Archive

2024

Browsing
Read this article for free!
Plus get unlimited access to thousands of articles, videos and more with your free account!
Please enter a valid email address.
By entering your email, you are agreeing to Fox News Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive. To access the content, check your email and follow the instructions provided.

EXCLUSIVE: A former aide to ousted Rep. George Santos, R-N.Y., is now being employed by Rep. Nancy Mace, R-S.C., Fox News Digital has learned.

Santos’ former communications director, Gabrielle Lipsky, started in a similar role for Mace this month, two sources told Fox News Digital. Her name and email were confirmed in a call to Mace’s Mount Pleasant district office on Monday afternoon.

Lipsky resigned from Santos’ office in mid-November, shortly after a damning report by the House Ethics Committee found that the former congressman misused campaign funds and accused him of violating criminal law, Semafor reported at the time. 

The House voted to expel Santos on Dec. 1 shortly after the report was released. 

Lipsky did not respond to multiple emails from Fox News Digital regarding the new role. A voicemail was left at Mace’s Washington, D.C., office Friday similarly seeking confirmation, but was not returned.

The staffer defended working for Santos last February in an interview with Business Insider, as revelations were breaking that the ex-congressman lied about his work history, education and family heritage, among other details. ‘At the end of the day, the congressman has a job to do, and he needs people to help him do that,’ she said at the time.

Santos is facing 23 federal charges related to misuse of donor funds, identity theft and other accusations. The most recent charges were levied against him in October.

The report of Lipsky’s hiring comes after Mace’s office lost several senior staffers in recent months, including her chief of staff, deputy chief and communications director.T

Mace was accused of making lewd comments in the office by three sources who spoke anonymously with the Daily Mail in December. 

A Daily Beast report from November claimed Mace had a ‘handbook’ for staffers that allegedly said, among other things, that her office must send out at least one press release per day and put her on TV at least nine times per week.

Mace told Fox News Digital during a Nov. 3 interview that she had not read the report, and shrugged off its accusations.

‘If someone wants to attack me for working hard and being demanding and wanting to ensure that our staff is organized and working hard for the almost 800,000 constituents that they represent, game on. Bring it. I don’t care. We’re going to continue to work hard for the Lowcountry, for South Carolina, and for the nation,’ she said at the time.

The South Carolina Republican was one of eight House GOP lawmakers who voted to oust Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., as speaker last year. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

A week of back-to-back Fox News-hosted town halls will kick off with presidential candidate and former United Nations Ambassador Nikki Haley on Monday, January 8.

Fox News Channel will host the first of three days of town halls with Haley at 6 p.m. EST, speaking with the only female candidate in the GOP presidential race on women’s issues and topics most important to voters.

‘Special Report’ chief political anchor Bret Baier and ‘The Story’ anchor Martha MacCallum will co-moderate the event in Iowa.

Haley’s GOP primary competitors, including former President Donald Trump and Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis, have ramped up attacks on her campaign after the former ambassador climbed to second place in several recent polls. The GOP hopeful’s surge was recently on full display after the campaign reported doubling donor contributions in the fourth quarter, reporting a $24 million haul during the October to December donation period.

How to watch

Viewers can tune in to the live town hall event featuring Haley on FOX News Channel. Viewers can also access a live stream on FOX Nation, FOX News Media’s streaming platform, as well as FOXNews.com and FOXBusiness.com. FOX websites will also include live debate reporting and a live blog throughout the evening.

Fox News will also host a town hall with Haley’s primary challenger Ron DeSantis on Tuesday evening and a town hall with former President Donald Trump on Wednesday.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
Read this article for free!
Plus get unlimited access to thousands of articles, videos and more with your free account!
Please enter a valid email address.
By entering your email, you are agreeing to Fox News Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive. To access the content, check your email and follow the instructions provided.

Several GOP senators, in alignment with House Republicans, expressed outrage over the agreed-upon annual government spending cap of $1.59 trillion brokered between House Speaker Mike Johnson and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer over the weekend. 

Lawmakers argued Monday that this figure neglects ample Republican suggestions for budget cuts. Meanwhile, the first spending deadline is fast approaching on Jan. 19. That means there are just eight legislative days until Congress must pass the first batch of appropriations to fund several federal agencies to avert a government shutdown. The second deadline is Feb. 2. 

‘As the House Freedom Caucus has noted, the actual spending levels in this plan are nearly $100 billion above what we are being promised, but mostly preserve all the pre-existing funding for Biden’s priorities,’ Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah told Fox News Digital on Monday. 

‘At a time when we’re $34 trillion in debt and inflation is hollowing out America’s middle class, Republicans can and must do better than this,’ he said. 

The $1.59 trillion figure was part of an agreement mandated by the Fiscal Responsibility Act (FRA) last year, a compromise reached during debt limit talks between President Biden and then-Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif. 

Democratic leaders said the final top line would also include an additional $69 billion in nondefense discretionary spending that was part of a McCarthy and Biden side deal at the time. That would bring the total to roughly $1.66 trillion, a figure the House Freedom Caucus called ‘a total figure.’

The budget comprises of $886 billion allocated for defense and $704 billion designated for nondefense expenses.

Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kans., a member of the upper chamber’s budget committee, said there will be at least a dozen Republican senators who ‘are going to have to look twice at this number.’ Nonetheless, he thinks the budget in its current form will still reach the 60 votes needed to pass.

‘Speaker Johnson is gonna have to try really hard to get his conference on board with this, but I don’t think he’s going to ever get more than 90% of them on board with it,’ Marshall told Fox News Digital on Monday. 

‘He needs every vote he can get, and they’re going to want to argue about this $70 billion, which is important — that’s a lot of money,’ he said. 

According to Johnson, the achieved Republican concessions involve $10 billion in extra cuts to IRS mandatory funding (totaling $20 billion) and a $6.1 billion reduction from the Biden administration’s ongoing COVID-related funds.

Johnson said the new agreement would see some additional cuts to discretionary spending to offset the deal.

However, a potential confrontation is approaching. Johnson has emphasized his desire to include conservative policy additions in the ultimate spending agreement.

Opening up the next legislative session Monday afternoon, Sen. Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said on the floor that ‘both parties reached this agreement without resorting to the painful and draconian cuts that the hard right, particularly those in the Freedom Caucus clamored for.’

‘And make no mistake, Democrats have made clear to Speaker Johnson that we will not support the inclusion of any poison pills in any of the 12 appropriation bills before the Congress,’ he said.

Fox News’ Elizabeth Elkind contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

FIRST ON FOX: A House Republican lawmaker is introducing articles of impeachment against Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, his office told Fox News Digital on Monday.

Rep. Matt Rosendale, R-Mont., plans to target Austin on Tuesday as fallout continues over the Pentagon’s delayed disclosure about Austin being hospitalized last week.

Rosendale told Fox News Digital in a statement that he believes Austin ‘violated his oath of office’ on multiple occasions, citing the Biden administration’s withdrawal from Afghanistan, the migrant crisis at the border, and last year’s incident with a Chinese spy craft floating above the continental U.S.

‘Sec. Austin knowingly put the American people in danger and compromised our national security when he allowed a spy balloon from a foreign adversary to fly over Malmstrom Air Force Base – home to ICBMs – and allowed the Chinese Communist Party to gather intel on American citizens,’ the Montana Republican said. 

‘This dishonesty seems to be a repeated pattern for the Secretary as he once again lied to our military and the American people about his health last week.’

The Pentagon publicly revealed on Friday that Austin had been in the hospital since Jan. 1 due to complications from elective surgery. But a Politico report later revealed that not only were media kept in the dark, but that the highest levels of the White House and top officials in the Pentagon itself were not aware until Thursday that Austin was in the hospital.

The non-disclosure prompted a flurry of bipartisan concern, with top Democrats and Republicans on the House and Senate Armed Services committees both calling for more transparency about the incident.

Rosendale’s Monday evening statement went beyond the health scandal, arguing that Austin ‘failed to uphold his oath of office during the Biden Administration’s disastrous withdrawal from Afghanistan which led to the death of 13 American soldiers and enabled unvetted migrants to flow into the United States.’

‘Sec. Austin is unfit for the Office of the Secretary of Defense, which is why I urge my colleagues to join me in impeaching him to protect the American people,’ he said.

A host of top Republicans have called for Austin to be fired over how the disclosure of his hospitalization was handled.

Fox News’ Liz Friden contributed to this report.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Note to the reader: This is the fourth in a series of articles I’m publishing here taken from my book, “Investing with the Trend.” Hopefully, you will find this content useful. Market myths are generally perpetuated by repetition, misleading symbolic connections, and the complete ignorance of facts. The world of finance is full of such tendencies, and here, you’ll see some examples. Please keep in mind that not all of these examples are totally misleading — they are sometimes valid — but have too many holes in them to be worthwhile as investment concepts. And not all are directly related to investing and finance. Enjoy! – Greg

The Deception of Average

The World of Finance is fraught with misleading information.

The use of averages, in particular, is something that requires discussion. Figure 4.1 shows the compounded rates of return for a variety of asset classes. If I were selling you a buy-and-hold strategy, or an index fund, I would love this chart. Looking at the 85 years of data shown here, I could say that, if you had invested in small-cap stocks, you would have averaged 11.95 percent a year, and if you had invested in large-cap stocks, you would have averaged 9.85 percent a year. And I would be correct.

Figure 4.1

I think that most investors have about 20 years, maybe 25 years, in which to accumulate their retirement wealth. In their 20s and 30s, it is difficult to put much money away for many reasons, such as low incomes, children, materialism, college, and so on. Therefore, with that information, what is wrong with this chart? It is for an 85-year investment, and people do not have 85 years to invest. As said earlier, most have about 20 years to acquire their retirement wealth. and there are many 20-year periods in this chart where the returns were horrible. The bear market that began in 1929 did not fully recover until 1954, a full 25 years later; 1966 took 16 years to recover, 1973 took 10 years, and, as of 2012, the 2000 bear still had not recovered.

Table 4.1 shows the performance numbers for the asset classes shown in Figure 4.1 (LT—Long Term, IT—Intermediate Term). The cumulative numbers in Table 4.1 begin at 1 on December 31, 1925.

Table 4.1Hint: Be careful when someone uses inappropriate averages; or more accurately, uses averages inappropriately.

In Table 4.1, recall how the small-cap and large-cap compounded returns were about 12 percent and 10 percent, respectively. Figure 4.2 shows rolling 10-year returns by range since 1900. A rolling return means it shows the periods 1900–1909, 1901–1910, 1902–1911, and so on. You can clearly see that the small stock and large stock returns depicted in Table 4.1 fall within the middle range (8 percent–12 percent) in Figure 4.2, yet, of all the 10-year rolling periods, only 22 percent of them were in that range. Often, average is not very average. It reminds me of the story of the six-foot-tall Texan that drowned while wading across a stream that averaged only three-feet deep.

Figure 4.2

Another (and final) example shows how easily it is to be confused over what is average. And, of course, this time it is intentional. This example should put it in perspective. You cannot relate rates of change linearly. In Figure 4.3 , point A is 20 miles from point B. If you drive 60 mph going from point A to point B, but returning from point B to point A, you drive 30 mph. What is his average speed for the time you were on the road?

A. 55 mph

B. 50 mph

C. 45 mph

D. 40 mph

Figure 4.3

Many will answer that it is 45 mph ((60mph + 30mph)/2). However, you cannot average rates of change like you can constants and linear relationships. Distance is rate multiplied by time (d = rt). So time (t) is distance (d)/rate (r). The first leg from A to B was 20 miles divided by 60 mph or one-third of an hour. The second leg from B to A was 20 miles divided by 30 mph or two-thirds of an hour. Adding the two times (1/3+2/3 = 1 hour) will mean you traveled for one hour and covered a total distance of 40 miles, which has to mean the average speed was 40mph. Look up harmonic mean if you want more information on this, as it is the correct method to determine central tendency of data when it is in the form of a ratio or rate.

Figure 4.4 shows the 20-year rolling price returns for the Dow Industrials. The range of returns in this 127-year sample (1885–2012) is from a low on 08/31/1949 (of .3.71) percent to a high on 3/31/2000 (of 14.06 percent), a 17.77 percent range.

To help clarify rolling returns, if investors were in the Dow Industrials from 9/30/1929 until 8/31/1949 (the low mentioned previously), they had a return of .3.71 percent. Complementary, if they invested on 4/30/1980, then, on 3/31/2000, they had a return of 14.06 percent. The mean return is 5.2 percent and the median return 4.8 percent. When median is less than mean, it simply means more returns were less average. If you recall the long-term assumptions that are often used in the first part of this chapter (Figure 4.1), you can see there is a problem. The magnitude of errors in assumptions of long-term returns cannot be overstated and certainly cannot be ignored. This variability of returns can mean totally different retirement environments for investors who use these long-term assumptions for future returns. It can be the difference between living like a king, or living on government assistance. Institutional investors have the same problems if using these long-term averages.

Figure 4.4

One of the primary beliefs developed by Markowitz in the 1950s as the architect of Modern Portfolio Theory was the details on the inputs for the efficient investment portfolio. In fact, his focus was hardly on the inputs at all. The inputs that are needed are expected future returns, volatility, and correlations. The industry as a whole took the easy approach to solving this by utilizing long-term averages for the inputs — in other words, one full swing through all the data that was available, and the average is the one used for the inputs into an otherwise fairly good theory. Those long-term inputs are totally inappropriate for the investing horizon of most investors; in fact, I think they are inappropriate for all human beings. While delving into this deeper is not the subject of this book, it once again brings to light the horrible misuse of average. These inputs should use averages appropriate for the investor’s accumulation time frame.

One If by Land, Two If by Sea

Sam Savage is a consulting professor of management science and engineering at Stanford University, and a fellow of the Judge Business School at the University of Cambridge. He wrote an insightful book, The Flaw of Averages, in 2009, wherein he included a short piece called “The Red Coats” that fits right into this chapter.

Spring 1775: The colonists are concerned about British plans to raid Lexington and Concord, Massachusetts. Patriots in Boston develop a plan that explicitly takes a range of uncertainties into account: The British will come either by land or by sea. These unsung pioneers of modern decision analysis did it just right by explicitly planning for both contingencies. Had Paul Revere and the Minutemen planned for the single average scenario of the British walking up the beach with one foot on the land and one in the sea, the citizens of North America might speak with different accents today.

Incidentally, Dr. Savage’s father, Leonard J. Savage, wrote the seminal The Foundation of Statistics in 1972 and was a prominent mathematical statistician who collaborated closely with Milton Friedman.

Everything on Four Legs Is a Pig

Although this is unrelated to investments and finance, it is a story about averages that offers additional support to this topic. Doctors use growth charts (height and weight tables) for a guide on the growth of a child. What folks do not realize is that they were created by actuaries for insurance companies and not doctors. As doctors began to use them, the terms overweight, underweight, obese, and so on were created based on average. So if your doctor says you are overweight and you need to lose weight, he is also saying you need to lose weight to be average. And from a Wall Street Journal article by Melinda Beck on July 24, 2012, “The wide variations are due in part to rising obesity rates, an increase in premature infants who survive, and a population that is growing more diverse. Yet the official growth charts from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Prevention still reflect the size distribution of U.S. children in the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s. The CDC says it doesn’t plan to adjust its charts because it doesn’t want the ever-more-obese population to become the new norm.” And now you know.

During my last physical examination, I told my doctor about how these charts on height and weight were just large averages created by actuaries for insurance companies, and that I did not mind being above average. The chapter that follows focuses on the multibillion-dollar industry of prediction. I rarely am invited to be on the financial media anymore because I refuse to make a prediction; it is a fool’s game.

Thanks for reading this far. I intend to publish one article in this series every week. Can’t wait? The book is for sale here.

Mean-reversion strategies typically buy stocks when they are oversold, which means catching the falling knife. These declines are often rather sharp, but the odds favor some sort of bounce after reaching an oversold extreme. While there are no guarantees, chartists can mitigate risk by insuring that the stock is still in a long-term uptrend. Today’s chart will show one such setup. Note that this stock is currently a setup for the mean-reversion trading strategy for System Trader at TrendInvestorPro.

The chart below shows Cadence Design System (CDNS) surging to new highs with a big move in November and trading above its rising 200-day SMA (long-term uptrend). CDNS recently fell below the mid December low with an 8% decline the last two weeks. Despite breaking the mid December low with a sharp decline, the stock is trading in a support-reversal zone marked by broken resistance and the 50-62 percent retracements (blue shading). I explained the significance of support-reversal zones in Saturday’s commentary featuring Apple (AAPL).

We do not need an indicator to understand that a stock is short-term oversold after an 8% decline in two weeks. Nevertheless, we can quantify oversold conditions using RSI(10) which moved below 30 (red shading). CDNS is both oversold and weak as long as RSI remains below 30. This is important to note because stocks can become oversold and remain oversold. An RSI move above 30 would signal improving momentum and could lead to a bounce. This occurred in mid August.

The System Trader offering at TrendInvestorPro runs a mean-reversion strategy that trades stocks in the Russell 1000. This strategy identifies short-term oversold stocks, buys into weakness and sells on the first bounce. It is a short-term hit-and-run strategy that seeks to complement our momentum-rotation strategies. Click here to see performance metrics and learn more.

//////////////////////////////////////////////////

The ‘stakes are high’ in the investigation into the Alaska Airlines flight that was forced to make an emergency landing when a panel of the Boeing plane blew out midair, according to the chair of the National Transportation Safety Board.

Sunday was the first full day of the NTSB investigation into the incident on Friday.

‘We will be looking at the entire chain of the events, from production to putting this plug in service to what happened to the history of this particular aircraft in flight and in service from the start to where we are today,’ Jennifer Homendy told NBC News on Sunday.

Sunday’s process has involved speaking with the flight crew, Homendy said, and the plane’s so-called black boxes have been sent to Washington, D.C., for review.

In a message sent to employees Sunday, Boeing President and CEO Dave Calhoun said an all-employee meeting focused on safety would be held Tuesday. He also canceled a leadership summit that was set to take place on Monday and Tuesday so the company can focus its attention to the NTSB investigation.

Homendy said investigators will also look into pressurization alerts that went off on the plane during flights Wednesday and Thursday, the days before the accident. She said her team was informed of the alerts but is still waiting for confirmation from Alaska Airlines.

She added the NTSB was told the alerts were ‘pretty benign’ but said her team is ‘digging into’ them.

Homendy described the ‘violent’ and ‘chaotic’ explosion of the door plug and noted that the situation could have been far more dire had the plane been at cruising altitude, about 35,000 feet.

‘This could have been a catastrophic, catastrophic event,’ she said. ‘This is why we go to incidents, why we go to accidents, when there aren’t fatalities, when there aren’t injuries, because we want to make sure that the public is aware of what’s occurring and that we’re taking a look and that we want to prevent this from reoccurring.’

She said Boeing is working closely with the NTSB to uncover what happened and to prevent it from happening again.

‘We will not stop until we get to the bottom of what has occurred and what led to this,’ Homendy said.

The Federal Aviation Administration has ordered the grounding of some Boeing 737 Max 9 airplanes, the model flown in the Alaska Airlines incident, after a retrofitted door panel detached at roughly 16,000 feet in the air Friday.

On Saturday, the FAA issued a directive that requires operators to inspect certain Boeing 737 MAX 9 aircraft before they can be flown again. The process is estimated to take four to eight hours per aircraft, affecting 171 planes worldwide.

The agency said Sunday the aircraft ‘will remain grounded until the FAA is satisfied that they are safe.’

The European Union Aviation Safety Agency adopted the FAA order but noted that the specific configuration of the model was not widely used in Europe, and no flights have been grounded as a result.

According to the NTSB, the part of the plane that detached was a plug door, which creates a seal where an emergency door would be in configurations with higher passenger capacity. From the inside of the plane, it would appear to be a normal window seat, but it appears in the shape of a door from the exterior.

The door plug has not been recovered.

There were no serious injuries or deaths, the NTSB has said, because of the plane’s relatively low altitude when the incident occurred and the fact that two seats by the panel were vacant. The NTSB said it happened about 10 minutes after the flight departed the Portland, Oregon, airport en route to San Bernardino County, California.

Jeff Guzzetti, a former investigator for the FAA and the NTSB, said the federal investigation will probe not only the cause of Friday’s incident but also whether it was a flaw caused during production that might have been more widespread.

‘This is an issue of life or death,’ Guzzetti said. ‘This is why aviation redundancy is so critical, why quality control is so critical, because even a small mistake, if this was a mistake, like misplaced bolt or something like that, that can lead to death and injury. … We have to nail down the process of what happened here.’

The issue appears to be, in Guzzetti’s opinion, a ‘quality escape,’ or, in other words, a part that gave way, which caused the plug to dislodge.

‘All manufacturers are going to have problems like this. It’s just a matter of how often they occur and how serious they are,’ Guzzetti said. ‘But yes, even an incident like this that doesn’t involve any injuries or fatalities does serve to undermine to some degree the confidence in Boeing’s ability to manufacture safe aircraft.’

Homendy has not speculated on a cause.

The plane used Friday was delivered a little over two months before the accident, the NTSB and Alaska have said.

John Cox, a former pilot and accident investigator, examined photos and said it appeared that all eight pins that attach the plug door to the plane were intact. The question then becomes, he told NBC News, whether the bolts were at fault.

‘There are four bolts that hold that plug in place,’ Cox said. ‘And why … why didn’t they do their job? Were they — was it an improper installation? Were they not properly torqued? Did they not have the proper hardware? All of those questions are the things that the investigators are going to look at.’

Cox recalled that Boeing made promises a few years ago to improve its quality assurance process after two fatal crashes in 2018 and 2019 that killed a total of 346 people, both of which also involved 737 Max models.

A congressional investigation released in September 2020 found that the crashes were “a horrific culmination of a series of faulty technical assumptions by Boeing’s engineers, a lack of transparency on the part of Boeing’s management, and grossly insufficient oversight by the FAA.’

It’s important for both passengers and airline operators to get answers about what happened to cause Friday’s accident, whether it was a one-off issue or a result of systemic breakdowns.

‘It certainly does not help the reputation of Boeing to go out into the world and sell new airplanes and for the operators to feel good that they’re not going to have an interruption or, worse, a safety issue that they have to deal with … because Boeing may build the airplane, but it’s the operators — they end up having to deal with the consequences,’ Cox said.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

The machinations of the NFL international schedule in 2023 deprived fans of witnessing Tyreek Hill’s return to GEHA Field at Arrowhead Stadium to face his former team, the Kansas City Chiefs. Instead, the regular-season matchup was played in Frankfurt, Germany, a game Hill’s current team, the Miami Dolphins, lost 21-14. 

The presumptive NFL Offensive Player of the Year will now return to his old stomping grounds for the first time in a playoff setting. Kansas City, the AFC’s No. 3 seed, will host sixth-seeded Miami in the AFC wild-card round matchup Saturday (8 p.m. ET, Peacock). 

Kansas City locked up its eighth consecutive AFC West title last week and sat key players such as quarterback Patrick Mahomes and tight end Travis Kelce during Week 18. Meanwhile, the Dolphins played for the AFC East title on “Sunday Night Football” against the Buffalo Bills; they lost, 21-14. Instead of hosting a playoff game or two, the Dolphins must go on the road for the second straight postseason. 

What happened in Chiefs vs. Dolphins? 

The Chiefs were coming off a loss to the Denver Broncos and put up six points on their first drive of the game, which took less than three minutes. They scored two touchdowns with less than three minutes left in the second half – the second of which came on a Hill fumble that was recovered, and lateraled, for a touchdown. 

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

Miami scored twice in the third quarter, but that’s all the Dolphins could muster against Chiefs defensive coordinator Steve Spagnuolo’s unit.

The game was insightful for how the Chiefs won in 2023: solid defense, just enough offense. 

Patrick Mahomes’ career record in playoffs

Mahomes has yet to play his first true postseason road game At Arrowhead, however, he’s 9-2, and 11-3 in the postseason overall with two Super Bowl victories. 

Will Taylor Swift be at Chiefs’ playoff game?

Barring any unforeseen circumstances or conflicts, it seems highly likely. She’s officially a member of ‘Chiefs Kingdom.’ Kelce, the pop star’s beau and reason why she has been a fixture at Chiefs games all season, has 133 catches for 1,548 yards with 16 touchdowns in 18 career playoff games.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

From a disaster season to the No. 2 seed in the AFC. Not bad for Josh Allen and the Buffalo Bills. 

Buffalo defeated the Miami Dolphins in an AFC East-deciding matchup on “Sunday Night Football” for their fourth straight division title. They’ve won at least one home playoff game in each of the last three postseasons and will look to make it a fourth over the No. 7 seed Pittsburgh Steelers on Sunday (1 p.m. ET, CBS). 

The Steelers’ victory over the top-seeded Baltimore Ravens on Saturday kept their playoff hopes alive. A Jacksonville Jaguars loss to the Tennessee Titans on Sunday clinched their postseason spot, and they awaited their seeding based on the ‘SNF’ game. The Bills’ victory means Pittsburgh is heading to Buffalo as the underdog.

Bills’ wild ride to division title

Buffalo was 6-6 entering its Week 13 bye following a devastating overtime loss to the Philadelphia Eagles. But they defeated the Kansas City Chiefs on the road on the other side of the off week. Buffalo was off to the races from there. The Bills won five in a row to end the season, while Miami coughed up its hefty division lead (losing twice to Buffalo this season didn’t help). The Bills defeated three playoff teams during that stretch: the Chiefs, the Dallas Cowboys and the Dolphins. 

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

Will Steelers’ T.J. Watt play after injury? 

The 2023 NFL sack leader exited Saturday’s game with a knee injury that was diagnosed as a Grade 2 MCL sprain. Watt’s brother, former NFL player turned media analyst J.J. Watt, wrote on social media that it was the “best-case scenario” and that the injury will require a few weeks of “rest/recovery,” casting doubt upon T.J. Watt’s availability to play against the Chiefs. 

Who will be Steelers’ QB?

All signs point to Mason Rudolph holding onto the role he’s held for the last three weeks. All three have been Pittsburgh victories, necessary for the Steelers to advance to the postseason.

Rudolph, a 2018 third-round draft pick by Pittsburgh, re-signed with the Steelers this offseason. He did not appear in a game in 2022.

The Steelers started the year with 2022 first-rounder Kenny Pickett at quarterback. But Pickett suffered a late-season ankle injury, and backup Mitchell Trubisky was uninspiring once promoted, prompting head coach Mike Tomlin to give Rudolph a look in hopes he could provide a spark.

Since taking over the starting role, Rudolph has completed nearly 75% of his passes and has five touchdowns with no interceptions (one fumble lost).

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

If the NFL handed out grades for rookies, Dallas Cowboys kicker Brandon Aubrey would still get an A.

But he’s no longer perfect.

Aubrey had his perfect first-year campaign snapped in the regular-season finale against the Washington Commanders when rookie Joshua Pryor broke through the Cowboys’ protection unblocked and rejected Aubrey’s 32-yard attempt. Jace Whittaker scooped the ball and returned it 51 yards deep into Dallas territory.

Aubrey had made all 35 of his field goals until the block. He’s still perfect (10-of-10) on kicks of 50 yards or more. Aubrey secured the rookie record for most consecutive field goals made to start a career (19) during a Week 9 loss to the Philadelphia Eagles when he drilled a 51-yarder.

His first true miss of the season came with 8:57 left in the fourth quarter. Aubrey hit the left upright on a 36-yard attempt. He rebounded with a 50-yard field goal later in the frame.

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

Aubrey entered the Commanders game with three missed extra points – none costly. He was also a weapon in the kickoff game, booting touchbacks on all but seven of his kickoffs.

The former Notre Dame men’s soccer player who was a first-round pick by Toronto FC in the 2017 MLS Draft, Aubrey began kicking in professional football two years ago for the USFL (which recently merged with the XFL to form the UFL). Aubrey won back-to-back championships with the Birmingham Stallions before the Cowboys signed him a training camp invitee.

Aubrey won the kicking battle against Tristan Vizcaino during the summer and Cowboys coach Mike McCarthy displayed confidence in the 28-year-old throughout the season. A Dallas-area native, Aubrey rewarded his coach and teammates with a historic performance.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY