Archive

2024

Browsing

A focus group of Democrats, independents and Republicans reacted to the moment when Gov. Tim Walz called himself a ‘knucklehead’ for claiming to have been in Hong Kong during the Tiananmen Square massacre.

Moderators confronted Walz on the claim during the CBS News Vice Presidential Debate Tuesday night. Walz admitted that he only traveled to Asia in August 1989, several months after the April 15 massacre. The focus group found that voters were initially skeptical of Walz’s answer, but he eventually recovered.

‘Can you explain that discrepancy?’ a moderator asked, as the focus group remained neutral.

‘Look, I grew up in small rural Nebraska, a town of 400. A town that you rode your bikes with your buddies until the streetlights come on, and I’m proud of that service. I joined the national guard at 17, worked on family farms, and then I used the GI bill to become a teacher. Passionate about it. Young teacher. My first year out, I got the opportunity in the summer of ’89 to travel to China–35 years ago, to be able to do that,’ Walz said.

‘I came back home and started a program to take young people there. We would take basketball teams, we would take baseball teams, we would take dancers, and we would go back and forth to China,’ he added.

The focus group showed support from Republicans, independents and Democrats all going down for Walz during the first portion of his response.

However, Walz recovered among independents and Democrats when he went on to admit that he can be ‘a knucklehead at times.’

‘Many times I will talk a lot. I will get caught up in the rhetoric,’ he said, as support from independents rose above 50% in the focus group.

Walz’s support among Republicans dipped to its lowest point – under 10% – when he said former President Donald Trump would have benefited from participating in one of his China trips, arguing Trump would never have befriended Chinese President Xi Jinping.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

In his remarks during last week’s United Nations General Assembly, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian, claimed that Iran wants to ‘live in peace.’ He demanded ‘a world free of nuclear weapons,’ and declared that Iran ‘is ready to disarm,’ if Israel does the same.

But just two weeks prior, Iran and its fellow dictatorship Russia were slapped with new economic sanctions by the Biden-Harris administration for Tehran’s delivery of ballistic missiles to Moscow. In fact, the national security community is increasingly concerned about the growing relations between two of America’s top adversaries. However, as Team Biden-Harris is hyper-focused on the threat this unholy alliance poses elsewhere in the world – Ukraine, the Middle East – what about us? Is anyone in charge of protecting our homeland?

As a former U.S. intelligence analyst who led Red Teams during war games, my team’s job was to come up with, thinking like our adversaries, out-of-the-ordinary ideas – no matter how implausible – that Red Force (Russia, Iran, etc.) could use against Blue Force (U.S. and Allied militaries). The goal was to enable the president, the Pentagon and other decision makers to develop plans for countering our adversaries and protecting the homeland. Here are a few insights, from the intelligence perspective, that make the Iran-Russia threat even bigger than most Americans realize. 

First, neither Russian nor Iranian leaders respect the Biden-Harris administration, making them more likely to act more aggressively against the United States. As a clear sign of indifference to Washington’s ire, two days after the new sanctions went into effect, Russian President Vladimir Putin held a meeting with Ali Ahmadian, secretary of the Supreme National Security Council of Iran. In it, he praised the supreme leader of the Islamic Republic, Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei, for fostering ‘additional momentum’ in Russian-Iranian relations and thanked Pezeshkian’s team for making the relationship a ‘priority.’ Five days later, Putin dispatched his top security official, Sergei Shoigu, to Tehran, where Shoigu held secret talks with Pezeshkian. 

Neither Russia nor Iran is afraid of economic sanctions. They’ve used loopholes in the sanctions regime to circumvent them and found alternative ways to finance their policy priorities and military programs. Despite the fact that the U.S., European Union (EU) and its Western allies banned nearly all Russian imports at the start of the war in Ukraine, Western nations purchased $2 billion worth of Russian oil indirectly through Turkey.  

In 2023, the Biden-Harris administration released $6 billion in unfrozen assets to Iran as part of the deal to release five American hostages in exchange for five Iranians held in U.S. prisons. It is almost a certainty that some of those funds were diverted by Iran toward its military programs and to train and equip its proxy terrorist groups, such as Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis.

Sanctions, therefore, are an optics instrument that politicians use to virtue signal that they are doing something in response to hostile foreign activities. They have not and will not change the behavior of our adversaries.

Second, both Putin and the ayatollahs understand that as Team Biden-Harris is focused on European and Ukrainian security, security inside the homeland isn’t taken seriously, presenting a vulnerability to be exploited. Explaining the decision for the new sanctions package, Secretary of State Antony Blinken expressed concern that Moscow will ‘likely use… Iranian ballistic missiles… against Ukraine.’ Blinken characterized the weapons trade between Moscow and Tehran as a ‘threat to European security.’ 

The Biden-Harris administration has approved billions of dollars for Ukraine to aid its defense against Russia, even as our own Secret Service is in crisis due to staffing shortages, high levels of turnover, inadequate training and incompetence of some of its personnel.

Two failed assassination attempts on former President Trump, during which would-be assassins were able to penetrate the security perimeter of the protectee, clearly demonstrate that the level of protection the Secret Service delivers is low. If security for a former president, with all the law enforcement personnel surrounding him 24/7, can be breached by an amateur, an operative trained and resourced by a state-actor like Iran or Russia, can do so much more damage. It also means that other targets – government buildings, military installations, critical infrastructure – are likely to be equally vulnerable. Saying nothing of soft targets, such as shopping malls and other public spaces. 

Third, Russia and Iran have the capabilities and political will to conduct hostile clandestine operations inside the U.S. The recent arrest in New York of a Iranian-linked Pakistani man who plotted to kill American leaders, highly likely including Trump, is just one example of Iran’s ongoing policy of infiltrating operatives inside the U.S. for nefarious purposes.

Moreover, according to a 2024 report by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Iran has been developing ‘surrogate networks inside the United States’ for ‘more than a decade.’ This assessment is consistent with a warning contained in another report about Iran’s plans to attack strategic security assets and institutions in the U.S. The report, titled ‘The Unseen Threat of the Mapping Project,’ claims that Iranian elements have identified 298 American strategic security assets and institutions, as well as personnel, for attacks, kidnappings and assassinations. 

Couple this with the fact that Russia, for decades, has been running an ‘illegals’ program aimed at maintaining networks of deep-cover sleeper agents inside the United States. In 2010, the FBI had to pull the plug on a 10-year counter-intelligence operation aimed at rooting out such a spy network inside the United States because one of the female spies was moving uncomfortably close in access to then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, her husband Bill Clinton, and members of their inner circle. The Russians almost certainly keep this program alive, now that the Biden-Harris open border policy has made it so much easier to infiltrate foreign operatives.

The Iranian regime has been funding anti-Israel protests on university campuses across the country. These ostensibly ‘grassroots activist’ groups, which sometimes don’t know who is behind them, present a vast pool of resources that could be weaponized, with the help of foreign clandestine operatives. What Putin and the ayatollahs want is to foment social unrest inside the United States, consistent with the Russian doctrine of ‘controlled instability.’

Fourth, should Russia and Iran join forces in strategic capabilities, the threat to homeland security could be catastrophic. The U.S. government investigation in the aftermath of the 9/11 terrorist attacks concluded that the government’s principal error was a failure to ‘connect the dots.’ In other words, the pieces of the puzzle were to be found in many corners of the U.S. government. Yet no one connected the dots, making it impossible to predict and preempt the attacks.

We are now living in a similar period. Our security apparatus is stretched thin, with analysts being pulled in many different directions – Ukraine, the Middle East, China. The same failure of imagination that plagued our intelligence in 2001 could prevent us from visualizing an impending threat coming from Iran-Russia cooperation. Below, I will connect the dots.

Putin spokesperson Dmitriy Peskov acknowledged that the two countries are cooperating, including on ‘the most sensitive’ areas,’ which he didn’t specify. As someone who spent my intelligence career tracking threats to our homeland, here they are – cyber attacks, space warfare and WMD. We are vulnerable in these areas due to our reliance on technology in military operations and civilian life.

Russia has the world’s most extensive nuclear know how, some of which it is likely sharing with Iran, which is already extremely close to operationalizing its atomic weapons. Russia is also sharing space launch technology with Iran, helping Tehran place its satellites into orbit. A multi-mission satellite network is a pre-requisite for missile warning, targeting, and command and control, including the employment of nuclear weapons. 

Russia has developed a comprehensive suite of counter-space weapons to target U.S. satellites during wartime and electronic warfare capabilities to disrupt the functioning of U.S. satellites in peacetime. Moscow has already used some of these capabilities during its war on Ukraine. It probably will share some of these technologies with Iran, which already has demonstrated jamming capabilities. 

U.S. airlines, which rely on GPS for flight navigation, are already concerned about becoming targets of GPS spoofing. Spoofing attacks have surged over the past six months, with most of them originating from electronic-warfare transmitters in Russia, Ukraine and Israel.

Russia already poses a chemical and biological weapons (CBW) threat and retains an undeclared chemical weapons program, having used them at least twice in recent years, according to a 2024 intelligence report. Iran continues ‘research and development of chemical and biological agents for offensive purposes.’ ‘Iranian military scientists have researched chemicals, toxins, and bioregulators, all of which have a wide range of sedation, dissociation, and amnestic incapacitating effects.’ 

Military ties between Moscow and Tehran are indeed the closest they’ve ever been, having strengthened dramatically on Biden-Harris’ watch. As we are nearing the presidential election and Team Biden-Harris continues to prioritize someone else’s security, Americans must decide which future president is more likely to place America’s security first. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz was not asked about several highly talked about news stories in the first and only vice presidential debate on Tuesday, including his military service, which Walz did not strongly invoke either. 

The CBS Vice Presidential Debate in New York City showcased the Republican and Democrat candidates answering questions on a variety of issues, but Walz’s military service, which he has faced sharp criticism from Republicans and some veterans for allegedly embellishing, was not asked about.

Walz only briefly mentioned his military service during the debate when he was forced to correct the record on whether he was in China for the Tiananmen Square protests.

At another point in the debate, Walz referred to himself as a ‘good soldier.’

Walz was also not asked during the debate about how many times he has visited China.

In the past, Walz has claimed he went ‘dozens of times’ and once claimed he went ‘about 30 times.’ This week, the Harris-Walz campaign walked that back and said the actual number is ‘closer to 15 times.’

Other questions Walz was not asked during the debate include his disputed claims about his wife’s IVF treatment and his claim that he carried weapons ‘in war.’

Despite CBS announcing that it would not allow live fact-checking during the debate, moderator Margaret Brennan interjected to correct Vance after he suggested that illegal immigrants are overwhelming resources in Springfield, Ohio.

‘Just to clarify for our viewers, Springfield, Ohio, does have a large number of Haitian migrants who have legal status, temporary protected status,’ Brennan said.

When Vance tried to push back on the fact-check, Brennan and her co-moderator Norah O’Donnell attempted to speak over Vance, insisting that they had to move on to the next question.

‘The rules were that you guys weren’t going to fact-check,’ Vance reminded them. ‘And since you are fact-checking me, I think it’s important to say what’s actually going on.’

While explaining the process of obtaining legal status and tying it to a Harris-backed immigration policy, the moderators again spoke over Vance, thanking him for ‘describing the legal process’ before they cut off his microphone as Walz attempted to argue with him.

Democrats quickly came out in support of Walz’s debate performance as it was unfolding, including Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg, who said Walz was ‘laying down facts.’

‘Gov Walz dominating JD Vance on the immigration exchange with undecided voters in a western battleground state,’ David Plouffe, campaign manager and White House Senior Advisor for Barack Obama and Senior Advisor for Kamala Harris for President, posted on X. ‘Reminding these voters Donald Trump built only 2 percent of the wall and Mexico didn’t pay a dime strongest moment of the debate.’

Many top Republicans took the opposite position and expressed support for Vance’s performance. 

‘JD knocks it out of the park with first question!!! Tim Walz implodes on first question in presentation, communication, and substance,’ Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., wrote on X. 

‘Senator JD Vance spitting the cold hard TRUTH on the debate stage,’ Trump 2024 national press secretary Karoline Leavitt wrote on X. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

PHOENIX — If it wasn’t painful enough for the Arizona Diamondbacks to be home for the postseason after being eliminated Sunday, they spent Monday in damage control after their owner pointed fingers and chastised one of his highest-paid players.

D-backs owner Ken Kendrick blamed himself for the signing of free-agent starter Jordan Montgomery, saying he was the one who suggested to the front office that they sign him after starter Eduardo Rodriguez injured his left shoulder in spring training.

Kendrick now says he regrets the recommendation, saying the Diamondbacks never should have signed Montgomery, who went 8-7 with a 6.23 ERA in 21 starts, to a one-year $25 million contract.

The kicker?

Instead of blasting Montgomery on his way out the door, Kendrick likely will be seeing plenty of him next year, too. Montgomery has a $22.5 million player option in 2025 that he expects to exercise.

Follow every MLB game: Latest MLB scores, stats, schedules and standings.

“Let me say it the best way I can say it,’ Kendrick said Monday on the The Burns & Gambo Show. “If anyone wants to blame anyone for Jordan Montgomery being a Diamondback, you’re talking to the guy who should be blamed, because I brought it to their attention. I pushed for it. They agreed to it.

“It wasn’t in our game plan. You know when he was signed, right at the end of spring training. And looking back, in hindsight, a horrible decision, to have invested that money in a guy that performed as poorly as he did.

“It was our biggest mistake this season from a talent standpoint. And I’m the perpetrator of that.”

This was one of the strongest condemnations by an owner towards a player since the days of George Steinbrenner and Hall of Famer Dave Winfield nearly 40 years ago.

Montgomery, who signed too late to pitch in spring training, struggled most of the year. He was removed from the starting rotation in August before returning in September.

Really, Montgomery didn’t want to pitch in Arizona in the first place. He waited for a contract offer from the Texas Rangers that never arrived, and passed up a four-year proposal by the Boston Red Sox earlier in the winter. He wound up taking the D-backs’ offer, and then fired his agent, Scott Boras.

Now, six months later, everyone is mad at one another.

Kendrick, frustrated that the D-backs missed the playoffs by one game, needing Atlanta or the New York to sweep their doubleheader Monday, also took shots at the commissioner’s office for forcing the two teams to play to play the twinbill. They were makeup games after Hurricane Helene caused the postponement of games last Wednesday and Thursday in Atlanta.

He called it a “debacle’ that could have been prevented, saying that MLB should have had the two teams to play a doubleheader last Monday when they were both off

“I’m disappointed that MLB did not take a more aggressive posture to insist on those games being played earlier,” Kendrick said. “That decision would have changed how the week would have unfolded for a lot of teams, even those guys. I think they are both very disadvantaged … having used, in some cases, top pitchers, and burned out their bullpens. They’re going to go play in a postseason when you should be able to have your best players ready to go.”

Yet, while Kendrick bemoaned the potential impact the hurricane might have played on their postseason chances, the players thought it was almost immoral to use that as an excuse.

“I mean, people are losing their lives, their homes,’ ace Zac Gallen told reporters Monday. “So, for me to get mad about a natural disaster when people are worried about other things would be tone deaf.’

Amen.

While Kendrick didn’t hide his disappointment – with the D-backs finishing with the same 89-73 record as Atlanta and the Mets but losing the tiebreaker – he did not criticize manager Torey Lovullo or GM Mike Hazen.

“For any of us, at least for me, to say our manager did a poor job this season or our general manager did a poor job this season,’ Kendrick said, “I wouldn’t be the one to say that.”

While the D-backs’ attendance increased to 2.3 million, their largest total since 2008, it’s unclear whether the franchise-record $175 million payroll will decrease after failing to make the playoffs.

Kendrick, who still paid former D-backs starter Madison Bumgarner $14 million this year, isn’t hiding the fact that he hopes Montgomery leaves, clearing $22.5 million.

“Are we going to be in a position to financially compete yet again next year?” Kendrick said. “I think the answer is basically, yes, we are. … I think that we have a core of players that will be returning that will leave us in a position that will allow us to be very, very competitive yet again next season. And it won’t be inexpensive to do that.”

The D-backs have their entire starting lineup under contract, along with their rotation, with the exception of first baseman Christian Walker.

“There’s a lot of unknowns here, a lot of uncertainties,’ Walker told reporters. “There’s a good chance I land here, but some unknowns.’

And now, there’s another unknown.

If Walker returns, and happens to struggle, could he be Kendrick’s next victim?

Follow Nightengale on X:@Bnightengale

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The centerpiece of Week 5 of the college football season saw Alabama knock off No. 1 Georgia, giving a big win to Crimson Tide coach Kalen Deboer and raising questions about the Bulldogs and their offense that was listless for most of the first three quarters. Was it the best college football game of recent memory or just the best of this season?

The other consequential matchup saw Mississippi get stunned at home by Kentucky with Mark Stoops taking an uncharacteristic gamble. The Rebels looked to be in good shape for a playoff berth, but now there are questions, especially with a road matchup against South Carolina coming Saturday.

That’s one of the notable games in Week 6. Another in the SEC sees No. 9 Missouri travels to No. 21 Texas A&M. Both teams are looking for resume boosters to their playoff hopes. Elsewhere, Washington and No. 10 Michigan meet in a rematch of the College Football Playoff championship game. How will these matchups and other matchups sort out?

Dan Wolken and Paul Myerberg of USA TODAY Sports discuss these topics and more in this week’s version of the College Football Fix.

AWARD TIME: The best and worst of the first month in college football

BOWL PROJECTIONS: Major changes to playoff field after wild Week 5

BRACKET OUTLOOK: Alabama now top seed in playoff after big win

CALM DOWN: Georgia playoff hopes lead Week 5 overecations

MISERY INDEX: Mississippi’s playoff hopes fall flat after spending big

HIGHS AND LOWS: Alabama-Georgia classic leads Week 5 winners and losers

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

HOUSTON — Let’s start with the nerves. Tarik Skubal felt them. Like he never had before. At least not since he made his major-league debut.  

Which tells us what we should’ve known all along: The best pitcher in the American League is not a cyborg. He just throws like one. And did for six electric innings Tuesday afternoon at Minute Maid Park, helping the Detroit Tigers win Game 1, 3-1, over the Houston Astros in the AL wild-card playoff series.

All things Tigers: Latest Detroit Tigers news, schedule, roster, stats, injury updates and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Democratic vice presidential nominee Tim Walz faced backlash on social media after he defended an individual healthcare mandate during a back and forth with his counterpart, Republican Sen. JD Vance, in their first and only debate on Tuesday night. 

‘The question about this of young people, whatever, that’s the individual mandate,’ Walz said during a conversation on healthcare and the Affordable Care Act at the CBS News debate in New York City. ‘And Republicans fought tooth and nail saying Americans should be free to do this.’

Vance then interjected, asking, ‘Tim do you think the individual mandate is a good idea?’

‘I think the idea of making sure the risk pool is broad enough to cover everyone — that’s the only way insurance works. When it doesn’t, it collapses. You are asking pre- ACA where we get people out. Look, people know that they need to be on health care. People expect it to be there.’

Walz went on to say that the ACA ‘works’ but we can ‘continue to do better.’

Walz’s comments defending the individual mandate drew criticism on social media, with people pointing out that it was repealed during the Trump administration.

‘We eliminated an especially cruel tax that fell mostly on Americans making less than $50,000 a year — forcing them to pay tremendous penalties simply because they could not afford government-ordered health plans,’ Trump told an audience during the 2018 State of the Union Address.

‘We repealed the core of disastrous ObamaCare — the individual mandate is now gone,’ he added.

‘Tim Walz just endorsed reinstating the Obamacare mandate which was a massive tax penalty for Americans who can’t afford to buy insurance,’ GOP Sen. Tom Cotton posted on X. 

‘Oh my god, Walz defending the individual mandate,’ journalist Josh Barro posted on X. ‘Does he know there isn’t one anymore?’

‘Tim Walz doubles down on his support for Obamacare’s individual mandate tax, by far the least popular part of Obamacare,’ Americans for Tax Reform Director Mike Palicz posted on X.

‘This would violate Kamala’s pledge not to raise taxes on anyone earning less than $400K. Trump Tax Cuts repealed the hated individual mandate tax.’

During the debate, Vance argued, ‘Donald Trump has said that if we allow states to experiment a little bit on how to cover both the chronically ill, but the non-chronically ill, it’s not just a plan. He actually implemented some of these regulations when he was president of the United States. And I think you can make a really good argument that it salvaged ObamaCare, which was doing disastrously until Donald Trump came along.’

Fox News Digital reported Monday that Walz has previously voiced his support for single-payer government-run healthcare.

‘I think that’s probably the path where we end up,’ Walz said in a 2018 debate while running for governor when asked, ‘Are you for single-payer?’

‘And I say that because, be very clear about this, there were no protections for preexisting conditions before the ACA,’ Walz continued. ‘A vote for the ACA was the first time in this nation’s history we had those protections and making sure people have that protection, making sure they were covered, and then making sure we were focused on preventative care, people were finally getting that under the ACA, we started to see health outcomes improve and that’s the real key to driving down insurance premium prices.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Sen. JD Vance, R-Ohio, and Gov. Tim Walz, D-Minn., met face to face on Tuesday night in New York City for the only vice presidential debate before the election. 

The event covered a variety of subjects ranging from immigration to climate change to abortion as the two lesser known politicians sought to make their introductions to American voters before election day. 

Here are the top moments from the debate: 

1. JD Vance fact-checks CBS News moderators

After CBS News’ Margaret Brennan offered an impromptu fact-check in response to Vance describing cities being overwhelmed by illegal immigration, noting that many Haitians in Springfield, Ohio have been granted a legal status, Vance hit back at her for violating the terms of the debate. 

‘Margaret, the rules were that you are not going to fact-check. And since you’re fact-checking me, I think it’s important to say what’s actually going on,’ he said. ‘So there’s an application called the CBP one app where you can go on as an illegal migrant, apply for asylum or apply for parole and be granted legal status at the wave of a Kamala Harris open border wand.’

2. In show of compassion, Vance tells Walz he is sorry that his son witnessed a shooting

Vance told Walz that he was sorry to hear that his son had been witness to a shooting, in a moment of civility that was particularly frequent during the vice presidential debate. This civility has also been less and less common during presidential debates, which have proven contentious in recent election cycles. 

‘I didn’t know that your 17-year-old witnessed a shooting, and I’m sorry about that,’ the senator told Walz. 

‘I appreciate it,’ Walz said. 

‘Christ have mercy,’ Vance remarked. 

3. Vance says he thinks Walz wants to solve border crisis—but Kamala Harris doesn’t

‘The American citizens have had their lives destroyed by Kamala Harris’s open border. It is a disgrace, Tim,’ Vance said during the debate.

‘And I actually think I agree with you,’ the Ohio senator said, adding, ‘I think you want to solve this problem.’

‘But I don’t think that Kamala Harris does.’ 

4. Walz claims there will be pregnancy registry in Trump-Vance administration but Vance pushes back 

Walz claimed there would be ‘a registry of pregnancies’ under what he said was Trump and Vance’s Project 2025. The Project 2025 is an endeavor of conservative think tank the Heritage Foundation.

‘It’s going to make it more difficult, if not impossible, to get contraception and limit access, if not eliminate access, to infertility treatments,’ he said. 

But Vance denied this claim. ‘No, certainly we won’t,’ he pushed back at the statement. 

5. Walz refers to his frequent note-taking, which was mocked by Trump

Walz referred back to his notes in one answer on Tuesday night, after frequently scribbling down observations during the debate. 

‘I made a note of this,’ he said. 

‘Economists can’t be trusted. Science can’t be trusted. National security folks can’t be trusted,’ he listed, referencing Vance’s skepticism of those heralded as experts. ‘Look, if you’re going to be president, you don’t have all the answers. Donald Trump believes he does.’

Even Trump poked fun at the noticeable amount of notes that the Minnesota governor was taking, writing on Truth Social, ‘Walz is taking so many notes – Never seen a Candidate take more! He needs the notes to keep his brain intact.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The Buffalo Bills’ defense will be without one of its key figures for the next few weeks.

On Tuesday, edge rusher Von Miller was suspended for four games for violating the NFL’s personal conduct policy.

Miller, 35, turned himself into Dallas police last November on an arrest warrant of third-degree felony assault of a pregnant woman. No charges were filed in the case, and Miller has called the allegations ‘100 percent false.’

A police affidavit said Miller put his hand on the woman’s neck, pushed her and pulled out part of her hair during an argument between the two.

Miller had one sack in each of the Bills’ first three games this season after being held without a sack in 2023, one year after he suffered a torn anterior cruciate ligament.

All things Bills: Latest Buffalo Bills news, schedule, roster, stats, injury updates and more.

The eight-time Pro Bowl selection will miss contests against the Houston Texans, New York Jets, Tennessee Titans and Seattle Seahawks.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

NFL power rankings entering Week 5 of the 2024 season (previous rank in parentheses):

1. Kansas City Chiefs (1): They may be 4-0 with an extensive championship pedigree, but their perch here seems increasingly precarious given their modest 5-point per game margin of victory and mounting personnel challenges – none more serious to date than the loss of WR Rashee Rice to a potentially season-ending knee injury. Now in the midst of a 20-game stretch with just one game, HC Andy Reid and Co. probably need this time, amid an especially frenetic schedule, to figure some things out if their bid for an unprecedented Super Bowl three-peat is going to ultimately bear fruit.

3. Baltimore Ravens (17): Their 0-2 start has quickly faded into the ether, last season’s No. 1 playoff seed quickly resurfacing as perhaps the league’s scariest outfit. After rushing for more than 500 yards the past two weeks, Baltimore’s 220.3 yards per game average is nearly 50 clear of the NFL’s second-most prolific ground attack. Yet this offense is dangerously varied and still seems to have room to grow, TE Mark Andrews yet to settle into his typically prominent role.

4. Detroit Lions (4): QB Jared Goff flexed his ‘Motor City Muscle’ with a near-perfect performance against the previously unbeaten ‘Hawks – becoming the first quarterback in 46 years to start consecutive games with at least 10 straight completions – as the Lions finally won what’s become their now-annual shootout with Seattle.

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

5. Buffalo Bills (2): Sunday night was hardly the way you want to start a stretch of five roadies in seven weeks – and further exposed what had already been a problematic run defense. But a team that still owns the AFC’s best point differential (+39) despite a 25-point loss at Baltimore still looks very capable – and set up – to make near- and long-term runs. LB Von Miller’s suspension hurts.

13. Houston Texans (11): They’ve been outscored on the season and have struggled to beat three average-at-best opponents. Fresh off scoring his first career rushing TD, perennial Pro Bowler Stefon Diggs and his new mates are now going to run into a smarting Buffalo team – and that may be an awkward reunion for the wideout six months after his surprising trade.

17. Los Angeles Chargers (16): No player wants a Week 5 bye, but the Bolts might wind up reaping the benefits given their rampant injuries. And better rest up with only one home game between now and Nov. 10.

All the players and the plays: Sign up for USA TODAY’s 4th and Monday newsletter for NFL news.

22. Dallas Cowboys (21): If it was hard to get excited about this defense stabilizing in a win over the Giants, it’s even harder to get excited about it without its top front seven players, LB Micah Parsons and DE DeMarcus Lawrence, missing a chunk of the upcoming murderers’ row schedule (Steelers, Lions, 49ers, Falcons, Eagles, Texans, Commanders).

30. Miami Dolphins (29): Sometimes an offense runs better with an experienced backup – and sometimes, it’s just screwed up beyond recognition without its primary starter. Still time to get a quality stopgap, though …

31. Cleveland Browns (28): Does anyone need a change of scenery more than WR Amari Cooper, who leads the league with six drops? (Bide your time, Coop.)

***

Follow USA TODAY Sports’ Nate Davis on X, formerly Twitter, @ByNateDavis.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY