Archive

2024

Browsing

The 2024 WNBA Finals is already one for the books.

The championship series between the New York Liberty and Minnesota Lynx has drawn in record viewership through the first two games, averaging 1.24 million viewers, an 82% increase from last year’s Finals between the Liberty and Las Vegas Aces.

The Lynx’s 95-93 overtime victory over the Liberty in Game 1 on ESPN brought in 1.1 million viewers Thursday. It was the most-viewed Game 1 of the WNBA Finals in league history, according to the network.

Game 2 did even better. The Liberty’s 80-66 win over the Lynx drew 1.34 million viewers to ABC to become the most-viewed WNBA Finals game in 23 years.

The WNBA Finals’ viewership numbers are even more impressive considering Thursday’s Game 1 and Sunday’s Game 2 went head-to-head with NFL games.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The National Women’s Soccer League’s newest expansion team in Boston has issued an apology after its social media video launching the team’s name and brand ‘missed the mark.’

The Boston-based football club revealed its name — BOS Nation FC, an anagram for ‘Bostonian’ — and its black-and-green team colors on Tuesday in a campaign centered around the city having ‘too many balls.’

‘Old balls, new balls. Steel balls. Cold balls. Even GOAT ball. Yeah, Boston loves its balls, but maybe there’s too many balls,’ said the launch video, which tagged and included footage of male sports teams in Boston, including the New England Patriots and Boston Celtics. ‘This is our city, our new team, our new nation. BOS Nation… no balls necessary.’

The rollout was instantly met with criticism for not only equating gender to body parts, but for omitting the city’s female teams, such as the Boston Fleet of the Professional Women’s Hockey League (PWHL) and the Boston Renegades of the Women’s Football Alliance (WFA). Seattle Reign FC’s Quinn, the first openly transgender and non-binary athlete in the NWSL, said the video ‘feels transphobic,’ while another added it was ‘ignorant.’ 

BOS Nation FC: ‘We missed the mark’

BOS Nation FC, which is scheduled to begin play the 2026 season, admitted the attempt to make a ‘bold and buzzworthy brand launch’ fell short.

‘We fully acknowledge that the content of the campaign did not reflect the safe and welcoming environment we strive to create for all, and we apologize to the LGBTQ+ community and to the trans community in particular for the hurt we caused,’ BOS Nation FC said. ‘We are proud to be part of the most inclusive sports league in the world and are committed to upholding the unifying values that define the NWSL and our club.’

The football club removed the launch video from X and Instagram amid the backlash and promised to make better decisions moving forward: ‘Thank you to all who have held us accountable by calling for us to do better. We hear and we will, together.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

In this video from StockCharts TV, Julius dives in to the sector rotation model, trying to find any alignment between theoretical and real-life rotations of sectors in combination with the economic cycle. The positions of the various sectors and the economic indicators that are part of this model are not giving a very clear answer at the moment. Combine that with a lack of trading volume on the upside and you have enough conflicting pieces of the puzzle for Julius to avoid being all-out bullish on the general market.

This video was originally published on October 15, 2024. Click anywhere on the icon above to view on our dedicated page for Julius.

Past episodes of Julius’ shows can be found here.

#StayAlert, -Julius

In this exclusive StockCharts TV video, Joe shares the MACD downside crossover signal and explains the different ways it can play out when it takes place above the MACD zero line. These downside crossovers can lead to opportunities depending on other criteria, including the ADX action. He then shows how this pattern is playing out in big name stocks like NVDA and LLY, as well as Bitcoin right now. Finally, he goes through the symbol requests that came through this week.

This video was originally published on October 16, 2024. Click this link to watch on StockCharts TV.

Archived videos from Joe are available at this link. Send symbol requests to stocktalk@stockcharts.com; you can also submit a request in the comments section below the video on YouTube. Symbol Requests can be sent in throughout the week prior to the next show.

Airline stocks had a strong day, with United Airlines (UAL), American Airlines (AAL), and Delta Airlines (DAL) posting strong gains. The main reason for the rise in airline stocks was UAL’s better-than-expected earnings report and strong guidance, which comes just days after Delta missed its earnings. Having struggled for years, UAL seems to have overcome some of its headwinds, which is an encouraging sign; after reducing routes and increasing prices, UAL is seeing its efforts pay off.

If you look closely at the Industrial sector in the StockCharts MarketCarpets, you’ll find these three companies represented as dark green squares.

FIGURE 1. MARKET CARPET FOR OCTOBER 16, 2024. It was a big day for airline stocks with United Airlines, American Airlines, and Delta Airlines as the top three performers.Image source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

The monthly chart of UAL below shows the stock price has broken out of a triangle pattern, clearing the runway for the stock to ascend toward its pre-pandemic high.

FIGURE 2. UNITED AIRLINES STOCK CLEARED FOR TAKEOFF. The stock price has broken out of a triangle pattern and could cruise toward its pre-pandemic high.Chart source: StockChartsACP. For educational purposes.

The relative strength index (RSI) is approaching its 70 level, another encouraging sign. Let’s move to a daily chart and see if there’s a trading opportunity in UAL.

FIGURE 3. IT’S CLEAR SKIES FOR UNITED AIRLINES STOCK. With a high SCTR score, strong relative performance against the airline industry, and a move above the 10-day exponential moving average, UAL can see more upside.Chart source: StockChartsACP. For educational purposes.

UAL is outperforming the Dow Jones US Airlines Index ($DJUSAR) by 24.06% ,and its StockCharts Technical Rank (SCTR) is at an impressive 98. Looking at the chart, the path is clear for UAL to hit its pre-pandemic highs of between $92 and $97. A pullback would be healthy and, if it happens, a reversal on strong momentum would present a buying opportunity.

I’ve added a 10-period exponential moving average (EMA) for a support level to use as a stop loss. If price hits that level, accompanied by a drop in the SCTR score, I would exit the position.

United vs. American vs. Delta

Let’s look at how the three top airline stocks performed.

FIGURE 4. COMPARING THE THREE TOP AIRLINE PERFORMERS. United Airlines and Delta Airlines are close to their pre-pandemic highs. American Airlines has a long way to go.Chart source: StockChartsACP. For educational purposes.

United and Delta are trading close to their pre-pandemic highs with similar chart patterns. You could do an analysis of Delta’s stock to determine if it’s worth adding it to your portfolio. A plus point for Delta—it pays out a small dividend. American Airlines is still struggling and probably wouldn’t be a portfolio candidate unless bottom fishing is your trading style.

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.

All-WNBA teams were announced by the league Wednesday and in the cap to her sensational rookie season, Caitlin Clark was named to the first team, earning 52 of a 67 possible votes. 

It’s the latest honor for the 2024 Rookie of the Year, who also finished fourth in MVP voting her first professional season after setting numerous WNBA records.

It’s the first time since 2008 that a rookie was selected to the first team. That season, former No. 1 pick Candace Parker was named the 2008 MVP, Rookie of the Year and All-WNBA First Team. Since 2000, five rookies have earned First Team honors: Clark (2024), Parker (2008), Diana Taurasi (2004), Sue Bird (2002) and Tamika Catchings (2002). 

Joining Clark on the first team were Las Vegas forward and 2024 MVP A’ja Wilson, Minnesota forward Napheesa Collier, New York forward Breanna Stewart and Connecticut forward Alyssa Thomas. 

Wilson and Collier were unanimous selections. Collier was named the 2024 Defensive Player of the Year, while Wilson was the first unanimous MVP selection since 1997, the year the league debuted. Collier, Wilson and Stewart were also named first team All-Defense. 

Voters picking all-WNBA teams, like with the NBA, choose the best players regardless of position.

New York guard Sabrina Ionescu and New York center Jonquel Jones, Phoenix guard Kahleah Copper, Seattle forward Nneka Ogwumike and Dallas guard Arike Ogunbowale were named second team. 

Schnell is a member of the 67-person voting panel.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Retired tennis star Serena Williams announced on Wednesday that she had a benign branchial cyst removed from her neck.

The 43-year-old Williams said on social media that the cyst that was ‘the size of a small grapefruit’ and deemed herself ‘OK.’

Williams added that the cyst was found in May and showed video of herself in a hospital bed.

‘They said I don’t need to get it removed if I don’t want,’ Williams wrote. ‘So I did not get it but it kept growing. I decided to get more test and 3 test and one biopsy later everything is still negative but doctors advised I get it removed asap because it was the size of a small grapefruit and it could get infected or worse leak.’

In another social media post, Williams said she is “still recovering, but getting better. Health always comes first.”

In her tennis career, Williams won 23 singles Grand Slam titles in singles and 14 more doubles titles. She was ranked No. 1 in the WTA rankings for 319 weeks, won four Olympic gold medals, and was voted Associated Press Athlete of the Year five times.

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fast.Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Former President Donald Trump is ahead of Vice President Kamala Harris in the presidential contest, 50-48% according to a new Fox News national survey. That’s a reversal from last month when Harris had a narrow advantage.

Harris, however, is ahead by 6 points among voters from the seven key battleground states and the candidates tie 49% each among voters in close counties (where the Joe Biden-Trump 2020 margin was less than 10 points). Trump’s advantage comes from a larger share in counties he won by more than 10 points in 2020 (64-35%) than Harris has in counties Biden won by more than 10 points (58-39%).

That raises the question of whether the Democrat could win the Electoral College while losing the national popular vote. In 2000 and 2016, it was the GOP candidate who lost the popular vote but won the Electoral College.

Trump’s 2-point edge among likely voters falls well within the margin of error. The results are identical among the larger group of registered voters. Last month, Harris was up by 2 points (50-48%) among both likely and registered voters. 

This analysis uses registered voter results for apples-to-apples trend comparisons.

These are Trump’s best numbers since Harris became the nominee in August. The movement toward him mainly comes from an increase in support among White voters, who now favor him by 10 points, up from 4 points last month and 6 points in August. He is also at record highs among voters 65 and over (49%) and those with a college degree (48%).  

At the same time, Harris receives her lowest support since becoming the nominee among Black voters (67%), college graduates (49%), voters 65 and over (47%), and Whites with a college degree (46%). 

Yet on the surface, the race has stayed within a small range. In August, Trump was ahead by 1 point, then Harris was up by 2 points in September, and now Trump has a 2-point edge.  

‘Overall, the movement toward Trump is subtle but potentially consequential, especially if he is making gains among college-educated voters,’ says Democratic pollster Chris Anderson, who conducts Fox News surveys with Republican Daron Shaw. ‘However, the race has been well within the margin of error for three months and the outcome will likely hinge on which side is more effective at getting their voters to the polls as opposed to persuasion.’ 

The 20-point gender gap remains, as men back Trump and women go for Harris.

The good news for Harris is she gets 52% of new voters (those who haven’t voted in the last two presidential elections) and 20% non-MAGA Republicans.

She is also maintaining her double-digit lead over Trump among independents. That keeps the contest close, as each candidate receives backing from over 9 in 10 of their respective partisans. On the other hand, more voters nationally identify as Republican than Democrat, and that is what gives Trump the edge in this race.

While the vice president gets majority support among Hispanics (52%) and voters under age 30 (54%), both numbers trail President Joe Biden’s support in 2020 according to the Fox News Voter Analysis election survey (6 in 10 from each group). 

For Trump, the good news is that he improved on every issue and character trait since September. And a majority remembers his time in office positively: 53% approve of the job he did as president. That is 4 points higher than he ever received while in office. Fully 93% of Republicans approve as do 74% of non-MAGA Republicans and 45% of independents.

By comparison, currently only 40% of voters approve of Biden’s job performance, which matches previous lows in November 2023 and July 2022. 

Only slightly more, 43%, approve of the government’s response to recent hurricanes, with most Democrats approving and most Republicans and independents disapproving.

The economy continues to outrank all other issues, as 40% say it is the most important issue in deciding their choice for president. Less than half as many prioritize immigration and abortion, and far fewer cite issues such as election integrity, health care, climate change, guns, crime, and foreign policy.

Seven in 10 view the economy negatively. The 30% who rate conditions positively is up from a low of 17% in 2022, and close to the 33% who felt good about the economy at the end of Trump’s term. Half of Democrats give positive ratings while majorities of Republicans and independents rate economic conditions negatively.

Overall, 44% say they are falling behind financially, which is worse by 17 points compared to three years ago when only 27% felt that way. Some 13% feel they are getting ahead financially, while 43% are holding steady.  

Trump is seen as better than Harris at handling the economy (by 8 points). He also bests her on immigration (+15), crime (+8), and guns (+6). With the expanding conflict in the Middle East, it is noteworthy Trump is favored by 13 points on Israel and the war, up from a 7-point lead in September. He has improved his standing on every issue compared to September, mostly by small margins.

More voters trust Harris to handle abortion (by 14 points), climate change (+12), and health care (+8). The two candidates are rated about evenly on taxes (Trump +4), Supreme Court nominations (Trump +1), and election integrity (Harris +3).  

‘Sometimes, elections are simple,’ says Shaw. ‘In three weeks, we may be wondering how we thought the sitting vice president would win when only two in five voters think the incumbent administration has done a good job and only one in seven say they are getting ahead financially.’

Democrats and Republicans prioritize the issues differently, with the widest gap (28 points) on immigration. There’s an 18-point gap on abortion and 15 points on the economy.

Some 12% of Democrats see Trump as better at handling the economy and 18% feel that way about immigration, while 17% of Republicans trust Harris more on abortion and climate change.

Trump is helped by more voters saying they know a great deal about where he stands on their priority issues than they do about Harris (57% vs. 44%). Fully 78% of Republicans feel they know a great deal about Trump’s stances while 65% of Democrats say the same about Harris.

Less than half believe Trump (43%) and Harris (48%) are honest and trustworthy, though Trump’s number is a personal best. Voters are also more likely to see him as a strong leader (55% vs. 47% for Harris) and ‘up to the job’ of president (53% vs. 50%). Harris has an edge on having the mental soundness to be president (54% vs. 52% for Trump), but here again Trump is at a personal best. 

Harris has lost ground on some key characteristics. She was seen as better at helping the middle class by 9 points in September and that has declined to 4 points now. Her 5-point edge on ‘fighting for people like you’ is now 2 points, and her 6-point advantage on ‘protecting personal rights and freedoms’ has disappeared as the candidates are tied. 

Voters also narrowly see Trump as the one bringing needed change and protecting free speech, both traits where Harris was favored last month. 

The race continues to be more about Trump than Harris, as most of his backers say their vote is for him rather than against Harris. Among Harris supporters, two-thirds describe their vote as for her, but one-third say it is against Trump. For comparison, in May, nearly half of Biden supporters said their vote was mainly against Trump. Among Trump supporters, 80% say they are voting for him rather than against Harris (18%).

When saying in their own words what one issue or factor was motivating them to get out and vote this year, the top response from Harris supporters is dislike of the other candidate, followed by protecting democracy, and abortion. For those backing Trump, the economy and immigration are the top two motivators, followed by candidate characteristics. Among men, it’s dislike of the other candidate, the economy, and traits (in that order), while for women the economy and abortion tie as the top motivator, followed by candidate traits.  

– As red and blue states become shades of purple it is tough to know what level of a popular vote suggests a win in the Electoral College. In 2016, Hillary Clinton got more votes nationally by a 2-point margin but lost the Electoral College (by 77 electoral votes), while Joe Biden had a 4-point advantage in the popular vote and won the Electoral College (by 74). 

– About one-third of voters overall and one-third of women say Harris becoming the first female president matters to their vote. Among the 17% saying it matters a great deal, 80% back Harris.

– About 3 in 10 voters say they check news multiple times a day and they favor Trump by 10 points. At the other end of the spectrum, 1 in 10 say they don’t pay attention to news, and these disengaged voters favor Trump by 16 points. The 57% who follow news regularly but not constantly back Harris by 6 points.

– Most of each candidate’s backers feel certain of their vote, and two-thirds of both Harris’ and Trump’s supporters say they are ‘extremely’ motivated to vote. 

Conducted October 11-14, 2024 under the direction of Beacon Research (D) and Shaw & Company Research (R), this Fox News survey includes interviews with a sample of 1,110 registered voters randomly selected from a national voter file. Respondents spoke with live interviewers on landlines (129) and cellphones (719) or completed the survey online after receiving a text (262). Results based on both the full registered voter sample and the subsample of 870 likely voters have a margin of sampling error of ±3 percentage points. Sampling error associated with results among subgroup is higher. In addition to sampling error, question wording and order can influence results. Weights are generally applied to age, race, education, and area variables to ensure the demographics of respondents are representative of the registered voter population. Sources for developing weight targets include the American Community Survey, Fox News Voter Analysis, and voter file data. Likely voters are based on a probabilistic statistical model that relies on past vote history, interest in the current election, age, education, race, ethnicity, church attendance, and marital status.

Fox News’ Victoria Balara contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) announced Wednesday that it will provide Ukraine with an additional $425 million worth of supplies and weapons as it continues to defend itself against Russian forces.

According to a press release from the DoD, this is the 67th tranche of equipment from DoD inventories being sent to Ukraine from the Biden administration since August 2021.

The Presidential Drawdown Authority (PDA) package is estimated to hold a value of about $425 million and will provide Ukraine with the ability to meet its most urgent needs in terms of air defense, air-to-ground weapons, rocket systems and artillery munitions, armored vehicles and anti-tank weapons.

Particularly, the capabilities being provided to Ukraine by the U.S. included additional munitions for National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile Systems (NASAMS); RIM-7 missiles and support for air defense; Stinger anti-aircraft missiles; ammunition for High Mobility Artillery Rocket Systems (HIMARS); air-to-ground munitions; 150mm and 105mm artillery ammunition; tube-launched, optically-tracked, wire-guided (TOW) missiles; Javelin and AT-4 anti-armor systems; High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicles (HMMWVs); small arms and ammunition; grenades, thermals and training equipment; demolitions equipment and munitions; and spare parts, ancillary equipment, services, training and transportation.

‘The United States is committed to supporting Ukraine with the equipment it needs to strengthen its position on the battlefield, defend its territory and people from the Kremlin’s brutal aggression, and secure a just and lasting peace,’ Secretary of State Antony Blinken said on Wednesday. ‘As President Biden has made clear, the United States and the international coalition we have assembled will continue to stand with Ukraine.’

Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2025, and both sides have made little gains on the battlefield.

As the winter fighting season begins soon, the Ukrainian government needs to step up its efforts to recruit new soldiers, train them and provide the necessary military equipment to win the war, the country said. 

With no end in sight, mobilization is proceeding according to plans laid out by the Ukrainian government.

In April, Ukraine passed a mobilization law to reform the military recruitment process as the war continues and casualties stack up.

Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustem Umerov told Fox News Digital the aim of the law is to make recruitment more efficient and transparent.

Umerov said that the positive numbers show that Ukrainians are ready to ‘defend their land with weapons in their hands.’

Still, he said Ukraine needs help from its international partners.

‘We have enough troops. However, we need support from international partners in weapons and equipment, and we require it fast.’

Umerov said Ukraine desperately needs modern Western-made air defense systems and a sufficient supply of ammunition for these systems. Ukraine needs a multi-layered air defense system to protect critical infrastructure and long-range capability to strike airfields and other military facilities deep inside Russia. 

So far, the Biden administration has been hesitant to consent to the need for long-range systems for fear of antagonizing Russian President Vladimir Putin and escalating a possible confrontation with Russia.

Official data on Ukrainian battlefield casualties are unreliable, but the U.S. estimates that some 70,000 Ukrainian soldiers have been killed and between 100,000 and 120,000 wounded. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said the goal is to mobilize up to 500,000 additional conscripts for future war efforts. 

Fox News’ Chris Massaro contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Earl Ehrhart says he only encountered Kirby Smart once, in March 2016, before Smart had coached a football game at Georgia. Perhaps then it should have been obvious the signs were already there that this Georgia football coach would play defense better than any Bulldogs coach before him. 

At the time, Ehrhart was the longest-tenured Republican in the Georgia House of Representatives. Smart had visited the capitol with university athletics department officials and been asked the differences between Georgia and other programs he was at previously. His answer convinced Ehrhart to introduce an 11th-hour amendment that changed the state’s open-records laws to conform with others in the SEC, most notably Alabama – where Smart had just worked under Nick Saban for nine seasons. 

Smart was strategic and calculated, ‘from the very beginning’ of his tenure, said former Georgia athletics director Greg McGarity, who was in the room. This particular meeting wound up providing Georgia’s athletics department and other public colleges in the state up to 90 business days to respond to open-records requests instead of three days.

Smart, when asked at the time, did not elaborate on how the amendment would help Georgia’s football program. Ehrhart said it was meant to protect the identities of prospects the Bulldogs were recruiting. McGarity said it helped his overwhelmed staff, which handled open records requests made to the athletics department.

‘I hope it brings us a national championship,’ then-Lieutenant Gov. Casey Cagle declared on the House floor. Several media reports declared it ‘Kirby’s Law.’ Smart bristled at the nickname, calling it ‘ridiculous.’

Smart “talked about that competitive advantage. It wasn’t about a lack of transparency. It was a competitive disadvantage across the board against all the other SEC schools,” Ehrhart recalled to USA TODAY Sports last month.

Eight years and two national titles later, the notion of Georgia taking a backseat to anybody in college football is almost laughable. Few operate quite like Smart and Georgia right now, with Alabama about the only team consistently standing in the Bulldogs’ way anymore.

Smart has moved into Saban’s spot as the highest-paid college football coach in the country this year, according to USA TODAY Sports’ annual analysis of coaches’ compensation released Wednesday. He is the first coach to earn more than $13 million in annual pay from a school after Georgia announced in May that it had extended his contract through 2033. It is about $2.5 million more than Smart made from the school in 2023 and is about $2 million more than what Clemson’s Dabo Swinney is set to make as the second-highest paid coach in the country (just over $11 million). It is the largest gap between the nation’s two highest-paid coaches in terms of recurring annual compensation since USA TODAY Sports began its salary database in 2006.

The new contract was a reward for all the wins, and all the revenue generated, during a run Georgia president Jere Morehead called “the definition of excellence for all of college football,” in a statement announcing the deal.

Smart’s compensation now dwarfs that of Kansas’ Bill Self and Arkansas’ John Calipari, who are the highest-paid men’s basketball coaches in the country at $8.65 million and $8 million from their respective schools for the upcoming season. Smart would rank among the top 15 highest-paid CEOs in the state of Georgia, according to AFL-CIO figures from 2023. There were only six coaches in American professional sports in 2023 earning more than Smart will this season, Sportico reported last year.

But the optics — and rationale — have been complicated by a rash of traffic-related incidents of varying significance involving Georgia football players that continued into this season; recent graduation rates that are among the worst in the country; and the underlying question of what responsibility lies with a man who’s likely now the highest-paid public employee in the country. 

Kirby Smart and ‘the cost of leadership’ at Georgia

Smart has spoken about ‘the costs of leadership’ before, and he mentioned the concept again when answering questions about the arrest of another Bulldogs football player earlier this month.

Junior wide receiver Colbie Young had been charged with battery and assault of an unborn child on Oct. 8 following an alleged altercation with Young’s ex-girlfriend at his apartment. Smart announced the next day that Young would be indefinitely suspended until the legal matter was resolved. It came just two months after Smart dismissed wide receiver Rodarius ‘Rara’ Thomas from the team after a second arrest for charges involving family violence.

Smart referred to potential domestic violence situations as, ‘the hardest thing you deal with when you deal with players and some of the decisions.’ But eventually it seemed as if he wasn’t speaking about just one type of incident.

‘When you have 130 17- to 23-year-olds, that’s, you’re going to have issues. It’s not going to be perfect and I certainly recognize we’ve got to do a better job,’ Smart said. ‘But it’s hard, it’s hard on our staff, because we got really good kids. We got really good people, man.

‘You just want them to make better decisions as men off the field, and I take a lot of responsibility in that,’ he continued. ‘It’s tough, but that’s the cost of leadership. You’re going to be judged by the people you lead, and you got to stand up and face it, and do right by the kids and keep trying to find a better way.

‘We’re constantly trying to find a better way to make a difference, and that’s in everything we do in our organization. That’s evaluation of the kids. That’s in the football side of it, becoming a man, the graduation, it’s all wrapped into one, and we’ve got to keep working on that.”

The price for Smart has never cost more.

Georgia put it right at the top of the news release in May. School officials wanted it known they were paying Smart more than anyone in college football. The designation, however, has only added to scrutiny on Smart as off-field headlines pile up. 

Georgia has had at least 30 arrests or citations for speeding, reckless driving or racing since a Jan. 15, 2023, crash that killed offensive lineman Devin Willock and recruiting staffer Chandler LeCroy, according to the Athens Banner-Herald, a member of the USA TODAY Network. Police said LeCroy and former Georgia star Jalen Carter were racing at about 104 miles per hour. Victoria Bowles, a former Georgia recruiting staffer who was in the backseat of LeCroy’s rented SUV, has since reached a settlement with the University of Georgia Athletic Association in which neither side was assigned blame. But a lawsuit against Carter from Bowles is still active. Carter was selected ninth overall in the June 2023 NFL draft by the Philadelphia Eagles.

Smart described the immediate aftermath of the incident at the emergency room as ‘probably one of the toughest moments I’ve ever experienced as a coach and a leader,’ when he first spoke to reporters about the crash in March 2023. Smart also insisted then that the program’s culture was not a problem.

‘Do kids make mistakes? Yes. Young student-athletes make mistakes. They do. It happens all across the country, it happens here,’ Smart said. ‘There’s no lack of control for our program. I think our kids will tell you across the board, we have an incredible culture here.”

In addition, the Georgia football team’s latest NCAA Graduation Success Rate from last December was among the bottom 15 of about 5,800 Division I teams in any sport, according to NCAA data. It was the second-worst among the division’s 260 football teams and the worst, by far, among the 130 Football Bowl Subdivision teams. The figures stem from six-year graduation rates that include players entering school between 2013 and 2016, which encompassed Mark Richt’s final three years as coach and Smart’s first year on the job.

The team’s most recent figure is a new low point in three consecutive years of decline. And it came at a time when an athletics department staff list – obtained this summer by the USA TODAY Network – shows 21 employees in its Student Services unit, 17 of whom have the word ‘academic’ or ‘learning’ in their title. Georgia’s most recent overall athletics Graduation Success Rate was more than double the football team’s.

The dynamic, with Smart given two lucrative contract extensions since 2022, is fueling a perception that Georgia isn’t concerned about what’s happening behind the scenes so long as Smart is winning football games. 

“I think there’s a systematic problem there because we’ve seen so many of these incidents that are the exact same in nature. Why is it that there can’t be some sort of message or punishment from above that indicates to these players that this type of behavior is completely and totally unacceptable?” said Mark Nagel, the associate director of the College Sports Research Institute and a sports management professor at the University of South Carolina, which along with Georgia is a member of the Southeastern Conference.

“At a certain point, the benefits and the danger kind of conflict,” he added, “but that’s the leeway when you win and you win at a very high level. We look the other way.” 

The Georgia athletics department would not make Smart or athletic director Josh Brooks available for an interview with USA TODAY Sports for this story. Morehead, the university president, also declined a USA TODAY Sports interview request through a spokesperson. Multiple university faculty members with roles involving Georgia athletics also declined to speak about Smart and his program when reached by USA TODAY Sports.

Smart had to defend Georgia football’s culture and disciplinary tactics for the second consecutive year at SEC Media Days in July, admitting the behavior by players was “disappointing” while insisting, “we do as much or more education than anybody in the country.” 

Smart said previously that the program has brought in numerous guests, including police officers from the UGA Police Department and Athens-Clarke County Police Department, to speak with players about the dangers of street racing. Georgia has also instituted what Smart termed ‘proactive’ education for players, like defensive driving courses.

‘This has got to be just one of the most frustrating things he’s ever had to deal with,’ said McGarity, who was Georgia’s athletics director when Smart was hired and who retired in 2020. ‘There’s no excuse for it. There’s no justification for it. But even when I was there at Georgia … you had some sexual issues to deal with, you had guns and you had moving violations on these mopeds. It was like, c’mon. And the worst things were ones that rose to the level of felonies, or guns. It always seems like it’s something, and the severity of this is serious because of the tragedy.’

Smart hasn’t been willing to discuss specific discipline, fearing it would “shame kids,” but Georgia running back Trevor Etienne did not play in the season opener against Clemson after a DUI arrest this summer in which he later pleaded no contest to reckless driving and guilty to charges of underage possession of alcohol, failure to maintain a lane and a window-tint violation. Smart has also mentioned fines to players levied by the school’s name, image and likeness collective.

Since the season started, though, cornerback Daniel Harris became the latest player to be arrested for reckless driving, on Sept. 12. Harris was allegedly driving 106 miles per hour in a 65-mph area. He did not play in Georgia’s next game at Kentucky, though he did travel with the team.

“We continue to have guys make poor decisions,” Smart told reporters last month in the aftermath of Harris’ incident. “I know that our staff, myself, continue to drive home the sensitive nature of it. It’s certainly a deadly speed when you talk about the speed that he was traveling at. You want kids to grow up, you want to treat kids like your own kids, you want them to grow up and make good decisions and learn from their own mistakes. We had guys share, and we obviously continue to talk to them. But it hasn’t stopped it. So we’ve got to find a way to do it.”

Former Wyoming and North Dakota State football coach Craig Bohl, who now works as the executive director of the American Football Coaches Association, pointed out that Smart is currently the co-chair of the NCAA Football Rules Committee and “cares about our game.” But he would only talk in general terms about how well Smart is or isn’t handling the issues Georgia football is confronting beyond gameday. 

“It was important for me to recognize that you had young men you’re working with, and young men are still in a maturing process, and some are faster than others,” Bohl said. “And so as a [former] coach, I’m always supportive of all the coaches’ decisions that they’re making and for doing what’s best for that young man and their program. As each coach sits in that chair, no one knows the challenges, no one understands the culture better than that coach.”

Why Kirby Smart is worth so much to Georgia

In so many ways, Smart is a Georgia football fairy tale. 

He’s the son of a Georgia high school football coach who then became an all-SEC defensive back and captain for the Bulldogs. He moved up the coaching ladder until he was essentially Saban’s deputy at Alabama, with his pick of head-coaching jobs. He waited until his alma mater came calling, immediately became Alabama’s top challenger in the SEC and eventually won back-to-back national championships.

The biggest impact, however, is that Smart ‘really transcended athletics at Georgia in a financial way,’ according to McGarity. The former athletics director pointed to recent improvements to the university’s track and field, soccer and baseball facilities that have been executed or planned as proof of what Smart’s success means. The school was able to fund those projects, as well as nearly $150 million in construction on the new football indoor practice facility and improvements to Sanford Stadium, because of how much money Smart brought in as a fundraiser through his big wins and his level of engagement with boosters.

‘His level of success, the way he talked about his vision of success, and being a home-grown Georgia person, I think if you add all those things together, football kind of exploded,’ McGarity said. ‘All these facilities now are getting the attention that football just consumed, all that space during my time there. Because you had to get football going. Football had to be successful because, if it wasn’t, then all these other things probably aren’t happening due to financial concerns.”

Now, the university is doing everything it can to make sure Smart would never want to leave – or want for anything, really.   

Georgia was one of nine power conference schools to exceed what the Knight Commission on Intercollegiate Athletics, a college sports watchdog organization, dubbed the “crossover point” in a 2022 study. The threshold is applied to schools that are spending more on the salaries of their football head coach and 11 full-time assistant coaches than on athlete scholarships, medical expenses and financial aid for the entire athletics department. 

And that was before Smart became the nation’s highest-paid coach this spring. 

“So much about value now is tied to brand, and winning is so critically important to your brand value in athletics, and your athletics are so important to the overall brand of the university,” Nagel said, “that schools in many cases feel like, well, even if we haven’t done an exact mathematical equation and know exactly what Kirby Smart does for Georgia versus (what) another prominent coach might do for Georgia, the concern is why would we stop the train moving in a great direction on the field … There’s this huge worry of slipping from being a top-five or top-10 program, and that worry is driving a lot of this as well.”

The numbers can be staggering. 

Georgia, for instance, boasts 70 staff members designated as “Athletics-Football” or “Athletics-Football Nutrition“ this season on the staff listing obtained by the USA TODAY Network, up from 59 in 2023.

All told, Georgia is paying more than $29 million for just its football staff and, not adjusting for inflation, spent $20 million more on its football program in fiscal year 2023 than it did in fiscal year 2020, according to financial disclosure documents obtained by USA TODAY Sports. There were 106 Division I public schools that reported less than $29 million in total athletics operating expenses last year. Northern Illinois — the Mid-American Conference school that shocked Notre Dame in football this season — had $26.4 million in total operating expenses for its entire athletics department during fiscal year 2023.

Georgia, though, saw tremendous revenue growth from football under Smart. In former coach Richt’s final season (2015), not adjusting for inflation, Georgia earned about $123.8 million in total operating revenue, including more than $28 million in ticket sales and $33 million in contributions. According to the most recent revenue filings obtained by USA TODAY Sports, Georgia had more than $210 million in total operating revenue, including more than $37 million in ticket sales and nearly $76 million in contributions.

“His salary is a reflection of his competency and his effort level, and where that sets – if he’s the highest-paid guy – so be it,” Bohl said about Smart. “But I believe he’s earning every nickel that he’s getting.” 

The Knight Commission’s study1, conducted by financial services firm CliftonLarsonAllen, predicted that by 2032, nearly half of the 68 power-conference schools would reach the crossover point thanks to the increase in revenue tied to media rights, and in particular the additional money coming due to the expansion of the College Football Playoff over the next decade.

Knight Commission CEO Amy Privette Perko said these increased revenues have disproportionately benefited college football coaches and called the crossover point “a sign of a financially dysfunctional system.”

Former MLB CFO Jonathan Mariner, who also serves as a board member and co-chair of the finance committee at the Knight Foundation, wondered aloud if at some point, as the NCAA continues to seek antitrust legislation from Congress in order to regulate NIL benefits, “perhaps there’s some notion that if you want to pay a college coach the way professionals are paid, you no longer get the benefit of a not-for-profit exemption for the organization.”

The annual splurges on salaries and buyouts are par for the course at this point, even with the introduction of NIL benefits that have effectively allowed college athletes to be paid. The increase in coaches’ salaries isn’t slowing down, particularly at the highest levels of college football.

This year, based on USA TODAY Sports’ analysis, there are 12 coaches making $9 million or more, up from six in 2022. In 2020, only one coach in the country made more than $9 million. Smart, meanwhile, has seen his salary grow from $3.75 million when he was first hired by Georgia in December 2015 to $13.28 million in just nine years.

Georgia, including this season, will have paid Smart more than $68 million in basic annual compensation since he took over the program, in addition to the $4.1 million buyout it had to give Richt. That’s actually less money than SEC cohorts Alabama, LSU, Texas, Texas A&M and Florida are committed to pay in head-coach salaries and buyouts for those seasons.

‘You may not like paying it, but in order to be fair to him, you want to be proactive. I think what Josh (Brooks) has done, the president, they’ve been proactive,’ said McGarity. ‘And so they see these numbers coming out, they appreciate what he’s done, and I promise you it’s not Kirby coming in there whining or something. That’s not the way he’s wired … but you never want to take him for granted. You never want to take the attitude of, ‘Well, he’ll never leave. He never says anything about his salary.’ You want to treat him as a commodity, as someone there who is treasured, and has done remarkable work.’

‘Kirby Smart is to Georgia what Nick Saban was to Alabama’

Just don’t try to compare Smart to his old boss. Not to his face, anyway. 

Smart has been asked numerous times since Saban announced his retirement from coaching in January whether he considers himself Saban’s replacement as the face of the sport, and Smart can’t sidestep the question fast enough. That’s a title he doesn’t want, at least right now.

“I don’t think that’s some kind of a spot that’s inherited or given to anybody. You earn that. He earned that through time. I’m not where he was,” Smart told CBS Sports in March.Saban finished his 28-year career as a head coach with 292 wins and seven national championships, including six won over 17 seasons at Alabama.

Georgia football, however, is humming in a manner that makes the comparisons inevitable. The program has never won like it has under Smart, even during Vince Dooley’s legendary run. Smart’s .853 winning percentage is better than any of his predecessors. It’s better than Saban and just about any other FBS coach from this century other than Urban Meyer. About the only blemish is a 1-6 record against Alabama.

“Kirby’s surpassed about, well, everybody,” said Ehrhart, the former member of the Georgia House of Representatives. “Kirby Smart is to Georgia what Nick Saban was to Alabama. He’s taken a great program and taken it to a level that’s stratospheric.”

All these years later, Ehrhart hasn’t encountered Smart again other than seeing him patrolling the sideline at a game. McGarity noted the Smart who met with legislators nine seasons ago ‘in no way went in there with an iron fist. At that point in time, it wasn’t like he was the national championship coach.’

“He has never utilized his bully pulpit, his fame and fortune and all that to press the legislature on anything other than one little thing 15 years ago,” Ehrhart emphasized. “I’d say that’s pretty good.”

But there is a bully pulpit to use when needed, and the mere acknowledgment of it is a nod to the power Smart wields, be it changing laws that could affect his program or changing the narrative forming around it.

So when the 2024 college football season began, once Georgia had confirmed its status as a top national championship contender again by blowing out Clemson, Smart was asked once more about the culture he’d molded at Georgia. He turned the question into a warning for those seeking to discredit what he’s built. 

“What you know on the inside is a lot more than what people can paint pictures of on the outside,” Smart said. “People use it in negative recruiting and throw it out there, and it comes back to bite them, too.”

The highest-paid college football coach in the country was standing behind a podium playing defense yet again.

Follow Mark Giannotto on social media @mgiannotto and email him at mgiannotto@gannett.com. Follow Steve Berkowitz@ByBerkowitz and email him at sberkowi@usatoday.com.

This story was updated to add new information and update a graphic.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY