Archive

2024

Browsing

ESPN and the College Football Playoff have agreed to a massive new rights deal that will keep the postseason format on the network through the 2031 season, according to a report from The Athletic.

ESPN and the playoff originally agreed in 2012 to a 12-year deal worth $5.64 billion, or roughly $470 million annually. That agreement expires after the 2025 season. According to The Athletic, the annual payout will be $608 million for the final two years of the original deal.

How much is ESPN’s deal with the College Football Playoff worth?

According to the report, the extension starting for the 2026 season is for six years and $7.8 billion and makes ESPN the continued broadcast partner for the 12-team playoff. The expanded format will begin during the 2024 season.

That makes the new agreement worth substantially more money for half the duration of the original deal, illustrating the outstanding success of the playoff and the increasing interest in the new format.

What this means for the playoff

While there are still items to be ticked off the to-do checklist, the completion of a new deal with ESPN removes one major hurdle before advancing into the 12-team era.

Before the new deal goes into effect, however, the playoff still must work through the nuts and bolts of the 12-team arrangement that was created before the dissolution of the Pac-12, which will occur after the end of this academic year.

The biggest unknown is how the playoff will approach the new Power Four and the number of at-large bids given to non-conference champions. While the playoff had indicated a desire to use a six plus six plan with the six top-rated conference winners and six at-large bids, that should shift to a five plus seven model.

What the new deal means for other networks

Fox was reportedly the other major network in the market for the expanded playoff. Adding the postseason would’ve joined the networks relationship with the Big Ten, which will feature an even more diverse collection of games with the league’s upcoming addition of Southern California, Washington, UCLA and Oregon.

That ESPN was able to retain the playoff shows the network’s immense clout in the world of college athletics. The network has owned the rights to the format since the playoff’s debut a decade ago and will remain the biggest player in the market, to the point where ESPN has and will continue to play an outsize role even in determining the makeup of the major conferences.

When it comes to the next two seasons until the new deal goes into effect, the network already owns the rights to the playoff quarterfinals, semifinals and championship game. Beginning next season, ESPN will add in the first-round games.

How the 12-team playoff will work

Once the five plus seven plan is made official, the selection committee will be tasked with picking the five best conference champions along with seven at-large bids. With just four power leagues, this method still ensures that at least one Group of Five conference winner makes the playoff.

The first round will be held at the home venues of the higher-rated teams. The four highest-ranked conference champions will receive a first-round bye to the quarterfinals, where they will be the home team. From there, the playoff will look identical to the four-team format that began with the semifinals.

Going off the College Football Playoff final rankings from last December, here’s how the playoff would’ve looked this past season had the 12-team field been in effect. (The playoff may decide to alter rankings slightly to avoid first-round rematches from the regular season, such as the one that would’ve taken place between Penn State and Ohio State.)

First round

No. 12 Liberty at No. 5 Florida State

No. 9 Missouri at No. 8 Oregon

No. 11 Mississippi at No. 6 Georgia

No. 10 Penn State at No. 7 Ohio State

Quarterfinals

No. 1 Michigan vs. No. 9 Missouri or No. 8 Oregon

No. 2 Washington vs. No. 10 Penn State or No. 7 Ohio State

No. 3 Texas vs. No. 11 Mississippi or No. 6 Georgia

No. 4 Alabama vs. No. 12 Liberty or No. 5 Florida State

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

The demand to see Caitlin Clark this season has been high, but as she goes for the NCAA women’s scoring record in her next game, ticket prices to see the historic achievement are reaching near-record levels.

Tickets to see No. 4 Iowa host Michigan on Thursday night has an average purchase price of $387, which is the second-most expensive women’s basketball game of all-time − college or WNBA − according to TickPick. But the average purchase price in the past week has been $521, showing how much the demand has risen as Clark nears the record.

The get-in price for the game is $426 as of Tuesday afternoon. On StubHub, courtside tickets could be purchased for $13,669 each with fees.

While Clark potentially rewriting the history books isn’t the top ticket price all-time, her and the Hawkeyes still own the most expensive women’s basketball game of all time. The regular season finale at home against Ohio State, which is Clark’s senior night, has an average purchase price of $517. The get-in price for that game on TickPick is $557.

It’s no surprise it cost hundreds of dollars to see Clark likely break Kelsey Plum’s record of 3,527 career points, as it hasn’t been cheap to see the superstar in action this season. Home games at Carver Hawkeye Arena have been sold out, and the same nearly goes for road games. The past four road contests for Iowa have been sellouts, and the last two road games of the season are already sold out. Tickets on the secondary market for the last two road games at Indiana and Minnesota are at least $100.

Iowa will hope to get a win if Clark breaks the record, with the Hawkeyes coming off an 82-79 upset loss at Nebraska on Sunday. Tip off for Thursday night is slated for 8 p.m. ET and will be streamed on Peacock.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

After the Kansas City Chiefs won Super Bowl 58, viewers waited with anticipation to see Travis Kelce and Taylor Swift meet on the field to celebrate the championship.

After hoisting the Lombardi Trophy, the couple eventually found each other on the field, with Kelce saying ‘Come here, baby girl,’ as he and Swift embraced. Broadcast cameras picked up Swift and Kelce kissing and speaking to each other, but you couldn’t hear what was being said.

Now, we know.

The NFL released footage taken of the intimate moment and Kelce is mic’d-up so we can hear every word.

What did Travis Kelce, Taylor Swift say after Super Bowl win?

After a kiss, Kelce thanks Swift for being there to watch the game after she traveled from her Eras Tour concert in Tokyo just the day before.

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

‘Thank you for coming, baby,’ Kelce said, as Swift said, ‘Oh, I cannot believe that.’

‘I can’t believe you,’ Swift said twice as Kelce thanks Swift for the support. ‘How did you do that?’ Swift adds.

‘Thank you for making it halfway across the world. You’re the best, baby. The absolute best,’ Kelce said.

‘Was it electric?’ Kelce asked before the two shared another kiss.

‘It was unbelievable,’ Swift said.

Swift and Kelce continued the Super Bowl celebration by hitting The Strip and partying at the Zouk Nightclub in Las Vegas. There, Kelce and Swift appeared to dedicate the lyrics of Swift’s ‘You Belong With Me’ to each other across the club, and they also danced and kissed to ‘Love Story.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

NBC Sports California announced Tuesday they are hiring Jenny Cavnar as their new primary play-by-play announcer for the Oakland A’s TV broadcasts.

Cavnar will become the first woman to hold that position in MLB history when the 2024 season begins. She replaces Glen Kuiper in the booth, who served as the television play-by-play voice for the A’s from 2006-2023. According to NBC, ‘she will call a majority of A’s games’ in her new role.

For the last 12 years, Cavnar served as the Colorado Rockies’ pregame and postgame show host for the now-defunct AT&T SportsNet Rocky Mountain. She also served as the network’s backup play-by-play voice, and in April 2018, she became the first woman since 1993 to call play-by-play for an MLB game.

Who is Jenny Cavnar

Cavnar is a five-time Emmy winner and became the first woman to win the National Sports Media Administration’s Colorado Sportscaster of the Year award in 2021.

HOT STOVE UPDATES: MLB free agency: Ranking and tracking the top players available.

“It is a dream come true to join the broadcast team for the Oakland A’s and their rich baseball history,” she said in a statement via NBC Sports. “Growing up the daughter of a baseball coach, I have loved the game from a young age, along with the stories, history and relationships the game provides. I’m excited to start my 18th season as a major league broadcaster with my good friend, Dallas Braden, and share our experiences with the loyal fans of the Athletics as we go on this ride together.”

In the five years prior to her job with the Rockies, Cavnar worked as the pregame and postgame host for the San Diego Padres. She graduated from Colorado State in 2004.

Dallas Braden reacts to Jenny Cavnar hiring

Dallas Braden, former Oakland A’s pitcher and current color commentator for NBC Sports California, posted a video to social media site X (formerly known as Twitter) sharing his excitement about his new booth partner.

‘[Cavnar’s] depth and wealth of knowledge when it comes to the baseball diamond is going to be apparent from the first pitch,’ he said. ‘You’re going to love her insight. You’re going to love her energy.’

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

On Tuesday, the NFL released the list of 2024 draft prospects who were invited to the scouting combine.

The annual event is a pivotal showcase for the prospects in that year’s draft, with team general managers, head coaches, positional coaches and scouts all gathering in Indianapolis to get an up-close-and-personal look at the prospective NFL players. In addition to on-field testing drills, prospects will be medically examined and official heights and weights taken by the league.

It should come as no surprise, but college football national champion Michigan had the most players invited to this year’s combine with 18.

2024 NFL DRAFT ORDER: All 32 first-round selections set after Super Bowl 58

MOCK DRAFT: Super Bowl champs get a major weapon at wide receiver

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

Here’s everything you need to know for the 2024 NFL scouting combine:

When is the 2024 NFL scouting combine?

The combine will begin on Monday, Feb. 26 and run through Monday, March 4. On-field workouts start on Thursday, Feb. 29.

NFL Network will air the workouts, with streaming available on NFL+.

Where will the NFL combine be in 2024?

The NFL scouting combine will be held in Indianapolis, Indiana, which has hosted the pre-draft event since 1987. The combine events will take place at Lucas Oil Stadium, home of the Indianapolis Colts.

How many players get invited to the NFL combine?

This year, there were 321 prospects invited to the NFL scouting combine.

NFL scouting combine 2024: Which players were invited?

QUARTERBACKS

Jayden Daniels, LSU
Sam Hartman, Notre Dame
Devin Leary, Kentucky
Drake Maye, North Carolina
J.J. McCarthy, Michigan
Joe Milton III, Tennessee
Bo Nix, Oregon
Michael Penix Jr., Washington
Michael Pratt, Tulane
Spencer Rattler, South Carolina
Austin Reed, Western Kentucky
Kedon Slovis, BYU
Jordan Travis, Florida State
Caleb Williams, USC

RUNNING BACKS

Rasheen Ali, Marshall
Braelon Allen, Wisconsin
Emani Bailey, TCU
Trey Benson, Florida State
Jonathon Brooks, Texas
Blake Corum, Michigan
Isaiah Davis, South Dakota State
Ray Davis, Kentucky
Daijun Edwards, Georgia
Audric Estimé, Notre Dame
Frank Gore Jr., Southern Mississippi
Isaac Guerendo, Louisville
George Holani, Boise State
Bucky Irving, Oregon
Dillon Johnson, Washington
Jawhar Jordan, Louisville
Dylan Laube, New Hampshire
MarShawn Lloyd, USC
Jase McClellan, Alabama
Kendall Milton, Georgia
Keilan Robinson, Texas
Cody Schrader, Missouri
Will Shipley, Clemson
Jaden Shirden, Monmouth
Tyrone Tracy Jr., Purdue
Kimani Vidal, Troy
Michael Wiley, Arizona
Miyan Williams, Ohio State
Jaylen Wright, Tennessee

WIDE RECEIVERS

Javon Baker, UCF
Jermaine Burton, Alabama
Jalen Coker, Holy Cross
Keon Coleman, Florida State
Malachi Corley, Western Kentucky
Jacob Cowing, Arizona
Ryan Flournoy, Southeast Missouri State
Troy Franklin, Oregon
Anthony Gould, Oregon State
Lideatrick Griffin, Mississippi State
Marvin Harrison Jr., Ohio State
Jha’Quan Jackson, Tulane
Cornelius Johnson, Michigan
Xavier Legette, South Carolina
Luke McCaffrey, Rice
Ladd McConkey, Georgia
Jalen McMillan, Washington
Bub Means, Pittsburgh
Adonai Mitchell, Texas
Malik Nabers, LSU
Rome Odunze, Washington
Ricky Pearsall, Florida
Ja’Lynn Polk, Washington
Brenden Rice, USC
Tayvion Robinson, Kentucky
Marcus Rosemy-Jacksaint, Georgia
Ainias Smith, Texas A&M
Brian Thomas Jr., LSU
Jamari Thrash, Louisville
Devaughn Vele, Utah
Devontez Walker, North Carolina
Malik Washington, Virginia
Tahj Washington, USC
Xavier Weaver, Colorado
Jordan Whittington, Texas
Isaiah Williams, Illinois
Johnny Wilson, Florida State
Roman Wilson, Michigan
Xavier Worthy, Texas

TIGHT ENDS

Erick All, Iowa
AJ Barner, Michigan
Jaheim Bell, Florida State
Brock Bowers, Georgia
Devin Culp, Washington
Dallin Holker, Colorado State
Theo Johnson, Penn State
Trey Knox, South Carolina
Tanner McLachlan, Arizona
Tip Reiman, Illinois
Ja’Tavion Sanders, Texas
Ben Sinnott, Kansas State
Brevyn Spann-Ford, Minnesota
Cade Stover, Ohio State
Jack Westover, Washington
Jared Wiley, TCU

OFFENSIVE LINEMEN

Isaiah Adams, Illinois
Joe Alt, Notre Dame
Kiran Amegadjie, Yale
Gottlieb Ayedze, Maryland
Karsen Barnhart, Michigan
Graham Barton, Duke
Cooper Beebe, Kansas State
Keaton Bills, Utah
Tanor Bortolini, Wisconsin
Javion Cohen, Miami (Fla.)
Andrew Coker, TCU
Brandon Coleman, TCU
Frank Crum, Wyoming
Anim Dankwah, Howard
Ethan Driskell, Marshall
Kingsley Eguakun, Florida
Josiah Ezirim, Eastern Kentucky
Olumuyiwa Fashanu, Penn State
Troy Fautanu, Washington
Blake Fisher, Notre Dame
Jeremy Flax, Kentucky
Javon Foster, Missouri
Zach Frazier, West Virginia
Taliese Fuaga, Oregon State
X’Zauvea Gadlin, Liberty
Nick Gargiulo, South Carolina
Delmar Glaze, Maryland
Matt Goncalves, Pittsburgh
Tylan Grable, UCF
Garret Greenfield, South Dakota State
Tyler Guyton, Oklahoma
C.J. Hanson, Holy Cross
Christian Haynes, Connecticut
LaDarius Henderson, Michigan
Christian Jones, Texas
Matthew Jones, Ohio State
Trente Jones, Michigan
Trevor Keegan, Michigan
Jarrett Kingston, USC
Brady Latham, Arkansas
JC Latham, Alabama
Sataoa Laumea, Utah
Matt Lee, Miami (Fla.)
KT Leveston Jr., Kansas State
Beaux Limmer, Arkansas
Christian Mahogany, Boston College
Mason McCormick, South Dakota State
Dylan McMahon, North Carolina State
Amarius Mims, Georgia
Jacob Monk, Duke
Jordan Morgan, Arizona
Hunter Nourzad, Penn State
Drake Nugent, Michigan
Patrick Paul, Houston
Julian Pearl, Illinois
Prince Pines, Tulane
Jackson Powers-Johnson, Oregon
Dominick Puni, Kansas
Andrew Raym, Oklahoma
Layden Robinson, Texas A&M
Roger Rosengarten, Washington
Walter Rouse, Oklahoma
Nick Samac, Michigan State
Kingsley Suamataia, BYU
Jalen Sundell, North Dakota State
Nathan Thomas, Louisiana
Charles Turner III, LSU
Sedrick Van Pran-Granger, Georgia
Caedan Wallace, Penn State
Zak Zinter, Michigan

DEFENSIVE LINEMEN

Austin Booker, Kansas
Solomon Byrd, USC
DeWayne Carter, Duke
Nelson Ceaser, Houston
Myles Cole, Texas Tech
Jaden Crumedy, Mississippi State
Tyler Davis, Clemson
Brandon Dorlus, Oregon
Justin Eboigbe, Alabama
Jonah Elliss, Utah
Braden Fiske, Florida State
Gabe Hall, Baylor
Michael Hall Jr., Ohio State
Jaylen Harrell, Michigan
Marcus Harris, Auburn
Jalyx Hunt, Houston Christian
Adisa Isaac, Penn State
Brennan Jackson, Washington State
McKinnley Jackson, Texas A&M
Javontae Jean-Baptiste, Notre Dame
Trajan Jeffcoat, Arkansas
Jordan Jefferson, LSU
Kris Jenkins, Michigan
Cedric Johnson, Mississippi
Mohamed Kamara, Colorado State
Marshawn Kneeland, Western Michigan
Laiatu Latu, UCLA
Logan Lee, Iowa
Zion Logue, Georgia
Fabien Lovett Sr., Florida State
Braiden McGregor, Michigan
Byron Murphy II, Texas
Myles Murphy, North Carolina
Jer’Zhan Newton, Illinois
Eyabi Okie-Anoma, Charlotte
Ruke Orhorhoro, Clemson
Keith Randolph Jr., Illinois
Chop Robinson, Penn State
Darius Robinson, Missouri
Justin Rogers, Auburn
Maason Smith, LSU
Javon Solomon, Troy
T’Vondre Sweat, Texas
Leonard Taylor III, Miami (Fla.)
Xavier Thomas, Clemson
Bralen Trice, Washington
David Ugwoegbu, Houston
Jared Verse, Florida State
Eric Watts, Connecticut
Mekhi Wingo, LSU

LINEBACKERS

Michael Barrett, Michigan
JD Bertrand, Notre Dame
Tatum Bethune, Florida State
Chris Braswell, Alabama
Aaron Casey, Indiana
Steele Chambers, Ohio State
Junior Colson, Michigan
Edgerrin Cooper, Texas A&M
Kalen DeLoach, Florida State
Khalid Duke, Kansas State
Tommy Eichenberg, Ohio State
Jaylan Ford, Texas
Easton Gibbs, Wyoming
Cedric Gray, North Carolina
Ty’Ron Hopper, Missouri
Jontrey Hunter, Georgia State
Curtis Jacobs, Penn State
Tyrice Knight, UTEP
Marist Liufau, Notre Dame
Jordan Magee, Temple
Darius Muasau, UCLA
Gabriel Murphy, UCLA
Maema Njongmeta, Wisconsin
Jeremiah Trotter Jr., Clemson
Zion Tupuola-Fetui, Washington
Dallas Turner, Alabama
Edefuan Ulofoshio, Washington
Trevin Wallace, Kentucky
Nathaniel Watson, Mississippi State
Payton Wilson, North Carolina State

DEFENSIVE BACKS

Kris Abrams-Draine, Missouri
Daijahn Anthony, Mississippi
Terrion Arnold, Alabama
Cole Bishop, Utah
Beau Brade, Maryland
Millard Bradford, TCU
Jarvis Brownlee Jr., Louisville
Javon Bullard, Georgia
Calen Bullock, USC
Jaylon Carlies, Missouri
Caelen Carson, Wake Forest
Ryan Cooper Jr., Oregon State
Cooper DeJean, Iowa
M.J. Devonshire, Pittsburgh
Marcellas Dial, South Carolina
Johnny Dixon, Penn State
Willie Drew, Virginia State
Renardo Green, Florida State
Kamal Hadden, Tennessee
Dominique Hampton, Washington
Myles Harden, South Dakota
Daequan Hardy, Penn State
Cam Hart, Notre Dame
Jaden Hicks, Washington State
Khyree Jackson, Oregon
DJ James, Auburn
Carlton Johnson, Fresno State
Isaiah Johnson, Syracuse
Elijah Jones, Boston College
Jarrian Jones, Florida State
Jaylen Key, Alabama
Kamren Kinchens, Miami (Fla.)
Kalen King, Penn State
Kamari Lassiter, Georgia
Dwight McGlothern, Arkansas
Kool-Aid McKinstry, Alabama
Patrick McMorris, Cal
Max Melton, Rutgers
Quinyon Mitchell, Toledo
Malik Mustapha, Wake Forest
Josh Newton, TCU
Tyler Nubin, Minnesota
Kitan Oladapo, Oregon State
Tyler Owens, Texas Tech
Andru Phillips, Kentucky
Deantre Prince, Mississippi
Nehemiah Pritchett, Auburn
Josh Proctor, Ohio State
Ennis Rakestraw Jr., Missouri
Decamerion Richardson, Mississippi State
Demani Richardson, Texas A&M
Christian Roland-Wallace, USC
Mike Sainristil, Michigan
Andre’ Sam, LSU
Jaylin Simpson, Auburn
Tykee Smith, Georgia
Chau Smith-Wade, Washington State
Tarheeb Still, Maryland
T.J. Tampa, Iowa State
Dadrion Taylor-Demerson, Texas Tech
Ro Torrence, Arizona State
Sione Vaki, Utah
Josh Wallace, Michigan
Ryan Watts, Texas
Nate Wiggins, Clemson
Evan Williams, Oregon
James Williams, Miami (Fla.)

SPECIALISTS

Joshua Karty, kicker, Stanford
Cam Little, kicker, Arkansas
Harrison Mevis, kicker, Missouri
Ryan Rehkow, punter, BYU
Will Reichard, kicker, Alabama
Tory Taylor, punter, Iowa

This post appeared first on USA TODAY

President Biden’s first term in office has been marked by several foreign policy challenges, with some experts giving the president low marks as he seeks a second term in November.

‘From the catastrophic surrender of Afghanistan to the brutal Russian invasion of Ukraine to the savage Hamas terrorist attack on Israel, President Biden’s foreign policy has consisted of unanticipated disasters to which his administration has responded ineptly,’ Victoria Coates, the vice president of national security and foreign policy at The Heritage Foundation, told Fox News Digital.

The comments come as Biden continued to confront several complex global challenges, including ongoing wars in Ukraine and Gaza, continued attacks of U.S. troops by Iranian proxies, and the growing threat of China.

Given the volume of challenges faced by the president in his first term, some experts have lauded his handling of foreign policy challenges, especially when compared to his most likely challenger in this year’s election, former President Donald Trump.

‘Trump’s encouragements to Putin and attempt to blackmail [Ukrainian President Volodymyr] Zelenskyy by withholding weapons from Ukraine (for which he was impeached by the House of Representatives), more than anything Biden did, led to the Russian invasion of Ukraine,’ David Tafuri, a foreign policy analyst who served as a foreign policy adviser to the Obama campaign, told Fox News Digital last week. ‘Now, the front line for protecting democracy and rule of law runs through eastern and southern Ukraine.’

That front line was solidified by solid anticipation of the looming threat by Biden, Tafuri argued, noting that the president began readying Ukraine for a potential invasion months in advance.

‘This gave Ukraine and its allies time to prepare for the invasion, which proved crucial in Ukraine’s early success in defending Kyiv as well as most of the territory that Russia thought it would be able to occupy,’ Tafuri said. ‘Biden led NATO to work more collaboratively than it has in decades to provide billions of dollars in aid and sophisticated weapons systems to Ukraine, again flustering Russia’s intentions.’

But not everyone is sold on Biden’s handling of the war in Ukraine, especially as the war drags on and the Ukrainian resistance shows potential signs of faltering.

‘Biden never authorized a sufficient amount of weaponry to Ukraine to win, opting for virtue signaling instead, or in his words, simply ‘doing something,’’ Rebekah Koffler, a strategic military intelligence analyst, former senior official at the Defense Intelligence Agency and author of ‘Putin’s Playbook,’ told Fox News Digital.

According to Koffler, the Biden administration has lacked a clear strategy to combat Russian aggression from the start, instead opting to ‘throw billions of dollars of weaponry to Ukraine and talk smack about Putin.’

‘Weaponry and technology don’t win wars – we learned it in Afghanistan and many other places. Putin is not afraid of words – he fears action,’ Koffler said. ‘Biden announced in the very beginning of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine that he will not authorize U.S. troops deployment into the theater to help Ukraine. It is insanity to give away a key deterrence element.’

Reached for comment by Fox News Digital, a White House National Security Council spokesperson pushed back against the idea that U.S. weapons aid has been insufficient to help Ukraine, pointing to American aid as being instrumental to Ukraine’s success in the Battle of Kyev, where Ukrainian forces beat back Russia’s initial invasion of the capital city in early 2022. The spokesperson also pointed to successes in the battle for Kharkiv and the retaking of more than 50% of seized Russian territory by Ukrainian forces, arguing U.S. weaponry was instrumental to the achievements.

‘Assuming Congress passes the president’s national security supplemental request, in 2024, we will enable Ukraine to both continue to conduct offensive operations to retake its sovereign territory and to strengthen its defenses against Russian attacks,’ the spokesperson said. ‘That includes creating and defending lanes for shipping in the Black Sea, and degrading Russian capabilities throughout the territory Russia occupies in sovereign Ukraine. Our aim through the totality of these efforts is to improve Ukraine’s standing on the battlefield and put Ukraine in the best position to win the war.’

Koffler also questioned the idea that Trump withheld weapons from Ukraine, noting that Trump was actually ‘the first one who authorized lethal military assistance to Ukraine.’

As part of Trump’s 2020 budget request to Congress, the former president did request $250 million in lethal aid for Ukraine that included Javelin anti-tank weapons, according to a 2019 report from Defense News, a weapon that would eventually become critical in the early days of the fighting against better equipped Russian forces. Meanwhile, the Biden administration at one point froze a $100 million aid package to Ukraine that included lethal weapons, a June 2021 Politico report noted, a move that came just months before Russia’s eventual invasion of the country.

All told, Koffler argued that Biden’s Russia policy has amounted to no more than ‘virtue signaling,’ while Trump’s policies were ‘based on real actions that sought to deter Putin.’

‘Most importantly, Biden’s policy of pushing Ukraine into NATO was a death sentence to Ukraine,’ Koffler said. ‘To think that Putin would fail to enforce his version of the Monroe Doctrine and allow NATO to absorb Ukraine, on which Russia relied for its security for centuries, was not simply incompetent. It amounted to signing Ukraine’s death sentence.’

 

But the administration’s struggles haven’t been contained to Ukraine, Coates noted, pointing to the U.S.’s ‘catastrophic surrender of Afghanistan’ and the president’s failure to ensure sufficient investment in defense by European allies.

‘He has continued to tolerate the insufficient defense spending and investments by the largest EU economies that President Trump has rightly decried, leaving American taxpayers footing a disproportionate percentage of the cost of the war,’ Coates said.

Meanwhile, Bill Roggio, the managing editor of Long War Journal, argued that the administration has also seen its fair share of struggles in the Middle East, telling Fox News Digital that Biden’s ‘general policy’ in the region has been to ‘disengage.’

‘I think the administration has a policy of wishful thinking,’ Roggio said. ‘It believes it can impose its will on the Middle East when the exact opposite is happening. Afghanistan is an example of this, to believe that withdrawing from Afghanistan would solve the problem of terrorism, and we saw how that went. The Taliban had a different take on that.’

Roggio also pointed to the continued attacks on U.S. forces by Iran-backed proxies, arguing that the administration’s actions to deter the attacks have been insufficient.

‘This administration believes it can go after the proxies themselves, but on a very limited basis, in order to restore deterrence, but they’re not getting to the root cause of the problem,’ Roggio said.

That root cause is the ‘Iranians themselves,’ argued Roggio, requiring the administration to target the country’s assets throughout the Middle East.

‘If the administration was serious about attempting to restore deterrence, it would go after the Iranian assets themselves, not just the proxies,’ Roggio said. ‘The members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard destroy Iranian intelligence ships that are providing targeting information.’

‘This doesn’t have to be strikes inside of Iran,’ Roggio added. ‘Iran has a lot of assets throughout the Middle East and we can go after that. That’s what needs to be done.’

But a White House National Security Council spokesperson defended the administration’s record on Iran, pointing out that the U.S. has administered over 55 sanctions on Iran that have targeted over 550 individuals and entities, continued oil seizures to enforce existing Iran sanctions, and indicted leaders of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps for terrorism and other charges.

Andrew Bates, the White House deputy press secretary, also pointed to Biden’s work to secure additional national security funding to target Iran, noting that the administration is seeking to cut off Tehran’s financial support for Russia and help Israel strengthen its defensive capabilities against Iran and groups backed by the country, arguing that a small group of Republicans in the House have worked to delay the critical aid.

Away from the battlefields of the Middle East and Europe, Biden has also been forced to confront the growing threat posed by China. Ian Bremmer, the president of Eurasia Group, believes the president has handled relations with China well, telling Fox News Digital last week that Biden has facilitated a ‘more functional and more stable’ relationship with the country and has ‘not given up anything that matters’ during tense negotiations.

Bremmer pointed to the fact that Biden has maintained tariffs on China at the level they were under Trump and has also secured export controls on ‘semiconductors, cloud computing, the CHIPS Act and the chips agreement with the Netherlands, South Korea and Japan.’

‘That is coordinating U.S. industrial policy and probably the most strategically important part of the advanced economy,’ Bremmer said.

But Koffler also pushed back on the idea that the administration has been successful in China, telling Fox News Digital that deals the president has struck with the country on climate change have been a ‘fiasco’ and only served to benefit China’s communist-led government.

‘Team Biden through regulations seeks to compel Americans to buy more electric cars that are powered by lithium-ion batteries and fewer cars that run on gasoline,’ Koffler said. ‘The U.S. is rich in oil and China controls 58% of the global production of lithium compounds and dominates the electric vehicle supply chain. So, Biden effectively seeks to help grow China’s economy and stifle the U.S. economy. The impact of these policies on U.S. national security will be profound.’

Meanwhile, Koffler pointed out that the crisis at the southern border has also benefited China, allowing the country to potentially sneak in people hostile to U.S. interests.

‘On Biden’s watch, record numbers of Chinese are pouring into the United States through the southern border, which Biden unsealed when he took over the presidency after Trump,’ Koffler said. ‘More than 24,000 Chinese have entered the U.S. illegally in 2023. It is almost certain that the CCP has dispatched a good number of them.’

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

By midday Tuesday, all three US indices had taken a massive plunge as a hotter-than-expected CPI inflation report left awash in red.

What’s interesting on days like this is running a New All-Time High scan (using StockCharts’ scan engine) to see which stocks bucked the trend (even momentarily) amid such a significant downturn.

The StockCharts Scan Engine is useful for narrowing down stocks and ETFs that match certain requirements. It comes with many predefined scans that are a good starting point. As you get the hang of these scans, you can adjust them or create new ones that align with your trading goals.

Try out the StockCharts Sample Scan Library (Charts & Tools > Sample Scan Library)

Among the 37 stocks that either stayed afloat or floated higher for the bulk of the trading day, one of the most recognizable names is (drum roll…) Walmart Inc. (WMT).

What’s Driving the Walmart Buying Spree?

Maybe it’s the 3-for-1 stock split set for February 26. Or maybe it’s simpler than that—its dominance as the world’s largest retailer offering staples and discretionary items,  consistent revenue growth, and reliable dividend yield, among other reasons. Also, Walmart is set to report earnings on February 20, before the market opens, and perhaps the upswing over the last two months reflects optimism toward the coming report.

Whatever the case, Walmart’s stock price is rising while the broader market is falling quite hard. Right now, investors bullish on Walmart stock are looking for an entry point, a possible dip, or both. So, let’s have at it.

Walmart Stock Price: Is Momentum Getting Stronger or Weaker?

CHART 1. WEEKLY CHART OF WALMART. Note the rise in WMT’s price against falling momentum and declining relative performance compared with its sector. The SCTR score is also at around 50, which doesn’t make WMT a technically strong stock.Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

Despite the volatility, a wide-ranging period (in 2021), and a few significant drops, Walmart stock’s net uptrend has remained relatively solid. Still, judging from the STCR score, well below the bullish 90 line and hovering around the 56 range, its technical ranking is declining, warning of technical weakness despite Walmart’s stock price rise.

In terms of Walmart’s performance relative to the Staples sector (using the SPDR Consumer Staples Select Sector Fund XLP as a proxy), Walmart’s outperformance stands at 20%, down from 25% last October–November.

Walmart Stock Price: Bucked and Retreated

CHART 2. DAILY CHART OF WALMART. Layering various indicators to find a confluence of support, establishing a range rather than specific levels, can be helpful when looking for a tricky entry.Chart source: StockCharts.com. For educational purposes.

After hitting an all-time high Tuesday morning, Walmart’s stock price succumbed to market forces, falling below yesterday’s open, signaling the beginning of a pullback.

Looking at the Stochastic Oscillator, Walmart stock has been hovering in overbought territory since the end of December. But it wasn’t until early February that buying pressure began to recede, as shown in the Chaikin Money Flow indicator, but not to the point where the CMF crossed below the zero line.

Here’s one game plan if you’re bullish on WMT:

Set a price alert at around $165.25, near a set of resistance levels that have been tested twice, yet may be too high to consider as reliable support.Once Walmart’s stock price reaches and hopefully breaches this level, look for early buyers to begin jumping in at $163, coinciding with the 38.2% Fibonacci retracement line.Note that an Ichimoku cloud has also been plotted to suggest a wider support range (versus specific support levels).The ideal entry spot (not signal) is between $158 and $160.75, near the Ichimoku cloud’s lowest level, Leading Span B.A favorable entry signal would be a candle or sequence of candles reversing upward on strong momentum and high volume.

The Bottom Line

So, what are we getting at? In the midst of a significant CPI-driven downturn tanking all three US indices, Walmart Inc. (WMT) was one of 37 notable outliers, with its stock price rising before succumbing to the market trend. The StockCharts’ scan engine identified WMT in the predefined New All-Time Highs scan. There are many reasons to feel bullish about Walmart stock, but finding a favorable entry point takes a little nuancing. Hopefully, the layering of the indicators above can help you map out a basic entry strategy, particularly if you’re bullish on WMT or looking to get in before or after its coming 3-for-1 split.

Disclaimer: This blog is for educational purposes only and should not be construed as financial advice. The ideas and strategies should never be used without first assessing your own personal and financial situation, or without consulting a financial professional.

In this edition of StockCharts TV‘s The Final Bar, Dave shows how the S&P 500 is just barely holding trendline support as his short-term Market Trend Model threatens to turn bearish this week. Guest Sean McLaughlin of All Star Charts talks through how he’s playing a potential market pullback, and shares four charts to consider on the short side.

You can see Dave’s chart showing the dramatic change in breadth and sentiment indicators at this link.

This video originally premiered on February 13, 2024. Watch on our dedicated Final Bar page on StockCharts TV!

New episodes of The Final Bar premiere every weekday afternoon. You can view all previously recorded episodes at this link.

Big spenders are set to boost Las Vegas service workers’ earnings during Super Bowl weekend, but maybe not by much.

Sin City expects to host more than 330,000 visitors as the San Francisco 49ers face off against the Kansas City Chiefs in the NFL’s title game on Sunday.

The Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority expects the matchup to generate $600 million in economic impact for the city, though the U.S. Chamber of Commerce says the broader payoff can take time to be fully realized, estimating Arizona’s statewide haul at $1.3 billion after Phoenix hosted last year.

Follow along for live coverage of Super Bowl 58

Much of that will come from attendance at Allegiant Stadium itself, where the least expensive seat was going for $5,700 on StubHub by Friday morning and the priciest neared $19,000. After fans splurged for a place in the stands, some stadium workers fear even the most well-heeled among them may not have much to spare for their tip jars — especially at a time of widespread “tipflation” fatigue.

Gamblers at Caesars Sports Book at Caesars Palace Hotel & Casino in Las Vegas on Feb. 12, 2023 .George Rose / Getty Images file

“Honestly, because of the price of the seats, I’m hoping they’ll have enough to even give us tips,” stadium employee Michael Santa Cruz said with a laugh.

The 63-year-old refreshment stand worker was taking a few days to rest up before clocking in 6:30 a.m. Sunday for the big game, where he’ll work until 9 at night.

Michael Santa Cruz.Courtesy Culinary Workers Union Local 226

“We’re assuming the people that come there have money,” he said, but “we’ve had people by the same token that come in and say, ‘Wow, $18 for a beer!?’ and they’ll walk away and they won’t tip us.”

“It’s understandable,” added Santa Cruz, who has worked at the stadium — the home of the Las Vegas Raiders — since July 2020 earning $13 an hour.

Beyond the arena, visitors will be shelling out on everything from souvenirs to a small galaxy of game-related festivities, such as a “Super Bowl Experience” at the Mandalay Bay Convention Center ($50 tickets) and “Shaq’s Fun House,” a Shaquille O’Neal-fronted poolside nightclub with carnival games and music (tickets start at $149.99). Fans heading to Vegas expressly for the Super Bowl are forecast to drop about $215 million on food, drinks, hotels and football swag alone, the Chamber estimates.

Because of the price of the seats, I’m hoping they’ll have enough to even give us tips.

Michael Santa Cruz, ALLEGIANT STADIUM WORKER

Many will be paying top dollar, which could help juice earnings for the more than 300,000 hospitality workers in Las Vegas, industry experts said.

“Historically, we see that when room rates are high in the city, it attracts consumers with higher disposable incomes, which translates into higher tips,” said Amanda Belarmino, an assistant professor of hospitality at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

Average daily rates for Vegas hotels hit $570 for the Friday before the game (the most expensive night), more than twice the $220 average when the city hosted the Formula 1 Grand Prix last fall, according to Hotels.com.

But because most local hospitality workers are union members whose pay is dictated by contracts, “it does not necessarily translate to higher salaries for line-level workers,” Belarmino said, though “it will enable some part-time union workers to get more hours.”

The Culinary Workers Union Local 226, which represents over 60,000 Las Vegas hospitality employees — from bartenders and guest room attendants to laundry and kitchen staff at resort casinos on and off the Strip — reached tentative contract agreements with major operators days ahead of the Super Bowl. The deals are expected to push the average member’s earnings up from around $28 an hour, including their benefits, to $37 an hour including benefits over five years, said union spokeswoman Bethany Khan.

The Formula 1 race in November was a warmup. No one knows what to expect from the Super Bowl.

Richard Samuels, General Manager of Omni Limousine

Santa Cruz, who works for a food and beverage contractor at the stadium and is involved in efforts to join the culinary union, said he’s hoping to “break at least $350” in tips on Sunday but added, “That’s not a guarantee.” He said he typically pulls in around $200 in gratuities during NFL games.

Allegiant Stadium was early to embrace the digital card readers that have become a growing source of tips for many retail and service workers. But as those systems proliferate, consumers are getting sick of their ubiquitous tipping prompts — and often have no trouble ignoring them, NBC News has reported.

For workers at restaurants that use Square’s payment system, the growth of tips as a share of take-home pay is slower in Sin City than elsewhere, the company said. It rose there just 3 percentage points since 2020 to hit 20%, versus a 5-percentage-point gain topping out at 21% nationwide.

Vegas restaurant workers’ overall compensation also lags the national average, according to Square. Their median base pay of $13 is about $1 shy of the U.S. rate, and the gap widens to $1.50 after tips and overtime, which clock in around $16.17 in the metro area. However, Square said restaurant staffers’ earnings in the city are growing faster than they are nationally.

To help encourage nonunion tip-earners to work Super Bowl weekend, some Las Vegas employers are charging customers extra.

On top of surge pricing, Uber is adding a $10 surcharge for rides to the stadium on Sunday afternoon, rising to $25 in the evening, that it says will go straight to drivers. Lyft said it was “planning increased incentives for drivers the week of the game” but no additional fees for stadium trips.

Many employers in Vegas already require fixed-rate gratuities, potentially making the promise of tips during the Super Bowl no better or worse than on any other day.

Omni Limousine, which has a fleet of 90 vehicles, hasn’t raised rates for this weekend but was fully booked for the big game five months ago, “mostly by our regular corporate and celebrity customers,” said general manager Richard Samuels.

The company charges an automatic 20% chauffeur gratuity on all rides, and drivers can still accept additional cash tips, Samuels said.

“The Formula 1 race in November was a warmup,” he said. “No one knows what to expect from the Super Bowl.”

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

In February for Black History Month, USA TODAY Sports is publishing the series ’29 Black Stories in 29 Days.’ We examine the issues, challenges and opportunities Black athletes and sports officials continue to face after the nation’s reckoning on race following the murder of George Floyd in 2020. This is the fourth installment of the series.

NFL analyst Merril Hoge recently offered the first of possibly many blistering assessments of USC quarterback Caleb Williams.

‘The one thing that is clear (is that) he is not special,’ Hoge said. ‘He is not something unique like Patrick Mahomes. And I hope the Bears don’t think ‘Well, let’s try to make up for our mistake for when we passed on Patrick Mahomes and go get Patrick Mahomes.’ The kid is not Patrick Mahomes. He ain’t even remotely close to that.’

Hoge added: ‘First of all, his ability to throw on the run is very disturbing. It is very inaccurate and it’s all over the place. There’s a ton of RPO (run pass option), which nobody is going to RPO themselves to a Super Bowl in our league. … You gotta push the ball down the field. There are times when he does that. He doesn’t play with a lot of anticipation because of all the clean pockets that exist for him.

‘The thing that’s disturbing me right now is his inability to be consistent on the move as a thrower. And he’s willing to do that a lot more than he has to. You don’t have that choice in our league…I don’t see anything magical with his arm…”

NFL STATS CENTRAL: The latest NFL scores, schedules, odds, stats and more.

How do you really feel, Hoge?

Hoge gets lots right and plenty wrong. Cam Newton is a good example of what he got wildly wrong.

‘The only word I can use after watching four games is atrocious,’ Hoge said of Newton before the 2011 draft. ‘You never know where that ball will end up. In fact, he was more of a runner than he ever was a passer.’

Williams can expect to get the Newton treatment. Newton was shredded by some analysts with one saying the quarterback had a ‘fake smile.’ You don’t have to go back to Newton. Last year during the draft process quarterback C.J. Stroud had test scores leaked. But Newton is one of the gold standards of NFL disparate treatment.

Some of the evaluations of Williams, like Hoge’s, will be earnest. Maybe they will be harsh. Or favorable. But they will be earnest.

“The evidence strongly suggests that racial bias is blinding teams in the draft process, leading them to prefer inferior quarterbacks as long as they’re not Black,” the site wrote.

It added: “In other words, Black quarterbacks are penalized in the draft solely for being Black, our analysis suggests, and it’sa penalty that reverberates years into their professional careers.”

“Black quarterbacks probably aren’t getting in the (draft) pool unless they’re amazing,” David Berri, a professor of economics at Southern Utah University who has studied race in the NFL, told SFGATE. “White quarterbacks are getting in the pool when they’re not amazing. That’s why you see this.” 

Williams could be another one of these quarterbacks who could be judged harshly because he’s already seen as polarizing (even though he really isn’t).

Again, this isn’t about Hoge, who last year said he felt Stroud would be good in the NFL. He just won offensive rookie of the year. This is about, if history repeats, there will be some evaluators both with teams and in the media who will evaluate Williams in good faith. There will be others who won’t because he’s a Black quarterback. It will happen because it happens repeatedly.

You can count on it.

This post appeared first on USA TODAY