Archive

2024

Browsing

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha is urging NATO leaders to invite Ukraine to join the Western military alliance during a meeting in Brussels next week, according to a letter sent to alliance leaders—reflecting the country’s frenzied push to gain membership in the alliance in the final days of Biden’s presidency. 

The letter, first reviewed by Reuters, comes as Ukraine has re-upped its request for NATO membership to help put an end to Russia’s war, including a recent uptick in attacks on its energy infrastructure. It also comes as the Biden administration has granted Ukraine new permissions to fight back against Russia in their final months in office. 

In the letter, Ukraine’s foreign minister acknowledged his country’s ongoing war with Russia prohibits Kyiv from joining NATO right now. But he argued that an invitation for membership in Brussels would be a powerful show of force—and a major symbolic blow—to Russian President Vladimir Putin, who has long opposed the idea of their membership in NATO.

‘We believe that the invitation should be extended at this stage,’ Sybiha said in the letter. ‘It will become the Allies’ adequate response to Russia’s constant escalation of the war it has unleashed, the latest demonstration of which is the involvement of tens of thousands of North Korean troops and the use of Ukraine as a testing ground for new weapons,’ he added.

Also on Friday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy used an interview on Sky News to up the public pressure for NATO leaders to extend his country a membership offer.

Speaking Friday to Sky News’s Stuart Ramsay, the Ukrainian president suggested that NATO could extend membership to the territory of Ukraine still under its control to help accelerate the NATO memberhsip process and wind down Russia’s war as quickly as possible.

‘If we want to stop the hot phase of the war, we need to take under the NATO umbrella the territory of Ukraine that we have under our control,’ he told Ramsay. NATO should ‘immediately’ cover parts of the country that are under Ukrainian authority, he said, stressing that it it something Ukraine needs ‘very much otherwise he will come back,’ in apparent reference to Russian President Vladimir Putin.

 

Ukraine would face many hurdles in attempting to join NATO, despite assurances from the alliance that it is on an ‘irreversible path’ to membership.

That’s because Ukraine lacks two key requirements for NATO membership: territorial integrity and the absence of ongoing conflict. Currently, Russia controls roughly 20% of Ukrainian territory, Rebekah Koffler, a strategic military intelligence analyst and author of ‘Putin’s Playbook,’ told Fox News Digital in an interview Friday. 

Any country hoping to gain membership ‘cannot have ongoing conflict because of Article 5,’ Koffler said. 

For Russia,’it is a red line for Ukraine to be part of NATO,’ Koffler added, since Russian President Vladimir Putin considers Ukraine part of Russia’s strategic security perimeter.

NATO members are also split over the idea of accepting Ukraine. ‘Those who are against it are concerned about Article 5 obligations: admitting Ukraine into NATO would automatically place the United States and the entire NATO alliance at war with Russia because of the collective defense clause,’ Koffler said.

The State Department said Friday that U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken had spoken by phone to Ukrainian Foreign Minister Sybiha to discuss battlefield updates and incoming U.S. security assistance in wake of recent Russian attacks on Ukraine’s energy infrastructure. On the call, officials said, Blinken ‘briefed the Foreign Minister on U.S. goals for sustainable support for Ukraine, to be discussed at upcoming diplomatic engagements with NATO and through the Ukraine Defense Contact Group.’

The press release stopped short of detailing any further overtures to Ukraine.

Still, Ukraine’s push for membership comes as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his administration brace for the many unknowns of a second Trump presidency. Trump has long expressed skepticism of NATO, and suggested as recently as this year that he could end the war between Russian and Ukraine ‘in a day.’  

While Ukraine’s push for NATO membership is not new, the timeline for leaders to approve their bid has taken on new urgency, as the war nears its third year and as President-elect Trump prepares to take office again.

NATO membership was included as one of the first— and most important—steps in Zelenskyy’s multi-part ‘victory plan’ to help win the war against Russia.

The outline, which his administration published in October, suggested that Ukraine could put an end to the war with Russia as early as 2025, if the country’s requests are granted for more weapons and the continued ability to carry out military operations on Russian soil. 

Any country hoping to gain membership ‘cannot have ongoing conflict because of Article 5,’ Koffler said. 

For Russia,’it is a red line for Ukraine to be part of NATO,’ Koffler added, since Russian President Vladimir Putin considers Ukraine part of Russia’s strategic security perimeter.

President Joe Biden, for his part, has used his final weeks in office to authorize new permissions for Ukraine in the ongoing war with Ukraine.

Earlier this month, the Biden administration granted Ukraine new permission to use U.S.-supplied long-range weapons to strike targets inside Russian teritory. Later, they also signed off on the transfer of anti-personnel mines to bolster Ukrainian army defenses in the east. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

It was always about this moment, anyway.  

Not an October prove-it game that may or may not mean anything by the time December rolls around. 

Not another speed bump of a November contender who believed they’d figured it out, or a pretender in October that barely scratched two yards on four plays from the 3.

This season was about Michigan for Ohio State and coach Ryan Day. There are jobs – and the looming financial NIL arms race between the schools – on the line. 

“It all leads to this,” Day says. “Everything you do, and the decisions you make, lead up to this game.”

Day has tried nearly everything to break a three-game losing streak to Michigan, to turn around a rivalry that was once so one-sided in favor of Ohio State, Michigan’s only win since 2004 was against a Buckeyes interim coach. 

He fired a defensive coordinator. He fired a quarterback. He hired a sitting Power Four conference coach as offensive coordinator to revamp his wildly successful offense — to develop “toughness” and “attitude.”

He bought the best running back (Quinshon Judkins) and safety (Caleb Downs) in college football this offseason from the transfer portal, and outbid everyone for his starting quarterback (Will Howard).  

All in the name of not just beating Michigan, but becoming more like the Wolverines. 

Yet here’s the most intriguing aspect of this rare rivalry, this disgust between universities that includes snitching on each other to the NCAA (hello, Connor Stalions and Jim Tressel): the hate will only get worse moving forward.

Now that Michigan has finally figured out the only way to keep pace with Ohio State is to play the give until it hurts game, the financial gloves are off in the NIL and free player movement world. Michigan vs. Ohio State will quickly become the Yankees vs. the Dodgers vs. no salary cap. 

GIVING THANKS: It’s Rivalry Week: Embrace the college football crazy

WEEKEND FORECAST: Experts picks for every Top 25 game in Week 13

As a sage philosopher once wrote, he with the most cash buys the best players and wins the games. 

Or something like that. 

When Bryce Underwood, the nation’s No.1 high school player and one of the best high school quarterbacks in decades, last week flipped a longtime commitment from LSU to Michigan for a reported $10-12 million NIL deal, money ball officially arrived in Ann Arbor. 

None other than Tom Brady, the greatest quarterback ever and former Michigan star, reportedly got involved by promising to be a resource for Underwood. In September, Barstool Sports owner Dave Portnoy spoke to Michigan coach Sherrone Moore and said he’d be willing to give $3 million to ‘find a quarterback.’

Apparently, he got one. And that’s not the first, or last step Michigan has taken into the NIL world. 

It’s just the first significant shot across the bow of Ohio State, with intent to deliver the message that Michigan, with its large and wealthy alumni base, will rage, rage against the dying of the light.

That Michigan, after tasting a national title in 2023, wants more. Even without the unbeatable team of former coach Jim Harbaugh and Stalions. 

That Michigan won’t stand still while Ohio State, with its own large and wealthy alumni base, spends $43 million this season with one, and only one goal: beat Michigan and win the national title. In that order. 

These two lovable lunatics are just getting started.

If you thought taking play calling away from a defensive coordinator three weeks into the season was odd, or firing a potentially elite quarterback because he couldn’t win The Game (that’s exactly what happened to Kyle McCord) was strange, or hiring Chip Kelly to make your team tougher to win The Game was drastic, you obviously didn’t follow what unfolded last year at Michigan. 

Because once you take the plunge of fighting your own conference and the NCAA about not one, but two ongoing NCAA investigations of your sitting head coach, you’ve just about crossed every line of winning at all cost. 

What’s another $40 million a year, give or take a few million, to continue the fight?  

There are jobs on the line, everyone. And it has always been about this moment. 

He with the most cash buys the best players and wins The Game. 

This time, and moving forward in the new world of Michigan vs. Ohio State.

Matt Hayes is the senior national college football writer for USA TODAY Sports Network. Follow him on X at @MattHayesCFB.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The Detroit Lions survived. 

That’s the only way to describe their 23-20 win over the lowly Chicago Bears on Thursday. 

Actually, time out. On second thought, there is one other way to describe their victory: They got lucky. 

After he delivered his victory speech in the locker room, Lions coach Dan Campbell should have awarded a game ball to Bears coach (for now) Matt Eberflus for forgetting how timeouts work and gift-wrapping the win. Maybe Eberflus was already in Black Friday mode. 

All things Lions: Latest Detroit Lions news, schedule, roster, stats, injury updates and more.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

We understand that this is the week when turkeys have their day. We have nothing against actual well-prepared poultry, of course. But this space is all about helping you, the discerning college football viewer, avoid figurative turkeys, even in this week of feasting.

Bearing that in mind though, some of these games that will have an impact on the playoff pursuit might not end up with fantastic finishes. But we think they’ll be the ones to pay the most attention to as the final Saturday of the regular season unfolds.

Here are our top seven recommended games to watch in Week 14.

No. 3 Texas at No. 19 Texas A&M

Time/TV: 7:30 p.m. ET, ABC.

Why watch: You have to ask? It’s the long-awaited renewal of acquaintances for these two Lone Star State programs that love to hate each other. As if that weren’t enough, a spot in the SEC title game opposite Georgia is also on the line. The Aggies need that more, as a fourth loss would be fatal to any playoff aspirations, but the Longhorns will have no interest in falling to the at-large pool. Texas QB Quinn Ewers has faced hostile environs before, but Kyle Field at night could set a new standard for noise. He has dependable short-game options like TE Gunnar Helm and RB Jaydon Blue, but an early deep connection with WR Isaiah Bond would help neutralize the crowd. The Aggies’ defense can be inconsistent, but DE Nic Scourton must be accounted for by the Longhorns’ protectors. A&M QB Marcel Reed has a deep crew of pass catchers but fewer breakaway threats. He isn’t afraid to keep the ball, but Texas LB Anthony Hill Jr. will likely have him under surveillance.

Why it could disappoint: Quite simply, the Aggies have been maddeningly inconsistent all season. The Longhorns will want to make short work of it, as the longer they let the Aggies hang around, the more the crowd becomes a factor.

No. 14 South Carolina at No. 12 Clemson

Time/TV: noon ET, ESPN.

Why watch: The Palmetto showdown won’t alter the conference picture for either participant, of course. But it’s an important contest nevertheless with the winner able to claim a quality result and keep its name in the at-large playoff discussion. South Carolina is arguably the hottest team in the SEC, closing out its league slate with four consecutive wins. The Tigers have done enough to get by since the Nov. 2 loss to Louisville, but that result could ultimately cost them a shot at the ACC title if Miami defeats Syracuse. Gamecocks QB LaNorris Sellers has been making excellent use of explosive RB Raheim Sanders, who will undoubtedly receive plenty of attention from Clemson LB Barrett Carter. Tigers QB Cade Klubnik also relies heavily on ground support from RB Phil Mafah, but WR Antonio Williams will have to find some room to operate as well. DB Nick Emmanwori does a little of everything backing the Gamecocks’ defense.

Why it could disappoint: With the notable exception of the Pittsburgh win, Clemson’s games have been largely drama free this season, win or lose. The Tigers have either taken charge quickly or fallen behind and failed to rally. That probably won’t be the case here, but the Gamecocks aren’t likely to be surprised by anything Clemson throws at them.

GIVING THANKS: It’s Rivalry Week: Embrace the college football crazy

WEEKEND FORECAST: Experts picks for every Top 25 game in Week 13

No. 7 Miami at Syracuse

Time/TV: 3:30 p.m. ET, ESPN.

Why watch: The mission is quite clear for the Hurricanes – win this game in the dome and then play for an ACC title a week later. The Orange might be in that position themselves but for a couple of puzzling losses, but even so this has been a largely successful debut season for coach Fran Brown. Miami continues to live and die with the high-risk, high-reward style of QB Cam Ward, who has a lofty 34 TDs with seven picks. His favorite target, WR Xavier Restrepo, will likely draw coverage from Syracuse DB Jayden Bellamy. Aside from a disastrous outing against Pittsburgh, QB Kyle McCord has been just as productive as Ward, with TE Oronde Gadsden II and WR Jackson Meeks serving as primary weapons. Miami DE Tyler Baron will lead the effort to disrupt them.

Why it could disappoint: It probably won’t. The Hurricanes have lived dangerously for most of the campaign. Even last week’s 42-14 triumph against Wake Forest was a one-score game in the fourth quarter, and the Orange should be even harder to put away in their friendly confines. A spate of turnovers could send things off the rails, but that could go either way.

Kansas State at No. 17 Iowa State

Time/TV: 7:30 p.m. ET, Fox.

Why watch: Every game in the Big 12 is going to matter on the final weekend with so many tiebreaker possibilities in play. But we suspect this one might be the best of the bunch for shear entertainment value, given both teams’ penchant for nail biters. The Cyclones have won three games on their final possession, including their triumph over Iowa way back in September. The Wildcats have been in their share of squeakers, though their two most recent contests lacked fourth-quarter suspense. Iowa State QB Rocco Becht has one of the nation’s top pass-catching duos at his disposal in WRs Jayden Higgins and Jaylin Noel, with nearly 2,000 yards between them. K-State DL Brendan Mott will lead the effort to prevent him from utilizing them. Wildcats QB Avery Johnson and RB DJ Giddens will look to establish the ground game first. Johnson does have reliable targets in the aerial attack, but he’ll need to avoid Cyclones DB Jontez Williams, who has four of the team’s 14 interceptions.

Why it could disappoint: It shouldn’t. The Cyclones’ losses were both by single-digit margins. The Wildcats have gotten buried a couple of times, but Iowa State tends to let opponents hang around. Expect a fun ride here in Ames.

No. 5 Notre Dame at Southern California

Time/TV: 3:30 p.m. ET, CBS.

Why watch: Still maintaining its independence, this will be the closing argument for the Fighting Irish for the playoff committee. It can best be described not so much as a must-win but more like a must-not-lose game, but the Trojans would like nothing more than to play spoiler for their long-standing rivals in what has by and large been a disappointing season. Notre Dame QB Riley Leonard is up to 27 total TDs on the season, 14 by air and 13 by land. He can expect plenty of attention from LB Easton Mascarenas-Arnold, the lead horse on the Trojans’ defense. USC’s QB switch to Jayden Maiava has not led to an appreciable increase in downfield completions, but RB Woody Marks is a consistent 100-yard game producer. Fighting Irish LBs Jack Kiser and Drayk Bowen figure to meet him often in the gaps.

Why it could disappoint: In terms of roster talent, this should be a competitive matchup. But USC has beaten itself with untimely mistakes too many times this year to expect it won’t happen again. To quantify it, Notre Dame is second in the nation in turnover margin, while the Trojans are 81st.

No. 8 Tennessee at Vanderbilt

Time/TV: noon ET, ABC.

Why watch: Tennessee can’t play for the league championship, but the Volunteers can put themselves in a favorable position to claim an at-large bid from the crowded SEC field of candidates. They cannot, however, afford to drop this rivalry game to the Commodores, who have escaped the conference cellar in 2024 and can now improve their bowl destination. QB Nico Iamaleava and the rest of the Vols predictably used last week’s date with Texas-El Paso as a get-right game after being shut down by Georgia, but DB Randon Fontenette and the Vandy defense has done a good job limiting big gainers. RB Dylan Sampson could help Tennessee beat the Commodores at their own game with sustained drives. Vanderbilt QB Diego Pavia has been largely held in check in his last couple of outings, and Tennessee LB Arion Carter and Co. will do their best to continue that trend.

Why it could disappoint: In past years, we’d be quick to dismiss the Commodores if they find themselves in an early hole. But this year’s group was beaten by multiple scores just once in SEC play, and the Vols haven’t exactly been overpowering even in their victories. This might not be the flashiest football, but it probably won’t be a rout.

Michigan at No. 2 Ohio State

Time/TV: noon ET, Fox.

Why watch: Having passed their major test against upstart Indiana with flying colors, the Buckeyes now tend to one final order of business to earn a rematch with Oregon next week in Indianapolis. The date with the Wolverines also represents a major hurdle to be cleared for Ohio State coach Ryan Day, who is still seeking his first win against Michigan since moving to the bigger office in Columbus. The Michigan defense is still quite formidable, with LBs Ernest Hausmann and Jaishawn Barham backing up an active front line that could make life somewhat challenging for Buckeyes QB Will Howard. But the RB tandem of TreVeyon Henderson and Quinshon Judkins are hard to contain for a full 60 minutes, and one of Ohio State’s dazzling deep threats usually gets loose at some point. The Wolverines’ one-two punch of RBs Kalel Mullings and Donovan Edwards have remained productive despite getting little air cover, but finding real estate in the Horseshoe will be difficult with hard-hitting Buckeyes DB Sonny Styles able to help in run support.

Why it could disappoint: There’s no reason to think it won’t to be honest. Obviously it’s a rivalry game, and the Wolverines will come out with plenty of energy. But as long as Ohio State doesn’t get generous with the ball, this should be decided in short order.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The 2024 MLS playoffs are down to four teams, with traditional powers to one side and upstarts hoping for a first-ever MLS Cup win on the other.

In the Eastern Conference, Lionel Messi and Inter Miami crashed out early, joining defending champion Columbus Crew and FC Cincinnati in suffering shock Round One eliminations. The Western Conference saw fewer upsets, though top-seeded LAFC saw its season end in an extra-time home loss to the Seattle Sounders.

Those results have set up conference finals few saw coming. In the East, No. 4 seed Orlando City faces the seventh-seeded New York Red Bulls in a conference final between two teams that rarely go this far into the postseason. In the West, the LA Galaxy — arguably the most entertaining team in MLS this season — will host the Sounders in a 2 vs. 4 matchup between two of MLS’ most successful clubs.

Here’s what you need to know about the full MLS playoff bracket, schedule and how to watch all the way through MLS Cup:

MLS playoff bracket

Nine teams from each conference qualified for the 2024 MLS playoffs, but the postseason is down to its final four teams. The structure, which was changed for 2024, started with a single-elimination wild card round that started on Tuesday, Oct. 22.

Round One, which saw teams play best-of-three series, kicked off on Friday, Oct. 25 and ran through Saturday, Nov. 9. Following a break to allow for FIFA-mandated national team play, the format returned to a more traditional approach. The higher seed hosted single-game conference semifinals, and the same structure is in place for the conference finals, with the conference champion holding the better regular-season record hosting MLS Cup.

MLS playoffs – Conference Semifinals

East No. 4 Orlando City vs. East No. 9 Atlanta United
East No. 6 New York City FC vs. East No. 7 New York Red Bulls
West No. 1 LAFC vs. West No. 4 Seattle Sounders
West No. 2 LA Galaxy vs. West No. 6 Minnesota United

MLS playoffs – Conference finals

East No. 4 Orlando City vs. East No. 7 New York Red Bulls
West No. 2 LA Galaxy vs. West No. 4 Seattle Sounders

MLS Cup

East Champion vs. West Champion

Note: MLS Cup hosting rights will go to the team with the best regular-season record.

MLS playoff schedule by day

All times Eastern. Home teams listed first.

Tuesday, Oct. 22 – Wild card round

CF Montréal 2-2 Atlanta United (Atlanta United advances 5-4 on penalty kicks)

Wednesday, Oct. 23 – Wild card round

Portland Timbers 0-5 Vancouver Whitecaps

Friday, Oct. 25 – Round One, Game 1

Inter Miami 2-1 Atlanta United

Saturday, Oct. 26 – Round One, Game 1

LA Galaxy 5-0 Colorado Rapids

Sunday, Oct. 27 – Round One, Game 1

Orlando City 2-0 Charlotte FC
LAFC 2-1 Vancouver Whitecaps

Monday, Oct. 28 – Round One, Game 1

FC Cincinnati 1-0 New York City FC
Seattle Sounders 0-0 Houston Dynamo (Seattle wins 5-4 on penalty kicks)

Tuesday, Oct 29 – Round One, Game 1

Columbus Crew 0-1 New York Red Bulls
Real Salt Lake 0-0 Minnesota United (Minnesota United wins 5-4 on penalty kicks)

Nov. 1 – Round One, Game 2

Charlotte FC 0-0 Orlando City (Charlotte FC wins 3-1 on penalty kicks)
Colorado Rapids 1-4 LA Galaxy

Nov. 2 – Round One, Game 2

New York City FC 3-1 FC Cincinnati
Atlanta United 2-1 Inter Miami
Minnesota United 1-1 Real Salt Lake (Minnesota United wins 3-1 on penalty kicks)

Nov. 3 – Round One, Game 2

New York Red Bulls 2-2 Columbus Crew (New York Red Bulls win 5-4 on penalty kicks)
Houston Dynamo 1-1 Seattle Sounders (Seattle Sounders win 7-6 on penalty kicks)
Vancouver Whitecaps 3-0 LAFC

Nov. 8 – Round One, Game 3

LAFC 1-0 Vancouver Whitecaps

Nov. 9 – Round One, Game 3

FC Cincinnati 0-0 New York City FC (New York City FC wins 6-5 on penalty kicks)
Orlando City 1-1 Charlotte FC (Orlando City wins 4-1 on penalty kicks)
Inter Miami 2-3 Atlanta United

Nov. 23 – Conference semifinals

New York City FC 0-2 New York Red Bulls
LAFC 1-2 Seattle Sounders

Nov. 24 – Conference semifinals

Orlando City 1-0 Atlanta United
LA Galaxy 6-2 Minnesota United

Nov. 30 – Conference finals

Eastern Conference final: Orlando City vs. New York Red Bulls — 7:30 p.m.
Western Conference final: LA Galaxy vs. Seattle Sounders — 10 p.m.

Dec. 7 – MLS Cup

Teams, TBD, 4 p.m.

How to watch MLS playoffs

Every game of the 2024 MLS playoffs will be streamed on Apple TV.

Select games, including MLS Cup, will be broadcast on Fox and FS1, and streamed via Fubo.

Watch select MLS playoff games with a Fubo subscription

We occasionally recommend interesting products and services. If you make a purchase by clicking one of the links, we may earn an affiliate fee. USA TODAY Network newsrooms operate independently, and this doesn’t influence our coverage.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

This story discusses suicide. If you or someone you know is having thoughts of suicide, please contact the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988 or 1-800-273-TALK (8255).

England and Wales edged closer to legalizing assisted dying after lawmakers approved a contentious bill in the House of Commons on Friday to allow terminally ill adults to end their lives.

Lawmakers voted 330 to 275 in Britain’s lower house for the assisted dying bill, which will now be sent on to further scrutiny in Parliament before it faces a final vote by lawmakers.

The proposed bill would allow people over 18 with less than six months to live to request and be provided with help to end their lives, subject to safeguards and protections.

The vote came after hours of emotional debate that saw personal stories of loss and suffering shared. The sensitive discussion touched on issues of ethics, grief, the law, faith, crime and money and drew large crowds outside parliament as the debate went on. 

Although hugely controversial, a majority of Britons support the principle of assisted dying, according to several polls. 

Euthanasia or assisted dying has been decriminalized in European countries like Belgium, Luxembourg, Germany, Spain, Austria, and Portugal, according to Euro News. Switzerland was the first country in the world to permit any kind of assisted dying, with the practice being legal since 1941.

It’s also legal in 10 U.S. states: Washington, D.C. and the states of California, Colorado, Oregon, Vermont, New Mexico, Maine, New Jersey, Hawaii and Washington.

Supporters said the law would provide dignity to the dying and prevent unnecessary suffering, while ensuring there are enough safeguards to prevent those near the end of their lives from being coerced into taking their own life.

Opponents, including faith leaders, said it would put vulnerable people at risk of being coerced, directly or indirectly, to end their lives so they don’t become a burden.

Under the proposals, two doctors and a High Court judge would need to verify that the person had made the decision voluntarily. Pressuring or coercing someone into ending their life would be punishable by up to 14 years in prison.

‘Let’s be clear, we’re not talking about a choice between life or death, we are talking about giving dying people a choice about how to die,’ the bill’s main sponsor, Kim Leadbeater, said as she presented the bill to a packed chamber.

She said it could take another six months before a second vote takes place.

‘I will take evidence, written evidence, oral evidence, we’ll get a very thorough, robust bill committee there to scrutinize the bill and make it the best that it possibly can be,’ she told reporters after the vote on Friday. ‘It’ll be a long process… And then, as I said in my speech, there’s a two-year implementation period, so there’s plenty of time to get this right.’

Assessments on how assisted dying will be funded and how it will impact the U.K.’s state-funded public health service, hospice care and the legal system will also have to be considered.

Conservative lawmaker Danny Kruger said he fears that the bill has lots of loopholes and that the safeguards ‘aren’t very strong.’

‘We now have months of further debate and I am hopeful that colleagues who have expressed concerns will either succeed in strengthening the bill to make it safe or they’ll conclude they haven’t been able to do that and then we can defeat it at the later stage, at third reading,’ he said.

U.K. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer voted in favor of the bill. He said last month that he was ‘very pleased’ that such a vote was taking place and said his government would remain neutral on the subject and that his MPs would be given a free vote, rather than having to follow a party line, per the BBC.

Others in his Cabinet, including Health Secretary Wes Streeting and the Justice Minister Shabana Mahmood, voted against it. There were similar divisions across other political parties.

Nigel Farage, the leader of Reform UK, said he voted against the measure. 

‘I voted against the assisted dying bill, not out of a lack of compassion but because I fear that the law will widen in scope,’ Farage wrote on X. ‘If that happens, the right to die may become the obligation to die.’

The Associated Press and Reuters contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

The story of The Bloodline in WWE has been one most captivating ones in all of wrestling, and a WWE Hall of Famer is applauding the work of it − even after he criticized it.

In August 2023, four-time WWE Champion and Olympic gold medalist Kurt Angle didn’t believe when Paul Heyman confidently said The Bloodline was in ‘bottom of the third’ of its storyline, which Heyman fired back at. Now more than a year later at The Bloodline is still dominating WWE and heads into Survivor Series: WarGames with another main event match taking place on Saturday. Maybe Heyman’s third inning proclamation was right, and Angle is loving what he has seen unfold.

‘The Bloodline thing has been really incredible,’ Angle told USA TODAY Sports. ‘It’s done amazing things for the sport.’

While Angle applauded The Bloodline, he highly praised the work of Roman Reigns during the run. Since The Bloodline formed in the summer of 2021, Reigns has gone from a menacing, hated champion to now someone the crowd loves as he seeks to reclaim the title of Tribal Chief. Angle said he has done so much for his heritage for the past few years and has launched himself to the top of the sport as a result.

‘Roman, I will say, he is the best wrestler today,’ Angle said. ‘Roman caught on and started improving very quickly and learning, and he continuously got better and better, and then he became the best. Right now, he’s red-hot. He could be the biggest baby face in the company or the biggest heel, depending on what he chooses to do.’

As for how long the story has been going, Angle said it ‘ridiculous’ how it’s been able to continuously develop because ‘it never happens’ in the sport. Angle hopes the payoff for it works, but no matter what happens, it will be well worth it.

Kurt Angle’s work with USA wrestling

Other than keeping his eye on the wrestling world, Angle is also working on raising money for USA wrestling as preparations for the 2028 Summer Olympics in Los Angeles will be underway before we know it.

The gold medalist from the 1996 Atlanta Olympics said many U.S. wrestlers don’t have the income to just focus on their training − something he experienced prior to his time − so the goal is to get enough money so wrestlers don’t have to work other jobs that take away from competing.

In the 2024 Paris Olympics, Team USA walked away with seven medals in wrestling, highlighted by the gold medals won by Amit Elor in the women’s wrestling 68-kilogram weight and Sarah Hildebrandt in the 50-kilogram class. It won the third most in wrestling behind Japan and Iran, and Angle wants Team USA to build on the success.

‘These athletes, they’re going to need to be taken care of,’ he said. ‘As long as they can train and compete full-time and not have to worry about anything else, they’re going to make history. I believe that.’

An added benefit will be the home field advantage Team USA will get in the next Olympics. Angel recalled what it was like to compete in front of your home country and he didn’t really have to adjust to time zones or a different lifestyle during the Games. When it gets to that time in four years, he believes it will be a big boost.

‘There are going to be other people from other parts of the world, but most of that crowd will be USA, and that’s such a huge advantage to have your home country cheering for you,’ Angle said.

Angle is also having a movie made about him. Focused on his Olympic career, he said the script for the movie is nearly finished and the project is looking for investors so it can start filming.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission has opened a broad antitrust investigation into Microsoft, including of its software licensing and cloud computing businesses, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters Wednesday.

A source confirmed the investigation to NBC News.

The investigation was approved by FTC Chair Lina Khan ahead of her likely departure in January. The election of Donald Trump as U.S. president, and the expectation he will appoint a fellow Republican with a softer approach toward business, leaves the outcome of the investigation up in the air.

The FTC is examining allegations the software giant is potentially abusing its market power in productivity software by imposing punitive licensing terms to prevent customers from moving their data from its Azure cloud service to other competitive platforms, sources confirmed earlier this month.

The FTC is also looking at practices related to cybersecurity and artificial intelligence products, the source said on Wednesday.

Microsoft declined to comment on Wednesday.

Competitors have criticized Microsoft’s practices they say keep customers locked into its cloud offering, Azure. The FTC fielded such complaints last year as it examined the cloud computing market.

NetChoice, a lobbying group that represents online companies including Amazon and Google, which compete with Microsoft in cloud computing, criticized Microsoft’s licensing policies, and its integration of AI tools into its Office and Outlook.

“Given that Microsoft is the world’s largest software company, dominating in productivity and operating systems software, the scale and consequences of its licensing decisions are extraordinary,” the group said.

Google in September complained to the European Commission about Microsoft’s practices, saying it made customers pay a 400% mark-up to keep running Windows Server on rival cloud computing operators, and gave them later and more limited security updates.

The FTC has demanded a broad range of detailed information from Microsoft, Bloomberg reported earlier on Wednesday.

The agency had already claimed jurisdiction over probes into Microsoft and OpenAI over competition in artificial intelligence, and started looking into Microsoft’s $650 million deal with AI startup Inflection AI.

Microsoft has been somewhat of an exception to U.S. antitrust regulators’ recent campaign against allegedly anticompetitive practices at Big Tech companies.

Facebook owner Meta Platforms, Apple and Amazon.com Inc. have all been accused by the U.S. of unlawfully maintaining monopolies.

Alphabet’s Google is facing two lawsuits, including one where a judge found it unlawfully thwarted competition among online search engines.

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella testified at Google’s trial, saying the search giant was using exclusive deals with publishers to lock up content used to train artificial intelligence.

It is unclear whether Trump will ease up on Big Tech, whose first administration launched several Big Tech probes. JD Vance, the incoming vice president, has expressed concern about the power the companies wield over public discourse.

Still, Microsoft has benefited from Trump policies in the past.

In 2019, the Pentagon awarded it a $10 billion cloud computing contract that Amazon had widely been expected to win. Amazon later alleged that Trump exerted improper pressure on military officials to steer the contract away from its Amazon Web Services unit.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

The rivalry had a perfect ending, but only for half of the parties involved: In late November 2011, what was assumed to be the last meeting in series history between Texas and Texas A&M ended with Justin Tucker’s 40-yard field goal attempt splitting the uprights as time expired to hand the Longhorns the 27-25 win.

This was it for the Aggies, who were set to leave the Big 12 for the SEC the following summer, chasing the riches afforded in that new conference and, most crucially, the chance to escape the Longhorns’ long shadow.

Well, so long, partner, Texas said. The Longhorns’ win had gone down as one of the most brutal sendoffs in college sports history, a final noogie and wedgie from the bullying big brother who had largely dominated the series from inception to expected conclusion.

“We knew the stakes at the time, that we would have a chance to send Texas A&M off to the SEC with a sour taste in their mouth, and we did exactly that,” Tucker said this week. “We knew for the foreseeable future that it was going to be the last matchup. So to be on the winning side of that was a special moment for anybody that cared about Texas football.”

Welcome back to a rivalry renewed. Thirteen years after the No. 19 Aggies’ split, the two programs were brought back together this past summer with the No. 3 Longhorns’ arrival in the SEC. With epic bragging rights on the line, the series officially restarts on Saturday night with the bonus of immense regional and national stakes.

“The game is the game,” said Texas coach Steve Sarkisian. “As far as what we are trying to accomplish, you know, to win that game, to get to the SEC championship game. But I’m not naive to know the rivalry is the rivalry, and what this game means to the entire state of Texas, you know, and households being divided Thanksgiving weekend.”

GIVING THANKS: It’s Rivalry Week: Embrace the college football crazy

WEEKEND FORECAST: Experts picks for every Top 25 game in Week 13

More than bragging rights on line for Texas, Texas A&M

There’s a second level of depth to the matchup in College Station. The winner will earn a spot in the conference championship game opposite No. 6 Georgia and play for an appearance in the College Football Playoff; for the Longhorns, a win should be enough to lock down a playoff berth regardless of what happens against the Bulldogs.

To have this much on the line is a rarity for a series that was first held in 1894 and then annually from 1915-2011. The Longhorns are 76-37-5 against A&M, including a run of just three losses over the course of more than three decades from 1940-74. The Aggies’ best run came with 10 wins in 11 games from 1984-94, with the one loss, in 1990, coming by a single point.

While at least one team was ranked in every meeting in this series from 1997-2011, the Longhorns and Aggies have met with both ranked in the top 20 just seven times in the modern era: in 1941, 1943, 1974, 1975, 1977, 1985 and 1995.

In terms of impact on the national championship, the closest analog to Saturday night was the 1975 game that saw No. 2 A&M beat No. 5 Texas to remain unbeaten, though the Aggies would drop their final two games of the season.

“I think everyone understands how big this game is and that they need to lock in and focus,” Texas A&M left tackle Trey Zuhn III said. “We’re playing for the SEC championship right now. We’re playing for the College Football Playoff. We can’t leave anything out there this week, and we’ve got to go all out on the field.”

One measure of the hype around Saturday’s reunion are rising ticket prices. The average ticket is selling for $1,100 and the cheapest seat for $520, according to StubHub. As of Wednesday, the most expensive tickets from the vendor are a pair located along midfield selling for roughly $2,600 apiece. According to another reseller, TickPick, Saturday’s game “is the most expensive regular season football ticket on record,” college or NFL.

“I’m way less concerned about being the last man to score in the rivalry and much more excited about the opportunity to watch the game for years to come,” Tucker said. “I think it’s one of the greatest rivalries in sports, not just college football, not just football.”

A regenerated rivalry. An SEC championship game appearance. The possibility of making the playoff; the chance to play for and win the national championship. There’s a reason this game has been circled as one of the must-see matchups of the 2024 season.

“Even though it hasn’t been played, it just doesn’t feel like it’s ever really left the fabric. I really don’t think it’s as removed from the psyche as maybe it feels,” Texas A&M coach Mike Elko said. “I think our kids are very much aware of what this is all about.”

Texas, Texas A&M bring hate and mutual respect

There is no shortage of hate between these two fan bases; this is college football, after all, and this is a rivalry, so disgust is baked into the recipe.

There is no shortage of hate between these two fan bases; this is college football, after all, and this is a rivalry, so disgust is baked into the recipe.

To illustrate, the ‘Aggie War Hymn’ written in 1918 specifically mentions its rival in the first verse with the lines, ‘Goodbye to Texas university. So long to the orange and white.’ And since, A&M fans refer to their rivals as ‘tu’ rather the popularized ‘UT’ that Texas prefers.

But the animosity is tempered by long-standing connections that have come to transcend the series, bonds developed in some cases by the familial blending of Aggies and Longhorns — A&M didn’t allow women to openly enroll until 1969, so generations of male undergraduates would make the roughly 100-mile trip to Austin to meet and marry female students at Texas.

“You hear about all the hatred and all this stuff, and I’m sure some people might have some,” said former A&M coach R.C. Slocum, who participated in a record 30 games in this rivalry as an assistant and head coach.

“But I know a whole bunch of people who have been involved in this game and there’s a lot of mutual respect there. Great desire to win. You want to beat them. When you go out on the field you’re going to do everything you can. To me, respect is a much better emotion.”

No moment in the series has come to encapsulate this underlying theme of mutual respect than the 1999 game which was held eight days after the collapse of a bonfire built on campus killed 12 current and former students and left another 27 injured.

With a late touchdown. Texas A&M won that memorable contest that counts as one of the program’s victories.

“I think that’s a great picture of what the feelings are when you get below the surface,” Slocum said. “It was a big display in the big picture of things. This game is not as important as people and the loss of these kids.”

That game has come to define the hate-but-respect vibe that permeates this series. But the rivalry has never had a moment like what is set to unfold on Saturday night.

“It’s probably going to be like the Alabama game, the Notre Dame and the LSU game on steroids,” said Texas A&M linebacker Taurean York.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Pride was on the line when Texas and Texas A&M last met 13 years ago. That’s still on the line – and so much more.
Texas considers Texas A&M its ‘little brother,’ but Aggies got stronger inside the SEC, before Longhorns joined them.
Texas won the race to CFP qualification first. Can it also reach SEC championship game first?

They arrived in the same place but took different paths to get here.

Texas A&M left behind its bitter rival, Texas, more than a dozen years ago and seized control of its future.

Exhausted of being in a conference where the Longhorns ruled the board room and controlled the till, the Aggies struck out for the SEC, which offered more visibility, premier opportunities for athletes and a sweet payday.

In doing so, A&M thought they might never again share a conference with Texas.

They thought wrong, but they did get there first.

What’s that worth?

We’ll learn a little something about that Saturday, when No. 19 Texas A&M hosts No. 3 Texas in the first meeting of these bitter rivals in 13 years.

“We’ve had a dozen years to establish ourselves independently of Texas, and that’s been a good thing,” said former Texas A&M president R. Bowen Loftin, the man who steered the school out of the Big 12 and into the SEC.

These programs find themselves on better footing than they were when they last met, after Big 12 unrest – and Texas’ role in it – spurred the Aggies to pursue another conference.  

Pride was on the line in 2011.

That’s still on the line – but much more, too. The victor Saturday will advance to play Georgia in the SEC championship game.

“We’ve always been treated by (Texas) as a little brother, a smaller version of them, basically,” Loftin, a Texas A&M alumnus, told USA TODAY Sports, “a less worthy version of them, and we had the chance to build up our base support, our reputation, and our image, independently of them for a dozen years.

“I think we’re ready for it.”

Texas A&M’s chance to show Texas how strong ‘little brother’ became

The Aggies, for the better part of a dozen years, enjoyed a laugh at Texas’ expense.

Although neither program spent much time among the elite during their years apart, Texas A&M inched ahead of Texas and won more games during that period, while competing in a tougher conference.

The footing shifted in 2021. The Longhorns finally got a coaching hire right, tapping Steve Sarkisian. That summer, SEC commissioner Greg Sankey shocked the Aggies with plans to add Texas and Oklahoma. Texas reached the College Football Playoff first, qualifying last season.

GIVING THANKS: It’s Rivalry Week: Embrace the college football crazy

WEEKEND FORECAST: Experts picks for every Top 25 game in Week 13

Saturday’s result will decide which program makes it to the SEC championship game first. Texas A&M came up just short in 2012 and again in 2020.

How haunting it would be for the Aggies to watch the Longhorns cruise to Atlanta at their expense and prove the SEC simple enough to summit, after all.

Alternatively, how humbling it would be for Texas to lose to the Aggies and swallow the harsh reality that “little brother” bulked up during their time apart.

Combine the rivalry’s hiatus with the SEC championship stakes and College Football Playoff plot, and this will be a game unlike any this past decade within a state where being a fan of one of these behemoths means despising the other.

‘To finally be playing and to be playing for what we’re playing for, it’ll be pretty electric on Saturday,” Texas A&M coach Mike Elko said.

Will it ever. A stadium that shakes for a normal conference game will positively tremble when the music plays while the home team emerge from the tunnel.

Earlier this year, a crowd of 110,905 piled into Kyle Field for a George Strait concert.

If anyone trumps Strait in Texas, it’s the Aggies and Longhorns. Even the cheap seats for are selling for upwards of $600 on ticket resale sites.

Among those attending will be Loftin, who didn’t expect to see Texas again as a conference foe after shepherding Texas A&M into the SEC.

“I’ll be there,” Loftin said. “I wouldn’t miss it for the world.”

How Texas ‘arrogance’ sparked Texas A&M’s decision to join SEC

Loftin remembers a meeting of Big 12 university leaders in 2009 and seeing who was in charge.

Then-Texas president Bill Powers chaired the Big 12’s board of directors.

“It was clear who was in command,” Loftin said.

Texas ran the show and controlled the purse.

Unlike the SEC’s equal media rights revenue distribution, the Big 12’s uneven revenue distribution then favored the biggest brands, like Texas and Oklahoma, that received top television exposure.

“The inequity in the conference was palpable,” Loftin said.

So was the disharmony.

By 2010, the realignment carousel kicked into gear.

“Their arrogance and condescension was clear to me,” Loftin said of Texas, “and I made it clear to the board of regents at Texas A&M, and they supported me, ordered me, to go out and find alternatives to our continued membership in the Big 12.”

Beyond the Big 12’s borders, Pac-10 commissioner Larry Scott harbored visions of building a Pac-16 super-conference by raiding the Big 12.

Scott’s plan would have preserved Texas and Texas A&M in a league together. Scott’s plot failed. He snagged only Colorado from the Big 12 and Utah from the Mountain West. Nebraska exited for the Big Ten.

Texas stayed put, in part because it enjoyed a pathway within the Big 12 to launch its own sports network, the Longhorn Network, in partnership with ESPN.

Loftin credits Texas – and the Longhorn Network – for unifying key brass and Aggies fans behind the idea of Texas A&M leaving the Big 12, separating from Texas and joining the SEC.

“Texas made this possible,” Loftin said. “The Longhorn Network was the primary reason that I was permitted to go forward in 2011 and get us into the SEC. Without that happening, I’m not sure we have the courage or the consensus to be able to do that.”

New generation will form memories of Texas-Texas A&M rivalry

These universities transitioned to new leaders since their breakup.

Loftin stepped down as Texas A&M’s president and became Missouri’s chancellor in 2014. He’s retired now, while remaining an avid Aggies supporter. Powers resigned at Texas in 2015. Athletics directors and coaches changed, too.

The rivalry got relegated to fan message boards, until the SEC restored one of college football’s best games to the Thanksgiving week calendar.

“I think it’s so cool that we’re playing this game again,” Sarkisian said.

Elko, formerly the Aggies’ defensive coordinator, says “it always felt weird not playing” Texas.

“When you have two programs as large as these two programs are as close to each other as they are, it doesn’t make a ton of sense for them not to play,” Elko said.

So many years passed since the last Texas-Texas A&M matchup, current players hardly know the hero of the 2011 Lone Star Showdown.

Texas’ Justin Tucker drilled a 40-yard field goal to lift the Longhorns to a 27-25 victory in that final meeting as Big 12 rivals.

With one field goal, Tucker entered Texas lore – just don’t expect current Longhorns remember him.

“He’s a kicker, right?” Texas wide receiver Matthew Golden, a Houston native, told reporters this week, unsure whether his answer was correct.

Yes, it’s past time to form new memories of an old rivalry, within the nation’s fiercest conference, with stakes as high as ever.

“The rivalry,” Loftin said, “is back.”

Blake Toppmeyer is the USA TODAY Network’s national college football columnist. Email him at BToppmeyer@gannett.com and follow him on Twitter @btoppmeyer. Subscribe to read all of his columns.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY