Archive

2024

Browsing

Abercrombie & Fitch isn’t giving up its crown anytime soon. 

The apparel company issued strong holiday guidance on Tuesday after posting its sixth straight quarter of double-digit sales growth and another quarter of results that topped expectations. The recent arrest of the company’s former CEO, Mike Jeffries, on charges of sex trafficking did not appear to affect results.

Here’s how Abercrombie did in its fiscal third quarter compared with what Wall Street was anticipating, based on a survey of analysts by LSEG:

The company’s reported net income for the three-month period that ended Nov. 2 was $131.98 million, or $2.50 per share, compared with $96.2 million, or $1.83 per share, a year earlier. 

Sales rose to $1.21 billion, up around 14% from $1.06 billion a year earlier. 

For the all-important holiday shopping quarter, Abercrombie is expecting sales growth of 5% to 7%, ahead of the 4.8% growth that analysts had expected, according to LSEG. For the full year, the company is expecting sales to rise between 14% and 15%, higher than the 12% to 13% range it previously anticipated. That new outlook is higher than the 12.1% growth analysts had expected, according to LSEG. 

Despite the better-than-expected guidance, Abercrombie shares dropped about 3% in premarket trading.

In a news release, CEO Fran Horowitz struck a positive note, leaving out the concerns she’d mentioned in the previous quarter about the “increasingly uncertain environment.” 

“With broad-based growth across regions and brands, we continue to execute at a high level, leveraging our regional playbooks and operating model. Each of our regions grew double-digits in the quarter, with the Americas growing 14%, EMEA growing 15% and APAC growing 32%,” said Horowitz.

The Abercrombie and Hollister brands posted comparable sales growth of 11% and 21%, respectively. Horowitz noted the strong performances lapped growth of 26% for Abercrombie and 7% for Hollister last year.

Under Horowitz’s direction, Abercrombie has become one of the retail industry’s biggest winners. As it laps the strong performance it posted last year, it’s continuing to build on those numbers.

To keep gaining momentum, Horowitz is looking to international markets for growth. Abercrombie has also gone into new categories, such as its wedding collection and recent partnership with the NFL. It’s also focused on developing its Hollister chain, which caters to Gen Z shoppers, and ensuring the brand is differentiated from Abercrombie, which caters to millennials. 

During the quarter, sales at Hollister were up 14%, accounting for nearly half of all revenue. 

As retailers gear up for Black Friday and the duration of the holiday shopping season, it appears as if some of the dim sentiment clouding the back half of the year has evaporated after President-elect Donald Trump’s victory. 

For example, Abercrombie and Dick’s Sporting Goods — which both reported earnings on Tuesday — struck cautious tones when reporting earnings over the summer, but that sentiment was replaced with bullishness now that the election is over. 

Consumer sentiment has improved since Trump’s election and analysts are hopeful that certainty in the election results — regardless of who won — will be a boon for spending.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

There was just one race featuring 38 people in Ames, Iowa, back in 2006, and what it has become since then is yet more confirmation that running is a Thanksgiving staple in the United States as much as the turkey at this point.  

The American Turkey Tradition is billed as “the world’s largest Thanksgiving running festival” by All Community Events, the company that puts it on each year. For 2024, it will partner with 22 different Thanksgiving Day turkey trots and half marathons held in 12 states around the country. Tens of thousands of runners are expected to participate, and that’s likely just a small fraction of those planning to run before they eat on Thursday.

“It’s probably one of the greatest athletic traditions in America if you think about numbers,” All Community Events president Peter Starykowicz said. 

When was the first turkey trot?

The YMCA Turkey Trot in Buffalo, New York, which was established in 1896, is considered the oldest consecutively-run footrace in the world. The inaugural race featured six runners competing on dirt roads in a five-mile cross-country race. As many as 14,000 runners will participate in the 129th annual YMCA Turkey Trot on Thursday.

How many people run on Thanksgiving? 

The website Run Signup, an online race management tool, told USA TODAY this year it had more than 1 million participants registered in 922 Thanksgiving Day races as of Monday. The figure will continue to grow up until race day and it’s likely only a fraction of how many runners will take part in every race around the country. 

Run Signup marketing director Johanna Goode estimated her company approaches 50 percent market share in the United States for online race registration. She also noted Thanksgiving Day race participation at Run Signup was up 10 percent last year, with races featuring anywhere from 10 to 20,000 runners. 

Why are turkey trots popular?

Thanksgiving and running meld together well.

Thanksgiving Day races often feature multiple distances, like a 10K for adults and a 5K that allow for children to walk the course if they choose. They are “approachable challenges,” as Starykowicz put it, and the entire household can participate. There’s also usually a charity component attached to the event.

“It’s really tied to it’s very much a family holiday,” Goode said. “You have multi-generational families that are together and want to do things together. It allows participation from multiple people and it builds a family tradition.”

The accessibility lends itself to increasing popularity, and the exercise pairs well with a holiday that’s also about eating a lot of food afterwards.

“It makes people feel like they’ve earned the right to indulge that evening,” Starykowicz said. “Most of the people who are running on Thanksgiving are people who won’t compete in a running event the rest of the year, and that’s the beauty of it. It’s people coming together for themselves as well as their community.”

Tips for running on Thanksgiving

The Cleveland Clinic recommends those running on Thanksgiving, particularly participants who don’t run regularly, follow some guidelines to make the experience as enjoyable as possible.

Pick a manageable distance
Train by running a few miles ahead of Thanksgiving
Run with a group
Wear comfortable shoes
Dress for the weather
Hydrate

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

After Jake Paul’s unanimous decision over Mike Tyson earlier this month, speculation instantly turned to Paul’s next opponent. Ryan Garcia threw his hat into the ring and doubled-down on his callout Tuesday.

‘It would be huge,’ Garcia said during a Tuesday appearance on ‘The Ariel Helwani Show.’. ‘I see it everywhere. Everywhere I go, people are asking me to fight Jake Paul. I’ve got to give the people what they want, that’s what I’m used to doing.’

Garcia is serving a year-long suspension after testing positive for a banned substance prior to his April fight against Devin Haney. Garcia’s New York State professional boxer license is suspended until April 20, 2025, but that’s not stopping him from attempting to get into the ring.

Garcia seemed set to fight Rukiya Anpo in an exhibition match in Tokyo on Dec. 30, but Golden Boy Promotions disputed the notion Tuesday. In a statement, it said that ‘Golden Boy Promotions has exclusive rights to Ryan Garcia’s fights. The organizers of this event (Garcia vs. Anpo) have acknowledged as such and have agreed in writing that our sign-off is needed for this event to occur. As no such sign-off has been given, as of today there is no event with Ryan Garcia.’

Garcia said he wanted the fight as payback for Anpo ‘beating up’ Manny Pacquiao. (Anpo, who was 28 at the time, participated in a July exhibition boxing match against Pacquiao, 45.)

‘I saw this dude way bigger than Manny Pacquiao and way younger, just beating up — well, trying to beat up — on him,’ Garcia said. ‘Just throwing haymakers the whole fight and just being obnoxious in the ring. I was like, ‘Oh my God, dude. If they give me a chance, I’ll knock this dude out.”

Garcia said the same logic applies to Paul, 27, who faced off against Tyson, 58.

‘He was trying to beat up on Uncle Mike (Tyson),’ Garcia said. ‘Like I said, the same way I feel about Manny Pacquiao, the same way I feel about this.’

Garcia said should they fight, he has every intention of knocking Paul out.

‘If Jake fights the way he fought with Mike, I genuinely believe I would knock him out within four (or) five rounds,’ Garcia said. ‘We said we would run it one day. He came to my gym a long time ago in Victorville, then he came to visit me with the Canelo (Alvarez) camp — this is before he boxed. So I kind of gave birth to his boxing career, so I’m here to end it. That’s it.’

Garcia has mainly fought in the lightweight (135 pounds) and super lightweight (140 pounds) divisions, while Paul weighed in at 227 pounds ahead of his bout with Tyson. Garcia said he would be willing to fight at a weight disadvantage if the two agreed to a match. He cited the June 2021 exhibition match between Logan Paul (189.5 pounds) and Floyd Mayweather (155 pounds) as an example.

The USA TODAY app gets you to the heart of the news — fastDownload for award-winning coverage, crosswords, audio storytelling, the eNewspaper and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

When the players for Team USA are announced next week for the 4 Nations Face-Off, there will automatically be a bunch of deserving players left off.

Not intentionally. It’s just that the U.S. pool of NHL players is that deep and that impressive.

Here is a projection of who could be on Team USA for the 4 Nations Face-Off that will be played from Feb. 12-20 in Montreal and Boston (listed alphabetically, *-originally named to the team):

Forwards

Matt Boldy, Minnesota Wild

Cole Caufield, Montreal Canadiens

Kyle Connor, Winnipeg Jets

Jack Eichel, Vegas Golden Knights*

Jake Guentzel, Tampa Bay Lightning

Jack Hughes, New Jersey Devils

Clayton Keller, Utah Hockey Club

Dylan Larkin, Detroit Red Wings

Auston Matthews, Toronto Maple Leafs*

Jason Robertson, Dallas Stars

Tage Thompson, Buffalo Sabres

Brady Tkachuk, Ottawa Senators

Matthew Tkachuk, Florida Panthers*

Analysis: There’s plenty to like and some caveats. There’s strength down the middle and scoring throughout the group. Matthews is both a three-time goal-scoring leader and a Selke Trophy finalist. It will be fun having the gritty Tkachuk brothers and high-scoring Hughes brothers on the team. The caveats: Matthews and Thompson have missed time with injury, though they should be fine by February. Matthew Tkachuk’s and Robertson’s scoring numbers are off. Vancouver’s J.T. Miller would be a good addition, but he has taken a leave of absence.

Other options: Miller; Brock Boeser, Vancouver Canucks; Vincent Trocheck, New York Rangers; Alex Tuch, Buffalo Sabres.

Defensemen

Brock Faber, Minnesota Wild

Adam Fox, New York Rangers*

Noah Hanifin, Vegas Golden Knights

Quinn Hughes, Vancouver Canucks*

Charlie McAvoy, Boston Bruins*

Jaccob Slavin, Carolina Hurricanes

Zach Werenski, Columbus Blue Jackets

Analysis: A strong blue line. Hughes and Fox are former Norris Trophy winners. Faber was runner-up for rookie of the year and Werenski had a recent five-point game. Hanifin and Slavin are solid two-way players and McAvoy, though his numbers are down, can drive offense. There are four left-handed shots to three righties, so there are opportunities to mix and match.

Other options: John Carlson, Washington Capitals; Neal Pionk, Winnipeg Jets.

Goaltenders

Connor Hellebuyck, Winnipeg Jets

Jake Oettinger, Dallas Stars

Jeremy Swayman, Boston Bruins

Analysis: Team USA will have the strongest goaltending of the tournament. Hellebuyck is a two-time Vezina Trophy winner and an early favorite for the award this season as the Jets have had their best start to a season. Oettinger took the Stars to the Western Conference final the past two seasons and is off to a strong start this season. Swayman has struggled at times this season after missing training during a contract dispute. But he had a .933 save percentage during the 2024 playoffs. Vancouver’s Thatcher Demko would be in the mix if he weren’t hurt.

Other options: Joey Daccord, Seattle Kraken; Anthony Stolarz, Toronto Maple Leafs; Demko.

4 Nations Face-Off schedule

(Times p.m. ET)

Wednesday, Feb. 12:  Canada vs. Sweden at Montreal, 8, TNT

Thursday, Feb. 13: USA vs. Finland at Montreal, 8, ESPN

Saturday, Feb. 15: Finland vs. Sweden at Montreal, 1, ABC

Saturday, Feb. 15: USA vs. Canada at Montreal, 8, ABC

Monday, Feb. 17: Canada vs. Finland at Boston, 1, TNT

Monday, Feb. 17:  Sweden vs. USA at Boston, 8, TNT

Thursday, Feb. 20: Championship game at Boston, 8, ESPN

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

President-elect Donald Trump last week announced the nomination of Florida’s former attorney general, Pam Bondi, to head up the Justice Department, touching off a flurry of speculation as to how Bondi, a longtime prosecutor and close ally of Trump, might lead the department.

Former colleagues who knew her best during her time as a Florida prosecutor, including a Democrat opponent for state attorney general who she later tapped to be her drug czar, described Bondi in a series of interviews as an experienced litigator whose leadership style is more consensus-builder than bridge-burner and whose tenure may generate less friction among rank-and-file career staff at the Justice Department than early critics might fear. 

If confirmed, those close to Bondi told Fox News Digital that she will likely espouse many of the same priorities she did in her years as a prosecutor in Florida, primarily in cracking down on drug trafficking, illicit fentanyl imports and in running a Justice Department that enforces fair treatment of both political and career appointees alike.

‘From a lawyer’s standpoint, this woman knows how to be a lawyer and a trial lawyer,’ Nicholas Cox, Florida’s statewide prosecutor, told Fox News Digital of Bondi’s record. ‘There’s just not a question about it.’ 

Here are some of the ways her time in Florida could inform her tenure as attorney general. 

In Florida, Bondi quickly earned a reputation for cracking down on opioids and the many ‘pill mills’ operating in the Sunshine State when she was elected as the state’s attorney general in 2010. At the time, Florida ‘was the epicenter of the opioid crisis,’ Florida statewide prosecutor Nicholas Cox said in an interview.

It was also a hub for so-called drug tourism: Out-of-state residents traveled to Florida from across the country to purchase opioids in bulk, relying on the state’s many-house pharmacies, ‘cash-only’ clinics and a lack of statewide prescribing laws to purchase the addictive medications, largely without restriction.

When Bondi took office, opioids were killing around seven people each day, Dave Aronberg, the state attorney for Palm Beach County, who formerly served as Bondi’s drug czar, said in an interview. 

There were also ‘more pain clinics than McDonald’s locations’ in Florida at the time, he said, illustrating the magnitude of the problem. 

Aronberg, a Democrat who ran against Bondi for attorney general in 2010 before she appointed him to the post, credits his former boss as being the person ‘most responsible for ridding the state of Florida of destructive pill mills.’

He and others point to Bondi’s push for legislation that helped eliminate pill mills in the state, her crackdown on doctors and clinics responsible for prescribing the pain pills en masse, and her work in enforcing Florida’s ‘Statewide Prescription Drug Diversion and Abuse Road Map’ to best coordinate federal, state and local efforts as helping end the crisis. 

Later, she served in Trump’s first presidential term as a member of his Opioid and Drug Abuse Commission.

If confirmed as U.S. attorney general, Bondi has made clear she plans to remain focused on cracking down on illicit drugs—albeit on a national scale.

Bondi’s former colleagues told Fox News Digital they expect she will bring the same playbook to Washington—this time with an eye to cracking down on drug trafficking, illicit fentanyl use, and the cartels responsible for smuggling the drugs across the border. 

Bondi has spent years as a prosecutor in Florida, first as a prosecutor in the Hillsborough County State Attorney’s Office before being elected in 2010 as the state’s attorney general. 

Cox, the Florida state prosecutor, noted that Bondi’s career was also heavily shaped by her 18 years working in the Florida District Attorney’s Office, a career position that was not informed by politics. 

There, the main focus was ‘cooperation’— a mentality that Cox said extended to ‘prosecutors, law enforcement, and public defenders, for that matter.’  ‘We all worked together and it made for a really strong criminal justice system,’ Cox said.

 ‘We all worked together, and it made for a really strong criminal justice system,’ Cox said.

Aronberg echoed this assessment. The state attorney for Palm Beach county had formerly served as a Democrat in the state senate before running for attorney general. He later dropped out endorsed her Democratic opponent. 

But afrer her election, Bondi tapped him to be her drug czar— an unorthodox move that Aronberg and others said demonstrates Bondi’s commitment to solving problems and working across the aisle on top priorities. 

‘It really said a lot about her because she got a lot of criticism, withering criticism, from some members of her own party’ who were upset she would choose a Democrat for the role, Aronberg said. 

In Florida, Bondi ‘was not seen as a very partisan person,’ he added, citing her ‘strong working relationship with Democrats,’ which continued even after being sworn in as state attorney general. 

‘She would support legislation regardless of whether it was supported by Democrats or Republicans,’ Aronberg said, and in return, she was well-liked across the aisle. 

In announcing Bondi as his nomination for attorney general, Trump again took aim at the Justice Department, which he characterized as being ‘weaponized’ against him.

‘Pam will refocus the DOJ to its intended purpose of fighting Crime, and Making America Safe Again,’ Trump said in the statement.

But those close to Bondi said they do not think of her as an overly political person, saying they believe the many years she spent as a litigator and state attorney general will help her deftly navigate the unique political pressures in the role, including Trump’s calls to go after his so-called ‘enemies’ within the Department of Justice.

Though Bondi herself has echoed calls to ‘investigate the investigators’ involved in the special counsel investigations into Donald Trump, former colleagues said they think she has learned from former Justice Department leaders before her, including former Attorney General Bill Barr and former Special Counsel John Durham, who was tapped by Barr to investigate alleged misconduct in the Trump-Russia probe. 

‘I’ve told my Democratic friends not to overreact because we have been through this before,’ Aronberg said, citing the special counsel probe led by Durham.

In the next four years, he said, ‘I think we will see more of that.’

But Aronberg sees a difference between Bondi and others, including Trump’s former attorney general nominee, Matt Gaetz. 

Bondi ‘is not going to burn the house down,’ Aronberg said. ‘She’s not going to manufacture evidence as a way to walk Trump’s enemies out in handcuffs.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

China’s desire to dominate space at the expense of the United States is no secret. The Chinese Communist Party has telegraphed its intentions, and our own intelligence community has issued glaring warnings that we would be wise to heed.  

A declassified report from the Director of National Intelligence stated in 2021 that ‘China is steadily progressing toward its goal of becoming a world-class space leader, with the intent to match or exceed the United States by 2045.’ 

The report detailed a rapidly approaching timeframe when the CCP may achieve its goal, stating ‘China is developing innovative systems in all space technology areas, and we judge … that by 2030 China will achieve world-class status in all but a few.’  

That is nothing short of a time bomb. And the clock is ticking.  

The very same year the DNI report was issued, China’s orbital launches exceeded those of the United States. This was the second year in a row China outpaced the United States in orbital launches.  

Like every one of China’s ambitions, the communist regime tells us what it intends to do with space dominance. In 2015, China designated space as the new warfare domain and has since been active in growing its arsenal of new technologies. One of these is a nuclear-capable hypersonic missile which the CCP demonstrated in 2021. The glide vehicle engaged in a low-orbit space flight before hitting its target within a dozen miles.  

This was the latest in a series of launches that demonstrated China’s ability to threaten America in space, whether it be targeting our satellites for destruction or surveilling our own activities in orbit.  

While the United States has regained the lead in orbital launches in subsequent years, complacency would be cataclysmic for our geopolitical, security and economic interests. The risk is compounded by China’s secret weapon in the space race: America’s own regulatory state.  

The regulator responsible for this is the Federal Aviation Administration. For too long, FAA’s regulations and its inability or unwillingness to streamline approval processes have doused our serious initiatives to compete in space. Thankfully, Republicans in Congress are taking this seriously. We aim to address it with majorities in the House and Senate, partnered with President-elect Donald Trump in the White House who has also made this a priority.  

As incoming Chairman of the House Science Space and Technology Committee Brian Babin, R-Texas, noted in a recent hearing on this very issue, ‘the national security implications posed by FAA’s regulations are very concerning.’ Babin homed in on the culprit within FAA’s regulatory regime – rules governing commercial launch and reentry known as Part 450.  

Part 450 was developed to expedite the licensing process, thus speeding up commercial launches. But, Babin made clear, ‘FAA has issued six licenses under Part 450, with applications taking years to complete. Many applications for Part 450 licenses are still under review, impacting launch schedules and NASA missions.’  

As the representative-elect for Florida’s 8th Congressional District, which includes America’s ‘Space Coast’ and the Kennedy Space Center, reigniting America’s competitive advantage in space will be my top priority. This is achievable through three main objectives.  

It was the latest in a series of launches that demonstrated China’s ability to threaten America in space, whether it be targeting our satellites for destruction or surveilling our own activities in orbit.  

First, Congress must take a scalpel to the FAA’s implementation of the Part 450 license and launch regulations for commercial space flight as Babin and the Science Space and Technology Committee recommend. This can be done legislatively by modifying Title 51 to reform Part 450 implementation. 

Second, the FAA must return all remote workers to the office to improve efficiency and productivity. It must also realign job duties so more federal workers are focused on granting licenses as opposed to areas Congress never gave the FAA authority over, such as space flight participant safety.   

Finally, we should sic the DOGE on the FAA. Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy have clearly articulated the commonsense objectives of the Department of Government Efficiency – to eliminate red tape and unleash American innovation. DOGE along with the new aerospace rulemaking committee with outside membership called SpARC will make the necessary recommendations to Congress to secure American dominance in space and reduce the growing threat from China.  

America’s regulatory regime is China’s secret weapon in the space race that could ultimately lead to our adversary winning this Cold War in the stars. But the United States will now have a Congress and a president willing and committed to addressing this threat and launching the next century of American dominance in space. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

As the college football regular season comes to a close, the weekly College Football Playoff rankings reveal becomes more important. As a result, it draws increased scrutiny.

Just when it seems like the college football world has an idea of how the bracket will unfold, chaos ensues to create even more questions as to which teams will be in the 12-team field. This past weekend, which saw Ohio State comfortably beat Indiana and a few SEC contenders take crushing losses, drastically changed the projected field.

With one week of regular season football left before conference title games take place, here are the grades for the selection committee’s choices in the latest rankings reveal.

1. Oregon: A+

Heading into the final week undefeated with the best win of the season (over Ohio State), the Ducks remain at the top of the rankings.

2. Ohio State: A+

Handling Indiana proved Ohio State is a top-two team in the country and is headed toward a rematch with Oregon.

3. Texas: A

Not only would it clinch a spot in the SEC championship game, but Texas could get a nice resume boost by beating rival Texas A&M.

4. Penn State: B-

The win over Minnesota wasn’t all that impressive and keeping this spot is up for debate.

5. Notre Dame: A-

Army isn’t ranked anymore, but Notre Dame impressed against the Black Knights and have been dominant for months. Beat Southern California and a playoff home game is clinched.

6. Miami: A

Miami had a case to be above Alabama last week, and are now well positioned to make the playoff as long as it beats Syracuse in the regular season finale.

7. Georgia: A

The first team to benefit from Alabama and Mississippi losing, Georgia should feel good about its playoff security if it enters the SEC title game at 10-2.

8. Tennessee: C+

Rightfully behind Georgia, yet the Volunteers aren’t being held back by the confusing loss to Arkansas. Beat Vanderbilt and Tennessee should like its chances to make the playoff.

9. Southern Methodist: A-

Finally getting credit as a legit playoff team, but the struggles of Brigham Young appear to be hurting SMU more than it should.

10. Indiana: B-

Indiana has to love that Alabama and Mississippi lost so it couldn’t be questioned as a playoff-worthy team. However, the Hoosiers have a better resume than SMU and should be above them.

11. Boise State: A

Even though it’s one spot, the Broncos moving up shows the committee respects them. Where they are positioned in relation to the highest-ranked Big 12 team will be something to watch.

12. Clemson: D+

Moving Clemson five spots up, just outside of the projected field, is questionable since the Tigers haven’t impressed much recently. A win against South Carolina can change the narrative.

13. Alabama: A-

Alabama fans may wonder why they’re behind a Clemson team that got throttled by Georgia, but scoring only three points against Oklahoma is worth a heavy drop.

14. Mississippi: A-

Of Alabama and Mississippi, which team’s loss was more damaging? Yes, Alabama looked worse, but the Crimson Tide have a better resume than the Rebels.

15. South Carolina: B-

South Carolina is behind two teams it lost to, but if the Gamecocks can beat their in-state rival, will the committee give them a possible path to the playoff?

16. Arizona State: A-

Deservingly got a major jump in the rankings. Arizona State is in position to get in the playoff but the path toward getting a first-round bye doesn’t look promising.

17. Tulane: D

If Boise State somehow collapses, what gives Tulane the best chance to make the playoff? The strength of schedule is 100th in the country and Army has a better case than the Green Wave.

18. Iowa State: B+

Putting Iowa State above Brigham Young and behind Arizona State is the right move with Kansas State on deck.

19. Brigham Young: A

Amazing how the Cougars have gone from a team well-positioned for a first-round bye to now hoping Iowa State falls to Kansas State.

20. Texas A&M: A-

Losing to Auburn is embarrassing. especially considering the Aggies don’t have any impressive wins. But you can’t forget that Texas A&M still has a chance to win the SEC.

21. Missouri: F

Does a win over an Oklahoma team that handled Alabama suddenly become impressive? Should Missouri be ranked? Maybe at No. 25 … at best.

22. UNLV: C-

A potential spoiler with a likely rematch with Boise State on deck, UNLV has to hope a win over the Broncos would be able to propel them over Tulane.

23. Illinois: C

A miracle against Rutgers isn’t impressive even with teams ranked higher losing.

24. Kansas State: B+

Holding a win over Colorado, it makes sense to put Kansas State above the Buffaloes. But the Wildcats have a very slim chance of actually getting to the Big 12 title game.

25. Colorado: A-

The Buffaloes should still be ranked, and the Big 12 title is still within reach.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Colorado football coach Deion Sanders blasted the fact that Travis Hunter was not selected as a finalist for the Jim Thorpe Award on Tuesday, saying the omission was “idiotic” and devalued the integrity of the award.

The Thorpe Award is awarded annually to the nation’s top defensive back. Hunter plays cornerback and receiver for Colorado and is the favorite to win the Heisman Trophy, according to BetMGM. But he wasn’t listed among the three finalists for the Thorpe Award, released Tuesday: Jahdae Barron of Texas, Caleb Downs of Ohio State and Malaki Starks of Georgia.

Sanders himself won the award at Florida State in 1988.

“How is Travis Hunter snubbed by the Thorpe Award?” Sanders said at his weekly news conference Tuesday in Boulder. “You can have my award. You can have it back. Matter of fact, I’m going to give him mine. I ain’t using it. It’s just sitting up there collecting dust. So Travis can have my Thorpe Award, because if this ain’t the most idiotic thing in college football, that he’s not a finalist for the Jim Thorpe Award and he is, I would say arguably, but I don’t think it’s really an argument about this young man being the best defensive back in college football.”

Who runs the Thorpe Award and what is response to Sanders?

The Thorpe Award is run through the Oklahoma Sports Hall of Fame. A screening committee of Oklahoma Sports Hall of Fame members narrows the field of candidates to 10-15 semifinalists near midseason, then reconvenes near the end of November to select three finalists, according to the organization’s website.

The executive director of the Hall of Fame, Mike James, said in an email to USA TODAY Sports Tuesday that “we offer no criticism of Coach Sanders and wish our former award winner the best.”

He also gave a statement:

“Since 1986 the Oklahoma Sports Hall of Fame and Jim Thorpe Association selection committee has done their due diligence to identify the top defensive backs across the college football landscape,” the statement read. “Although no easy task, committee members pour measureless amounts of time, energy, and resources into doing just that.  Each year presents scores of challenges for our committee and this year was no different. Numerous young men were in contention for the coveted finalist position; be that as it may, the committee was tasked with the difficult job of picking our top three. I commend all the coaches who believe that their players deserved greater recognition. We look forward to announcing our winner and welcoming that deserving young man into the Paycom Jim Thorpe Award fraternity.”

‘He rarely gets thrown at’

By contrast, Hunter has been named one of three finalists for the Biletnikoff Award, which is given to the best receiver in major college football.

He has caught 82 passes for 1,036 yards and 11 touchdowns on offense. On defense, he has three interceptions, nine pass breakups and 30 tackles, but much of what he does on that side of the ball doesn’t show up statistically. For example, opposing quarterbacks avoid his side of the field because of his ability and football smarts.

“He rarely gets thrown at,” Sanders said, adding that “they just messed up all the integrity of the award and he can have mine. Whoever’s voting down there, whoever’s bringing it home, thank you. Because I don’t even want mine now. God bless you.’

Colorado (8-3) finishes the regular season Friday at home against Oklahoma State (3-8) and still has an outside chance to get in the Big 12 championship game Dec. 7. After suffering a damaging loss against Kansas last week, the Buffaloes would need at least two other Big 12 teams to lose certain games on Saturday in order to get into the Big 12 title game.

The Thorpe Award winner is announced Dec. 12. Heisman Trophy finalists will be announced Dec. 9, followed by the announcement of the Heisman winner on Dec. 14.

Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. Email: bschrotenb@usatoday.com

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Things got a little crazy last week in college football. The fallout from the upsets and significant victories was revealed in the College Football Playoff committee rankings released Tuesday.

Entering the reveal, the big questions started with determining the team that would occupy the No. 5 spot held by Indiana before the Hoosiers fell apart against Ohio State on Saturday. That position went to Notre Dame, which improved one spot after defeating Army, which was ranked No. 19 by the committee last week.

The Fighting Irish are in line to host a home game in the first round with a win against Southern California in their finale. Miami is slotted behind the Fighting Irish after an improvement of two places. The Hurricanes must beat Syracuse to reach the ACC championship game against SMU. Indiana ended up at No. 10 and finishes its regular season against Purdue.

The other question was where Alabama and Mississippi would fall after each suffered a third loss. The Crimson Tide and Rebels were ranked No. 7 and No. 9, respectively, before Week 13. With each out of the SEC championship race, where would they stack up against the other at-large contenders? Alabama fell to No. 13 and Mississippi slotted in at No. 14 and need serious help to make the field.

The top 10 was completed by No. 7 Georgia, No. 8 Tennessee and No. 9 SMU. The two SEC teams in this group face tricky games this week with the Bulldogs hosting Georgia Tech and the Volunteers meeting Vanderbilt.

BREAKDOWN: Winners and losers from College Football Playoff rankings

BIG LOSERS: Committee boosts easy schedules over quality wins

There was no mystery at the top of the rankings with Oregon, Ohio State, Texas and Penn State continuing to occupy the first four positions for the third consecutive week. The Ducks are set to play in the Big Ten title game in two weeks. The Buckeyes and Longhorns must beat respective rivals Michigan and Texas A&M to secure spots in the Big Ten and SEC championship games. The Nittany Lions would face Oregon if they beat Maryland and Ohio State loses.

No. 11 Boise State remains the top Group of Five team and would lock up one of the five spots given to conference champions by beating Oregon State and either UNLV or Colorado State in the Mountain West title game. It’s possible the Broncos could earn a first-round bye given to the four highest-rated champions. They currently are five spots ahead of Arizona State, the top team from the Big 12 in the rankings. No. 17 Tulane is also in the mix for an automatic spot with a win against Memphis on Thanksgiving, then winning the American Athletic championship game against Army.

The SEC continues to have the most teams in the rankings with all eight that appeared last week holding in the top 25. The Big Ten has five teams with No. 23 Illinois joining Oregon, Ohio State, Penn State and Indiana. The Big 12 also has five teams with Brigham Young and Colorado, its two top schools last week, staying in after losses, and Kansas State joining. The ACC has three and the Mountain West have two.

This is the fourth ranking release from the College Football Playoff committee. There will be another next Tuesday, and the final rankings will be announced Dec. 8 and establish the 12-team field that will determine this season’s national champion.

What is the College Football Playoff schedule?

First-round games will take place Dec. 20 and Dec. 21 at campus sites with the higher seeds hosting. The No. 5 seed will play the No. 12 seed, No. 6 faces No. 11, No. 7 matches up with No. 10 and No. 8 meets No. 9.

Winners of those games will advance to the quarterfinals. The Fiesta Bowl will be played on Dec. 31. The Sugar Bowl, Rose Bowl and Peach Bowl will be played Jan. 1.

The Orange Bowl and Cotton Bowl will host the semifinals on Jan. 9 and Jan. 10, respectively.

The championship game will be played Jan. 20 in Atlanta at Mercedes-Benz Stadium.

The schedule based on this week’s rankings would look like this:

First-round games (with seeding)

No. 12 Arizona State at No. 5 Ohio State

No. 11 Indiana at No. 6 Penn State

No. 10 SMU at No. 7 Notre DAme

No. 9 Tennessee at No. 8 Georgia

Quarterfinals

Fiesta Bowl: No. 4 Boise State vs. Ohio State-Arizona State winner

Peach Bowl: No. 3 Miami vs. Penn State-Indiana winner

Sugar Bowl: No. 2 Texas vs. Notre Dame-SMU winner

Rose Bowl: No. 1 Oregon vs. Georgia-Tennessee winner

College Football Playoff rankings Top 25

1. Oregon (11-0)

2. Ohio State (10-1)

3. Texas (10-1)

4. Penn State (10-1)

5. Notre Dame (10-1)

6. Miami (Fla) (10-1)

7. Georgia (9-2)

8. Tennessee (9-2)

9. SMU (10-1)

10. Indiana (10-1)

11. Boise State (10-1)

12. Clemson (9-2)

13. Alabama (8-3)

14. Mississippi (8-3)

15. South Carolina (8-3)

16. Arizona State (9-2)

17. Tulane (9-2)

18. Iowa State (9-2)

19. Brigham Young (9-2)

20. Texas A&M (8-3)

21. Missouri (8-3)

22. UNLV (9-2)

23. Illinois (8-3)

24. Kansas State (8-3)

25. Colorado (8-3)

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Experts expect President-elect Donald Trump to take aim at federal agencies and Biden-era regulations after campaigning on deregulation of the administrative state. 

‘The first thing is that on day one of [Trump’s] presidency, we’ll see a lot of executive orders, which will order agencies to review the administration regulations to determine whether they should be retained, amended or repealed,’ Robert Glicksman, J.B. and Maurice C. Shapiro Professor of Environmental Law at George Washington University Law School, told Fox News Digital. 

Mark Chenoweth, president of the New Civil Liberties Alliance, particularly pointed to Biden-era regulations, saying they could be on the chopping block once Trump takes office, telling Fox News Digital, ‘the Biden administration did a lot of things that lacked statutory authority completely.’

Chenoweth noted that the Biden administration has already been the target of lawsuits over its regulations and said that if Trump were to take those regulations on, ‘I think they’ll enjoy a lot of success.’

Trump has already been vocal about his intentions of cutting back on federal agency power and slashing the flow of federal dollars. The president-elect has also announced he has tapped Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to head the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 

The entity will act as an advisory panel, not a government agency, and will be aimed at suggesting ways to dismantle government bureaucracy and restructure federal agencies in order to save costs and improve efficiency, according to Trump’s transition team.

Regarding DOGE, Glicksman stated the Trump administration will ‘certainly take seriously’ DOGE’s guidance on ‘cutting back on regulations, streamlining executive agencies, possibly even eliminating some agencies.’ 

Both Chenoweth and Glicksman said they can foresee labor regulations becoming a target come January. Glicksman said climate change and environmental regulations could also come under fire.

‘In the labor area, because [the Biden administration has] been so radical, they really reached well beyond what the statutory authority that was given to NLRB or the Department of Labor with a lot of what they’ve done. So that’s one area that I could foresee,’ Chenoweth said. 

Likewise, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled to overturn the Chevron doctrine in June of this year in its Loper Bright decision. The doctrine previously gave deference to an agency’s interpretation of a federal regulation. In its holding, the Supreme Court effectively scaled back administrative power in holding that ‘Courts must exercise their independent judgment in deciding whether an agency has acted within its statutory authority.’

Chenoweth, whose organization litigated on the matter, applauded the Loper Bright ruling, saying it ‘goes back to empowering Congress rather than the administrative agencies.’

‘For the last 40 years, the administrative state has been burgeoning because of this ability to, kind of, write law and create law itself when there’s a gap or ambiguity in the statute,’ Chenoweth said. ‘Now, they’re not going to able to do that so much. And so it’s going to throw it back to Congress if we need to have reform in an area or new legislation.’

Glicksman, however, said Loper Bright could ‘boomerang’ on the Trump administration instead. 

‘Had Chevron remained in effect, it would be Trump administration initiatives that would get the benefit of Chevron deference, but that’s no longer the case,’ Glicksman said. ‘And so it’s possible that courts will look more rigorously or apply greater scrutiny to Trump administration initiatives in administrative law issues in administrative ones than they would have done had Loper Bright not been decided.’

Glicksman said he can foresee such legal challenges unfolding specifically in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, which notably tends to lean conservative in its rulings. Likewise, Glicksman predicts Democrat-led challenges to appear in the Ninth and D.C. Circuits. 

‘I think you’ll see blue states led by California challenging those regulations, starting off probably in the Ninth Circuit and the D.C. Circuit, which are more friendly to agency authority than the Fifth Circuit and some other circuits. So you’ll see a skewing of litigation,’ Glicksman said. 

Chenoweth stated that because so many Biden-era regulations ‘are so lacking in authority,’ the circuit in which the lawsuit is started may very well not make much of a difference. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS