Archive

2024

Browsing

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre denied that President Biden was referring to Trump supporters when he said Tuesday, ‘The only garbage I see out there is his supporters.’ 

‘Just to clarify, he was not calling Trump supporters garbage,’ Jean-Pierre told reporters at the daily White House press briefing on Wednesday, reiterating that Biden put out a statement to clarify his remarks.

‘He does not view Trump supporters or anybody who supports Trump as garbage,’ she said, adding that Biden has said numerous times that he is a ‘president for all,’ including those who did not vote for him in red states and blue states. 

During a Zoom call on Tuesday, Biden was asked about a comment made Sunday during a Trump rally at Madison Square Garden in which comedian Tony Hinchcliffe called Puerto Rico a ‘floating island of garbage.’

Outrage spewed from Democrats over the next two days saying Trump’s campaign should not refer to Puerto Rico like that.

Then, as Vice President Kamala Harris was holding her last major campaign event – and not far from the White House – Biden was asked what he thought of Hinchcliffe’s comedy bit at the Trump rally in New York.

‘The only garbage I see floating out there is his supporters,’ Biden said. ‘[Trump’s] demonization of Latinos is unconscionable, and it is un-American.’

Biden tweeted later that evening, ‘Earlier today I referred to the hateful rhetoric about Puerto Rico spewed by Trump’s supporters at his Madison Square Garden rally as garbage – which is the only word I can think of to describe it. His demonization of Latinos is unconscionable. That’s all I meant to say. The comments at that rally don’t reflect who we are as a nation.’

Harris responded to the controversy earlier Wednesday, observing that Biden had ‘clarified his comments.’ 

‘I strongly disagree with any criticism of people based on who they vote for,’ Harris said. ‘You heard me last night and continuously throughout my career. I believe that the work that I do is about representing all the people, whether they support me or not.’

Harris added that Biden had called her Tuesday night after the event, but she said they did not discuss his ‘garbage’ comment.

Fox News Digital’s Scott McDonald and Anders Hagstrom contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

First lady Jill Biden’s former press secretary is torching the White House’s attempt to cover up President Biden’s ‘garbage’ comment, calling it a ‘bonehead move’ that they have attempted before.

The president unleashed a storm of controversy by calling supporters of former President Donald Trump ‘garbage’ on a Tuesday call with Hispanic activist group Voto Latino.

During the call, Biden criticized Trump’s Madison Square Garden rally for a comedian’s joke calling Puerto Rico a ‘floating island of garbage,’ saying that ‘the only garbage I see floating out there is his supporters.’

After the call, the White House released an official transcript of the call in which Biden’s comment was written as ‘the only garbage I see floating out there is his supporter’s,’ insinuating that the president was referring to the comedian instead of all Trump supporters.

‘The only garbage I see floating out there is his supporter’s — his — his demonization of Latinos is unconscionable, and it’s un-American. It’s totally contrary to everything we’ve done, everything we’ve been,’ read the transcript.

Posting a screenshot of the transcript to social media, Andrew Bates, the White House senior deputy press secretary and deputy assistant to the president, claimed that Biden ‘referred to the hateful rhetoric at the Madison Square Garden rally as ‘garbage.’’

Michael LaRosa, Jill Biden’s former press secretary, meanwhile, wrote on X that the White House’s attempt to transcribe ‘supporters’ as ‘supporter’s,’ was ‘a bonehead move and one they’ve been caught making before.’

LaRosa also reposted another post that pointed out that Biden had previously expressed shock in an NBC News interview over Trump supporters’ vitriol toward him. 

‘I’ve never seen a circumstance where you ride through certain rural areas of the country and people have signs there stand — big Trump signs with — m — middle — signs saying ‘F Biden’ and the little kid standing there putting up his middle finger,’ Biden said in a July 15 interview, according to an NBC transcript. 

Trump responded to Biden’s remark by calling it ‘terrible’ and worse than Hillary Clinton calling his supporters ‘deplorables’ in 2016.

‘Garbage, I think, is worse,’ he said. ‘But he doesn’t know. You have to please forgive him.’

‘Please forgive him for not knowing what he said,’ Trump said. ‘These people are terrible, terrible, terrible to say a thing like that. But he really doesn’t know. He really, honestly, he doesn’t. And I’m convinced that he likes me more than he likes Kamala. But that’s a terrible thing.’

In a second response, Trump wrote, ‘While I am running a campaign of positive solutions to save America, Kamala Harris is running a campaign of hate.’ 

‘Now, on top of everything, Joe Biden calls our supporters ‘garbage.’ You can’t lead America if you don’t love the American People. Kamala Harris and Joe Biden have shown they are both unfit to be President of the United States,’ Trump wrote. 

Vice President Kamala Harris was asked about Biden’s remark on Wednesday morning. Harris said that she had spoken to Biden since the call but that his ‘garbage’ remark did not come up in their conversation.

‘First of all, he clarified his comments, but let me be clear, I strongly disagree with any criticism of people based on who they vote for,’ she said. ‘I believe that the work that I do is about representing all the people, whether they support me or not. And as president of the United States, I will be a president for all Americans, whether you vote for me or not.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

In this exclusive StockCharts video, Joe shows a specific candlestick pattern that, when it develops at the right time, can signal the start of a new upleg. He uses NVDA, MSFT and GLD to explain how this can setup at different times and can give a timely signal to look to enter or in some cases a signal to exit. Joe then covers TNX and some commodities like Silver, Oil and Copper. Finally, he goes through the symbol requests that came through this week, including GOOGL, GBTC, and more.

This video was originally published on October 30, 2024. Click this link to watch on StockCharts TV.

Archived videos from Joe are available at this link. Send symbol requests to stocktalk@stockcharts.com; you can also submit a request in the comments section below the video on YouTube. Symbol Requests can be sent in throughout the week prior to the next show.

How will this year’s World Series play out? Using the Dynasty League Baseball online simulation, USA TODAY Sports’ Steve Gardner and DLB designer Mike Cieslinski will pre-play each game to provide some insight into the key matchups and strategy fans can expect to see in the Fall Classic.

When the going gets tough, baseball teams need to be able to rely on their stars.

Arguably the two most important players on the New York Yankees played critical roles in a 2-0 shutout of the Los Angeles Dodgers in Game 5 of USA TODAY Sports’ annual Simulated World Series.

Ace Gerrit Cole tossed 5 2/3 scoreless innings and MVP Aaron Judge hit a mammoth home run to propel the Yankees to victory, but not before some ninth-inning drama had the Dodgers within an eyelash of reversing the outcome.

BOX SCORE: Yankees 2, Dodgers 0

FULL PLAY-BY-PLAY: Cole, Judge come up big for Yanks in Game 5

World Series Game 5 simulation

In a rematch of Game 1, starting pitchers Cole and Jack Flaherty matched zeroes early — albeit in very different fashion. The Dodgers had baserunners in scoring position in each of the first four frames, but Cole continually managed to escape with crucial strikeouts in situations where a batter even making weak contact would have scored a run.

Meanwhile, Flaherty retired the first 12 Yankees batters in order before doubles by Giancarlo Stanton and Anthony Rizzo plated the game’s first run. (Rizzo’s hit through a drawn-in infield was his first of the Sim Series, breaking an 0-for-16 skid.)

Judge provided the big blow of the game, a gargantuan 501-foot blast to deep left field in the bottom of the sixth inning that gave New York an important insurance run. It was Judge’s third home run of the Sim Series.

But the Yankees still had to keep the potent Dodgers lineup from scoring. Lefty Nestor Cortes came in to face the top of the order in the seventh, allowing a single to Shohei Ohtani, but getting Freddie Freeman to hit into a fielder’s choice for the final out.

With Yankees closer Luke Weaver unavailable after his seven-out save in Game 4, the Dodgers loaded the bases with two outs in the ninth. However, lefty Tim Hill retired Freeman on a soft grounder to first to end the game.

What to watch in (the real) Game 5

Pitcher’s duel? The two teams will have their best starters on full rest in Game 5; how long will the managers stick with them? In our Sim Series both Cole and Flaherty made it into the sixth inning, with Cole being relieved by Tommy Kahnle for the final out in the sixth and Flaherty giving way to Alex Vesia to start the seventh.

One thing to watch, Cole has had trouble holding runners on base this season. Dynasty League Baseball gives him a D hold rating, which puts him among the worst in the majors. The Dodgers took advantage by stealing three bases off Cole in Sim Series Game 5.

Yankees’ shaky fielding: It’s been a recurring theme throughout the Sim Series and the World Series, and the Yankees put themselves in difficult spots due to their inability to make routine plays.

Third baseman Jazz Chisholm couldn’t range far enough into the hole to flag a ground ball by Betts in the first. He then misplayed a grounder by Will Smith in the second for an error.
Catcher Austin Wells’ throwing error on a stolen base attempt in the first allowed Betts to go all the way to third.
First baseman Anthony Rizzo was unable to run down a foul ball off the bat of Freeman.

Missed opportunities: The Dodgers had a runner on base every inning of the game, but went 1-for-13 with runners in scoring position and left 12 runners on base in the shutout loss. They also had a little bit of bad luck mixed in with two runners nailed at the plate. In addition, Yankees right fielder Juan Soto threw out Tommy Edman at second on a bizarre play in the fifth inning in which he struck out, but catcher Austin Wells missed the ball and then threw wildly to first trying to record the putout. Soto recovered in time to gun down Edman trying to take an extra base.

Bases-loaded drama: In a situation eerily reminiscent of what happened in Game 1 of the actual World Series, the Dodgers loaded the bases in the ninth inning with a chance to tie or take the lead.

While in real life, Yankees manager Aaron Boone turned to Cortes to face Freeman — and saw him give up a game-winning grand slam, virtual Boone had Cortes face the Dodgers’ key lefty hitters in the seventh and called on Hill in the ninth.

In this instance, Hill gave up a double to Ohtani and intentionally walked Betts to fill the bases. And in the confrontation Yankees fans wish they’d seen in Game 1, Hill got Freeman to hit a ground ball to first for the final out.

Previous 2024 Sim Series results

Game 1: Dodgers 13, Yankees 9

Game 2: Yankees 7, Dodgers 4

Game 3: Dodgers 9, Yankees 5

Game 4: Yankees 4, Dodgers 3

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

INDIANAPOLIS — The Indiana Fever are in the market for a new coach.

But after letting go of Christie Sides on Sunday, a month after the Fever’s season ended, it can’t be just anyone.

With six openings for head coaches across the league, there’s plenty of competition. Bringing in another first-time head coach after firing Sides, especially after Fever president Kelly Krauskopf said they want to be ‘bold and assertive’ with their goal of a WNBA championship, wouldn’t necessarily make sense.

The Fever will need to aim big with an experienced head coach who can take Indiana deep into the playoffs. Letting go of Sides only makes sense if it’s for a well-experienced head coach that has had a lot of success in the league – and there are only a few coaches that fit that description.

Stephanie White

The obvious one, yes, as Annie Costabile of the Chicago Sun-Times reported on Sunday multiple sources expect White to take the job with the Fever. White had one more year on her contract with the Sun, but Connecticut announced Monday that it had parted ways with the coach.

White, who was an assistant when the Fever won the finals in 2012, brought Indiana back to the finals in 2015 in her first year as a head coach. She left after the 2016 season for a college job at Vanderbilt, but got back into the WNBA as the head coach of Connecticut in 2023.

White could be exactly what the Fever need; she’s an experienced head coach at all levels of the game and commands respect from the rest of the league. She knows what it’s like to win in the WNBA, both as an assistant and as a head coach.

The Sun have been contenders in each of the two years she’s been in Connecticut, finishing second in the Eastern Conference and making it to the WNBA semifinals each year. Connecticut also hangs its hat on defense, finishing first in defensive rating in 2023 and second in 2024.

The Fever struggled defensively in the past two years, finishing 11th in the league both seasons. It’s something Indiana has long struggled with, and the Fever need a defensive coach to shore up that side of the ball.

White is also from West Lebanon, Indiana, and won Miss Indiana Basketball out of Seeger High School in 1995 and a national title as a player at Purdue in 1999. 

Curt Miller

Miller is the only other coach that would make sense to let go of Sides for.

He was recently fired from the Los Angeles Sparks after two rebuild seasons, similar to Sides. Miller was originally brought into L.A. to lead a rebuild of the franchise, but pressures from minority ownership groups within the Sparks franchise led to him being let go.

Multiple injuries, including an ACL tear for No. 2 pick Cameron Brink near the beginning of the season, hampered Miller’s 2024 season as the Sparks finished 8-32 – last in the league. 

Outside of Los Angeles, Miller has been an effective coach. He was the head coach of Connecticut from 2016-22, leading the Sun to two WNBA Finals appearances and playoffs berths in six of the seven seasons he was at the helm. He, like White, has the experience of leading a consistently good team deep into the playoffs.

Miller also has some ties to Indiana, as he was the head coach of the Indiana women’s basketball team from 2012-14. He abruptly resigned from IU in July 2014, citing health and family reasons, before making the jump to the WNBA as an assistant for the Sparks in 2015.

Jenny Boucek

The Pacers assistant coach has appeared on multiple WNBA coaching candidacy boards, drawing on her experience as a head coach for multiple franchises in the 2000s. Boucek, who has been an assistant on Rick Carlisle’s Pacers staff since 2021, is also already familiar with Krauskopf, who was a Pacers assistant general manager from 2018-24. 

Boucek has not been in the WNBA space, though, since 2017. She was the Seattle Storm’s head coach from 2015-17, compiling a 36-58 record over three seasons. Before that, she was the head coach of the now-defunct Sacramento Monarchs from 2007-09, and she was relieved in the middle of the 2009 season. 

Boucek has worked closely with Carlisle for a number of years based on their shared background of being University of Virginia standouts. She was an assistant on his Mavericks staff before the Pacers, as well. 

Boucek could be a potential hire for the Fever or any of the five other WNBA franchises looking for a new coach – that is, if she is interested in leaving the NBA in the first place. 

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fast.Download for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Mike Tyson-Jake Paul fight is next month and it will of course be a bloated spectacle. Who knows if it will be a competitive fight. Who knows if it will justify the hype. What we do know is it is one of boxing’s bigger moments.

But it is nothing compared to its biggest. In many ways the Tyson-Paul fight owes everything to something that happened 50 years ago on Oct. 30, 1974: The Rumble in the Jungle.

In Zaire, at the Stade des Martyrs stadium, Muhammad Ali, then 32, fought George Foreman, 25. Most thought Ali didn’t stand a chance. It was understandable. Ali was making a comeback after his world title was stripped for declining to be drafted for the Vietnam War.

It was one of the most principled stances any American athlete has ever taken. But that bravery cost Ali time and experience and Foreman was a vicious fighter who was undefeated.

Pulitzer Prize winner Dave Anderson from the New York Times wrote of the fight: “George Foreman might be the heaviest puncher in the history of the heavyweight division. For a few rounds, Ali might be able to escape Foreman’s sledgehammer strength, but not for 15 rounds. Sooner or later, the champion will land one of his sledgehammer punches and, for the first time in his career, Muhammad Ali will be counted out. That could happen in the first round.”

Embedded content: https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/boxing/2014/10/29/muhammad-ali-george-foreman-rumble-in-the-jungle-40th-anniversary/18097587/

The fight ended with Ali knocking Foreman out in the eighth round but the bout’s significance went far beyond what happened in the ring. The bout happened in Africa, which is a dismissed and disrespected continent in some parts of the world. Ali built a love affair with the people of Zaire (now Congo) that lasts to this day.

Ali also got back a title that had been stolen from him.

“The fight when I was at my best as a boxer was against Cleveland Williams,” Ali once said. “The fight that was the best for fans was against Joe Frazier in Manila. But the fight that meant the most to me was beating George Foreman to win the championship of the world again.”

Ali added: ‘So many people come up to me and tell me they remember where they were when I whupped George Foreman. I remember where I was too.”

What the Rumble also did was show the spectacular possibility of how great and beloved a sporting event can be. It was the Super Bowl before the Super Bowl became the Super Bowl.

It was able to be great while also lacking a corporate feel. The fight was rooted and pure because both fighters were the same in their own ways. Ali was an activist and genius and Foreman was the perfect villain who would later become a congenial pitch man. Both men later became friends.

The fight showed what possibility was. It was a beautiful moment.

Boxing would undergo numerous changes, some good, and others awful. Tyson would become part of these great moments. He’d become a legend in the sport.

Boxing has faced challenges from the UFC and sometimes a lack of star power. It weaves between lacking relevance and being powerfully irresistible.

The Tyson-Paul fight exemplifies what boxing is now. Many of us will watch it. Maybe it will be decent but none of us would be stunned if it was absolutely putrid. Not to sound like the old man yelling at clouds but this fight is the artificial sweetener version of boxing. Like diet soda or watching bad science fiction. You’ll drink it or watch it in a pinch. But it lacks a core.

The Rumble reminds us of what boxing greatness was. Can it be that way again? Maybe there’s some fight in another 50 years that surpasses it. Maybe a Rumble 2. But it would be difficult to do that. We know it won’t be Tyson-Paul.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Jameson Williams has been a dynamic receiver for the Detroit Lions since the team made him a first-round pick in the 2022 NFL draft.

That said, Williams has had trouble staying on the field consistently for the Lions. Those issues aren’t entirely injury related.

Williams missed most of his rookie year in 2022 while recovering from a torn ACL he suffered at Alabama. In the two seasons since, the 23-year-old has largely stayed healthy but missed time due to suspensions.

Williams has been suspended for a total of six games since the start of the 2023 NFL season. He is now facing more potential trouble stemming from a charge of carrying a concealed weapon in a motor vehicle.

Here’s what to know about Williams’ history of suspensions and off-the-field issues from his NFL career to date.

All things Lions: Latest Detroit Lions news, schedule, roster, stats, injury updates and more.

Jameson Williams gambling suspension

Williams first found himself in trouble during his NFL career when he was among five players – and four Lions – suspended for violating the league’s gambling policy.

Williams was dealt a six-game suspension on April 21, 2023, for placing bets on college sporting events from inside the Lions’ practice facility. While NFL personnel are permitted to bet on non-NFL events, they are not permitted to do so in any club or league facility, per the NFL’s gambling policy.

Williams eventually had his suspension reduced from six games to four and missed the start of the 2023 NFL season because of it. He returned in Week 5 and played the next 12 games consecutively before sitting out Detroit’s Week 18 game against the Minnesota Vikings.

Jameson Williams PED suspension

Williams was suspended a second time during the 2024 NFL season for violating the NFL’s Performance-Enhancing Substance (PES) policy, which is also known as the NFL’s Performance-Enhancing Drug (PED) policy.

The NFL announced Williams’ suspension on Oct 24, 2023. He received a two-game suspension for violating the PES policy, indicating he had tested positive for a ‘Stimulant, Diuretic, or Masking Agent.’ That category carries the lowest-level penalty until the NFL and NFLPA’s jointly developed policy.

NFL players are subject to random testing for these substances and can be asked to provide as many as 24 blood or urine tests per year. Players who produce a positive test are subject to discipline, and any player who refuses to appear for required testing or doesn’t cooperate fully with the collection process is also considered to be in violation of the policy.

Williams accepted the suspension but said it ‘came as a complete surprise that I am still trying to understand.’

‘This week I was notified by the NFL that I have been suspended for a violation of the Performance Enhancing Substances Policy,’ Williams said in a statement shared on social media by his agent, Rocky Arceneaux. ‘I don’t take supplements or vitamins and I am overly cautious about even taking over-the-counter medicine. At no time have I ever taken something in an attempt to cheat or look for an unfair advantage. I understand that I am responsible for everything that goes into my body and I have to take accountability in this instance.’

Williams missed the Lions’ Week 8 win over the Tennessee Titans because of the suspension and is due to be out for the team’s crucial Week 9 game against the Green Bay Packers as well.

Jameson Williams gun incident

On Oct. 29, 2024 – just five days after Williams was suspended for violating the NFL’s PES policy – the Lions wide-out became the subject of a police investigation, according to a report from WXYZ Channel 7.

Specifically, police are investigating why Williams was not arrested after being found with a concealed weapon in his car during a traffic stop.

Williams was riding in a car driven by his brother after midnight on Oct. 8, 2024, when they were pulled over for speeding, Channel 7 reports. Williams’ brother told the police officer during the stop that there were two guns in the vehicle – one registered to him and one registered to the Lions receiver.

However, unlike his brother, Williams did not have a concealed pistol license (CPL) for his weapon. The officers then told Williams he would be taken into custody for carrying a concealed weapon.

Body cam footage revealed that Williams told the officers, ‘I play for the Lions, bro.’ The officers still cuffed him and placed him in a patrol car while a supervisor was brought to the scene.

Eventually, Williams was released without being arrested and had the gun returned to him. This came after the supervising sergeant who arrived made phone calls with higher-ranking officials upon recognizing Williams.

‘You’re a (expletive) hero. Thank you so much,’ the sergeant is heard saying on the footage obtained by Channel 7.

Originally, no police report was filed because of the incident. But amid the Detroit Police Department’s investigation into the matter, it submitted a warrant request to the Wayne County Prosecutor’s Office for Williams. He may now face a charge of carrying a concealed weapon in a motor vehicle, per WXYZ.

The Lions provided Channel 7 with a statement making it clear they were aware about Williams’ traffic stop and were in touch with the NFL regarding it.

‘Jameson made us aware immediately that he was a passenger in a routine traffic stop on October 8th. We discussed the incident with him and have kept the league informed of what we know,’ the Lions said. ‘We understand he was released without incident or citation. It is now our understanding that the Detroit Police Department is revisiting the matter. Jameson has hired an attorney, and we will not be commenting further out of respect for the legal process.’

That said, the NFL typically waits until the legal process is complete before enacting discipline against its players. As such, Williams doesn’t seem likely to face a suspension from the matter during the 2024 NFL season.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

I’ve lost track of how many times people have asked if I will be glad when the election is over. 

Truth be told, just after the election is when the hard stuff begins.

Election Day is Tuesday, but in reality, that’s just the beginning of the process. It may take days to sort out who voters have chosen as president. Control of the House is razor tight. It may boil down to a handful of races decided by a grand total of several thousand votes. So don’t for a moment think we automatically know which party will be in the majority as election officials sort all of that out. There’s a scenario where a thin margin of contested seats in the House could spring several weeks of challenges. 

Moreover, Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution dictates that the House and Senate ‘shall be the Judge of the elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members.’ And it’s the new House in the new Congress next year that will decide whether to seat people if there’s a dispute.

Of course, that’s provided the House can elect a speaker when the new Congress is constitutionally mandated to begin on Jan. 3. Don’t forget that House Republicans incinerated a total of 27 days on two separate occasions to elect former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., and current Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La.

We’ll come back to that in a moment. 

In the meantime, let’s run through some of the hazards that could unfold after the final ballot is cast.

Let’s start with when we might learn which party controls either the House or Senate.

Election Day fell on Nov. 8 for the 2022 midterms, but it wasn’t clear that Democrats held their Senate majority until late on the evening of Nov. 12, when Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., retained her seat. 

Determining House control took even longer in 2022. Remember that McCarthy touted the possibility that Republicans might marshal as many as 50 seats. Republicans won the House by a thread, but the GOP majority was not clear until Nov. 16. 

In 2020, most news organizations projected on election night that Democrats would hold the House, but it wasn’t until December that a picture emerged showing how close Democrats came to losing their majority. It took weeks to sort out multiple House contests, decided by very few votes.

Control of the Senate from the 2020 midterms wasn’t even established until 2021. It took until January and a pair of runoffs in Georgia for it to be clear that Democrats tied the Senate and thus seized the majority thanks to Vice President Kamala Harris in her capacity as president of the Senate.

These protracted election determinations are not a byproduct of recent polarization and controversy.

Democrats captured the Senate in the 2006 midterms, but it wasn’t clear until two days after the election, once Democratic challenger Jim Webb defeated incumbent Republican Sen. George Allen in Virginia.

It’s likely we’ll have clarity on the Senate sooner rather than later this year. If Republicans enjoy a big night, who won the Senate could be known on election night. That’s especially if the GOP is en route to a 53- or 54-seat majority. But if competitive Senate contests in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Montana, Michigan, Nevada, Texas and elsewhere are all tight, it may take a few days to determine which party has the majority.

Regardless, the biggest order of business facing the Senate is who emerges as the new Republican leader.

Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., is stepping down from his leadership post in early January but remaining in the Senate. Senate Minority Whip John Thune, R-S.D., former Senate Majority Whip John Cornyn, R-Texas, and Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., are vying to succeed McConnell as the body’s top Republican. But there’s chatter that Sen. Steve Daines, R-Mont., or other candidates could emerge.

The selection of Senate Republican leader could hinge on whether Harris or former President Trump wins – or, if the GOP claims the Senate or fails to capture the majority. A secret vote for GOP leader is slated for Nov. 13, and if it’s clear that Trump is headed to the White House, his influence could sway who Republican senators select as their next leader.

Then there’s the House.

Republicans hold a narrow, single-digit advantage in the House right now. There are more than 30 seats in battleground districts that could swing the control in one direction or the other.

But when will we know?

The House Republican Conference convenes its leadership election on Nov. 13, and the House Democratic Caucus also meets around that time. Regardless of if they are in the majority or minority, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., will lead his party in the new Congress. Jeffries is poised to ascend to the speakership next year if Democrats flip the House.

But for the GOP, things could get messy.

Which party controls the House might not be settled by the time House Republicans hold their leadership election. Republican Conference rules allow certain GOP candidates whose races have not been called to come to Washington in November and December for the freshmen orientation and vote in those leadership elections. In other words, people who might not ultimately become House members could decide who the GOP picks for leadership posts and formally nominates as the Republican candidate for speaker on the floor Jan. 3.

One senior House Republican source told Fox there could be a push to delay those leadership elections if control of the House isn’t settled. This could be an issue if there’s a contingent of GOP candidates in uncalled races who could wield too much influence in the private balloting.

So here’s the issue facing Johnson: If Republicans hold the House, and especially if they pick up a sizable chunk of seats, the Louisiana Republican probably returns to the speakership. A ‘President-elect Trump’ would certainly bolster that scenario. But if it’s a tiny majority, Johnson could win the nomination for speaker in the GOP conference but struggle to prevail on the floor early next year.

Here’s why: There’s a group of three to perhaps as many as 10 current House Republicans who have a problem with Johnson. Johnson only needs a simple majority of the House Republican Conference to get the nomination for speaker and stand before the entire House in January.

It’s about the math.

Let’s say Republicans have a small majority: 223 seats. In the November conference vote, Johnson only needs 112 votes to become the nominee for speaker. But when the entire House convenes on Jan. 3, Johnson – or any other nominee – will need an outright majority of all members casting ballots for a candidate by name. So if the House is at 435 and all members vote for someone by name, the magic number is 218.

You see the problem.

This is the same issue that vexed McCarthy and the other GOP nominees who failed to become speaker last October. 

Ironically, it’s easier for Johnson to become minority leader if Republicans lost their majority. That’s because the minority leader just needs the majority of his or her conference or caucus. So let’s say the GOP is relegated to the minority with 217 seats. Johnson just needs 109 votes to win the conference.

If there’s a problem electing a speaker on the floor in January, one should pray it’s wrapped up fast. That’s because Congress must start certifying the Electoral College on Jan. 6. After starting its vote for speaker on Jan. 3, 2023, the House didn’t elect McCarthy until the wee hours of Jan. 7. Any delay in electing a speaker would foment major issues for certifying the electoral vote – especially if the presidential race is contested. 

The House of Representatives cannot do anything, including swearing in members, until it elects a speaker. Period. A fight over the speakership could paralyze the House and risk delaying the electoral vote count. This is a nightmare scenario that has the potential to eclipse the chaos of the Electoral College certification in 2021. 

And if things weren’t fraught enough, here’s another wild card: the government runs out of money on Dec. 20.

Johnson meandered through a host of interim spending bills from last fall until spring, flirting with multiple government shutdowns. The speaker ran the exact same playbook that partially cost McCarthy the speakership. Johnson enraged scores of conservatives by green-lighting a bill to fund Ukraine and advancing an omnibus spending bill in the spring.

Lots of conservatives have grievances with Johnson, but Johnson could face trouble if he attempts to move any bill to avert a December shutdown that lacks the blessing of key conservatives. Granted, the sign-off on any spending plan by a ‘President-elect Trump’ could shield Johnson, and if Trump is elected, he likely makes the call on what he wants Johnson to do. The former president’s heat shield likely blunts any rebuke of Johnson.

That said, a misstep by Johnson on the spending bill could potentially cost him the speakership if the GOP holds the majority. And if Republicans win the House, Senate and White House, don’t expect any help from Democrats. While in the minority, House Democrats have carried gallons of water for Republicans. They’ve lugged numerous must-pass bills to avoid government shutdowns across the finish line for nearly two years. If the GOP attains unified government this fall, Democrats could push back from the table in the lame-duck session and tell House Republicans to figure it out themselves.

Heretofore, House Republicans have not shown they can advance a spending bill on their own that would become law. That’s why there’s a risk of the new Congress beginning with a government shutdown in January.

That’s exactly what happened in late 2018, drifting into early 2019. The government was shuttered as a new Congress began that January. 

So here is the utter worst-case scenario: a government shutdown, coupled with a complex speaker’s election, thus sparking a delay in certification of the Electoral College in the shadow of a disputed presidential election.

I’ll let you read that all again to digest it. 

So the campaigning and voting concludes next week, but the hardest stuff is about to begin. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) on Wednesday said its forces in the Middle East conducted a ‘series of strikes’ on several ISIS locations in Syria earlier this week in an operation that killed up to 35 terrorists. 

The operation, which targeted multiple camps across Syria on Monday evening, also successfully took out ‘multiple’ senior ISIS leaders, confirmed CENTCOM.

The release also confirmed that no civilian casualties have been ‘indicated’ in the sweeping strikes. 

‘The airstrikes will disrupt the ability of ISIS to plan, organize, and conduct attacks against civilians, as well as U.S., allies, and partners throughout the region and beyond,’ the command said in a release. ‘CENTCOM, alongside allies and partners in the region, will continue to aggressively degrade ISIS operational capabilities to ensure its enduring defeat.’

The announcement comes one week after two U.S. service members were injured in Iraq during an operation that targeted and killed at least seven ISIS operatives.

The American service members were reported to be in stable condition. 

While ISIS remains a major security concern in Iraq and Syria, it does not pose the same level of threat that it did 10 years ago. Though concern mounted earlier this year following reports that the U.S. may be looking to pull its troops out of the country as soon as 2025.

U.S. soldiers have been fighting ISIS alongside coalition forces in Iraq and Syria since the terrorist group first emerged in 2014. 

Less than 1,000 U.S. troops remain in Syria while roughly 2,500 remain in Iraq.

Last month, the Pentagon said that it plans to change its ‘footprint’ in Iraq in 2025, but it refused to detail what that means in regard to the number of troops that will remain.

U.S. and Iraqi coalition forces will also continue to support anti-ISIS efforts in Syria as Washington works with Baghdad to determine future steps for U.S. troops fighting the terrorist network in the region.  

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The reactions to political rhetoric in today’s climate often seem baffling. Take former President Donald Trump, for example. When he unleashes insults—branding opponents and their supporters as ‘radical,’ ‘losers,’ ‘spoiled children’ or even ‘the enemy from within’—it’s almost anticipated. Many Americans see him as a fighter, a bulldog taking on the political establishment and these remarks are viewed as part of his tough persona. Supporters love his directness and his willingness to ‘drain the swamp.’

Now, contrast that with the fallout when former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called Trump supporters a ‘basket of deplorables’ or when President Joe Biden labeled them as ‘garbage’ the way he did on Tuesday night. 

The backlash has been swift and loud. 

Why? Because Biden and Harris have positioned themselves as the candidates of decency and civility. When they stray from that image, it feels hypocritical. They are held to a different standard.  One they have created themselves. So, any lapsed behavior tends to raise eyebrows and stoke outrage.

What I find fascinating is how Trump supporters embrace these insults, wearing them like badges of honor. They proudly call themselves ‘deplorables’ and even joke about it, saying things like, ‘I prefer rubbish to garbage; it’s classier.’ For these voters, it’s not about the insult itself; it’s about defiance against a political system they believe has long ignored them.

This dynamic starkly highlights the differences in reactions to political discourse. Trump’s supporters celebrate his unapologetic style because it resonates with their hard-fought battle against perceived elites. Meanwhile, when Biden and Harris deviate from their civil demeanor, the scrutiny they face is intensified, reinforcing the perception of hypocrisy.

The contrast in reactions highlights deeper divides in our political landscape. It’s about more than just words; it speaks to identity, loyalty, and the quest for recognition. 

Political rhetoric is more charged than ever, with some getting a pass while others face backlash. Language carries significant weight, and how we interpret that language fundamentally shapes our perceptions of candidates. One thing is certain: authenticity is essential to trust.

When you call half of America ‘garbage’ or refer to Trump supporters as ‘deplorables,’ you’re making a blanket statement that reflects contempt for an entire group. In contrast, labeling some Democrats as ‘enemies from within’ targets a select few individuals who are problematic. 

Don’t get me wrong, both are inappropriate, but the former implies a deep-seated disdain for millions of people, which creates an almost insurmountable barrier to understanding or supporting the opposing side.

You can’t have it both ways; you can’t claim to hate the hater while also calling for unity. You can’t stand for an end to division and then contribute to it. This contradiction is at the heart of the difference in responses.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS