulder surgery, and promising rookie right-hander River Ryan was lost for the remainder of the season with a right elbow injury.

The Dodgers also sent infielder/outfielder Chris Taylor on a rehab assignment to Triple-A Oklahoma City on Friday. Taylor, who has struggled this season with a .167 batting average and a .542 OPS, has not played since July 24 because of a groin injury.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Lawyers for the plaintiffs in the proposed multi-billion-dollar settlement of three athlete-compensation antitrust cases against the NCAA and the Power Five conferences on Friday unloaded a sharply worded response to multiple filings last week that asked a federal judge in California to refuse to provide preliminary approval of the deal.

Taken together, last week’s arguments sought to raise myriad issues about the deal, including whether it undervalues the claims, discriminates against female athletes, creates another illegal cap on compensation and involves inappropriate fee provisions for the plaintiffs’ attorneys.

The proposed settlement includes, among its main elements, nearly $2.8 billion in damages that would go to current and former athletes over 10 years. It also would allow Division I schools to start paying athletes directly for use of their name, image and likeness (NIL), subject to a per-school cap that would increase over time and be based on a percentage of certain athletics revenues.

A hearing on the motion for preliminary approval is set to occur before U.S. District Judge Claudia Wilken on Sept. 5.

At the outset of their filing Friday, the plaintiffs’ lawyers wrote: “Objectors’ attempt to argue that this landmark settlement fails to satisfy the preliminary approval test is frivolous. The relief is comparable to what class members might achieve at trial, but only after more years of litigation facing an uncertain outcome.”

The plaintiffs’ lawyers did offer a clarification aimed at one group of settlement opponents — attorneys for plaintiffs in a separate lawsuit concerning Ivy League schools’ refusal to award athletic scholarships filed an opposition to the proposed settlement that seeks a carve-out for their claims.

In Friday’s filings, the plaintiffs’ lawyers in these cases wrote that the parties to the proposed settlement have agreed that the deal “is not intended to release, and does not release” the claims in the Ivy League case and: “We will amend the settlement notice documents (that would go out to affected athletes) to make this distinction clear…”

The plaintiffs’ lawyers also offered the same statement about another ongoing case, one claiming that athletes should be considered employees of their schools under federal minimum-wage law.

(Lawyers for the NCAA and the conferences reiterated these two points in a separate filing Friday night in support of the proposed settlement.) 

Otherwise, the plaintiffs’ lawyers vigorously defended the proposed settlement, which also allows them to ask the judge to approve up to $495.2 million in fees, plus ‘out-of-pocket expenses’ from the damages pool.

They addressed challenges that the overall value of the proposed deal was affected by a series of trade-offs within its various components. They wrote that the proposed changes in NCAA rules that would occur under an injunction and each of the various monetary damages claims were addressed separately during negotiating sessions with mediator Eric Green. To back that, they provided a written, signed declaration from Green to that effect. Green also wrote that “any attorney fee provisions attributed to the injunctive relief settlement were not negotiated until the entire settlement agreement, including damages, was finalized.”

The plaintiffs’ lawyers said that there is “no merit to the Objectors’ claim” that the proposed settlement is “inadequate because … it does not remove all limits on compensation.” Since a settlement “is, by nature, a compromise, it need not remove all future limits on competition to be reasonable and adequate.”

Citing cases involving the NFL and the NBA, the plaintiffs’ lawyers — among whom is renown pro sports labor attorney Jeffrey Kessler — argued that settlements of previous antitrust cases “challenging athlete compensation restraints have allowed defendants to impose some restraints going forward — like compensation caps — in exchange for the elimination of other restraints on athlete compensation.’

Under the proposed NCAA settlement, it is estimated that each Division I school would be able to start paying its athletes as much as $20 million to $22 million directly for use of their NIL. And that amount would increase over time. Meanwhile, NCAA leaders would seek to engineer rules changes eliminating longstanding, sport-by-sport scholarship limits and replacing them with a new set of roster-size limits.

Noting Kessler’s experience representing pro sports labor unions, the plaintiffs’ lawyers contend that all of this will “enhance, not detract from the bargaining power of athletes if collective bargaining becomes possible,” a concept that would be allowed under the settlement.

“The unique experience of … counsel in negotiating revenue sharing systems for professional athletes provided Class Counsel with special expertise to negotiate the injunctive relief settlement here,” the plaintiffs wrote. Lawyers for the set of settlement opponents who raised questions about the value of the proposed deal “do not have any such experience, which limits their ability to assess the value of the injunctive relief settlement terms.”

The plaintiffs’ lawyers also took aim at these settlement opponents’ economic consultant, who placed the value of one component of the damages claims at $24.3 billion, while that component would be settled for $600 million out of a total damages settlement of about $2.8 billion. They called the settlement opponents’ methodology “deeply flawed” because they say it is based in part on certain types of schools’ athletics revenues that are “not attributable to the performance of athletes.”

In an email, one of the plaintiffs’ lead attorneys, Steve Berman, said of these settlement opponents: “These objections are a thinly veiled and last ditch effort to get a seat at the table. They are based on voodoo economics and damage numbers and flat out misstatements of the settlement and the negotiation history. A shameful effort to stand in the way of a [$]20 billion plus change in college athletics.”

As for the opposition based on the proposed settlement’s treatment of female athletes, arguments based in part on damages for name, image and likeness (NIL) opportunities that athletes allegedly lost because of NCAA restrictions, the plaintiffs wrote that it is “misplaced.”

“The NIL Settlement,” the plaintiffs wrote “appropriately provides relief for antitrust violations that harmed Settlement class members’ ability to earn NIL compensation in the constrained market, which, for better or for worse, has historically been driven by Division I football and men’s basketball. … The Objectors’ claims of historic gender discrimination belong in a different case in a different forum.”

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

In the late 1970s, ‘Saturday Night Live’ ran a sketch with Chevy Chase and Richard Pryor in which the black and white comedians engaged in a word association game that consisted of them hurling racial slurs at each other, culminating in the racial slur. 

It was hilarious and something that would never be broadcast today. But what can be broadcast today was the bizarre ‘white guy taco’ comedy skit that Kamala Harris and Tim Walz released this week.

In the clearly scripted and cringworthy clip, Harris asks Walz if, as a white guy, his tacos consist of mayonnaise and tuna. Then folksy old Tim chuckles and says something about how black pepper is the hottest thing he, as a white guy, eats. 

Setting aside the fact that white people eat spicy foods like buffalo wings at a rate that boggles the mind, this bit exposes the hypocrisy of the progressive left’s view of race.

It is obvious to everyone that the Harris-Walz campaign would not release a video in which he jokes about Kamala eating fried chicken. This is because in the 1980s and 1990s new rules emerged under which races were not to be treated equally but differently, depending on their perceived place in the hierarchy of power.

This change meant that Chevy Chase could no longer use the N word for a joke, but Richard Pryor could still use ‘cracker.’ This is a double standard that many people have grown uncomfortable with, and we are seeing a lot of it from the Harris campaign.

In both the white women and white dude Zoom calls that were held in support of Kamala, the clear message was that white people are to blame for Donald Trump, and everything else they think is wrong with the country, and now white people must accept that guilt, and graciously hand power over to wiser people of color.

Just as in the case of cultural appropriation, where white culture is the only one that belongs to everyone, making white people the only group that can be the butt of derogatory jokes, or told their skin color makes them guilty of something, centers whiteness in exactly the way the left pretends to reject.

In a very real way, progressives are creating the white supremacy they say they oppose by making white people the only ones strong enough to handle a joke or to see their cultural traditions adopted by others. 

Now, the Left will argue that Harris was ‘punching up,’ with her tuna and mayo joke, and that Walz would be ‘punching down’ if he joked about Black or Indian food. But that is a perverse and un-American way to think about human beings. Nobody is above or below anyone else because of their skin color.

The silly sketch from the Democratic ticket isn’t horrible racism that requires a march on Washington, but the Harris campaign picked that specific joke and it’s not an isolated incident. Walz as the self-deprecating white guy, sitcom dad is clearly a theme they are pushing.

More and more Americans, especially those four generations removed from the successes of the civil rights movement, are not comfortable with this racial double standard, and for that reason alone we should knock it off.

From the 1950s through the 1980’s, comedy was an essential tool in overcoming racism in America, but it worked precisely because, as with Chase and Pryor, everyone was subject to the jokes. That was equality.

The Harris campaign, much more so than the Biden campaign, is seeking to treat Americans not as equal and unique individuals, but as members of their racial group, with separate Zoom calls and rules about jokes. 

It is well past time for Americans to reject this kind of thinking and return to the very simple and easy way of treating everyone the same way regardless of their race. Sadly, that is not something Harris and her campaign seem to want. Instead, they want us focused time and again on skin color.

For now, the Tim Walz white guy minstrel show goes on, but it is not funny, it is not helpful to anyone, and it is a show that deserves to be canceled. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Romanian gymnast Ana Bărbosu addressed Jordan Chiles as she received her Olympic bronze medal for the floor exercise on Friday amid an ongoing scoring controversy that could see Chiles lose the bronze medal she was initially awarded. 

The official medal ceremony in Bucharest, Romania, came just one day after the International Olympic Committee (IOC) gave the go-ahead to Romanian officials. ​​Bărbosu offered words of encouragement to Chiles and Romanian teammate Sabrina Voinea at the event. 

“I can’t help but think about Sabrina and Jordan right now,” Bărbosu said in Romanian. “It’s a difficult situation for us, with so many uncertainties and overwhelming emotions. I hope everyone understands that we have not done anything wrong at the Olympics. And that the Olympic spirit is more important than any misunderstanding between the authorities.”

“I want to believe that the day will come when all three of us will receive a bronze medal,” she added. 

Bărbosu and Voinea received the same score for their routines, but Bărbosu won the tiebreaker with a higher execution score. 

2024 Paris Olympics: Follow USA TODAY’s coverage of the biggest names and stories of the Games.

Chiles was originally awarded the bronze medal in Paris ahead of the two Romanians after her coach, Cecile Landi, submitted an inquiry that increased her difficulty score. The Court of Arbitration for Sport later overturned this inquiry due to an alleged time violation, which dropped Chiles’ score to fifth place — behind the Romanians. U.S. officials dispute the alleged time violation. 

Bărbosu received her medal — different from the one Chiles is reportedly still in possession of — from IOC member Octavian Morariu and Mihai Covaliu, president of the Romanian Olympic and Sports Committee. Romanian Prime Minister Marcel Ciolacu was also in attendance.

‘I did not realize how heavy it is,’ Bărbosu told the audience at the ceremony. ‘I am glad to be in possession of this medal and I hope to continue to represent Romania at the highest level.’

Chiles broke her silence on the controversy Thursday, posting a statement to social media saying the decision ‘feels unjust’ and that she has been subject to ‘racially driven attacks’ online. 

“I will approach this challenge as I have others — and will make every effort to ensure that justice is done,” Chiles wrote. “I believe that at the end of this journey, the people in control will do the right thing.” 

This post appeared first on USA TODAY