Archive

2024

Browsing

The chief financial officer of Trump Media and two other corporate insiders sold more than $16 million worth of company stock in the week following the presidential election, according to new disclosures.

Most of the stock was sold by CFO Phillip Juhan, who in August adopted a trading plan that revealed his intention to sell 400,000 DJT shares by December 2025.

Trump Media director Eric Swider and Scott Glabe, the company’s general counsel, each sold fewer shares of the company, whose majority owner Donald Trump was elected president on Nov. 5.

Trump Media, which operates the Truth Social app, has a market capitalization of $6.3 billion despite reporting revenue of slightly more than just $1 million in the third quarter of this year.

The company, whose share price has dramatically fluctuated since the stock became publicly traded in late March, reported losses of $19.2 million for the quarter.

Truth Social’s daily active user rate is minuscule compared to other social media apps.

Similarweb, a digital intelligence platform, reported that Truth Social had about 200,000 daily active users on Nov. 6, the day after Election Day. By contrast, the social media site X had 36.7 million users that day, Threads had 4.7 million users and Bluesky had about one million users.

Juhan, who is also Trump Media’s treasurer, sold 320,000 shares on Friday at a price of $30.65 per share, or a total of $9.8 million worth of stock according to a Form 4 filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

On Monday, Juhan sold another 64,000 shares at $32.97 per share, another $2.11 million worth, the same filing said.

After the second sale, Juhan still had 265,798 shares of DJT, according to the filing. All but about 20,000 of those shares are restricted stock units, which were awarded to him on Nov. 5, Election Day, and which cannot be immediately sold.

One-quarter of that awarded stock will vest, and become eligible for sale, on Dec. 25, a filing showed. The remaining shares will vest in quarterly installments through March 2027.

Swider sold 136,183 shares of DJT on Friday at $28.23 per share, for a total of $3.84 million worth, according to his new Form 4 filing.

The sale disposed of all of Swider’s Trump Media shares, the filing indicated. Swider controls a company, Renatus Advisors, that still owns 18,043 shares of Trump Media.

Glabe, the general counsel, on Friday sold 15,917 shares for $32.19 per share, or a total of $512,368, a filing shows.

Glabe, who is also the company’s secretary, still owns 336,576 restricted stock units in Trump Media after that sale. That stock was awarded to him on Nov. 5, and will vest according to the same schedule as Juhan’s RSUs.

On the same day that Juhan and Scott received the RSUs, Trump Media CEO Devin Nunes received 1.3 million RSUs, which as of Wednesday were worth nearly $38 million on paper.

Nunes’ RSUs are subject to the same vesting schedules as those owned by Juhan and Scott.

A Trump Media spokeswoman did not immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment on the stock sales.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

PHILADELPHIA – The decision by Washington Commanders head coach Dan Quinn to go for it on fourth down with about eight minutes left Thursday, his team in field-goal range and trailing the Philadelphia Eagles by two points Thursday, may seem unorthodox. 

His players expected nothing less.  

“That’s the nature of this team,” wide receiver Noah Brown said following the Commanders’ 26-18 defeat. 

Nature lost to nurture in this instance. Rookie quarterback Jayden Daniels took the fourth-and-2 snap from Philadelphia’s 26-yard-line – it would have been roughly a 43-yard field goal for Zane Gonzalez, kicking in his second game for Washington in place of the injured Austin Seibert – but the problems for the Commanders started before that. 

Daniels said after the game center Tyler Biadasz and he were not on the same page and that the snap exchange was delayed.  

All things Commanders: Latest Washington Commanders news, schedule, roster, stats, injury updates and more.

“I just have to be louder,” he said. 

As Daniels bobbled the ball, Washington offensive linemen Sam Cosmi and Nick Allegretti ran into each other as they both pulled in their respective directions. Daniels sprinted parallel to the line of scrimmage in desperate search of the corner and a first down. It never materialized. Eagles linebacker Zack Baun smacked him out of bounds, and Philadelphia took over on downs.  

“I trust the coaching staff and any decision they make. I’m always of the heart of going for it,’ Daniels said. ‘I trust my teammates and trust the unit. I always trust the questions. I never question it.”

Quinn himself realized the magnitude of his choice and opened his postgame news conference with an explanation before anyone had a chance to ask him about it. He referred to the fourth-down decision as a ‘bold call.’

‘I would also say we were prepared for that moment. Don’t love the execution, but we’ve been an excellent fourth-down team,’ said Quinn, whose group entered the game tied for the league lead in fourth-down conversion rate at 91.7% (11 of 12). ‘Going into it, we knew we’d have to take our shots against a tough division team on the road.

“That’s one we can fix.’

The Eagles starting to move the ball with serious success for the first time all game played a factor into Quinn’s decision, the coach said. 

“We’ve been doing that all season, you know what I mean?’ wideout Terry McLaurin said. ‘Coach Quinn and (offensive coordinator) Kliff (Kingsbury) are going to be aggressive. We just didn’t execute the play.

‘It wasn’t a shock.’

Philadelphia scored a touchdown less than three minutes later and the extra point made it a two-possession game at 19-10. 

“Hey, we’re coming out to play. We’re coming out to win. Touchdowns win games. That’s what DQ (Quinn) wants,” running back Austin Ekeler said. “When we get in those game-winning moments, right – ‘Hey, it’s on the line let’s go get it done.’ That’s what he talks about. We know we’re going to go for it. So that’s exactly what happened there.”

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

In light of President-elect Donald Trump’s upcoming second-term, two federal judges ruled to delay criminal trials for several defendants charged with trespassing on the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. 

Politico reported on Thursday that Washington, D.C., circuit court judges Carl Nichols and Rudolph Contreras – Trump and Obama appointees, respectively – ruled to delay the trials until after Trump’s inauguration. The judges reasoned that Trump may call off the cases and issue pardons to those convicted when he assumes control of the presidency and Department of Justice. 

This is the first time that judges have agreed to Jan. 6 defendants’ pleas to delays in anticipation of potential Trump pardons. 

CNN reported that Contreras, who delayed a trial set for defendant William Pope till late February, said it would be a waste to call in a jury and expend taxpayer resources when there is a ‘real possibility’ of a Trump pardon.

‘I’m focused on conservation of the resources of the parties, the court and citizens,’ Contreras said.

Pope has already had his felony obstruction charge dropped because of the Supreme Court’s June ruling. He is now being charged with misdemeanor violations. His trial was set for December. 

Nichols delayed trials for three other Jan. 6 defendants charged with misdemeanor trespassing. He issued the decision after asking federal prosecutors whether they expected the trial to continue under the Trump administration. When prosecutors could not guarantee, Nichols ruled to delay the trial to April. 

Marina Medvin, an attorney representing two of the defendants in Nichols’ court, said that ‘as soon as the prosecutor asked for a trial date, Judge Nichols confronted her on whether she could assure the court that this matter would be moving forward to trial once the new administration takes office.’ 

‘Of course, the prosecutor could make no such assurances,’ she said. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Guard Norman Powell has carved out a role to start his fourth season with the Los Angeles Clippers and has managed to have an impact early in the season.

Powell reached his goal of becoming an everyday starter but is now looking to prove pundits who had low expectations for the Clippers in 2024 wrong.

While the Clippers are off to a 6-6 start, Powell has been a bright spot in the lineup following the departures of Russell Westbrook and Paul George.

Powell has referred to it as “addition by subtraction.”

He’d proven his worth to the Clippers by finishing fourth in the Sixth Man of the Year Award race in consecutive seasons but made his intentions clear that he wanted to strive for more this year. 

With more opportunities available, he’s managed to capitalize and succeed early in the season.

Clippers sixth man to crucial starter

“I’ve always had that mentality,’ Powell said. ‘I’ve always had super high expectations for myself and envisioned myself in the NBA and being a starter and key contributor for any team I was on.’

With the sixth-man discussion off the table this season, Powell could find himself as a potential NBA All-Star and in a position to contend for the Most Improved Player Award at the end of the season after seeing a drastic change in his scoring production. 

Through 12 games, he’s averaged 26 points, compared to the 13.9 points per game he averaged in a career-high 76 games played throughout the 2023-24 season.

He’s scored a season-high 37 points in a 109-104 victory over the Denver Nuggets and produced 31 points on the road against the Sacramento Kings and the Oklahoma City Thunder, respectively.

“He’s been on one this year, especially with (Paul George) gone and Kawhi (Leonard) hurt,” Kings guard Malik Monk told Fox 40 Sacramento about Powell. “He’s been playing good ball.”

Powell’s ability to score at a high volume has proven to be valuable for a team that was expected to lean on James Harden as its primary option.

“It’s huge to pick up some of that scoring load with Kawhi being out,” Clippers coach Tyronn Lue said about Powell’s production. “I think it shows James that other guys can also score the basketball and not have to put pressure on himself every night to score.”

Powell joins Nikola Jokic (Nuggets) and Kyrie Irving (Dallas Mavericks) as the only players averaging at least 25 points per game while shooting 50% from the field and 50% from the 3-point line as of Wednesday.

Powell focused on mental health

Powell spent the offseason working on his physical ability to continue being in the best shape possible but also credits the time he’s spent focusing on his mental health and well-being for some of his success this season.

“I read a lot of self-help books that will help better me as a person, my mentality and approach, especially when it comes to sports because today we have a more open dialog about mental health, depression and pressure that we as athletes face … so much of the game is mental.”

Powell’s work with a mental health coach has helped point him in the right direction with some of the books he’s read and has allowed him to overcome some of the overthinking and depression he’s faced when the physical work he’s put in hadn’t always translated into success on the court.

He’s also prioritized the phrase “Understand the Grind,” which is also the name of his clothing brand.

Since high school, the motto has served as a reminder to become someone others from his hometown of San Diego can look up to.

A chance for him to return to the Clippers in 2021 has allowed him to expand his outreach back in his hometown and stay closer to his immediate family.

Powell has given back to the community in a similar fashion using his platform to help “uplift the next generation” with his AAU and mentorship programs. He also participates in charity give-back events during the back-to-school and holiday seasons.

“My humanitarian work comes from my mom. Growing up, she was a social worker and a single mother who raised me and my older sisters but still found time to give back to the community and be a mom of San Diego.”

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Mike Tyson vs. Jake Paul. There has been plenty of chatter and analysis about who has the advantage in the ring for Friday’s fight.

There is no question Tyson holds the experience edge. He turned pro at 18, is a former heavyweight champion and is known for his debilitating blows. Now, he is returning to the ring at 58 for his first sanctioned bout since 2005.

But what about the brass tacks of boxing? Who has the advantage when it comes to reach, height or stance? Paul has not been boxing long and while his record is solid, some critics say he has not been challenged.

Let’s go to the tale of the tape:

Mike Tyson

Age: 58

Height: 5-10

Weight: 228.4 pounds

Stance: Orthodox

Reach: 71 inches

Record: 50-6

Knockouts: 44

Nickname: Iron Mike, The Baddest Man on the Planet

Hometown: Brooklyn, New York

Zodiac sign: Cancer

Net worth: $10 million, according to Celebrity Net Worth

Jake Paul

Age: 27

Height: 6-1

Weight: 227

Stance: Orthodox

Reach: 76 inches

Record: 10-1

Knockouts: 7

Nickname: The Problem Child, El Gallo

Hometown: Cleveland, Ohio

Zodiac sign: Capricorn

Net worth: Almost $80 million, according to Celebrity Net Worth

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Trump’s 2025 election victory was resounding and, it appears, realigning. The Democrats, for their part, are engaging in a rather public autopsy of their misfortune. While almost all claims that a party will be in the wilderness for years to come are exaggerations, there are at least three major mountains in the way of any realignment back in the Democrats’ favor.

First, it must be said that Trump’s triumph and the Democrats’ loss has much to do with the economy. Yes, there were other factors such as immigration, crime and cultural issues. Even so, it was economy that was at the center of this election.

Beyond the polling that indicated it was the number one issue, the following – astonishing – economic fact played no small role:

After the inflation of 2021 through 2023, as reported by GOBankingRates in January, 2024, ‘nearly half of Americans have less than $500 in savings – and almost 60% of Americans have less than $1000 saved up.’

Now combine that with the record credit card debt of many of those same people and there is no other conclusion to be made but that a huge percentage of Americans are living on the margin. They voted their dwindling pocket book over social justice pleas.

Prior to government response to Covid, wages had risen under Trump by 7.1%. Adjusting for inflation, they fell under Biden.

Little wonder over 70% said on Election Day the country was headed in the wrong direction.

As for the mountains the Democrats face, they are as follows:

The modern Democrat party has become the party of government, taxation and regulation. The Green New Deal is a comprehensive example of that.

The Green New Deal legislation is what economists call a government directed ‘industrial policy.’ It seeks to direct enormous government expenditures toward their favored sector of the economy that they want to design.

To realize that, Democrats have imposed regulations that are unprecedented in their scope and reach. That includes openly stating that entire industries should be shutdown, such as coal.

Of course, the Democrats also seek large tax hikes to pay for that program as well. In the last two presidential cycles, the Democrats have openly campaigned on higher taxes. That used to be taboo – at least from Reagan, to Clinton, to the Bush 41and 43 and Obama’s first terms.

The Green New Deal, of course, follows up the last major Democrat legislative victory and huge expansion of government known as Obamacare. That was passed without a single Republican vote.

Just how government-centric are the Democrats?

Well, consider one of their prospects for 2028, California Governor Gavin Newsom. He is a big proponent of Green New Deal policies. Through regulations, he has purported to ban combustion engines for cars and trucks in the next decade among other things.

Recently, Newsom boasted about how California is producing high-paying jobs.

In truth, however, from January of 2022 to June of 2024, California produced only 5,400 private sector jobs. That’s 180 jobs a month for 30 months for a state of over 35 million. By contrast, in that period, government hiring accounted for over 95% of the new jobs in California.

In other words, the party also has become the party of government jobs.

Why were there so few jobs produced in California under Newsom? The simple answer is that California has the highest burden of taxes and regulations of any state in the Union. Nationally, a similar story has taken hold.

In the last decade, the spending by our state, local and federal governments has reached 35% according to Trading Economics. It peaked over 40% during the government response to Covid.

Further, the costs of regulations imposed by our governments is well over $2 trillion all combined. If regulations were its own industry – it would trail only government and healthcare in size.

The societal costs of that spending, the taxes imposed to pay for it and those regulations, has been to limit yearly, average, economic growth to 2% or below. We used to average 4% in the 1950s. It has steadily declined since then as government has grown.

Two percent growth does not and cannot produce enough private sector jobs for a country the size of the United States – plain and simple.

So, it can be no surprise that the rate in growth of government jobs nationwide exceeds private sector jobs growth at this time. Without enough job growth, those on the margin wind up on government programs.

Of course, those government jobs have come at the expense of trillion-dollar deficits and an exploding national debt, which is over $35 trillion as of this writing. All combined, those are sources of inflation which could ignite again if a crisis occurs.

In the final analysis, the size of government and its regulations have reached the point that they are strangling private sector job growth. Promoting more government, the staple of the current Democrat party, is not an option that will produce jobs for voters.

Recently, polling by Scott Rasmussen, in conjunction with The Committee to Unleash Prosperity, found that, among the elites (defined as people having at least one post-graduate degree, earning at least $150,000 annually, and living in high population density areas):

‘70% of the elites trust the government to do the right thing most of the time – more than twice the national average. Among the politically active members of the elites, the figure rises to a stunning 89%.’

That is important to know because that subgroup populates Democrat elites in and out of government.

Historically, once the appetite for such big government, if not socialism, grips a party hierarchy, it doesn’t let go. That is consistent with Labor Party history in England. It is also consistent with the fact that Obama and Hillary Clinton were to the left of Bill Clinton, Biden bragged he was the most progressive ever and Harris was to the left of them all. Meanwhile, Truman and JFK would not recognize any of them.

Those are the three mountains in the way of any Democrat comeback. There are others, but far more American Latinos want jobs than handouts. A growing number of black male voters agree with them.

Of course, if Republicans simply spend money on their favorite special interests, as they have in the past, instead of paring down government, they could hand the Democrats a free pass back into power. For now, however, Democrats have the higher hill to climb.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The Indian benchmark Nifty 50 extended its corrective decline. Over the past four sessions of a truncated week, the Nifty 50 index remained largely under selling pressure. Throughout the past week, the markets continued with their process of mean-reversion. The volatility, though, did not show any major surge. The volatility gauge, IndiaVIX rose by a modest 2.11% to 14.77. The trading range over the past week stayed wider on the expected lines. The Nifty oscillated in a range of 852 points. It closed with a net weekly loss of (-615.50) points (-2.55%).

The coming week is truncated as well. Wednesday, November 20th is a trading holiday due to Assembly Elections in the state of Maharashtra. The markets are undergoing a painful mean-reversion process. As of now, though the Nifty has closed a notch below the 200-DMA which is currently placed at 23555, it has managed to defend this important support. Beyond this, the Nifty is within striking distance of the 50-week MA which presently stands at 23253. Even if the index ends up testing this level, the long-term primary uptrend would still stay intact. Two possibilities remain distinct; a relief rally in the form of a technical pullback cannot be ruled out; in the same breadth, the markets remain weak and vulnerable to extended corrective pressure.

On Monday, the Nifty will adjust to the global market setup as it will open after a gap of one day.  The levels of 23650 and 23780 may act as potential resistance points. The supports come in at 23250 and 23000 levels.

The weekly RSI is 43.26; it has made a fresh 14-period low which is bearish. It also stays neutral and does not show any divergence against the price. The weekly MACD is bearish and stays below its signal line. The widening Histogram shows accelerated momentum during the downtrend. A long black body occurred on the Candles; this showed the strength of the trend on the downside.

The pattern analysis shows that the Nifty has made a feeble attempt to defend its 200-DMA though it has closed slightly below this important point. Any further downside may see the Index testing another important support level of 50-week MA which is placed at 23253. Besides this, the index has taken support on an extended trendline which also remains in close proximity to the 50-week MA.

All in all, the markets are trading with a weak undercurrent. A technical rebound and a relief rally cannot be ruled out; however, the markets are also vulnerable to sustained selling pressure and a test of lower levels cannot be ruled out. The market breadth remains weak and this is concerning as all technical rebounds may get sold if the breadth continues to remain weak. It is strongly recommended that all leveraged exposures must be curtailed. Any technical rebound; as and when it occurs, should not be chased and all gains must be mindfully protected. A highly cautious approach is advised for the coming week.

Sector Analysis for the coming week

In our look at Relative Rotation Graphs®, we compared various sectors against CNX500 (NIFTY 500 Index), which represents over 95% of the free float market cap of all the stocks listed.

Relative Rotation Graphs (RRG) show a largely unchanged sectoral setup. Nifty Services Sector, Pharma, Financial Services, and IT sector indices are inside the leading quadrant. They are likely to continue to relatively outperform the broader markets.

The Nifty Consumption, Midcap 100, and FMCG indices are inside the weakening quadrant. These sectors are expected to continue giving up on their relative performance over the coming weeks.

The Realty, Infrastructure, PSE, Media, Auto, Commodities, and Energy indices are inside the lagging quadrant. Among these, Commodities, Energy, Realty, and Infrastructure Indices are seen improving their relative momentum against the Nifty 500 index.

The Banknifty, PSU Bank, and Nifty Metal Indices are inside the improving quadrant. A gradual betterment in their relative performance can be expected over the coming weeks.

Important Note: RRG™ charts show the relative strength and momentum of a group of stocks. In the above Chart, they show relative performance against NIFTY500 Index (Broader Markets) and should not be used directly as buy or sell signals.  

Milan Vaishnav, CMT, MSTA

Consulting Technical Analyst

www.EquityResearch.asia | www.ChartWizard.ae

The Philadelphia Eagles are one of the hottest teams in the NFL.

Philadelphia defeated the Washington Commanders 26-18 on Thursday night. The Eagles’ win increased their NFC East lead and improved their win streak to six in a row. They are currently 3-0 in the division after winning their third consecutive game against the Commanders.

The Commanders have now dropped two straight games but are still firmly in the NFC playoff hunt.

USA TODAY Sports examines the winners and losers from Thursday night’s NFC East battle:

Winners

Saquon Barkley, Eagles’ rushing attack

The Eagles have topped 100 rushing yards in every game this season. The trend continued in Week 11.

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

Philadelphia’s rushing attack produced 228 yards and three touchdowns.

Barkley was Philadelphia’s best offensive player. His 23-yard touchdown run effectively put the game away in the fourth quarter. On the Eagles’ next series, Barkley found a hole up the middle and raced to a 39-yard touchdown that sealed the deal for good.

Barkley came into Week 11 ranking second in the NFL in yards from scrimmage and rushing yards. The Eagles star running back logged 198 yards from scrimmage and two touchdowns Thursday night. He had 146 yards on the ground and now has six 100-plus yard rushing games this season.

Barkley crossed the 1,000-yard rushing mark in the win. He joins the Ravens’ Derrick Henry as the only running backs with over 1,000 rushing yards thus far this year.

Eagles’ defense

Philadelphia’s defense deserves a lot of credit for containing Washington’s offense. The Eagles’ defense allowed a touchdown in the first quarter and then kept Washington out of the end zone until the game’s final moments.

The Eagles’ pass rush and coverage in the secondary made Jayden Daniels uncomfortable.

Philadelphia gave up 264 yards versus the Commanders. Defensive coordinator Vic Fangio’s unit entered Week 11 the top defense in the NFC, allowing 274 yards per game.

Eagles rookie cornerback Quinyon Mitchell aligned across from Terry McLaurin on 20 of 25 routes, per Next Gen Stats. He was not targeted in coverage against McLaurin.

Mitchell didn’t allow a reception all game. He deserves to be in the NFL Defensive Rookie of the Year conversation.

Linebacker Zack Baun tallied a game-high 15 tackles.

Brotherly Shove/Tush Push

The Eagles ran a variation of the “Brotherly Shove,’ aka the “Tush Push,” in the game. They snapped the football in the formation, but Hurts pitched to Barkley for a first-down run.

Philadelphia dialed up the traditional version of the play in the fourth quarter and it resulted in Hurts’ 1-yard, go-ahead touchdown.

The different play out of the same formation might keep opposing defenses on their heels going forward.

Losers

Jayden Daniels, Commanders’ pass offense

Daniels is in the midst of the first losing streak of his NFL career.

Daniels and Washington’s pass offense never got into a rhythm Thursday night. The rookie quarterback threw an interception with under five minutes remaining in the fourth quarter that sealed the Commanders’ fate.

Daniels finished with 191 yards, one touchdown and one interception. He had a 81.6 passer rating.

Commanders’ wide receivers

Daniels didn’t look comfortable, but Washington’s pass catchers didn’t help him, either.

The Commanders had two drops in the first half and their wide receivers were quiet the whole game — not a single Commanders wide receiver had more than one catch.

McLaurin had just one catch for 10 yards.

Running back Austin Ekeler and tight end Zach Ertz were the only Commanders with more than three catches. Ekeler had a team-high eight catches for 89 yards. 

Jake Elliott

The Eagles kicker missed a 44-yard field goal wide left on Philly’s opening drive. Elliott followed up his opening miss by sailing a 51-yard field goal wide left in the second quarter.

Elliott also missed an extra point in the fourth quarter. He was erratic kicking the football.

The last kicker to miss two field goals and one extra point was Ove Johansson in Week 11 of the 1977 season, per NFL Research.

Cowboys, Giants

The Eagles and Commanders are the only two teams in the NFC East above .500. It’ll likely stay that way for the remainder of the regular season. Both teams are clearly better than the Cowboys (3-6) and the Giants (2-8). Dallas is 1-1 in the division, while New York is a disastrous 0-4.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Fight night.

It used to be a glamourous, must-see TV American tradition, with boxers like Muhammad Ali, Joe Louis, Sugar Ray Leonard and Roberto Duran. Now, it is back – albeit in a vastly different form and forum – in what is probably the most hyped bout of the past decade.

Former world heavyweight champion Mike Tyson, who earned the moniker “Iron Mike’ for his powerful and devastating blows, will face “Problem Child’ Jake Paul, who has risen from YouTube influencer to a boxer in a manner once unimaginable in one of the oldest sports in the world. The scheduled eight-round bout Friday night will take place not under the hot lights of a casino in Las Vegas but in the middle of an NFL football field – outside at AT&T Stadium in Irving, Texas, home of the Dallas Cowboys.

Tyson, 58, has not fought since a 2020 exhibition. Paul, 27, started boxing recently after a career in MMA, preceded by time as a child actor on a Disney show. His last bout was a sixth-round TKO victory in July.

USA TODAY Sports offers a ringside look at how each man got here:

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Plenty of bettors nationwide have lofty expectations for the upcoming fight between Jake Paul and Mike Tyson. But what do the sportsbooks think?

The bout is, to say the least, a unique case. It is sanctioned by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR), but some gaming officials have questioned the legitimacy of the fight. It will be scored like a real fight, but some rules, including length of rounds (two minutes instead of three) and glove weight (14 ounces instead of 10) are not standard.

Regardless, at least one sportsbook anticipates Tyson-Paul to deliver an unprecedented volume of bets.

‘I expect Tyson vs. Paul to be the most-bet-on boxing match in BetMGM history,’ BetMGM senior trader Alex Rella said. ‘This is the rare fight that transcends different demographics: Tyson supporters, old-school boxing fans that may have tuned out in recent years, Jake Paul haters and casual sports fans that want to be included in the conversation.’

Paul already owns the No. 2 spot for most-bet boxing matches at BetMGM after his decision victory over Nate Diaz. And, as Rella put it, ‘Diaz isn’t Tyson.’

The other aspect to consider is where the public money lies. People might be surprised to learn it isn’t with the 27-year-old who has a 10-1 professional record.

A staggering 80% of bets, including 73% of money, are on the 58-year-old Tyson to win, per BetMGM. Tyson is considered a +170 underdog, although that number has moved from +240.

‘I believe the public money is on Tyson for two reasons,’ Rella told USA TODAY Sports. ‘The first is obvious: Tyson is one of the all-time greats and one of the most popular fighters ever. Even at his age now, he has this aura that few fighters ever had. The second reason, many people have been rooting for Jake Paul to get violently knocked out for quite some time. Paul is a polarizing character, and people back that up with betting.’

In terms of payouts, and given the vast majority of money on the other side, BetMGM will be rooting for Paul (-210) to win.

At least six states have prohibited placing wagers on the fight, with some citing concerns with its legitimacy.

“We just consider it an untraditional boxing event that’s more of an exhibition,’’ Richard McGarvey, spokesperson for the Pennsylvania Gaming Control Board, told USA TODAY Sports. “We just said, ‘Not in Pennsylvania.’ ‘

In addition to Pennsylvania, officials in New York, Colorado, Kentucky, Louisiana and Vermont will also turn away bettors.

‘This fight is fully sanctioned,’ Rella said, ‘so we are expecting a legitimate fight. Since this is a unique situation, our compliance department has reached out individually to each state gambling regulator to get clear directions. A few states did decline, so we are not offering it everywhere.’

Still, for those who can get in on the action, Rella said the majority of people with money on the fight have a clear goal in mind.

‘Bettors want to see Paul get knocked out.’

Josh Peter contributed to this story.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY