Archive

2024

Browsing

MIAMI GARDENS, Fla. — Georgia football coach Kirby Smart’s team just pummeled a Florida State team a shell of its former self due to a slew of opt outs, injuries and transfers.

The final in the Orange Bowl: No. 6 Georgia 63, No. 5 Florida State 3.

It was the largest margin of victory in college football bowl history.

“Maybe I’m wrong here and maybe this will be a bad sound bite,” Smart said Saturday night near the end of his postgame press conference. “People need to see what happened tonight, and they need to fix this. It needs to be fixed. It’s very unfortunate that they, who has a good football team and a good football program, are in the position they’re in.”

Florida State had 28 players miss the game due to opt outs, injuries or transfers.

“Everybody can say it’s their fault,” Smart said. “Everybody can say we had our guys and they didn’t have their guys. I can listen to all that, but college football has to decide what they want. I know things are changing and things are going to change next year (with the 12-team playoff), but you know what? There’s still going to be bowl games outside of those. People got to decide what they want and what they want to get out of it.”

Florida State was 13-0 and the ACC champions but left out of the four-team playoff after losing starting quarterback Jordan Travis to injury.

“It’s really unfortunate for those kids on that sideline that had to play in that game that didn’t have their full arsenal,’ Smart said. ‘It affected the game 100 percent.”

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

ARLINGTON, Texas – What a ball of confusion. The Detroit Lions had the sneaky design of a two-point conversion pass to 318-pound tackle Taylor Decker that might have won a thrilling Saturday night showdown had the play not been called back on a technicality.

Unless it should not have been.

The Dallas Cowboys squeaked out a 20-19 victory, but not without another layer of controversy attached to the officiating.

It was he-said, he-said. Referee Brad Allen contended – and announced to the Cowboys defense and the crowd at A&T Stadium – that tackle Dan Skipper and not Decker reported as an eligible tackle for the play.

The Lions, however, maintain that Skipper never reported himself as eligible and that implied that Allen somehow mixed it up. Replays showed that two linemen – Decker and Penei Sewell – approached Allen as the Lions huddled up. Then Skipper came running over as the other linemen walked away.

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

What was actually said by the players and acknowledged by Allen is unclear. Yet clearly the versions don’t match up.

‘Very confused,’ Lions quarterback Jared Goff said afterward. ‘What I do know, and I don’t know if I’ll get fined for this, but I do know that Decker reported. I do know that Dan Skipper did not. I do know that they said that Dan Skipper did.’

Lions coach Dan Campbell carefully measured his words, too, as he tried to explain what went down during his postgame news conference. Remember, Kansas City Chiefs coach Andy Reid was recently fined $100,000 for criticizing the officiating.

On the play, which followed Amon-Ra St. Brown knifing inside the pylon for an 11-yard TD reception, Decker slipped off the line and was uncovered in the back of the end zone. Goff floated a soft, easy pass.

Allen, though, said the Lions were guilty of two penalties on the play. He said that, in addition to the ‘illegal touching’ flag, that Detroit was in an illegal formation based on where Skipper was lined up.

‘I explain everything pre-game, to the T,’ Campbell said of the sequence. 

Without blasting Allen, Campbell said the explanation given to him was that Skipper reported and Decker didn’t – the opposite of what his players said.

It’s also true that had the officials let the conversion stand, the Cowboys (11-5) could have claimed they were jilted. After all, Allen alerted Dallas that Skipper – and not Decker – was the eligible tackle.

Either way, the NFL has another messy officiating sequence to explain.

‘I did exactly what coach told me to do, and went to the ref, said ‘report,’ ‘ Decker said. ‘You know, Dan brings up the possibility of those sorts of plays pregame, so I did what I was told to do. Did how we did it in practice all week, and that’s probably all I’m really going to touch on with that.”  

There’s video showing that Goff apparently instructed Decker to leave the huddle and report to the official.

‘I mean, see the video of it,’ Decker said. ‘It is what it is, I guess.”

Campbell was undeniably frustrated in trying to provide answers. But the man who dropped a virtual calling card for aggressiveness in his first news conference as Lions coach was cooler than many in his shoes might have been.

Regardless, there was no lack of aggressiveness. The fact that the Lions were rolling for a two-point conversion with 23 seconds on the clock further confirmed Campbell’s style. He could have opted to kick a PAT and forced overtime.

‘We were going for the win,’ Campbell said.

Just as he envisioned. When the Lions took possession at their 25-yard line with 1:41 remaining, Campbell told his players the expectation: They would drive the length of the field for a touchdown, then win on a two-point conversion.

That the Lions (11-5) nearly pulled it off is a testament to the culture that Campbell has instilled in a team that last week won the franchise’s first division title in 30 years. In the second quarter, he called for a fake punt from his own 28-yard line and it worked with upback Jalen Reeves-Maybin connecting with Khalil Dorsey for a 30-yard completion.

Later in the second quarter, they went for it on fourth-and-goal from the 4-yard line. Goff’s pass into the end zone for Sam LaPorta was incomplete, but it proved to be an omen. In the third quarter, the Lions converted on fourth-and-two Goff’s four-yard completion to LaPorta, which kept alive a 13-play, 74-yard go-ahead TD drive. 

Was there any doubt that the Lions would go for two, given the M.O. they’ve had under Campbell?

Dak Prescott certainly expected it.

‘This guy is crazy,’ Prescott said. ‘Respectfully crazy. I love it. You’re playing to win a game and not lose a game. Credit the mindset.’

Prescott passed for 345 yards and two touchdowns to help the Cowboys finish undefeated at home for the first time since 1981. It was their closest finish yet this season on their own turf, which is why Prescott described the game’s ending as ‘a roller coaster of thoughts.’

After the Lions’ conversion was wiped out, a Dallas goal-line interception was nullified by a penalty by Micah Parsons jumping offsides. Detroit’s third attempt at the conversion ended with tight end James Mitchell dropping a low pass from Goff at the 1-yard line.

‘That’s a hell of a team,’ Prescott said. ‘Wouldn’t be surprised if we see them again.’

What a great idea. The way the game ended on Saturday night, it would be fitting if the Lions and Cowboys met again in the playoffs. If it happens, though, it would likely be in Detroit – with Dallas looking on track for a wild-card berth – where payback would add one more layer of motivation.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Even on the day he turned 39, LeBron James showed he was still capable of hitting a clutch shot in crunch time.

As the clock ticked down to the final seconds Saturday night with his Lakers trying to rally against the Minnesota Timberwolves, James nailed what he thought was a game-tying 3-pointer. But officials said his foot was ever-so-slightly on the line, effectively sealing the Lakers’ fate.

The NBA’s all-time leading scorer was livid, pleading unsuccessfully for replay to overturn the call. In the locker room after the 108-106 loss, he was still steaming.

‘It’s obvious (it’s) a three. My foot was behind the line. You could see the space between the front of my foot and the 3-point line,’ James said. ‘Stevie Wonder could see that, champ.’

Officials after the game said there wasn’t ‘clear and conclusive’ evidence to reverse the ruling. James clearly disagreed.

‘In the replay center, somebody over there eating a ham sandwich made the call,’ he added disgustedly.

James finished with 26 points, becoming just the 11th player in NBA history to score 25 or more after turning 39. However, not getting a 27th was, for him, the missing icing on the cake.

‘What do we have replay for if even the replay gets it wrong?’ James said.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The 15th version of the outdoor Winter Classic will feature the NHL’s two newest teams.

But the matchup will bring the defending Stanley Cup champions in the Vegas Golden Knights and iconic views of the Seattle skyline when the third-year Kraken host the annual outdoor game at the home of Major League Baseball’s Seattle Mariners.

The game takes on extra importance because the Golden Knights are trying to overcome a 2-5 slide that knocked them out of sole possession of first in the league and the Kraken have surged to close to a playoff spot after a slow follow-up to the franchise’s first playoff appearance.

Here’s what to know about the Golden Knights vs. Kraken Winter Classic:

What time is the Golden Knights vs. Kraken Winter Classic?

The Winter Classic is scheduled to begin at 3 p.m. ET on Monday, Jan. 1, at Seattle’s T-Mobile Park, home of the Mariners.

HOT STOVE UPDATES: MLB free agency: Ranking and tracking the top players available.

What is the weather forecast for the Golden Knights vs. Kraken Winter Classic?

The forecast calls for partly cloudy weather with 44 degrees at the game’s start at noon local time. By game’s end, it will be 46 with mostly cloudy skies. Chance of rain during the game is 10 percent.

How can I watch the Golden Knights vs. Kraken Winter Classic?

The game will be aired on TNT. A pregame show starts at 2 p.m. ET.

How can I stream the Golden Knights vs. Kraken Winter Classic?

It will be available on Max, plus streaming services that carry TNT.

What are the odds for the Golden Knights vs. Kraken Winter Classic?

Moneyline: Golden Knights -145 (bet $145 to win $100) | Kraken +120 (bet $100 to win $120)

Puck line (PL)/Against the spread (ATS): Golden Knights -1.5 (+180) | Kraken +1.5 (-225)

Over/Under (O/U): 6 (O: +100 | U: -120)

How have the Golden Knights and Kraken fared in outdoor games?

This will be the first outdoor game for the Kraken. The Golden Knights lost to the Colorado Avalanche in 2021 on a rink built on a golf course in Stateline, Nevada, next to Lake Tahoe. The game started on time but was pushed back into the evening because of bad ice conditions caused by intense sunshine.

What is the entertainment for the Golden Knights vs. Kraken Winter Classic?

Fourteen-year-old Seattle-based singer, songwriter and guitarist Nikhil Bagga will perform the national anthem. Seattle-based band Heart will perform during the first intermission.

What else to know about this game

The Golden Knights are 8-1 all-time against the Kraken, including a 4-1 win in the season opener. … Defending Stanley Cup champions are 5-1 in outdoor games. … Golden Knights coach Bruce Cassidy is 2-0 in outdoor games, both while with the Boston Bruins. Kraken coach Dave Hakstol is 0-1, losing with the Philadelphia Flyers in a 2017 Stadium Series game in Pittsburgh. … Seattle’s Pierre-Edouard Bellemare leads the way with four outdoor games, two with the Colorado Avalanche and one each with the Flyers and Tampa Bay Lightning. He was no points and seven penalty minutes, including a fight. … Newly acquired Kraken forward Tomas Tatar leads the way with four points in three outdoor games. … Ivan Barbashev has the most outdoor points for Vegas, a goal and an assist while playing for the St. Louis Blues. … The NHL’s first outdoor game was played in Las Vegas, a 1991 exhibition game between the New York Rangers and Los Angeles Kings on a rink built on the parking lot of Caesars Palace. The Kings won 5-2.

Are there other outdoor games this season?

Feb. 17: Stadium Series, Philadelphia vs. New Jersey at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey, 8 p.m.

Feb. 18: Stadium Series, New York Rangers vs. New York Islanders at MetLife, 3 p.m.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

Perhaps you think you are being helpful. Maybe you were a standout high school player, or even a college player, at your kid’s sport of choice. So you “cheer,” or at least that’s what you think you are doing.

You bark instructions to your child when he or she is on the court, field or ice. (The coach can’t possibly know more than you, right?)

You let your son or daughter know exactly what to do: which pitch to swing at, when to take a shot, when to turn around and look for a pass.

The sound of your voice rises with the intensity of the game. If the game is close, you are practically screaming. Other parents around you are doing the same thing, so it must be OK, right? 

Some players are getting into the act, too, saying a teammate’s name in the heat of a game that quickly escalates to screams, too.

By the end, the team is left with a cacophony of noise, especially if you’re in a high school gym. If the players hear anything you are saying, they are confused by all of the comments, many of which run counter to what their coach is saying.

Or maybe those players are just stressed because of the critical edge or tone you use when you yell to them (or at them).

Have you been here before? We all have. When our child is out there playing or competing, cheering can quickly give way to overenthusiasm that can hurt his or her performance – and more importantly, diminish a passion for a sport they once loved. 

Next time you are on the sidelines or in the bleachers at a youth sports event, listen to what everyone besides the coaches are saying. Yes, we want to cheer. More importantly, though, we want to pay attention to how we cheer.

Like the founders of The Reformed Sports Project, I am “reformed” myself. I used to be one of these parents, at least to some degree. 

I have sons who are 16 and 13 and still active in competitive sports. I recently “retired” from coaching them, although I am still at most of their games. I undertook a new challenge in March to write a sports parenting column each week. This initiative has allowed me to step away and examine not only the behavior of sports parents around me, but also my own behavior. 

Every year, a new enrollment of the population dives headfirst into youth sports without much education or a blueprint on how to go about behaving. 

The first step in this process is so simple: Cheer for them. When I say “cheer,” I don’t mean “coach” (unless you’re the team’s actual coach), criticize, yell or single out. Just cheer, and do the same for your kid’s teammates. 

Here are examples of comments I have heard from parents and teammates at my sons’ games. All of these words can be substituted for chatter that is more encouraging and empowering.

‘Don’t lose him’ or ‘throw strikes

Alternatives: “You’ve got this” or “You can do it”

How many times have you heard this one when a pitcher has a 3-0 count on a hitter or throws a number of balls in a row? It can come from parents in the stands, teammates or even coaches. The problem is, the word “lose” is a term a player will associate with negativity or failure. 

One of my interviewees for a previous column, Billy Pinckney, had a high school coach who would shout “Don’t blow it!” during an intense moment of a game. Pinckney mentions how sports psychologist Harvey Dorfman, author of “The Mental ABC’s of Pitching,” suggested the last thing a pitcher hears is what he thinks about. In this case, the pitcher would hear “blow it” or “lose him.” 

“Be aggressive”

Alternatives: “Keep that focus!” or “Let’s get a stop” or “Have fun out there!”

These two words might seem harmless. But you want to make sure everything you say won’t interfere with a coach’s intent. In some cases, “be aggressive” may not apply. If the hitter has that 3-0 count against him, a coach may want him to watch a strike. In basketball, perhaps a coach doesn’t want overaggressive fouls or has his or her team playing a zone defense and waiting for the offense to make the first move. 

It’s important to know your sport. In tennis, you might not want to say, “be aggressive,” because, at least at the younger levels, you want players to keep the ball in bounds, not power them beyond the lines. In football, being overly aggressive might necessitate an offside call.

You wouldn’t want to yell, “drive!” if a coach’s desire is to pass and look for a good shot, just like you wouldn’t want to say, “let’s make a good throw!” to the quarterback of a team that wants to run the ball. 

‘Look at me

Alternatives:“Listen to your coach” or “Take a deep breath” (One of my favorites as a parent or coach; you’d be amazed what a difference a simple pause or mound visit from a coach can make)

I had a player on one of my son’s Little League teams who would turn and find his dad (who was usually sitting near the backstop) after every pitch instead finding me coaching third base. What lessons does this teach?

Having a kid constantly look at you during a game discourages them from figuring out problems on their own. A good coach will provide constructive feedback when a player looks over during a game, making a comment that will motivate a player into action.  These words might be, “Find a good pitch to hit” or “Get a good look (at the basket).”

‘C’mon now!

Alternatives: “That’s all right” or “Don’t worry about it” if it comes after an error or mistake; “Keep going” or “Power through it” for general encouragement.  

This one can come with a critical tone that puts a kid on edge. I’ve heard these words followed by something that could undermine the coach. C’mon now, be aggressive. … C’mon now, do something with the ball. … C’mon now, make a play. Either way, by saying “C’mon now,” you are sending negative vibes. 

You are implying your kids are doing something wrong, even if you’re just trying to encourage them. It’s understandable you are disappointed about what just happened. But remember this is not your game or your passion or your dream anymore. It belongs to your kids. Give them something to show you truly support them.

‘C’mon (name)!

Alternatives: “Get the next one” or “You’re good!”   

This one is more aggressive than the last example and most often comes from another player after a teammates makes a mistake. (I’ve heard it from a parent in the bleachers, too.) The first reaction of a kid, especially one of the stronger players of the team, is to sometimes lash out at a teammate. Doing something like this can crush the other kid’s spirits and negatively affect his or her performance the rest of the season.

Instead, let your emotions settle for a few seconds, or even until the next timeout or huddle or pause in between innings. Then try something that might help that teammate play better in the future.

Remember: Kids follow their parents’ lead. Don’t talk disparagingly about the weaker players on the team to your child after the game. Instead, make this a good teaching moment. 

So what’s your end game?

Before your child’s next game, ask yourself: What is your end game? We learned in 2022 at reformedsportsproject.com, via data from the NCAA, that about 7% of high school athletes play in college. Youth sports are about growth as athletes, yes, but they’re more about emotional growth and development. 

Everything you say — and the way you say it — has an effect on them.

A version of this column was originally published as a guest blog for the Reformed Sports Project in August.

Steve Borelli, aka Coach Steve, has been an editor and writer with USA TODAY since 1999. He spent 10 years coaching his two sons’ baseball and basketball teams. He and his wife, Colleen, are now loving life as sports parents for a high schooler and middle schooler. For his past columns, click here.

Got a question for Coach Steve you want answered in a future column? Email him at sborelli@usatoday.com.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

If the Miami Dolphins hope to overtake the Baltimore Ravens for the No. 1 seed in the AFC in their game Sunday, they’ll have to do it without one of their best players. 

Dolphins starting running back Raheem Mostert will not play Sunday due to knee and ankle injuries, according to ESPN and NFL Network. 

Miami will also be without No. 2 receiver Jaylen Waddle, who is out against the Ravens because of a high ankle sprain. 

Baltimore (12-4) enters as the No. 1 seed in the conference, after their win over the San Francisco 49ers last week. 

But Miami (11-5) has a chance to take the top seed with a win against the Ravens, and in its season finale at home against the Buffalo Bills next week. The Dolphins hold the lead in the AFC East over the Bills (9-6) heading into Week 17. 

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

Mostert isn’t just one of Miami’s best players. He’s been one of the best in the NFL this season. 

Mostert, 31, is tied with 49ers star running back Christian McCaffrey with 21 total touchdowns scored this season. He has set the Dolphins’ franchise record with 18 rushing touchdowns, while his career-high 1,012 rushing yards are fourth in the NFL. 

Without Mostert and Waddle, the Dolphins will turn to rookie De’Von Achane, veteran Jeff Wilson Jr. and rookie Chris Brooks in their backfield behind quarterback Tua Tagovailoa and star receiver Tyreek Hill. 

While Hill leads Miami with 1,641 yards and 12 touchdowns, Waddle is second on the Dolphins with four touchdowns and 1,014 receiving yards, eclipsing 1,000 yards in each of the first three seasons in his career. 

The Dolphins also have injuries along their offensive line where starting right guard Robert Hunt (hamstring) is inactive for the Ravens game, and center Liam Eichenberg (calf/ankle), starting right tackle Austin Jackson (oblique), and backup guard/tackle Lester Cotton (hip) are questionable.

Miami’s three best secondary players – cornerback Jalen Ramsey (knee), cornerback Xavien Howard (hip/thumb) and safety Jevon Holland (knees) – are questionable to play against Baltimore.

Meanwhile, safety Kyle Hamilton and guard Kevin Zeitler will be inactive for the Ravens.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

When it comes to his approval rating, President Biden ends 2023 where he started the year – firmly in negative territory.

The president stood at 43% approval and 57% disapproval in the latest Fox News national poll, which was conducted in mid-December, and he registered below 40% approval in a handful of major polls in the field this month.

Biden’s approval rating stands at 41%-56% as the calendar turns from 2023 to 2024, according to an average of all the most recent national surveys compiled by Real Clear Politics.

The approval rating is a key indicator of a president’s performance, clout and popularity and is a closely watched metric, especially when an incumbent in the White House seeks a second term. The 81-year-old Biden is running for re-election in 2024.

Biden’s approval rating hovered in the low to mid 50s during his first six months in the White House. However, the president’s numbers started sagging in August 2021 in the wake of Biden’s much-criticized handling of the turbulent U.S. exit from Afghanistan and following a surge in COVID-19 cases that summer, mainly among unvaccinated people.

The plunge in the president’s approval was also fueled by soaring inflation – which started spiking in the summer of 2021 and remains to date a major pocketbook concern with Americans – and the surge of migrants trying to cross into the U.S. along the southern border with Mexico. 

Biden stands well below where his three most recent two-term predecessors – former Presidents Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama – stood at this point in their presidencies, as they successfully ran for re-election. 

The only recent president whose approval ratings were nearly as negative as Biden’s current numbers was his most recent predecessor, former President Trump, who was defeated by Biden in the 2020 election.

Trump stood at 45%-53% in a Fox News poll conducted in December 2019, and at 45%-52% on the last day of 2019, according to the Real Clear Politics average at the time.

Trump remains the commanding frontrunner for the 2024 Republican presidential nomination, and as the new year approaches, a 2020 election rematch appears likely next November.

Biden once held the upper hand over Trump in 2024 presidential election surveys, but Trump began enjoying an advantage over his successor in the White House in many polls starting in October.

‘Predictions more than a year out tend to look a little different a year later,’ Biden campaign spokesperson Kevin Munoz said early last month. ‘Don’t take our word for it: Gallup predicted an eight-point loss for President Obama only for him to win handily a year later.’

Veteran Republican pollster Neil Newhouse concurred that polls ‘aren’t necessarily predictive a year out.’

But Newhouse emphasized ‘that doesn’t mean you ignore these polls and they [Biden’s campaign] do so at their own risk.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS