Archive

2024

Browsing

JERUSALEM — Iran’s Navy commander announced in a televised broadcast last fall that the regime owns Antarctica and will build a military operation in the South Pole.

‘We have property rights in the South Pole. We have plan to raise our flag there and carry out military and scientific work,’ Iranian Navy Commander Rear Admiral Shahram Irani said in late September, according to a translation by the Washington D.C.-based Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI).

Iran’s naval saber-rattling is drawing new attention in response to the Iranian-backed militias that murdered three U.S. soldiers in Jordan last month.

Fox News Digital asked a U.S. State Department spokesperson if the recent American unfreezing of $6 billion in Iranian funds held in Qatar could be used by Iran to set up a base in Antarctica.

‘No. Iran’s funds held in Qatar may not be used for any activities in Antarctica,’ the spokesperson said. ‘Those funds can only be used to purchase humanitarian goods, meaning food, medicine, medical devices and agricultural products.’

Despite the clerical regime’s growing bellicosity in the Middle East and across the world, according to veteran Iran observers, the Biden administration released $6 billion in sanctions relief to Tehran’s rulers ahead of the Iran-backed Hamas massacre of 1,200 people Oct. 7 in southern Israel. Hamas slaughtered over 30 Americans during its invasion of Israel.

Iran’s President, Ebrahim Raisi, who was sanctioned by former President Trump for his role in the two massacres of Iranian dissidents and protesters, disputed the Biden administration’s restrictions on the use of the $6 billion. Raisi taunted Biden’s White House, declaring his regime will use the massive cash infusion ‘wherever we need it.’

‘Iran’s future plans to try to expand its military presence and influence into the Antarctic would not only violate multilateral conventions on the issue, but continues the regime’s trend of aggression across the globe,’ said Yonah Jeremy Bob, author of ‘Target Tehran’ and a senior Jerusalem Post military and intelligence analyst.

‘Whether through terrorism on basically every continent or its rampant piracy in the maritime arena, the Islamic Republic continues to show why it is a danger to world stability and why Israel and the Mossad’s role in holding it back from nuclear weapons remains critical.’

‘Every time Tehran expands its tentacles into a new area to disrupt the rules-based order promoted by the West, the U.S. and its allies are given an additional opportunity to take the nuclear threat more seriously. Antarctica might seem a distant threat, but if the West acts as meekly as it did when Iran recently kicked out nuclear weapons inspectors, the Islamic Republic will only become further emboldened on other track,’ he added. 

Fox News Digital reported in February 2023 that the United States tracked warlike announcements by Iran’s navy chief that Tehran plans to establish a military presence at the Panama Canal. Iran deployed two military ships to Brazil at the time that were headed for the Panama Canal. 

In December, the Islamic Republic claimed it was building ‘smart’ cruise missiles for its navy arsenal.

‘It’s an arcane topic, but little lies between Iran’s coast outside the Persian Gulf and the eastern hemisphere side of Antarctica,’ Jennifer Dyer, a retired commander of U.S. Naval Intelligence, told Fox News Digital

‘In theory, Iran could claim an interest in Antarctica similar to India’s, Australia’s, New Zealand’s or Chile’s (or those of the U.K. and France, for that matter), with their island outposts in the southern hemisphere.

‘I can say that raising the flag at the South Pole doesn’t carry any implications in international law. The Antarctic Treaty (which became effective in 1961) has a specific provision that no action by any nation after 1961 can be the basis of a territorial claim on the continent.’

‘Iran isn’t a signatory to the treaty and might try to do frisky things in Antarctica,’ Dyer noted. ‘Those things wouldn’t be recognized by other nations, at least as matters stand now. The U.S., U.K., Germany, France, Japan, India, China and Russia are all signatories to the treaty, as are Brazil, and Argentina, Chile, Australia and New Zealand, the ‘jumping off’ nations closest to the continent.’

Potkin Azarmehr, an expert on Iran, told Fox News Digital, ‘Everything in Iran is reminiscent of the USSR in its last days before collapse. Ambitious but pointless plans by a state with completely wrong priorities. Unable to provide basic services to its people, bankrupt institutions but full of grandiose talks’

Fox News Digital sent press queries to Iran’s Foreign Ministry and its U.N. mission in New York. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., was forced to backpedal on holding a House vote on renewing and revising a key surveillance tool of the U.S. government after a bloc of GOP lawmakers threatened a mutiny, Fox News Digital has learned.

The House Rules Committee had been partially through considering a bill to renew Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) when Johnson’s spokesperson announced that a planned House-wide vote would not happen this week as expected.

The Rules panel, which had to approve the bill before it hit the House floor, abruptly called off the rest of its session with no explanation.

But four sources told Fox News Digital that all progress on the FISA bill would be postponed until a later date because members of the House Intelligence Committee threatened to tank a procedural vote to effectively kill the legislation.

‘Instead of playing the game through Rules and regular order, Intel decided to take their ball and go home, walking away from the negotiated text and amendment plan without any understanding of why,’ one source said.

Three more sources close to the Intelligence Committee challenged that narrative to Fox News Digital, saying the bill text was changed over the weekend without their consent or the consent of the House Judiciary Committee, which also worked on the bill.

They said the issue was primarily with an amendment offered by Rep. Warren Davidson, R-Ohio, a member of the ultraconservative House Freedom Caucus who does not sit on either committee.

One of those two sources said Davidson’s amendment was not ‘germane’ to the compromise text, meaning it was ineligible for consideration because it was not deemed relevant to the bill – until the text was allegedly altered over the weekend.

‘Someone in leadership staff ended up drafting text that got inserted into the base text over the weekend, so they basically airdropped … this one paragraph into the base text that now makes that amendment germane,’ that source said. ‘The amendment totally screws FISA, the text that was added totally screws FISA in terms of its ability to be a national security tool.’

That source said taking a chance on whether Davidson’s amendment will pass was like ‘playing Russian roulette.’

Section 702 has been both credited with preventing terror attacks on U.S. soil and accused of being a vehicle for spying on U.S. citizens.

It lets the government keep tabs on specific foreign nationals outside the country without first obtaining a warrant to do so, even if the party on the other side of those communications is an American on U.S. soil.

Davidson’s proposed amendment would have forced feds acting within FISA to seek a warrant before trying to obtain third-party-owned communications and location data of a U.S. citizen.

The bill intended to come to the floor this week was the product of monthslong talks between the Judiciary and Intelligence panels. Both sides agreed that Section 702 needs to be reformed, and a task force of seven lawmakers was created to hash out the compromise, two sources said.

Judiciary members, along with a coalition of GOP hard-liners and progressives, saw FISA as a tool abused to spy on Americans and sought severe restrictions. Intelligence Committee members argued their restrictions would have rendered it ineffective as a tool to stop terror attacks.

Rep. Darin LaHood, R-Ill., who is on Intelligence, agreed FISA needs reforms and defended his panel’s work on the matter but insisted the warrant aspect could hinder efforts to prevent threats to Americans.

He said the committee’s proposed emphasis on more transparency and oversight of the FISA court would ‘help remedy these problems and puts us on the best path forward to protect national security, and secondly, to hold the FBI accountable.’

LaHood also pointed to a letter signed by Trump-era national security officials affirming support for his committee’s version of the bill.

‘This was airdropped in there,’ the second source close to the Intelligence Committee said of text related to Davidson’s amendment. ‘This was not something that the seven members of the working group had ever digested, ever looked at. So really, it was disingenuous to think that that would be a part of that. And essentially, [House GOP leadership] agreed.’

That source said Johnson and Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., were ‘surprised’ to hear that the legislative text was altered.

The third source said, ‘What they’re asking for is a secondary requirement, a warrant which would be a warrant for the query of a database of already lawfully collected data … that would be the equivalent of a police officer needing a warrant before running a license plate.’

Rep. Ralph Norman, R-S.C., an ally of Davidson’s who supported his warrant amendment, hit back at the Intelligence Committee’s reform efforts, saying, ‘Intel didn’t want the Judiciary [amendments]. See, the Judiciary Committee is the committee of jurisdiction. That’s where it should’ve gone.’

But the third source close to the Intelligence Committee said those on the panel ‘are the ones that see the threats to our nation up close and personal every day.’

It’s not immediately clear when House GOP leaders plan to bring the bill back up. House leadership has until April 19 before Section 702 expires.

Johnson’s and Davidson’s offices did not immediately provide comment.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

If the second attempt to impeach the Homeland Security chief had taken place a short time later, the Republicans would have failed again.

Instead, they managed to impeach Alejandro Mayorkas–the first sitting Cabinet secretary to draw that sanction–by a single vote.

But after a victory in George Santos’ old district, the Democrats would have had the extra vote to stop the impeachment.

Tom Suozzi beat Republican Mazi Pilip in Tuesday’s special election on Long Island, unleashing a tidal wave of punditry about his winning formula–openly tackling such issues as illegal migration and crime rather than avoiding them.

I always caution against drawing sweeping conclusions in one-off local races, and this election in a snowstorm is no exception. 

The underlying factor was Santos, the outlandish, lying, fabricating lawmaker who won the seat with a made-up resume, was expelled by the House and is under indictment. Voters felt hosed by the Republican publicity hound, and maybe the Dems were more motivated to vote.

Sure, Suozzi deserves credit for seizing on illegal migration and crime rather than avoiding such explosive issues – and doggedly distancing himself from President Biden. But he also has to run again in the fall.

Trump, for his part, blamed Pilip, ‘running in a race where she didn’t endorse me and tried to ‘straddle the fence,’ when she would have easily WON if she understood anything about MODERN DAY politics in America…I STAYED OUT OF THE RACE, ‘I WANT TO BE LOVED!’’ 

A subtle Valentine’s Day message?

The move against Mayorkas, the first against a Cabinet officer in 150 years, is about the politics of symbolism. Republicans know full well the Democratic-controlled Senate is not going to convict him. This was about keeping the spotlight on one of the GOP’s best issues.

But if the press saddled Johnson with a humiliating defeat last week, it has to credit him with a big win now.

Both episodes shed light on the fractious politics of the Hill. Just when it looked like the Senate might pass a bipartisan border security bill–which included military aid to Ukraine and Israel–Donald Trump ripped it and the package was dead.

Now the Senate appears ready to pass a stand-alone military aid bill by a filibuster-proof majority. But Johnson says he won’t bring it up for a House floor vote.

That would bury it, unless a handful of Republicans join with Democrats to force a vote through a discharge petition.

Think about it: the United States, unable to help two major allies because of election-year politics, especially Ukraine, which remains under siege by Vladimir Putin.

And that’s why Biden took the rare step of delivering a televised speech on Tuesday.

His predecessor gave him an opening by saying he wouldn’t protect any NATO member who didn’t pay its fair share in military costs. And if that were the case, Putin and Russia could ‘do whatever the hell they want.’

Biden, in his speech, accused Trump of siding with the Russian dictator, calling the comments ‘dumb,’ ‘shameful,’ ‘dangerous’ and ‘un-American.’

Put aside whether Biden is right or Trump is trying to pressure delinquent allies. Joe Biden passed up a softball Super Bowl interview. So why is he getting in front of the cameras now?

One, he’s trying to get push Congress to pass the military aid bill.

Two, he’s trying to change the subject from his own questionable memory in that wake of that stinging special counsel’s report.

Three, he is finally heeding the advice of those who say he needs to do more television to prove his competence and dim the focus on every gaffe or misstatement.

What’s fascinating is the spin of each party when it comes to backing their candidate.

Democrats are hitting the airwaves saying Biden is sharp and laser-focused in private, and counsel Robert Hur has no business airing his personal criticism of the president’s mental acuity.

Republicans are saying Trump would not actually abandon NATO and that he doesn’t mean what he’s saying.

And everyone is getting sustained exposure to a system that generally favors political maneuvering over actual results.

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

Special Counsel Jack Smith has requested that the U.S. Supreme Court reject former President Trump’s bid to delay his 2020 election interference from going to trial. 

Trump’s legal team requested the delay be extended earlier this week as the court considers whether to take up the question of whether the former president is immune from prosecution for official acts in the White House. Two lower courts have overwhelmingly rejected that argument, prompting Trump to ask the high court to intervene.

Prosecutors responded to Trump’s appeal within two days even though the court had given them until next Tuesday.

Though their filing does not explicitly mention the upcoming November election or Trump’s status as the Republican primary front-runner, prosecutors described the case as having ‘unique national importance’ and said that ‘delay in the resolution of these charges threatens to frustrate the public interest in a speedy and fair verdict.’

Smith’s team charged Trump in August with plotting to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

Trump’s lawyers, meanwhile, have argued that he is shielded from prosecution for acts that fell within his official duties as president — a legally untested argument since no other former president has been indicted.

The trial judge and then a federal appeals court rejected those arguments, with a three-judge appeals panel last week saying, ‘We cannot accept that the office of the Presidency places its former occupants above the law for all time thereafter.’

The proceedings have been effectively frozen by Trump’s immunity appeal, with U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan canceling a March 4 trial date while the appeals court considered the matter. No new date has been set.

Earlier Wednesday, prosecutors urged the court to reject Trump’s petition to hear the case, saying that lower court opinions rejecting immunity for the former president ‘underscore how remote the possibility is that this Court will agree with his unprecedented legal position.’

However, if the court does want to decide the matter, Smith said, the justices should hear arguments in March and issue a final ruling by late June. 

The Associated Press contributed to this report.  

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

– Former GOP hopeful Vivek Ramaswamy on Wednesday threw his support behind Republican Congressional Candidate J.R. Majewski in his bid to unseat Democratic Congresswoman Marcy Kaptur.

Ramaswamy said he was endorsing Majewski to represent the 9th Congressional District in Toledo, Ohio, because he is an ‘America First’ patriot. 

Ramaswamy, who suspended his presidential campaign last month, said he would do ‘everything in his power’ to ensure Majewski beat Rep. Marcy Kaptur, D-Ohio, who has held her position for more than four decades.

‘If there was ever a case for term limits, Marcy Kaptur is a perfect example,’ Ramaswamy said. 

Ramaswamy slammed the Republican establishment for bailing on Majewski in the 2022 midterms after the ‘mainstream media’ falsely reported that he had not won an Air Force medal that he had in fact won. 

‘It’s time for us to level up as a Republican Party. Time to actually stand up for truthful patriots – not swallowing what we’re force-fed by the mainstream media, but standing up for what’s right, what’s true,’ Ramaswamy said. 

Ramaswamy’s endorsement comes days after he unveiled his endorsement criteria for other political hopefuls he dubbed ‘The American Truth Pledge.’ 

The ‘American Truth Pledge’ has four broad categories. The first reads ‘The people we elect to run government should actually run the government,’ the second being ‘The first and only moral duty of US leaders is to US citizens,’ the third being ‘Public service is about serving the public, not oneself,’ and the final one reading ‘The absence of national pride is an existential threat to our nation’s future — we must fill that void.’ 

Fox News’ Joseph A. Wulfsohn contributed to this report. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

In this edition of StockCharts TV‘s The Final Bar, Dave tracks the S&P 500 back above 5K, Bitcoin back above 50K, and why NFLX, META, & AMZN may be the most important names to follow in the coming weeks. Guest Mish Schneider of MarketGauge breaks down the four charts she’s watching during a market pullback and why she remains constructive on stocks.

Click here to see Dave’s chart comparing AAPL and MCHP.

This video originally premiered on February 14, 2024. Watch on our dedicated Final Bar page on StockCharts TV!

New episodes of The Final Bar premiere every weekday afternoon. You can view all previously recorded episodes at this link.

Cruise, the driverless car company owned by General Motors is back in the spotlight after another close call with a pedestrian.

The California DMV is investigating allegations that a self-driving vehicle operated by Cruise nearly hit a 7-year-old boy after failing to yield to him and his family while they crossed the street in San Francisco last year, according to DMV records obtained by NBC News.

The family says the driverless Cruise car headed straight towards them as they crossed the street.

“[The car] was fully stopped, and then it started when he had gotten maybe a third of the way or halfway across the intersection,” said Sascha Retailleau, who was walking with his wife and son in their Mission District neighborhood when they crossed 20th Street near the intersection of York Street on the evening of Aug. 14. “It started to accelerate towards us like we weren’t there.”

Retailleau said the car swerved as it approached, right towards his young son Luke, who said he had to rush ahead to avoid being hit. Retailleau later reported the incident to the DMV, which told NBC News it couldn’t disclose any details from its ongoing investigation. 

“If I didn’t run, it would have hit me, probably,” Luke, 7, said. “I felt scared.”

Luke, 7, says a driverless Cruise car nearly hit him while he was walking with his parents near his home in San Francisco last summer.Michael Horn / NBC Bay Area

The alleged incident came just one day after an eerily similar near-miss was caught on camera in the city’s Pacific Heights neighborhood. The video, posted to the website Reddit and later obtained by regulators, shows a Cruise car accelerating straight towards two women and two children walking in a crosswalk. The vehicle then brakes and swerves around them at the last second.

Cruise acknowledged its vehicle was involved, but declined to comment further, citing an ongoing federal investigation looking into the incident.

As for the similar near-miss reported by Retailleau, Cruise said its records show none of its driverless cars traveled through the specific intersection around the time Retailleau and his family were crossing the street.

“We have reviewed data and video in response to this complaint, but to date, we have not identified a Cruise driverless [autonomous vehicle] traveling in the locations on the dates or times provided that encountered any pedestrians,” said Cruise spokesperson Erik Moser. “We are committed to operating with safety and transparency and continue to investigate this incident.”

Retailleau, a mechanical engineer who has built robots himself, says there’s no mistaking what he saw that day: a driverless Cruise car with the company’s signature orange stripe.

“We were scared at first and then I was just angry, super angry,” Retailleau said. “My kid could have been hurt or killed by this Cruise vehicle.”

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is now investigating at least four incidents involving Cruise vehicles and pedestrians, including the one posted on Reddit.

“The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) has received reports of incidents in which Automated Driving System (ADS) equipped vehicles operated by Cruise LLC (Cruise) may not have exercised appropriate caution around pedestrians in the roadway,” the agency stated in a summary of its investigation.

Retailleau reached out to Cruise to explain how one of its driverless cars nearly hit his son, but after giving the company all the details it asked for, he said he is still waiting to hear back from Cruise more than five months later. 

“There was no apology,” he said. “There was no ‘we’ll try to make this right.’”

Cruise admits to the NBC Bay Area Investigative Unit it never replied to the family, adding it apologizes for the lack of communication.

“They shouldn’t be allowed to have 2,000 pounds of metal rolling through the streets of San Francisco, potentially endangering other people,” Retailleau said. “Here is a company that is beta testing on the public.”

The embattled car company is now at the center of at least five separate state and federal investigations looking into the company’s safety record and whether it purposefully misled regulators and the public. Cruise denies the accusations. 

Cruise’s fleet of 400 driverless cars has been grounded since last October. The company suspended operation of its driverless vehicles in San Francisco, Austin, Phoenix and Houston after California regulators determined the company posed an “unreasonable risk to public safety.” Cruise hasn’t announced when or where it expects to get its cars back on the road. 

Cruise declined an interview request from NBC News, however, in a statement said, “we are focused on advancing our technology and earning back public trust.”

Cruise’s driverless vehicles have remained off the road for more than three months. Michael Horn / NBC Bay Area

Critics, including top lawmakers, continue to argue the driverless car industry lacks oversight, saying current regulations have failed to keep up with the technology.

Late last year, NBC News exposed a loophole that has allowed driverless cars in California to avoid penalties when they break the rules of the road. Across the state, traffic tickets issued for moving violations must be issued to an actual driver, according to the DMV, so driverless vehicles have essentially been immune from those fines.

“It’s really been a very glaring hole in the law,” said California Assemblymember Phil Ting, who represents communities in both San Francisco and nearby San Mateo counties. “This is new technology, and we have to get it right the first time.”

Ting wants driverless car companies held liable and the traffic tickets sent to them when their vehicles violate traffic rules, so he is pushing for a new state law following the recent NBC News investigation. 

“Really appreciate that story for coming out and highlighting, frankly, the need for the legislation that I’m introducing,” Ting said.  “I think your specific story validates everything I’ve been hearing in San Francisco.” 

Phil Ting.Michael Horn / NBC Bay Area

The Autonomous Vehicle Industry Association, which represents the largest driverless car companies in America, says it is willing to support closing the legal loophole.

It has never been the expectation of the autonomous vehicle industry that our vehicles are not able to be ticketed,” said Jeff Farrah, CEO of the association. “If there is clarification that needs to be made in California on this issue … we are committed to sitting down and working that through with the appropriate policymakers.”

If Ting’s legislation passes, it likely wouldn’t take effect until 2025, giving autonomous vehicles about another year of traffic ticket amnesty before they begin facing the same types of penalties and fines as human drivers.

“There’s no way for law enforcement to really hold them accountable,” Ting said. “There’s no way for law enforcement to really engage with these vehicles.”

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Cruise, the driverless car company owned by General Motors is back in the spotlight after another close call with a pedestrian.

The California DMV is investigating allegations that a self-driving vehicle operated by Cruise nearly hit a 7-year-old boy after failing to yield to him and his family while they crossed the street in San Francisco last year, according to DMV records obtained by NBC News.

The family says the driverless Cruise car headed straight towards them as they crossed the street.

“[The car] was fully stopped, and then it started when he had gotten maybe a third of the way or halfway across the intersection,” said Sascha Retailleau, who was walking with his wife and son in their Mission District neighborhood when they crossed 20th Street near the intersection of York Street on the evening of Aug. 14. “It started to accelerate towards us like we weren’t there.”

Retailleau said the car swerved as it approached, right towards his young son Luke, who said he had to rush ahead to avoid being hit. Retailleau later reported the incident to the DMV, which told NBC News it couldn’t disclose any details from its ongoing investigation. 

“If I didn’t run, it would have hit me, probably,” Luke, 7, said. “I felt scared.”

Luke, 7, says a driverless Cruise car nearly hit him while he was walking with his parents near his home in San Francisco last summer.Michael Horn / NBC Bay Area

The alleged incident came just one day after an eerily similar near-miss was caught on camera in the city’s Pacific Heights neighborhood. The video, posted to the website Reddit and later obtained by regulators, shows a Cruise car accelerating straight towards two women and two children walking in a crosswalk. The vehicle then brakes and swerves around them at the last second.

Cruise acknowledged its vehicle was involved, but declined to comment further, citing an ongoing federal investigation looking into the incident.

As for the similar near-miss reported by Retailleau, Cruise said its records show none of its driverless cars traveled through the specific intersection around the time Retailleau and his family were crossing the street.

“We have reviewed data and video in response to this complaint, but to date, we have not identified a Cruise driverless [autonomous vehicle] traveling in the locations on the dates or times provided that encountered any pedestrians,” said Cruise spokesperson Erik Moser. “We are committed to operating with safety and transparency and continue to investigate this incident.”

Retailleau, a mechanical engineer who has built robots himself, says there’s no mistaking what he saw that day: a driverless Cruise car with the company’s signature orange stripe.

“We were scared at first and then I was just angry, super angry,” Retailleau said. “My kid could have been hurt or killed by this Cruise vehicle.”

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration is now investigating at least four incidents involving Cruise vehicles and pedestrians, including the one posted on Reddit.

“The Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) has received reports of incidents in which Automated Driving System (ADS) equipped vehicles operated by Cruise LLC (Cruise) may not have exercised appropriate caution around pedestrians in the roadway,” the agency stated in a summary of its investigation.

Retailleau reached out to Cruise to explain how one of its driverless cars nearly hit his son, but after giving the company all the details it asked for, he said he is still waiting to hear back from Cruise more than five months later. 

“There was no apology,” he said. “There was no ‘we’ll try to make this right.’”

Cruise admits to the NBC Bay Area Investigative Unit it never replied to the family, adding it apologizes for the lack of communication.

“They shouldn’t be allowed to have 2,000 pounds of metal rolling through the streets of San Francisco, potentially endangering other people,” Retailleau said. “Here is a company that is beta testing on the public.”

The embattled car company is now at the center of at least five separate state and federal investigations looking into the company’s safety record and whether it purposefully misled regulators and the public. Cruise denies the accusations. 

Cruise’s fleet of 400 driverless cars has been grounded since last October. The company suspended operation of its driverless vehicles in San Francisco, Austin, Phoenix and Houston after California regulators determined the company posed an “unreasonable risk to public safety.” Cruise hasn’t announced when or where it expects to get its cars back on the road. 

Cruise declined an interview request from NBC News, however, in a statement said, “we are focused on advancing our technology and earning back public trust.”

Cruise’s driverless vehicles have remained off the road for more than three months. Michael Horn / NBC Bay Area

Critics, including top lawmakers, continue to argue the driverless car industry lacks oversight, saying current regulations have failed to keep up with the technology.

Late last year, NBC News exposed a loophole that has allowed driverless cars in California to avoid penalties when they break the rules of the road. Across the state, traffic tickets issued for moving violations must be issued to an actual driver, according to the DMV, so driverless vehicles have essentially been immune from those fines.

“It’s really been a very glaring hole in the law,” said California Assemblymember Phil Ting, who represents communities in both San Francisco and nearby San Mateo counties. “This is new technology, and we have to get it right the first time.”

Ting wants driverless car companies held liable and the traffic tickets sent to them when their vehicles violate traffic rules, so he is pushing for a new state law following the recent NBC News investigation. 

“Really appreciate that story for coming out and highlighting, frankly, the need for the legislation that I’m introducing,” Ting said.  “I think your specific story validates everything I’ve been hearing in San Francisco.” 

Phil Ting.Michael Horn / NBC Bay Area

The Autonomous Vehicle Industry Association, which represents the largest driverless car companies in America, says it is willing to support closing the legal loophole.

It has never been the expectation of the autonomous vehicle industry that our vehicles are not able to be ticketed,” said Jeff Farrah, CEO of the association. “If there is clarification that needs to be made in California on this issue … we are committed to sitting down and working that through with the appropriate policymakers.”

If Ting’s legislation passes, it likely wouldn’t take effect until 2025, giving autonomous vehicles about another year of traffic ticket amnesty before they begin facing the same types of penalties and fines as human drivers.

“There’s no way for law enforcement to really hold them accountable,” Ting said. “There’s no way for law enforcement to really engage with these vehicles.”

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Cast members at Disneyland in California have sought to organize with the United States’ primary stage actors union.

Some 1,700 characters and parades workers are receiving unionization cards from the group, Actors’ Equity Association, according to an association statement.

‘As the Entertainment Cast Members at the Disneyland Resort, it is time for us to come together as a union, to use our collective power to ensure that the park is a safer, more sustainable place to build careers and share magic with Guests from all over the world,’ the leaders of the park’s unionization effort, which they are calling Magic United, said in a statement released by the association.  

Among the workers whom union drive leaders are seeking to organize are cast members who bring ‘characters to life in shows, meet and greets and character dining experiences.’

Others who have signed union authorization cards include parade performers, hosts, trainers and other roles that support their fellow cast members, the association said.

In a statement to NBC News, a Disneyland official said, “We believe that our Cast Members deserve to have all the facts and the right to a confidential vote that recognizes their individual choices.”

Equity, as the collective is colloquially known, already represents hundreds of performers at Walt Disney World in Orlando, Florida. Union drive leaders said it chose Equity because of “how well they work with Disney in Florida, on Broadway and on tour.”

“Our Walt Disney World colleagues exemplify how you can be pro-Disney and pro-union at the same time,” the leaders said.

‘Disney workers are openly and powerfully invested in and loyal to the Walt Disney Company and its values, so it’s reasonable for them to expect ‘the happiest place on earth’ to pay them fairly and prioritize their health and safety,’ Actors’ Equity Association President Kate Shindle said. ‘Unionizing is the collective pathway to ensuring that the magic makers share not only in the happiness, but in the $9.13 billion in quarterly ‘experience’ revenue that Disney announced to its shareholders on February 7.’

Disney is facing a variety of pressures and has lost 44% of its value over the past three years, but Tuesday’s announcement did not seem to affect the company’s market value, as its shares were trading higher on the day.

And while tens of thousands of Disney workers are already represented by a union, the drive still represents a significant event for a company whose founder was famously opposed to unions.

A Disney spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS

Cast members at Disneyland in California have sought to organize with the United States’ primary stage actors union.

Some 1,700 characters and parades workers are receiving unionization cards from the group, Actors’ Equity Association, according to an association statement.

‘As the Entertainment Cast Members at the Disneyland Resort, it is time for us to come together as a union, to use our collective power to ensure that the park is a safer, more sustainable place to build careers and share magic with Guests from all over the world,’ the leaders of the park’s unionization effort, which they are calling Magic United, said in a statement released by the association.  

Among the workers whom union drive leaders are seeking to organize are cast members who bring ‘characters to life in shows, meet and greets and character dining experiences.’

Others who have signed union authorization cards include parade performers, hosts, trainers and other roles that support their fellow cast members, the association said.

In a statement to NBC News, a Disneyland official said, “We believe that our Cast Members deserve to have all the facts and the right to a confidential vote that recognizes their individual choices.”

Equity, as the collective is colloquially known, already represents hundreds of performers at Walt Disney World in Orlando, Florida. Union drive leaders said it chose Equity because of “how well they work with Disney in Florida, on Broadway and on tour.”

“Our Walt Disney World colleagues exemplify how you can be pro-Disney and pro-union at the same time,” the leaders said.

‘Disney workers are openly and powerfully invested in and loyal to the Walt Disney Company and its values, so it’s reasonable for them to expect ‘the happiest place on earth’ to pay them fairly and prioritize their health and safety,’ Actors’ Equity Association President Kate Shindle said. ‘Unionizing is the collective pathway to ensuring that the magic makers share not only in the happiness, but in the $9.13 billion in quarterly ‘experience’ revenue that Disney announced to its shareholders on February 7.’

Disney is facing a variety of pressures and has lost 44% of its value over the past three years, but Tuesday’s announcement did not seem to affect the company’s market value, as its shares were trading higher on the day.

And while tens of thousands of Disney workers are already represented by a union, the drive still represents a significant event for a company whose founder was famously opposed to unions.

A Disney spokesperson did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

This post appeared first on NBC NEWS