Archive

2024

Browsing

The Cincinnati Bengals fell short on ‘Thursday Night Football’ with a 35-34 loss to the Baltimore Ravens. A back-and-forth second half saw the Bengals keep up thanks to Joe Burrow and Ja’Marr Chase scoring three touchdowns.

The last of their touchdowns came with 38 seconds left to cut the deficit to one point.

Bengals coach Zac Taylor opted to go for the two-point conversion instead of playing for overtime. Burrow looked for tight end Tanner Hudson but Hudson couldn’t pull in the go-ahead conversion.

After viewing multiple replays, the ‘Thursday Night Football’ broadcast team questioned why there were no penalties called on the two-point conversion attempt.

One was for holding Bengals tight end Mike Gesicki, the other for a hit to the helmet on Burrow after he released the ball.

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

‘That’s defensive holding right there that they should’ve called,’ color analyst Kirk Herbstreit said on the broadcast in reference to the Gesicki contact.

‘Wow, that’s another one,’ he said after a replay of the hit to Burrow.

Prime Video rules analyst Terry McAulay agreed with Herbstreit.

‘It was clearly defensive holding before the pass was in flight, that should’ve been called,’ McAulay said on the broadcast. ‘And that does look like forceable contact to the head of the quarterback, that’s roughing the passer and should’ve been called.’

‘Too many games end this way,’ play-by-play announcer Al Michaels said. ‘You miss calls, the whole thing, it’s so frustrating to the fans. So frustrating.’

‘A lot of people are going to be talking about those non-calls there on the two-point conversion,’ Herbstreit said. ‘Doesn’t mean that they would’ve ended up winning the game but they would’ve definitely had another opportunity.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

There are four weeks left before the conference championship games, meaning we are inching closer to finding out who will be in the first 12-team College Football Playoff.

The initial reveal of the College Football Playoff rankings may have caused some surprises or frustrations, and while fans have to remember there’s still plenty of football left to make one of the coveted spots, the first reveal set the path teams have to go down. As a result, the critical November games become even more important for some.

It’s tough to predict the playoff field given this is an unprecedented season, but it’s safe to say some teams have their hopes hanging on by a thread. So, which games have the biggest impact on who stays in the playoff race in Week 11?

No. 11 Alabama vs. No. 15 LSU

Practically an elimination game, the loser of this game can effectively kiss their College Football Playoff hopes away. Heading into the season, there were questions if a three-loss team from the SEC or Big Ten would be able qualify for the playoff given the strength in each conference. At this point, it doesn’t appear to be possible.

The Crimson Tide boast one of the best wins in the country over Georgia, but the loss against Vanderbilt weighs heavy. They did lose to a quality opponent in Tennessee, but Alabama didn’t look good in that one, which has been the case in some of its victories. On the other land, the Tigers are coming off a convincing loss against Texas A&M, and the season-opening defeat to Southern California gets worse as the Trojans continue to struggle.

A loss from either side will create a very difficult path toward reaching the SEC championship game and the automatic conference title bid. The loser will also take a sizable drop in the next playoff rankings, and with no highly-ranked opponents left on schedule, there isn’t much left to impress the selection committee.

No. 2 Georgia vs. No. 16 Mississippi

Georgia appears its way toward making the playoff, but this is Mississippi’s last stand.

There was plenty of hype prior to the season in the ‘Sip for Lane Kiffin’s crew with a possible path to the CFP. However, the Rebels are 7-2 headed into their toughest game of the season without any quality victories. Their best win is against South Carolina, while they lost to LSU and a bad Kentucky squad.

Now, Ole Miss needs to get one of the best wins in the country in order to keep their playoff hopes alive. A loss and the Rebels would certainly end the season without a ranked win.

WEEKEND FORECAST: SEC clashes top Week 11 picks for all Top 25 games

BUCKLE UP: Bumpy road to College Football Playoff starts with Week 11

No. 24 Colorado vs. Texas Tech

Colorado didn’t play a game last week and saw its College Football Playoff chances boosted, thanks to Texas Tech. Now, the Red Raiders meet the Buffaloes in an elimination game.

Colorado is in a tie for second place in the Big 12 after winning five of its last six games, and knows a playoff spot is within its grasp. The Buffaloes, ranked No. 20 by the committee, have a realistic chance of qualifying for the conference title game and getting the automatic bid, but it relies on them at least keeping up with Iowa State. If Colorado loses, it would be at 4-2 in conference play and lose tiebreakers to Kansas State and Texas Tech with no quality victory. The current strength of schedule is at 80th, which doesn’t bode well.

For Texas Tech, last week’s win against then-unbeaten Iowa State revived its playoff hopes. Defeating Colorado would give them consecutive ranked victories, likely putting them in the Top 25 and just outside a conference title game spot.

No. 17 Clemson vs. Virginia Tech

Just a few weeks ago, Clemson looked like it was cruising toward the ACC title game and at worst, an at-large spot in the playoff. Now, Dabo Swinney needs some major work to get there after being ranked 23rd by the committee.

Clemson heads into Lane Stadium in need of a victory against a quality opponent. The tough season-opening loss to Georgia didn’t appear to weigh as much, but now it looms large in Clemson’s bid for a quality win after it couldn’t handle business against Louisville. A loss would also make it nearly impossible for the Tigers to have a path to the ACC conference championship game.

No. 18 Iowa State vs. Kansas

The last-minute loss to Texas Tech hurt Iowa State, and it was made more was painful by being No. 17 in the first playoff rankings. It comes down to a lack of schedule strength.

The best win for the Cyclones is against rival Iowa, and they haven’t faced the top end of the Big 12 yet. Iowa State very well can still go 11-1 and like its chances of making the playoff, but they can’t drop another trap game against a Kansas team that had solid expectations prior to this seasons and lost several close games. Falling to the Jayhawks would be devastating for the Cyclones, who still can win their way into the conference championship game.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

In the final days of President-elect Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign, he honed in on a culture war issue that may have locked in more swing votes and with it the election, a conservative activist instrumental in the ad campaign argues.

‘Kamala is for they/them, President Trump is for you,’ the narrator of Trump’s advertisement said.

The ad, which focused on men in women’s sports and Vice President Kamala Harris’ track record of ushering in sex change procedures for incarcerated people in California, was in part due to the influence of American Principles Project’s president, Terry Schilling, who began pushing out these ads in 2019.

Schilling said back then, the issue was ‘too premature’ to make waves in the conservative movement. But over the course of the Biden-Harris administration, as the gender ideology wars began to make it into the mainstream spotlight, Schilling believed it would be a winning issue for conservatives.

The American Principles Project spent tens of millions on ads highlighting the transgender issue in states across the country, and Schilling went to Mar-a-Lago a few months ago to personally encourage Trump to lean in on the opportunity.

‘The cue of giving sex change procedures to inmates is so radical, it’s so extreme, and it’s one of those issues that touches on not just the culture war, but the economy, too,’ Schilling told Fox News Digital. 

‘You have a lot of families that are hurting, they’re struggling to put food on the table,’ Schilling said. ‘They’re struggling to be able to afford to send their kids to a decent school where they can learn to read and write properly, and they’re scrapping all their pains together, and then they see that their government is paying to give people that committed very serious crimes that are in federal prisons, sex change procedures that cost hundreds of thousands of dollars.’

‘When you go to prison, you have to lose some rights, and it was an issue that really resonated,’ he continued. ‘Trump gets so much credit. I have heard from several people that that maniac-madman-genius actually came up with that closing line of, ‘Kamala Harris is for they/them, Donald Trump’s for you.’ He’s so good at the branding.’

Schilling said there was record-breaking fundraising for his organization this year, noting a 50% increase from the previous year, growing from $12 million to $18 million. He highlighted that this funding has driven extensive research, ad production, and messaging guidance, which has reportedly influenced Republicans to focus on transgender issues in campaign ads. 

According to Schilling, Republicans spent over $215 million on ads targeting transgender issues.

Last year, Schilling’s organization produced an ad featuring women’s activist Riley Gaines advocating for candidate Daniel Cameron against Democrat Andy Beshear for governor in Kentucky. 

In August 2023, APP released a post-2022 election report, titled, ‘The Failed Red Wave: Lessons from the GOP Letdown,’ arguing that Republicans performed poorly in part because they failed to take advantage of Democrats’ cultural extremism on transgender issues.

This summer, APP announced an $18 million ad campaign exposing Kamala Harris and other Democrats’ stances on transgender issues.

‘We spent over seven figures on polling and focus groups and message testing, and we’ve been passing it out, beating our heads against the wall with candidates up and down the ballot. And 2024 was the year that it finally broke through,’ Schilling said. 

The ads came during a time during the election cycle where several actions by the Biden-Harris administration gave the messaging a boost. 

In June, health officials in the Biden administration urged international transgender health nonprofit, World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH), to omit the age limit in its guidelines for transgender surgical procedures for adolescents – and succeeded – according to unsealed court documents.

More than a dozen states in the U.S. have enacted bans on surgical procedures and hormonal prescriptions for transgender youth. 

Idaho, North Dakota, Florida, Oklahoma and Alabama have passed laws making it a felony to perform sex changes on children. Several blue states, meanwhile, have enacted ‘sanctuary state’ laws in recent years shielding medical providers from facing penalties for conducting transgender procedures on adolescents. 

Trump’s success in reaching people in this issue hasn’t come without its opposition. The executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union pledged ‘to combat’ the forthcoming Trump administration’s proposed policies on critical issues such as abortion, border security and LGBTQ rights.

The left-wing civil liberties organization launched 434 legal challenges against President Trump during his first term, and will continue during his second term, according to Romero’s open letter. They plan, for example, to use the courts to ‘invalidate Trump administration policies’ impacting the gay and transgender communities, such as actions that keep biological males out of women’s bathrooms or that prevent them from playing on women’s sports teams.

Fox News Digital’s Alec Schemmel contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wisc., says President-elect Trump should not offer Hunter Biden a pardon after Biden pleaded guilty to federal tax charges in September. 

‘I don’t think he should pardon Hunter,’ Johnson said in an interview on NewsNation’s ‘Dan Abrams Live.’

‘I think we need to be very careful about having a dual system of justice where the powerful, or the sons and daughters of the powerful get off scot-free,’ he said.

Johnson and Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, have spearheaded the Senate GOP’s investigations into President Biden’s son and allegations of corruption surrounding the Biden family. He has often criticized the Biden administration’s Justice Department for purportedly treating Hunter Biden’s alleged crimes with kid gloves, all the while calling the various criminal investigations into Trump politically motivated.

While Johnson is opposed to letting Biden off the hook, he did suggest that Trump might commute or otherwise reduce the first son’s sentence as a show of good will and effort to unify the country.

‘I could see possibly commuting the sentence, reducing it, and it wouldn’t surprise me if President Trump would do that,’ he said. ‘I would not pardon Hunter. I would certainly not. I wouldn’t scream about commuting his sentence or reducing it in some way, shape or form.’

Hunter Biden was indicted on three felonies and six misdemeanor counts alleging he evaded paying at least $1.4 million in taxes while simultaneously spending money on ‘drugs, escorts and girlfriends, luxury hotels and rental properties, exotic cars, clothing, and other items of a personal nature, in short, everything but his taxes,’ according to the December 2023 indictment.

Prosecutors also allege the tax returns Hunter ultimately did file falsely claimed that things like prostitutes, strip club visits, porn website subscriptions and other personal expenses were actually deductible business expenses.

The aim, according to the indictment, was to ‘evade assessment of taxes to reduce the substantial tax liabilities’ that Hunter faced.

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre has been repeatedly asked whether President Biden might pardon his son before leaving office. Asked again on Thursday, Jean-Pierre said the president still had no intention of doing so.

‘We’ve been asked that question multiple times. Our answer stands, which is no,’ she said.

Trump himself floated the idea of a pardon or commuted sentence for Biden in a radio interview with Hugh Hewitt in October.

‘Will you pardon Hunter Biden,’ Hewitt asked the former and future president on Oct. 24. 

‘I wouldn’t take it off the books,’ Trump replied. ‘See, unlike Joe Biden, despite what they’ve done to me, where they’ve gone after me so viciously, despite what, and Hunter’s a bad boy. There’s no question about it. He’s been a bad boy. All you had to do is see the laptop from hell. But I happen to think it’s very bad for our country.’ 

Fox News’ Greg Wehner contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Special Counsel Jack Smith on Friday filed a motion to vacate all deadlines in the 2020 election interference case against President-elect Trump in Washington, D.C., a widely expected move, but one that stops short of dropping the case against him completely.

The filing from Smith was widely expected following Trump’s election to a second term, and is in keeping with longstanding Department of Justice policy against bringing criminal charges against a sitting president. 

While the case has not been officially dropped, it appears to be moving in that direction. Smith said Friday that his team plans to give an updated report on the official status of the case against Trump on Dec. 2. 

The news is likely a welcome relief for Trump, who vowed to fire Smith ‘within two seconds’ if re-elected — ridding him of both a yearlong legal foe and the criminal charges Trump faced following his loss in the 2020 election.

Smith was tapped by Attorney General Merrick Garland in 2022 to investigate both the alleged effort by Trump and his allies to overturn the results of the 2020 election, as well as Trump’s keeping of allegedly classified documents at his residence in Florida after leaving the White House in 2020.

Fox News reported earlier this week that the Department of Justice had been looking to wind down its criminal cases against Trump in Washington, D.C., and Florida, citing an Office of Legal Counsel memo that states it is against Department of Justice policy to investigate a sitting president for federal criminal charges and is a violation of the separation of powers doctrine. 

Smith had indicted Trump in D.C. earlier this year on charges stemming from the former president’s alleged efforts to overturn the outcome of the 2020 election.

He also brought federal charges against Trump in Florida for his handling of classified documents after leaving the White House.

Former Attorney General Bill Barr told Fox News Digital earlier this week that Smith should immediately halt the federal cases in both D.C. and Florida, citing DOJ policy.

While Trump still faces state cases in Georgia and New York, Barr said this week that local prosecutors and judges need to move on from the ‘spectacle’ of prosecuting the president-elect.

‘Further maneuvering on these cases in the weeks ahead would serve no legitimate purpose and only distract the country and the incoming administration from the task at hand,’ Barr said. 

Next week, the presiding judge in the New York case is expected to announce whether the state will proceed with felony conviction proceedings against Trump in the final months before he takes office, or whether to apply claims of presidential immunity expanded by the Supreme Court earlier this year. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Wall Street dealmakers and corporate leaders expect the flood gates to open on merger and acquisition activity after President-elect Donald Trump takes office in January.

And he’ll likely have congressional help. Trump defeated Democratic candidate Vice President Kamala Harris, and Republicans claimed a majority of the Senate in elections this week. That red wave is expected to spell loosening regulations on deal-making, with plenty of pent-up demand.

“We know kind of where the world is headed in a Trump environment because we’ve seen it before,” said Jeffrey Solomon, president of TD Cowen, on CNBC’s “Money Movers” Wednesday. “I think the regulatory environment will be much more conducive to economic growth. There will be lighter and targeted regulation.”

Solomon added that the scaled-back regulation will be focused on certain areas “of particular interest to the Trump administration,” rather than a broad based reassessment of the entire landscape.

In recent years, there has been greater scrutiny of pending deals by the Biden administration’s Department of Justice and Federal Trade Commission, headed by Chair Lina Khan. Some have pointed to that dynamic as a chilling factor on deal flow. High interest rates and soaring company valuations have contributed, too.

Khan said in September that “when you see greater scrutiny of mergers, you can see greater deterrence of illegal mergers.” Her hard line has drawn harsh criticism, but now, there’s optimism around a forthcoming FTC with a lighter hand.

“Assuming interest rates drop and you see corporate tax rates go down, the ingredients are there for a really active M&A market,” said one top dealmaker, who talked to CNBC on the condition of anonymity to speak candidly.

On Wednesday, markets rallied on the Republican presidential win, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average soaring 1,500 points to a new record high.

Some sectors, including financial and pharmaceutical industries in particular, are likely to get a lift under a second Trump regime, experts said.

Pharmaceutical executives are especially optimistic that lighter antitrust enforcement could clear the way for deal-making, said one health-care-focused M&A advisor, who added that antitrust enforcement could have “hardly gotten worse” under either administration but now believes things will improve “meaningfully.”

Khan has taken on scores of biopharma mergers over the last four years, arguing that monopolies will stifle the development of new drugs in certain disease areas and hurt consumer choice. Biotech company Illumina last year said it would divest diagnostic test maker Grail after heated battles with the FTC and European antitrust regulators.

Also last year, the FTC blocked Sanofi’s proposed acquisition of a drug in development for Pompe disease, a genetic condition, from Maze Therapeutics. Sanofi ultimately terminated that deal.

“Whether or not Lina Khan is bounced day one is a key consideration, but even if fewer changes at the FTC take place, there is no doubt this administration — at least on paper — will be far more amicable when it comes to business combinations,” Jared Holz, Mizuho health-care equity strategist, said in an email on Wednesday.

One top dealmaker expected an M&A uptick broadly, but agreed that pharmaceuticals and the financial sector were particularly poised for a resurgence. That deal-maker also noted that with the Senate flipping, more outspoken antitrust voices like Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., could find it more difficult to push for DOJ or FTC investigations.

In the financial sector regional banks recognize the need for scale, making them likely candidates for consolidation, said one former industry executive, noting that smaller banks had been getting gobbled up for “some time.” That person expects the pace and size of those acquisitions to ramp up under a Trump presidency.

Other industries, such as tech, may still face an uphill battle in getting deals done.

One M&A advisor, who also spoke to CNBC anonymously, noted that Trump’s disdain for Big Tech companies — historically active deal-makers — might keep them on the sidelines. On Wednesday, tech leaders took to social media to congratulate Trump.

Apparent GOP opposition to the CHIPS Act means that semiconductor consolidation might be challenging, the advisor noted, while cautioning it is still too early to know what a Trump presidency would mean. CNBC previously reported that Qualcomm recently approached Intel about a potential takeover.

“I think the simplest way to put it is more deals, less regulation with the administration having its thumb on the scale, perhaps with a willingness to pick winners and losers,” said Jonathan Miller, chief executive of Integrated Media, which specializes in digital media investments.

A Trump presidency could usher in a number of retail deals that have been hamstrung by the FTC. Kroger’s bid to take over grocery chain Albertsons could have a better chance of getting approved under Trump, as could Tapestry’s proposed acquisition of Capri.

The merger between Kroger and Albertsons is currently under review by a federal judge, while Tapestry is working to appeal a federal order that granted the FTC’s motion for a preliminary injunction against the tie-up.

“The hostile approach of the FTC to mergers and acquisitions will almost certainly be reset and replaced with a worldview that is more favorable to corporate dealmaking,” said GlobalData managing director Neil Saunders. “This does not necessarily mean that big deals like Kroger-Albertsons will be waved through, but it does mean others like Tapestry-Capri will receive a far warmer reception than they have under the Biden administration.”

Meanwhile, ongoing turmoil in the media industry has led many to consider consolidation as the next step for the sector.

Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav on Thursday highlighted opportunities that could come up if regulations were to loosen, doubling down on comments he made earlier this year at Allen & Co.’s annual Sun Valley conference.

“We have an upcoming new administration. … It’s too early to tell, but it may offer a pace of change and opportunity for consolidation that may be quite different, that would provide a real positive and accelerated impact on this industry that’s needed,” Zaslav said on an earnings call.

Broadcast station group owner Sinclair on Wednesday echoed a similar sentiment.

“We’re very excited about the upcoming regulatory environment,” CEO Chris Ripley said during an earnings call. “It does feel like a cloud over the industry is lifting here.”

Still, the track record between the previous Trump administration and the Biden administration for media industry deals is split.

Trump’s DOJ allowed Disney to buy Fox’s assets, but then sued to block AT&T’s deal for Time Warner.

Under the Biden administration, Amazon’s $8.5 billion deal for MGM and the merger of Warner Bros. and Discovery Communications were both waved through, but a federal judge blocked the $2.2 billion sale of Simon & Schuster to Penguin Random House.

Skydance Media and Paramount Global agreed to merge earlier this year and expect to receive regulatory approval in 2025.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Former White House attorney Mark Paoletta took to social media Thursday to say that President-elect Donald Trump ‘will not use the DOJ for political purposes’ but rather for ‘implementing his agenda.’

Paoletta, who previously served as counsel to former Vice President Mike Pence and general counsel for the Office of Management & Budget in the executive office during the Trump administration, was responding to a CNN reporter stating that the Department of Justice has ‘operated historically as an independent entity.’ 

‘Constitution vests our ELECTED President with ALL executive power, including DOJ. He has the duty to supervise DOJ, including, if necessary, on specific cases. Our system does not permit an unaccountable agency,’ Paoletta wrote on X. 

Paoletta cited Chief Justice John Roberts’ opinion in Trump v. United States, wherein the Court held that a former president has substantial immunity from prosecution for official acts committed while in office, but not for unofficial acts. In the majority opinion, Roberts wrote ‘the Constitution vests the entirety of the executive power in the President.’

He went on to say, ‘The President has a duty to supervise the types of cases DOJ should focus on and can intervene to direct DOJ on specific cases. He is the duly elected chief executive and he has every right to make sure the executive branch, including the DOJ, is implementing his agenda.’

Paoletta then gave examples as to how Trump could use the DOJ during his next term, including directing the ‘DOJ to significantly increase resources to prosecute criminals at the highest charging level and to seek maximum sentences’ and extending resources towards deportation efforts and ‘against sanctuary cities who defy and obstruct federal law enforcement efforts.’

Paoletta clarified, however, that despite such actions, Trump will not use the DOJ ‘for political purposes.’

‘Just because you are a political opponent’ does not mean one gets ‘a free pass if you have violated the law,’ Paoletta wrote.

Paoletta then said Democrats, in contrast, ‘went after President Trump solely to punish him because he was a political opponent,’ stating that they ‘invented crimes, twisted statutes, abused their offices and power, all to stop him and destroy him.’

‘The President should supervise and direct the DOJ to implement his agenda, which was voted on and supported by a landslide majority of the American people on November 5th,’ Paoletta wrote. 

The DOJ announced on Wednesday it was seeking to wind down two federal criminal cases against Trump ahead of his second term.  

Justice Department officials cited a memo from the Office of Legal Counsel filed in 2000, which upholds a Watergate-era argument that asserts it is a violation of the separation of powers doctrine for the Justice Department to investigate a sitting president. 

Trump was also prosecuted at the state level after his first term in office, aside from the two federal cases brought by special counsel Jack Smith. Trump pleaded not guilty in all of his cases. 

Fox News’ Breanne Deppisch contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

: The House Judiciary Committee is concerned that special counsel Jack Smith and prosecutors involved in the investigations of now President-elect Donald Trump will ‘purge’ records to skirt oversight and is demanding they produce to Congress all documents related to the probes before the end of the month, Fox News Digital has learned. 

House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, and Rep. Barry Loudermilk, R-Ga., penned a letter to Smith on Friday, obtained by Fox News Digital. 

‘The Committee on the Judiciary is continuing its oversight of the Department of Justice and the Office of Special Counsel. According to recent public reports, prosecutors in your office have been ‘gaming out legal options’ in the event that President Donald Trump won the election,’ they wrote. ‘With President Trump’s decisive victory this week, we are concerned that the Office of Special Counsel may attempt to purge relevant records, communications, and documents responsive to our numerous requests for information.’ 

Jordan and Loudermilk warned that the Office of Special Counsel ‘is not immune from transparency or above accountability for its actions.’ 

‘We reiterate our requests, which are itemized in the attached appendix and incorporated herein, and ask that you produce the entirety of the requested material as soon as possible but no later than November 22, 2024,’ they wrote. 

Jordan and Loudermilk are demanding Smith turn over information about the use of FBI personnel on his team — a request first made in June 2023 — and whether any of those FBI employees ‘previously worked on any other matters concerning President Trump.’ 

They also renewed their request from August 2023, demanding records relating to Smith and prosecutor Jay Bratt visiting the White House or Executive Office of the President; a request from September 2023 for records related to lawyer Stanley Woodward—who represented Trump aide Walt Nauta; a request from December 2023 for communications between Attorney General Merrick Garland and the special counsel’s team; and more. 

The Justice Department is looking to wind down two federal criminal cases against President-elect Trump as he prepares to be sworn in for a second term in the White House — a decision that upholds a long-standing policy that prevents Justice Department attorneys from prosecuting a sitting president. 

DOJ officials have cited a memo from the Office of Legal Counsel filed in 2000, which upholds a Watergate-era argument that asserts it is a violation of the separation of powers doctrine for the Justice Department to investigate a sitting president. 

It further notes that such proceedings would ‘unduly interfere in a direct or formal sense with the conduct of the Presidency.’  

‘In light of the effect that an indictment would have on the operations of the executive branch, ‘an impeachment proceeding is the only appropriate way to deal with a President while in office,’’ the memo said in conclusion.

Smith was leading an investigation into the alleged retention of classified records. Trump pleaded not guilty to the charges stemming from that probe. 

The case was eventually tossed completely by a federal judge in Florida, who ruled that Smith was improperly and unlawfully appointed as special counsel. 

Smith also took over an investigation into alleged 2020 election interference. Trump also pleaded not guilty, but his attorneys took the fight to the U.S. Supreme Court to argue on the basis of presidential immunity. 

The high court ruled that Trump was immune from prosecution for official presidential acts, forcing Smith to file a new indictment. Trump pleaded not guilty to those new charges as well. Trump attorneys are now seeking to have the election interference charges dropped in Washington, D.C., similarly alleging that Smith was appointed unlawfully. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

House GOP Conference Chairwoman Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., is in contention for a role in the new Trump administration, Fox News Digital is told.

Stefanik became the first congressional leader to back President-elect Donald Trump’s third White House campaign when she endorsed him in November 2022.

She is now being discussed as a potential candidate for U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, two people familiar with such discussions told Fox News Digital.

One said Stefanik was ‘high on the list’ of potential candidates.

However, for Stefanik and other House lawmakers in contention for Trump administration roles, their chances will depend heavily on where the majority falls in their chamber.

Republicans are bullish about keeping the House majority after victories in the Senate and White House on election night, however, the outcome will likely come down to a handful of close races in California, Arizona, Alaska and Oregon – and both sides anticipate the margin being close.

Replacing a House member, even one from a district that heavily favors one party or the other, generally takes at least several weeks. Additionally, Republican leaders have already signaled they would not want to waste any time in using their majorities in Congress to forward Trump’s agenda.

It is not immediately clear who else is in contention for the UN ambassador role.

Stefanik would have familiarity with foreign affairs as a senior member of the House permanent select committee on Intelligence and the House Armed Services Committee.

The New York Republican has been a vocal supporter of Israel since the Oct. 7 terror attack by Hamas. She is also one of Trump’s closest allies in Congress, having headlined multiple ‘Women for Trump’ rallies and other events for him on the campaign trail.

Stefanik announced to House colleagues on Thursday that she is running for her current leadership role as chair of the House GOP conference again.

Stefanik’s office did not return a request for comment from Fox News Digital.

Notably, one of Trump’s prior U.N. ambassadors was Nikki Haley, who challenged the president-elect for the 2024 Republican nomination before dropping out and eventually endorsing him.

Fox News Digital was also told that another House member, retired Green Beret Rep. Mike Waltz, R-Fla., is in consideration for a Trump administration role. Waltz is being looked at as a potential candidate for Defense secretary, though Trump is also considering options from the private sector and others, Fox News Digital was told.

In addition to serving in the military before coming to Congress, Waltz was an advisor to Defense Secretaries Robert Gates and Donald Rumsfeld and spent time in the private sector as CEO of defense contractor Metis Solutions.

He is currently on the House Armed Services and Intelligence committees with Stefanik, in addition to the House Foreign Affairs Committee.

Waltz’s office did not respond to an email requesting comment.

Trump-Vance transition spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt told Fox News Digital when asked for comment about the possible appointments, ‘President-Elect Trump will begin making decisions on who will serve in his second Administration soon. Those decisions will be announced when they are made.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

WASHINGTON — Golden State Warriors forward Kevon Looney wasn’t sure the Warriors could’ve won a game the way they did Saturday – in overtime, on the road against an up-and-coming Houston Rockets and without Steph Curry in the lineup.

“The ball didn’t go our away. Sometimes, we didn’t execute. We had mental lapses. We might have a silly foul and the momentum went against us,’ Looney said of the seasons since Golden State last won the title in 2022. ‘We never were able to get it back under control last year, probably the last two years. But (against Houston), things didn’t go our way … but we were still able to keep our composure and go out there in overtime and close it out.”

In their first season without Klay Thompson since drafting him in 2011, the Warriors are 7-1 and on a five-game winning streak, including three victories without Curry – who is now back in the lineup.

Now, the schedule hasn’t been too difficult. Just two of their wins have been against teams with winning records, however, the Warriors beat Boston 118-112 Wednesday on the road and two more road tests are next: at 9-0 Cleveland on Friday and at 7-1 Oklahoma City on Sunday.

Warriors coach Steve Kerr was quick to remind four reporters after a team practice Sunday at Georgetown University that Golden State started 5-1 last season and was 9-10 by the end of November.

“Great start,” Kerr said. “Couldn’t ask for anything more, but we have to understand we got off to that same start last year and so it’s a long year and you got to continue to identify areas of need, weakness, anything that you’ve got to brush up on and then continue to hammer home the identity.

“The whole point right now is our identity has to be a scrappy, defensive-minded team and I think we’re much more capable of being that team this year than last year. Last year, it was a different team and this year it is built to be disruptive defensively and feisty, play a lot of people and play with a lot of energy and so I’m happy with what I’ve seen so far, but we’ve got a lot of tough games coming up.”

Minus Thompson but still with Curry and Draymond Green, this is a different iteration of the Warriors. They didn’t lure Paul George in free agency, but they signed De’Anthony Melton and acquired Buddy Hield and Kyle Anderson.

The Warriors are producing early in the season with the league’s No. 3 offense (119.3 points per 100 possessions) and No. 2 defense (103.8 points allowed per 100 possessions). That equals the No. 1 net rating at plus-15.5.

Golden State is also:

Tied for third in assists (29.4 per game)
No. 5 in steals (9.3 per game)
Tied for fourth in blocks (6.3 per game)
No. 1 in rebounding (49.5 per game, including No. 3 in offensive rebounds and tied for sixth in offensive rebounds)
No. 2 in fastbreak points allowed (9.0 per game)

It’s done by committee. Through eight games, Kerr has given 13 players at least 12.7 minutes per game and no player is above 28.1 minutes per game. Some of that is due to injuries, but Kerr is going deep into his roster each game.

In the victory against Boston, 11 players recorded at least 13:26 played. Curry had 27 points, nine assists, seven rebounds, four steals and one block, and Hield scored 16 points on 4-for-7 shooting on 3-pointers, lifting his 3-point percentage to 51.7% on 9.1 attempts per game.

The Warriors are not strangers to depth. Their championship teams in 2015, 2017 and 2018 had the “Strength in Numbers” slogan.

“I’ve always liked playing the bench probably because I was a bench guy, and I appreciated that when I got to play,” Kerr said. “But I do think the philosophy that we’ve had here for a long time, it’s very helpful for team chemistry, energy. Strength in numbers, I know it’s a cliche, but it really is something that we’ve leaned into. It helps you get through the 82 (games in a regular season) when a lot of people are playing. It helps you in moments like these where Steph’s out and you’re able to win a few games in a row and so the depth can really play to your advantage if you build it (and) you grow it.

“But at the same time, you kind of want some separation to form, too, so that each game you know who your closing lineup is and kind of who you’re going to.”

Against Boston, the Warriors closed the game with Curry, Green, Looney, Hield and Andrew Wiggins getting a bulk of the final 6:19 when the Warriors outscored the Celtics 30-17.

The Warriors were 46-36 last season, which was only good enough for 10th place in the West, and they lost to Sacramento in the play-in game. Even though they didn’t get Paul George and couldn’t pry Lauri Markkanen from Utah (and it’s no secret around the league that they have a vigilant eye on Giannis Antetokounmpo), the Warriors like what they have this season.

Is it good enough to become a top-six team in a loaded West? There’s enough talent, depth and championship pedigree for the Warriors to believe that.

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY