Archive

2024

Browsing

The U.S. government is investigating unauthorized access to commercial telecommunications infrastructure by Chinese hackers, targets of which include the Trump and Harris campaigns. 

The campaigns have been informed of the potential breach of cellphones used by former President Trump and his running mate, JD Vance, and members of Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign, the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal reported Friday, citing sources familiar with the matter.

‘After the FBI identified specific malicious activity targeting the sector, the FBI and the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) immediately notified affected companies, rendered technical assistance, and rapidly shared information to assist other potential victims,’ the FBI and CISA told Fox News Digital in a joint statement. 

The FBI and CISA said the investigation was ongoing and ‘we encourage any organization that believes it might be a victim to engage its local FBI field office or CISA. Agencies across the U.S. Government are collaborating to aggressively mitigate this threat and are coordinating with our industry partners to strengthen cyber defenses across the commercial communications sector.’

The hackers are believed to be connected to the Chinese government’s intelligence services, The Journal reported. 

‘We are aware that a highly sophisticated nation-state actor has reportedly targeted several U.S. telecommunications providers to gather intelligence,’ telecommunications company Verizon said in a statement. ‘Along with federal law enforcement, industry peers and third-party cyber experts, we are working to confirm, assess and remediate any potential impact. Verizon is committed to assisting law enforcement in this investigation.  Since this is an active investigation, we have no additional comment at this time.’

The anonymous officials said that investigators are working to find out if any data was stolen from the campaigns, adding that other people in the U.S. government may have been targeted by the attackers. 

The Trump campaign blamed the Biden-Harris administration over the attack. 

‘This is the continuation of election interference by Kamala Harris and Democrats who will stop at nothing, including emboldening China and Iran attacking critical American infrastructure, to prevent President Trump from returning to the White House,’ Steven Cheung, communications director for the Trump campaign, told Fox News Digital on Friday. 

A person familiar with the matter also confirmed to Fox News Digital that the Harris campaign was also targeted.

The latest apparent attack comes months after the Trump campaign said campaign data was targeted by hackers from Iran. 

In September, three hackers linked to Iran were indicted in connection with a hacking plot against the Trump campaign. 

The three hackers, who are accused of working for Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, were allegedly ‘engaged in a wide-ranging hacking campaign that used spear-phishing and social engineering techniques to target and compromise the accounts of current and former U.S. government officials, members of the media, nongovernmental organizations, and individuals associated with U.S. political campaigns.’

‘These documents were obtained illegally from foreign sources hostile to the United States, intended to interfere with the 2024 election and sow chaos throughout our Democratic process,’ Cheung said in August after Politico reported that the campaign had been targeted through spear phishing. 

Fox News Digital has also reached out to the Harris campaign for comment. 

It’s not the first election cycle a foreign power has attempted to influence the election via hacking.

In 2016, the Democratic candidate for president, Hillary Clinton, and the DNC infamously had their emails hacked by Russia and released through Wikileaks during the election. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Russia has been aiding the Houthis’ assault on Western shipping lanes in the Red Sea by providing them targeting data. 

As the Houthis ramped up their strikes on the U.S. and other nations’ postures in the region after the Oct. 7 attack on Israel, Russians offered satellite data allowing them to expand their strikes, take out multimillion-dollar U.S. drones and hit ships sailing through the Red Sea and the Suez Canal, through which 12% of global trade passes, according to a Wall Street Journal report. 

Each munition used to intercept a Houthi strike costs the U.S. upwards of between $1 million and $4 million. 

The data passed through Iran’s Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). 

The satellite data would represent direct Russian involvement in attacks on the U.S.

In response to the report, Russia’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova told Fox News Digital: ‘I am focused on U.S./U.K. providing satellite data to [Kyiv] regime to commit terrorist attacks against civilians.’

While the U.S. has tried to avoid direct involvement in the war by withholding long-range capabilities of U.S. weapons for Ukraine, it has provided classified intelligence to Kyiv’s war efforts. 

The news comes at the same time North Korea is sending at least 3,000 troops to fight alongside the Russians — as the conflicts in both the Middle East and Ukraine expand in global involvement. 

The U.S. has long been involved in diplomatic efforts to prevent Russia from arming the Houthis, a group Washington redesignated as a terrorist organization in January. 

The Houthis have vowed to continue their attacks until there is a cease-fire in Gaza and Lebanon. 

In addition to destroying goods destined for the West, the regular Houthi attacks drive up insurance costs, as premiums for some shot up tenfold. They also force some ships to travel the long way, down around the Horn of Africa, which can add $1 million in fuel costs for a round trip. 

Since Oct. 7, 2023, Houthis have targeted more than 100 merchant vessels with missiles and drones, seizing one, sinking two and killing four sailors. Oil tanker traffic has now nearly halved through Bab al-Mandab, the strait that separates the Red Sea from the Indian Ocean, from October 2023 to August of this year, according to Windward, a maritime-intelligence company.

The rebel group shot down one of the U.S.’ MQ-9 Reaper drones, valued at $30 million a piece, in October and two in September. 

In recent months, Russian President Vladimir Putin has strengthened ties with Iran, despite a historic friendship with Israel and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. 

Putin has criticized the U.S. and Israel over the conflicts in Gaza and Lebanon and said the region risks all-out war. 

The U.S. has been urging Russia not to provide antiship or antiair missiles to the Houthis which could threaten U.S. military postures in the region. 

Viktor Bout, the Russian arms dealer the U.S. traded for WNBA player Brittney Griner in a prisoner exchange, is attempting to broker a $10 million small arms deal with the Houthis, according to The Wall Street Journal. It’s not clear whether the deal is sanctioned by the Kremlin. 

Tankers carrying Russian oil have been the subject of Houthi attacks, but they are operating through shell companies meant to hide their Russian origin and evade Western oil sanctions. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

American F-16 fighter jets have been deployed to the Middle East, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) confirmed on Friday, in a show of an ‘ironclad’ commitment to Israel as tensions mount with Iran. 

CENTCOM did not detail how many F-16s had been sent to the ‘area of responsibility,’ but said they had been deployed from the 480th Fighter Squadron based at Spangdahlem Air Base in Germany.

When pressed by reporters about whether the move signaled Jerusalem was preparing to launch its promised retaliatory attack on Iran for the 180-missile strike it levied at Israel earlier this month, White House National Security Council communications director John Kirby said he could not go into any detail on the issue.

‘Our commitment to Israel’s security remains ironclad,’ he said. ‘And that means, as appropriate, making force posture changes that we think need to be made to help Israel defend itself.’

The U.S., which has been increasingly bolstering its regional defenses for months, has played a critical role in defending Israel from two substantial missile attacks, the first incident occurring in April when some 300 missiles and drones were fired and the second having played out earlier this month.

According to a report by Bloomberg on Friday, the U.S. has also signaled to Saudi Arabia that it will help defend the kingdom should it come under attack by Iran, once its chief adversary in the region, or its proxy forces. 

The promise allegedly served as some comfort to the U.S. partner as many Gulf states remain on high alert over concerns of a regional war. 

The international community has been anxiously watching Israel’s fight against Iranian proxy forces, Hamas and Hezbollah, as the U.S., as well as other regional partners, hustle to de-escalate the situation from becoming an all-out war between Israel and Iran — both of which have sophisticated military capabilities. 

Secretary of State Antony Blinken, who was in the Middle East this week before traveling to London on Thursday, met with United Arab Emirates (UAE) Foreign Minister Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan on Friday to discuss efforts to bring an end to the war in Gaza and to secure the release of the hostages who have been in Hamas captivity for more than a year. 

State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said Blinken and his UAE counterpart also discussed ‘the post-conflict period’ and what a ‘vision for governance, security and reconstruction that establishes lasting peace for Israelis and Palestinians alike’ could look like.

While the Biden administration holds tight to a two-state solution, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has rejected the idea long pushed by many in the international community. 

But the war in Gaza wasn’t the only issue up for discussion with the top regional ally. The pair also looked to Israel’s operations in Lebanon in its push to eradicate the threat Hezbollah poses there. 

‘The Secretary underscored the importance of a diplomatic solution that fully implements United Nations Security Council Resolution 1701,’ Miller said, though he did not go into detail on how the U.S. and its allies will look to ensure Hezbollah, which has embedded itself in the everyday life of many in Lebanon, will be stamped out. 

While Blinken also spoke with Lebanese Caretaker Prime Minister Najib Mikati on Friday, their discussions appeared to concentrate on the humanitarian toll Israel’s operations have taken, including mounting civilian casualties.

‘He emphasized Iran and Hezbollah must not stand in the way of Lebanon’s security and stability,’ Miller said in a readout. ‘He also expressed support for the U.N. Interim Force in Lebanon and underscored that the safety and security of their personnel is essential.’

‘They discussed Lebanon’s presidential vacancy and the need to empower leadership that reflects the will of the people,’ he added. Blinken also met with Jordanian Foreign Minister Ayman Safadi.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Although earnings season is in full swing, trading volume has been relatively light this week. Perhaps investors are waiting for the stock market to show some direction. It could happen next week, one that’s jampacked with earnings and market-moving economic data, or the following week after the US election and Fed meeting.

A Bird’s-Eye View Of the Stock Market

Tesla’s upbeat Q3 earnings on Thursday juiced up the Nasdaq Composite ($COMPQ), the laggard of the three US broad market indexes. This price action continued into Friday, with the Nasdaq reaching a record high. Sadly, it couldn’t hold on to it, but still managed to close higher by 0.56%. The S&P 500 ($SPX) and Dow Jones ($INDU) snapped their six-week winning streak, but the Nasdaq retained its seven-week winning streak.

Technology was the top-performing sector on Friday, followed by Consumer Discretionary and Communication Services (see the StockCharts MarketCarpets screenshot below). It looked like the stock market had regained its mojo for a little while, but the week ended without giving investors much of a sense of direction. Next week could be a different story, since most mega-cap Tech stocks will report quarterly earnings.

FIGURE 1. STOCKCHARTS MARKETCARPET, OCTOBER 25, 2024. Technology regained its top spot in sector performance on Friday. Next week is a big earnings week for technology companies. Will they impress or disappoint?Image source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

The US dollar and precious metals traded higher this week. The 10-year US Treasury Yield Index ($TNX) bounced off its 200-day simple moving average and closed at 4.23% (see daily chart of $TNX below).

FIGURE 2. DAILY CHART OF 10-YEAR US TREASURY YIELD INDEX ($TNX). $TNX bounced off the 200-day moving average and moved higher. The rise in yields suggests investors are uncertain about near-term market direction.Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

Seeing gold, the US dollar, and Treasury yields rally simultaneously is unusual and is an indication of investor uncertainty. So far, the three seem to be holding on to their uptrends. Whenever there’s a slight pullback, they recover quickly and move higher, suggesting that these assets have momentum behind them. The chart below displays the US dollar ($USD), SPDR Gold Shares ETF (GLD), and $TNX.

FIGURE 3. THE US DOLLAR, GOLD, AND YIELDS. Gold has been trending higher in 2024, whereas the US dollar and yields still display a series of lower highs and lower lows.Chart source: StockChartsACP. for educational purposes.

Even though the US dollar and 10-year yields are rising, they haven’t yet established an uptrend. Gold, on the other hand, has been on an upward trend in 2024. 

If you hold a long position in gold, ride the momentum, but know that it could dry up. It’s a good idea to start thinking about managing your position. Gold prices are looking extended, and with Treasury yields and the US dollar as high as they are, I would watch them closely for a reversal, as it could cause gold prices to fall.

Looking Forward

Next week, we will have some key economic data that could influence the Fed’s interest rate decision at their November 7 meeting. According to the CME FedWatch Tool, a 25 basis point cut probability is 95.5%. This could change as economic data comes in next week. If the data supports a strengthening US economy, investors may think the Fed will not cut rates at the next meeting. This could give rise to fear, which in turn spikes volatility.

The Cboe Volatility Index ($VIX) closed higher, but is still relatively low at 20.33. Keep an eye on it, because even a little negative news could send it higher.

Next week is chock full of market-moving events. Earnings from mega-cap Tech and other large-cap companies, plus key economic data (see the End-of-Week Wrap-Up section below), are among them. If trading volatility remains anemic next week, then you know that investors are having the election jitters. You may have to wait another week for trading volume to pick up.

In the meantime, it’s best to exercise patience and focus more on managing your portfolio holdings. If you are going to add positions, keep your sizes small to minimize your risks. The stock market is vulnerable and could make large moves in either direction.

End-of-Week Wrap-Up

S&P 500 closed down 0.96% for the week, at 5808.12, Dow Jones Industrial Average down 2.68% for the week at 42,114.40; Nasdaq Composite closed up 0.16% for the week at 18,690.01$VIX up 12.76% for the week, closing at 20.33Best performing sector for the week: Consumer DiscretionaryWorst performing sector for the week: MaterialsTop 5 Large Cap SCTR stocks: Applovin Corp. (APP); Carvana (CVNA); Insmed Inc. (INSM); Ubiquiti, Inc. (UI); MicroStrategy, Inc. (MSTR)

On the Radar Next Week

September JOLTS ReportQ3 GDP Growth Rate QoQ AdvSeptember PCE Price IndexOctober Jobs ReportOctober ISM Manufacturing PMIEarnings from Alphabet (GOOGL), AMD, Microsoft (MSFT), Meta Platforms (META), Amazon, Inc. (AMZN), Apple Inc. (AAPL), McDonald’s Corp (MCD), Pfizer, Inc. (PFE), Chipotle Mexican Grill (CMG), D.R. Horton, Inc. (DHI), Microstrategy (MSTR), Carvana (CVNA), and many more.

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.

When I was growing up, I loved Choose Your Own Adventure books.  I see the world in shades of gray instead of black-and-white, so I was immediately drawn to the seemingly endless scenarios that the main characters could experience as I made different choices for them.

As investors, we often get so caught up in one particular market narrative that we are unable to think “outside the box” and consider other possible outcomes.  Successful investors I’ve worked with have been exceptionally good at looking at all the possibilities, challenging their own investment thesis by opening themselves up to other options.

Today, we’ll walk through four potential outcomes for the S&P 500 index over the next six to eight weeks.  As I share each of these four future paths, I’ll describe the market conditions that would likely be involved, and I’ll also share my estimated probability for each scenario.  

By the way, we ran through four scenarios for the S&P 500 back in July, and you may be surprised to see which scenario actually played out!

And remember, the point of this exercise is threefold:

Consider all four potential future paths for the index, think about what would cause each scenario to unfold in terms of the macro drivers, and review what signals/patterns/indicators would confirm the scenario.Decide which scenario you feel is most likely, and why you think that’s the case. Don’t forget to drop a comment and let me know your vote and what you think will cause that scenario to play out.Think about how each of the four scenarios would impact your current portfolio. How would you manage risk in each case? How and when would you take action to adapt to this new reality?

Let’s start with the most bullish scenario, where the S&P 500 keeps going with a consistent pace and breaks above 6000 by early December.

Option 1: The Super Bullish Scenario

The S&P 500 has experienced a remarkably strong run off the low in early August.  This first scenario would mean a continuation of the pace of the current trend, suggesting the SPX would remain above a trendline drawn from the August and September lows.  This scenario would include the S&P breaking above 6000 for the first time, and by early December, we’d be wondering how we made it through an entire calendar year with the biggest drawdown sitting at just less than 10%.

Dave’s Vote: 5%

Option 2: The Mildly Bullish Scenario

Let’s say that Trump wins a second term, and investors see that as a fairly pro-business and pro-market outcome?  But at the same time, new economic data and the November Fed meeting leave investors a little skeptical of the Fed’s ability to navigate the soft landing scenario into early 2025?

The second scenario would mean we drift a bit higher, but breadth conditions break down as investors gravitate to Magnificent 7 stocks and other safe havens as the VIX pushes above 20.  We don’t see a major correction into early December, but it still feels like one is just around the corner and everyone’s talking about overvaluations and a potential Q1 pullback.

Dave’s vote: 25%

Option 3: The Mildly Bearish Scenario

A Harris victory could certainly weigh on the markets as we progress through Q4, as we realize how much investors had been pricing in a Republican White House.  Skepticism of the Fed reaches a fever pitch as we’re no longer talking about a potential soft landing, but rather when the next major correction will play out.  Volume and breadth divergences that have been growing in October continue to play out, and a 2018-style Q4 drop becomes our reality in 2024.

Dave’s vote: 50%

Option 4: The Very Bearish Scenario

You always need a “doomsday” scenario, where things get bad and stay bad.  What if the S&P 500 starts selling off as a frustrating earnings season leads into a contentious election and a November Fed meeting raises more questions than answers?  Paul Tudor Jones famously remarked, “Nothing good happens below the 200-day moving average.”  And in this scenario, that’s exactly what we’re facing in December as we wonder where how and why the normal Q4 rally is nowhere to be seen.

Dave’s vote: 20%

What probabilities would you assign to each of these four scenarios?  Check out the video below, and then drop a comment with which scenario you select and why!

RR#6,

Dave

PS- Ready to upgrade your investment process?  Check out my free behavioral investing course!

David Keller, CMT

Chief Market Strategist

StockCharts.com

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice.  The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.  

The author does not have a position in mentioned securities at the time of publication.    Any opinions expressed herein are solely those of the author and do not in any way represent the views or opinions of any other person or entity.

The hate comes so easily. So, too, the lies and the gaslighting.

And in the middle of it is a young woman who was minding her own business as a decent-but-not-great player on a decent-but-not-great volleyball team until the right wing decided to make her a piñata in its latest culture war.

Nevada officially forfeited Saturday’s volleyball game against San Jose State, the fifth school to join a transphobic panic that has no basis in fact or science. It’s part of an ongoing grift that would have you believe transgender athletes are taking over women’s sports, robbing cisgender women of opportunities to play, scholarships and trophies, and doing them physical harm in the process.

None of which is true. But it doesn’t lessen the damage being done.

The San Jose State player hasn’t commented and her gender identity hasn’t been confirmed, yet the most private parts of her life are being picked over and debated. She’s been betrayed by the silence of the Mountain West conference and the NCAA, as well as the noise of teammate Brooke Slusser and Nevada captain Sia Liilii, whose newfound interest in “fairness” seems to have a direct correlation to its ability to make them right-wing media stars.

The San Jose State player has been the target of online abuse and harassment, and now Donald Trump is talking about her at his rallies. And no one seems to give a damn about the toll this could be taking on her mental health.

It’s taken a toll on her team, too, with the Spartans dropping three in a row after the first forfeit. As for players on the forfeiting teams who don’t support this nonsense, their postseason hopes are being threatened.

All because we hate what we don’t know and fear what we don’t understand.

The percentage of Americans who are transgender is minuscule, the number who play sports even smaller. Between 30 and 40 at the college level, according to Athlete Ally, which promotes safe and supportive environments for LGBTQ+ athletes. That’s out of the nearly 539,000 athletes who competed across all NCAA divisions last year.

So, no, transgender women are not overrunning collegiate sports teams. And those who sputter that it “could” happen ignore the reality that it hasn’t, despite the NCAA and the International Olympic Committee having had protocols allowing the participation of transgender athlete for more than two decades. It simply isn’t a thing.

As for the “advantage” transgender athletes supposedly have, there is no scientific proof of that. Most of the studies the transphobes spout are comparisons between cisgender men and cisgender women, with the leap being made that of course transgender women must have an advantage. In fact, a study commissioned by the IOC and released earlier this year found evidence of the opposite. That transgender women might actually be disadvantaged when it comes to lung capacity and cardiovascular performance.

Besides, if it were true that transgender athletes had an advantage, then why aren’t they winning? Laurel Hubbard, the first openly transgender woman to compete at the Olympics, didn’t even make it out of the first round in Tokyo. Paralympic sprinter Valentina Petrillo didn’t get past the semifinals in Paris. Juniper Eastwood, the first openly transgender woman to compete in Division I cross country, was eighth at the 2019 Big Sky championships, finishing almost 45 seconds behind the winner.

What even of Lia Thomas? Yes, she won one NCAA title her senior year, but in a time that was more than nine seconds off Katie Ledecky’s collegiate record and slower than all but one of the previous eight NCAA champions. She finished well behind the winners in each of her other two finals, too.

But facts don’t matter to the anti-trans crowd, whose silence on issues that actually do threaten women athletes — lack of funding, inadequate support, abusive coaches, etc. — speaks volumes. They are only interested in fearmongering, taking a page from the time-worn playbook of sowing hate and divisiveness against the marginalized for their own power and gain.

What they don’t realize is punching down on those who are more marginalized does not make them superior. It makes them bigots. Ignorant ones, at that, for not understanding that sex and gender are not the same thing, and both exist on a spectrum.

And rather than ‘protecting’ women athletes, all this hysteria does is put more women in the crosshairs. Any woman who is masculine presenting, or has short hair or dresses like a tomboy, is considered suspect, exemplified by the ugliness at this summer’s Paris Olympics. A witch hunt on their teammate has made the season chaotic and uncertain for the rest of the San Jose State team, too.

History will eventually recognize these shameful and uninformed furies for what they are. But the harm they’re doing now, to the San Jose State player and so many others, can never be undone.

Follow USA TODAY Sports columnist Nancy Armour on social media @nrarmour.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

How will this year’s World Series play out? Using the Dynasty League Baseball online simulation, USA TODAY Sports’ Steve Gardner and DLB designer Mike Cieslinski will pre-play each game to provide some insight into the key matchups and strategy fans can expect to see in the Fall Classic.

Get ready for a World Series slugfest.

Freddie Freeman hit a go-ahead, two-run home run in the bottom of the eighth inning and Will Smith added his second homer of the game two batters later to propel the Los Angeles Dodgers to a 13-9 victory over the New York Yankees in Game 1 of USA TODAY Sports’ annual Simulated World Series.

BOX SCORE:  Dodgers 13, Yankees 9

FULL PLAY-BY-PLAY:  Dodgers take Game 1 with pair of late homers

World Series Game 1 simulation

The game featured a total of six home runs, three of them in the first inning, as the Yankees got out to an early lead on Giancarlo Stanton’s two-run blast off Dodgers starter Jack Flaherty.

But in the bottom of the frame, L.A. struck back with six runs before Yankees starter Gerrit Cole had even recorded an out. Mookie Betts plated a pair with a homer to left and Will Smith capped the scoring with a grand slam to left off a bewildered Cole to put the Dodgers up 6-2.

However, the Yankees kept the pressure on and managed to chip away at the lead. Aaron Judge went deep in the sixth to plate three runs and bring the Yankees to within one. Then with the bases loaded in the top of the eighth, Judge singled in two to put New York ahead 9-8.

The Dodgers staged their own rally in the bottom of the eighth against Yanks reliever Jake Cousins. Shohei Ohtani doubled to right with one out, stole third and came home to tie the game on Betts’ RBI single.

After Betts stole second, Freeman unloaded with a monster 447-foot blast to right field to put the Dodgers on top to stay.

What to watch in (the real) Game 1

Cole play. The biggest advantage the Yankees have in this series is in their starting pitching. Ace Gerrit Cole has pitched in many big games before so he shouldn’t have any trouble meeting the moment. However, the Dodgers jumped on him immediately in the Sim Series opener with six runs in the first inning. That obviously can’t happen if the Yankees hope to win a championship. Cole will need to set the tone immediately when he takes the mound in the first against the Dodgers’ best hitters.

Stars come out at night. While the Yankees did dig themselves a big hole early, they have some pretty powerful sluggers of their own. Juan Soto reached base four times and scored twice. And of course, Judge played like an MVP, going 4-for-4 with five RBI to lead the comeback.

For the Dodgers, Ohtani, Betts, Freeman and Max Muncy all had three hits, while Smith ended up with six RBI. This is a team that scored a record 46 runs in six games against the Mets in the NLCS. The offensive juggernaut should continue to roll no matter who the Yankees send out to the mound.

Yankees deficient on defense. Several plays in Sim Series Game 1 came down to Yankees infielders (specifically Gleyber Torres) being unable to get to ground balls that an average fielder would. Torres’ Dynasty League Baseball range rating is a D, which cost him on several plays, starting with the first batter of the game when Shohei Ohtani beat out a high chopper — and Betts followed with a home run. Later in that inning, Freeman hit a grounder in the hole that Torres was unable to field and he later scored on Smith’s grand slam.

In addition, the Yankees starting outfielders all have average to below-average range. Aaron Judge in center and Juan Soto in right both have D ranges, while Alex Verdugo is a C in left field. In Sim Series Game 1, the Dodgers’ Teoscar Hernandez took advantage of Judge’s poor range for a double.

Simulate your own World Series. Get a FREE one-month subscription to Dynasty League Baseball online by going to DynastyLeagueBaseball.com, selecting the monthly option and entering code USA2 at checkout.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Houston Texans are 5-2 heading into their matchup with the Indianapolis Colts in Week 8. Despite the good start, the Texans have been without top receiver Nico Collins since Week 5, when he suffered a hamstring injury that knocked him out of the game.

Initially, the Texans seemed optimistic that Collins’ injury may be short-term. It was originally reported that Collins would be day-to-day ahead of Houston’s Week 6 game against the New England Patriots. However, DeMeco Ryans said the team’s top receiver would be week-to-week.

‘It takes a couple of weeks for a hamstring,’ Ryans said when discussing the injury, per NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport. Shortly after the comments, Houston placed Collins on injured reserve.

Here’s the latest on Nico Collins’ hamstring injury and potential return:

When will Nico Collins return?

Once the Texans placed Collins on IR, he would be guaranteed to sit for the next four games.

All things Texans: Latest Houston Texans news, schedule, roster, stats, injury updates and more.

The Texans may get their No. 1 wide receiver back in Week 10 against the Detroit Lions on ‘Sunday Night Football.’ This is the earliest Collins can return.

According to a report, Collins has experienced no setbacks during his recovery. He will miss the team’s Week 8 matchup with the Colts and Week 9 against the Jets on ‘Thursday Night Football.’ He will look to step back into the Texans’ No. 1 receiving role in Week 10.

Despite missing the last two games, Collins sits fourth in the NFL in receiving yards entering Week 8.

When was Nico Collins’ injury?

Nico Collins was injured in the Texans Week 5 matchup against the Bills at home. He left the game at the end of the first quarter, with Houston leading 14-3. The Texans ruled Collins out for the remainder of the game against Buffalo because of a hamstring injury. He finished his day with 2 catches for 78 yards and a touchdown.

Collins injured his hamstring on the same play he reeled in a 67-yard touchdown catch from CJ Stroud. He appeared to let up on his way into the end zone after the catch.

Nico Collins stats

Collins led the NFL in receiving yards through five weeks with 567 yards. Below is a full look at his stats from the 2024 season:

Targets: 45
Catches: 32
Yards: 567
TDs: 3
Yards per reception: 17.7

Collins has three games with at least 100 receiving yards and has recorded at least 78 yards in each of his five games.

Texans WR depth chart

Houston has relied on Stefon Diggs and Tank Dell as its primary receivers with Collins out.

Robert Woods and Xavier Hutchinson have alternated as the team’s No. 4 receiver this season, but Hutchinson had a larger role than Woods, who has been dealing with a foot injury himself.

Below is a full look at the Texans wide receiver depth chart behind Collins:

Stefon Diggs
Tank Dell
Xavier Hutchinson
Robert Woods
John Metchie III
Steven Sims

The team also has Johnny Johnson III available on the practice squad if additional reinforcements are needed.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Tua Tagovailoa is almost back from his extended concussion layoff. Now let’s hold our collective breath. 

The Miami Dolphins’ star quarterback, last seen during an NFL game curled up in the fencing position and then helped off the field after suffering at least his third concussion within two years, returned to practices this week and on Friday was fully cleared to play Sunday against the Arizona Cardinals. 

Sure, after the last one, Tagovailoa got wind of the widespread debate and concern about his life, future and career – with so many voices, including credible ones in the NFL universe belonging to former players, urging him to walk away. And he wants to hear none of it. By his own admission, he is oblivious to what others say about him.  

“I appreciate your concern, I really do,” Tagovailoa said during a news conference this week, asked to respond to the sentiments. “I love this game, and I love it to the death of me. That’s it.” 

What a chilling choice of words. 

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

Tagovailoa, 26, undoubtedly hates being the walking poster image for concussion risk. Yet for all the spark he can inject into Miami’s offense – the deep passing game that can strike in a heartbeat with speedy receivers Tyreek Hill and Jaylen Waddle has been non-existent as team has stumbled to 2-4 during Tagovailoa’s absence – even more intrigue will come with the next big hit. 

Or maybe even with a not-so-big hit, given how Tagovailoa went down the last time on Sept. 12, when he barreled into Buffalo Bills safety Damar Hamlin for a collision that was only so intense by typical football standards. 

He knows. It’s an accepted truth in the medical community: The more concussions a person sustains, the more susceptible they are to another one. Tagovailoa discussed that with the experts he consulted with during recent weeks but hasn’t reached a conclusion when it comes to future risk. 

You’d think it has to be sobering, though, for any player who has suffered multiple concussions to consider whether they are at risk for developing chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) or other long-term degenerative brain conditions. 

“I think the brain is – there’s just a gray area when it comes to that,” Tagovailoa said. “If you do know that you’re going to get long-term disease from it, or you’re not, I just think there’s a lot of gray area with it. For me, this is what I love to do. This is what makes me happy and I’m going to do it, that’s it.” 

But still: How many concussions are too many? How does that factor into risk? 

“I don’t know if there’s a magic number, but the number that’s always been mentioned as far as I know is three or more in a finite period of time,” Dr. Julian Bailes, a renowned neurosurgeon with Endeavor Health in suburban Chicago, told USA TODAY Sports. 

“So, three or more in rapid succession has always been to me cause for pause. And to take time off to hopefully let it heal. But then you’ve got the other factor, the susceptibility, the threshold to getting a concussion being lowered.” 

As Tagovailoa alluded to, the gray area in understanding his case includes his rebound from the setbacks in 2022; he played the entire 2023 season (starting all 17 regular-season games and one postseason contest) without suffering a concussion. Then again, the image of him going down again early this season brought an immediate flashback to two seasons ago. After the extended window for rest and healing – Tagovailoa maintains that he was symptom-free the day after he suffered his latest concussion and has been throwing for five weeks while on injured reserve – he now has been medically cleared to play. 

The final steps of the NFL’s graduated return-to-play protocols for Tagovailoa were clearance from the Dolphins medical staff and an independent neurologist.  

Yet given his history, Tagovailoa’s case isn’t just about whether he’s fit to play now. Allen Sills, the NFL’s chief medical adviser, allows that even with a player’s concussion history, there’s no scientific formula that can calculate concussion risk. Variables that are unique from one case to another – such as the number of concussions, duration of symptoms, conditions when the injury occurred – are obviously considered. 

“Then it’s a best guess,” Sills told reporters during a conference call earlier this month. “A guess at what (is) someone’s future risk of concussion.” 

If a player is medically cleared, the NFL or NFL Players Association won’t suggest that a player retire. The ultimate decision belongs to the player – who, of course, could be influenced by family or advisers. Tagovailoa said that he never considered walking away from the sport after his latest setback. Although he discussed his future with his family following the concussions in 2022, he didn’t seek any input from family members beyond his wife, Annah, this time around. 

As Sills put it, “patient autonomy” is an essential element included in the process of gathering input from doctors when considering a player’s future risk. The league’s primary objective, he said, is to ensure its return-to-play protocols are followed to heal from the acute injury, without having a role in the player’s decision about his future. 

But what if the “patient’s voice” is misguided? Ill-informed? Naive? Egocentric? Disillusioned? If someone has suffered from a brain injury – and scientifically there’s gray area to determine the extent of the injury – perhaps that voice represents an inherent flaw in the equation.  

Interestingly, Tagovailoa said the Dolphins’ decision to put him on injured reserve for the minimum of four weeks was a matter of the team “protecting myself from myself” because the Dolphins realized that, as a competitor, he would want to hurry back to the lineup. Dolphins coach Mike McDaniel, though, said the decision was based on medical advice that dictated the quarterback have an extended window for rest and recovery. 

In any event, there’s no doubt that Tagovailoa’s “patient’s voice” is still plenty determined. Or downright defiant. 

Someone asked a hypothetical question about how he might react to advice from doctors to take a longer period off if he suffered another concussion. 

“Man, I just think it’s based on whatever that individual feels,” Tagovailoa said. “If you feel like you can go, you can go.” 

It was striking that he was so cavalier in considering that question under such a condition. 

“I just think this is only becoming a thing just because of what ended up happening two years ago for myself within the sport,” Tagovailoa added. “I hate that it’s happened, but we don’t look at boxers the same way. We don’t look at hockey players the same way, but I just think because of what happened in the magnitude that that had, that it’s becoming more of an issue here in the league.” 

When the NFL revised protocols after Tagovailoa’s cases in 2022, it was a response to the optics to the quarterback not being diagnosed with a concussion when knocked out of a game against Buffalo (it was announced as a neck injury), only to suffer a concussion four days later when his head bounced off the turf at Cincinnati. The NFLPA fired the independent neurotrauma consultant who examined Tagovailoa after the initial injury, which ultimately set off the chain of events that led to revised protocols. 

Still, Tagovailoa is fooling himself if he thinks the scrutiny of his case isn’t part of the larger picture. The emphasis on concussions ramped up years before the quarterback entered the league in 2020. 

Bailes was at the cutting edge of research efforts two decades ago, partnering with Dr. Bennet Omalu, who discovered CTE, presenting findings to the NFL. He is concerned about Tagovailoa, in part because of what is unknown about the risks. As Bailes pointed out, a big breakthrough for concussion research will come when doctors are able to diagnose CTE and other degenerative brain conditions in living patients. 

“My best wishes for him; I hope it turns out,” said Bailes, who is also on the advisory board for the Chuck Noll Foundation for Brain Injury Research. “I hope he can play in as safe a way as possible, maybe sliding more instead of running and putting his head in there, trying to get more yardage.” 

Tagovailoa acknowledges a need to make better decisions, maintaining that he can play smarter – even if his tendency to run with reckless abandon has been part of his edge since high school. He won’t wear a Guardian Cap, the layer of foam padding fixated over the standard helmet to reduce the shock absorbed on hits. Instead, he’s wearing the top-rated “Guardian Cap-compliant’ helmet for quarterbacks, the VICIS ZERO2 MATRIX ID QB, which the league maintains is as safe or safer than wearing a helmet with a Guardian Cap. 

Tagovailoa also expressed a desire to stay more available for his team, which incidentally in August signed him to a massive four-year, $212.4 million contract extension. His deal included $167.171 million in guarantees, according to Spotrac.com, so his decision to play doesn’t seem to hinge on money. 

Still, it’s when pondering the long-term risk that Tagovailoa sounds like a man with a certain blind spot. 

“How much risk do we take when we get up in the morning to drive to work?” he said. “Get into a car crash, I don’t know. Everything, I think, takes risk…Every time we suit up, we’re all taking a risk that we could potentially get hurt, whether it’s a concussion, a broken bone, anything. You get up off the bed the wrong way, you potentially could risk spraining your ankle. There’s just risk in any and everything and I’m willing to play the odds.” 

It’s just that some odds cost a lot more. 

This story has been updated with new information.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Trump campaign released an ad Friday featuring a Holocaust survivor criticizing Vice President Kamala Harris for comparing former President Trump to Adolf Hitler. 

‘I know more about Hitler than Kamala will ever know in a thousand lifetimes,’ 94-year-old Jerry Wartski, a survivor of Auschwitz, says in the roughly minute-and-a-half advertisement. ‘For her to accuse President Trump of being like Hitler is the worst thing I’ve ever heard in my 75 years living in the United States.’

Wartski said Trump was a ‘mensch,’ a Yiddish term of endearment, arguing ‘he has always stood with the Jewish people and the State of Israel.’

Wartski also demanded an apology from Harris. 

‘I know President Trump, and he would never say this, and Kamala Harris knows this,’ Wartski says. ‘She owes my parents and everybody else who was murdered by Hitler an apology.’

Fox News Digital reached out to the Harris campaign for comment but did not immediately receive a response.

The ad comes after Harris repeatedly compared Trump to Hitler this week, including during a press conference from the steps of her formal residence at the U.S. Naval Observatory in Washington, D.C., during a town hall Wednesday that Harris conducted with CNN and on social media. 

Harris’ remarks followed media reports this week that detailed alleged claims by ex-Trump administration officials, including Trump’s former chief of staff, John Kelly, that the former president on ‘multiple occasions’ praised Hitler and the loyalty his Nazi generals showed him.

‘Donald Trump is out for unchecked power. He wants a military like Adolf Hitler had, who will be loyal to him, not our Constitution,’ Harris posted to X this week. ‘He is unhinged, unstable, and given a second term, there would be no one to stop him from pursuing his worst impulses.’

‘If the President of the United States, the commander in chief, is saying to his generals, in essence, ‘Why can’t you be more like Hitler’s generals?’ Anderson, come on. This is a serious, serious issue,’ Harris said during her town hall event Wednesday. 

‘And we know who he is. He admires dictators, sending love letters back and forth with Kim Jong Un.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS